Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS5314478 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 07/692,202
Publication dateMay 24, 1994
Filing dateApr 26, 1991
Priority dateMar 29, 1991
Fee statusPaid
Also published asDE69127354D1, DE69127354T2, EP0505634A1, EP0505634B1, US5458643
Publication number07692202, 692202, US 5314478 A, US 5314478A, US-A-5314478, US5314478 A, US5314478A
InventorsMasanori Oka, Shokyu Gen, Yoshito Ikada, Hideaki Okimatsu
Original AssigneeKyocera Corporation, Kabushiki Kaisha Biomaterial Universe
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Artificial bone connection prosthesis
US 5314478 A
Abstract
A prosthesis used for a damaged bone, an artificial articular cartilage or an artificial intervertebral disc being characterized in that the prosthesis is a composite body comprising polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel and ceramic or metallic porous body. With this prosthesis, PVA hydrogel enhances lubrication and shock absorbing functions, and the porous body allows the ingrowth and ossification of the bone tissue of a living body therein to affinitively connect said hydrogel to the bones of the living body.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(13)
We claim:
1. A prosthesis used for replacing damaged articular bone portions having bone tissue grown thereon and damaged articular cartilage of a living body, the prosthesis comprising: polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel and a porous body, wherein the hydrogel is carried into said porous body via infiltration and fixation thereby forming a resulting porous body such that said porous body is shaped in the form of said bone portions or articular cartilage it replaces, and wherein the resulting porous body is positioned at and brought into contact with the articular bone portions so that the bone tissue is allowed to grow into and ossify within said resulting porous body to connect said hydrogel to the bone portions of the living body.
2. A prosthesis according to claim 1 wherein said porous body is selected from the group consisting of ceramic and metallic mesh.
3. A prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein said polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel has a water content of 10 to 60 weight %.
4. A prosthesis used for replacing damaged articular bone portions having bone tissue grown thereon and damaged articular cartilage of a living body, the prosthesis comprising: polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel and a porous body, wherein said polyvinyl alcohol has a polymerization rate of at least 1700 and a saponification rate of at least 99.5 mol % is carried into said porous body via infiltration and fixation thereby forming a resulting porous body, and wherein the resulting porous body is positioned at and brought into contact with the articular bone portions so that the bone tissue is allowed to grow into and ossify within said resulting porous body to connect said hydrogel to the bone portions of the living body.
5. A prosthesis used for replacing damaged articular bone portions having bone tissue grown thereon and damaged articular cartilage of a living body, the prosthesis comprising: polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel and a porous body of titanium mesh, wherein the hydrogel is carried into said porous body via infiltration and fixation thereby forming a resulting porous body, and wherein the resulting porous body is positioned at and brought into contact with the articular bone portions so that the bone tissue is allowed to grow into and ossify within said resulting porous body to connect said hydrogel to the bone portions of the living body.
6. A prosthesis according to claim 5, wherein the porous body is alumina.
7. A prosthesis device for replacing bone or articular cartilage, the device comprising:
a porous body; and
polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel, wherein said hydrogel is fixed within the porous body such that said porous body is shaped in the form of said bone or articular cartilage it replaces.
8. The prosthetic device according to claim 7, wherein the porous body is selected from the group consisting of ceramic and metallic mesh.
9. The prosthetic device according to claim 8, wherein the ceramic porous body is alumina having a porosity of 20% to 80%.
10. The prosthetic device according to claim 7, wherein the porous body is titanium mesh.
11. A prosthetic device for replacing damaged bone and articular cartilage, the device comprising:
a porous body;
polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel having a water content of approximately 10 to 60 weight %;
said porous body being selected from the group consisting of ceramic and metallic mesh;
said hydrogel being fixed within the porous body when the bone and articular cartilage are replaced; and
said porous body having the hydrogel fixed therein being shaped in the form of the bone and the articular cartilage replaced.
12. A prosthetic device according to claim 11, wherein the ceramic porous body is alumina.
13. A prosthetic device according to claim 11, wherein the metallic mesh porous body is titanium.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a prosthesis, more specifically an artificial bone connection prosthesis used for the replacement of damaged bones, an articular cartilage such as a coxa and a knee joint, and a spine's intervertebral disc.

In the disclosure described below, the invention relating to the articular cartilage is described as a first invention and the invention relating to the intervertebral discs is described as a second invention.

2. Prior Art

At present, even if an articular cartilage is partially damaged, it is replaced with an artificial articular cartilage since there is no appropriate surgical treatment method. The artificial articular cartilage is greatly beneficial to patients who are suffering from joint trouble. However, serious problems, such as complications caused by the replacement of artificial joints, in particular a high occurrence rate of loosening problems and the necessity of another operation due to the breakage of the bones around the artificial joints.

The artificial joints which are currently used are made of hard materials such as metals and ceramics and a soft socket made of ultra-polymer high-density polyethylene (HDPE). This HDPE is superior in wear resistance, but it is inferior in wear resistance and shock absorbing performance for impact load. Reaction of foreign matter caused by powder generated due to wear is also causing problems.

An articular cartilage is located on the surface of a bone joint. The articular cartilage of the knee joint or coxa of a human being is 2 to 4 mm in thickness. The articular cartilage absorbs shock applied by the weight of the human being and distributes and transmits the impact load to a chondral cancellous bone trabeculation to play an important role of allowing smooth movability under low friction. One of the most important features of the articular cartilage is its high extracellular water content, 60 to 80%. The elasticity and lubrication of the articular cartilage are brought by this high water content.

So far, various materials, such as HDPE, polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate (PHEMA) gel, silicone and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) gel, have been examined as the materials for the artificial articular cartilage, but they were insufficient in their dynamic characteristics.

The materials of the artificial articular cartilage must meet the requirements listed below:

i) Superior affinity to a human body

ii) Chemical and physical stability

iii) Superior dynamic characteristics (wear resistance, shock absorbing effect, lubrication, etc.)

As described above, conventional artificial articular cartilages have-drawbacks in characteristics regarding lubrication, shock absorbing and wear resistance.

On the other hand, an intervertebral disc is located between individual vertebral bodies. More specifically, two vertebral bodies and an intervertebral disc located therebetween comprise a motion segment: a function unit at the spine. The disc comprises sturdy fiber rings which surround the outer circumference of the nucleus pulposus made of fiber cartilage with alternately arranged collagen fiber bundles, liquefied soft nucleus pulposus which holds the tension state of the intervertebral disc made of colloidal gel including much glycosaminoglycan bonded to water, and the end plate of cartilage which is made of glassy cartilage and is used to separate the vertebral body from the above-mentioned elements.

In our daily life, the intervertebral disc is subjected to complicated load which is a combination of compression, bending and distortion. When the spine is bent forward, stretched and bent sideways, stresses, in particular, tension and compression stresses occur on the disc. When the spine is turned, shearing stress occurs on the disc. The load applied to the nucleus pulposus in the intervertebral disc is uniformly distributed in a normal case and exerts force hydrostatically. Therefore, the intervertebral disc has a hydrostatic function at its motion segment. The disc thus has very important roles; it functions as a cushion between vertebral bodies, stores energy and absorbs shock of load by distributing the load. In addition, the disc is greatly related to the internal stability together with ligaments.

If the intervertebral disc having the above-mentioned important functions is damaged by a disease such as the hernia of the intervertebral disc, the damaged disc is treated as described below at present. The deformed intervertebral disc is taken out first. Then, a self transplantation bone, bone cement or an artificial vertebral body spacer is mainly used to fix the portion between the vertebral bodies.

However, all means, including the self transplantation bone, artificial vertebral body made of stainless steel, alumina ceramics and hydroxy apatite, bone cement made of polymethyl methacrylate or a combination of these, are used only to fix the connection between vertebral bodies without considering the dynamic characteristics inherent to the intervertebral disc of a living body. The flexibility and shock absorbing function inherent to the intervertebral disc are disregarded. In particular, the upper and lower sections adjacent to the intervertebral disc are adversely affected in the living body dynamics, thereby frequently causing secondary problems at the sections adjacent to the intervertebral disc.

