Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS5907420 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 08/713,568
Publication dateMay 25, 1999
Filing dateSep 13, 1996
Priority dateSep 13, 1996
Fee statusPaid
Also published asCA2215115A1, CA2215115C, DE69732203D1, EP0829981A2, EP0829981A3, EP0829981B1
Publication number08713568, 713568, US 5907420 A, US 5907420A, US-A-5907420, US5907420 A, US5907420A
InventorsAndrew R. Chraplyvy, John C. Ellson, George W. Newsome, Robert William Tkach, John Lehrer Zyskind
Original AssigneeLucent Technologies, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System and method for mitigating cross-saturation in optically amplified networks
US 5907420 A
Abstract
A system and method of protecting all the amplifiers in a link between wavelength routing network elements of an optical network. According to the invention, an optical control channel is added before a plurality of optical amplifier, preferably the first amplifier, in a link. To prevent improper loading of downstream links, the control channel is stripped off at the next wavelength routing network element. The power of the control channel is automatically adjusted using a fast feedback circuit to hold substantially constant the total power of the signal channels and the control channel at the input of the first amplifier following the feedback loop. In this manner, channel loading of all optical amplifiers in the link is maintained substantially constant, and the incidence of error bursts, as might otherwise result when one or more channels are added or dropped due to a network fault or reconfiguration, is substantially reduced.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(25)
What is claimed is:
1. A method of operating an optical communication network including at least one optical communication path having at least one input terminal and at least one output terminal and a plurality of optical amplifiers along the at least one optical communication path, comprising:
transmitting multiplexed optical signal channels along a communication path of the network;
introducing an optical compensating channel into the at least one communication path, said optical compensating channel being at a wavelength in the gain band of the optical amplifiers;
adjusting the power level of the optical compensating channel using an optical amplifier of the plurality of optical amplifiers in response to a change in the power of at least one of the signal channels; and
removing the optical compensating channel at a next optical amplifier along the communication path to prevent improper loading downstream of the adjusting optical amplifier.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the optical compensating channel passes through at least one optical amplifier in the communication path.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein at least some of the optical amplifiers are rare-earth doped optical fiber amplifiers.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein said adjusting step is performed within 100 μsec of a change in signal channel power.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein said adjusting step includes monitoring the total signal power level in all of the optical signal channels.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein wavelength division multiplexed signals are transmitted during said transmitting step.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein time-division multiplexed signals are transmitted during said transmitting step.
8. The method of claim 1, further including a step of selectively routing at least one of the optical signal channels from a first channel routing element to a second channel routing element to thereby establish the communication path between an input terminal and an output terminal of the optical communication network.
9. The method of claim 8, further including a step of selectively routing at least one of the optical signal channels from said second channel routing element to a third channel routing element.
10. The method of claim 1, further including a step of selectively routing, using at least one channel routing element, at least one of the optical signal channels to thereby establish the communication path between an input terminal and an output terminal of the optical communication network.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the channel routing element is selected from the group consisting of fixed or reconfigurable wavelength-selective crossconnects, fixed or reconfigurable wavelength-add/drop multiplexers, fixed or reconfigurable wavelength routers, and fixed or reconfigurable wavelength-interchanging crossconnects.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the adjusting step is performed when one or more optical signal channels are added or dropped as a result of network reconfigurations or faults.
13. An optical communication network including at least one optical communication path having at least one input terminal and at least one output terminal and a plurality of optical amplifiers along the at least one optical communication path, comprising:
means for transmitting multiplexed optical signal channels along a communication path of the network;
means for introducing an optical compensating channel into the at least one communication path, said optical compensating channel being at a wavelength in the gain band of the optical amplifiers;
means for adjusting the power level of the optical compensating channel using an optical amplifier of the plurality of optical amplifiers in response to a change in the power of at least one of the signal channels; and
means for removing the optical compensating channel at a next optical amplifier along the communication path to prevent improper loading downstream of the adjusting optical amplifier.
14. The network of claim 13, wherein the optical compensating channel passes through at least one optical amplifier in the communication path.
15. The network of claim 13, wherein at least some of the optical amplifiers are rare-earth doped optical fiber amplifiers.
16. The network of claim 13, wherein said means for adjusting is operable to adjust the power level of the optical control channel within 100 μsec of a change in signal channel power.
17. The network of claim 13, wherein said means for adjusting is operable to monitor the total signal power level in all of the optical signal channels.
18. The network of claim 13, wherein said means for transmitting is operable to direct wavelength division multiplexed signals over the optical communication path.
19. The network of claim 13, wherein said means for transmitting is operable to direct time-division multiplexed signals over the optical communication path.
20. The network of claim 13, further including a first channel routing element and a second channel routing element, said first channel routing element being operable to route at least one of the optical signal channels to a second channel routing element to thereby establish the communication path between an input terminal and an output terminal of the optical communication network.
21. The network of claim 20, wherein the second channel routing element is operable to selectively route at least one of the optical signal channels to a third channel routing element.
22. The network of claim 13, further including at least one channel routing element for routing at least one of the optical signal channels to thereby establish the communication path between an input terminal and an output terminal of the optical communication network.
23. The network of claim 22, wherein the channel routing element is selected from the group consisting of fixed or reconfigurable wavelength-selective crossconnects, fixed or reconfigurable wavelength-add/drop multiplexers, fixed or reconfigurable wavelength routers, and fixed or reconfigurable wavelength-interchanging crossconnects.
24. An apparatus for controlling a plurality of optical amplifiers disposed along an optical communication path, comprising:
means for transmitting multiplexed optical signal channels along a communication path of the network;
means for introducing an optical compensating channel into the at least one communication path, said optical compensating channel being at a wavelength in the gain band of the optical amplifiers; and
means for adjusting the power level of the optical compensating channel using an optical amplifier of the plurality of optical amplifiers in response to a change in the power of at least one of the signal channels; and
removing the optical compensating channel at a next optical amplifier along the communication path to prevent improper loading downstream of the adjusting optical amplifier.
25. The apparatus of claim 24, further including a channel routing element selected from the group consisting of fixed or reconfigurable wavelength-selective crossconnects, fixed or reconfigurable wavelength-add/drop multiplexers, fixed or reconfigurable wavelength routers, and fixed or reconfigurable wavelength-interchanging crossconnects.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to optical fiber communication networks and, more particularly, to systems and methods for dynamically controlling gain in accordance with the collective behavior of the amplifier chains employed in the links of such networks.

