|Publication number||US5485066 A|
|Application number||US 08/231,221|
|Publication date||Jan 16, 1996|
|Filing date||Apr 19, 1994|
|Priority date||Apr 15, 1994|
|Publication number||08231221, 231221, US 5485066 A, US 5485066A, US-A-5485066, US5485066 A, US5485066A|
|Original Assignee||Savannah Foods And Industries|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (23), Referenced by (6), Classifications (7), Legal Events (11)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 08/228,499, filed Apr. 15, 1994 in the name of the same inventor, now abandoned.
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in Patent and Trademark Office file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to motor control systems, and more specifically, to a motor control system for centrifugals used in sugar refining machines and the like which implement graduated motor speed control to provide superior processing performance.
2. Description of the Related Art
Centrifugals used in refining sugar and similar substances are required to separate particulate sugar crystals from the syrup fraction of the massecuite, magma, or mother liquor that serves as the raw material in the refining process. When they are used in this way, they generally are classified as affination centrifugals. Also, they are used to spin moisture from the crystallized sugar during the cleaning process. When used in this way, they are called white sugar centrifugals.
The type of centrifugal used in these applications generally is the filter or basket centrifugal. FIG. 1 shows a typical centrifugal of this type. The centrifugal has a drive motor assembly 2 composed of a main drive motor 4 and a discharge drive motor 6 which alternately drive a perforated basket 8 disposed in a housing or curb 10. The basket 8 is usually about four feet high and three feet in diameter and can hold about 830 lb of raw sugar.
When used to separate impurities from the sugar product, the massecuite is loaded into the basket 8 and the main drive motor 4 spins the basket 8 to cause impurities in the massecuite to separate from the sugar due to centrifugal force. The screen of the basket 8 has apertures sufficiently small to retain sugar crystals included in the mixture, but the impurities pass through the perforations in the basket 8 and are drained off at the bottom of the curb 10. The sugar crystals accumulate on the screen and are held there by centrifugal force.
After the mixture has been separated, the basket 8 is spun down through a combination of regenerative motor braking and brake 12, and some sugar crystals adhere to the screen. These must be removed by a plow device 14 such as a knife or scraper that transits the screen surface of the basket 8 at a slow rotational speed when driven in reverse by the discharge motor 6. Once the sugar crystals have been removed from the sides of the basket 8 by the plow 14, a bell valve 16 in the basket 8 is raised or lowered (in the design shown in FIG. 1, it is lowered) to permit the sugar product to pass therethrough and be collected for further processing.
One stage of the additional processing involves the drying of a sugar slurry. At this point, it is necessary to remove moisture from the slurry by centrifugal spinning. This process involves a similar use of the centrifugal in which the slurry is introduced into the centrifugal basket 8 and excess moisture is spun out using the main drive motor 4. Then, the plow 14 is used to plow out the cake of dried sugar crystals formed during the spinning process while the basket 8 is driven by the discharge motor 6.
Prior art systems have used two-speed induction motors for main drive motor 4 to implement the above-described operations. Idealized speed and torque curves for a centrifugal cycle using such a motor are shown by traces 21 and 22 in FIG. 2, respectively, and trace 23 in FIG. 3 shows an actual cycle graph for a two-speed induction drive or current source modulated (CSM) centrifugal drive. The primary figure of merit in these systems is the cycle time, which is the amount of time required for the centrifugal to fully complete one sequential cycle of loading 26, accelerating 28, spinning 30, decelerating 32 and plowing out 34.
In the CSM drive arrangement, the main drive motor 4 is accelerated in its low speed mode until it reaches a desired loading speed (as shown in the Figure, about 250 rpm). The basket 8 is loaded, and the motor 4 is accelerated in high speed mode to spin the massecuite at about 1200 rpm to remove its impurities. Then, the centrifugal is decelerated, reversed, and plowed out as described above.
Operation of the CSM type drive has proven to be problematic for reasons of, for example, poor speed regulation capabilities, loss of kinetic energy due to high-slip operation and the brake 12, high maintenance requirements, and inability to use such motors in hazardous environments.
To partially overcome some of the above problems, prior art systems also have utilized pulse width modulated (PWM) drives for main drive 6, where the speed of the motor 6 is controlled by pulse width modulation. Trace 24 in FIG. 4 shows a typical cycle for a PWM centrifugal.
While these centrifugal systems function adequately, they have several disadvantages. For example, the amount of sugar that can be produced by a batch-type centrifugal such as those described above is necessarily limited by its cycle time.
Since the centrifugal runs in essentially a continuous operation, a cycle time decrease of a few seconds can result in a substantial increase in the efficiency (and consequently, productivity) of the machine. For example, a ten second decrease in a 150 second cycle time can result in an increase of 700,000 pounds of sugar per day over several centrifugals.
