Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS5765144 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 08/669,080
Publication dateJun 9, 1998
Filing dateJun 24, 1996
Priority dateJun 24, 1996
Fee statusPaid
Publication number08669080, 669080, US 5765144 A, US 5765144A, US-A-5765144, US5765144 A, US5765144A
InventorsKimberly Larche, Clemens Taeuber
Original AssigneeMerrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System for selecting liability products and preparing applications therefor
US 5765144 A
Abstract
A system is disclosed having a graphical interface for interactively interviewing and educating a customer regarding their credit needs and the available products. The system also inquires, for example, about the customer's opinion regarding the future of interest rates or the importance to the customer of steady monthly payments. Using the information gained and unique selection processes, the system determines which of the available credit products will result in the lowest average monthly payment or lowest average interest rate over the expected holding period of the product. The selection is based on updated interest rate and product information. Once the customer selects a recommended product, the system generates an electronic credit application, requiring only information germane to that customer's transaction. The system also automatically completes as much information as possible on the application. Once the customer finishes the minimal information remaining, the system generates a completed application to be submitted to the financial institution for processing and approval in any of a number of formats. If the customer already has asset or liability accounts with the particular financial institution offering the credit products, the customer's information is also automatically retrieved and incorporated into the selection and application generation processes.
Images(14)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(7)
We claim:
1. An interactive computer system for assisting a user in selecting a liability product from a pre-determined set of liability products, at least a subset of said products having differing variable rate structures, comprising:
means for said user to select a first prediction for the direction of future interest rates;
means for said user to select a second prediction for the rate of change of future interest rates;
means for said user to input the duration that said selected product will be held; and
means for calculating the variable rate applicable to each of said liability products over said duration based on said first and second predictions to thereby select at least one of said liability products having one of the lowest average payment and the lowest average interest rate.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein said second prediction may be selected from a first, second and third rate of change, said first rate representing 1/2 point per year, said second rate representing 1 point per year, said third rate representing 2 points per year, said means for calculating adding the selected rate of change to the variable rate for each of said liability products for each year of said duration.
3. The system of claim 1, further comprising:
means for retrieving updated variable rate structure information for said liability products.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein said means for calculating applies said first prediction for a first portion of said duration, and further comprising:
means for said user to select a third prediction for the direction of future interest rates during a second portion of said duration, said means for calculating applying said third prediction for said second duration portion.
5. The system of claim 4, further comprising:
means for said user to choose one of said liability products selected by said means for calculating; and
means for generating a liability/credit application for the chosen liability product, said liability/credit application being automatically partially completed with information regarding said chosen liability product.
6. The system of claim 5, further comprising:
a checklist builder, said builder having a database of possible attachments to said liability/credit application, said checklist builder automatically generating a list of only those attachments necessary based on the chosen liability product.
7. The system of claim 6, further comprising:
means for interactively gathering financial information from said user, said means for generating automatically completing said application with said gathered financial information, said checklist builder automatically altering said list based on said gathered financial information.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to systems for processing financial information and customer profile data. More specifically, the present invention relates to a system for processing customer data to assist in the selection of credit programs and to assist in the creation of an appropriate credit application.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The credit industry is highly competitive, with many different credit sources offering a multitude of credit packages tailored to meet almost any conceivable financial situation and need. Even within one financial institution, there may be a wide variety of credit products, varying in their interest structures, qualifying requirements and governing rules. Each credit product might also be affected by the various states' statutes and regulations, so that one particular product might appear different to a customer in one state compared to a customer in another.

Matching a customer with an appropriate credit product would be a difficult task if left to the customer alone. Thus, in the past, financial institutions have used their own personnel to assist customers. There are basic customer service representatives (CSRs) or loan officers, who are capable of answering simple, technical questions, such as those relating to filling out forms. One financial institution further utilizes financial consultants (FCs) who assist customers by discussing the customer's overall financial position and credit needs and then selecting and recommending products that seem to fit with that particular customer's situation. Sometimes, these recommendations are based on one or two simple calculations, perhaps based on assets and needs. FCs also may inject their own personal opinions, even when they may not be the most appropriate. Otherwise, the selection of products would often be based on the subjective and often uninformed opinions of the customer.

Unfortunately, FCs have historically been highly trained to assist customers with their asset management, but are only recently addressing liability and credit issues. The resulting variability in FC recommendations due to individual subjectivity may therefore also lead to erroneous decisions by customers. These decisions can obviously have a significant effect on the customer, since an improper credit product translates into a lower overall net worth for the customer. To date, the only attempts to decrease the variability of FCs recommendations have involved personnel education, which still leaves the individual FC's subjectivity as a significant factor in customer recommendations.

Beyond the issue of what recommendations are given, after the selection of a credit product has been made and agreed upon by the customer, a lengthy application process lies ahead for the customer, beginning with a blank set of application papers sent to the customer by the FC or CSR. Because of the increasingly cautious nature of underwriting credit, these applications are overwhelming to customers who need to fill in page after page of exacting financial and personal information. Also, these applications tend to be universal, including much information that does not apply to a particular customer's transaction, lengthening the application completion process. In fact, this step is often the crux of closing a transaction relating to credit, in that many of these applications go uncompleted by the applicant. This not only leads to the financial institution's loss of the interest income on that customer's credit, but also a waste of valuable manpower, measured by the FC's time, and administrative resources, measured by the recordkeeping burden for the FC's and the costs associated with producing and forwarding applications.

In an attempt to increase the closure rate among credit applications sent to customers, some financial institutions have begun to simplify the application preparation process. FCs not only have the capability of assisting with the selection of an appropriate credit product, but also now assist with completing the application itself. Using the customer profile data obtained from the customer, either over the phone, fax or in person, along with information relating to the specific credit product selected, the FC would prepare an application form with as much information as possible already completed. When the customer receives the application, his/her overall burden will be reduced, as there will be fewer "blanks" on the application form. With less to do, the applicant is more likely to complete the application and forward it back to the financial institution for processing and, perhaps, approval.

However, even with this added assistance from the FCs, the customer's overall paper and records preparation process is a multi-step, fairly burdensome procedure. For customers who need the credit, the burden is a necessary evil, although one financial institution with an easier process might attract customers from an institution with a more onerous process. For customers who do not have an immediate need for the credit, but can nevertheless benefit from consolidating their credit or moving to another product, the burden might dissuade them, denying them those benefits and denying the financial institution the benefits of interest income, closing costs, and/or origination fees.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the deficiencies of the prior art, it is an object of the present invention to provide a system for assisting a sales force and customers in objectively selecting liability/credit products by using techniques termed "Liability Management.SM." to maximize net worth and also for automatically generating credit applications.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a system that gathers various information from a customer on which to base the selection of credit products for that customer.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a system that selects credit products based in part on the customer's personal opinion as to the future of interest rates.

It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a system that includes a graphical, interactive interface for use by a customer in entering information and selecting credit products.

It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a system that automatically uses information gathered during the credit product selection process to automatically complete portions of a credit application and that automatically generates a completed application.

It is still another object of the present invention to provide a system that has access to updated information relating to the various credit products available to the customer.

It is a yet further object of the present invention to provide a system that has access to any available information concerning the customer and automatically uses the information both in the product selection process and the application generation process.

