US6231308B1 - Rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft - Google Patents

Rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6231308B1
US6231308B1 US08/925,526 US92552697A US6231308B1 US 6231308 B1 US6231308 B1 US 6231308B1 US 92552697 A US92552697 A US 92552697A US 6231308 B1 US6231308 B1 US 6231308B1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
distance
leading edge
blade
edge
outboard end
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
US08/925,526
Inventor
Natsuki Kondo
Tomoka Tsujiuchi
Eiichi Yamakawa
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Advanced Technology Institute of Commuter Helicopter Ltd
Original Assignee
Advanced Technology Institute of Commuter Helicopter Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Advanced Technology Institute of Commuter Helicopter Ltd filed Critical Advanced Technology Institute of Commuter Helicopter Ltd
Assigned to ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER-HELICOPTER, LTD. reassignment ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER-HELICOPTER, LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TSUJIUCHI, EIICHI YAMAKAWA
Assigned to ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF COMMUTER-HELICOPTER, LTD. reassignment ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF COMMUTER-HELICOPTER, LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TSUJIUCHI, TOMOKA, KONDO, NATSUKI, YAMAKAWA, EIICHI
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6231308B1 publication Critical patent/US6231308B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C27/00Rotorcraft; Rotors peculiar thereto
    • B64C27/32Rotors
    • B64C27/46Blades
    • B64C27/463Blade tips

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft such as a helicopter, and particularly to a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft having a special blade tip planform shape.
  • FIG. 8 is a view showing rotor aerodynamic environment of a helicopter in forward flight.
  • FIG. 8A when a helicopter 1 flying at forward speed V with a rotor having radius R which rotates at angular speed ⁇ , the relative airspeed varies significantly between an advancing blade where the angular speed ⁇ R of the rotor is added to the forward speed V and a retreating blade where the forward speed V is subtracted from the angular speed ⁇ R of the rotor.
  • the airspeed of the advancing blade reaches a maximum and the airspeed of the blade tip becomes ⁇ R+V.
  • a noise generated by the strong shock wave is called high-speed impulsive noise.
  • a phenomenon called delocalization in an ultrasonic region takes place at this time in a coordinate system viewed from the rotor blade which is in rotational motion. The shock wave generated is transmitted through the delocalized ultrasonic region over a great distance, making a high noise to be heard at a distance.
  • the angle of attack ⁇ of the blade becomes about 0° at the root end and about 4° at the tip end.
  • lift coefficient Cl and pitching moment coefficient Cm change rapidly, causing to violent vibration of the helicopter structure and a high fatigue load being applied to the pitch link.
  • Design items used for evaluating the characteristics of an advancing blade include high-speed impulsive noise and those for evaluating a retreating blade include maximum lift coefficient Clmax and stalling angle.
  • the maximum lift coefficient Clmax is defined as the maximum value of lift coefficient when the angle of attack ⁇ of a blade having a particular aerofoil section is just before the stalling angle.
  • a blade is considered to be better blade when the high-speed impulsive noise and the absolute value of pitching moment coefficient Cm are smaller, and the values of the maximum lift coefficient Clmax and stalling angle are greater. Applying the blade tip portion with a sweptback angle is an example of reducing high-speed impulsive noises.
  • the blade tip with the sweptback angle mitigates the shock wave and somewhat decreases the noises, though the delocalized supersonic region itself remains and the noise is still at a significant level. Moreover, in the case a large sweptback angle is given to the blade tip, blade tip stalling occurs at a smaller angle of attack, resulting in rapid change in the pitching moment coefficient Cm and a decrease in the maximum lift coefficient Clmax.
  • An objective of the invention is to provide a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft capable of eliminating delocalization in a supersonic region and reducing high-speed impulsive noises.
  • Another objective of the invention is to provide a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft capable of increasing a stalling angle to provide a good flight performance.
  • the invention provides a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft comprising:
  • a blade tip portion having a planform shape defined by a first leading edge extending forwardly as a distance from an outboard end of the leading edge of the central portion outwardly increases, a second leading edge which is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end of the first leading edge outwardly increases, a side edge and a trailing edge,
  • delocalization in the supersonic region can be eliminated and the high-speed impulsive noises can be greatly reduced.
  • a region where the speed of the air exceeds the speed of sound is generated at the forward area of the blade tip portion viewed from a rotating blade coordinate system, and moreover a steep air speed gradient in the supersonic region likely to cause large shock waves and the supersonic region tends to extend further and delocalized, with a result of high noises being easily transmitted over a great distance.
  • such an extension of the leading edge is provided as an apex of the extension or outboard end point P is located at 0.88 to 0.92 so that shock wave occurring at this position is mitigated and delocalization is eliminated, and therefore the high-speed impulsive noises can be reduced.
  • the invention also provides a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft comprising:
  • a blade tip portion having a planform shape defined by a first leading edge extending forwardly as a distance from an outboard end of the leading edge of the central portion outwardly increases, a second leading edge which is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end of the first leading edge outwardly increases, a side edge and a trailing edge,
  • trailing edge comprises a first trailing edge extending forwardly as a distance from the outboard end of the trailing edge of the central portion outwardly increases and a second trailing edge which is swept rearwardly increasingly as the distance from the outboard end of the first trailing edge outwardly increases.
