|Publication number||US6075707 A|
|Application number||US 09/326,167|
|Publication date||Jun 13, 2000|
|Filing date||Jun 4, 1999|
|Priority date||May 19, 1995|
|Also published as||CA2176625A1, CA2176625C, DE69609765D1, DE69609765T2, EP0743615A1, EP0743615B1, US5914862, US6195858|
|Publication number||09326167, 326167, US 6075707 A, US 6075707A, US-A-6075707, US6075707 A, US6075707A|
|Inventors||Donald Harold Ferguson, Mircea Paun|
|Original Assignee||Kasten Chase Applied Research Limited|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (32), Referenced by (25), Classifications (38), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a division of application U.S. Ser. No. 08/926,321, filed Sep. 5, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,914,862, issued Jun. 22, 1999, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/444,969, filed May 19, 1995, now abandoned.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to electro-mechanical circuit design, and more particularly to a flexible radio frequency identification tag for mail efficiency measurement applications.
2. Background of the Invention
Traditional circuit board assemblies use rigid insulated materials to form a substrate for the mounting of electronic components. According to well known prior art designs, the signal flow between electronic components is effected by wire connections (e.g. copper traces) printed on the substrate. The electronic components themselves are connected to these wire traces via solder. The rigidity of the substrate material prevents cracking of the copper solder joint connections and insures the integrity of these connections when the device is subjected to mechanical stress.
Certain specialized applications require circuit board assemblies of size greater than approximately 4 cm2 to be flexible. One such application is mail efficiency processing measurement wherein the circuit board assemblies are disposed within or on envelopes which pass through mail sorting equipment. The circuit board assemblies in such an application may be designed to incorporate low frequency antennae and associated electronic circuitry, The circuit board assembly must be designed to withstand the stresses of being passed through mechanical sorting machines.
According to the present invention, a radio frequency identification tag is provided having a printed RF coil integrated with a flexible substrate, and an integrated circuit area of the substrate adjacent the coil, wherein the integrated circuit area is reinforced to protect electrical components thereon. The radio frequency tag of the present invention is designed to endure mechanical stresses far in excess of the stresses which standard circuit board assemblies are normally subjected to. The tag of the present invention is also designed to be sufficiently thin and light for use in mail processing measurement applications.
The integrated antenna and circuit area are disposed on the same substrate thereby resulting in increased reliability and decreased complexity over prior art designs having antenna elements separate from the sensing circuit.
A detailed description of the preferred embodiment is provided herein below with reference to the following drawings, in which:
FIGS. 1A and 1B are top and bottom plan views of the radio frequency identification tag according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a cross-section through the line II--II in FIGS. 1A and 1B;
FIG. 3 is an expanded view of the portion shown in phantom outline in FIG. 1A; and
FIGS. 4A-4D is a schematic diagram of a representative circuit carried by the integrated circuit area of the tag shown in FIGS. 1-3.
With reference to the FIGS. 1 and 2, a radio frequency tag is shown comprising a flexible substrate 1 on opposite sides of which a receive antenna coil 2 is provided. The antenna coil 2 comprises a first winding 2A on the top side of the substrate and a second winding 2B on the bottom of the substrate, as shown best in FIGS. 1A and 1B, respectively. The substrate 1 is preferably made from standard industrial grade epoxy glass laminate, type FR-4, such as manufactured by ADJ/Isola or NAN YA. According to the preferred embodiment, the core thickness of the substrate is made 8 mils, at Class 3 tolerance (i.e. 8±1 mil).
The size and efficiency of the antenna 2 is determined by the following variables:
1. the excitation frequency,
2. sensitivity requirements,
3. effective area of the coil,
4. number of turns of the coil,
5. Q factor of the coil, all of which are limited by
6. package size.
The size of the LF antenna 2 for the mail processing application discussed above, is limited by the postal envelope size specifications as dictated by any particular application. Antenna efficiency is optimized by maximizing antenna size and minimizing resistive losses in a tuned circuit configuration within the boundaries determined by the packaging constraints. It should be noted that for all low frequency excitation applications, the antenna 2 should be designed to be as large as possible for maximum efficiency.
