|Publication number||US5808671 A|
|Application number||US 08/561,874|
|Publication date||Sep 15, 1998|
|Filing date||Nov 22, 1995|
|Priority date||Nov 24, 1994|
|Also published as||CA2136567A1, CA2136567C|
|Publication number||08561874, 561874, US 5808671 A, US 5808671A, US-A-5808671, US5808671 A, US5808671A|
|Inventors||John Charles Maycock, Carey Todd Ritchey, Vincent Maddock Smith|
|Original Assignee||Augat Photon Systems Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (86), Classifications (10), Legal Events (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to apparatus for and a method of monitoring video signals being transmitted through, for example, a co-axial cable, an optical fiber cable, a terrestrial microwave or a satellite system.
2. Description of the Related Art
The benefit of a cable television system to its subscribers is measured not only by the quantity of channels and/or entertainment provided, but also increasingly by the signal quality. To determine the quality of its transmission, cable TV operators have relied upon the measurement of operating parameters of amplifiers employed in co-axial cable in the system as an indirect indication of the transmitted signal quality passing through the amplifiers. Data derived from the parameters, such as power, temperature, and housing status (i.e. open or closed), is encoded by a status monitoring modem and transferred into a return path frequency allocation of the co-axial cable, typically in the frequency band 5 to 35 MHZ. The modem would typically consist of a simple analog-to-digital converter with polling capability from the forward path signal. CATV status monitoring systems such as this are commercially available at the present time. Some provide data on the noise performance of the network. Each unit is addressable and the data it provides is interpreted at a headend into a display using proprietary software.
The critical parameters of cable television system performance comprises the quality of the picture and the audio signal. The quality of the video and audio signals is affected principally by noise and distortion. It is not possible to accurately detect most distortion parameters using the RF detection methods used by the prior art monitoring systems. Hence they are usually referred to as "status monitoring" systems rather than "performance monitoring" systems, since they detect the status of the equipment being monitored at a selected point but not the quality of the signals passing through that point. To obtain a true representation of the quality of a video signal, specific measurements must be undertaken on the baseband signal and confirmed by observation of an actual picture.
The addition of fibre optics to the technologies used for cable television has increased the distances over which signals are transmitted. For example, one SCM transmission system which is commercially available at the present time uses 1550 nm technology to transmit over 80 channels of audio and video programming over 200 km. This system uses optical amplifiers positioned approximately every 50 to 60 km. To monitor performance, the return path would have to be duplicated almost in its entirety to bring the return path signals back to the headend for detection. This would add difficulty and cost to the design of the system. The return path frequency band (5 to 35 MHZ) is notoriously difficult to use due to ingress of other RF signals on the same frequency. Historically, this has restricted the status monitoring to simple data feeds. The bandwidth of a return fibre path is very underutilized if used for only this simple status monitoring information.
In addition, the analog format of the signals gives rise to path length related degradation. As the path loss increases, then so the carrier level in reference to the noise floor of the system decreases, thereby decreasing the carrier-to-noise level. With the present am-vsb CATV signal format, this translates directly to a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio and manifests itself as "snow" in the picture. In the return path, the same limitation will eventually make the received carrier level indistinguishable from the noise floor, resulting in a total loss of signal. This limits the distance over which analog transmission can take place. The cost to build a return path system over several hundred kilometers would equal that of the forward path, making the system prohibitively expensive.
The optical amplifiers used in the above-mentioned commercially available system represent the state-of-the-art of leading edge fibre optics technology applied to cable television systems. While their operation is stable, the process of optical amplification cannot be monitored by conventional means. Therefore, to determine the performance, either indirect electrical parameters must be measured, as in the case of an RF amplifier in a co-axial cable, or another method must be employed.
According to the present invention, apparatus for monitoring the transmission of a video signal from a headend employs means at a location remote from the headend for capturing the video signal. The captured video signal is passed to a channel selector, which selects a signal channel from the captured video signal. The selected channel is then demodulated, digitized and serialized in a digitizer and transmitted as a digital video signal to a monitoring location, where it is converted back into an analog video signal for display on a monitor and test equipment.
The monitoring location may be at the headend or elsewhere, and the video signal may be transmitted from the headend through an optical fibre cable provided with one or more optical amplifiers, the means for capturing the video signal comprising a coupler located at the output of one of the optical amplifiers or at some other location.
