|Publication number||US5645876 A|
|Application number||US 08/656,596|
|Publication date||Jul 8, 1997|
|Filing date||May 31, 1996|
|Priority date||Jan 14, 1994|
|Also published as||DE19500730A1, DE69518991D1, EP0663152A1, EP0663152B1|
|Publication number||08656596, 656596, US 5645876 A, US 5645876A, US-A-5645876, US5645876 A, US5645876A|
|Inventors||Persis Jebakumari Subramaniam, Sylvia Anna Jones, Iain Cunningham Mutter Dea|
|Original Assignee||Cpc International Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (27), Non-Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (27), Classifications (26), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This Application is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/359,173, filed Dec. 19, 1994 now abandoned.
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to dehydrated vegetables, to methods for their production and to comestible products containing dehydrated vegetables.
2. Description of Related Art
Dehydrated vegetables are used widely in products such as soups and other processed foods often in dehydrated, diced form. The major problem associated with dehydrated vegetables is that on rehydration they often remain collapsed and shrunk giving rise to a product of poor texture relative to the textural quality of the fresh or minimally processed vegetables. The irreversible shrinkage that occurs during drying is due to the collapse of the cell-wall structure.
Pectin is a major component of vegetable cell walls and as such makes a major contribution to the structural integrity and strength of vegetables and vegetable pieces. Native pectin is, generally, high methoxyl in structure and, as a result, is susceptible to degradation on heating under neutral pH conditions. This form of degradation occurs during cooking and is the major reason for unwanted textural softening of vegetables on heat processing. During forced-air drying of vegetable pieces, water is removed, thus releasing the turgor pressure and causing the cell wall structure to collapse. The collapse can be irreversible, if the moisture content of the materials is very high or if the cell wall structure is weak. In these cases, rehydration only causes the absorption of water into the intercellular spaces, thus leading to poor rehydratability of the dehydrated material and poor texture on rehydration.
Vegetables contain pectinmethylesterase (PME) in their cell walls. This endogenous enzyme can be activated by mild heat treatment under specific conditions of pH and ionic strength and, when activated, leads to demethoxylation of the native pectin. The resulting demethoxylated pectin has a structure that is more stable against degradation on heating at neutral pH and that more effectively cross-links in the presence of calcium ions. Both of these factors lead to the strengthening of the cell wall structure and pretreatments that activate the PME enzyme in vegetables have been shown to give improved texture after freezing and canning.
EP-A-0337621 discloses a method for producing dried fruit which involves stabilizing the color and flavor of the fruit by infusing it in a 10 to 70% carbohydrate solution prior to drying.
EP-A-0404543 also describes a process for preparing dried fruit which includes infusion in an aqueous carbohydrate solution. This document teaches that the fruit must be soaked under conditions which deactivate the enzymes and also soften the fruit before deaeration is carried out.
The present invention relates to the production of dehydrated vegetables which have improved textural qualities on rehydration. It has been found that improved texture in the rehydrated product may be achieved by preservation of the cell wall structure of vegetables on dehydration by activating the endogenous pectinmethylesterase enzyme.
According to the present invention, there is provided a method for producing dehydrated vegetables comprising preparing the vegetables, holding the prepared vegetables for a time and at a temperature to activate endogenous pectinmethylesterase, blanching and drying.
Preferably, the method of the invention comprises infusing the prepared vegetables before, during or after the holding treatment in an aqueous solution comprising from 20 to 70% of one or more carbohydrates and, optionally, up to 5.0% of a calcium salt.
Plant material such as vegetables containing pectinmethylesterase may be used in the invention and, particularly, include carrot, tomato, celery and bell pepper. Activation of the endogenous pectinmethylesterase is preferably carried out by holding the vegetable matter under specific pH conditions at an elevated temperature. The pH conditions, the temperature range and the time for which the material is held in that range to effect activation varies with the vegetable used and the optimum conditions required in each specific case may be determined if the optimal conditions to promote PME activity in the vegetable is known. The conditions and/or the methods for their determination will be well-known to those skilled in the art. Generally, the vegetable pieces are held in water or an aqueous solution at a pH of from 6 to 8 at a temperature of from 45° to 70° C. for from 10 to 60 minutes. For carrot, bell pepper, celery and tomato, the optimum conditions are about 60° C. for 40 minutes, about 60° for 30 minutes, about 60° C. for 15 minutes and about 50° C. for 15 minutes, respectively.