Within the cycle time, the loading and spinning time are generally constant for any centrifugal. While the accelerating, decelerating and plowing out phases are variable, they are limited at the lower end by the physical integrity of the centrifugal drive mechanism and by the quality of the finished product.
While the cycle time of prior art centrifugals has generally been viewed as being limited in part by their braking and plow-out times, the inventor has discovered that by implementing variable, non-linear curves for the deceleration and plow-out phases of the cycle, the cycle time itself can be significantly reduced. Further, the inventor has discovered that this technique provides a significant reduction in power consumption from both the faster cycle time and as a result of the synergistic advantages provided by this technique.
Therefore, it is an object of this invention to provide a drive control system for a centrifugal that has a reduced cycle time as compared to conventional drive systems.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a centrifugal system that has the ability to optimize the deceleration of the system based on a given drive motor's characteristics.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a drive control system for a centrifugal that implements a dynamic braking function that tracks the dynamic braking curve of its drive motor.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a drive control system for a centrifugal that transitions from spin to plow-out in a minimum amount of time.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a drive control system for a centrifugal that plows out finished product in a minimum amount of time.
It also is an object of the present invention to provide a centrifugal that consumes less power than do conventional systems.
The above objects are achieved by providing a drive control system for a centrifugal that optimizes the deceleration and plow-out phases of its operation based on the torque characteristics of its particular drive motor. This is achieved by providing a centrifugal having a PWM frequency-modulated drive controlled by a programmable logic controller (PLC) running a ladder logic program. The ladder logic program implements a regenerative braking loop which complements the dynamic braking characteristic curve of the drive motor, thereby obtaining an optimal amount of braking torque for the motor over a wide range of motor rpms. Preferably, the system also implements a dynamic plow-out control for the motor when in plow-out mode to enable the centrifugal to be plowed-out in a minimal amount of time.
These and other objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the presently preferred exemplary embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, of which:
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a conventional affination or white sugar centrifugal;
FIG. 2 is a graph of rpm versus time and motor torque versus time for an idealized cycle for an affination centrifugal;
FIG. 3 is a graph of rpm versus time for an actual cycle of a CSM centrifugal drive;
FIG. 4 is a graph of rpm versus time for an actual cycle of a PWM centrifugal drive;
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a graph of rpm versus time for an actual cycle of a centrifugal according to the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the overall operation of a control program according to the present invention;
FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the operation of a regenerative braking process according to the present invention; and
FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a plow-out process according to the present invention.
FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and trace 35 in FIG. 6 is a graph of its cycle.
As shown in FIG. 5, an alternating current (AC) line 36 provides power to a plurality of centrifugal drive units 38. Preferably, each of the drive units is a Model 8804 Adjustable Frequency Controller Unit manufactured by the Square D Company of Raleigh, N.C.
Within each of the centrifugal drive units 38, the AC power is converted to DC power by an AC-DC converter 40 and fed to a DC bus 42 common to all drive units 38. This common DC bus structure 42 is essential to the dynamic regenerative braking capabilities of the present invention, as will be discussed in greater detail below.
As is known in the art, regenerative braking uses back EMF signals generated by an electrical motor when it is decelerated to provide electrical energy to associated devices. In the context of multiple centrifugals in a sugar refinery or the like, regenerative braking energy from a centrifugal in the braking phase of its cycle may advantageously be used to power another centrifugal which is in its acceleration or spin phase over a common bus. That is, when the motor is being decelerated, its inertia causes it to spin faster than it would be able solely from the operative power applied thereto. This induces a back EMF in the motor, causing it to act as a generator and output electrical power. Using this braking scheme, the mechanical brake 12 shown in FIG. 1 can be eliminated.
In the above-described system utilizing a common DC bus 42, the cycle of each centrifugal advantageously is staggered relative to other units to most effectively use regenerative braking energy supplied to the common DC bus 42.
Within each drive unit 38, the DC bus 42 feeds a DC-AC inverter 44. The DC-AC inverter 44 converts DC power on the DC bus 42 to AC power to operate drive motor 6. The inverter 44 is responsive to a programmable logic controller (PLC) 46 which controls the inverter 44 to selectively provide a drive voltage to the drive motor 6. The PLC 46 receives as an input a signal representative of the voltage drop across a shunt resistor 48. Preferably, the shunt resistor 48 is of a small value such as 0.1 Ω resistor. By monitoring the voltage drop across the shunt resistor 48, the PLC 46 can effectively monitor the backfed EMF generated by the drive motor 6.
