Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS5476144 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 08/309,239
Publication dateDec 19, 1995
Filing dateSep 20, 1994
Priority dateOct 15, 1992
Fee statusPaid
Publication number08309239, 309239, US 5476144 A, US 5476144A, US-A-5476144, US5476144 A, US5476144A
InventorsJames J. W. Nahm, Reece E. Wyant
Original AssigneeShell Oil Company
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Conversion of oil-base mud to oil mud-cement
US 5476144 A
Abstract
A water-in-oil emulsion drilling fluid can be converted into an oil mud-cement slurry for use in oil well cementing procedures. Also, a universal fluid can be prepared using the water-in-oil emulsion drilling fluid by treating with an hydraulic material so that it will lay down a filter cake during drilling which can be triggered to set into a hard cement and bond to the formation after the above oil mud-cement slurry has been placed in the borehole at the conclusion of drilling.
Images(10)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(1)
What is claimed is:
1. A method for drilling a well comprising:
admixing oil and water with blast furnace slag to form a water-settable universal fluid; and
drilling a borehole with the universal fluid and laying down a settable filter cake on the walls of the borehole;
admixing oil and water with blast furnace slag to form a cement slurry and displacing the slurry into the well in contact with the filter cake; and
causing the filter cake and cement to set up.
Description

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/210,637 filed Mar. 18, 1994 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,382,290), which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/033,404 filed Mar. 19, 1993 (abandoned), which is a division of application Ser. No. 07/961,217 filed Oct. 15, 1992 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,213,160), which is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/691,904 filed Apr. 26, 1994 (abandoned).

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention pertains to improvements in compositions and methods for zonal isolation for vertical, deviated, and horizontal oil and gas wells. The method involves the utilization of oil-base universal fluid for providing settable filter cake while drilling and the subsequent in-situ solidification of the drilling mud or both the drilling mud and universal fluid filter cake to compressive strengths well in excess of that required for casing support, zonal isolation, and borehole stability.

2. Description of Prior Art

The general procedure of drilling an oil or gas well includes drilling a borehole using a drilling fluid (also termed drilling mud). Subsequent to drilling the borehole, casing is run into the well and a cement slurry is then placed in the annulus between the outside of the casing and the borehole wall. In order to obtain a good cementing job, it is necessary for the cement slurry to displace substantially all of the drilling mud from the annulus. A reduced displacement efficiency arises from the geometry of the system and also from the fact that drilling fluids and cements are usually incompatible.

Nondisplaced mud (mud still left in the borehole after cementing) and mud filter cake are major causes of unsatisfactory cement performance. Since the nondisplaced mud and mud filter cake do not set or bond to the casing, the borehole wall or the set cement itself, the mud and filter cake do not support the casing properly and later can allow annular gas or fluid migration.

Wells frequently are drilled with oil-base muds which contain water as the internal emulsified phase. These oil-base muds are used, for example, to lower drilling torque and drag, reduce damage to productive formations, increase wellbore stability or reduce differential pressure pipe sticking, etc. The presence of oil mud in the wellbore can even further reduce the displacement efficiency while cementing with a conventional water-base cement slurry.

The drilling industry has sought to overcome the above problems by using a variety of techniques to displace the drilling fluid with cement, e.g., turbulent flow, casing movement (reciprocation/rotation), casing equipment (centralizers, flow diverters, mud cake scratchers), and special spacers and wash fluids, but these have had limited success. Even greater cementing difficulties are encountered when the boreholes deviate greatly from vertical. Major problems arise in connection with casing placement, drilled solids settling, mud displacement, casing centralization, fluid separation (free water), and mechanical friction. When a good cementing job is not obtained, it may be necessary to perforate the casing and squeeze cement under high pressure through the perforations into the annulus and try to fill the zones that were not properly cemented initially. Frequently, this squeeze cementing is not successful, and such failures may eventually lead to abandoning the hole.

One of the major objectives of a primary cementing is to obtain good zonal isolation in the annulus of the well. Effective zonal isolation is achieved by sealing the cement and borehole wall. The interface of the cement and borehole wall is usually an interface between the cement and drilling fluid filter cake which is the source of many cementing problems. Good zonal isolation can be achieved if the filter cake hardens, permanently bonds to the formation face and the cement, and provides hydraulic sealing.

Accordingly, the present invention is directed to overcoming the above-noted problems in the art and to providing a solution as more particularly described hereinafter.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The primary purpose of the present invention is to provide compositions and methods for in-situ solidification of oil-base drilling muds and for forming oil-base universal fluid filter cakes which can be solidified.

Hereinafter, the term "cement" is used in reference to Portland cement or other available hydraulic materials. Most of the exemplification herein is based on using Portland cements. The type of oil in the oil-base mud is usually not critical to the cementing process in the present context. If necessary, a satisfactory oil mud cement slurry could be made from pure oil by adding sufficient amounts of cement, water, emulsifiers, fluid loss additives, suspending agents, accelerators, etc.

Drilling muds are used for the present in-situ conversion process for many reasons. The oil-base mud is already present at the well site in the large quantities necessary for cementing the well. All (or most) of the emulsifying, stabilizing, and fluid loss control materials, and a major portion of the mechanical shearing necessary to produce a good emulsion already have been incorporated into the mud to be converted to an oil mud cement slurry. It is much easier, less expensive, and less time consuming to make adjustments to a preexisting invert emulsion mud (oil-base mud) than to build one from scratch.

In addition, drilling mud left after the drilling of a well must be disposed. Oil-base muds are even more of an environmental problem than are water-base muds. If a large portion of the leftover drilling mud is used to cement the well, the total disposal expense can be substantially reduced.

A satisfactory oil mud cement slurry must have a sufficiently high ratio of total solids-to-oil so that the solids particles will be closely spaced, and growing cement hydrate crystals can link to each other and adjacent solids particles to give a strong, unified, cohesive structure without the separation of oil from the solid mass. The total solids (cement plus the solids already in the mud)-to-oil volume ratio can vary from about 1.4 to 2.2.

Sufficient water must be present in the slurry to allow for hydration of the dry cement particles. Extra water is normally added even to the slurries prepared from high water content oil-base muds. This is to provide hydration water for the total cement added to satisfy the desired solids-to-oil ratio. Thus, the present slurry design is a two-step process: first, enough cement, and second, enough water.

