Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS5908422 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 09/008,787
Publication dateJun 1, 1999
Filing dateJan 20, 1998
Priority dateJan 13, 1997
Fee statusPaid
Also published asCA2276290A1, CA2276290C, CN1158974C, CN1244105A, DE69725342D1, DE69725342T2, EP0961587A1, EP0961587B1, US5741256, WO1998030164A1
Publication number008787, 09008787, US 5908422 A, US 5908422A, US-A-5908422, US5908422 A, US5908422A
InventorsStephen Bresina
Original AssigneeSynthes (U.S.A)
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Helical osteosynthetic implant
US 5908422 A
Abstract
An osteosynthetic implant for setting a broken bone. The implant comprises a nail having a plurality of helically twisted blades that share a common helical axis. At least two of the blades define an angle of less than 180 in a plane perpendicular to the helical axis. In a preferred embodiment, one pair of the blades of the nail is tapered towards its proximal portion and another pair has a uniform thickness. The blades are twisted by at least about 30. A cannulation runs through the center of the nail to receive a guide wire. The nail is slidably engageable to a member that is securable to an elongated portion of the bone, such as a side plate or an intramedullary nail. In a preferred implantation orientation, the proximate portion of the tapered blades is parallel to the elongated portion of the bone, and a proximate portion of the uniform blades is perpendicular thereto.
Images(5)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(21)
I claim:
1. A nail for setting a broken bone, the nail comprising:
a shaft defining a helical axis;
a uniform pair of blades disposed on the shaft; and
a tapered pair of blades disposed on the shaft such that each tapered blade is positioned between the uniform pair of blades, the tapered blades having a greatest width at a distal portion and a smallest width at a proximal portion, the uniform and tapered blades having a total helical twist of at least about 30 around the helical axis.
2. The nail of claim 1, wherein the nail is configured for engaging a securing member which is securable to an elongate portion of the bone.
3. The nail of claim 1, wherein each tapered blade is about 90 out of helical phase with the uniform blades.
4. The nail of claim 1, wherein the uniform blades are disposed substantially on opposite sides of the helical axis, and the tapered blades are disposed substantially on opposite sides of the helical axis.
5. A nail for setting a broken bone, the nail comprising first and second blades which are helically twisted along first and second coaxial helixes respectively and configured for implantation in a bone fragment, the first and second coaxial helixes being less than 180 out of phase, wherein the second blade is tapered along the second coaxial helix and has a different shape than the first blade.
6. The nail of claim 5, wherein the blades are substantially flat and the helixes are out of phase by between 30 and 150.
7. The nail of claim 5, wherein the helixes are out of phase by between 60 and 120.
8. The nail of claim 5, wherein the blades are twisted by at least about 30 along the helixes.
9. The nail of claim 5, wherein the second blade is twisted by about 45 to 120 along the second helix.
10. The nail of claim 9, wherein the second blade is twisted by about 90.
11. The nail of claim 5, further comprising a hollow shaft configured for receiving a guide wire and extending coaxially with the helixes.
12. The nail of claim 5, wherein the nail comprises third and fourth blades being helically twisted along third and fourth helixes respectively, the third and fourth helixes being out of phase with each other and coaxial with the first and second helixes, wherein the fourth blade is tapered.
13. The nail of claim 12, wherein the second and fourth blades are respectively positioned between the first and third blades on opposite sides of the nail.
14. The nail of claim 5, wherein the first blade has a substantially uniform width along the first helix.
15. The nail of claim 5, wherein the blades are coextensive over at least a portion of the first and second helixes.
16. The nail of claim 5, wherein the first and second helixes are about 90 out of phase.
17. The nail of claim 5, wherein the nail is configured for engaging to a securing member that is securable to an elongate portion of the bone.
18. The nail of claim 5, wherein the first and second helixes have a common helical axis, and the second blade tapers toward the helical axis.
19. The nail of claim 5, wherein the second blade is tapered along the second coaxial helix such that the second blade has a different shape than the first blade.
20. A nail for setting a broken bone, the nail comprising first and second blades which are helically twisted along first and second coaxial helixes respectively and configured for implantation in a bone fragment, the first and second coaxial helixes being less than 180 out of phase, wherein the second blade is tapered and has a proximal portion and a distal portion that is wider than the proximal portion.
21. A method of setting a broken femur having a head on a proximal side and a shaft on a distal side, the method comprising:
providing a nail with a helical axis, a uniform pair of blades, and a tapered pair of blades disposed such that each tapered blade is positioned between the uniform pair of blades, the tapered blades having a greatest width at a distal portion and a smallest width at a proximal portion, wherein the uniform and tapered blades have a total helical twist of at least about 30 around the helical axis; and
implanting the nail in the femur with the proximal portion of the tapered blades inside the head of the femur and substantially parallel to the shaft of the femur, and with the distal portion of the tapered blades disposed towards the distal side of the femur and substantially perpendicular to the shaft of the femur.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a division of application Ser. No. 08/782,231, filed Jan. 13, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,741,256.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates to an implant for setting bone fractures and in particular to an implant for osteosynthesis of stable and unstable fractures of the neck and intertrochanteric region of the femur.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The elderly population experiences a high incidence of femoral fractures, commonly in the femoral neck and intertrochanteric regions. These fractures are normally treated by inserting a nail or hip screw from the side of the femur, through the neck, and into the femoral head. The nail or screw is then fixed to a side plate, that is fastened to the outside of the femur shaft, or to an intramedullary nail, that is inserted through the femur shaft. Both the side plate and the intramedullary nail may by secured to the femur shaft with bone screws.

