|Publication number||US5503554 A|
|Application number||US 08/419,813|
|Publication date||Apr 2, 1996|
|Filing date||Apr 11, 1995|
|Priority date||Apr 11, 1995|
|Publication number||08419813, 419813, US 5503554 A, US 5503554A, US-A-5503554, US5503554 A, US5503554A|
|Inventors||G. John Schoeffel|
|Original Assignee||Schoeffel; G. John|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (44), Classifications (4), Legal Events (12)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The invention is in the field of endondtic files.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In the middle of every tooth is a small tube, referred to as the root canal, approximately one inch long and varying in diameter from the diameter of a piece of angel hair spaghetti to the diameter of a human hair. This tube in normally filled with healthy tissue, but for a variety of reasons this tissue can become inflamed, infected and die. In order to remove the dead or dying tissue, the root canal must be "drilled out" or enlarged with special dental instruments until a clean tube is established that can be filled with a permanent hermetic material. The instruments used to accomplish this objective are called "endodontic files".
Prior to 1959, endodontic files were not manufactured according to any set standards. That is, the size, shape and overall configuration varied from manufacturer to manufacturer.
During 1959, a standard known as variable linear dimensional (VLD) standardization came into being. Endodontic files manufactured after 1959 were defined by the diameter of the file at a point approximately 1 mm from the tip (D1) as shown in FIG. 1. An endodontic file with a diameter of 0.10 m at D1 is designated as a number 10 instrument; an endodontic file with a diameter of 0.15 at D1 is designated as a number 15 instrument, etc. Endodontic files between a #6 and a #10 increase in size 0.02 mm per file size, from the #10 endodontic file to the #60 endodontic file, each one in the series increases by 0.05 mm, and after endodontic file #60 each one increases by 0.10 mm at D1. This sizing system has become the ISO (International Standards Organization) standard. The taper is also defined by the standard and is determined as follows. A point 15 mm from D1 is designated D2 as shown in FIG. 1. At D2, the diameter of each file is 0.30 mm greater than the diameter of the file at D1. There is a linear increase in diameter from D1 to D2 so that for each 1 mm increase in length, there is a 0.02 mm increase in diameter. It should be noted that the 15 mm height or D1-D2 distance and the 0.30 mm relationship between D1 and D2 is simply a standard or tradition and of little clinical significance. In other words, the D1-D2 distance and D1-D2 relationship could be other than 15 mm and 0.30 mm respectively and beneficial results could still be obtained.
During 1991 a new endodontic file sizing system known as constant percent (CP) came into being. The constant percent change sizing system was the first change in endodontic file size standardization in over thirty years and is based on changing the diameter of D1 by an exact percentage. The CP system came into being because for a myriad of clinical reasons, the diameter of many root canals has decreased since 1962. Accordingly, endodontic treatment became more and more difficult since the introduction of the variable linear dimensional standardization. Specifically, since endodontic instruments were used by hand or, as explained below, in oscillating tools, it was becoming increasingly difficult to treat the more difficult endodontic cases. The problem with the VLD system is that the percentage change from file size to file size is erratic under the VLD sizing system. For example, the percentage change of D1 from a #8 endodontic file to a #10 endodontic file is 20%, from a #10 endodontic file to a #15 endodontic file the change is 50%, and from a #15 endodontic file to a #20 endodontic file the change is 33%. In order to rectify this shortcoming, the CP change system was introduced and is based on a constant percent change from one file size to the next. Each D1 is exactly x% larger than the its predecessor, where x is chosen so that a root canal treatment is accomplished while minimizing the number of instruments needed to perform the root canal treatment. In this connection, in the currently utilized CP system, x is 29.17%. Additionally, files currently produced under the CP system utilize a D1 to D2 differential of 0.6 mm instead of 0.3 mm as is the case with files produced under the VLD system. The CP system seemingly provides a smoother transition from one file to the next since each file is the same percentage larger than its predecessor. A paper describing the CP system is entitled "Revolutionary New Concepts In Endodontic Instruments Sizing" by Herbert Schilder in Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia, Vol 7, No 4, 1993.
