US6215776B1 - Satellite communication system - Google Patents
Satellite communication system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US6215776B1 US6215776B1 US08/947,015 US94701597A US6215776B1 US 6215776 B1 US6215776 B1 US 6215776B1 US 94701597 A US94701597 A US 94701597A US 6215776 B1 US6215776 B1 US 6215776B1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- satellite
- communication
- terrestrial
- static
- satellites
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/14—Relay systems
- H04B7/15—Active relay systems
- H04B7/185—Space-based or airborne stations; Stations for satellite systems
- H04B7/18578—Satellite systems for providing broadband data service to individual earth stations
- H04B7/18589—Arrangements for controlling an end to end session, i.e. for initialising, synchronising or terminating an end to end link
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to a method of communicating between data processing systems, and more particularly, to terrestrial communication systems communicating through a satellite communication system.
- satellite system Various communication systems provide a communication path between terrestrial data processing systems through a satellite system.
- Inter-satellite routing methods include circuit switching and packet switching. Circuit switch routing defines a communication path from source to destination and maintains that channel throughout the communication. Circuit switching is inherently inefficient since the channel is dedicated to the communication regardless of the amount of data being transmitted.
- Packet switch routing also known as virtual circuit switching, allocates the communication paths for each segment(“packet”) of the communication rather than the entire communication. Thus, a path can be used by multiple terminals, since each only uses that path during data transmission.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,600,629 discloses an example packet switch routing system.
- Static communication paths are determine at the beginning of a communication session and used throughout that session. Since the routing is static, all packets associated with the communication follow the same communication path. Static routing provides a simple mechanism to route messages. However, it fails to take to advantage of changing loads and resource availability.
- Dynamic routing transfers data packets based on system resource availability. Thus, each data packet may traverse the network through a different route. However, dynamic routing that bases route determination on system resource that are available at the beginning of a transmission fail to take advantage of resource changes that occur during the transmission of the data packets.
- Satellite communication protocols often vary substantially from their terrestrial counterparts. Thus, significant time and computations are required to convert terrestrial communication protocols to satellite communication protocols. A need exists for a satellite system that uses a protocol substantially similar to terrestrial protocols.
- Addressing in satellite systems is either based on satellite locations or fixed geographic locations.
- Non-geostationary satellites must hand-off terrestrial communication links before the satellite's coverage area moves beyond the terrestrial gateway.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,625,867 discloses a hand-off method based in part on the quality of service. Efficient utilization of over-lapping can be maximized by determining hand-off based not only on quality of service but also on a variety of system parameters. Thus, a need exists for a satellite system to base the hand-off decision on a variety of system parameters.
- Existing satellite systems coordinate between two overlapping satellites.
- the satellite currently linked to the terrestrial station acts as the master and the other over-lapping satellite acts as a slave.
- a satellite determines when to hand-off a communication link.
- Over-lapping satellites require more coordination when the complexity of determining efficient hand-offs increases, and when the number of overlapping satellites increase, and when the number of hand-offs increases.
- Such a control satellite minimizes the computations required to determine the optimal load balancing between over-lapping satellites within the static cell.
- An object of the present invention is to link remote terrestrial terminals together through a dynamically routed packet switched satellite communication system using a protocol which is substantially compatible with terrestrial network protocols.
- Another objects of this invention is to reduce the search time for dynamically routing packets.
- a further object of this invention is to manage non-geostationary satellites in order to balance the communication load for the respective satellites.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a communication system connecting remote terrestrial systems together through a satellite system;
- FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of satellite coverage areas
- FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of satellite orbits and satellite planes
- FIG. 4 is a representative table for a satellite communication packet
- FIG. 5 is a representative table of terminals and their associated cell identification
- FIG. 6 is a representative table of cells covered by each satellite in a plane
- FIG. 7 is a representative table of connection information for each in progress communication stream
- FIG. 8 is a representative table of satellite loading per cell.
- FIG. 9 is a representative table of time based satellite coverage area per cell.
- the satellite communication system 10 includes a plurality of non-geostationary orbiting satellites 12 , 14 , and 16 .
- a terminal 22 in a static cell 38 communicates with a terminal 36 in a remote static cell 40 through a satellite communication system 10 .
- Terminals 30 and 28 are linked directly or through a network 26 to a gateway 24 .
- a terminal 30 can communicate with more than one gateway and a gateway 24 can communicate with one or more satellites.
- FIG. 5 represents a table of links between terminals in column 112 and gateways in column 114 .
- a static cell “25.1.4.4” in column 116 has one or more gateways within it.
- FIG. 1 shows satellite 12 linked to satellite 14 , which in turn is linked to satellite 16 .
- a satellite 12 communicates with one or more gateways within one or more static cells.
- each satellite in plane 1 and its corresponding coverage area are tracked in column 118 and 120 respectively.
- the gateway 20 (FIG. 1) communicates with one or more satellites when are within the satellite's coverage area. When a gateway is within the coverage area of a plurality of satellites the gateway is in what is known as an overlap state. A gateway is “blacked-out” when it is outside the coverage area of any satellites in the satellite communication system 10 .
- a plurality of terminals 28 and 30 in a static cell 38 are linked to a single gateway 24 .
- a terminal 30 can communicate with a plurality of gateways.
- a terminal 28 and 30 can be remotely located with respect to a gateway 24 or a terminal 22 can be co-located with a gateway 20 .
- the terminals 22 , 28 , and 30 and the gateways 20 and 24 can be fixed location devices, mobile devices, or portable devices. They can be land based, water based, or airborne devices.
- a mobile satellite phone 32 which communicates directly with a satellite 16 , contains both a terminal 36 and a gateway 34 in one hand-held unit 32 .
- IPv4 Internet Protocol version 4
- IPv6 Internet Protocol Next Generation
- ATM asynchronous transfer mode
- the satellite communication protocol is substantially similar to the terminal protocol. As a result, the translation computations needed to convert between the terminal and the satellite communication protocol are minimized.
- the satellite 12 in communication with a source gateway 24 in a static cell 38 determines the optimal payload length 88 (FIG. 4) for transmitting a data stream through the satellite communication system 10 .
- the gateway 24 segments the communication stream into packets 70 of the optimal length.
- the optimal payload length 88 is based on dynamic communication factors in the satellite communication system 10 . These factors include link error rate, quality of service, priority, cost of service, and the number of available links.
- all potential terrestrial coverage areas are partitioned into static cells as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,408,237.
- the satellites are addressed by plane number and satellite number.
- the planes 73 (FIG. 3) are perpendicular to the orbits 72 of the non-geostationary satellites 12 , 14 , and 16 (FIG. 1 ).
- FIG. 5 shows a representative table of terminal links to gateways and the associated static cell address of the gateway. This table is updated when a gateway moves to a different static cell address.
- a representative table of satellites in a plane 1 identifies which static cell each satellite is in contact with.
- Each control satellite in control of static cell in plane 1 monitors this table.
- Each control satellite 54 (FIG. 2) updates the table when the information concerning a satellite 56 (FIG. 2) under its control changes.
- Each control satellite 54 (FIG. 2) transmits the updates to adjacent control satellites.
- Gateway addressing in less populated areas uses fewer levels than addressing in more populated areas. There is no technological limit to the number of levels that can be used for addressing. However, it is a preferred embodiment of the present invention that the addressing includes from one to ten levels.
- FIG. 4 illustrates one such protocol and the structure of a packet 70 within the protocol.
- the packet 70 includes a context switch marker 72 , routing information 74 , payload information 76 , and an error correction code 78 , payload (“terminal data”) 80 .
- the context switch marker (“CSM”) 72 reduces the computations required to route a packet 70 . Since each satellite 12 , 14 , and 16 determines the optimal route for each packet 70 it receives, the efficiency of the route determination process is critical to the over all system performance. To reduce the subsequent search time, the satellite 12 linked to the source gateway 24 determines not only the current optimal route but also a context switch marker 72 for each packet 70 it receives.
- the CSM 72 is included in each packet 70 for reference by other satellites 14 and 16 routing the same packet.
- the CSM 72 includes an empty/full code 82 and an entry point 84 .
- the empty/full code 82 indicates whether an entry point 84 has previously been determined and placed in the packet 70 .
- the satellite 12 , 14 , and 16 determines the entry point 84 and places it in the packet 70 .
- the entry point 84 provides a starting point in the routing table similar to an index or bookmark. Thus, subsequent satellites 12 , 14 , and 16 begin their routing search from the entry point 84 and do not search the entire routing table. After each satellite 12 , 14 , and 16 completes the route determination, the satellite 12 , 14 , and 16 updates the entry point 84 to reflect current location of the routing information. Thus, if the routing tables changes while a packet is being routed, the entry point 84 remains accurate because each satellite 12 , 14 , and 16 routing the packet 70 updates the entry point 84 .
