|Publication number||US5760568 A|
|Application number||US 08/690,055|
|Publication date||Jun 2, 1998|
|Filing date||Jul 31, 1996|
|Priority date||Sep 5, 1995|
|Also published as||DE69619912D1, DE69619912T2, EP0762594A1, EP0762594B1|
|Publication number||08690055, 690055, US 5760568 A, US 5760568A, US-A-5760568, US5760568 A, US5760568A|
|Inventors||Matti J. Naskali|
|Original Assignee||Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Referenced by (26), Classifications (15), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Vbatt0 =Vmin +K*η*(Vmax -Vmin)
Vbatt0 =Vmin +K*η*(Vmax -Vmin)
Vbatt0 =Vmin +K*η*(Vmax -Vmin)
Vbatt0 =Vmin +K*η*(Vmax -Vmin)
The invention generally pertains to charging batteries with a power supply and is particularly related to determining the optimum voltage value during the charging of lithium batteries and to a device for charging small batteries.
Because of their good power/weight ratio, lithium batteries and battery packs comprising lithium batteries are generally used as power sources in small, portable electric devices. During operation, a battery is discharged, after which it has to be recharged. To ensure the correct operation of the battery and a long battery life, it is important that the charging be performed in the correct manner.
Especially the voltage that is used for charging lithium batteries and generated by a charging device must very accurately follow the open circuit voltage of the battery, i.e. the voltage that would exist between the terminals of the battery if no charging current would flow to the battery or if no discharging current were drawn from the battery. When a battery is fully charged but still connected to a charging device, an incorrect charging voltage value harms the battery and shortens its life.
A charging method for lithium batteries is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,736,150 which is based on chopping the charging current at the frequency of 0.1 to 10 hertz. A preferred embodiment of the method disclosed in the Patent employs a charging device generating a constant voltage and producing a relatively great charging current which, however, is limited below a certain maximum value, and chopped current superimposed on the charging current with a peak value of a few hundred milliamperes. Corresponding arrangements are known e.g. from Japanese Patent documents JP 152,002 and JP 5,114,422. The method sets no great requirements on the voltage source of the charging device, but the value of the chopped current and the duty cycle have to be determined relatively accurately. The problem is that to determine the duty cycle one should know the open circuit voltage of the battery charged, but it cannot be measured because either charging current flows to the battery or discharge current is drawn from the battery all the time.
It is an object of this invention to provide a method and a device with which the open circuit voltage of a battery can be determined during charging for the purpose of adjusting the charging conditions. It is another object of this invention to provide a method and a device as mentioned above the implementation of which is economical and suitable for mass production.
The objects of the invention are achieved by using a charging arrangement based on chopped, or pulsed, current, measuring the terminal voltage of the battery both during the current pulse and between the current pulses and by calculating the open circuit voltage of the battery on the basis of the measurement results using a method described later in this document.
It is characteristic of the method according to the invention, in which the battery is charged with the pulsed current according to a certain duty cycle, that in it
the terminal voltage of said battery is measured during a pulse and between pulses of said charging current,
the open circuit voltage of said battery is calculated on the basis of said measurements of the terminal voltage,
the calculated open circuit voltage is compared with a certain reference value, and
said duty cycle is altered on the basis of said comparison.
The invention is also directed to a device for implementing the method according to the invention. It is characteristic of the device according to the invention generating a pulsed charging current and including a control unit that
it also includes measuring means for measuring the terminal voltage of the battery charged during a charging current pulse and between charging current pulses and means for delivering the measurement data indicating the measured voltage values to said control unit, and
said control unit includes means for calculating the open circuit voltage of the battery charged on the basis of said measurement data, and means for altering the duty cycle of said pulsed charging current on the basis of said calculated open circuit voltage.