Tables 1 and 2 below shows the D1 and D2 diameters for a typical VLD and CP file system respectively, along with a percentage change of D1 diameters and the volume and percentage volume change between adjacent files between adjacent files in each system.
TABLE 1______________________________________D1 VLD Diameter VLD VolumeIncre- D1 % D2 VLD %ment diameter Change diameter Volume Change______________________________________ 0.150 0.450 1.150.0500 0.200 33% 0.500 1.53 33%0.0500 0.250 25% 0.550 1.97 29%0.0500 0.300 20% 0.600 2.47 25%0.0500 0.350 17% 0.650 3.03 23%0.0500 0.400 14% 0.700 3.65 20%0.0500 0.450 13% 0.750 4.33 19%0.0500 0.500 11% 0.800 5.07 17%0.0500 0.550 10% 0.850 5.86 16%0.0500 0.600 9% 0.900 6.72 15%0.1000 0.700 17% 1.000 8.60 28%0.1000 0.800 14% 1.100 10.72 25%0.1000 0.900 13% 1.200 13.08 22%0.1000 1.000 11% 1.300 15.67 20%______________________________________
TABLE 2______________________________________D1 Constant Diameter Constant Constant VolumeIncre- Pct D1 % Pct D2 Pct %ment diameter Change diameter Volume Change______________________________________ 0.129 0.729 2.520.0380 0.167 29% 0.767 2.92 16%0.0490 0.216 29% 0.816 3.49 19%0.0630 0.279 29% 0.879 4.30 23%0.0810 0.360 29% 0.960 5.49 27%0.1050 0.465 29% 1.065 7.25 32%0.1350 0.600 29% 1.200 9.90 37%0.1750 0.775 29% 1.375 13.97 41%0.2250 1.000 29% 1.600 20.26 45%______________________________________
Also of note is that in 1993 endodontic files made of an alloy of nickel and titanium transformed the traditional methods of endodontic instrumentation and preparation. Endodontic files (referred to as reamers when used in a rotary mode in which case the flutes are duller than is the case with files which operate in a reciprocating mode) made from this alloy were, for the first time ever, capable of being used in a rotating dental drill. However, their use in an endodontic rotary mode created a new problem. As it turns out, rotating files or reamers can only predictably remove a specific volume of dentin (root material) per file pass. Since both prior art sizing systems (VLD and CP) remove irregular volumes per file size, as shown in Tables 1 and 2, clinical "workarounds" had to be employed in order to prepare root canals when using rotary files or reamers based on this geometry. For example, accordingly to one leading manufacturer's instructions, the reamers must be used repeatedly in a complicated protocol of alternating sizes in order to achieve the goal of preparing the root canal system when using the rotary technique.
The present invention is directed to endodontic files which provide constant dentin volume removal from file to file or from reamer to reamer. Although the CP sizing system reflects a constant percent change from one Dt to the next, it does not consider the actual volume of dentin removed by each successive file. The invented constant volume removal (CVR) sizing system is based on the actual volume of dentin removed from file to file. Each file removes exactly the same increase in volume as its predecessor-there are no irregular increases in volume removal like those encountered in both prior art systems. The clinical results are dramatic because the practitioner can, for the first time, use each file in a sequential manner from smallest to largest without the need to alternate sizes or rely on subjective factors. Correspondingly, the time required to prepare a patient's root canal drops as a function of the reduced need to interchange sizes along the way.
Upon first look, the CP file sizing system used in endodontics today seems to make logical sense. However, if the actual volume of dentin (root structure) removed between files is calculated, the inconsistencies become apparent. For example the currently available CP file system increases the D1 diameter at a rate of 29.17%. At this increase in size, the difference in dentin removal between each file varies from approximately 16% between the first two sizes and approximately 45% between the last two sizes as shown in Table 2 above. However, the difference between the volume removed between CVR files is always the same. This constant change in volume removal from one size to the next results in a smoother transition from file size to file size under clinical conditions.