- Each satellite 12 , 14 , and 16 uses the routing information 74 to determine the optimal route for that packet 70 .
- the routing information 74 includes: a destination cell address 86 , a payload length 88 , a hop count 90 , a priority 92 , a flow label 94 , and a version 96 .
- the destination cell address 86 includes an address of the destination gateway 34 (FIG. 1 ).
- the payload length 88 specifies the length of the payload 80 in the packet 70 .
- the hop count 90 as defined in Internet Protocol version 6, indicates the maximum number of satellite links allowed for the packet 70 .
- the priority 92 indicates the priority level of a communication stream.
- Each packet 70 in a communicate stream receives the same priority 92 .
- Traffic from communication streams with higher priority are routed over shorter or more reliable routes.
- Priority levels as defined in Internet Protocol version 6 include uncharacteristic traffic, filter traffic, unattended data transfer, interactive traffic, internal satellite traffic, and highest quality of service traffic.
- Satellites 12 , 14 , and 16 are configured by packets 70 with a priority 92 of “internal satellite traffic.”
- Network control centers, remote network control centers, and satellite control centers transmit satellite configuration data.
- Configuration data includes updates to routing tables and satellite navigation control information.
- the flow label 94 provides a 24 bit unique code sequence that uniquely identifies a communication stream as defined by Internet Protocol version 6.
- the version 96 is a four bit code that identifies the communication protocol version as defined by Internet Protocol version 6.
- the payload information 76 is included in the packet 70 , but it is not used by the satellite system 10 .
- the payload information 76 can include a session identification 98 , a sequence number 100 , a destination terminal address 102 , a destination terminal logical identification 104 , a source terminal address 106 , and a source terminal logical identification 108 .
- the source gateway 24 create the payload information 76 .
- the destination gateway 34 uses the payload information 76 to reassemble the payload 80 in the correct order before forwarding the payload to the destination terminal 36 (FIG. 1 ). For example, a second packet arrives at the destination gateway 34 before the first packet.
- the destination gateway 34 orders the payload data in the correct sequence based on the sequence number 100 in each of the first and second packets 70 .
- the destination gateway 34 then transmits the data to destination terminal 36 .
- the Error Correction Code(“ECC”) 108 enables the satellite system 10 to detect, errors in a packet 70 . Depending on the type of error, the ECC 108 can also be used to correct the error.
- the source terminal address 106 and source terminal logical identification 108 are used to notify the source terminal 30 (FIG. 1) that an error occurred. If desired, the destination terminal 36 (FIG. 1) can request the packet 70 to be re-transmitted.
- the payload 80 includes ordered data from a source terminal 30 (FIG. 1) directed toward a destination terminal 36 (FIG. 1 ). For example, a terminal 30 transferring ten ATM data cells may require two packets 70 .
- the first packet's payload 80 includes the first six ATM data cells in their correct order.
- the next packet 70 includes the remaining four ATM data cells in their correct order.
- the ATM data cells including all protocol and header information are encapsulated into the respective payloads.
- a communication stream is segmented into packets 70 .
- a gateway 24 (FIG. 1) requests an optimal payload length 88 from a satellite 12 (FIG. 1 ).
- the satellite evaluates system parameters and communication parameters.
- the system parameters include which satellites are available to link the source and destination gateways, the loads on each of the available satellites, error rate of each satellite, cost of service, and the number of hops required.
- the communication parameters include the priority, the hop count, and amount of data to be transferred.
- the packets 70 are routed among the non-geostationary satellites 12 , 14 , and 16 using the satellite communication protocol.
- the optimal route for each packet 70 is determined independently at each satellite. Route determination is based on satellite system parameters.
- the satellite determines the error rate of every existing link to other satellites and to gateways.
- a source terminal 30 can transmit multiple copies of the same packet 70 .
- the payload information of the packet 70 includes identical session identification 98 and sequence numbers.
- the destination gateway 34 recognize the packets 70 as repeated packets.
- the gateway 34 compares the payload of the repeated packets.
- the repeated payloads are compared bit by bit. That is, the first bit of the payload of each packet is compared, then the next bit is compared until each bit has been compared.
- the value of each original transmitted bit is determined by a simple majority. Since a simple majority is required to determine the value of the original transmitted data, it is desirable to transmit an odd number of repeat packets. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention three copies of the terminal data are sent when repetition is desired.
- a control satellite 54 manages the links within the static cell 68 including the selection of satellites with over-lapping coverage areas.
- gateway 52 is within the over-lap area of two satellites 12 and 54 .
- the control satellite 54 determines which satellite provides a link or route with the gateway. The control satellite follows the route determination process described above.
- each static cell has a control satellite 54 .
- Communication links with a gateway 52 are balanced between over-lapping satellites 54 and 12 by the control satellite 54 .
- satellite 54 as the control satellite for cell 68 determines that satellite 12 is less loaded than satellite 54 , the communication link with gateway 52 is transferred to satellite 12 .
- the control satellite 54 balances the links based on communication factors including traffic density, transport delays, quality of service, computational capacity, lack of coverage timing, cost of service, and error rate in the static cells.
- Factors specific to each satellite in the overlap state include logical user identifications of terminal, connection time of each link, satellite identification, end of coverage time per satellite, traffic status, and access code.
- Satellite coverage areas are constantly moving since the satellites 12 , 54 , and 56 are non-geostationary. As a satellite moves to a new static cell, it requests satellite information for all satellites in the new static cell from the control satellite of the new static cell. If no control satellite exists of the new static cell, the first satellite to enter the static cell assigns itself as the control satellite. If a control satellite exists for that static cell, the satellite transmits its satellite information to the control satellite.
- the satellite information includes connection time of each terrestrial link, satellite identification, end of coverage time per gateway, and access codes.
- the satellite was a control satellite in the static cell it is moving out of, it assigns a different satellite as the control satellite for the static cell before leaving the static cell.
- a satellite As a satellite exits a static cell, it transmits an “exiting cell” message to the control satellite. If the exiting satellite is the control satellite, the exiting control satellite determines the satellite with the longest remaining coverage time in the static cell and makes that satellite the next control satellite. The exiting control satellite transmits to each satellite it controls a message identifying the new control satellite.
- the control satellite maintains satellite coverage information.
- An example of such information is represented in FIG. 9 .
- Each satellite's time until coverage or coverage time remaining 152 , 154 , 156 , 158 , 160 , and 162 is updated by each satellite transmitting changes in the information to the control satellite.
- the table represents static cells in column 150 and the time remaining for current satellites' coverage and the time until future satellites' coverage.
- a gateway 50 not within the coverage area of a satellite is “blacked-out”. Terminals linked to more than one gateway can route their communication through a gateway within a satellite's coverage area to avoid the black-out.
- the control satellite 54 for a static cell 68 determines when a gateway 50 will be blacked-out.
- the control satellite transmits a message to the gateway 50 before it is blacked-out identifying the black-out start and stop time.
- the gateway 50 routes messages over available terrestrial links during black-out periods.
- the gateway 50 stores communication data during a black-out period. Once satellite coverage resumes, the gateway 50 transmits the stored communication data over the satellite link.
- the routing information are maintained at each satellite and updated periodically. Examples of the routing information maintained at each satellite is illustrated in FIG. 5 and FIG. 6 .
Abstract
A multimedia communication system having a plurality of mobile, fixed location, and portable terrestrial communication terminals. The system links terrestrial communication terminals together through a network of non-geostationary satellites. The satellites communicate with a communication protocol similar to terrestrial communication protocols to reduce protocol conversion. The source and destination addressing uses static terrestrial cells for the uplink and the downlink. The terminal data stream is segmented into communication packets at the terrestrial gateway based on the uplink satellite's determination of system parameters. A control satellite dynamically balances up-links and down-links in the terrestrial areas with over-lapping satellite coverage.
Description
The present invention relates generally to a method of communicating between data processing systems, and more particularly, to terrestrial communication systems communicating through a satellite communication system.
Various communication systems provide a communication path between terrestrial data processing systems through a satellite system. The earliest satellite systems, known as “bent pipe” satellites, echoed signals between terrestrial transmitters and receivers. These systems required a significant number of satellites and terrestrial transmitters and receivers.
More recently, satellite systems route communication between satellites, thus requiring fewer terrestrial stations. Inter-satellite routing methods include circuit switching and packet switching. Circuit switch routing defines a communication path from source to destination and maintains that channel throughout the communication. Circuit switching is inherently inefficient since the channel is dedicated to the communication regardless of the amount of data being transmitted.