In addition to the above-mentioned technologies practiced actually, the prior arts disclosed so far are: "Artificial vertebral body spacer" (Japanese Provisional Patent Publication No. 64-76851) comprising a metal mesh unit with an elasticity close to that of the bone and being characterized in the method of fixing the unit to the upper and lower vertebral bodies, "Artificial intervertebral disc for a cervical vertebra" (Japanese Provisional Patent Publication No. 63-164948) attaching importance to the motion of the intervertebral disc, "Artificial vertebral body" (Japanese Provisional Patent Publication No. 63-300758) aiming for substitution of the dynamic characteristics of the intervertebral disc, "Artificial intervertebral disc capsule and its embedding method" (Japanese Provisional Patent Publication No. 64-70041) and "Intervertebral disc prosthesis" (Japanese Provisional Patent Publication No. 2-215461).

The various artificial intervertebral discs devised so far are only artificial vertebral body spacers used just to substitute self transplantation bones and had no dynamic characteristics of the intervertebral disc of the living body, or have insufficient internal stability as a result that too much importance is placed to mobility. Even composite body discs aimed to substitute the dynamic characteristics of the intervertebral disc, made of flexible polymer material mainly at the inner sections and comprising hard materials, such as ceramic powder material or bioinactive fibers, at the sections contacting bones cannot sufficiently substitute the softness and shock absorbing function of the intervertebral disc-of the living body, cannot be sufficiently fixed to the bones or cannot have sufficient mechanical strength of itself. In this way, these composite body discs cannot satisfy the above-mentioned overall functions at the same time as artificial intervertebral discs.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The object of the first invention is to obviate the defects in the materials for the above-mentioned conventional artificial articular cartilages, that is, to improve the dynamic characteristics of an artificial articular cartilage and the method for connecting and fixing the artificial articular cartilage to the tissue of a living body.

The object of the second invention is to eliminate the problems in the above-mentioned conventional intervertebral discs.

The concepts of the first and second inventions are common in that the hydrogel of polyvinyl alcohol is used to improve the dynamic characteristics of the prosthesis and that the hydrogel is also used, in combination with ceramics or metallic porous bodies harmless to the living body, as a carrier to allow ingrowth and ossification of the bone tissue of the living body to improve the connection and fixation to the living tissue. The hydrogel of PVA is combined with the porous body and positioned at the dynamic interface between the living bones to provide excellent lubrication and shock absorbing characteristics. On the other hand, the tissue of the living body grows and ossificates into the porous body so that the prosthesis can achieve affinitive connection to the tissue of the living body. In this way, the prosthesis of the first invention has a significant adaptability as an articular cartilage and the prosthesis of the second invention also has a significant adaptability as an intervertebral disc.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating the artificial articular cartilage of the first invention installed in a living body.

FIG. 2 is a schematic view illustrating the artificial intervertebral disc produced as an example of the second invention;

FIGS. 3(a) to 3(e) are schematic views illustrating the artificial intervertebral discs of examples of the second invention;

FIG. 4 is a view illustrating the installation condition of the artificial intervertebral disc of the second invention inside the human body;

FIG. 5(a) is a view illustrating a PVA hydrogel model of an example of the second invention and FIG. 5(b) is a view illustrating an ultra-polymer polyethylene model of an example of the second invention, and;

FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating secular changes in the stresses obtained during experiment 1 using the examples of the second invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The inventors of the present invention earnestly studied to provide a prosthesis with excellent lubrication and shock absorbing characteristics of the articular cartilage of a living body and to make the prosthesis securely fixed to the tissue of a living body. As a result, the inventors have found that the above-mentioned objects can be achieved by combining PVA hydrogel with porous ceramics or titanium mesh, which are superior in affinity with the bones of a living body. More specifically, in the case of the artificial articular cartilage of the first invention, PVA hydrogel is carried via infiltration and fixation in part or most of the pores in the porous alumina ceramics or titanium mesh. By this method, the dynamic secure fixation is made between the members to be connected. In addition, the tissue of the living body ossificates into the non-infiltration/fixation section of the PVA hydrogel, thereby achieving secure connection and fixation as well as dynamic stability and adaptability to the living body for an extended period of time.

The artificial articular cartilage of the first invention is produced by the method described below. A PVA solution with a polymerization rate of 1700 or more and a saponification rate of 99.5 mol % is carried via infiltration in part or at an end of the porous alumina ceramics or titanium mesh. The solution is then subjected to a gelatinization process and set to gel at low temperature. The PVA is then dried and heat-treated at a high temperature between 120° and 180° C.

With the artificial articular cartilage produced as described above, the PVA hydrogel functions as the articular cartilage of the living body, and the porous alumina ceramics or titanium mesh assures connection and fixation between the tissue of the living body and the PVA hydrogel.

The first invention will be specifically described below.

The PVA used with the present invention should have a saponification rate of 95 mol % or more, preferably 97 mol % or more, most preferably 99 mol % or more. If the saponification rate is lower than those values, the gel is apt to have less strength. The average polymerization rate should be 1,700 or more at an average viscosity, preferably 3,300 or more. As the polymerization rate becomes lower, the strength of the gel also becomes lower. The starting material of the PVA should be subjected to molecular distillation to prevent PVA with low molecular weight from eluting.

When the PVA solution is obtained, only water can be used as solvent. However, it is preferable to use solvent mixed with organic solvent which is affinitive to water. Examples of the organic solvents affinitive to water are dimethyl glycol (DMSO), ethylene glycol (EG), glycerol (GC), propylene glycol (PG), propylene alcohol (POH), ethyl alcohol (EOH), 1,3-dimethyl-imidazolizinone (DMI). The solvent can be a mixture of two or more types.

With the present invention, it is preferable to select DMSO from among the above-mentioned organic solvents by considering the solubility to the PVA, the ratio of mixture with water and the drop of the freezing point.

The mixture ratio between water and the above-mentioned solvent can be determined as desired, but normally should be in the range of 5:95 to 95:5.

In the present invention, the PVA solution is first adjusted and prepared. Its concentration should be in the range of 2 to 30 weight % depending on the desired strength and water content. To adjust and prepare such a solution, PVA is generally heated and dissolved. Only heating while stirring is possible or dissolution is possible by using an autoclave or a microwave oven.

The completely dissolved PVA solution is then carried via infiltration into the porous alumina ceramics or titanium mesh. In order to carry the PVA hydrogel via fixation only at the desired portions, cyanic acrylate (instantaneous adhesive) or gelatin is filled in the portions where the living body tissue is desired for ossification. After the fixation, the PVA solution is carried via infiltration and left at low temperature less than room temperature. The solution is set to gel, thereby making an artificial articular cartilage made of the PVA hydrogel. In the process, the solution is set to gel in a shorter period of time as the temperature is lower. The process should thus be conducted in a freezer at a temperature of -10° C. or less, preferably -20° C. or less.

The obtained PVA gel comprising a large amount of water and organic solvent is dried and heat-treated at high temperature. This heat treatment process can be done in the air, but preferably be conducted in vacuum, nitrogen gas flow or silicone oil. The heat treatment temperature should be 100° C. or more where the crystallization of the PVA can be promoted, preferably 120° to 160° C. The sufficient heat treatment time is normally 1 to 10 hours depending on the heating temperature.

Since the water content of the PVA hydrogel artificial articular cartilage made as described above can be greatly changed between 10 to 60 weight %, the desired dynamic characteristics can be obtained by adjusting the water content.

FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating the artificial articular cartilage (for a coxa) of the first invention installed in a living body. An articular cartilage C of the present invention is embedded in recess R disposed at the top end of femur F. PVA hydrogel g of the articular cartilage C is disposed to fit for cartilage C' of the living body. Porous alumina ceramics C1 with no hydrogel g is embedded in subchondral bone F1 of femur F.