In accordance with the objects of the invention, a system is provided having a graphical interface for interactively interviewing and educating a customer regarding their credit needs and the available products. The system also inquires, for example, about the customer's opinion regarding the future of interest rates or the importance to the customer of steady monthly payments. Using the information gained and unique selection processes, the system determines which of the available credit products will result in the lowest average monthly payment or lowest average interest rate over the expected holding period of the product. The selection is based on updated interest rate and product information. Once the customer selects a recommended product, the system generates an electronic credit application, requiring only information germane to that customer's transaction. The system also automatically completes as much information as possible on the application. Once the customer finishes the minimal information remaining, the system generates a completed application to be submitted to the financial institution for processing and approval in any of a number of formats. If the customer already has asset or liability accounts with the particular financial institution offering the credit products, the customer's information is also automatically retrieved and incorporated into the selection and application generation processes.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment in conjunction with a review of the appended drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic hardware diagram of a system according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic software diagram showing the overall organization of various software components of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a high-level logic flowchart of a home purchase submodule of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a lower level logic flowchart of the home purchase submodule of the system shown in FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is a logic flowchart of a refinancing submodule of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a logic flowchart of a personal credit submodule of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a Best Use of Funds screen of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 8 is an Economic Outlook screen of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 9 is a Recommendations screen of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 10 is a Product Information screen of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 11 is an Application Builder screen of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 12 is a Mortgage Application screen of the system of the present invention;

FIG. 13 is a Checklist Builder screen of the system of the present invention; and

FIG. 14 is a Calculator screen of the system of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to FIG. 1, the hardware of a system according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown. Three different operational structures are shown in the figure, although many are contemplated. All three require the main component of the system, which is a personal computer or other workstation 10a,10b,10c, on which the system software is accessed by a customer or FC. In general, the operation of the system is identical for the three workstations, although each has a different means of accessing the financial institution supporting the system. Preferably, each workstation has at least a 486-type processor with a VGA display and multimedia capabilities, although the exact configuration is not critical. The Windows operating system is preferred, although any graphical user interface may be used similarly.

Since several of the submodules of the present system may access databases not resident on the workstations 10, as will be discussed further below, each workstation 10 has a network connection to the financial institution offering the products stored in the system. In the case of workstation 10a, this connection is preferably a constant connection over a local or wide area network (LAN/WAN) to a server 50. In this configuration, the workstation 10a would be used by a CSR or FC within the financial institution. Workstation 10b is preferably a mobile, laptop-type computer and is preferably connected to the server 50 through a standard modem connection over the public telephone network, but it is also contemplated as an ISDN, X.25 or any other data transfer protocol network. This telephone network connection to the financial institution first passes through a firewall system 60 for security purposes, as is known in the art. Workstation 10b would most likely be used by an FC at a remote site, perhaps a customer's residence. Workstation 10c is preferably connected to the financial institution over a global network, such as the present Internet. In this situation, the workstation 10c would only include standard internet access software, such as a World Wide Web browser, while the system software would be maintained on an internet server 70, within the financial institution, downloading information to the workstation 10c as needed. Such a setup could be used directly by a customer at his/her residence or business. The internet server 70 would then be connected to the main system server 50.

Once the workstation 10 is connected, through whatever means, data as needed may be retrieved from the financial institution servers 50 containing the databases described below. For example, the server 50 preferably includes a database containing interest rate information and customer profile data. It is also contemplated that the server 50 could contain any updates to the software resident on the workstations 10abc, downloading it to the workstations 10abc as necessary.

Each workstation 10a, 10b, 10c is then also preferably connected to a printer (20, 30, 40, respectively) such as a standard laser printer, for outputting a completed credit application generated by the system resident on the workstation 10abc (or through the internet). Although it is not in any way critical to the system, the system implementation on workstations 10a and 10b are preferably accomplished using the Visual Basic, C++, MS Access and SQL server programming environments.

Referring now to FIG. 2, the overall system component organization is shown schematically. The central processor 200 receives input from various sources, including the customer, and generates outputs to the display 210, mortgage/credit application generator 220, and alternatively, as discussed below, to the financial institution. The processor includes the various drivers and operating system routines necessary to operate the system, such as generating the multimedia interface and communicating with the financial institution. The processor 200 receives data from potentially two database sources within the financial institution; namely, a database 230 containing updated product interest rate and parameter information, and a database 240 containing customer data if the customer using the system already has accounts with the financial institution.

The processor 200 also receives input from the customer through a keyboard and mouse 250, in response to the interactive interface 260, which is displayed as appropriate. For selecting its recommended credit products, the processor 200 accesses static information (non-volatile parameters) about the products, which is stored in an internal database 270 as part of the present system and is preferably resident on the workstation. The processor also accesses a database 280 of state-specific rules and regulations that apply depending on the property's state. Since this database 280 is also generally non-volatile, it is preferably stored on the workstation 10. Both databases 270, 280 may be updated as necessary, such as by access to a financial institution server 50.

The interactive interface includes video clips of a "guide" to help the customer navigate through the interview process by which the processor obtains information necessary to recommend products. Throughout the interview and selection processes, the customer is presented with screen buttons, input fields and charts to easily enter information or respond to the system inquiries. As an example of the ease of using the system, the customer is often presented with a choice of "I don't know" in response to specific questions. Upon selecting "I don't know," the interactive interface presents the customer with worksheets or other assistive information to allow the customer or the system to accurately estimate the answer. For further background information, a Bookshelf submodule is included in the system, which provides descriptive material on the available products from the financial institution.

If the FC or customer is unsure which of the submodules described below would be most helpful to the customer, a brief interview may be conducted by the system, gathering basic financial data on the customer's properties, assets and debts. Once gathered, calculations are performed to determine if any of the financial institution's products would improve the customer's overall portfolio. If so, the appropriate submodule described below is initiated.

Home Purchase Submodule

Referring now to FIG. 3, a high-level flowchart showing the logic of the Home Purchase submodule of the present invention is shown. This particular submodule concerns the purchase of a home and selecting an appropriate mortgage product for that purchase. To arrive at product recommendations and ultimately generate a credit application for a particular product, the submodule performs five major steps: (1) The Property/Years in Property 310; (2) Best Use of Funds 320; (3) Down Payment 330; (4) Economic Outlook 340; and (5) Financial Picture 350. Once those steps have been performed, the system calculates and then displays its recommendations 360, allowing the customer to review each recommended product's features, make a selection and ultimately generate an application. Other submodules, described below, for Refinancing and Personal Credit, have some steps in common with the Home Purchase submodule, as will be seen. Thus, the Home Purchase submodule will be discussed in the greatest detail, while the description of the other submodules will refer back to portions of the Home Purchase submodule. The calculations used in making recommendations, described more fully below, focus on whether a particular product is available to a customer and if the customer is eligible for that product. Each step of the process will be described in more detail, as follows.

Referring now to FIG. 4, the Home Purchase submodule is shown in greater detail than in FIG. 3. When the system is initiated by the customer or FC, the processor 200 accesses the interactive interface information 260 and displays the video guide, who presents the submodules available to the customer. Once the customer has selected the Home Purchase submodule, the processor initiates the interview/selection process (at block 400, FIG. 4). The system first inquires as to whether the property to be purchased has been selected 405. If not, the system will later in the process suggest how large of a mortgage the customer can qualify for. If property has been chosen, the customer must input the details of the property 410, such as the price, the property state/county, the property type and whether the property is a first or second residence or investment property. The system next inquires how long the customer intends to stay in the property 415. If known by the customer, he/she inputs the number of years 425. If not known by the customer, the system asks further questions and then estimates the number of years based on national averages 420. For example, someone who answers that they intend to move frequently will be estimated to stay three years, while if it is the customer's final home, the estimate jumps to 30 years. Once determined, this figure is stored in memory as the holding period, which is referred to below. Logic blocks 405-425 are represented by block 310 in FIG. 3.