A high incidence of death, between 10% to 25%, is associated with this type of hip fractures due to the injury itself or related complications. Frequent complications may arise when two or more bone fragments are forced towards each other when the patient supports his or her weight on the healing bone. For example, a sharp implanted nail or hip screw may cut through and penetrate the femoral head or neck; or a nail, hip screw, side plate, or intramedullary nail may bend or break under load where the contact between bone fragments is insufficient for the bone itself to carry the patient's weight.

Collapsible implants have been developed to maximize bone to bone contact by permitting bone fragments to migrate towards one another. Examples in the prior art include the Richards-type compression hip-screw and the Kenn-type nail. Richards screws comprise a long, smooth shaft and external threads at the tip. Kenn nails comprise a wide, tri-flanged tip at the end of a smooth shaft. In both examples, the nail or screw implanted through the neck of the femur is allowed to slide back through the side plate or intramedullary nail as the bone fragments move together under a load.

On the other hand, these known implants are laterally stiff. Their sharp ends may cut sideways through the cancellous tissue of a femoral head after implantation and migrate within the bone, either piercing the surface of the femur or simply no longer retaining proper alignment of bone fragments. To resolve this problem, single, helical blades were developed, such as the SPIRAL BLADE brand, currently sold by Synthes, Paoil, Pa., and such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,300,074 and 4,978,349. These blades are twisted about 90 along their length and have a substantially uniform width. When implanted into the neck and head of a femur, the distal end of the blade lies in parallel with the femur shaft, and the proximal end lies perpendicularly to the shaft. In this position, the load on the head acts on relatively flexible, large, flat surface, reducing the pressure on the cancellous tissue and diminishing the tendency of the implant to further cut through the bone once implanted. The distal end, being aligned with the femoral shaft, provides a higher bending stiffness than the tip to sufficiently support the blade. Also, unlike previous nails and screws, these blades require little or no material removal in the femoral head, prior to implantation, where the amount of bone is critical.