The present apparatus can thus provide at the monitoring location, in addition to all of the data provided by the above-mentioned prior art systems, baseband video and audio signals for both visual and quantitative measurement without any path loss-related degradation. Also, the present apparatus may be used with amplitude modulated vestigial side band signals (i.e. the normal CATV format) and, with suitable modification, for compressed digital signals of the future and satellite frequency modulated signals in both analog and digital formats.
The present invention will be more readily apparent from the following description of preferred embodiments thereof when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a block diagram illustrating in a general manner a video signal transmission monitoring system embodying the present invention;
FIG. 1A shows a block diagram of an embodiment of the present monitoring system applied to a cascaded video signal transmission system;
FIGS. 1B and 1C show block diagrams of two further embodiments of the present monitoring system;
FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of parts of the monitoring system of FIG. 1A at a location remote from the headend of the system;
FIG. 3 shows parts of the monitoring system at a monitoring location; and
FIGS. 4 and 5 are diagrams illustrating the operation of a computer forming part of the monitoring system of FIG. 1A.
Referring firstly to FIG. 1, a video signal transmission headend 10 in the form of a broadband transmitter provides analog video signals which are received at a remote predetermined site or location by a signal receiver 12. The signal receiver 12 may be an optical receiver, an antenna, or any other device which enables the capture of a broadband signal to provide an electrical equivalent in a useable frequency range. A channel selector 14 selects from the received signal a channel to be monitored and measures parameters of the selected signal. Corresponding measurement data and the selected received entire video signal are transmitted by a digitizing optical transmitter 16 over a signal link or conduit in the form of a fibre optic cable 18 to a monitoring unit 20 at a monitoring location, which may be at the headend or at some other location.
In the monitoring unit 20 the signal is recovered and displayed on a video monitor (not shown) and analysed both for audio and video content and the measurement data is compared with reference data stored for the purpose. The channel selection is made manually by an operator or automatically by a control computer (not shown) at the monitoring location. Channel selection information for operating the channel selection device 14 is embedded into the transmitted video signal emanating from the transmitter at the headend 10 and is interpreted by the channel selection device at the remote site.
FIG. 1A shows a somewhat more complicated transmission and monitoring system than that of FIG. 1. As shown in FIG. 1A, the headend 10 is connected to an optical fibre cable 11 for transmitting the video signal, the cable being provided with optical amplifiers 13a, 13b. . . 13n in cascade at respective predetermined locations or sites, each of which has, at its output, an optical coupler in the form of a splitter 15a, 15b . . . 15n for capturing the video signal and supplying it to a respective signal receiver 12a, 12b . . . 12n and a channel selector 14a, 14b . . . 14n, corresponding to the signal receiver 12 and the channel selector 14 of FIG. 1. The outputs of the channel selectors 14a, 14b. . . 14n are connected to respective, electronic two-way switches 17a,17b . . . 17n connected between respective opto-electronic transmitters 19a, 19b . . . 19n and opto-electronic receivers 21a, 21b . . . 21n in a common signal conduit link comprising an optical fibre cable 18.
At each amplifier 13a, 13b . . . 13n, the video signal is captured and the channel is selected by the respective channel selector 14a, 14b . . . 14n. The selected signal and the associated measurement data are provided as one input to the respective switch 17a, 17b . . .. 17n. Upon command from the monitoring location, as described in greater detail below, the switch 17a, 17b . . . 17n can select either this selected local signal from the respective channel selector 14a, 14b . . . 14n or a signal from the respective receiver 21a, 21b . . . 21n. The central monitoring location can thus analyse the signal selected at any of the channel selectors 14a, 14b . . ..14n. Since the signal from each transmitter 19a, 19b . . . 19n is in a digital format, it can be repeated almost indefinitely without any loss of information.
FIG. 2 shows in block diagram form the components of the channel selector 14a, which obtains the analog video signal from the cable 11 by an input comprising the optical splitter 15a and the receiver 12a, which receives the optical signal extracted by the optical splitter 15a and converts it into an electrical RF signal. The optical receiver 12a is of known construction and comprises a PIN diode coupled to an RF amplifier.
In case the optical fibre cable 11 is replaced by a co-axial cable 11a for transmitting the video signal as an electrical RF signal, and in this case the input comprises an RF coupler 23. A further alternative is to employ as the input an antenna 24 for receiving the video signal as a radio signal, which is supplied to a down convertor 25 connected to the coupler 23.