The second invention

To eliminate the defects of the above-mentioned intervertebral discs, the inventors of the present invention studied and experimented variously. Consequently, the inventors provide an artificial intervertebral disc comprising a pair of metallic or ceramic porous bodies and-a polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel block incorporated therebetween.

(Examples)

The first and second inventions will be described further taking examples. However, the technical concepts of the present invention are not limited only to the examples.

Example 1: corresponding to the first invention Preparation and adjustment of a PVA solution

10 g of PVA with a polymerization rate of 5,000 and a saponification rate of 99.9 mol % was added to 90 g of dimethyl sulfoxide/water mixture solvent (8:2 weight ratio) and dissolved at 130° C. while stirred by a magnetic stirrer for two hours to obtain a solution.

Fixation of the PVA hydrogel to the porous alumina ceramics

Cyanic acrylate (instantaneous adhesive) was carried via infiltration and fixation beforehand at about half of the entire length of a cylindrical alumina ceramic body (porosity 40%) measuring 5 cm in diameter and 10 cm in height. The ceramic body was then immersed in the above-mentioned PVA solution and the PVA solution was carried via infiltration in the alumina ceramic body by removing gas from the ceramic body by using an aspirator. The ceramic body was then left for 24 hours in a freezer at -20° C. to set the PVA to gel. As a result, the PVA gel was carried by fixation in the alumina ceramics.

Heat treatment of the PVA hydrogel

To remove infiltrated and fixed cyanic acrylate and DMSO (solvent) from the above-mentioned alumina ceramics/PVA hydrogel composite body, the composite body was cleaned in acetone at 50° C. for three hours. The composite body was then dried for 24 hours at room temperature by wind and with a vacuum drier. The dried PVA hydrogel was heat-treated in silicone oil at 140° C. for one hour to obtain PVA hydrogel with low water content.

This PVA hydrogel was immersed in water at 37° C. for three days to obtain an equilibrium condition. The saturated water content rate of the obtained gel was about 20 weight %.

The shearing and peeling strength of the PVA hydro gel

The shearing and peeling strength of the alumina ceramics/PVA hydrogel composite body was about 3 MPa when measured with the S-100 Auto-graph made by Shimazu Seisakusho Ltd.

Embedding the cartilage into the knee joint of a rabbit

The PVA hydrogel artificial articular cartilage made as described above was cut and formed into a cylinder of 4 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height. The knee joint of a rabbit was unfolded by cutting the para-patellar median patella skin under "Nembutal" intravenous anesthesia. The femoropopliteus surface was drilled to the subchondral bone. The above-mentioned artificial articular cartilage was then embedded into the obtained hole.

As a comparison example, an ultra-polymer polyethylene piece (HDPE) used at the socket section of the currently used artificial articular cartilage was also embedded in the same way. Three rabbits were used for each material.

Two weeks after operation, no inflammation was found at the degenerated synovial membrane of the cartilage of all groups. In histology, immature scar tissue was generated and a few inflammation cells were found partially. However, the degree of the inflammatory cellular infiltration was low for both materials. Significant differences were not recognized between the two materials.

Four weeks after the operation, inflammation reaction disappeared from around the materials and the maturity of the scar tissue was recognized.

Eight weeks after the operation, the maturity of the scar tissue made gradual progress for all materials. In the case of the artificial articular cartilage made of PVA hydrogel fixed alumina ceramics, bone ossification occurred at the portions of the alumina ceramics with unfixed PVA hydrogel, and the ossificated bone was firmly fixed to the joint. On the other hand, the artificial articular cartilage made of HDPE dropped easily from the joint.

The artificial articular cartilage of the first invention has the superior dynamic characteristics equivalent to those of the articular cartilage of the living body, that is, the characteristics similar to the lubrication and shock absorbing characteristics. In addition, the artificial articular cartilage can assure firm fixation to the bones of the living body. Consequently, the artificial articular cartilage can be used as the cartilage of the knee joints and coxae. Therefore, since the artificial articular cartilage has the excellent joint characteristics inherent to the living body, it is greatly beneficial to the welfare of the human being.

Example 2: corresponding to the second invention

PVA with a polymerization rate of 11,000 and a saponification rate of 99.9 mol % was added to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/water mixture solvent (8:2 weight ratio) to set the PVA concentration to 5 weight %. The PVA solution was then dissolved and prepared in a constant-temperature oil bath (including ethylene glycol) at 135° C. for seven hours while being stirred by an electric stirrer.

The PVA solution used in this case should have a saponification rate of 95 mol % or more, preferably 97 mol % or more. If the saponification rate is less than the above-mentioned values, the gel to be obtained has less strength. The average polymerization rate should be 1,700 or more at the average viscosity, preferably 5,000 or more. If the rate is less than the values, the polymerization rate of the PVA lowers and the gel to be obtained has less strength. The starting material of the PVA should be used after molecular distillation to prevent PVA with low molecular weight from eluting.

When the PVA solution is obtained, only water can be used as solvent. However, just as in the case of the first invention, it is possible to use one or a mixture of two or more solvents described before and listed as follows: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol (EG), glycerol (GC), propylene alcohol (POH), ethyl alcohol (EOH), 1,3-dimethyl-imidazolizinone (DMI).

Just like the first invention, it is preferable to select DMSO from among the above-mentioned organic solvents by considering the solubility to the PVA, the ratio of mixture with water and the drop of the freezing point.

The mixture ratio between water and the above-mentioned solvent can be determined as desired, but normally should be in the-range of 5:95 to 95:5.

Its concentration should be in the range of 2 to 30 weight % depending on the desired strength and water content. To prepare and adjust such a solution, PVA is generally heated and dissolved. Only heating while stirring is passable or dissolution is possible by using an autoclave or a microwave oven.

Two pieces of rectangular-column pure titanium fiber mesh (porosity about 50%) measuring 20×20×8 mm were preformed. One piece of the pure titanium fiber mesh was set on the bottom of a metal mold (prepared separately) and the adjusted PVA solution was poured into the mold. The PVA solution was covered with the other piece of tie pure titanium fiber mesh. Immediately after compression by using a press molding machine took place on the laminate, the temperature of the PVA solution was lowered by using an instantaneous cooling spray to carry PVA hydrogel via infiltration only in the desired portions inside the upper and lower fiber mesh pores. In this case, cyanic acrylate or gelatin can be filled beforehand in the portions where biologic fixation due to ingrowth and ossification of the living body tissue is desired, to carry the PVA hydrogel via infiltration and pixation only at the desired portions so that the PVA solution can be carried via infiltrated after solidification. At this time, the PVA solution which is not carried via infiltration into the above-mentioned fiber mesh can exist independently between the upper and lower fiber mesh bodies.

The pieces of the mesh bodies were then left for 24 hours in a freezer at -20° C. to set the PVA solution to gel. The PVA hydrogel in the upper and the lower pure titanium fiber mesh bodies is fixed to obtain a block of the PVA hydrogel. In this case, the solution is set to gel in a shorter period of time as the temperature is lower. Therefore, a freezer was used at a temperature of -10° C. or less, preferably -20° C. or less. The amount of the PVA solution should be determined beforehand so that the PVA block with a desired thickness can be formed. To remove DMSO which was used as a solvent, two pieces of the pure titanium fiber mesh/PVA hydrogel block composite bodies were infiltrated in ethyl alcohol and cleaned about-one week while heating and stirring. The pieces of the composite bodies were then dried for three days at room temperature by wind and with a vacuum drier. The dried composite bodies were heat-treated in silicone oil at 140° C. for three hours. This heat treatment process can be done in the air, but preferably be conducted in vacuum, nitrogen gas flow or silicone oil. The heat treatment temperature should be 100° C. or more where the crystallization of the PVA can be promoted, preferably in the range of 100° to 180° C.. The sufficient heat treatment time is generally 1 to 72 hours depending on the heat treatment temperature. The time can be made longer.