Packet switch routing, also known as virtual circuit switching, allocates the communication paths for each segment(“packet”) of the communication rather than the entire communication. Thus, a path can be used by multiple terminals, since each only uses that path during data transmission. U.S. Pat. No. 5,600,629 discloses an example packet switch routing system.
Communication paths can be either static or dynamic. Static communication paths are determine at the beginning of a communication session and used throughout that session. Since the routing is static, all packets associated with the communication follow the same communication path. Static routing provides a simple mechanism to route messages. However, it fails to take to advantage of changing loads and resource availability.
Dynamic routing transfers data packets based on system resource availability. Thus, each data packet may traverse the network through a different route. However, dynamic routing that bases route determination on system resource that are available at the beginning of a transmission fail to take advantage of resource changes that occur during the transmission of the data packets.
Satellite communication protocols often vary substantially from their terrestrial counterparts. Thus, significant time and computations are required to convert terrestrial communication protocols to satellite communication protocols. A need exists for a satellite system that uses a protocol substantially similar to terrestrial protocols.
Addressing in satellite systems is either based on satellite locations or fixed geographic locations.
An Earth fixed cell addressing methods is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,408,237, Patterson, et al. Such addressing reduces the computations during the transfer or “hand-off” of terrestrial links.
Non-geostationary satellites must hand-off terrestrial communication links before the satellite's coverage area moves beyond the terrestrial gateway. U.S. Pat. No. 5,625,867 discloses a hand-off method based in part on the quality of service. Efficient utilization of over-lapping can be maximized by determining hand-off based not only on quality of service but also on a variety of system parameters. Thus, a need exists for a satellite system to base the hand-off decision on a variety of system parameters.
Existing satellite systems coordinate between two overlapping satellites. The satellite currently linked to the terrestrial station acts as the master and the other over-lapping satellite acts as a slave. As the master, a satellite determines when to hand-off a communication link. Over-lapping satellites require more coordination when the complexity of determining efficient hand-offs increases, and when the number of overlapping satellites increase, and when the number of hand-offs increases. Thus, a need exist for a satellite system with a coordinating satellite that determines when hand-off should occur and between which satellites the hand-off should occur. Such a control satellite minimizes the computations required to determine the optimal load balancing between over-lapping satellites within the static cell.
An object of the present invention is to link remote terrestrial terminals together through a dynamically routed packet switched satellite communication system using a protocol which is substantially compatible with terrestrial network protocols.
Another objects of this invention is to reduce the search time for dynamically routing packets.
A further object of this invention is to manage non-geostationary satellites in order to balance the communication load for the respective satellites.
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a communication system connecting remote terrestrial systems together through a satellite system;
FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of satellite coverage areas;
FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of satellite orbits and satellite planes;
FIG. 4 is a representative table for a satellite communication packet;
FIG. 5 is a representative table of terminals and their associated cell identification;
FIG. 6 is a representative table of cells covered by each satellite in a plane;
FIG. 7 is a representative table of connection information for each in progress communication stream;
FIG. 8 is a representative table of satellite loading per cell; and
FIG. 9 is a representative table of time based satellite coverage area per cell.
Referring to FIG. 1, various terminals 22, 28, 30, and 36 are linked together through a satellite communication system 10. The satellite communication system 10 includes a plurality of non-geostationary orbiting satellites 12, 14, and 16.
A terminal 22 in a static cell 38 communicates with a terminal 36 in a remote static cell 40 through a satellite communication system 10. Terminals 30 and 28 are linked directly or through a network 26 to a gateway 24. While not shown in FIG. 1, a terminal 30 can communicate with more than one gateway and a gateway 24 can communicate with one or more satellites. For example, FIG. 5 represents a table of links between terminals in column 112 and gateways in column 114. A static cell “25.1.4.4” in column 116 has one or more gateways within it.
As satellites orbit the Earth in non-geostationary orbits, their respective terrestrial coverage areas vary. Every satellite in the satellite communication system 10 is linked to at least one other satellite in that system. For example, FIG. 1 shows satellite 12 linked to satellite 14, which in turn is linked to satellite 16. A satellite 12 communicates with one or more gateways within one or more static cells.
Referring to FIG. 6, each satellite in plane 1 and its corresponding coverage area are tracked in column 118 and 120 respectively.
The gateway 20 (FIG. 1) communicates with one or more satellites when are within the satellite's coverage area. When a gateway is within the coverage area of a plurality of satellites the gateway is in what is known as an overlap state. A gateway is “blacked-out” when it is outside the coverage area of any satellites in the satellite communication system 10.
Referring to FIG. 1, a plurality of terminals 28 and 30 in a static cell 38 are linked to a single gateway 24. While not shown in FIG. 1, a terminal 30 can communicate with a plurality of gateways. A terminal 28 and 30 can be remotely located with respect to a gateway 24 or a terminal 22 can be co-located with a gateway 20. The terminals 22, 28, and 30 and the gateways 20 and 24 can be fixed location devices, mobile devices, or portable devices. They can be land based, water based, or airborne devices. For example, a mobile satellite phone 32, which communicates directly with a satellite 16, contains both a terminal 36 and a gateway 34 in one hand-held unit 32.
Typically, communication between terminals 28 and 30 follows a structured communication protocol, such as the Internet Protocol version 4 (“IPv4”), Internet Protocol Next Generation (“IPv6”), or asynchronous transfer mode (“ATM”). A gateway 24 translates the terminal protocol to the satellite communication protocol before transmitting the communication to the satellite 12.
In accordance with the present invention, the satellite communication protocol is substantially similar to the terminal protocol. As a result, the translation computations needed to convert between the terminal and the satellite communication protocol are minimized.
The satellite 12 (FIG. 1) in communication with a source gateway 24 in a static cell 38 determines the optimal payload length 88 (FIG. 4) for transmitting a data stream through the satellite communication system 10. The gateway 24 segments the communication stream into packets 70 of the optimal length. The optimal payload length 88 is based on dynamic communication factors in the satellite communication system 10. These factors include link error rate, quality of service, priority, cost of service, and the number of available links.
Referring to FIG. 2, all potential terrestrial coverage areas are partitioned into static cells as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,408,237. The satellites are addressed by plane number and satellite number. The planes 73 (FIG. 3) are perpendicular to the orbits 72 of the non-geostationary satellites 12, 14, and 16 (FIG. 1).
For example, FIG. 5 shows a representative table of terminal links to gateways and the associated static cell address of the gateway. This table is updated when a gateway moves to a different static cell address.
Referring to FIG. 6, a representative table of satellites in a plane 1 identifies which static cell each satellite is in contact with. Each control satellite in control of static cell in plane 1 monitors this table. Each control satellite 54 (FIG. 2) updates the table when the information concerning a satellite 56 (FIG. 2) under its control changes. Each control satellite 54 (FIG. 2) transmits the updates to adjacent control satellites.
Gateway addressing in less populated areas uses fewer levels than addressing in more populated areas. There is no technological limit to the number of levels that can be used for addressing. However, it is a preferred embodiment of the present invention that the addressing includes from one to ten levels.
Referring to FIG. 1, the satellites 12, 14, and 16 communicate using a satellite communication protocol. FIG. 4 illustrates one such protocol and the structure of a packet 70 within the protocol. As shown in FIG. 4, the packet 70 includes a context switch marker 72, routing information 74, payload information 76, and an error correction code 78, payload (“terminal data”) 80.
The context switch marker (“CSM”) 72 reduces the computations required to route a packet 70. Since each satellite 12, 14, and 16 determines the optimal route for each packet 70 it receives, the efficiency of the route determination process is critical to the over all system performance. To reduce the subsequent search time, the satellite 12 linked to the source gateway 24 determines not only the current optimal route but also a context switch marker 72 for each packet 70 it receives.
The CSM 72 is included in each packet 70 for reference by other satellites 14 and 16 routing the same packet. Referring to FIG. 4, the CSM 72 includes an empty/full code 82 and an entry point 84. The empty/full code 82 indicates whether an entry point 84 has previously been determined and placed in the packet 70.
When a satellite 12, 14, and 16 receives a packet 70 with the empty/full code 82 indicating empty, the satellite 12, 14, and 16 determines the entry point 84 and places it in the packet 70. The entry point 84 provides a starting point in the routing table similar to an index or bookmark. Thus, subsequent satellites 12, 14, and 16 begin their routing search from the entry point 84 and do not search the entire routing table. After each satellite 12, 14, and 16 completes the route determination, the satellite 12, 14, and 16 updates the entry point 84 to reflect current location of the routing information. Thus, if the routing tables changes while a packet is being routed, the entry point 84 remains accurate because each satellite 12, 14, and 16 routing the packet 70 updates the entry point 84.
