|Publication number||US6119151 A|
|Application number||US 08/206,706|
|Publication date||Sep 12, 2000|
|Filing date||Mar 7, 1994|
|Priority date||Mar 7, 1994|
|Also published as||CA2142797A1, CA2142797C, CN1121216A, CN1132109C, DE69416875D1, DE69416875T2, EP0749602A1, EP0749602B1, WO1995024685A1|
|Publication number||08206706, 206706, US 6119151 A, US 6119151A, US-A-6119151, US6119151 A, US6119151A|
|Inventors||Thomas George Cantrell, Sebnem Jaji, Amal Ahmed Shaheen, Richard Byron Ward|
|Original Assignee||International Business Machines Corp.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (14), Non-Patent Citations (24), Referenced by (179), Classifications (10), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to information handling systems for managing data. More particularly, the present invention relates to data management in clients in a distributed file system. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to caching and logging in distributed file system clients which may support connected or disconnected client operation.
2. Background and Related Art
Computer workstations have increased in power and storage capacity. Workstations were originally used by a single operator to perform one or more isolated tasks. The increased deployment of workstations to many users in an organization has created a need to communicate between workstations and share data between users. This has led to the development of distributed file system architectures such as that shown in FIG. 1.
A number of workstations in FIG. 1 are interconnected by a local area network (LAN). A wide area network (WAN) may be used to interconnect a number of local LANS. The LANs and WANs form a single logical network. Workstations in FIG. 1 are identified as servers S1, S2, S3 and clients C1, C2, C3. The designation of a workstation as a client or server depends upon the function executed by the specific workstation in the network. A particular workstation may be both a client and a server. Implementation of a distributed file system requires the presence of at least one server and at least one client.
Client workstations have traditionally been connected to the LAN at all times to receive the services of the LAN and to share resources such as files. Disconnection from the LAN meant the workstation was cutoff from the LAN resources. Work could be continued on the detached client only if the necessary files and programs had been copied to the client before disconnection.
The increased power of portable workstations has made detached or "mobile" computing practical. Portable workstations can be purchased with processor, memory and disk storage capacities equal to those of desktop or deskside units. Portable workstations or portable computers, however, currently have the same limitation when detached: no shared resource can be used unless a copy of that file or program was made prior to disconnection. When the workstation is reconnected it is left to the user to manually reconcile the files changed on the portable device with those on the network. FIG. 1 illustrates a disconnectable portable workstation as client C1 102 connected by a dashed line to the network.
The sharing of data files across a network such as that shown in FIG. 1 has evolved over time. The simplest form of sharing allows a client to request data from a file on the server. The necessary data is sent to the client processor and any changes or modifications to the data are returned to the server. Appropriate locks are created so that a second client does not change the data in a file held by the first client.
Distributed file systems enhance file sharing by adding mechanisms to more effectively distribute data to clients and to more effectively control sharing of files. Many distributed file systems exist. One popular distributed file system is the Andrew File System (AFS) distributed by Transarc Corp.
AFS improves distributed file processing efficiency by creating a file cache in a client that is accessing server data. This cache is referenced by client applications and only a cache miss causes data to be fetched from the server. Caching of data reduces network traffic and speeds response time at the client.
AFS cache consistency is based on a server callback system. The server will notify each client that has certain data cached of any condition that renders the client's cached data invalid. Once invalid, the data is purged from the cache and must be reacquired from the server when it is needed.
Disconnection of a workstation connected to AFS will cause loss of distributed file access by the client. The client will automatically drop all callbacks when disconnected causing the cache to be invalidated.
The Distributed File System (DFS) is a follow-on to AFS that supports the OSF Distributed Computing Environment(DCE). DFS uses a server-based token mechanism to ensure client cache consistency. Clients acquire "read" tokens to ensure the data in their cache is valid. If a client is to change data in a file, it acquires a "write" token for the data. Granting a "write" token to one client, e.g. C1, invalidates "read" tokens for the same data in all other clients. The token invalidation renders the cached data in these clients invalid. Disconnection from a DFS system will cause the client to lose any outstanding tokens. The client will be unable to read or write even to cached data due to the lack of tokens.
Carnegie Mellon University has undertaken an effort to provide support for detachable workstations connected to an AFS network. The CODA project is directed at providing a distributed file system with constant data availability. It accomplishes this by replicating data in multiple servers and providing support for disconnected operations by clients. See "Coda: A highly Available File System for a Distributed Workstation Environment," IEEE Transactions, Vol. 39, No. 4, April 1990.
Distributed operation in Coda is accomplished by optimistic replica control of data. Optimistic control allows many clients to read and write data, even if disconnected. Data inconsistencies are left to be identified and resolved later. Pessimistic replica control avoids all conflicts by restricting reads and writes to a single partition. Disconnection removes from the client the ability to determine whether another client has access to data. Under pessimistic replica control, the client would be unable to write. See "Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System," J. Kistler, M Satyanarayanan, Carnegie Mellon University, Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, October 1991.
Coda distributed operation allows the client to continue to access and update data held in the client side cache. File operations fail only when a cache miss occurs since the only then is the client unable to access the data from the server. AFS and Coda cache entire files. Coda updates the file during disconnected operations and maintains a log of all changes to the data. Upon reconnection the client is responsible for updating all server replicas of the data by applying the logged transactions to the server files. Data inconsistencies are handled by deferring resolution for manual intervention.
Coda has a major disadvantage that only connection to a Coda server is supported. Coda, like AFS, is a distributed file system protocol. Coda relies on the fact that the server or servers and all clients are using the same distributed file system protocol. The requires that all clients and servers in the network be changed to the Coda protocol to support disconnected operation.
A second approach has been suggested by Huston and Honeyman in "Disconnected Operation for AFS," L. B. Huston and P. Honeyman, Center for Information Technology Integration, The University of Michigan, published in the Proceedings of the USENIX Mobile and Location-Independent Computing Symposium, August, 1993. Huston and Honeyman propose a client system that can connect to a standard AFS server without modification to the server. Client code modifications support disconnected operation and reconnection. Reconnection and reconciliation is accomplished by logging every transaction while disconnected. Every read, write or update is recorded in a transaction log that is replayed to the server upon reconnection. This approach has the advantage of supporting a standard AFS server. It depends, however, on the presence of the AFS distributed file system protocol and does not operate with servers other than an AFS server. The total logging approach also detracts from the system efficiency. The size of the log would create client disk space problems and reconciliation delays in systems of any size.