The RF signal is split by a splitter 27, one leg being fed to a down converter 26 and the other leg being sent to an RF modem 28. The modem 28 demodulates programming information comprising a channel selection control signal sent by a central processor (not shown) as a data carrier generated in the headend. The control signal is interpreted by a microprocessor 30 and used to control the frequency of a phase locked loop 32. This frequency in turn controls the frequency of the down converter 26 and thereby effects the video signal channel selection. The frequency of the down converter output is typically an IF signal of 45.75 MHZ. The output of the down converter 26 is fed to a first demodulator 34, which turns the IF signal into a baseband signal in the 0 to 6 MHZ range (for an NTSC system). This signal consists of NTSC video information including luminance, a chrominance subcarrier and an audio subcarrier. Similar compositions but with different frequency components would be employed for a PAL or SECAM signal.
The demodulator 34 has two output paths. A first path extends to an audio demodulator 36 and the other extends to an analog-to-digital converter 38.
The resolution of the analog-to-digital converter 38 is chosen carefully so as not to degrade the performance of the received signal. In the present embodiment of the invention, the analog-to-digital converter 38 provides 8 bit resolution giving a theoretical signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 60 dB. The demodulator 34 has a signal-to-noise ratio of about 52 dB, and since visual problems are visible at about 45 to 48 dB, the digitizing process has sufficient headroom so as not to degrade the signal being sent to the monitoring location.
The audio demodulator 36 turns the BTSC encoded audio subcarrier into stereo left and right audio channels. Other appropriate demodulators would be used to demodulate mono audio and/or secondary audio programming (SAP). For stereo audio, the audio demodulator 36 has two outputs for the left and right stereo channels, respectively. The two stereo channels are further encoded by analog-to-digital converters 37a and 37b, followed by a high speed multiplexer 35 which converts the two serial bitstreams from the analog-to-digital converters 37a and 3 7b to a single serial bitstream for input to a multiplexer 43.
The output from the analog-to-digital converter 38 is an 8 bit parallel format and the multiplexer 43 is designed to accept 10 parallel bits. In addition to the eight bits from the analog-to-digital converter 38, one bit comes from the audio multiplexer 35 and the final bit comprises digital data information from the microprocessor 30. To ensure accurate decoding and recovery at the monitoring unit 20, error correction codes are embedded and transmitted as overhead bits.
The digital data information is supplied as direct feed from the microprocessor 30 and comprises digitally encoded information comprising signal quality data indicative of the quality of the selected channel of the analog video signal and local status information provided by the microprocessor 30. The signal quality data comprises the video carrier power level obtained from the down converter 26, the video carrier frequency obtained from the phase locked loop 32, the audio carrier frequency obtained from the demodulator 34 and the audio carrier level obtained from the audio modulator. The local status information is provided in the form of analog inputs to an analog multiplexer 45. The amplifier 13a comprises an amplifier sold by Photon Systems Corp. of Burnaby, B.C., Canada as Model No. LT4000-A and incorporates means for providing , as such local status information, analog signals indicating the amplifier status. The analog inputs may also include temperature and other local status information from sources known in the art. Under the control of the microprocessor 30, the analog multiplexer 45 effects port-to-port sampling of these analog inputs and measures the values of these inputs as analog values, which it inputs to an analog-to-digital converter 46, which outputs corresponding digital data to the microprocessor 30. The multiplexer 45 and the analog-to-digital converter 46 are both controlled by the microprocessor 30.
An alternative arrangement, which is not shown in the drawings but which is appropriate where fast sampling is required, employs individual analog-to-digital converters for converting respective ones of the analog inputs into digital inputs to a digital multiplexer, which is sampled by the microprocessor 30.
The multiplexer 43 encodes the parallel input signals into a high speed serial bitstream, which is one of the inputs to the high speed switch 17a, which can be made to select between two input positions based on a signal from the local microprocessor 30, which in turn is based on a signal received from the headend 10. The second input to the switch is from the local digital receiver and reprocessor 21a, which recovers a digital bitstream from the next transmitter in line, i.e. the transmitter 19b, and reconstructs a clean signal consisting of the usual ones and zeros. Depending on the state of the switch, the corresponding signal is used as an input to the digital optical transmitter 19a for transmission back to the headend 10.