Each satellite 12, 14, and 16 uses the routing information 74 to determine the optimal route for that packet 70. The routing information 74 includes: a destination cell address 86, a payload length 88, a hop count 90, a priority 92, a flow label 94, and a version 96.
The destination cell address 86 includes an address of the destination gateway 34 (FIG. 1). The payload length 88 specifies the length of the payload 80 in the packet 70. The hop count 90, as defined in Internet Protocol version 6, indicates the maximum number of satellite links allowed for the packet 70.
Referring to FIG. 4, the priority 92 indicates the priority level of a communication stream. Each packet 70 in a communicate stream receives the same priority 92. Traffic from communication streams with higher priority are routed over shorter or more reliable routes. Priority levels as defined in Internet Protocol version 6 include uncharacteristic traffic, filter traffic, unattended data transfer, interactive traffic, internal satellite traffic, and highest quality of service traffic.
The flow label 94 provides a 24 bit unique code sequence that uniquely identifies a communication stream as defined by Internet Protocol version 6.
The version 96 is a four bit code that identifies the communication protocol version as defined by Internet Protocol version 6.
Referring to FIG. 4, the payload information 76 is included in the packet 70, but it is not used by the satellite system 10. The payload information 76 can include a session identification 98, a sequence number 100, a destination terminal address 102, a destination terminal logical identification 104, a source terminal address 106, and a source terminal logical identification 108.
The source gateway 24 (FIG. 1) create the payload information 76. The destination gateway 34 (FIG. 1) uses the payload information 76 to reassemble the payload 80 in the correct order before forwarding the payload to the destination terminal 36 (FIG. 1). For example, a second packet arrives at the destination gateway 34 before the first packet. The destination gateway 34 orders the payload data in the correct sequence based on the sequence number 100 in each of the first and second packets 70. The destination gateway 34 then transmits the data to destination terminal 36.
The Error Correction Code(“ECC”) 108 enables the satellite system 10 to detect, errors in a packet 70. Depending on the type of error, the ECC 108 can also be used to correct the error.
If an error is detected in a packet 70, the source terminal address 106 and source terminal logical identification 108 are used to notify the source terminal 30 (FIG. 1) that an error occurred. If desired, the destination terminal 36 (FIG. 1) can request the packet 70 to be re-transmitted.
The payload 80 includes ordered data from a source terminal 30 (FIG. 1) directed toward a destination terminal 36 (FIG. 1). For example, a terminal 30 transferring ten ATM data cells may require two packets 70. The first packet's payload 80 includes the first six ATM data cells in their correct order. The next packet 70 includes the remaining four ATM data cells in their correct order. The ATM data cells including all protocol and header information are encapsulated into the respective payloads.
A communication stream is segmented into packets 70. For each communication stream, a gateway 24 (FIG. 1) requests an optimal payload length 88 from a satellite 12 (FIG. 1). The satellite evaluates system parameters and communication parameters. The system parameters include which satellites are available to link the source and destination gateways, the loads on each of the available satellites, error rate of each satellite, cost of service, and the number of hops required. The communication parameters include the priority, the hop count, and amount of data to be transferred.
The packets 70 are routed among the non-geostationary satellites 12, 14, and 16 using the satellite communication protocol. The optimal route for each packet 70 is determined independently at each satellite. Route determination is based on satellite system parameters. The satellite determines the error rate of every existing link to other satellites and to gateways.
To enhance communication reliability on links with lower quality of service (“QoS”), a source terminal 30 (FIG. 1) can transmit multiple copies of the same packet 70. The payload information of the packet 70 includes identical session identification 98 and sequence numbers. Thus, the destination gateway 34 (FIG. 1) recognize the packets 70 as repeated packets. The gateway 34 then compares the payload of the repeated packets. The repeated payloads are compared bit by bit. That is, the first bit of the payload of each packet is compared, then the next bit is compared until each bit has been compared. The value of each original transmitted bit is determined by a simple majority. Since a simple majority is required to determine the value of the original transmitted data, it is desirable to transmit an odd number of repeat packets. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention three copies of the terminal data are sent when repetition is desired.
Referring to FIG. 2, a control satellite 54 manages the links within the static cell 68 including the selection of satellites with over-lapping coverage areas. For example, gateway 52 is within the over-lap area of two satellites 12 and 54. The control satellite 54 determines which satellite provides a link or route with the gateway. The control satellite follows the route determination process described above.
As explained below, each static cell has a control satellite 54. Communication links with a gateway 52 are balanced between over-lapping satellites 54 and 12 by the control satellite 54. Thus, if satellite 54 as the control satellite for cell 68 determines that satellite 12 is less loaded than satellite 54, the communication link with gateway 52 is transferred to satellite 12.
The control satellite 54 balances the links based on communication factors including traffic density, transport delays, quality of service, computational capacity, lack of coverage timing, cost of service, and error rate in the static cells. Factors specific to each satellite in the overlap state include logical user identifications of terminal, connection time of each link, satellite identification, end of coverage time per satellite, traffic status, and access code.
Satellite coverage areas are constantly moving since the satellites 12, 54, and 56 are non-geostationary. As a satellite moves to a new static cell, it requests satellite information for all satellites in the new static cell from the control satellite of the new static cell. If no control satellite exists of the new static cell, the first satellite to enter the static cell assigns itself as the control satellite. If a control satellite exists for that static cell, the satellite transmits its satellite information to the control satellite. The satellite information includes connection time of each terrestrial link, satellite identification, end of coverage time per gateway, and access codes.
Moreover, if the satellite was a control satellite in the static cell it is moving out of, it assigns a different satellite as the control satellite for the static cell before leaving the static cell.
Referring to FIG. 2, as a satellite exits a static cell, it transmits an “exiting cell” message to the control satellite. If the exiting satellite is the control satellite, the exiting control satellite determines the satellite with the longest remaining coverage time in the static cell and makes that satellite the next control satellite. The exiting control satellite transmits to each satellite it controls a message identifying the new control satellite.
The control satellite maintains satellite coverage information. An example of such information is represented in FIG. 9. Each satellite's time until coverage or coverage time remaining 152, 154, 156, 158, 160, and 162 is updated by each satellite transmitting changes in the information to the control satellite. The table represents static cells in column 150 and the time remaining for current satellites' coverage and the time until future satellites' coverage.
Referring to FIG. 2, a gateway 50 not within the coverage area of a satellite is “blacked-out”. Terminals linked to more than one gateway can route their communication through a gateway within a satellite's coverage area to avoid the black-out.
The control satellite 54 for a static cell 68 determines when a gateway 50 will be blacked-out. The control satellite transmits a message to the gateway 50 before it is blacked-out identifying the black-out start and stop time. The gateway 50 routes messages over available terrestrial links during black-out periods.
If no terrestrial link exists, the gateway 50 stores communication data during a black-out period. Once satellite coverage resumes, the gateway 50 transmits the stored communication data over the satellite link.
The routing information are maintained at each satellite and updated periodically. Examples of the routing information maintained at each satellite is illustrated in FIG. 5 and FIG. 6.
While a preferred embodiment has been shown and described, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the disclosure, but rather it is intended to cover all modifications and alternate methods and apparatuses falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims or their equivalents.
Claims (26)
1. A satellite communication system for multimedia communication comprising:
(a) a plurality of non-geostationary communication satellites;
(b) a plurality of mobile and terrestrial communication systems linked to the non-geostationary satellites;
(c) means for communicating between non-geostationary satellites using a satellite communication protocol which is compatible with mobile and terrestrial communication protocols and reduces protocol conversion;
(d) means for dynamically fixing the non-geostationary satellites with respect to terrestrial cells serving as transmitting and receiving points, wherein the means for dynamically fixing performs the steps of:
(i) defining terrestrial coverage areas as static cells; and
(ii) addressing the static cells in planes that are perpendicular to the orbits of the non-geostationary satellites, the addressing including variable resolution within the static cells.
(e) means for segmenting terminal data into communication packets for transmitting through the satellite communication system;
(f) means for routing communication packets among non-geostationary satellites using the satellite communication protocol; and
(g) means for dynamically balancing terrestrial communication links among the non-geostationary satellites in an over-lapping state.
2. The satellite communication system according to claim 1, wherein the means for communicating between the non-geostationary satellites includes communication packet comprising:
(a) terminal data;
(b) payload information;
(c) routing information; and
(d) an error correction code.
3. The satellite communication system according to claim 1, further including means for calculating an efficient communication packet size for transmitting terminal data through the satellite communication system, the calculating based on measuring communication factors including:
(a) an error rate;
(b) a quality of service;
(c) a traffic status;
(d) a cost of service; and
(e) a count of available links.