Thus, a technical problem exists to provide a distributed file system that allows continued operation by disconnected clients with efficient reconciliation upon reconnection. A further technical problem is the creation of a distributed file system client that is usable with numerous distributed file system protocols. Finally, a technical problem exists of creating a distributed file system client that is independent of operating system syntax for object or pathname resolution.
The present invention is directed to providing a distributed file system that supports both connected and disconnected client operations. The client file system is connectable to multiple file system architectures and supports efficient transaction logging.
The present invention is directed to a method of managing a file system cache in a client computer system operating under a first operating system. The method comprises the steps of: intercepting operating system requests for a file system object in a distributed file system; transforming said requests to remove operating system dependent syntax; testing a cache in a storage means of said client for the presence of data about said file system object; and satisfying said file system object request, if cache data exists.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a distributed file system client that can operate when disconnected from the server.
It is a further object to provide a disconnectable client that efficiently logs transactions for reconciliation upon reconnection.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a file system client with efficient caching to reduce the amount of memory and disk space required for caching and to increase the speed and efficiency of cache processing.
It is yet another object to provide a distributed file system client operable with multiple distributed file system protocols.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a distributed file system client that is operating system independent.
It is still another object of the invention to increase cache efficiency through aggressively caching resolved object names.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a cache management system that is not dependent upon an object name allowing each file system object to have multiple parents each having different object name syntax rules.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawing wherein like reference numbers represent like parts of the invention.
FIG. 1 is an illustration of a distributed network environment in which the present invention is practiced.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a workstation incorporating one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a prior art distributed file system.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating the functional components of an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is an illustration of the data structures in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart depicting the process steps of one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 illustrates a typical client or server workstation configuration. The present invention is preferably practiced with a workstation such as the IBM RISC System/6000 workstation or the IBM PS/2 personal computer. The client and server workstations are interconnected by a token ring or Ethernet LAN as shown in FIG. 1. Workstations connected to the LAN may include portable workstations such as C1, which may be disconnected from the LAN and used independent of the LAN. it will be realized that many other configurations of workstation hardware or LAN types can be used within the scope of this invention.
A typical client or server workstation 200 has a processor 210, system memory 214 and non-volatile storage 212 such as a hard disk drive, a diskette or optical storage device. The processor accepts input from input/output (I/O) devices such as a keyboard 224 and pointing device 226 through I/O controller 218. The system presents graphic information to the operator on display 222 driven by graphics controller 220. The workstation is connected to a network (not shown) through network interface adapter 216.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention is implemented by a computer process operating in the memory and processor of workstation 200. A computer program product embodying the invention may be stored in non-volatile storage 212 including storage on a tape, diskette, or a compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM) device.
The operation of prior art distributed file systems is illustrated with reference to FIG. 3. FIG. 3 illustrates a client workstation 302 and a server workstation 304 interconnected by a network interface 306. A request by a user process 308 for a particular file or for information about a file residing on disk storage 390 is processed as follows. Note that both the client 302 and server 304 have been divided into user address space 310, 314 and kernel address space 312, 316. The interface between the application and the kernel (known as an application program interface or API) is the VFS/vnode API defined in S. R. Kleiman, "Vnodes: An Architecture for Multiple File System Types in Sun UNIX®", Summer Usenix Conference Proceedings, 1986. Other interfaces, of course, could be employed. The VFS/vnode interface allows multiple virtual file systems to exist. The distributed file system becomes a virtual file system to the client workstation.
User process 308 requests a data file on storage device 390. The request 320 is intercepted by the VFS interface and passed to the distributed file system client 322 resident in the client kernel address space 312. The distributed file system client manages communication with the server over the network. The request is passed in a message 326 to the distributed file system server 324 in the server kernel 316 over the network 306. Distributed file system server 324 accesses storage device 390 by using the VFS interface 328 to access the server's local physical file system that contains device 390. The requested data is acquired and passed 330 from distributed file system server 324 to distributed file system client 322 which in turn passes 332 the data to the requesting user process 308.
The distributed file system client 322 may include a data cache (not shown) to cache data requested from the server. The distributed file system client will check the cache for valid data before requesting that data from the server.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 4. The client workstation has a user address space 402 and a kernel address space 404. The improved cache manager 406 of the present invention operates preferably in the user address space 402 but can be implemented in the kernel address space 404.
User programs 408, 411, 413 issue file system requests 414, 416, 418. User program n is shown as using a logical file system 430 that in turns issues a file system request 440. The file system requests conform to the VFS/vnodes interface, though other interfaces could be used within the scope of the invention. The present invention can be used with any logical file system that conforms to the VFS/vnode API or, in alternate embodiments, conforms to any other API.
The VFS interface directs the file system request to cache manager 406. Cache manager 406 maintains the local information about the distributed file systems accessed by the client. If possible, file system requests are serviced by the cache manager without access to the server. File system requests can be satisfied by the cache manager if the requested information is in the cache and still valid. Cache manager 406 will be described in greater detail below.
File system requests are satisfied by cache manager 406 either from data resident in cache manager memory or by accessing the local physical file system 420 or by using distributed file system access 422. The cache manager keeps local copies of distributed files in the local physical file system for quick access. The distributed file system access 422 issues the necessary commands to the distributed file system server 324 as discussed above. The preferred embodiment caches entire files though the invention is not limited to full file caching.
