US5786530A - Testing of packages - Google Patents

Testing of packages Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5786530A
US5786530A US08/732,374 US73237496A US5786530A US 5786530 A US5786530 A US 5786530A US 73237496 A US73237496 A US 73237496A US 5786530 A US5786530 A US 5786530A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
test
head
displacement
conveying path
package
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08/732,374
Inventor
Christopher Fenlon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ishida Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Ishida Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ishida Co Ltd filed Critical Ishida Co Ltd
Assigned to ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN LIMITED reassignment ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FENLON, CHRISTOPHER
Assigned to ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN LIMITED reassignment ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FENLON, CHRISTOPHER
Assigned to ISHIDA CO., LTD. reassignment ISHIDA CO., LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN LIMITED
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US5786530A publication Critical patent/US5786530A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M3/00Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
    • G01M3/02Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
    • G01M3/36Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by detecting change in dimensions of the structure being tested

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for testing packages, e.g. packages of snack foods such as bags of crisps.
  • the invention provides test apparatus having conveyor means for conveying test substrates, and one or more test stations arranged along the conveying path; there being at least one such test station having a test head adapted to be moved towards and away from the conveying path; wherein the head is normally urged towards the conveying path so that a package being conveyed along the path contacts the head and urges it away from the conveying path; and wherein the resulting displacement of the head is monitored.
  • the test head is urged solely by gravity towards the conveying path. Its contact surface is desirably such as to allow continuing movement of packages along the conveying surface. It preferably uses an array of low back line pressure rollers.
  • the apparatus has two test stations, each having a test head adapted to be raised by a substrate moving along the conveying path.
  • each test station includes means for deriving a signal related to the displacement of the test head.
  • the apparatus may also include computing means which receives data from the displacement detectors.
  • the test head When a substrate reaches a test station, the test head is raised thereby. If the substrate is "leaky", the test head will then fall somewhat.
  • the first test station is adapted to produce an additive output signal, or the data are treated additively by the computer. That is, if a substrate causes the head to rise by x and then to descend by y, the resulting datum corresponds to (x+y).
  • the second test station leads to a differential datum corresponding to (x-y).
  • the invention provides a method of testing a substrate, comprising conveying the substrate through a test station having a test head arranged so that passage of the substrate urges displacement of the test head, which is urged against the substrate.
  • the displacement of the head is monitored to gain information about the substrate.
  • the method uses apparatus as referred to above.
  • FIGURE is a schematic representation of apparatus embodying the invention.
  • the apparatus shows a conveyor belt 10 having an upper conveying run 12.
  • the run 12 passes through two test stations 14, 16. These are essentially identical.
  • Each has a test head 18 associated with a vertical stem 20 which displaceably engages an encoder 22 which provides an output indicative of relative displacement of the stem 20.
  • the outputs from the encoders 22 are passed to a computer 24.
  • Each head 18 is primarily a carrier for a length of roller chain 26. This is a row of free-running rollers 28. Each roller 28 extends transversely of the conveyor run 12. It actually consists of a multiplicity of coaxial, independently rotatable rollers.
  • roller chain is available from, for example, Rexnord. (Its conventional use is for conveyor belts, to provide a surface on which a conveyed article can be held stationary while the belt continues to run.)
  • the chain 26 At the upstream end of each head 18, there is a lead-in formation 30, the chain 26 extending upwardly at an angle.
  • the heads are freely displaceable upwardly and downwardly. They are normally gravitationally urged to contact the conveying run 12. (Alternatively they can have stop means so that they do not descend quite that far.)
  • the force can be varied by adding or removing weights 39 to a carrier 42.
  • the computer 24 receives the data from the two encoders 22.
  • the data are analysed to provide information relation to the nature of the package, particularly its compressibility and leakiness.
  • a substrate passes through a test station, it provides two pieces of data; a "rise” value for the amount that the head is raised by the arrival of a substrate; and a “fall” value (which may be zero) relating to the amount that the head falls while the substrate is beneath it.
  • these pieces of data from the first station 14 are combined additively, whereas they are combined substractively at the second station 16. This can give extremely high sensitivity, as will be explained.
  • a sound package arriving at the first station may allow the first head to move down by a distance such that the encoder counts a value of 150. The same will happen at the second test station. But consider a leaky package. At the first test station, some air or gas will be squeezed out, e.g. so that the head moves down by 200 counts. At the second station, if a similar amount of further leakage occurs, the head will move down by 250 counts. Thus the fact that the package is leaky will be shown by the fact that the ratio of the counts from the first station to the counts from the second station is 200:250 instead of 1:1.
  • a package arriving at the first station may raise the first head by 150 counts. If the package is sound, the same would happen at the second station. But if, once again, the package is leaky such that each head descends by 50 counts during passage of the package, then the first head is initially raised to a height of 150 counts and then falls by 50 counts, giving a total (additive) value of 200.
  • the compressed package is such that it will only raise the second head through 100 counts. Assuming once again a leakage fall of 50 counts, the subtractive total is 50 counts. That is to say, the resulting values from the first and second heads are 200 counts and 50 counts.
  • ratio 200:250 instead of a given degree of leakiness being indicated by the ratio 200:250, it is indicated by the ratio 200:50. Clearly this is very much easier to detect. This means that much smaller leaks can be detected. This is further assisted by the consistency and lack of vibration resulting from the use of the gravity-urged system.
  • Data can also be passed to the computer 24 from a keyboard/display unit 50. For example this may be used to set acceptable limits for substrate thickness and leakiness.
  • the apparatus may include means for removing rejected substrates from the conveyor 10., e.g. a blower 52 actuable by the computer.
  • the computer may also receive an input from a substrate detector 60 immediately upstream of the first test station 14.
  • the keyboard can also be used to calibrate the system and allow for differences between the test stations. Thus it is set to calibration mode by means of the keyboard, and a standard, non-leaky substrate is run through the system. If the rise values of the two heads 18 are not identical, the computer stores a compensation value to be added to or substracted from the data given by one encoder.

