|Publication number||US6042292 A|
|Application number||US 08/624,923|
|Publication date||Mar 28, 2000|
|Filing date||Mar 29, 1996|
|Priority date||Dec 9, 1994|
|Also published as||US5511272|
|Publication number||08624923, 624923, US 6042292 A, US 6042292A, US-A-6042292, US6042292 A, US6042292A|
|Inventors||Michael J. Belanger, Robert J. Wentworth|
|Original Assignee||Belanger, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (18), Referenced by (10), Classifications (16), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/352,657 filed on Dec. 9, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,511,272.
The present invention relates to rotary brush units used in vehicle washes and the like. More specifically, the present invention relates to a brush shaft designed such that, under external force, permanent deformation is limited to a predetermined portion which can be easily removed and replaced without having to disassemble the entire brush unit.
A common problem in rotary brush units used in vehicle washes is the permanent deformation or breakage of the brush shaft. Frequently, vehicles which stray from the proper path or track or which are too large or driven too fast run into the brushes with excessive force, causing the brush shaft to bend or break.
A typical prior art overhead brush unit 10 shown in FIG. 1 comprises a motor drive unit, drive/support shaft, and brush. The rotating drive shaft 20 is suspended at its upper end 20a from an overhead, motorized drive unit 15. A brush 18 is attached to the shaft at its lower end 20b to rotate with the shaft. Though made of steel or a similar strong material, the drive shaft 20 can be bent when, for example, an automobile 1 runs into the brush 18. If the force of the collision is great enough, shaft 20 can be permanently bent or even broken at a bending moment region 27 between the brush and the drive unit. This type of damage requires disassembly of the entire brush unit 10 in order to replace the damaged shaft; removing the shaft from the drive unit is a particularly labor intensive operation. Such damage is also expensive from the standpoint of both replacement shaft cost and downtime during which the brush unit, and often the entire wash, is inoperative.
In the present invention the expense of replacing a bent or broken shaft is eliminated through the use of a sacrificial link, detachably interposed between first and second portions of the rotating brush shaft. This link is designed to permanently deform or break prior to the remainder of the shaft. To accomplish this, the sacrificial link is preferably incorporated between the first and second shaft portions at a point where the shaft is expected to experience significant bending moment in response to external force. The preferred form of this invention is further characterized by a sacrificial link having a center region whose diameter is smaller than the diameter of either the first or second shaft portions, making it significantly weaker and the first to bend. Once permanently deformed, the sacrificial link is easily replaced with a minimum of downtime and expense.
In a vehicle-cleaning brush unit having a brush-supporting shaft depending from a support unit, the brush shaft comprises separate first and second shaft portions connected to the brush and motor drive unit, respectively, and the sacrificial link is removably connected to the first and second shaft portions.
The sacrificial link in one form comprises a sacrificial shaft section having two ends connected to the first and second shaft portions of the brush unit, and a center region pre-engineered to fail before the first and second shafts by virtue of a reduced diameter. The ends of the sacrificial shaft section and the reduced diameter center region are preferably connected by regions of tapered diameter. The ends can include sockets whose diameter is approximately equal to the diameter of the first and second shaft portions.
In a further form of the invention the socket ends of the sacrificial shaft section are divided into clamping halves for improved, shear-resistant coupling to the rotating shaft portion. The socket ends preferably further include a tap hole to assist in removing a shaft section clamped therein should the parts become stuck or corroded.
FIG. 1 depicts a prior art brush assembly and shaft being bent by an automobile;
FIG. 2 illustrates a sacrificial brush shaft link according to the present invention, as it is incorporated into a brush shaft, also being bent;
FIG. 3 is an exploded perspective view of the sacrificial link and brush shaft of FIG. 2; and
FIG. 4 is a more detailed perspective view of the sacrificial link of FIG. 2, showing its connections with a brush shaft in phantom.
