|Publication number||US5637451 A|
|Application number||US 08/413,054|
|Publication date||Jun 10, 1997|
|Filing date||Mar 29, 1995|
|Priority date||Mar 29, 1995|
|Publication number||08413054, 413054, US 5637451 A, US 5637451A, US-A-5637451, US5637451 A, US5637451A|
|Inventors||Ehud Ben-Hur, Bernard Horowitz|
|Original Assignee||New York Blood Center, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (56), Classifications (9), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention was made with government support under 1-RO1-HL41221 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in this invention.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an improved process for inactivating a virus which may be present in blood or blood products by treating the blood or blood product with a phthalocyanine dye under the influence of red light.
2. Description of the Related Art
Despite impressive reduction during the last decade in the risk of human pathogenic viruses as a result of blood transfusion, complete viral safety has not been achieved (R. Y. Dodd, "The risk of transfusion-transmitted infection", N. Eng. J. Med., 327, 419-421, 1992). Most of these viruses are lipid enveloped and their inactivation in cellular components of blood is the subject of intensive research.
Photochemical methods are the most promising for virus sterilization of platelets and red blood cells (RBC). For decontamination of platelet concentrates, UVA light and psoralens (PUVA) has been shown to be highly effective (L. Lin et al., "Use of 8-methoxypsoralen and long wavelength ultraviolet radiation for decontamination of platelet concentrates", Blood, 74, 517-525, 1989; R. Y. Dodd et al., "Inactivation of viruses in platelet suspensions that retain their in vitro characteristics: comparison of psoralen-ultraviolet A and merocyanine 540-visible light methods", Transfusion, 31, 483-490, 1991; and H. Margolis-Nunno et al., "Virus sterilization in platelet concentrates with psoralen and ultraviolet A light in the presence of quenchers", Transfusion, 32, 541-547, 1992).
For viral inactivation in RBC suspensions, red light (λ>600 nm) has to be used to avoid light absorption by hemoglobin. Following the pioneering work by Matthews et al. ("Photodynamic therapy of viral contaminants with the potential for blood banking applications", Transfusion, 28, 81-83, 1988) using HPD, other sensitizers with strong absorption in the far red have been employed (H. C. Neyndorff et al., "Development of a model to demonstrate photosensitizer mediated viral inactivation in blood", Transfusion, 30, 485-490, 1990; and M. M. Judy et al., "In vitro photodynamic inactivation of herpes simplex virus with sapphryins: 22π-electron porphyrin-like macrocycles", Photochem. Photobiol., 53, 101-107, 1991).
Our laboratory has focused on the phthalocyanines as sensitizers for inactivation of lipid enveloped viruses (B. Horowitz et al., "Inactivation of viruses in blood with aluminum phthalocyanine derivatives", Transfusion, 31, 102-108, 1991; and E. Ben-Hur et al., "Photodynamic inactivation of retroviruses by phthalocyanines: the effect of sulfonation, metal ligand and fluoride", J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. Biol., 13, 145-152, 1992). To obtain maximum virucidal action while minimizing damage to RBC we have used two approaches. One was to screen for structural features of phthalocyanines that enhance viral inactivation and reduce RBC damage (E. Ben-Hur et al., "Phthalocyanine-induced photohemolysis: structure activity relationship and the effect of fluoride", Photochem. Photobiol., 58, 351-355, 1993; Z. Smetana et al., "Photodynamic inactivation of herpes viruses with phthalocyanine derivatives" J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. Biol., 22, 37-43, 1994; and S. Rywkin et al., "New phthalocyanines for photodynamic virus inactivation in red blood cell concentrates", Photochem. Photobiol., 60, 165-170, 1994). The second approach was to use scavengers of reactive oxygen species. It appears that quenchers of type I photodynamic reactions can reduce RBC damage without reducing virus inactivation (S. Rywkin et al., "Importance of type I and type II mechanisms in the photodynamic inactivation in blood with aluminum phthalocyanine derivatives", Photochem. Photobiol., 56, 463-469, 1992). This is presumably due to singlet oxygen being the primary mediator of virus killing while both types I and II reactions contribute to RBC damage. See also our earlier U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,120,649 and 5,232,844 and copending application Ser. Nos. 08/031,787, 08/344,919 and 08/364,031, the entire disclosures of which patents and applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
In spite of these advances, there remains a definite need in the art for new methods or improvements in existing methods which cause less RBC damage without also reducing virus kill.