Abstract

Packages (7) are conveyed through at least one, and preferably two, test stations (14, 16). At each station there is a test head (7) which is urged towards the conveying path, preferably by gravity. As a package (7) is conveyed through a station it displaces the head away from the path. The displacement is monitored. Preferably, subsequent displacement towards the path due to leakage of the package is also monitored.

Description

The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for testing packages, e.g. packages of snack foods such as bags of crisps.
It is known to test a package by applying a load which tends to compress the package, and monitoring the effect. After an interval, the package may be tested again. For a good package, if the two tests use identical loads, then the package should behave identically, e.g. in terms of the amount of compression. But if the package contains air or other fluid and has a leak, the first test will cause some deflation. Thus the amount of compression will be greater than for a good package. Furthermore the package will already be in a deflated state at the start of the second test, and will undergo further deflation (unless it is already fully deflated). Testing equipment working on this principle has been brought to quite a high level of sophistication, e.g. as described in WO93/17317. But we have now found ways to improve the operation of such test systems.
In a first aspect, the invention provides test apparatus having conveyor means for conveying test substrates, and one or more test stations arranged along the conveying path; there being at least one such test station having a test head adapted to be moved towards and away from the conveying path; wherein the head is normally urged towards the conveying path so that a package being conveyed along the path contacts the head and urges it away from the conveying path; and wherein the resulting displacement of the head is monitored.
Desirably, the test head is urged solely by gravity towards the conveying path. Its contact surface is desirably such as to allow continuing movement of packages along the conveying surface. It preferably uses an array of low back line pressure rollers.
Since it is the arrival of a substrate that causes the movement of the test head directly, there is no need for sophisticated devices for synchronising the action of a test station with the arrival of a package, or for synchronising the actions of a plurality of test stations. Since the arrival of a substrate acts to raise a test head, if a second substrate arrives while a first substrate is still at the head, this merely causes further raising of the head, if necessary. In contrast, with prior art systems using powered pistons, the result tended to be the bursting of one or more packages. Furthermore, since a test head can be urged by gravity, the mechanism can be very simple. It is also very consistent and reliable, whereas pneumatic systems in particular are prone to variability. They also inevitably introduce vibration.
Preferably the apparatus has two test stations, each having a test head adapted to be raised by a substrate moving along the conveying path. Preferably each test station includes means for deriving a signal related to the displacement of the test head. The apparatus may also include computing means which receives data from the displacement detectors.
When a substrate reaches a test station, the test head is raised thereby. If the substrate is "leaky", the test head will then fall somewhat. Preferably the first test station is adapted to produce an additive output signal, or the data are treated additively by the computer. That is, if a substrate causes the head to rise by x and then to descend by y, the resulting datum corresponds to (x+y). Preferably the second test station leads to a differential datum corresponding to (x-y).
In conventional apparatus having two or more test stations, it is necessary to make careful mechanical adjustments to the relative heights of the test heads. In the present invention, particularly with gravity-urged heads, this is much less of a problem. Furthermore, adjustment can be made electronically, rather than mechanically. Thus if a "good" (non-leaky) substrate is passed through the system, it should give identical values at all test stations. If it does not, a correction can be applied by the computer to the data from one or more test stations.
Should it be desired to vary the load applied by a test head, this can be done simply by adding or removing weights to it.
In further aspect the invention provides a method of testing a substrate, comprising conveying the substrate through a test station having a test head arranged so that passage of the substrate urges displacement of the test head, which is urged against the substrate. The displacement of the head is monitored to gain information about the substrate. Preferably there are two test stations, to which the substrate passes successively. Preferably the method uses apparatus as referred to above.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which the sole FIGURE is a schematic representation of apparatus embodying the invention.