The method according to the invention is based on the use of a pulsed charging current and on the adjustment of the duty cycle to achieve a desired effective charging voltage. It is an advantage of this system that the output voltage of the DC power supply used in the charging device needs not be accurately adjusted, whereby it is possible to use a power supply with very low production costs. In the method according to the invention the voltage between the terminals of the battery is measured during a charging current pulse and between charging current pulses. The open circuit voltage of the battery charged is calculated on the basis of the measurements by adding to the latter the difference of the voltage values multiplied by the duty cycle used in the chopping of pulses (a ratio between 0 and 1 that indicates the temporal duration of a current pulse in relation to the time period of the chopped current) and, if necessary, by a correction coefficient the value of which depends on the charging device used in a manner described later. When the open circuit voltage of the battery has been calculated in the manner explained, the duty cycle used in the charging is altered according to certain rules described later in such a way that with the new duty cycle the calculated open circuit voltage of the battery would be nearer to the predetermined specification.
Below, the invention is described in more detail with reference to a preferred embodiment presented as an example and to the attached drawing, in which
FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram of a charging device in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of a voltage Vbatt measured between terminals of a battery in accordance with a method of the invention, and a theoretical open circuit voltage Vbatt0 of the battery;
FIGS. 3a and 3b illustrate a logic flow diagram of a method in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 3c is a logic flow diagram that illustrates in greater detail the function of the block 40' of FIG. 3a;
FIG. 3d is a logic flow diagram that illustrates in greater detail the function of the block 180 of FIG. 3b; and
FIG. 3e is a logic flow diagram that illustrates in greater detail the function of the block 190 of FIG. 3b.
Corresponding parts in the figures are marked with identical reference numbers and markings.
FIG. 1 shows a simplified circuit diagram of a charging device 1 connected to a battery 2 to be charged. The operation of the charging device 1 is controlled by a microprocessor 3 that gives to a pulse width controller 4 a desired duty cycle η, or the temporal duration of the current pulse Ion in relation to the time period τ of the pulsing of the current. If the charging current Ich is on all the time, the duty cycle η is 1, and if it is not on at all, the duty cycle η is 0. For a pulsed charging current, the value of the duty cycle η is between these two extremes. The current pulsing period τ, or the time constant, is of no great significance to the invention, but advantageously the pulse frequency is from 0.1 to 10 hertz, whereby one pulse period lasts at the most ten and at least 0.1 seconds. A DC voltage supply 5 of the charging device, the output voltage of which is marked U, supplies a charging current Ich via the pulse width controller 4.
Pulsed charging current Ich is directed into the battery 2, between the terminals of which there is connected an A/D converter 6 to measure the voltage Vbatt of the battery 2. The A/D converter 6 converts the measured instantaneous battery voltage Vbatt to a digital number and inputs it to the microprocessor 3. The microprocessor can choose the sampling moment at which the A/D converter 6 measures the voltage Vbatt of the battery 2 by sending to it a control signal via a control line 7. A mobile phone 8, which is on during the charging of the battery, is also connected to the terminals of the battery 2. An electric current Iph, the rate of which depends on the operating mode of the phone, flows to the mobile phone 8. In addition, the circuit includes as a separate unit a storage means 9 for saving and reading the program for the microprocessor 3 and the parameter values required by it. The battery 2 is shown as an equivalent circuit with an ideal voltage source 2a without an internal impedance and a resistor 2b the resistance Rbatt of which corresponds to the internal impedance of the real battery. Generally, the internal impedance of the battery depends, among other things, on the structure and age of the battery, and it can be calculated e.g. by connecting a constant current load to the battery and measuring the voltage between the terminals of the loaded battery, whereby the internal impedance of the battery equals the measured voltage divided by said constant current.
The open circuit voltage of the battery 2 cannot be measured, because during such a measurement no current should be supplied to or drawn from the battery. During a charging current pulse Ion current is supplied to the battery from the charging device 1, and between the pulses current is drawn from the battery and directed into the mobile phone 8. According to the invention, the open circuit voltage of the battery 2 marked Vbatt0 is calculated as follows:
Vbatt0 =Vmin +K*η*(Vmax -Vmin), (I)
where η is the duty cycle and Vmax means the voltage between the terminals of the battery 2 measured by the A/D converter 6 during the current pulse Ion, and Vmin means the voltage between the terminals of the battery 2 between the current pulses. Coefficient K is 1, if the charging device is a DC power supply. In a second embodiment of the invention that employs a simple power supply implemented with a diode rectifier only, the average of the charging current Ich during the charging current pulse Ion is a certain portion of its peak value, whereby the ratio of said average and said peak value is used as the value of coefficient K.