2. Description of the Background Art

A dramatic increase in the information capacity of an optical fiber can be achieved by the simultaneous transmission of optical signals over the same fiber from many different light sources having properly spaced peak emission wavelengths. By operating each light source at a different peak wavelength, the integrity of the independent messages from each source is maintained for subsequent conversion to electric signals at the receiving end. This is the basis of wavelength division multiplexing (WDM).

Wavelength switched optical networks potentially offer high capacity networking at lower cost than current electronically switched networks. The optical amplifiers in the nodes and repeaters of such networks will each be traversed by multiple signal channels following diverse routes. In optical amplifiers such as rare-earth doped fiber amplifiers (e.g., erbium doped fiber amplifiers--EDFA's), amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) is the major source of noise. ASE originates from the spontaneous emission of incoherent light over the broad gain bandwidth of the amplifier and constitutes the random noise contribution of the amplifier. If the signal powers in the transmission fibers are too high, optical nonlinearities such as Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS) can also occur and further degrade the signals by introducing noise. In the wavelength domain, gain saturation induced by a data channel operating at λ1 produces a level change in another data channel at wavelength λ2.

In optically amplified systems, the above-described noise sources present two limitations on the amplifier operating range. At low input signal levels the amplifier random noise contribution, ASE, causes bit errors (signal-spontaneous beat noise) while at large input signal levels, nonlinearities in the transmission fiber add noise and can also degrade performance. As such, fluctuations in the transmitted data stream--as may occur, for example, when one or more wavelength channels are added or dropped--can have a substantial effect on the reliability and quality of service in a multiwavelength network. Illustratively, the number of channels traversing an EDFA may change suddenly as a result of a network reconfiguration or a fault that interrupts some of the channels. Cross saturation in the affected optical amplifiers of a network will induce power transients in the surviving channels, the speed of which is proportional to the number of amplifiers in the network; for large networks, surviving channel power transients can be large and extremely fast. If their power levels exceed thresholds for optical nonlinearities or become too low to preserve adequate eye opening, the surviving channels traversing the optical amplifier will suffer error bursts.