Accordingly, it was the principal object of the present invention to provide an improved blood sterilization procedure whereby extracellular or intracellular lipid enveloped virus which may be present in blood or blood products are substantially inactivated under conditions wherein little or no damage is done to blood cells, especially RBC, and labile biological proteins contained in such blood or blood products.
Toward this end, we investigated a third possible approach to enhance the selectivity of virus inactivation in blood, i.e., a change in the light fluence rate. Cells are able to deal with reactive oxygen species by various mechanisms such as quenchers and antioxidant enzymes (G. R. Buettner, "The pecking order of free radicals and antioxidants: lipid peroxidation, α-tocopherol and ascorbate", Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 300, 535-543. 1993; and P. Cerutti et al., "Oxy-radicals in Molecular Biology and Pathology", Alan R. Liss, New York, 1988). Therefore, it would have been expected that when photodynamic treatment is delivered at a reduced fluence rate, the blood cells would be able to tolerate the treatment better. This has been shown for mammalian cells (fibroblasts derived from Chinese hamsters) photosensitized with AlPcSn (E. Ben-Hur et al., "Effect of light fluence rate on mammalian cells photosensitization by aluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate", Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 51, 467-476, 1987) and HPD (W. Matthews et al., "In vitro photodynamic therapy of human lung cancer: Investigation of dose-rate effects", Cancer Res., 49, 1718-1721, 1989). Since viruses are devoid of such protective mechanisms, their inactivation rate is not expected to be affected by the light fluence rate. Thus, by modulating the rate at which the light is delivered, treatment conditions can be optimized in virus RBC sterilization protocols.
However, in contrast to these expectations, we have discovered that surprisingly, using phthalocyanines as sensitizers, the extent of RBC damage actually decreased with increasing fluence rate.
Therefore, the present invention relates to an improved process for inactivating an extracellular lipid enveloped virus or an intracellular lipid enveloped virus which may be present in an extracorporeal composition containing red blood cells, said process comprising subjecting said composition to a virucidally effective amount of a phthalocyanine compound and red light, wherein the improvement comprises subjecting said composition to a virucidally effective amount of a phthalocyanine compound and red light of a fluence rate of at least above about 5 mW/cm2.
The invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to the drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the hemolytic curves of RBC following exposure to 1.2 J/cm2 at various fluence rates, in the presence of 1 μM AlPcSn ;
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the rate of hemolysis (1/t50) as a function of light fluence rate for treatment with AlPcSn ;
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the hemolytic curves of RBC following exposure to 0.96 and 1.28 J/cm2 as a function of light fluence rate for treatment with 0.25 μM Pc 5;
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the fluence rate response curves for reduction of RBC binding to PLL sensitized by 2 μM Pc 5 at various fluence rates;
FIG. 5 is a graph showing VSV inactivation sensitized by 2 μM Pc 5 at various fluence rates; and
FIG. 6 is a graph showing the photohemolysis of RBC sensitized by 1 μM AlPcSn at 80 mW/cm2, exposed to 1.6 and 2.4 J/cm2 under air or oxygen atmosphere.
Conditions for photodynamic treatment of red blood cell containing compositions using phthalocyanines and red light are described in detail in the aforementioned patents and applications.
The extracorporeal composition containing red blood cells is preferably selected from the group consisting of whole blood and red cell concentrates.
According to the teachings of the present invention, superior viral inactivation and retention of red cell structure and function is retained by subjecting the extracorporeal composition containing red cells to red light of a fluence rate of at least about 5 mW/cm2. Preferably, the red light fluence rate is greater than at least about 20 mW/cm2. Most preferably, the red light fluence rate is about 20 mW/cm2 to about 80 mW/cm2, but 80 mW/cm2 is the maximum fluence rate obtainable with our light source. It is likely that higher fluence rates will yield even better results. The wavelength of this light is greater than 600 nm, preferably greater than 650 nm and, most preferably, between about 660 to 690 nm.
