Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS5418814 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 08/257,094
Publication dateMay 23, 1995
Filing dateJun 7, 1994
Priority dateJul 1, 1993
Fee statusLapsed
Also published asDE4420421A1, DE4420421C2
Publication number08257094, 257094, US 5418814 A, US 5418814A, US-A-5418814, US5418814 A, US5418814A
InventorsAnthony P. Hulbert
Original AssigneeRoke Manor Research Limited
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Threshold cancellation means for use in digital mobile radio networks
US 5418814 A
Abstract
In a direct sequence spread spectrum code division multiple access receiver using interference cancellation, the signal for cancellation is derived by demodulating the unwanted signals and re-modulating a carrier to create a near replica for subtraction from a delayed version of the total received signal. Errors in the demodulation process degrade the cancellation. The present invention provides an optimal way of using the reliability information in the demodulator decision variable either to turn the cancellor off for unreliable bit decisions or to partially disable the cancellor according to the bit reliabilities.
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(4)
I claim:
1. A cancellation apparatus, comprising:
means for receiving and modifying an output signal indicative of an absolute value from a Rake combiner;
means for receiving and scaling a pilot signal;
first multiplying means for generating a signal, said signal being a product of the scaled pilot signal and the modified output signal from said receiving and modifying means;
an average and hold device for receiving said signal generated by said first multiplying means and providing an output signal;
second multiplying means for combining said output signal provided by said average and hold device and a delayed signal of said output signal from said Rake combiner, said second multiplying means providing an output signal;
generator means for receiving said output signal from said second multiplying means and generating a signal indicative of a non-linearity function;
third multiplying means for combining said output signal from said average and hold device and said signal indicative of a non-linearity function to produce an output signal; and
interference spreading means for receiving said output signal from said third multiplying means, said output signal from said third multiplying means thereby controlling said interference spreading means.
2. A cancellation apparatus as claimed in claim 1, further comprising:
threshold means for performing said non-linearity function on an input signal, said threshold means providing an output signal equal to said input signal when the absolute value of said input signal exceeds a threshold and said output signal being zero for all other values of said input signal.
3. A cancellation apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said non-linearity function is the mathematical function tanh, wherein if the input to said non-linearity function is x, the output will be tanh x, where tanh x is the hyperbolic tangent of x.
4. A method for controlling a cancellation apparatus, comprising the steps of:
receiving an output signal indicative of an absolute value from a Rake combiner and modifying said output signal;
receiving and scaling a pilot signal;
generating a signal using a first multiplying means, said signal being a product of said scaled pilot signal and said modified output signal;
receiving said signal generated by said first multiplying means using an average and hold device;
combining a signal generated from said average and hold device with a delayed signal of said output signal from said Rake combiner using a second multiplying means;
receiving an output signal from said second multiplying means and generating a signal indicative of a non-linearity function with a generator means, said signal being applied to a third multiplying means together with a signal from said average and hold device to produce an output signal; and
providing interference spreading means for receiving said output signal from said third multiplying means, said interference spreading means being controlled by said output signal from said third multiplying means.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to threshold cancellation means for use in digital mobile radio networks of the type wherein a number of base stations communicate with a number of mobile radio units each being temporarily affiliated to a particular base station.

The present invention relates more specifically to interference cancellation in a direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) code division multiple access (CDMA) scheme. Any unwanted signals are demodulated and the recovered data along with the channel information is derived from a pilot signal and is used to create a near replica of the unwanted signal for cancellation.

2. Description of the Related Art

Cancellation can be very effective if the code phase, carrier phase and amplitude of the significant multipath components of the interfering signal are known, provided correct decisions are taken on the data modulating the unwanted signal. Whenever an incorrect decision is taken, tar from canceling the interference the circuit will increase it. For example, if the interference RMS voltage is A volts, then the optimum cancellation would be an equal and opposite, reconstructed signal, also of A volts. However, when an error is made, the output of the cancellation means will not be zero but 2A volts, i.e. providing four times the power which would have been received if cancellation had not been applied. In this situation it would have been better not to have attempted to cancel the interference.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide cancellation means which can be turned off whenever incorrect decisions become likely.

A further object of the present invention is to provide cancellation means which may be partially turned off whenever incorrect decisions become likely.

