|Publication number||US5985719 A|
|Application number||US 08/977,313|
|Publication date||Nov 16, 1999|
|Filing date||Nov 24, 1997|
|Priority date||Apr 1, 1996|
|Also published as||US5707898, US5726471|
|Publication number||08977313, 977313, US 5985719 A, US 5985719A, US-A-5985719, US5985719 A, US5985719A|
|Inventors||J. Dennis Keller, Roger R. Lee|
|Original Assignee||Micron Technology, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (18), Classifications (18), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation application which claims priority from application Ser. No. 08/627,778, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,707,898 and which was filed on Apr. 1, 1996.
This invention relates generally to fabrication of semiconductor wafers to form memory arrays having non-volatile memory devices employing floating gate transistors.
Typical semiconductor memory utilized during microprocessor operation is volatile. That is in the case of power interruption, the data stored in the semiconductor memory is typically completely lost. One way to circumvent this problem is to provide separate backup of the memory, such as battery power or capacitor storage. An alternate technique is to make the memory fundamentally non-volatile. This option is highly desirable because non-volatile semiconductor memories would not only withstand power interruption, but also would be stored or shipped without being energized.
Random access memories (RAMs) enable information to be both stored and read to a memory cell as dictated by a microprocessor. Read-only-memories (ROMs), on the other hand, are memories into which information is permanently stored during fabrication and cannot be subsequently written to by a microprocessor. All ROM memory is considered non-volatile as only read operations can be performed.
Each bit of information in a ROM is stored by the presence or absence of a data path from the word (access) line to a bit (sense) line. The data path is eliminated simply by insuring no circuit element joins a word and bit line. Thus, when the word line of a ROM is activated, the presence of a signal on the bit line will mean that a 1 is stored, whereas the absence of a signal indicates that a 0 is stored.
If only a small number of ROM circuits are needed for a specific application, custom mask fabrication might be too expensive or time consuming. In such cases, it would be faster and cheaper for users to program each ROM chip individually. ROMs with such capabilities are referred to as programmable read-only-memories (PROMs). In the first PROMs which were developed, information could only be programmed once into the construction and then could not be erased. In such PROMs, a data path exists between every word and bit line at the completion of the chip manufacture. This corresponds to a stored 1 in every data position. Storage cells during fabrication were selectively altered to store a 0 following manufacture by electrically severing the word-to-bit connection paths. Since the write operation was destructive, once the 0 had been programmed into a bit location it could not be erased back to a 1. PROMs were initially implemented in bipolar technology, although MOS PROMs became available.
Later work with PROMs led to development of erasable PROMs. Erasable PROMs depend on the long-term retention of electric charge as the means for information storage. Such charge is stored on a MOS device referred to as a floating polysilicon gate. Such a construction differs slightly from a conventional MOS transistor gate. The conventional MOS transistor gate of a memory cell employs a continuous polysilicon word line connected among several MOS transistors which functions as the respective transistor gates. The floating polysilicon gate of an erasable PROM interposes a localized secondary polysilicon gate in between the continuous word line and silicon substrate into which the active areas of the MOS transistors are formed. The floating gate is localized in that the floating gates for respective MOS transistors are electrically isolated from the floating gates of other MOS transistors.
Various mechanisms have been implemented to transfer and remove charge from a floating gate. One type of erasable programmable memory is the so-called electrically programmable ROM (EPROM). The charge-transfer mechanism occurs by the injection of electrons into the floating polysilicon gate of selected transistors. If a sufficiently high reverse-bias voltage is applied to the transistor drain being programmed, the drain-substrate "pn" junction will experience "avalanche" breakdown, causing hot electrons to be generated. Some of these will have enough energy to pass over the insulating oxide material surrounding each floating gate and thereby charge the floating gate. These EPROM devices are thus called floating-gate, avalanche-injection MOS transistors (FAMOS). Once these electrons are transferred to the floating gate, they are trapped there. The potential-barrier at the oxide-silicon interface of the gate is greater than 3 eV, making the rate of spontaneous emission of the electrons from the oxide over the barrier negligibly small. Accordingly, the electronic charge stored on the floating gate can be retained for many years.
When the floating gate is charged with a sufficient number of electrons, inversion of the channel under the gate occurs. A continuously conducting channel is thereby formed between the source and drain exactly as if an external gate voltage had been applied. The presence of a 1 or 0 in each bit location is therefore determined by the presence or absence of a conducting floating channel gate in each device.