The measurement of the terminal voltage of the battery 2 and the charge current pulses Ich must not be synchronized in time so that the measurement of the voltage Vbatt occurs always at the same moment of time in relation to the pulsing period τ, since then the measurement would every time result in only either the Vmax or the Vmin value. In the charging device according to the invention, the measurement and pulsing can be actively desynchronized, whereby several (even dozens) measurements need to be performed with the A/D converter 6 to make sure that at least one representative of both the Vmax and the Vmin value is included in the measurements. Another alternative is to use the microprocessor 3 to control the beginning and end of the current pulses generated by the pulse width controller 4 and the sampling of the A/D converter so that the sampling is controlled both during the current pulse and between them. The latter method is a little more complicated from the microprocessor 3 standpoint, because in it part of the operation of the pulse width controller 4 is in fact transferred to the processor and precise timing is required of the program run in the processor.
FIG. 2 is a graphic representation of the real voltage Vbatt between the terminals of the battery 2, the behaviour of which is pulse-like corresponding to the charging current pulses, and the theoretical open circuit voltage Vbatt0 that would exist between the terminals of the battery 2 without charging and current drawn by the mobile phone 8. The difference V1 of the voltage values measured during the charging current pulse (position A) and between the charging current pulses (position B) equals the product of the internal impedance Rbatt of the battery and the charging current Ich, or (Rbatt * Ich). Since between the charging current pulses the mobile phone 8 generates practically a constant current load, it can be concluded that the difference V2 of the open circuit voltage Vbatt0 of the battery 2 and the terminal voltage Vmin measured between the charging current pulses equals the product of the internal impedance Rbatt of the battery 2 and the current Iph flowing to the mobile phone 8, or (Rbatt * Iph).
Above it was stated that the open circuit voltage of the battery 2 cannot be measured during charging since at all times current is either drawn from the battery or supplied to the battery. However, to regulate the charging process it is necessary to use a voltage value to represent the assumed open circuit voltage. To illustrate the advantages of the invention, it will be next examined how big the charging voltage error, i.e. the difference of the voltage value used in charging to represent the open circuit voltage of the battery and the real open circuit voltage Vbatt0 of the battery 2, is, if the value calculated with the formula (I) according to the invention is not used as the representing value, but instead different values are used, referring to the markings in FIG. 2.
Let us first assume that the open circuit voltage is represented by the minimum value Vmin of the voltage, ie. the terminal voltage value of the battery 2 between charging current pulses. Since it was stated above that the difference of the minimum value Vmin and the real open circuit voltage Vbatt0 equals (Rbatt * Iph), the biggest possible charging voltage error is produced in a situation where the internal impedance Rbatt of the battery 2 is high (e.g. an old battery with small cells) and the mobile phone 8 draws a lot of current Iph (e.g. keypad lights and automatic scanning on). Using values Rbatt =350 mΩ and Iph =220 mA the charging voltage error becomes 77 mV. In a more favourable situation where the internal impedance Rbatt of the battery 2 is low (e.g. a new battery with large cells) and the mobile phone 8 draws only a little current Iph (e.g. when the phone is in so-called battery-saving state), the corresponding values are 100 mΩ, 10 mA and 1 mV.
Let us then assume that the value representing the open circuit voltage is the voltage Vmax between the terminals of the battery 2 during the charging current pulse. Looking at the markings in FIG. 2 and making a simple deduction we can see that the charging voltage error then equals Rbatt * (Ich -Iph)!. The worst case is achieved with a high internal impedance Rbatt of the battery 2 and a small current consumption Iph by the mobile phone 8. With values Rbatt =350 mΩ, Ich =800 mA and Iph =10 mA the charging voltage error becomes 277 mV. In a more favourable case, with the values of the above example, Rbatt =100 mΩ and Iph =220 mA, the charging voltage error becomes 58 mV.
