|Publication number||US6085223 A|
|Application number||US 08/546,070|
|Publication date||Jul 4, 2000|
|Filing date||Oct 20, 1995|
|Priority date||Oct 20, 1995|
|Publication number||08546070, 546070, US 6085223 A, US 6085223A, US-A-6085223, US6085223 A, US6085223A|
|Inventors||Felipe Carino, Jr., Anthony L. Rollins|
|Original Assignee||Ncr Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (36), Non-Patent Citations (38), Referenced by (125), Classifications (11), Legal Events (11)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The foregoing application is related to the commonly assigned applications now pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, all of which are incorporated by reference herein:
Method and Apparatus for Extending Existing Database Management System for New Data Types, Ser. No. 08/546,101, by Felipe Carino Jr. et al., filed on same date herewith;
Method and Apparatus for Managing Shared Data, Ser. No. 08/546,283, by William P. Jones et al., filed on same date herewith;
Method and Apparatus for Providing Shared Data to a Requesting Client, Ser. No. 546,466, by Felipe Carino Jr. et al., filed on same date herewith;
Method and Apparatus for Parallel Execution of User-Defined Functions in an Object-Relational Database Management System, Ser. No. 546,465, by Felipe Carino Jr., filed on same date herewith; and
Method and Apparatus for Extending a Database Management System to Operate With Diverse Object Servers, Ser. No. 08/546,059, by Felipe Carino Jr. et al. filed on the same date herewith.
1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates generally to database management systems, and in particular to a federated database management system that provides users and application developers with large object processing and retrieval capabilities within an SQL-based operating environment.
2. Description of Related Art
Large-scale integrated database management systems provide an efficient, consistent, and secure means for storing and retrieving vast amounts of data. This ability to manage massive amounts of information has become a virtual necessity in business today.
At the same time, wider varieties of data are available for storage and retrieval. In particular, multimedia applications are being introduced and deployed for a wide range of business and entertainment purposes, including multimedia storage, retrieval, and content analysis. Properly managed, multimedia information technology can be used to solve a wide variety of business problems.
For example, multimedia storage and retrieval capability could be used to store check signature images in a banking system. These images may then be retrieved to verify signatures. In addition, the authenticity of the signatures could be confirmed using content-based analysis of the data to confirm that the customer's signature is genuine. However, practical limitations have stymied development of large multimedia database management systems.
Multimedia database information can be managed by ordinary relational database management systems (RDBMS), or by object-oriented database management systems (OODBMS). Each of these options present problems that have thus far stymied development.
Object-oriented database management systems are unpopular because they require a large initial capital investment and are incompatible with existing RDBMSs. Further, maintaining two separate data repositories in a RDBMS and a OODBMS is inconsistent with the database management philosophy of maintaining a secure consistent central repository for all data.
RDBMSs such as the TERADATA® system are vastly more popular than OODBMS. However, existing RDBMSs cannot effectively handle large multimedia objects. Also, although RDBMS database features and functions apply equally well to alphanumeric or multimedia data types, multimedia objects introduce new semantics problems, and require new strategies for manipulating and moving extremely large objects, which would otherwise overwhelm RDBMS computational capacity and the I/O capability of the computer implementing the RDBMS.
Another problem associated with storage and retrieval of multimedia objects relates to the transmission of data from the database management system to the client requesting the data. Real-time transmission requires expensive high-throughput communications channels. For example, for real time transmission of a 100 minute audio compact disc, a data transfer rate of at 2 Kbits/sec would be required, even if the data were compressed. A 100 minute VHS movie would require 1.5 Mbits/second High Definition Television (HDTV) would increase this requirement to 30 Mbits/sec. Large data instances may cause unacceptably lengthy response times to user commands, and excessive transmission costs. Also, the object data may be highly sensitive, and best transmitted over expensive high-security communication channels.
Accordingly, there is a need to extend existing RDBMSs to process and access extremely large data objects such as multimedia objects. In many applications, the client initiating the request does not desire to receive the results of the data query, but instead desires to direct the data to one or more receiver clients. For example, in a video electronic mail application, a client may wish to send an e-mail to one or more other clients in either a point to point or broadcast mode. Another example is for video-on-demand services to receiver clients. In this situation, the video requests will not be directed through the multimedia database, but rather through an application processor which will act as the requesting client to the database server and direct the selected video to the end-user, or receiving client, not back to the application processor. Therefore, there is a need to provide for secure, economical efficient selection and transmission of large object data instances to third party receiver clients. The present invention satisfies this need by providing a method and apparatus for transmission of objects over a secondary channel to receiver clients.
To overcome the limitations in the prior art described above, and to overcome other limitations that will become apparent upon reading and understanding the present specification, the present invention discloses a method and apparatus for providing access to object data stored in a database management system to a receiver client. The method comprises the steps of receiving a database query from a submitting client on a first communication path, transforming the database query into database management system commands, transmitting the database management system commands to a database management system, receiving a response from the database management system comprising a media object locator, compiling an answer set comprising the database management system response, and transmitting the media object locator to the receiver client on the first communication path. In another embodiment, the method further comprises the steps of receiving a transport request from the receiver client comprising the media object locator, and establishing a transport session between the receiver client and the object server.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
FIG. 1 is a conceptual illustration of the object-relational database structure of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the architectural elements of one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3a is a block diagram showing the component modules of the federated coordinator of the present invention;
FIG. 3b is a block diagram of one embodiment of an object server; and
FIGS. 4a-4p are flow charts describing the operations and transaction flow for the present invention.
In the following description of the preferred embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration a specific embodiment in which the invention may be practiced It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
1. System Concept/Components
FIG. 1 presents a conceptual illustration of the object-relational database structure of the present invention, showing a representation of a generic multimedia table instantiation 101, and an object-relational database table instantiation 102. Either database structure may be stored in the memory of one or more computers or processors, or in a related data storage device. Conceptually, database instances may include both alphanumeric data and large object instances. In the generic multimedia table instantiation 101, data instances may include a variety of data types, including a character string 106, a byte string 108, video data 110, integer data 112, a large bit string 114, a document 116, audio data 118, and another character string 120. Of course, these items could all be stored in the database directly as shown, however, this makes database processing difficult, because the large data objects such as the video 110, the large bit string 114, the document 116, and the audio 118 must be must be processed along with other table elements, overwhelming the database processing capability.
These problems are avoided by using an object-relational database table instantiation 102. In the object-relational structure, each object in the row is instantiated with a portion in an object-relational table instantiation 102, and a portion in an object storage device 104. Two data types are therefore associated with large object instances, the object identifier (such as the video object identifier 126, the large bit string object identifier 130, the document object identifier 132, and the audio object identifier 134) type and the object value type (the video object 138, large bit string object 140, document object 142, and audio object 144, respectively). This allows a "lightweight" surrogate to "represent" data where the objects are too large to be casually copied or moved from one place to another.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing one implementation of the object relational database structure described above. The primary components of the present invention are a client 220, a receiver client 258, a relational database management system (RDBMS) 210, an object server 212, a primary network 204, a federated coordinator 206, and a virtual network 218.
The client 220 is where user 221 requests are submitted and where results are normally displayed. Architecturally, the client 220 may be an independent computer with sufficient buffering and processing to support the presentation of results to the user 221. Functionally, the client 220 hosts end-user applications programs, sends application structured query language (SQL) and general purpose call level interface (CLI) requests to the federated coordinator 206, which participates in object transport connections set up by object server 212, and receives result set elements and stages them for display, playback, or further processing by client applications.
The client interface 202 provides an interface between the client 220, the federated coordinator 206, and the virtual network 218. The client interface 202 may be resident in the same computer system as the federated coordinator 206, the client 220 or a separate computer, and comprises an open database connectivity module (ODBC) 227 and an object server connectivity module (OSC) 229. In the preferred embodiment, the ODBC module uses MICROSOFT's ® Open Database Connectivity technology, which is well known in the art. The ODBC 227 provides an interface between the client 220 and the federated coordinator 206. Since the a command from a client 220 could be either a direct SQL command or a command in another language from an application resident at the client, the ODBC 227 translates object-relational database (ORDB) commands from the client 220 into a form suitable for the federated coordinator 206. In one embodiment, these ORDB commands are translated into Multimedia-SQL (M-SQL), an object relational database language compatible with and derived from SQL. Of course, the actual language implementation is unimportant, and those skilled in the art will recognize that many different languages and protocols can be selected, so long as the ORDB commands are from potentially multiple sources are interpreted and translated into commands that can be understood by the federated coordinator 206. As described herein, the OSC 229 and ODBC 227 are parallel, but not independent, because the ODBC 227 also uses the OSC 229 to redirect object instance data streams to the ODBC 227 control interface to preserve ODBC 227 application interface semantics and to hide the fact that the object data resides on a different data source (such as object server 212) from the RDBMS 210.