Such a construction also enables means for removing the stored electrons from the floating gate, thereby making the PROM erasable. This is accomplished by flood exposure of the EPROM with strong ultraviolet light for approximately 20 minutes. The ultraviolet light creates electron-hole pairs in the silicon dioxide, providing a discharge path for the charge (electrons) from the floating gates.
In some applications, it is desirable to erase the contents of a ROM electrically, rather than to use an ultraviolet light source. In other circumstances, it would be desirable to be able to change one bit at a time, without having to erase the entire integrated circuit. Such led to the development of electrically erasable PROMs (EEPROMs). Such technologies include NMOS transistors, floating-gate tunnel oxide MOS transistors (FLOTOX), textured high-polysilicon floating-gate MOS transistors, and flash EEPROMs. Such technologies can include a combination of floating gate transistor memory cells within an array of such cells, and a peripheral area to the array which comprises CMOS transistors.
With floating gate transistors, the floating gate polysilicon (commonly referred to as Poly 1) is positioned in between the overlying word line polysilicon (commonly referred to as Poly 2) and underlying substrate. FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary prior art floating gate transistor construction as utilized in an array of memory cells employing non-volatile floating gate transistors. A wafer fragment 10 comprises a bulk monocrystalline silicon substrate 12 having filed oxide regions 14 provided therein. A floating gate transistor is indicated generally with numeral 15, and comprises a gate construction 16 and a pair of opposing source/drain regions 18. Gate construction 16 comprises a gate oxide or tunneling oxide layer 19, a floating gate layer 20 (typically conductively doped polysilicon), an overlying dielectric layer 21, and a wordline or control gate 22 thereatop. Gate construction 16 includes a pair of outer sidewalls 23 having an oxide layer 24 grown thermally thereover. A planarized dielectric layer 25 (typically borophosphosilicate glass or undoped SiO2 deposited by decomposition to tetraethylorthosilicate [TEOS]) is provided outwardly over gate construction 16.
Conductive regions 20 and 22 act as two plates of a capacitor. Programming of the device occurs as described above by ingesting floating gate layer 20 with a large volume of electrons. The overlying gate line 22 is thereby prevented from gating the underlying substrate channel region between source/drain diffusion regions 18. The transistor in such state is considered to be "programmed", effectively in a "zero" or "off" state.
FIG. 2 illustrates an analogous prior art construction. Like numerals from the first described embodiment are utilized where appropriate, with differences being indicated by the suffix "a" or by different numerals. Transistor gate construction 16a within a wafer fragment 10a includes anisotropically etched sidewall spacers 26, typically comprising undoped SiO2 deposited by decomposition of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS). Source/drain regions 18a further comprise LDD regions 19. Such circuitry, at least with respect to memory integrated circuitry, would typically be utilized in control circuitry peripheral to the memory array circuitry. The FIG. 1 prior art is generally utilized within a memory array where LDD regions are not typically utilized.
One challenge in maintaining a programmed transistor in either of the above described and depicted embodiments is assuring that the electrons programmed into the floating gate layer 20 do not deplete or migrate from the floating gate. One principal pathway for such undesired migration is laterally outward of sidewalls 23. If sufficient electrons laterally migrate outward of floating gate layer 20, the transistor effectively becomes undesirably deprogrammed. The problem can be especially problematic in memory integrated circuitry having two closely adjacent gate constructions 16 having different respective programmed states. Electrons from the programmed floating gate transistor are attracted towards the floating gate of a non-programmed transistor, which adversely adds to the electron migration problem.
Further, gate construction 16 is susceptible to undesired minority carrier and other contaminate ingestion. Specifically, minority carrier "holes" emanating from other areas of operating circuitry have a tendency to migrate through insulating layer 25, through oxide layers 25 and 24 into conductive gate regions 20 and 22. Impurities likewise can physically diffuse within such regions.
It would be desirable to overcome or alleviate the above described prior art problems.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to the following accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is diagrammatic sectional view of a prior art semiconductor wafer fragment, and is discussed in the "Background" section above.
FIG. 2 is diagrammatic sectional view of another prior art semiconductor wafer fragment, and is discussed in the "Background" section above.
FIG. 3 is diagrammatic sectional view of a semiconductor wafer fragment at one step in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 4 is a view of the FIG. 3 wafer fragment at a processing step subsequent to that shown by FIG. 2.
FIG. 5 is a view of the FIG. 3 wafer fragment at a processing step subsequent to that shown by FIG. 4.