The PLC 46 runs a control program 50 which selectively applies driving voltages to the drive motor 6 based on its rotational speed. Preferably, the PLC 46 is a Model 450 Processor manufactured by the Square D company of Raleigh, N.C. Also, the control program preferably is written using a ladder logic program such as the one provided with the above-noted Model 450 processor. A copy of a preferred embodiment of a control program 50 used in a preferred embodiment of the present invention for one PLC 46 is shown in APPENDIX A.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the overall operation of the control program 50. At Step 52, the drive motor 6 is ramped up to 280 rpms. At Step 54, the basket 8 is loaded with approximately 830 pounds of massecuite or white sugar while maintaining the rotational speed of the drive motor 6 at 280 rpms. At Step 56, the drive motor is accelerated to 1200 rpm and at Step 57, it spins at this speed for 10 to 50 seconds depending on the type of sugar being processed.
Of particular interest in the context of the present invention are the last two steps in this process. In Step 58, the motor 6 is decelerated using a dynamic regenerative braking technique described in more detail below. In Step 60, the motor is driven in a two-stage dynamic plow-out operation to remove the finished product.
FIG. 8 is a flowchart describing the regenerative braking process 58 in greater detail. In Step 62, a gradually decreasing voltage signal is applied to the motor 6. This signal is designed to reduce the speed of the motor 6 from 1200 rpm to a stationary position in 29 seconds; however, when the motor 6 reaches a rotational speed of 900 rpm, the PLC 46 applies another gradually decreasing voltage signal to the motor 6 in Step 62. This second signal is designed to further reduce the speed of the motor 6 from the aforementioned 900 rpm to a stationary position in 52 seconds. Again, this signal is not permitted to run its course. Instead, when the motor 6 reaches 500 rpm, a third voltage gradient is applied to the motor 6 to enable it to stop completely in 40 seconds in Step 64.
By using a segmented braking curve as described above rather than a constant straight line curve as in prior art systems, the particular dynamic braking characteristics of a particular drive motor can be advantageously matched to obtain the maximum amount of available braking torque at any given speed. Since the drive system is able to extract more braking torque from the motor 6 than usual, it is able to bring the motor 6 to a halt more quickly and consequently can begin the plow-out phase sooner.
FIG. 9 provides a more detailed description of the plow-out process 34 shown in FIG. 6. Once the motor 6 is stationary, the PLC 46 applies a gradually increasing voltage designed to accelerate the motor to 300 rpm at a maximum rate in Step 68. When the motor 6 reaches this speed, it is inertially braked to 150 rpm in Step 70, and the plow 14 is engaged in Step 72.
Preferably, the plow-out operation does not rely on the frequency feedback capabilities of the drive motor 6 to accurately gauge the rotational speed of the motor. Instead, it uses a speed switch to provide a true measurement of the motor's speed to the PLC 46.
In contrast to prior art systems which require that the motor 6 be driven to a relatively high speed to provide sufficient torque to accomplish a satisfactory plow-out operation, the present invention is able to increase the torque of the system when it is most needed while still allowing the system to perform the actual plow-out operation at a relatively low speed. In this way, the plow-out time can be significantly reduced while maintaining a thorough plow-out.
Surprising improvements in the centrifuging process can be realized with the present invention. For example, when compared with the present invention, prior art system require 74% more energy in terms of kilowatt-hour consumption, 60% more raw kilowatts, and 830% more KVAR-hours. The energy cost per cycle of a typical prior art system is about 9.21¢ per cycle, compared with 5.27¢ per cycle for the invention, a 74.6% increase.
Variations on the above-described preferred embodiments of this invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, as noted above, the present invention may be used not only to control affination centrifugals, but can be used in other phases of the refining process as well. For example, the invention can be used in a white sugar centrifugal with little modification other than increasing the length of the spin phase of the centrifugal cycle to allow the sugar to be dried sufficiently. Also, the invention is not limited to food refining application; rather, it can be used in any applications where dynamic motor braking is effective.