Use of the CVR system:
1. Reduces preparation time.
2. Reduces metal fatigue of the endodontic files.
3. Eliminates need for Crown-down preparation.
4. Provides a less subjective technique.
The reason for developing the CVR system of endodontic file design is to allow the clinician to objectively and quickly prepare a root canal space. This is achieved by proceeding in a step-by-step manner from one endodontic file size to the next. This is not the case with the other systems. For example, from a review of the instructions for a typical CP system, it is clearly apparent that the subjective judgment of the clinician is extremely important. In particular, the clinician is instructed to start with an endodontic file two sizes larger than the endodontic file most likely to work the apex (end of the root canal). This is a very empirical determination and must be based on considerable experience. Then through a series of passes of decreasing file sizes (again based on subjective assessment) the endodontic files are taken to the apex.
Additionally, the instructions for a typical CP system call for repeating this series of steps if the clinician is unable to achieve full canal length, again an extremely subjective evaluation. In contradistinction, by the time a clinician using the CP system of files has achieved working length, a clinician using the CVR system would have completed the preliminary filing through a progressive series of files designed to remove exactly the same volume of dentin with every pass. That is, for a typical CP procedure, 5-6 files are used per root canal, but they are rotated so that there are about 30 file changes per root canal. On the other hand, for a typical CVR procedure, 10-12 files are used per root canal, but each file is used only once per root canal.
The CVR system provides a clinical method of preparing root canals that relies on objective clinical techniques. For example, when using the CVR system, once the length of the root canal is determined (from a completely objective measurement), then each file is used sequentially from beginning to end at exact working distances. On the other hand the directions for using the CP system are filled with subjective guidelines.
FIG. 1 is an illustration of a typical endodontic file showing the relationships between D1 and D2.
FIG. 2 is a further illustration showing the relationships between D1 and D2 and the terms used to calculate volume removal.
The present invention is directed to endonontic files which are manufactured so that each endondontic file in a series of files removes a volume of dentin which is substantially equal to the volume of dentin removed by the immediately prior file in the series. Endodontic files manufactured based on the present invention are manufactured in the same manner as prior art endodontic files excepting that the diameter of each file at D1, which is a point 1 mm from the tip of the file, is chosen so that with increasing D1 diameters, the volume formed by the frustum which exists between the D1 and D2 diameters increases by the same percentage between files. However, the inventive concepts apply equally to endontic files having D1 and D2 diameters defined in some other way than having a D1-D2 distance of 15 mm and a D1-D2 relationship such that D2 is 0.30 mm greater than D1. However, for simplicity, the invention is described herein utilizing the standard or traditional relationships between D1 and D2.
Although the file has ridges or threads, in use, the volume of dentin which is removed when the file is inserted through a centerline in a root canal can be calculated by determining the volume of the frustum which is formed by the file between diameters D1 and D2. The formula for the volume of a frustum is: ##EQU1## where r1 is the radius at D1, r2 is the radius at D2 and h is the distance between D1 and D2 (with all variables in millimeters) as shown in FIG. 2. Referring now to Table 3, assuming an initial D1 of 0.15 mm, r1 =0.075, and, assuming D2 is 0.3 mm greater than D1, r2 is 0.15 mm greater than r1 (since D2=D1+0.30 mm, r2 =(D1+0.30)/2=D1/2+0.15=r1 +0.15). With these assumed values, the initial volume is calculated as follows: ##EQU2##
Assuming that a constant volume increase of 12% is desired, the next r1 may be calculated by solving for r1 in the formula: ##EQU3##
Assuming the next r1 is designated rx, the resulting formula is: ##EQU4##
Table 3 shows the results of such a calculation which is repeated for successive r1 values.
