|Publication number||US5306855 A|
|Application number||US 07/799,446|
|Publication date||Apr 26, 1994|
|Filing date||Nov 27, 1991|
|Priority date||Feb 15, 1991|
|Also published as||CA2103789A1, DE69226169D1, DE69226169T2, EP0572517A1, EP0572517A4, EP0572517B1, WO1992014738A1|
|Publication number||07799446, 799446, US 5306855 A, US 5306855A, US-A-5306855, US5306855 A, US5306855A|
|Inventors||Roy A. Periana, Douglas J. Taube, Henry Taube, Eric R. Evitt|
|Original Assignee||Catalytica, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (14), Non-Patent Citations (22), Referenced by (44), Classifications (41), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation-in-part of U. S. Ser. No. 07/656,910, filed Feb. 15, 1991, to "CATALYTIC PROCESS FOR CONVERTING LOWER ALKANES TO ESTERS", by Roy A Periana, Eric R. Evitt, and Henry Taube, now U. S. Pat. No. 5,233,173, and also of U. S. Ser. No. 07/766,200, filed Sept. 26, 1991, to "PROCESS FOR SELECTIVE OXIDATION OF ALKANES AND ARENES", by Roy A. Periana, now abandoned, the entirety of which are incorporated by reference.
This invention is a process for converting lower alkanes into their corresponding esters and optionally into various intermediates (such as alcohols) and other liquid hydrocarbons. The alkanes are oxidatively converted to oxy-esters at high selectivity and conversion and at practical reaction rates using at least catalytic amounts of certain class "B" metals and/or metal ions defined by the Pearson definition as "soft" or "borderline". Desirable catalysts comprise such metals as Pd, Tl, Pt, Hg, and Au. Mercury is most desired. If so desired, the alkyl oxy-esters may be converted to alcohols or other intermediates such as alkyl halides. The oxy-esters, alcohols, and other intermediates may optionally be converted to liquid hydrocarbons such as gasoline.
The countries of North America currently import significant portions of their needed liquid hydrocarbons from Asia and Africa. Natural gas is abundant on the North American continent but is often present in remote locations. Although natural gas may be liquified and transported for subsequent use, appropriate refrigeration and compression equipment and transportation are quite expensive. Additionally, there are few economically viable technologies available for converting gaseous hydrocarbons to higher molecular weight liquid form materials. This invention includes a highly effective ctalytic step useful in converting methane and other lower alkanes to another, more reactive form which may then be converted to normally liquid hydrocarbons.
It is generally accepted that conversion of methane into a reactive intermediate is the most difficult step in the overall conversion of methane into higher molecular weight hydrocarbons (see, for instance, A.E. Shilov and A. A. Shteinman, "Activation of Saturated Hydrocarbons by Metal Complexes in Solution", Kinetika i Kataliz, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 1129-1145, 1977).
Several documents disclose a variety of methods for activating methane to produce other higher molecular weight materials.
Mobil Oil Corporation is assignee in several U.S. patents using sulfur or certain sulfur-containing compounds as the reactants in non-catalytic reactions with methane to produce methyl intermediates which can then be converted to higher molecular weight hydrocarbons.
In U. S. Pat. No. 4,543,434 Chang teaches a process using the following steps: ##STR1## where "[CH2 ]" is a hydrocarbon having at least two carbon atoms.
Another Mobil disclosure (U. S. Pat. No. 4,864,073 to Han et al.) suggests a carbonyl sulfide-based process in which methane and carbonyl sulfide are contacted in the presence of ultraviolet light under conditions sufficient to produce CH3 SH. No other reaction initiators are said to be present. The reaction scheme is shown to be: ##STR2## The selectivity of the first reaction is said to be high, i.e., around 81%; however, the conversion appears to be quite low.
A disclosure similar to that in Chang is found in Mobil's U.S. Pat. No. 4,864,074 to Han et al. As in Chang, the methane is contacted with sulfur. The process conditions are changed, however, so that either CS2 or CH3 SH is formed. These sulfur compounds may then be converted in the presence of the preferred HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst to produce hydrocarbons having two or more carbon atoms. Also, as was the case with Chang, the step of contacting the methane to produce a methyl-sulfur compound is performed in the absence of a catalyst.
Other methods are known for producing substituted methanes which are suitable for further reaction to heavier hydrocarbons. A thermal methane chlorination process is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,804,797 to Minet et al. A similar process is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,979,470 to Fimhaber et al. although a preference for C3 hydrocarbon feeds is expressed.
One method shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,523,040 to Olah utilizes either a solid strongly acidic catalyst or a supported Group VIII metal (particularly platinum and palladium) in the gas phase halogenation of methane to produce methyl halides. The patent indicates that monohalides are produced in 85% to 99% selectivity. Olah suggests that subsequent or concurrent catalytic hydrolysis produces methyl alcohol and/or dimethyl ether. Production of methyl oxy-esters is not shown.
The reaction of methane with palladium (II) acetate in trifluoroacetic acid to effect the trifluoroacetoxylation of methane is shown in Sen et al., "Palladium (II) Mediated Oxidative Functionalization of Alkanes and Arenes", New Journal of Chemistry (1989), Vol. 13, No. 10-11, pp. 756-760. A yield of 60% based on palladium was reported when the reaction was practiced using methane as the reactant. Consequently, the reaction with methane utilized palladium as a reactant and not as a catalyst. The extent of methane conversion, selectivity, and reaction rates were not stated.