The average of the voltage values Vmax and Vmin mentioned above can also be used as the value representing the open circuit voltage of the battery 2. A simple deduction then yields the expression Rbatt * (0.5 * Ich -Iph)! for the charging voltage error, whereby we get the biggest possible error 137 mV with the values Rbatt =350 mΩ, Ich =800 mA and Iph =10 mA, and the smallest possible error 18 mV with the values Rbatt =100 mΩ, Ich =800 mA and Iph =220 mA.
The formula (I) according to the invention for determining the open circuit voltage of the battery is based on a deduction saying that when the battery 2 is fully charged, no charging current on average enters the battery, because the charging current Ich generated by the charging device 1 charges the battery 2 during the current pulse Ion by the same amount that is discharged between the charging current pulses Ion through the mobile phone 8 functioning as a load. Then the charge brought to the system during the charging current pulse Ion by the charging device 1, equalling (Ich * ητ), equals the charge consumed by the mobile phone 8 during the whole pulse period. The expression for the latter charge is (Iph τ). Since it can also be stated, looking at the markings in FIG. 2, that the difference of the maximum and minimum voltage equals the product of the internal impedance of the battery and the charging current, Vmax -Vmin =(Rbatt * Ich), and the open circuit voltage of the battery is expressed Vbatt0 =Vmin +(Rbatt * Iph), we will arrive in the mathematical deduction ##EQU1##
The last line is identical with the formula (I) except for the correction coefficient K included in the formula (I). The deduction above is valid for a DC charging device for which the value of the correction coefficient K is, as stated earlier, 1. If the average of the charging current Ich is (K * Ich), the charge brought to the system by the charging device is expressed as (K * Ich * ητ), wherefrom, by repeating the deduction above, we get the formula (I). In theory, the open circuit voltage of the battery is obtained error-free according to the formula (I). Laboratory measurements have verified that when a value calculated with the formula (I) according to the invention is used to represent the open circuit voltage of the battery, the charging voltage errors are smaller than when using the mininmum voltage value Vmin, the maximum voltage value Vmax or their average as the representing value.
As regards the structure and characteristics of the battery 2 charged, we know that when the battery is fully charged, its open circuit voltage has a certain value. In the embodiment described as an example it is possible to use a lithium battery the open circuit voltage of which, when fully charged, is 8.2 V. Advantageously, this voltage value is stored in the storage means 9 of the microprocessor 3, and it is called the charging reference value Vch. In an alternative embodiment, a simple circuit can be included in the various batteries in the manufacturing stage, e.g. a resistor (not shown in the drawing) having a certain resistance, the value of which corresponds to the open circuit voltage of the battery according to a certain correspondence table. Then the charging device has a part (not shown) connected to that identification circuit, by means of which the charging device recognizes the type of the battery, whereby the microprocessor 3 can fetch from its storage means 9 the charging reference value Vch corresponding to that particular type of battery. Identification may be also based on the shape or other mechanical properties of the battery 2. In the method according to the invention, the voltage values Vmax and Vmin are measured and the open circuit voltage of the battery Vbatt0 is calculated on the basis of those values and a known duty cycle η. The calculated value is compared with the charging reference value Vch mentioned above. If the calculated value Vbatt0 is smaller than the charging reference value Vch, the duty cycle η has to be increased, and, correspondingly, if the calculated value Vbatt0 is bigger than the charging reference value Vch, the duty cycle η has to be decreased. The rule or formula for changing the value of the duty cycle is as such insignificant, as long as it either increases or decreases the value of the duty cycle. An advantageous embodiment of the invention employs a certain set of fuzzy logic rules which, as a response to a certain difference of values Vbatt0 and Vch and a change rate of value Vbatt0 provides a certain change in the duty cycle η. The main principle is that if the calculated value Vbatt0 is considerably smaller than the reference value Vch, the duty cycle is altered considerably or it is even set to 1, whereby the charging current is on all the time. The closer to the reference value the calculated voltage Vbatt0 is, the smaller the change made in the duty cycle. A person skilled in the art can easily draw up several alternative formulas or sets of rules to achieve the desired effect.
The preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention is illustrated by the logic flow diagram shown in FIGS. 3a-3c, and by Table 1 below which contains the pseudo-code of a computer program that comprises one whole adjustment cycle to adjust the duty cycle η of the charging device 1. Corresponding method steps of the invention shown in FIGS. 3a-3c and Table 1 are identified by the same reference numerals.
TABLE 1______________________________________ 10 read battery voltage from A/D converter 20A IF pulse width is at maximum 20B pulse = `up` 20C ELSEIF pulse width is zero 20D pulse = `down` 30 ELSE determine by measuring whether pulse is `up` or `down` ENDIF 40 IF pulse is `down` 50 update `minimum voltage average` 60 update `maximum voltage average` less 70 IF difference of averages is greater than allowed 80 set `maximum voltage average` to normal distance ENDIF 90 ELSE update `maximum voltage average`110 update `minimum voltage average` less120 IF difference of averages is greater than allowed130 set `minimum voltage average` to normal distance ENDIF140 calculate weighted average of maximum and minimum voltage150 calculate voltage change and error160 save averages170 check input value limits before calling fuzzy logic rules180 call fuzzy logic rules190 add resulting pulse width change to pulse width200 check pulse width limits210 save new value for pulse width220 RETURN new pulse width______________________________________
First, the battery voltage is read (Step 10). Since in the described embodiment the timing used for generating the current pulses is not known to the processor, ie. it does not know when the pulses start and end, it has to be checked, whether the measured value corresponds to the current pulse (Vmax) or the current pulse interval (Vmin) (see lines 20A-30 of Table 1, block 40' of FIG. 3a, and FIG. 3c which shows the steps of block 40' in greater detail). If the processor knows that the pulse width is set to the maximum or zero, as determined in steps 20A and 20C, respectively, the correspondence of the measurement is directly known and, hence, the variable `pulse` is assigned the value `up` (step 20B) or `down` (step 20D). Otherwise, as shown on line 30, it has to checked by measuring whether the voltage produced by the A/D converter corresponds to the current pulse (`up`, Vmax) or the current pulse interval (`down`, Vmin).
Lines 40 to 80 are executed only if it is found out that the measured voltage corresponds to the pulse interval (value of pulse variable is `down`). The average of the earlier minimum voltages in the memory is updated on the basis of the measurement result. On line 60 it is performed a cautious maximum voltage average update on an estimate basis, because tens of seconds may have been gone since the previous maximum voltage measurement, and if the minimum voltage has increased, it is probable that also the maximum voltage has increased. The difference of the updated averages is checked on line 70, and if it is greater than a certain predetermined limit value, then the maximum voltage average is set to a value at a certain normal distance from the calculated minimum voltage average, line 80. Lines 90 to 130, which are executed only if the pulse variable value is `up`, describe the corresponding operation starting from the maximum voltage measurement.
On line 140, it is calculated the weighted average of the minimum and maximum voltage representing the open circuit voltage of the battery using the formula (I) according to the invention that was discussed above. On the next line (150) it is calculated how much this value and the maximum and minimum values have changed from the previous measurement. These comprise the input data supplied to the fuzzy logic ruleset. They are saved on line 160 and their reasonableness is checked on line 170, lest measuring errors affect the adjustment. On line 180 a call is made to the fuzzy logic rules which on the basis of said input data indicate how much the duty cycle should be changed (blocks 180a and 180b of FIG. 3d). The change is added to the current duty cycle value on line 190 (see blocks 190a and 190b of FIG. 3e), and on line 200 it is checked that the resulting new duty cycle is between zero and one, ends included. Then the new duty cycle value is saved and sent to the pulse width controller (lines 210 and 220).
