|Publication number||US5312407 A|
|Application number||US 07/997,033|
|Publication date||May 17, 1994|
|Filing date||Dec 28, 1992|
|Priority date||Dec 28, 1992|
|Publication number||07997033, 997033, US 5312407 A, US 5312407A, US-A-5312407, US5312407 A, US5312407A|
|Inventors||L. Philip Carter|
|Original Assignee||Carter L Philip|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (14), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (72), Classifications (10), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to surgical instrumentation. More particularly, the present invention relates to microsurgical instrumentation that has structure for facilitating unimpeded visualization of the operating field when used in conjunction with an operating microscope.
The operating microscope has revolutionized the surgical approach to many neurosurgical diseases by providing magnification, binocular vision and excellent lighting in the depths of surgical wounds, and thus facilitating operative procedures which would otherwise be impossible. These microscope dependent operative procedures occasionally involve microscopic bone dissection and the use of osseous dissection instrumentation. While microsurgical instrumentation has been readily available for work with soft tissue, tumor removal and deep suturing, suitable microsurgical osseous instrumentation is not readily available. The task of microscopic bone dissection has been done with bone dissection instruments which are large and awkward to use. The available bone dissection instruments, commonly referred to as rongeurs, are designed to exert large forces for cutting the hard bone material, which results in the large size of the instrument. Whether the bone dissection task requires the use of the microscope or not, the bite-end, including the punch and footplate of the rongeur must be designed to withstand the forces which a surgeon applies to effect the removal of the bone. However, when performing a microsurgical procedure which requires microsurgical removal of osseous material, it is extremely important that the surgeon have a surgical tool that does not require the surgeon's hand to be in the operating field which may impede visualization through the operating microscope. The known commercially available ronguers are designed for use in non-operating microscope environments, and when used in a microsurgical osseous dissection procedure, the surgeon must cope with the problem. By example, rongeur instruments which are commonly used by surgeons in neurosurgical procedures are available from Ruggles Corp. in North Quincy, Mass. (U.S.A.).
The closest prior art patents concerns the following U.S. patents:
______________________________________U.S. Pat. No. Inventor Date of Issue______________________________________ 984,756 P. Frisch Feb. 21, 19112,691,370 F.J. Wallace Oct. 12, 19542,790,437 W.C. Moore Apr. 30, 19574,201,213 P.R. Townsend May 06, 19804,574,803 K. Storz Mar. 11, 19864,777,948 D.W. Wright Oct. 18, 19884,990,148 Worrick, III et al. Feb. 05, 1991______________________________________
These patents are of interest for teaching the basic shape of the ronguers and appear to be cumulative of the commercially available surgical instrumentation. The patents also teach improvements in the surgical rongeur instrumentation field, see for example U.S. Pat. No. 4,990,148 to Worrick, III et al., teaching an improved footplate, also termed anvil, for a rongeur. U.S. Pat. No. 2,691,370 is of interest for its teaching of an instrument for use with a telescope as a means to obviate problems associated with visualization of the field of operation in heart surgery. These patents, and known commercially ronguers in the prior art have not addressed the visual obstruction problem encountered by neurosurgeons when using these surgical instruments to perform microsurgical osseous dissections.
Thus, a need is seen to exist for a surgical instrument that has structural feature which assures that a surgeon's hand not be in the operating field, and thus facilitate unimpeded visualization by the surgeon through an operating microscope during a microsurgical osseous dissection procedure. In particular, a need is seen to exist for a rongeur having a shank portion designed with an offset portion (bayonet-like, and hereinafter referred to as offset bayonet portion) that obviates the visual obstruction problem encountered during a microsurgical procedure when using presently commercially available rongeurs.
While the rongeur surgical instrument is the preferred embodiment of the present invention, a need is also seen for other surgical instrument, such as a curette, to embody the same type of offset bayonet portion on a composite shank member of the instrument to obviate visual obstruction problems encountered when using them in a microsurgical procedure.