In general, the extracorporeal composition containing red cells is subjected to red light for a period of time ranging from 5 minutes to 5 hours. Preferably, the time period ranges from 5 minutes to 1 hour, most preferably, from 5 minutes to 20 minutes. Of course, the total fluence (J/cm2) is calculated by multiplying the fluence rate (mW/cm2 =J/cm2 /sec) by the time of irradiation (in seconds).
In the inventive methods, various phthalocyanine dyes, many of which are already known in the art, may be used. Non-limiting examples of phthalocyanines for use in the present invention include:
GaCl-, AlCl- or Ga-tetranitrophthalocyanine.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention involves the use of cationic phthalocyanine Pc 5 (HOSiPcOSi(CH3)2 (CH2)3 N+(CH3)3 I--) and its neutral analog Pc 4 (HOSiPcOSi(CH3)2 (CH2)3 N(CH3)2). Also preferred is the use of phthalocyanines of the formula AlPcSn, wherein n is 3 or 4. The dyes are added to the extracorporeal red blood cell composition to a concentration of the dye of up to 10 μM. Preferred concentrations for the dyes are 1 to 5 μM, most preferably about 2 μM.
When quenchers are employed, any quencher compounds that scavenge free radicals or reactive oxygen species, such as singlet oxygen, may be used alone or in combination. Types of quenchers, quencher combinations and suitable amounts contemplated are set forth in detail in the aforementioned patents and applications, but preference is given to mannitol, glutathione (GSH), vitamin E and derivatives thereof such as Trolox. Preferred are the use of quencher combinations calculated to quench both free radical or singlet oxygen generating reactions or of individual quencher compounds capable of quenching both types of reactions.
Examples of viruses that can be inactivated by the inventive method are hepatitis B virus (HBV), non-A, non-B hepatitis virus (NANBHV), e.g., hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, for a more detailed list of such viruses, please see the aforementioned patents and applications.
The inventive method is protective of blood cells, especially red blood cells, and labile blood proteins. In general, red cells and platelets retain at least 70% and, preferably, greater than 80% and, more preferably, greater than 95% of structural integrity. Structural integrity of red cells is measured by counting the number of red cells remaining after the photodynamic treatment or by assaying the amount of hemoglobin released as a result of said treatment. For example, if at least 70% of said red cells remain after said treatment or if less than 30% of the initial hemoglobin is released after said treatment, then a structural integrity of at least 70% of said red cells has been retained. Similarly, structural integrity of platelets is determined by counting the number of platelets remaining after said treatment or by determining the aggregation of the platelets as compared to an untreated control upon the addition of a biological aggregation agent, for example, collagen. In the case of labile biological proteins, a recovery of at least 70% and, preferably, greater than 80% and, more preferably, greater than 95% is achieved. Methods for assaying labile blood protein activity and other methods for assaying structural and functional integrity of blood cells are discussed in the aforementioned patents and applications.
The invention will now be described in the following non-limiting example.
RBC: Whole blood, obtained from the New York Blood Center, was centrifuged at 1800 rpm for 20 min and the plasma and white blood cells were removed. The RBC concentrate (70% hematocrit) was diluted 1:1 with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and either irradiated at 35% hematocrit or further diluted and irradiated at a concentration of 5×107 cells/ml.
Light exposure: The light source used was a 500 W Xenon short arc lamp (Versa Light, Medic Lightech Ltd., Haifa, Israel) equipped with filters transmitting red light at 600 nm<λ<700 nm. The light was delivered via 1.5 m flexible fiber optic bundle terminated with a lens. The light fluence rate incident onto the sample was measured with a photometer (Model 1L 1350, International Light, Newburyport, Mass.) and was adjusted by varying the sample distance and power supply. Samples of 3 ml RBC suspensions were irradiated in 5 cm petri dishes without covers and stirred with a magnetic bar. Temperature during irradiation was 24°±1° C. Phthalocyanines were added to RBC 30 min prior to light exposure.
Phthalocyanines: AlPCSn (a mixture of tri- and tetrasulfonated aluminum phthalocyanine) was kindly supplied by Ciba-Geigy, Basel. A stock solution of 1 mM was prepared in PBS and stored at 4° C. prior to use. Pc 5 was prepared as described previously (N. L. Olenick et al., "New phthalocyanine photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy", Photochem. Photobiol., 57, 242-247, 1993) and a 1 mM stock solution DMSO was stored at -20° C.
