|Publication number||US5745577 A|
|Application number||US 08/687,303|
|Publication date||Apr 28, 1998|
|Filing date||Jul 25, 1996|
|Priority date||Jul 25, 1996|
|Publication number||08687303, 687303, US 5745577 A, US 5745577A, US-A-5745577, US5745577 A, US5745577A|
|Inventors||Marcus D. Leech|
|Original Assignee||Northern Telecom Limited|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (49), Classifications (10), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention is directed to a cryptographic system to be used in digital data processing. In particular, it is directed to the cryptographic system which includes a novel block cipher technique. It is further directed to a novel key schedule generation using the novel block cipher technique.
The basic function provided by a cryptographic system (or cryptosystem) is encipherment/decipherment. A cryptosystem can be considered to consist of a pair of data transformations--the first transformation is applied to a data item, known as plaintext (or cleartext), and generates a new (unintelligible) data item called ciphertext. The other transformation, applied to ciphertext, results in the regeneration of the original plaintext. An encipherment transformation uses as input both the plaintext data and an independent data value known as an encipherment key. Similarly, a decipherment transformation uses a decipherment key. These keys are seemingly random bit-vectors. The symmetric cryptosystems e.g., DES (U.S. Data Encryption Standard), use the same key in the encipherment and decipherment transformation.
FIGS. 1 and 2 are algorithmic flow charts of the DES enciphering process. The DES algorithm employs a 56-bit key and operates on 64-bit blocks of data. Referring to FIG. 1, the encipherment process begins at an initial permutation 10 of a block of 64 bits of plaintext which is then divided into two 32-bit halves. One half (e.g., Right half R0 at the first round) is used as input to a key-dependent round function 12 (e.g. f0) which takes internal key K0 as a second input, and the result (e.g. R'0) is exclusive-ORed (XORed or summed modulo 2) 14 to the other half (e.g. Left half L0). After one such iteration, or round, the two halves of the data are swapped and the operation is performed again. After n (e.g. 16) rounds of computation, the output is put through a final permutation 16 to generate the ciphertext which is 64 bits long. The round function includes passes through eight nonlinear substitutions known as s-boxes and will be described in more detail in FIG. 2, in which the round function fi of the i-th round (i=0, 1, 2, . . . , 15) is shown. The function takes two inputs, the right half Ri of the block and an internal key Ki, and generates an output R'i. The initial key is 56 bits long from which 48 bits are selected at each round according to a predetermined key schedule 20 to generate the internal key Ki. The right half Ri is first expanded at 22 from 32 bits to 48 bits and XORed 24 with the internal key Ki. The result is divided into eight parts and is applied to eight different s-boxes 26. The s-boxes are nonlinear substitutions, mapping 6 input bits into 4 output bits. The eight outputs of the s-boxes are concatenated at 28 and then permuted at 30 to yield an output R'i 32 which will be XORed with the left half Li as shown in FIG. 1. The set of internal keys (also called subkeys) K0, K1, K2, . . . K14 and K15 is called a key schedule.
The decipherment process is of the same form as the encipherment process, except that the internal keys for the 16 rounds are in reverse order e.g., K15, K14, . . . K1 and K0.
The ciphertext displays no correlation to the plaintext. Every bit of the output depends upon every bit of the input and on every bit of the key. The security of DES depends primarily upon the non-linear s-boxes, since the remaining parts of the algorithm are all linear and thus easily attacked. It does not, however, depend on the secrecy of the algorithm, since the complete algorithm, including the contents of the s-boxes, is public knowledge.