The apparatus shows a conveyor belt 10 having an upper conveying run 12. The run 12 passes through two test stations 14, 16. These are essentially identical. Each has a test head 18 associated with a vertical stem 20 which displaceably engages an encoder 22 which provides an output indicative of relative displacement of the stem 20. The outputs from the encoders 22 are passed to a computer 24.
Each head 18 is primarily a carrier for a length of roller chain 26. This is a row of free-running rollers 28. Each roller 28 extends transversely of the conveyor run 12. It actually consists of a multiplicity of coaxial, independently rotatable rollers. Such roller chain is available from, for example, Rexnord. (Its conventional use is for conveyor belts, to provide a surface on which a conveyed article can be held stationary while the belt continues to run.) At the upstream end of each head 18, there is a lead-in formation 30, the chain 26 extending upwardly at an angle.
The heads are freely displaceable upwardly and downwardly. They are normally gravitationally urged to contact the conveying run 12. (Alternatively they can have stop means so that they do not descend quite that far.) The force can be varied by adding or removing weights 39 to a carrier 42. When a substrate 7, such as a packet of crisps, passes along the conveyor 10, it contacts the first lead-in 30 of the first head 18, causing it to rise. The amount of the rise is sensed by the encoder 22. As the substrate passes between the head and the conveyor, for the main, flat length 32 of the head, the head should not move. But if the packet leaks, the head will descend somewhat. Any such descent is also sensed by the encoder 22. The package leaves the first test station, and a similar sequence of events happens at the second test station 16.
The computer 24 receives the data from the two encoders 22. The data are analysed to provide information relation to the nature of the package, particularly its compressibility and leakiness.
As a substrate passes through a test station, it provides two pieces of data; a "rise" value for the amount that the head is raised by the arrival of a substrate; and a "fall" value (which may be zero) relating to the amount that the head falls while the substrate is beneath it. Preferably these pieces of data from the first station 14 are combined additively, whereas they are combined substractively at the second station 16. This can give extremely high sensitivity, as will be explained.
With a conventional apparatus, having two test stations each having a plunger which is forced down onto a substrate, a sound package arriving at the first station may allow the first head to move down by a distance such that the encoder counts a value of 150. The same will happen at the second test station. But consider a leaky package. At the first test station, some air or gas will be squeezed out, e.g. so that the head moves down by 200 counts. At the second station, if a similar amount of further leakage occurs, the head will move down by 250 counts. Thus the fact that the package is leaky will be shown by the fact that the ratio of the counts from the first station to the counts from the second station is 200:250 instead of 1:1. With the apparatus embodying the present invention, in a similar situation, a package arriving at the first station may raise the first head by 150 counts. If the package is sound, the same would happen at the second station. But if, once again, the package is leaky such that each head descends by 50 counts during passage of the package, then the first head is initially raised to a height of 150 counts and then falls by 50 counts, giving a total (additive) value of 200. The compressed package is such that it will only raise the second head through 100 counts. Assuming once again a leakage fall of 50 counts, the subtractive total is 50 counts. That is to say, the resulting values from the first and second heads are 200 counts and 50 counts. Thus instead of a given degree of leakiness being indicated by the ratio 200:250, it is indicated by the ratio 200:50. Clearly this is very much easier to detect. This means that much smaller leaks can be detected. This is further assisted by the consistency and lack of vibration resulting from the use of the gravity-urged system.
Data can also be passed to the computer 24 from a keyboard/display unit 50. For example this may be used to set acceptable limits for substrate thickness and leakiness. The apparatus may include means for removing rejected substrates from the conveyor 10., e.g. a blower 52 actuable by the computer. The computer may also receive an input from a substrate detector 60 immediately upstream of the first test station 14.
The keyboard can also be used to calibrate the system and allow for differences between the test stations. Thus it is set to calibration mode by means of the keyboard, and a standard, non-leaky substrate is run through the system. If the rise values of the two heads 18 are not identical, the computer stores a compensation value to be added to or substracted from the data given by one encoder.