  • providing the forward extension on the leading edge of the blade tip portion increases the stalling angle and the maximum lift coefficient Clmax, and making a forward extension in the trailing edge in correspondence to the forward extension on the leading edge makes it possible to have chord dimension of the blade tip portion nearly equal to the chord dimension of the central portion, thus preventing the blade performance from deteriorating due to smaller thickness to chord ratio in the portion provided with the forward extension.
  • This configuration greatly improves the flight performance.
  • FIG. 1 is a plan view showing an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a partially enlarged view of a rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1;
  • FIGS. 3A through 3D are plan views showing configurations of the rotor blade 10 and a comparative example
  • FIGS. 4A through 4C are equi-Mach number diagrams obtained through CFD analysis
  • FIGS. 5A through 5D are graphs showing variations of sound pressure in a far field on a blade tip portion of each blade, based on sound analysis
  • FIG. 6 is a graph showing angle of attack dependency of lift coefficient Cl of each blade
  • FIG. 7 is a graph showing angle of attack dependency of pitching moment coefficient Cm of each blade.
  • FIGS. 8A and 8B show aerodynamic environment of a helicopter rotor in forward flight.
  • FIG. 1 is a plan view showing an embodiment of the invention.
  • a rotor blade 10 is like a main wing which supports the weight of a helicopter by rotating, and has a root end 9 , a central portion 11 and a tip portion 12 .
  • the root end 9 is a member for attachment to a rotor head which drives the rotor blade 10 to rotate.
  • the central portion 11 is formed to extend linearly from the root end, and has a leading edge 21 and a trailing edge 22 which are parallel to each other.
  • a chord dimension C of the central portion 11 is defined by the distance between the leading edge 21 and the trailing edge 22 .
  • the central portion 11 has aerodynamic characteristics which are related to the leading edge 21 , the trailing edge 22 , chord dimension C.
  • planform shape of the blade an outline thereof will be described first by referring to FIG. 2, then the length of each portion and other properties will be described, followed by definition of the configuration by means of an equation.
  • FIG. 2 is a partially enlarged drawing of the rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1.
  • a tip portion 12 is formed on an end of the central portion 11 opposite to the root end 9 , with a planform shape being defined by a first leading edge 23 , a second leading edge 24 , a side edge 25 , a first trailing edge 26 and a second trailing edge 27 .
  • the first leading edge 23 extends forwardly as the distance from an outboard end P 1 of the leading edge 21 of the central portion end 11 outwardly increases, and extends to an outboard end P of the first leading edge 23 .
  • Outboard side here refers to the side of blade tip in Y direction (span direction) of the rotor blade 10 , and outboard end of the leading edge means the end point on the side of a blade end in the span direction of the rotor blade 10 .
  • the second leading edge 24 is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end P of the first leading edge 23 toward outboard side increases outwardly, and extends to the outboard end point P 3 of the second leading edge 24 .
  • the side edge 25 is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end P 3 of the second leading edge 24 toward outboard side increases outwardly, and extends to the trailing end point P 4 of the side edge 25 .
  • the first trailing edge 26 is curved forwardly as the distance from an outboard end P 5 of the trailing edge 22 of the central portion end 11 increases outwardly, and extends to an outboard end P 6 of the first trailing edge 26 .
  • the second trailing edge 27 is swept rearwardly increasingly toward outboard side to the trailing end point P 4 of the side edge 25 .
  • FIG. 2 are given dimensions of portions of the rotor blade 10 , normalized on the basis of the blade length R in Y direction and on the basis of the chord dimension C in X direction to facilitate embodying the invention as various sizes of helicopters.
  • a position of the extension on the leading edge or distance R1 in Y direction from the center of rotation to the outboard end P is set to satisfy the following conditional relationship in order to mitigate shock waves:
  • An amount of forward extension of the leading edge namely distance of the outboard end P from the leading edge 21 , is set to 25 to 35%C in order to suppress the generation of shock waves and prevent the nose-up pitching moment from increasing.
  • the notch in the trailing edge is located at a position corresponding to the forward extension of the leading edge, namely a distance from the outboard end P 6 of the first trailing edge 26 is set equal to distance R1, and the outboard end P 6 is located at a distance of 10 to 30%C from the trailing edge 22 .
  • distance R3 from the center of rotation to the outboard end P 3 in Y direction is set to 96%R
  • a chord dimension passing through the outboard end P 3 is set to approximately C
  • a rearwardly sweeping angle of the second leading edge 24 is set to 20° to 30°.
  • the side edge 25 is swept rearwardly at a steep angle of 60° to 75° from the outboard P 3 thereby tapering down the chord length toward the tip.
  • the outline which defines the planform shape described above includes curved sections smoothly joining with each other.
  • the planform shape of the rotor blade 10 includes curved sections defined by equations (2) through (11), where an origin of the XY coordinate system being at the center of rotation of the rotor, and a Y axis corresponding to the feathering axis L 1 .