TABLE 3______________________________________D1 Constant Diameter Constant Constant VolumeIncre- Vol D1 % Vol D2 Vol %ment Diameter Change Diameter Volume Change______________________________________ 0.150 0.450 1.150.0190 0.169 12.67% 0.469 1.29 12%0.0200 0.189 11.83% 0.489 1.44 12%0.0210 0.210 11.11% 0.510 1.62 12%0.0220 0.232 10.48% 0.532 1.81 12%0.0230 0.255 9.91% 0.555 2.02 12%0.0250 0.280 9.80% 0.580 2.27 12%0.0260 0.306 9.29% 0.606 2.54 12%0.0210 0.327 6.86% 0.627 2.77 9%0.0220 0.349 6.73% 0.649 3.02 9%0.0220 0.371 6.30% 0.671 3.29 9%0.0240 0.395 6.47% 0.695 3.59 9%0.0404 0.435 10.23% 0.735 4.13 15%0.0426 0.478 9.78% 0.778 4.73 15%0.0470 0.525 9.83% 0.825 5.46 15%0.0490 0.574 9.33% 0.874 6.26 15%0.0530 0.627 9.23% 0.927 7.20 15%0.0570 0.684 9.09% 0.984 8.28 15%0.0610 0.745 8.92% 1.045 9.53 15%0.0780 0.823 10.47% 1.123 11.24 18%0.0850 0.908 10.33% 1.208 13.28 18%0.0920 1.000 10.13% 1.300 15.67 18%0.1000 1.100 10.00% 1.400 18.50 18%0.1080 1.208 9.82% 1.508 21.81 18%______________________________________
It will be noted that at a D1 diameter of 0.327, the volume percentage change is 9%, at a D1 diameter of 0.435, the volume percentage change is 15% and at a D1 diameter of 0.823, the volume percentage change is 18%. In this connection, in the preferred embodiment of the invention, the volume percentage change is only constant within a range of file sizes. The reason it is preferable that the volume percentage change be constant only within a range of file sizes is that once the root canal has been partially cleared by an initial set of files, subsequent uses of the file system can usually have an increased percentage of volume removed while maintaining approximately the same amount of force on the file. However, after an initial clearing using a set of files with a constant volume removal percentage of 12%, due to characteristics of the material employed to make the files, it may be preferable to reduce the constant volume removal percentage to 9% as shown in Table 3. However, it should be understood that the specific percentages employed may vary from those shown in Table 3 depending on the material used to make the files. The only limitation regarding the specifics of the construction of the files is that the D1 diameter be chosen so that the resulting volume of the D1-D2 frustum changes at a constant percentage for a subset of files within the complete file system.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4518356 *||Sep 30, 1983||May 21, 1985||Dentsply Research & Development Corp.||Utrasonic dental file and method of determining failure resistant lengths thereof|
|US4971556 *||Jul 8, 1988||Nov 20, 1990||Francesco Ritano||Endodontistry bit set|
|US5017138 *||May 5, 1989||May 21, 1991||Herbert Schilder||Set of endodontic instruments|
|US5026284 *||Feb 17, 1988||Jun 25, 1991||Howard Martin||Apex root canal file|
|US5219284 *||Feb 18, 1992||Jun 15, 1993||Les Fils D'auguste Maillefer, Societe Anonyme A Ballaigues||Set of instruments for reaming out dental root canals|
|US5257934 *||Mar 25, 1992||Nov 2, 1993||Giovanni Cossellu||Endodontic instrument for preparing the root canal|
|EP0257961A1 *||Aug 18, 1987||Mar 2, 1988||Leonard Stephen Buchanan||Dental root canal shaping file|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5653590 *||Jun 6, 1995||Aug 5, 1997||Tulsa Dental Products, L.L.C.||Kit of endodontic instruments and method of utilizing same|
|US5676541 *||Nov 14, 1995||Oct 14, 1997||Maillefer Instruments S.A.||Set of instruments of increasing dimension for the boring of radicular dental canals|
|US5775902 *||Dec 22, 1995||Jul 7, 1998||Kabushiki Kaisha Matsutani Seiskusho||Root canal treatment instrument and manufacturing method for the root canal treatment instrument|