The strength of DES has been a controversial issue and many attacks have been debated. In an article entitled "Differential Cryptanalysis of the Full 16-round DES" in Advances in Cryptology, Proceedings of CRYPTO '92, Springer-Verlag, pp 487-496, E. Biham and A. Shamir describe a cryptanalytic attack that can break DES using 247 chosen plaintexts. Their differential cryptanalysis is based on the principle that when the XOR of two plaintexts is equal to a specific value, it is possible to perform a statistical attack on the key given the two plaintexts and their corresponding ciphertexts. The statistical attack is possible because the s-boxes, while nonlinear, generate a highly skewed distribution of XOR outputs for given XOR inputs. For example, S1 maps the XOR input of "30" hexadecimal to an XOR output of "4" with probability 1/4. Since the output of an s-box is 4-bits, an even distribution would map each input XOR into each output XOR with probability 1/16.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,511,123, issued Apr. 23, 1996 (Adams et al), describes a new symmetric cryptosystem which employs (m×n) s-boxes, where m and n are positive integers and m<<n. This cryptosystem is now generally known as CAST and gives better performance.
FIG. 3 shows the algorithmic structure of CAST according to its one embodiment. The data blocksize of plaintext is set at 64 and is initially broken into halves of length 32. At each round, one half is modified, is added modulo 2 to the other half, and the two halves are interchanged. After 8 rounds the two halves are concatenated to form the ciphertext. Unlike DES, there are no permutation layers. As well, the modification (round function) of a half data block at each round is implemented completely differently from DES. Referring to FIG. 4, in CAST, the round function contains six (8×32) partially bent-function-based s-boxes from separate compatibility classes. The internal key Ki for round i is broken into two 8-bit pieces. Each of the two pieces of the internal key is input to each of two separate (8×32) s-boxes and the 32-bit outputs are XORed to form the 32-bit modified internal key. The 32-bit modified internal key is XORed with the half data block Ri to generate a 32-bit first modified half data bloc R"i, which is then broken into four 8-bit pieces. Each of the four 8-bit pieces is input to each of four separate (8×32) s-boxes and all the 32-bit outputs of the four s-boxes are XORed to produce a 32 second modified half data block R'i. The second modified half data block is then XORed with the remaining half of the data block to generate a transformed half data block of the round.
The present invention is a novel symmetric cryptosystem which uses two or more different sets of (m×n) s-boxes and novel key schedules, where m and n are different integers.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a cryptographic system which is immune to differential and linear cryptanalysis.
It is another object of the invention to provide a cryptographic system which employs two or more different sets of (m×n) s-boxes where m and n are different integers.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a novel internal key scheduling mechanism which generates no weak or semi-weak encryption keys.
Briefly stated, the invention resides in a symmetric cryptographic encryption. According to one aspect, it is directed to a method of generating a key schedule from a key of a predetermined bitlength. The method comprises a step of processing the key through a block cipher operation using a preset key schedule to generate an intermediate key schedule, each block cipher operation comprising a plurality of iterative transformation rounds each of which in turn includes a round function. The method includes further steps of, after each block cipher operation, replacing a part of the preset key schedule with a part of the intermediate key schedule; and repeating a predetermined number of block cipher operation to generate the key schedule.
According to another aspect, the invention is directed to a data encryption method of cryptographically transforming between plaintext and ciphertext in data blocks of a predetermined bitlength in which the data blocks are processed one data block after another in sequence through a set of a plurality of consecutive transformation rounds. Each consecutive transformation round comprising steps of expanding a half of a data block and XORing the half of said data block with a subkey to generate a first modified half data block. The consecutive transformation round further includes steps of processing the first modified half data block by two or more sets of a plurality of different substitution boxes to generate a second modified half data block and XORing the second modified half data block with the remaining half of said data block to generate a transformed half data block of a transformation round.
According to a further aspect, the invention is directed to a data encryption system for cryptographically transforming between plaintext and ciphertext in data blocks of a predetermined bitlength by performing a plurality of consecutive transformation rounds of half of each data block. The data encryption system comprises a first set of a plurality of "m×n" s-boxes where m and n are different integers for processing each half data block to expand the same to a predetermined bitlength and a first XOR gate for XORing a subkey and the expanded half data block to generate a first transformed half data block of the transformation round. The data encryption system further includes a second set of "p×q" s-boxes and a third set of "q×r" s-boxes where p, q and r are different integers for processing the first transformed half data block to generate a second transformed half data block; and a second XOR gate for XORing the second transformed half data block to generate a transformed half data block of one of the consecutive transformation rounds.
