Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS6208987 B1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 09/115,540
Publication dateMar 27, 2001
Filing dateJul 15, 1998
Priority dateJul 15, 1997
Fee statusPaid
Publication number09115540, 115540, US 6208987 B1, US 6208987B1, US-B1-6208987, US6208987 B1, US6208987B1
InventorsKatsumi Nihei
Original AssigneeNec Corporation
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Hierarchically structured indexed information retrieval system
US 6208987 B1
Abstract
An information retrieval system is provided to retrieve through a retrieval object database storing retrieval object data so as to obtain retrieval result data. In accordance with a retrieval condition which is expressed by a logical expression or else and is input by a user, the information retrieval system produces the retrieval result data in consideration of hierarchically-structured indexes which have nodes and leaves arranged in a tree structure, wherein each of the leaves has an index for the retrieval object data. Then, the retrieval result data are narrowed down in accordance with prescribed procedures. Herein, the system obtains question nodes corresponding to common nodes commonly connected with leaves pointing to the retrieval result data while obtaining answer nodes to the question nodes. The question nodes and answer nodes are visually presented for the user in an order determined by occurrence probabilities representing occurrence of the retrieval object data within the retrieval result data. So, the retrieval result data are narrowed down to match with the answer node which is selected by the user and which is provided for the question node selected by the user. Incidentally, main functions of the information retrieval system can be actualized on the computer in accordance with programs, recorded on recording media, in association with storage unit storing the database.
Images(9)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(8)
What is claimed is:
1. An information retrieval system comprising:
a retrieval object database for storing a plurality of retrieval object data;
means for providing hierarchically-structured indexes constructed by a plurality of nodes and a plurality of leaves, wherein each of the plurality of nodes is connected with at least one node and/or at least one leaf which are located one level of hierarchy below therefrom, and
wherein each of the plurality of leaves has an index of each of the plurality of retrieval object data;
retrieval execution means for retrieving through the retrieval object database based on a retrieval condition input by a user so as to obtain retrieval result data; and
narrowing-down execution means for obtaining question nodes corresponding to common nodes commonly connected with leaves pointing to the retrieval result data retrieved by the retrieval execution means within the hierarchically-structured indexes and for obtaining answer nodes that are located at a level of hierarchy just below a level of hierarchy to which each of the question nodes belongs, wherein narrowing-down factors are calculated with respect to the question nodes respectively so that the question nodes are presented for the user in a form that the user is capable of recognizing merits of the narrowing-down factors, whereby the narrowing-down execution means narrows down the retrieval result data on the basis of the answer node that is selected by the user within the answer nodes to the question nodes selected by the user;
an information retrieval system wherein each of the plurality of nodes is set to have content of classification, which is hierarchically performed in a prescribed aspect on the retrieval object data stored in the retrieval object database;
wherein the narrowing-down execution means further comprises
first means, activated when leaves pointing to same retrieval result data exist in a level of hierarchy below a level of hierarchy to which the answer nodes belong, for newly obtaining nodes belonging to the same level of hierarchy of the answer nodes as new question nodes and for newly obtaining nodes located at a level of hierarchy just below the level of hierarchy of the new question nodes as new answer nodes, and
second means, activated when leaves pointing to retrieval result data related to the new question nodes belong to a same level of hierarchy and when a level of hierarchy of the new question nodes is one level of hierarchy above the level of hierarchy of the leaves or is identical the level of hierarchy of the leaves, for disallowing utilization of the new question nodes.
2. An information retrieval system as defined in claim 1 wherein the narrowing-down execution means further comprises
first calculation means for performing a first calculation using a set C of the retrieval result data, a number “k” of the retrieval result data and an occurrence probability pj indicating a probability of occurrence of retrieval object data j in the set C of the retrieval result data so as to calculate an information amount M(C) of the set C of the retrieval result data in accordance with an equation given as M ( C ) = - j = 1 k p j log 2 p j ,
second calculation means for dividing the set C of the retrieval result data into partial sets C1, . . . , Cn by answer nodes a1, . . . , an of a prescribed answer node “a” and for performing a second calculation, with regard to all of the question nodes obtained by the narrowing-down execution means, with respect to an expected information amount B(C,a) by an equation given as B ( C , a ) = i = 1 n C i C M ( C i ) , and
third calculation means for performing a third calculation, with regard to all of the question nodes obtained by the narrowing-down execution means, with respect to an expected gain “gain(C,a)” of an information gain by an equation given as
gain(C,a)=M(C)−B(C,a),
whereby the narrowing-down factors for the question nodes are produced based on the expected gain “gain(C,a)” of the information gains calculated for the question nodes respectively.
3. An information retrieval system as defined in claim 2 further comprising a retrieval object occurrence probability database storing a number of retrieval times with respect to each of the retrieval object data stored in the retrieval object database, wherein the narrowing-down execution means further comprises
fourth calculation means for performing a fourth calculation using retrieval result data r1, . . . , rk and a number “ht” of retrieval times that retrieving is performed on prescribed retrieval object data rt in accordance with an equation given as p j = h j j = 1 k h j
so as to calculate the occurrence probability pj.
4. A computer program product comprising computer readable instructions to cause a computer to execute said instructions, said instructions comprising instructions for implementing a retrieval object database for storing a plurality of retrieval object data and hierarchically-structured indexes constructed by a plurality of nodes and a plurality of leaves, wherein each of the plurality of nodes is connected with at least one node and/or at least one leave which are located one level of hierarchy below therefrom, and wherein each of the plurality of leaves has an index for each of the plurality of retrieval object data, said instructions further comprising instructions for implementing
retrieval execution means for retrieving through the retrieval object database based on a retrieval condition input by a user so as to obtain retrieval result data, and
narrowing-down execution means for obtaining question nodes corresponding to common nodes commonly connected with leaves pointing to the retrieval result data retrieved by the retrieval execution means within the hierarchically-structured indexes and for obtaining answer nodes that are located at a level of hierarchy just below a level of hierarchy to which each of the question nodes belongs, wherein narrowing-down factors are calculated with respect to the question nodes respectively so that the question nodes are presented for the user in a form that the user is capable of recognizing merits of the narrowing-down factors, whereby the narrowing-down execution means narrows down the retrieval result data on the basis of the answer node hat is selected by the user within the answer nodes to the question nodes selected by the user, wherein the instructions for implementing the narrowing-down execution means further comprises instructions for implementing
first means, activated when leaves pointing to same retrieval result data exist in a level of hierarchy below a level of hierarchy to which the answer nodes belong, for newly obtaining nodes belonging to the same level of hierarchy of the answer nodes as new question nodes and for newly obtaining nodes located at a level of hierarchy just below the level of hierarchy of the new question nodes as new answer nodes, and
second means, activated when leaves pointing to retrieval result data related to the new question nodes belong to a same level of hierarchy and when a level of hierarchy of the new question nodes is one level of hierarchy above the level of hierarchy of the leaves or is identical the level of hierarchy of the leaves, for disallowing utilization of the new question nodes.
5. An information retrieval system comprising:
a retrieval object database for storing a plurality of retrieval object data;
retrieval execution means for retrieving through the retrieval object database on the basis of a retrieval condition input by a user so as to obtain retrieval result data;
storage means for storing hierarchically-structured indexes having nodes and leaves which are arranged in a tree structure, wherein each of the leaves has an index for the retrieval object data;
question node means for obtaining question nodes corresponding to common nodes commonly connected with leaves pointing to the retrieval result data within the hierarchically-structured indexes;
answer node means for obtaining answer nodes that are located below a level of hierarchy of each of the question nodes;
occurrence probability calculation means for calculating occurrence probabilities each representing occurrence of prescribed retrieval object data within the retrieval result data;
presentation means for presenting a user with the question nodes in an order determined by the occurrence probabilities; and
narrowing means for narrowing down the retrieval result data to match with at least one answer node selected by the user, which is provided for at least one question node selected by the user.
6. An information retrieval system as defined in claim 5 further comprising index repetition eliminating means for eliminating repetition of indexes between different answer nodes, wherein the index repetition eliminating means is activated when a same leaf having an index to same retrieval result data exists repeatedly below answer nodes connected with a same question node and wherein the index repetition eliminating means comprises
new question node means for obtaining new question nodes corresponding to the answer nodes below which the same leaf repeatedly exists, and
new answer node means for obtaining new answer nodes with respect to each of the new question nodes.
7. An information retrieval system as defined in claim 5 or 6 further comprising utilization decision means for making a decision as to whether utilization of the question node is allowed or disallowed, wherein it is determined that utilization of the question node is disallowed when all of leaves having indexes for retrieval result data regarding the question node belong to a same level of hierarchy and when a level of hierarchy of the question node is one level of hierarchy above the level of hierarchy of the leaves or is identical to the level of hierarchy of the leaves.
8. An information retrieval system as defined in claim 5 further comprising calculation means for calculating an information amount “M(C)” for a set C of the retrieval result data and expected information amount “B(C,a)” for partial sets C1, . . . , Cn that are produced by dividing the set C by answer nodes a1, . . . , an of a prescribed question node “a” as well as expected gains “gain(C,a)” of information gains where gain(C,a)=M(C)−B(C,a), wherein the narrowing means narrowing down the retrieval result data by dividing the set C of the retrieval result data in accordance with the question node “a” that maximizes the expected gain “gain(C,a)”.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to information retrieval systems that retrieves data from databases. Particularly, this invention relates to the information retrieval system that uses hierarchically-structured indexes for the retrieving to efficiently narrow down retrieval results. This application is based on patent application No. Hei 9-205278 filed in Japan, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.