The Sen et al. article has been criticized in Vargaftik et al., "Highly Selective Partial Oxidation of Methane to Methyl Trifluoroacetate", Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications (1990), pp. 1049-1050, to the extent that the results were not found to be reproducible. Vargaftik et al. discloses the catalytic oxy-esterification of methane to methyl trifluoroacetate with cobalt in trifluoroacetic acid but shows that palladium is not even suitable for stoichiometric methane oxidation in that process. With Pd, less than 0.1% yield of methyl trifluoroacetate based on palladium (II) trifluoroacetate was obtained.
The Varaftik et al. article discloses that although palladium is ineffective for the conversion of methane to methyl trifluoroacetate, CoIII can be used for this reaction. The CoIII is said to be catalytic in the presence of oxygen. The rate of the reaction was very low, 2.5×10-11 mol/cc sec, (or four to five orders of magnitude away from typical commercial rates of about 10-6 mol/cc.sec). Only four turnovers of the Co ion were disclosed. The extent of methane conversion was not stated. In addition to Co, other metals were suggested which were said to allow stoichiometric oxidation of methane to methyl trifluoroacetate in varying yields (based on amount of metal charged): Mn (30%), Cu (0.1%), and Pb (10%).
A later publication by Sen et al ("Homogeneous Palladium (II) Mediated Oxidation of Methane", Platinum Metals Review, (1991), Vol 35, No. 3, pp. 126-132) discloses a catalytic system using palladium as the catalyst, peroxytrifluoroacetic acid as the oxidant, and a mixture of trifluoroacetic acid and trifluoroacetic anhydride as the solvent. The reaction rate was low (4.2×10-9 mol/cc.sec) and only 5.3 turnovers of Pd were observed. The extent of methane conversion and selectivity were not stated.
None of these disclosures appear to show a process in which a lower alkane is oxidized to an oxy-ester intermediate using our class of catalysts and acids nor do they show a process combining that step with a step in which the oxy-ester intermediates so-produced are then converted into heavier liquid hydrocarbons. These disclosures further do not show processes achieving high conversion and selectivity for the catalytic oxidation of methane to methyl oxy-esters, particularly at practical reaction rates.
This invention is a catalytic oxidation process for the conversion of lower alkanes into alkyl oxy-esters which alkyl oxy-esters may be converted into hydrocarbons (desirably in the gasoline boiling rante) or alcohols. The alcohols may also be converted into hydrocarbons via a process such as oligomerization or the like.
The first step is catalytic and involves the contacting of a lower alkane (such as methane) with an acid, a catalyst in at least a catalytic amount comprising a Class "B" metal from the Mendeleev table and/or Pearson "soft" and "borderline" metal cations, and an oxidizing agent. The Class "B" metals are as described in Inorganic Chemistry, C. S. G. Phillips and R. S. P. Williams, Oxford University Press, 1966 at pp. 459-477. The so-called Pearson definitions of "soft" and "borderline" metal ions used in this disclosure may be found at pages 276 to 290 of Inorganic Chemistry, James E. Huheey, Harper and Row Publishers, Second Edition, 1978. The reaction may take place at low pressures and temperatures. The preferred metal catalysts are selected from Pd, Tl, Pt, Hg, and Au; most preferred is Hg. The preferred oxidizing agent is oxygen and/or H2 SO4. The alkane is converted to an alkyl oxy-ester of the acid which is relatively inert to further oxidation under the reaction conditions.
The esters produced in the first step may then be converted to alcohols or to other suitable intermediates. This step may be used to regenerate the acid for recycle and reuse in the first step.
The alcohols or other intermediates may then be converted to higher hydrocarbons, preferably suitable for direct use as a fuel but at least suitable for further processing to higher hydrocarbons or chemicals. Of course, the alcohols can also be used directly as a fuel.
As noted above, this invention includes both the overall process for producing alcohols or higher hydrocarbons and the individual step of esterifying lower alkanes such as methane.
The overall process, using methane as an example of a lower alkane, may be outlined in the following fashion: ##STR3##
The first step (utilizing the reaction of Eq. 1) involves contacting methane with an acid and an oxidizing agent in the presence of a catalyst. The acid HX (where X is the acid's anion) may be an organic or inorganic acid such as HNO3, H2 SO4, CF3 CO2 H, CF3 SO3 H, H3 PO4, HPA's (heteropolyacids), B(OH)3 or the like, anhydrides of these acids such as H4 P2 O7, H2 S2 O7 or the like, and mixtures of two or more of these acids or these acids and anhydrides. The preferred acids are strong inorganic acids (pKa <2.0) and especially preferred are H2 SO4 and CF3 SO3 H. For greatest efficiency the acids should be oxidation resistant: they should not be oxidized by the catalyst metal in the noted reaction medium. If such an oxidation were to occur, it would obviously result in destruction of the acid and need for additional acid processing. In addition to acting as a reactant, the acid may also be used in excess, and, in some cases as an oxidant, thereby acting as reactant (to form the oxy-ester), solvent, and sometimes, oxidant.