The gain medium in a rare-earth doped optical fiber amplifier such, for example, as an EDFA has a comparatively long excited state lifetime or relaxation time, and for this reason is generally regarded as allowing for a larger saturation energy and, hence, as exhibiting virtually no saturation in response to high speed data pulses (1 ns). In fact, it has been reported that transient effects of gain saturation and recovery in an individual amplifier typically occur on a 100 μsec-1 msec time scale. Desurvire et al., Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers, p. 412 (1994)!. The inventors herein, have, however, observed gain dynamics in a chain of EDFA's almost two orders of magnitude faster than this and, for large scale wavelength routed networks, gain dynamics three orders of magnitude may be predicted. These fast transients in chains of amplifiers may ultimately constrain the design or extent of multiwavelength optical networks. Accordingly, there is recognized a need for a technique by which the amplifiers employed in optical networks can be reliably controlled despite power level fluctuations in the respective wavelength channels or, in the case of time division multiplexed networks, individual time slots.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The aforementioned need is addressed, and an advance is made in the art, by a system and method of protecting, on a link-by-link basis, the surviving channels in a link between wavelength routing network elements (NE's). According to the invention, an optical control channel is added before a plurality of optical amplifiers in a link. To prevent improper loading of downstream links, the control channel is stripped off at the next wavelength routing network element. The power of the control channel is automatically adjusted using a fast feedback circuit to hold substantially constant the total power of the signal channels and the control channel at the input of the first amplifier. In this manner, channel loading of all optical amplifiers in the link is maintained substantially constant, and the incidence of error bursts, as might otherwise result when one or more channels are added or dropped due to a network fault or reconfiguration, is substantially reduced.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description of several preferred exemplary embodiments, which should be read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting a portion of an illustrative optical network employing chains of optical amplifiers and link control in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an investigative apparatus utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of link control in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the wavelength channel spectrum obtained at the link control power tap in the investigative apparatus of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a graphical representation comparing the bit error rates obtained with and without link control in accordance with the present invention while six or seven multiple wavelength channels were transmitted over the 560 km transmission span employed in the investigative apparatus of FIG. 2; and

FIG. 5 is a graphical representation comparing the power excursions observed in a surviving wavelength channel, with and without the control channel operating to maintain constant power over the test transmission span.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

An illustrative, large-scale optical communications network 10 is shown in FIG. 1. Initially, it should be noted that although a wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) network is shown and described in detail, such description is by way of illustrative example only. It should, in fact, be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art from the discussion which follows that the teachings of the present invention are equally applicable to other multiplexed optical networks such, for example, as time division multiplexed (TDM) networks.

In any event, and as seen in FIG. 1, wavelength division multiplexed data is transmitted on multiple wavelengths or channels between a plurality of network routing elements--illustratively, cross-connect switches (XC)--that are distributed throughout the network 10 and interconnected by optical fiber links. Although an optical communications network such as network 10 may, in fact, include hundreds of such network routing elements, only three such switches--indicated generally at 12a, 12b, and 12c--are shown for purposes of clarity and ease of illustration.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, it will be observed that the optical fiber links between a pair of network elements, as for example, link 14 that interconnects cross-connect switches 12a and 12c, typically includes many optical amplifiers--these being indicated generally at 16a through 16n. The type and spacing of the optical amplifiers employed along the link will, of course, depend upon the wavelength band to be utilized for transmission. A typical wavelength band of interest in telecommunications applications, for example, is centered at 1550 nm. The gain profile of a rare-earth doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) is generally regarded as being best suited for this wavelength, with a typical inter-amplifier spacing of 40 km being considered suitable for an optical fiber link such as link 14.

