|Publication number||US5646411 A|
|Application number||US 08/595,355|
|Publication date||Jul 8, 1997|
|Filing date||Feb 1, 1996|
|Priority date||Feb 1, 1996|
|Publication number||08595355, 595355, US 5646411 A, US 5646411A, US-A-5646411, US5646411 A, US5646411A|
|Inventors||Robert C. Kain, Christopher C. Alexay|
|Original Assignee||Molecular Dynamics, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (123), Classifications (5), Legal Events (10)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to laser scanning imaging systems, particularly for use in fluorescence imaging.
Fluorescence microscopy is often used in the fields of molecular biology, biochemistry and other life sciences. One such use is in identifying a specific antigen using antibodies. Antibodies are proteins produced by vertebrates as a defense against infection. They are made of millions of different forms, each having a different binding site and specifically recognizing the antigen that induces its production. To identify an antigen, a sample of cells is provided that contains specific antibodies coupled to a fluorescent dye. The cells are then assessed for their fluorescence. Taking advantage of the precise antigen specificity of antibodies, the cells having fluorescent properties are known to contain a specific antigen.
Originally, the fluorescence of cells was assessed manually by visual inspection, using conventional microscopy. This proved time-consuming and costly. The need for high-speed automated systems became manifest. Many high-speed imaging systems, such as confocal microscopes, are available for assaying cell samples. The illumination and collection optics, along with their relative geometry, determine in large part the parameters of the other system elements.
A prior art high-speed imaging system is shown in FIG. 1 and includes an F-Θ objective 10 positioned above a sample 11 so that the surfaces of the objective are perpendicular to the sample's normal. A laser light source 12 produces a beam 13. The objective 10 directs the beam 13 to illuminate a spot on the sample's surface. An oscillating reflective surface 14 is disposed at the pupil 15 of the system, between the light source 12 and the objective 10, to deflect the beam 13 back and forth along one axis. The sample is placed on a table to move the sample in a direction perpendicular to the first scan direction, thereby resulting in a two dimensional scan pattern on the sample's surface. The objective is not designed for coaxial collection resulting in light reflected from the sample surface being collected by a condenser assembly 16 that is separate and apart from the objective. Such a geometry results in increased system footprint, increased optical complexity and a limitation of solid angle collection. The collected light is then imaged on a photo-detector 17. The design of a classical F-Θ lens is primarily for monochromatic illumination. As a result, such lenses lack good polychromatic performance. Therefore, the objective 10 manifests lateral and axial chromatic aberrations over a broad band of wavelengths.
A prior art high-speed imaging system, similar to that described with respect to FIG. 1, is disclosed by Richard L. Shoemaker et al., in "An Ultrafast Laser Scanner Microscope for Digital Imaging Analysis", IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. BME-29, No. 2, February 1982, pp. 82-91. The principal difference between these two systems concerns the scanning device. Instead of a galvanometric scanner, Shoemaker et al. require the use of a rotating polygon mirror to scan the spot over the sample's surface.
Another prior art high-speed imaging system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,284,897 by Sawamura et al., in which laser light is reflected through two galvanometric mirrors and one dichroic mirror to direct a beam through an objective and illuminate a spot on a sample's surface. The galvanometric mirrors are swung in appropriate directions to allow the spot to scan over the entire surface of the sample. In response to the illuminating spot, the sample emits fluorescence light. The objective, serving as a condenser lens, transmits the light back through a first dichroic mirror. Positioned behind the first dichroic mirror is a second dichroic mirror that splits the fluorescent light into a light produced by a first probe at a first wavelength and light produced by a second probe at a second wavelength. The first and second wavelengths are transmitted to respective photo-detectors.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,700 to Kumagai discloses a fluorescent confocal microscope which includes, in pertinent part, an intermediary optical system disposed between a pair of scan mirrors and an objective optical system. The intermediary optical system is designed to cancel chromatic aberrations of magnification introduced by the objective optical system.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,260,578 to Bliton et al. discloses a scanning confocal microscope which includes, in pertinent part, two beam sources. One beam source produces ultra violet light. One beam source produces visible light. An optical assembly is included in the common optical train to correct chromatically induced scanning errors.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,381,224 by Dixon et al. discloses a scanning laser imaging system which allows simultaneous confocal and non-confocal imaging of reflected light. The system includes, in pertinent part, a laser producing a beam which traverses a beam expander and impinges upon a single mirror disposed in an optical axis, which is defined by an objective lens. The objective lens directs the beam onto a sample, which is disposed upon a moveable stage. The mirror scans the beam along a first direction, and the stage moves the sample along a second direction, transverse to the first direction. In this manner, the beam scans across the sample in two directions. Disposed between the objective and the sample is a beam splitter designed to collect light emitted from the sample. The beam splitter directs a portion of light emitted from the sample onto a condenser lens, which in turn directs it onto a non-confocal detector. A portion of the light collected by the beam splitter is directed along the same path as the beam, but in an opposite direction, forming a retro-beam. The retro-beam impinges upon a second beam splitter, positioned between the scan mirror and the laser. The second beam splitter directs the light onto a focusing lens. The focusing lens is positioned proximate to a field stop, having an aperture. The aperture is confocal to the light emitted from the sample and selectively restricts light in the retro-beam from reaching the detector. Light traversing the aperture impinges upon a confocal detector.