The cache manager 406 and distributed file system access 422 are independent of the operating system and the distributed file system access protocol. Operating system independence is achieved by supporting defined interfaces. The supported interfaces include: the VFS+/Vnodes interface for file system operations; a persistence interface such as that provided by the IBM SOMobjects persistence framework; local file system interface (LSI) for cached files; various distributed file system protocols; a cache synchronization interface; and a log replay interface. The cache manager does not depend on any operating system syntax. File names are transformed to be independent of file name component separator characters, and are considered to have no reserved characters and no reserved words. Path name resolution is also independent of operating system syntax. Thus, a particular file system object can be referenced by two operating systems with conflicting syntax rules. For example, cache manager 406 may be implemented to operate with the IBM OS/2® operating system or the IBM AIX® operating system or with any other operating system.
The cache manager of the present invention is independent of the distribute file system protocol. Distributed file system access 422 can access remote servers using either the Distributed Computing Environment (DCE®) server from the Open Software Foundation (OSF®) or the IBM LAN Server program product. Other remote file access protocols can be used. The synchronization mechanism and log replay mechanism handle protocol dependent tasks.
Cache manager 406 maintains the client cache 409. In connection with the cache 409, cache manager 406 maintains volume information 410 and a modification log 412. Volume information 410 contains information about the file systems accessible to the client workstation through the cache manager. In the preferred embodiment, remote file systems are connected to the client by volume. Each volume will have a volume entry in the volume information database. Thus, a remote file system will be connected to the client workstation either as a Unix-type file system (e.g. mounted as a particular file system/rfs), or as a DCE drive letter (e.g. as drive G:\.) All information about the remote file system and it's status is maintained in volume information database 410. Multiple remote file systems can be concurrently connected to a single client.
The structure of cache 409 is shown in greater detail in FIG. 5. Cache 409 maintains a single cache for file pathname, file system object data, and file system object status information. The cache is maintained in the persistent heap, i.e. it is periodically written to non-volatile storage from which it can be restored in case of power or system failure. A single integrated cache reduces overall cache memory requirements thereby increasing cache performance. The single cache requires only one hash table instead of the three found in prior art systems. All cache processing can be implemented in a single set of code that stores different types of file system objects rather than the traditional mechanism of separate code for each type of cache. The cached file system object is shown generally at 502. The file system object 502 is used for both connected and disconnected operation of the cache manager.
File system object 502 is a data structure containing the information necessary to access a remote file or the local cached copy of the remote file. A file system object entry is created in the cache for each remote file or directory referenced by the client workstation. The file system object contains a FS+/vnode identifier 504 and file identifier 506. File identifier 506 includes volume, server, and file data. The VFS+/vnode identifier contains the information defined by the VFS/Vnodes standard specification. Inclusion of that information allows full support for all VFS/Vnode interfaces. The present invention appends additional information to the data structure to support enhanced caching and disconnected operation. The volume entry 508 is a pointer to a volume entry 545 in the volume information database 410 for the volume to which the file belongs. A state variable 510 and state structure 512 is maintained to provide cache status information for the data. In the preferred embodiment, implemented in an object oriented environment using tools such as the C++ programming language, the status structure is defined as an object class. The status structure for a particular operating system file (e.g. OS/2 or AIX) is defined by creating a subclass of the status structure class. The subclass will override the status structure class with the exact contents necessary to define file status.
The file system object maintains cache coherency information 514. This information is used to ensure consistency between the cache and the server and server replicas. A list of access control lists (ACLs) 516 define permissions for file system access and modification according to the IEEE POSIX® standard. Other flag information is maintained at 518. The mount state of the volume is maintained 520 as is parent pointer 522 and priority information 524. Each file system object has an assigned priority that is used when determining which objects to purge to make room for new objects.
File system data is accessed through a file/directory/symlink pointer 526. This pointer provides access to three different types of cache data depending on the file system object type. A file system object for a data file will have a pointer to the cached file 540 which in turn points to the copy of the local cached data file in the local file system 420. A directory pointer points to a cached directory 542. The cached directory 542 is built based on an aggressive caching scheme. Whenever directory information is requested for a particular directory, that directory and all of its immediate children are returned. This reduces cache misses because of the high probability that information about one or more children will be requested soon after the parent directory information. The directory cache provides information necessary for pathname resolution, i.e. mapping a particular file system path request to a particular data file. Finally, pointer 526 may point to cached symbolic link information 544. This cached information allows resolution of symbolic links.
Entries are provided for miscellaneous counters, locks and handles at 528, and an indicator of the clean status 532. The clean status indicator 532 is important for disconnected operation and is used to indicate reconciliation status.
It is important to note that the name of the file system object is not included in the data structure 502. This allows the file system object to be referenced from different object names sets without conflict. Each file system object can have multiple parents. Each parent may conform to a different naming convention, e.g. the naming specification of the Object Management Group (OMG), or that of AIX, OS/2 or other operating system. Thus, a particular file object employee-- list may be accessible from OS/2 as c:\employee-- list and from AIX as /usr/employee-- list.
Cache manager 406 supports both connected and disconnected operation. During connected operation cache manager 406 satisfies file system requests from the cache or, if necessary, though remote file access. When disconnected, cache manager satisfies requests from the cache and maintains a modification log 412 of all file system modifications.
One implementation of the cache manager according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 6. This embodiment is designed for use with the IBM OS/2 operating system. File system requests are issued by the system as a "doscall" command 602. All file system requests are served by the IFS file system 604. IFS provides logical file system capabilities. Different types of file systems may be mounted and served by IFS. Mounted file systems may include for example, the FAT file system 606 common to DOS systems, or the OS/2 HPFS file system 608. In a LAN environment, the LAN Requester 610 appears as another file system in which file accesses are passed to the LAN Server for action. A cache manager according to the present invention can be mounted as another type of file system 612. All remote file system accesses are passed to the cache manager 612. The cache manager tests the cache 614 (in user address space) to determine whether the requested information has been cached. If so, the information is provided to the application, including, if necessary, providing or modifying cached data retained in the local file system 606 or 608. If the file system data is not found, a request is passed to the LAN requester 610 causing it to access the necessary data on the LAN server. When the remote data arrives, it is placed in the cache for future reference.