  • An X axis is set such that positive values of X coordinates direct to the rearward side of the blade, and Y axis is set such that Y coordinates positively increase to the blade tip side.
  • the feathering axis refers to the axis around which the blade rotates as the angle of attack of the blade is changed.
  • X f represents the X-coordinate for a given y value of the forward portion of the rotor blade and where X r represents the X-coordinate for a given y value of the rear portion of the rotor blade.
  • the leading edge 21 is defined by a straight line represented by equation (2).
  • the first leading edge 23 is defined by equation (3), equation (4) and part of equation (5), which represent a part of circle, a straight line and a part of circle in order from the center of rotation of the rotor, respectively.
  • the second leading edge 24 is defined by a part of equation (5) and equation (6), which represent a part of circle and straight line, respectively.
  • the side edge 25 is defined by a parabola represented by equation (7).
  • the trailing edge 22 is defined by a straight line of equation (8).
  • the first trailing edge 26 is defined by a cubical curve represented by equation (9).
  • the second trailing edge 27 is defined by a cubical curve represented by equation (10) and a straight line represented by equation (11).
  • coordinates Xf, Xr and Y may include errors of about +3% introduced during the manufacturing process, and also the coordinates Xf, Xr and Y may be subject to errors of about +3% due to thermal deformation and other causes after manufacturing.
  • FIGS. 3A through 3D and FIGS. 4A through 4C the delocalization in the supersonic region will be described below.
  • FIGS. 3A through 3D are plan views showing the configurations of the rotor blade 10 and a rotor blade of an comparative example
  • FIGS. 4A through 4C are equi-Mach number diagrams obtained through CFD analysis.
  • the rotor blade 51 shown in FIG. 3A has a rectangular shape.
  • the rotor blade 52 shown in FIG. 3B has a leading edge of the tip portion swept rearwardly by a sweptback angle of 30°, while being tapered at a rate of 0.5.
  • the rotor blade 53 shown in FIG. 3C is a configuration described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,077,741, with the leading edge of the tip portion extending forwardly and being smoothly swept rearwardly toward the tip end.
  • FIG. 3D shows the rotor blade 10 , the same as that of FIGS. 1 and 2. In drawings that follow, the rotor blade 10 will be designated to as AT 1 .
  • a dashed line in FIG. 4 indicates the position where Mach number is 1, while the region enclosed by the dashed line is a supersonic region wherein Mach number is not less than 1.
  • FIGS. 5A through 5D are graphs showing results of analyzing variations of sound pressure in a far field away from each rotor blade ( 3 R from the center of rotation). Times (in seconds) are plotted along the axis of abscissa and sound pressures are plotted along the axis of ordinate.
  • the rotor blade 10 causes a less variation of sound pressure in the far field than the rotor blades 51 through 53 . This shows that the pressure variation originating from a shock wave generated on the blade is less likely to be transmitted over a distance in the case of the rotor blade 10 .
  • FIG. 6 is a graph showing angle of attack dependency of lift coefficient.
  • FIG. 7 is a graph showing angle of attack dependency of pitching moment coefficient. Angle of attack are plotted along the axis of abscissa (in degrees) and the values of the coefficients are plotted along the axis of ordinate. With the rotor blade 10 , the stalling angle and maximum lift coefficient Clmax are increased and rapid change in the pitching moment coefficient Cm is suppressed, as compared with the cases of the rotor blades 51 , 52 .

Abstract

The root end is attached to the rotor head for rotationally driving. The central portion has aerodynamic characteristics depending on the leading and trailing edges and which extend linearly from the root end in parallel to each other, and the chord dimension therebetween. A planform shape of the blade tip portion is defined by the first leading edge which extends forwardly as the distance from the outboard end of the leading edge of the central portion outwardly increases, the second leading edge and the side edge which are rearwardly swept as the distance from the outboard end of the first leading edge toward outboard side outwardly increases, the first trailing edge which is curved forwardly as the distance from an outboard end of the trailing edge of the central portion outwardly increases, and the second trailing edge which is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end point of the first trailing edge outwardly increases. This configuration makes it possible to eliminate the delocalization in the supersonic region and greatly reduce high-speed impulsive noises.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft such as a helicopter, and particularly to a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft having a special blade tip planform shape.
2. Description of the Related Art
FIG. 8 is a view showing rotor aerodynamic environment of a helicopter in forward flight. As shown in FIG. 8A, when a helicopter 1 flying at forward speed V with a rotor having radius R which rotates at angular speed Ω, the relative airspeed varies significantly between an advancing blade where the angular speed ΩR of the rotor is added to the forward speed V and a retreating blade where the forward speed V is subtracted from the angular speed ΩR of the rotor.