|US5882198 *||Jun 30, 1997||Mar 16, 1999||Ormco Corporation||Endodontic instrument having enhanced compliance at the tip|
|US5947730 *||Oct 31, 1997||Sep 7, 1999||Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System||Increased taper segmental rotary files|
|US6042375 *||Jan 28, 1998||Mar 28, 2000||Ultradent Products, Inc.||Endodontic systems for progressively, sectionally and anatomically preparing root canals with specific instruments for each section having predetermined working lengths|
|US6045362 *||Jan 28, 1998||Apr 4, 2000||Ultradent Products, Inc.||Endodontic methods for progressively, sectionally and anatomically preparing root canals with specific instruments for each section having predetermined working lengths|
|US6059572 *||Jun 3, 1999||May 9, 2000||Ultradent Products, Inc.||Endodontic methods for the anatomical, sectional and progressive corono-apical preparation of root canals with three sets of dedicated instruments|
|US6146138 *||Jan 28, 1999||Nov 14, 2000||Dalmau; Marcela Ridao||Method and device for a non-traumatic expansion of the bone for receiving affixing means for dental prosthetics|
|US6379155||Mar 27, 2000||Apr 30, 2002||Ultradent Products, Inc.||Endodontic systems and methods for the anatomical, sectional and progressive corono-apical preparation of root canals with instruments utilizing stops|
|US6390819||Jan 3, 2001||May 21, 2002||Ultradent Products, Inc.||Endodontic systems and methods for the anatomical, sectional and progressive corono-apical preparation of root canals with dedicated stainless steel instruments and dedicated nickel/titanium instruments|
|US6558163||May 3, 2001||May 6, 2003||Ultradent Products, Inc.||Endodontic systems and methods for preparing upper portions of root canals with increasingly rigid files|
|US6585513||May 3, 2001||Jul 1, 2003||Ultradent Products, Inc.||Endodontic systems and methods for preparing apical portions of root canals with a set of files having large tapers|
|US6746245||Feb 21, 2002||Jun 8, 2004||Ultradent Products, Inc.||Methods for cleaning and shaping asymmetrical root canals in an anatomical fashion|
|US6942484 *||May 3, 2004||Sep 13, 2005||Scianamblo Michael J||Critical path endodontic instruments for preparing endodontic cavity spaces|
|US7094056||Jan 22, 2004||Aug 22, 2006||Scianamblo Michael J||Endodontic instrument having reversed helix|
|US7270541||Mar 2, 2006||Sep 18, 2007||Johnson William B||Endodontic files having variable helical angle flutes|
|US7481652||May 24, 2002||Jan 27, 2009||Discus Dental, Llc||Endodontic reamer and files|
|US7669332||Mar 2, 2010||Discus Dental, Llc||Method for manufacturing endodontic reamers and files|
|US7955078||Jun 7, 2011||Scianamblo Michael J||Endodontic instruments for preparing endodontic cavity spaces|
|US7967605||Jun 28, 2011||Guidance Endodontics, Llc||Endodontic files and obturator devices and methods of manufacturing same|
|US8454361||Jun 4, 2013||Michael J. Scianamblo||Swaggering endodontic instruments|
|US8496476||May 20, 2011||Jul 30, 2013||Michael J. Scianamblo||Endodontic instruments for preparing endodontic cavity spaces|
|US8882504||Mar 14, 2013||Nov 11, 2014||Michael J. Scianamblo||Swaggering endodontic instruments|
|US8932056||Mar 11, 2013||Jan 13, 2015||Michael Scianamblo||Swaggering endodontic instruments|
|US9271740||Aug 20, 2014||Mar 1, 2016||Michael J. Scianamblo||Precessional-motion bone and dental drilling tools and bone harvesting apparatus|
|US9277925||Aug 20, 2014||Mar 8, 2016||Michael J. Scianamblo||Precessional drilling and reaming|
|US9351803||Feb 26, 2015||May 31, 2016||Michael J. Scianamblo||Endodontic instruments with offset centers of mass|