2. Description of the Related Art

In general, the conventional information retrieval systems are designed to operate based on retrieval conditions, which are input by users. For example, when the user inputs retrieval conditions in the form of logical expressions, the conventional information retrieval system retrieves through a retrieval object database storing retrieval object data, which should be retrieved by the system. So, the conventional system provides the user with the retrieval object data, which match with the retrieval conditions. In some case, however, a number of retrieval result data becomes extremely large in response to some retrieval condition(s) input by the user. In such a case, it is necessary to narrow down the retrieval result data. In order to do so, a first example of the conventional information retrieval system requires inputting of a new retrieval condition for narrowing down the retrieval result data, which should be newly created and input by the user.

The paper of Japanese Patent Application, Publication No. Hei 4-114277 discloses a second example of the conventional information retrieval system, that is, an information retrieval device which is designed as follows:

Hierarchically-structured indexes are presented for the user. So, the user selects a node of the hierarchically-structured indexes, based on which the system performs retrieving on retrieval object data.

As described above, the first example of the conventional information retrieval system requires creation of the new retrieval condition by the user in order to narrow down the retrieval result data. So, there is a problem that the creation of the new retrieval condition is troublesome for the user. Particularly, a person such as a beginner who is not accustomed to the computer retrieving so much is not skilled in determination of retrieval conditions by which retrieval result data can be narrowed down. For this reason, such a person should add or delete the retrieval conditions by trial and error to narrow down the retrieval result data, which causes great load in working.

In contrast, the second example of the conventional information retrieval system is capable of performing retrieving of data by merely selecting nodes of the hierarchically-structured indexes, which are presented for the user. So, it is possible to reduce load to the user in working. However, there is a trouble in the case where multiple nodes matching with the object data exist in the same hierarchical level. In such a case, the user cannot make determination of the node within the multiple nodes that provide a most efficient way for narrowing down the retrieval result data. So, there is a problem that a number of the retrieval result data should be extremely large with respect to some node that is selected by the user.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the invention to provide an information retrieval system that is capable of efficiently narrowing down retrieval result data with a reduced load to a user in working.