Accordingly, the primary object of the present invention is to provide a surgical instrument for use in conjunction with an operating microscope for performing a microsurgical procedure, said instrument having structure that assures that a surgeon's visual field of operating is not obstructed or impeded by its use with an operating microscope.
A particular object of the present invention is to provide a surgical instrument having its operating field structural portion suitably designed for performing a microsurgical osseous dissection procedure requiring the use of an operating microscope.
A more particular object of the present invention is to provide a rongeur-type surgical instrument having a shank portion designed with an offset bayonet portion for use in conjunction with an operating microscope during a microsurgical osseous dissection procedure.
A related object of the present invention is to provide other surgical instruments having the foregoing offset bayonet portion feature, such as on a curette.
A related object of the present invention is to provide a surgical instrument that facilitates the foregoing objects in a safe manner.
The foregoing objects are accomplished by providing, on a preferred embodiment, a microsurgical rongeur having an offset bayonet portion for allowing microscopic visualization of an operating field. The rongeur design of the present invention comprises a modified composite shank member (i.e. not a straight structure) designed to include a proximate shank portion, an offset portion and a distal shank portion. The offset portion, is preferably referred to as an offset bayonet portion, since the word bayonet is commonly used to describe offset structure in the field of surgical instruments. The distal shank portion includes the bite-end member of the rongeur, which includes a cutter tip, (also called punch), and the footplate, or anvil. The present invention maintains the mechanical action principles of prior art rongeurs in that the composite shank member comprises a stationary shank member and a movable shank member, whereby the stationary shank member is controlled by the thumb/palm portion of the surgeon's hands while the movable member is controlled by clinching action of the surgeon's fingers. The important difference between the prior art rongeur and the present invention being that the distal shank portion is spacially offset, in a bayonet fashion, from the proximate shank portion, yet maintains the mechanical objective of being able to actuate the bite-end member. In the present invention, the movable shank member is controllably urged, by the surgeon's clinching action of the fingers. The movement being along the length of the proximate portion of the stationary shank member, continuing through the offset bayonet portion, and through the distal shank portion to effect opening and closing of a punch travel region, i.e. to effect the cutter tip portion at the end of the moving shank member to engage, by example, bone material positioned between it and the footplate.
The offset bayonet portion is defined by a first angled shank portion on the stationary shank member and a second angled shank portion on the movable shank member, each angled shank portion interconnecting said proximate shank portion to said distal shank portion. Each stationary and movable shank member having a shank extension portion dimensioned to factor the distance defined by the punch travel region at the bite-end. In essence, the offset bayonet portion forms a parallelogram-shaped frame whose opening varies in area according to the length of the punch travel region, (typically in the 5 to 10 millimeter range), and the amount of spacial offset between the proximate shank portion and the distal shank portion, (preferably at least 25 millimeters, but adequate to effect an offset in accordance with the objects of the present invention), and which varies in area dynamically during an operative procedure according to the amount of clinching action that the surgeon is exerting on the movable shank member via the trigger portion of the rongeur. The dimensional characteristics and the clinching action results in virtually zero area opening under a fully clinched position, to the maximum area opening under a relaxed, unused state. The amount and type of offset is controlled by the length of the respective angled shank portion and the angle at which the angled shank portions are arranged with respect to a longitudinal axis of the proximate shank portion, considering the desired orientation of the distal shank member into the operating field. An angle of at least 45 degrees, with respect to a longitudinal axis of the proximate shank portion, has been found to adequately offset the distal shank portion to allow its use with an operating microscope, yet not impede visualization of the operating field.
Because the amount and type of offset can vary, the surgeon can have a variety of rongeur-type surgical instruments, each having a desired type of offset bayonet portion which is suitable for a particular type of microsurgical procedure. When the offset bayonet feature is combined with the present variations available in bite-ends, the field of surgical ronguers is greatly expanded and improved.