The oxidizing agent generally may be any oxidant capable of oxidizing the reduced form of the metal catalysts, e.g., a halogen (such as F2, Cl2, Br2, l2), HNO3, perchloric acid, hypochlorites (such as NaOCl), peroxy compounds (such as H2 O2, CH3 CO3 H, K2 S2 O8), O2 or O3, SO3, NO2, H2 SO4, cyanogen, etc. Oxygen is preferred because of its ready availability and low cost. H2 SO4 is a desirable oxidant since the regeneration of the SO2 produced is well known technology. Where O2 is the oxidant, the manner of accomplishing Eq. 1 is as follows:
CH4 +1/2O2 +HX→CH3 X+H2 O Eq 1a
Where H2 SO4 is both the oxidant and the acid, the process for accomplishing Eq. 1 is as follows:
CH4 +2H2 SO4 →CH3 OSO3 H+2H2 O+SO2Eq 1b
Where SO3 is the oxidant and H2 SO4 is the acid, the process for accomplishing the reaction of Eq. 1 is as follows:
CH4 +SO3 +H2 SO4 →CH3 OSO3 H+SO2 +H2 O Eq 1c
Where O2 is the oxidant and CF3 SO3 H is the acid, the process for accomplishing the reaction of Eq. 1 is as follows:
CH4 +1/2O2 +CF3 SO3 H→CH3 OSO2 CF3 +H2 O Eq 1d
Since this is an oxidation process, the chemical oxidizing agent may be replaced with an electrochemical system. Where the oxidation is carried out electrochemically, the process for accomplishing the reaction of Equation 1 (at the anode) is as follows:
CH4 +HX→CH3 X+2H+ +2e- Eq. 1e
The catalyst used in Eq. 1 is one or more metals selected from the Class "B" metals of the Mendeleev Table and/or metals ions that are characterized as "soft" or "borderline" by the Pearson definitions. Thus, the metal ions are selected from the following: Cu, Zn, Pd, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, Te, Pt, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb, Bi, Ga, Ge, As, Po, Rh, Ir, Os, and Ru. The stable high oxidation states of these metals are characterized by a relatively high affinity for binding to "soft" polarizable ligands. Thus, these metals bind well to organic ligands since these species are "soft" and polarizable and tend to show the following order of binding (and insolubility) to the halogens: I>Br>Cl>F. Another important characteristic of these metals is the relative inefficiency with which these metals undergo one-electron reductions while still allowing efficient two-electron reductions. For example, AuIII, HgII, TlIII, PdII, PtII and PtIV are not readily reduced to the Mn-1 oxidation state but are readily reduced to the Mn- 2 states. Thus, for example, Hg2+ reduces to produce Hg2 2+ (a net 2e- change) and Hg+ is not a known species. (This is in stark contrast to metals such as CoIII and MnIII which readily undergo 1e- reduction by one-electron changes to produce the Mn-1 ions.) Strong acids (desired for heterolytic reactions) and the corresponding anions are resistant to oxidation and more easily oxidized by one-electron than two-electron processes. Thus, the Class "B" and/or "soft" metal ions do not readily oxidize strong acid solvents or the corresponding anions but can still allow efficient reaction of methane via a two-electron heterolytic process.
One such metal ion, Pd2+, is a powerful oxidant (E0 Pd2+ /Pd0 =0.98 V vs. NHE), and is characterized as a "soft" metal ion by the Pearson definition. Consistent with its classification as a "soft" metal ion and high ionization potential (19.42 eV), Pd2+ allows facile reactions with alkanes ("soft including methane. Consistent with these "soft" properties of Pd2+ are the well known reactions of Pd2+ with arenes (palladation) to produce isolable phenyl-palladium species. These phenyl-palladium species further react to produce functionalized aryl species, including aryl esters, presumably by a similar process that occurs in the formation of methyl esters from methyl-palladium species. This metallation reaction of arenes has been relatively well studied compared to the corresponding reaction with alkanes. The initial important reaction with arenes is thought to proceed via a heterolytic electriphilic CH bond activation, Eq 6, and since this is similar to the processes proposed for reaction with alkanes (See, Periana et al and Sen et al, above), could serve as a good model for electrophilic reactions with alkanes, Eq 7.
C6 H6 +Pd2+ →C6 H5 -Pd+ +H+Eq 6
CH4 +Pd2+ →CH3 -Pd+ +H+ Eq 7
Due to the expense and slow reaction rates of Pd in the conversion of methane to methyl esters, the selection of other more active metals for methane activation is an important goal for the development of an economic process based on the heterolytic electrophilic conversion of methane to methyl esters. Using the intrinsic chemical properties of Pd discussed above as guidelines, other class "B", "soft" metal ions with oxidation potentials>0.1 volts were identified as candidates for the conversion of methane to methyl esters: AuIII, TlIII, PtIV, PtII, HgII, CuII, AgI, BiIV, BiIII, PbIV, PbII, RhIII, SnIV, SnII, SbV, SbIII, TeIV, TeIII, IrIII, RuIII, RuIV, RuVI, RuVII, and RuVIII. Importantly, certain of these metal ions (TlIII, AuIII, PtII, HgII, PbIV) are known to react with arenes by electrophilic mechanisms.
We have found that HgII, TlIII, PtIV, PtII and AuIII are also effective ions for the selective oxidation of methane to methyl esters. Of these, HgII is the most effective, exhibiting much higher activity than PdII, and is significantly less expensive and is especially reactive in H2 SO4. The stoichiometry of the reaction when using H2 SO4 is shown in Eq 1 b above.
The form in which the catalyst is introduced to the reaction medium is not particularly important; the requirements being only that it be in a form allowing oxidant, acid, and reactant access to the metal and that the form not restrict the ability of the catalytic metal to vary between oxidation states during the reaction. For instance, the metal may be introduced as a metal, salt, or complex into a liquid reaction medium. The catalytic metal (or metals) may be placed on the usual catalyst supports provided that the supports do not interfere with the requirements listed above. We have found that introducing the metal to the liquid reaction medium in a form which produces a homogeneous catalyst is very desirable. The metal may be introduced to the liquid reaction medium in a convenient form such as the salt of the acid used in Eq. 1, although that is not required. The metallic form of the catalyst may also be used. The catalyst metal concentration must be present in at least a catalytic amount; amounts of metal ranging between 50 ppm and 1.0% by mole of the total liquid present are effective although we have found no intrinsic limitation on the metal concentration. If the metal is to be used as a reactant rather than as a catalyst, then substantially larger amounts of the metal may be added. The reaction rate is related to the concentration of the catalytic metal; higher rates result from higher metal concentration.