Although a few preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes may be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and the spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims. ##SPC1##
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2427101 *||May 14, 1942||Sep 9, 1947||Applied Sugar Lab Inc||Centrifugal apparatus for impregnating one material with another|
|US2752044 *||Apr 20, 1953||Jun 26, 1956||Charles A Olcott||Driving means for centrifugal machines|
|US2759372 *||Jul 2, 1953||Aug 21, 1956||Western States Machine Co||Heavy centrifugal drive organization|
|US3504794 *||Feb 12, 1968||Apr 7, 1970||Laval Separator Co De||Method and apparatus for controlling operation of a centrifugal|
|US3906315 *||Jan 15, 1974||Sep 16, 1975||Aerojet General Co||Closed-loop, precision-stop induction motor control circuit|
|US4118248 *||Mar 17, 1977||Oct 3, 1978||Jorge Halder Lacher||Automatic discharge centrifuge and method|
|US4223829 *||Jan 2, 1979||Sep 23, 1980||The Western States Machine Company||Cyclical centrifugal machine|
|US4443266 *||Jul 15, 1982||Apr 17, 1984||Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt Ag||Continuously operating sugar centrifuge|
|US4482853 *||Aug 24, 1981||Nov 13, 1984||Reuland Electric Company||Composite control for soft start and dynamic braking of a three-phase induction motor|
|US4519039 *||Jul 23, 1982||May 21, 1985||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Digital coil diameter function generator and reel motor drive system embodying the same|
|US4520450 *||Jul 23, 1982||May 28, 1985||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Digital ramp function generator and motor drive system including the same|
|US4532597 *||Jul 23, 1982||Jul 30, 1985||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Digital inertia compensation generator and reel motor drive system embodying the same|
|US4582097 *||Oct 5, 1983||Apr 15, 1986||Mateer-Burt Company, Inc.||Control apparatus and method for automatic filling machine|
|US4848673 *||Jul 5, 1988||Jul 18, 1989||Freund Industrial Co., Ltd.||Fluidized granulating and coating apparatus and method|
|US4895733 *||Sep 8, 1987||Jan 23, 1990||Pharmatronic Ag||Method and system for agglomerating particles and/or for coating particles|
|US4947089 *||Oct 30, 1989||Aug 7, 1990||Abel Manufacturing Co., Inc.||Apparatus for selectively controlling a plurality of electric motors|
|US5044092 *||Jun 21, 1990||Sep 3, 1991||Fives-Cail Babcock||Automated method for the cyclic operation of a centrifugal drier|
|US5087864 *||May 25, 1990||Feb 11, 1992||Abel Manufacturing Co., Inc.||Apparatus for selectively controlling a plurality of electric motors|
|US5115575 *||Jun 21, 1990||May 26, 1992||Fives-Cail Babcock||Automated method for the cyclic operation of a centrifugal drier|
|US5132142 *||Mar 19, 1991||Jul 21, 1992||Glatt Gmbh||Apparatus and method for producing pellets by layering power onto particles|
|US5254241 *||Aug 12, 1992||Oct 19, 1993||The Western States Machine Company||Loading control system for a cyclical centrifugal machine which adjusts pinch position|
|US5346377 *||Oct 7, 1993||Sep 13, 1994||Fuisz Technologies Ltd.||Apparatus for flash flow processing having feed rate control|
|SU1350173A1 *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6507161 *||Mar 30, 2001||Jan 14, 2003||The Western States Machine Company||Centrifuge motor control|
|US6602178||Mar 15, 2001||Aug 5, 2003||Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd.||Desk-top centrifuge having improved safety in the event of an operational failure|
|CN102806205A *||Aug 3, 2012||Dec 5, 2012||常州市众华建材科技有限公司||Novel powder selecting device|
|EP1136131A2 *||Mar 16, 2001||Sep 26, 2001||Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd.||Safety guard for desk-top centrifuge|
|WO2001078902A1 *||Apr 6, 2001||Oct 25, 2001||The Western States Machine Company||Centrifuge motor control|
|WO2012004803A1||Dec 10, 2010||Jan 12, 2012||Miranda Albert A||Programmable logic controller based sugar conveying, pulverizing and dosing system|
|U.S. Classification||318/375, 318/7, 318/34, 318/6|
|Jun 17, 1994||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SAVANNAH FOODS AND INDUSTRIES, GEORGIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ZEIGLER, DWAYNE;REEL/FRAME:007047/0580
Effective date: 19940509
|Jun 28, 1999||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Aug 1, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Free format text: PATENT COLLATERAL AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SAVANNAH FOODS AND INDUSTRIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:011019/0872
Effective date: 20000728
|Oct 11, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Free format text: GUARANTEE AND COLLATERAL AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SAVANNAH FOODS & INDUSTRIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012243/0738
Effective date: 20010828
|Jan 27, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SAVANNAH FOODS & INDUSTRIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013684/0372
Effective date: 20021231
Owner name: SAVANNAH FOODS & INDUSTRIES, INC., GEORGIA
Free format text: RELEASE AND REASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK;REEL/FRAME:013684/0394
Effective date: 20021227
Owner name: SAVANNAH FOODS & INDUSTRIES, INC., GEORGIA
Free format text: RELEASE AND REASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK;REEL/FRAME:013684/0397
Effective date: 20021227
|Jun 27, 2003||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jul 23, 2007||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Jan 16, 2008||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Mar 4, 2008||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20080116
|Jun 10, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TEXAS
Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SAVANNAH FOODS INDUSTRIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026423/0744
Effective date: 20110518
|Jul 24, 2012||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SAVANNAH FOODS & INDUSTRIES, INC., CONNECTICUT
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:028627/0409
Effective date: 20120620
Owner name: SAVANNAH FOODS & INDUSTRIES, INC., CONNECTICUT
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:028622/0513
Effective date: 20120620