As part of the interactive nature of the system, and consistent with the overall strategy termed Liability Management.SM., the system also educates the customer concerning the best use of his/her available down payment money, i.e., whether the money should be invested separately or put into the downpayment for the mortgage 430. The system calculates the return on investments relative to the holding period made instead of a down payment and then displays comparisons for different rates of return, preferably 5, 10 and 15 percent. This allows the customer to recognize in plain, visual terms, that with a high enough rate of return, investing a down payment may be a wiser investment, even though the amount financed in the mortgage will be greater. The system then gathers information from the user so that it may display graphically how much the customer might actually gain by investing their intended down payment. The system asks for the rate of return the customer expects 435. It is contemplated that the system would also display various indices average return for the customer to select, if needed. The system also asks for the customers tax rate 440. It is contemplated that the system could include a tax rate estimator, including the formulas used by the Internal Revenue Service. By the customer inputting his/her income and deduction figures and married status, the tax rate may be calculated. The system then displays a graph 445 of the effects of investing the down payment for the period determined in block 420 or 425. Referring now to FIG. 7, an example is shown in which the customer's gain by investing the money would exceed the additional interest that would be paid. In other words, it would be wiser for the customer to invest the money rather than put it in a down payment. Blocks 430-445 are represented by block 320 in FIG. 3. As an aside, as seen in FIGS. 7-10, a tool bar 710 is shown in the upper right hand corner for the FCs or customer's use. The button with the gavel is intended to allow the FC or the customer to access any legal disclosures required with respect to the products offered. Depending on the applicable regulations, the button may flash when such disclosure is required, allowing the FC or customer to view the disclosure and potentially preventing further activity in the system until the FC or customer acknowledges reviewing the disclosure.

Returning to FIG. 4, the system then gathers information about the customer to determine if the customer is eligible for a low or no down payment program. At block 450, the system inquires about the customer's liquid assets. If the customer is already a client of the financial institution offering the credit products, which the system will know by asking initially for a client account number, the system will cause the workstation 10 to automatically access the financial institution's server 50 and download (represented by the open arrow into block 450) the value of the customer's accounts from the customer data database 240. In this way, the customer's task in completing the overall interview process is diminished because there is less information to manually gather and input. It is also contemplated that the system might retrieve financial information about the customer from the customer's personal computer. Further, it is contemplated that the financial information might be retrieved from any central source, such as a credit bureau or the Internal Revenue Service.

The system also inquires about other investments 455, 465, or investments of the customer's parents 460 that may be used as collateral to decrease the down payment needed for the mortgage. If the customer or his/her parents own other property that is not currently for sale, the market value, state and lien information are entered at block 470. Blocks 450-470 are represented by block 330 of FIG. 3.

The next step in the interview/selection process is to determine the customer's personal opinion of the economic outlook, since this alone may seriously impact the recommendations made by the system for that customer. The economic outlook has two major components--interest rates or stability of monthly payments.

Referring now the FIG. 8, the customer is presented with five choices, represented by five buttons 810, as to what he/she thinks will be the future of interest rates (block 475, FIG. 4). A graph 820 on the screen shows in a simplified manner what the customer has currently selected. When a button is pressed, that direction for interest rates is shown in the graph 820. For example, in the example screen shown in FIG. 8, the customer has chosen that the interest rates will go down and then up. It is contemplated that the system will include recent news items discussing the future of interest rates to assist the customer. If the customer does not have a sense for the direction of future interest rates or simply chooses not to decide, he/she may select the "I don't know" button 840, which will allow him/her to instead decide how important it is to predict monthly payments (block 485, FIG. 4), described below.

The customer must also select the degree of rise and fall that the interest rates will move. The three choices 830 are gradually, moderately or extremely. Selecting one of the choices 830 causes the down portion of the graph 810 to change, reflecting the degree of movement--the example shows "gradual" degree. By selecting the duration 850 as short, the customer has indicated that the first down portion of the outlook will be short. The system translates a "short" duration into the first 1/3 of the holding period. A "long" duration would be 2/3 of the holding period. In the example of FIG. 8, the customer has also selected that the interest rates will then rise also in a "gradual" degree (at 860). In the final calculations, when the system will be determining which product provides, for example, the lowest monthly payments, the system will move any variable rates according to the customer's selections. For example, if the customer had selected that rates would go up, by also selecting "gradual," the system will move the interest rate by 1/2 point per year until the lifetime cap is reached. Selecting "moderate" will cause the system to move the rate by 1 point each year, while "extreme" will cause the system to move 2 points each year, both until the lifetime cap is reached.

At block 485, if the customer does not want to address the future of interest rates, the system inquires how important it is to the customer to be able to predict monthly payments. This is preferably measured on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most important. With selections from 8 to 10, the system will only select products that offer fixed rates over the holding period. With selections from 1 to 3, the system will select products that offer variable and quick changing interest rates over the holding period so that the customer can take advantage of the possibility of lowering the average monthly payment. With selections from 4 to 7, the system will still select products with variable interest rates over the holding period, but only those preselected to have relatively small risks and thus, smaller movements in rate. Blocks 475-485 are represented by block 340 of FIG. 3.

The final step before the system makes its calculations and recommendations is to gather information concerning the customer's income and their cash needs (such as for improvements upon purchasing the house). A short list of categories is displayed for the customer to fill in, such as monthly income monthly debt payments, primary residence payments and number of family members (block 490). If such information is not immediately known to the customer, he/she may press a "Detail Worksheet" button to bring up worksheets with income or expenses broken down into specific categories, which once entered by the customer will be used by the system to calculate the overall income and expenses. The customer's cash need, if any, is also requested (at block 495).

After the five interviewing steps, the system now calculates preferably up to three recommended products for the customer, mainly based on the lowest average interest rate (if the customer should invest the down payment in the mortgage) or the lowest average payment (if the customer should invest the down payment in the market) of the mortgage over the holding period. By this point in the process, the system will have retrieved updated interest rates for the various stored products. The processor uses the financial institution's standard product eligibility formulas (or any other desired formulas) to determine and retrieve from the internal products information database 270 products for which the customer is eligible. Using the property's state, the processor also retrieves any applicable rules and regulations from the internal database 280, such as yearly or lifetime caps for a product. At this point, the system would access the financial institution's server 50 to download the most up-to-date interest rates for the programmed products. Then, using the mortgage amount, holding period, economic outlook information as described above, down payment information, and other parameters, the system performs hypothetical calculations with each product to determine the products with the least average payment or average interest rate over the holding period. Using the economic outlook information described above, the system calculates the interest rate for each year in the holding period and then calculates the average interest rate. Using that calculated rate and standard amortization formulas (for amortizing products), the system then calculates the average payment.

Referring now to FIG. 9, a Recommendations screen is shown in which three products have been recommended by the system based on the customer's information. These three recommendations are shown as buttons 910 that allow the customer to press a recommendation to learn more about the particular product by displaying a product summary retrieved from the interactive interface information 260. Such a product information screen is shown as FIG. 10. One button 1010 allows the customer to see more information about the product. A subwindow 1020 displays the reasons for the recommendations, generated by the system based on the customer's preferences, resources and needs. The calculators button 1030 allows the user to initiate the Calculators submodule, described more fully below, that provides more detailed financial information on the various available products and allows the user to change parameters and view the effects. The application button 1040 initiates the mortgage/credit application generator, described more fully below. Button 1050 causes the processor to retrieve from the interactive interface information 260 and display a brief vignette about how the product selected helped another customer minimize their liability.

Mortgage/Credit Application Generator

From either the initial introductory screens, the recommendations screen or any screen with the Application button, the customer may cause the processor to output data to the mortgage/credit application generator submodule 220. The generator 220 then initiates the Application Builder screen, shown as FIG. 11. As seen at areas 1110, the application builder presents an easy-to-use graphic interface (as with all of the submodules of the system) that allows the customer to select his/her particular application needs from the four main sections--Purpose, Income, Assets and Obligations. As each item is selected, it moves to the application list (area 1120) so that the customer can track his/her progress. In the example shown in FIG. 11, John selected that his income comes from salary, he is a client of the financial institution and that he currently carries credit cards accounts. He has yet to select a Purpose--this is done in the example for illustrative purposes, as once a purpose is selected most of the remaining choices are no longer possible and are not displayed. After he (or an FC) has selected all of the appropriate options, selecting "Next >>" will cause the system to create an on-screen electronic form containing all of the necessary fields for a credit application for the selected product. An example of the preferred on-screen form is shown in FIG. 12.