Essentially, the present invention is based on the recognition by the inventors herein that the gain dynamics in a chain of optical amplifiers such, for example, as the erbium doped fiber amplifiers (EDFA's) deployed in link 14 of network 10, may be up to several orders of magnitude faster than those reported for a single amplifier. According to the present invention, a technique for maintaining constant input power to all of the amplifiers in a link is utilized to ensure continued reliable service, in the surviving channels being transmitted along the link, when one or more wavelength channels are suddenly dropped or added, as may be experienced when a system reconfiguration or fault occurs.

In the illustrative embodiment of the invention depicted in FIG. 1, link control according to the present invention is implemented by a feedback arrangement that includes a power tap 18, a photodetector 20, a control circuit 22 that responds to fluctuations in the transmitted power level detected by the photodetector 20 by adjusting an output error signal which, in turn, controls the output power level of optical source 24--illustratively a semiconductor laser--which outputs a control signal at a wavelength λc that is within the gain band of the optical amplifier. The thus generated control channel λc is then introduced back into the link as, for example, by a wavelength selective coupler 26. As will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, by controlling the power level of the control channel, it is possible to maintain the power level of the optical signal supplied to some or all of the optical amplifiers in a given link (depending, of course, upon where the control channel is introduced). In the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 1, the feedback control circuit is implemented before the first amplifier (amplifier 16a) so that the optical power input to all of the optical amplifiers is maintained at a substantially constant level.

Preferably, the control channel is stripped off at the next wavelength routing NE to prevent improper loading of downstream links. This is easily achieved either by addition of another filter or as a byproduct of the filtering action of the demultiplexers commonly located in NEs. Advantageously, the amplifiers between wavelength routing NE's require no special control circuitry or modification since control is handled on a link-by-link basis.

An experimental setup for the demonstration of link control surviving channel power protection is illustrated in FIG. 2. The outputs of seven tunable lasers tuned to MONET channel wavelengths as shown were combined, five through a fused fiber coupler and the other two through a second coupler, and each group was amplified. The output of the five lasers was passed through an acousto-optic modulator to simulate the loss and addition of these channels and then combined with the other pair in a 22 coupler. The channels were then modulated at 2.5 Gb/s.

The link control channel (λc =1554 nm) was then added before the first amplifier in the link using a circulator and Bragg grating. A spectrum showing the signal channels and control channel when all channels are present is shown in FIG. 3. In an actual system, the grating Bragg wavelength should be chosen close to, but outside of, the band of signal channels so as to permit use of the full complement of signal channels. A portion of the total power of the signal channels and the control channels was tapped off and detected. A fast feedback circuit was used to adjust the line control channel's power to maintain the total power constant. The signal channels and control channel were then transmitted through seven amplified spans of standard single mode fiber with a total length of 570 km and passed through a bandpass filter to select channel 7, the bit error rate of which was monitored.

Measurements were carried out in which all seven signal channels were transmitted and in which channels 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 8 were transmitted. When channels 1, 2, 3, 5 and 8 were modulated on and off with a frequency of 1 KHz (FIG. 4) surviving channel 7 suffers a penalty exceeding 2 dB for seven channel transmission (two surviving channels) and 3 dB for six channel transmission (one surviving channel) due to the induced cross saturation. Finally, measurements were carried out with the control channel operating to maintain constant power through the link. The results of these measurements are shown in FIG. 5. Without control, channel 7 suffers large power excursions which degrade the BER performance due to optical nonlinearities in the transmission fiber. With fast link control according to the present invention in operation, on the other hand, the power excursions are mitigated. The feedback circuit utilized in the investigational apparatus of FIG. 2 limits the power increase after 4 μs; a faster circuit would limit the power excursions even more effectively. Even with the present control circuit, Channel 7 is successfully protected (see FIG. 4); penalties are reduced to a few tenths of a dB and the error floors disappear.

As will be readily ascertained by those skilled in the art, the link control technique of the present invention is fast; changes in channel loading result in prompt changes in a link's total power--permitting much faster detection and response than schemes which rely on detecting the much slower changes in channel output power, gain or ASE in individual EDFA's (which are much slower than the transients in EDFA networks). Performing corrections on a per link basis rather than a per amplifier basis simplifies the required hardware, does not increase the complexity of the network's EDFA's and is well suited to the architecture of wavelength routed networks.