|US20040126734 *||May 24, 2002||Jul 1, 2004||Steven Senia||Endodontic reamer and method for manufacturing endodontic reamer and files|
|US20040219484 *||Jan 22, 2004||Nov 4, 2004||Scianamblo Michael J.||Endodontic instrument having reversed helix|
|US20040219485 *||May 3, 2004||Nov 4, 2004||Scianamblo Michael J.||Critical path endodontic instruments for preparing endodontic cavity spaces|
|US20060137184 *||Nov 29, 2005||Jun 29, 2006||Lightspeed Technologies Inc.||Method for manufacturing endodontic reamers and files|
|US20060216668 *||Sep 13, 2005||Sep 28, 2006||Scianamblo Michael J||Critical path endodontic instruments for preparing endodontic cavity spaces|
|US20060228669 *||Apr 10, 2006||Oct 12, 2006||Scianamblo Michael J||Swaggering endodontic instruments|
|US20070059663 *||Aug 21, 2006||Mar 15, 2007||Scianamblo Michael J||Endodontic instrument|
|US20070101827 *||Nov 1, 2006||May 10, 2007||Quan Nancy N||Endodontic Instrument|
|US20070207438 *||Mar 2, 2006||Sep 6, 2007||Johnson William B||Endodontic files having variable helical angle flutes|
|US20080047143 *||Oct 30, 2007||Feb 28, 2008||Discus Dental, Llc.||Endodontic Instrument|
|US20080050697 *||Oct 30, 2007||Feb 28, 2008||Discus Dental, Llc||Endodontic Instruments|
|US20080153055 *||Oct 30, 2007||Jun 26, 2008||Discus Dental, Llc||Endodontic Reamer and Method for Manufacturing Endodontic Reamer and Files|
|US20110217673 *||Sep 8, 2011||Scianamblo Michael J||Endodontic instruments for preparing endodontic cavity spaces|
|USD750246||Mar 15, 2013||Feb 23, 2016||Michael J. Scianamblo||Endodontic device|
|EP1624825A1 *||May 3, 2004||Feb 15, 2006||Michael J. Scianamblo||Critical path endodontic instruments for preparing an endodontic cavity space|
|WO2004098438A1 *||May 3, 2004||Nov 18, 2004||Scianamblo Michael J||Critical path endodontic instruments for preparing an endodontic cavity space|
|Jul 23, 1996||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Oct 4, 1999||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Oct 2, 2003||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jul 27, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DISCUS DENTAL INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DENTA POWER, INC.;DENTISTRY 2000;SCHOEFFEL, JOHN;REEL/FRAME:018132/0097
Effective date: 20060630
|Oct 2, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DISCUS DENTAL, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR S NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 018132 FRAME 0097;ASSIGNORS:DENTAL POWER, INC.;DENTISTRY 2000;SCHOEFFEL, JOHN;REEL/FRAME:018350/0759;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060628 TO 20060720
|Oct 25, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, WA
Free format text: NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DISCUS DENTAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018433/0306
Effective date: 20060313
|Oct 8, 2007||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Nov 20, 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DISCUS DENTAL, LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DISCUS DENTAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020134/0466
Effective date: 20071120
|Dec 13, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Dec 13, 2007||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 11
|Oct 21, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ORMCO CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DISCUS DENTAL, LLC;REEL/FRAME:027100/0186
Effective date: 20111018
|Oct 24, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DISCUS DENTAL, LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:027108/0154
Effective date: 20090424