Tuning of the antenna 2 in the identification tag of the present invention, is accomplished by first measuring the inductance, parasitic capacitance and resistance of the antenna at its terminals (i.e. at multiple connections 3 between the embedded antenna windings 2A and 2B and the integrated circuit area 4, discussed in greater detail below). The inductance, parasitic capacitance and resistance of the antenna 2 are measured at the intended excitation frequency (in the case of the postal tag application referred to herein above --135 KHz). Decreasing parasitic capacitance improves antenna efficiency. Once the characteristic impedance of the antenna 2 has been measured, a calculated parallel capacitance is added in order to tune the circuit to resonate at the selected excitation frequency. Turning briefly to the preferred embodiment of FIGS. 4A-4D, this capacitance is provided by capacitors C1 and C2 connected in parallel with the antenna 2.
Without the addition of an external capacitor (e.g. parallel capacitance provided by capacitor C1 and C2 in FIG. 4), the embedded antenna 2 is characterized by its own self resonance determined by its inductance and parasitic capacitance.
The desired parallel capacitance C is given by:
where L is the measured inductance, W=2πf0, and f0 is the excitation frequency.
It is important to note that the size, shape and number of turns of the embedded coil 2 are limited by packaging constraints and the excitation frequency (f0), and that these variables may change with changes in the selected excitation frequency and packaging requirements.
In order to increase the inductance of the embedded LF antenna coil 2, the windings 2A and 2B are printed on both sides of the substrate 1 and are connected together via single plated through hole 5.
According to the preferred embodiment, the antenna traces 2A on the top side of the substrate 1 are offset from the antenna traces 2B on the bottom of the substrate to minimize parasitic capacitance therebetween. The degree of offset is based on the spacing between the traces and the width of the traces themselves. Generally, the traces 2B on the underside of substrate 1 should be offset such that the middle of the width of each trace is referenced to the middle space between traces 2A on the top side of the substrate 1.
It should be noted that any application using a specific receiver frequency must have a specific design layout optimized for that frequency and application. Applications where the tag requires a different received frequency will normally require a different layout.
Circuit elements carried by the integrated circuit area 4 of the tag are interconnected via copper traces in the usual manner. According to the preferred embodiment, the copper thickness is double sided at 1/2 ounce per square foot. This results in a net tag thickness of 0.008 inches of core material coupled with 1/2 ounce copper, which results in good flexibility at low cost.
The tag of the present invention is fabricated using industry standard processes for the manufacture of flex circuit boards, with close attention being paid to the plating requirements for forming connections via the through holes from one side of the substrate 1 to the other (e.g. hole 5 ). Excessive plating may increase the total weight above acceptable limits and make the board less flexible, while deficient plating may increase the resistance of the antenna 2, thereby decreasing efficiency. According to the preferred embodiment, a protective solder mask coating is placed over top of the integrated circuit area 4 after etching. It should be noted that care must be taken in the application of the solder mask to ensure a thin even coat. If the solder mask is applied too thickly, the tag may exceed weight requirements for a particular application.
After processing, the printed circuit board (PCB) formed on substrate 1 is characterized by the following specifications:
Copper thickness after plating (addition--both sides--total):
0.5 mils (plus 0.2-0) mils
Solder mask thickness each side: 11.4±1 mils
Total weight of the PCB: 5.5±.5g
Coil inductance (640±5) μH at 135 KHz
Coil Q (quality factor): 8.0±0.5 at 135 KHz
In order to further optimize weight characteristics of the identification tag, portions of the substrate 1 are cut out where not required to support operative circuit elements. As shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B, a rectangular portion 8 of the substrate 1 is cut out from the center of the antenna coil windings 2A and 2B.
According to the preferred embodiment, efficiency, selectivity and sensitivity are further improved by gold plating the etched printed circuit board for increasing the conductivity of the traces of coil windings 2A and 2B. The resistance of each coil winding 2A, 2B decreases when the copper traces are gold plated. The Q value of the coil increases as a result. The Q factor is an indication of efficiency and selectivity of the coil, and is given by:
where R is the resistance of the antenna 2.