4. The satellite communication system according to claim 1, wherein the means for routing communication packets among non-geostationary satellites using the satellite communication protocol includes measuring communication factors including:
(a) an error rate;
(b) a quality of service;
(c) a traffic status;
(d) a cost of service; and
(e) a count of available links.
5. The satellite communication system according to claim 1, wherein the means for dynamically balancing the terrestrial communication links among satellites in an over-lapping state comprising:
(a) measuring communication factors in a static cell including:
(i) a traffic density;
(ii) a transport delay;
(iii) a quality of service;
(iv) a computational capacity;
(v) a lack of coverage timing;
(vi) a cost of service;
(vii) a traffic status;
(viii) an error rate in the source and destination static cells;
(b) measuring satellite factors for each satellite in the over-lapping state including:
(i) a logical user identification of a terminal;
(ii) a connection time of each connection;
(iii) a satellite identification;
(iv) an end of coverage time;
(v) a traffic status specific to each satellite in the overlapping state;
(vi) an access code; and
(c) allocating terrestrial links to the non-geostationary satellites covering the static cells such that loads are balanced between over-lapping satellites based on the communication factors and the satellite factors.
6. The satellite communication system according to claim 1, wherein the links between the non-geostationary satellites and the terrestrial communication systems are managed by a control satellite in each static cell comprising the steps of:
(a) selecting one of the non-geostationary satellites first in time to enter the static cell to control communication links within that static cell;
(b) requesting satellite information from each satellite upon entering the static cell;
(c) assigning new terrestrial links to non-geostationary satellites based on the control satellite's determination of satellite information of each satellite covering the static cell;
(d) re-assigning existing terrestrial links to a different non-geostationary satellites based on the control satellite's determination of the satellite information of each satellite covering the static cell; and
(e) assigning a different satellite to control the static cell before a current control satellite leaves the static cell.
7. The satellite communication system according to claim 1, wherein each non-geostationary satellite determines a route for each communication packet by referencing a dynamic routing table using a context switch marker to reduce search time, the context switch marker provides a reference point in a static cell data base for searching for the static cell's location and routing information.
8. A satellite communication system capable of multimedia communication comprising:
(a) a plurality of non-geostationary communication satellites, each of the plurality of non-geostationary communication satellites being assigned to cover a static terrestrial cell;
(b) a plurality of control satellites which are a subset of the plurality of non-geostationary communication satellites, each control satellite being assigned to cover a static terrestrial cell and each static terrestrial cell being assigned no more than one control satellite, wherein each control satellite dynamically balances terrestrial communication links among the satellites assigned to the corresponding static terrestrial cell such that the loads are balanced between the satellites covering that static terrestrial cell;
(b) a first non-geostationary communication satellite assigned to cover a first static terrestrial cell;
(c) a first gateway located in the first static terrestrial cell, the first gateway
(i) receiving a first data stream having a terrestrial protocol from a first terrestrial communication unit;
(ii) converting the first data stream into communication packets having a satellite communication protocol, wherein the satellite communication protocol is similar to the terrestrial protocol;
(iii) sending the communication packets to the first non-geostationary communication satellite over a first link;
(d) a second non-geostationary communication satellite assigned to cover a second static terrestrial cell, the second non-geostationary communication satellite receiving the communication packets routed from the first non-geostationary communication satellite; and
(e) a second gateway located in the second static terrestrial cell receiving the communication packets from the second non-geostationary communication satellite over a second link, converting the communication packets into a second data stream having the terrestrial protocol, and sending the second data stream to a second terrestrial communication unit.
9. The satellite communication system of claim 8, wherein each control satellite makes a load determination based on communication factors and satellite factors.
10. The satellite communication system of claim 9, wherein the communication factors include at least one of:
(i) a traffic density;
(ii) a transport delay;
(iii) a quality of service;
(iv) a computational capacity;
(v) a lack of coverage timing;
(vi) a cost of service;
(vii) a traffic status; and
(viii) an error rate in the source and destination static cells.
11. The satellite communication system of claim 9, wherein the satellite factors are factors specific to a satellite and include at least one of:
(i) a logical user identification of a terminal;
(ii) a connection time of each connection;
(iii) a satellite identification;
(iv) an end of coverage time;
(v) a traffic status; and
(vi) an access code.
12. The satellite communication system of claim 8, wherein when a satellite moves to a new static terrestrial cell with no satellites assigned to that static terrestrial cell, the satellite assigns itself as a control satellite for that static terrestrial cell.
13. The satellite communication system of claim 9, wherein when a satellite moves to a new static terrestrial cell it requests satellite information for all satellites in the new static terrestrial cell from the control satellite assigned to the new static terrestrial cell.
14. The satellite communication system of claim 13, wherein when a satellite exits a static terrestrial cell, the satellite transmits its satellite information to the control satellite for that static terrestrial cell.
15. The satellite communication system of claim 14, wherein when a control satellite exits a static terrestrial cell, the control satellite assigns a different satellite as the new control satellite for that static terrestrial cell before leaving the cell.
16. The satellite communication system of claim 15, wherein the control satellite exiting the static terrestrial cell determines the satellite with the longest remaining coverage time in that static terrestrial cell, and assigns that satellite as the new control satellite.
17. The satellite communication system of claim 16, wherein the satellite information includes at least one of:
(a) a connection time of each terrestrial link;
(b) a satellite identification; and
(c) an end of coverage time per gateway.
18. The satellite communication system of claim 8, wherein each control satellite assigned to a static terrestrial cell maintains satellite coverage information including:
(a) coverage time remaining for satellites assigned to that static terrestrial cell; and
(b) time until coverage for satellites that will move into that static terrestrial cell in the future.
19. The satellite communication system of claim 8, wherein a control satellite transmits a message to a gateway before it will be blacked-out, the message identifying the black-out start time and black-out stop time.
20. The satellite communication system of claim 19, wherein a gateway enters a black-out period and the gateway:
(1) routes messages over available terrestrial links during black-out periods; or
(2) stores communication data streams during a black-out period and transmits the stored communication data over a satellite link once satellite coverage resumes.
21. The satellite communication system of claim 8, wherein the first gateway requests an optimal communication packet payload length from the first non-geostationary communication satellite, the first non-geostationary communication satellite determining an optimal communication packet payload length based on system parameters and communication parameters.
22. The satellite communication system of claim 21, wherein the system parameters include at least one of:
(a) which satellites are available to link to the first and second gateways;
(b) loads on each of the available satellites;
(c) an error rate of each satellite;
(d) a cost of service; and
(e) number of hops required.
23. The satellite communication system of claim 21, wherein the communication parameters include at least one of:
(a) a priority;
(b) a hop count; and
(c) an amount of data to be transferred.
24. The satellite communication system of claim 8, wherein each communication packet includes:
(a) terminal data;
(b) payload information;
(c) a payload;
(d) routing information; and
(e) an error correction code.
25. The satellite communication system of claim 24, wherein the terrestrial protocol is at least one of Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4), Internet Protocol Next Generation (IPv6), or asynchronous transfer mode (ATM).
26. The satellite communication system of claim 24, wherein the terrestrial protocol is comprised of data cells, and the payload comprises a plurality of the data cells.