VSV assay: Assay of vesicular stomatis virus (VSV) was done as described previously (B. Horowitz et al., "Inactivation of viruses in blood with aluminum phthalocyanine derivatives", Transfusion, 31, 102-108, 1991). Briefly, VSV was added into RBC (35% hematocrit) to a final titer of 106 infectious units per mi. After 30 min dark incubation together with Pc the samples were irradiated and the suspension diluted 1:10 with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 5% fetal calf serum (FCS) and centrifuged to remove RBC. The supernatants were sterile filtered by passing through 0.22μ filters (Millipore) and stored frozen at -80° C. For assay the samples were 10-fold serially diluted, inoculated into A549 cell cultures in 96-well microtiter plates and incubated for 72 h. The cytopathology of the cells was then scored in eight well replicates for each dilution. Quantitation of the virus titer was done with the Spearman-Karber method (C. Spearman, "The method of right and wrong cases (constant stimuli) with Gauss formulae", Br. J. Psychol., 2, 227-242, 1908).
RBC hemolysis: RBC suspensions at 5×107 cells/ml in PBS were irradiated and then incubated in the dark at 24° C. At intervals 0.3 mL cell suspension was added to 3 ml PBS and mixed. The cells were centrifuged at 4° C. for 5 min, and the hemoglobin content of the supernatant was measured by recording absorbance at 415 nm. Percentage hemolysis was then calculated (100% was taken as the absorbance obtained in a sample lysed in distilled water). The time required to obtain 50% hemolysis is designated t50, and its reciprocal was used to estimate the rate of photohemolysis. Each experiment was repeated 2-3 times with essentially the same results. In experiments involving D2 O (99.9 atom % D, from Aldrich), the cells were suspended in PBS-D2 O during irradiation only. For light exposure under O2 atmosphere, O2 (99.9%) was bubbled through the cell suspension 1 min prior to and during irradiation.
RBC binding to PLL. The reduction of RBC surface negative charges as a result of photosensitization was assayed by measuring RBC binding to poly-L-lysine (PLL) (S. Rywkin et al., "New phthalocyanines for photodynamic virus inactivation in red blood cell concentrates", Photochem. Photobiol., 60, 165-170, 1994). Briefly, RBC at 35% hematocrit were irradiated and diluted in PBS to a concentration of 5×106 cells/mL. One mL of cell suspension was added into 35 mm Petri dish pre-coated with PLL and incubated at room temperature for 1 hr. The plates were then rinsed with PBS and the adsorbed cells were lysed with 2 ml distilled water. The absorbance at 415 nm of the lysate was used to quantitate the hemoglobin released from the adherent RBC, and the results calculated as a percentage of those obtained from untreated controls. Standard errors were less than 10% and are not shown for clarity.
FIG. 1 shows the hemolytic curves of RBC following exposure to 1.2 J/cm2 at various fluence rates, in the presence of 1 μM AlPcSn. It can be seen that as the fluence rate increased between 5 and 80 mW/cm2, hemolysis became slower. A more quantitative analysis is shown in FIG. 2, where the rate of hemolysis (1/t50) was plotted as a function of light fluence rate. Again, at fluence rates above 5 mW/cm2 there was an inverse relationship between the rate of hemolysis and the fluence rate. To test the generality of this phenomenon with other phthalocyanines we used Pc 5, a more potent virucidal sensitizer than AlPcSn (S. Rywkin et al., "New phthalocyanines for photodynamic virus inactivation in red blood cell concentrates", Photochem. Photobiol., 60, 165-170, 1994). Because Pc 5 is also more effective in causing RBC damage, a lower sensitizer concentration was used. The results show that with Pc 5 the same inverse relationship occurs between fluence rate (above 5 mW/cm2) and the rate of hemolysis (FIG. 3). Under our standard virucidal treatment conditions (35% hemocrit) hemolysis is minimal and cannot be used as a useful assay to quantitate RBC damage (B. Horowitz et al., "Inactivation of viruses in blood with aluminum phthalocyanine derivatives", Transfusion, 31, 102-108, 1991; and S. Rywkin et al., "New phthalocyanines for photodynamic virus inactivation in red blood cell concentrates", Photochem. Photobiol., 60, 165-170, 1994). We therefore measured reduction in RBC negative surface charges as an endpoint. FIG. 4 shows that under these conditions RBC damage again was reduced as the fluence rate increased between 20 and 80 mW/cm2, using Pc 5 as a photosensitizer. When RBC were spiked with VSV, complete viral kill occurred after 20 J/cm2 (FIG. 5), independent of the fluence rate.