An information retrieval system of this invention is designed to retrieve through a retrieval object database storing retrieval object data so as to obtain retrieval result data. In accordance with a retrieval condition which is expressed by a logical expression or else and is input by a user, the information retrieval system produces the retrieval result data in consideration of hierarchically-structured indexes which have nodes and leaves arranged in a tree structure, wherein each of the leaves has an index for the retrieval object data. Then, the retrieval result data are narrowed down in accordance with procedures as follows:

The system obtains question nodes corresponding to common nodes commonly connected with leaves pointing to the retrieval result data while obtaining answer nodes to the question nodes. The question nodes and answer nodes are visually presented for the user in an order determined by occurrence probabilities representing occurrence of the retrieval object data within the retrieval result data. So, the retrieval result data are narrowed down to match with the answer node which is selected by the user and which is provided for the question node selected by the user.

Incidentally, it is possible to efficiently narrow down the retrieval result data by dividing the set of the retrieval result data into partial sets by answer nodes connected with a question node that maximizes an expected gain of an information gain, for example.

Moreover, main functions of the information retrieval system can be actualized on the computer in accordance with programs, recorded on recording media, in association with the storage unit storing the database.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other objects, aspects and embodiment of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the following drawing figures, of which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a preferred embodiment of an information retrieval system according to this invention;

FIG. 2 shows an example of content of a plant table, which is stored in a retrieval object database shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 shows an example of contents of hierarchically-structured indexes;

FIG. 4 shows an example of content of a retrieval object occurrence probability database shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 shows an example of a display screen which visually displays retrieval results;

FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing processes of a narrowing-down execution unit shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 7A shows an example of content of hierarchically-structured indexes regarding shapes of leaves;

FIG. 7B shows an example of content of hierarchically-structured indexes regarding habitats;

FIG. 8 shows an example of a display screen which visually displays several pieces of information as well as graphical user interfaces when retrieval result data are narrowed down;

FIG. 9 shows another example of content of the retrieval object occurrence probability database shown in FIG. 1, which is used for calculations; and

FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing an example of a hardware configuration of the information retrieval system of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

This invention will be described in further detail by way of examples with reference to the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a preferred embodiment of an information retrieval system according to this invention. The information retrieval system of FIG. 1 is configured by a retrieval condition input reception unit 200, a retrieval condition expression creation unit 201, a retrieval condition expression storage unit 202, a retrieval execution unit 203, a retrieval object database 204, a retrieval result storage unit 205, a retrieval result display unit 206, a narrowing-down execution reception unit 207, a hierarchically-structured index storage unit 208 and a narrowing-down execution unit 209 as well as a retrieval object occurrence probability database 250 and an occurrence probability setting unit 251.

The retrieval object database 204 stores multiple sets of retrieval object data. For example, data regarding plants are stored in a relational database as shown in FIG. 2. Herein, the data are stored in a plant table 300 with being classified into several items, such as “ID” (i.e., identification number) 301, “Plant Name” 302, “Keyword” 303 and “Description” 304. For example, “2” of “ID” provides description with regard to “Tanpopo”, which is a Japanese word corresponding to “Dandelion” in English.

The hierarchically-structured index storage unit 208 stores hierarchically-structured indexes for the retrieval object database 204. For example, if the data regarding the plants (i.e., plants data) are stored in the retrieval object database 204, hierarchically-structured indexes as shown in FIG. 3 are stored in the hierarchically-structured index storage unit 208. In the case of FIG. 3, the plants data are subjected to hierarchical classification in an aspect of “characteristics of leaves” 400 so as to produce hierarchically-structured indexes. Reference symbol 401 a designates an example of a node, which is described by a question; “in what way, the leaves are attached to the plants”. Such a node has other nodes or leaves at its lower level of hierarchy. That is, the node corresponds to classification content, which is used to perform hierarchical classification in a certain aspect with respect to retrieval object nodes. Reference symbol 402 a designates an example of a leaf, which describes “Kosendan-gusa” (i.e., a name of a plant in Japanese). This leaf does not have other nodes or other leaves at its lower level of hierarchy. But, the leaf 402 a has an index which is connected with retrieval object data 204 d. In general, multiple aspects are provided for classification of the retrieval object data. As for aspects which are provided for classification of data regarding plants, there are provided “characteristics of leaves” and “height of stalk”, for example. Therefore, multiple hierarchically-structured indexes can be provided for each different aspect.

The retrieval object occurrence probability database 250 stores a number of times to perform retrieving with respect to each retrieval object data, wherein “a number of times to retrieve” will be represented by “retrieval times”. FIG. 4 shows an example of content of the retrieval object occurrence probability database 250. So, data regarding retrieval object occurrence probabilities are stored in the database 250 by being classified into two items, i.e., “ID” 250 a and “Retrieval Times” 250 b.

The retrieval condition input reception unit 200 receives retrieval conditions given from a user. As for the retrieval condition, it is possible to employ a combination form representing a combination of keywords using a logical expression, such as “Dandelion OR White”, for example.

The retrieval condition expression creation unit 201 inputs retrieval conditions received by the retrieval condition input reception unit 200 as well as retrieval condition expressions stored in the retrieval condition expression storage unit 202. So, the retrieval condition expression creation unit 201 connects the retrieval conditions and retrieval condition expressions by using expressions of logical sum and/or logical product so as to create retrieval condition expressions, which can be subjected to retrieval execution. For example, if the retrieval object database 204 is stored in the form of the relational database, the retrieval condition expressions are expressed by “SQL” (i.e., Structured Query Language), which is the standard language used for inquiries to the relational database. In addition, the retrieval condition expression creation unit 201 creates retrieval condition expressions, which are used to perform retrieving on retrieval object data represented by an index that is passed thereto from the narrowing-down execution unit 209.

Suppose an example that the retrieval condition expression storage unit 202 stores a retrieval condition expression, which is represented as follows:

“SELECT*FROM PLANT WHERE KEYWORD=QUADRILATERAL”

The above SQL expression instructs the system to retrieve data, which match with “quadrilateral” in the field of “keyword”, from the table “plant”. In this case, if a keyword of a retrieval condition that is received by the retrieval condition input reception unit 200 indicates “Tanpopo” (i.e., “dandelion” in English), the retrieval condition expression creation unit 201 creates a retrieval condition expression, which is represented as follows:

“SELECT*FROM PLANT WHERE KEYWORD=QUADRILATERAL OR KEYWORD=TANPOPO”

The above SQL expression instructs the system to retrieve data, which match with “quadrilateral” or “tanpopo” in the field of “keyword”, from the table “plant”. Herein, the retrieval condition expression storage unit 202 uses the expression of logical sum to create the above retrieval condition expression by connecting the retrieval condition expression stored in the retrieval condition expression storage unit 202 and the retrieval condition received by the retrieval condition input reception unit 200 together. However, the present embodiment is not necessarily limited in utilization of the logical sum, so it is possible to use the logical product for integration of the retrieval condition expression and retrieval condition.