These single, helical blades, however, are fairly compliant in the transverse direction, towards the fore and aft of the patient's body, because of the vertical positioning of the distal end of the blade. Moreover, the blades provide little resistance to cutting through the cancellous bone like a knife in directions aligned with the width of the blade at any station along its length. A need exists, therefore, to provide improved osteosynthetic implants which do not have a tendency to cause such cutting.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a dynamic osteosynthetic-implant that minimizes the tendency to cut through the cancellous bone tissue after implantation and provides the required stiffness to maintain the relative orientation of the bone fragments. One implant according to the invention includes a plurality of helically twisted blades fixed to one another along a common helical axis. At least two of the blades define an angle of less than 180 in a plane disposed perpendicularly to the helical axis. The blades are preferably slidably engageable to a first member, such as a side plate or an intramedullary nail, that is itself engageable to the shaft of a femur. These blades provide the implant with a relatively flexible, large area, proximal end, but which gradually becomes stiffer towards its distal portion for additional support.

In a preferred embodiment, two perpendicular pairs of oppositely oriented blades are helically twisted by at least about 30. One pair of blades tapers towards its proximal end; the other pair has substantially uniform widths. In a preferred implanted orientation, the distal ends of the uniform blades are oriented in parallel to the femoral shaft, while the distal ends of the tapered blades are oriented perpendicularly to the shaft. The respective proximal ends are oriented at about 90 of helical twist to their distal ends. As a result, the proximal end of the implant provides a large surface normal to the principal downward load on the head of the femur and is more compliant than the distal portion of the implant, with the distal portion having increased bending stiffness in all directions. Moreover, the angle formed between any two adjacent blades, together with the portions of the blades normal to a shearing load on the bone, resist the tendency of the implant to cut out through the bone under such a load.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of an implant according to the invention.

FIG. 2 shows a proximal view of an implant according to the invention.

FIG. 3 is cross-sectional side-view of an implant according to the invention implanted in a femur in conjunction with a side plate.

FIG. 4 illustrates a cross-sectional side-view of an implant according to the invention implanted in a femur in conjunction with an intramedullary nail.

FIG. 5 is a partial cross-section of a perspective of an alternative embodiment of the implant.

FIG. 6 is a distal view of the embodiment shown in FIG. 5.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIG. 1, an osteosynthetic nail 8 comprises a plurality of helically twisted blades 10 and 12 that are fixed to a proximal portion 14 of a shaft 16. In this description of the preferred embodiments, the terms distal and proximal are defined in relation to a surgeon implanting the device. Thus, a proximal portion of an element is preferably located closer to the central part of the body than its distal portion. The shaft 16 is coaxial with the common helical axis of the blades 10 and 12. The blades 10 and 12 are substantially flat and may have sharp proximal ends. Their helical twist is at least about 30, preferably from about 45 to 120 and most preferably about 90. The helical rate of twist is such that nail 8 may be driven into a femur from the distal end of the nail 8. After implantation, this twist also inhibits nail 8 from sliding forwards or backwards along its helical axis with respect to the femoral head.

The preferred embodiment comprises a pair of uniform blades 10 disposed on opposite sides of the helical axis and exhibiting a substantially uniform width, and a tapered pair of blades 12 disposed on opposite sides of the helical axis and substantially at right angles to the uniform blades 10. The angle 17, defined between at least two adjacent blades at any station along the helix and denoting a helical phase difference between the adjacent blades, may be any angle of less than 180. Preferably, this angle is between 30 and 150, and more preferably between 60 and 120. The most preferable angle when four blades are used is 90. The tapered blades 12 are widest at their distal ends 18 and taper down, in the direction of their proximal ends 20, until they lie flush with the outer surface of the proximal portion 14 of the shaft 16. Only one of the two proximal ends 20 of the blades 12 is visible in FIG. 1. From this vantage, the other is hidden behind the shaft 16.

A cannulation 24 extends along the inner length of shaft 16. The cannulation 24 is sized to permit the insertion of a guide wire (not shown) to aid in the alignment of the nail during the implantation procedure as is commonly known in the art.

FIG. 2 is a view from the proximal end of the nail which illustrates the helical shape of blades 10 and 12 and the taper of blades 12. It also shows the angle 17 formed between the blades 10 and 12. From this view, the distal ends 18 of the tapered blades 12 are directly behind the proximal tips of the uniform blades 10 and are thus hidden from view.