FIG. 1 shows a typical prior art brush unit 10. As depicted, it includes a shaft 20 suspended at its upper region 20a by an overhead drive unit 15. A brush 18 is suspended from the opposite end 20b of shaft 20. Excessive force imposed on brush 18 by, for example, an automobile 1 can cause permanent deformation or breakage of the shaft 20. Because the shaft and brush are freely suspended from the drive unit 15, the bending moment is concentrated at a point 27 near the drive unit. Since the shaft is connected to both the drive unit 15 and brush 18, repair of the bent or broken shaft requires disassembly of the entire brush unit 10.
In the present invention, shown in FIG. 2, the rotating shaft 30 of the overhead brush unit 10 comprises three distinct portions: an upper shaft portion 31; connected to and protruding from the drive unit 15; a second shaft portion 32, connected to and protruding from the brush 18; and a sacrificial link 40 removably connected to the free ends of upper and lower shaft portions 31,32 to form a unitary drive/support shaft. Sacrificial link 40 is located where the greatest bending moment is anticipated, in the illustrated embodiment near drive unit 15 at a pre-engineered failure area 42.
This three-piece shaft structure alleviates problems of both downtime and replacement cost when repairing damaged brush shafts. Since excessive force on the brush 18 focuses the greatest bending moment at pre-engineered failure area 42 of the sacrificial link 40 between the first and second shaft portions 31, 32, deformation or breakage of the shaft 30 is limited to the sacrificial link 40, an easily replaceable element.
Referring now to FIGS. 3 and 4, the structure and function of the present invention is illustrated in greater detail. The sacrificial link 40 is generally cylindrical in shape, comprising a reduced diameter center region 42 and spaced, opposing ends 41. The center region 42 is solid, while each end region 41 includes a socket 44 for receiving a free end of the upper or lower shaft portions 31,32 of the brush unit. Each socket 44 has an inner diameter approximating the outer diameter of the upper and lower shaft portion received therein. In the illustrated embodiment, upper and lower shaft portions 31 and 32 are the same diameter and sockets 44 are accordingly identical. This symmetrical, reversible arrangement is preferred since it reduces cost and simplifies installation and replacement. It is possible, however, to use upper and lower shaft portions of different diameter or shape, and correspondingly different sockets 44 at the ends of the sacrificial link 40.
The circumferential socket wall of each end 41 includes a pair of opposed slots 45 extending from the end of each socket 44 downward along the long axis of the link 40. These slots effectively divide each socket wall into clamping halves to facilitate the secure attachment of the link 40 to the upper and lower shaft portions 31, 32 of the brush unit.
Each socket 44 also includes bolt through-holes 46, extending through the wall of each clamping half. Through-holes 46 are aligned along an axis perpendicular to the long axis of the link 40 and the plane of slots 45. Upper and lower shaft portions 31,32 include matching bolt through-holes 33 at their free ends. The sockets 44 in each end 41 of the link 40 are formed or milled to a depth permitting the alignment of through-holes 46 and through-holes 33 when each end 41 of link 40 is connected to the upper and lower shaft portions.
Link 40 in the illustrated embodiment is approximately twelve to fourteen inches in length and about two inches in diameter at its widest point (ends 41). It will be understood that other lengths and diameters can be used to accommodate brush-unit shafts of varying lengths and diameters.
While each of the socket ends 41 has an outside diameter of approximately two inches, the center region 42 is characterized by a reduced diameter, in the illustrated embodiment approximately 1.25 inches. The transition region from each socket end to the reduced diameter center region of link 40 is defined by a solid tapered shoulder region 43) in the illustrated embodiment approximately 1/2 inch in length. Other taper lengths are possible, depending on the desired deflection and strength characteristics of link 40 and its overall dimensions. However, the deflection characteristics of link 40 with the illustrative 1/2 inch taper have been determined to be preferred for the link dimensions recited above.