An additional benefit of link control according to the present invention is the cancellation of modulation of the total power arising from the information content of the signal channels. The faster transient response of long chains of amplifiers will result in cross talk due to cross saturation in the amplifier chains up to much higher frequencies than would occur for single amplifiers, as high as 10 MHz for large networks. The link control channel eliminates this crosstalk by eliminating modulation in the total power for the range of frequencies at which cross saturation will occur. Other advantages include detection of changes in channel loading, speed limited only by feedback circuit, simpler implementation requiring less hardware, less management and no changes to the amplifiers and cancellation of low frequency channel power variations.

From the foregoing, it should be readily ascertained by those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited by the embodiments described above which are presented herein as examples only but may, in fact, be modified in various ways within the scope of protection as defined by the appended patent claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5225922 *Nov 21, 1991Jul 6, 1993At&T Bell LaboratoriesOptical transmission system equalizer
US5311347 *Jun 30, 1992May 10, 1994Fujitsu LimitedOptical communication system with automatic gain control
US5374973 *Sep 21, 1993Dec 20, 1994Alcatel Network Systems, Inc.Optical amplifier
US5396360 *May 11, 1994Mar 7, 1995Canon Kabushiki KaishaWavelength-multiplexed optical communication system and optical amplifier used therefor
US5428471 *Jul 30, 1992Jun 27, 1995Alcatel Network Systems, Inc.Fail-safe automatic shut-down apparatus and method for high output power optical communications system
US5438445 *Oct 29, 1991Aug 1, 1995Hitachi, Ltd.Optical wavelength multiplexing communication system
US5448660 *Jul 6, 1994Sep 5, 1995Cselt - Centro Studi E Laboratori Telecomunicazioni S.P.A.Wavelength selective optical switch
US5463487 *Jul 29, 1994Oct 31, 1995Northern Telecom LimitedOptical transmission system
US5479082 *Jul 6, 1994Dec 26, 1995Cselt-Centro Studi E Laboratorti Telecommunicazioni S.P.A.Device for extraction and re-insertion of an optical carrier in optical communications networks
US5488500 *Aug 31, 1994Jan 30, 1996At&T Corp.Tunable add drop optical filtering method and apparatus
US5500756 *Feb 26, 1993Mar 19, 1996Hitachi, Ltd.Optical fiber transmission system and supervision method of the same
US5510926 *Jan 11, 1995Apr 23, 1996Alcatel N.V.Transmission method and an optical link using multiplexing with application
US5633741 *Feb 23, 1995May 27, 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.Multichannel optical fiber communications
US5644423 *Mar 13, 1996Jul 1, 1997Nec CorporationMethod and device for optical amplification
US5673142 *Aug 1, 1996Sep 30, 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.Optical amplifier with internal input signal monitoring tap
US5675432 *Apr 3, 1996Oct 7, 1997Hitachi, Ltd.Optical amplification apparatus
US5701186 *Mar 29, 1996Dec 23, 1997Ciena CorporationOptical cable TV system
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1A. Hamel et al, "Optical filters in WDM Ring Network Architectures" Proc. SPIE, vol. 2449, pp. 70-77 Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 1995.
2 *A. Hamel et al, Optical filters in WDM Ring Network Architectures Proc. SPIE, vol. 2449, pp. 70 77 Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 1995.
3H. Toba et al "An Optical FDM-Based Self-Healing Ring Network Employing Arrayed Waveguide Grating Filters and EDFA's with Level Equalizers", IEEE J. on Selected Areas in Communications, V. 14, #5, Jun., 1996 pp. 800-813.
4 *H. Toba et al An Optical FDM Based Self Healing Ring Network Employing Arrayed Waveguide Grating Filters and EDFA s with Level Equalizers , IEEE J. on Selected Areas in Communications, V. 14, 5, Jun., 1996 pp. 800 813.
5J.E. Midwinter, Photonics in Switching vol. II Systems Academic Press, "Quantum Electronics-Principles and Applications" Chap. 3.