The vegetables used in the present invention may be the whole or any part of the whole vegetable and are prepared in conventional ways well-known in the art. The vegetables may be treated by cutting to any given size as required by their end use. Preferably, the vegetables are diced and have dimensions of from 0.5 to 1.5 mm. Typically, the vegetables may be prepared by washing, peeling and dicing the fresh vegetables.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the vegetables are infused with an aqueous infusion solution comprising from 20 to 70% by weight of one or more carbohydrates and, optionally, up to 5.0% by weight of a calcium salt (e.g., from 0.5% to 5.0%). The infusion may be carried out before, during or after the holding treatment but is preferably carried out either after the holding treatment or during the holding treatment by carrying out the holding treatment in the infusion solution. The infusion treatment causes osmotic dehydration and, therefore, aids drying. The carbohydrates are preferably monosaccharides or disaccharides since it is preferred that they have a relatively low molecular weight to permit ready infusion into the vegetable tissue. The most preferred carbohydrates are glucose, sucrose, fructose and mixtures thereof. Any edible calcium salt having a sufficiently high solubility to provide a 0.5 to 5.0% solution of the salt in the infusion solution may be used in the invention. Suitable salts include calcium chloride, calcium lactate and mixtures thereof. The infusion solution may include other substances, such as sodium chloride (up to 10%) that promote osmotic dehydration, and other flavorants or preservatives that do not affect the performance of the invention.
The infusion of the vegetables may take place at ambient pressure but is preferably carried out under vacuum. Vacuum infusion methods of the type used in the invention are well-known to those skilled in the art. Preferably, vacuum infusion is carried out by subjecting the vegetable matter in the infusion solution to a vacuum of from 2.67 to 5.33 MPa (20 to 40 mmHg) for a period of from 1 to 10 minutes. A typical vacuum infusion process involves holding the vegetable matter in the infusion solution, applying a vacuum of 20 mmHg for 5 minutes, slowly releasing the vacuum and holding for a further 5 minutes.
Blanching of the treated vegetable matter may be carried out by the standard commercial treatments which are used prior to dehydration in order to deactivate enzymes that are known to cause deterioration in the quality of the dried products. Suitable blanching treatments include immersion of the vegetable matter in water or an aqueous solution (e.g., a dilute sodium bicarbonate solution) at about 100° C. for from 1 to 5 minutes. Preferably, blanching is carried out in the infusion solution. The skilled person will be aware of the blanching conditions which are suitable in any given case.
Drying of the blanched material may be carried out by conventional methods such as vacuum drying or forced air drying. The treated vegetables may, for example, be dried by forced air drying at a temperature of from 75° to 95° C. with an air velocity of 3 m/s.
The present invention will now be described with reference to the following examples.
Raw carrots were peeled and then cubed to a size of about 10 mm×10 mm×10 mm. The resulting cubed carrot was held at a temperature of 60° C. in a thermostat-controlled water bath for a predetermined length of time. Where the vegetables were subjected to vacuum infusion, this was carried out in a Jacketed vessel at a reduced pressure of about 20 mmHg for about 5 minutes followed by a slow return to atmospheric pressure and holding in the solution for 5 minutes. Blanching of the treated vegetables was carried out using conditions similar to those of standard commercial treatments (1000° C. for 4 minutes in water). Drying was carried out by forced air drying at about 930° C. with an air velocity of 3 m/s. The moisture level of the samples was determined by monitoring the loss in weight and drying was terminated when a moisture level of approximately 4% was obtained.
Product assessment--Dehydrated products were assessed for rehydration and textural characteristics.