Upper and lower shaft portions 31,32 are preferably manufactured from solid rods of steel, for example 7075 steel, while the sacrificial link 40 in the illustrated embodiment is milled from a rod of commercially available steel known as "Stressproof". The following tables illustrate the deflection characteristics of this material in link 40 according to the invention versus those in a one-piece prior art brush shaft:
______________________________________ Permanent SetForce Applied Deflection Under Load Deflection______________________________________STANDARD 7075 STEEL SHAFT (Prior Art)400 psi 14" 0.5"500 psi 19.5" 1"550 psi 23" 1.5"600 psi 25.5" 2.5"SHAFT WITH 11/4" DIAMETER STRESSPROOFLINK WITH 1/2" TAPER300 psi 7.5" 0.25"400 psi 11" 0.5"500 psi 14" 0.75"600 psi 17.25" 2.75"______________________________________
The illustrative dimensions above result in a sacrificial link 40 whose bending strength is approximately 20%-30% less than that of shaft portions 31,32. This range has been found to provide an optimum balance between failure threshold and overall brush unit performance under normal operating conditions and forces.
Of course, various grades of steel and even other metal alloys may be used to practice the present invention. In addition, shafts of varying diameters are also possible. The following tables illustrate the deflection characteristics of some alternative diameters and materials tested for the sacrificial link described above, with the diameter given for the reduced center section 42:
______________________________________ Permanent SetForce Applied Deflection Under Load Deflection______________________________________11/2" DIA HRS200 psi 3.75" 0.25"300 psi 6" 0.75"400 psi 9" 1.5"Quit11/2 × 1/4 WALL THICKNESS HRS TUBING200 psi 3.25" 0300 psi 6" 0.25"400 psi 8.5" 0.75"500 psi 11.5" 1.5"600 psi 18.5" 6.25"Quit1 3/8" DIA STRESSPROOF200 psi 3.25" 0300 psi 5.75" 0400 psi 8.25" 0500 psi 10" 0.75" (0)*600 psi 18" 3" (0)*Quit______________________________________ *indicates clamping half failure
______________________________________ Permanent SetForce Applied Deflection Under Load Deflection______________________________________1" DIA STRESSPROOF200 psi 7.75" 0.25"300 psi 14.5" 2"Quit2" DIA 6061-T6 ROD200 psi 3.5" 0.75"300 psi 6.25" 1"400 psi 9.75" 2.5"500 psi 13.25" 4"Quit______________________________________
In operation, the sacrificial link 40 is detachably connected by socket ends 41 to the upper and lower brush unit shaft portions 31,32. As indicated above, the depth of each socket 44 in ends 41 is such that through-holes 46 can be aligned with each of the corresponding through-holes 33 in the upper and lower shaft sections. To insure a secure engagement between the sacrificial link and each of the first and second shaft portions, a nut and bolt assembly 50 is fastened through each bore defined by aligned through-holes 46 and 33. The slots 45 in the circumferential walls of each socket end 41 permit the halves of each socket end to be clamped together upon tightening of the nuts and bolts 50; securely clamping link 40 to shaft portions 31,32 during normal brush operation. This clamping arrangement eliminates shear forces on bolt 50, resulting in a stronger connection.
The vehicle wash environment in which brush shaft 30 operates is often a corrosive one, and can cause the ends of shaft portions 31,32 to become locked in sockets 44 even after bolts 50 are removed. Socket ends 41 are accordingly provided with tap holes 49 through which a bolt can be threaded into contact with the stuck shaft. Advancing the bolt against the shaft in socket end 41 separates the stuck parts.