Claims (7)

I claim:
1. Test apparatus comprising conveyor means for conveying an object along a conveying path and through one or more test stations arranged along the conveying path, at least one of said test stations comprising a test head which is freely movable toward and away from the conveying path; said test head being urged solely by gravity towards the conveying path so that an object being conveyed along the path which contacts the head urges the head away from the conveying path; said test head having a contact surface comprising an array of free running rollers adapted to contact and to allow continuing movement of an object along the conveying path; said test station being actuated by the displacement of the test head by contact of the test head with an object moving along the conveying path, there being no additional means for synchronising the action of the test station with the arrival of an object at the test station; and means for monitoring displacement of the head, said displacement monitoring means comprising means for measuring the displacement of the head and means for providing an output signal related to the measured displacement of the head.
2. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the apparatus comprises two of said test stations.
3. Apparatus according to claim 2 wherein said displacement monitoring means comprises means for measuring the displacement of the test head of each of the two test stations, and means for providing an output signal related to the displacement of each of the test heads of each of the two test stations, and wherein the test apparatus includes computing means which receives said output signals.
4. Apparatus according to claim 2 wherein said displacement measuring means comprises means for determining at each test station a rise value R related to the distance through which a respective test head is moved away from the conveying path by an object, and a fall value F related to the distance through which the head returns towards the conveying path while in contact with an object; and means for determining (R+F) for a first of said two test stations and (R-F) for a second of said two test stations.
5. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said test head comprises means for holding a weight to establish a load applied by that test head.
6. A method of testing a sealed flexible package comprising conveying the package along a conveyor path through a test station of a test apparatus, said apparatus comprising conveyor means for conveying an object along a conveying path and through one or more test stations arranged along the conveyor path; at least one of said test stations comprising a test head which is freely movable toward and away from the conveying path; said test head being urged solely by gravity towards the conveying path so that a package being conveyed alone the path which contacts the head urges the head away from the conveying path; said test head having a contact surface comprising an array of free running rollers adapted to contact and to allow continuing movement of a package along the conveying path; said test station being actuated by the displacement of the test head by said contact of the test head with a package moving along said conveyor path, there being no additional means for synchronising the action of the test station with the arrival of a package at the test station; and means for monitoring displacement of the head, said displacement monitoring means comprising means for measuring the displacement of the head and means for providing an output signal related to the measured displacement of the head whereby passage of the package along conveyor path through said test station causes displacement of said test head, the method further comprising monitoring the displacement of the test head to gain information about the package.
7. A method according to claim 6 wherein said apparatus comprises two of said test stations and wherein the method comprises passing the packages through said two test stations.
US08/732,374 1994-05-03 1995-05-03 Testing of packages Expired - Lifetime US5786530A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9408705 1994-05-03
GB9408705A GB9408705D0 (en) 1994-05-03 1994-05-03 Testing of packages
PCT/GB1995/001010 WO1995030137A1 (en) 1994-05-03 1995-05-03 Testing of packages

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5786530A true US5786530A (en) 1998-07-28

Family

ID=10754457

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/732,374 Expired - Lifetime US5786530A (en) 1994-05-03 1995-05-03 Testing of packages

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US5786530A (en)
EP (1) EP0760089B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH09511831A (en)
AU (1) AU689255B2 (en)
DE (1) DE69518074T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0760089T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2149983T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9408705D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1995030137A1 (en)