The application is divided into major sections 1210--About the customer, Assets and Liability, Property and Mortgage, and Other Required Info. Each major section 1210 includes subsections 1220 for easier organization. In the example shown, the subsections 1220 for major section "About John" are shown. Any fields 1230 that contain information inputted in any other portion of the interview/selection process are automatically completed by the application generator, such as the customer name shown in FIG. 12. For example, if the application is for a home purchase mortgage, the description of the property entered at the beginning of the interview process (block 310 & 410) is automatically entered on the form. The customer may change any entries that are automatically entered, if desired. These automatic entries significantly decrease the overall task of completing the application, and, just as important, eliminates repetitive entries by the customer of the same information inputted during the interview process. Further, from the application builder of FIG. 11, the form only contains those sections that are necessary for the options selected, also decreasing the time needed to complete the application.

During the application completion process, the customer may also press the "Checklist Builder" button 1240, which will scan all of the entered information, the product requirements and the state rules and regulations and then generate a checklist of support paperwork and any other forms that must be completed and submitted for the application to be processed, as seen in FIG. 13. For example, for any piece of property that is entered as possible collateral for a no-down-payment mortgage, the generator will create an entry on the checklist listing copies of the deed and lien papers for that property.

The generator 220 is also capable of determining how many of the fields have been completed and will generate a message that the "Application is already-- percent complete" whenever the customer switches from the application to another submodule. The processor stores any information entered on the form so that the next time the customer initiates the mortgage/credit application generator, they do not need to start from scratch. Once the electronic form on the screen is completed, the customer may cause the mortgage/credit application generator to print a hardcopy of the application, which then only needs the customer's signature and mailing to the financial institution. It is also contemplated that the customer might submit the completed application electronically. In that case, the processor 200 would cause the workstation 10 to connect to the financial institution's server 50. The application would then be submitted through digital data transfer. Any supporting documents would need to be sent in hardcopy, although scanned images sent electronically are also contemplated.

Refinance Submodule

Referring now to FIG. 5, a high-level logic flowchart for the Refinance Submodule is shown. This submodule is accessed from the initial main menu screen. As the Home Purchase and Refinance submodules both involve credit based on a specific piece of property, their operation has many similarities, as will be seen below.

Initially, the system requests information concerning the property to be refinanced at block 520 (similar to blocks 405, 410). The system then inquires about the current mortgage (block 530), which is not a concern in the Home Purchase submodule. The questions include the remaining balance on the mortgage and the months/years remaining. Then, depending on whether the current mortgage is fixed, adjustable or fixed to float, the system inquires about the starting interest rate, the yearly rate cap and the lifetime cap. If any caps are not known, the system preferably assumes a yearly cap of 2 percent and a lifetime cap of 6 percent.

The system inquires concerning the number of years the customer expects to hold on to the property 540. Similar to blocks 430-445, the system describes how the customer might save through refinancing and then asks similar questions to the Home Purchase submodule. Additionally, the system inquires (at block 550) if the customer intends to invest any savings received. If so, the savings are compounded and added to the benefits calculations.

Both the Economic Outlook and Financial Picture processes (blocks 555, 560) are identical to those regarding the Home Purchase submodule (blocks 475-495). The Recommendation process 565 is also similar to that described above, except the choices are selected based on the lowest average payment over the holding period and the eligibility for refinance.

To determine the actual recommendations, the system starts with the closing costs and origination fees for each recommended product. Using the inputted rate of return (from block 550), the system calculates the result of investing the closing cost and origination fees over the holding period. That value is stored as Refi1. Next, the system determines the difference in average payment over the holding period and multiplies it by the number of months in the holding period. This savings value is stored as Refi2. If the customer indicated that they will invest the savings monthly, the system treats the savings as an annuity with the savings as the contribution. The compounded contribution using the inputted rate of return gives a value stored as Refi3. If the customer intends to invest the savings and Refi1>Refi3, the system recommends that the customer not refinance at all, but take the refinance costs and invest it. If Refi3>Refi1, the system recommends refinancing into that product. If the customer does not intend to invest the savings and Refi1>Refi2, the system recommends against refinancing. If Refi2>Refi1, the system recommends refinancing into that product.

The Recommendations screen is similar to FIG. 10 for the Refinance submodule, and similarly provides access to the mortgage/credit application generator (at 570). The customer completes the application as described above, and submits it either in hardcopy or electronically.

Personal Credit

Referring now to FIG. 6, a functional flowchart for another submodule of the system using the techniques of Liability Management.SM. is shown. In this submodule, the system will assist the customer in determining whether his/her current credit products are resulting in the lowest costs, i.e., lowest average payment over their respective holding periods. If not, the system can select credit products of the financial institution and recommend them to the customer for lowering his/her overall personal credit costs.

First, it is necessary for the system to analyze the customer's present personal credit portfolio and thus, that information must be entered (block 600). If the customer has some or all of his/her portfolio with the financial institution, the system will automatically retrieve that information. Information on any other credit products, such as credit cards, credit lines and personal loans are manually entered by the customer or FC, including the remaining balance and monthly payments. Based on the information entered, the system then calculates the average interest rate on his/her debt portfolio (block 610).

To determine if any of the financial institution's products would lower the customer's cost, it is first necessary to gather some information about other aspects of the customer's financial situation. This includes any current cash need the customer may have (block 620), as well as any unused credit lines the customer may have, including the available balance and the interest rate that would apply (block 630). Next, the system requests information on any properties that might qualify as collateral to perhaps support more attractive credit products for the customer, rather than a basic, unsecured credit line (block 640). As indicated by the arrow entering block 640, the system will automatically retrieve any information on properties already stored by the financial institution. Of course, if such information had been entered at another part of the system, it would automatically be transferred to this part as well, eliminating the need for redundant entries by the customer or FC. Similar to the properties query, the system also inquires as to any non-retirement investments that might be used by the customer for collateral (block 650). The arrow again indicates that such information might be automatically retrieved from the financial institution or another portion of the system.

Once all the necessary information has been input, the system will make its recommendations. This will be done in a similar manner to the Home Purchase submodule, although additional personal credit products will be considered. The system will first select only those products for which the customer is qualified, based on his/her available collateral, credit needs, outstanding credit, residence state or any other criteria. Then, at some point before calculating the best available product, the system will retrieve updated interest rate information for the products from the financial institution. Once retrieved, the system can perform its lowest monthly cost analysis for the available products.

The products with the lowest average payment over the holding periods will be displayed as recommendations on a Recommendations screen (block 660), similar to FIG. 10 for the Home Purchase submodule, and similarly provides access to the mortgage/credit application generator (at 670). The customer completes the application as described above, and preferably submits it either in hardcopy or electronically.

Calculators Submodule

To assist the customer or FC in making selections, he/she may access the Calculators submodule from any other point in the system. This submodule provides the customer or FC with the ability to perform "what if" calculations for any of the available credit products. Referring now to FIG. 14, a Calculators screen is shown. One of the windows (area 1410, partially covered in FIG. 14) of the screen allows the customer to enter various parameters for a credit product to see the effect, for example, on the monthly payment. By entering the loan amount, interest rate, and term, but leaving the monthly payment box open, the system will automatically calculate the information in the open box. To assist in selecting the various products, they are categorized. By first selecting a major category in area 1420, the system then displays the subcategories in area 1430. Once a subcategory is selected, the system scans its product database to find all of the products within that subcategory and displays them (at area 1440) for selection by the customer. The system will limit the displayed products to those for which the customer is qualified based on set parameters, such as the property state (if the information is already entered in another submodule), but not on the customer's personal finances. If such information has not been entered, the system will inquire regarding the necessary parameters. The parameters of the selected product will then be used in the window (area 1410) for calculations.

The Calculators submodule also allows the FC or customer to view amortization schedules for various products, based on the financial information input in other submodules or in the Calculators submodule. The system also allows the FC or customer to adjust individual payments within the schedule to review the resulting effect on payments after the altered payment. The Calculator submodule also allows the FC or customer to enter information related to either a buy up or buy down of the interest rate and view the resulting payment schedule.