A disadvantage of the prior art systems is that additional optics are required to correct optical aberrations over a scan field and to efficiently collect light emitted from a sample, thereby increasing the systems' cost and size.
What is needed, therefore, is to provide a high-speed, low cost, laser scanning system that will provide point by point image of a sample on both a micro and macro scale.
A further need exists to provide an imaging system of a substantially smaller size than the prior art systems that affords a larger scan field than existing coaxial illumination and collection systems.
Provided is a coaxial illumination and collection laser scanning system designed to provide substantially uniform detection sensitivity across a planar field of view by reducing lateral chromatic aberrations and allowing a predetermined amount of axial chromatic aberrations at the objective lens and removing the axial chromatic aberrations using another lens already existing in the system. A laser is in optical communication with the objective lens. The laser produces a collimated beam of coherent light that is directed through the objective lens to illuminate a spot on a sample, thereby stimulating a small region of the sample to emit light. The objective lens also serves as a condenser and collects the light emitted by the sample. The objective lens is designed with correction for lateral chromatic aberrations and without correction for axial chromatic aberrations. The objective lens directs the collected light back along the identical path traveled by the incident beam, but in an opposite direction. A wavelength-discriminating dichroic filter is placed along the optical axis between the laser and the objective lens to separate the emitted light from the incident beam, a focusing lens directs the collected light onto a photo-detector. The photo-detector produces a signal in response to the emitted light sensed, representing the sample emitting the light. The focusing lens is a doublet lens that uses two elements in order to keep a constant focal length with different wavelengths of light. The doublet lens is disposed in the path of a retro-beam and is optically designed to introduce axial chromatic aberrations necessary to correct for axial chromatic aberrations introduced elsewhere in the system, e.g., by the objective lens. To scan over the entire sample, a two dimensional scanning device having a reflecting element is disposed in the path of the incident beam. A display device is provided and synchronized with the scanning device to reproduce an image of the sample.
In a second embodiment, a plurality of lasers are provided, each of which emits one or more wavelengths different from the remaining lasers. Each of the plurality of lasers are in optical communication with a common beam expander providing the incident beam with a plurality of wavelengths of light. The common beam expander has optical properties that introduce axial chromatic aberrations to cancel axial chromatic aberrations introduced by the objective lens, with respect to the incident beam.
FIG. 1 is a simplified side view of a laser scanning microscope of the prior art.
FIG. 2 is a side view of optical components of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a detailed view of a scanning beam passing through the objective shown in FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 is a graph showing an amount of optical energy impinging upon a detector disposed in an image plane using a common microscope system.
FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing the effects of lateral chromatic aberrations.
FIG. 6 is a graph showing an amount of optical energy impinging upon a detector in an image plane employing a large field objective lens of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a schematic view of optical elements which comprise a large field objective lens of the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a schematic view of optical elements showing the effects of axial chromatic aberrations.
FIG. 9 is a simplified side view of the optical components shown on FIG. 2 including a video display system to reproduce an image of the sample in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a side view of the invention shown in FIG. 2 in accord with an alternate embodiment.
FIG. 11 is a side view of an alternate embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 shows a light source 18 producing an excitation/incident beam 19 of light. Beam 19 is directed through an excitation filter 20 to reduce unwanted wavelengths in the incident beam 19. Upon exiting the excitation filter 20, beam 19 impinges upon a beam expander 21 and then a beam splitter 23. Beam splitter 23 directs beam 19 onto a two dimensional scanning device 25. Two dimensional scanning device 25 directs beam 19 through an objective lens 27. Objective lens 27 directs beam 19 to illuminate a spot (not shown) on a sample 29, thereby stimulating a small region of sample 29 to emit light. Typically, the light emitted by sample 29 is fluorescent. Objective lens 27, acting as a condenser, collects the fluorescent light, forms a retro-beam 31 and directs retro-beam 31 along an identical path of incident beam 19, but in an opposite direction. Retro-beam 31 passes through a pupil stop 32, consisting of a spatial filter with an aperture. After exiting pupil stop 32, retro-beam 31 impinges upon beam splitter 23. Beam splitter 23 separates fluorescent light from the laser light and directs retro-beam 31 onto a focusing lens 33 via band pass filter 34. Focusing lens 33 directs retro-beam 31 onto a transmissive aperture 35 of a spatial filter 37, thereby causing retro-beam 31 to impinge upon a photodetector 39.
It is preferred that light source 18 is a laser producing a collimated beam of coherent light. It is possible, however, to use a non-coherent light source optically coupled to collimating optics to create an incident light beam, e.g., a light emitting diode. If a non-coherent light source, such as an LED, is employed, a pinhole and a collimating lens are disposed in front of the LED to create a collimated excitation/incident beam capable of being focused to a small spot. Band pass filter 34 typically rejects the excitation wavelengths while transmitting longer wavelengths.
Beam splitter 23 may be any known in the art, so long as it is capable of separating the light of the incident beam from the light of the retro-beam. For example, beam splitter 23 may be a dichroic filter or a 50% beam splitter. Alternatively, a polarization sensitive beam splitter may be used to achieve separation of beams 19 and 31. This embodiment could include a 1/4 waveplate positioned between the beam splitter and the objective. This would cause beam 19 exiting the 1/4 waveplate to be circularly polarized. Also, the separating means may be a fresnel reflector. Sample 29 is illuminated point by point, scanning the spot in a raster scan fashion over the entire area of sample 29.