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6041646A (en) * 1996-01-18 2000-03-28 Testamatic Limited Package tester for testing package integrity
US6105419A (en) * 1997-03-25 2000-08-22 Recot, Inc. Apparatus and process for inspecting sealed packages
US6202476B1 (en) * 1995-08-25 2001-03-20 Testamatic Limited Method of and apparatus for testing for leaks in a package
EP1086897A2 (en) * 1999-09-27 2001-03-28 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal inspecting machine for bagged products
US6470733B1 (en) * 2001-08-03 2002-10-29 Wayne R. Barr Automatic testing of package content and integrity
US20030015402A1 (en) * 2001-07-09 2003-01-23 Ishida Co., Ltd. Conditioning of articles
US20030015023A1 (en) * 2001-07-03 2003-01-23 Ishida Co., Ltd. Package handling apparatus detecting package height
US20040020264A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2004-02-05 Lockheed Martin Corp., A Maryland Corporation System and method for detecting bio-hazardous particulates in mail handling systems
US20040035189A1 (en) * 2002-03-12 2004-02-26 Tna Australia Pty Limited Conveyor
US6711939B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2004-03-30 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and system for expelling test-sample volumes from luggage/packages
US20040134840A1 (en) * 2001-06-12 2004-07-15 Gianfranco Salmi Method and a station for checking the integrity of packages, in particular single-dose packages
WO2005005949A1 (en) * 2003-07-08 2005-01-20 Ishida Europe Limited Seal integrity testing apparatus and method
US20060042190A1 (en) * 2004-09-02 2006-03-02 Sealed Air Corporation (U.S.) Apparatus and system for detecting under-filled cushions
NL1028103C2 (en) * 2005-01-24 2006-07-25 Blueprint Holding Bv Density determination of packaging.
US7107823B1 (en) * 2003-11-17 2006-09-19 Cpor Solutions, Inc. Package seal inspecting apparatus, and method for inspecting package seals
US20070125183A1 (en) * 2005-11-30 2007-06-07 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal checker
US20080318750A1 (en) * 2007-06-22 2008-12-25 Haver & Boecker Ohg Packaging machine and discharging device for a packaging machine
US20090266148A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2009-10-29 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal checker
US20110023422A1 (en) * 2009-07-28 2011-02-03 Ishida Co., Ltd. Case packer
US20150316441A1 (en) * 2012-12-05 2015-11-05 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Method and apparatus for testing quality of seal and package integrity
US9346169B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2016-05-24 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for universal, flexible pillow bag pattern creation
US9346170B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2016-05-24 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for universal, flexible pillow bag pattern creation
US9802720B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2017-10-31 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for maintaining a pattern of non-rigid objects in a desired position and orientation
US20190178745A1 (en) * 2016-05-06 2019-06-13 Ishida Europe Limited Container leak detection
US11059185B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2021-07-13 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for transferring a pattern from a universal surface to an ultimate package
WO2021238089A1 (en) * 2020-05-25 2021-12-02 盐城佳华塑料制品有限公司 Production line capable of detecting leak of finished swim ring
US11480494B2 (en) * 2019-04-25 2022-10-25 Snack Engineering Ltd Seal tester apparatus and method

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19542651C1 (en) * 1995-11-15 1997-01-09 Bosch Gmbh Robert Device for checking the tightness of tubular bag packs
EP1050469B1 (en) 1999-04-07 2003-03-19 Ishida Co., Ltd. Automatic package inspecting system
JP4498622B2 (en) * 2001-01-23 2010-07-07 株式会社イシダ Seal check device
JP4498626B2 (en) * 2001-02-08 2010-07-07 株式会社イシダ Seal check device
CN105890853B (en) * 2016-04-11 2018-05-18 中国计量学院 Swim ring gas leakage on-line measuring device and its detection method

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4148213A (en) * 1976-06-09 1979-04-10 Bouwe Prakken Apparatus for discarding leaky packages from a row of filled sealed packages
US4649740A (en) * 1985-03-13 1987-03-17 Bishopbarn Limited Apparatus for and method of testing for leaks in packages
US4671101A (en) * 1983-04-16 1987-06-09 Bishopbarn Limited Package handling apparatus and method
WO1993017317A1 (en) * 1992-02-26 1993-09-02 Ishida-Nonpareil Ltd. Testing of packages
US5284003A (en) * 1992-03-26 1994-02-08 Prototype Equipment Corporation Machine for conditioning product in a sealed bag
US5531101A (en) * 1992-03-07 1996-07-02 Ishida-Nonpareil Limited Package testing
US5533385A (en) * 1995-02-06 1996-07-09 Frievalt; William Package seal integrity testing device and method of operation thereof