FIG. 6 is diagrammatic sectional view of an alternate embodiment semiconductor wafer fragment in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 7 is diagrammatic sectional view of another alternate embodiment semiconductor wafer fragment in accordance with the invention.
This disclosure of the invention is submitted in furtherance of the constitutional purposes of the U.S. Patent Laws "to promote the progress of science and useful arts" (Article 1, Section 8).
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a method of reducing undesired electron depletion through sidewalls of a floating gate of a floating gate transistor comprises providing a non-oxide layer over said sidewalls.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, integrated circuitry including a non-volatile field effect transistor comprises:
a floating gate transistor having a gate construction and a pair of opposing source/drain regions, the gate construction having at least one sidewall;
a shielding layer over the gate sidewall; and
a dielectric layer on the shielding layer, the dielectric layer being of a different material than the shielding layer.
Preferred aspects of the invention are initially described with reference to FIGS. 3 and 4 where a wafer fragment is generally indicated with reference numeral 30. Such comprises a bulk monocrystalline silicon substrate 32 having field oxide regions 34 provided therein. A patterned gate construction 35 includes conventional prior art tunneling or other gate dielectric layer 36, an overlying floating gate layer 37, an overlying dielectric layer 38, and an outer control or wordline gate 39. Gate construction 35 includes a pair of opposing sidewalls 40. A pair of opposing source/drain regions 41 are provided relative to bulk substrate 32. Typically and preferably, bulk substrate 32 would be provided with a suitable low background p-doping concentration, with source/drain diffusion regions 14 constituting heavily doped n-type material.
Referring to FIG. 4, an oxide layer 42 is provided on gate sidewalls 40. Such is preferably provided by a thermal growing technique, with such not being shown grown over the exposed silicon areas of the substrate for clarity.
Referring to FIG. 5, a shielding layer 44 is provided directly on oxide layer 42, and thus over gate sidewalls 40. Such preferably comprises an oxynitride compound (SiOx Ny) or a non-oxide layer. Oxynitride compounds are characterized by having material properties which are a compromise between those of pure nitride and pure oxide with respect to the stopping or barrier characteristics capability of nitride for moisture and sodium and the stress relief qualities of oxide. Such can be deposited by conventional techniques, such as LPCVD, PECVD, etc. Other preferred examples for shielding layer 42 include aluminum and Si3 N4, with Si3 N4 believed to be most preferred material for the shielding layer. Layer 44 is preferably provided to a thickness of about 50 Angstroms to about 200 Angstroms, with from about 100 Angstroms to about 150 Angstroms being most preferred.
A dielectric layer 46 is provided over shielding layer 44, and preferably planarized as shown. Most preferably and as shown, dielectric layer 46 is preferably provided directly on shielding layer 44. Ideally, the dielectric layer is of a different predominate material than the shielding layer. Example and preferred materials for layer 46 include BPSG or undoped SiO2.
Layer 44 effectively functions as a shielding or diffusion restricting layer to both undesired electron depletion through sidewalls of the floating gate, and as well to minority character or other impurity diffusion into gate construction 35.
One alternate embodiment is shown in FIG. 6. Like numerals from the first described embodiment are utilized where appropriate, with differences being indicated by the suffix "a" or with different numerals. Floating gate construction 35a in a wafer fragment 30a differs from the first described embodiment in the provision of anisotropically etched electrically insulating sidewall spacers 55 being provided directly on oxide layer 42, with shielding layer 44a being deposited over, and directly on as shown, spacers 55.
A further alternate embodiment is shown and described with reference to FIG. 7. Like numerals from the first described embodiment are utilized where appropriate, with differences being indicated by the suffix "b", or with different numerals. The FIG. 7 construction is similar to the FIG. 6 construction. However here, a gate construction 35b within a wafer fragment 30b provides shielding layer 44b prior to provision of anisotropically etched spacers 55b. Shielding layer 44b is provided over, and preferably directly on as shown, oxide layer 42. A spacer layer would then be deposited and anisotropically etched to produce spacers 55b.