A possible explanation for the effect of the fluence rate is depletion of oxygen from the cell suspension during light exposure at high fluence rates. To test this possibility we compared photohemolysis at 80 mW/cm2 saturated with air or with oxygen (1 atmosphere pressure). The results obtained at two different light fluences show no significant dependence on oxygen concentration (FIG. 6).
Contrary to our expectation, RBC damage produced upon photosensitization with phthalocyanines was inversely related to light fluence rate between 5 and 80 mW/cm2. The most trivial explanation for this is that oxygen becomes rate limiting for the photodynamic reactions at high fluence rates. This possibility has been ruled out because the effect was not reduced when exposure was carried out in oxygen-saturated rather than air-saturated solutions (FIG. 6). This is also consistent with a lack of a fluence rate effect on VSV inactivation, which would be difficult to explain if depletion of oxygen played a role in this effect.
Other possible explanations for the fluence rate effect can be invoked and are based on an enhancement of the quenching of reactive species at high fluence rates. For example, 1 O2 can form dimoles, (1 O2)2, the concentration of which should be proportional to the square of the light fluence rate. Tetra-t-butylphthalocyanine is particularly effective in sensitizing dimol 1 O2 in organic solvents (A. A. Krasnovsky et al., "Time-resolved measurements of singlet-oxygen dimol-sensitized luminescence", J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 6013-6016, 1993). To test whether dimol production is responsible for the observed effect, the experiment shown in FIG. 1 was performed in D2 O. Although D2 O enhances photohemolysis under these conditions (I. Rosenthal et al., "Ascorbate-assisted, phthalocyanine-sensitized photohaemolysis of human erythrocytes", Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 62, 481-486, 1992), suggesting the involvement of 1 O2, the fluence rate effect was not affected (data not shown). These results argue against dimol contribution to the basic observations.
Another possibility is the quenching of 1 O2 by sensitizer molecules in their triplet excited states (R. D. Kenner et al., "Singlet molecular oxygen annihilation luminescence in polymers", J. Chem. Phys., 64, 1877-1882, 1977). Basically, if energetic requirements are met, the 1 O2 can collide with an aromatic photosensitizer molecule (P) in its triplet excited state, thus generating the singlet excited state of P. The net result is that a biphotonic mechanism leads to the deactivation of a 1 O2 molecule. This mechanism depends on the absorption of two photons: the first photon generates the 3 P sensitizer that produces the 1 O2 molecule in the first place. The second photon generates another 3 P molecule that serves as a quencher for the 1 O2 resulting from the first photon absorption. Obviously, this mechanism should be characterized by a decreasing yield of 1 O2 molecules with increasing fluence rate. The observation of such a mechanism should by facilitated at high sensitizer concentration. However, when the experiment shown in FIG. 1 was performed at 4-fold lower concentration of AlPcSn the fluence rate effect was not affected (data not shown). This experiment also makes the possibility that recombination of other reactive oxygen species (e.g. OH radicals) underlies the fluence rate effect less likely.
Indeed, in view of the lack of a fluence rate effect for viral inactivation, it is difficult to see how any of the above could explain an effect that is specific to RBC. However, while its mechanism is presently unknown, the fluence rate effect has an obvious practical application for photochemical blood sterilization. The use of high fluence rates, especially 80 mW/cm2 and above, would minimize RBC damage and allow higher light fluences to be used in the process.