Drilling muds having a low oil-to-water ratio (high water) are preferred (but not necessary) according to the following reasoning. High water means lower oil content, so less cement is required to provide the correct solids-to-oil ratio. This lowered cement content then requires less additional water for hydration. If a stable high-water oil-base mud is used, additional emulsifiers probably will not be required. Low-water oil-base muds usually require additional emulsifiers and stabilizers to produce a good oil mud cement. Thus lower added volumes and costs are required for each barrel of the excess high-water drilling mud used. Also, more barrels of the drilling mud are used to produce the required fluid volume of oil mud cement and the ultimate disposal costs are reduced.

In conjunction with the method and composition for the solidification of an oil-base drilling mud, the present invention includes a composition and method for drilling with an oil base universal fluid and for providing a filter cake (formed as a permeable formation is drilled with an oil-base mud) which can be solidified to form a cementitious structure intimately bound to the formation itself.

Accordingly, the present invention provides a method for cementing a well comprising admixing an oil mud with (a) sufficient hydraulic material and water to form a slurry having a total solids-to-oil volume ratio of about 1.4 to 2.2 and a water-to-hydraulic material weight ratio of about 0.15 to 0.60, and (b) sufficient accelerator or retarder to cause the oil mud cement to harden and set up at a preselected time; and displacing the slurry to a preselected location in the well, and allowing the oil mud cement to harden and set up.

The present invention also provides a composition for cementing a well comprising an oil mud containing sufficient hydraulic material and water to form a slurry having (a) a total solids-to-oil volume ratio of about 1.4 to 2.2 and a water-to-hydraulic material weight ratio of about 0.15 to 0.60, and (b) sufficient accelerator or retarder to cause the oil mud-cement to harden and set up at a preselected time.

Other purposes, distinctions over the art, advantages and features of the invention will be apparent to one skilled in the art upon review of the following.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following preferred embodiments of the invention, together with the following examples, explain the principles of the invention.

In accordance with the present invention, it has been discovered that high water oil-base muds, with an alkali metal halide (preferably sodium chloride) internal phase, are particularly suitable for forming oil mud cements. Although calcium chloride brine muds usually are preferred in field drilling operations, it has been found that it is generally not satisfactory to use calcium chloride in the formation of an oil mud cement. Also, although not preferred, conventional invert oil muds,. e.g., having an oil-to-water volume ratio of 95:5 to 70:30, also can be used for in-situ mud conversion, although additional emulsifiers and stabilizers may be required. By the term "high water" it is intended to mean an oil-to-water volume ratio of approximately 30:70 to 70:30, with a ratio of about 50:50 being optimal. The high water oil-base muds must be formulated to have high emulsion stability with large amounts of water under high temperature drilling conditions. Such muds must tolerate the high water content and maintain reasonable rheological properties comparable to those of regular invert oil muds. A highly contamination-resistant mud is desired because a large quantity of cement and extra water are added to the mud system in order to convert the mud into a high-compression strength mud concrete. The addition of any necessary emulsifiers, stabilizers or wetting agents adds to the cost of the system.

One barrel of a representative 13.5 lb/gal mud suitable for use in the invention has a composition as follows: diesel oil, 0.42 barrels; lime, 2.4 pounds; "CARBO-TEC L" (primary emulsifier, tall oil fatty acids, by Milpark Drilling Fluids), 1 gallon (8.1 pounds); water, 0.42 barrels; sodium chloride, 49 pounds; "CARBO-MUL" (secondary emulsifier, tall oil polyamide, by Milpark), 1 gallon (7.7 pounds); "SURFCOTE" (wetting agent, amine dodecyl benzene sulfonate, by Milpark), 2.0 pounds; barite, 312 pounds. While the preceding mud formulation is with diesel oil, it is to be understood that other oils or hydrocarbons may be employed. The use of diesel oil-based muds is restricted in many parts of the world because of environmental concerns. Non-toxic, mineral or "clean" oil muds offer the benefits of an oil-base mud while maintaining a toxicity near that of water-base muds. Currently, non-toxic mineral oils such as Exxon's "ESCAID 110" (1.6 csf @40 C.), Conoco's "LVT 200", Vista's "ODC", and Shell's "SOL DMA" are available. These oils are considerably thinner than diesel oil (3.7 csf @40 C.), but can be used satisfactorily for making low toxicity oil-base muds.

As above mentioned, it is highly preferred to ,use a sodium chloride salt with the oil mud of the present invention. Calcium chloride brine muds are very difficult to use, giving many thickening, emulsion-breaking, and fluid separation problems even while mixing. The calcium chloride slurries become very thick during mixing and never attain a satisfactory set strength for use herein. Thus, although calcium chloride brine muds usually are preferred in field drilling operations, they are not desirable for making the oil mud cements. Other less preferred salts which may be suitable for use with the invention include potassium chloride, zinc chloride, sodium nitrate, and ammonium sulfate.

As also above mentioned, the present invention utilizes an oil base mud to which is added cement and extra water if desired for additional cement hydration. The dry cement particles are coated with the oil phase and the extra water is dispersed as the internal emulsified phase (adding to the emulsified water already present in the mud).

The water becomes available to the cement for hydration by an osmosis-like process across a semi-permeable membrane of oil and surfactants between the water droplets and the cement particles. An osmotic pressure causes water molecules to migrate across the semi-permeable membrane from the high vapor pressure (wet) water droplets to the low vapor pressure (dry) cement particles. Water molecules arriving at the cement combine with the "water thirsty" cement particles to form calcium silicate hydrate crystals. The calcium silicate hydrate crystals grow and extend through the surrounding oil phase, link together, and form a competent set cement structure. As long as the vapor pressure of the cement particles remains low, the osmosis of water occurring in the cement hydration reactions will continue. The majority of water present in the mud is consumed by the cement hydration reactions, and the emulsion droplets are used up as the oil mud cement sets. The water-internal emulsion does not break during setting. The oil remains evenly dispersed in the set mass, and no water or oil separates from the set oil mud cement. Any separated fluids would produce undesirable channels in the set oil mud cement.

The hydration reactions are accelerated by increased temperature, which increases the chemical potential (vapor pressure driving force), and by high mechanical shear during preparation and well operations. This mechanical energy helps to generate a large number of small water droplets which lie closer to the cement particles. The cement accelerators increase the rate of early strength development by decreasing the dormant or induction period in the hydration of portland cement.

While various waters may be used with the present invention, such as fresh water, brackish water, brine, seawater or other water-containing fluids, for ease of control it is preferred that fresh water added to allow full hydration of the cement be used. Waters other than fresh might have various materials (e.g., salts, lignins or tannins) present which could affect the cement hydration rates.