The channel selectors 14b . . . 14n are similar to the channel selector 14a.
The digitally encoded format of the video and audio baseband signal sent to the monitoring location may be digitally repeated many times without degradation of the signal. As an alternative to repeating the signal, a plurality of respective signal conduits in the form of individual fibre-optic cables 18a, 18b . . . 18n may be provided, as shown in FIG. 1B, for connecting the transmitters 19a, 19b . . . 19n to respective receivers 50a, 50b . . . 50n, provided with a selector switch 51, at the monitoring location.
Another possible arrangement is illustrated in FIG. 1C, in which each transmitter 19a, 19b . . . 19n is connected by a respective coupler 51a, 51b . . . 51n to a common signal conduit comprising a fibre-optic cable 18x, which may comprise the video signal transmission cable 11. In this case, each of the transmitters 19a, 19b . . . 19n has a respective optical wavelength fa,fb . . . fn. These wave lengths are demultiplexed at the monitoring location by a splitter 53 and filtered by respective optical bandpass filters 55a, 55b . . . 55n. This arrangement permits the use of an optical amplifier (not shown) to boost the signals along the cable 18x. Also, this arrangement provides a sample from each of the transmitters 19a, 19b . . . 19n without requiring means for selecting one of these transmitters, which may be advantageous since it allows a plurality of monitors to be simultaneously scanned by one operator.
The components of the monitoring unit 20 are shown in FIG. 3. These comprise a digital opto-electronic video receiver 50 connected to the cable 18, the receiver 50 being compatible with the transmitter 19a and feeding into a demultiplexer 52. Eight bits of a 10 bit output bus of the demultiplexer 52 go to a video digital-to-analog converter 54 to reconstitute the video signal and its sub-carriers. An audio bit bus goes to an audio digital-to-analog converter 56 and a third data bit bus goes directly to a control computer 58 for analysis of the digitized performance information.
The video digital-to-analog converter 54 provides a baseband signal output which contains both video and audio information which is a representation of the signal as encoded at the channel selector 14a, 14b . . . 14n. To analyze this information, the output is split by a splitter 59 into four paths. A main path extends to a video monitor 60 which displays a video image for visual analysis of the signal. The monitor 60 will show distortions present in the signal which may not be measurable by any other means. Such distortions are usually manifest as bars or narrow lines at some angle across the screen and will either move or be stationary. A second path is used as input to a video analyser 62, which in the present embodiment of the invention comprises a Tektronix VM 700, manufactured by Tektronix Inc., of Beaverton, Oreg. The video analyzer 62 measures signal quality parameters such as signal-to-noise ratio, differential gain, differential phase and other video parameters referenced in the video specification EIA RS-250. The data from the video analyzer 62 is acquired by the control computer 38 and displayed on a computer monitor 64.
The computer 58 compares the present values of these video parameters to reference data, stored on a hard drive 63 in the computer 58, to monitor the performance over a period of time. By automating this process, the computer 58 monitors the system performance by polling, i.e. by requesting data from each channel selector 14a, 14b . . . 14n and making the required comparisons on a continuous basis.
A third leg from the splitter 59 is fed to a decoder 66, which can demodulate information encoded in the video signal, for example channel insertion (used for advert deletion and substitution), scrambler and set top information. This information can be checked for accuracy, assessed for errors and displayed by a computer monitor 64.
A fourth leg from the splitter 59 is fed to a BTSC stereo audio decoder 68 which recreates the left and right audio channel from the BTSC standard signal.
The audio digital-to-analog converter 56 recovers two audio channels, which may comprises the left and right stereo signals and provides them as inputs to a switch 69, which is controlled by the control computer 58 through a control line 71 and which selects either the locally decoded stereo signal from the BTSC decoder 68 or the remotely decoded signal from the digital-to-analog connecter 56 as input to an audio analyzer 70. The audio analyzer 70 performs measurements of parameters such as signal-to-noise ratio and harmonic distortion. The outputs of the audio analyzer 70 are fed to the computer 58 for analysis, comparison and display in a manner similar to the video information.
The digital carriers derived from the microprocessor in the field contain encoded information such as video level, video carrier frequency, audio carrier level, audio carrier frequency plus other digitally encoded information such as temperature at the site or in the equipment, relative humidity and status of the amplifier or site equipment. Other digital bitstreams, e.g. telephone or 56 kb/sec channels, separate from the function of this equipment could also be included.