For a more complete understanding of the invention and for further objects and advantages thereof, reference may now be made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is an algorithmic flow chart of the known DES encryption process;
FIG. 2 is a detailed algorithmic illustration of a round function of DES;
FIG. 3 is an algorithmic flow chart of a known CAST encryption process;
FIG. 4 is an algorithmic flow chart of a round function of known CAST;
FIG. 5 is an algorithmic flow chart of the present invention according to one embodiment;
FIG. 6 is a detailed algorithmic illustration of a round function of one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 7 is a detailed algorithmic illustration of an expansion function according to one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 8 is a bit arrangement of a key according to one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 9 is a detailed algorithmic illustration of key scheduling process according to one embodiment of the invention;
FIGS. 10 and 11 are two examples of ES( ) s-boxes designed for the invention; and
FIGS. 12a, 12b, 12c, 13a, 13b, and 13c are two examples of S( ) s-boxes designed for the invention.
FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate the algorithmic flow charts of the encryption process according to one embodiment of the invention. Referring specifically to FIG. 5, it is shown that a 128-bit block of plaintext is divided into two 64-bit halves, L0 (left) and R0 (right). At the first round, R0 is modified by using an internal key KS 0 ! at round function f0. The key scheduling to generate a specific internal key for each round will be described in detail below. The output of f0 is R'0, which is added modulo 2 to the left half data block L0 to derive a transformed half data block. The transformed half data block is now used for an input R1 for the second round. R0 is used directly for the left half data block L1 for the second round. The same process is repeated for 6 rounds to generate L6 and R6 which are concatenated to form the ciphertext.
FIG. 6 shows in detail one embodiment of the round function fi for round i, using the same parameters as those in FIG. 5. According to this embodiment, by using a specific key scheduling mechanism 60, internal key KS i ! with a length of 88 bits is selected from the 128-bit key K. Meanwhile the half data block Ri is expanded to 88 bits by an expansion function ES() 62 which will be described in detail below. The expanded half data block and KS i ! are XORed to produce a first modified half data block R"i of 88 bits in length, which is divided into eight pieces and put through two different sets of s-boxes S() and S2(). S() and S2() are from different classifications, e.g., S() comprises eight 11×8 s-boxes 64, e.g. S(0), S(1), . . . and S(7), and S2() comprises five 8×32 s-boxes 66, e.g., S2(0), S2(1), . . . and S2(4). On the first pass, five of eight outputs of S() are input to S2() and on the second pass a different five of the eight outputs of S() are put through S2(). One example selection of five outputs are shown in FIG. 5 by solid and dotted lines. The outputs of S2() on each pass are XORed separately and concatenated together to produce a second modified half data block R'i, 64 bits long.
Referring to FIG. 7, the expansion function ES() in which the half data block of 64 is divided into eight 8-bit pieces 70 and each piece is put through different one of eight ES s-boxes 72 on each of two passes, is shown in detail. ES s-boxes are 8×11 s-boxes, e.g., ES0, ES1, . . . and ES7. The outputs of ES s-boxes are XORed on each of the two passes to produce outputs S0, S1, S2, . . . S7 which are concatenated together to produce an expanded half data block. Example selections of s-boxes and XORing pairs are shown in the figure by solid and dotted lines.
The S2() function provides an extra stage of confusion and diffusion within the round function. It increases the overall complexity of differential cryptanalysis, reducing the single round, single s-box probability from 1.46×10-2 to 8.82×10-7 (0.0146*(0.0078)2). This is shown in recent results by J. Lee, H. Heys, S. Tavares, in "On the Resistance of the CAST Encryption Algorithm to Differential Cryptanalysis", SAC '95: Workshop Records, pages 107-119, which describes the differential cryptanalysis properties of random 8×32 s-boxes.