An embodiment of the present invention provides cancellation means including means for receiving and modifying an output signal indicative of an absolute value from a Rake combiner, means for receiving and scaling a pilot signal, first multiplying means for generating a signal that is a product of the scaled pilot signal and a modified output signal, an average and hold device for receiving the output signal generated by the first multiplying means, second multiplying means for combining a signal generated from the average and hold device with a delayed output signal, from the Rake combiner generator means for receiving said output signal from said second multiplying means and generating a signal indicative of a non-linearity function, third multiplying means for combining the output signal from the average and hold device and the signal indicative of a non-linearity function to product an output signal and interference spreading means for receiving the output signal from the third multiplying means, the output signal from the third multiplying means thereby controlling the interference spreading means.

Features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description with reference to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a cancellation means having optimum thresholding constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a cancellation means having optimum non-linearity constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention provides a threshold cancellation means for use in digital mobile radio networks. A detailed description thereof using exemplary values follows.

Consider a known short term signal rms voltage, A, with modulation for the kth symbol, mk which is either +1 (for a transmitted "1") or -1 (for a transmitted "0"). The signal is received in the presence of noise with variance, σ. The demodulator makes decisions dk which match mk when correct. Thus, the signal energy component at the output of the canceler (when active) for the kth symbol is given by:

Cout (active)k=A2 (mk -dk)2 

The probability distribution of the received voltage, R, is given by: ##EQU1##

For a given particular value r of R, it is desirable to know whether it is better to cancel or not. The problem is that it is not known whether a 1 or 0 was transmitted. The reliability of the decision will depend on the modulus of r. Therefore, ##EQU2## Using Baye's rule and solving for |r| gives: ##EQU3##

This implies a threshold which must adapt to the mean levels of noise and signal. A simpler solution is to weight the signal before applying to a fixed threshold, i.e.: ##EQU4##

This requires normalizing the signal. The noise power out of the Rake combiner is proportional to the pilot energy, i.e.: ##EQU5##

In the above equation, σc is the unweighted noise voltage out of any of the correlators. The multiplier is exactly the stun of the squares of the pilot signals as applied to the scaling circuit in FIG. 4 of Great Britain patent application number 9313078.9. Thus, normalization of the r by 1/σ2, requires division by this scaling signal, as already performed in FIG. 4 of the above-mentioned patent application. In FIG. 4, the scaling is performed on a decision corrected signal to obtain a mean signal level. Thus, the output of the average and hold circuit in FIG. 1 is proportional to ##EQU6## and is the correct scale for r.

Referring to FIG. 1, a block diagram is shown for the thresholding cancellation means of the present invention. The threshold and cancellation means has a hard limiting device 2 which receives at an input an output signal form a Rake combiner which requires cancellation. The hard limiting device 2 performs decisions on the interferer's data which are used to reconstruct the interferer for the purpose of subtraction, i.e. cancellation. The output from the Rake combiner is also connected to an input of a delay circuit 4 and to an input of a combiner circuit 6. A scaling device 8 receives a summed and squared pilot signal from the Rake combiner. As mentioned above, the input shown in FIG. 1 is a sum pilot signal squared, such as that disclosed in FIG. 4 of Great Britain patent application 9313078.9. The scaling device 8 also has an output connected to an input of a multiplying circuit 10. An output from the combiner circuit 6 is connected to a further input of the multiplying circuit 10. An output from the multiplying circuit 10 is connected to an input of an average and hold device 12, the output of which is connected to an input of two further multiplying circuits 14 and 16. An output from the delay circuit 4 is connected to a further input of the multiplying circuit 14 and an output thereof is connected to an input of a threshold circuit 18. An output from the threshold circuit 18 is connected to a further input of the multiplying circuit 16, which has an output connected to an input of a complex interferer A spreader 20. The spreader 20 is provided with two output lines which are connected to further circuitry as shown in FIG. 4 of the above-mentioned patent application.

The threshold circuit 18 performs a bi-directional thresholding, since the requirement is to subtract a fixed voltage (weighted in the following circuit) which has the same sign as the instantaneous signal whenever the modulus of the instantaneous signal exceeds a threshold. In this manner, the cancellation means is turned on or off. Any constant terms required in the multiplications are assumed to be hardwired into the scaling used.