A flowchart illustrating the process flow for a file write command is shown in FIG. 7. Other file system commands are implemented similarly. The command starts at 702 with the issuance of a file write command 704. The cache manager tests to determine whether the requested file is in the cache 706. If so, the cache copy of the file is updated 708. Next, the cache is tested to determine whether the volume is currently connected 710. Connection status is maintained in the volume information database 410. If the volume is connected, the change is propagated back to the server 712 and processing terminates 722. If the volume is not connected, the change is logged 714 in the modification log and processing terminated 722.
If the requested file is not in the cache, the cache manager next tests whether or not the requested volume is connected 716. If connected, the file is requested from the remote file system 718, placed in the cache and processing resumed at step 708. If the volume is not connected, a failure signal is returned to the application 720.
Logging of modifications (e.g. step 714) into modification log 546 is accomplished by logging objects. The problem domain is represented by a client modify log class and a separate class for each different type of transaction logged. A different object is defined for each type of operation, e.g. one would exist for write file, create file, remove file. When the cache manager logs a change 714 in disconnected operation mode a log object type corresponding to the requested operation is created (e.g. write file.) A log method is invoked to put the object in the log. The object methods include methods to compress and optimize the log for replay. Logging a particular object may cause removal of a previously logged object. For example, when a file is created and then later removed, the file removal object will remove the file creation log entry, any file modification log entries, and then exit without placing a file removal entry in the log. This system assures that the synchronization of the cache with the remote file system on reconnection will occur rapidly and efficiently. The intelligence in the logging objects eliminates the need to process or compress the log prior to replay.
It will be understood from the foregoing description that various modifications and changes may be made in the preferred embodiment of the present invention without departing from its true spirit. It is intended that this description is for purposes of illustration only and should not be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of this invention should be limited only by the language of the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4887204 *||Feb 13, 1987||Dec 12, 1989||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for accessing remote files in a distributed networking environment|
|US5113519 *||May 15, 1989||May 12, 1992||International Business Machines Corporation||Maintenance of file attributes in a distributed data processing system|
|US5136716 *||Mar 8, 1990||Aug 4, 1992||Digital Equipment Corporation||Session control in network for digital data processing system which supports multiple transfer protocols|
|US5151989 *||Feb 13, 1987||Sep 29, 1992||International Business Machines Corporation||Directory cache management in a distributed data processing system|
|US5210824 *||Mar 28, 1991||May 11, 1993||Xerox Corporation||Encoding-format-desensitized methods and means for interchanging electronic document as appearances|
|US5261051 *||Aug 14, 1989||Nov 9, 1993||Microsoft Corporation||Method and system for open file caching in a networked computer system|
|US5287507 *||Mar 27, 1992||Feb 15, 1994||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for portable object handles that use local caches|
|US5305389 *||Aug 30, 1991||Apr 19, 1994||Digital Equipment Corporation||Predictive cache system|
|US5305440 *||Jun 12, 1992||Apr 19, 1994||International Business Machines Corporation||File extension by clients in a distributed data processing system|
|US5313581 *||Sep 28, 1993||May 17, 1994||Digital Equipment Corporation||System and method for communication between windowing environments|
|US5313638 *||Mar 24, 1992||May 17, 1994||International Business Machines Corp.||Method using semaphores for synchronizing communication between programs or processes resident in a computer system|
|US5329619 *||Oct 30, 1992||Jul 12, 1994||Software Ag||Cooperative processing interface and communication broker for heterogeneous computing environments|
|US5339435 *||Nov 24, 1993||Aug 16, 1994||Hewlett-Packard Company||Heterogenous software configuration management apparatus|
|US5410697 *||Oct 6, 1993||Apr 25, 1995||International Business Machines Corporation||Concurrency management using version identification of shared data as a supplement to use of locks|
|1||*||Computer , IEEE May 1990, Scalable, Secure, and Highly Available Distributed File Access , M. Satyanarayanan, pp. 9 21.|
|2||*||Computer Standards & Interfaces , 14 (1992), No. 3, Amsterdam, NL, On the Feasibility of ISO FTAM based File Servers to Implement a Heterogeneous File System , Marshall et al, pp. 191 208.|
|3||Computer Standards & Interfaces, 14 (1992), No. 3, Amsterdam, NL, "On the Feasibility of ISO FTAM-based File Servers to Implement a Heterogeneous File System", Marshall et al, pp. 191-208.|
|4||Computer, IEEE May 1990, "Scalable, Secure, and Highly Available Distributed File Access", M. Satyanarayanan, pp. 9-21.|
|5||*||IEEE Transactions on Computers , vol. 39, No. 4, Apr. 1990, Coda: A Highly Available File System for a Distributed Workstation Environment , M. Satyanarayanan et al, pp. 447 459.|
|6||IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 39, No. 4, Apr. 1990, "Coda: A Highly Available File System for a Distributed Workstation Environment", M. Satyanarayanan et al, pp. 447-459.|
|7||*||IEEE Transactions on Software Enginering , 19 (1993) Jun., No. 6, New York, Accessing Files in an Internet: The Jade File System , Rao et al, pp. 613 624.|
|8||IEEE Transactions on Software Enginering, 19 (1993) Jun., No. 6, New York, "Accessing Files in an Internet: The Jade File System", Rao et al, pp. 613-624.|
|9||*||Log based Directory Resolution in the Coda File System by Satyanarayanan, 1993 IEEE publication, pp. 202 213.|
|10||Log-based Directory Resolution in the Coda File System by Satyanarayanan, 1993 IEEE publication, pp. 202-213.|
|11||*||Mobile and Location Independent Computing Symposium, USENIX Association, Disconnected Operation for AFS , L. B. Huston et al, pp. 1 10.|
|12||Mobile and Location-Independent Computing Symposium, USENIX Association, "Disconnected Operation for AFS", L. B. Huston et al, pp. 1-10.|
|13||Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Oct. 1991, "Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System", J. J. Kistler et al.|