Thus, the system of the present invention provides a simple, interactive process for allowing a customer to select an appropriate credit product based on their own circumstances and opinions. The system also makes the application process itself more simplified, streamlined and less paper intensive for both the customer and the financial institution.

While the embodiments shown and described above are fully capable of achieving the objects and advantages of the present invention, it is to be understood that the embodiments are shown solely for the purpose of illustration and not for the purpose of limitation, the invention being limited solely by the claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4346442 *Jul 29, 1980Aug 24, 1982Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedSecurities brokerage-cash management system
US4376978 *Oct 22, 1980Mar 15, 1983Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & SmithSecurities brokerage-cash management system
US4597046 *Sep 30, 1982Jun 24, 1986Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & SmithSecurities brokerage-cash management system obviating float costs by anticipatory liquidation of short term assets
US4674044 *Jan 30, 1985Jun 16, 1987Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Automated securities trading system
US4700297 *Sep 14, 1984Oct 13, 1987Merrill Lynch Relocation Management, Inc.Relocation management and reporting system
US4774663 *Nov 21, 1983Sep 27, 1988Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedSecurities brokerage-cash management system with short term investment proceeds allotted among multiple accounts
US5270922 *Jun 27, 1991Dec 14, 1993Merrill Lynch & Company, Inc.System for distributing, processing and displaying financial information
US5297032 *Feb 1, 1991Mar 22, 1994Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedSecurities trading workstation
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *Anonymous, A Man with Grand Visions, Banking Technology, pp. 30 32, May 1993.
2Anonymous, A Man with Grand Visions, Banking Technology, pp. 30-32, May 1993.
3 *Anonymous, MortgageWare Resource Guide, INTERLINK Software Corp, Chapt. MAI, QUA and CRG., Nov. 1992.
4 *Emily Thornton, Going Belly up In Japan, Business Week, May 5, 1997.
5Emily Thornton, Going Belly-up In Japan, Business Week, May 5, 1997.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5940812 *Aug 19, 1997Aug 17, 1999Loanmarket Resources, L.L.C.Apparatus and method for automatically matching a best available loan to a potential borrower via global telecommunications network
US6026438 *Oct 31, 1997Feb 15, 2000Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.Dynamic workstation configuration processor
US6112215 *Sep 24, 1998Aug 29, 2000International Business Machines CorporationDatabase or repetitively used data entries displayable for selection and entry on a variety of user interactive interfaces from sources independent of said database
US6173270Sep 23, 1997Jan 9, 2001Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithStock option control and exercise system
US6233566Mar 18, 1999May 15, 2001Ultraprise CorporationSystem, method and computer program product for online financial products trading
US6269346Aug 31, 1999Jul 31, 2001Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithStock option control and exercise system
US6374231Oct 21, 1998Apr 16, 2002Bruce BentMoney fund banking system
US6393416Dec 16, 1998May 21, 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod for entering bidirectional and DBCS languages in tier-0 devices
US6438526Mar 29, 1999Aug 20, 2002Frederick T. DykesSystem and method for transmitting and processing loan data
US6473807Dec 3, 1998Oct 29, 2002Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.System for invocation of CICS programs as database stored procedures
US6513019Feb 16, 1999Jan 28, 2003Financial Technologies International, Inc.Financial consolidation and communication platform
US6513020Sep 29, 1999Jan 28, 2003Macro Securities Research, LlcProxy asset data processor
US6625620 *Apr 21, 2000Sep 23, 2003International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for the management of file attachments in a groupware oriented system
US6876981 *Oct 26, 1999Apr 5, 2005Philippe E. BerckmansMethod and system for analyzing and comparing financial investments
US6910020 *Mar 31, 1997Jun 21, 2005Fujitsu LimitedApparatus and method for granting access to network-based services based upon existing bank account information
US6938008Sep 20, 2000Aug 30, 2005Fujitsu Services LimitedLoan modeller method and apparatus
US6988082Dec 30, 2002Jan 17, 2006Fannie MaeComputerized systems and methods for facilitating the flow of capital through the housing finance industry
US7006994Jul 16, 1999Feb 28, 2006American Management Systems, Inc.Automated receivables management system
US7020631May 21, 2001Mar 28, 2006The Chase Manhattan BankMethod for mortgage and closed end loan portfolio management
US7103556Sep 26, 2001Sep 5, 2006Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for aggregate portfolio client support
US7155468Mar 5, 2004Dec 26, 2006Weiss Allan NCommon index securities
US7203663Jun 20, 2000Apr 10, 2007Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for converting information on paper forms to electronic data
US7212993May 19, 2000May 1, 2007Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.Security receipts management system
US7212996Apr 20, 2000May 1, 2007Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for dynamic, multivariable comparison of financial products
US7295999Dec 20, 2000Nov 13, 2007Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for determining eligibility and enrolling members in various programs
US7310615Jan 18, 2002Dec 18, 2007Goldensource CorporationFinancial data reporting system with alert notification feature and free-form searching capability
US7315841 *Jul 8, 1999Jan 1, 2008Sourcetec, Inc.Mortgage loan and financial services data processing system
US7318046Jul 16, 1999Jan 8, 2008American Management Systems, Inc.Collector's account payment promise option advisory apparatus and method
US7340435May 1, 2003Mar 4, 2008Sourcetec, Inc.Mortgage loan data processing system and method for a loan broker
US7353197Sep 13, 2002Apr 1, 2008Siebel Systems Emea Ltd.Transaction control system
US7356503 *Feb 21, 2001Apr 8, 2008Fair Isaac And Company, Inc.ASP business decision engine
US7379913Nov 27, 2001May 27, 2008Nextworth, Inc.Anonymous transaction system
US7386504May 5, 2003Jun 10, 2008Sourcetec, Inc.Mortgage loan data collection method and apparatus for a financial planning originator and/or financial institution originator of a mortgage loan
US7395239Jul 19, 1999Jul 1, 2008American Business FinancialSystem and method for automatically processing loan applications
US7398919Dec 21, 2004Jul 15, 2008Tcf Financial CorporationTransaction card system and approach
US7409364Sep 8, 1999Aug 5, 2008Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Financial advice strategy system
US7412417Mar 3, 2000Aug 12, 2008Infoglide Software CorporationLoan compliance auditing system and method
US7415471Nov 30, 2001Aug 19, 2008Midland Loan Services, Inc.Methods and systems for automated data collection and analysis for use in association with asset securitization
US7433840Mar 14, 2007Oct 7, 2008Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for dynamic, multivariable comparison of financial products
US7444302Jun 14, 2002Oct 28, 2008Ellie Mae, Inc.Online system for fulfilling loan applications from loan originators
US7461020Dec 17, 2003Dec 2, 2008Fannie MaeSystem and method for creating and tracking agreements for selling loans to a secondary market purchaser
US7467109May 7, 2007Dec 16, 2008Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for determining eligibility and enrolling members in various programs
US7472088Jun 1, 2001Dec 30, 2008Jpmorgan Chase Bank N.A.System and method for offering a financial product
US7472089Aug 15, 2002Dec 30, 2008Ellie Mae, Inc.Loan origination system interface for online loan application processing
US7480631Dec 15, 2004Jan 20, 2009Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for detecting and processing fraud and credit abuse
US7509279Apr 17, 2006Mar 24, 2009Riskmetrics Group, Inc.Method and system for computing path dependent probabilities of attaining financial goals
US7509286Apr 11, 2003Mar 24, 2009Reserve Management CorporationSystems and methods for money fund banking with flexible interest allocation
US7519551Feb 8, 2002Apr 14, 2009Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for administering return sweep accounts
US7536350Mar 6, 2003May 19, 2009Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks
US7542921Sep 29, 2000Jun 2, 2009Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Network-based financial planning system and method
US7552086 *Dec 3, 2001Jun 23, 2009Oracle International Corp.Methods and systems for managing credit
US7574401 *Jun 26, 2000Aug 11, 2009Arthur Dale BurnsStudent loan consolidation qualification system and method of operation thereof