Since the contents of the S2() s-boxes are unknown to the cryptanalyst, both linear and differential cryptanalysis are significantly hampered.
Keying is a crucial aspect of cryptosystem design. A key schedule that provides some guarantee of key/ciphertext Strict Avalanche Criterion (SAC) and Bit Independence Criterion (BIC) is required. That is, each ciphertext bit should depend in a complicated, nonlinear way on every key bit and any change in the key should cause each ciphertext bit to change with probability one half, virtually independently of the other ciphertext bits. On the other hand, it is preferable from an implementation standpoint that the key schedule is as simple as possible.
Key Schedule Generation (Subkey Generation)
According to one embodiment of the invention, subkeys are generated in such a way that if a given subkey is determined by cryptanalysis, it is cryptographically difficult to determine the other subkeys from the known subkey.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the subkeys are generated by using the present encryption function described above in reference to FIGS. 5-7 as a pseudo-random number generator, using the key as a seed. In particular, they are generated in a multi-step process which will be described below.
First, a "standard" key schedule is loaded into the transformation function of the present invention, the standard key schedule is derived from the first 48 entries in table 0 and table 7 in the ES() function, combined with XOR. This standard key schedule is then perturbed by selecting bits from the input key as shown in FIG. 8, and XOR combining them with the "standard" key schedule, 11 bits at a time. A total of 88 bits from the input key are selected for use in perturbing the "standard" key schedule, as follows:
______________________________________Round 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7______________________________________1 4CC 079 4AA 7BC 6C8 573 3DE 5EC2 63F 6EF 2BF 1AE 7F2 253 595 42E3 5E3 24B 7CB 1D9 324 341 2E6 1E24 142 47C 26D 593 151 028 23D 0045 527 39F 30C 217 01D 7A6 55B 1DB6 7FA 271 64E 4B4 316 53A 2B8 3A9______________________________________
Each row in this table is XORed with the corresponding (0 through 7) 11-bit value extracted from the key. This slightly-perturbed key schedule (phase one key schedule) is then used in a feedback execution of the transformation function of the invention to produce a new key schedule.
Referring to FIG. 9, the feedback begins by using the key as the initial plaintext, on each iteration, the feedback buffer is updated by XOR with the ciphertext output. This phase-two key schedule is produced by using each output of the feedback execution of the transformation function to produce 11-bit key schedule elements that update the phase-one schedule by one element on each iteration, for a total of 48 iterations.
The final key schedule is produced by again using the transformation function of the invention in a feedback mode, with the input key as the initial cleartext, using the phase two key schedule, and the standard S2() function. Each ciphertext output is considered as eight 16-bit values, each of which is XORed together, then masked down to 11 bits to produce a key-schedule element. This process is repeated until all of the key-schedule elements have been filled. There are 8 11-bit elements per round, with 6 rounds in the standard implementation, for a total of 48 key schedule elements or 528 key schedule bits.
Generation of the S2() Function
The S2() function is computed in a similar fashion to the final key-schedule, using the transformation function of the invention in feedback mode. This feedback execution is a continuation of the feedback execution used in generating the final key-schedule. Each output of the transformation execution is considered as four 32bit values. The values are combined using XOR, with the resulting value being placed in the next available S2() table element. If the 32bit value has already been used in an S2() table element, it is discarded and a new value is generated.
There are five S2() tables, each with 256 entries, for a total of 1280 32bit elements.