The computer 58 has an input device 73 in the form of a keyboard or mouse, by which an operator can input instruction with the computer 58 identifying the video signal channel which is to be selected and the location at which the selection is to be effected. The computer 58 then outputs corresponding data in the form of the channel selector control signal to an RF modem 72, which encodes the data by FSK encoding onto an RF carrier of a frequency chosen not to interfere with the video signal on the cable 11. QPSK encoding may alternatively be employed.
The RF carrier is then supplied to a transmitter 75 at the headend 10 for transmission along the cable 11 to the respective channel selector 14a, 14b . . . 14n. The computer 58 thus comprises a channel selection control signal generator for controlling the channel selection by the respective channel selector 14a, 14b . . . 14n.
FIG. 4 shows the sequence for initializing the measurements and collecting the results in the computer 58. Two operator parameters input into the computer 58 by the input device 73 are the frequency of sampling and the sampling rate for each site and channel. The former determines the number of samples that comprises a reading and typically would be averaged. The second determines how long the measurements are taken at each site and which channels are measured. It could arise that a particular channel is of more interest than others, either because it is being used to transmit a test signal for system performance evaluation or because of a suspected frequency-related problem with the system. A test signal has the advantage that it is a steady state condition and hence enables more accurate performance measurements.
FIG. 5 shows the measurement validation procedure. A reading taken as part of the routine of FIG. 4 is compared to data stored on the hard disk 63. The difference between that reading and the stored data could be either:
No change from previous reading or baseline data, i.e. within prescribed limits.
Within limits of both initial reading and previous reading, but each reading is exhibiting trend to greater deviation from baseline data. (Warning)
Outside limits set for baseline data, but within limits of change for previous reading (indicates drift and therefore a maintenance condition) (Maintenance Alarm).
Outside both limits from baseline data, and outside range of previous reading. Indicates:--Major maintenance requirement or system failure Major Alarm; Activate back up system if available.
The system performance parameter to be monitored is selected by programming. Such a parameter might be video signal-to-noise ratio. The value gathered is validated by comparison with stored data representing both a range of acceptable values predetermined at the time of the system commissioning and an indication of change in the parameter being measured over the value obtained at the previous reading. The amount of the change or deviation gives rise to varying levels of alarms according to the severity as outlined above.
The diagnosis routine is described in the following truth table. The routine determines the type of failure and its location. When an alarm is displayed in FIG. 5, the site, channel and the type of failure are known.
______________________________________Preceding Present Subsequent Possible Diagnosis______________________________________SingleChannel.check mark. .check mark. .check mark. Channel OKX X X Repeat procedure making preceding site present site, if first site OK then headend failure.check mark. X X Check all channels, if OK, then monitor equipment maintenance required.check mark. .check mark. X Repeat procedure making subsequent site present site.check mark. X .check mark. Monitor equipment maintenance requiredAllChannels.check mark. .check mark. .check mark. System OKX X X Repeat procedure making preceding site present site, if first site OK then headend failure.check mark. X X Equipment at present site requires maintenance.check mark. .check mark. X Repeat procedure making subsequent site present site.check mark. X .check mark. Monitor equipment maintenance required______________________________________
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4550407 *||Jun 14, 1983||Oct 29, 1985||Couasnon Tristan De||Method of analyzing broadcast data, a network analyzer implementing such a method, and receiver equipment using such an analyzer|
|US4558358 *||May 27, 1982||Dec 10, 1985||Pioneer Electronic Corporation||Cable network monitoring system for CATV system|
|US4760442 *||Jul 10, 1985||Jul 26, 1988||American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories||Wideband digital signal distribution system|