|14||*||Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Oct. 1991, Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System , J. J. Kistler et al.|
|15||Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, Apr. 23, 1992, "On the Ubiquity of Logging in Distributed File Systems", Satyanarayanan et al, pp. 122-125.|
|16||*||Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, Apr. 23, 1992, On the Ubiquity of Logging in Distributed File Systems , Satyanarayanan et al, pp. 122 125.|
|17||*||Proceedings of the Usenix Mobile and Location Independent Computing Symposium, Aug. 2 3, 1993, Disconnected Operation for AFS , Huston et al, pp. 1 10.|
|18||Proceedings of the Usenix Mobile and Location Independent Computing Symposium, Aug. 2-3, 1993, "Disconnected Operation for AFS", Huston et al, pp. 1-10.|
|19||Summer USENIX Conference Proceedings, 1986, "Vnodes: An Architecture for Multiple File System Types in Sun UNIX", S. R. Kleiman, pp. 238-247.|
|20||*||Summer USENIX Conference Proceedings, 1986, Vnodes: An Architecture for Multiple File System Types in Sun UNIX , S. R. Kleiman, pp. 238 247.|
|21||Summer USENIX Conference Proceedings, Anaheim, Jun. 1990, "Efficient User-Lever File Cache Management on the Sun Vnode Interface", D. C. Steere et al.|
|22||*||Summer USENIX Conference Proceedings, Anaheim, Jun. 1990, Efficient User Lever File Cache Management on the Sun Vnode Interface , D. C. Steere et al.|
|23||*||The Influence of Scale on Distributed File System Design, by Satyanarayanan, IEEE publication 1992, pp. 1 8.|
|24||The Influence of Scale on Distributed File System Design, by Satyanarayanan, IEEE publication 1992, pp. 1-8.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6625641 *||Jun 3, 1996||Sep 23, 2003||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for providing client support without installation of server software|
|US6662198||Aug 30, 2001||Dec 9, 2003||Zoteca Inc.||Method and system for asynchronous transmission, backup, distribution of data and file sharing|
|US6678724 *||Jul 30, 2002||Jan 13, 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Common namespace for internet and local filesystem objects|
|US6728716 *||May 16, 2000||Apr 27, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Client-server filter computing system supporting relational database records and linked external files operable for distributed file system|
|US6772193 *||Apr 7, 2000||Aug 3, 2004||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for continuing data transfer to network cache from server without transferring said data to user terminal irrespective of user interruption of the data transferring request|
|US6792436 *||Feb 9, 2001||Sep 14, 2004||Persistence Software, Inc.||Method for synchronizing multiple software caches in a memory|
|US6842770 *||Aug 18, 2000||Jan 11, 2005||Apple Computer, Inc.||Method and system for seamlessly accessing remotely stored files|
|US6922757||Oct 8, 2002||Jul 26, 2005||Exanet Inc.||Flexible and adaptive read and write storage system architecture|
|US6968345 *||Feb 27, 2002||Nov 22, 2005||Network Appliance, Inc.||Technique to enable support for symbolic link access by windows clients|
|US6970975||Nov 15, 2002||Nov 29, 2005||Exanet Co.||Method for efficient caching and enumerating objects in distributed storage systems|
|US6981097 *||Mar 14, 2003||Dec 27, 2005||Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation||Token based cache-coherence protocol|
|US7051174||Sep 24, 2002||May 23, 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||Method, system, and program for restoring data in cache|
|US7103617 *||Jan 13, 2004||Sep 5, 2006||Tacit Networks, Inc.||Method and system for use of storage caching with a distributed file system|
|US7139811 *||Jul 31, 2002||Nov 21, 2006||Actona Technologies Ltd.||Double-proxy remote data access system|
|US7185005||May 11, 2001||Feb 27, 2007||Oracle International Corporation||Nested transactions in a file system|
|US7203709||May 30, 2003||Apr 10, 2007||Oracle International Corporation||Transaction-aware caching for access control metadata|
|US7240329 *||Dec 28, 2001||Jul 3, 2007||Oracle International Corporation||Policies on a per instance basis|
|US7389493||Dec 28, 2001||Jun 17, 2008||Oracle International Corporation||Categories on a per instance basis|
|US7392345 *||Aug 7, 2006||Jun 24, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Policy setting for client-side caching|
|US7421541||May 30, 2003||Sep 2, 2008||Oracle International Corporation||Version management of cached permissions metadata|
|US7428703||Dec 22, 2004||Sep 23, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for processing media content|
|US7447754||Dec 6, 2000||Nov 4, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for processing multi-media editing projects|
|US7457677||Oct 28, 2004||Nov 25, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for mixing digital audio signals|
|US7472395||Oct 5, 2004||Dec 30, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Systems for generating and managing filter strings in a filter graph|
|US7512990 *||Oct 16, 2003||Mar 31, 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Multiple simultaneous ACL formats on a filesystem|
|US7526776||Feb 14, 2008||Apr 28, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Systems and methods for generating and managing filter strings in a filter graph utilizing a matrix switch|
|US7529848||Jun 13, 2006||May 5, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for efficiently processing compressed and uncompressed media content|
|US7543308||Feb 2, 2004||Jun 2, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||System and related methods for reducing source filter invocation in a development project|
|US7568220||Apr 19, 2005||Jul 28, 2009||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Connecting VPN users in a public network|
|US7571385||Apr 8, 2004||Aug 4, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for processing media content|
|US7581185||Dec 26, 2003||Aug 25, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Interface and related methods for reducing source accesses in a development system|
|US7584220||Feb 7, 2005||Sep 1, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for determining target failback and target priority for a distributed file system|
|US7584479||Jul 29, 2005||Sep 1, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Interface and related methods for dynamically generating a filter graph in a development system|
|US7590845||Dec 22, 2003||Sep 15, 2009||Lenovo Singapore Pte. Ltd.||Key cache management through multiple localities|
|US7596563 *||Oct 28, 1999||Sep 29, 2009||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Computerized file system and method|