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3195724A (en) * 1961-08-22 1965-07-20 Francis M Whitacre Machine for testing sealed cans and for rejecting defective cans
JPS59163532A (en) * 1983-03-09 1984-09-14 Hokkai Can Co Ltd Method and device for inspecting internal pressure of tightly sealed-up vessel

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4148213A (en) * 1976-06-09 1979-04-10 Bouwe Prakken Apparatus for discarding leaky packages from a row of filled sealed packages
US4671101A (en) * 1983-04-16 1987-06-09 Bishopbarn Limited Package handling apparatus and method
US4649740A (en) * 1985-03-13 1987-03-17 Bishopbarn Limited Apparatus for and method of testing for leaks in packages
WO1993017317A1 (en) * 1992-02-26 1993-09-02 Ishida-Nonpareil Ltd. Testing of packages
US5542288A (en) * 1992-02-26 1996-08-06 Ishida-Nonpareil Limited Testing of packages
US5531101A (en) * 1992-03-07 1996-07-02 Ishida-Nonpareil Limited Package testing
US5284003A (en) * 1992-03-26 1994-02-08 Prototype Equipment Corporation Machine for conditioning product in a sealed bag
US5533385A (en) * 1995-02-06 1996-07-09 Frievalt; William Package seal integrity testing device and method of operation thereof

Cited By (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6202476B1 (en) * 1995-08-25 2001-03-20 Testamatic Limited Method of and apparatus for testing for leaks in a package
US6041646A (en) * 1996-01-18 2000-03-28 Testamatic Limited Package tester for testing package integrity
US6105419A (en) * 1997-03-25 2000-08-22 Recot, Inc. Apparatus and process for inspecting sealed packages
US6474141B1 (en) 1999-09-27 2002-11-05 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal inspecting machine
EP1086897A2 (en) * 1999-09-27 2001-03-28 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal inspecting machine for bagged products
EP1086897A3 (en) * 1999-09-27 2002-06-19 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal inspecting machine for bagged products
US20040134840A1 (en) * 2001-06-12 2004-07-15 Gianfranco Salmi Method and a station for checking the integrity of packages, in particular single-dose packages
US7111737B2 (en) * 2001-06-12 2006-09-26 I.M.A. Industria Macchine Automatiche Method and a station for checking the integrity of packages, in particular single-dose packages
US20030015023A1 (en) * 2001-07-03 2003-01-23 Ishida Co., Ltd. Package handling apparatus detecting package height
US6941796B2 (en) * 2001-07-03 2005-09-13 Ishida Co., Ltd. Package handling apparatus detecting package height
US20030015402A1 (en) * 2001-07-09 2003-01-23 Ishida Co., Ltd. Conditioning of articles
US7401451B2 (en) * 2001-07-09 2008-07-22 Ishida Co., Ltd. Conditioning of articles
US6470733B1 (en) * 2001-08-03 2002-10-29 Wayne R. Barr Automatic testing of package content and integrity
US20040020264A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2004-02-05 Lockheed Martin Corp., A Maryland Corporation System and method for detecting bio-hazardous particulates in mail handling systems
US6834533B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2004-12-28 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and method for detecting bio-hazardous particulates in mail handling systems
US6711939B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2004-03-30 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and system for expelling test-sample volumes from luggage/packages
US20040035189A1 (en) * 2002-03-12 2004-02-26 Tna Australia Pty Limited Conveyor
US6955256B2 (en) 2002-03-12 2005-10-18 Tna Australia Pty Limited Conveyor
WO2005005949A1 (en) * 2003-07-08 2005-01-20 Ishida Europe Limited Seal integrity testing apparatus and method
US7107823B1 (en) * 2003-11-17 2006-09-19 Cpor Solutions, Inc. Package seal inspecting apparatus, and method for inspecting package seals
US7231749B2 (en) * 2004-09-02 2007-06-19 Sealed Air Corporation (Us) Apparatus and system for detecting under-filled cushions
US20060042190A1 (en) * 2004-09-02 2006-03-02 Sealed Air Corporation (U.S.) Apparatus and system for detecting under-filled cushions
WO2006078166A2 (en) * 2005-01-24 2006-07-27 Blueprint Holding B.V. Determination of the seal quality of packages
NL1028103C2 (en) * 2005-01-24 2006-07-25 Blueprint Holding Bv Density determination of packaging.
WO2006078166A3 (en) * 2005-01-24 2006-10-26 Blueprint Holding Bv Determination of the seal quality of packages
US20080115566A1 (en) * 2005-01-24 2008-05-22 Bluepring Holding B.V. Determination of the Seal Quality of Packages
US20070125183A1 (en) * 2005-11-30 2007-06-07 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal checker
US7475590B2 (en) * 2005-11-30 2009-01-13 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal checker
US7900502B2 (en) * 2005-12-22 2011-03-08 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal checker
US20090266148A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2009-10-29 Ishida Co., Ltd. Seal checker
US7698877B2 (en) * 2007-06-22 2010-04-20 Haver & Boecker Ohg Packaging machine and discharging device for a packaging machine
US20080318750A1 (en) * 2007-06-22 2008-12-25 Haver & Boecker Ohg Packaging machine and discharging device for a packaging machine
US20110023422A1 (en) * 2009-07-28 2011-02-03 Ishida Co., Ltd. Case packer
US8549825B2 (en) * 2009-07-28 2013-10-08 Ishida Co., Ltd. Case packer
US20150316441A1 (en) * 2012-12-05 2015-11-05 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Method and apparatus for testing quality of seal and package integrity
US9346169B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2016-05-24 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for universal, flexible pillow bag pattern creation
US9346170B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2016-05-24 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for universal, flexible pillow bag pattern creation
US9802720B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2017-10-31 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for maintaining a pattern of non-rigid objects in a desired position and orientation
US11059185B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2021-07-13 Frito-Lay North America, Inc. Apparatus and method for transferring a pattern from a universal surface to an ultimate package
US20190178745A1 (en) * 2016-05-06 2019-06-13 Ishida Europe Limited Container leak detection
US10690564B2 (en) * 2016-05-06 2020-06-23 Ishida Europe Limited Container leak detection
US11480494B2 (en) * 2019-04-25 2022-10-25 Snack Engineering Ltd Seal tester apparatus and method
WO2021238089A1 (en) * 2020-05-25 2021-12-02 盐城佳华塑料制品有限公司 Production line capable of detecting leak of finished swim ring