The value of the open circuit voltage Vbatt0 of the battery, calculated using the formula (I) according to the invention, also provides a certain estimate for the instantaneous capacity, or the charge level, of the battery 2. In an embodiment of the invention, this feature is utilized by connecting to the charging device 1 an indicator (not shown in the drawing) operating on the basis of the calculated value Vbatt0, indicating to the user the charge level of the battery at a given moment.
Using the formula (I) according to the invention it is possible to determine the open circuit voltage of a battery charged during pulsed charging for the purpose of adjusting the charging conditions. Since the formula takes into account the minimum and maximum voltage during the charging of the battery as well as the duty cycle used in the charging, it is particularly well suited for various situations in which the internal impedance of the battery adopts different values and the device coupled to the battery during the charging draws different amounts of current. In the preferred embodiment, the invention only requires of the hardware an ability to read or measure the voltage of the battery charged (meaning, usually, a simple A/D conversion) and programming of the microprocessor that controls the operation of the hardware or controlling of a pulse width modulator, so it will not require high production costs or precise, hardware-specific adjustments that would make it more difficult to apply the invention in mass production. Since charging voltage errors, when using the method and device according to the invention, are smaller than in prior art arrangements, the battery life will be prolonged.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4736150 *||Jul 9, 1986||Apr 5, 1988||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Method of increasing the useful life of rechargeable lithium batteries|
|US5179335 *||Oct 6, 1988||Jan 12, 1993||Norvik Inc.||Battery charger|
|US5295078 *||May 15, 1992||Mar 15, 1994||Best Power Technology Corporation||Method and apparatus for determination of battery run-time in uninterruptible power system|
|US5296797 *||Jun 2, 1992||Mar 22, 1994||Byrd Electronics Corp.||Pulse modulated battery charging system|
|US5321347 *||Dec 18, 1992||Jun 14, 1994||Chien Chih Chien||Battery charger device and method|
|US5381096 *||Oct 5, 1993||Jan 10, 1995||Hirzel; Edgar A.||Method and apparatus for measuring the state-of-charge of a battery system|
|US5408170 *||Jun 15, 1993||Apr 18, 1995||Sony Corporation||Device for charging a secondary battery having interrupt means to prevent overcharging|
|US5446364 *||Feb 14, 1992||Aug 29, 1995||Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.||Fast charging arrangement|
|US5523667 *||Feb 28, 1994||Jun 4, 1996||Feldstein; Robert S.||Alkaline battery charger and method of operating same|
|EP0311460A2 *||Oct 10, 1988||Apr 12, 1989||Norvik Technologies Inc.||Battery charger|
|EP0432690A2 *||Dec 10, 1990||Jun 19, 1991||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Charging apparatus|
|EP0657983A2 *||Dec 1, 1994||Jun 14, 1995||Motorola, Inc.||Pulsed battery charger circuit|
|WO1992011680A1 *||Nov 20, 1991||Jul 9, 1992||Motorola, Inc.||Battery characteristic detection scheme and apparatus|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6100672 *||Aug 11, 1999||Aug 8, 2000||Nokia Mobile Phones Limited||Start up charging control|
|US6137262 *||Feb 9, 1999||Oct 24, 2000||Volkswagen Ag||Process and arrangement for monitoring and/or controlling charging of a modular battery, particularly in a battery powered vehicle|
|US6157172 *||Jun 11, 1999||Dec 5, 2000||Nokia Mobile Phones Limited||Charging method and device|
|US6169388||Jan 12, 2000||Jan 2, 2001||Nokia Mobile Phones Limited||Charging method and device|
|US6232750 *||Jan 19, 2000||May 15, 2001||Enrey Corporation||Battery charger with enhanced charging and charge measurement processes|