From a safety consideration, and considering that the offset bayonet portion forms a variable parallelogram-shaped frame opening that may inadvertently produce a pinchure point, a shroud is provided to cover the opening to prevent any inadvertent pinching of the surgeon's hand or glove during an operating procedure.
It should be apparent from the foregoing that, the surgical rongeur of the present invention will effect a comfortable and adequate placement of the handgrip portion of the surgical instrument away from the operating field to allow its use with an operating microscope under microsurgical procedures.
In other surgical instruments, such as a curette, the offset bayonet portion is defined by an angled shank portion that interconnects a hand grip proximate shank portion of the instrument to a distal shank portion. The distal shank portion includes the work-end of the instrument, such as the cups on a curette. As in the case of the ronguers, the amount and type of offset is controlled by the length of the angled shank portion and the angle at which the angled shank portion depends from the proximate shank portion towards the distal shank portion. Also, as in the design of rongeur, an angle of at least 45 degrees, with respect to a longitudinal axis of the proximate shank portion, has been found to adequately offset the distal shank portion of the curette to allow its use with an operating microscope, yet not impede visualization of the operating field.
Therefore, to the accomplishments of the foregoing objects, the invention consists of the foregoing features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims, the accompanying drawings and the following disclosure describing in detail the invention, such drawings and disclosure illustrating two of the various ways in which the invention may be practiced.
FIG. 1 is a side view of prior art rongeur, illustrating the straight shank member.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the present invention, illustrating an offset bayonet portion formed between a proximate shank portion and a distal shank portion, and further illustrating the maximum sized parallelogram-shaped frame formed by the offset bayonet portion.
FIG. 2a is an enlarged view of an intermediate sized parallelogram-shaped frame formed by the offset bayonet portion, further illustrating a cross-section of the protective shroud, the variable frame opening and the offset angle reference.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the present invention illustrating the fully clinched state of the instrument, and the resulting minimum frame opening formed by the offset bayonet portion.
FIG. 4 is a view illustrating the visualization problem which surgeons experience using the prior art rongeur, such as the rongeur illustrated in FIG. 1, in conjunction with an operating microscope.
FIG. 5 is a view illustrating the present invention in use by a surgeon, in conjunction with an operating microscope, without experiencing any visualization problem of an operating field.
FIG. 6 illustrates a curette surgical instrument adapted with an offset bayonet portion in accordance with the present invention.
Referring now to FIG. 1 where a prior art rongeur 100 is illustrated having a straight shank portion 101 and hand grip portions 102, 103, shown in an open position as indicated by arrow Co, and to FIG. 4 where the prior art rongeur 100 is shown being used by a surgeon S on a patient P in conjunction with an operating microscope M during a microsurgical procedure. FIG. 4 illustrates the problem which the present invention is directed at solving, namely, that when the prior art rongeur 100 is used to perform microsurgery, the hand grip portions 102, 103, and the surgeon's hand Sh must be positioned in the line of sight LS between the microscope M and the patient P, and thus obstructing the surgeon's visualization of the operating field, due to the straight design of the shank portion 101.
In solving the foregoing visualization problem with the prior art rongeurs, consideration must be given to the mechanical action by which the instrument accomplishes the surgical objectives. The present invention maintains the mechanical action principles of prior art rongeurs in that the modified composite shank member 400, shown in FIG. 2, still comprises a stationary shank member 440, similar to stationary shank member 101b and a movable shank member 450, similar to movable shank member 101a, whereby the stationary shank member is controlled by the thumb/palm portion of the surgeon's hand, while the movable member is controlled by clinching action of the surgeon's fingers. The important difference between the prior art rongeur 100 shown in FIG. 1, and rongeur 200 illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, being that the distal shank portion 430 is spacially offset from the proximate shank portion 410 by an offset bayonet portion 420, and yet maintains the mechanical objective of actuating bite-end member 104. It should be noted that the extreme distal end of the distal shank portion 430 of the present invention still includes the bite-end member 104, as in rongeur 100, which bite-end 104 includes a cutter tip 104b, (also called punch), and footplate 104a, or anvil, which in combination, define a punch travel region 4301. The surgeon's mechanical clinching action is designated as Co for the relaxed state, and as CF for the fully clinched state, as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, respectively. The clinching action translates into motion A1 of movable shank member 450 (101a) and requires the compression of hand grip 300, via thumb/palm rest portion 303 and trigger portion 302 to urge associated spring leaf member 301.