Moisture determination--The actual moisture content of the dried pieces was measured by drying 5 g of the samples to constant weight in a vacuum oven at 70° C.
Rehydration characteristics--To assess the performance of dehydrated pieces in finished products, the samples were rehydrated in boiling water. 50 ml of boiling water was added to 5 g of the sample and left for 5 minutes. The pieces were then strained and weighed to determine the rehydration ratio which is the ratio of the weight of the reconstituted sample to that of the dry sample.
Organoleptic assessment--All samples were informally assessed for organoleptic quality by a few experienced assessors, who examined the pieces for color, texture and flavor. The results are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________FORMATION OF DEHYDRATED CARROT BY THE PRESENT INVENTION Drying Rehydration Shrinkage on OrganolepticPretreatment time (h) ratio rehydration quality__________________________________________________________________________60° C./40 min then 3.80 1.46 Very slightly Crunchy; sweetinfusion of 1% calcium shrunk soft outside and alactate + 60% glucose 7-9 mm × 7 mm × hard crisp center 7 mm60° C./40 min in 60% 2.50 2.03 Very slightly Crunchy; slightlysucrose + 10% NaCl shrunk crispy; good 9-7 mm × 7-5 mm × flavor but salty 7-8 mm60° C./40 min in 60% 2.50 2.07 Quite shrunk Crunch with hardsucrose 8-9 mm × 8-5 mm × core; sweet; 10-5 mm slight loss of color; quite good flavor__________________________________________________________________________
The method described in EXAMPLE 1 was applied to the production of dehydrated celery. Celery pieces were produced by cutting fresh celery lengthwise into 10 mm wide strips and then slicing into 10 mm segments. The thinner, greener part of the celery stalk was used in preference to the wider, whiter part in order to obtain appropriately sized pieces.
Pretreatments were carried out at 60° C. and blanching in 0.5% sodium bicarbonate solution. The results are given in Table 2.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________FORMATION OF DEHYDRATED CELERY BY THE PRESENT INVENTION Drying Moisture Rehydration Shrinkage on OrganolepticPretreatment time (h) content (%) ratio rehydration quality__________________________________________________________________________10% NaCl + 60% 8.00 0.58 1.36 Slightly shrunk; Bright color;sucrose vacuum no collapse 9- some celeryinfusion 60° C./15 10 mm odor; verymin + blanch in crunchy, likesame raw, very salty10 NaCl 60% 8.00 0.77 1.77 As above 9-10 mm Some typicalsucrose 60° C./15 aroma; crunchy;min + blanch in more flesh;same salty__________________________________________________________________________
The method of EXAMPLE 1 was applied to the production of dehydrated tomato from 10 mm×10 mm×10 mm tomato pieces obtained by cutting the tomato in half, removing the seeds and dicing the resulting "shells".
Pretreatments were carried out at 50° C. and the treated vegetable blanched in water at 100° C. for 1 minute. The results are presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________FORMATION OF DEHYDRATED TOMATO BY METHOD OF THEPRESENT INVENTION Drying Rehydration Shrinkage on OrganolepticPretreatment time (h) ratio rehydration quality__________________________________________________________________________50° C./15 min in 60% 11.25 1.90 Flesh intact Soft flesh; crispysucrose center; sweet; good flavorVacuum infuse 60% 19.00 1.17 Slightly Soft outer; slightsucrose + 2% CaCl2 and shrunk crisp center; flavorhold (50° C./15 min) quite sweet; good fleshVacuum infuse 60% 19.00 1.13 Slightly Bright color; flesh asglucose + 2% CaCl2 and shrunk in fresh; crisphold (50° C./15 min) center; sweet but salty50°/15 min in 60% 11.25 1.61 Flesh intact Very birght color;sucrose + 10% NaCl slight crisp center; good flavor; salty; flesh similar to fresh__________________________________________________________________________
The method of EXAMPLE 1 was applied to the production of dehydrated bell pepper (CAPSICUM ANNUM L.) from 10 mm×10 mm pepper pieces obtained by cutting the pepper in half, removing the seeds and then cutting the resulting "shells" into squares.