Receiver clients 258 are client instances that receive subsets of queries submitted by another client instance. A request from a client 220 can result in some portion of a result set being transported to a receiving agent other than the client. This feature allows multimedia objects selected from the database to be down-loaded to a special playback device, such as a video server 216. This feature also allows work-sharing between clients, in which context one client is treated as a receiver by another. Functionally, receiver clients 258 are capable of a subset of client 220 functions. Receiver clients 258 can participate in object transport connections, and receive result set elements and stage them for display, playback, or further processing by client applications.
The RDMBS 210 in FIG. 2 is analogous to the object relational database table instantiation 102 described in FIG. 1. The RDBMS 210 is used to store, retrieve, and process alphanumeric data and the object identifiers described above. Architecturally, the RDBMS 210 logical database component can be any relational database system, such as the TERADATA® Database Version 2. In one embodiment, communications between the client 220 and the RDBMS 210 are in SQL, the American National Standards Organization (ANSI) and International Standards Organization (ISO) standard database management language. The object-relational database management system enhances this SQL to provide access to non-traditional data types as well as normal RDMBS data types using the object identifier paradigm to create an object-relational database system. The present invention enhances the RDBMS 210 by adding abstract data type functions such as those envisioned for SQL-3 and user-defined functions for content analysis of objects. However, the functions performed by the RDBMS 210 are operationally no different than those which would be expected of any database product. The extensions provided by the present invention do not change the semantics of how the relational data in the RDBMS 210 are defined, managed, or used.
The object server 212 stores and manages objects, executes user-defined functions on those objects, performs connection operations through the virtual network 218 to transport selected objects, including real time session control, and participates in distributed transactions, as directed by the federated coordinator 206, and is analogous to the object storage 104 in FIG. 1. The extent of these object handling capabilities will depend significantly upon the type of objects and client application needs. In one embodiment, the object server 212 provides scaleable processing over very large collections of object values in a query processing context. Other object servers, such as the auxiliary object server 212 and the video server 216 are also supported, but are not required. A wide variety of object servers can be supported by the present invention. For example, the video server 216 may provide movie-on-demand applications, and the auxiliary object server 214 may provide special search engines for text-processing applications. Initially, the video server 216 may be limited to storage and retrieval of objects, but may later be expanded to allow content based operations on the data stored therein. Another possible auxiliary object server would be a dedicated text processor for independently storing a text index and performing text searches against the index. In this configuration, the object server 212 could store the actual text documents as data objects.
The federated coordinator 206 comprises a session management/plan generation module 236 which handles all aspects of primary sessions between clients 220 and the host. The session plan/generation module 236 also accepts requests from clients 220, and transforms them into execution plans which are executed by the RDBMS 210 and the object servers 212, 214, and 216, performs database administration, establishes sessions with the client 220 (including maintaining accounting information and termination), and interprets client SQL or CLI requests and transforms them into execution plans.
The plan execution module 238 manages repositories of large object values, including multimedia data. The plan execution module 238 is the host agent responsible for executing plans built by the federated coordinator 206, and interacts directly with the RDBMS 210 and the object server 212 instances. Relational data and data dictionary tables are stored by the RDBMS 210, while object values are stored on the object servers 212, 214, 216. The plan execution module processes the execution plans generated by the session management/plan generation module 236, participates in distributed transactions, stores result sets and participates in sending the result sets to clients 220, manages object servers 212, and participates in setting up transport connections controlling execution of user defined functions in the object servers 212.
In the present invention, the RDBMS 210 is used as a resource that may be shared with other applications. As such, the RDBMS 210 may contain database and table instance which have nothing whatever to do with the object-relational database or any of its functions or operations. Accordingly, it is desirable for native database operations and interfaces to be supported concurrently with the object-relational database management system. The present invention provides this capability by providing a separate native interface to the RDBMS 210, and by automatically applying associated database access control mechanisms to keep non-object-relational database applications from modifying physical structures which contain object data values or their locators. This native connectivity is also illustrated in FIG. 2. The RDBMS 210 can interface directly with the client 220 via the native RDBMS interface 244 or via the multimedia database system of the present invention. Database commands are supplied to native RDBMS interface 224, and passed to the RDBMS 210 via the primary network 204. Database responses from the RDBMS 210 are supplied to the client along the same data path.
Communications between the components of the present invention include (1) primary communications, (2) transport communications, and (3) internal messaging communications. Communications between the components of the present invention include as primary communications, transport (or secondary) communications, and internal messaging communications. Communications between the user 221 and the object-relational database management system are provided via the client interface 202, and these communications will generally be internal to a computer implementing the client interface 202. Communications between the client interface 202 and the federated coordinator 206 are provided via a primary network 204 by a first or primary communication path 234, which provides an electronic or optical pathway for communication signals. Since it is not necessary for large object data instances to be transported via this communication path, the primary communication path 234 need not be a high bandwidth communications link.
Internal messaging communications are provided through internal messaging data paths between the federated coordinator 206, the virtual network 208, and the RDBMS 210, object server 212, and auxiliary object server 214. Since large object data instances are not transmitted via these paths, they also need not offer high bandwidth communications.
The client 220 also communicates with the object server 212, and optionally, an auxiliary object server 214 and/or a video server 216 by establishing transport connections 254, 256, 250 using the virtual network 218. Optionally, these communications are established according to selected performance criteria indicated by a quality of service (QOS) parameter selected by the client 220. Normally, these communications are established only for the period of time required to transmit object data to the selected destination These transport communications could be established by Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) or Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI), Switched Multi-megabit Data Services (SMDS) or other high bandwidth network. ATM is a high-speed switching network technology for local area networks (LANs) and wide area networks (WANs) that handle data and real time voice and video. It combines the high-efficiency of packet switching used in data networks, with the guaranteed bandwidth of the circuit switching used in voice network and provides "bandwidth on demand" by charging customers for the amount of data they send rather than fixed-cost digital lines that often go under-utilized. SMDS is a high speed switched data communications service offered by local telephone companies to interconnect LANs. It uses IEEE 802.6 DQDB MAN network technology at rates up to 45 megabits per second (Mbps). Of course, the present invention is not limited to the particular embodiments of the virtual network described herein. Any network that provides enough bandwidth and nominal latency can be used to practice the present invention.
2. Federated Coordinator
A diagram showing the component modules of the federated coordinator 206 and their interrelationships is presented in FIG. 3a. The federated coordinator 206 comprises an ODBC Application Program Interface (API) manager 302 such as the MICROSOFT® ODBC API coupled to a session manager 304, a parser 306, a resolver 308, and an answer set manager 350. The ODBC API manager 302 coordinates activities between the session manager 304, the parser 306, the resolver 308, and the answer set manager 350.
The ODBC API manager 302 handles ODBC requests to establish a session, parse a query, and resolve a query plan. The ODBC API manager 302 also handles first-pass answer set data that is obtained from the answer set manager 350 and sent to the requesting client 220.
The session manager 304 creates a session that is used to communicate with the client 220, and assigns a session identifier. This session handles incoming requests and sends back responses to the client 20. However, the session manager does not participate in object data transport activities.
The parser 306 checks the syntax of the commands from the ODBC 227 and uses a grammar definition 307 (M-SQL, for example) to generate a high-level collection of object structures that will be later optimized and converted into a query execution plan. This is accomplished by defining language protocol classes (objects) that represent the parse tree. In one embodiment, these objects are defined according to the C++ protocol. For example, suppose the client 220 wanted to retrieve data comprising a magnetic resonance image (MRI) for patients who are older than 45 years of age and who have a tumor greater than 0.13 centimeters in diameter Further suppose that the information is stored in a "patient" DBMS table such as the object relational database table instantiation 102 shown in FIG. 1, which includes object identifiers to MRI data in object storage. An SQL command responsive to this client request is as follows:
SELECT patient-- name, MRI FROM patient WHERE age>45 and TumorSize(MRI)>0.13
The parser 306 creates a link-list of attribute objects (such as "(patient-- name, MRI)"), table name objects (such as "(patient)"), and predicate expressions. In the example above, there are two predicate expressions, (age>45) AND (TumorSize(MRI)>0.13). The first boolean predicate expression contains an attribute (age) and a scalar expression (>45). The second boolean predicate invokes a user defined function (UDF) which will operate on the object data. UDFs are described in detail later in this specification. The above example would result in a C++ pseudo-code generation such as described below:
ProjectList=ObjName (Patient-- name), UDFType(MRI);
Boolean1=BoolExprEval (age, BOOL-- GT, 45);
Boolean2=BoolFuncEval (UDFExec(TumorSize(MRI)), GT, 0.13);
WhereClause=BoolAND (Boolean1, Boolean2);
ExecPlan=new SqlSelect (ProjectList, FromList, WhereClause);
The resolver 308 receives the object structures from the parser, iterates over the object parse tree, and binds attributes and UDF invocations to object-relational tables and libraries. The resolver 308 also appends statistical, static cost, and historical usage information to the parse tree objects. This information is later used to optimize the query plan. For example, in the example described above, the resolver binds "patient-- name" and MRI to the "patient" table, and makes sure that the function TumorSize() is a valid function for type MRI within the "patient" table.