US7593889Dec 30, 2002Sep 22, 2009Fannie MaeSystem and method for processing data pertaining to financial assets
US7593893Dec 30, 2005Sep 22, 2009Fannie MaeComputerized systems and methods for facilitating the flow of capital through the housing finance industry
US7594606Jun 17, 2008Sep 29, 2009Tcf Financial CorporationTransaction card system and approach
US7599879Mar 21, 2001Oct 6, 2009Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National AssociationSyndication loan administration and processing system
US7606756Jun 3, 2003Oct 20, 2009Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Synthetic funds having structured notes
US7610231Nov 1, 2005Oct 27, 2009Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Synthetic funds having structured notes
US7624068Aug 18, 2004Nov 24, 2009Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Method and system for dynamically adjusting discount rates for a card transaction
US7647262Feb 8, 2008Jan 12, 2010Oracle Emea LimitedTransaction control systems and methods
US7653592Dec 30, 2005Jan 26, 2010Fannie MaeSystem and method for processing a loan
US7657475Dec 30, 2004Feb 2, 2010Fannie MaeProperty investment rating system and method
US7668771Jun 25, 2007Feb 23, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for allocation to obtain zero activity in a selected aggregated account
US7668772Nov 14, 2008Feb 23, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for money fund banking with flexible interest allocation
US7668777Jul 23, 2004Feb 23, 2010Jp Morgan Chase BankSystem and method for providing instant-decision, financial network-based payment cards
US7672886Jun 10, 2005Mar 2, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for managing client accounts
US7672901Jun 25, 2007Mar 2, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for holdback procedure for after-hours transactions
US7672902Jun 25, 2007Mar 2, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for pre-funding interest for early termination of client account having funds in one or more aggregated accounts
US7680716Jun 25, 2007Mar 16, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for allocating excess funds in aggregated control account
US7680734Nov 26, 2002Mar 16, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcMoney fund banking system
US7685064Apr 19, 2005Mar 23, 2010Jp Morgan Chase BankMethod and apparatus for evaluating a financial transaction
US7702580Dec 26, 2002Apr 20, 2010Fannie MaeSystem and method for mortgage loan pricing, sale and funding
US7707090Aug 21, 2008Apr 27, 2010Globys, Inc.Method and system for selecting optimal commodities based upon business profile and preferences
US7707192May 23, 2006Apr 27, 2010Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Confidence index for assets
US7711606Mar 9, 2005May 4, 2010Globys, Inc.Method and computer readable medium for assisting a customer in choosing among commodities
US7716106Oct 26, 2006May 11, 2010Market Shield Capital, LlcCommon index securities
US7716131Oct 31, 2007May 11, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcMoney fund banking system with multiple banks and/or rates
US7734522Jan 9, 2008Jun 8, 2010Fair Isaac CorporationASP business decision engine
US7742980Nov 15, 2002Jun 22, 2010Imx, Inc.Automated loan approval system
US7742981Dec 16, 2004Jun 22, 2010Fannie MaeMortgage loan commitment system and method
US7747519Dec 16, 2003Jun 29, 2010Fannie MaeSystem and method for verifying loan data at delivery
US7747526Aug 23, 2006Jun 29, 2010Fannie MaeSystem and method for transferring mortgage loan servicing rights
US7752107Mar 21, 2007Jul 6, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for managing aggregated accounts
US7752129Oct 2, 2000Jul 6, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for managing client accounts
US7752132Feb 25, 2002Jul 6, 2010Efunds CorporationElectronic payment and authentication system with debit and identification data verification and electronic check capabilities
US7756778Dec 16, 2004Jul 13, 2010Fannie MaeSystem and method for tracking and facilitating analysis of variance and recourse transactions
US7765151Jul 21, 2006Jul 27, 2010Fannie MaeComputerized systems and methods for facilitating the flow of capital through the housing finance industry
US7769688Aug 16, 2007Aug 3, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcMoney fund banking system
US7774248Apr 19, 2005Aug 10, 2010Jp Morgan Chase BankMethod and apparatus for managing risk
US7774271May 8, 2006Aug 10, 2010Globys, Inc.Electronic financial management and analysis system and related methods
US7801809Jun 24, 2005Sep 21, 2010Fannie MaeSystem and method for management of delegated real estate project reviews
US7805349Sep 22, 2006Sep 28, 2010Intuit Inc.Using an instantiated model to generate an application-specific document
US7809633Dec 16, 2003Oct 5, 2010Fannie MaeSystem and method for pricing loans in the secondary mortgage market
US7809640Aug 16, 2007Oct 5, 2010Island Intellectual Property LlcMoney fund banking system
US7813990Feb 1, 2010Oct 12, 2010Fannie MaeProperty investment rating system and method
US7818222 *Nov 30, 2007Oct 19, 2010Hrb Innovations, Inc.Method and system for organizing tax information and providing tax advice
US7818254Jun 21, 1999Oct 19, 2010Juno Holdings, N.V.Application apparatus and method
US7822680Dec 30, 2004Oct 26, 2010Fannie MaeSystem and method for managing data pertaining to a plurality of financial assets for multifamily and housing developments
US7831467Oct 17, 2000Nov 9, 2010Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Method and system for retaining customer loyalty
US7831508Jun 23, 2000Nov 9, 2010Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for implementing a consolidated application process
US7831509Aug 22, 2005Nov 9, 2010Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.On-line higher education financing system
US7844518Apr 19, 2005Nov 30, 2010Jp Morgan Chase BankMethod and apparatus for managing credit limits
US7860781Jan 3, 2003Dec 28, 2010Midland Loan Services, Inc.Methods and systems for asset/loan management and processing
US7860787Jan 24, 2008Dec 28, 2010Fannie MaeSystem and method for modifying attribute data pertaining to financial assets in a data processing system
US7877320Jul 7, 2010Jan 25, 2011Fannie MaeSystem and method for tracking and facilitating analysis of variance and recourse transactions
US7882024 *Sep 23, 2004Feb 1, 2011Routeone LlcSystem and method for efficiently processing multiple credit applications
US7885889Dec 16, 2004Feb 8, 2011Fannie MaeSystem and method for processing data pertaining to financial assets
US7890343Jan 11, 2005Feb 15, 2011Jp Morgan Chase BankSystem and method for generating risk management curves
US7912774Aug 6, 2009Mar 22, 2011Tcf Financial CorporationTransaction card system and approach
US7925578Aug 26, 2005Apr 12, 2011Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Systems and methods for performing scoring optimization
US7925579Dec 30, 2005Apr 12, 2011Fannie MaeSystem and method for processing a loan
US7925583Nov 23, 2009Apr 12, 2011Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Method and system for dynamically adjusting discount rates for a card transaction
US7930229Aug 6, 2009Apr 19, 2011Tcf Financial CorporationDebit card billing system and method
US7933821Apr 10, 2009Apr 26, 2011Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for administering return sweep accounts
US7938316 *May 18, 2009May 10, 2011Bennett James DOnline purchasing system supporting sellers with affordability screening
US7942316 *May 18, 2009May 17, 2011Bennett James DOnline purchasing system supporting buyer affordability screening
US7962391 *Nov 14, 2008Jun 14, 2011Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for determining elegibility and enrolling members in various programs
US7962396Feb 3, 2006Jun 14, 2011Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for managing risk
US7970675Feb 27, 2007Jun 28, 2011Bank Of America CorporationSecurity receipts management system
US7974895Mar 11, 2005Jul 5, 2011Jp Morgan Chase BankSystem and method for developing finance rate information
US7979346Oct 1, 2010Jul 12, 2011Fannie MaeSystem and method for pricing loans in the secondary mortgage market
US7987148May 20, 2010Jul 26, 2011Strands, Inc.Systems and methods for prioritizing media files in a presentation device
US7996305Dec 17, 2010Aug 9, 2011Routeone LlcSystem and method for efficiently processing multiple credit applications
US7996308Jul 2, 2010Aug 9, 2011Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for managing aggregated accounts
US7996310Jul 19, 2000Aug 9, 2011Globys, Inc.Electronic financial management and analysis system and related methods
US8001043Sep 1, 2000Aug 16, 2011Walker Digital, LlcMethod, apparatus, and program for customizing credit accounts
US8019667Jan 7, 2010Sep 13, 2011Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for money fund banking with flexible interest allocation