The esterification process conditions used in the first step are as follows:
a. temperature is greater than 50° C., preferably 50° C. to 300° C., and most preferably 95° C. to 200° C.;
b. methane is added at a pressure above about 50 psig, preferably above about 300 psig, and most preferably above about 450 psig; and
c. oxidant (whether pure or with other inert diluents) is added in an amount sufficient to support the reaction.
These conditions result in production of the alkyl oxy-ester of the acid in a molar amount greater than the molar amount of the catalyst metal charged in the reactor therefore giving a truly catalytic process.
The most preferred reaction situation for accomplishing Eq. 1 above is thus: the reaction is carried out in sulfuric acid, which acts as the solvent, reactant and oxidant. The concentration of Hg is as discussed generically above. The Hg is typically introduced into the reaction mixtures as HgSO4 but any form of Hg is acceptable; e.g. HgCl2, Hg2 SO4, Hg(NO3)2, Hg(CH3)2, Hg(C6 H5)2, Hg metal, Hg amalgams with various metals, etc. Although the metallic form of the metal permits a reaction to occur, the ionic form is presumed to be the catalytically active state and reactions with metallic Hg likely proceed first by oxidation of the metal to the ionic state. Importantly, metallic Hg is not produced in the reaction and the reaction remains homogeneous independent of the form of Hg added to the reaction. The yield of the reaction when using Hg is sensitive to the concentration of the sulfuric acid and lower acid concentration results in lower yields. However, reaction does occur in 90% sulfuric acid and may occur in solutions as low as 50%. The fastest reactions and highest yields have been observed in 100% sulfuric acid. The reaction also occurs in sulfuric acid containing excess SO3 (oleum). However, since the water generated in the reaction (Eq 1) must be removed (to prevent hydrolysis of the CH3 OSO3 H and dilution of the sulfuric acid) a preferred concentration is about 96% H2 SO4, since this concentration can readily be maintained by removal of water through simple distillation. The reaction may also be controlled to run at any desired concentration of H2 SO4 by continous, controlled addition of SO3 to the reaction mixture. This addition step prevents the build-up of water and may allow high conversion of the H2 SO4 to the product methyl sulfate.
It is desirable to use O2 as the oxidant in conjunction with H2 SO4 as the reaction medium. This reaction is shown as Eq. 5 above. This combination avoids production of SO2 and the concomitent need for its recycle by oxidation to SO3.
Use of devices promoting good mixing between the gas and liquid phases is desirable.
This reaction may be carried out in a molten salt reaction medium rather than in acids as solvents (so long as the stoichiometric requirements of the reaction are met), e.g. molten KHSO4, NaHSO4, K2 S2 O7, Na3 BO3, etc. This process variation has certain potential advantages such as lower corrosivity, lower volatility, increased reaction medium inertness, and lower overall cost.
This step is shown above as Eq. 2. It is an optional step and is carried out generally for the purpose of replacing the oxy-ester formed in the first step with an intermediate which is both reactive in the third step and does not substantially degrade the catalyst used in that later step. This step allows regeneration of the acid utilized in the first step for generation of the methyl ester.
The methyl ester may be separated from the first step reaction media by commonly practiced steps such as flashing or distillation. However, there is no need to isolate the methyl ester since solutions of the methyl ester and acid solvent react with added nucleophile to produce an intermediate which is reactive in the third step. The nucleophile in Eq. 2 is suitably then mixed with the methyl oxy-ester (pure or in the acid solvent) to produce a "methyl intermediate". By "methyl intermediate" is meant methanol, if the nucleophile is H2 O; methyl halide, if the nucleophile is a hydrogen halide such as HCl, HBr, or HI; methyl amino, if the nucleophile is NH3 ; methyl thiol, if the nucleophile is H2 S, or acetonitrile if the nucleophile is HCN. Other nucleophiles can be utilized and would be known to the ordinary skilled worker but should be of a type not decomposed by reaction with the acid solvent. These reactions proceed readily to completion. An excess of the nucleophile is desirable. The preferred nucleophile is H2 O since it may also be produced in the first step. The product methanol may be used directly or may be converted to a variety of hydrocarbons in a following step or steps.
This step (shown above as Eq. 3) includes conversion of the methyl intermediate to a longer chain or higher molecular weight hydrocarbon.
Suitable processes for converting methanol and other methyl intermediates to higher molecular weight hydrocarbons are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,894,107 and 3,979,472 to Butter et al. Butter shows the production of olefinic and aromatic compounds by contacting the methyl intermediate with an aluminosilicate catalyst, preferably HZSM-5, at a temperature between 650° F. and 1000° F.
Similarly, Butter suggests a process using a preferably catalyst of antimony oxide and HZSM-5 at a temperature between 250° C. and 700° C.
The ZSM-5 zeolite has been disclosed as a suitable molecular sieve catalyst for converting methyl alcohol into gasoline-range hydrocarbons. See, for instance, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,702,886 to Argauer et al. and 3,928,483 to Chang et al.
Other processes include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,373,109 to Olah (bifunctional acid-base catalyzed conversion of methanol and other methyl intermediates into lower olefins); U.S. Pat. No. 4,687,875 to Currie et al. (metal coordination complexes of heteropolyacids as catalysts for converting short change aliphatic alcohols to short change hydrocarbons); U.S. Pat. No. 4,524,234 to Kaiser (production of hydrocarbons preferably from methanol using aluminophosphate molecular sieves); and U.S. Pat. No. 4,579,996 to Font Freide et al. (production of hydrocarbons from C1 to C4 monohaloalkanes using layered clays); etc. Each of the above is potentially suitable for the third step of this process and their contents are incorporated by notice.