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/947,015 US6215776B1 (en) | 1997-10-08 | 1997-10-08 | Satellite communication system |
EP98954938A EP1034636A4 (en) | 1997-10-08 | 1998-10-08 | Packet satellite communication system with balanced links |
PCT/US1998/020926 WO1999018690A1 (en) | 1997-10-08 | 1998-10-08 | Packet satellite communication system with balanced links |
US09/739,329 US6643273B2 (en) | 1997-10-08 | 2000-12-19 | Satellite communication system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/947,015 US6215776B1 (en) | 1997-10-08 | 1997-10-08 | Satellite communication system |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/739,329 Continuation US6643273B2 (en) | 1997-10-08 | 2000-12-19 | Satellite communication system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6215776B1 true US6215776B1 (en) | 2001-04-10 |
Family
ID=25485372
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/947,015 Expired - Lifetime US6215776B1 (en) | 1997-10-08 | 1997-10-08 | Satellite communication system |
US09/739,329 Expired - Fee Related US6643273B2 (en) | 1997-10-08 | 2000-12-19 | Satellite communication system |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/739,329 Expired - Fee Related US6643273B2 (en) | 1997-10-08 | 2000-12-19 | Satellite communication system |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6215776B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1034636A4 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1999018690A1 (en) |
Cited By (58)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020052206A1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2002-05-02 | Fabio Longoni | Cell load control method and system |
US6400696B1 (en) * | 2000-11-07 | 2002-06-04 | Space Systems/Loral, Inc. | Bent-pipe satellite system which couples a lan to a gateway and uses a dynamic assignment/multiple access protocol |
US20020072374A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-06-13 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Communication system using multiple link terminals |
US20020081969A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-06-27 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Communication system using multiple link terminals |
US6415329B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2002-07-02 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for improving efficiency of TCP/IP protocol over high delay-bandwidth network |
US6430167B1 (en) * | 1998-08-03 | 2002-08-06 | Trw Inc. | Method for transferring data over a satellite network by using unique beam identifiers to route the data |
US20020128045A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-09-12 | Chang Donald C. D. | Stratospheric platforms communication system using adaptive antennas |
US20020132643A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-09-19 | Chang Donald C.D. | Multiple basestation communication system having adaptive antennas |
US6460085B1 (en) * | 1999-02-02 | 2002-10-01 | Mentat Inc. | Method and system for managing memory in an internet over satellite connection |
US20020143591A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-03 | Connelly Jay H. | Method and apparatus for a hybrid content on demand broadcast system |
US20020178263A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-11-28 | William Hreha | Dynamic resource allocation architecture for differentiated services over broadband communication networks |
US6501741B1 (en) * | 1998-01-28 | 2002-12-31 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. | Method supporting the quality of service of data transmission |
US20030005465A1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2003-01-02 | Connelly Jay H. | Method and apparatus to send feedback from clients to a server in a content distribution broadcast system |
US6529477B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2003-03-04 | Mentat Inc. | Internet over satellite system |
US20030046708A1 (en) * | 2001-08-28 | 2003-03-06 | Jutzi Curtis E. | Error correction for regional and dynamic factors in communications |
US20030053424A1 (en) * | 2001-08-07 | 2003-03-20 | Srikanth Krishnamurthy | Method and apparatus for determining position and trajectory of gateways to optimize performance in hybrid non-terrestrial-terrestrial multi-hop mobile networks |
US20030061611A1 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2003-03-27 | Ramesh Pendakur | Notifying users of available content and content reception based on user profiles |
US20030066090A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Brendan Traw | Method and apparatus to provide a personalized channel |
US20030079022A1 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2003-04-24 | Mentat Inc. | Multicast delivery systems and methods |
US6584083B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2003-06-24 | Mentat Inc. | Internet over satellite method |
US6654344B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2003-11-25 | Mentat Inc. | Method and system for controlling data flow in an internet over satellite connection |
US6691274B1 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2004-02-10 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for error correction in a communication system |
US6724737B1 (en) * | 1999-06-17 | 2004-04-20 | Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications, Inc | System for controlling communications between a terminal and satellite and method therefore |
US6725013B1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2004-04-20 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Communication system having frequency reuse in non-blocking manner |
US6738824B1 (en) * | 1999-03-30 | 2004-05-18 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dial-out link selection via static route redistribution |
US20040097192A1 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2004-05-20 | Schiff Leonard N. | Satellite-based programmable allocation of bandwidth for forward and return links |
US6751458B1 (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2004-06-15 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Architecture utilizing frequency reuse in accommodating user-link and feeder-link transmissions |
US6816732B1 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2004-11-09 | Ipr Licensing, Inc. | Optimal load-based wireless session context transfer |
US6829479B1 (en) | 2000-07-14 | 2004-12-07 | The Directv Group. Inc. | Fixed wireless back haul for mobile communications using stratospheric platforms |
US6839324B1 (en) | 1999-03-30 | 2005-01-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus providing dial on demand scaling |
US6950060B1 (en) | 2002-10-15 | 2005-09-27 | General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc. | Satellite positioning system |
US20050232180A1 (en) * | 1999-02-02 | 2005-10-20 | Toporek Jerome D | Internet over satellite apparatus |
US20050231378A1 (en) * | 2003-06-26 | 2005-10-20 | Oliver Young | Vehicle occupant sensing system having a low profile sensor assembly |
US6982964B2 (en) | 2001-10-15 | 2006-01-03 | Beering David R | High performance ECL-to-ATM protocol network gateway |
US6985454B1 (en) * | 1999-01-26 | 2006-01-10 | Globalstar L.P. | ISP system using non-geosynchronous orbit satellites |
US7027769B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2006-04-11 | The Directv Group, Inc. | GEO stationary communications system with minimal delay |
US7088694B1 (en) * | 1998-05-05 | 2006-08-08 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Transfer of overlapping routing area control information in a radio access network |
US20060178143A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2006-08-10 | Chang Donald C D | Communication system using multiple link terminals for aircraft |
US7200360B1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2007-04-03 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Communication system as a secondary platform with frequency reuse |
US20070079324A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2007-04-05 | Hallford Jason C | Method and apparatus for combining broadcast schedules and content on a digital broadcast-enabled client platform |
US7215954B1 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2007-05-08 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Resource allocation method for multi-platform communication system |
US20080022008A1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2008-01-24 | Connelly Jay H | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US20080144713A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-06-19 | Viasat, Inc. | Acm aware encoding systems and methods |
US20090041100A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2009-02-12 | Viasat, Inc. | Link aware mobile data network |
US20090051589A1 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2009-02-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Satellite communication system constituted with primary and back-up multi-beam satellites |
US20090060033A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2009-03-05 | Viasat, Inc. | Predictive adaptive coding and modulation |
US20090060086A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2009-03-05 | Viasat, Inc. | Terminal aware multicasting |
US20090073876A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2009-03-19 | Viasat, Inc. | Adaptive coding and modulation aware network load balancing |
US20100260045A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-10-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Video and data network load balancing with video placeholder |
US20100260254A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-10-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Multiple transmission paths for hierarchical layers |
US20100260259A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-10-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Acm and fixed coding and modulation of hierarchical layers |
US20100260043A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-10-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Video and data network load balancing |
US7835733B1 (en) * | 1999-11-29 | 2010-11-16 | Thales | Satellite telecommunication system |
US8396513B2 (en) | 2001-01-19 | 2013-03-12 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Communication system for mobile users using adaptive antenna |
US8411571B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2013-04-02 | Viasat, Inc. | Video and data network load balancing with video drop |
US8943540B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2015-01-27 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to provide a personalized channel |
US20180006713A1 (en) * | 2016-03-29 | 2018-01-04 | Space Systems/Loral, Llc | Satellite system with handover for multiple gateways |
CN113179114A (en) * | 2021-04-16 | 2021-07-27 | 广州爱浦路网络技术有限公司 | Inter-satellite routing method for communication satellite, communication satellite and control device |
Families Citing this family (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100506220B1 (en) * | 2002-02-27 | 2005-08-05 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Map matching apparatus and method for single path or multi paths to navigation service |
WO2004107185A1 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2004-12-09 | Macdonald, Dettwiler And Associates Ltd. | Satellite communications system for providing global, high quality movement of very large data files |
US7606210B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2009-10-20 | Nivis, Llc | System and method for message consolidation in a mesh network |
US7676195B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2010-03-09 | Nivis, Llc | System and method for communicating messages in a mesh network |
US7554941B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2009-06-30 | Nivis, Llc | System and method for a wireless mesh network |
US7505734B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2009-03-17 | Nivis, Llc | System and method for communicating broadcast messages in a mesh network |
US20070186251A1 (en) * | 2006-02-03 | 2007-08-09 | Horowitz Edward D | Emergency satellite network |