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0760089A1 (en) 1997-03-05
DE69518074D1 (en) 2000-08-24
AU689255B2 (en) 1998-03-26
GB9408705D0 (en) 1994-06-22
AU2349995A (en) 1995-11-29
DE69518074T2 (en) 2001-03-22
ES2149983T3 (en) 2000-11-16
WO1995030137A1 (en) 1995-11-09
DK0760089T3 (en) 2000-10-30
EP0760089B1 (en) 2000-07-19
JPH09511831A (en) 1997-11-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5786530A (en) Testing of packages
US5542288A (en) Testing of packages
US4649740A (en) Apparatus for and method of testing for leaks in packages
EP0561645B1 (en) Package leak detection
EP1222449B1 (en) Multiple sensor in-line container inspection
US6941796B2 (en) Package handling apparatus detecting package height
JPS58500671A (en) Measurement
US5531101A (en) Package testing
EP1344727B2 (en) Conveying device for detecting leaks in bags
US20080115566A1 (en) Determination of the Seal Quality of Packages
US3998091A (en) Test apparatus for determining quality of packaging for vacuum packaged products
US5258579A (en) Weighing method and weighing apparatus
EP0540148A1 (en) Bag seal tester
US20100122570A1 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting sealing of food packages
JP2003149073A (en) Method and device for detecting defectively sealed package
JP4302808B2 (en) Product inspection equipment
EP1538434A1 (en) Method and apparatus for leak testing gas-filled flexible packages
JPH0719112U (en) Device for detecting defective sealing of packaging bags
AU2003200907B2 (en) A conveyor
JPH0743279A (en) Method and equipment for inspecting inner pressure of enclosed container

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FENLON, CHRISTOPHER;REEL/FRAME:008927/0649

Effective date: 19961029

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FENLON, CHRISTOPHER;REEL/FRAME:008951/0092

Effective date: 19961029

AS Assignment

Owner name: ISHIDA CO., LTD., JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ISHIDA-BISHOPBARN LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:009137/0830

Effective date: 19961101

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12