Where the process steps outlined as Eqs. 1-3 above are integrated, as might be done in an operating plant, O2 is the oxidant and HY is a nucleophile, the overall process scheme is as follows:
CH4 +1/2O2 +HX→CH3 X+H2 O
CH3 X+HY→CH3 Y+HX
CH3 Y→[CH2 ]+HY
Net Reaction: CH4 +1/2O2 →[CH2 ]+H2 O
Where H2 SO4 is both the oxidant and the acid and water is the nucleophile, the process for accomplishing the overall process is as follows:
CH4 +2H2 SO4 →CH3 OSO3 H+2 H2 O+SO2
SO2 +1/2O2 +H2 O→H2 SO4
CH3 OSO3 H+H2 O→CH3 OH+H2 SO4
CH3 OH→[CH2 ]+H2 O
Net Reaction: CH4 +1/2O2 →[CH2 ]+H2 O
It should be understood that the first two reactions expressed immediately above are equivalent in sum to Eq. 1 of the overall process.
Where SO3 is the oxidant, H2 SO4 is the acid, and water is the nucleophile, the process for accomplishing the overall process is as follows:
CH4 +SO3 +H2 SO4 →CH3 OSO3 H+SO2
SO2 +1/2O2 →SO3
CH3 OSO3 H+H2 O→CH3 OH+H2 SO4
CH3 OH→[CH2 ]+H2 O
Net Reaction: CH4 +1/2O2 →[CH2 ]+H2 O
It should be understood that the first two reactions expressed immediately above are equivalent in sum to Eq. 1 of the overall process. Where O2 is the oxident, CF3 SO3 H is the acid, and water is the nucleophile, the process is as follows:
CH4 +1/2O2 +CF3 SO3 H→CH3 OSO2 CF3 +H2 O
CH3 OSO2 CF3 +H2 O→CH3 OH+CF3 SO3 H
CH3 OH→[CH2 ]+H2 O
Net Reaction: CH4 +1/2O2 →[CH2 ]+H2 O
These reaction schemes permit regeneration and recycle of the acid and, in some instances, the auxiliary oxidant, which makes the process more economical. Some acids require additional steps to separate the nuecleophile but such steps are known to the ordinarily skilled worker.
These examples are intended to show portions of the overall inventive process, in particular the alkyl esterification reaction utilizing methane as the reactant. The remainder of the process steps are easily selectable from known processes.
A. A 50 ml high pressure reactor was charged with 25 ml of 100% H2 SO4 and 2.0 g of HgSO4 (270 mM). The contents of the reactor were stirred, the reactor was flushed with methane and heated to 188° C. under 1800 psig of methane. After 1 hr the reactor was cooled to room temperature. A gas sample of the gas in the reactor was obtained for gas chromatographic analysis and an aliquot of the reaction mixture was qualitatively analyzed for methyl sulfate by 13 C NMR and 1 H NMR. A second aliquot was first diluted with 3 volumes of water and the resulting solution heated in a sealed container for 2 hrs. The resulting solution was quantitatively analyzed for free CH3 OH by HPLC using an ion exclusion column with an eluant of 0.01% H2 SO4 in H2 O and a refractive index detector. Based on the high pressure liquid chromatography ("HPLC") and nuclear magnetic resonance ("NMR") analyses, the yield of methyl sufate was 746 mol % (25 mmoles, 1008 mM, Table I, entry 1) based on HgSO4 added (assuming that the reaction proceeds via the Hg redox couple Hg2+ /Hg2 2+). This corresponds to a productivity rate of 2.8×10-7 mol. of oxy-ester/cc of reaction volume-sec based on the conversion of methane to methyl sulfate. Trace levels of acetic acid and dimethylether were detected. Gas chromatographic analysis showed that copious amounts of SO2 and trace levels of CO2 were produced.
B. To show the effect of HgSO4 concentration, the general procedure of example A was repeated both with 1000 mM and 100 mM of HgSO4 for 60 minutes under 510 psig of methane. The results shown in Table I (entries 2 and 3) show that the higher concentrations of HgSO4 result in higher yields of methyl sulfate over the same reaction time.
C. To show the greater effectiveness of HgII as compared to PdII, the general procedure of example A was repeated but with 165 mM of PdSO4 and 100 mM HgSO4 for 180 minutes under 400 psig of methane. The results shown in Table I (entries 4 and 5) show that, under identical conditions, the HgSO4 system is about 17 times more active than the PdSO4 system for the production of methyl sulfate.
D. As a "blank" run, the procedure of Example C was repeated but without added PdSO4 or HgSO4. As may be seen from the results in Table I (entry 6) no methyl sulfate was produced in the reaction.
E. To show the effect of acid concentration, the general procedure of Example A was twice repeated but with 90% (wt) H2 SO4 (remainder H2 O) and 100% (wt) H2 SO4, 100 mM HgSO4, and 510 to 560 psig of methane for two hours. The results shown in Table I (entries 7 and 8) show that the yield of methyl sulfate was 464 mol % based on HgSO4 added in the 100% H2 SO4 and 155 mol % in the 90% H2 SO4 system.
F. To show the effect of temperature, the general procedure of Example A was repeated at 140° C., 180° C., 180° C. and 200° C. with 100 mM HgSO4 for two hours under 510 psig of methane. The results shown in Table I (entries 8, 9, 10 and 11) show that increasing temperatures from 140°-180° lead to increased yields of methyl sulfate. At 220° C., a loss in yield was observed.
G. To show the effect of methane pressure, the general procedure of Example A was repeated with 100 mM HgSO4 at methane pressures from 360 psig to 1820 psig. The results shown in Table I (entries 12 and 13) show that the yield of methyl sulfate increases at higher pressures.