It will be understood that the foregoing is merely an illustrative embodiment of the invention. Various other changes and alterations, apparent to those skilled in the art, can be made without departing from the scope of the following claims:
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US612685 *||Jan 7, 1898||Oct 18, 1898||Coupling for broom-handles|
|US1050116 *||Apr 12, 1912||Jan 14, 1913||Michael F Shay||Rope-coupling.|
|US2085074 *||May 13, 1935||Jun 29, 1937||Waterous Co||Hydrant and deformable or breakable valve stem therefor|
|US2249848 *||Jun 22, 1939||Jul 22, 1941||O'brien Denis F||Frangible hydrant|
|US2381699 *||Jun 14, 1944||Aug 7, 1945||Mcquay Norris Mfg Co||Piston expander|
|US3185413 *||Mar 25, 1963||May 25, 1965||Walker Dale W||Integral tension bar retainer|
|US3439947 *||Feb 10, 1967||Apr 22, 1969||Mueller Co||Fire hydrant stem coupling|
|US3534941 *||Sep 20, 1967||Oct 20, 1970||Dresser Ind||Fire hydrant|
|US3586019 *||Dec 18, 1968||Jun 22, 1971||Waterous Co||Fire hydrant|
|US3630474 *||Aug 18, 1970||Dec 28, 1971||Kearney National Inc||Breakaway pole support structure|
|US3837752 *||Jan 26, 1973||Sep 24, 1974||Shewchuk J||Coupling for break away pole bases|
|US3846030 *||Aug 10, 1972||Nov 5, 1974||Katt H||Post|
|US3851983 *||Feb 20, 1973||Dec 3, 1974||Mackenzie K||Coupling|
|US3917424 *||Apr 10, 1974||Nov 4, 1975||Cyclo Index Corp||Clamping device for couplings|
|US5065555 *||Nov 21, 1989||Nov 19, 1991||Kajima Corporation||Elasto-plastic damper|
|US5470118 *||Mar 11, 1994||Nov 28, 1995||Burton; James E.||Shear device for well service tools|
|US5503493 *||Nov 29, 1993||Apr 2, 1996||Ishikawajima-Harima Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Joint structure for synthetic resin structural members|
|US5511272 *||Dec 9, 1994||Apr 30, 1996||Belanger, Inc.||Pre-engineered failure link for brush shaft|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7401457||Aug 1, 2005||Jul 22, 2008||Cnh America Llc||Auger finger with tether for retaining and retracting the finger when broken|
|US7937921 *||May 10, 2011||Agco Corporation||Break-away finger for retracting finger auger|
|US8353073||Oct 30, 2008||Jan 15, 2013||Washtech Holding Gmbh||Brush arrangement for a carwash facility|
|US20070022727 *||Aug 1, 2005||Feb 1, 2007||Bich Gary L||Auger finger with tether for retaining and retracting the finger when broken|
|US20080295472 *||Jun 4, 2008||Dec 4, 2008||Thompson Scott K||Retention device for separating combine auger finger materials and agricultural material engagement method|
|US20090217639 *||Mar 3, 2008||Sep 3, 2009||Agco Corporation||Break-Away Finger for Retracting Finger Auger|
|US20100199446 *||Oct 30, 2008||Aug 12, 2010||Washtec Holding Gmbh||Brush arrangement for a carwash facility|
|WO2009065715A1 *||Oct 30, 2008||May 28, 2009||Washtec Holding Gmbh||Brush arrangement for a carwash facility|
|WO2012093228A1||Jan 3, 2012||Jul 12, 2012||Turbomeca||Mechanical protection method and device|
|WO2012143656A1||Apr 12, 2012||Oct 26, 2012||Turbomeca||Mechanical protection device|
|U.S. Classification||403/2, 403/41, 403/305|
|International Classification||B60S3/06, F16D9/00, F16D3/72|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10T403/5733, Y10T403/11, B60S3/063, Y10T403/27, F16D9/00, F16D3/72, Y10S15/02|
|European Classification||F16D9/00, B60S3/06B, F16D3/72|
|Mar 2, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BELANGER, INC., MICHIGAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BELANGER, MICHAEL J.;WENTWORTH, ROBERT J.;REEL/FRAME:009794/0361
Effective date: 19941209
|Feb 6, 2001||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Aug 27, 2003||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Aug 29, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Nov 7, 2011||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Mar 28, 2012||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|May 15, 2012||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20120328