The offset bayonet portion 420 is defined by a first angled shank portion 422 on stationary shank member 440 and a second angled shank portion 421 on movable shank member 450. In combination, each angled shank portion 421, 422 interconnect proximate shank portion 410 to distal shank portion 430. Stationary shank member 440 and movable shank member 450 each has a shank extension portion dimensioned to factor the full distance defined by the punch travel region 4301, designated 42211 on the proximate portion of the stationary shank member, and 42111 on the distal portion of the movable shank member. In essence, the offset bayonet portion 420, viewed as a composite structure, forms a parallelogram-shaped frame delineated by first opposing sides 42111, 42211, having a maximum dimension determined by the length of punch travel region 104, and second opposing sides 421, 422 whose length is determined according to the amount of spacial offset OFS and offset angle A, see FIG. 2a.
The maximum length of the punch travel region 104 can vary according to the type of instrument, typically in the range of 5 to 10 millimeter. The punch travel region 104 decreases dynamically during an operative procedure according to the amount of clinching action that the surgeon is exerting on the movable shank member 450 via the trigger portion 302 of the rongeur. The maximum frame opening is shown in FIG. 2, designated S1, and corresponds to the relaxed state Co of the instrument and corresponding maximum opposing sides 42111, 42211. FIG. 2a shows the result of an intermediate state C1 of clinching of the instrument, which results in a decreased frame open area, designated S2, and corresponding opposing sides 42112, 42212. FIG. 3 shows the minimum punch travel region 43013, which results in a virtually zero area opening S3 under a fully clinched state CF of the instrument.
Considering the foregoing described dynamics of the delineated parallelogram-shaped frame, especially the zero area opening S3, a potential pinchure point may exist. As best seen in FIG. 3, and for purposes of protecting against any inadvertent pinching of the surgeon's hand or glove during an operating procedure, as a safety precaution, a shroud 500 is added as part of the structure for the improved instrument 200.
As best seen in FIG. 2a, the spacial offset OFS is a factor of the length of angled shank portions 421, 422, and the angle A at which the angled shank portions are arranged with respect to a longitudinal axis A2--A2 of the proximate shank portion 410. An angle A of at least 45 degrees, with respect to longitudinal axis A2--A2 of the proximate shank portion of stationary shank member, has been found to adequately offset the distal shank portion 430 to allow its use with an operating microscope, yet not impede visualization of the operating field. FIG. 5 shows the improved rongeur instrument 200 being used by a surgeon whereby the surgeon's hands and the rongeur instrument's hand grip member do not impede visualization of a microsurgical operating procedure.
FIG. 6 illustrates the object of the present invention as applied to a curette 600. Here, the shank of the curette 600 is defined by an angled shank portion 601 that interconnects a proximate shank portion 602 and hand grip 604 of the instrument to a distal shank portion 603. The distal shank portion 603 includes the work-end of the instrument, such as the illustrated cup. As in the case of the design of rongeur 200, the amount and type of offset OFS is controlled by the length of the angled shank portion 601 and the angle Ax at which the angled shank portion 601 depends from the proximate shank portion 602 towards the distal shank portion 603. Also, as in the design of rongeur 200, an angle Ax of at least 45 degrees, with respect to a longitudinal axis Ac--Ac of the proximate shank portion 602, has been found to adequately offset the distal shank portion 603 of the curette to allow its use with an operating microscope, yet not impede visualization of the operating field.