FIGS. 10 and 11 are two examples of ES() s-boxes. They are 8×11 s-boxes, with no particular characteristics, except that no given output value is repeated over all eight s-boxes. Furthermore two examples of S() s-boxes are shown in the combined figures of FIGS. 12a, 12b and 12c and FIGS. 13a, 13b and 13c. These s-boxes have a maximum pairs-XOR count of 30, with a minimum hamming distance of 0.45215 from any linear Boolean vector. The value 30 corresponds to a single round probability of 0.0146.
Comparison of the Present Invention and DES Round Functions
The round function of DES takes a 32bit input, and computes a non-linear function of that 32bit input. It accomplishes this using four discrete steps. The 32bit data input is expanded using the E expansion, then mixed with the 48bit key-schedule bits. The resulting 48bit value is then non-linearly substituted using the eight 6×4 s-boxes. The final step is to permute the 32bit s-box output using the P permutation.
When examining the E expansion in DES, notice that it provides no guarantee that a given input bit can affect more than one s-box. This makes differential cryptanalysis easier, since single s-boxes can be "isolated" for differential cryptanalysis purposes.
The cryptographic significance of the P permutation is assumed to be for the purposes of improving the diffusion properties of the round function, since the E expansion provides rather less diffusion.
The present invention has the same basic structure in its round function as DES. The round function takes a 64bit input, expands it to 88 bits using the ES function, mixes it with the key, and non-linearly substitutes the 88-bits using eight 11×8 s-boxes. When examining the ES function, observe that each input bit affects two s-boxes, thus making differential cryptanalysis somewhat harder. The ES function also provides, as a secondary effect, a small amount of non-linearity, since it acts as a 16×11 s-box. The s-boxes of the invention, due to their size, provide a higher degree of resistance both to differential and linear cryptanalysis than DES.
In the present invention, the post s-box function, S2, corresponds roughly to the P permutation in DES. Observe that S2 provides a non-linear transform of the s-box outputs, while the P function in DES is entirely linear. The S2 function also improves resistance to both differential and linear cryptanalysis, since the S2 table elements are unknown to the cryptanalyst. Even if the cryptanalyst is able to determine the contents of S2, it is assumed that the analysis of random 8×32 s-boxes, as described in the article by Lee et al referred to above, would hold for the S2 function in the present invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4319079 *||Jan 17, 1980||Mar 9, 1982||Best Robert M||Crypto microprocessor using block cipher|
|US4776011 *||Oct 24, 1983||Oct 4, 1988||Sony Corporation||Recursive key schedule cryptographic system|
|US5231662 *||Nov 12, 1991||Jul 27, 1993||Tulip Computers International B.V.||Method and device for enciphering data to be transferred and for deciphering the enciphered data, and a computer system comprising such a device|
|US5317638 *||Jul 17, 1992||May 31, 1994||International Business Machines Corporation||Performance enhancement for ANSI X3.92 data encryption algorithm standard|
|US5442705 *||Mar 11, 1994||Aug 15, 1995||Nec Corporation||Hardware arrangement for enciphering bit blocks while renewing a key at each iteration|
|US5511123 *||Aug 4, 1994||Apr 23, 1996||Northern Telecom Limited||Symmetric cryptographic system for data encryption|
|1||"Differential Cryptanalysis of the Full 16-round DES", E. Biham and A. Shamir, Advances in Cryptology, Proceedings of CRYPTO '92, Springer-Verlag, pp. 487-496.|
|2||"On the Resistance of the CAST Encryption Algorithm to Differential Cryptanalysis", J. Lee et al, SAC '95: Workshop Records, pp. 107-119.|