Pretreatments were carried out at 60° C. and the treated vegetable blanched in either water or test solution at 100° C. for 2 minutes. The result are presented in Table 4.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________FORMATION OF DEHYDRATED BELL PEPPER BY THEPRESENT INVENTION Drying Rehydration Shrinkage on OrganolepticPretreatment Time (h) ratio rehydration quality__________________________________________________________________________60° C./30 min in 7 1.9 Quite Mild pepperya 30% sucrose/ fleshy odor;4% NaCl followed by crunchy texture;vacuum infusion and sweet; goodblanching in flavorthe same solution60° C./30 min in 7 1.9 Slightly Mild peppery2% calcium lactate fleshy firm texture;followed by infusion of salty flavor30% sucrose/4%NaCl then blanchingin the same solution__________________________________________________________________________
Dehydrated carrot and bell pepper prepared by the method of the present invention were rehydrated by the following methods:
a) soaking in boiling water for 5 minutes;
b) microwaving in water for 2 minutes at full power; and
c) soaking in cold water for 2, 4 and 22 hours.
The carrot samples used in this example were as follows:
1. standard blanched carrot (100° C./4 minutes) without pretreatment--used as a control;
2. 60° C./40 minutes in deionized water, vacuum infusion of 1% calcium lactate/60% glucose and blanch in same;
3. 60° C./40 minutes in deionized water, blanch in deionized water, vacuum infusion of 1% calcium lactate/60% glucose;
4. 60° C./40 minutes in 60% sucrose/10% sodium chloride and blanch in same.
The results of the tests are given in Tables 5, 6 and 7.
The pepper samples used in this example were as follows:
1. Control, standard blanch 2 minutes at 100° C. in deionized water.
2. Holding at 60° C. for 3 minutes in deionized water, then blanching as the control.
3. Holding at 60° C. for 30 minutes in 30% sucrose/4% NaCl solution, followed by vacuum infusing for 10 minutes, then blanching in the same way as the control.
4. Holding at 60° C. for 30 minutes in 30% sucrose/4% NaCl solution, followed by vacuum infusing for 10 minutes, then blanching in the same way as the control.
5. Holding at 60° C. for 30 minutes in 2% calcium lactate solution, followed by vacuum infusing for 10 minutes in 30% sucrose/4% NaCl solution, then blanching in 30% sucrose 4% NaCl solution, as the control.
The result of the tests involving pepper are given in Tables 8, 9 and 10.
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________REHYDRATION OF CARROT SAMPLES WITH BOILING WATERSample No. 1 2 3 4__________________________________________________________________________Rehydration (RR) 1.87 1.57 1.58 1.45Dimensions after 5 × 6 × 5 7 × 7 × 7 7 × 7 × 7 7 × 6 × 6rehydration (mm) 5 × 6 × 5 7 × 6 × 5 7 × 5 × 5 6 × 10 × 6 7 × 6 × 6 8 × 6 × 6 7 × 6 × 5 9 × 7 × 6Shrinkage on Quite shrunk & Slightly Very slightly Best so far;rehydration collapsed collapsed & more shrunk hardly any shrunk than 2 shrinkageOdor Carroty Not much odor Not much odor Not much odorColor Orange; bright Orange; bright Dark color Orange; slightly slightly less duller than 1 color than 1Texture Slight crunch, Very crunchy; Crunchy; but Softer than 2 & but quite soft slightly hard not as crunchy 3, but crunchier center; like as 2; not fully than 1; hard fresh hydrated; hard center centerFlavor Only a slight More flavor Same as for 2 Too salty; carrot flavor than 1, but except sweet carroty still quite bland__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________REHYDRATION OF CARROT SAMPLES IN THE MICROWAVESample No. 1 2 3 4__________________________________________________________________________Rehydration 1.83 1.48 1.48 1.43ratio (RR)Dimensions after 5 × 5 × 6 5 × 6 × 6 7 × 6 × 5 8 × 6 × 6rehydration (mm) 5 × 5 × 6 4 × 6 × 6 7 × 5 × 5 7 × 6 × 6 7 × 6 × 6 5 × 5 × 5 7 × 5 × 5 8 × 6 × 6Shrinkage