It will be appreciated that the instant specification and claims are set forth by way of illustration and not limitation, and that various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5120649 *||May 15, 1990||Jun 9, 1992||New York Blood Center, Inc.||Photodynamic inactivation of viruses in blood cell-containing compositions|
|US5232844 *||May 29, 1991||Aug 3, 1993||New York Blood Center||Photodynamic inactivation of viruses in cell-containing compositions|
|1||*||Ben Hur E et al, 22nd Annual Meeting of The Am. Soc. for Photobiology in Photochem & Photobiol. 59: 74S 75S (1994).|
|2||*||Ben Hur E et al, Cancer Lett 30: 321 27 (1986).|
|3||Ben-Hur E et al, 22nd Annual Meeting of The Am. Soc. for Photobiology in Photochem & Photobiol. 59: 74S-75S (1994).|
|4||Ben-Hur E et al, Cancer Lett 30: 321-27 (1986).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6190609||May 18, 1998||Feb 20, 2001||Baxter International Inc.||Methods and apparatus for inactivating contaminants in biological fluid|
|US6270952||Jul 6, 1998||Aug 7, 2001||Cerus Corporation||Methods for quenching pathogen inactivators in biological materials|
|US6461866 *||Nov 15, 2000||Oct 8, 2002||Photo Therapeutics Limited||In vitro photodynamic therapy using non laser light|
|US6565802||Jun 3, 1999||May 20, 2003||Baxter International Inc.||Apparatus, systems and methods for processing and treating a biological fluid with light|
|US6635222||Nov 5, 2001||Oct 21, 2003||Clearant, Inc.||Method of sterilizing products|
|US6682695||Jul 18, 2002||Jan 27, 2004||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing biological materials by multiple rates|
|US6696060||Jun 14, 2001||Feb 24, 2004||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing preparations of monoclonal immunoglobulins|
|US6709810||Jul 23, 2001||Mar 23, 2004||Cerus Corporation||Methods for quenching pathogen inactivators in biological materials|
|US6749851||Aug 31, 2001||Jun 15, 2004||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing preparations of digestive enzymes|
|US6783968||Sep 24, 2001||Aug 31, 2004||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing preparations of glycosidases|
|US6908591||Jul 18, 2002||Jun 21, 2005||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing biological materials by irradiation over a temperature gradient|
|US6946098||Aug 10, 2001||Sep 20, 2005||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing biological materials|
|US6986867||Jul 29, 2002||Jan 17, 2006||Baxter International Inc.||Apparatus, systems and methods for processing and treating a biological fluid with light|
|US7025877||Jun 3, 1999||Apr 11, 2006||Baxter International Inc.||Processing set for processing and treating a biological fluid|
|US7068361||Oct 11, 2002||Jun 27, 2006||Baxter International||Apparatus, systems and methods for processing and treating a biological fluid with light|
|US7105093||Oct 8, 2002||Sep 12, 2006||Baxter International Inc.||Processing set and methods for processing and treating a biological fluid|
|US7252799 *||Aug 31, 2001||Aug 7, 2007||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing preparations containing albumin|
|US7293985||Mar 17, 2004||Nov 13, 2007||Cerus Corporation||Methods for quenching pathogen inactivators in biological materials|
|US7425304||Feb 13, 2006||Sep 16, 2008||Fenwal, Inc.||Processing set and methods for processing and treating a biological fluid|
|US7445756||Oct 11, 2002||Nov 4, 2008||Fenwal, Inc.||Fluid processing sets and organizers for the same|
|US7459695||Jul 27, 2005||Dec 2, 2008||Fenwal, Inc.||Apparatus, and systems for processing and treating a biological fluid with light|
|US7601298||May 31, 2006||Oct 13, 2009||Fenwal, Inc.||Method for processing and treating a biological fluid with light|
|US7655392||Feb 2, 2010||Cerus Corporation||Quenching methods for red blood cell inactivation process|
|US7848487||Nov 3, 2008||Dec 7, 2010||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing biological materials containing non-aqueous solvents|
|US8512942||Nov 29, 2011||Aug 20, 2013||New York Blood Center, Inc.||Method of blood pooling and storage|
|US8900805||Apr 9, 2009||Dec 2, 2014||Cerus Corporation||Quenching methods for red blood cell pathogen inactivation|
|US8968993||Jul 17, 2013||Mar 3, 2015||The New York Blood Center, Inc.||Method of blood pooling and storage|