The resolver 308 obtains statistical, static cost, and historical usage information from the Global Data Dictionary (GDD) 313, which is stored in the form of GDD tables in the RDBMS 210, and managed by the GDD manager 310. The GDD manager 310 also maintains a user-configurable and definable GDD cache 312 which is updated when changes are made to the GDD 313. This is accomplished by spooling entries during data definition language (DDL) M-SQL operations or checking a time-stamp or version number associated with the GDD tables. If a change has occurred, the GDD manager 310 updates the GDD cache 312. The GDD cache 312 structure is subdivided into boundary areas which are allocated to a GDD table whose values are replaced using a least recently used (LRU) algorithm. This method decreases system response times and improves overall performance. The GDD manager 310 also checks the integrity of the entries in the GDD 313.
The security module 314 determines whether a user and/or application has approved access to the requested data. If the user/application is determined to have access to the requested data, the output of the resolver (an object parse tree bound with attributes and UDF invocations) is provided to the optimizer module 316.
The optimizer module 316 optimizes and balances query plans using the appended cost values from the GDD 313 and derived costs computed from the parse tree. The optimizer module 316 iterates over the parse tree while evaluating parse tree branch options to modify the object parse tree which is used by the plan generator 318 to generate optimized query plans. Of course, the number of iterations can be bounded to avoid excessive optimization time.
Many different optimization algorithms and optimization criteria are within the scope of the present invention. For example, parse object trees may be optimized with regard to any or all of the following criteria: query response time, system throughput, primary network 204 traffic and usage, temporary result and space management, parallel or concurrent execution of query steps, predicate evaluations involving one or more UDFs, and resource allocation provided to individual queries. Also, although a system in which the optimization precedes plan generation, other implementations are within the scope of the current invention. The process of optimization can be performed any time after binding, and different data structures may indicate that optimization should occur after the query plans are generated.
The plan generator 318 translates the optimized parse tree into a query execution plan. This is performed by writing functions that transform parse-tree objects into multimedia step (M-Step) commands that can be understood by the component modules which will receive these commands. For example, the RDBMS 210 M-Step can be SQL and for TERADATA® internal (AMP) steps and the object server 212 may use special object M-Steps that invoke UDF functions. The protocol for M-Step commands is stored in the M-Steps Definition 319 and accessed by the plan generator module 318. Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize the present invention could be practiced with other command protocols as well.
The dispatcher 320 distributes the M-Steps to the RDBMS 210, the object server 212, and any auxiliary servers 214. For the RDBMS, these steps are interpreted according to the CLI protocol 330 and are in the SQL 332 language. For the object server 212, these steps are sent to the interface manager (IM) 336 for evaluation. For auxiliary object servers 214, the M-Steps are interpreted by the auxiliary object server application program interface (OBJ API) 342. The dispatcher 320 also coordinates execution of the M-Steps, and coordinates sending first-pass results from the M-Step commands to the requesting client 220.
The answer set manager 350 collects the partial results from the RDBMS 210 and corresponding object identifiers (such as the video object identifier 126, the large bit string object identifier 130, the document object identifier 132, and the audio object identifier 134 in FIG. 1) from the object servers 212, 214, and 216. The answer set manager also converts object identifiers to object locators (OLs). If responding to a SELECT client 220 query, this first-pass information is sent to the client 220 via the primary network 204. The non-relational objects are later retrievable using the OLs via a virtual network 218 connection. If not a SELECT query, success or failure packets are sent to the client 220 via the primary network 204. The answer set manager 350 also appends a security ticket to the object identifier. This assures that only authorized clients are granted access to the object data.
3. Virtual Network
As described above, first-pass query responses regarding large data objects from the object managers 212, 214, 216 are transmitted to the client 220 via the primary network 204. Because these communications are low bandwidth, the primary communication network 204 need not have high-throughput capability. However, large data objects, such as multimedia data, typically require high throughput capability for efficient transmission and display. Accordingly, large data objects are transmitted to clients 220 and receiver clients 258 via a second or separate communications path such as the virtual network 218, which supports high-throughput communications. This separate communication path configuration also has other advantages. Object data may be highly sensitive, and require special security measures to assure that it is not compromised or otherwise disclosed in transmission. Providing a separate path for data transmission allows the security of the object data to be maintained.
Each object server 212, 214 also includes a network relation (NET) 340, 346 respectively, which contain network and bandwidth information to assist in the retrieval and storage of large objects. As described herein, when the transfer of large objects is desired, a quality of service (QOS) parameter may be used to determine which of the available communication paths is selected to retrieve or store the object.
4. Object Server
FIG. 3b presents a block diagram of one implementation of the object server. The object server 212 comprises one or more processors 350 coupled to a data storage device 352. The data storage device 352 may comprise one or more physical disk drive units 354. The object server 212 allows applications to be implemented by virtual processors (VPROCs) 356, running on the processor 350. Each VPROC 356 is given its own private logical disk space for storing data called a virtual disk (VDISK) which may comprise conglomeration of several physical disk drive units 354.
The use of VPROCs 356 allows parallel processing and higher system availability. For example, if a single processor were coupled to multiple disk drive units, a single thread of execution might occupy only one of the drives at a time, leaving the others under-utilized, or even idle. By using the VPROC structure, execution parallelism is increased to include one thread per disk. Multiple VPROCs with associated private VDISKs maximize CPU utilization as well. For example, M-Steps and user defined functions may be processed in parallel using multiple VPROCs 356. This is made possible because information regarding the storage location and other characteristics of object data is stored in the global data dictionary (GDD) 313, where it can be accessed by the federated coordinator 206 to parallelize execution and dispatch M-Steps to the most efficient VPROCs 356. Execution speed is also enhanced since the M-Steps are logically placed close to the object data. Further, M-Step and user defined function execution instances are executed in the same VPROC that is associated with the VDISK containing the subject object data. By moving execution instances rather than object data, the object manager minimizes expensive and time-consuming transport of object data between memory locations within the data storage device 352.
Implemented in the processor 350 are an interface manager module 336, a transporter module 340, and an executor module 338. The transporter module 336 implements transmission and receipt of object data to and from the object server 212. The interface manager module 336 provides an interface between the dispatcher 320 in the federated coordinator 206, and the object server 212. The executor 338 on the object server executes M-Steps received from the dispatcher 320 via the interface manager module 336. The executor 338 is an application that runs VPROCs 356 established in the object server. To parallelize processing within the object server 212, multiple copies of the executor 338 are run simultaneously in each of the object server's VPROCs. Each executor 338 runs a separate worker thread. The number of worker threads spawned for each virtual processor running the executor 338 is configurable Also, where an M-Step is for multiple VPROCs on the object server 212, multiple worker threads, usually one per VPROC, can be used to simultaneously to execute an M-Step. Communications between the executors 338 and the data storage device 352 is accomplished via the object manager 358.
5. User-Defined Functions
User defined functions (UDFs) allow client applications to define functions that operate or manipulate the values of abstract data type (ADT) object data instances. Two general types of UDFs are possible in SQL SELECT queries: projection UDFs and predicate expression UDFs. Predicate UDF's return either: (1) boolean values which are used as partial search conditions, (2) an expression value used to evaluate a boolean expression, or (3) an object used by another UDF function. Projection UDFs operate, manipulate, and/or modify objects that satisfied the query predicate for viewing or other client application uses. Other UDF uses include: (1) updating or modifying existing objects, (2) feature extraction and pattern matching, (3) converting from one data type to another (i.e. converting MPEG-2 to MPEG-4), (4) partial extraction (i.e. retrieve audio track from video) and (5) many other information extraction operations that "information mine" (multimedia) complex data.
UDFS execute on the object servers 212, 214 in a run-time environment that is logically "close" to the object instance values, or object data. UDF semantics are such that when a UDF is invoked, it is associated with a particular object instance value, even when a UDF accesses more than one object instance. Even when a UDF operates on multiple objects, all but one of them are accessed remotely. Accordingly, when UDFs are associated with an object instance value, a UDF execution thread is on a processor which is guaranteed direct I/O access to the object instance value. This increases execution speed and minimizes transportation of large object instance values, even though the UDF is not guaranteed direct I/O access to other object instance values.
In one embodiment, the UDFs are developed in C or C++, and are bound into UNIX dynamic link libraries. UDF invocations occur as part of SQL statement execution and they access external quantities only through parameters and return values. Parameters and returns are restricted by value, with ADT instances represented by media object identifiers (MOIDs). UDFs can use object server application program interfaces (APIs) and services in conjunction with object instance values.