The integrated circuit area 4 is encapsulated by a tough UV (ultraviolet) adhesive 6, such as model number 35241 adhesive made by Loctite Inc. The adhesive is preferably applied by a programmable controlled automatic dispensing unit for providing consistent application of the adhesive to the integrated circuit area with components soldered thereon. An ink dam 9 is provided surrounding the integrated circuit area 4, for limiting the flow of encapsulation material. After applying the adhesive 6, the circuit board assembly is immediately placed under a UV lamp for curing. The profile of the encapsulation is as shown in FIG. 2.
Application of the UV adhesive 6 over the component area 4 reinforces that area, so that it becomes "semi-rigid". According to the present invention, this area is made semi-rigid as opposed to substantially completely rigid, because the UV adhesive 6 which is chosen for the present invention has a limited degree of flexibility so that it will not crack or fracture under stress. It has been found through experimentation that the substrate 1 experiences the greatest stress and degree of flexing at the edge of the semi-rigid area between the surface mount components in area 4 and the embedded antenna coil 2. Because of this, multiple connections 3 are utilized between the embedded antenna coil 2 and the sensing circuit disposed in area 4, in order to reduce the risk of failure should one of the connections fail due to excessive flexing.
After the UV adhesive 6 is applied and cured, a Mylar™ protective film 7 is applied to the integrated circuit area 4 to compensate for any discontinuities or irregularities in the application of the UV adhesive 6. The Mylar™ film 7 is rolled on to the encapsulated area, and the entire flexible circuit board substrate with imbedded antenna coil on both sides and the electrical connection means and then cut with a rolled dye. The Mylar™ film 7 also minimizes any sharp edges not covered by encapsulation by the UV adhesive. This minimizes the surface stress experienced by the tag, thereby allowing it to "slip" through the rollers and belts of a sorting machine. This is useful for the intended postal tag application of the preferred embodiment. Furthermore, in applications where static electricity build up is common, the Mylar™ film or membrane 7 may be provided with a resistive coating having a surface resistivity of tens of mega-ohms per square inch, to reduce surface charge build up and decrease discharge current when discharge occurs.
Turning now to FIGS. 4A-4D, a schematic diagram is shown of a preferred embodiment of receiver/transmitter sensing circuitry fabricated on the integrated circuit area 4 of the tag. The physical layout of these circuit elements is shown in the expanded view of FIG. 3.
The receive antenna section comprises an embedded antenna coil 2, tuning capacitors C1 and C2, a dual bi-directional diode clamp D1, and high sensitivity RF Schotky barrier diode D2.
Capacitors C1 and C2 are connected in parallel with the receive antenna 2 (i.e. interconnected antenna windings 2A and 2B). The values of capacitors C1 and C2 are selected based on the required receive signal frequency, inductance value of antenna 2 and parasitic capacitance of the embedded antenna 2, as discussed above. In the presence of the desired low frequency excitation signal, electromagnetic energy is coupled into the embedded antenna and the capacitors C1 and C2.
A dual bi-directional diode clamp D1 is placed in parallel with the receive antenna 2 to limit the signal amplitude. The signal is then half-wave rectified through diode D2, which is an RF Schotky barrier diode. The cathode of the diode D2 is connected to resistor R16. Because the resistance of diode D2 increases directly with temperature, resistor R16 is selected to be many times larger than the maximum resistance of diode D2, in order to ensure adequate signal levels at the input of amplifier U1A. According to the preferred embodiment shown in FIGS. 4A-4D, amplifier U1A is implemented as a MAX417ESA dual operational amplifier. The internal series capacitance of the MAX417ESA amplifier is approximately 2.0 pF. This capacitance combined with the high impedance input of U1A and the rectification provided by diode D2, results in peak voltage detection of the incoming signal. The resulting peak detected voltage is positive with respect to ground (minus the D2 forward voltage drop) and is completely dependent on the coupled energy from the incoming signal.