In the end, the pieces of the composite bodies were immersed in water. In this way, the two artificial intervertebral discs were obtained which were similar in shape to that shown in FIG. 2 and were composed of the pure titanium fiber mesh body and PVA hydrogel block.

FIGS. 2 and 3 are schematic views of artificial intervertebral discs of the second invention. In the figures, numerals 1 and 11 represent pure titanium fiber mesh bodies positioned over and under the artificial intervertebral disc. Numeral 22 represents a PVA hydrogel block. Numerals 3 and 33 represent PVA hydrogel infiltration portions of the pure titanium fiber mesh bodies. While numerals 4 and 44 represent the hydrogel non-infiltration portions.

The pure titanium fiber mesh bodies 1 and 11 were firmly connected and fixed in the condition where the PVA hydrogel from the PVA hydrogel block 22 had entered via infiltration part or most of the block 22. In this case, to make the connection firmer, a collar or a projection (both not shown) can be provided at the ends of the PVA hydrogel infiltration portions 3 and 33 so that an anchoring effect is offered.

Like the artificial intervertebral disc shown in FIG. 3(a), the block 22 made of the PVA hydrogel has wing sections projecting right-and-left or back-and-forth to provide a larger area for contacting the end plates of the upper and lower neighboring vertebral bodies, thereby allowing such load distribution as can be obtained by the intervertebral disc of the living body. The block 22 is desired to have an anatomical sectional shape close to the end plate to enhance the internal stability of the artificial intervertebral disc when installed. The shape of the artificial intervertebral disc of the second invention is not limited to a rectangular column, but can have a shape of a triangular column, an elliptic cylinder, a circular cylinder or an irregular shape depending on the shape of the installation position, as shown in the schematic views of FIGS. 3(b) to 3(e). The above-mentioned titanium fiber mesh bodies 1 and 11 can be composed of porous ceramic bodies, metallic mesh bodies or metallic porous bodies such as metallic beads, which are affinitive to the living body. In this case, the porous body of the second invention can be made of alumina, zirconia, hydroxy apatite or crystallized glass ceramics. The metallic porous body can be made of titanium-based alloy, cobalt-chrome alloy or stainless steel, which are affinitive to the living body. Furthermore, the above-mentioned pure titanium fiber mesh bodies 1 and 11 can be a combination of ceramic or metallic porous bodies described above. The porosity of the porous bodies is desired to be in the range of 20 to 90%. In the example of the second invention, two porous bodies are provided over and under the above-mentioned block. However, porous bodies provided back-and-forth and right-and-left as stoppers and integrated with the above-mentioned block can also be used. Accordingly, the number of porous bodies of the artificial intervertebral disc of the second invention is not limited to two.

The water content of the PVA hydrogel of the porous body/PVA hydrogel block composite body made by infiltrating water in the end can be changed greatly in the range of 10 to 60 weight % depending on the heat treatment condition of the composite body so that the water content suited for the desired dynamic characteristics can be adjusted and obtained. When this artificial intervertebral disc was immersed in water at 37° C. for a week until its equilibrium condition was obtained, the saturated water content of the block made of the PVA hydrogel was about 14 weight %.

FIG. 4 shows an actual installation condition of the artificial intervertebral disc of the second invention which is similar to that shown in FIG. 3(a). In this case, the non-infiltration portions 4 and 44 of the PVA hydrogel of the pure titanium fiber mesh bodies 1 and 11 directly contact the bones of the upper and lower vertebral bodies 5 and 55, thereby achieving biological fixation by ingrowth and ossification of bones into the porous interior of the non-infiltration portion mentioned above.

Next, some experiments were conducted to examine the characteristics of the artificial intervertebral disc of the second invention produced by the above-mentioned method.

Experiment 1

A PVA solution of 4 weight % was prepared and adjusted by using the preparation method for the above-mentioned artificial intervertebral disc and a circular cylindrical PVA hydrogel 6 measuring 6 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height was made [FIG. 5 (a)]. The water content of the gel was about 16 weight %. FIG. 5 (a) shows a PVA hydrogel model sample made by laminating a circular cylindrical pure titanium fiber mesh-body 7 (porosity about 50%) measuring 6 mm in diameter and 6 mm in height and cancellous bone section 8 obtained from the knee joint of a pig and formed in a circular cylinder measuring 6 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height over and under the above-mentioned PVA hydrogel block 6. FIG. 5(b) shows an ultra-polymer polyethylene model sample made by laminating an ultra-polymer polyethylene body 9 (6 mm in diameter and 5 mm in height), a bone cement piece made of oolymethyl methacrylate 10 (6 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height) and the above-mentioned cancellous bone section 8 (6 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height).

A weight of 2.7 kg was dropped from a height of 50 mm to each sample in physiological saline solution. The stress transmitted through each sample was measured with the passage of time by using a load cell installed under each sample. FIG. 6 shows the results of the measurement. According to the graph, a shock load was transmitted for an extended period of time in the case of the PVA hydrogel model sample. It was thus confirmed that the PVA hydrogel model sample was superior in shock absorbing performance.

Experiment 2

Just as in the case of tho first experiment, a PVA solution of 4 weight % was prepared and adjusted. Four pieces of circular cylindrical pure titanium fiber mesh bodies measuring 8 mm in diameter and 20 mm in height with porosity values of 50 and 70% (two pieces for each type) were also produced. Cyanic acrylate was infiltrated and fixed in the section at about half length of each piece. The PVA solution was pressed and infiltrated by using an injection syringe. The following treatment methods were the same as those for the first invention, except that heating and cleaning in acetone were added before cleaning in ethyl alcohol to remove infiltrated and fixed cyanic acrylate. Just as in the case of the first invention, the pure titanium fiber mesh/PVA hydrogel block composite bodies were made. The water content of the block comprising the PVA hydrogel was about 16 weight % just as in the case of experiment 1.

The PVA hydrogel block composite bodies were trimmed in a size of 5 to 6 mm in diameter and subjected to a shearing force test by using an auto-graph universal tester made by Shimazu Seisakusho Ltd. Table 1 shows the results of the measurement.

              TABLE 1______________________________________        Test factor          Contact area                     Load   Shearing stressSample         (mm2) (kgf)  MPa______________________________________Sample 1 (porosity 50%)          24         3.5    1.4Sample 2 (porosity 50%)          20         3.2    1.8Sample 3 (porosity 70%)          28         6.1    2.1Sample 4 (porosity 70%)          28         5.4    1.9______________________________________

The average shearing stress of the composite bodies with 50% porosity was 1.5 MPa and that of the composite bodies with 70% porosity was 2.0 MPa. The composite bodies with higher porosity delivered higher shearing stress. Since the maximum shearing force applied to the thoractic and lumber vertebrae of a human being is said to be 150N, it is assumed that at least the maximum shearing force of 0.375 MPa is applied to the connection area (20×20 =400 mm2) of the pure titanium fiber mesh/PVA hydrogel block composite body of example 1. It is clear that the shearing forces of the composite bodies of the present example are far greater than the maximum value. Therefore, it is proved that in the artificial intervertebral disc of the second invention, the connection between the PVA hydrogel block 22 and porous bodies can be firmly secured via infiltration and fixation in part or most of the pores of the ceramic or metallic porous bodies positioned over and under the PVA hydrogel block 22.

Experiment 3

A PVA solution of 4 weight % was prepared and adjusted by the above-mentioned production method of the artificial intervertebral disc of the second invention. Pure titanium fiber mesh/PVA hydrogel block composite bodies (water content about 16 weight %) were made by using a circular cylindrical pure titanium fiber mesh body measuring 5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in height and with 70% porosity. The composite bodies were embedded in the patellar groove of the femurs of mongrel dogs. They were killed with the passage of time and the operation sections were examined histologically.