6 *J.E. Midwinter, Photonics in Switching vol. II Systems Academic Press, Quantum Electronics Principles and Applications Chap. 3.
7L. Quetel et al "Programmable fiber grating based wavelength multiplexer" OFC '96 Technical Digest, WF6, pp. 120-121.
8 *L. Quetel et al Programmable fiber grating based wavelength multiplexer OFC 96 Technical Digest, WF6, pp. 120 121.
9N. N. Khrais et al "Effect of cascaded misaligned optical (de) (de) multiplexers on multiwavelength optical network performance" OFC '96 Technical Digest pp. 220-221.
10 *N. N. Khrais et al Effect of cascaded misaligned optical (de) (de) multiplexers on multiwavelength optical network performance OFC 96 Technical Digest pp. 220 221.
11 *Oda et al, An Optical FDM Add/Drop Myltiplexing Ring Network Utilizing Fiber Fabry Perot Filters and Optical Circulators, IEEE Photo. Tech. Letters, vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 825 828, Jul. 1993.
12Oda et al, An Optical FDM-Add/Drop Myltiplexing Ring Network Utilizing Fiber Fabry-Perot Filters and Optical Circulators, IEEE Photo. Tech. Letters, vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 825-828, Jul. 1993.
13P.A. Perrier et al. "4-channel, 10-Gbit/s capacity self-healing WDM ring network with wavelength add/drop multiplexers". OFC '96 Technical Digest, ThD3, pp. 218-220.
14 *P.A. Perrier et al. 4 channel, 10 Gbit/s capacity self healing WDM ring network with wavelength add/drop multiplexers . OFC 96 Technical Digest, ThD3, pp. 218 220.
15P.E. Green, Jr., "Optical Networking Update", IEEE J. of Selected Areas in Communications. vol. 14, #5, Jun. 1996 pp. 764-779.
16 *P.E. Green, Jr., Optical Networking Update , IEEE J. of Selected Areas in Communications. vol. 14, 5, Jun. 1996 pp. 764 779.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6142994 *May 5, 1998Nov 7, 2000Ep Technologies, Inc.Surgical method and apparatus for positioning a diagnostic a therapeutic element within the body
US6169615 *Mar 13, 1998Jan 2, 2001Fujitsu LimitedWavelength division multiplex optical transmission apparatus
US6275313 *Feb 3, 1998Aug 14, 2001Lucent Technologies Inc.Raman gain tilt equalization in optical fiber communication systems
US6342959 *Sep 24, 1997Jan 29, 2002AlcatelTransient suppression in an optical wavelength division multiplexed network
US6388802Jul 31, 2001May 14, 2002Seneca NetworksReduction of ASE in WDM optical ring networks
US6400475 *Nov 12, 1998Jun 4, 2002Hitachi, Ltd.Optical transmission system and optical communications device
US6421168Jan 3, 2002Jul 16, 2002Seneca NetworksReduction of ASE in WDM optical ring networks
US6426817 *Jan 26, 1999Jul 30, 2002Fujitsu LimitedOptical wavelength multiplexing system and terminal
US6456408 *Mar 22, 1999Sep 24, 2002Lucent Technologies Inc.Method and apparatus for controlling the optical power of a optical transmission signal
US6563614May 21, 1999May 13, 2003Corvis CorporationOptical transmission system and amplifier control apparatuses and methods
US6584246 *Jul 5, 2000Jun 24, 2003Litton Systems, Inc.Source, system and method for generating amplified stimulated emission using a coupler mechanism
US6671466Jul 20, 1999Dec 30, 2003Lucent Technologies Inc.Distortion compensation in optically amplified lightwave communication systems
US6678041 *Jun 1, 2001Jan 13, 2004Advantest CorporationOptical characteristic measuring apparatus, the method thereof and recording medium
US6760152Oct 11, 2002Jul 6, 2004Jds Uniphase CorporationMethod for increasing dynamic range of erbium doped fiber amplifiers
US6907195Aug 28, 2001Jun 14, 2005Dorsal Networks, Inc.Terminals having sub-band substitute signal control in optical communication systems
US6907201 *Jul 28, 2000Jun 14, 2005Ciena CorporationOptical power transient control system and method
US6944399Aug 28, 2001Sep 13, 2005Dorsal Networks, Inc.Methods of signal substitution for maintenance of amplifier saturation
US7016104Jun 30, 2003Mar 21, 2006Jds Uniphase CorporationWider dynamic range to a FBG stabilized pump