H. To show that the reaction proceeds in other acids, the general procedure of Example A was repeated in pyrophosphoric acid and trifluoromethanesulfonic acids. The results shown in Table I (entries 14 and 15) show that the reaction can be successfully carried out in pyrophosphoric acid and trifluoromethanesulfonic acids.
I. To show that the reaction proceeds with different forms of Hg, the general procedure of Example A was repeated variously using HgO, HgCl2, Hg2 SO4, and Hg metal in place of HgSO4. The results shown in Table I (entries 16, 17, 18, and 23) show that these forms of Hg also leads to formation of methyl esters.
J. To show that other class "B" metals and/or Pearson "soft" metal ions can be utilized in our process for the selective oxidation of methane, the general procedure of Example A was repeated variously using the metals shown in Table I (entries 19-22). The metals Tl, Pt, and Au successfully facilitated the oxidation of methane to the methyl esters. Although the molar amount of methyl ester produced in entries 19-22 was less than the amount of metal present in the reaction medium (the metal could therefore be considered either a reactant or a catalyst), it was apparent that the use of oxygen to oxidize these metals would result in a process utilizing the metals in a truly catalytic fashion.
TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________ Rxn Metal [Metal] Temp Time [CH4 ] [CH3 OH]Entry Salt (mM) Acid (°C.) (min) (psig) (mM)__________________________________________________________________________ 1 HgSO4 270 H2 SO4 180 60 1800 1008 (100%) 2 HgSO4 100 H2 SO4 180 60 510 247 (100%) 3 HgSO4 1000 H2 SO4 180 60 510 378 (100%) 4 PdSO4 165 H2 SO4 180 180 400 50 (100%) 5 HgSO4 100 H2 SO4 180 180 400 526 (100%) 6 -- -- H2 SO4 180 180 400 0 (100%) 7 HgSO4 100 H2 SO4 180 120 560 155 (90%) 8 HgSO4 100 H2 SO4 180 120 510 464 (100%) 9 HgSO4 100 H2 SO4 140 120 510 16 (100%)10 HgSO4 100 H2 SO4 160 120 510 121 (100%)11 HgSO4 100 H2 SO4 200 120 510 452 (100%)12 HgSO4 100 H2 SO4 180 60 360 187 (100%)13 HgSO4 100 H2 SO4 180 60 1820 394 (100%)14 HgSO4 100 H4 P2 O7 220 114 400 26 (100%)15 HgO 230 CF3 SO3 H 180 120 900 112 (100%)16 Hg0 155 H2 SO4 180 70 930 175 (100%)17 HgCl2 100 H2 SO4 180 180 900 16 (100%)18 HgO 155 H2 SO4 180 180 510 200 (100%)19 Tl2 O3 100 CF3 SO3 H 170 120 500 123 (100%)20 Tl2 O3 50 H2 SO4 180 180 400 38 (100%)21 PtO2 62 H2 SO4 180 185 400 48 (100%)22 Au(OH)3 100 H2 SO4 180 120 920 94 (100%)23 Hg2 SO4 51 H2 SO4 180 180 920 609 (100%)__________________________________________________________________________
The invention has been shown both by description and by example. The examples are only examples; they should not be used in any fashion to limit the scope of the invention otherwise described here.
Additionally, it should be clear that one having ordinary skill in this art would envision equivalents to the processes described in the claims that follow and these equivalents would be within the scope and spirit of the claimed invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3702886 *||Oct 10, 1969||Nov 14, 1972||Mobil Oil Corp||Crystalline zeolite zsm-5 and method of preparing the same|
|US3894107 *||Aug 9, 1973||Jul 8, 1975||Mobil Oil Corp||Conversion of alcohols, mercaptans, sulfides, halides and/or amines|
|US3928483 *||Sep 23, 1974||Dec 23, 1975||Mobil Oil Corp||Production of gasoline hydrocarbons|
|US3979470 *||Sep 24, 1973||Sep 7, 1976||Pullman Incorporated||Process for the production of primary normal monochloroparaffins|
|US3979472 *||Mar 28, 1975||Sep 7, 1976||Mobil Oil Corporation||Process for manufacturing hydrocarbons|
|US4373109 *||Aug 5, 1981||Feb 8, 1983||Olah George A||Bifunctional acid-base catalyzed conversion of hetero-substituted methanes into olefins|
|US4453434 *||Dec 6, 1982||Jun 12, 1984||James Lissy||Rotary adjusting tool for use in inaccessible areas|
|US4523040 *||May 16, 1983||Jun 11, 1985||Olah George A||Methyl halides and methyl alcohol from methane|
|US4524234 *||Oct 19, 1984||Jun 18, 1985||Union Carbide Corporation||Production of hydrocarbons with aluminophosphate molecular sieves|
|US4579996 *||Nov 29, 1984||Apr 1, 1986||The British Petroleum Company P.L.C.||Process for the production of hydrocarbons from C1 to C4 monohaloalkanes|
|US4687875 *||Apr 21, 1986||Aug 18, 1987||The Standard Oil Company||Metal coordination complexes of heteropolyacids as catalysts for alcohol conversion|
|US4804797 *||Aug 24, 1987||Feb 14, 1989||Gas Research Institute||Production of commodity chemicals from natural gas by methane chlorination|
|US4864073 *||May 3, 1988||Sep 5, 1989||Mobil Oil Corporation||Processes for converting methane to higher molecular weight hydrocarbons via sulfur-containing intermediates|
|US4864074 *||May 3, 1988||Sep 5, 1989||Mobil Oil Corporation||Process for converting methane to higher molecular weight hydrocarbons via sulfur-containing intermediates|
|1||A. E. Shilov and A. A. Shteinman, "Activation of Saturated Hydrocarbons by Metal Complexes in Solutions," Kinetka i Kataliz, 18:1129-1145 (1977).|
|2||*||A. E. Shilov and A. A. Shteinman, Activation of Saturated Hydrocarbons by Metal Complexes in Solutions, Kinetka i Kataliz, 18:1129 1145 (1977).|
|3||Gretz et al., "Carbon-Hydrogen Bond Activation by Electrophydic Transition Metal Compounds. Palladium (II)-Mediated Oxidation of Arenes and Alkanes Including Methane": J. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. 109, 8109-8111 (1987).|