US8019668Jan 13, 2010Sep 13, 2011Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for allocation to obtain zero activity in a selected aggregated account with holdback
US8024265Jun 28, 2010Sep 20, 2011Fannie MaeSystem and method for verifying loan data at delivery
US8027914Jan 5, 2010Sep 27, 2011Jp Morgan Chase BankSystem and method for providing instant-decision, financial network-based payment cards
US8032450Jun 10, 2010Oct 4, 2011Fannie MaeLoan commitment system and method
US8032456Dec 19, 2008Oct 4, 2011Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem, methods and program products for processing for a self clearing broker dealer
US8046298Dec 15, 2003Oct 25, 2011Fannie MaeSystems and methods for facilitating the flow of capital through the housing finance industry
US8060440Dec 23, 2010Nov 15, 2011Fannie MaeSystem and method for modifying attribute data pertaining to financial assets in a data processing system
US8060441May 24, 2010Nov 15, 2011Efunds CorporationElectronic payment and authentication system with debit and identification data verification and electronic check capabilities
US8065211Nov 24, 2008Nov 22, 2011Fannie MaeSystem and method for creating and tracking agreements for selling loans to a secondary market purchaser
US8082202Feb 17, 2009Dec 20, 2011Market Shield Capital, LlcMarket-indexed mortgage system and method
US8117117Nov 18, 2008Feb 14, 2012Ellie Mae, Inc.Loan origination system interface for online loan application processing
US8126920Nov 18, 2004Feb 28, 2012Ellie Mae, Inc.Enterprise security management system using hierarchical organization and multiple ownership structure
US8150766Dec 19, 2006Apr 3, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for investing public deposits
US8156025 *Nov 12, 2008Apr 10, 2012National City BankComputer-implemented systems and methods for student loan application processing
US8170952Aug 3, 2011May 1, 2012Jp Morgan Chase BankSystem and method for providing instant-decision, financial network-based payment cards
US8214315Jun 23, 2011Jul 3, 2012Apple Inc.Systems and methods for prioritizing mobile media player files
US8224974 *Jan 29, 2007Jul 17, 2012Intuit Inc.Method and apparatus for downloading information
US8234184 *Jul 15, 2005Jul 31, 2012Phoenix Licensing, LlcAutomated reply generation direct marketing system
US8239321Jul 12, 2011Aug 7, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for allocation to obtain zero activity in one or more selected aggregated deposit accounts
US8244628Jul 7, 2010Aug 14, 2012Fannie MaeComputerized systems and methods for facilitating the flow of capital through the housing finance industry
US8260697Jul 12, 2011Sep 4, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for money fund banking with flexible interest allocation
US8260705Dec 21, 2010Sep 4, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems, methods and program products for deposit and withdrawal processing
US8266054Jan 19, 2012Sep 11, 2012Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for implementing a consolidated application process
US8285625Aug 18, 2011Oct 9, 2012Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Synthetic funds having structured notes
US8290859Mar 20, 2009Oct 16, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks
US8290860Mar 20, 2009Oct 16, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks
US8290861May 8, 2009Oct 16, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks
US8311916Mar 21, 2011Nov 13, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for administering return sweep accounts
US8311939Jun 4, 2010Nov 13, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcMethod and system for allocating deposits over a plurality of depository institutions
US8312017Jan 11, 2010Nov 13, 2012Apple Inc.Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics
US8321312 *Sep 14, 2010Nov 27, 2012Hrb Innovations, Inc.Method and system for organizing tax information and providing tax advice
US8326747Jun 18, 2009Dec 4, 2012American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.System and method for flexible deferred payment terms
US8326748Jun 16, 2010Dec 4, 2012Imx, Inc.Automated loan approval system
US8346654Jan 15, 2010Jan 1, 2013Market Shield Capital, LlcIndexed payment stream system and method
US8352342Jun 15, 2010Jan 8, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcMethod and system for determining fees for deposits allocated over a plurality of deposit institutions
US8355985Mar 20, 2009Jan 15, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks
US8356038Jun 13, 2011Jan 15, 2013Apple Inc.User to user recommender
US8359267Sep 29, 2011Jan 22, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for investing public deposits
US8364579Oct 27, 2008Jan 29, 2013Ellie Mae, Inc.Online system for fulfilling loan applications from loan originators
US8370236Nov 23, 2010Feb 5, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcMethod and system for allocating funds over a plurality of time deposit instruments in depository institutions
US8380621Feb 4, 2008Feb 19, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems, methods and program products for swap processing for uninsured accounts
US8386382Jun 21, 2012Feb 26, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for allocation to obtain zero activity in one or more selected aggregated deposit accounts
US8386383Nov 20, 2009Feb 26, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcMoney fund banking system with multiple banks and/or rates
US8401962May 8, 2009Mar 19, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks
US8401966Sep 26, 2011Mar 19, 2013Efunds CorporationElectronic payment and authentication system with debit and identification data verification and electronic check capabilities
US8403217Apr 20, 2012Mar 26, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Advertising infrastructure supporting cross selling opportunity management
US8407251Apr 18, 2012Mar 26, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Promotion infrastructure having dispensing controls
US8407252Apr 18, 2012Mar 26, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Promotion infrastructure having third party posting service
US8407334Apr 18, 2012Mar 26, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Promotion infrastructure having dual input and dual output interface
US8423450Dec 17, 2003Apr 16, 2013Fannie MaeSystem and method for processing data pertaining to financial assets
US8423451Dec 30, 2005Apr 16, 2013Fannie MaiSystem and method for processing a loan
US8428752Apr 19, 2012Apr 23, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Network infrastructure supporting a multi-seller promotion and transaction environment
US8438108Jun 28, 2010May 7, 2013Fannie MaeSystem and method for transferring mortgage loan servicing rights
US8452702Sep 8, 2011May 28, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem, method and program product for minimizing fund movements
US8458062Aug 11, 2006Jun 4, 2013Capital One Financial CorporationReal-time product matching
US8458089Feb 22, 2011Jun 4, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem, method and program product for administering fund movements using depository institution groups
US8463409Apr 18, 2012Jun 11, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Promotion data and codes supporting redemption processing
US8463643Jun 14, 2012Jun 11, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Multi-search infrastructure supporting advertising and internet search term reuse
US8463851Apr 18, 2012Jun 11, 2013Enpulz, LlcPromotion infrastructure supporting selected and emailed promotion delivery
US8464942Feb 16, 2012Jun 18, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Sales promotion system supporting a plurality of differing sellers
US8464943Jul 2, 2012Jun 18, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Competitive advertising and sales infrastructure
US8468053Feb 16, 2012Jun 18, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Seller selection of content for promotion creation
US8468055Jun 14, 2012Jun 18, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Advertising system supporting multi-advertiser system communications
US8468079May 5, 2008Jun 18, 2013Market Shield Capital, LlcIndex-based liquidity system and method
US8473313Dec 1, 2009Jun 25, 2013Geelux Holdings, Ltd.System and method for communicating product recall information, product warnings or other product-related information to users of products
US8473581Aug 21, 2012Jun 25, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Promotion system supporting web content and promotion searching
US8477786May 29, 2012Jul 2, 2013Apple Inc.Messaging system and service
US8478637Apr 8, 2008Jul 2, 2013Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Index for assessing discount potential
US8479987Jun 19, 2012Jul 9, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Multi-seller sales system supporting multiple sales portals and promotion systems
US8484093Jun 15, 2012Jul 9, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Advertising system supporting multi-advertiser system interface structures