In FIG. 3, an embodiment that employs a side plate 26 is shown in a preferred implantation orientation. Side plate 26 is aligned with the shaft 28 of femur 29 and is securable to the outside thereof with fasteners 30, as shown in FIG. 3. A portion of the side plate 26, in one embodiment, may slide vertically with respect to fasteners 30 to allow for vertical compression of the bone fragments. The proximal portion 22 of shaft 16 is telescopically slideable within a channel 31, which extends through a cylindrical sleeve 32 that is fixed to the side plate 26 at an angle 33 that will be generally between 90 and 150, but that may be selected according to the anatomy of the patient. Alternatively, the side plate may be configured and dimensioned as a fixed plate that does not vertically move with respect to the fasteners. The length, width and other dimensions of either the fixed or slidable plate can be selected by one of ordinary skill in the art.

The implantation procedure for fixation nails is also well known in the art and can be applied with the present invention. In the preferred implantation orientation, sleeve 32 penetrates the side of the femur 29 towards the femur neck 34 and head 36. The distal portion 22 of shaft 16 in this embodiment has a larger outer diameter than does the proximal portion 14. This distal portion 22 is slidably engaged within sleeve 32 such that the distal ends of blades 10 and 12 are separated from the proximal end 38 of the sleeve. This separation enables the nail 8 to slide back into the sleeve 32 as the femur head 36 is compressed distally in the direction of the helical axis. This prevents the blades 10 and 12 from further cutting the head 36 after implantation.

The nail 8 is implanted inside the neck 34 and head 36 of the femur 29. The distal portions of the uniform blades 10 are oriented in parallel to the shaft 28 of the femur, while the distal portions 18 of the tapered blades 12 are perpendicular to the femur shaft 28. At their proximal ends, uniform blades 10 are perpendicular to the femur shaft while tapered blades 12 and proximal ends 20 are parallel to the femur shaft 28.

In this orientation, the wide proximal portions of the uniform blades 10 provides a large surface normal to the principal downward load imposed on the femoral head 36 when the patient stands and ambulates. This reduces the pressure on the cancellous tissue within the femur 29 and resists the tendency to cut through the bone cortex. The distal portions of the uniform blades 10, aligned with the principal load, increase the bending stiffness of the shaft 16 resisting that load, and efficiently transfer the load to the side plate 26. The taper in the tapered blades 12 affords additional stiffness in their distal portions 18, where blades 12 have a larger width, but retains the compliancy of the nail 8 at the tapered proximal ends 20. In this manner, the proximal part of the nail 8 may flex, rather than carve through, or crush, the bone tissue. In addition, the extra surface area furnished by tapered blades 12 also counter any propensity of the blades 10 and 12 to migrate laterally relative through the bone 29. Moreover, if the nail 8 is forced laterally into the bone tissue, the tissue will be driven into the angles formed between adjacent blades 10 and 12, further resisting nail 8 migration. Preferably, the outer diameter of sleeve 32 is about the size of the widest portion of nail 8 so that nail 8 may fit easily through a hole drilled for insertion of the sleeve 32, making it easier to achieve the above orientation.

An alternative embodiment is shown in FIG. 4. This embodiment utilizes an intramedullary nail 40 implanted in the femoral shaft 28. As in the first embodiment described, the nail 6 may slide telescopically within a channel 42 inside the intramedullary nail 40. The channel 42 defines an angle 44 with the length of the intramedullary nail 40 of generally between 90 and 150, which may be chosen according to shape of the femur.

During implantation, the intramedullary nail 40 is inserted into the bone first. The nail 8 is then implanted through the side of the femur 29 through a hole drilled merely up to the depth of the side surface of the intramedullary nail 40. Helical groves 46 extend radially from channel 42 and are shaped to receive blades 10 and 12. As the nail 8 is hammered into the bone, as commonly done by persons skilled in the art, blades 10 and 12 slide through grooves 46.

The preferred implantation orientation resembles that of the side-plate embodiment. The nail 8 is positioned in the same relationship to the femur 29 and shares the same advantages.