Not only is the type of water employed significant, but it is also considered important that the correct amount of water be utilized. A large amount of cement is added to the drilling mud to make a slurry that can attain the desired set strength. Water is necessary for the cement hydration which produces the set strength. If enough water is not already present in the stable oil-base mud, it must be added. A water-to-cement weight ratio of about 0.15 to 0.60 is preferred and optimally about 0.30 to 0.35. If a high-water oil-base mud is used, the mud has already been conditioned to withstand a high water content and it will probably remain stable when the cement and extra water (if necessary) is added without requiring treatment with expensive emulsifiers, stabilizers or wetting agents. Thus the oil-base mud with an oil-to-water volume ratio of 30:70 to 70:30 has been specified with a practical optimum of about 50:50. Water in excess of the amount needed to hydrate the cement will increase the viscosity (as water is the internal phase), reduce the slurry density, and remain unreacted in the set oil mud-cement mass, thus reducing compressive strength and increasing porosity and permeability. Theoretically, the water required for complete cement hydration is about 25% of the weight of cement. In normal practice oil well cementing, water-to-cement values of 35% to 45% by weight are used to provide sufficient fluidity and density control. Hereinafter, a water-to-cement value of 35% by weight usually has been used to be sure that complete cement hydration takes place.

Another significant variable of the present invention is the amount of solids in the oil mud-cement slurry. A solids-to-oil ratio by volume of 1.4 to 2.2, and optimally 1.80 is preferred. Any oil in excess of the amount needed to coat all of the added cement particles and to provide sufficient fluidity for mixing and pumping will remain as an inert diluent in the set oil mud cement mass, reducing the compressive strength and giving increased porosity and permeability. By using a constant volume ratio of the total solids (mud solids plus cement)-to-oil, a nearly comparable fluidity is attainable .using any oil mud. The amount of oil is fixed in a given base mud and no extra oil is required. A solids-to-oil volume ratio of 1.8 appears to be optimum. From this solids-to-oil volume ratio value, the amount of cement needed is determined. Then, based on a chosen water-to-cement ratio, the amount of supplemental water is calculated.

Another important variable in the present invention is the cement material which is employed. In accordance with the present invention it has been found that Portland cement is economical, is widely available as a finely ground powder, and usually is very suitable for use. Other hydraulic materials such as fly ash, natural pozzolan, trass, tuff, and blast furnace slag may be usable for these purposes. None of these latter agents, however, performs as well as Portland cement which is preferred. Among the Portland cements, Class C or A cement gives higher strength than does Class G or H, and accordingly, Class C or A is generally preferred.

It has been found that oil mud-cements set harder and more rapidly at 180 F. than at 150 F. Thus, to the extent that temperature is controllable, it is possible to control the setting rate of the oil mud-cement. Normally, the control of temperature in a well is not within the scope of the operator, at least to any significant degree.

Essentially, oil mud-cements preferably are prepared by adding a Portland cement to an oil-base mud. An emulsified internal water phase is necessary to allow hydration of the cement. Supplemental water may be emulsified in the system to provide more hydration. The cement disperses in the oil phase and remains out of contact with the water under normal conditions of mixing and storage. With time and/or higher temperatures, the water becomes available in the cement, and the cement hydration reaction proceeds, giving a solid set mass.

The slurry viscosity, the setting time, and the set strength of the slurries of the present invention can be adjusted using appropriate oil-wetting agents, emulsifiers, and accelerators, as well as controlling temperature. The mechanism by which the setting occurs is not fully understood, but with increased temperature, the rate of setting is greatly increased. Initially, the mud should be able to accept addition of the cement and extra water while maintaining stable properties, so that the resulting slurry can be mixed and pumped into a wellbore. With time at elevated temperatures, the water molecules apparently migrate through the oil phase to the cement particles by an osmosis-like process. The cement then slowly hydrates, and the calcium silica hydrate crystals grow through the oil phase to link and form a solid structure. The oil and any unreacted water remain evenly dispersed in the set cement. Too little water will not produce sufficient hydration to give strength, while too much water unnecessarily increases the porosity and permeability and reduces the strength. Any oil present in excess of that required to coat all of the solid materials and to provide sufficient fluidity remains in the solidified mass, increasing the porosity and permeability and reducing the ultimate strength. Properly prepared oil mud-cements have very low air permeabilities.

Another significant variable of the invention is the additives employed in the system. These various additions, used in effective amounts, can provide set acceleration, retardation, or viscosity control as well as additional emulsification or oil wetting properties if needed for the incorporation of the cement or extra water.

Set accelerators are desirable to provide sufficient set strength within a reasonable time. "POZZUTEC-20" (a proprietary commercial low temperature accelerator of mixed organic and inorganic salts made by Master Builders for the construction industry) is an effective accelerator. By itself, FAM (an acronym for a mixture of 45% by volume formic acid, 45% by volume acetic acid, and 10% by volume methanol) is not as effective as Pozzutec-20 but it seems to work very well in combination with the Pozzutec-20. Formic acid and acetic acid separately give some acceleration but appear to work more effectively in combination and with methanol. MSF (magnesium silicofluoride) and ZSF (zinc silicofluoride) appear to be about equivalent but not as effective as either FAM or Pozzutec-20. "SURFCOTE" (a Milpark oil wetting agent believed to contain dodecyl benzeneaminesulfonate) is the only agent found to have a thinning effect on the oil mud cement other than the thinning effect afforded by mere oil dilution. However, SurfCote is also a strong set retarder.

To help stabilize the high water content of the oil mud cements, inclusion of additional emulsifiers may be required. Milpark's primary emulsifier "CARBO-TEK L" (primarily a modified tall oil fatty acid), their secondary emulsifier "CARBO-MUL" (known as tall oil polyamide), and their "CARBO-DRILL" (composition undisclosed), an experimental emulsifier for high water content oil muds, have been useful for this purpose.

The above-mentioned emulsifying and stabilizing agents are used to give the oil mud-cement stability for whatever conditions are necessary. It is preferred, however, not to overtreat the oil mud-cement system since such agents are expensive and frequently are strong set retarders. Any over-retardation then requires additional accelerators to give a set within the desired time. For example, three similar oil-base muds (designated Na-1, Na-2, and Na-3) were mixed in the laboratory. Na-1 had moderate amounts of the emulsifiers and stabilizers; Na-2, excessive amounts; Na-3, minimal amounts. Oil mud-cement slurries of each, made by adding the same calculated ratios of cement-to-solids and water-to-cement, were then placed in a 180 F. oven to cure. Oil mud-cement prepared from Na-1 became hard in five days; oil mud-cement prepared from Na-2 did not become hard even by 36 days; and oil mud-cement prepared from Na-3 became hard by one day. The addition of 7.5 lb/bbl of Pozzutec-20 made both oil mud-cements made from Na-1 and Na-2 also become hard in one day.