Therefore, while the present invention has been shown and described herein in what is believed to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is recognized that departures can be made therefrom within the scope of the invention, which scope is therefore not to be limited to the details disclosed herein but is to be accorded the full scope of the claims so as to embrace any and all equivalent apparatus.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US890279 *||Apr 23, 1907||Jun 9, 1908||John Hoare||Apparatus for cutting the edges of lawns and the like.|
|US984756 *||Sep 8, 1909||Feb 21, 1911||Paul Frisch||Surgical forceps.|
|US1754806 *||Sep 5, 1929||Apr 15, 1930||Holland N Stevenson||Surgical instrument|
|US2427169 *||Mar 31, 1944||Sep 9, 1947||Bronislaw Wandel||Instrument for applying ligatures to blood vessels|
|US2691370 *||Mar 27, 1952||Oct 12, 1954||American Cystoscope Makers Inc||Instrument for heart surgery|
|US2790437 *||Oct 12, 1955||Apr 30, 1957||Welch Allyn Inc||Surgical instrument|
|US2878809 *||Jan 23, 1958||Mar 24, 1959||Richards Mfg Company||Surgical drill attachment|
|US3404677 *||Jul 8, 1965||Oct 8, 1968||Henry A. Springer||Biopsy and tissue removing device|
|US4201213 *||Jan 30, 1978||May 6, 1980||Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.||Surgical tool|
|US4491132 *||Aug 6, 1982||Jan 1, 1985||Zimmer, Inc.||Sheath and retractable surgical tool combination|
|US4574803 *||Feb 17, 1981||Mar 11, 1986||Karl Storz||Tissue cutter|
|US4763669 *||Sep 4, 1987||Aug 16, 1988||Jaeger John C||Surgical instrument with adjustable angle of operation|
|US4777948 *||Jan 16, 1984||Oct 18, 1988||Wright David W||Surgical tool|
|US4990148 *||Jan 13, 1989||Feb 5, 1991||Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.||Thin footplate rongeur|
|1||*||Ruggles Neurosurgical Instruments Catalog, pp. 137 145, Ruggles Corporation, 38 Billings Rd. North Quincy, Mass.|
|2||Ruggles Neurosurgical Instruments Catalog, pp. 137-145, Ruggles Corporation, 38 Billings Rd. North Quincy, Mass.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5597640 *||Sep 14, 1995||Jan 28, 1997||Signode Corporation||Oriented plastic strap|
|US5851214 *||Sep 16, 1996||Dec 22, 1998||United States Surgical Corporation||Surgical instrument useful for endoscopic procedures|
|US6214010||Nov 4, 1999||Apr 10, 2001||Thompson Surgical Instruments, Inc.||Rongeur surgical instrument|
|US6638280||Oct 10, 2001||Oct 28, 2003||Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.||Rongeur with drainage|
|US6685710||Oct 10, 2001||Feb 3, 2004||Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.||Rongeur with detachable crossbar|
|US6991633 *||Mar 31, 2003||Jan 31, 2006||Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.||Rongeur with detachable crossbar|
|US7578820||Sep 2, 2003||Aug 25, 2009||Moore Jeffrey D||Devices and techniques for a minimally invasive disc space preparation and implant insertion|
|US7621932||Nov 24, 2009||Jörg Wenzler Medizintechnik GmbH||Surgical punching instrument|
|US7651500||Jul 1, 2003||Jan 26, 2010||Mathys Ag Bettlach||Ligament tensing device with displaceable lug|
|US7749251 *||Jun 13, 2003||Jul 6, 2010||Aeolin, Llc||Method and apparatus for stabilization of facet joint|
|US7931689||Apr 26, 2011||Spineology Inc.||Method and apparatus for treating a vertebral body|
|US7935124 *||May 3, 2011||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Devices and techniques for a posterior lateral disc space approach|
|US8088163||Jan 3, 2012||Kleiner Jeffrey B||Tools and methods for spinal fusion|
|US8277510||Oct 2, 2012||Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc||Tools and methods for spinal fusion|