At a position where azimuth angle Ψ (angle measured counterclockwise from the rearward direction of the helicopter 1) equals to 90°, the airspeed of the advancing blade reaches a maximum and the airspeed of the blade tip becomes ΩR+V. At a position of azimuth angle Ψ=270°, on the other hand, the airspeed of the retreating blade reaches a minimum and the airspeed of the blade tip becomes ΩR−V. The airspeed of an intermediate portion of the blade takes a value obtained by proportional distribution of ΩR+V and ΩR−V. For example, when ΩR=795 km/h and V=278 km/h are assumed, the airspeed at a position of about 35% from the root end of the retreating blade becomes zero, as shown in FIG. 8A.
When a helicopter flies at high speed, in particular, the airspeed at a tip of an advancing blade reaches a transonic speed resulting in a strong shock wave. A noise generated by the strong shock wave is called high-speed impulsive noise. A phenomenon called delocalization in an ultrasonic region takes place at this time in a coordinate system viewed from the rotor blade which is in rotational motion. The shock wave generated is transmitted through the delocalized ultrasonic region over a great distance, making a high noise to be heard at a distance.
Since the airspeed of a retreating blade is significantly lowered, the angle of attack a of the blade must be greater in order to produce a lift similar to that of the advancing blade, and it is common to use a cyclic pitch control wherein the pitch angle of the blade is controlled in accordance to the azimuth angle Ψ. While the pitch angle of the blade is controlled by means of sine wave of which amplitude is minimum at azimuth angle Ψ=90° and maximum at azimuth angle Ψ=270°, the angle of attack α of the blade in this case varies in the direction of span as shown in FIG. 8B due to flapping of the blade itself. For example, when Ψ=90°, the angle of attack α of the blade becomes about 0° at the root end and about 4° at the tip end. When Ψ=270°, the angle of attack α of the blade becomes about 0° at the root end and about 16 to 18° at the tip end, thus exceeding the stalling angle. When the angle of attack α of the blade exceeds the stalling angle, lift coefficient Cl and pitching moment coefficient Cm change rapidly, causing to violent vibration of the helicopter structure and a high fatigue load being applied to the pitch link.
Design items used for evaluating the characteristics of an advancing blade include high-speed impulsive noise and those for evaluating a retreating blade include maximum lift coefficient Clmax and stalling angle. The maximum lift coefficient Clmax is defined as the maximum value of lift coefficient when the angle of attack α of a blade having a particular aerofoil section is just before the stalling angle. A blade is considered to be better blade when the high-speed impulsive noise and the absolute value of pitching moment coefficient Cm are smaller, and the values of the maximum lift coefficient Clmax and stalling angle are greater. Applying the blade tip portion with a sweptback angle is an example of reducing high-speed impulsive noises. The blade tip with the sweptback angle mitigates the shock wave and somewhat decreases the noises, though the delocalized supersonic region itself remains and the noise is still at a significant level. Moreover, in the case a large sweptback angle is given to the blade tip, blade tip stalling occurs at a smaller angle of attack, resulting in rapid change in the pitching moment coefficient Cm and a decrease in the maximum lift coefficient Clmax.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An objective of the invention is to provide a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft capable of eliminating delocalization in a supersonic region and reducing high-speed impulsive noises.
Another objective of the invention is to provide a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft capable of increasing a stalling angle to provide a good flight performance.
The invention provides a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft comprising:
a root end portion attached to a rotor head for rotationally driving,
a central portion having aerodynamic characteristics depending on leading and trailing edges linearly extending in parallel from the root end and a chord dimension therebetween, and
a blade tip portion having a planform shape defined by a first leading edge extending forwardly as a distance from an outboard end of the leading edge of the central portion outwardly increases, a second leading edge which is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end of the first leading edge outwardly increases, a side edge and a trailing edge,
wherein distance R1 from the center of rotation of the rotor to outboard end point P of the first leading edge normalized by the blade length satisfies the following conditional relationship (1):
0.88≦R1≦0.92   (1)
According to the invention, delocalization in the supersonic region can be eliminated and the high-speed impulsive noises can be greatly reduced. With a rectangular blade or a tapered blade of the prior art, a region where the speed of the air exceeds the speed of sound is generated at the forward area of the blade tip portion viewed from a rotating blade coordinate system, and moreover a steep air speed gradient in the supersonic region likely to cause large shock waves and the supersonic region tends to extend further and delocalized, with a result of high noises being easily transmitted over a great distance. According to the invention, in contrast, such an extension of the leading edge is provided as an apex of the extension or outboard end point P is located at 0.88 to 0.92 so that shock wave occurring at this position is mitigated and delocalization is eliminated, and therefore the high-speed impulsive noises can be reduced.
The invention also provides a rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft comprising:
a root end portion attached to a rotor head for rotationally driving,
a central portion having aerodynamic characteristics depending on leading and trailing edges linearly extending in parallel from the root end and a chord dimension therebetween, and
a blade tip portion having a planform shape defined by a first leading edge extending forwardly as a distance from an outboard end of the leading edge of the central portion outwardly increases, a second leading edge which is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end of the first leading edge outwardly increases, a side edge and a trailing edge,
wherein the trailing edge comprises a first trailing edge extending forwardly as a distance from the outboard end of the trailing edge of the central portion outwardly increases and a second trailing edge which is swept rearwardly increasingly as the distance from the outboard end of the first trailing edge outwardly increases.