|4||*||Gretz et al., Carbon Hydrogen Bond Activation by Electrophydic Transition Metal Compounds. Palladium (II) Mediated Oxidation of Arenes and Alkanes Including Methane : J. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. 109, 8109 8111 (1987).|
|5||*||Huheey, Inorganic Chemistry, pp. 276 290 (1978).|
|6||Huheey, Inorganic Chemistry, pp. 276-290 (1978).|
|7||Kao et al., "Low Temperature, Palladium (II) Catalyzed, Solution-Phase Oxidation of Methane to Methanol", J. Amer. Chem. Soc. vol. 113, 701-703 (1991).|
|8||*||Kao et al., Low Temperature, Palladium (II) Catalyzed, Solution Phase Oxidation of Methane to Methanol , J. Amer. Chem. Soc. vol. 113, 701 703 (1991).|
|9||Olah et al., "Superacid-Catalyzed Oxygenation of Alkanes," Angew, Chem. Int. Ed., 17:909-931 (1978).|
|10||*||Olah et al., Superacid Catalyzed Oxygenation of Alkanes, Angew, Chem. Int. Ed., 17:909 931 (1978).|
|11||*||Phillips and Williams, Inorganic Chemistry, pp.459 477 (1966).|
|12||Phillips and Williams, Inorganic Chemistry, pp.459-477 (1966).|
|13||Rudakov et al., "Oxidation Kinetics of Saturated Hydrocarbons in the Pd(II)-H2 SO4 and NO2+ -H2 SO4 Systems": Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 224, No. 1, pp. 153-156 (1975).|
|14||*||Rudakov et al., Oxidation Kinetics of Saturated Hydrocarbons in the Pd(II) H 2 SO 4 and NO 2 H 2 SO 4 Systems : Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 224, No. 1, pp. 153 156 (1975).|
|15||Sen et al., "Homogeneous Palladium Mediated Oxidation of Methane," Platinum Metals Review, 35:126-132 (1991).|
|16||Sen et al., "Palladium (II) Mediated Oxidative Functionalization of Alkanes and Arenes," New Journal of Chemistry 13:756-760 (1989).|
|17||*||Sen et al., Homogeneous Palladium Mediated Oxidation of Methane, Platinum Metals Review, 35:126 132 (1991).|
|18||*||Sen et al., Palladium (II) Mediated Oxidative Functionalization of Alkanes and Arenes, New Journal of Chemistry 13:756 760 (1989).|
|19||*||Tret yakov et al., Ruthenium (IV) Complexes: Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysts for the Oxidation of Unsaturated Hydrocarbons , Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 245, No. 5, pp. 1135 1138.|
|20||Tret'yakov et al., "Ruthenium (IV) Complexes: Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysts for the Oxidation of Unsaturated Hydrocarbons", Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 245, No. 5, pp. 1135-1138.|
|21||Vargaftik et al., "Highly Selective Partial Oxidation of Methane to Methyl Trifluoroacetate," Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications pp. 1049-1050 (1990).|
|22||*||Vargaftik et al., Highly Selective Partial Oxidation of Methane to Methyl Trifluoroacetate, Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications pp. 1049 1050 (1990).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5585515 *||Apr 30, 1993||Dec 17, 1996||Battelle Memorial Institute||Method and reaction pathway for selectively oxidizing hydrocarbon compounds|
|US5708246 *||Aug 28, 1996||Jan 13, 1998||Battelle Memorial Institute||Method of photocatalytic conversion of C-H organics|
|US5786505 *||Jul 3, 1996||Jul 28, 1998||Battelle Memorial Institute||Method and reaction pathway for selectively oxidizing organic compounds|
|US6455716||Mar 2, 2001||Sep 24, 2002||The Proctor & Gamble Company||Process for the branching of saturated and/or unsaturated fatty acids and/or alkyl esters thereof|
|US6538162 *||Jan 30, 2001||Mar 25, 2003||Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.||Method for converting alkanes to oxygenates|
|US7161048||May 11, 2006||Jan 9, 2007||Rinnovi, L.L.C.||Method for deriving methanol from waste generated methane and structured product formulated therefrom|
|US7282603||Jun 21, 2004||Oct 16, 2007||Richards Alan K||Anhydrous processing of methane into methane-sulfonic acid, methanol, and other compounds|
|US7674941||Jun 13, 2008||Mar 9, 2010||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Processes for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US7838708||Jan 25, 2010||Nov 23, 2010||Grt, Inc.||Hydrocarbon conversion process improvements|
|US7847139||Jul 2, 2008||Dec 7, 2010||Grt, Inc.||Hydrocarbon synthesis|
|US7880041||Jul 16, 2007||Feb 1, 2011||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Process for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US7883568||Feb 5, 2007||Feb 8, 2011||Grt, Inc.||Separation of light gases from halogens|
|US7915459||Feb 24, 2006||Mar 29, 2011||Periana Roy A||Catalytic systems for the conversion of hydrocarbons to functionalized products|
|US7964764||Jan 7, 2010||Jun 21, 2011||Grt, Inc.||Hydrocarbon synthesis|
|US7998438||May 27, 2008||Aug 16, 2011||Grt, Inc.||Zone reactor incorporating reversible hydrogen halide capture and release|
|US8008535||Apr 30, 2008||Aug 30, 2011||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Process for converting gaseous alkanes to olefins and liquid hydrocarbons|
|US8053616||Jul 1, 2009||Nov 8, 2011||Grt, Inc.||Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US8173851||Jun 3, 2009||May 8, 2012||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Processes for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US8198495||Mar 2, 2010||Jun 12, 2012||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Processes and systems for the staged synthesis of alkyl bromides|