CN102404184A (en) * | 2010-09-09 | 2012-04-04 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Data transmission system and transmission method |
KR20120065611A (en) * | 2010-12-13 | 2012-06-21 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Router apparatus using power saving routing information and method for routing router apparatus |
WO2014004259A1 (en) * | 2012-06-28 | 2014-01-03 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Reduced system latency for dominant speaker |
JP5737323B2 (en) | 2013-05-01 | 2015-06-17 | 住友電気工業株式会社 | Electrical insulation cable |
AU2016302616B2 (en) | 2015-07-31 | 2020-06-25 | Viasat, Inc. | Flexible capacity satellite constellation |
CN109690974B (en) * | 2016-09-13 | 2021-10-29 | 高通股份有限公司 | Dynamically partitioning information according to at least one criterion |
US11632166B2 (en) | 2016-09-13 | 2023-04-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Neighbor cell list |
CN110751353B (en) * | 2018-07-24 | 2023-09-05 | 民政部国家减灾中心 | Multi-satellite collaborative observation method and device for flood emergency |
AT522277B1 (en) * | 2019-03-26 | 2021-11-15 | Frequentis Ag | Procedure for the transmission of data in packets |
US11251862B2 (en) | 2020-07-14 | 2022-02-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for simultaneous operation of dissimilar SATCOM systems |
US20220131600A1 (en) * | 2020-10-27 | 2022-04-28 | Hughes Network Systems, Llc | Dynamic inroute reconfiguration in satellite systems |
US20230032024A1 (en) * | 2021-07-30 | 2023-02-02 | Hughes Network Systems, Llc | System and methods for providing integrated 5g and satellite service in backhaul and edge computing applications |
Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4991133A (en) | 1988-10-07 | 1991-02-05 | International Business Machines Corp. | Specialized communications processor for layered protocols |
US5142622A (en) | 1989-01-31 | 1992-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for interconnecting applications across different networks of data processing systems by mapping protocols across different network domains |
US5280480A (en) | 1991-02-21 | 1994-01-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Source routing transparent bridge |
US5408237A (en) * | 1991-11-08 | 1995-04-18 | Teledesic Corporation | Earth-fixed cell beam management for satellite communication system |
US5434852A (en) | 1993-06-25 | 1995-07-18 | At&T Corp. | Distributed processing architechture for control of broadband and narrowband communications networks |
US5485464A (en) * | 1993-10-21 | 1996-01-16 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Communication protocol for a high data rate satellite communication system |
US5581558A (en) | 1995-03-29 | 1996-12-03 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Apparatus for bridging non-compatible network architectures |
US5600629A (en) | 1994-07-25 | 1997-02-04 | Motorola, Inc. | Inter-satellite method for routing packets |
US5625867A (en) * | 1991-10-01 | 1997-04-29 | Alcatel Espace | Method of handing off traffic in a low orbit satellite communication system serving terminals and communication system using a method of this kind |
US5634190A (en) | 1995-06-06 | 1997-05-27 | Globalstar L.P. | Low earth orbit communication satellite gateway-to-gateway relay system |
US5732351A (en) * | 1995-08-31 | 1998-03-24 | Motorola, Inc. | Communication system and method for single channel hand-offs |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5583562A (en) * | 1993-12-03 | 1996-12-10 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | System and method for transmitting a plurality of digital services including imaging services |
WO1995034153A1 (en) * | 1994-06-08 | 1995-12-14 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Apparatus and method for hybrid network access |
US6058429A (en) * | 1995-12-08 | 2000-05-02 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and apparatus for forwarding traffic between locality attached networks using level 3 addressing information |
US6493342B1 (en) * | 1998-09-11 | 2002-12-10 | Teledesic Llc | Method of data transmission in a data communication network |
US7103017B2 (en) * | 2001-01-30 | 2006-09-05 | Globecomm Systems Inc. | Techniques for implementing telephonic, fax, and/or data communications using internet protocols and satellite links |
-
1997
- 1997-10-08 US US08/947,015 patent/US6215776B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1998
- 1998-10-08 EP EP98954938A patent/EP1034636A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1998-10-08 WO PCT/US1998/020926 patent/WO1999018690A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2000
- 2000-12-19 US US09/739,329 patent/US6643273B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4991133A (en) | 1988-10-07 | 1991-02-05 | International Business Machines Corp. | Specialized communications processor for layered protocols |
US5142622A (en) | 1989-01-31 | 1992-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for interconnecting applications across different networks of data processing systems by mapping protocols across different network domains |
US5280480A (en) | 1991-02-21 | 1994-01-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Source routing transparent bridge |
US5625867A (en) * | 1991-10-01 | 1997-04-29 | Alcatel Espace | Method of handing off traffic in a low orbit satellite communication system serving terminals and communication system using a method of this kind |
US5408237A (en) * | 1991-11-08 | 1995-04-18 | Teledesic Corporation | Earth-fixed cell beam management for satellite communication system |
US5434852A (en) | 1993-06-25 | 1995-07-18 | At&T Corp. | Distributed processing architechture for control of broadband and narrowband communications networks |
US5485464A (en) * | 1993-10-21 | 1996-01-16 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Communication protocol for a high data rate satellite communication system |
US5600629A (en) | 1994-07-25 | 1997-02-04 | Motorola, Inc. | Inter-satellite method for routing packets |
US5581558A (en) | 1995-03-29 | 1996-12-03 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Apparatus for bridging non-compatible network architectures |
US5634190A (en) | 1995-06-06 | 1997-05-27 | Globalstar L.P. | Low earth orbit communication satellite gateway-to-gateway relay system |
US5732351A (en) * | 1995-08-31 | 1998-03-24 | Motorola, Inc. | Communication system and method for single channel hand-offs |
Cited By (93)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6501741B1 (en) * | 1998-01-28 | 2002-12-31 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. | Method supporting the quality of service of data transmission |
US6415329B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2002-07-02 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for improving efficiency of TCP/IP protocol over high delay-bandwidth network |
US7088694B1 (en) * | 1998-05-05 | 2006-08-08 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Transfer of overlapping routing area control information in a radio access network |
US6430167B1 (en) * | 1998-08-03 | 2002-08-06 | Trw Inc. | Method for transferring data over a satellite network by using unique beam identifiers to route the data |
US6968192B2 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2005-11-22 | Nokia Corporation | Cell load control method and system |
US20020052206A1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2002-05-02 | Fabio Longoni | Cell load control method and system |
US6985454B1 (en) * | 1999-01-26 | 2006-01-10 | Globalstar L.P. | ISP system using non-geosynchronous orbit satellites |
US6584083B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2003-06-24 | Mentat Inc. | Internet over satellite method |
US6529477B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2003-03-04 | Mentat Inc. | Internet over satellite system |
US6460085B1 (en) * | 1999-02-02 | 2002-10-01 | Mentat Inc. | Method and system for managing memory in an internet over satellite connection |
US6654344B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2003-11-25 | Mentat Inc. | Method and system for controlling data flow in an internet over satellite connection |
US20050232180A1 (en) * | 1999-02-02 | 2005-10-20 | Toporek Jerome D | Internet over satellite apparatus |
US7215954B1 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2007-05-08 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Resource allocation method for multi-platform communication system |
US7861000B2 (en) | 1999-03-30 | 2010-12-28 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dial-out link selection via static route redistribution |
US6839324B1 (en) | 1999-03-30 | 2005-01-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus providing dial on demand scaling |
US20040215820A1 (en) * | 1999-03-30 | 2004-10-28 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dial-out link selection via static route redistribution |
US20050083931A1 (en) * | 1999-03-30 | 2005-04-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus providing dial on demand scaling |
US6952403B2 (en) | 1999-03-30 | 2005-10-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus providing dial on demand scaling |
US6738824B1 (en) * | 1999-03-30 | 2004-05-18 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dial-out link selection via static route redistribution |
US6724737B1 (en) * | 1999-06-17 | 2004-04-20 | Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications, Inc | System for controlling communications between a terminal and satellite and method therefore |
US6691274B1 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2004-02-10 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for error correction in a communication system |
US7835733B1 (en) * | 1999-11-29 | 2010-11-16 | Thales | Satellite telecommunication system |
US8108542B2 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2012-01-31 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US8839298B2 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2014-09-16 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US20080022008A1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2008-01-24 | Connelly Jay H | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US7962573B2 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2011-06-14 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US20110093475A1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2011-04-21 | Connelly Jay H | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US7027769B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2006-04-11 | The Directv Group, Inc. | GEO stationary communications system with minimal delay |
US7200360B1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2007-04-03 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Communication system as a secondary platform with frequency reuse |
US6725013B1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2004-04-20 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Communication system having frequency reuse in non-blocking manner |
US6751458B1 (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2004-06-15 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Architecture utilizing frequency reuse in accommodating user-link and feeder-link transmissions |
US20050032545A1 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2005-02-10 | Chang Donald C. D. | Fixed wireless back haul for mobile communications using stratospheric platforms |
US6829479B1 (en) | 2000-07-14 | 2004-12-07 | The Directv Group. Inc. | Fixed wireless back haul for mobile communications using stratospheric platforms |
US20090149190A1 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2009-06-11 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Optimal load-based wireless session context transfer |
US7873365B2 (en) | 2000-07-27 | 2011-01-18 | Ipr Licensing, Inc. | Optimal load-based wireless session context transfer |
US7493122B2 (en) | 2000-07-27 | 2009-02-17 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Optimal load-based wireless session context transfer |