|US4845711 *||Jan 15, 1987||Jul 4, 1989||Societe Anonyme De Telecommunications (S.A.T.)||Multiplexing and demultiplexing method and equipments measuring transmission quality and locating operation faults on multiplexed digital channels|
|US4991011 *||Apr 20, 1989||Feb 5, 1991||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Interactive television terminal with programmable background audio or video|
|US5329311 *||May 11, 1993||Jul 12, 1994||The University Of British Columbia||System for determining noise content of a video signal in the disclosure|
|US5510855 *||Apr 17, 1995||Apr 23, 1996||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Satellite television broadcasting receiver including improved clamping circuit|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6002422 *||Jan 6, 1997||Dec 14, 1999||Motorola, Inc.||Method for signal level monitoring|
|US6178455||Apr 11, 1997||Jan 23, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Router which dynamically requests a set of logical network addresses and assigns addresses in the set to hosts connected to the router|
|US6208656||Apr 11, 1997||Mar 27, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Methods for dynamically assigning link addresses and logical network addresses|
|US6211926 *||Nov 13, 1997||Apr 3, 2001||Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd.||Remote control apparatus for digital cable television system and method thereof|
|US6230203||Mar 14, 1997||May 8, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||System and method for providing statistics for flexible billing in a cable environment|
|US6243568 *||Mar 22, 1997||Jun 5, 2001||Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.||System and method for intuitively indicating signal quality in a wireless digital communications network|
|US6249523||Apr 11, 1997||Jun 19, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Router for which a logical network address which is not unique to the gateway address in default routing table entries|
|US6269482 *||Jul 14, 1997||Jul 31, 2001||Altinex, Inc.||Methods of testing electrical signals and compensating for degradation|
|US6272150 *||May 5, 1997||Aug 7, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Cable modem map display for network management of a cable data delivery system|
|US6282208||Dec 17, 1997||Aug 28, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Data traffic control in a data modem system|
|US6286058||Apr 14, 1997||Sep 4, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for automatically rerouting packets in the event of a link failure|
|US6291983 *||Apr 24, 1998||Sep 18, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Selecting and monitoring signal lines with spurious transients in broadband network|
|US6301223||Apr 11, 1997||Oct 9, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Method of using routing protocols to reroute packets during a link failure|
|US6308328||Apr 10, 1997||Oct 23, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Usage statistics collection for a cable data delivery system|
|US6324267||Apr 10, 1997||Nov 27, 2001||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Two-tiered authorization and authentication for a cable data delivery system|
|US6377299 *||Mar 24, 1999||Apr 23, 2002||Kdd Corporation||Video quality abnormality detection method and apparatus|
|US6380971 *||May 28, 1999||Apr 30, 2002||Qwest Communications International Inc.||VDSL video/data set top test equipment|
|US6405253||Nov 9, 2000||Jun 11, 2002||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Dynamic allocation of a set of addresses to router RF modem for individual assignment to hosts|
|US6467091||Apr 19, 1999||Oct 15, 2002||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Constant bit rate transport in a contention based medium access control|
|US6493024 *||Sep 11, 1998||Dec 10, 2002||Hamlet Video International Limited||Signal monitoring apparatus|
|US6519224||Jul 11, 2001||Feb 11, 2003||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Method of using routing protocols to reroute packets during a link failure|
|US6529517||Jan 23, 2001||Mar 4, 2003||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Router for which a logical network address which is not unique to the router is the gateway address in default routing table entries|
|US6618353||Apr 11, 1997||Sep 9, 2003||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Router for use with a link that has a set of concurrent channels|
|US6734898 *||Apr 17, 2001||May 11, 2004||General Instrument Corporation||Methods and apparatus for the measurement of video quality|