In another embodiment, with which either a side plate or an intramedullary nail may be employed, the distal end of the nail 8 defines a hexagonal cavity 48 concentric with the proximal base of the shaft 16 and the cannulation 24. This cavity 48 is shaped to receive the tip of an instrument, normally used in the art, designed to ease rotational orientation of the nail during implantation. The cavity 48 may be shaped differently depending on the instrument used. For, example, instead of a central cavity, the distal base and sides of shaft 16 may have indentations or raised portions to fit the instrument.

The length and proportions of the elements of the invention may be selected by the surgeon according to the anatomy of the patient. Examples of selectable dimensions include the length of nails 8 and sizes of side plate 26 or intramedullary nail 40. Also, other embodiments may contain a different number of blades, if desired.

It will be appreciated that those skilled in the art may devise numerous modifications and embodiments. It is intended that the following claims cover all such modifications and embodiments that fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2627855 *Apr 7, 1950Feb 10, 1953Price James WFracture nail and bone plate
US2834342 *Aug 29, 1956May 13, 1958Yost Clyde ESurgical device for the fixation of fractured bones
US3002514 *Jan 24, 1958Oct 3, 1961Minor Deyerle WilliamHip setting pin
US3025853 *Jul 7, 1958Mar 20, 1962Mason Christopher AFixation device for fractured femur
US3029811 *Apr 25, 1960Apr 17, 1962Ken Standard CorpSurgical hip nail
US3561437 *Mar 20, 1968Feb 9, 1971Jose Luis OrlichApparatus for fixing fractures of the femur
US4103683 *Jun 3, 1977Aug 1, 1978Neufeld John ASub-trochanteric nail
US4628923 *Nov 28, 1983Dec 16, 1986Medoff Robert JAxial compression device
US4776330 *Jun 23, 1986Oct 11, 1988Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc.Modular femoral fixation system
US4908032 *Mar 2, 1988Mar 13, 1990Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Reconstruction prosthesis
US4978349 *Aug 3, 1989Dec 18, 1990Synthes (U.S.A.)Fixation plate
US5002544 *Jul 26, 1990Mar 26, 1991Synthes (U.S.A.)Osteosynthetic pressure plate osteosynthetic compression plate
US5032125 *Feb 6, 1990Jul 16, 1991Smith & Nephew Richards Inc.Intramedullary hip screw
US5047029 *Apr 5, 1989Sep 10, 1991Synthes (U.S.A.)Clamp and system for internal fixation
US5116336 *Jun 18, 1990May 26, 1992Synthes (U.S.A.)Osteosynthetic anchor bolt
US5295991 *May 15, 1992Mar 22, 1994Synthes (U.S.A.)Surgical instrument for positioning osteosynthetic elements
US5300074 *Dec 6, 1991Apr 5, 1994Synthes (U.S.A.)Two-part angle plate
US5312402 *Apr 16, 1992May 17, 1994Synthes (U.S.A.)Connection device
US5437666 *Aug 24, 1992Aug 1, 1995Synthes (U.S.A.)External fixation device for osteosynthesis
US5462547 *May 21, 1992Oct 31, 1995Synthes (U.S.A.)Trochanter stabilization device
US5498264 *Dec 23, 1994Mar 12, 1996Synthes (U.S.A.)Clamp connection for connecting two construction components for a setting device, particularly an osteosynthetic setting device
US5501684 *Jun 25, 1992Mar 26, 1996Synthes (U.S.A.)Osteosynthetic fixation device
US5534001 *May 11, 1993Jul 9, 1996Synthes (U.S.A.)Osteosynthetic fixation element and manipulation device
US5591168 *May 7, 1996Jan 7, 1997Tornier S.A.Device for stabilizing fractures of the upper end of the femur
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1"The Titanium Unreamed Femoral Nail System Technique Guide", 1995 Synthes (USA).
2Calandruccio et al., "Internal Fixation Devices for Fractures of the Proximal Femur American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Committee on the History of Orthopaedic Surgery," Brochure (pp. 1-7).