|US20030031584 *||Aug 10, 2001||Feb 13, 2003||Wilson Burgess||Methods for sterilizing biological materials using dipeptide stabilizers|
|US20030086817 *||Nov 6, 2001||May 8, 2003||Horton Isaac B.||Blood purification system|
|US20030095890 *||Sep 24, 2001||May 22, 2003||Shirley Miekka||Methods for sterilizing biological materials containing non-aqueous solvents|
|US20030146162 *||Oct 11, 2002||Aug 7, 2003||Metzel Peyton S.||Fluid processing sets and organizers for the same|
|US20030161753 *||Jul 18, 2002||Aug 28, 2003||Macphee Martin||Methods for sterilizing biological materials by multiple rates|
|US20030162163 *||Mar 6, 2003||Aug 28, 2003||Clearant, Inc.||Method of sterilizing heart valves|
|US20030165398 *||Oct 11, 2002||Sep 4, 2003||Waldo Jeffrey M.||Apparatus, systems and methods for processing and treating a biological fluid with light|
|US20030180181 *||Apr 29, 2002||Sep 25, 2003||Teri Greib||Methods for sterilizing tissue|
|US20030185702 *||Feb 1, 2002||Oct 2, 2003||Wilson Burgess||Methods for sterilizing tissue|
|US20030213920 *||Aug 31, 2001||Nov 20, 2003||Miekka Shirley I.||Methods for sterilizing preparations containing albumin|
|US20040013562 *||Jul 18, 2002||Jan 22, 2004||Wilson Burgess||Methods for sterilizing milk.|
|US20040033160 *||Jul 18, 2002||Feb 19, 2004||Macphee Martin||Methods for sterilizing biological materials by irradiation over a temperature gradient|
|US20040067157 *||Jun 10, 2003||Apr 8, 2004||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing biological materials|
|US20040086420 *||Jun 13, 2003||May 6, 2004||Macphee Martin J.||Methods for sterilizing serum or plasma|
|US20040091388 *||Oct 29, 2003||May 13, 2004||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing biological materials by multiple rates|
|US20040101436 *||Oct 29, 2003||May 27, 2004||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing biological materials|
|US20040180321 *||Mar 17, 2004||Sep 16, 2004||Cerus Corporation||Methods for quenching pathogen inactivators in biological materials|
|US20040249135 *||Oct 10, 2003||Dec 9, 2004||Teri Grieb||Methods for sterilizing preparations of monoclonal immunoglobulins|
|US20050047958 *||May 7, 2004||Mar 3, 2005||Clearant Inc.||Methods for sterilizing preparations of digestive enzymes|
|US20050258109 *||Jul 27, 2005||Nov 24, 2005||Hanley Kathleen A||Apparatus, systems and methods for processing and treating a biological fluid with light|
|US20060115466 *||Oct 31, 2005||Jun 1, 2006||Adonis Stassinopoulos||Quenching methods for red blood cell inactivation process|
|US20060197031 *||Feb 13, 2006||Sep 7, 2006||De Gheldere Serge||Processing set and methods for processing and treating a biological fluid|
|US20080080998 *||Jul 16, 2007||Apr 3, 2008||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing tissue|
|US20080176306 *||Aug 22, 2007||Jul 24, 2008||Macphee Martin J||Methods for Sterilizing Biological Materials|
|US20090202039 *||Nov 3, 2008||Aug 13, 2009||Shirley Miekka||Methods for Sterilizing Biological Materials Containing Non-Aqueous Solvents|
|US20110091353 *||Dec 2, 2010||Apr 21, 2011||Wilson Burgess||Methods for Sterilizing Tissue|
|WO1998022150A1 *||Oct 23, 1997||May 28, 1998||Baxter International Inc.||Method and apparatus for inactivating contaminants in biological fluid|
|WO1999059645A1 *||May 10, 1999||Nov 25, 1999||Baxter International Inc.||Methods and apparatus for inactivating contaminants in biological fluid|
|WO2003086480A1 *||Aug 9, 2002||Oct 23, 2003||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing biological materials|
|U.S. Classification||435/2, 424/93.73, 435/238|
|International Classification||A61L2/00, A61K41/00|
|Cooperative Classification||A61K41/0071, A61L2/0011|
|European Classification||A61K41/00W, A61L2/00P2|
|Mar 29, 1995||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER, INC., NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BEN-HUR, EHUD;HOROWITZ, BERNARD;REEL/FRAME:007652/0564
Effective date: 19950310
|Apr 26, 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, THE, MARYLAND
Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER;REEL/FRAME:008001/0796
Effective date: 19951207
|Sep 22, 2000||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Oct 20, 2004||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Sep 30, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12