According to the invention, providing the forward extension on the leading edge of the blade tip portion increases the stalling angle and the maximum lift coefficient Clmax, and making a forward extension in the trailing edge in correspondence to the forward extension on the leading edge makes it possible to have chord dimension of the blade tip portion nearly equal to the chord dimension of the central portion, thus preventing the blade performance from deteriorating due to smaller thickness to chord ratio in the portion provided with the forward extension. This configuration greatly improves the flight performance.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other and further objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be more explicit from the following detailed description taken with reference to the drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is a plan view showing an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a partially enlarged view of a rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1;
FIGS. 3A through 3D are plan views showing configurations of the rotor blade 10 and a comparative example;
FIGS. 4A through 4C are equi-Mach number diagrams obtained through CFD analysis;
FIGS. 5A through 5D are graphs showing variations of sound pressure in a far field on a blade tip portion of each blade, based on sound analysis;
FIG. 6 is a graph showing angle of attack dependency of lift coefficient Cl of each blade;
FIG. 7 is a graph showing angle of attack dependency of pitching moment coefficient Cm of each blade; and
FIGS. 8A and 8B show aerodynamic environment of a helicopter rotor in forward flight.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Now referring to the drawings, preferred embodiments of the invention are described below.
FIG. 1 is a plan view showing an embodiment of the invention. A rotor blade 10 is like a main wing which supports the weight of a helicopter by rotating, and has a root end 9, a central portion 11 and a tip portion 12. The root end 9 is a member for attachment to a rotor head which drives the rotor blade 10 to rotate. The central portion 11 is formed to extend linearly from the root end, and has a leading edge 21 and a trailing edge 22 which are parallel to each other. A chord dimension C of the central portion 11 is defined by the distance between the leading edge 21 and the trailing edge 22. The central portion 11 has aerodynamic characteristics which are related to the leading edge 21, the trailing edge 22, chord dimension C.
With regard to the planform shape of the blade, an outline thereof will be described first by referring to FIG. 2, then the length of each portion and other properties will be described, followed by definition of the configuration by means of an equation.
FIG. 2 is a partially enlarged drawing of the rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1. A tip portion 12 is formed on an end of the central portion 11 opposite to the root end 9, with a planform shape being defined by a first leading edge 23, a second leading edge 24, a side edge 25, a first trailing edge 26 and a second trailing edge 27. The first leading edge 23 extends forwardly as the distance from an outboard end P1 of the leading edge 21 of the central portion end 11 outwardly increases, and extends to an outboard end P of the first leading edge 23. Outboard side here refers to the side of blade tip in Y direction (span direction) of the rotor blade 10, and outboard end of the leading edge means the end point on the side of a blade end in the span direction of the rotor blade 10 .
The second leading edge 24 is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end P of the first leading edge 23 toward outboard side increases outwardly, and extends to the outboard end point P3 of the second leading edge 24. The side edge 25 is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end P3 of the second leading edge 24 toward outboard side increases outwardly, and extends to the trailing end point P4 of the side edge 25. The first trailing edge 26 is curved forwardly as the distance from an outboard end P5 of the trailing edge 22 of the central portion end 11 increases outwardly, and extends to an outboard end P6 of the first trailing edge 26. The second trailing edge 27 is swept rearwardly increasingly toward outboard side to the trailing end point P4 of the side edge 25.
In FIG. 2 are given dimensions of portions of the rotor blade 10, normalized on the basis of the blade length R in Y direction and on the basis of the chord dimension C in X direction to facilitate embodying the invention as various sizes of helicopters.
A position of the extension on the leading edge or distance R1 in Y direction from the center of rotation to the outboard end P is set to satisfy the following conditional relationship in order to mitigate shock waves:
88%R≦R1≦92%R   (1).
An amount of forward extension of the leading edge, namely distance of the outboard end P from the leading edge 21, is set to 25 to 35%C in order to suppress the generation of shock waves and prevent the nose-up pitching moment from increasing. Also in order to have a thickness to chord ratio as nearly the same that of the central portion end 11 as possible, the notch in the trailing edge is located at a position corresponding to the forward extension of the leading edge, namely a distance from the outboard end P6 of the first trailing edge 26 is set equal to distance R1, and the outboard end P6 is located at a distance of 10 to 30%C from the trailing edge 22. In order to cancel out the nose-up pitching moment caused by the forward extension of the leading edge, distance R3 from the center of rotation to the outboard end P3 in Y direction is set to 96%R, a chord dimension passing through the outboard end P3 is set to approximately C, and a rearwardly sweeping angle of the second leading edge 24 is set to 20° to 30°. Moreover, in order to suppress the delocalization in the supersonic region, the side edge 25 is swept rearwardly at a steep angle of 60° to 75° from the outboard P3 thereby tapering down the chord length toward the tip.
