|Publication number||US5828410 A|
|Application number||US 08/504,284|
|Publication date||Oct 27, 1998|
|Filing date||Jul 19, 1995|
|Priority date||Jul 19, 1995|
|Publication number||08504284, 504284, US 5828410 A, US 5828410A, US-A-5828410, US5828410 A, US5828410A|
|Inventors||Raoul E. Drapeau|
|Original Assignee||Drapeau; Raoul E.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (55), Classifications (10), Legal Events (12)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
U.S. Pat. No. 3,909,525 September/1975 Fagan 178/7.85
U.S. Pat. No. 4,695,135 September/1987 Den Exter Blokland et al 350/452
U.S. Pat. No. 4,734,779 March/1988 Levis et al 358/231
U.S. Pat. No. 4,866,530 September/1988 Kalua 358/237
U.S. Pat. No. 4,924,318 May/1990 Ho 358/250
U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,277 April/1992 Ogino et al 353/94
This invention relates to the field of video displays, and particularly to those display systems called "video walls", comprised of a number of individual video display units.
Because of the difficulty and expense of making a bright, large-area display for the presentation of still or moving images using a single video display unit, the concept of video wall systems was developed. A video wall consists of a plurality of individual video display units, usually standard television monitors, either of the direct-view or projection type, that are placed with their viewing screens adjacent to each other in a two-dimensional array.
In addition to the physical conjunction of such video display units, there can also be the inclusion of electronics that will divide up a single video image into as many sections as there are individual video display units in the video wall system, and then distribute those image sections to each video display unit of the wall, while maintaining their original respective positions. This technology is described in Levis et al (U.S. Pat. No. 4,734,779) and available commercially as multi-screen controllers from such firms as RGB Spectrum, Iden and Electrosonic. Thus, the viewer sees the effect of a much larger version of that single image than can be presented on a single video display unit, yet the composite display has a greater brightness and contrast than is usually possible from a single projection video display of the same size.
The difficulty with this approach of dividing a single image into sections for display on individual video display units is that the individual display screens do not meet perfectly at their outer edges. There is an unavoidable gap devoid of image between adjacent screens due to the supporting mechanical structure and bezel, the combination hereinafter referred to as the frame, as well as the inability of the picture in some video display units to extend to the very edges of the screen. This practical reality detracts from the intended effect of these combined video display systems. To maximize the effect of a single large screen, the video display units are usually chosen to have the minimum possible frame around the margin of each such video display unit.
It is possible to obscure this frame from the viewed image by using laterally-abutted plano-convex magnifying or projection lenses covering the display surface of each video display unit such as described in Kalua (U.S. Pat. No. 4,866,530), DenExter Blokland (U.S. Pat. No. 4,695,135) and Fagan (U.S. Pat. No. 3,909,525). Such lenses are adapted to magnify the image of each individual video display unit, so that the magnified image covers and hence masks the frame, thereby producing a unified image. However, arrays of such large lenses are bulky, heavy and costly, even when the lenses are made of plastic, or are of the relatively-thin Fresnel type.
In addition to these disadvantages, this approach of enlarging the entire picture produces the desired frame-elimination effect only when the observer is on or close to the imaginary plane that lies between each of two adjacent video display units and is perpendicular to their display surfaces; that is, for small viewing angles. This plane is hereinafter referred to as the separating plane. The angle subtended at the point where the separating plane meets the viewing surfaces of two adjacent video display units and measured between the separating plane and the viewer, is hereinafter referred to as the viewing angle. As the aforementioned viewing angle increases, the frame begins to become visible, thereby destroying the desired effect. Prior art has not addressed this problem effectively.
Until the current invention, there was no practical, cost-effective means available of obscuring the video display unit frames in a video wall system over a useful viewing angle.
The object of the current invention is to provide a unique and cost-effective means of obscuring the frame between adjacent video display units of a video wall system over an increased viewing angle, before the frame is again visible in the viewed image.