Two weeks after the operation, immature scar tissue was generated and a few inflammation cells were found partially. However, the degree of infiltration was low. Four weeks after the operation, the inflammation reaction around the sample disappeared. As the scar tissue became matured, the ingrowth of new bones into the pores of the pure titanium fiber mesh body was recognized. The new bone trabeculation became matured with the passage of time. Eight weeks after the operation, the composite body was firmly fixed to the base of the bone. Therefore, it was proved that the fixation to the living tissue was achieved by the ossification of the living tissue to the hydrogel non-infiltration portions of the porous body located over and under the PVA hydrogel block, and the dynamic stability and affinity to the living body were made excellent for an extended period of time.

In the end, an experiment similar to experiment 3 was conducted by using porous bodies made of alumina measuring 5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in height and with 70% porosity. The results of the experiment were excellent just like those of the above-mentioned experiment results.

The artificial intervertebral disc of the second invention has characteristics similar to the dynamic characteristics: flexibility and shock absorbing characteristics of the living body. In addition, it offers firm connection and fixation to living bones. Its composite body has high connection strength applicable to actual use. Therefore, the disc can be used as an artificial intervertebral disc which is an important element of the spine. The disc can thus substitute for the excellent intervertebral disc of the living body, thereby greatly contributing to the welfare of human being.