For a signal to noise ratio of 0 dB, an improvement in cancellation of about 0.85 dB can be achieved in the present invention. Further improvements can be obtained if the cancellation means is turned partially on or off according to the reliability of the decisions.

This can be achieved by weighting the canceling signal according to the reliability of the decisions, i.e. according to r. Thus, the weighting term is a function of r, k(r). For a given value of r:

Cout.k =A2 {(mk -dk k(|r|))2 }

Now if a correct decision is made, mk =dk and Cout.k =A2 (1-k(|r|))2. If an incorrect decision is made mk ≠dk and Cout.k =A2 (1+k(|r|))2. Therefore:

Differentiating with respect to k(|r|) to obtain: ##EQU7##

Set to zero to find minimum: ##EQU8##

The normalization against ##EQU9## is as for the thresholding circuit. The decision dk may be taken into the tanh non-linearity by removing the modulus operator. The circuit for applying the optimum non-linearity is shown in FIG. 2.

The non-linearity obtained by FIG. 2 increases mean interference cancellation by about 1.35 dB at 0 dB signal to noise ratio.

With reference to FIG. 2, it would be seen that the circuit is substantially identical with that of FIG. 1 and therefore further description is deemed not to be necessary. However, the threshold circuit 18 is now arranged to perform a tanh non-linearity function which allows the cancellation means to be partially switched on and off.