Any scanning mechanism that provides a two dimensional scan may be used, e.g., a rotating polygonal mirror, rotating holographic scanner, or oscillating prisms. Also, an acousto-optic deflector or a penta-prism scanning deflector may be employed. The preferred embodiment, however, is to employ a scanning system having one beam reflecting element 43 in the path of the incident beam which is pivotable about two perpendicular axes. Reflecting element 43 is a planar mirror, but this is not essential. The mirror may be concave or convex. Refractive or diffractive deflecting elements may also be used as reflecting element 43. Mirror 43 is pivotable about axis A. Mirror 43 may be moved by any means known in the art, such as motor 45, but is typically a galvanometer mirror. Mirror 43 and motor 45 rest atop a moveable platform 47 that is rotated by a stepper motor 49. Stepper motor 49 moves platform 47 to pivot mirror 43 about axis B, which is orthogonal to axis A.
Referring to FIG. 3, objective lens 27 typically forms an external pupil of the system and affords coaxial illumination and collection. To maximize collection efficiency, it is preferred that objective lens 27 have a large numerical aperture. With respect to incident beam 19, objective lens 27 is afocal in the image plane. Objective lens 27 is typically telecentric, or near telecentric. The telecentricity of objective lens 27 results in sample 29's surface always lying at a right angle with respect to the chief ray of incident beam 19, exiting objective lens 27. With respect to incident beam 19, the objective plane is proximate to sample 29. Beam 19 is shown entering objective lens 27 at three different positions, with beam 19 having a different angle of incidence at each position. Regardless of beam 19's angle of incidence on objective lens 27, the chief ray of beam 19 exiting objective lens 27 is orthogonal to sample 29's surface. One advantage of having this telecentric objective is that it renders the system magnification relatively insensitive to errors in focus position. In addition, objective lens 27 must be designed to operate over a broad band of wavelengths of light, e.g., the primary wavelength plus approximately 200 nm, or greater. This allows objective lens 27 to operate with lasers of various wavelengths and to collect light from a wide variety of fluorochromes.
An important aspect of the system is to reduce an amount of optical loss in the field of view due to chromatic aberrations, which reduces the detection sensitivity of the system. FIG. 4 shows the relationship between field position and the relative detection sensitivity of a system not being corrected for lateral chromatic aberrations, as a function of the fraction of optical energy sensed versus size of the spot impinging upon sample 29. The amount of light detected on the optical axis 51, as defined by an objective lens, is substantially greater than the amount of light detected at a half field position 53. The lowest amount of light detected was at a full field 55 position, with the field of view defined by the objective lens. Lateral chromatic aberrations increase at larger field angles. The non-uniformity of light detected across the field of view of the lens in the system is typically a result of lateral chromatic aberrations and other field degradations such as coma. Referring to FIGS. 5 and 2, lateral chromatic aberrations may cause a reduction in detection sensitivity by allowing, e.g., green wavelengths 57 of light to pass through aperture 35 while causing longer yellow wavelengths 58 to be blocked by field stop 37.
To avoid the problems associated with lateral chromatic aberrations, it is preferred that objective lens 27 correct for all lateral chromatic aberrations in the scanning system. This may be accomplished by reducing the field of view of the objective. However, there are advantages in providing objective lens 27 with a large field of view. For example, a large (macro) field of view is useful for scanning large arrays of samples, e.g., planar field arrays containing up to a million specimens. Nonetheless, the increased field of view exacerbates the problems with lateral chromatic aberrations, because there is increasing difficulty in correcting lateral chromatic aberrations as the lens' field of view increases. The macro field of view makes lateral chromatic aberrations more pronounced, thereby making it more difficult to provide a uniform resolution across the field.
Considering the aforementioned concepts, the parameters for two implementations of objective lens 27 are as follows:
TABLE 1______________________________________ Micro Macro Objective Objective______________________________________Scan Area (diagonal) 1 mm 1 cmResolution 0.6 μm 10 μmNumerical Aperture 0.75 0.25Intensity Uniformity 95% 95%Spatial Uniformity 98% 98%Polychromatic Range 500-750 nm 500-750 nmThru focus sensitivity 1% (signal 1% (signal change over change over 20 μm) 100 μm)Field Flatness Variation +/-10 μm +/-20 μmWorking Distance 3 mm 3.5 mm______________________________________
As can be seen above, the micro and macro objectives described may allow the system to provide between 0.6 to 20 μm resolution.