|US7028088||Jun 6, 2000||Apr 11, 2006||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||System and method for providing statistics for flexible billing in a cable environment|
|US7050090||Jan 30, 2002||May 23, 2006||Qwest Communications International Inc.||VDSL video/data set top test equipment|
|US7068304 *||Aug 23, 2001||Jun 27, 2006||Kddi Corporation||Apparatus for assessing quality of a picture in transmission, and apparatus for remote monitoring quality of a picture in transmission|
|US7110048 *||Mar 29, 2002||Sep 19, 2006||Weiss S Merrill||Digital signal transmitter synchronization system|
|US7161617 *||Apr 19, 2002||Jan 9, 2007||Leitch Technology International Inc.||Data monitoring system|
|US7236757||Feb 6, 2002||Jun 26, 2007||Vativ Technologies, Inc.||High-speed multi-channel communications transceiver with inter-channel interference filter|
|US7295623||Jul 11, 2001||Nov 13, 2007||Vativ Technologies, Inc.||High-speed communications transceiver|
|US7388904 *||Jun 3, 2003||Jun 17, 2008||Vativ Technologies, Inc.||Near-end, far-end and echo cancellers in a multi-channel transceiver system|
|US7403752||Dec 4, 2002||Jul 22, 2008||Vativ Technologies, Inc.||Multi-channel communications transceiver|
|US7568207||Jun 23, 2000||Jul 28, 2009||Braun Warren L||Cable drop monitor with upstream signalling|
|US7590168||Sep 26, 2001||Sep 15, 2009||Entropic Communications, Inc.||Low complexity high-speed communications transceiver|
|US7667780 *||Feb 16, 2006||Feb 23, 2010||Weiss S Merrill||Digital signal transmitter synchronization system|
|US7940842||Jun 6, 2008||May 10, 2011||That Corporation||Reciprocal index lookup for BTSC compatible coefficients|
|US8006668||Jun 29, 2007||Aug 30, 2011||Econtrols, Inc.||Electronic pressure regulator|
|US8014741||Mar 31, 2006||Sep 6, 2011||That Corporation||Signal quality estimation and control system|
|US8136506||Dec 23, 2010||Mar 20, 2012||Econtrols, Inc.||Electronic pressure regulator|
|US8176897||Dec 23, 2010||May 15, 2012||E-Controls, Inc.||Electronic pressure regulator|
|US8212941 *||Apr 30, 2008||Jul 3, 2012||Mediatek Inc.||Digitized analog TV signal processing system|
|US8286611||Dec 23, 2010||Oct 16, 2012||Econtrols, Inc.||Electronic pressure regulator|
|US8294772||Jan 29, 2009||Oct 23, 2012||Pelco, Inc.||System and method for monitoring connections within an analog video system|
|US8522265||Oct 19, 2007||Aug 27, 2013||Scott E. Hrastar||Modem apparatus for a cable data delivery system|
|US8595784 *||Jan 5, 2007||Nov 26, 2013||Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.||System for testing set-top boxes and content distribution networks and associated methods|
|US8983768||Jan 28, 2011||Mar 17, 2015||Enovation Controls, Llc||Event sensor|
|US9052717||Dec 10, 2010||Jun 9, 2015||Enovation Controls, Llc||Watercraft speed control device|
|US9068838||Jan 28, 2011||Jun 30, 2015||Enovation Controls, Llc||Event sensor|
|US9092033||Jan 28, 2011||Jul 28, 2015||Enovation Controls, Llc||Event sensor|
|US9098083||Jan 28, 2011||Aug 4, 2015||Enovation Controls, Llc||Event sensor|
|US9207675||Jul 29, 2011||Dec 8, 2015||Enovation Controls, Llc||Event sensor|
|US20010028411 *||Mar 23, 2001||Oct 11, 2001||Yoshizou Honda||Moving image reception quality determination apparatus|
|US20020126207 *||Jan 30, 2002||Sep 12, 2002||Qwest Communications International, Inc.||VDSL video/data set top test equipment|
|US20020140867 *||Mar 29, 2002||Oct 3, 2002||Weiss S. Merrill||Digital signal transmitter synchronization system|
|US20020163963 *||Apr 19, 2002||Nov 7, 2002||Leitch Technology International Inc.||Data monitoring system|
|US20030058955 *||Jul 11, 2001||Mar 27, 2003||Sreen Raghavan||High-speed communications transceiver|
|US20030081693 *||Sep 26, 2001||May 1, 2003||Raghavan Sreen A.||Low complexity high-speed communications transceiver|
|US20030086001 *||Apr 17, 2001||May 8, 2003||General Instrument Corporation||Methods and apparatus for the measurement of video quality|
|US20030087634 *||Feb 6, 2002||May 8, 2003||Raghavan Sreen A.||10165368High-speed multi-channel communications transceiver with inter-channel interference filter|
|US20030134607 *||Dec 4, 2002||Jul 17, 2003||Raghavan Sreeen A.||Multi-channel communications transceiver|
|US20030210352 *||May 9, 2002||Nov 13, 2003||Fitzsimmons John E.||Remote monitoring system|
|US20030212994 *||Jul 17, 2002||Nov 13, 2003||Radiant Communications Corporation||Remote monitoring system|
|US20030212998 *||Jun 5, 2003||Nov 13, 2003||Radiant Communications Corporation||Channel transmitter unit|
|US20040088733 *||Nov 4, 2002||May 6, 2004||Havens Daniel W.||Broadband network test system and method|