EXAMPLES Laboratory Test Procedures

Screening tests were conducted in small glass vials. A base oil mud-cement slurry was made by adding cement, extra water, and any additives to the oil muds using normal lab mixers and Hamilton-Beach high-speed mixers. Equal portions (20 ml) of this base slurry were then measured into small glass vials (32 ml) for test series.

The samples were sealed in the vials and heat aged statically for hardening. The large majority of the samples were aged at either 150 F. or 180 F. The setting of the oil mud-cement (OMC) samples were monitored with time using a spatula "hardness" test in the vials. The hardness scale ranged from 0 to 10, with 0 being completely fluid and 10 being "rock hard." A hardness of 9 corresponds to a compressive strength of approximately 150 psi. Samples with hardness greater than 9 were retested using a Brinell tester to estimate equivalent compressive strengths measured in psi. All laboratory testing used Milpark's 13.5 lb/gal "CARBODRILL-HW" oil mud (oil-to-water ratio of 50:50) with a 25 percent sodium chloride brine as the internal phase. The water added to allow full hydration of the cement was fresh water rather than brine.

Table A shows the effects of changing the solids-to-oil ratio studied in the absence of accelerators using a base mud system, Na-2. The amount of Class A cement needed to give the same solids-to-oil ratio varies with mud composition. Higher solids-to-oil ratios seem to produce slightly higher compressive strength.

              TABLE A______________________________________Solidification of Various 14 lb/gal "CARBODRILL-HW"Muds Without Adding Any Accelerator: Effect of Maintaininga Constant Water-to-Cement Ratio and Varying TotalSolids-to-Oil Ratio (SOR) on Compressive Strength of SamplesCured Static at 180 F.                                    Compress-                                    ive               Class A                      Water Hardness                                    Strength Mud           Cement (lb/  w/Time  (psi)Slurry Type   SOR    (lb/bbl)                      bbl)  (in days)                                    (GHN)______________________________________OMC   Na-2   1.85   617.5  129.5 3.5(24),                                   ns358                              3.8(36)OMC   Na-2   2.0    688.0  157.5 3.7(9),                                   ns359                              3.7(28),                            4.4(36)______________________________________ Notes: SOR, cement and mud solidsto-oil ratio. 40% bwoc (by weight of cement) water (initial and added) used in all cases. *ns = not set

The samples prepared using the Na-2 mud were strongly retarded and did not set. The Na-2 mud contained both "SURFCOTE", a powerful oil wetting agent, and "CARBODRILL-HW", an experimental emulsifier of undisclosed chemical composition.

The two slurries (OMC 358 and 359) shown in Table A were used as base slurries to study the effectiveness of several accelerators. The setting of base slurries OMC 358 and 359 using the highly retarded Na-2 mud was accomplished only by adding 7.5 lb/bbl "POZZUTEC"20.

A series of tests screening candidate accelerators was conducted at 150 F. and 180 F. The hardness test results are listed in Table B. API Class A cement at 600 lb/bbl levels was added to specially formulated high-water oil emulsion muds, Na-2, along with several accelerators and setting agents. Accelerators are added to the OMC slurries to speed the reactions and to attain a higher set strength within a reasonable time. They were Pozzutec 20 (PT-20), magnesium silicofluoride (MSF), and zinc silicofluoride (ZSF). Pozzutec 20 is a low temperature accelerator from Master Builders used in the construction industry.

Table B shows that (1) a temperature increase from 150 F. to 180 F. increases the compressive strength, (2) a PT-20 ("POZZUTEC" 20) concentration of 7.5 lb/bbl seems to be about optimum, and (3) MSF and ZSF appear to be about equivalent, but "POZZUTEC" 20, at a concentration of 7.5 lb/gal appears to be superior to either of them.

              TABLE B______________________________________Effect of Temperature and Accelerator on CompressiveStrength of Set 14 lb/gal CarboDrill Na-2 Mud              Hardness/    Hardness/              Compressive  Compressive              Strength     Strength  Accelerator (BHN)        (BHN)Slurry (lb/bbl)    Aged at 150 F.                           Aged at 180 F.______________________________________Base   --           3.51/--     --OMC 1  MSF, 6       9.5/--      10/570OMC 2  MSF, 9       9.7/250      9.8/410OMC 2a ZSF, 9       9.9/440     10/280OMC 3  ZSF, 9       9.7/410      9.9/850OMC 4  PT-20, 5.5   9.9/480     10/840OMC 5  PT-20, 7.5  10/520       10/890OMC 6  PT-20, 10   10/560        9.8/710OMC 7  PT-20, 15   10/590        9.9/710______________________________________ Notes: Base oil mudcement contains 600 lb/bbl Class A cement and 94.5 lb/bbl supplemental water MSF, magnesium silicofluoride PT20 is Pozzutec 20 by Master Builders ZSF is zinc silicofluoride

Efforts were continued to improve the compressive strength by using combinations of additives. Table C shows that OMC 393 had a compressive strength of 1,300 psi. This was achieved by adding 7.5 lb/bbl Pozzutec 20 and 1.75 lb/bbl cyclohexanol in a Na-2 base mix which contains 600 lb/bbl Class A cement and 107 lb/bbl additional water. In this case, the cyclohexane doubled the strength of a comparable slurry, but in two other cases it slightly decreased the strength, and in the fourth case it completely prevented set. Although the role of cyclohexanol was not clear, it may have acted as a mutual solvent such that the cement hydration reactions were improved.