on Shrinkage worse Similar to Similar to Similar torehydration than with boiling water boiling water boiling water boiling water rehydration rehydration rehydration rehydrationOdor Similar to boiling water rehydrated productsTexture Drier than Very crunchy; Slightly Soft outer and boiling water hard center; not crunchy; quite hard center rehydrated as rehydrated as hard center; not samples; soft; boiling water as rehydrated as rubbery samples boiling water samplesFlavor Bland; slight Strong carrot Some carrot Not as salty as carrot flavor flavor flavor present rehydrating in boiling water good carrot flavor__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________REHYDRATION OF CARROT PIECES IN COLD WATER Soaking time (h)Sample No. 2 4 22__________________________________________________________________________Rehydration 1 2.94 3.38 4.09ratio (RR) 2 2.47 2.98 3.27 3 2.34 2.85 3.24 4 2.15 2.59 2.85Shrinkage on 1 Slightly shrunk Very slightly shrunk Very slightly shrunkrehydration 2 No shrinkage No shrinkage No shrinkage 3 Slightly shrunk No Shrinkage No shrinkage 4 No shrinkage No shrinkage No shrinkageTexture 1 -- -- Slightly soft; slight crunch 2 -- -- Like raw carrot 3 -- -- Quite crunchy 4 -- -- Slightly crunchy but slightly softFlavor 1 -- -- Good carrot flavor 2 -- -- Slight carrot flavor; slightly sweet 3 -- -- Quite crunchy; sweet 4 -- -- Salty; slight carrot flavor__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 8______________________________________REHYDRATION OF PEPPER SAMPLES WITH BOILED WATERSample No. 1 2 3 4 5______________________________________Rehydration 2.9 3.2 1.7 1.9 1.9ratioShrinkage on Shrunk Shrunk Fleshy Most Slightlyrehydration fleshy fleshyOdor Hay-like; Grass Slightly Mild; Mild; peppery peppery peppery pepperyColor Dark green Dark Green Lighter Green greenTexture Slimy Skin/ Firm Crunchy Firm toughFlavor Bitter Bitter Salty Sweet; Salty peppery best flavor______________________________________
TABLE 9______________________________________REHYDRATION OF PEPPER SAMPLES IN THE MICROWAVESample No. 1 2 3 4 5______________________________________Rehydration 3.2 3.4 1.9 2.1 1.9ratioShrinkage on Quite Very shrunk Shrunk Least Shrunkrehydration shrunk shrunkOdor Dried Hay-like All 3 samples were mildly peppery grassColor Olive/ Olive Olive Bright Light brown green greenTexture Soft Skin/ Crunchy Most Firm tough crunchyFlavor Bitter; Cabbage; Sweet; Too salty Salty; mild bitter mild no pleasant pepper flavor______________________________________
TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________REHYDRATION OF PEPPER SAMPLES IN COLD WATERSample No. 1 2 3 4 5__________________________________________________________________________Rehydrationratio aftervarious soakingtimes2 h 5.0 5.3 2.8 3.3 2.84 h 5.7 6.1 3.3 3.8 3.422 h 7.0 7.6 4.4 4.8 4.1Shrinkage on Slightly Shrunk Fleshy As raw Slightlyrehydration shrunk fleshyOdor Hay-like Green grass Pepper-like Peppery Some pepperyColor Dark Dark green Pale/bright Bright green Green green greenTexture Soft Skin Crunchy Very Crunchy crunchy; as rawFlavor No flavor Very little Sweet, Best; Salt; flavor slightly peppery water; peppery; slightly watery peppery__________________________________________________________________________
The samples infused with glucose/calcium, before blanching, showed a lower amount of shrinkage than the samples infused after blanching, when rehydrated in boiling water (Table 5). The pieces held in sucrose/salt solution showed the least amount of shrinkage, but were slightly softer in texture compared with the glucose-infused samples. The samples infused with glucose solution after blanching were found to be too sweet and samples treated with sucrose/salt were too salty but had good carrot flavor. Soaking in boiling water for 5 minutes was not adequate to rehydrate any of the treated samples completely.