FIG. 6 shows a reduction in lateral chromatic aberrations of the macro objective lens which is achieved at the expense of amplifying axial chromatic aberrations. The increased axial chromatic aberrations are shown by the amount of light detected, at the 3 μm position, being substantially less than that shown in FIG. 4. Specifically, sensed by detector is approximately 40% of the on axis light 65 impinging upon sample 29, 3 μm from the chief ray. In FIG. 4, the amount of on axis light 51 detected 3 μm from the chief ray was nearly 80%. Nonetheless, the overall effect of lateral chromatic aberrations is shown to be substantially reduced. This is demonstrated by the amount of light detected for any given spot size being substantially the same for light at the on axis 65, half field light 67 and full field 69 positions, i.e., there exists substantial uniformity of detection sensitivity across the field of view of the macro objective lens. Additionally, FIG. 6 shows that at 10 μm from the chief ray, collection from all field points is greater than 90%. FIG. 7 shows the optical elements of the macro objective lens, and the specifications are as follows:
TABLE 2______________________________________MACRO OBJECTIVE LENS Radius Thickness ApertureSurface (mm) (mm) Material (mm)______________________________________STO 27.672" 29.95 3.89 Schott-- 24 SK143 224.24 0.20 air 244" 19.85 5.21 SK14 245 136.67 0.65 air 206" 134.23 2.10 SF11 227 24.80 3.84 air 188" -28.59 6.44 SF5 189 -60.20 4.86 air 2210" 27.86 5.73 SK14 18.611 -36.27 0.24 air 18.612" 11.40 5.02 SK14 1413 88.81 0.69 air 11.614" -33.76 1.32 SF11 11.615 11.90 3.69 air 9______________________________________
The aforementioned lens parameters and specifications are merely exemplary. The lens design may be adjusted to provide larger and smaller fields, as desired. This may be achieved by modifying lens radii, thickness, glass type, etc. Lenses with vastly different parameters may be designed to afford optimum performance at other resolutions and field sizes. Additionally, lenses could be designed for the same resolution and field size, as the aforementioned lenses, while satisfying different parameters, e.g., working distance and field flatness.
Referring to FIG. 8, similar to lateral chromatic aberrations, axial chromatic aberrations reduce the detection sensitivity of the system by having the focal length of a lens being wavelength dependent. For example, green wavelengths 71 of light focus before impinging upon detector 39, while the longer yellow wavelengths 73 of light are sensed by detector 39. Unlike lateral chromatic aberrations, however, axial chromatic aberrations do not change with the field position. Thus, the axial chromatic aberrations introduced by objective lens 27 may be kept constant, while correcting for lateral chromatic aberrations. Referring again to FIG. 1, because incident beam 19 is monochromatic, there is no need to correct axial aberrations in the incident path. Rather, axial chromatic aberrations may be corrected in the return (retro) path. It is preferred that focusing lens 33 corrects, or removes, all axial chromatic aberrations in the system. This allows manufacturing a less expensive objective lens 27, because correcting for both axial and lateral chromatic aberrations in a single lens greatly increases costs. In addition, the size/foot print of the system is kept to a minimum. As focusing lens 33 is necessary to condense retro-beam 31 onto aperture 35, no additional optics are included to reduce axial aberrations. Typically, focusing lens 33 is a doublet having the optical properties necessary to correct axial chromatic aberrations of the system. Focusing lens 33 could be composed of binary elements or any other design known in the art which focuses a beam and corrects axial chromatic aberrations.
Referring to FIG. 9, the operation of the system is discussed. Preferably, the system is to take advantage of detection using the conjugate focal (confocal) technique. In this manner, retro-beam 31 is shown emanating from a point 75 which corresponds to a point source of light illuminated by an incident beam which was focused to a diffraction limited spot on sample 29. Retro-beam 31 is imaged on detector 39, after passing through aperture 35. Aperture 35, in spatial filter 37, isolates the detection of the system to that substantially coincident with the illuminating spot so that aperture 35 and point 75 are optically conjugated with each other. Although any light detector may be used, it is preferred to use a photomultiplier tube. The signal from the photomultiplier tube passes through electrical connections 77 to a signal processor 79 of a video display system including a video display screen 81. The signal from the photomultiplier tube 39 modulates the intensity of the image signal transmitted from the processor 79 through the output line 83 to the display screen 81. A scanning signal generator 85, under control of the signal processor 79 via line 89, supplies electrical signals to the scanning apparatus 25 through electrical connections 87. The scanning apparatus 25 moves in response to the generator 85's signals. The signal from photomultiplier tube 39 is digitized and stored in memory and can be simultaneously scanned onto a display.
Although fluorescent confocal imaging is the preferred embodiment, the system may be used in a non-confocal manner. In this fashion, field stop 37 and aperture 35 may filter light in a either non-confocal or semi-confocal manner. In either manner, spatial filter 37 and aperture 35 improve the signal to noise ratio. Pupil stop 32 is configured to control the numerical aperture of the objective lens with respect to retro-beam 31. Without pupil stop 32, the numerical aperture at a given scan angle would be established by vignetting of objective lens 27. In effect, pupil stop 32 increases retro beam 31's intensity uniformity across objective lens 27's field of view and defines both the diameter of retro-beam 31 impinging upon focusing lens 33, and, therefore, the numerical aperture of the system. Although pupil stop 32 is shown positioned between scanning device 25 and beam splitter 23, pupil stop 32 may be positioned anywhere in the retro path between scanning device 25 and focusing lens 33.
An obvious extension of the system is in the area of reflection imaging. That is, the reflected laser beam could be collected at the detector instead of the fluorescent beam. Both the reflected beam and the fluorescent beam could be read at a different detector if a second dichroic beam splitter was positioned after the primary dichroic beam splitter. Or in a like manner, multiple fluorescent labels could be detected by using multiple secondary beam splitters and detectors.