              TABLE C______________________________________Evaluation of Accelerators and Other Additives in Na-2 Mud:Hardness and Compressive Strength of Samples Cured Static at180 F., Base OMC Contains 600 lb/bbl Class A Cement and93 lb/bbl Water   Accelerator/              Compressive   Additive                  StrengthSlurry  (lb/bbl)      Hardness (days)                             (psi) (BHN)______________________________________OMC 248 None          3.0(64)     n.s.OMC 383 PT-20, 7.5    9.9(3)      690OMC 384 PT-20, 3.8    9.8(3)      750OMC 385 PT-20, 7.5    9.9(5)      760OMC 386 W, 13.3; PT-20, 7.5                 9.9(5)      730OMC 387 W, 26.6; PT-20, 7.5                 9.9(5)      550OMC 391 PT-20, 7.5; CH, 0.9                 9.9(4)      750OMC 392 PT-20, 7.5; CH, 1.8                 9.9(4)      640OMC 393 W, 13.3; PT-20, 7.5                 4.4(4), 9.8(11)                             1300   CH 1.75______________________________________ Notes: CH, cyclohexanol W, water n.s., did not set or no strength

As shown in Table D, the effects varying amounts of extra water had on hardness and compressive strength were investigated in the Na-2 mud. The extra water varied from 0 to 209 lb/bbl, while "POZZUTEC"20 concentration was kept constant. OMC 411 gave a compressive strength of 1,057 psi with 93 lb/bbl of extra water. This strength peak was at a W/C ratio of 35 percent, rather than at the 25 percent ratio, which theoretically can give complete hydration.

                                  TABLE D__________________________________________________________________________Solidification of Na-2 Mud: Effect of External WaterAt 180 F.; Base Mix = Na-2 + 600 lb/bbl Class A Cement                           BHN Added      Total          Additive/        Compressive Water      Water          Concentration                  Hardness/Curing                           StrengthSlurry (lb/bbl)*      (bwoc)          (lb/bbl)**                  Time (days)                           (psi)__________________________________________________________________________OMC 409  0   19.6%          PT-20, 13.9                   6.0(3), 8.5(4),                           852                   9.7(6)OMC 410  70  31.3%          PT-20, 13.9                   9.9(3)  925OMC 411  93  35.1%          PT-20, 13.9                  10(3)    1057OMC 412 140  43.0%          PT-20, 13.9                   9.9(3)  911OMC 413 209  54.4%          PT-20, 13.9                   9.9(3)  727__________________________________________________________________________ *Concentration based on mud. **Concentration based on base mix (mud + cement + water). BHN is Brinell hardness number.

Table E lists the test results of Na-4 and Na-5 (conventional low water oil mud) muds. The Na-5 mud is a 14.3 lb/gal Milpark "CARBODRILL-HW" with an oil-to-water ratio of 87:13. The Na-5 mud is not a "high water" mud. First of all, the base mix 449 did not set. OMC 451 made from the Na-5 mud set hard and both contained 7.5 lb/bbl Pozzutec 20. The effect of FAM on set acceleration is not as good as that of "POZZUTEC" 20.

                                  TABLE E__________________________________________________________________________Solidification of Na-5 Muds at 180 F.:Na-5 Mud - Milpark's 14.3 lb/gal "CARBODRILL-HW"(Oil-to-Water Ratio 87:13)                          BHN     Additive/            Compressive Base     Concentration              Hardness/Curing Time                          StrengthSlurry Mix (lb/bbl) (days)      (psi)__________________________________________________________________________OMC 449 449 --       3.7(8)      --OMC 451 449 PT-20, 7.5              5.2(1), 9.2(4)                          407OMC 453 449 FAM, 4   3.7(1), 9.6(4d), 9.7(8)                          --OMC 455 449 FAM, 6   5.8(1), 9.6(4), 9.7(8)                          278OMC 457 449 SC*, 1.9; PT, 7.5              7.0(4), 9.8(8)                          <237OMC 459 449 SC, 1.9; FAM, 4              9.7(4d)     <237__________________________________________________________________________ 49 = Na5 + 921 lb/bbl Class A cement + 335 lb/bbl water; solidsto-oil ratio = 1.8; waterto-cement = 40% *SC = "SURFCOTE

The base slurry OMC 449 contains 921 lb/bbl Class A cement and 335 lb/bbl water in order to maintain a solids-to-oil ratio of 1.8 and a water-to-cement ratio of 40 percent. This will result in a volume increase of 180 percent based on the original mud volume. It is quite clear that a considerable amount of cement is needed to absorb the large amount of oil present in the Na-5 (conventional) oil mud. Considerable amounts of extra water are also needed to provide sufficient water for the cement hydration.

The retarding effect of "SURFCOTE" was demonstrated in a series of experiments shown in Table F. Addition of "SURFCOTE" clearly reduces the slurry yield point (lb/100 ft2), but it retards the setting. The retardation by "SURFCOTE" can be reversed by adding an accelerator such as "POZZUTEC" 20. The OMCs treated with "SURFCOTE" did not set without adding "POZZUTEC" 20. Table F clearly shows that the more "SURFCOTE" added, the more "POZZUTEC" 20 is needed to offset the influence of its retardation.

              TABLE F______________________________________Effects of "POZZUTEC" 20 on Setting and CompressiveStrength of an OMC Containing Varying Amounts of SurfCote               Compressive Strength, psiSurfCote Rheology   Pozzutec 20, lb/bbl(lb/bbl) YP         0      7.5    13.1 18.75______________________________________2.0      330         ns*   1107   1115  9303.0      285        ns     ns      913  9775.0      250        ns     ns     ns   10083.0/2.0**    250        ns     ns     ns   1143______________________________________ *ns = not set **Added separately two different times
High Water Oil-Base Mud System

A 12-barrel batch of a 13.5 ppg Milpark's "CARBODRILL-HW" mud (designated as Na-7 mud) was prepared. This is a "high water" content oil mud with an oil-to-water ratio of 50:50. The formulation of this mud is as follows:

______________________________________Water            212        gallonsDiesel           212        gallonsNaCl             588        pounds"CARBO-TEC* L"   11.2       gallonsLime             30         pounds"CARBO-MUL"      19.5       gallonsBarite           3,800      pounds"SURFCOTE"       24         pounds______________________________________

The final mud properties and retort analysis on this mud were as follows:

______________________________________Plastic Viscosity, cp                56Yield Point, lb/100 ft2                3710 sec/10 min Gels, lb/100 ft2                13/15Electrical Stability, volt                216Oil Volume Fraction  0.39Water Volume Fraction                0.39Solids Volume Fraction                0.22______________________________________

Both the oil mud cement use and the universal fluid concept were tested in a large scale test unit which allowed mixing, pumping, filtration, and setting by using field equipment in a realistically sized simulated borehole at elevated temperatures. The filtration section of the test unit had a five-inch casing centralized (100% standoff) in a 61/2-inch borehole in a synthetic permeable core 15 feet long. Two tests, OMC-1 and OMC-2, were run using this test system.