|US7631319||Feb 2, 2004||Dec 8, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||System and related methods for reducing source filter invocation in a development project|
|US7664788 *||Jan 10, 2005||Feb 16, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Method and system for synchronizing cached files|
|US7673013 *||Oct 27, 2004||Mar 2, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for processing multi-media editing projects|
|US7680898 *||Oct 21, 2004||Mar 16, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Systems for processing multi-media editing projects|
|US7693962 *||Nov 19, 2004||Apr 6, 2010||Apple Inc.||Method and system for seamlessly accessing remotely stored files|
|US7711788||Apr 20, 2006||May 4, 2010||Actona Technologies Ltd.||Double-proxy remote data access system|
|US7712106||Dec 27, 2005||May 4, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||System and methods for generating and managing filter strings in a filter graph|
|US7716168||Jun 29, 2005||May 11, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Modifying table definitions within a database application|
|US7729919||Jul 3, 2003||Jun 1, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Combining use of a stepwise markup language and an object oriented development tool|
|US7734733||Jun 15, 2007||Jun 8, 2010||Packeteer, Inc.||WAFS disconnected-mode read-write access|
|US7743026||Jan 31, 2006||Jun 22, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Redirection to local copies of server-based files|
|US7743109||Jan 31, 2007||Jun 22, 2010||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Reducing round trips across a wide area network for resource locking by extended locking and delayed unlocking|
|US7805602||Nov 10, 2005||Sep 28, 2010||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Prioritized call admission control for internet key exchange|
|US7814501||Mar 17, 2006||Oct 12, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Application execution in a network based environment|
|US7827216 *||Jul 23, 2003||Nov 2, 2010||Novell, Inc.||Method for coordinating relationships between multiple physical entities|
|US7853921||Aug 29, 2005||Dec 14, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Interface and related methods for dynamically generating a filter graph in a development system|
|US7895651 *||Jul 29, 2005||Feb 22, 2011||Bit 9, Inc.||Content tracking in a network security system|
|US7940275||Aug 29, 2005||May 10, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Interface and related methods for dynamically generating a filter graph in a development system|
|US7962600||Feb 10, 2010||Jun 14, 2011||Packeteer, Inc.||WAFS disconnected-mode read-write access|
|US7987217||May 30, 2003||Jul 26, 2011||Oracle International Corporation||Transaction-aware caching for document metadata|
|US8005951 *||Jun 25, 2008||Aug 23, 2011||Pitts William M||Method for creating an extensible content distribution framework|
|US8010649||Nov 3, 2008||Aug 30, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for processing multi-media editing projects|
|US8135755||Sep 20, 2005||Mar 13, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Templates in a schema editor|
|US8150954||Nov 3, 2008||Apr 3, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for processing multi-media editing projects|
|US8185630 *||Aug 22, 2011||May 22, 2012||Willaim M Pitts||Method for creating global distributed namespace|
|US8225002 *||Mar 5, 2003||Jul 17, 2012||Network Disk, Inc.||Data storage and data sharing in a network of heterogeneous computers|
|US8255456||Dec 30, 2005||Aug 28, 2012||Citrix Systems, Inc.||System and method for performing flash caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network|
|US8261057||Jun 4, 2010||Sep 4, 2012||Citrix Systems, Inc.||System and method for establishing a virtual private network|
|US8272058 *||Jul 29, 2005||Sep 18, 2012||Bit 9, Inc.||Centralized timed analysis in a network security system|
|US8301839||Dec 30, 2005||Oct 30, 2012||Citrix Systems, Inc.||System and method for performing granular invalidation of cached dynamically generated objects in a data communication network|
|US8321483||Apr 1, 2010||Nov 27, 2012||Apple Inc.||Method and system for seamlessly accessing remotely stored files|
|US8346966 *||Jul 19, 2007||Jan 1, 2013||Blue Coat Systems, Inc.||Transparent file system access for wide area network file system acceleration|
|US8429192 *||Dec 2, 2004||Apr 23, 2013||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for supporting a plurality of access control list types for a file system in an operating system|
|US8452823||Oct 19, 2010||May 28, 2013||Novell, Inc.||Method for coordinating relationships between multiple physical entities|
|US8495044||Sep 2, 2009||Jul 23, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||File system node updates|
|US8495305||Dec 30, 2005||Jul 23, 2013||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Method and device for performing caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network|
|US8499057||Feb 22, 2011||Jul 30, 2013||Citrix Systems, Inc||System and method for performing flash crowd caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network|
|US8549149||Dec 30, 2005||Oct 1, 2013||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP multiplexing|
|US8559449||May 31, 2011||Oct 15, 2013||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Systems and methods for providing a VPN solution|
|US8612859||Oct 22, 2007||Dec 17, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for effecting video transitions represented by bitmaps|
|US8634420||May 25, 2010||Jan 21, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Systems and methods for communicating a lossy protocol via a lossless protocol|
|US8694464||Sep 9, 2009||Apr 8, 2014||Microsoft Corporation||File system node updates|
|US8700695||Dec 30, 2005||Apr 15, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP pooling|
|US8706877||Dec 30, 2005||Apr 22, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Systems and methods for providing client-side dynamic redirection to bypass an intermediary|
|US8726006||Aug 21, 2012||May 13, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||System and method for establishing a virtual private network|
|US8739274 *||Jun 29, 2005||May 27, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network|
|US8745017||Mar 14, 2008||Jun 3, 2014||Oracle International Corporation||Transaction-aware caching for access control metadata|
|US8782800||Apr 30, 2012||Jul 15, 2014||Bit9, Inc.||Parametric content control in a network security system|
|US8788581||Jan 18, 2013||Jul 22, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Method and device for performing caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network|