The retrieval condition expression storage unit 202 stores retrieval condition expressions created by the retrieval condition expression creation unit 201. Incidentally, in the initial state, stored content of the retrieval condition expression storage unit 202 is empty.

The retrieval execution unit 203 executes retrieval on the retrieval object database 204 on the basis of the retrieval condition expressions created by the retrieval condition expression creation unit 201. For example, if the retrieval object database 204 stores data in the form of the relational database, the retrieving can be executed by merely issuing the retrieval condition expressions to a relational database management system (not shown).

Based on retrieval result of the retrieval execution unit 203, the occurrence probability setting unit 251 adds “1” to a number of retrieval times. Such addition is performed with respect to the number of retrieval times, which is stored in the occurrence probability database 250 with regard to retrieval object data represented by the aforementioned retrieval result.

The retrieval result storage unit 205 stores the retrieval result, which is obtained by the retrieval execution unit 203.

The retrieval result display unit 206 uses graphical user interfaces of the computer to visually display the retrieval result, stored in the retrieval result storage unit 205, on a screen thereof. FIG. 5 shows an example of visual presentation of the retrieval results. This shows one example of an image of a display screen 500, which is produced when the system performs retrieving with respect to the data regarding the plants. Herein, reference symbol 501 designates a number of retrieval results corresponding to a number of retrieved plants; 502 designates a list of names of the retrieved plants; 503 designates a button for narrowing down (or “narrow-down button”); and 504 designates a button for end of processing (or “end button”).

The user is capable of giving an instruction to the system to start narrowing down the retrieval results displayed on the display screen 500 shown in FIG. 5. When receiving such an instruction, the narrowing-down execution unit 207 starts operation of the narrowing-down execution unit 209. That is, when the user uses a mouse to select (or click) the narrow-down button 503 on the display screen 500, the system starts the narrowing-down execution unit 209.

Processing of the narrowing-down execution unit 209 will be described with reference to a flowchart of FIG. 6 as well as FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B. Suppose an example that retrieval object data correspond to data regarding plants while the hierarchically-structured index storage unit 208 stores two series of hierarchically-structured indexes with regard to the plants as shown in FIG. 7. Specifically, FIG. 7A shows hierarchically-structured indexes 600 with regard to “shapes of leaves”, while FIG. 7B shows hierarchically-structured indexes 650 with regard to “habitats”.

The hierarchically-structured indexes 600 regarding “shapes of leaves” has leaves 602 a to 602 f as indexes for the retrieval object data, while the hierarchically-structured indexes 650 regarding “habitats” has leaves 652 a to 652 f as indexes for the retrieval object data. Incidentally, the leaves 652 c and 652 g correspond to indexes which are provided for the same retrieval object data (i.e., “Awayuki-sendan-gusa”, a Japanese name of a certain plant).

The following description uses terms of “question node” and “answer node”, which will be explained below.

Suppose hierarchically-structured indexes which contains leaves pointing to retrieval result data obtained through retrieving, which exist in different levels of hierarchy. In such hierarchically-structured indexes, the system travels up the hierarchy from all of the leaves pointing to the retrieval result data so as to firstly reach a common node, which is referred to as a question node. On the other hand, in the above hierarchically-structured indexes, the system travels up the hierarchy from all of the leaves pointing to the retrieval result data so as to reach the question node, whose lower level node is referred to as an answer node. That is, the answer node is located one level of hierarchy below the question node.

Suppose an example that four retrieval results such as names of plants of “Sirobana-sendan-gusa”, “America-sendan-gusa”, “Siozaki-sou” and “Sendan-gusa” are obtained through the retrieving as retrieval result data. In such an example, a question node for the above four retrieval results in the hierarchically-structured indexes 650 is a node 651 a representing “Habitats”. Specifically, leaves 652 a, 652 b, 652 e and 652 f point to the above four retrieval result data respectively, so if the system travels up the hierarchy from those leaves, the system firstly reaches a common node 651 a representing “Habitats”. Thus, the question node for those leaves corresponds to the node 651 a representing “Habitats”. An answer node is located on a path that the system travels up the hierarchy. Herein, answer nodes are nodes which are located one level of hierarchy below the question node 651 a, i.e., a node 651 b representing “Grassland”, a node 651 d representing “marshland” and a node 651 h representing “wasteland”.

Suppose another example that the system obtains two retrieval results representing names of plants of “Kosendan-gusa” and “Siozaki-sou”. In such an example, a question node in the hierarchically-structured indexes 650 is the node 651 d representing “marshland”. So, an answer node, which is located one level of hierarchy below the question node, corresponds to a node 651 e representing “rice field”, a node 651 e representing “riverside” and a node 651 g representing “bogland”.

Next, the processing of the narrowing-down execution unit 209 will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. 6. Suppose an example that the retrieval execution unit 203 performs retrieving to retrieve six data regarding plants such as “America-sendan-gusa”, “Sirobana-sendan-gusa”, “Awayuki-sendan-gusa”, “Kosendan-gusa”, “Siozaki-sou” and “Sendan-gusa”, so that the corresponding retrieval results are stored in the retrieval result storage unit 205.

In such an example, the narrowing-down execution unit 209 proceeds firstly to step 100 shown in FIG. 6, wherein a decision is made as to whether a number of retrieval results stored in the retrieval result storage unit 205 is one or less or not. If the number of the retrieval results is one or less, the narrowing-down execution unit 209 terminates the processing thereof. If not, the narrowing-down execution unit 209 (hereinafter, simply referred to as the unit 209) transfers control to step 101.