A 12-barrel (504 gallons) batch of the above-listed mud was prepared and stabilized by stirring and pumping with high shear within the mixing unit. Portions of this mud were used for the two tests. The test slurries were batch-mixed, using this stabilized mud, with a high shear mixer (RCM cement mixing unit) just prior to their displacement into and circulation through the test model using a triplex pump.

In both tests an oil mud-cement slurry was made using a total solids-to-oil volume ratio of 1.8 and a total water-to-cement weight ratio of 0.31 (563 pounds of Class C cement and 49.3 pounds of added water per barrel of mud).

In Test OMC-1 this oil mud-cement slurry was circulated across the clean, permeable section of the model for five minutes and was then left static for five hours to filter at 100 psi pressure differential and 150 F. The filtration was then stopped and the temperature raised to 200 F. for curing.

In Test OMC-2 a universal fluid was prepared from the same base mud but with no additional water and only half of the previously used 563 pounds of cement per barrel of mud. This universal fluid was circulated across a clean permeable section of another test model and was left to filter for 18 hours at 150 psi and 150 F. Another portion of the base mud was then converted into the final oil mud-cement slurry by adding the same amounts of cement, water, and accelerators contained in the OMC-1 test. In field usage the universal fluid would have been the drilling mud and the addition of cement would have been only the differences of the components of the universal fluid and the final OMC slurry. This OMC slurry was used to displace the universal fluid from the model and to circulate across the universal fluid filter cake for several minutes. It was then left to filter at 150 psi and 150 F., forming an oil mud-cement cake on top of the universal filter cake. After the filtration it was left to cure at 250 F.

This part of the testing demonstrated that both the universal fluid and the oil mud cement slurries could be mixed, pumped, and set using field-type equipment without major operational problems.

Displacement Test Results

The traditional percent "displacement efficiency" is not applicable in these tests because no normal drilling mud filter cake was formed. Building and incorporating a settable universal fluid filter cake was the major goal for the OMC-2 test.

Slurry samples collected during the displacement tests were poured in 2-inch cube molds and small shear bond molds (1.5-inch diameter by 7 inches long) and cured in a water bath at 200 F. As shown in Table G, both OMC-1 and OMC-2 were demonstrated to gain adequate compressive strengths and excellent shear bonds.

              TABLE G______________________________________Compressive Strengths and Shear Bondson OMC-1 and OMC-2 Samples Aged at 200 F.  Average Compressive  Strength (psi)  Average Shear Bond (psi)Test   (crushed)       (shear bond mold)______________________________________OMC-1  895 (8 days)    Not measuredOMC-2  960 (7 days)    258 (7 days)______________________________________

A slurry sample collected during the OMC-2 test was run on an ultrasonic cement analyzer (UCA). Although the ultrasonic cement analyzer indicated a strength of 534 psi, its core recovered after the ultrasonic cement analyzer test was crushed, giving a compressive strength of 1108 psi.

Compressive strength data were obtained as checks of the effects of time and temperature on the oil mud-cement slurry and the heat aging samples. A one lab-barrel (350 ml) sample of the large test batch of the base mud was made into an oil mud-cement using the same composition as used in the displacement tests. Small vial samples of this oil mud-cement were then heat aged at 180 F., 200 F., and 210 F., leaving the main portion at room temperature. These three samples showed increased compressive strength with increased aging temperature (1104, 1304, and 1385 psi, respectively, all at 2.8 days curing time).

After three days the main sample was stirred with a Hamilton Beach mixer and another vial sample taken for heat aging. After 10 days another stirred sample was taken. After 11 days a non-stirred sample and a stirred sample (OMC 701) was taken. All of these samples set hard at 180 F. giving an average Brinell compressive strength of 1218 psi.

After 17 days, however, two stirred samples were taken, neither of which set even after 29 days at 180 F.

In some cases this time related non-setting phenomenon has been reversed by a strong mechanical shearing. In some other cases, the setting by the addition of more accelerator combined with the strong mechanical shearing has been required to initiate the test.

Zonal Isolation Tests

Each of the two test models with the solidified oil mud-cements supporting the 5-inch casing in the permeable 61/2-inch simulated borehole was cut horizontally (perpendicular to its 15-foot axis) 80 inches from the top. The lower sections (from the 80- to the 180-inch levels) were used for the hydraulic bond tests. The entire length of the model was used for the shear bond tests.

For the hydraulic bond tests, five sets of two holes each (on opposite sides of the model) were drilled at the 90-, 110-, 130-, 150-, and 180-inch levels of the bottom 100-inch-long section, each set of holes being perpendicular to the adjacent ones. One hole at each level, spiraling down around the model at 90 increments, was drilled through the 103/4-inch outside casing and almost through the permeable, synthetic formation lying just beneath. The second hole at each level was drilled through the outside casing, the permeable formation, the filter cake zone, and almost through the oil mud-cement layer (approaching but not reaching the internal casing).

Epoxy cement was then used to bond small pipe nipples, for use as pressure taps, all the way into the holes, sealing all the layers exposed by the drilling. After the epoxy had hardened, a hole was drilled down the axis of each of the first set of nipples, through the remaining part of the permeable layer, and just into the filter cake layer, thus exposing the formation-filter cake junction. A hole was also drilled down the axis of each of the second set of nipples, through the remaining part of the oil mud-cement layer, and just into the inner casing surface, thus exposing the oil mud-cement casing junction.

The "hydraulic bond" at each of the formation-cake junctions and the oil mud-cement casing junctions was successively measured by injecting water through the pressure tap at a rate of four ml per minute until a pressure breakdown was noted. The maximum pressure at each tap was recorded as the hydraulic bond.

Following the hydraulic bond tests, the entire model was cut into 10-inch lengths (except for the 60-80-inch level section which was left 20 inches long). The shear bond tests were then run on each section on a hydraulic press by pressing first on the 5-inch casing to measure the oil mud-cement to pipe bond and then on the set oil mud-cement area to measure the oil mud-cement to formation bond.

As shown in Table H, both oil mud-cement systems were demonstrated to provide good bonding in the displacement models. The data on hydraulic and shear bonds indicate that the oil mud-cements can provide excellent zonal isolation in a borehole.