6. Transaction Description
FIGS. 4a-4p present a flow chart showing of the operation of the object relational database. FIG. 4a presents a top-level description of the operation of the present invention. The process begins when the client 220 establishes 400 a primary session with the federated coordinator 206. This may be accomplished through direct commands or through an application resident at the client 220. Thereafter, the client 220 requests that the federated coordinator opens 402 a transaction, and initiates 404 the client command with the federated coordinator 206. This is accomplished using the ODBC 227. Client commands are broadly categorized into either insert commands, which store data from the client 220 to the object server 212, or select commands, which retrieve data from the RDBMS 210, and perhaps also the object server 212.
If the client command is an insert command 406, the data object selected by the client 220 is inserted 408 into the object server 212 and associated with a Media Object Locator (MOL). If the client 220 command is a select command, an answer set is obtained 410 from the RDBMS 210 and associated with a MOL to identify the subject object server data. At this time, the object data associated with the MOL may be sent to the submitting client (the client that requested the query), or a receiver client. If transmission of the object data is desired 412, the data is transmitted to the selected client via the virtual network 414.
FIG. 4b is a flow chart showing how the client 220 establishes a primary session with the federated coordinator 206. Because of the potential pay-per-view applications for an object relational database, a reliable and simple client authentication method is critical. The authentication system employed is based on the KERBEROS system. The KERBEROS system was developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and is well known in the art.
The federated coordinator 206 receives 416 a user/client identification and password, authenticates them 418, and generates a random session key 420. The federated coordinator 206 then generates a ticket granting ticket (TGT) 422. The TGT is then encrypted with the user's password 424, and returned to the client 426. When a client 220 establishes a primary session, the federated coordinator 206 generates a TGT and returns it to the client 220. Each time the client 220 originates a request on a primary session, it builds a modified authenticator value and sends it along to the federal coordinator 206 with the request. The authenticator is modified so that it does not contain the name of a specific object server, but a token server name. The authenticator includes a ticket granting ticket (TGT) which contains the name of the client 220, the name of the federated coordinator 206, the lifetime of the TGT, the network address of the client 220, and a random session key. Upon receipt of a request, the federated coordinator 206 uses the TGT embedded within the authenticator to verify that the client 220 is not a usurper. Then the federated coordinator 206 assembles a response message, it builds a service ticket for each object in the answer set, and embeds this ticket in the MOL. The ticket is encrypted with the object server's private key, then encrypted again with the client's session key. The service ticket contains the name of the object server 212, the name of the client 220, the lifetime of the ticket, the client's network address, and a token identifying a specific object. When a client 220 attempts to access an object, it must first decrypt the ticket using its session key. The service ticket, still encrypted with the object server's private key, is presented to the object server 212 which can then verify that the client is allowed to access the object without exchanging authorization or authentication messages with the federated coordinator 206. This approach, which is further described in detail below, reduces backchannel traffic messages to the federated coordinator 206.
FIG. 4c is a flow chart illustrating how the user initiates a client command with the federated coordinator 206. The client command, which was received by the ORDB is transmitted to and received 428 by the federated coordinator. The ORDB command includes an authenticator used by the federated coordinator 206 to verify and authenticate 430 that the client is authorized to access the selected data service. ORDB commands can be direct client SQL commands, or may be commands from an application resident in the client 220. Since the federated coordinator 206 must be capable of responding to potentially different commands from several different clients, the ORDB command is translated 432 into commands readable by the federated coordinator 206, which are referred to as M-SQL commands. This process takes place in the ODBC 227.
b. Inserting Data From Client to Object Server.
If the client command was an insert command, object data from the client is inserted into the object server 212, and associated with a MOL 408. FIG. 4d describes how this is accomplished. First, a query plan is formulated 434 in the federated coordinator 206. The query plan formulation process transforms M-SQL commands into optimized RDBMS 210 and object server 212 commands. Formulation of the query plan is described in more detail later in this description. Next, transaction is opened 436 between the federated coordinator 206 and the object server 212. This transaction allows communications between different modules to proceed. After establishing the transaction, the query plan is dispatched to the object server 212 and the RDMBS 210. The federated coordinator 206 then requests 440 an object identifier (OID) from the object server 212. The DID is then transformed 442 into a MOL, or media object locator.
After the MOL is created, the data identified by the MOL is transmitted 444 to the object server 212. This process is described in FIG. 4e. Since the ODBC 227 handles communications between the federated coordinator 206 and the client 220, and the OSC 229 handles communications between the object servers 212 and the client 220, the ODBC 227 and the OSC 229 must cooperate with one another to transmit data to the object server 212. First, the ODBC 227 requests 458 that the OSC 229 open a transport connection via the virtual network 218. The MOL identifying the data is then passed 460 to the OSC 229. The OSC 229 requests 466 that the federated coordinator 206 open a transport connection, and passes 468 the MOL to the federated coordinator 206 to accomplish this. The federated coordinator 206 validates 470 the session and security component of the MOL, using the TGT previously described. The federated coordinator 206 then initiates 472 a transport agent process on the object server 212, and returns 474 the network address of the transport agent to the OSC 229 to allow the transaction to proceed. The OSC 229 uses the network address to open 476 a transport connection to the transport agent, and the object data (ADT value) is sent 478 to the transport agent via the OSC 229. Thereafter, the object data is written 480 to a disk or other storage medium in the object server 212. Finally, the OSC 229 is informed 482 that the transfer has been completed.
Returning to FIG. 4d, the data identified by the MOL is transmitted 444 to the object server 212. Nominally, the object data transmitted is multimedia data. However, executable user defined functions can also be inserted into the object server in the same way. After the object data is transmitted 44 to the object server 212, the transport connection with the transport agent in the object server 212 is closed 446. The federated coordinator 206 is informed 448 that the transaction is complete, and the status is returned 450 to the client 220 via the ODBC 227. Next, after the client 220 then requests that the federated coordinator 206 end the transaction 452, the changes prescribed by the insert command are committed 454 to the RDBMS 210 and the object server 212, and the transport connection context is cleaned up 456. FIG. 4f describes the process of committing changes to the RDBMS 210 and the object server 212. This process involves inserting 484 the MOID in the RDBMS 210 to create the object relational database, and updating 486 the global data dictionary (GDD) table values and statistics. The operation of the GDD will be described in greater detail below.
In the embodiment described above, communications between processes and modules utilizes a protocol in which messages are transmitted by erecting transaction processes, transmitting data, and ending the transaction process. However, the present invention could be practiced with any communication protocol, and is not limited in scope to this inter-module communication protocol described herein.
c. Retrieving Data Stored On the Object Server
If the client command was a select command, object data associated with a MOL is obtained from the object server 212, and provided to the requesting client 220 or to a receiver client 258. First, the requested data is obtained 410 using the answer set from the RDBMS 210, and if the client requests actual object data 412, that data is sent 444 to the selected client via the virtual network 218. FIG. 4g presents a flow chart illustrating the process of obtaining 410 an answer set responsive to the select command, associating the resulting data with a MOL 410. First, a query plan is formulated 434. The query plan is an optimized set of commands which will be distributed to the RDBMS 210 and the object server 212 to obtain the desired data. FIG. 4h describes how the query plan is formulated. First, the M-SQL commands are parsed 512, resolved 514, checked to assure that access to the indicated database is authorized 516, and optimized 518. Next, the optimized plan is used to generate 520 the query plan. The process of parsing the query plan is described in FIG. 4i. First, the federated coordinator 206 obtains schema, network, and security information from the global data dictionary, which is stored in the RDBMS 210. This information provides the federated coordinator 206 with the building block information it needs to parse the M-SQL commands. Next, this information is used to transform 524 the M-SQL commands into a parse tree of objects, as described earlier. Items in the parse tree are then resolved 514. This is accomplished as shown in FIG. 4j. Eventually the query plan must be optimized according to a set of criteria established by the client 220 or other entities. To perform this optimization, costs for the various alternative plans must be obtained. These costs include both static and dynamic costs. Static costs are obtained from the GDD 526. Derived costs depend on the execution path chosen, and must be calculated 528 on the go. After the derived costs are calculated 528, they are bound to the parse tree nodes 530, and by iteration, these parse tree nodes are used to derive an optimized execution plan 532. This optimized plan is then used to generate the query plan, which comprises RDBMS 210 SQL commands and M-Step execution plans for the object server 212. This process is illustrated in FIG. 4k.