US8484117Apr 28, 2010Jul 9, 2013Market Shield Capital, LlcMulti-input system that makes index-based adjustments
US8489497Jan 27, 2006Jul 16, 2013Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Online interactive and partner-enhanced credit card
US8489498Dec 30, 2005Jul 16, 2013Fannie MaeSystem and method for processing a loan
US8495209May 22, 2012Jul 23, 2013James D. BennettPersistence mechanism for facilitating online transactions
US8498933May 8, 2009Jul 30, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks
US8504424Jun 18, 2012Aug 6, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Advertising system supporting multi-advertiser system remote advertisement posting
US8504438Jul 16, 2012Aug 6, 2013James D. BennettOnline purchasing system supporting lenders with affordability screening
US8505812Feb 16, 2012Aug 13, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Email promotion portal supporting buyer anonymity
US8515861Sep 22, 2006Aug 20, 2013Fannie MaeSystem and method for facilitating sale of a loan to a secondary market purchaser
US8521569Jan 7, 2013Aug 27, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcMethod and system for allocating funds over a plurality of time deposit instruments in depository institutions
US8521611Mar 6, 2007Aug 27, 2013Apple Inc.Article trading among members of a community
US8527402 *Feb 29, 2008Sep 3, 2013Isourceloans LlcMortgage loan data processing system and method for a loan broker
US8533030Aug 30, 2004Sep 10, 2013Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.In-bound telemarketing system for processing customer offers
US8534552Aug 21, 2012Sep 17, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Sales promotion system with secondary sales server system
US8543575May 21, 2012Sep 24, 2013Apple Inc.System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US8560425Dec 10, 2002Oct 15, 2013Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Method and system for adding liquidity to alternative investment transactions
US8560442May 8, 2009Oct 15, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks
US8566200Aug 22, 2012Oct 22, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for money fund banking with flexible interest allocation
US8566201Aug 22, 2012Oct 22, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for money fund banking with flexible interest allocation
US8571960Feb 5, 2013Oct 29, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for allocation to obtain zero activity in one or more selected aggregated deposit accounts
US8571974Jun 17, 2008Oct 29, 2013The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.Methods and systems for automated data collection and analysis
US8571984Mar 13, 2013Oct 29, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks
US8573477Aug 21, 2012Nov 5, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Promotion system supporting emailed promotions with transaction accounting
US8573491Aug 21, 2012Nov 5, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Sales promotion system supporting coupon link in multi-seller environment
US8583545Sep 20, 2011Nov 12, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for money fund banking with flexible interest allocation
US8583612Jun 14, 2012Nov 12, 2013Enpulz, L.L.C.Whois server verifying whois records and search engine accesses
US8583671Apr 29, 2009Nov 12, 2013Apple Inc.Mediaset generation system
US8589284Jun 18, 2009Nov 19, 2013American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.System and method for flexible election of payment terms
US8589289Feb 22, 2011Nov 19, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem, method and program product for administering fund movements
US8600798Sep 21, 2007Dec 3, 2013Ellie Mae, Inc.Loan screening
US8600891Aug 7, 2009Dec 3, 2013Tcf Financial CorporationSystems, approaches and methods involving deferring debit payment for debit-card transactions
US8606676Mar 15, 2013Dec 10, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for allocating excess funds in control account
US8612324Oct 15, 2012Dec 17, 2013Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems and methods for administering return sweep accounts
US8620919May 21, 2012Dec 31, 2013Apple Inc.Media item clustering based on similarity data
US8655689Oct 12, 2012Feb 18, 2014Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem, method and program product for modeling fund movements
US8666879Dec 30, 2003Mar 4, 2014Fannie MaeMethod and system for pricing forward commitments for mortgage loans and for buying committed loans
US8666880Sep 6, 2007Mar 4, 2014American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.System and method for flexible payment terms
US8666965Oct 24, 2012Mar 4, 2014Enpulz, L.L.C.Web search with visited web page search result restrictions
US8671000Apr 17, 2008Mar 11, 2014Apple Inc.Method and arrangement for providing content to multimedia devices
US8671052Sep 14, 2012Mar 11, 2014Fannie MaeMethod and system for pricing forward commitments for mortgage loans and for buying committed loans
US8684266Apr 2, 2012Apr 1, 2014Enpulz, L.L.C.Forecast and demand based price calculation
US8688577Jul 31, 2012Apr 1, 2014Island Intellectual Property LlcSystems, methods and program products for deposit and withdrawal processing
US8706549Feb 16, 2012Apr 22, 2014Enpulz, LlcSystem supporting seller's promotion creation
US8706553Feb 16, 2012Apr 22, 2014Enpulz, L.L.C.Geographical and dispensing limits for E-promotions
US8712911Mar 15, 2013Apr 29, 2014Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for investing public deposits
US8719062Mar 15, 2013May 6, 2014Island Intellectual Property LlcMethod and system for allocating funds over a plurality of time deposit instruments in depository institutions
US8719078May 29, 2013May 6, 2014Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Index for assessing discount potential
US8719157Dec 14, 2012May 6, 2014Island Intellectual Property LlcSystem and method for investing public deposits
US8762260Aug 14, 2012Jun 24, 2014Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Systems and methods for performing scoring optimization
US8762357Feb 27, 2012Jun 24, 2014Ellie Mae. Inc.Enterprise security management system using hierarchical organization and multiple ownership structure
US8781931Dec 15, 2009Jul 15, 2014Island Intellectual Property LlcMethod and system for allocating deposits over a plurality of depository institutions
US8782072Oct 29, 2012Jul 15, 2014Enpulz, L.L.C.Search engine supporting mixed image and text search input
US20100274683 *Jul 9, 2010Oct 28, 2010Echarge CorporationMethod and apparatus for ordering goods, services and content over an internetwork using a virtual payment account
US20100312708 *Jul 9, 2010Dec 9, 2010Echarge CorporationMethod and apparatus for ordering goods, services and content over an internetwork using a virtual payment account
US20110004537 *Sep 14, 2010Jan 6, 2011Hrb Innovations, Inc.Method and system for organizing tax information and providing tax advice
US20110137801 *Feb 15, 2011Jun 9, 2011Echarge CorporationMethod and apparatus for ordering goods, services and content over an internetwork using a virtual payment account
US20110289006 *Jul 19, 2011Nov 24, 2011Echarge CorporationMethod and apparatus for ordering goods, services, and content over an internetwork using a virtual payment account
USRE43246Apr 14, 2004Mar 13, 2012Island Intellectual Property LlcMoney fund bank system
USRE44626Apr 25, 2012Dec 3, 2013Juno Holdings S.A.R.L.Application apparatus and method
EP1049039A1 *Jul 5, 1999Nov 2, 2000Minerva NVApplication apparatus and method
WO2001057771A1 *Feb 5, 2001Aug 9, 2001Omnichoice ComSystem and method for assisting customers in choosing among a set of commodities using customer preferences
WO2001059660A1 *Feb 8, 2001Aug 16, 2001Marcio Marc AbreuSystem and method for communicating product recall information, product warnings or other product-related information to users of products
WO2001069468A1 *Mar 14, 2000Sep 20, 2001James CallanA transaction control system
Classifications
U.S. Classification705/38
International ClassificationG06Q30/00, G06Q40/00
Cooperative ClassificationG06Q40/02, G06Q40/025, G06Q30/02
European ClassificationG06Q30/02, G06Q40/02, G06Q40/025
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Aug 20, 2010ASAssignment
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.;REEL/FRAME:024863/0522
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, NORTH CAROLINA
Effective date: 20100806
Sep 11, 2009FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Sep 20, 2005FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Jan 2, 2002REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
Nov 8, 2001FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Dec 2, 1996ASAssignment
Owner name: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TAEUBER, CLEMENS;REEL/FRAME:008248/0927
Effective date: 19960828
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LARCHE, KIMBERLY;REEL/FRAME:008248/0931
Effective date: 19961126