              TABLE H______________________________________Average Hydraulic and Shear Bond Test Resultson OMC-1 and OMC-2 Cores  Hydraulic Bond (psi)                    Shear Bond (psi)Test No. Formation Casing    Formation                                Casing______________________________________OMC-1    180       569       45      66OMC-2    187       429       25      39Average  184       500       35      53______________________________________
Oil Base Universal Fluid

In the full-scale testing, the LC OMC (containing one-half the amount of the cement needed for OMC-2 and 8.4 lb/bbl "POZZUTEC" 20) was tested as an oil-base universal fluid. This fluid was circulated in the model and left pressurized static overnight to deposit a settable filter cake in the test model. This LC OMC fluid was displaced by circulating the full OMC-2 slurry in the model at the end of the static filtration period. The entire system was then left static and pressurized to cure at elevate temperatures.

The filter cake laid down by the LC OMC hardened well. As discussed previously, the set filter cake plays a critical role in providing zonal isolation was shown in Table H.

A 5-gallon sample of the oil-base universal fluid was taken from the test batch and used for monitoring long-term rheological stability. As shown in Table I, rheological properties, slurry density, and electrical stability of this slurry were very stable for nearly 50 days. It appears that this fluid would be sufficient for drilling operations, assuming normal mud engineering care.