|US8848710||Jul 25, 2012||Sep 30, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||System and method for performing flash caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network|
|US8856777||Sep 2, 2010||Oct 7, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Systems and methods for automatic installation and execution of a client-side acceleration program|
|US8892778||Sep 14, 2012||Nov 18, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Method and systems for securing remote access to private networks|
|US8897299||Jan 11, 2013||Nov 25, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Method and systems for routing packets from a gateway to an endpoint|
|US8914522||Jul 22, 2005||Dec 16, 2014||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Systems and methods for facilitating a peer to peer route via a gateway|
|US8943413 *||May 5, 2014||Jan 27, 2015||International Business Machines Corporation||Visually representing and managing access control of resources|
|US8954595||Dec 30, 2005||Feb 10, 2015||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP buffering|
|US8984636 *||Jul 29, 2005||Mar 17, 2015||Bit9, Inc.||Content extractor and analysis system|
|US9020992 *||Dec 9, 2010||Apr 28, 2015||Symantec Corporation||Systems and methods for facilitating file archiving|
|US9110911||Dec 16, 2013||Aug 18, 2015||Open Text S.A.||System and method for the synchronization of a file in a cache|
|US9118615||Jun 20, 2012||Aug 25, 2015||Open Text S.A.||Method and system for providing personalized network based marketing dialogues|
|US9135284||Mar 13, 2008||Sep 15, 2015||Blue Coat Systems, Inc.||Composite execution of rename operations in wide area file systems|
|US9137253 *||Jan 7, 2015||Sep 15, 2015||International Business Machines Corporation||Visually representing and managing access control of resources|
|US9141627||Sep 26, 2006||Sep 22, 2015||Sony Corporation||Providing a user access to data files distributed in a plurality of different types of user devices|
|US9210236 *||Oct 29, 2013||Dec 8, 2015||Parallel Networks, Llc||Method and system for dynamic distributed data caching|
|US9219579||Jul 22, 2005||Dec 22, 2015||Citrix Systems, Inc.||Systems and methods for client-side application-aware prioritization of network communications|
|US9231958 *||Jul 9, 2015||Jan 5, 2016||International Business Machines Corporation||Visually representing and managing access control of resources|
|US9292536||Jul 13, 2015||Mar 22, 2016||Open Text S.A.||System and method for the synchronization of a file in a cache|
|US9419934||Jul 7, 2014||Aug 16, 2016||Open Text S.A.||Method and system for message pacing|
|US9442850||Mar 25, 2008||Sep 13, 2016||Blue Coat Systems, Inc.||Efficient directory refresh operations in wide area file systems|
|US9507800||Oct 23, 2013||Nov 29, 2016||Netapp, Inc.||Data management in distributed file systems|
|US9515979||Jul 11, 2014||Dec 6, 2016||Open Text Sa Ulc||Method and system for providing personalized network based dialogues|
|US9547726||Mar 15, 2010||Jan 17, 2017||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Virtual file-sharing network|
|US9575974 *||Dec 20, 2013||Feb 21, 2017||Netapp, Inc.||Distributed file system gateway|
|US9591489||Jul 9, 2015||Mar 7, 2017||International Business Machines Corporation||Controlling application access to applications and resources via graphical representation and manipulation|
|US9594768||Feb 5, 2016||Mar 14, 2017||Open Text Sa Ulc||System and method for the synchronization of a file in a cache|
|US20020099789 *||Dec 6, 2000||Jul 25, 2002||Rudolph Eric H.||Methods and systems for processing multi-media editing projects|
|US20030145114 *||Mar 5, 2003||Jul 31, 2003||Ilya Gertner||Data storage and data sharing in a network of heterogeneous computers|
|US20030159006 *||Oct 8, 2002||Aug 21, 2003||Exanet, Inc.||Flexible and adaptive read and write storage system architecture|
|US20030195865 *||May 30, 2003||Oct 16, 2003||Long David J.||Transaction-aware caching for access control metadata|
|US20030200197 *||May 30, 2003||Oct 23, 2003||Oracle International Corporation||Transaction-aware caching for document metadata|
|US20040019640 *||Jul 25, 2002||Jan 29, 2004||Bartram Linda Ruth||System and method for distributing shared storage for collaboration across multiple devices|
|US20040059870 *||Sep 24, 2002||Mar 25, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Method, system, and program for restoring data in cache|
|US20040068523 *||Oct 7, 2002||Apr 8, 2004||Keith Robert Olan||Method and system for full asynchronous master-to-master file synchronization|
|US20040098539 *||Nov 15, 2002||May 20, 2004||Exanet Co.||Method for efficient caching and enumerating objects in distributed storage systems|
|US20040181636 *||Mar 14, 2003||Sep 16, 2004||Martin Milo M.K.||Token based cache-coherence protocol|
|US20040186861 *||Jan 13, 2004||Sep 23, 2004||Phatak Shirish Hemant||Method and system for use of storage caching with a distributed file system|
|US20040189688 *||Apr 8, 2004||Sep 30, 2004||Miller Daniel J.||Methods and systems for processing media content|
|US20040221291 *||Feb 2, 2004||Nov 4, 2004||Miller Daniel J.||System and related methods for reducing source filter invocation in a development project|
|US20040225683 *||Feb 2, 2004||Nov 11, 2004||Microsoft Corporation||System and related methods for reducing source filter invocation in a development project|
|US20040255048 *||Jul 31, 2002||Dec 16, 2004||Etai Lev Ran||Virtual file-sharing network|
|US20050004800 *||Jul 3, 2003||Jan 6, 2005||Kuansan Wang||Combining use of a stepwise markup language and an object oriented development tool|
|US20050060422 *||Oct 27, 2004||Mar 17, 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and systems for processing multi-media editing projects|
|US20050086491 *||Oct 16, 2003||Apr 21, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Method, apparatus, and program for multiple simultaneous ACL formats on a filesystem|
|US20050091222 *||Nov 19, 2004||Apr 28, 2005||Bertrand Serlet||Method and system for seamlessly accessing remotely stored files|
|US20050091339 *||Oct 21, 2004||Apr 28, 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Systems for processing multi-media editing projects|
|US20050120304 *||Dec 20, 2004||Jun 2, 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Interface and related methods for reducing source accesses in a development system|
|US20050135626 *||Dec 22, 2003||Jun 23, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Key cache management through multiple localities|
|US20050262514 *||Jul 29, 2005||Nov 24, 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Interface and related methods for dynamically generating a filter graph in a development system|
|US20050273486 *||Aug 4, 2004||Dec 8, 2005||Keith Robert O Jr||Virtual distributed file system|