Rehydration of dried carrot pieces in the microwave was not as successful as in boiling water. The rehydration ratios of samples were lower when the microwave method was used. All the rehydrated products were drier in texture but only the control samples developed a rubbery texture.
Rehydration in cold water was investigated to determine whether dried samples could be rehydrated without heating in wet products. Although the samples soaked for 2 and 4 hours were not tasted, the rehydration results indicated that 2 hours would be adequate to rehydrate the dried pieces completely. After soaking for 2 hours, the pretreated samples showed little or no shrinkage, the samples from pretreatment 2 and 4 having a swollen appearance. After 22 hours no shrinkage was seen on any of the pretreated samples. On tasting, the samples infused with glucose/calcium (pretreatment 2) were said to be the best, with a raw carrot-like texture. The samples treated in sucrose/salt were slightly soft.
Dehydrated carrot samples prepared by the method of the present invention and a control sample were tested for their rehydration properties in instant and simmered dried soup products.
In the instant soup (Knorr® low-calorie chicken noodle soup), the samples were assessed by adding approximately 3 g of dried pieces to the dried soup (about 10 g) and then rehydrating with 90 ml of boiling water and stirring.
Dried samples were assessed in the simmered soup (Knorr® cream of chicken soup) by preparing the soup according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the rehydrated pieces assessed for size and texture. The samples were prepared by adding approximately 5 g of dried pieces to 22.7 g of the dry soup, then 283 ml of cold water, bringing the mixture to boil and simmering for 5 minutes. The results are presented in Table 11.
TABLE 11__________________________________________________________________________ASSESSMENT OF CARROT SAMPLES IN SOUPS Instant soupPretreatment Simmered soup Assessed instantly Assessed after 5 mins__________________________________________________________________________Control Carrot soft but not Carroty taste Softer than 2; soggy; good carrot slightly soft; slightly hard flavor crunchy center60° C./40 min then Very crunchy; no Crunchy especially Very crunchyinfusion of 1% calcium hard center; good in center; quite good carrotlactate + 60% glucose flavor, especially carroty taste flavor the aftertaste60° C./40 min in 60% Outside of pieces Not fully hydrated; Not fullysucrose very soft but hard hard center; soft hydrated; hard centers; softer than outside center; soft 2; did not taste too outside salty__________________________________________________________________________
The pretreated samples did not hydrate completely in the instant soup after 5 minutes. Both pretreated samples had a firmer texture than the control samples but holding at 60° C. combined with infusion of glucose/calcium gave the best result.
When assessed in the simmered soup, the control and samples held at 60° C. and then infused with glucose/calcium (pretreatment 2) had hydrated completely and the latter had a very crunchy texture and good flavor. The sample treated in sucrose/NaCl did not hydrate adequately and had a softer texture.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2534263 *||Jul 18, 1947||Dec 19, 1950||Hills Claude H||Method of firming fruit and vegetable slices|
|US3904774 *||Aug 17, 1973||Sep 9, 1975||Regents For Education Of The S||Food preserving process|
|US4330946 *||Sep 23, 1980||May 25, 1982||Ralph S. Tillitt||High efficiency material drying|