The above descriptions are made of the first and second inventions directed to an artificial cartilage and artificial intervertebral discs. However, it could be understood from the above descriptions that the present prosthesis is also applicable to a prosthesis for replacement of damaged living bones.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4073999 *May 9, 1975Feb 14, 1978Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing CompanyPorous ceramic or metallic coatings and articles
US4220152 *Feb 22, 1979Sep 2, 1980Pfizer Inc.Delivery system
US4220153 *Feb 22, 1979Sep 2, 1980Pfizer Inc.Controlled release delivery system
US4634720 *Feb 19, 1985Jan 6, 1987The Dow Chemical CompanyProcess for the preparation of hard tissue prosthetics
US4661536 *Oct 2, 1986Apr 28, 1987The Dow Chemical CompanyProcess for the preparation of hard tissue prosthetics
US4664669 *Feb 28, 1984May 12, 1987Kuraray Co. Ltd.Composite hollow fiber-type separation membranes, processes for the preparation thereof and their use
US4693986 *Jan 21, 1987Sep 15, 1987Orthomatrix, Inc.Ceramic process and products
US4778471 *Nov 19, 1986Oct 18, 1988University Of DaytonZcap ceramics
US4813965 *Feb 29, 1988Mar 21, 1989Nuclear Metals, Inc.Brazed porous coating and improved method of joining metal with silver material
US4842604 *Jun 1, 1987Jun 27, 1989The Dow Chemical CompanyComposites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics
US4938778 *Sep 10, 1986Jul 3, 1990Kuraray Co., Ltd.Composite hollow fiber type separation membranes processes for the preparation thereof and their use
US4990163 *Feb 6, 1989Feb 5, 1991Trustees Of The University Of PennsylvaniaMethod of depositing calcium phosphate cermamics for bone tissue calcification enhancement
US5007930 *Aug 6, 1990Apr 16, 1991The Dow Chemical CompanyComposites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics
JP6470041A * Title not available
JP6476851A * Title not available
JPH02215461A * Title not available
JPH06316948A * Title not available
JPS5861744A * Title not available
JPS63300758A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5425773 *Apr 5, 1994Jun 20, 1995Danek Medical, Inc.Intervertebral disk arthroplasty device
US5514180 *Jan 14, 1994May 7, 1996Heggeness; Michael H.Prosthetic intervertebral devices
US5522898 *Sep 16, 1993Jun 4, 1996Howmedica Inc.Dehydration of hydrogels
US5549679 *Mar 1, 1995Aug 27, 1996Kuslich; Stephen D.Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment
US5562738 *Jan 12, 1995Oct 8, 1996Danek Medical, Inc.Intervertebral disk arthroplasty device
US5571189 *May 20, 1994Nov 5, 1996Kuslich; Stephen D.Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment
US5645596 *Jul 6, 1994Jul 8, 1997Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaCeramic vertebrae prosthesis
US5865845 *Mar 5, 1996Feb 2, 1999Thalgott; John S.Prosthetic intervertebral disc
US5961554 *Dec 31, 1996Oct 5, 1999Janson; Frank SIntervertebral spacer
US5976186 *Jun 25, 1996Nov 2, 1999Stryker Technologies CorporationHydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus
US6074420 *Jan 8, 1999Jun 13, 2000Board Of Trustees Of The University Of ArkansasFlexible exint retention fixation for external breast prosthesis
US6132465 *Jun 4, 1998Oct 17, 2000Raymedica, Inc.Tapered prosthetic spinal disc nucleus
US6132468 *Sep 10, 1998Oct 17, 2000Mansmann; Kevin A.Arthroscopic replacement of cartilage using flexible inflatable envelopes
US6146419 *Mar 3, 2000Nov 14, 2000Board Of Trustees Of The UniversityMethod for forming a hollow prosthesis
US6187048 *May 23, 1995Feb 13, 2001Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Intervertebral disc implant
US6200347 *Aug 3, 1999Mar 13, 2001LifenetComposite bone graft, method of making and using same
US6231605Mar 17, 1999May 15, 2001Restore TherapeuticsPoly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel
US6277149Jun 8, 1999Aug 21, 2001Osteotech, Inc.Ramp-shaped intervertebral implant
US6280475Sep 2, 1999Aug 28, 2001Stryker Technologies CorporationHydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus implantation method
US6283998May 13, 1999Sep 4, 2001Board Of Trustees Of The University Of ArkansasAlloplastic vertebral disk replacement
US6296664Jun 17, 1998Oct 2, 2001Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc
US6383221Aug 8, 2001May 7, 2002Osteotech, Inc.Method for forming an intervertebral implant
US6402785Jun 2, 2000Jun 11, 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Artificial disc implant
US6458158 *Oct 27, 2000Oct 1, 2002LifenetComposite bone graft, method of making and using same
US6458159 *Aug 15, 2000Oct 1, 2002John S. ThalgottDisc prosthesis
US6482233Jan 28, 1999Nov 19, 2002Synthes(U.S.A.)Prosthetic interbody spacer
US6520996Jun 5, 2000Feb 18, 2003Depuy Acromed, IncorporatedOrthopedic implant
US6527810Dec 21, 2000Mar 4, 2003Wright Medical Technology, Inc.Bone substitutes
US6530955May 18, 2001Mar 11, 2003Osteotech, Inc.Ramp-shaped intervertebral implant
US6547823Jun 8, 1999Apr 15, 2003Osteotech, Inc.Intervertebral implant
US6562045Aug 22, 2001May 13, 2003Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Machining apparatus
US6572654Oct 4, 2000Jun 3, 2003Albert N. SantilliIntervertebral spacer
US6575986Feb 26, 2001Jun 10, 2003Ethicon, Inc.Scaffold fixation device for use in articular cartilage repair
US6616698Mar 16, 2001Sep 9, 2003Osteotech, Inc.Bone graft and guided bone regeneration method
US6626950Jun 28, 2001Sep 30, 2003Ethicon, Inc.Composite scaffold with post anchor for the repair and regeneration of tissue
US6629997 *Mar 27, 2001Oct 7, 2003Kevin A. MansmannMeniscus-type implant with hydrogel surface reinforced by three-dimensional mesh
US6656224Aug 3, 2001Dec 2, 2003Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Artificial intervertebral disc
US6673075Dec 3, 2001Jan 6, 2004Albert N. SantilliPorous intervertebral spacer
US6706067Nov 5, 2001Mar 16, 2004Osteotech, Inc.Spinal intervertebral implant and method of making
US6743232Feb 26, 2001Jun 1, 2004David W. OverakerTissue scaffold anchor for cartilage repair
US6761738Sep 19, 2000Jul 13, 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Reinforced molded implant formed of cortical bone
US6802867Dec 20, 2002Oct 12, 2004Depuy Acromed, Inc.Orthopedic implant
US6881228Feb 28, 2002Apr 19, 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Artificial disc implant
US6902578 *Oct 27, 2000Jun 7, 2005LifenetComposite bone graft, method of making and using same
US6949105Aug 7, 2001Sep 27, 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Method and apparatus for stereotactic implantation
US6966929Oct 14, 2003Nov 22, 2005St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with a spacer
US6977095Nov 15, 1999Dec 20, 2005Wright Medical Technology Inc.Process for producing rigid reticulated articles
US6989034May 31, 2002Jan 24, 2006Ethicon, Inc.Attachment of absorbable tissue scaffolds to fixation devices
US7001431Feb 13, 2003Feb 21, 2006Disc Dynamics, Inc.Intervertebral disc prosthesis
US7025787Nov 25, 2002Apr 11, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Implantable joint prosthesis and associated instrumentation
US7066960 *Jun 28, 2002Jun 27, 2006Dickman Curtis AIntervertebral disk replacement
US7077865Feb 13, 2003Jul 18, 2006Disc Dynamics, Inc.Method of making an intervertebral disc prosthesis
US7083649Oct 14, 2003Aug 1, 2006St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with translating pivot point
US7128762Sep 26, 2003Oct 31, 2006Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Artificial intervertebral disc
US7147665Jul 22, 1999Dec 12, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Threaded cylindrical multidiscoid single or multiple array disc prosthesis
US7156877May 24, 2002Jan 2, 2007The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaBiodegradable/bioactive nucleus pulposus implant and method for treating degenerated intervertebral discs
US7179262Dec 4, 2003Feb 20, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Method and apparatus for stereotactic implantation
US7214245Oct 27, 2000May 8, 2007Drexel UniversityAssociating hydrogels for nucleus pulposus replacement in intervertebral discs
US7226480Sep 27, 2002Jun 5, 2007Depuy Spine, Inc.Disc prosthesis
US7226481May 16, 2003Jun 5, 2007Spineology, Inc.Expandable porous mesh bag device and methods of use for reduction, filling, fixation, and supporting of bone
US7250550Oct 22, 2004Jul 31, 2007Wright Medical Technology, Inc.Synthetic bone substitute material
US7255712Apr 15, 1997Aug 14, 2007Active Implants CorporationBone growth promoting implant
US7264634 *Sep 22, 2003Sep 4, 2007Arthrex, Inc.Method and instrumentation for osteochondral repair using preformed implants
US7273496Oct 14, 2003Sep 25, 2007St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer and method
US7320707Nov 5, 2004Jan 22, 2008St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Method of laterally inserting an artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer
US7361192Apr 22, 2005Apr 22, 2008Doty Keith LSpinal disc prosthesis and methods of use
US7384430Jun 30, 2004Jun 10, 2008Depuy Products, Inc.Low crystalline polymeric material for orthopaedic implants and an associated method
US7452379Aug 11, 2004Nov 18, 2008Kyphon SarlArtificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer and method
US7468075Nov 27, 2002Dec 23, 2008Conformis, Inc.Methods and compositions for articular repair
US7481839Nov 23, 2004Jan 27, 2009Kyphon SarlBioresorbable interspinous process implant for use with intervertebral disk remediation or replacement implants and procedures
US7481840Nov 2, 2004Jan 27, 2009Kyphon SarlMulti-piece artificial spinal disk replacement device with selectably positioning articulating element
US7497859Oct 14, 2003Mar 3, 2009Kyphon SarlTools for implanting an artificial vertebral disk
US7503935Nov 5, 2004Mar 17, 2009Kyphon SarlMethod of laterally inserting an artificial vertebral disk replacement with translating pivot point
US7510558Jul 14, 2003Mar 31, 2009Arthrosurface, Inc.System and method for joint resurface repair