Referring to FIG. 10, a second embodiment of the present invention is shown in which a further benefit of having all axial chromatic aberrations corrected in the retro-path is described. The second embodiment of the system includes all of the features of the systems described above with respect to FIG. 1, except two or more light sources 117 and 118 are provided, each of which emits a wavelength different from the remaining light source, forming an incident beam 119 comprising multi-chromatic light. The light sources may be utilized simultaneously, or each could be scanned individually by turning-off, or shuttering, the undesired light source. A beam expander 121 is optically coupled to at least one of the light sources 117 and 118 to control the collimated beam diameter and to correct for any axial chromatic aberrations in the system along the incident beam 119 path. In this fashion, substantially all light comprising incident beam 119 will impinge upon the same focal plane of sample 129. This is particularly useful for providing a highly efficient confocal imaging system.
Each light source 117 and 118 may be uniquely associated with a beam expander. It is preferred, however, that all light sources are in optical communication with a common beam expander, as shown, in order to reduce both the size and cost of the system. To that end, a dichroic filter 120 is disposed between light sources 117 and 118 and beam expander 121. Dichroic filter 120 allows light from source 117 to pass through while reflecting light from source 118 so that the light from both form incident beam 119 before entering beam expander 121. Beam expander 121 has optical properties that introduce axial chromatic aberrations to cancel axial chromatic aberrations introduced by optical elements, e.g., objective lens 127 in the system following beam expander 121 to ensure all wavelengths of light comprising beam 119 impinge upon the same focal plane of sample 129.
Referring to FIG. 11, shown is another objective lens system that may be employed by having all axial chromatic aberrations corrected in the retro-path. The collection lens 233 may be used in a microscope style system. In such a system, objective lens 227 is optically coupled to reflecting element 243 via an eye piece 230. The remaining elements of the system are identical to those shown in FIG. 2.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4284897 *||Mar 13, 1978||Aug 18, 1981||Olympus Optical Company Ltd.||Fluorescence determining microscope utilizing laser light|
|US5022757 *||Jan 23, 1989||Jun 11, 1991||Modell Mark D||Heterodyne system and method for sensing a target substance|
|US5091652 *||Jun 1, 1990||Feb 25, 1992||The Regents Of The University Of California||Laser excited confocal microscope fluorescence scanner and method|
|US5192980 *||Jun 26, 1991||Mar 9, 1993||A. E. Dixon||Apparatus and method for method for spatially- and spectrally-resolved measurements|
|US5260578 *||Apr 30, 1992||Nov 9, 1993||Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research||Confocal imaging system for visible and ultraviolet light|
|US5296700 *||Sep 9, 1992||Mar 22, 1994||Nikon Corporation||Fluorescent confocal microscope with chromatic aberration compensation|
|US5381224 *||Aug 30, 1993||Jan 10, 1995||A. E. Dixon||Scanning laser imaging system|
|US5504336 *||May 18, 1994||Apr 2, 1996||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Spectrofluorometric apparatus for obtaining spectral image information|
|1||Shoemaker, Richard L., et al., "An Ultrafast Laser Scanner Microscope for Digital Imaging Analysis," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-29, No. 2, Feb. 1982, pp. 82-91.|
|2||*||Shoemaker, Richard L., et al., An Ultrafast Laser Scanner Microscope for Digital Imaging Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME 29, No. 2, Feb. 1982, pp. 82 91.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5847400 *||Jan 30, 1997||Dec 8, 1998||Molecular Dynamics, Inc.||Fluorescence imaging system having reduced background fluorescence|
|US5981956 *||May 15, 1997||Nov 9, 1999||Affymetrix, Inc.||Systems and methods for detection of labeled materials|
|US6078390 *||May 4, 1998||Jun 20, 2000||General Scanning, Inc.||Scanning system and method of operation for automatically setting detection sensitivity|
|US6140653 *||Mar 27, 1998||Oct 31, 2000||Vysis, Inc.||Large-field fluorescence imaging apparatus|
|US6143535 *||Mar 27, 1998||Nov 7, 2000||Palsson; Bernhard O.||Targeted system for removing tumor cells from cell populations|
|US6185030||Oct 13, 1998||Feb 6, 2001||James W. Overbeck||Wide field of view and high speed scanning microscopy|
|US6201639||Mar 20, 1998||Mar 13, 2001||James W. Overbeck||Wide field of view and high speed scanning microscopy|
|US6207960 *||Apr 21, 1999||Mar 27, 2001||Affymetrix, Inc||System and methods for detection of labeled materials|
|US6310686||Nov 23, 1999||Oct 30, 2001||Spectracode, Inc.||Raman probe with spatial filter and semi-confocal lens|
|US6320196||Jan 28, 1999||Nov 20, 2001||Agilent Technologies, Inc.||Multichannel high dynamic range scanner|