In step 101, the unit 209 obtains all of question nodes from the hierarchically-structured index storage unit 208. In the case of the hierarchically-structured indexes 600 shown in FIG. 7A, the question node corresponds to the node 601 a representing “shapes of leaves”. In the case of the hierarchically-structured indexes 650 shown in FIG. 7B, the question node corresponds to the node 651 a representing “habitats”.

In step 102, a decision is made as to whether a number of the question nodes obtained in step 101 is zero or not. If the number of the question nodes is zero, the unit 209 terminates the processing thereof. If not, the unit 209 transfers control to step 103.

In step 103, the unit 209 obtains answer nodes with respect to each of the question nodes, which are obtained in step 101. In the case of FIG. 7A, two answer nodes, i.e., a node 601 b representing “sharp” and a node 601 c representing “round”, are provided with respect to the question node 601 a representing “shapes of leaves”. In the case of FIG. 7B, three answer nodes, i.e., the node 651 b representing “grassland”, the node 651 d representing “marshland” and the node 651 h representing “wasteland”, are provided with respect to the question node 651 a representing “habitats”.

In step 104, the unit 209 eliminates repeated indexes of the answer nodes, which are obtained with respect to each of the question nodes obtained in step 101. Herein, the retrieval results are divided by the answer nodes that correspond to answer choices for the question node. In some case, a same leaf having an index for the same retrieval result data repeatedly appears at different locations, which are placed at lower levels of hierarchy to be respectively lower than different answer nodes obtained for the same question node. In that case, the above answer nodes are used as new question nodes, so that the unit 209 obtains new answer nodes with respect to the new question nodes. This process is repeated until repetition of the same leaf (hereinafter, simply referred to as leaf repetition) disappears.

In FIG. 7A, the answer node 601 b representing “sharp”, which is obtained with respect to the question node 601 a representing “shapes of leaves”, provides four leaves representing “America-sendan-gusa”, “Sirobana-sendan-gusa”, “Awayuki-sendan-gusa” and “Kosendan-gusa” respectively. In addition, another answer node 601 c representing “round” provides two leaves representing “Siozaki-sou” and “Sendan-gusa” respectively. So, there is no leaf repetition between the leaves of the answer nodes 601 b and 601 c.

In FIG. 7B, the answer node 651 b representing “grassland”, which is obtained with respect to the question node 651 a representing “habitats”, provides two leave representing “Sirobana-sendan-gusa” and “America-sendan-gusa” respectively. In addition, the answer node 651 d representing “marshland” provides three leaves representing “Awayuki-sendan-gusa”, “Kosendan-gusa” and “Siozaki-sou” respectively. Further, the answer node 651 h representing “wasteland” provides two leaves representing “Sendan-gusa” and “Awayuki-sendan-gusa” respectively. So, there occurs leaf repetition between the above answer nodes. Specifically, a same leaf representing “Awayuki-sendan-gusa” repeatedly appears with respect to the answer node 651 d representing “marshland” and the answer node 651 h representing “wasteland”. Therefore, all of the above answer nodes 651 b, 651 d and 651 h are used as new question nodes, so that new answer nodes are obtained with respect to the new question nodes. Herein, a new answer node 651 c representing “shade” is obtained with respect to the new question node 651 b representing “grassland”. In addition, three new answer nodes, which correspond to a node 651 e representing “rice field”, a node 651 f representing “riverside” and a node 651 g representing “bogland”, are obtained with respect to the new question node 651 d representing “marshland”. Further, a new answer node 651 i representing “pasture land” is obtained with respect to the new question node 651 h representing “wasteland”. Thus, it is possible to eliminate the leaf repetition.

In step 105, a decision is made as to whether utilization of the question node is allowed or disallowed. Herein, it is determined that the utilization of the question node is disallowed if all of the leaves having indexes for the retrieval result data with regard to the question node obtained in step 104 belong to the same level of hierarchy and if the level of hierarchy of the question node is located one level of hierarchy above the level of hierarchy of the leaves or is identical to the level of hierarchy of the leaves.

In the case of FIG. 7A, as the leaves having indexes for the retrieval result data regarding the question node 601 a representing “shapes of leaves”, there are provided the leaf 602 a representing “America-sendan-gusa”, leaf 602 b representing “Sirobana-sendan-gusa”, leaf 602 c representing “Awayuki-sendan-gusa”, leaf 602 d representing “Kosendan-gusa”, leaf 602 e representing “Siozaki-sou” and leaf 602 f representing “Sendan-gusa”. All of those leaves belong to the same level of hierarchy. Herein, the level of hierarchy of the question node 601 a representing “shapes of leaves” is not one level of hierarchy above the level of hierarchy of the leaves nor the same level of hierarchy of the leaves. So, it is determined in step 105 that utilization of the question node is allowed.

In the case of FIG. 7B, as the leaves having indexes for the retrieval result data regarding the question node 651 b representing “grassland”, there are provided the leaf 652 a representing “Sirobana-sendan-gusa” and leaf 652 b representing “America-sendan-gusa”. Those leaves belong to the same level of hierarchy. However, the level of hierarchy of the question node 651 b is not one level of hierarchy above the level of hierarchy of the leaves nor the same level of hierarchy of the leaves. So, it is determined in step 105 that utilization of the question node is allowed.

In addition, as the leaves having indexes for the retrieval result data regarding the question node 651 d representing “marshland”, there are provided the leaf 652 c representing “Awayuki-sendan-gusa”, leaf 652 d representing “Kosendan-gusa” and leaf 652 e representing “Siozaki-sou”. Those leaves belong to the same level of hierarchy, however, the level of hierarchy of the question node 651 d representing “marshland” is not one level of hierarchy above the level of hierarchy of the leaves nor the same level of hierarchy of the leaves. So, it is determined in step 105 that utilization of the question node is allowed.

Further, as the leaves having indexes for the retrieval result data regarding the question node 651 h representing “wasteland”, there are provided the leaf 652 f representing “Sendan-gusa” and leaf 652 g representing “Awayuki-sendan-gusa”. Those leaves belong to the same level of hierarchy, however, the level of hierarchy of the question node 651 h representing “wasteland” is not one level of hierarchy above the level of hierarchy of the leaves nor the same level of hierarchy of the leaves. So, it is determined in step 105 that utilization of the question node is allowed.