In compliance with the statute, the invention has been described in language more or less specific as to structural and methodical features. It is to be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific features shown and described, since the means herein disclosed comprise preferred forms of putting the invention into effect. The invention is, therefore, claimed in any of its forms or modifications within the proper scope of the appended claims appropriately interpreted in accordance with the doctrine of equivalents.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5068697 *||Jul 17, 1990||Nov 26, 1991||Sony Corporation||Semiconductor memory which is protected from erasure by light shields|
|US5298446 *||Aug 25, 1992||Mar 29, 1994||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Process for producing semiconductor device|
|US5422504 *||May 2, 1994||Jun 6, 1995||Motorola Inc.||EEPROM memory device having a sidewall spacer floating gate electrode and process|
|US5460992 *||May 11, 1995||Oct 24, 1995||Nec Corporation||Fabricating non-volatile memory device having a multi-layered gate electrode|
|US5472890 *||Apr 26, 1995||Dec 5, 1995||Nec Corporation||Method for fabricating an insulating gate field effect transistor|
|US5534456 *||Mar 30, 1995||Jul 9, 1996||Sandisk Corporation||Method of making dense flash EEPROM cell array and peripheral supporting circuits formed in deposited field oxide with sidewall spacers|
|US5573965 *||Dec 17, 1993||Nov 12, 1996||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Method of fabricating semiconductor devices and integrated circuits using sidewall spacer technology|
|US5614748 *||Jul 10, 1996||Mar 25, 1997||Sony Corporation||Nonvolatile memory device and process for production of the same|
|JPS57130474A *||Title not available|
|1||Wolf, "Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era", vol. 1, p. 195, 1986.|
|2||*||Wolf, Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era , vol. 1, p. 195, 1986.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6103576 *||Apr 13, 1999||Aug 15, 2000||Microchip Technology Incorporated||Dielectric layer of a memory cell having a stacked oxide sidewall and method of fabricating same|
|US6348379||Feb 11, 2000||Feb 19, 2002||Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.||Method of forming self-aligned contacts using consumable spacers|
|US6417046||May 5, 2000||Jul 9, 2002||Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company||Modified nitride spacer for solving charge retention issue in floating gate memory cell|
|US6417537||Jan 18, 2000||Jul 9, 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Metal oxynitride capacitor barrier layer|
|US6465828||Jul 30, 1999||Oct 15, 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Semiconductor container structure with diffusion barrier|
|US6631069||Nov 30, 2001||Oct 7, 2003||Micron Technology, Inc.||Metal oxynitride capacitor barrier layer|
|US6664583||Nov 30, 2001||Dec 16, 2003||Micron Technology, Inc.||Metal oxynitride capacitor barrier layer|
|US6664584||Nov 30, 2001||Dec 16, 2003||Micron Technology, Inc.||Metal oxynitride capacitor barrier layer|
|US6670256||Aug 28, 2001||Dec 30, 2003||Micron Technology, Inc.||Metal oxynitride capacitor barrier layer|
|US6780706||Oct 9, 2002||Aug 24, 2004||Micron Technology, Inc.||Semiconductor container structure with diffusion barrier|
|US7002202||Oct 17, 2003||Feb 21, 2006||Micron Technology, Inc.||Metal oxynitride capacitor barrier layer|
|US7015527||Oct 17, 2003||Mar 21, 2006||Micron Technology, Inc.||Metal oxynitride capacitor barrier layer|
|US7199007 *||Mar 22, 2004||Apr 3, 2007||Macronix International Co., Ltd.||Non-volatile memory device having a nitride barrier to reduce the fast erase effect|
|US20040085802 *||Oct 17, 2003||May 6, 2004||Micron Technology, Inc.||Metal oxynitride capacitor barrier layer|
|US20040229437 *||Mar 22, 2004||Nov 18, 2004||Uway Tseng||Non-volatile memory device having a nitride barrier to reduce the fast erase effect|
|US20070007578 *||Jul 7, 2005||Jan 11, 2007||Li Chi N B||Sub zero spacer for shallow MDD junction to improve BVDSS in NVM bitcell|
|US20070139661 *||Nov 2, 2004||Jun 21, 2007||Quark, Inc.||Systems and methods for producing media products|
|US20070228450 *||Mar 29, 2006||Oct 4, 2007||Di Li||Flash memory device with enlarged control gate structure, and methods of making same|
|U.S. Classification||438/265, 257/E29.129, 438/595, 257/E21.422, 257/E23.114|
|International Classification||H01L29/423, H01L23/552, H01L21/336, H01L23/58|
|Cooperative Classification||H01L2924/0002, H01L23/552, H01L23/585, H01L29/42324, H01L29/66825|
|European Classification||H01L29/66M6T6F17, H01L29/423D2B2, H01L23/552, H01L23/58B|
|Apr 23, 2003||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 20, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jan 4, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023786/0416
Effective date: 20091223
Owner name: ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023786/0416
Effective date: 20091223
|Apr 14, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12