|US8232441||Jul 13, 2009||Jul 31, 2012||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Process for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US8242300||Jul 1, 2008||Aug 14, 2012||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Process for selective, partial, substantially solvent-free, oxidation of methane to methanol and/or a methanol derivative with a heterogeneous catalyst and sulfur trioxide|
|US8273929||Jul 17, 2009||Sep 25, 2012||Grt, Inc.||Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US8282810||Jun 3, 2009||Oct 9, 2012||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Bromine-based method and system for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons using electrolysis for bromine recovery|
|US8367884||Feb 17, 2011||Feb 5, 2013||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Processes and systems for the staged synthesis of alkyl bromides|
|US8415512||Oct 13, 2010||Apr 9, 2013||Grt, Inc.||Hydrocarbon conversion process improvements|
|US8415517||Jul 17, 2009||Apr 9, 2013||Grt, Inc.||Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US8436220||Jun 10, 2011||May 7, 2013||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Processes and systems for demethanization of brominated hydrocarbons|
|US8642822||May 27, 2011||Feb 4, 2014||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Processes for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons using microchannel reactor|
|US8741250||Aug 3, 2012||Jun 3, 2014||The Curators Of The University Of Missouri||Hydroxylation of icosahedral boron compounds|
|US8802908||Oct 8, 2012||Aug 12, 2014||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Processes and systems for separate, parallel methane and higher alkanes' bromination|
|US8815050||Mar 22, 2011||Aug 26, 2014||Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd.||Processes and systems for drying liquid bromine|
|US8829256||Jun 30, 2011||Sep 9, 2014||Gtc Technology Us, Llc||Processes and systems for fractionation of brominated hydrocarbons in the conversion of natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US8921625||Jul 17, 2009||Dec 30, 2014||Reaction35, LLC||Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US9133078||Dec 13, 2012||Sep 15, 2015||Gtc Technology Us, Llc||Processes and systems for the staged synthesis of alkyl bromides|
|US9193641||Dec 4, 2012||Nov 24, 2015||Gtc Technology Us, Llc||Processes and systems for conversion of alkyl bromides to higher molecular weight hydrocarbons in circulating catalyst reactor-regenerator systems|
|US9206093||Apr 17, 2014||Dec 8, 2015||Gtc Technology Us, Llc||Process for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons|
|US20030120125 *||Oct 11, 2002||Jun 26, 2003||Periana Roy A.||Ligated platinum group metal catalyst complex and improved process for catalytically converting alkanes to esters and derivatives thereof|
|US20050070614 *||Jun 21, 2004||Mar 31, 2005||Richards Alan K.||Anhydrous processing of methane into methane-sulfonic acid, methanol, and other compounds|
|US20060241327 *||Feb 24, 2006||Oct 26, 2006||Periana Roy A||New catalytic systems for the conversion of hydrocarbons to functionalized products|
|US20060264683 *||May 11, 2006||Nov 23, 2006||Knox Walter R||Method for deriving methanol from waste generated methane and structured product formulated therefrom|
|US20110021802 *||Jul 1, 2008||Jan 27, 2011||Gonzalez Michael A||Process for selective, partial, substantially solvent-free, oxidation of methane to methanol and/or a methanol derivative with a heterogeneous catalyst and sulfur trioxide|
|US20110184204 *||Feb 7, 2011||Jul 28, 2011||Periana Roy A||Catalytic systems for the conversion of hydrocarbons to functionalized products|
|DE10132526A1 *||Jul 9, 2001||Jan 30, 2003||Ruhrgas Ag||Production of alkane derivatives from alkane, especially methanol from methane, involves oxidative reaction with sulfur trioxide to form alkyl sulfate, reaction with auxiliary acid and separation of the resulting ester|
|WO2009017925A1||Jul 1, 2008||Feb 5, 2009||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Process for selective, partial, substantially solvent-free, oxidation of methane to methanol and/or a methanol derivative with a heterogeneous catalyst and sulfur trioxide|
|U.S. Classification||585/500, 560/302, 585/733, 585/943, 560/304, 560/318, 585/638, 560/305, 585/469|
|International Classification||C07B61/00, C07C305/06, C07C305/08, C07C303/06, C10G50/00, C10G3/00, C07C9/02, C07C305/04, C07C31/04, C07C2/84, C07C391/00, C07C309/65, C07C29/50, C07C29/48, C07C67/035, C07C303/24, C07C303/28|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02P20/52, Y02P30/20, Y10S585/943, C07C29/50, C07C303/24, C07C29/48, C07C391/00, C07C67/035, C07C303/28|
|European Classification||C07C303/24, C07C29/48, C07C67/035, C07C391/00, C07C29/50, C07C303/28|
|Mar 2, 1992||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CATALYTICA, INC.
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:PERIANA, ROY A.;TAUBE, DOUGLAS J.;TAUBE, HENRY;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:006048/0916;SIGNING DATES FROM 19920106 TO 19920108
|Jul 30, 1997||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CATALYTICA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CATALYTICA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:008574/0831
Effective date: 19970718
|Sep 22, 1997||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 28, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Nov 9, 2005||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Apr 26, 2006||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Jun 20, 2006||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20060426