In step 106, the unit 209 performs an end decision. That is, if a number of the question nodes whose utilization is allowed in step 105 is zero, the unit 209 ends the processing thereof. If not, the unit 209 transfers control to step 107.

In step 107, the unit 209 determines an order to present the question nodes for the user. The unit 209 calculates an expected information gain with respect to each of the question nodes. Herein, details of the expected information gain will be described later, wherein the expected information gain is an expected amount of information which is acquired by making the question of the question node. So, the unit sorts the question nodes to be arranged in a decreasing order of the expected information gains. In other words, the unit 209 sorts the question nodes in an order to reduce efficiencies in narrowing-down operations. In the case of FIG. 7B, the question nodes are arranged in an order as follows:

651 b “grassland”→651 d “marshland”→651 h “wasteland”→601 a “shapes of leaves”.

In step 108, the unit 209 presents the question nodes and answer nodes to the user in accordance with the order which is determined in step 107. FIG. 8 shows an example of an image of a display screen of the display unit using the graphical user interfaces of the computer. In FIG. 8, the display unit displays four items in blocks 701 a to 701 d with regard to “Question” while also displaying one item in a block 702 a with regard to “Answer”. As for “Question”, the blocks 701 a, 701 b, 701 c and 701 d respectively show “1. Grassland”, “2. Marshland”, “3. Wasteland” and “4. Shapes of Leaves”. As for “Answer”, the block 702 a shows “Shade”, which is an answer to the question 701 a representing “1. Grassland”. In FIG. 8, reference symbol 703 designates a display section on the screen that displays a number of data retrieved by the retrieval execution unit 203; 704 designates a list of the retrieved plants; 705 designates a narrow-down button; and 706 designates an end button.

In step 109, the unit 209 receives an input from the user. If the user wishes to end the processing, the user selects the end button 706. Thus, the unit 209 ends the processing thereof. On the other hand, if the user wishes to further narrow down the retrieval result data, the user selects one of the answers displayed on the screen of the display unit. In the present embodiment, only the answer “Shade” is displayed on the screen of the display unit. Then, the user selects the narrow-down button 705. If the first question 701 a is not the effective question to perform the narrowing down, the user selects one of the other questions 701 b to 701 d as the effective question to perform the narrowing down. If the user finds both of the second question 701 b representing “2. Marshland” and the fourth question 701 d representing “4. Shapes of Leaves” as the effective questions, the user selects one of them, i.e., the second question 701 b representing “2. Marshland”, for example. Thus, the display unit displays answers to the selected question, i.e., “Rice Field”, “Riverside” and “Bogland”.

In step 110, the unit 209 executes the narrowing down. That is, the unit 209 picks up the leaves 652 a and 652 b (see FIG. 7B) that relate to the answer “Shade”, which is selected by the user. So, the unit 209 detects indexes for “Sirobana-sendan-gusa” and “America-sendan-gusa”, which are set to the leaves 652 a and 652 b respectively. Thus, the unit 209 passes those indexes to the retrieval condition expression creation unit 201. After completion of the step 110, the narrowing-down execution unit 209 reverts control to the step 100.

When receiving the indexes for “Sirobana-sendan-gusa” and “America-sendan-gusa” from the narrowing-down execution unit 209, the retrieval condition expression creation unit 201 creates a retrieval condition expression to perform retrieving on them. The retrieval condition expression is passed to the retrieval execution unit 203. Thus, the retrieval execution unit 203 retrieves through the retrieval object database 204. As a result, the display unit displays the screen image as shown in FIG. 5 on the screen thereof. In this case, a number of the retrieval results (see 501) is narrowed down to “2”, so the list 502 displays “Sirobana-sendan-gusa” and “America-sendan-gusa”.

Next, a description will be given in further detail with respect to a method to determine an order to arrange questions in step 107 (hereinafter, simply referred to as “determination method of question order”). The determination method of question order is based on the expected information gain maximization principle, which is used in “ID3” (J. R. Quinlan, “Induction of Decision Trees”, Machine Learning, Vol. 1, pp. 81-106, 1986).

Using a set “C” of the retrieval results stored in the retrieval result storage unit 205 and a number “k” of the retrieval results as well as retrieval result data r1, r2, . . . , rk for the retrieval object wherein retrieval result data rt (where 1≦t≦k) is retrieved by a number ht of retrieval times, occurrence probability pj for retrieval object data rj (where 1≦j≦k) is given by an equation 1 as follows: p j = h j i = 1 k h i [ Equation 1 ]

In addition, an information amount (entropy) M(C) for the set C is given by an equation 2 as follows: M ( C ) = - j = 1 k p j log 2 p j [ Equation 2 ]

In accordance with answer nodes a1, a2, . . . , an to a certain question node “a”, the set C is divided into partial sets C1, C2, . . . , Cn, wherein an expected information amount B(C,a) is given by an equation 3 as follows: B ( C , a ) = i = 1 n C i C M ( C i ) [ Equation 3 ]

Using the above equations, an expected gain “gain(C,a)” of information gain can be calculated by an equation 4 as follows:

[Equation 4]

gain(C,a)=M(C)−B(C,a)

By using the question node “a” that maximizes the above gain(C,a), the retrieval result set is subjected to division. Thus, it is possible to efficiently narrow down the retrieval results.

In order to cope with the hierarchically-structured indexes shown in FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B, the retrieval object occurrence probability database 250 stores an information table as shown in FIG. 9 to perform calculations for occurrence probabilities, for example. FIG. 9 shows numbers “1” to “6” for “ID”, wherein “ID=1” represents “America-sendan-gusa”, “ID=2” represents Sirobana-sendan-gusa”, “ID=3” represents “Awayuki-sendan-gusa”, “ID=4” represents “Kosendan-gusa”, “ID=5” represents “Siozaki-sou” and “ID=6” represents “Sendan-gusa”, for example.