The outline which defines the planform shape described above includes curved sections smoothly joining with each other. In an XY plane, for example, the planform shape of the rotor blade 10 includes curved sections defined by equations (2) through (11), where an origin of the XY coordinate system being at the center of rotation of the rotor, and a Y axis corresponding to the feathering axis L1. An X axis is set such that positive values of X coordinates direct to the rearward side of the blade, and Y axis is set such that Y coordinates positively increase to the blade tip side. The feathering axis refers to the axis around which the blade rotates as the angle of attack of the blade is changed.
0≦Y<A1, Xf=B1   (2) A1 Y < A2 , Xf = B2 2 - ( Y - A1 ) 2 + B2 + B1 ( 3 )
Figure US06231308-20010515-M00001
A2≦Y<A3, Xf=tan(−60)(Y−A2)+B3+B1   (4) A3 Y < A4 , Xf = B2 2 - ( Y - A7 ) 2 + B4 + B1 ( 5 )
Figure US06231308-20010515-M00002
A4≦Y<A5, Xf=tan(20)(Y−A4)+B5+B1   (6)
A5≦Y≦A6, Xf=B6Y 2 +B7Y+B8+B1   (7)
0≦Y<A1, Xr=C1+B1   (8)
A1≦Y<A7, Xr=C2Y 3 +C3Y 2 +C4Y+C5+C1   (9)
A7≦Y<A5, Xr=C6Y 3 +C7Y 2 +C8Y+C9+B1   (10)
A5≦Y≦A6, Xr=tan(10)(Y−A5)+C10+B1   (11)
where Xf represents the X-coordinate for a given y value of the forward portion of the rotor blade and where Xr represents the X-coordinate for a given y value of the rear portion of the rotor blade.
The leading edge 21 is defined by a straight line represented by equation (2). The first leading edge 23 is defined by equation (3), equation (4) and part of equation (5), which represent a part of circle, a straight line and a part of circle in order from the center of rotation of the rotor, respectively. The second leading edge 24 is defined by a part of equation (5) and equation (6), which represent a part of circle and straight line, respectively. The side edge 25 is defined by a parabola represented by equation (7). The trailing edge 22 is defined by a straight line of equation (8). The first trailing edge 26 is defined by a cubical curve represented by equation (9). The second trailing edge 27 is defined by a cubical curve represented by equation (10) and a straight line represented by equation (11).
When the ratio of a blade length R to the chord dimension C is set to a constant value R/C=18.06685, for example, the constants become A1=0.895540185, A2=0.9030299516, A3=0.9060258583, A4=0.9164735648, A5=0.96540625, A6=1, A7=0.913515625, B1=0.0138335, B2=−0.0086484375, B3=−0.0043242188, B4=−0.0051890625, B5=−0.0133159354, B6=37.9362379432, B7=−72.8837907, B8=35.0100387877, C1=0.05535, C2=2382.4239404288, C3=−6464,9068069736, C4=5847.1112560, C5=−1762.5583891568, C6=−97.8796005419, C7=277.5612092703, C8=−262.0682683, C9=82.4414516986, and C10=0.0598441055.
When the constants are set as shown above, the position of each portion is represented by coordinates which assume R=1. When applying the configuration to particular aircraft, actual dimensions can be obtained by multiplying the above dimensions by the actual value of R.
Thus because the leading edge at the blade tip portion 12 extends forwardly with an apex located at a position of Y=91.3515625%R, delocalization in the supersonic region is eliminated and high-speed impulsive noises can be reduced. Furthermore, since the trailing edge of the blade tip portion 12 is recessed with the bottom of the recess located at a position of Y=91.3515625%R, rapid change in the pitching moment coefficient Cm can be suppressed while increasing the stalling angle and the maximum lift coefficient Clmax.
Even when the configuration is defined as described above, coordinates Xf, Xr and Y may include errors of about +3% introduced during the manufacturing process, and also the coordinates Xf, Xr and Y may be subject to errors of about +3% due to thermal deformation and other causes after manufacturing.
Now referring to FIGS. 3A through 3D and FIGS. 4A through 4C, the delocalization in the supersonic region will be described below.
FIGS. 3A through 3D are plan views showing the configurations of the rotor blade 10 and a rotor blade of an comparative example, and FIGS. 4A through 4C are equi-Mach number diagrams obtained through CFD analysis.
The rotor blade 51 shown in FIG. 3A has a rectangular shape. The rotor blade 52 shown in FIG. 3B has a leading edge of the tip portion swept rearwardly by a sweptback angle of 30°, while being tapered at a rate of 0.5. The rotor blade 53 shown in FIG. 3C is a configuration described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,077,741, with the leading edge of the tip portion extending forwardly and being smoothly swept rearwardly toward the tip end. FIG. 3D shows the rotor blade 10, the same as that of FIGS. 1 and 2. In drawings that follow, the rotor blade 10 will be designated to as AT1.
A dashed line in FIG. 4 indicates the position where Mach number is 1, while the region enclosed by the dashed line is a supersonic region wherein Mach number is not less than 1. With the rotor blade 51, as can be seen from FIG. 4A, the region located forward of the blade tip portion continually extends far away from the blade on the tip side. This is generally referred to as delocalization. With the rotor blade 52, as can be seen from FIG. 4B, Mach number is less than that of the rotor blade 51, but the region located forward of the blade tip portion still continually extends far away, with the supersonic region being delocalized. With the rotor blade 10, as can be seen from FIG. 4C, the region located forward of the blade tip portion is separated from the far field and the supersonic region is not delocalized.