|US6335824||Sep 19, 2000||Jan 1, 2002||Genetic Microsystems, Inc.||Wide field of view and high speed scanning microscopy|
|US6355938||Nov 24, 1999||Mar 12, 2002||Phormax Corporation||Phosphor screen scanning systems|
|US6376149||May 26, 1999||Apr 23, 2002||Yale University||Methods and compositions for imaging acids in chemically amplified photoresists using pH-dependent fluorophores|
|US6472671||Feb 9, 2000||Oct 29, 2002||Jean I. Montagu||Quantified fluorescence microscopy|
|US6483581||Jul 2, 1998||Nov 19, 2002||Spectra Code, Inc.||Raman system for rapid sample indentification|
|US6514722||Nov 30, 2000||Feb 4, 2003||Oncosis||Method and apparatus for selectively targeting specific cells within a cell population|
|US6534308||Nov 30, 1999||Mar 18, 2003||Oncosis, Llc||Method and apparatus for selectively targeting specific cells within a mixed cell population|
|US6537801||Oct 4, 1999||Mar 25, 2003||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Biochip and biochip reading device comprising a plurality of zones for molecular recognition|
|US6566030||Oct 31, 2001||May 20, 2003||Yale University||Methods and compositions for imaging acids in chemically amplified photoresists using pH-dependent fluorophores|
|US6597000||Jul 8, 2002||Jul 22, 2003||Affymetrix, Inc.||Systems and methods for detection of labeled materials|
|US6642018||Mar 13, 2000||Nov 4, 2003||Oncosis Llc||Method for inducing a response in one or more targeted cells|
|US6741344||Oct 30, 2000||May 25, 2004||Affymetrix, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detection of fluorescently labeled materials|
|US6768764 *||Dec 15, 2001||Jul 27, 2004||Trumpf Lasertechnik Gmbh||Laser beam reforming system|
|US6804385||Oct 24, 2001||Oct 12, 2004||Oncosis||Method and device for selectively targeting cells within a three-dimensional specimen|
|US6809812||Jun 8, 2001||Oct 26, 2004||Spectracode, Inc.||Spectral analysis system with moving objective lens|
|US6861515||Feb 22, 2001||Mar 1, 2005||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Analysis of biological targets using a biochip comprising a fluorescent marker|
|US6984828||Aug 7, 2002||Jan 10, 2006||Montagu Jean I||Quantified fluorescence microscopy|
|US7092557||Sep 27, 2004||Aug 15, 2006||Cyntellect, Inc.||Method and device for selectively targeting cells within a three-dimensional specimen|
|US7129070||Jan 9, 2003||Oct 31, 2006||Cyntellect, Inc.||Targeted system for removing tumor cells from cell populations|
|US7227633||Jun 2, 2004||Jun 5, 2007||Oc Oerlikon Balzers Ag||Optical substrate for enhanced detectability of fluorescence|
|US7247494 *||Feb 27, 2004||Jul 24, 2007||Agilent Technologies, Inc.||Scanner with array anti-degradation features|
|US7285789 *||Jun 3, 2004||Oct 23, 2007||Oc Oerlikon Balzers Ag||Optical device for surface-generated fluorescence|
|US7300795||Mar 30, 2004||Nov 27, 2007||Cyntellect, Inc.||Optoinjection methods|
|US7312919||Dec 27, 2001||Dec 25, 2007||Affymetrix, Inc.||Wide field of view and high speed scanning microscopy|
|US7324271||Mar 28, 2003||Jan 29, 2008||Carl Zeiss Jena Gmbh||Laser-scanning microscope with collimator and/or pinhole optics|
|US7405819||Apr 25, 2007||Jul 29, 2008||Oc Oerlikon Balzers Ag||Optical substrate for enhanced detectability of fluorescence|
|US7425426||Mar 15, 2004||Sep 16, 2008||Cyntellect, Inc.||Methods for purification of cells based on product secretion|
|US7505618||Feb 4, 2003||Mar 17, 2009||Cyntellect, Inc.||Method and apparatus for selectively targeting specific cells within a cell population|
|US7622274||Aug 20, 2007||Nov 24, 2009||Cyntellect, Inc.||Method for determining a product secretion profile of cells|
|US7988918||Oct 30, 2008||Aug 2, 2011||Complete Genomics, Inc.||Structures for enhanced detection of fluorescence|
|US8039817||May 1, 2009||Oct 18, 2011||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US8055098||Jan 26, 2007||Nov 8, 2011||Affymetrix, Inc.||System, method, and product for imaging probe arrays with small feature sizes|
|US8071962||Aug 12, 2011||Dec 6, 2011||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US8143599||Oct 25, 2011||Mar 27, 2012||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US8218840||Feb 17, 2011||Jul 10, 2012||Intrexon Corporation||Method and device for selectively targeting cells within a three-dimensional specimen|
|US8233735||Sep 17, 2008||Jul 31, 2012||Affymetrix, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for detection of fluorescently labeled materials|
|US8236521||Oct 21, 2009||Aug 7, 2012||Intrexon Corporation||Methods for isolating cells based on product secretion|
|US8242463||Feb 17, 2012||Aug 14, 2012||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US8278630||Jul 9, 2012||Oct 2, 2012||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US8287812||Jul 12, 2011||Oct 16, 2012||Complete Genomics, Inc.||Structures for enhanced detection of fluorescence|
|US8294977||Sep 12, 2007||Oct 23, 2012||Ucl Business Plc||Imaging apparatus and methods|
|US8351026||Apr 21, 2006||Jan 8, 2013||Affymetrix, Inc.||Methods and devices for reading microarrays|