To this end, one implementation of this unique system consists of a uni-directional magnifying structure that has a magnifying axis and a non-magnifying, or longitudinal axis, hereinafter referred to as a cylindrical lens. This lens is placed over both the frame and a portion of the displayed image of each video display unit of the array, with the longitudinal, or non-magnifying axis of the lens oriented parallel to the video display unit frame. The aforementioned portion of the displayed image lies nearest to where the video display unit viewing surface meets each inside edge of the frame, and is hereinafter referred to as a marginal strip.
To offset the effect of only a portion of the displayed image being magnified by the aforementioned cylindrical lens, the video display unit electronics can be modified to spatially-compress the marginal strip of the image in the direction perpendicular to the long axis of the cylindrical lens, with said marginal strip further lying directly under the aforementioned cylindrical lens. The combination of said unidirectional compression of a marginal strip of the image, with the collinear unidirectional magnification of the same strip, produces an unmodified image that covers the frame and forms a unified image with the portion of the image not lying under the cylindrical lens.
To obscure the frame from the viewed image, it is not required to employ the aforementioned unidirectional image compression at the edge of the viewing surface; however in its absence, the image in the expanded area covering the frame may appear different from that in the remainder of the display.
In this arrangement using a cylindrical lens, with or without spatial compression, the frame will become visible even for very small viewing angles. To obscure the frame for a much greater viewing angle, the video display unit electronics can be further modified to produce a marginal strip of the image on a video display unit that is duplicated in the corresponding position on the adjacent video display unit, said duplicated portions also lying under their respective cylindrical lenses.
The aforementioned cylindrical lens, in combination with the compressed portion of the displayed image and the duplicated portion of the displayed image on adjacent video display units, produces a magnified image that, by proper selection of lens magnification and dimensions can give the effect of a single large display, whose frame is obscured from view over a much wider range of viewing angles than is possible in previous art.
A number of lens configurations will produce the desired effect, but one can be formed starting with an asymmetrical plano-convex cylindrical lens of sufficient length to cover one side of the frame of a video display unit of the video wall. The lens asymmetry results from the two longitudinal edges having different thicknesses. This asymmetrical nature of the lens can be achieved by molding the lens in the desired shape at the outset, or by separating a symmetrical cylindrical lens longitudinally into two identical segments, such as by scoring and breaking.
For the purposes of this invention, the best effect is produced when the flat, or piano, side of each such lens segment is placed next to the display screen surface, and its thin, or edge having greatest refraction, also hereinafter referred to as the second edge, is closest to the adjacent video display. The thicker, or least refracting edge is hereinafter referred to as the first edge.
One physical appearance of a lens structure fabricated from such cylindrical lens segments would be a mitred set of four such segments, mounted above each video display unit of the video wall, and covering both the video display unit's frame and the aforementioned marginal strip of the displayed image. The appearance of the lens structure would be similar to that of a picture frame, with the thinner edge of the lens structure lying along the outside of the lens structure.
Another configuration of greater cost, but simpler to mount to the video display unit structure, would be to construct the required lens structure from a single sheet of clear flat material of sufficient area to completely cover each video display unit of the array, including its frame, the outer portion of which sheet being molded or cut into the cylindrical magnifying shape described. Alternatively, and this is the technique described in the preferred embodiment, a clear, flat sheet of somewhat smaller area could be used, to the outside edges of which, cylindrical lens segments of the kind described were attached.
Because a cylindrical lens structure of the kind described made of solid glass or plastic will add an undesirable element of weight and thickness to the video wall structure, a Fresnel lens can be used instead. In that case, the lens consists of very small lens segments molded or cut into clear plastic. The overall thickness of such a lens is nearly uniform across its surface, and its weight can be considerably less than that of a solid lens. The reduced thickness also conveys a benefit in reduced distortion of the perceived image at the thick edge of a solid lens.
A further implementation would employ a series of laterally-abutted uniform spherical magnifying lenses, each of sufficient size to cover the entire screen of each of the video display units of the array, including the frame, such lenses used in conjunction with the aforementioned duplication of a marginal strip of the image.