In some situations, the client command requires predicate object data to be transmitted from the client 220 to the object server 212 before the UDF can be performed. If predicate data is required 496, it is transmitted 498 to the object server 212. FIG. 4l illustrates this process. First, the federated coordinator 206 obtains an OID for the temporary object 538 to store the predicate expression. The federated coordinator receives the OID, transforms 540 it into a MOL, and returns 542 it to the ODBC 227. The ODBC 227 requests 544 that the OSC 229 open a transport connection, and passes 546 the MOL to the OSC 229. The OSC then requests 548 that the federated coordinator 206 open a transport connection, and passes 550 the MOL to the federated coordinator 206. The federated coordinator 206 validates the session, verifies 552 that the transport session is authorized by examining the MOL, and initiates a transport agent 554 on the object server 212. The federated coordinator 206 returns 556 the network address of the transport agent to the OSC 229, and the OSC 229 uses this address to open a transport connection 558 with the transport agent. Thereafter, the required object data is sent 560 to the transport agent via the virtual network 218 and the OSC 229, and the object data is written 562 to the object server 212. Finally, the OSC is informed that the data transport has completed 564, the transport connection is closed 566, and the federated coordinator 206 is informed that the transfer is complete 568.
The present invention supports the operation of user defined functions (UDFs) on object data. User defined functions are executed in the object server 212, and may include a nominal function set, or may be downloaded from the client 220 to the object server 212. If the client command requires a UDF function 500, the functions are invoked on the object server 502. This process is completed when the object server 212 creates a temporary object to hold the result of the UDF function, and returns an object identification (OID) for the temporary object to the federated coordinator 206. The federated coordinator 206 collects responses from the executed UDFs and correlates 504 them with the answer set previously calculated. The OIDs of the correlated answer sets are then transformed 506 into MOLs. Thereafter, the answer set is encrypted 508 and returned 510 to the client 220.
The encryption or securing of the answer set is illustrated in FIG. 4m. As shown in FIG. 4m, a service ticket is built for each object in the answer set 570. This service ticket is then encrypted with the respective object manager's private key 572, and also with the session key 574. Finally, the service ticket is embedded 576 within the answer set object locators, thus creating a modified answer set. This allows the client 220 or receiver clients 258 to access data stored in the object server 212 without further intervention or processing from the federated coordinator 206.
If transmission of object data is desired 412, the object data is transmitted 414 to the selected client via the virtual network. The selected client could be the submitting client 220 or a receiver client 258. The present invention supports both transaction controlled transmission of object data and transmission without transaction control. As shown in FIG. 4n, when transaction control is not selected 578, the changes are committed on the RDBMS 210 and the object server 212 before the data has been transmitted to the client 220.
Data can be transmitted to the submitting client 220 or one or more receiver clients 258. Also, data may be passed via the two pass paradigm described herein using the virtual network 218, or can be sent directly to the submitting client 220, or receiver client 258 in the initial pass using the primary network 204. Ordinarily, since the selected data objects may be large, the default retrieval method would be the two pass method using the virtual network 218. However, the submitting client 220 may, with an appropriate command, select immediate transmission of the object data via the primary network 204. Further, provision is made for automatic selection of the object data transmission method from the quality of service parameter described herein. Of course, this automatic selection may be overridden by an appropriate command from the submitting client 220
If data is to be sent to a receiver client 584, the answer set is sent to the receiver client 586. FIG. 4o presents a flow chart illustrating this process. First, the answer set MOL is provided 602 to the receiver client 258. Next, a second primary session is opened 604 with the federated coordinator 206. This request is revalidated 606, and a query plan is formulated 434. This query plan formulation process is analogous to that previously described. Next, if receiver client access is authorized 608, the MOL received at the receiver client is transformed 610 into a second MOL, and transferred 612 to the receiver client 258. This is used to request that the federated coordinator 206 open 614 a transport connection between the receiver client 258 and the object server 212. To accomplish this, the second MOL is passed 616 to the federated coordinator 206. The federated coordinator 206 validates 618 the session and security component of the second MOL, and if the receiver client is granted access to the object data identified by the MOL, initiates 620 a transport session on the object server 212. In doing so, the federated coordinator 206 receives a network address, which is later returned 622 to the OSC 229. The OSC 229 uses this address to open a second transport connection 624. Thereafter, the object data is read from the transport agent 626 via the OSC 229, and a temporary object is created by executing a UDF 628. This temporary object data is sent 630 to the receiver client 258, and the OSC 229 is informed that the transfer is complete 632.
If the object data is to be sent to the submitting client, the data identified by the MOL is transmitted 588 from the object server 212 to the submitting client 220 via the virtual network 218. FIG. 4p presents a flow chart illustrating this process. First, the client 220 requests that the OSC 229 open 634 a transport connection. The MOL associated with the requested data is then passed 636 to the OSC 229. Next, the OSC 229 requests that the federated coordinator 206 open 638 a transport connection, and the MOL is passed 640 to the federated coordinator 206. After validating that the client 220 is authorized to begin a session 642, the federated coordinator 642 initiates a transport session 644 on the object server 212. The federated coordinator 206 obtains the network address of the transport agent, and returns 646 this address to the OSC 229. Thereafter, a transport connection is opened 648 to the transport agent. If the client is authorized to access the requested data 650, the object data is read 652 from the transport agent, and any projection UDFs are executed 654. Thereafter, the object data responsive to the UDF is sent 656 to the client 220, and the OSC 229 is informed 658 that the transfer is complete. Referring back to FIG. 4n, the federated coordinator is informed that the transaction is complete 590, and the status of the request is returned 592 to the client 220 via the ODBC 227. If transaction control was selected (indicating that the changes to the RDBMS 210 and the object server 212 were not to be committed until the data had been transferred to the client), the federated coordinator 201 is requested to end the transaction 596, and commit the changes to the RDBMS 210 and the object server 212. This commit process has already been described. Finally, to complete the transaction, the federated coordinator 206 cleans up the transport connection context 600.
Of course, the steps described above can be used to update or delete data stored on the object server as well. Typically, data in the object server 212 will be updated in response to a SQL UPDATE command. In this situation, the federated coordinator 206 provides the object server 212 with an object identifier, and informs the object server 212 that the data instance associated with this identifier is to be updated. Thereafter, a transport connection is established and the data is transferred as described above. Similarly, object data may be deleted from the object server 212 in response to a SQL DELETE command. This process involves sending the DELETE statement to the federated coordinator 206, where the a SELECT SQL statement is compiled from the DELETE SQL statement. The SELECT statement is passed to the RDBMS 210 for execution to retrieve the rows effected by the DELETE SQL statement. The federated coordinator 206 extracts the object identifiers for those rows, and calls the object server with a list of identifiers to be deleted. Then, the DELETE SQL statement is passed to the RDBMS for execution.
This concludes the description of the preferred embodiment of the invention. In summary, the present invention discloses a method and apparatus for providing access to data stored in a database management system to a receiver client. The method comprises the steps of receiving a database query from a submitting client on a first communication path, transforming the database query into database management system commands, transmitting the database management system commands to a database management system, receiving a response from the database management system comprising a media object locator, compiling an answer set comprising the database management system response, and transmitting the media object locator to the receiver client on the first communication path.