3 *Calandruccio et al., Internal Fixation Devices for Fractures of the Proximal Femur American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Committee on the History of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brochure (pp. 1 7).
4Jarrett et al., "The stable internal fixation of peritrochanteric hip fractures," Part V (pp. 203-218).
5 *Jarrett et al., The stable internal fixation of peritrochanteric hip fractures, Part V (pp. 203 218).
6Richards et al., "The AO Dynamic HIP Screw and the Pugh Sliding Nail in Femoral Head Fixation," J. Bone Joint Surg. Br! 72-B:794-6, (1990).
7 *Richards et al., The AO Dynamic HIP Screw and the Pugh Sliding Nail in Femoral Head Fixation, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br 72 B:794 6, (1990).
8 *The Titanium Unreamed Femoral Nail System Technique Guide , 1995 Synthes (USA).
9W. L. Pugh, "A Self-Adjusting Nail-Plate for Fractures About the Hip Joint," J. Bone Joint Surg. 37-A:1085-93, (1955).
10 *W. L. Pugh, A Self Adjusting Nail Plate for Fractures About the Hip Joint, J. Bone Joint Surg. 37 A:1085 93, (1955).
11William K. Massie, M.D., "Extracapsular Fractures of the Hip Treated by Impaction Using a Sliding Nail-plate Fixation," Chapter 18 (pp. 180-201).
12 *William K. Massie, M.D., Extracapsular Fractures of the Hip Treated by Impaction Using a Sliding Nail plate Fixation, Chapter 18 (pp. 180 201).
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6159210 *Jan 14, 1998Dec 12, 2000Research Corporation Technologies, Inc.Bone fixation pin with rotary cutting tip
US6187007 *Jul 31, 1996Feb 13, 2001Synthes (Usa)Device for attaching fractured hip-joint heads
US6379360Sep 8, 2000Apr 30, 2002Synthes (Usa)Spiral blade insertion instrument
US6409730May 31, 2000Jun 25, 2002Synthes (Usa)Humeral spiral blade
US6511481Mar 30, 2001Jan 28, 2003Triage Medical, Inc.Method and apparatus for fixation of proximal femoral fractures
US6533789 *Apr 4, 2000Mar 18, 2003Synthes (Usa)Device for rotational stabilization of bone segments
US6562042 *Feb 1, 2001May 13, 2003Owen A. NelsonOrthopedic implant used to repair intertrochanteric fractures and a method for inserting the same
US6632224Mar 22, 2001Oct 14, 2003Triage Medical, Inc.Bone fixation system
US6648890Apr 10, 2001Nov 18, 2003Triage Medical, Inc.Bone fixation system with radially extendable anchor
US6685706Nov 19, 2001Feb 3, 2004Triage Medical, Inc.Proximal anchors for bone fixation system
US6835197Oct 17, 2001Dec 28, 2004Christoph Andreas RothBone fixation system
US6887243Jul 12, 2002May 3, 2005Triage Medical, Inc.Method and apparatus for bone fixation with secondary compression
US6890333Nov 13, 2001May 10, 2005Triage Medical, Inc.Method and apparatus for bone fixation with secondary compression
US6908465Nov 13, 2001Jun 21, 2005Triage Medical, Inc.Distal bone anchors for bone fixation with secondary compression
US6942668Dec 23, 2003Sep 13, 2005Triage Medical, Inc.Proximal anchors for bone fixation system
US6951561May 6, 2004Oct 4, 2005Triage Medical, Inc.Spinal stabilization device
US7008428May 16, 2003Mar 7, 2006Triage Medical, Inc.Bone fixation system
US7070601Jan 14, 2004Jul 4, 2006Triage Medical, Inc.Locking plate for bone anchors
US7182765Feb 6, 2004Feb 27, 2007Synthes (Usa)Bone fixation system
US7306600Feb 6, 2004Dec 11, 2007Synthes (U.S.A.)Bone fixation system
US7527627Sep 8, 2004May 5, 2009Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic implant and screw assembly
US7534244Sep 8, 2004May 19, 2009Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic plate and screw assembly