However constructed, cylindrical lens assemblies are then attached to the frame of each video display unit, and suitably raised above the video display unit screen to provide the needed magnification. Although not part of the current invention, those skilled in the art can appreciate that the aforementioned lens structures can be held in place by partition plates attached to the outer edges of the video display unit frame, since that portion of the overall structure is, by the very purpose of the invention, not visible; such plates used in combination with small clips that grip and hold the lens structure in place to those plates, or the like.
Although the required electronics modifications are not claimed in this invention, persons skilled in the art will know that the unidirectional, spatially-compressed marginal strip and their duplication on adjacent video display units can be produced in several ways.
One means to accomplish such unidirectional spatial compression of a marginal strip of the displayed image is to suitably modify the digital image processing circuits that are commonly used to separate a single video image into sections that are then allocated to each video display unit of the array. This modification could include using a pixel replication algorithm that produces a different spatial density for pixels near either end of both horizontal and vertical scans than in the center of the image.
An alternative means to achieve such unidirectional spatial compression of a marginal strip of the displayed image is to modify the scan rate in both the beginning and ending portions of both the horizontal and vertical analog deflection electronics.
By adaptation of the video memory circuits, the same digital image processing systems can be further modified to produce a duplication of a marginal strip of a video display unit with that of the adjacent video display unit.
An embodiment of the invention is described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a front view of a typical video wall display system displaying a single image, portions of which are distributed to each of a plurality of video display units.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of the viewing surface of two adjacent video display units, each of which is covered by a spherical lens.
FIG. 3 is a top view of the same lens and video display unit arrangement of FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 depicts the viewing surfaces of FIG. 3, with a duplicated marginal strip on two adjacent video display units.
FIG. 5 depicts the viewing surfaces of FIG. 4, showing the effect of an off-axis viewing position.
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of the viewing surfaces of two adjacent video display units, each of which is covered by a cylindrical lens structure.
FIG. 7 is a top view of the same lens and video display unit arrangement of FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 depicts the viewing surfaces of FIG. 7, with a duplicated marginal strip on two adjacent video display units.
FIG. 9 depicts the viewing surfaces of FIG. 8, showing the effect of an off-axis viewing position.
FIG. 10 depicts the viewing surfaces of FIG. 8, with the outermost portion of both displayed images spatially compressed.
It will be recognized that some or all of the preceding Figures do not necessarily show all the elements required to construct the depicted preferred embodiment, or accurately reflect their relative sizes or positions.
FIG. 1 is a frontal view of a video wall system consisting of four separate video display units, 1-4, organized into two rows of two video display units each. Each such video display has a bezel or frame 5 around all four of its sides, as indicated for video display unit 1. In addition, there is a joint 6, between adjacent video display units, from which the aforementioned imaginary separating plane emerges. Each video display unit can carry a complete, individual image, or display a segment of a single image, 7.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of the viewing screen near the frame 20 and 20a of two adjacent video display units of an array of such video display units such as shown in FIG. 1. In the descriptions and Figures to follow, the video display units referred to may be of either the direct-view CRT type, or of the projection type, and still satisfy the purposes of the current invention. The entire frontal area of each such video display unit screen, including its frame, is covered by a plano-convex, spherical-surfaced magnifying lens, hereinafter referred to as a spherical lens, a portion of which is shown as 23 and 23a, said lenses producing equal magnification in both height and width of the underlying image.
The portion of the lenses closest to their respective video display unit frames are indicated as 23 and 23a, the faceplate of the video display units as 31 and 31a, and the actual effective viewing surface, the outer edges of which are shown, as 32 and 32a. The gap between mechanical supporting structure and frame 20 and 20a for the video display units, also can provide a means for the mounting of the lenses 23 and 23a by means of a suitable thin plate 35 with integral supporting shelf and retention clip, 34. As described in Ho (U.S. Pat. No. 4,924,318) and Kalua (U.S. Pat. No. 4,866,530), this vertical portion of said plate can be opaque to prevent interference between adjacent video display units. Further, the clip, or retention portion 34, directly above and below the outermost edges of the lenses can be transparent to avoid blocking the image.