US20040259564A1 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2004-12-23 | Interdigital Communications Corp. | Optimal load-based wireless session context transfer |
US6816732B1 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2004-11-09 | Ipr Licensing, Inc. | Optimal load-based wireless session context transfer |
US6400696B1 (en) * | 2000-11-07 | 2002-06-04 | Space Systems/Loral, Inc. | Bent-pipe satellite system which couples a lan to a gateway and uses a dynamic assignment/multiple access protocol |
US20060178143A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2006-08-10 | Chang Donald C D | Communication system using multiple link terminals for aircraft |
US20020081969A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-06-27 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Communication system using multiple link terminals |
US20020072374A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-06-13 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Communication system using multiple link terminals |
US8396513B2 (en) | 2001-01-19 | 2013-03-12 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Communication system for mobile users using adaptive antenna |
US20020128045A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-09-12 | Chang Donald C. D. | Stratospheric platforms communication system using adaptive antennas |
US20020132643A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-09-19 | Chang Donald C.D. | Multiple basestation communication system having adaptive antennas |
US7929984B2 (en) | 2001-01-19 | 2011-04-19 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Multiple basestation communication system having adaptive antennas |
US7809403B2 (en) | 2001-01-19 | 2010-10-05 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Stratospheric platforms communication system using adaptive antennas |
US20090011789A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2009-01-08 | Chang Donald C D | Multiple basestation communication system having adaptive antennas |
US20020143591A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-03 | Connelly Jay H. | Method and apparatus for a hybrid content on demand broadcast system |
US7219132B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2007-05-15 | Space Systems/Loral | Dynamic resource allocation architecture for differentiated services over broadband communication networks |
US20020178263A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-11-28 | William Hreha | Dynamic resource allocation architecture for differentiated services over broadband communication networks |
US20070079324A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2007-04-05 | Hallford Jason C | Method and apparatus for combining broadcast schedules and content on a digital broadcast-enabled client platform |
US20030005465A1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2003-01-02 | Connelly Jay H. | Method and apparatus to send feedback from clients to a server in a content distribution broadcast system |
US20030053424A1 (en) * | 2001-08-07 | 2003-03-20 | Srikanth Krishnamurthy | Method and apparatus for determining position and trajectory of gateways to optimize performance in hybrid non-terrestrial-terrestrial multi-hop mobile networks |
US6807158B2 (en) * | 2001-08-07 | 2004-10-19 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Method and apparatus for determining position and trajectory of gateways to optimize performance in hybrid non-terrestrial-terrestrial multi-hop mobile networks |
US20030046708A1 (en) * | 2001-08-28 | 2003-03-06 | Jutzi Curtis E. | Error correction for regional and dynamic factors in communications |
US7047456B2 (en) * | 2001-08-28 | 2006-05-16 | Intel Corporation | Error correction for regional and dynamic factors in communications |
US20030061611A1 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2003-03-27 | Ramesh Pendakur | Notifying users of available content and content reception based on user profiles |
US8943540B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2015-01-27 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to provide a personalized channel |
US20030066090A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Brendan Traw | Method and apparatus to provide a personalized channel |
US6982964B2 (en) | 2001-10-15 | 2006-01-03 | Beering David R | High performance ECL-to-ATM protocol network gateway |
US20030079022A1 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2003-04-24 | Mentat Inc. | Multicast delivery systems and methods |
US7054902B2 (en) | 2001-10-23 | 2006-05-30 | Packeteer, Inc. | Multicast delivery systems and methods |
US8358971B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2013-01-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Satellite-based programmable allocation of bandwidth for forward and return links |
US20040097192A1 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2004-05-20 | Schiff Leonard N. | Satellite-based programmable allocation of bandwidth for forward and return links |
US20090051589A1 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2009-02-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Satellite communication system constituted with primary and back-up multi-beam satellites |
US8744344B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2014-06-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Satellite communication system constituted with primary and back-up multi-beam satellites |
US6950060B1 (en) | 2002-10-15 | 2005-09-27 | General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc. | Satellite positioning system |
US20050231378A1 (en) * | 2003-06-26 | 2005-10-20 | Oliver Young | Vehicle occupant sensing system having a low profile sensor assembly |
US7961665B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2011-06-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Terminal aware multicasting |
US8411572B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2013-04-02 | Viasat, Inc. | ACM and fixed coding and modulation of hierarchical layers |
US7944872B2 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2011-05-17 | Viasat, Inc. | Adaptive coding and modulation aware network load balancing |
US20090041100A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2009-02-12 | Viasat, Inc. | Link aware mobile data network |
US20100260259A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-10-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Acm and fixed coding and modulation of hierarchical layers |
US20100260254A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-10-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Multiple transmission paths for hierarchical layers |
US8358690B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2013-01-22 | Viasat, Inc. | Predictive adaptive coding and modulation |
US20100260045A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-10-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Video and data network load balancing with video placeholder |
US8395993B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2013-03-12 | Viasat, Inc. | Video and data network load balancing with video placeholder |
US20090073876A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2009-03-19 | Viasat, Inc. | Adaptive coding and modulation aware network load balancing |
US8411571B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2013-04-02 | Viasat, Inc. | Video and data network load balancing with video drop |
US20100260043A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-10-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Video and data network load balancing |
US8456986B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2013-06-04 | Viasat, Inc. | Video and data network load balancing |
US8576858B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2013-11-05 | Viasat, Inc. | Multiple transmission paths for hierarchical layers |
US20090060086A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2009-03-05 | Viasat, Inc. | Terminal aware multicasting |
US20090060033A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2009-03-05 | Viasat, Inc. | Predictive adaptive coding and modulation |
US20080144713A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-06-19 | Viasat, Inc. | Acm aware encoding systems and methods |
US9036716B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2015-05-19 | Viasat, Inc. | Link aware mobile data network |
US11570838B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2023-01-31 | Viasat, Inc. | Opportunistic progressive encoding |
US11083037B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2021-08-03 | Viasat, Inc. | Opportunistic progressive encoding |
US10470236B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2019-11-05 | Viasat, Inc. | Opportunistic progressive encoding |
US10381748B2 (en) * | 2016-03-29 | 2019-08-13 | Space Systems/Loral, Llc | Satellite system with handover for multiple gateways |
US20180006713A1 (en) * | 2016-03-29 | 2018-01-04 | Space Systems/Loral, Llc | Satellite system with handover for multiple gateways |
CN113179114A (en) * | 2021-04-16 | 2021-07-27 | 广州爱浦路网络技术有限公司 | Inter-satellite routing method for communication satellite, communication satellite and control device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6643273B2 (en) | 2003-11-04 |
WO1999018690A1 (en) | 1999-04-15 |
US20010000455A1 (en) | 2001-04-26 |
EP1034636A4 (en) | 2002-11-13 |
EP1034636A1 (en) | 2000-09-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6215776B1 (en) | Satellite communication system | |
US5365520A (en) | Dynamic signal routing | |
CA2142152C (en) | Method and apparatus for adaptive directed route randomization and distribution in a richly connected communication network | |
US5796715A (en) | Non-blocking dynamic fast packet switch for satellite communication system | |
US6404769B1 (en) | Directional routing of packets in a satellite network | |
US6985454B1 (en) | ISP system using non-geosynchronous orbit satellites | |
US7107050B2 (en) | Resource manager for a satellite telecommunication system | |
US5608721A (en) | Communications network and method which implement diversified routing | |
US5572512A (en) | Data routing method and apparatus for communication systems having multiple nodes | |
US6078577A (en) | System and method for packet data communication | |
US5499237A (en) | Waste canceling packet routing system and method | |
CN112019255B (en) | Transparent and processing mixed low-orbit inter-satellite networking communication system and method | |
US6301231B1 (en) | Satellite communication system with variable rate satellite link diversity | |
US6208625B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for increasing call-handling capacity using a multi-tier satellite network | |
CN113452432B (en) | Dynamic allocation method for downlink resources of multi-beam low-orbit satellite communication | |
US5752162A (en) | Methods for assigning subscriber units to visited gateways | |
US5860058A (en) | Method and apparatus for routing signals through a communication system having multiple destination nodes | |
Apollonio et al. | DTN LEO satellite communications through ground stations and GEO relays | |
EP0772322A2 (en) | System and methods of routing packets through a network with changing topology | |
MXPA01011464A (en) | Apparatus and method for efficient tdma bandwidth allocation for tcp ip satellite based networks. | |
WO1999039459A1 (en) | Connectionless satellite network | |
US5794120A (en) | Method and apparatus for default node operation in a multi-nodal communication system | |
JP2001177463A (en) | Satellite communication system utilizing un-stationary satellite | |
WO1999050976A1 (en) | System and method for sector-based routing | |
WO2024024051A1 (en) | Wireless communication system, communication route control device, communication route control method, and program for communication route control |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LOCKHEED MARTIN MISSILES AND SPACE COMPANY, CALIFO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CHAO, WILLIAM W.;REEL/FRAME:008844/0821 Effective date: 19971006 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |