|Publication number||US5450394 A|
|Application number||US 08/208,325|
|Publication date||Sep 12, 1995|
|Filing date||Mar 10, 1994|
|Priority date||Mar 10, 1994|
|Publication number||08208325, 208325, US 5450394 A, US 5450394A, US-A-5450394, US5450394 A, US5450394A|
|Inventors||John G. Gruber, Asghar E. Methiwalla, Anil Chandan|
|Original Assignee||Northern Telecom Limited|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (12), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (146), Classifications (10), Legal Events (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
CDV=Td-most recent minimum Td.
CDV=Ts1-most recent minimum Ts1.
The present invention relates generally to monitoring performance of a telecommunication network. In particular, it is directed to monitoring of the cell delay between two nodes of a telecommunication network, e.g. ATM networks, frame relay networks etc., using measurement cells, test cells or OAM (Operations, Administration, and Maintenance) cells or, in the case of a frame relay network, test or OAM flames.
Telecommunication networks must be properly maintained to ensure that adequate network performance is achieved and that end-user services are supported. Maintenance functions include "performance management" (continuous in-service performance monitoring for proactive warning of performance degradation) and "fault management" (detection and location of network trouble and failure).
Delay monitoring is important in managing performance of ATM networks and the following parameters are used for such purposes because they affect important network management functions.
Cell Transfer Delay (CTD)
Relates to throughput and response time for high speed data services, and is used for:
provisioning congestion and protocol parameters such as window sizes and time-outs;
selecting low delay routes (e.g. to avoid satellite links); and
deploying echo cancellers.
Cell Delay Variation (CDV)
dimensioning AAL-1 buffers for smoothing CBR (continuous bit rate) traffic;
detecting excessive traffic; and
To support performance and fault management functions of VPC/VCC (virtual path connection/virtual channel connection) in ATM networks, OAM cells are defined to carry operation information such as error checks, node identifiers (IDs), fault descriptions, loopback indications, timestamps, etc. OAM cells are identified in the ATM cell header as separate from user cells.
Bellcore Technical Advisory TA-NWT-001248, Issue 1, October 1992, describes on pages 5-12 and 5-13 how Performance Management OAM cells (PM OAM cells), each containing a timestamp, can be used to obtain an estimate of excessive cell transfer delay occurrences at the broadband switching system that receives the timestamp information in the forward report within the forward monitoring cell. It further states that this count can only be made and stored at the connection/segment end point that receives the forward monitoring cell, because at present there is no field in the PM OAM cell that allows backward reporting of excessive cell transfer delay occurrences. Bellcore goes on to state:
If "the clocks of the BSSs are synchronized in absolute time, . . . the one-way delay can be measured directly with a Performance Management OAM cell. However while the frequencies of the BSSs' clocks will be almost perfectly matched in a BISDN network, the absolute time is not expected to be synchronized. In practice, absolute time differences of several seconds are possible.
Whether the clocks are synchronized or not, there is a lower bound on the delays observed at a receiving node. Delays longer than the minimum would be caused by queuing and processing delays. . . . the parameter of interest is how many delay measurements exceed the maximum allowed value, L+Vmax, where L is the lowest observed value (obtained through calibration). . . .
When the timestamp is being used, it is encoded in the PM OAM cell at the originating end. This time stamp will be accurate to within ±1.0 μsec. The terminating end point compares the time stamp to the time shown by its own clock. This comparison needs to be done as soon as OAM processing has begun on the received PM OAM cell, so that the delay measurement includes as little OAM cell processing time as possible. Variation of the delay experienced by the PM OAM cell will provide a good estimate of the delay variation experienced by the user-information cells.
. . One can estimate the lowest value, L, by a calibration procedure in which the delays of the first C PM cells [C may be e.g. 1000] are observed, and the lowest value is recorded. Note that L may be negative, because the clocks of the two nodes are not necessarily synchronized. The amount by which the observed delay measurements exceed L provides an unbiased estimate of the delay variation."
To summarize, Bellcore states that:
"To measure cell delay variation, the following actions have to be performed:
the originating mode must encode time stamps,
the receiving node must calibrate the first C PM cells to calculate L, and
the receiving node must count the number of PM cells with delays greater than L+Vmax."
Monitoring can be performed at different locations in a network and the following are examples:
a) Near-End monitoring which provides performance of a received signal from its origination to its termination. Bit Interleaved Parity (BIP) is used for ATM by forward monitoring OAM cells. The monitoring point is at the received signal termination.
b) Far-End monitoring provides performance of a transmitted signal from its origination to its termination. For ATM, performance at the far-end termination is sent back to the monitoring point in received signal overhead, e.g. backward reporting OAM cells. The monitoring point is at the received signal termination where the overhead is read.
c) Intermediate monitoring is at intermediate locations in a transparent mode such that near- and far-end performance indicators are read but not terminated. This provides performance of the received signal from its origination to the intermediate monitoring point (e.g. by calculating BIP in forward monitoring OAM cells), and performance of a transmitted signal from its origination to its termination (e.g. by reading backward reporting OAM cells at the intermediate monitoring point).
As seen in the above description, the technique described by Bellcore only provides near-end monitoring, and for one parameter only. The present invention provides near-end and/or far-end monitoring of a number of delay parameters of a telecommunication network such as an ATM or frame relay network.
The present invention can therefore support single-ended monitoring, that is to say, it can monitor performance in both directions from one end. The present invention can further support single-ended monitoring from each node so that both nodes can obtain results of their far-end as well as near-end monitoring.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method of monitoring performance of a telecommunication network such as an ATM or frame relay network.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of monitoring delay parameters of a telecommunication network such as an ATM or frame relay network.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method of near-end monitoring of delay parameters of a telecommunication network such as an ATM network using measurement cells.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a method of near-end and far-end monitoring of delay parameters of a telecommunication network such as an ATM network using measurement cells.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a method of near-end and far-end monitoring of delay parameters of a telecommunication network such as an ATM network using measurement cells to support single-ended monitoring.
It is still a further object of the present invention to provide a method of near-end and far-end monitoring of delay parameters of a telecommunication network such as an ATM network using measurement cells to support single-ended monitoring at both ends.
Briefly stated, the present invention is directed to a method of measuring delay parameters between nodes A and B in a telecommunication network, each node having a clock. The method comprises steps of node A sending to node B a measurement containing timestamp value T1 indicating the time the measurement cell is sent according to the clock at node A, and node B, in response to the measurement cell, sending to node A a reporting measurement cell containing timestamp value T3 and a delay difference value Td, wherein Td=T2-T1, and T2 and T3 are respectively the times the measurement cell is received at node B and the reporting measurement cell is sent from node B according to the clock at node B. The method further includes steps of node A receiving the reporting measurement cell at time T4, according to the clock at node A, and obtaining delay parameters using T1, T3, T4 and Td.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and for further objects and advantages thereof, reference may now be made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a basic concept of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the present invention according to another embodiment; and
FIG. 3 shows a PM OAM cell format.
FIG. 1 depicts schematically the basic concept of near-end and far-end performance monitoring of an ATM network at node A. Near-end and far-end monitoring can be performed independently, however, for convenience the figure shows both. According to one embodiment of the present invention, when monitoring of both near- and far-end is performed, single-ended monitoring is possible at node A. In the figure, the following designations are employed:
-T1 is the timestamp value indicating when a measurement cell is sent from A, according to A's clock;
-T2 is the time the measurement cell is received at B, according to B's clock;
T3 is the timestamp value indicating when a reporting measurement cell is sent from B, according to B's clock; and
T4 is the time the reporting measurement cell is received at A, according to A's clock.
It should be noted that the measurement cell and reporting measurement cell described above can be any specialized cells, they can be test cells, or PM OAM cells. OAM cells are defined in ATM standards and are used for in-service monitoring. The test cells, on the other hand, are used for out-of-service measurements. It is to be understood, therefore, that measurement cells, test cells and OAM cells are interchangeably used throughout this application. OAM cells will be described in more detail below with respect to a different embodiment of the present invention. In frame relay networks, on the other hand, test or OAM frames can be used.
Delays can be expressed as follows:
Td=T2-T1=transfer delay+variable delay+TOD error, at B, for A to B direction; and
Ts=T4-T3=transfer delay+variable delay+TOD error, at A, for B to A direction.
In the above equations, the TOD (Time of Day) error is a discrepancy between individual clocks at A and B and equal in value in each direction; it is considered constant during the period of delay test. The transfer delay is system specific and includes propagation and processing delays. Transfer delay is also considered constant in each direction during the period of delay test. The variable delays are not necessarily equal in each direction. A change in Td or Ts is called cell delay variation (CDV). It should be noted that in unidirectional monitoring (single-ended monitoring at one node), the test is initiated at node A when node A sends a forward monitoring cell or frame to node B and node B responds by sending to node A a backward reporting cell or frame. Full test results are available only at node A. In bidirectional monitoring (single-ended monitoring at both nodes), the test is also initiated at node A but node B not only responds to node A but sends its own forward monitoring cell or frame to node A, thus enabling node A to respond to node B. Full test results are available at both nodes A and B. In one embodiment, node B's backward reporting cell or frame doubles up as its own forward monitoring cell or frame. Referring to FIG. 1 again, the algorithmic process of the present invention is explained as follows:
Node A sends to node B a measurement cell with timestamp T1;
Node B receives the measurement cell and calculates T2-T1 to obtain the delay difference information Td in the direction from A to B
Node B sends to node A a reporting measurement cell containing timestamp T3 and delay difference information Td;
Node A receives the reporting measurement cell at T4.
Thus Node A has in its possession values T1, T3, T4 and Td and will be able to obtain various delay parameters using these values.
Delay difference Ts in the direction from B to A is
and therefore Round Trip Delay (RTD) can be determined as the sum of the delay differences
Equation (3) can be rearranged as below:
Equation (4) thus indicates that RTD is the total round trip delay (T4-T1) less (T3-T2) which includes the cell processing delay and other miscellaneous delays of equipment at node B. From RTD, the cell transfer delay (CTD) in one direction can be estimated as
Estimated CTD=RTD/2. (5)
If Time of Day (TOD) distribution among network nodes were accurate, or in other words, if the clocks at the nodes were perfectly synchronized in absolute time, the TOD error in Equations (1) and (2) would be zero. However, in practice, the TOD error can be of the order of a few seconds, so that direct monitoring of one-way transfer delay using timestamps in Equations (1) and (2) is impractical. However, it should be noted that even if the clocks at the nodes are not synchronized, Equations (3) and (4) are always true for RTD measurement because the TOD error in the direction from A to B in equation (1) will cancel out with the TOD error in another direction from B to A in equation (2). The TOD error is expected to be constant during the period of delay test and can therefore be eliminated by subtracting a fixed delay, such as the minimum of all Td=(T2-T1) samples, from each of the individual Td samples to obtain samples of delay variation. A similar subtraction can be performed in the opposite direction. These subtractions also eliminate the unknown minimum system transfer delay in each direction.
Therefore, Td and Ts in equations (1) and (2) can be replaced by:
Estimated CDV=Td-min.(T2-T1), at B, for A to B direction; (5)
Estimated CDV=Ts-min.(T4-T3), at A, for B to A direction. (6)
It should be noted that the cell processing time of node B requires a separate calculation of T3-T2 because node B does not send T2 to node A. In other words, node A has T1, T3, T4 and Td at its disposal. Furthermore, within reasonable limits, T3 and Td can be sent at an arbitrary time from B to A, thereby disguising the true processing time at node B.
Various other delay parameters can be obtained at node A.
Estimated Maximum Cell Transfer Delay (MCTD)
Estimated CTD=RTD/2=(T4-T1)-(T3-T2). Averaging samples of CTD provides the mean one-way delay, but for certain circumstances it is more useful to monitor the maximum CTD. Thus:
Estimated Max. CTD=Max. RTD/2=Max. [(T4-T1)-(T3-T2)]/2 (7)
This is a reasonable estimate of maximum CTD, since physical routing of ATM connections is the same in each direction, that is to say, propagation and nominal processing delays are similar in each direction, although CDV may differ. In equation (7) Max. RTD is the maximum value among RTD samples obtained by equation (3) or (4).
Cell Delay Variation (CDV)
CDV is with respect to a reference delay which is, for example, the first delay sample or calibrated minimum delay sample. However, the present invention uses the most recent minimum delay difference information as the reference for determining CDV because it is simpler in processing (no calibration needed) and operationally more useful due to the fact that all CDV values are now positive. Thus, for each direction, CDV is the delay difference in that direction less the most recent minimum delay difference in that direction. Therefore, in place of equations (5) and (6), CDV can be expressed as follows:
CDV from A to B=Td--most recent minimum Td (8)
CDV from B to A=Ts--most recent minimum Ts. (9)
Excessive Cell Delay Variation
Excessive CDV is an instance where CDV exceeds a maximum limit, with default limits to be determined. The limits should eventually be limited to a small number of values (2 or 3), but should be settable until the most appropriate values are determined. The expected maximum CDV range is of the order of 1 ms for CBR (constant bit rate) traffic but may be more for VBR (variable bit rate) traffic.
Advantages of this single ended monitoring approach of the present invention are:
neither a Time of Day (TOD) clock (i.e., hour, min., sec., etc.), nor TOD coordination among nodes is required. The TOD error among nodes cancels;
the processing time spent at a particular node can be disguised (within reasonable limits) by sending the far-end timestamp and delay difference at an arbitrary time; and
times T1, T2 and T3 don't need to be stored in the equipment at nodes while the delay measurement is underway. They are effectively stored in the test or OAM cells.
In another embodiment, FIG. 2 illustrates the bidirectional monitoring setup wherein the mirror image of FIG. 1 includes unidirectional monitoring in the opposite direction. Thus in FIG. 2, after unidirectional monitoring is initiated at node A, node B sends a measurement cell with timestamp T5 and node A sends a reporting measurement cell with timestamp T7 and value Ts which in this case is (T6-T5). Node B receives the reporting measurement cell at T8. From FIGS. 1 and 2, each node will have full test results at their disposal and can determine delay parameters such as estimated max. CTD and excessive CDV to each direction. Excessive CDV events counted during 15 min. intervals are accumulated directly over 1 day intervals. In yet another embodiment, the reporting measurement cell which node B sends to node A can also be used as the measurement cell in the opposite direction. In this case, T5 and T6 would be T3 and T4 respectively.
While a measurement cell containing a timestamp has thus far been described, different embodiments use test or PM OAM cells which have fields suitable for the purpose of delay monitoring.
The main performance management functions included in the OAM cell format are shown in FIG. 3.
Forward Monitoring Fields
OAM cell sequence number: (1 byte), detects lost/misinserted OAM cells, which affect the validity of performance monitoring results.
Total User-cell Count (TUC): in cells (2 bytes). The running total of user cell payloads over which error checking has been performed. This technique (as opposed to a simple cell block count), enables the number of lost user cells to be determined when OAM cells are lost.
Error Check Code: BIP-16 (2 bytes), for error detection on a block of user cell payloads.
Backward Reporting Fields
Lost or misinserted cell count: based on TUC (2 bytes). The number of received user cells over which the current error check should be performed, is the difference between the current and previous TUC. If the actual count of user cells is lower, cells have been lost; if higher, cells have been misinserted.
Block Error Result: based on BIP-16 error check (1 byte).
Delay Result: (4 bytes). Used to report delay difference information, e.g., Td=T2-T1 in FIG. 1.
Timestamp: (4 bytes), can be used to monitor cell delay variation which relates to congestion, and is useful as a trigger for engineering additional traffic capacity. This field is shared because it is used for both forward monitoring and backward reporting. Currently, there is no explicit backward reporting field specified for far-end delay variation. However, this field could be used for this purpose, and with the use of the delay result field could provide a far-end monitoring of cell delay variation in both directions.
Delay Accuracy Considerations
As seen in FIG. 3, four byte fields in test cells or PM OAM cells can each be coded as an integer number of clock periods with a range of from 0 to 232 -1 periods. Each period represents a 10 ns unit of time; e.g., a delay of 50 μs would appear as 50/0.01=5000 (10 ns) units. Delay is monitored to an accuracy of ±1 μs. Thus a clock frequency of 1 MHz or more can be used; e.g., each period of a 20 MHz clock represents 1/(20*0.01)=5 (10 ns) units. To achieve this accuracy, TOD coordination is not required since, as noted earlier, the TOD error between nodes cancels. However, clocks with sufficient short term stability are required as discussed below.
For CTD, the error in μs due to clock instability is CTDe=106 δ T, where δ is the relative short term clock stability, and in this case T=CTD is the time in sec. of the delay measurement. Assuming a worst case CTD of 1 sec., then to achieve an error CTDe within ±1 μs, δ must be within 10-6, or 1 PPM.
Similarly, for CDV, the error in μs is CDVe=106 δ T. In this case T is the maximum time between the current delay difference and the most recent minimum delay difference. CDV is monitored over 15 min. intervals. Assuming an unlikely worst case T of 15 min. (900 sec.), to achieve an error CDVe within ±1 μs, δ must be within about 10-9, or 0.001 PPM.
The parameters can be readily determined with stable clocks inherent in network elements (NEs) which, for SONET and switching equipment, are slaved to the synchronization network (δ within 10-11). This applies to clocks in public network NEs, as well as clocks in CPEs which would either be loop-timed to public networks, or slaved to private synchronization networks. It is expected that external test set clocks can either have sufficient short term stability, or can be timed externally from a stable synchronization network clock.
Delay Monitoring Implementation Considerations
Out-of-Service Approach: Test cells would be inserted and extracted at test ports. Test cells could be specialized cells with out-of-service test equipment. For delay monitoring, test cells would have a 4 byte timestamp field to carry T1 forward, and the same field could be used to carry T3 backward. In addition, there would be an additional 4 byte field to carry the delay difference Td=(T2-T1) backward. These fields would be similar in principle to the delay monitoring related fields in the PM OAM cell in FIG. 3.
In-Service Approach: This approach would use the PM OAM cell. At present, the optional 4 byte timestamp field in PM OAM cells is defined for monitoring cells (and for monitoring+reporting cells), and can be used to carry T1 forward. At present, this timestamp field is unused for reporting cells, but could be used to carry T3 backward. As in FIG. 3, an additional optional 4 byte "delay result" field could be defined to carry the delay difference Td=(T2-T1) backward.
Ignored or missing user cells have no bearing on the integrity of delay monitoring as long as a sufficiently large number of samples are reported to reliably determine CTD and CDV.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4247464 *||Oct 1, 1979||Jan 27, 1981||General Electric Company||Liquid extraction method for recovering aromatic bisimides|
|US4800560 *||Mar 13, 1987||Jan 24, 1989||Nec Corporation||Synchronization control capable of establishing synchronization without transmission of distance information between control and local earth stations|
|US4961188 *||Sep 7, 1989||Oct 2, 1990||Bell Communications Research, Inc.||Synchronous frequency encoding technique for clock timing recovery in a broadband network|
|US5130984 *||Dec 18, 1990||Jul 14, 1992||Bell Communications Research, Inc.||Large fault tolerant packet switch particularly suited for asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) communication|
|US5255291 *||Nov 14, 1988||Oct 19, 1993||Stratacom, Inc.||Microprocessor based packet isochronous clocking transmission system and method|
|US5260978 *||Oct 30, 1992||Nov 9, 1993||Bell Communications Research, Inc.||Synchronous residual time stamp for timing recovery in a broadband network|
|US5276677 *||Jun 26, 1992||Jan 4, 1994||Nec Usa, Inc.||Predictive congestion control of high-speed wide area networks|
|US5313454 *||Apr 1, 1992||May 17, 1994||Stratacom, Inc.||Congestion control for cell networks|
|US5381404 *||Jul 12, 1993||Jan 10, 1995||Mita Industrial Co., Ltd.||Packet-switching communication network and method of design|
|JPH04123549A *||Title not available|
|JPH04207435A *||Title not available|
|JPS63271645A *||Title not available|
|1||*||Bellcore Technical Advisory TA NWT 001248, Issue 1, Oct. 1992, Generic Requirements for Operations of Broadband Switching Systems , pp. 5 12 and 5 13.|
|2||Bellcore Technical Advisory TA-NWT-001248, Issue 1, Oct. 1992, "Generic Requirements for Operations of Broadband Switching Systems", pp. 5-12 and 5-13.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5521907 *||Apr 25, 1995||May 28, 1996||Visual Networks, Inc.||Method and apparatus for non-intrusive measurement of round trip delay in communications networks|
|US5566162 *||Dec 7, 1995||Oct 15, 1996||Northern Telecom Limited||Method of sectionalizing trouble on telecommunication network connections|
|US5612949 *||May 5, 1995||Mar 18, 1997||Hewlett-Packard Company||Method and apparatus for determining network delays|
|US5638379 *||Jun 6, 1995||Jun 10, 1997||Symmetricom, Inc.||Encoding system for distribution of synchronization|
|US5668801 *||Jul 21, 1995||Sep 16, 1997||Alcatel Str Ag||Method for evaluating a number of discriminated digital data units and for estimating the response time|
|US5692030 *||May 31, 1995||Nov 25, 1997||Mci Communications Corporation||Electronic interface for exchange of trouble administration information in telecommunications|
|US5717858 *||Oct 17, 1994||Feb 10, 1998||Motorola, Inc.||Method and structure for prioritizing performance monitoring cells in an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) system|
|US5719863 *||Jan 19, 1996||Feb 17, 1998||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method and arrangement for fast through-connect of virtual connections in ATM communications systems|
|US5740159 *||May 23, 1996||Apr 14, 1998||Northern Telecom Limited||Loopback mechanism for frame relay OAM|
|US5757778 *||Dec 6, 1996||May 26, 1998||Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute||Apparatus for testing protocols and traffics in broadband integrated services digital networks and the method thereof|
|US5764626 *||Nov 17, 1995||Jun 9, 1998||Telecommunications Techniques Corporation||Rate-matched cell identification and modification, replacement, or insertion for test and measurement of ATM network virtual connections|
|US5793976 *||Apr 1, 1996||Aug 11, 1998||Gte Laboratories Incorporated||Method and apparatus for performance monitoring in electronic communications networks|
|US5802082 *||Jul 25, 1996||Sep 1, 1998||Deutsche Telekom Ag||Method and device for measuring cell propagation time in ATM networks|
|US5812528 *||Nov 17, 1995||Sep 22, 1998||Telecommunications Techniques Corporation||Measuring round trip time in ATM network virtual connections|
|US5828670 *||Jun 6, 1995||Oct 27, 1998||Symmetricom, Inc.||Distribution of synchronization in a synchronous optical environment|
|US5867564 *||Feb 27, 1996||Feb 2, 1999||Lucent Technologies||Time-of-day clock synchronization in commincations networks|
|US5878032 *||Nov 7, 1997||Mar 2, 1999||Northern Telecom Limited||Delay monitoring of telecommunication networks|
|US5896388 *||Jun 10, 1997||Apr 20, 1999||Ncr Corporation||Method and apparatus using GPS to reshape isochronous data at the receiving ends of an ATM network|
|US5974103 *||Jul 1, 1996||Oct 26, 1999||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Deterministic exchange of data between synchronised systems separated by a distance|
|US6023455 *||Sep 10, 1997||Feb 8, 2000||Nec Corporation||Loopback cell control system|
|US6049530 *||Jun 20, 1997||Apr 11, 2000||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson||Segment performance monitoring|
|US6052726 *||Jun 30, 1997||Apr 18, 2000||Mci Communications Corp.||Delay calculation for a frame relay network|
|US6055247 *||Jul 15, 1996||Apr 25, 2000||Sony Corporation||Data transmission method, data transmission apparatus and data transmission system|
|US6058102 *||Nov 6, 1998||May 2, 2000||Visual Networks Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for performing service level analysis of communications network performance metrics|
|US6069876 *||Feb 13, 1997||May 30, 2000||Nortel Networks Corporation||Performance monitoring of an ATM Network|
|US6118759 *||Apr 21, 1997||Sep 12, 2000||Fujitsu Limited||Network system and frame relay switch|
|US6147998 *||Dec 17, 1997||Nov 14, 2000||Visual Networks Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for performing in-service quality of service testing|
|US6201793 *||Mar 16, 1998||Mar 13, 2001||Lucent Technologies||Packet delay estimation in high speed packet switches|
|US6215772 *||Nov 26, 1997||Apr 10, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Dynamic parameter estimation for efficient transport of HPR data on IP|
|US6260070||Jun 30, 1998||Jul 10, 2001||Dhaval N. Shah||System and method for determining a preferred mirrored service in a network by evaluating a border gateway protocol|
|US6269084 *||May 5, 1998||Jul 31, 2001||Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.||Time delay based solution of a telecommunication route|
|US6292832||Oct 20, 1998||Sep 18, 2001||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for determining a preferred service in a network|
|US6298381||Oct 20, 1998||Oct 2, 2001||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for information retrieval regarding services|
|US6381227||Jan 21, 1997||Apr 30, 2002||Gilat Florida Inc.||Frame relay protocol-based multiplex switching scheme for satellite mesh network|
|US6445681 *||Sep 15, 1999||Sep 3, 2002||Vocaltec Communications Ltd.||Method for measuring delay parameters in a network|
|US6446121 *||May 26, 1998||Sep 3, 2002||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for measuring round trip times in a network using a TCP packet|
|US6449290||Jun 12, 1998||Sep 10, 2002||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Methods and arrangements in a radio communications system|
|US6532274 *||Jan 11, 2000||Mar 11, 2003||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Synchronization method and arrangement|
|US6625130||Feb 8, 2002||Sep 23, 2003||Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd.||Frame relay protocol-based multiplex switching scheme for satellite mesh network|
|US6628636 *||Jun 28, 1999||Sep 30, 2003||Rockwell Collins||Method and apparatus for managing communication resources using neighbor segregation|
|US6643612||Jun 28, 2001||Nov 4, 2003||Atrica Ireland Limited||Mechanism and protocol for per connection based service level agreement measurement|
|US6658607 *||May 23, 2000||Dec 2, 2003||Eci Telecom Ltd.||Method for detecting troubles of transmission in SDH and SONET|
|US6683856 *||Oct 9, 1998||Jan 27, 2004||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Method and apparatus for measuring network performance and stress analysis|
|US6687752 *||Mar 1, 2000||Feb 3, 2004||Ezenial Inc.||Dynamic RTP/RTCP timestamp validation|
|US6711137||Mar 12, 1999||Mar 23, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for analyzing and tuning a communications network|
|US6724724||Jan 21, 1999||Apr 20, 2004||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for resolving an electronic address|
|US6742031||Oct 1, 1999||May 25, 2004||Mci Communications Corporation||Delay calculation for a frame relay network|
|US6747951 *||Sep 20, 1999||Jun 8, 2004||Nortel Networks Limited||Method and apparatus for providing efficient management of resources in a multi-protocol over ATM (MPOA)|
|US6769029 *||Aug 7, 2000||Jul 27, 2004||Nec Corporation||Method of measuring packet network transmission delay and machine-readable recording medium storing a program for implementing the method|
|US6771617||May 14, 2003||Aug 3, 2004||Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd.||Frame relay protocol-based multiplex switching scheme for satellite mesh network|
|US6778493||Feb 7, 2000||Aug 17, 2004||Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.||Real-time media content synchronization and transmission in packet network apparatus and method|
|US6781967||Aug 29, 2000||Aug 24, 2004||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Scheduling techniques for receiver directed broadcast applications|
|US6791994||Apr 19, 2000||Sep 14, 2004||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Method and apparatus for assigning receive slots in a dynamic assignment environment|
|US6795860||Apr 5, 1999||Sep 21, 2004||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for selecting a service with dynamically changing information|
|US6810022||Aug 29, 2000||Oct 26, 2004||Rockwell Collins||Full duplex communication slot assignment|
|US6810045 *||Feb 25, 1999||Oct 26, 2004||Thomson Licensing S.A.||Method and device for processing data packets which have been received or are to be transmitted on a data channel|
|US6819685 *||Nov 19, 1999||Nov 16, 2004||Alcatel||Method of and system for controlling a frequency via an asynchronous transmission network and mobile telephone network including the system|
|US6868094 *||Nov 4, 1999||Mar 15, 2005||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for measuring network data packet delay, jitter and loss|
|US6885641||Dec 1, 1999||Apr 26, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for monitoring performance, analyzing capacity and utilization, and planning capacity for networks and intelligent, network connected processes|
|US6885651||Aug 29, 2000||Apr 26, 2005||Rockwell Collins||Maintaining an adaptive broadcast channel using both transmitter directed and receiver directed broadcasts|
|US6901051||Nov 15, 1999||May 31, 2005||Fujitsu Limited||Server-based network performance metrics generation system and method|
|US6925062 *||Dec 18, 2000||Aug 2, 2005||Nec Corporation||ATM test equipment operable as source and responder for conducting multiple tests|
|US6996064||Dec 21, 2000||Feb 7, 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for determining network throughput speed and streaming utilization|
|US7003098 *||Dec 17, 2003||Feb 21, 2006||At&T Corp.||Method and system for measurement of the delay through a network link bounded by an echo canceller|
|US7023816||Dec 13, 2000||Apr 4, 2006||Safenet, Inc.||Method and system for time synchronization|
|US7031264 *||Jun 12, 2003||Apr 18, 2006||Avaya Technology Corp.||Distributed monitoring and analysis system for network traffic|
|US7092410 *||Jan 21, 2005||Aug 15, 2006||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for measuring network data packet delay, jitter and loss|
|US7116639||Dec 21, 2000||Oct 3, 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for determining network discrete utilization|
|US7123616||Jul 27, 2004||Oct 17, 2006||Ixia||Determining round-trip time delay|
|US7137937||Jul 26, 2004||Nov 21, 2006||Ellen Croft||Collapsible resistance exercise device|
|US7185100||Jun 15, 2001||Feb 27, 2007||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for determining a preferred mirrored service in a network by evaluating a border gateway protocol|
|US7200596||Sep 25, 2001||Apr 3, 2007||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for information retrieval regarding services|
|US7274714||Jan 15, 2001||Sep 25, 2007||Nokia Corporation||Emulating of information flow|
|US7310380||May 28, 2004||Dec 18, 2007||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Generic transmission parameter configuration|
|US7327686||Nov 12, 2003||Feb 5, 2008||Ixia||Generating processed traffic|
|US7360244||Dec 29, 2005||Apr 15, 2008||Graphon Corporation||Method for authenticating a user access request|
|US7362707 *||Jul 23, 2001||Apr 22, 2008||Acme Packet, Inc.||System and method for determining flow quality statistics for real-time transport protocol data flows|
|US7380273||Dec 29, 2005||May 27, 2008||Graphon Corporation||Method for authenticating a user access request|
|US7382799||May 18, 2004||Jun 3, 2008||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||On-demand broadcast protocol|
|US7385999||Oct 20, 2003||Jun 10, 2008||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Heuristics for combining inter-channel and intra-channel communications in a wireless communications environment|
|US7397810||Jun 14, 2004||Jul 8, 2008||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Artery nodes|
|US7403780||Feb 19, 2004||Jul 22, 2008||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Hybrid open/closed loop filtering for link quality estimation|
|US7424737||May 6, 2004||Sep 9, 2008||Graphon Corporation||Virtual host for protocol transforming traffic traversing between an IP-compliant source and non-IP compliant destination|
|US7457877||Mar 8, 2005||Nov 25, 2008||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for measuring round trip times in a network using a TCP packet|
|US7536546||Aug 28, 2001||May 19, 2009||Acme Packet, Inc.||System and method for providing encryption for rerouting of real time multi-media flows|
|US7561559 *||Mar 30, 2005||Jul 14, 2009||Ixia||Hardware time stamping and processor synchronization|
|US7606171||Jul 28, 2005||Oct 20, 2009||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Skeletal node rules for connected dominating set in ad-hoc networks|
|US7643414||Feb 10, 2004||Jan 5, 2010||Avaya Inc.||WAN keeper efficient bandwidth management|
|US7657643||Jan 23, 2007||Feb 2, 2010||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for determining a preferred mirrored service in a network by evaluating a border gateway protocol|
|US7668095||Dec 21, 2004||Feb 23, 2010||At&T Corp.||Traffic management for frame relay switched data service|
|US7668168||Dec 30, 2005||Feb 23, 2010||At&T Corp.||Frame relay switched data service|
|US7733794 *||May 16, 2006||Jun 8, 2010||Alcatel Lucent||Performance monitoring of frame transmission in data network OAM protocols|
|US7764679||Dec 27, 2006||Jul 27, 2010||Acme Packet, Inc.||System and method for determining flow quality statistics for real-time transport protocol data flows|
|US7792083||Jul 5, 2006||Sep 7, 2010||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for measuring network data packet delay, jitter and loss|
|US7817673||Mar 27, 2008||Oct 19, 2010||Zarlink Semiconductor Limited||Clock synchronisation over a packet network|
|US7826372||Mar 26, 2004||Nov 2, 2010||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Network routing process for regulating traffic through advantaged and disadvantaged nodes|
|US7826374 *||Dec 19, 2005||Nov 2, 2010||Trilliant Networks, Inc.||Method and apparatus for efficient transfer of data over a network|
|US7835290 *||Aug 14, 2006||Nov 16, 2010||Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute||Method for measuring end-to-end delay in asynchronous packet transfer network, and asynchronous packet transmitter and receiver|
|US7840664||Aug 29, 2003||Nov 23, 2010||Ixia||Automated characterization of network traffic|
|US7948906 *||Mar 15, 2004||May 24, 2011||Realnetworks, Inc.||System and method for determining network conditions|
|US8072906 *||Aug 11, 2003||Dec 6, 2011||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Signal propagation delay routing|
|US8155026 *||Sep 11, 2008||Apr 10, 2012||Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.||Method and system for identifying network paths|
|US8159957||Jun 19, 2009||Apr 17, 2012||Ixia||Hardware time stamping and synchronized data transmission|
|US8284795||Jun 9, 2005||Oct 9, 2012||Broadcom Corporation||Differential delay compensation and measurement in bonded systems|
|US8289871 *||Dec 25, 2007||Oct 16, 2012||Nihon University||Propagation delay time measuring system|
|US8369225||Sep 23, 2009||Feb 5, 2013||Ixia||Network testing providing for concurrent real-time ingress and egress viewing of network traffic data|
|US8406139 *||Nov 2, 2010||Mar 26, 2013||Trilliant Networks, Inc.||Method and apparatus for efficient transfer of data over a network|
|US8427958||Apr 30, 2010||Apr 23, 2013||Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.||Dynamic latency-based rerouting|
|US8559341||Nov 8, 2010||Oct 15, 2013||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for providing a loop free topology in a network environment|
|US8576388||Jan 17, 2012||Nov 5, 2013||International Business Machines Corporation||Optical differential delay tester|
|US8670326||Mar 31, 2011||Mar 11, 2014||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for probing multiple paths in a network environment|
|US8670329||Jan 28, 2013||Mar 11, 2014||Ixia||Network testing providing for concurrent real-time ingress and egress viewing of network traffic data|
|US8694626||Oct 28, 2010||Apr 8, 2014||Ixia||Automated characterization of network traffic|
|US8724517||Jun 2, 2011||May 13, 2014||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for managing network traffic disruption|