|US20060085428 *||Feb 7, 2005||Apr 20, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for determining target failback and target priority for a distributed file system|
|US20060123005 *||Dec 2, 2004||Jun 8, 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for supporting a plurality of access control list types for a file system in an operating system|
|US20060155776 *||Jan 10, 2005||Jul 13, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Method and system for synchronizing cached files|
|US20060168554 *||Dec 27, 2005||Jul 27, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||A System and Methods for Generating and Managing Filter Strings in a Filter Graph|
|US20060218299 *||Jun 13, 2006||Sep 28, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and Systems for Efficiently Processing Compressed and Uncompressed Media Content|
|US20060236378 *||Apr 19, 2005||Oct 19, 2006||Burshan Chen Y||Connecting VPN users in a public network|
|US20070005630 *||Jun 29, 2005||Jan 4, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Modifying table definitions within a database application|
|US20070005634 *||Sep 20, 2005||Jan 4, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Templates in a schema editor|
|US20070038884 *||Jun 27, 2006||Feb 15, 2007||Spare Backup, Inc.||System and method of remote storage of data using client software|
|US20070083592 *||Sep 20, 2006||Apr 12, 2007||Bartram Linda R||System and method for distributing shared storage for collaboration across multiple devices|
|US20070143477 *||Jan 31, 2007||Jun 21, 2007||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Reducing round trips across a wide area network for resource locking by extended locking and delayed unlocking|
|US20070174428 *||Apr 20, 2006||Jul 26, 2007||Actona Technologies Ltd.||Double-proxy remote data access system|
|US20070198657 *||Jan 31, 2006||Aug 23, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Redirection to local copies of server-based files|
|US20070198685 *||Jul 26, 2006||Aug 23, 2007||Phatak Shirish H||Method and system for use of storage caching with a distributed file system|
|US20070220528 *||Mar 17, 2006||Sep 20, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Application execution in a network based environment|
|US20080022392 *||Jul 5, 2006||Jan 24, 2008||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Resolution of attribute overlap on authentication, authorization, and accounting servers|
|US20080022650 *||Jul 28, 2006||Jan 31, 2008||Pascoe William M||Composite yarn and process for producing the same|
|US20080028149 *||Aug 7, 2006||Jan 31, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Method and system for client-side caching|
|US20080077594 *||Sep 26, 2006||Mar 27, 2008||Takaaki Ota||Providing a user access to data files distributed in a plurality of different types of user devices|
|US20080109728 *||Oct 22, 2007||May 8, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and Systems for Effecting Video Transitions Represented By Bitmaps|
|US20090037915 *||Jul 31, 2007||Feb 5, 2009||Rothman Michael A||Staging block-based transactions|
|US20090077202 *||Jun 25, 2008||Mar 19, 2009||Pitts William M||Method for creating an extensible content distribution framework|
|US20100146083 *||Feb 10, 2010||Jun 10, 2010||Packeteer, Inc.||WAFS Disconnected-Mode Read-Write Access|
|US20100169392 *||Mar 15, 2010||Jul 1, 2010||Actona Technologies Ltd.||Virtual file-sharing network|
|US20100191785 *||Apr 1, 2010||Jul 29, 2010||Bertrand Serlet||Method and system for seamlessly accessing remotely stored files|
|US20110047194 *||Oct 19, 2010||Feb 24, 2011||Novell, Inc.||Method for coordinating relationships between multiple physical entities|
|US20110055182 *||Sep 2, 2009||Mar 3, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||File system|
|US20110055184 *||Sep 9, 2009||Mar 3, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||File system|
|US20110087738 *||Mar 16, 2010||Apr 14, 2011||Linda Ruth Bartram||System and method for distributing shared storage for collaboration across multiple devices|
|US20110307597 *||Aug 22, 2011||Dec 15, 2011||Willaim M Pitts||Method for creating global distributed namespace|
|US20120259953 *||Jun 19, 2012||Oct 11, 2012||Network Disk, Inc.||Data Storage and Data Sharing in a Network of Heterogeneous Computers|
|US20120323966 *||Feb 24, 2011||Dec 20, 2012||Rakuten, Inc.||Storage device, server device, storage system, database device, provision method of data, and program|
|US20130304842 *||Nov 15, 2011||Nov 14, 2013||Intel Corporation||Endpoint Caching for Data Storage Systems|
|US20140059159 *||Oct 29, 2013||Feb 27, 2014||Parallel Networks, Llc||Method and system for dynamic distributed data caching|
|US20140245429 *||May 5, 2014||Aug 28, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||Visually representing and managing access control of resources|
|US20150113010 *||Dec 20, 2013||Apr 23, 2015||Netapp, Inc.||Distributed file system gateway|
|US20150163227 *||Jan 7, 2015||Jun 11, 2015||International Business Machines Corporation||Visually representing and managing access control of resources|
|USRE42892||Oct 17, 2002||Nov 1, 2011||Netscape Communications Corporation||Method and apparatus for maintaining state information on an HTTP client system in relation to server domain and path attributes|
|CN101164057B||Jun 30, 2005||Nov 20, 2013||赛特里克斯网络应用有限责任公司||Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network|
|EP1984839A1 *||Jan 30, 2007||Oct 29, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Redirection to local copies of server based files|
|EP1984839A4 *||Jan 30, 2007||Jul 1, 2009||Microsoft Corp||Redirection to local copies of server based files|
|WO2003102779A2 *||May 27, 2003||Dec 11, 2003||Flyingspark Limited||Methods and system for using caches|
|WO2003102779A3 *||May 27, 2003||Aug 26, 2004||Flyingspark Ltd||Methods and system for using caches|
|WO2005119495A2 *||Jun 3, 2005||Dec 15, 2005||Keith Jr Robert O||Virtual distributed file system|
|WO2005119495A3 *||Jun 3, 2005||Apr 9, 2009||Jr Robert O Keith||Virtual distributed file system|
|U.S. Classification||709/216, 707/E17.01, 711/100|
|International Classification||G06F15/00, G06F13/18, G06F12/00, G06F17/30, G06F15/16|
|Mar 7, 1994||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CANTRELL, THOMAS G.;JAJI, SEBNEM;SHAHEEN, AMAL A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:006910/0346
Effective date: 19940302
|Sep 25, 2003||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 19, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Apr 23, 2012||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Aug 16, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Aug 16, 2012||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 11