Resistors R14 and R15 are provided to compensate for variations in the voltage input offset characteristics of amplifiers U1A and U1B. According to the preferred embodiment illustrated, the MAX417ESA series dual operational amplifier has been found to consume excessive current when the difference in the two input voltages with respect to ground (the voltage between pins 2 and 3) is less than the characteristic input offset voltage for the amplifier. Nonetheless, the MAX417ESA dual operational amplifier was chosen in the preferred embodiment for its extremely low biasing current, which at the time of filing this application is apparently unavailable from any other component.
Resistors R14 and R15 are configured in series across the supply voltage for providing a voltage divider network whereby one terminal of the embedded antenna coil 2 is referenced through the junction of the two resistors. Resistor R15 is selected such that the voltage drop across R15 causes a positive voltage differential between pins 2 and 3 of operational amplifier U1A that is greater than the input offset characteristic of U1A.
The resistors R2 and R3 surrounding operational amplifier U1A are used to configure the amplifier as a non-inverting amplifier with a gain of 10 in the preferred embodiment. D3 is a bidirectional diode clamp and is placed across the feedback resistor R3 for providing automatic gain control. D3 has an equivalent resistance, RD3, of 480K ohms in the preferred embodiment. The amplifier gain is given by:
AA =1+((R3 RD3 /(R3 +RD3))/R2)
Capacitor C3 is connected from the output of U1A to the input of a band pass filter comprising the components R1, C14, R4, C15, R5, R17, R13 surrounding U1B, thereby creating a second order band pass filter with a gain of 16.5 and a passband of 80 Hz centred at 610 Hz. Capacitor C3 AC couples the signal from the first stage amplifier U1A to the second stage amplifier U1A to the second stage band pass filter. The amplifier gain is given by:
AB =R5 /2R1
The pass band is given by:
The centre frequency is given by: ##EQU1##
The two amplifiers U1A and U1B are cascaded together to provide a total gain of 165.5, as follows:
At =AA ×AB
The output of U1B is connected to capacitor C16 which couples the signal to a peak detector circuit comprising D6, C17 and R18. Dual diode D6 comprises two diodes, and when configured as per the preferred embodiment, conducts during the negative cycle of the amplified signal, hereby charging capacitor C16. During the negative cycle of the amplified signal, diode D6A does not conduct and therefore blocks negative current flow.
The positive charge accumulated across capacitor C16 is added to the signal on the next positive cycle of the detected signal effectively boosting the voltage that appears across capacitor C17. Resistor R6 is connected from the node of capacitor C17 and resistor R18 to the base of transistor Q1. When the resulting voltage across the peak detector circuit exceeds the turn on voltage of Q1 (which in the preferred embodiment, is at 0.45 volts) transistor Q1 turns on, thereby pulling the voltage across resistor R7 to ground. Thus, transistor Q1 operates as a switch. Transistor Q3 is connected in parallel with Q1. Transistor Q3 is a phototransistor that is specifically used for writing information into the microprocessor of the tag. When exposed to infrared light, transistor Q3 turns on. Information is sent to the tag by modulating the infrared light with encoded information.
The remaining portions of the circuitry shown in FIGS. 4A-4D, are substantially identical to the circuitry disclosed in applicant's co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 946,425, filed May 1, 1991, the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In summary, according to the present invention, a radio frequency identification tag is provided which is of robust, flexible design. The tag exhibits greater efficiency, lower cost and lower weight than prior art designs, and is capable of withstanding considerable stresses experienced in applications such as mail efficiency processing measurement.