|3||*||Differential Cryptanalysis of the Full 16 round DES , E. Biham and A. Shamir, Advances in Cryptology, Proceedings of CRYPTO 92, Springer Verlag, pp. 487 496.|
|4||*||On the Resistance of the CAST Encryption Algorithm to Differential Cryptanalysis , J. Lee et al, SAC 95: Workshop Records, pp. 107 119.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5933501 *||Aug 1, 1996||Aug 3, 1999||Harris Corporation||`Virtual` encryption scheme combining different encryption operators into compound-encryption mechanism|
|US6108421 *||Mar 6, 1998||Aug 22, 2000||Harris Corporation||Method and apparatus for data encryption|
|US6246768 *||Jul 13, 1998||Jun 12, 2001||Penta Security Systems, Inc.||Data encryption system for encrypting plaintext data|
|US6266412 *||Jun 15, 1998||Jul 24, 2001||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Encrypting speech coder|
|US6496583 *||Dec 28, 1998||Dec 17, 2002||Sony Corporation||Digital data transfer apparatus and method|
|US6615354 *||Mar 20, 2000||Sep 2, 2003||Hitachi, Ltd.||Information processing equipment|
|US6631471 *||Dec 10, 1999||Oct 7, 2003||Hitachi, Ltd.||Information processing equipment|
|US6868159||Apr 5, 2001||Mar 15, 2005||Harris Corporation||‘Virtual’ encryption scheme combining different encryption operators into compound-encryption mechanism|
|US7092525 *||Apr 20, 2001||Aug 15, 2006||Matchett Noel D||Cryptographic system with enhanced encryption function and cipher key for data encryption standard|
|US7103180 *||Oct 25, 2001||Sep 5, 2006||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Method of implementing the data encryption standard with reduced computation|
|US7133525 *||Feb 4, 2003||Nov 7, 2006||Communication Security Apparatus Corp.||Communication security apparatus and method of using same|
|US7162031 *||Dec 16, 1999||Jan 9, 2007||Nokia Corporation||Method and device for cryptographically processing data|
|US7187769 *||Jun 1, 1999||Mar 6, 2007||Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Public Corporation||Method and apparatus for evaluating the strength of an encryption|
|US7194090 *||Jul 12, 2001||Mar 20, 2007||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Encryption apparatus, decryption apparatus, expanded key generating apparatus and method therefor, and recording medium|
|US7362859 *||Oct 4, 2001||Apr 22, 2008||Sandia Corporation||Enhancement of utilization of encryption engine|
|US7376235 *||Jul 29, 2002||May 20, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for frustrating statistical attacks by injecting pseudo data into a data system|
|US7512241||Aug 11, 2004||Mar 31, 2009||Nagravision Sa||Method for generating pseudo-random keys|
|US7599488||Oct 29, 2007||Oct 6, 2009||Cryptography Research, Inc.||Differential power analysis|
|US7606365 *||Jan 11, 2005||Oct 20, 2009||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Encryption/decryption system and key scheduler with variable key length|
|US7668310||Aug 15, 2001||Feb 23, 2010||Cryptography Research, Inc.||Cryptographic computation using masking to prevent differential power analysis and other attacks|
|US7783037 *||Sep 20, 2004||Aug 24, 2010||Globalfoundries Inc.||Multi-gigabit per second computing of the rijndael inverse cipher|
|US7787620||Oct 18, 2005||Aug 31, 2010||Cryptography Research, Inc.||Prevention of side channel attacks against block cipher implementations and other cryptographic systems|
|US7792287||Oct 30, 2007||Sep 7, 2010||Cryptography Research, Inc.||Leak-resistant cryptographic payment smartcard|
|US7941666||Mar 24, 2003||May 10, 2011||Cryptography Research, Inc.||Payment smart cards with hierarchical session key derivation providing security against differential power analysis and other attacks|
|US8150033 *||Oct 4, 2007||Apr 3, 2012||University Of Connecticut||Optical security system using fourier plane encoding|