US7520899Nov 5, 2004Apr 21, 2009Kyphon SarlLaterally insertable artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer
US7537664Nov 7, 2003May 26, 2009Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Laser-produced porous surface
US7544208May 2, 2005Jun 9, 2009Theken Spine, LlcAdjustable corpectomy apparatus
US7572295Dec 3, 2002Aug 11, 2009Active Implants CorporationCushion bearing implants for load bearing applications
US7575600Dec 3, 2004Aug 18, 2009Kyphon SarlArtificial vertebral disk replacement implant with translating articulation contact surface and method
US7601174Jun 20, 2003Oct 13, 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Wear-resistant endoprosthetic devices
US7604641Apr 18, 2006Oct 20, 2009Arthrosurface IncorporatedSystem and method for joint resurface repair
US7618460 *Jun 10, 2004Nov 17, 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Reinforced molded implant formed of cortical bone
US7618462Jan 20, 2004Nov 17, 2009Arthrosurface IncorporatedSystem and method for joint resurface repair
US7641691Aug 16, 2006Jan 5, 2010The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaBiodegradable/bioactive nucleus pulposus implant and method for treating degenerated intervertebral discs
US7641692Aug 8, 2001Jan 5, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implantable joint prosthesis
US7648521Mar 15, 2007Jan 19, 2010Zimmer Spine, Inc.System and method for minimally invasive spinal surgery
US7662185Aug 28, 2003Feb 16, 2010Osteotech, Inc.Intervertebral implants
US7670377Nov 5, 2004Mar 2, 2010Kyphon SarlLaterally insertable artifical vertebral disk replacement implant with curved spacer
US7678147 *Jul 9, 2007Mar 16, 2010Moximed, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems and implantation method
US7678151Feb 24, 2003Mar 16, 2010Ek Steven WSystem and method for joint resurface repair
US7682540May 8, 2008Mar 23, 2010Georgia Tech Research CorporationMethod of making hydrogel implants
US7691146Nov 5, 2004Apr 6, 2010Kyphon SarlMethod of laterally inserting an artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with curved spacer
US7713301Mar 29, 2006May 11, 2010Disc Dynamics, Inc.Intervertebral disc prosthesis
US7713305Feb 22, 2006May 11, 2010Arthrosurface, Inc.Articular surface implant
US7726002Oct 13, 2004Jun 1, 2010Osteotech, Inc.Processes for making spinal intervertebral implant, interconnections for such implant
US7740897Oct 6, 2005Jun 22, 2010Wright Medical Technology, Inc.Process for producing rigid reticulated articles
US7758653May 21, 2003Jul 20, 2010Active Implants CorporationImplants
US7766965Jun 30, 2006Aug 3, 2010Disc Dynamics, Inc.Method of making an intervertebral disc prosthesis
US7766972Jul 2, 2007Aug 3, 2010Wright Medical Technology, Inc.Synthetic, malleable bone graft substitute material
US7780708Jan 31, 2005Aug 24, 2010Osteotech, Inc.Implant retaining device
US7796791Nov 7, 2003Sep 14, 2010Conformis, Inc.Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment
US7799077Oct 7, 2003Sep 21, 2010Conformis, Inc.Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces
US7799080Sep 29, 2006Sep 21, 2010Doty Keith LSpinal disc prosthesis and methods of use
US7799087Aug 31, 2006Sep 21, 2010Zimmer GmbhImplant
US7803193Dec 3, 2004Sep 28, 2010Active Implants CorporationKnee prosthesis having a deformable articulation surface
US7828853Feb 22, 2006Nov 9, 2010Arthrosurface, Inc.Articular surface implant and delivery system
US7837732Nov 19, 2004Nov 23, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral body fusion cage with keels and implantation methods
US7857817Mar 31, 2009Dec 28, 2010Arthrosurface Inc.System and method for joint resurface repair
US7879103Apr 17, 2006Feb 1, 2011Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationVertebral disc repair
US7879275Dec 30, 2004Feb 1, 2011Depuy Products, Inc.Orthopaedic bearing and method for making the same
US7881768Apr 24, 2007Feb 1, 2011The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityAssessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment
US7883653Dec 30, 2004Feb 8, 2011Depuy Products, Inc.Method of making an implantable orthopaedic bearing
US7896883Mar 3, 2009Mar 1, 2011Arthrosurface, Inc.Bone resurfacing system and method
US7896885Nov 22, 2004Mar 1, 2011Arthrosurface Inc.Retrograde delivery of resurfacing devices
US7896921Dec 30, 2004Mar 1, 2011Depuy Products, Inc.Orthopaedic bearing and method for making the same
US7901408Aug 22, 2005Mar 8, 2011Arthrosurface, Inc.System and method for retrograde procedure
US7910124Feb 7, 2005Mar 22, 2011Georgia Tech Research CorporationLoad bearing biocompatible device
US7914545Jan 5, 2006Mar 29, 2011Arthrosurface, IncSystem and method for retrograde procedure
US7918876Mar 24, 2004Apr 5, 2011Theken Spine, LlcSpinal implant adjustment device
US7935133Feb 8, 2008May 3, 2011Mmsn Limited PartnershipInterlaminar hook
US7939108Dec 5, 2007May 10, 2011Osteotech, Inc.Method of making demineralized bone particles
US7951163Oct 23, 2006May 31, 2011Arthrosurface, Inc.Retrograde excision system and apparatus
US7959683Jul 23, 2007Jun 14, 2011Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationPacked demineralized cancellous tissue forms for disc nucleus augmentation, restoration, or replacement and methods of implantation
US7959941Jan 12, 2007Jun 14, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Bone graft comprising a demineralized bone matrix and a stabilizing agent
US7972380 *Sep 17, 2008Jul 5, 2011Linares Medical Devices, LlcArtificial joint support between first and second bones
US8002813Aug 26, 2009Aug 23, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Volume maintaining osteoinductive/osteoconductive compositions
US8002830Feb 7, 2005Aug 23, 2011Georgia Tech Research CorporationSurface directed cellular attachment
US8012206Sep 4, 2007Sep 6, 2011Arthrex, Inc.Preformed implants for osteochondral repair
US8012211Oct 8, 2008Sep 6, 2011Spineology, Inc.Semi-biological intervertebral disc replacement system
US8021424Jan 21, 2009Sep 20, 2011Aesculap AgIntervertebral implant
US8036729Jan 22, 2004Oct 11, 2011The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityAssessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment
US8066750Oct 6, 2006Nov 29, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, IncPort structures for non-rigid bone plates
US8077950Aug 10, 2010Dec 13, 2011Conformis, Inc.Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment
US8092542Nov 23, 2009Jan 10, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implantable joint prosthesis
US8097038Jul 18, 2008Jan 17, 2012Mmsn Limited PartnershipProsthetic vertebral assembly
US8112142Jun 27, 2007Feb 7, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityAssessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment
US8114156 *Mar 12, 2009Feb 14, 2012Edwin Burton HatchFlexibly compliant ceramic prosthetic meniscus for the replacement of damaged cartilage in orthopedic surgical repair or reconstruction of hip, knee, ankle, shoulder, elbow, wrist and other anatomical joints
US8142808May 8, 2008Mar 27, 2012Georgia Tech Research CorporationMethod of treating joints with hydrogel implants
US8142886Jul 24, 2008Mar 27, 2012Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Porous laser sintered articles
US8147559Oct 20, 2009Apr 3, 2012Arthrosurface IncorporatedSystem and method for joint resurface repair
US8147861Aug 15, 2006Apr 3, 2012Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Antimicrobial implant
US8177841Feb 6, 2008May 15, 2012Arthrosurface Inc.System and method for joint resurface repair
US8182532Sep 30, 2004May 22, 2012Lifenet HealthComposite bone graft, method of making and using same
US8187304Nov 10, 2008May 29, 2012Malek Michel HFacet fusion system
US8187326May 22, 2002May 29, 2012Advanced Technologies And Regenerative Medicine, Llc.Attachment of absorbable tissue scaffolds to fixation devices
US8197474Jul 19, 2011Jun 12, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Volume maintaining osteoinductive/osteoconductive compositions
US8226724Jun 18, 2009Jul 24, 2012Doty Keith LIntervertebral spinal disc prosthesis
US8234097Feb 24, 2010Jul 31, 2012Conformis, Inc.Automated systems for manufacturing patient-specific orthopedic implants and instrumentation
US8265730Jun 15, 2001Sep 11, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityAssessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage
US8268008Jul 19, 2006Sep 18, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Osteoimplants and methods for their manufacture
US8268099Apr 22, 2009Sep 18, 2012Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Laser-produced porous surface
US8268100Jul 26, 2010Sep 18, 2012Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Laser-produced porous surface
US8277505Jun 10, 2011Oct 2, 2012Doty Keith LDevices for providing up to six-degrees of motion having kinematically-linked components and methods of use
US8287598Dec 5, 2011Oct 16, 2012TrueMotion Spine, Inc.True spinal motion preserving, shock absorbing, intervertebral spinal disc prosthesis
US8306601Aug 13, 2011Nov 6, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityAssessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment
US8308807Nov 9, 2006Nov 13, 2012Zimmer, GmbhImplant with differential anchoring
US8318192Nov 18, 2008Nov 27, 2012Georgia Tech Research CorporationMethod of making load bearing hydrogel implants
US8333985Jan 27, 2005Dec 18, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Non-glycerol stabilized bone graft
US8334044Feb 6, 2008Dec 18, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityHydrogel-metal assembly
US8337507Dec 22, 2008Dec 25, 2012Conformis, Inc.Methods and compositions for articular repair
US8343218Dec 22, 2008Jan 1, 2013Conformis, Inc.Methods and compositions for articular repair
US8350186Dec 29, 2006Jan 8, 2013Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Laser-produced implants
US8361159Jun 28, 2005Jan 29, 2013Arthrosurface, Inc.System for articular surface replacement