Using the content of the information table of FIG. 9, it is possible to calculate the information amount M(C) for the retrieval result set in accordance with an equation 5 as follows: M ( C ) = - ( 100 105 log 2 100 105 + 1 105 log 2 1 105 + 1 105 log 2 1 105 + 1 105 log 2 1 105 + 1 105 log 2 1 105 + 1 105 log 2 1 105 ) = 0.387 ( bits ) [ Equation 5 ]

Next, an expected information amount B(C,shapes-of-leaves) for the question node 601 a representing “shapes of leaves” can be calculated as follows:

The question node 601 a representing “shapes of leaves” has two answer nodes, i.e., the answer node 601 b representing “sharp” and answer node 601 c representing “round”. Herein, an attribute number is “2”; a number of retrieval results obtained for the answer node 601 b representing “sharp” is “4”; and a number of retrieval results obtained for the answer node 601 c representing “round” is “2”. Thus, it is possible to calculate an expected information amount B(C,shapes-of-leaves) by an equation 6 as follows: B ( C , shapes-of-leaves ) = 103 105 ( - 100 103 log 2 100 103 - 1 103 log 2 1 103 - 1 103 log 2 1 103 - 1 103 log 2 1 103 ) + 2 105 ( - 1 2 log 2 1 2 - 1 2 log 2 1 2 ) = 0.251 ( bits ) [ Equation 6 ]

Similarly, an expected information amount B(C,grassland) for the question node 651 b representing “grassland” can be calculated by an equation 7 as follows: B ( C , grassland ) = 101 105 ( - 1 101 log 2 1 101 - 100 101 log 2 100 101 ) + 4 105 ( - 1 4 log 2 1 4 - 1 4 log 2 1 4 - 1 4 log 2 1 4 - 1 4 log 2 1 4 ) = 0.153 ( bits ) [ Equation 7 ]

An expected information amount B(C,marshland) can be calculated by an equation 8 as follows: B ( C , marshland ) = 1 105 ( - 1 1 log 2 1 1 ) + 1 105 ( - 1 1 log 2 1 1 ) + 1 105 ( - 1 1 log 2 1 1 ) + 102 105 ( - 100 102 log 2 100 102 - 1 102 log 2 1 102 - 1 102 log 2 1 102 ) = 0.154 ( bits ) [ Equation 8 ]

An expected information amount B(C,wasteland) can be calculated by an equation 9 as follows: B ( C , wasteland ) = 2 105 ( - 1 2 log 2 1 2 - 1 2 log 2 1 2 ) + 103 105 ( - 100 103 log 2 100 103 - 1 103 log 2 1 103 - 1 103 log 2 1 103 - 1 103 log 2 1 103 ) = 0.251 ( bits ) [ Equation 9 ]

Next, expected gains for information gains are calculated with respect to the question nodes by equations, which will be described below.

An expected gain “gain(C,shapes-of-leaves)” for the question node 601 a representing “shapes of leaves” is calculated by an equation 10 as follows:

[Equation 10]

gain(C,shapes-of-leaves)=M(C)−B(C,shapes-of-leaves)=0.387−0.251=0.136(bits)

An expected gain “gain(C,grassland)” for the question node 651 b representing “grassland” is calculated by an equation 11 as follows:

[Equation 11]

gain(C,grassland)=M(C)−B(C,grassland)=0.387−0.153=0.234(bits)

An expected gain “gain(C,marshland)” for the question node 651 d representing “marshland” is calculated by an equation 12 as follows:

[Equation 12]

gain(C,marshland)=M(C)−B(C,marshland)=0.387−0.154=0.233(bits)

An expected gain “gain(C,wasteland)” for the question node 651 h representing “wasteland” is calculated by an equation 13 as follows:

[Equation 13]

 gain(C,wasteland)=M(C)−B(C,wasteland)=0.387−0.251=0.136(bits)

According to the above calculation results, the above four question nodes are arranged in a decreasing order in expected gains, as follows:

Question node 651 b “grassland”→question node 651 d “marshland”→question node 651 h “wasteland”→question node 601 a “shapes of leaves”

In the aforementioned embodiment, the occurrence probability pj of the retrieval object data rj is calculated by the aforementioned equation 1. Instead of using the calculated value of the equation 1, it is possible to use a ratio that the retrieval object data rj exists in the retrieval result set C. In this case, pj=⅙ while |C|=6.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing an example of a hardware configuration employed for the information retrieval system of the present invention. There are provided a computer 1000, a recording media 1001 and a storage unit 1002. Herein, the recording media 1001 corresponds to the semiconductor memory, disk or other recording media, which stores programs that cause the computer 1000 to operate as the information retrieval system.

The programs stored in the recording media 1002 are loaded to the computer 1000 to control operations of the computer 1000. Thus, it is possible to actualize functions of the retrieval condition input reception unit 200, retrieval condition expression creation unit 201, retrieval execution unit 203, retrieval result display unit 206, narrowing-down execution reception unit 207, narrowing-down execution unit 209 and occurrence probability setting unit 251 on the computer 1000. In addition, the retrieval object database 204, hierarchically-structured index storage unit 208, retrieval object occurrence probability database 250, retrieval condition expression storage unit 202 and retrieval result storage unit 205 are actualized on the storage unit 1002.