US7556629Apr 23, 2004Jul 7, 2009Interventional Spine, Inc.Method and apparatus for bone fixation with secondary compression
US7780667Mar 20, 2007Aug 24, 2010Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic plate and screw assembly
US7799030Mar 20, 2007Sep 21, 2010Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic plate and screw assembly
US7824429Jul 18, 2003Nov 2, 2010Interventional Spine, Inc.Method and apparatus for spinal fixation
US7837709Mar 3, 2004Nov 23, 2010Synthes Usa, LlcBone fixation means
US7883509Aug 22, 2007Feb 8, 2011Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic implant and screw assembly
US7892234Jun 22, 2004Feb 22, 2011Synthes Usa, LlcIntramedullary nail
US7909882Jan 19, 2007Mar 22, 2011Albert StinnetteSocket and prosthesis for joint replacement
US7918853Mar 3, 2008Apr 5, 2011Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic plate and screw assembly
US7931652Aug 17, 2007Apr 26, 2011Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic plate and screw assembly
US7993377Jan 15, 2007Aug 9, 2011Interventional Spine, Inc.Method and apparatus for spinal fixation
US7998176Jun 6, 2008Aug 16, 2011Interventional Spine, Inc.Method and apparatus for spinal stabilization
US8066706Jun 30, 2004Nov 29, 2011Synthes Usa, LlcSurgical nail
US8070750 *Mar 5, 2004Dec 6, 2011Depuy Mitek, Inc.Tunnel notcher and guidewire delivery device
US8070786Jan 9, 2006Dec 6, 2011Acumed LlcSystem for fusing joints
US8092505Jan 28, 2009Jan 10, 2012Acumed LlcBone nail
US8105326Apr 17, 2009Jan 31, 2012Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic implant and fastener assembly
US8109977Jan 15, 2007Feb 7, 2012Interventional Spine, Inc.Method and apparatus for spinal fixation
US8147493Mar 8, 2006Apr 3, 2012Synthes Usa, LlcBone-fixation device
US8187275Dec 21, 2007May 29, 2012Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic implant and fastening assembly
US8221419Feb 28, 2006Jul 17, 2012Synthes Usa, LlcIntramedullary nail
US8298234Nov 10, 2010Oct 30, 2012Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic implant and fastener assembly
US8317845Jan 19, 2007Nov 27, 2012Alexa Medical, LlcScrew and method of use
US8449544Jun 30, 2009May 28, 2013Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic implant and fastener assembly
US8449578Nov 9, 2009May 28, 2013Ebi, LlcMultiplanar bone anchor system
US8454606 *Oct 29, 2002Jun 4, 2013Synthes Usa, LlcDevice for the treatment of fractures of the femur
US8465489Dec 12, 2005Jun 18, 2013Synthes Usa, LlcSurgical nail
US8551093 *Nov 18, 2004Oct 8, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCBone fixation system
US8617161Dec 16, 2010Dec 31, 2013Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic plate and fastener assembly
US8734448 *Apr 7, 2005May 27, 2014Navin N ThakkarImplant assembly for proximal femoral fracture
US8834469Jun 30, 2010Sep 16, 2014Smith & Nephew, Inc.Orthopaedic implant and fastener assembly
EP1369088A1 *May 7, 2003Dec 10, 2003Stryker Trauma GmbHScrew for the neck of the femur
Classifications
U.S. Classification606/67, 606/325, 606/323
International ClassificationA61B17/74, A61B17/58, A61B17/78
Cooperative ClassificationA61B17/746, A61B17/744
European ClassificationA61B17/74D2, A61B17/74D4
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Oct 29, 2010FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Mar 16, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: SYNTHES USA, LLC, PENNSYLVANIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SYNTHES (U.S.A.);REEL/FRAME:022399/0008
Effective date: 20081231
Dec 1, 2006FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Sep 10, 2002FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4