|US4361589 *||Jun 8, 1981||Nov 30, 1982||General Foods Corporation||Infused dried celery|
|US4418083 *||Jul 29, 1982||Nov 29, 1983||Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation||Process of making hollow dried grape|
|US4542033 *||Oct 23, 1984||Sep 17, 1985||Gen Mills Inc||Sugar and acid infused fruit products and process therefor|
|US4622757 *||Dec 24, 1984||Nov 18, 1986||Energy International, Inc.||Cogeneration microwave food dryer|
|US4640020 *||Nov 27, 1985||Feb 3, 1987||Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation||Zoned microwave drying apparatus and process|
|US4664924 *||Aug 13, 1985||May 12, 1987||House Food Industrial Co., Ltd.||Method of producing a dehydrated food product|
|US4746968 *||Mar 30, 1987||May 24, 1988||Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation||Combined microwave and thermal drying apparatus|
|US4889730 *||Feb 18, 1988||Dec 26, 1989||The Procter & Gamble Company||Crisp fruit or vegetable snack product and process|
|US5000972 *||Jun 21, 1989||Mar 19, 1991||Del Monte Corporation||Method of making dried fruits|
|US5020237 *||Apr 30, 1990||Jun 4, 1991||The J. M. Smucker Company||Method and apparatus for dehydrating fruit|
|US5053232 *||May 10, 1990||Oct 1, 1991||Stazione Sperimentale Per L'industria Delle Conserve Alimentari||Proteic inhibitor of pectinesterase and use thereof in the preparation of fruit and vegetable juices|
|US5113597 *||Jul 24, 1990||May 19, 1992||Kohlensaeurewerk Deutschland Gmbh||Process for drying of plant or animal material|
|US5135122 *||Feb 21, 1991||Aug 4, 1992||The J. M. Smucker Company||Method and apparatus for dehydrating fruit|
|US5380189 *||Aug 2, 1993||Jan 10, 1995||California State University, Fresno Foundation||Method for deydrating vegetive matter|
|DE2713935A1 *||Mar 29, 1977||Oct 20, 1977||Mccain Foods Ltd||Verfahren zur herstellung von gefrorenen pommes frites|
|EP0221489A2 *||Oct 27, 1986||May 13, 1987||FreshWorld, L.P.||Prolonging the shelf life of fresh root vegetables|
|EP0337621A1 *||Mar 22, 1989||Oct 18, 1989||The Horticulture And Food Research Institute Of New Zealand Limited||Process for the production of fruit products|
|EP0404543A1 *||Jun 20, 1990||Dec 27, 1990||Del Monte Corporation||Dried fruits and their method of preparation|
|EP0407299A2 *||Jul 4, 1990||Jan 9, 1991||S.A. DAREGAL Société:||Treatment process for herbs, aromatic plants or essential plants|
|EP0413071A1 *||Aug 17, 1989||Feb 20, 1991||S.A. Eurocolor||Process for the preparation of fruits or vegetables, entire or in slices, by reduced humidity|
|EP0546350A1 *||Nov 16, 1992||Jun 16, 1993||Societe Des Produits Nestle S.A.||Process for preparing dried fruits|
|FR2182234A1 *||Title not available|
|GB1067967A *||Title not available|
|GB1579392A *||Title not available|
|1||*||Microwave/Vacuum Convective Drying of Foodstuffs, by A. Heindl, W. Holley, D. Rehmann, Munich, pp. 1 14.|
|2||Microwave/Vacuum Convective Drying of Foodstuffs, by A. Heindl, W. Holley, D. Rehmann, Munich, pp. 1-14.|
|3||*||MIVAC, A Natural Food De Hydration Process, Pitt DesMoines, Inc. Sales Literature.|
|4||MIVAC, A Natural Food De-Hydration Process, Pitt-DesMoines, Inc. Sales Literature.|
|5||*||MIVAC, Dried Foods Technology, Pitt DesMoines, Inc. Sales Brochure.|
|6||MIVAC, Dried Foods Technology, Pitt-DesMoines, Inc. Sales Brochure.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6004590 *||Jul 10, 1996||Dec 21, 1999||Bestfoods||Process for producing dehydrated vegetables|
|US6027757 *||Aug 8, 1997||Feb 22, 2000||Amway Corporation||Process for producing dehydrated plant matter or portions thereof|
|US6086933 *||Jun 4, 1999||Jul 11, 2000||Rockstrom; Erik I.||Process for preparing dehydrated vegetable products|