FIG. 3 is a top view of the same lens and video display unit arrangement of FIG. 2. The effect of this arrangement is to produce a perceived image in which the frames 20 and 20a are obscured when viewed on the imaginary separating plane between two adjacent video display units. Any observer positioned to either side of said separating plane will begin to observe through the lens, portions of the frames 20 or 20a. It is this deleterious effect that the additional modifications that are the subject of this invention, address.
For comparison, in this and the following drawings, the displayed image on each video display unit will be assumed to be two lines of text. One line of text on each video display screen will be shown as unaffected by the lens structure, and the second as subject to the effect of the lens. Thus, lines 21 and 22 are as they appear on their respective video display screens, and 24 and 25 are as they appear to the viewer through the respective lens structures 23 and 23a. Notice that both height and width of the characters have been equally magnified by the spherical lens.
FIG. 4 is a top view of the same spherical lens, lens support and video display units shown in FIG. 3, where in addition, the outermost portion of the image 69 and 69a of both displayed lines 21 and 22 has been duplicated on each adjacent video display unit. Further, the lens and support structures have been repositioned to produce a somewhat greater magnification so that half the width of the duplicated portion 69 and 69a is visible on one side of the line separating the two adjacent video display units, and half on the other side, resulting in magnified line fragments 24 and 25. As in FIG. 3, the frames 20 and 20a are obscured in the viewed image.
FIG. 5 is a top view of the same lens and video display unit arrangement of FIG. 4, showing the effect of a shift of the lens structure to the right of the imaginary separating plane between the two adjacent video display units, or equivalently, an unshifted lens structure, but with an off-axis viewing position to the left of the separating plane. This shift in structure or viewing position is shown with the farthest point of the duplicated portion of image visible, resulting in magnified line fragments 27 and 28, and thereby affording a noticeably increased viewing angle before the image of the frame becomes visible. This same viewing angle and effect can be achieved by shifting the observer's point of view in the opposite direction.
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of the viewing surface near the frames of the same two video display units of FIG. 3, wherein a marginal strip of the viewing surface of each of such video display unit is covered by a segment of a plano-convex cylindrical magnifying lens 68 and 68a, whose longitudinal, or non-magnifying axis is parallel to the viewing surface, and whose edge of greatest refraction is closest to its respective video display unit's frame. For reasons of support, the cylindrical lens segment is here shown adjoined to a clear, flat supporting sheet 53 and 53a along the surface 44 and 44a.
The video display unit elements 31, 31a, 32, 32a, 20 and 20a, and lens support elements 34 and 35 are all as described in FIG. 2. It will be apparent that the position of the lens structure above the video display screen, or the magnification of the lens used in FIG. 6 may be different from that used in FIG. 2, since in FIG. 2, the entire width of the video display screen is magnified to produce the effect of covering the frames 20 and 20a, whereas in FIG. 6, a smaller portion of the displayed lines of text must be magnified a larger amount to cover the same frame.
FIG. 7 is a top view of the same lens and video display unit arrangement of FIG. 6. The cylindrical magnifying lenses are again indicated as 68 and 68a, the flat supporting sheets as 53 and 53a, and the surfaces joining said lenses to said support sheets as 44 and 44a. In this configuration however, the marginal strip under the cylindrical lenses 68 and 68a, is magnified only in the direction orthogonal to the lens' longitudinal axis, such that the resulting magnified image covers the frame.
FIG. 8 is a top view of the same cylindrical lens, lens support and video display unit arrangement of FIG. 7, where in addition, a marginal strip of the image 69 and 69a of the displayed lines 21 and 22 has been duplicated on the adjacent video display unit. Further, the lens and support structures have been repositioned to afford a somewhat greater magnification so that half the width of the duplicated portion 69 and 69a is visible on one side of the imaginary separating plane, and half on the other side, resulting in magnified line fragments 65 and 66 adjacent to unmagnified fragments 67 and 68.