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4558413 *||Nov 21, 1983||Dec 10, 1985||Xerox Corporation||Software version management system|
|US5014125 *||May 5, 1989||May 7, 1991||Cableshare, Inc.||Television system for the interactive distribution of selectable video presentations|
|US5181162 *||Dec 6, 1989||Jan 19, 1993||Eastman Kodak Company||Document management and production system|
|US5369776 *||May 10, 1993||Nov 29, 1994||Casio Computer Co., Ltd.||Apparatus for producing slips of variable length and having pre-stored word names, and wherein labels are added to word data thereon|
|US5377323 *||Sep 13, 1991||Dec 27, 1994||Sun Microsytems, Inc.||Apparatus and method for a federated naming system which can resolve a composite name composed of names from any number of disparate naming systems|
|US5408655 *||Jun 18, 1992||Apr 18, 1995||Apple Computer, Inc.||User interface system and method for traversing a database|
|US5414837 *||May 22, 1991||May 9, 1995||Hitachi, Ltd.||System for determining and returning frequenly requested information by an alternate path in a distributed database|
|US5442389 *||Dec 28, 1992||Aug 15, 1995||At&T Corp.||Program server for interactive television system|
|US5442749 *||Jul 9, 1993||Aug 15, 1995||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Network video server system receiving requests from clients for specific formatted data through a default channel and establishing communication through separate control and data channels|
|US5448727 *||Apr 30, 1991||Sep 5, 1995||Hewlett-Packard Company||Domain based partitioning and reclustering of relations in object-oriented relational database management systems|
|US5455953 *||Nov 3, 1993||Oct 3, 1995||Wang Laboratories, Inc.||Authorization system for obtaining in single step both identification and access rights of client to server directly from encrypted authorization ticket|
|US5488412 *||Mar 31, 1994||Jan 30, 1996||At&T Corp.||Customer premises equipment receives high-speed downstream data over a cable television system and transmits lower speed upstream signaling on a separate channel|
|US5511002 *||Sep 13, 1993||Apr 23, 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Multimedia player component object system|
|US5513126 *||Oct 4, 1993||Apr 30, 1996||Xerox Corporation||Network having selectively accessible recipient prioritized communication channel profiles|
|US5534913 *||Mar 31, 1994||Jul 9, 1996||At&T Corp.||Apparatus and method for integrating downstream data transfer over a cable television channel with upstream data carrier by other media|
|US5548587 *||Sep 12, 1994||Aug 20, 1996||Efficient Networks, Inc.||Asynchronous transfer mode adapter for desktop applications|
|US5548749 *||Oct 29, 1993||Aug 20, 1996||Wall Data Incorporated||Semantic orbject modeling system for creating relational database schemas|
|US5555365 *||Aug 26, 1994||Sep 10, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for optimizing static and dynamic binding of presentation objects with the object data they represent|
|US5555403 *||Nov 27, 1991||Sep 10, 1996||Business Objects, S.A.||Relational database access system using semantically dynamic objects|
|US5557518 *||Apr 28, 1994||Sep 17, 1996||Citibank, N.A.||Trusted agents for open electronic commerce|
|US5557798 *||Dec 21, 1990||Sep 17, 1996||Tibco, Inc.||Apparatus and method for providing decoupling of data exchange details for providing high performance communication between software processes|
|US5560005 *||Feb 25, 1994||Sep 24, 1996||Actamed Corp.||Methods and systems for object-based relational distributed databases|
|US5564113 *||Jun 7, 1995||Oct 8, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Computer program product for rendering relational database management system differences transparent|
|US5581758 *||Jun 6, 1995||Dec 3, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Computer program product for object specification, generation, and management in a distributed database|
|US5615337 *||Apr 6, 1995||Mar 25, 1997||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for efficiently processing diverse result sets returned by a stored procedures|
|US5623660 *||Oct 2, 1995||Apr 22, 1997||Josephson; Jeffrey L.||System for regulating access to data base for purposes of data base management|
|US5630124 *||Dec 6, 1993||May 13, 1997||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for assuring atomicity of distributed update requests in a parallel database|
|US5632017 *||Jun 24, 1994||May 20, 1997||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Telecontrollable communication system having a remote transmission module|
|US5634053 *||Aug 29, 1995||May 27, 1997||Hughes Aircraft Company||Federated information management (FIM) system and method for providing data site filtering and translation for heterogeneous databases|
|US5634122 *||Dec 30, 1994||May 27, 1997||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for multi-level token management for distributed file systems|
|US5640556 *||Jan 3, 1996||Jun 17, 1997||Fujitsu Limited||Synchronous/asynchronous client server access based upon database file record attribute|
|US5689698 *||Oct 20, 1995||Nov 18, 1997||Ncr Corporation||Method and apparatus for managing shared data using a data surrogate and obtaining cost parameters from a data dictionary by evaluating a parse tree object|
|US5794250 *||Apr 18, 1997||Aug 11, 1998||Ncr Corporation||Method and apparatus for extending existing database management system for new data types|
|US5864843 *||Oct 20, 1995||Jan 26, 1999||Ncr Corporation||Method and apparatus for extending a database management system to operate with diverse object servers|
|US5873083 *||Oct 3, 1997||Feb 16, 1999||Ncr Corporation||Method and apparatus for extending a relational database management system using a federated coordinator|
|US5930786 *||Oct 20, 1995||Jul 27, 1999||Ncr Corporation||Method and apparatus for providing shared data to a requesting client|
|1||Alan Morse and George Reynolds, "Overcoming Current Growth Limits in UI Development", Communications of the ACM, Apr. 1993, vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 73-81.|
|2||*||Alan Morse and George Reynolds, Overcoming Current Growth Limits in UI Development , Communications of the ACM , Apr. 1993, vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 73 81.|
|3||Alexandros Biliris, Euthimios Panagos, "EOS User's Guide", Release 2.0, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, May 5, 1993, pp. i-iv; 1-60.|
|4||*||Alexandros Biliris, Euthimios Panagos, EOS User s Guide , Release 2.0, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, May 5, 1993, pp. i iv; 1 60.|
|5||Alfonso F. Cardenas, Ion Tim leong, Ricky K. Taira, Roger Barker, Claudine M. Breant; "The Knowledge-Based Object-Oriented PICQUERT+ Language", IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 5, No. 4, Aug. 1993, pp. 644-657.|
|6||*||Alfonso F. Cardenas, Ion Tim leong, Ricky K. Taira, Roger Barker, Claudine M. Breant; The Knowledge Based Object Oriented PICQUERT Language , IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , vol. 5, No. 4, Aug. 1993, pp. 644 657.|
|7||*||Amit P. Sheth and James A. Larson, m Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous and Autonomous Databases , ACM Computing Surveys , vol. 22, No. 3, Sep. 1990, pp. 183 236.|
|8||Amit P. Sheth and James A. Larson, m"Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous and Autonomous Databases", ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 22, No. 3, Sep. 1990, pp. 183-236.|
|9||Amit P. Sheth, James A. Larson; "Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous, and Autonomous Databases1 " -Acm Computing Surveys, vol. 22, No. 3; Sep. 1990; pp. 183-236.|
|10||*||Amit P. Sheth, James A. Larson; Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous, and Autonomous Databases 1 Acm Computing Surveys , vol. 22, No. 3; Sep. 1990; pp. 183 236.|
|11||*||Andrew Wtikowski, Felipe Cari n o and Pekka Kostamaa, NCR 3700 The Next Generation Industrial Database Computer , Proceeding of the 19th VLDB Conference , Dublin, Ireland, 1993, pp. 230 243.|
|12||Andrew Wtikowski, Felipe Carino and Pekka Kostamaa, "NCR 3700--The Next-Generation Industrial Database Computer", Proceeding of the 19th VLDB Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 1993, pp. 230-243.|
|13||*||B. Clifford Neuman and Theodore Ts o; Kerberos: An Authentication Service for Computer Networks, IEEE Communications Magazine , Sep. 1994, pp. 33 38.|
|14||B. Clifford Neuman and Theodore Ts'o; "Kerberos: An Authentication Service for Computer Networks," IEEE Communications Magazine, Sep. 1994, pp. 33-38.|
|15||Claudio Calvelli, Vijay Varadharajan; "An Analysis of Some Delegation Protocol for Distributed Systems," pp. 92-110 (1992 IEEE).|
|16||*||Claudio Calvelli, Vijay Varadharajan; An Analysis of Some Delegation Protocol for Distributed Systems, pp. 92 110 (1992 IEEE).|
|17||Dave Mandelkern, "GUIs The Next Generation", Communications of The ACM, Apr. 1993, vol. 36, No. 4; pp. 37-39.|
|18||*||Dave Mandelkern, GUIs The Next Generation , Communications of The ACM , Apr. 1993, vol. 36, No. 4; pp. 37 39.|
|19||Dennis Heimbigner and Dennis McLeod; "A Federated Architecture for Information Management"; ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 3, No. 3, Jul. 1985--pp. 253-278.|
|20||*||Dennis Heimbigner and Dennis McLeod; A Federated Architecture for Information Management ; ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems , vol. 3, No. 3, Jul. 1985 pp. 253 278.|
|21||*||Felipe Cari n o and Pekka Kostamaa, Exegesis of DBC/1012 and P 90 Industrial Supercomputer Database Machine , Teradata Advanced Concepts Laboratory (TACL), El Segundo, CA, 1992, 14 pages.|
|22||*||Felipe Cari n o, Jr., Hetero Hetgerogeneous DBMS Frontend , Office Systems: Methods and Tools , Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North Holland) IFIP, 1987; p. 159 172.|
|23||*||Felipe Cari n o, Jr., Warren Sterling and Pekka Kostamaa, Industrial Database Supercomputer Exegesis: The DBC/1012, The NCR 3700, The Ynet, and The Bynet , Teradata Advanced Concepts Laboratory, El Segundo, CA, 1994, pp. 139 157.|
|24||Felipe Carino and Pekka Kostamaa, "Exegesis of DBC/1012 and P-90--Industrial Supercomputer Database Machine", Teradata Advanced Concepts Laboratory (TACL), El Segundo, CA, 1992, 14 pages.|