|US8370642 *||Nov 19, 2009||Feb 5, 2013||Sony Corporation||Cryptographic processing apparatus|
|US8577023 *||Aug 29, 2007||Nov 5, 2013||Sony Corporation||Encryption processing method, apparatus, and computer program utilizing different types of S-boxes|
|US8879724||Dec 14, 2009||Nov 4, 2014||Rambus Inc.||Differential power analysis—resistant cryptographic processing|
|US20020021801 *||Mar 21, 2001||Feb 21, 2002||Takeshi Shimoyama||Computing apparatus using an SPN structure in an F function and a computation method thereof|
|US20020021802 *||Jul 12, 2001||Feb 21, 2002||Hirofumi Muratani||Encryption apparatus, decryption appatatus, expanded key generating apparatus and method therefor, and recording medium|
|US20020051534 *||Apr 20, 2001||May 2, 2002||Matchett Noel D.||Cryptographic system with enhanced encryption function and cipher key for data encryption standard|
|US20050053233 *||Aug 11, 2004||Mar 10, 2005||Serge Vaudenay||Method for generating pseudo-random keys|
|US20050190923 *||Jan 11, 2005||Sep 1, 2005||Mi-Jung Noh||Encryption/decryption system and key scheduler with variable key length|
|US20060045264 *||Oct 18, 2005||Mar 2, 2006||Kocher Paul C||Prevention of side channel attacks against block cipher implementations and other cryptographic systems|
|US20090055458 *||Sep 20, 2005||Feb 26, 2009||O'neil Sean||Substitution Boxes|
|US20100040224 *||Feb 18, 2010||The University Of Connecticut||Optical security system using fourier plane encoding|
|US20100104093 *||Aug 29, 2007||Apr 29, 2010||Taizo Shirai||Encryption Processing Apparatus, Encryption Processing Method, and Computer Program|
|US20100153744 *||Nov 19, 2009||Jun 17, 2010||Hiromi Nobukata||Cryptographic processing apparatus|
|CN100574183C||Sep 2, 2004||Dec 23, 2009||纳格拉影像股份有限公司||Method for generating pseudo-random sequence|
|CN101536062B||Aug 29, 2007||Sep 18, 2013||索尼株式会社||Encryption device, encryption method|
|CN102594545B *||Aug 29, 2007||May 6, 2015||索尼株式会社||信息处理装置|
|EP1172963A2 *||Mar 28, 2001||Jan 16, 2002||Fujitsu Limited||Computing apparatus using an SPN structure in an F function and a computation method thereof|
|EP1513285A1 *||Sep 5, 2003||Mar 9, 2005||Mediacrypt AG||Method for generating pseudo-random sequence|
|WO1998036524A1 *||Feb 3, 1998||Aug 20, 1998||At & T Corp||System and method for constructing block ciphers|
|WO2000041356A1 *||Dec 16, 1999||Jul 13, 2000||Koninkl Kpn Nv||Method and device for cryptographically processing data|
|WO2001082524A1 *||Apr 20, 2001||Nov 1, 2001||Noel D Matchett||Cryptographic system for data encryption standard|
|WO2005025123A1 *||Sep 2, 2004||Mar 17, 2005||Mediacrypt Ag||Method for generating pseudo-random sequence|
|WO2006033013A2 *||Sep 20, 2005||Mar 30, 2006||Synaptic Lab Ltd||Substitution boxes|
|WO2007075154A2 *||Dec 1, 2005||Jul 5, 2007||Stevens Inst Technology||Method and apparatus for maintaining data integrity for block-encryption algorithms|
|U.S. Classification||380/28, 380/29, 380/259, 380/43, 380/37|
|Cooperative Classification||H04L2209/24, H04L9/0625, H04L9/002|
|Jun 5, 1997||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BELL-NORTHERN RESEARCH LTD., CANADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LEECH, MARCUS D.;REEL/FRAME:008547/0036
Effective date: 19960722
Owner name: NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED, CANADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BELL-NORTHERN RESEARCH LTD.;REEL/FRAME:008547/0043
Effective date: 19970501
|Jun 18, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ENTRUST TECHNOLOGIES LTD., CANADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:009257/0843
Effective date: 19961231
|Aug 1, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Nov 16, 2005||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Jun 27, 2006||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20060428