|US8292960||May 16, 2012||Oct 23, 2012||Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc||Spinal fusion cage with removable planar elements|
|US8353907||Dec 18, 2008||Jan 15, 2013||Atricure, Inc.||Ablation device with internally cooled electrodes|
|US8366748||Feb 5, 2013||Kleiner Jeffrey||Apparatus and method of spinal implant and fusion|
|US8425509||Jun 22, 2007||Apr 23, 2013||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Surgical instrument for performing controlled myotomies|
|US8562683||Jul 16, 2010||Oct 22, 2013||Aeolin Llc||System and method for spinal fusion|
|US8685031||Jul 22, 2013||Apr 1, 2014||Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc||Bone graft delivery system|
|US8709088||Nov 22, 2013||Apr 29, 2014||Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc||Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system|
|US8715355||Oct 22, 2012||May 6, 2014||Nuvasive, Inc.||Spinal fusion cage with removable planar elements|
|US8808305||Oct 1, 2012||Aug 19, 2014||Jeffrey B. Kleiner||Spinal fusion cage system with inserter|
|US8864654||Apr 20, 2011||Oct 21, 2014||Jeffrey B. Kleiner||Method and apparatus for performing retro peritoneal dissection|
|US8870882||Jan 30, 2013||Oct 28, 2014||Jeffrey KLEINER||Apparatus and method of spinal implant and fusion|
|US8906028||Sep 20, 2010||Dec 9, 2014||Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc||Bone graft delivery device and method of using the same|
|US8915878||Jan 14, 2013||Dec 23, 2014||Atricure, Inc.||Ablation device with internally cooled electrodes|
|US8998892||Apr 26, 2010||Apr 7, 2015||Atricure, Inc.||Ablation device with cooled electrodes and methods of use|
|US9060877||Feb 6, 2012||Jun 23, 2015||Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc||Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system|
|US9173694||Dec 14, 2012||Nov 3, 2015||Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc||Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system|
|US9186193||Apr 28, 2014||Nov 17, 2015||Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc||Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system|
|US9247943||Jun 24, 2011||Feb 2, 2016||Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc||Devices and methods for preparing an intervertebral workspace|
|US9370295||Jun 18, 2014||Jun 21, 2016||Trice Medical, Inc.||Fully integrated, disposable tissue visualization device|
|US9427264||Oct 6, 2014||Aug 30, 2016||Jeffrey KLEINER||Apparatus and method of spinal implant and fusion|
|US9439782||Aug 18, 2014||Sep 13, 2016||Jeffrey B. Kleiner||Spinal fusion cage system with inserter|
|US20030187450 *||Mar 31, 2003||Oct 2, 2003||Agbodoe Victor Banford||Rongeur with detachable crossbar|
|US20040030346 *||Aug 7, 2003||Feb 12, 2004||George Frey||Devices and techniques for a posterior lateral disc space approach|
|US20040254575 *||Jun 13, 2003||Dec 16, 2004||Obenchain Theodore G.||Method and apparatus for stabilization of facet joint|
|US20050049623 *||Sep 2, 2003||Mar 3, 2005||Moore Jeffrey D.||Devices and techniques for a minimally invasive disc space preparation and implant insertion|
|US20060085021 *||Oct 13, 2005||Apr 20, 2006||Jorg Wenzler||Surgical punching instrument|
|US20060155295 *||Jul 1, 2003||Jul 13, 2006||Walter Supper||Ligament tensing device with displaceable lug|
|US20070032810 *||Aug 24, 2006||Feb 8, 2007||Martin Storz||Medical cutting and/or holding instrument|
|US20080195136 *||Sep 16, 2005||Aug 14, 2008||Cordis Development Corporation||Thin Film Devices for Temporary or Permanent Occlusion of a Vessel|
|US20090054898 *||Mar 26, 2008||Feb 26, 2009||Joe Gleason||Articulating Shaper|