|25||Felipe Carino, Jr., "Hetero Hetgerogeneous DBMS Frontend", Office Systems: Methods and Tools, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland) ©IFIP, 1987; p. 159-172.|
|26||Felipe Carino, Jr., Warren Sterling and Pekka Kostamaa, "Industrial Database Supercomputer Exegesis: The DBC/1012, The NCR 3700, The Ynet, and The Bynet", Teradata Advanced Concepts Laboratory, El Segundo, CA, 1994, pp. 139-157.|
|27||Jeff Chase, Hank Levy and Ashutosh Tiwary; "Using Virtual Addresses as Object References," pp. 245-248 (1992 IEEE).|
|28||*||Jeff Chase, Hank Levy and Ashutosh Tiwary; Using Virtual Addresses as Object References, pp. 245 248 (1992 IEEE).|
|29||Kevin Wilkinson, Peter Lyngbaek and Waqar Hasan; "The Iris Architecture and Implementation" --IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 2, No. 1, Mar. 1990, pp. 63-75.|
|30||*||Kevin Wilkinson, Peter Lyngbaek and Waqar Hasan; The Iris Architecture and Implementation IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , vol. 2, No. 1, Mar. 1990, pp. 63 75.|
|31||Leonard Gallagher and Joan Sullivan, "Database Language SQL: Integrator of CALS Data Repositories", NISTIR 4902, U. S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD, Sep. 1992, pp. 1-59.|
|32||*||Leonard Gallagher and Joan Sullivan, Database Language SQL: Integrator of CALS Data Repositories , NISTIR 4902 , U. S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD, Sep. 1992, pp. 1 59.|
|33||Rafael Alonso, Daniel Barbard; "Negotiating Data Access in Federated Database Systems" --pp. 56-65 (1989 IEEE).|
|34||*||Rafael Alonso, Daniel Barbard; Negotiating Data Access in Federated Database Systems pp. 56 65 (1989 IEEE).|
|35||Steven J. Lunt; "Using Kerberos™ In Operations Systems" --Globecom '91 (1991 IEEE); pp. 0687-0693.|
|36||*||Steven J. Lunt; Using Kerberos In Operations Systems Globecom 91 (1991 IEEE); pp. 0687 0693.|
|37||Wesley W. Chu, Fellow, IEEE, and Ion Tim leong, "A Transaction-Based Approach to Vertical Partitioning for Relational Database Systems", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 19, No. 8, Aug. 1993, pp. 804-812.|
|38||*||Wesley W. Chu, Fellow, IEEE, and Ion Tim leong, A Transaction Based Approach to Vertical Partitioning for Relational Database Systems , IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 19, No. 8, Aug. 1993, pp. 804 812.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6256626 *||Sep 24, 1998||Jul 3, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Externalizing very large objects in a relational database client/server environment|
|US6338056 *||Apr 22, 1999||Jan 8, 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Relational database extender that supports user-defined index types and user-defined search|
|US6366907 *||Dec 15, 1999||Apr 2, 2002||Napster, Inc.||Real-time search engine|
|US6446128 *||Dec 1, 1997||Sep 3, 2002||Netselector, Inc.||Site access via intervening control layer|
|US6487551 *||Apr 16, 2001||Nov 26, 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Externalizing very large objects in a relational database client/server environment|
|US6556995 *||Nov 18, 1999||Apr 29, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Method to provide global sign-on for ODBC-based database applications|
|US6567819 *||Apr 7, 2000||May 20, 2003||Ebest!, Inc.||Run time objects|
|US6581055 *||Sep 11, 2000||Jun 17, 2003||Oracle International Corporation||Query optimization with switch predicates|
|US6598055 *||Dec 23, 1999||Jul 22, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Generic code for manipulating data of a structured object|
|US6742023||Apr 28, 2000||May 25, 2004||Roxio, Inc.||Use-sensitive distribution of data files between users|
|US6810412 *||Mar 30, 2000||Oct 26, 2004||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Method for increasing network bandwidth across multiple network interfaces with single internet protocol address|
|US6912564||May 4, 2001||Jun 28, 2005||America Online, Inc.||System for instant messaging the sender and recipients of an e-mail message|
|US6950468 *||Nov 8, 2001||Sep 27, 2005||Sony Corporation||Image formation conversion apparatus and image information conversion method|
|US6959336 *||Apr 7, 2001||Oct 25, 2005||Secure Data In Motion, Inc.||Method and system of federated authentication service for interacting between agent and client and communicating with other components of the system to choose an appropriate mechanism for the subject from among the plurality of authentication mechanisms wherein the subject is selected from humans, client applications and applets|
|US7089301||Aug 11, 2000||Aug 8, 2006||Napster, Inc.||System and method for searching peer-to-peer computer networks by selecting a computer based on at least a number of files shared by the computer|
|US7155676||Dec 19, 2001||Dec 26, 2006||Coolernet||System and method for multimedia authoring and playback|
|US7165071||Dec 19, 2001||Jan 16, 2007||Napster, Inc.||Real-time search engine|
|US7302422||Apr 14, 2004||Nov 27, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||Query workload statistics collection in a database management system|
|US7310629||Apr 3, 2002||Dec 18, 2007||Napster, Inc.||Method and apparatus for controlling file sharing of multimedia files over a fluid, de-centralized network|
|US7334037||Mar 13, 2002||Feb 19, 2008||Netselector, Inc.||Systems and methods for site access|
|US7392306||Jul 24, 2000||Jun 24, 2008||Aol Llc||Instant messaging client having an embedded browser|
|US7464070||Jul 29, 2003||Dec 9, 2008||Hitachi, Ltd.||Database query operations using storage networks|
|US7472174||Jan 18, 2005||Dec 30, 2008||International Business Machines Corporation||Abstract mechanism for constructing commands for the command pattern|
|US7512652||Jun 28, 2002||Mar 31, 2009||Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company||Passive personalization of buddy lists|
|US7525951||Mar 7, 2001||Apr 28, 2009||Netscape Communications Corporation||Integration of e-mail with instant messaging services|
|US7606580||Sep 29, 2005||Oct 20, 2009||Aol Llc||Personalized location information for mobile devices|
|US7624172||Jul 24, 2000||Nov 24, 2009||Aol Llc||State change alerts mechanism|
|US7765265||Sep 29, 2005||Jul 27, 2010||Aol Inc.||Identifying users sharing common characteristics|
|US7765484||Apr 30, 2002||Jul 27, 2010||Aol Inc.||Passive personalization of lists|
|US7774711||Sep 29, 2005||Aug 10, 2010||Aol Inc.||Automatic categorization of entries in a contact list|
|US7814072||Dec 30, 2004||Oct 12, 2010||International Business Machines Corporation||Management of database statistics|
|US7831683 *||Oct 29, 2004||Nov 9, 2010||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Storage and access method for an image retrieval system in a client/server environment|
|US7873627||Jan 18, 2006||Jan 18, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Relational database scalar subquery optimization|
|US7890123||Oct 19, 2009||Feb 15, 2011||Aol Inc.||Personalized location information for mobile devices|
|US7899915||May 8, 2003||Mar 1, 2011||Richard Reisman||Method and apparatus for browsing using multiple coordinated device sets|
|US7921369||Dec 30, 2005||Apr 5, 2011||Aol Inc.||Mood-based organization and display of instant messenger buddy lists|
|US7945674||Dec 29, 2003||May 17, 2011||Aol Inc.||Degrees of separation for handling communications|
|US7949759||Dec 29, 2003||May 24, 2011||AOL, Inc.||Degrees of separation for handling communications|
|US7979802||May 17, 2002||Jul 12, 2011||Aol Inc.||Providing supplemental contact information corresponding to a referenced individual|
|US7984024||Jun 17, 2008||Jul 19, 2011||International Business Machines Corporation||Statistics management|
|US7984098||Jul 25, 2001||Jul 19, 2011||AOL, Inc.||Video messaging|
|US7987491||May 8, 2003||Jul 26, 2011||Richard Reisman||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8001190||Jun 25, 2001||Aug 16, 2011||Aol Inc.||Email integrated instant messaging|
|US8037150||May 18, 2004||Oct 11, 2011||Aol Inc.||System and methods for providing multiple personas in a communications environment|
|US8041768||Mar 19, 2001||Oct 18, 2011||Aol Inc.||Voice instant messaging|
|US8042055||Mar 14, 2008||Oct 18, 2011||Tealeaf Technology, Inc.||Replaying captured network interactions|
|US8060566||Nov 30, 2005||Nov 15, 2011||Aol Inc.||Automatically enabling the forwarding of instant messages|
|US8078678||May 27, 2011||Dec 13, 2011||Aol Inc.||Video messaging|
|US8122363||May 4, 2001||Feb 21, 2012||Aol Inc.||Presence status indicator|
|US8127000||Dec 27, 2006||Feb 28, 2012||Tealeaf Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for monitoring and synchronizing user interface events with network data|
|US8132110||Aug 5, 2003||Mar 6, 2012||Aol Inc.||Intelligently enabled menu choices based on online presence state in address book|
|US8161172||Sep 2, 2009||Apr 17, 2012||Teleshuttle Tech2, Llc||Method and apparatus for browsing using multiple coordinated device sets|
|US8185638||Apr 25, 2011||May 22, 2012||Aol Inc.||Degrees of separation for handling communications|
|US8200658 *||Jun 13, 2011||Jun 12, 2012||Oracle International Corporation||System and method for providing highly available database performance|
|US8250144||Dec 22, 2009||Aug 21, 2012||Blattner Patrick D||Multiple avatar personalities|
|US8280867 *||Oct 20, 2005||Oct 2, 2012||Teradata Us, Inc.||Identifying database request sources|
|US8335848||Dec 27, 2011||Dec 18, 2012||Tealeaf Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for monitoring and synchronizing user interface events with network data|
|US8402378||Nov 7, 2008||Mar 19, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Reactive avatars|
|US8429231||Sep 8, 2011||Apr 23, 2013||Facebook, Inc.||Voice instant messaging|
|US8443290||May 14, 2013||Aol Inc.||Mood-based organization and display of instant messenger buddy lists|
|US8473572||Nov 9, 2009||Jun 25, 2013||Facebook, Inc.||State change alerts mechanism|
|US8474628||Jun 13, 2005||Jul 2, 2013||Facebook, Inc.||Presenting a recipient of an e-mail with an option to instant message a sender or another recipient based on the sender's or the other recipient's address and online status|
|US8527640||Sep 2, 2009||Sep 3, 2013||Teleshuttle Tech2, Llc||Method and apparatus for browsing using multiple coordinated device sets|