US7054559 *Sep 4, 1997May 30, 2006Mci Communications CorporationMethod and system for modular multiplexing and amplification in a multi-channel plan
US7072588 *Aug 17, 2001Jul 4, 2006Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Multiplexed distribution of optical power
US7106487 *Jun 25, 2003Sep 12, 2006Intel CorporationThermal tuning of a laser using doped silicon etalon
US7173756Feb 17, 2005Feb 6, 2007Jds Uniphase CorporationOptical amplification system for variable span length WDM optical communication systems
US7181137 *Sep 30, 2002Feb 20, 2007Cisco Technology, Inc.Subband spectrum analysis for optical multiplex section protection
US7327958 *Jul 30, 2004Feb 5, 2008Lucent Technologies Inc.Transient-based channel growth for optical transmission systems
US7349637Dec 1, 2006Mar 25, 2008Optium CorporationOptical transmitter with SBS suppression
US7529482Jan 18, 2007May 5, 2009Cisco Technology, Inc.Subband spectrum analysis for optical multiplex section protection
US7738791Jan 21, 2004Jun 15, 2010Ericsson, AbTransmitter and method for transmitting messages on an optical fiber
US7822345Jan 21, 2004Oct 26, 2010Ericsson AbOutput stage for carrying out WDM message transmission and methods for exchanging full light sources in an output stage of this type
US7903978Dec 7, 2006Mar 8, 2011Broadwing, LlcOptical transmission systems and amplifier control apparatuses and methods
US8064770 *Aug 11, 2005Nov 22, 2011Tyco Electronics Subsea Communications LlcSystem and method for spectral loading an optical transmission system
US8462428Jan 12, 2009Jun 11, 2013Nokia Siemens Networks OyMethod and device for providing and/or controlling an optical signal
US8705978 *Jun 20, 2011Apr 22, 2014Futurewei Technologies, Inc.Method of efficiently and safely adding and deleting channels in an amplified wavelength division multiplexing system
US20120321319 *Jun 20, 2011Dec 20, 2012Futurewei Technologies, Inc.Method of Efficiently and Safely Adding and Deleting Channels in an Amplified Wavelength Division Multiplexing System
DE10303313A1 *Jan 28, 2003Jul 29, 2004Marconi Communications GmbhMessage transmission method via optical fiber, by distributing change in optical power of filling channels to reduce displacement of entire spectrum
DE10303314A1 *Jan 28, 2003Jul 29, 2004Marconi Communications GmbhOutput stage for wavelength division multiplexing transmission, has auxiliary circuit for supplying one of two filling light sources with continuously decreasing desired-power signal
Classifications
U.S. Classification398/180, 398/37, 398/38, 398/97, 398/94, 398/30
International ClassificationH04B10/04, H04B10/14, H04B10/16, H04J14/02, H04B10/17, H04B10/06
Cooperative ClassificationH04J14/0221
European ClassificationH04J14/02B
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Mar 7, 2013ASAssignment
Effective date: 20130130
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.;REEL/FRAME:030510/0627
Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, NEW YORK
Nov 19, 2010FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Dec 6, 2006ASAssignment
Owner name: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK), AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:018590/0047
Effective date: 20061130
Nov 3, 2006FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Sep 30, 2002FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Nov 27, 2001CCCertificate of correction
Apr 5, 2001ASAssignment
Owner name: THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, TEX
Free format text: CONDITIONAL ASSIGNMENT OF AND SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. (DE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:011722/0048
Effective date: 20010222
Owner name: THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT P.O.
Dec 23, 1996ASAssignment
Owner name: AT&T CORP., NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHRAPLYVY, ANDREW R.;ELLSON, JOHN C.;NEWSOME, GEORGE W.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:008324/0056;SIGNING DATES FROM 18961218 TO 19961205
Owner name: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, NEW JERSEY