|US20040160622 *||Aug 23, 2001||Aug 19, 2004||Kddi Corporation||Apparatus for assessing quailty of a picture in transmission, and apparatus for remote monitoring quality of a picture in transmission|
|US20040247022 *||Jun 3, 2003||Dec 9, 2004||Raghavan Sreen A.||Near-end, far-end and echo cancellers in a multi-channel transceiver system|
|US20050114879 *||Nov 20, 2003||May 26, 2005||General Instrument Corporation||Monitoring signal quality on a cable network|
|US20050155679 *||Apr 9, 2003||Jul 21, 2005||Coastcast Corporation||CoCr alloys and methods for making same|
|US20050178818 *||Jul 2, 2003||Aug 18, 2005||Kiyokazu Kobayashi||Method of joining steel members, method of processing joined surface of steel member and reinforcing member|
|US20060046851 *||Aug 24, 2004||Mar 2, 2006||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Remote gaming and projection|
|US20060143677 *||Feb 16, 2006||Jun 29, 2006||Weiss S M||Digital signal transmitter synchronization system|
|US20060229751 *||Mar 31, 2006||Oct 12, 2006||Barnhill Matthew S||Signal quality estimation and control system|
|US20070047542 *||Aug 30, 2005||Mar 1, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Real-time audio-visual quality monitoring in a network|
|US20070058043 *||Aug 30, 2005||Mar 15, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Real-time IPTV channel health monitoring|
|US20080168520 *||Jan 5, 2007||Jul 10, 2008||Verozon Services Corp.||System for testing set-top boxes and content distribution networks and associated methods|
|US20080317114 *||Jun 6, 2008||Dec 25, 2008||Easley Matthew F||Reciprocal Index Lookup for BTSC Compatible Coefficients|
|US20090273714 *||Apr 30, 2008||Nov 5, 2009||Mediatek Inc.||Digitized analog tv signal processing system|
|US20100188513 *||Jan 29, 2009||Jul 29, 2010||Victor Joseph Duvanenko||System and method for monitoring connections within an analog video system|
|USRE44211||Oct 14, 2004||May 7, 2013||Scientific-Atlanta, Llc||Constant bit rate transport in a contention based medium access control|
|EP2062440A2 *||Aug 14, 2007||May 27, 2009||Verizon Laboratories Inc.||Measurement of video quality at customer premises|
|EP2589220A1 *||Jun 13, 2011||May 8, 2013||Delta Vidyo, Inc.||Video feedback loop|
|EP2589220A4 *||Jun 13, 2011||Jul 23, 2014||Vidyo Inc||Video feedback loop|
|WO2004100604A1 *||Apr 9, 2003||Nov 18, 2004||Arris International, Inc.||Reciprocal index lookup for btsc compatible coefficients|
|WO2006107852A2 *||Mar 31, 2006||Oct 12, 2006||That Corporation||Signal quality estimation and control system|
|WO2006107852A3 *||Mar 31, 2006||Oct 18, 2007||That Corp||Signal quality estimation and control system|
|U.S. Classification||348/180, 348/192, 348/189|
|International Classification||H04N21/24, H04H20/12, H04N21/442, H04N17/00|
|Cooperative Classification||H04N21/442, H04H20/12|
|Nov 22, 1995||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AUGAT PHOTON SYSTEMS INC., CANADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MAYCOCK, JOHN CHARLES;RITCHEY, CAREY TODD;SMITH, VINCENTMADDOCK;REEL/FRAME:007780/0007;SIGNING DATES FROM 19951120 TO 19951121
|Jul 23, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: THOMAS & BETTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., NEVADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AUGAT PHOTON SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:009334/0351
Effective date: 19980630
|Sep 2, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AUGAT COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC., TENNESSEE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THOMAS & BETTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010206/0988
Effective date: 19990901
|Sep 14, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: THOMAS & BETTS - PHOTON SYSTEMS INC., CANADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AUGAT COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010238/0132
Effective date: 19990911
|Dec 21, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC., GEORGIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THOMAS & BETTS-PHOTON SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010470/0858
Effective date: 19990914
|Feb 26, 2002||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 28, 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Feb 19, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Nov 19, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, LLC, GEORGIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:034299/0440
Effective date: 20081205
Owner name: CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, LLC;REEL/FRAME:034300/0001
Effective date: 20141118