Other embodiments and variations of the invention are possible. For example, although the preferred embodiment is directed to radio frequency identification tag for mail sorting efficiency applications, the flexible substrate of the present invention with imbedded antenna coil and adjacent semi-rigid circuit component area, may be utilized in different configurations for different applications such as inventory control, vehicle identification, etc. All such alternative embodiments and configurations are believed to be within the sphere and scope of the claims as appended hereto.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4691202 *||Apr 3, 1985||Sep 1, 1987||Denne Phillip R M||Identification systems|
|US4829540 *||Oct 29, 1987||May 9, 1989||Fairchild Weston Systems, Inc.||Secure communication system for multiple remote units|
|US4864615 *||May 27, 1988||Sep 5, 1989||General Instrument Corporation||Reproduction of secure keys by using distributed key generation data|
|US5005106 *||Dec 7, 1989||Apr 2, 1991||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Multifunctional card having an electromagnetic wave protection|
|US5043195 *||Oct 28, 1988||Aug 27, 1991||Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company||Static shielding film|
|US5091229 *||Aug 14, 1990||Feb 25, 1992||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Electronics protective packaging film|
|US5124697 *||Oct 16, 1989||Jun 23, 1992||Motorola, Inc.||Acknowledge-back pager|
|US5164985 *||Oct 26, 1988||Nov 17, 1992||Nysen Paul A||Passive universal communicator system|
|US5175033 *||Jun 22, 1990||Dec 29, 1992||W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.||Metallized bag with improved interlayer adhesion for static protection of electronic components|
|US5180615 *||Dec 13, 1989||Jan 19, 1993||W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.||Metallized bag for static protection of electronic components|
|US5247332 *||Nov 1, 1991||Sep 21, 1993||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Copying machine having a zooming function|
|US5321240 *||Jan 25, 1993||Jun 14, 1994||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Non-contact IC card|
|US5321753 *||Jul 8, 1991||Jun 14, 1994||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Secure communication of static information by electronic means|
|US5355120 *||Oct 9, 1992||Oct 11, 1994||Security Tag Systems, Inc.||Frequency-dividing-transponder tag|
|US5382829 *||Mar 17, 1993||Jan 17, 1995||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Packaged microwave semiconductor device|
|US5436803 *||Dec 16, 1993||Jul 25, 1995||Schlegel Corporation||Emi shielding having flexible conductive envelope|
|US5528222 *||Sep 9, 1994||Jun 18, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Radio frequency circuit and memory in thin flexible package|
|US5617300 *||Apr 28, 1994||Apr 1, 1997||Nagano Japan Radio Co., Ltd.||Connecting method of printed substrate and apparatus|
|US5837992 *||Aug 31, 1995||Nov 17, 1998||Shinko Nameplate Co., Ltd.||Memory card and its manufacturing method|
|EP0082690A1 *||Dec 17, 1982||Jun 29, 1983||Senelco Limited||Transmitter/responder systems|
|EP0125143A2 *||May 9, 1984||Nov 14, 1984||Marc Industries Incorporated||Movement monitor|
|EP0253368A1 *||Jul 14, 1987||Jan 20, 1988||Amtech Corporation||System for identifying particular objects|
|EP0301127A1 *||Jul 31, 1987||Feb 1, 1989||Texas Instruments Deutschland Gmbh||Transponder arrangement|
|EP0595549A2 *||Oct 21, 1993||May 4, 1994||Hughes Microelectronics Europa Limited||Radio frequency baggage tags|
|FR2604808A1 *||Title not available|
|GB2112607A *||Title not available|
|GB2157132A *||Title not available|
|GB2163324A *||Title not available|
|GB2202981A *||Title not available|
|WO1983001697A1 *||Oct 29, 1982||May 11, 1983||Reeb, Max, E.||Identification device formed as a band carried by a tag-like object|
|WO1986004172A1 *||Nov 11, 1985||Jul 17, 1986||Saab Automation Ab||Tags for identification system|