FIG. 9 is a top view of the same lens and video display unit arrangement of FIG. 8, showing the effect of a shift of the lens structure to the right of the imaginary separating plane, or equivalently, an unshifted lens structure, but with an off-axis viewing position to the left of the separating plane. An observer can then move in the direction shown until the farthest point of the duplicated marginal strip is reached, resulting in magnified line fragments 75 and 76 adjacent to unmagnified segments 77 and 78, and thereby affording a noticeably increased viewing angle before the image of the frame becomes visible. This same viewing angle and effect can be attained by shifting the observer's point of view in the other direction.
FIG. 10 is a top view of the same lens and video display unit arrangement of FIG. 8, wherein a marginal strip 73 and 74 of both displayed images lying under the cylindrical lenses 88 and 88a and adjoined to clear flat sheet 83 and 83a, is spatially compressed in the direction orthogonal to the lens' longitudinal axis, and contains marginal strips 69 and 69a. The effect of this arrangement in combination with the magnification afforded by the overlying cylindrical lenses, is to restore the relative size of the magnified image, so that the frames 20 and 20a are obscured from the viewed image, the resulting image is uniform across the field of view, and the allowed viewing angle before the frame becomes visible is increased. The specific magnification of the cylindrical lenses 88 and 88a that are adjoined to the clear, flat support structures 83 and 83a at the surfaces 44 and 44a, will be different from that used in FIG. 8, since the required magnification may be somewhat greater to achieve the desired visual effect. The cross-section view for the configuration of FIG. 10 has the same general appearance as that of FIG. 6 and is not shown here.
It will also be clear that the smaller the frame 20 and 20a are relative to the spatially-compressed portion of the screen or to the duplicated portion, the greater the viewing angle that the observer can be removed from the separating plane and still have the frame obscured.
Other variants and combinations of the described optical, mounting and electronic video display system elements are possible, especially in the amount of magnification required, the magnitude and extent of the displayed object spatial compression, the amount of image repetition used, the lens parameters employed, the means by which the lens segments are fabricated and mounted, and the type of video display unit employed; direct-view or projection, all without departing from the scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3909525 *||Dec 10, 1973||Sep 30, 1975||Rockwell International Corp||Display system optics|
|US4631584 *||Feb 3, 1984||Dec 23, 1986||Rca Corporation||Transmission of reduced resolution picture edge information using horizontal blanking period|
|US4695135 *||Oct 11, 1985||Sep 22, 1987||U.S. Philips Corp.||Information display panel|
|US4734779 *||Jun 8, 1987||Mar 29, 1988||Video Matrix Corporation||Video projection system|
|US4866530 *||Feb 22, 1988||Sep 12, 1989||Kalua Kevin A||Multiple screen, modular video display projection system|
|US4924318 *||Jun 15, 1989||May 8, 1990||Ho Ji S||Lattice elimination assembly for a television wall|
|US5011277 *||May 9, 1990||Apr 30, 1991||Hitachi, Ltd.||Multi-screen projector|
|US5067021 *||Jul 21, 1988||Nov 19, 1991||Brody Thomas P||Modular flat-screen television displays and modules and circuit drives therefor|
|US5299017 *||Nov 15, 1991||Mar 29, 1994||Pioneer Electronic Corporation||Screen fixing device of projection type television system|
|US5300942 *||Feb 21, 1991||Apr 5, 1994||Projectavision Incorporated||High efficiency light valve projection system with decreased perception of spaces between pixels and/or hines|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6243059 *||May 14, 1996||Jun 5, 2001||Rainbow Displays Inc.||Color correction methods for electronic displays|