|US8374818||Dec 21, 2009||Feb 12, 2013||Affymetrix, Inc.||System, method and apparatus for calibrating inspection tools|
|US8401263||Jan 7, 2011||Mar 19, 2013||Intrexon Corporation||Method and apparatus for selectively targeting specific cells within a cell population|
|US8520976||Sep 23, 2011||Aug 27, 2013||Affymetrix, Inc.||System, method, and product for imaging probe arrays with small feature size|
|US8546772||Sep 28, 2012||Oct 1, 2013||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US8576482 *||Oct 29, 2010||Nov 5, 2013||Olympus Corporation||Laser scanning microscope system|
|US8586947||Aug 23, 2013||Nov 19, 2013||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US8687268||Sep 14, 2012||Apr 1, 2014||Ucl Business Plc||Imaging apparatus and methods|
|US8698102||Oct 17, 2013||Apr 15, 2014||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US8788213||Jan 12, 2010||Jul 22, 2014||Intrexon Corporation||Laser mediated sectioning and transfer of cell colonies|
|US8809808 *||Dec 17, 2010||Aug 19, 2014||National Yang Ming University||Stimulated emission-based optical detection system|
|US9068220||Mar 28, 2014||Jun 30, 2015||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US9069227||Apr 13, 2012||Jun 30, 2015||Ucl Business Plc||Methods and apparatus to control acousto-optic deflectors|
|US9104087||Feb 10, 2014||Aug 11, 2015||Ucl Business Plc||Imaging apparatus and methods|
|US9341919||Apr 20, 2011||May 17, 2016||Ucl Business Plc||Methods and apparatus for controling drive frequencies of acousto-optic deflectors|
|US9365898||May 26, 2015||Jun 14, 2016||Illumina, Inc.||Compensator for multiple surface imaging|
|US9445025||Aug 23, 2013||Sep 13, 2016||Affymetrix, Inc.||System, method, and product for imaging probe arrays with small feature sizes|
|US9551026||Dec 27, 2011||Jan 24, 2017||Complete Genomincs, Inc.||Method for nucleic acid detection using voltage enhancement|
|US20020080845 *||Dec 15, 2001||Jun 27, 2002||Joachim Schulz||Laser beam reforming system|
|US20030017081 *||Jun 11, 2002||Jan 23, 2003||Affymetrix, Inc.||Method and apparatus for imaging a sample on a device|
|US20030138923 *||Jan 9, 2003||Jul 24, 2003||Palsson Bernhard O.||Targeted system for removing tumor cells from cell populations|
|US20030152490 *||Feb 21, 2003||Aug 14, 2003||Mark Trulson||Method and apparatus for imaging a sample on a device|
|US20030165914 *||Feb 22, 2001||Sep 4, 2003||Marc Cuzin||Analysis of biological targets using a biochip comprising a fluorescent marker|
|US20030180902 *||Mar 18, 2003||Sep 25, 2003||Palsson Bernhard O.||Method and apparatus for selectively targeting specific cells within a mixed cell population|
|US20030219892 *||Feb 4, 2003||Nov 27, 2003||Palsson Bernhard O.||Method and apparatus for selectively targeting specific cells within a cell population|
|US20040002154 *||Apr 18, 2003||Jan 1, 2004||Palsson Bernhard O.||Methods for preparing libraries of unique tags and related screening methods|
|US20040029162 *||Dec 19, 2001||Feb 12, 2004||Patrick Chaton||Support for determining an analyte comprising a selective spectral filter|
|US20040048362 *||Aug 11, 2003||Mar 11, 2004||Mark Trulson||Method and apparatus for imaging a sample on a device|
|US20040051941 *||Mar 28, 2003||Mar 18, 2004||Johannes Winterot||Laser-scanning microscope with collimator and/or pinhole optics|
|US20040096883 *||Aug 25, 2003||May 20, 2004||Affymetrix, Inc., A California Corporation||Scanned image alignment systems and methods|
|US20040180437 *||Mar 30, 2004||Sep 16, 2004||Oncosis Llc||Optoinjection methods|
|US20040196456 *||Apr 21, 2004||Oct 7, 2004||Affymetrix, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detection of fluorescently labeled materials|
|US20040224421 *||Jun 15, 2000||Nov 11, 2004||Deweerd Herman||Bi-directional scanning method|
|US20040247485 *||Jun 2, 2004||Dec 9, 2004||Jorg Kraus||Optical substrate for enhanced detectability of fluorescence|
|US20040253714 *||Aug 12, 2003||Dec 16, 2004||Affymetrix, Inc.||Thermal and fluidic cycling device for nucleic acid hybridization|
|US20050012057 *||May 10, 2004||Jan 20, 2005||Alara, Inc.||Method and apparatus for radiation image erasure|
|US20050037367 *||Aug 25, 2003||Feb 17, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc., A California Corporation||Scanned image alignment systems and methods|
|US20050047640 *||Sep 27, 2004||Mar 3, 2005||Oncosis Llc||Method and device for selectively targeting cells within a three-dimensional specimen|
|US20050051733 *||Jun 3, 2004||Mar 10, 2005||Unaxis Balzers Ltd.||Optical device for surface-generated fluorescence|
|US20050191756 *||Feb 27, 2004||Sep 1, 2005||Corson John F.||Scanner with array anti-degradation features|
|US20050200948 *||Feb 4, 2005||Sep 15, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Method and apparatus for imaging a sample on a device|
|US20050202558 *||Mar 15, 2004||Sep 15, 2005||Koller Manfred R.||Methods for purification of cells based on product secretion|
|US20050206893 *||May 26, 2005||Sep 22, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Quantified fluorescence microscopy|
|US20050266475 *||Jun 3, 2005||Dec 1, 2005||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Method for determining an analyte|