|US8774010||Nov 2, 2010||Jul 8, 2014||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for providing proactive fault monitoring in a network environment|
|US8830875||Jun 15, 2011||Sep 9, 2014||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for providing a loop free topology in a network environment|
|US8848563||Jun 12, 2012||Sep 30, 2014||Calix, Inc.||Systems and methods for measuring frame loss in multipoint networks|
|US8982733||Mar 4, 2011||Mar 17, 2015||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for managing topology changes in a network environment|
|US8989032||Jun 12, 2012||Mar 24, 2015||Calix, Inc.||Systems and methods for measuring frame loss in multipoint networks|
|US20010053130 *||Dec 18, 2000||Dec 20, 2001||Hironao Tanaka||ATM test equipment operable as source and responder for conducting multiple tests|
|US20020003776 *||Apr 30, 2001||Jan 10, 2002||Gokhale Dilip S.||Interworking unit for integrating terrestrial ATM switches with broadband satellite networks|
|US20020080726 *||Dec 21, 2000||Jun 27, 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for determining network throughput speed and streaming utilization|
|US20040228473 *||Dec 17, 2003||Nov 18, 2004||At& T Corporation||Method and system for measurement of the delay through a network link bounded by an echo canceller|
|US20040236866 *||Aug 29, 2003||Nov 25, 2004||Diego Dugatkin||Automated characterization of network traffic|
|US20040252646 *||Jun 12, 2003||Dec 16, 2004||Akshay Adhikari||Distributed monitoring and analysis system for network traffic|
|US20040258099 *||Mar 4, 2004||Dec 23, 2004||Scott Martin Raymond||Clock synchronisation over a packet network|
|US20050099959 *||Nov 12, 2003||May 12, 2005||Roger Standridge||Generating processed traffic|
|US20050276223 *||Jun 1, 2005||Dec 15, 2005||Alcatel||Bandwidth optimization in transport of Ethernet frames|
|US20050286424 *||Jun 9, 2005||Dec 29, 2005||Broadcom Corporation||Differential delay compensation and measurement in bonded systems|
|US20060007863 *||Aug 11, 2003||Jan 12, 2006||Siamak Naghian||Signal propagation delay routing|
|US20060013145 *||Aug 30, 2005||Jan 19, 2006||Samson Boodaghians||Loopback capability for Bi-directional multi-protocol label switching traffic engineered trunks|
|US20100195517 *||Dec 25, 2007||Aug 5, 2010||Nihon University||Propagation delay time measuring system|
|US20110058494 *||Nov 2, 2010||Mar 10, 2011||Trilliant Networks, Inc.||Method and apparatus for efficient transfer of data over a network|
|USRE41000 *||Sep 3, 2004||Nov 24, 2009||Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ)||Methods and arrangements in a radio communications system|
|CN100550786C||Jun 15, 2006||Oct 14, 2009||阿尔卡特公司||Performance monitoring of frame transmission in data network OAM protocols|
|CN100593301C||Aug 11, 2003||Mar 3, 2010||斯比德航海有限公司||Signal propagation delay routing|
|EP0804047A2 *||Feb 6, 1997||Oct 29, 1997||Deutsche Telekom AG||Method for measuring the switching delay in an ATM network|
|EP0915635A1 *||Nov 2, 1998||May 12, 1999||Northern Telecom Limited||Delay monitoring of telecommunication networks|
|EP1109360A1 *||Dec 15, 2000||Jun 20, 2001||Nec Corporation||ATM test equipment operable as source and responder for conducting multiple tests|
|EP1215559A2 *||Dec 5, 2001||Jun 19, 2002||Chrysalis- ITS Inc.||Method and system for time synchronization|
|EP1608112A1 *||Mar 9, 2005||Dec 21, 2005||Broadcom Corporation||Differential delay compensation and measurement in bonded systems|
|WO1996034476A1 *||Apr 17, 1996||Oct 31, 1996||Visual Networks Inc||Method and apparatus for non-intrusive measurement of round trip delay in communications networks|
|WO1997037310A1 *||Mar 27, 1997||Oct 9, 1997||Gte Laboratories Inc||Performance monitoring of an atm switch|
|WO2001020825A1 *||Sep 14, 2000||Mar 22, 2001||Vladimir Pogrebinsky||Method for measuring delay parameters in a network|
|WO2009082334A1 *||Nov 27, 2008||Jul 2, 2009||Ericsson Telefon Ab L M||Method and arrangement in a telecommunication system|
|WO2010118569A1 *||Apr 14, 2009||Oct 21, 2010||Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.||Ip network performance measurement method, apparatus and system|
|U.S. Classification||370/253, 375/354|
|International Classification||H04Q11/04, H04L12/56, H04J3/06|
|Cooperative Classification||H04Q11/0478, H04L2012/5649, H04L2012/5628, H04L2012/5652|
|Jun 9, 1994||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BELL-NORTHERN RESEARCH LTD., CANADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GRUBER, JOHN GERALD;METHIWALLA, ASGHAR EBRAHIM;CHANDAN, ANIL;REEL/FRAME:007017/0620;SIGNING DATES FROM 19940303 TO 19940304
Owner name: NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED, CANADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BELL-NORTHERN RESEARCH LTD.;REEL/FRAME:007017/0649
Effective date: 19940527
|Jan 7, 1999||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 23, 1999||AS||Assignment|
|Aug 30, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED,CANADA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:011195/0706
Effective date: 20000830
|Feb 24, 2003||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Mar 28, 2007||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Sep 12, 2007||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Oct 30, 2007||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20070912