|US6254481||Sep 10, 1999||Jul 3, 2001||Wms Gaming Inc.||Gaming machine with unified image on multiple video displays|
|US6483482 *||May 26, 2000||Nov 19, 2002||Samsung Sdi Co., Ltd.||Multi-display device|
|US6483537||May 21, 1998||Nov 19, 2002||Metavision Corporation||Apparatus and method for analyzing projected images, singly and for array projection applications|
|US6529331||Apr 20, 2001||Mar 4, 2003||Johns Hopkins University||Head mounted display with full field of view and high resolution|
|US6569018||Jun 8, 2001||May 27, 2003||Wms Gaming Inc.||Gaming machine with unified image on multiple video displays|
|US6663244 *||Dec 14, 2001||Dec 16, 2003||Infocus Corporation||Illumination field blending for use in subtitle projection systems|
|US6690337 *||Jun 8, 2000||Feb 10, 2004||Panoram Technologies, Inc.||Multi-panel video display|
|US6760075||Jun 6, 2001||Jul 6, 2004||Panoram Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for seamless integration of multiple video projectors|
|US6814578||Apr 11, 2002||Nov 9, 2004||The Boeing Company||Visual display system and method for displaying images utilizing a holographic collimator|
|US6883917||Dec 11, 2003||Apr 26, 2005||Infocus Corporation||Illumination field blending for use in subtitle projection systems|
|US6927908 *||Nov 7, 2001||Aug 9, 2005||Seamless Display Limited||Visual display screen arrangement|
|US7008324 *||Sep 17, 1999||Mar 7, 2006||Paltronics, Inc.||Gaming device video display system|
|US7092247 *||Jul 16, 2004||Aug 15, 2006||Semmie Kim||Method of designing a size-adjustable multi-mode display unit for portable electronic devices|
|US7227510||Jun 12, 2001||Jun 5, 2007||Panoram Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for seamless integration of images using a transmissive/reflective mirror|
|US7347560||Apr 21, 2005||Mar 25, 2008||Straight Signals Llc||Method and/or apparatus for projecting an image|
|US7352415||Mar 18, 2005||Apr 1, 2008||Geronimi Heather A||Electronic image display systems|
|US7414594 *||Jun 13, 2006||Aug 19, 2008||Si Han Kim||Multi display device|
|US7525511 *||Jul 2, 2004||Apr 28, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for determining display differences between monitors on multi-monitor computer systems|
|US7551372||Oct 18, 2007||Jun 23, 2009||Motorola, Inc.||Image expanding lenses, display devices and electronic devices|
|US7701517||Mar 31, 2008||Apr 20, 2010||Dual Image Systems, Llc||Electronic image display systems|
|US7802888||Jan 24, 2008||Sep 28, 2010||Wichner Brian D||Illumination field blending for use in subtitle projection systems|
|US8023194 *||Dec 3, 2009||Sep 20, 2011||Lg Electronics Inc.||Display apparatus|
|US8045068||Oct 7, 2009||Oct 25, 2011||Lg Electronics Inc.||Display apparatus with gradation pattern near display boundary|
|US8045272||Dec 3, 2009||Oct 25, 2011||Lg Electronics Inc.||Display apparatus|
|US8054554||Dec 3, 2009||Nov 8, 2011||Lg Electronics Inc.||Display apparatus|
|US8284330||Oct 7, 2009||Oct 9, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Display apparatus having light-shielding layer and variable light-transmittance pattern|
|US8284487||Nov 29, 2011||Oct 9, 2012||3M Innovative Properties Company||Large format tiled projection display screen with flexible surface film|
|US8289687 *||Dec 11, 2006||Oct 16, 2012||Marc Chase Weinstein||Multi-panel sliding cover for a device|
|US8368729 *||Nov 17, 2008||Feb 5, 2013||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Display device|
|US8482691||Dec 3, 2009||Jul 9, 2013||Lg Electronics Inc.||Display apparatus having a minimized non-display region|
|US8508431 *||Jul 9, 2008||Aug 13, 2013||Lg Display Co., Ltd.||Expandable multi-module display apparatus|
|US8593578||Feb 22, 2010||Nov 26, 2013||Heather A. Geronimi||Electronic image display systems|