|WO1988004453A1 *||Feb 27, 1987||Jun 16, 1988||Ronald W Froelich||Computerized data-bearing card and reader/writer therefor|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6275157 *||Sep 21, 1999||Aug 14, 2001||Intermec Ip Corp.||Embedded RFID transponder in vehicle window glass|
|US6316734 *||Mar 7, 2000||Nov 13, 2001||3M Innovative Properties Company||Flexible circuits with static discharge protection and process for manufacture|
|US6357685 *||May 1, 2000||Mar 19, 2002||Wibmer Gmbh U. Co. Kommanditgesellschaft Papier-Formtechnik||Spool-collar with transponder especially for spin-spooling of glass fibers|
|US6779246||Jun 14, 2001||Aug 24, 2004||Appleton Papers Inc.||Method and system for forming RF reflective pathways|
|US6825766||Dec 21, 2001||Nov 30, 2004||Genei Industries, Inc.||Industrial data capture system including a choke point portal and tracking software for radio frequency identification of cargo|
|US7123204||Apr 24, 2003||Oct 17, 2006||Forster Ian J||Energy source communication employing slot antenna|
|US7162799||Feb 25, 2005||Jan 16, 2007||Ford Motor Company||Method for manufacturing an item|
|US7372418||Aug 31, 2006||May 13, 2008||Mineral Lassen Llc||Energy source communication employing slot antenna|
|US7414589||May 21, 2007||Aug 19, 2008||Mineral Lassen Llc||Energy source communication employing slot antenna|
|US7467760||Apr 29, 2003||Dec 23, 2008||Allflex Europe Sas||Coil arrangement for radio-frequency identification devices, process and apparatus for making said arrangement|
|US7683761||Jan 26, 2005||Mar 23, 2010||Battelle Memorial Institute||Method for autonomous establishment and utilization of an active-RF tag network|
|US7755556||Jul 11, 2008||Jul 13, 2010||Forster Ian J||Energy source communication employing slot antenna|
|US7786871 *||May 23, 2007||Aug 31, 2010||Radiant Rfid, L.L.C.||Radio frequency identification devices with separated antennas|
|US8228236 *||Aug 29, 2007||Jul 24, 2012||Intelleflex Corporation||Inverted F antenna with coplanar feed and RFID device having same|
|US8292168||Oct 24, 2006||Oct 23, 2012||Petratec International Ltd.||System and method for authorizing purchases associated with a vehicle|
|US8364094||Mar 13, 2008||Jan 29, 2013||Petratec International Ltd.||Antenna assembly for service station|
|US8665069||Oct 16, 2008||Mar 4, 2014||Petratec International Ltd.||RFID tag especially for use near conductive objects|
|US20020152604 *||Apr 23, 2001||Oct 24, 2002||Debraal John Charles||Method and system for forming electrically conductive pathways|
|US20040080299 *||Apr 24, 2003||Apr 29, 2004||Forster Ian J.||Energy source recharging device and method|
|US20040106376 *||Apr 24, 2003||Jun 3, 2004||Forster Ian J.||Rechargeable interrogation reader device and method|
|US20050005856 *||Aug 9, 2004||Jan 13, 2005||Appleton Papers Inc.||Method and system for forming RF reflective pathways|
|US20050138785 *||Feb 2, 2005||Jun 30, 2005||Ford Motor Company||Method for manufacturing an item|
|US20050150094 *||Feb 25, 2005||Jul 14, 2005||Ford Motor Company||Method for manufacturing an item|
|US20050248429 *||Apr 29, 2003||Nov 10, 2005||Quelis Id Systems, Inc.||Coil arrangement for radio-frequency identification devices, process and apparatus for making said arrangement|
|US20120257336 *||Oct 11, 2012||Snagg, LLC||Anti-theft deterrent protection kit and a method of assembling and using said kit|
|U.S. Classification||361/750, 361/739, 174/256, 361/782, 361/737, 340/572.7, 343/702, 361/749, 174/254|
|International Classification||G08G1/017, G06K19/077, H05K1/16, G06K19/07, G06K19/04|
|Cooperative Classification||G06K19/0723, Y10T29/4902, G06K19/07779, Y10T29/435, Y10T29/49018, G08G1/017, G06K19/04, G06K19/0702, G06K19/07749, H05K1/16, H05K1/165, G06K19/07758, G06K19/07781, Y10T29/49146, G06K19/07783|
|European Classification||G06K19/077T3, G06K19/077T7C1, G08G1/017, G06K19/07A2, G06K19/077T7C1C, G06K19/077T7C1A, G06K19/077T, G06K19/07T, G06K19/04|
|Oct 10, 2003||AS||Assignment|
|Oct 28, 2003||AS||Assignment|
|Dec 3, 2003||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 12, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Dec 12, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12