|US20090062805 *||Jul 30, 2008||Mar 5, 2009||Zimmer Gmbh||Rongeur|
|US20090088848 *||Sep 27, 2007||Apr 2, 2009||Martz Erik O||Instrument set and method for performing spinal nuclectomy|
|US20090163905 *||Dec 18, 2008||Jun 25, 2009||Winkler Matthew J||Ablation device with internally cooled electrodes|
|US20090203961 *||Feb 6, 2009||Aug 13, 2009||Regadas F Sergio P||Surgical Instrument|
|US20090264939 *||Oct 22, 2009||Martz Erik O||Instrument set and method for performing spinal nuclectomy|
|US20100106151 *||Jun 22, 2007||Apr 29, 2010||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Surgical instrument for performing controlled myotomies|
|US20100121155 *||Nov 12, 2008||May 13, 2010||Ouyang Xiaolong||Minimally Invasive Tissue Modification Systems With Integrated Visualization|
|US20100198262 *||Jan 30, 2009||Aug 5, 2010||Mckinley Laurence M||Axial offset bone fastener system|
|US20100286477 *||Nov 11, 2010||Ouyang Xiaolong||Internal tissue visualization system comprising a rf-shielded visualization sensor module|
|US20110009694 *||Jul 10, 2009||Jan 13, 2011||Schultz Eric E||Hand-held minimally dimensioned diagnostic device having integrated distal end visualization|
|US20110144687 *||Jun 16, 2011||Kleiner Jeffrey||Lateral Based Retractor System|
|USD656610||Mar 27, 2012||Kleiner Jeffrey B||Spinal distraction instrument|
|USD667542||Sep 18, 2012||Kleiner Jeffrey B||Spinal distraction instrument|
|USD696399||Sep 28, 2012||Dec 24, 2013||Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc||Spinal distraction instrument|
|USD700322||Jul 17, 2012||Feb 25, 2014||Jeffrey B. Kleiner||Intervertebral surgical tool|
|USD723682||May 3, 2013||Mar 3, 2015||Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc||Bone graft delivery tool|
|USD750249||Oct 20, 2014||Feb 23, 2016||Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc||Expandable fusion cage|
|CN101511287B||Jun 22, 2007||Apr 27, 2011||伊西康内外科公司||A surgical instrument for performing controlled myotomies|
|DE19742112A1 *||Sep 24, 1997||Mar 25, 1999||Raible Cnc Technik||Surgical slide shaft instrument for cutting|
|EP0806912A1 *||Jan 26, 1996||Nov 19, 1997||Robert S. Bray, Jr.||Microsurgical curette|
|EP1699368A2 *||Feb 22, 2005||Sep 13, 2006||Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG||Medical cutting and/or holding instrument|
|EP1897506A1 *||Sep 8, 2006||Mar 12, 2008||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||A surgical instrument for performing controlled myotomies|
|EP2087834A1 *||Feb 9, 2009||Aug 12, 2009||Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG||Surgical instrument|
|WO2005020827A2 *||Sep 1, 2004||Mar 10, 2005||Sdgi Holdings, Inc.||Devices and techniques for a minimally invasive disc space preparation and implant insertion|
|WO2005020827A3 *||Sep 1, 2004||Sep 22, 2005||Charles L Branch||Devices and techniques for a minimally invasive disc space preparation and implant insertion|
|WO2005079680A3 *||Feb 22, 2005||Nov 10, 2005||Storz Karl Gmbh & Co Kg||Medical cutting and/or holding instrument|
|WO2007085628A1 *||Jan 25, 2007||Aug 2, 2007||Zimmer Gmbh||Rongeur|
|WO2008028701A1 *||Jun 22, 2007||Mar 13, 2008||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||A surgical instrument for performing controlled myotomies|
|U.S. Classification||606/79, 606/83|
|International Classification||A61B17/22, A61B17/32, A61B17/28|
|Cooperative Classification||A61B2017/00738, A61B17/1611, A61B17/320708, A61B2017/2904|
|Nov 4, 1997||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jul 2, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Nov 17, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Nov 30, 2005||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|