As this invention may be embodied in several forms without departing from the spirit of essential characteristics thereof, the present embodiment is therefore illustrative and not restrictive, since the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims rather than by the description preceding them, and all changes that fall within metes and bounds of the claims, or equivalence of such metes and bounds are therefore intended to be embraced by the claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5257365 *Mar 16, 1990Oct 26, 1993Powers Frederick ADatabase system with multi-dimensional summary search tree nodes for reducing the necessity to access records
US5359724 *Mar 30, 1992Oct 25, 1994Arbor Software CorporationMethod and apparatus for storing and retrieving multi-dimensional data in computer memory
US5692175 *Apr 17, 1996Nov 25, 1997The Sabre Group, Inc.Decision modeling and analysis for object oriented data access and analysis system
US5701467 *Jul 1, 1994Dec 23, 1997European Computer-Industry Research Centre GmbhComputer data storage management system and methods of indexing a dataspace and searching a computer memory
US5767854 *Sep 27, 1996Jun 16, 1998Anwar; Mohammed S.Multidimensional data display and manipulation system and methods for using same
JP8341945A Title not available
JPH0385638A Title not available
JPH0439774A Title not available
JPH0644113A Title not available
JPH0668159A Title not available
JPH0728687A Title not available
JPH0744576A Title not available
JPH0765020A Title not available
JPH0954778A Title not available
JPH01219927A Title not available
JPH01239628A Title not available
JPH03174654A Title not available
JPH04114277A Title not available
JPH04145578A Title not available
JPH05120338A Title not available
JPH05174064A Title not available
JPH07129623A Title not available
JPH07175820A Title not available
JPH08147322A Title not available
JPH08255166A Title not available
JPH09153053A Title not available
JPH09160931A Title not available
JPS5351028A Title not available
JPS63251836A Title not available
JPS63282569A Title not available
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *Eckerson, Wayne ("Drilling for data", Computerworld, Dec. 2, 1996, pp. 1-4).
2J.R. Quilan, "Induction of Decision Trees", Machine Learning, 1986, pp. 81-106.
3Radding, Alan ("Is OLAP the answer?", Computerworld, Dec. 19, 1994, pp. 1-4).*
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6470351Jan 3, 2000Oct 22, 2002Ufil Unified Data Technologies, Ltd.Binary-oriented set sequencing
US6484182 *Jun 11, 1999Nov 19, 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for publishing part datasheets
US6636865Sep 10, 2001Oct 21, 2003Ufil Unified Data Technologies, Ltd.Method and apparatus for binary-oriented set sequencing
US6691129Sep 10, 2001Feb 10, 2004Ufil Unified Data Technologies, Ltd.Method and apparatus for binary-oriented set sequencing
US6721757Sep 10, 2001Apr 13, 2004Ufil Unified Data Technologies, Ltd.Method and apparatus for binary-oriented set sequencing
US6819967Jul 24, 2002Nov 16, 2004International Business Machines CorporationRelational database for producing bill-of-materials from planning information
US6839665 *Jun 27, 2000Jan 4, 2005Text Analysis International, Inc.Automated generation of text analysis systems
US7076501Dec 22, 2003Jul 11, 2006Ufil Unified Data Technologies, Ltd.Method and apparatus for binary-oriented set sequencing
US7225176 *Mar 26, 2003May 29, 2007Casebank Technologies Inc.System and method for case-based reasoning
US7526794Sep 30, 2005Apr 28, 2009Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Data perspectives in controller system and production management systems
US7548789Sep 29, 2005Jun 16, 2009Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Editing lifecycle and deployment of objects in an industrial automation environment
US7650405Sep 29, 2005Jan 19, 2010Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Tracking and tracing across process boundaries in an industrial automation environment
US7660638Sep 30, 2005Feb 9, 2010Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Business process execution engine
US7672737Sep 30, 2005Mar 2, 2010Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Hierarchically structured data model for utilization in industrial automation environments
US7676281Sep 29, 2005Mar 9, 2010Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Distributed database in an industrial automation environment
US7721085 *Sep 21, 2004May 18, 2010Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Encryption of hierarchically structured information
US7734590Sep 30, 2005Jun 8, 2010Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Incremental association of metadata to production data
US7801628Sep 30, 2005Sep 21, 2010Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Industrial operator interfaces interacting with higher-level business workflow
US7809683Sep 29, 2005Oct 5, 2010Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Library that includes modifiable industrial automation objects
US7881812Sep 29, 2005Feb 1, 2011Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Editing and configuring device
US7904488Jul 21, 2004Mar 8, 2011Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Time stamp methods for unified plant model
US8019796Jun 7, 2010Sep 13, 2011Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Incremental association of metadata to production data
US8060223Jun 5, 2009Nov 15, 2011Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Editing lifecycle and deployment of objects in an industrial automation environment
US8086649Jun 7, 2010Dec 27, 2011Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Incremental association of metadata to production data
US8204609Jun 27, 2008Jun 19, 2012Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Industrial operator interfaces interacting with higher-level business workflow
US8224829Nov 28, 2001Jul 17, 2012Bernard Consulting LimitedDatabase
US8275680Sep 30, 2005Sep 25, 2012Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Enabling transactional mechanisms in an automated controller system
US8280537Oct 7, 2011Oct 2, 2012Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Editing lifecycle and deployment of objects in an industrial automation environment
US8438191Aug 19, 2011May 7, 2013Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Incremental association of metadata to production data
US8484250Sep 30, 2005Jul 9, 2013Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Data federation with industrial control systems
US8484401Apr 15, 2010Jul 9, 2013Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Systems and methods for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system
US8635245 *Oct 1, 2010Jan 21, 2014The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.Mapping business questions to source system data elements
US8694541 *Oct 1, 2010Apr 8, 2014The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.Mapping business questions to source system data elements
US8799800Sep 29, 2005Aug 5, 2014Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Automatic user interface generation
US20120284231 *May 4, 2012Nov 8, 2012International Business Machines CorporationDistributed, asynchronous and fault-tolerant storage system
US20120323851 *Aug 28, 2012Dec 20, 2012International Business Machines CorporationDistributed, asynchronous and fault-tolerant storage system
WO2002044940A2 *Nov 28, 2001Jun 6, 2002Coppereye LtdMethod of organising, interrogating and navigating a database
Classifications
U.S. Classification1/1, 707/999.003, 707/999.1, 707/999.005
International ClassificationG06F17/30
Cooperative ClassificationY10S707/99933, Y10S707/99935, G06F17/30327, G06F17/30392
European ClassificationG06F17/30S2P3, G06F17/30S4F1
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jul 5, 2012FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
May 23, 2012ASAssignment
Owner name: RAKUTEN, INC., JAPAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NEC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:028252/0280
Effective date: 20120514
Sep 17, 2008FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Aug 25, 2004FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Oct 6, 1998ASAssignment
Owner name: NEC CORPORATION, JAPAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NIHEI, KATSUMI;REEL/FRAME:009509/0448
Effective date: 19980817