|US8533532||Jun 23, 2010||Sep 10, 2013||International Business Machines Corporation||System identifying and inferring web session events|
|US8548503||Aug 28, 2008||Oct 1, 2013||Aol Inc.||Methods and system for providing location-based communication services|
|US8560706||May 16, 2012||Oct 15, 2013||Facebook, Inc.||Degrees of separation for handling communications|
|US8583772||Oct 14, 2010||Nov 12, 2013||International Business Machines Corporation||Dynamically configurable session agent|
|US8595146||Mar 15, 2005||Nov 26, 2013||Aol Inc.||Social networking permissions|
|US8627215||Feb 25, 2011||Jan 7, 2014||Microsoft Corporation||Applying access controls to communications with avatars|
|US8631456||Oct 26, 2012||Jan 14, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions, LLC||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8640183||Oct 26, 2012||Jan 28, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions, LLC||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8646020||Oct 26, 2012||Feb 4, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions, LLC||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8661495||Oct 26, 2012||Feb 25, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions, LLC||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8689273||Nov 6, 2012||Apr 1, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions, LLC||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8712431||Jan 6, 2011||Apr 29, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Personalized location information for mobile devices|
|US8719354||Jun 15, 2010||May 6, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Identifying users sharing common characteristics|
|US8726195||Sep 5, 2007||May 13, 2014||Aol Inc.||Enabling an IM user to navigate a virtual world|
|US8775950||Sep 15, 2012||Jul 8, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Automatic categorization of entries in a contact list|
|US8787932||Sep 13, 2012||Jul 22, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Personalized location information for mobile devices|
|US8787940||Feb 15, 2013||Jul 22, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Personalized location information for mobile devices|
|US8799266 *||Aug 31, 2006||Aug 5, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for managing operation of a user-defined function on a partitioned database|
|US8805408||Sep 13, 2012||Aug 12, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Personalized location information for mobile devices|
|US8813125||Apr 26, 2011||Aug 19, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions Llc||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8818407||Sep 13, 2012||Aug 26, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Personalized location information for mobile devices|
|US8850507||Jan 6, 2014||Sep 30, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions Llc||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8868112||Mar 11, 2013||Oct 21, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Personalized location information for mobile devices|
|US8868533||Mar 13, 2012||Oct 21, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for intelligent capture of document object model events|
|US8875215||Jan 6, 2014||Oct 28, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions Llc||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8893212||Jan 6, 2014||Nov 18, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions Llc||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8898275||Aug 21, 2013||Nov 25, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||Dynamically configurable session agent|
|US8898722||Jan 6, 2014||Nov 25, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions Llc||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8910056||Aug 9, 2010||Dec 9, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Automatic categorization of entries in a contact list|
|US8914736||Feb 21, 2012||Dec 16, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||On-page manipulation and real-time replacement of content|
|US8914840||Jan 6, 2014||Dec 16, 2014||Convergent Media Solutions Llc||Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases|
|US8918460||Apr 22, 2010||Dec 23, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Organizing entries in participant lists based on communications strengths|
|US8918727||Dec 9, 2011||Dec 23, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Video messaging|
|US8930480||Oct 8, 2013||Jan 6, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Degrees of separation for filtering communications|
|US8930818||Mar 30, 2010||Jan 6, 2015||International Business Machines Corporation||Visualization of website analytics|
|US8949406||Aug 14, 2008||Feb 3, 2015||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for communication between a client system and a server system|
|US8959164||Feb 15, 2012||Feb 17, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Tri-state presence indicator|
|US8990714||Aug 31, 2011||Mar 24, 2015||International Business Machines Corporation||Replaying captured network interactions|
|US9002949||Dec 21, 2004||Apr 7, 2015||Google Inc.||Automatically enabling the forwarding of instant messages|
|US9025497||Jun 21, 2010||May 5, 2015||Qualcomm Incorporated||Media forwarding for a group communication session in a wireless communications system|
|US9043418||Sep 14, 2012||May 26, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Systems and methods for instant messaging persons referenced in an electronic message|
|US9049159||Sep 14, 2012||Jun 2, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Establishing audio communication sessions|
|US9049160||Sep 13, 2012||Jun 2, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Identifying users sharing common characteristics|
|US9049569||May 11, 2010||Jun 2, 2015||Google Inc.||Prohibiting mobile forwarding|
|US9071725||Sep 13, 2012||Jun 30, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Methods and user interfaces for video messaging|
|US9083661||Dec 17, 2008||Jul 14, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Passive personalization of buddy lists|
|US9088630 *||Jul 8, 2010||Jul 21, 2015||Qualcomm Incorporated||Selectively mixing media during a group communication session within a wireless communications system|
|US9088879||Feb 19, 2013||Jul 21, 2015||Google Inc.||Automatically enabling the forwarding of instant messages|
|US9092360 *||Aug 1, 2011||Jul 28, 2015||Broadcom Corporation||Advanced processor translation lookaside buffer management in a multithreaded system|
|US9100221||Sep 14, 2012||Aug 4, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Systems for messaging senders and recipients of an electronic message|
|US9100538||Sep 13, 2012||Aug 4, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Limited length video messaging|
|US20040128356 *||Jun 25, 2001||Jul 1, 2004||Keith Bernstein||Email integrated instant messaging|
|US20040260946 *||Jun 20, 2003||Dec 23, 2004||Cahill Conor P.||User not present|
|US20050027693 *||Jul 29, 2003||Feb 3, 2005||Hitachi, Ltd.||Database query operations using storage networks|
|US20050030937 *||Mar 7, 2001||Feb 10, 2005||Andy Wick||Integration of e-mail with instant messaging services|
|US20050108365 *||Oct 29, 2004||May 19, 2005||Detlef Becker||Storage and access method for an image retrieval system in a client/server environment|
|US20050216914 *||Mar 5, 2004||Sep 29, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Application of the command pattern to a client/server application|
|US20050234900 *||Apr 14, 2004||Oct 20, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Query workload statistics collection in a database management system|
|US20060031772 *||Sep 29, 2005||Feb 9, 2006||Judson Valeski||Automatic categorization of entries in a contact list|
|US20110167104 *||Jul 7, 2011||Qualcomm Incorporated||Selectively mixing media during a group communication session within a wireless communications system|
|US20120030445 *||Feb 2, 2012||Netlogic Microsystems, Inc.||Advanced processor translation lookaside buffer management in a multithreaded system|
|USRE45254||May 31, 2013||Nov 18, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Implicit population of access control lists|
|U.S. Classification||709/203, 707/E17.032, 709/217, 707/999.01|
|Cooperative Classification||G06F17/30427, G06F17/30566, G06F17/30023|
|European Classification||G06F17/30S5F, G06F17/30E2, G06F17/30S4P2|
|Jan 22, 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AT & T GLOBAL INFORMATION SOLUTIONS COMPANY, OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROLLINS, ANTHONY L.;REEL/FRAME:007784/0263
Effective date: 19951222
|Apr 9, 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NCR CORPORATION, OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AT&T GLOBAL INFORMATION SOLUTIONS COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:008047/0429
Effective date: 19960109
|Aug 5, 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ATT& GLOBAL INFORMATION SOLUTIONS COMPANY, OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CARINO, FELIPE JR.;REEL/FRAME:008070/0047
Effective date: 19960801
|Dec 2, 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NCR CORPORATION, OHIO
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:AT&T GLOBAL INFORMATION SOLUTIONS COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:008259/0394
Effective date: 19960109
|Jan 21, 1997||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AT&T GLOBAL INFORMATION SOLUTIONS COMPANY, OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CARINO, FELIPE, JR.;REEL/FRAME:008312/0289
Effective date: 19960801
|Mar 26, 1997||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NCR CORPORATION, OHIO
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:AT&T GLOBAL INFORMATION SOLUTIONS COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:008673/0251
Effective date: 19960109
|Sep 30, 2003||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jan 7, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jan 7, 2008||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 7
|Oct 14, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jan 15, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Effective date: 20140106
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:NCR CORPORATION;NCR INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:032034/0010