|US8634042 *||Nov 4, 2009||Jan 21, 2014||Tovis Co., Ltd.||Liquid crystal display with a plurality of liquid crystal display modules|
|US8644757 *||Dec 4, 2008||Feb 4, 2014||Nokia Corporation||Method and system for creation and control of virtual rendering devices|
|US8807768||Oct 7, 2009||Aug 19, 2014||Lg Electronics Inc.||Display apparatus|
|US9103524 *||Oct 31, 2013||Aug 11, 2015||Corning Incorporated||Immersive display with minimized image artifacts|
|US20020008675 *||Jun 12, 2001||Jan 24, 2002||Theodore Mayer||Method and apparatus for seamless integration of images using a transmissive/reflective mirror|
|US20020151360 *||Jun 21, 2002||Oct 17, 2002||Durham Timothy J.||Gaming machine having a controller for controlling multiple displays|
|US20040119953 *||Dec 11, 2003||Jun 24, 2004||Wichner Brian D.||Illumination field blending for use in subtitle projection systems|
|US20050185154 *||Apr 21, 2005||Aug 25, 2005||Wichner Brian D.||Illumination field blending|
|US20060001593 *||Jul 2, 2004||Jan 5, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for determining display differences between monitors on multi-monitor computer systems|
|US20060009286 *||Sep 9, 2005||Jan 12, 2006||Wms Gaming Inc.||Gaming machine having a controller for conrolling multiple displays|
|US20060012951 *||Jul 16, 2004||Jan 19, 2006||Semmie Kim||Method of designing a size-adjustable multi-mode display unit for portable electronic devices|
|US20060077544 *||Oct 14, 2003||Apr 13, 2006||Seamless Display Limited||Visual display screen arrangement|
|US20090015513 *||Jul 9, 2008||Jan 15, 2009||Lg Display Co., Ltd.||Expandable multi-module display apparatus|
|US20090168116 *||Dec 26, 2007||Jul 2, 2009||Chengwu Cui||Method and System For Calibrating A Scanner Having A Scan Bar Including Sensor Elements|
|US20100144283 *||Dec 4, 2008||Jun 10, 2010||Nokia Corporation||Method and System for Creation and Control of Virtual Rendering Devices|
|US20100259566 *||Nov 17, 2008||Oct 14, 2010||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Display device|
|US20110112913 *||Nov 12, 2009||May 12, 2011||Ian Murray||System and method for live music performance digital recording, distribution, and digital advertising|
|US20110221995 *||Nov 4, 2009||Sep 15, 2011||Tovis Co., Ltd.||Liquid crystal display with a plurality of liquid crystal display modules|
|DE10060743A1 *||Dec 7, 2000||Jun 13, 2002||Deutsche Telekom Ag||Image screen e.g. for telecommunications and information technology equipment, uses lens for each image screen unit formed from display zone and edge zone|
|DE10133158A1 *||Jul 7, 2001||Jan 16, 2003||Deutsche Telekom Ag||Line display has cylindrical lenses over elements and repeated information at edges|
|WO2000076210A1 *||Jun 9, 2000||Dec 14, 2000||Panoram Technologies Inc||Multi-panel video display|
|WO2001097514A1 *||Jun 12, 2001||Dec 20, 2001||Panoram Technologies Inc||Method and apparatus for seamless integration of images using a transmissive/reflective mirror|
|U.S. Classification||348/383, 359/450, 348/839, 348/E09.012, 348/359, 348/36, 348/840|
|May 14, 2002||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Oct 28, 2002||REIN||Reinstatement after maintenance fee payment confirmed|
|Dec 24, 2002||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20021027
|Oct 26, 2004||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Oct 26, 2004||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Dec 20, 2004||AS||Assignment|
|Dec 27, 2004||PRDP||Patent reinstated due to the acceptance of a late maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20041229
|Dec 29, 2004||AS||Assignment|
|Apr 10, 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|May 31, 2010||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Oct 27, 2010||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Dec 14, 2010||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20101027