|US6775259||Dec 29, 1998||Aug 10, 2004||Nokia Mobile Phones Limited||Method and a device to utilise the channels of a cellular system|
|US6778521||Dec 30, 1998||Aug 17, 2004||Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.||Method for using effectively the broadcast capacity in a cell|
|US6841973 *||Oct 9, 2003||Jan 11, 2005||Infineon Technologies Ag||DC-DC conversion charging apparatus|
|US7102329 *||Feb 16, 2001||Sep 5, 2006||Donavan Developments Limited||Method of measuring the battery level in a mobile telephone|
|US7405571 *||Sep 13, 2005||Jul 29, 2008||Hdm Systems Corporation||Methods and apparatuses for determining battery capacity|
|US7696724||Aug 14, 2008||Apr 13, 2010||Donovan Developments Limited||Method of measuring the battery level in a mobile telephone|
|US8754611 *||Sep 30, 2008||Jun 17, 2014||Apple Inc.||Diffusion-limited adaptive battery charging|
|US9035622 *||Jun 21, 2012||May 19, 2015||Go-Tech Energy Co. Ltd.||Charging device with battery management system for rechargeable battery|
|US9071071 *||Mar 10, 2014||Jun 30, 2015||Apple Inc.||Diffusion-limited adaptive battery charging|
|US20040046528 *||Feb 16, 2001||Mar 11, 2004||Sebastian Soyer||Method of measuring the battery level in a mobile telephone|
|US20040145351 *||Oct 9, 2003||Jul 29, 2004||Derek Bernardon||DC-DC conversion charging apparatus|
|US20080100265 *||Sep 10, 2007||May 1, 2008||Samsung Sdi Co., Ltd.||Battery management system and driving method thereof|
|US20080315838 *||Aug 14, 2008||Dec 25, 2008||Donovan Developments Limited||Method of measuring the battery level in a mobile telephone|
|US20090256528 *||Sep 30, 2008||Oct 15, 2009||Apple Inc.||Diffusion-limited adaptive battery charging|
|US20100164437 *||Oct 22, 2009||Jul 1, 2010||Mckinley Joseph P||Battery formation and charging system and method|
|US20130342172 *||Jun 21, 2012||Dec 26, 2013||Go-Tech Energy Co., Ltd.||Charging device with battery management system for rechargeable battery|
|US20140197805 *||Mar 10, 2014||Jul 17, 2014||Apple Inc.||Diffusion-limited adaptive battery charging|
|CN103490699A *||Nov 1, 2012||Jan 1, 2014||赐福科技股份有限公司||Current measuring circuit and motor control device provided with the same|
|CN103490699B *||Nov 1, 2012||Apr 13, 2016||赐福科技股份有限公司||电流量测电路及具有该电流量测电路的电机控制装置|
|EP1059721A2 *||Jun 9, 2000||Dec 13, 2000||Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.||Improved charging method and device|
|EP1059721A3 *||Jun 9, 2000||Aug 8, 2001||Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.||Improved charging method and device|
|U.S. Classification||320/139, 320/149, 320/157, 320/128|
|International Classification||H01M10/44, H02J7/02, H02J7/00, G01R19/04, H02J7/04, H02J7/10|
|Cooperative Classification||H02J7/0093, Y02B40/90, H01M10/44|
|European Classification||H01M10/44, H02J7/00M10E|
|Jul 31, 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NOKIA MOBILE PHONES, LTD., FINLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NASKALI, MATTI J.;REEL/FRAME:008174/0788
Effective date: 19950814
|Sep 27, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Nov 4, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Nov 4, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jan 10, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NOKIA CORPORATION, FINLAND
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NOKIA MOBILE PHONES, LTD.;REEL/FRAME:025608/0978
Effective date: 20080911
|Apr 28, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ROAC ND INVESTMENTS L.L.C., DELAWARE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NOKIA CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:026197/0632
Effective date: 20110328
|Dec 31, 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NYTELL SOFTWARE LLC, DELAWARE
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:ROAC ND INVESTMENTS L.L.C.;REEL/FRAME:037391/0341
Effective date: 20150826