FIGS. 5A through 5D are graphs showing results of analyzing variations of sound pressure in a far field away from each rotor blade (3R from the center of rotation). Times (in seconds) are plotted along the axis of abscissa and sound pressures are plotted along the axis of ordinate. The rotor blade 10 causes a less variation of sound pressure in the far field than the rotor blades 51 through 53. This shows that the pressure variation originating from a shock wave generated on the blade is less likely to be transmitted over a distance in the case of the rotor blade 10.
FIG. 6 is a graph showing angle of attack dependency of lift coefficient. FIG. 7 is a graph showing angle of attack dependency of pitching moment coefficient. Angle of attack are plotted along the axis of abscissa (in degrees) and the values of the coefficients are plotted along the axis of ordinate. With the rotor blade 10, the stalling angle and maximum lift coefficient Clmax are increased and rapid change in the pitching moment coefficient Cm is suppressed, as compared with the cases of the rotor blades 51, 52.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description and all changes which come within the meaning and the range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.

Claims (3)

What is claimed is:
1. A rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft having a rotor head, the rotor blade comprising:
a root end portion for attachment to the rotor head;
a central portion having aerodynamic characteristics depending on leading and trailing edges linearly extending in parallel from the root end and a chord dimension therebetween; and
a blade tip portion having a planform shape defined by a first leading edge extending forwardly as a distance from an outboard end of the leading edge of the central portion outwardly increases, a second leading edge which is swept rearwardly as a distance from the outboard end of the first leading edge outwardly increases, a side edge and trailing edges;
wherein the trailing edges of the blade tip portion include a first trailing edge extending forwardly as a distance from the outboard end of the trailing edge of the central portion outwardly increases, and a second trailing edge swept rearwardly as a distance from an outboard end of the first trailing edge outwardly increases, and distance R1 from the center of rotation of the rotor to outboard end point of the first leading edge normalized by the blade length satisfies the conditional relationship:
0.88≦R1≦0.92.
2. The rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft of claim 1, wherein:
the outboard end is located at a distance of 0.25C to 0.35C forwardly from the leading edge of the central portion, where C is the chord dimension;
the outboard end of the first trailing edge is located at a distance of 0.1C to 0.3C forwardly from the trailing edge of the central portion;
a sweptback angle of the second leading edge ranges from 20 degrees to 30 degrees; and
a sweptback angle of the side edge ranges from 60 degrees to 75 degrees.
3. A rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft having a rotor head, the rotor blade comprising:
a root end portion for attachment to the rotor head;
a central portion having aerodynamic characteristics depending on leading and trailing edges linearly extending in parallel from the root end and a chord dimension there between, and
a blade tip portion having a planform shape defined by a first leading edge extending forwardly as a distance from an outboard end of the leading edge of the central portion outwardly increases, a second leading edge which is swept rearwardly as the distance from the outboard end of the first leading edge outwardly increases, a side edge and trailing edges,
wherein the trailing edges comprises a first trailing edge extending forwardly as a distance from the outboard end of the trailing edge of the central portion outwardly increases and a second trailing edge which is swept rearwardly as a distance from an outboard end of the first trailing edge outwardly increases, and
when the center of rotation of the rotor blade is defined as an origin, a longitudinal direction of the rotor blade is set to a Y coordinate, a direction perpendicular to the Y coordinate is set to an X coordinate, and A1 to A7, B1 to B8, and C1 to C10 are constant, outlines of the forward side and rearward sides of the blade satisfy the following conditional relationships:
0≦Y<A1, Xf=B1 A1 Y < A2 , Xf = ( B2 2 - ( Y - A1 ) 2 + B2 + B1
Figure US06231308-20010515-M00003
A2≦Y<A3, Xf=tan(−60)(Y−A2)+B3+B1 A3 Y < A4 , Xf = ( B2 2 - ( Y - A7 ) 2 ) + B4 + B1
Figure US06231308-20010515-M00004
A4≦Y<A5, Xf=tan(20)(Y−A4)+B5+B1
A5≦Y≦A6, Xf=B6Y 2 +B7Y+B8+B1
0≦Y<A1, Xr=C1+B1
A1≦Y<A7, Xr=C2Y 3 +C3Y 2 +C4Y+C5+C1
A7≦Y<A5, Xr=C6Y 3 +C7Y 2 +C8Y+C9+B1
A5≦Y≦A6, Xr=tan(10)(Y−A5)+C10+B1.