|US20060111850 *||Dec 30, 2005||May 25, 2006||Affymetrix, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detection of fluorescently labeled materials|
|US20060258002 *||Mar 3, 2006||Nov 16, 2006||Affymetrix, Inc.||Scanned image alignment systems and methods|
|US20070012885 *||Aug 28, 2006||Jan 18, 2007||Affymetrix, Inc.||Quantified fluorescence microscopy|
|US20070188746 *||Apr 25, 2007||Aug 16, 2007||Oc Oerlikon Balzers Ag||Optical substrate for enhanced detectability of fluorescence|
|US20070197911 *||Jan 26, 2007||Aug 23, 2007||Affymetrix, Inc.||System, Method, and Product for Imaging Probe Arrays with Small Feature Sizes|
|US20070269875 *||Feb 27, 2007||Nov 22, 2007||Koller Manfred R||Method and apparatus for cell permeabilization|
|US20080014606 *||Aug 20, 2007||Jan 17, 2008||Cyntellect, Inc.||Methods for purification of cells based on product secretion|
|US20090117006 *||Oct 30, 2008||May 7, 2009||Complete Genomics, Inc.||Structures for enhanced detection of fluorescence|
|US20090175529 *||Mar 17, 2009||Jul 9, 2009||Cyntellect, Inc||Method and apparatus for selectively targeting specific cells within a cell population|
|US20100161266 *||Dec 21, 2009||Jun 24, 2010||Affymetrix, Inc.||System, method and product for calibrating inspection tools|
|US20100179310 *||Jan 8, 2010||Jul 15, 2010||Cyntellect, Inc.||Genetic analysis of cells|
|US20100328759 *||Sep 12, 2007||Dec 30, 2010||Paul Anthony Kirkby||Imaging apparatus and methods|
|US20110043906 *||Oct 29, 2010||Feb 24, 2011||Olympus Corporation||Immersion microscope objective and laser scanning microscope system using same|
|US20110051229 *||Aug 25, 2010||Mar 3, 2011||StingRay Optics, LLC||Achromatic visible to far infrared objective lens|
|US20110201075 *||Dec 17, 2010||Aug 18, 2011||Cyntellect, Inc.||Optoinjection methods|
|US20120008193 *||Jun 17, 2011||Jan 12, 2012||Moeller Gerhard||Method for equalizing arbitrary parfocal lengths of objectives when focusing stereomicroscopes and macroscopes|
|US20120112094 *||Dec 17, 2010||May 10, 2012||National Yang Ming University||Stimulated emission-based optical detection system|
|CN100427926C||Dec 31, 2005||Oct 22, 2008||浙江大学;浙江金成科技发展有限公司||Biochip imaging method splitted with laser cofocus scanning combined image and its device|
|CN100516841C||Dec 9, 2004||Jul 22, 2009||暨南大学||Method for producing light field or wide field fluorescence light section|
|EP1355181A2 *||Mar 21, 2003||Oct 22, 2003||CARL ZEISS JENA GmbH||Laser scanning microscope with collimator and/or pinholeoptic|
|EP1355181A3 *||Mar 21, 2003||Aug 4, 2004||CARL ZEISS JENA GmbH||Laser scanning microscope with collimator and/or pinholeoptic|
|EP1477258A1 *||May 16, 2003||Nov 17, 2004||Fisba Optik Ag||Device and method for local temperature treatment with heat detector and image treatment|
|EP2281879A1||Nov 30, 2000||Feb 9, 2011||Cyntellect, Inc.||Method and apparatus for selectively targeting specific cells within a cell population|
|EP2634615A2 *||Sep 12, 2007||Sep 4, 2013||UCL Business PLC||Imaging apparatus and methods|
|EP2634615A3 *||Sep 12, 2007||Dec 11, 2013||UCL Business PLC||Imaging apparatus and methods|
|EP3004819A4 *||Jul 31, 2014||May 24, 2017||Mks Tech Inc||Spectrometer|
|WO2001061324A1 *||Feb 16, 2001||Aug 23, 2001||The University Of Chicago||Fluorescence microscopy methods and devices using light emission diodes|
|WO2008032061A3 *||Sep 12, 2007||Oct 30, 2008||Ucl Business Plc||Imaging apparatus and methods|
|Cooperative Classification||G02B21/002, G01N2021/6463|
|Apr 8, 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MOLECULAR DYNAMICS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KAIN, ROBERT C.;ALEXAY, CHRISTOPHER C.;REEL/FRAME:007877/0993;SIGNING DATES FROM 19960325 TO 19960326
|Oct 7, 1997||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Dec 19, 2000||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 2, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AMERSHAM BIOSCIENCES (SV) CORP., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:MOLECULAR DYNAMICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013897/0650
Effective date: 20011203
|Dec 6, 2004||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Apr 20, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GE HEALTHCARE (SV) CORP., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:AMERSHAM BIOSCIENCES (SV) CORP;REEL/FRAME:017492/0595
Effective date: 20060109
|Jan 8, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Apr 5, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTEGENX ACQUISITION CORP., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GE HEALTHCARE (SV) CORP.;REEL/FRAME:030162/0871
Effective date: 20120423
|May 3, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTEGENX INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTEGENX ACQUISITION CORP.;REEL/FRAME:030344/0120
Effective date: 20120930
|Jun 30, 2016||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HERCULES CAPITAL, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:INTEGENX, INC.;REEL/FRAME:039221/0013
Effective date: 20160629