|US6376002 *||Jun 12, 2000||Apr 23, 2002||Hong Young Food Co., Ltd.||Method for preparation of mulberry leaf powder and ice cream containing thereof|
|US6770313 *||Jun 29, 2001||Aug 3, 2004||Nongshim, Co., Ltd.||Method and apparatus for hygienically preparing dried pepper by continuous sterilization and drying processes|
|US7695746||Jul 19, 2006||Apr 13, 2010||Frito-Lay Trading Company Gmbh||Process for making a healthy snack food|
|US7867533||Mar 14, 2007||Jan 11, 2011||Frito-Lay Trading Compnay GmbH||Process for making a healthy snack food|
|US7968137||Jun 28, 2011||Olam West Coast, Inc.||Method for dehydro-roasting|
|US7993693||Aug 9, 2011||Frito-Lay Trading Company Gmbh||Process for making a healthy snack food|
|US8007852 *||Aug 30, 2011||Olam West Coast, Inc.||Method for production of frozen vegetables or fruits|
|US8460728||Jul 12, 2006||Jun 11, 2013||Nestec S.A.||Preserved slices of vegetables and fruits and processing methods|
|US20040096559 *||Nov 18, 2002||May 20, 2004||Swanson Wade H||Method for production of frozen vegetables or fruits|
|US20080026118 *||Mar 14, 2007||Jan 31, 2008||John Richard Bows||Process for making a healthy snack food|
|US20080026122 *||Jul 19, 2006||Jan 31, 2008||John Richard Bows||Process for Making a Healthy Snack Food|
|US20080138480 *||Jan 18, 2008||Jun 12, 2008||John Richard Bows||Process for making a healthy snack food|
|US20080179318 *||Dec 18, 2007||Jul 31, 2008||Christopher John Cornwell||Apparatus and Method for Vacuum Microwave Drying of Food Products|
|US20090047400 *||Aug 16, 2007||Feb 19, 2009||Varadharajan Radhami Basker||Apparatus and method for hybrid infusion of food pieces|
|US20090087529 *||Sep 22, 2008||Apr 2, 2009||Conagra Foods Food Ingredients Compnay, Inc.||Method for dehydro-roasting|
|US20100055263 *||Jul 12, 2006||Mar 4, 2010||Nestec S.A.||Preserved slices of vegetables and fruits and processing methods|
|US20100196567 *||Aug 5, 2010||Beau Giannini||Method of preparing apple chips|
|US20100203210 *||Aug 12, 2010||Vsp Products, Inc.||Tomato sweet infusion process|
|US20100203223 *||Feb 9, 2009||Aug 12, 2010||Vsp Products, Inc.||Process for manufacturing sun-dried tomatoes utilizing vinegar|
|US20100266734 *||Jul 18, 2007||Oct 21, 2010||Frito-Lay Trading Company, Gmbh||Process for making a healthy snack food|
|CN1893835B||Dec 24, 2003||Apr 28, 2010||科学与工业研究委员||Tomato powder and its product making method|
|WO2005070229A1 *||Dec 24, 2003||Aug 4, 2005||Council Of Scientific And Industrial Research||A process for preparing tomato powder and products thereof|
|WO2008006388A1 *||Jul 12, 2006||Jan 17, 2008||Nestec S.A.||Preserved slices of vegetables and fruits and processing methods|
|WO2009105039A1 *||Feb 19, 2009||Aug 27, 2009||National University Of Singapore||Process for treating plant material|
|U.S. Classification||426/50, 426/639, 426/640|
|International Classification||A23B7/155, A23B7/154, A23B7/005, A23B7/06, A23B7/08, A23B7/10, A23B7/022|
|Cooperative Classification||A23B7/0053, A23B7/10, A23B7/08, A23B7/154, A23B7/022, A23B7/155, A23B7/005, A23B7/06|
|European Classification||A23B7/005, A23B7/154, A23B7/005F, A23B7/10, A23B7/08, A23B7/022, A23B7/06, A23B7/155|
|Aug 21, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BESTFOODS, NEW JERSEY
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:CPC INTERNATIONAL INC.;REEL/FRAME:009396/0275
Effective date: 19971124
|Jan 2, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jul 8, 2005||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Sep 6, 2005||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20050708