Although the invention has been described with respect to preferred embodiments, it is not to be so limited as changes and modifications can be made therein which are within the full intended scope as defined by the appended claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4470138 *Nov 4, 1982Sep 4, 1984The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyNon-orthogonal mobile subscriber multiple access system
US5099493 *Aug 27, 1990Mar 24, 1992Zeger-Abrams IncorporatedMultiple signal receiver for direct sequence, code division multiple access, spread spectrum signals
US5105435 *Dec 21, 1990Apr 14, 1992Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for cancelling spread-spectrum noise
US5224122 *Jun 29, 1992Jun 29, 1993Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for canceling spread-spectrum noise
US5235612 *Jun 28, 1991Aug 10, 1993Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for cancelling spread-spectrum noise
US5325394 *Mar 3, 1993Jun 28, 1994Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for canceling spread-spectrum noise
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5553062 *Jul 26, 1994Sep 3, 1996Interdigital Communication CorporationSpread spectrum CDMA interference canceler system and method
US5719852 *May 29, 1996Feb 17, 1998Interdigital Technology CorporationSpread spectrum CDMA subtractive interference canceler system
US5742595 *Nov 16, 1995Apr 21, 1998Dsc Communications CorporationProcessing CDMA signals
US5787130 *Dec 10, 1996Jul 28, 1998Motorola Inc.Method and apparatus for canceling interference in a spread-spectrum communication system
US5818615 *May 26, 1995Oct 6, 1998Ois Optical Imaging Systems, Inc.Liquid crystal display with patterned retardation films
US5920555 *Apr 17, 1997Jul 6, 1999Roke Manor Research LimitedPilot assisted direct sequence spread spectrum synchronization apparatus
US6014373 *Sep 29, 1997Jan 11, 2000Interdigital Technology CorporationSpread spectrum CDMA subtractive interference canceler system
US6137788 *Jun 12, 1996Oct 24, 2000Ntt Mobile Communications Network, Inc.CDMA demodulating apparatus
US6169590Jun 24, 1997Jan 2, 2001Ois Optical Imaging Systems, Inc.Liquid crystal display with optical compensator
US6259688Mar 25, 1999Jul 10, 2001Interdigital Technology CorporationSpread spectrum CDMA subtractive interference canceler system
US6366570Apr 20, 1998Apr 2, 2002Alcatel Usa, Inc.Processing CDMA signals
US6404760Jul 19, 1999Jun 11, 2002Qualcomm IncorporatedCDMA multiple access interference cancellation using signal estimation
US6473451Jan 4, 2000Oct 29, 2002Fujitsu LimitedSignal to interference power ratio measuring apparatus and signal to interference power ratio measuring method as well as transmission power controlling method under CDMA communication system
US6574235 *Aug 12, 1999Jun 3, 2003Ericsson Inc.Methods of receiving co-channel signals by channel separation and successive cancellation and related receivers
US6714775Feb 24, 2000Mar 30, 2004Veridian Engineering, Inc.Interference canceller
US6868076May 9, 2001Mar 15, 2005Interdigital Technology CorporationMultichannel CDMA subtractive interference canceler
US6904109 *Oct 6, 1995Jun 7, 2005Nokia Telecommunications OyInterference cancellation method, and receiver
US7027423Mar 14, 2005Apr 11, 2006Interdigital Technology CorporationCDMA subtractive interference cancellation
US7161919Jun 6, 2002Jan 9, 2007Interdigital Technology CorporationMultichannel CDMA subtractive interference cancellation method employed by a base station
US7164668Jun 6, 2002Jan 16, 2007Interdigital Technology CorporationBase station multichannel CDMA subtractive interference canceller
US7167462Jun 6, 2002Jan 23, 2007Interdigital Technologies CorporationRemote unit multichannel CDMA subtractive interference canceller
US7167464Jun 6, 2002Jan 23, 2007Interdigital Technology CorporationMultichannel CDMA subtractive interference cancellation method employed by a remote unit
US7230938Jul 24, 2002Jun 12, 2007Interdigital Technology CorporationMethod employed by a base station for spread spectrum CDMA subtractive interference cancellation
US7242675Jul 24, 2002Jul 10, 2007Interdigital Technology CorporationRemote terminal spread spectrum CDMA subtractive interference canceller
US7751465Sep 23, 2005Jul 6, 2010Interdigital Technology CorporationCancellation of pilot and traffic signals
US8369385Jun 25, 2010Feb 5, 2013Interdigital Technology CorporationCancellation of pilot and traffic signals
US8494662 *Oct 27, 2009Jul 23, 2013Chi Mei Communication Systems, Inc.Controller and method for controlling actuator to drive plant
US8594157Jan 22, 2013Nov 26, 2013Interdigital Technology CorporationCancellation of pilot and traffic signals
US20100250002 *Oct 27, 2009Sep 30, 2010Chi Mei Communication Systems, Inc.Controller and method for preventing sending saturated control signals to an actuator
CN1094274C *Mar 4, 1998Nov 13, 2002富士通株式会社通信系统中信噪比测量装置和方法以及发射功率控制方法
CN100459475C *Dec 10, 2003Feb 4, 2009华为技术有限公司Interference cancellation method base on threshold of error probability in CDMA system
CN100550708C *Dec 10, 2003Oct 14, 2009华为技术有限公司Interference cancellation method base on soft decision in CDMA system
EP0863618A2 *Mar 4, 1998Sep 9, 1998Fujitsu LimitedMethod and apparatus for transmission power control by measuring the signal to interference ratio in a CMDA communication system
EP1443694A1 *Oct 9, 2002Aug 4, 2004Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.A method of double weighting parallel interference cancellation
WO1996003819A1 *Jul 5, 1995Feb 8, 1996Interdigital Tech CorpSpread spectrum interference canceler system and method
WO1996011534A2 *Oct 6, 1995Apr 18, 1996Ari HottinenInterference cancellation method, and receiver
WO2001006664A2 *Jul 18, 2000Jan 25, 2001Qualcomm IncCdma multiple access interference cancellation using signal estimation
WO2001015366A1 *Aug 22, 2000Mar 1, 2001Matsushita Electric Ind Co LtdMethod and apparatus for radio reception
Classifications
U.S. Classification370/342, 375/349, 375/346, 455/296, 455/502, 375/E01.029, 455/297, 380/34, 375/148, 455/501, 455/63.1
International ClassificationH04B1/707, H04B1/10, H04L1/00, H04B7/26
Cooperative ClassificationH04B1/7107
European ClassificationH04B1/7107
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jul 20, 1999FPExpired due to failure to pay maintenance fee
Effective date: 19990523
May 23, 1999LAPSLapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
Dec 15, 1998REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
Jun 7, 1994ASAssignment
Owner name: ROKE MANOR RESEARCH LIMITED, ENGLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HULBERT, ANTHONY PETER;REEL/FRAME:007035/0547
Effective date: 19940523