US8369926Jan 31, 2011Feb 5, 2013The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityAssessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment
US8372157Feb 11, 2008Feb 12, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Joint revision implant
US8388624Feb 25, 2010Mar 5, 2013Arthrosurface IncorporatedTrochlear resurfacing system and method
US8394149Aug 18, 2010Mar 12, 2013Zimmer, GmbhMethod for implantation of a femoral implant
US8419740Sep 29, 2008Apr 16, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLC.Customized patient-specific bone cutting instrumentation
US8425523Sep 29, 2008Apr 23, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCCustomized patient-specific instrumentation for use in orthopaedic surgical procedures
US8425524Sep 29, 2008Apr 23, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCCustomized patient-specific multi-cutting blocks
US8470045May 5, 2009Jun 25, 2013K2M, Inc.Endplate for an intervertebral prosthesis and prosthesis incorporating the same
US8480754Feb 25, 2010Jul 9, 2013Conformis, Inc.Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools
US8486113Dec 30, 2010Jul 16, 2013Michel H. MalekSpinal stabilization systems
US8486436Mar 22, 2012Jul 16, 2013Georgia Tech Research CorporationArticular joint implant
US8491653Oct 4, 2010Jul 23, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral body fusion cage with keels and implantation methods
US8497023Aug 5, 2009Jul 30, 2013Biomimedica, Inc.Polyurethane-grafted hydrogels
US8523872Jan 16, 2007Sep 3, 2013Arthrosurface IncorporatedTibial resurfacing system
US8529962Jan 20, 2011Sep 10, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Method of making demineralized bone particles
US8540717Mar 16, 2010Sep 24, 2013Arthrosurface IncorporatedSystem and method for joint resurface repair
US8545569Jan 5, 2004Oct 1, 2013Conformis, Inc.Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices
US8545864Jul 5, 2007Oct 1, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Hemostatic bone graft
US8556902Mar 8, 2011Oct 15, 2013Arthrosurface IncorporatedSystem and method for retrograde procedure
US8556949Nov 13, 2008Oct 15, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCHybrid bone fixation element and methods of using the same
US8556981Sep 18, 2009Oct 15, 2013Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Laser-produced porous surface
US8556983Mar 9, 2011Oct 15, 2013Conformis, Inc.Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs and related tools
US8594395Sep 29, 2008Nov 26, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCSystem and method for fabricating a customized patient-specific surgical instrument
US8617214Jan 7, 2008Dec 31, 2013Mmsn Limited PartnershipSpinal tension band
US8617242Feb 14, 2008Dec 31, 2013Conformis, Inc.Implant device and method for manufacture
US8632601Apr 24, 2007Jan 21, 2014Zimmer, GmbhImplant
US8634617Dec 6, 2011Jan 21, 2014Conformis, Inc.Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment
US8636806 *Oct 4, 2010Jan 28, 2014Said G. OsmanBiologic diarthrodial joint
US8641721Jun 30, 2011Feb 4, 2014DePuy Synthes Products, LLCCustomized patient-specific orthopaedic pin guides
US8663230Mar 1, 2011Mar 4, 2014Arthrosurface IncorporatedRetrograde delivery of resurfacing devices
US8663326Dec 13, 2007Mar 4, 2014Said G. OsmanBiologic artificial bone
US8663672Sep 21, 2005Mar 4, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Osteoimplant and method of making same
US8668739Aug 5, 2011Mar 11, 2014Zimmer, Inc.Unitary orthopedic implant
US8672980Aug 24, 2010Mar 18, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implant retaining device
US8679190Mar 12, 2012Mar 25, 2014The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityHydrogel arthroplasty device
US8682052Mar 5, 2009Mar 25, 2014Conformis, Inc.Implants for altering wear patterns of articular surfaces
US8690945May 11, 2010Apr 8, 2014Conformis, Inc.Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices
US8709089May 3, 2010Apr 29, 2014Conformis, Inc.Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces
US8722075Oct 26, 2009May 13, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Compositions and methods for promoting bone formation
US8728387Dec 6, 2005May 20, 2014Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Laser-produced porous surface
US8735773Jun 10, 2011May 27, 2014Conformis, Inc.Implant device and method for manufacture
US8753689Sep 9, 2013Jun 17, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Method of making demineralized bone particles
US8768028May 11, 2010Jul 1, 2014Conformis, Inc.Methods and compositions for articular repair
US8771365Jun 23, 2010Jul 8, 2014Conformis, Inc.Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs, and related tools
US8814946Jul 17, 2009Aug 26, 2014Active Implants CorporationCushion bearing implants for load bearing applications
US8852284Feb 5, 2008Oct 7, 2014Zimmer, Inc.Hydrogel proximal interphalangeal implant
US8853294May 29, 2013Oct 7, 2014Biomimedica, Inc.Polyurethane-grafted hydrogels
US8864827May 14, 2012Oct 21, 2014Arthrosurface Inc.System and method for joint resurface repair
US8864831Jan 19, 2006Oct 21, 2014K2M, Inc.Fixation of elastomer to rigid structures
US8882847Nov 24, 2004Nov 11, 2014Conformis, Inc.Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices
US8883915Aug 26, 2011Nov 11, 2014Biomimedica, Inc.Hydrophobic and hydrophilic interpenetrating polymer networks derived from hydrophobic polymers and methods of preparing the same
US8894714May 19, 2011Nov 25, 2014Moximed, Inc.Unlinked implantable knee unloading device
US8895073Mar 21, 2011Nov 25, 2014Georgia Tech Research CorporationHydrogel implant with superficial pores
US8906107Nov 11, 2011Dec 9, 2014Conformis, Inc.Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs and related tools
US8926615Mar 29, 2011Jan 6, 2015Arthrosurface, Inc.System and method for retrograde procedure
US8926706Nov 11, 2011Jan 6, 2015Conformis, Inc.Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools
US8932363Nov 7, 2003Jan 13, 2015Conformis, Inc.Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment
US8945230May 12, 2010Feb 3, 2015Conformis, Inc.Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices
US8961614Nov 9, 2010Feb 24, 2015Arthrosurface, Inc.Articular surface implant and delivery system
US8965088Jan 17, 2014Feb 24, 2015Conformis, Inc.Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment
US8974539Nov 11, 2011Mar 10, 2015Conformis, Inc.Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools
US8979855Feb 23, 2011Mar 17, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Customized patient-specific bone cutting blocks
US8979935Jul 25, 2008Mar 17, 2015Zimmer, Inc.Joint space interpositional prosthetic device with internal bearing surfaces
US8992703Sep 6, 2012Mar 31, 2015Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Laser-produced porous surface
US8999000Dec 3, 2010Apr 7, 2015Zimmer Technology, Inc.Orthopedic implant with bone interface anchoring
US9020788Feb 15, 2012Apr 28, 2015Conformis, Inc.Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools
US20020173855 *Feb 8, 2002Nov 21, 2002Mansmann Kevin A.Cartilage repair implant with soft bearing surface and flexible anchoring device
US20120203341 *Oct 4, 2010Aug 9, 2012Osman Said GBiologic Diarthrodial Joint
US20120271418 *Feb 28, 2012Oct 25, 2012Tissue Regeneration Systems, Inc.Modular tissue scaffolds
US20130184820 *Dec 21, 2012Jul 18, 2013Biopoly, LlcPartial joint resurfacing implant, instrumentation, and method
USRE42480Dec 14, 2001Jun 21, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Human spinal disc prothesis with hinges
USRE42576Feb 2, 2001Jul 26, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Human spinal disc prosthesis
USRE43282Aug 19, 2008Mar 27, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityAssessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment
CN100486543CDec 31, 2005May 13, 2009四川大学Compound artificial joint with artificial cartilage structure
CN100502808CMay 28, 2002Jun 24, 2009肯弗默斯股份有限公司Compositions for articular resurfacing
DE19933382A1 *Jul 21, 1999Feb 1, 2001Eska Implants Gmbh & CoFüllimplantat für Knorpel- und Knochendefekte in einem Gelenk
DE102006016986A1 *Apr 6, 2006Oct 18, 2007Aesculap Ag & Co. KgZwischenwirbelimplantat
EP1842510A1 *Mar 7, 2007Oct 10, 2007AESCULAP AG & Co. KGIntervertebral implant
EP2145604A1Dec 3, 2002Jan 20, 2010Active Implants CorporationCushion bearing implants for load bearing applications
WO1995026697A1 *Jun 10, 1994Oct 12, 1995Danek Medical IncIntervertebral disk arthroplasty device
WO1999062439A1 *Jun 4, 1999Dec 9, 1999Raymedica IncTapered prosthetic spinal disc nucleus
WO2000040177A1 *Dec 18, 1999Jul 13, 2000LifenetComposite bone graft, method of making and using same
WO2003065932A1 *Feb 8, 2003Aug 14, 2003Kevin A MansmannCartilage repair implant with soft bearing surface and flexible anchoring device
WO2003103543A1 *Mar 27, 2002Dec 18, 2003Mansmann Kevin AMeniscus implant having mesh reinforced hydrogel
WO2005032426A1 *Oct 4, 2004Apr 14, 2005Kevin A MansmannHydrogels having charged surfaces for cartilage replacement
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Oct 28, 2005FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Sep 28, 2001FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Jan 30, 1998FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Jan 30, 1998SULPSurcharge for late payment
Oct 29, 1996CCCertificate of correction
Jun 27, 1991ASAssignment
Owner name: KABUSHIKI KAISHA BIOMATERIAL UNIVERSE, A CORP. OF
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:OKA, MASANORI;GEN, SHOKYU;IKADA, YOSHITO;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:005751/0353
Effective date: 19910531
Owner name: KYOCERA CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE., JAPAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:OKA, MASANORI;GEN, SHOKYU;IKADA, YOSHITO;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:005751/0353
Effective date: 19910531