                                  TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________Monitoring of Rheological Properties of the Oil-Base Universal Fluid             Slurry PropertiesFarm RPM Dial Reading             PV  YP Gels                        MW   ES600   300 200 100        6  3 (cp)                 (lb/100 ft2)                        (lb/gal)                             (volt)__________________________________________________________________________180   60 43  26 4  3 48  12 4   17.4 252114   65 47  27 4  3 49  16 4   17.4 249104   59 43  25 4  3 45  14 4   17.4 235116   60 43  25 4  3 56   4 3   17.4 --102   59 43  25 4  3 53  16 3   17.4 254105   60 44  25 4  3 54  15 3   17.4 278106   62 45  26 5  3 44  18 3   17.4 281107   62 45  26 5  3 45  17 3   17.4 283108   62 44  26 5  4 46  16 4   17.4 308117   68 50  29 5  4 49  19 4   17.4 287110   64 48  28 5  4 56  18 4   17.4 286120   69 52  30 5  4 51  17 4   17.4 297118   67 50  29 5  4 51  16 4   17.4 265123   71 58  32 5  4 52  16 4   17.4 275120   69 52  30 5  4 52  16 4   17.4 280121   70 52  30 5  4 51  19 4   17.4 268__________________________________________________________________________ Notes: MW = Slurry density ES = Electrical stability Rheology measured with 10x spring at 150 F.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2649160 *Mar 15, 1952Aug 18, 1953Atlantic Refining CoMethod of cementing casings in oil wells
US2705050 *May 25, 1953Mar 29, 1955Stanolind Oil & Gas CoSettable drilling fluid
US2776112 *Sep 30, 1954Jan 1, 1957Exxon Research Engineering CoMethod of drilling wells
US2776713 *Sep 30, 1954Jan 8, 1957Exxon Research Engineering CoCementing of wells
US2806530 *Nov 7, 1955Sep 17, 1957Exxon Research Engineering CoMethod for cementing wells
US2806531 *Dec 19, 1955Sep 17, 1957Exxon Research Engineering CoComposition for treating wells and method for using same
US2890169 *Mar 26, 1956Jun 9, 1959Jersey Prod Res CoDrilling fluid for wells
US2953525 *Feb 29, 1956Sep 20, 1960Shell Oil CoOil base drilling fluid
US3022824 *Sep 8, 1958Feb 27, 1962Jersey Prod Res CoMethod and composition for cementing wells
US3145774 *Jan 17, 1963Aug 25, 1964Socony Mobil Oil Co IncCement for wells
US3168139 *May 8, 1961Feb 2, 1965Great Lakes Carbon CorpConverting drilling muds to slurries suitable for cementing oil and gas wells
US3409093 *Apr 17, 1967Nov 5, 1968Halliburton CoMethod of drilling wells
US3499491 *Jun 28, 1968Mar 10, 1970Dresser IndMethod and composition for cementing oil well casing
US3605898 *Jul 29, 1968Sep 20, 1971Dow Chemical CoMethod of drilling and cementing a well using an aqueous hydraulic cement slurry
US4083407 *Feb 7, 1977Apr 11, 1978The Dow Chemical CompanySpacer composition and method of use
US4176720 *Jul 27, 1978Dec 4, 1979Atlantic Richfield CompanyWell cementing in permafrost
US4519452 *May 31, 1984May 28, 1985Exxon Production Research Co.Using heat deactivatable deflocculant
US4548270 *Oct 6, 1983Oct 22, 1985The Dow Chemical CompanyControlling gelation with water soluble phosphate
US4676832 *Oct 26, 1984Jun 30, 1987Halliburton CompanyHydratable gel forming materials, methylene phosphonic acids
US4883125 *Dec 11, 1987Nov 28, 1989Atlantic Richfield CompanyCementing oil and gas wells using converted drilling fluid
US4997487 *Mar 7, 1990Mar 5, 1991Halliburton CompanyPumpable slurry
US5005646 *Jul 12, 1990Apr 9, 1991Atlantic Richfield CompanyWell completion using formate ester
US5058679 *Mar 19, 1991Oct 22, 1991Shell Oil CompanySolidification of water based muds
CA747213A *Nov 29, 1966GrefcoConverting drilling muds to slurries suitable for cementing oil and gas wells
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5585333 *Oct 12, 1994Dec 17, 1996Halliburton CompanyHydrocarbon base cementitious drilling fluids and methods
US6361596Mar 24, 1999Mar 26, 2002Cementos Apasco S.A. De C.V.Process for converting well drill cuttings into raw materials for the production of cement, and cement compositions obtained therefrom
US6464009 *Jul 6, 2001Oct 15, 2002Baker Hughes IncorporatedOil well completion and oil recovery operations
US7204310Apr 11, 2006Apr 17, 2007Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Methods of use settable drilling fluids comprising cement kiln dust
US7284609Nov 10, 2005Oct 23, 2007Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Methods of using settable spotting compositions comprising cement kiln dust
US7337842Oct 24, 2005Mar 4, 2008Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Above ground or subterranean formation cementing using partially calcined kiln feed that is removed from a gas stream and collected in a dust collector during the manufacture of cement and soluble phosphate
US7338923Apr 11, 2006Mar 4, 2008Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Settable drilling fluids comprising cement kiln dust
US7353870Sep 9, 2005Apr 8, 2008Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.cementing with an additive comprising at least one material selected shale, zeolite, slag cement, metakaolin into a well bore or in a subterranean formation; vitrified shale provides compressive strengths; free of Portland cement to reduce cost, eliminate waste
US7354886Oct 13, 2004Apr 8, 2008Baker Hughes IncorporatedPumpable multiple phase compositions for controlled release applications downhole
US7381263Oct 24, 2005Jun 3, 2008Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Cement compositions comprising high alumina cement and cement kiln dust
US7387675Sep 9, 2005Jun 17, 2008Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Foamed settable compositions comprising cement kiln dust
US7395860Sep 9, 2005Jul 8, 2008Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Methods of using foamed settable compositions comprising cement kiln dust
US7445669Sep 9, 2005Nov 4, 2008Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Settable compositions comprising cement kiln dust and additive(s)
US7478675Feb 21, 2008Jan 20, 2009Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Extended settable compositions comprising cement kiln dust and associated methods
US7538074Apr 19, 2007May 26, 2009M-I L.L.C.A wellbore fluid comprising oil additives, solid colloidal particles coated with a dispersant, barite coated with acrylate polymer of stearyl methacrylate, butylacrylate and acrylic acid; suspension stability without increase viscosity; drilling
US7589049Sep 26, 2005Sep 15, 2009M-I L.L.C.Well bore fluid mixture of oil additive, solid colloidal particles coated with dispersant, barite coated with sterayl methacrylate, butyl acrylate; suspension stability; drilling fluids
US7607482Sep 11, 2008Oct 27, 2009Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.such as butadiene-styrene block copolymers; hydraulic cements; subterranean formations
US7607484Nov 3, 2008Oct 27, 2009Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.For subterranean formations
US7631692Apr 8, 2009Dec 15, 2009Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Settable compositions comprising a natural pozzolan and associated methods
US7674332Jan 7, 2009Mar 9, 2010Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Subterranean applications such as primary cementing, remedial cementing, and drilling operations, surface applications, for example, construction cementing
US7727939Dec 17, 2004Jun 1, 2010M-I L.L.C.Well bore fluid mixture of oil additive, solid colloidal particles coated with dispersant; barite coated with stearyl methacrylate, butyl acrylate; suspension stability; drilling fluids
US7743828Oct 27, 2009Jun 29, 2010Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Methods of cementing in subterranean formations using cement kiln cement kiln dust in compositions having reduced Portland cement content
US7745380Jan 15, 2009Jun 29, 2010M-I L.L.C.Additive for increasing the density of a fluid for casing annulus pressure control
US7789150Oct 30, 2009Sep 7, 2010Halliburton Energy Services Inc.cementing well; rapid strength development; terpolymer rubber of 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid and butadiene and styrene
US7896076 *Dec 27, 2007Mar 1, 2011Schlumberger Technology CorporationRheology modifier for cement slurries
US7927419Sep 11, 2009Apr 19, 2011Halliburton Energy Services Inc.Subterranean applications such as primary cementing, remedial cementing, and drilling operations, surface applications, for example, construction cementing
US7989398Apr 3, 2008Aug 2, 2011Baker Hughes IncorporatedVesicles for carrying through conduit, separated by surface active material bilayer composed of phospholipids, alkyl polyglycosides, gemini surfactants, sorbitan monooleate, and/or sorbitan trioleate
US8030253Aug 20, 2009Oct 4, 2011Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Foamed cement compositions comprising oil-swellable particles
US8122950Apr 8, 2009Feb 28, 2012Schlumberger Technology CorporationMicrowave-based downhole activation method for wellbore consolidation applications
US8261827Apr 16, 2012Sep 11, 2012Halliburton Energy Services Inc.Methods and compositions comprising kiln dust and metakaolin
US8281859Feb 17, 2012Oct 9, 2012Halliburton Energy Services Inc.Methods and compositions comprising cement kiln dust having an altered particle size
US8297357Jun 28, 2010Oct 30, 2012Halliburton Energy Services Inc.Acid-soluble cement compositions comprising cement kiln dust and/or a natural pozzolan and methods of use
US8307899Jun 23, 2010Nov 13, 2012Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Methods of plugging and abandoning a well using compositions comprising cement kiln dust and pumicite
US8318642Jun 27, 2012Nov 27, 2012Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Methods and compositions comprising kiln dust and metakaolin
US8324137Jul 27, 2010Dec 4, 2012Roddy Craig WLatex compositions comprising pozzolan and/or cement kiln dust and methods of use
US8327939May 24, 2012Dec 11, 2012Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Settable compositions comprising cement kiln dust and rice husk ash and methods of use
US8333240Nov 3, 2008Dec 18, 2012Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Reduced carbon footprint settable compositions for use in subterranean formations
US8349771Jun 14, 2010Jan 8, 2013Baker Hughes IncorporatedMethod for improving the clean-up of emulsified acid fluid systems
US8399387Sep 14, 2012Mar 19, 2013Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Settable compositions comprising cement kiln dust and rice husk ash and methods of use
US8403045Dec 21, 2010Mar 26, 2013Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Settable compositions comprising unexpanded perlite and methods of cementing in subterranean formations
US8434553Sep 7, 2012May 7, 2013Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Settable compositions comprising unexpanded perlite and methods of cementing in subterranean formations
US8440596Sep 7, 2012May 14, 2013Halliburton, Energy Services, Inc.Settable compositions comprising unexpanded perlite and methods of cementing in subterranean formations
US8486868Nov 5, 2012Jul 16, 2013Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Settable compositions comprising unexpanded perlite and methods of cementing in subterranean formations
EP1600489A2 *Jul 16, 1997Nov 30, 2005Compagnie Des Services Dowell SchlumbergerAn additive for increasing the density of a fluid comprising such additive
EP1626077A2 *Jul 16, 1997Feb 15, 2006Sofitech N.V.An additive for increasing the density of a fluid and fluid comprising such additive
EP2110508A1Apr 16, 2008Oct 21, 2009Schlumberger Holdings Limitedmicrowave-based downhole activation method for wellbore consolidation applications
Classifications
U.S. Classification166/293, 507/140, 166/300, 175/65
International ClassificationC04B28/02, C09K8/46, E21B33/13, C09K8/32, C04B18/04
Cooperative ClassificationC09K8/32, C09K8/46, E21B33/13, C04B18/049, C04B18/141, C04B28/02, C04B28/04
European ClassificationC04B18/14B, C04B28/04, C09K8/46, C09K8/32, C04B18/04Z10, C04B28/02, E21B33/13
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
May 30, 2007FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
May 28, 2003FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Jun 1, 1999FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4