US08/925,526 1997-03-24 1997-09-08 Rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft Expired - Fee Related US6231308B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP07021497A JP3170470B2 (en) 1997-03-24 1997-03-24 Rotor blades for rotary wing aircraft
JP9-070214 1997-03-24

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US6231308B1 true US6231308B1 (en) 2001-05-15

Family

ID=13425067

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/925,526 Expired - Fee Related US6231308B1 (en) 1997-03-24 1997-09-08 Rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US6231308B1 (en)
EP (1) EP0867363A3 (en)
JP (1) JP3170470B2 (en)

Cited By (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6497385B1 (en) 2000-11-08 2002-12-24 Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Rotor blade with optimized twist distribution
US6666648B2 (en) 2002-05-17 2003-12-23 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Directional elastomeric coupler
US20040042901A1 (en) * 2002-08-30 2004-03-04 Carter Jay W. Extreme mu rotor
US6769872B2 (en) 2002-05-17 2004-08-03 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Active control of multi-element rotor blade airfoils
US20050013694A1 (en) * 2003-07-16 2005-01-20 Kovalsky David A. Rotor blade tip section
US6932569B2 (en) 2002-05-17 2005-08-23 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Active control of multi-element rotor blade airfoils
US20050281676A1 (en) * 2004-06-16 2005-12-22 Egolf Thomas A Multi-hedral rotary wing
US20060038058A1 (en) * 2004-08-23 2006-02-23 Routery Edward E Active control of airfoils
US20060104812A1 (en) * 2004-11-18 2006-05-18 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Mission replaceable rotor blade tip section
WO2008091299A2 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-07-31 Abe Karem High performance outboard section for rotor blades
US20090148301A1 (en) * 2007-12-10 2009-06-11 Leahy Kevin P Main rotor blade with removable tip cap
US20090252604A1 (en) * 2008-04-02 2009-10-08 Alexander Eric J Thermal management system for a gas turbine engine
CN101585413A (en) * 2008-05-22 2009-11-25 阿古斯塔公司 Helicopter antitorque tail rotor blade
US20120237354A1 (en) * 2010-12-02 2012-09-20 Alan Brocklehurst Aerofoil
US20120251326A1 (en) * 2011-03-31 2012-10-04 Eurocopter Deutschland Gmbh Noise and performance improved rotor blade for a helicopter
US20140326826A1 (en) * 2013-05-03 2014-11-06 Airbus Helicopters Ducted rotor for an aircraft and a rotorcraft
RU2603710C1 (en) * 2015-08-24 2016-11-27 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Центральный аэрогидродинамический институт имени профессора Н.Е. Жуковского" (ФГУП "ЦАГИ") Rotary-winged aircraft propeller blade
US9630704B2 (en) 2011-09-29 2017-04-25 Snecma Blade for a fan of a turbomachine, notably of the unducted fan type, corresponding fan and corresponding turbomachine
US10106247B2 (en) 2011-06-09 2018-10-23 Aviation Partners, Inc. Split blended winglet
US10232934B2 (en) * 2008-06-20 2019-03-19 Aviation Partners, Inc. Wing tip with optimum loading
US10252793B2 (en) * 2008-06-20 2019-04-09 Aviation Partners, Inc. Split blended winglet
US10370086B2 (en) * 2014-02-05 2019-08-06 Safran Aircraft Engines Blade for a turbine engine propeller, in particular a propfan engine, propeller, and turbine engine comprising such a blade
US10899440B2 (en) * 2017-03-09 2021-01-26 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Rotor blade tip design for improved hover and cruise performance
US11279469B2 (en) * 2016-07-12 2022-03-22 The Aircraft Performance Company Gmbh Airplane wing
US11427307B2 (en) * 2018-01-15 2022-08-30 The Aircraft Performance Company Gmbh Airplane wing
DE102009025843B4 (en) 2009-05-19 2022-11-17 Kronen Gmbh Device and method for separating plant parts

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3822105A (en) * 1971-09-22 1974-07-02 United Aircraft Corp Helicopter blade
US4077741A (en) * 1975-05-19 1978-03-07 Westland Aircraft Limited Helicopter rotor blades
JPS56149297A (en) * 1980-03-28 1981-11-19 Westland Aircraft Ltd Rotor blade for helicopter
JPH0260898A (en) * 1988-07-05 1990-03-01 Westland Helicopters Ltd Rotor-blade for helicopter, main-rotor for helicopter and helicopter
EP0518598A1 (en) * 1991-06-14 1992-12-16 Westland Helicopters Limited Helicopter rotor blades
US5174721A (en) * 1990-10-13 1992-12-29 Westland Helicopters Limited Helicopter rotor blades
US5199851A (en) * 1990-10-24 1993-04-06 Westland Helicopters Ltd. Helicopter rotor blades
US5205715A (en) * 1990-10-13 1993-04-27 Westland Helicopters, Ltd. Helicopter rotor blades
US5320494A (en) * 1992-12-22 1994-06-14 United Technologies Corporation Helicopter rotor blade having a replaceable anhedral tip

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5584661A (en) * 1994-05-02 1996-12-17 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Forward sweep, low noise rotor blade

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3822105A (en) * 1971-09-22 1974-07-02 United Aircraft Corp Helicopter blade
US4077741A (en) * 1975-05-19 1978-03-07 Westland Aircraft Limited Helicopter rotor blades
GB1538055A (en) * 1975-05-19 1979-01-10 Westland Aircraft Ltd Helicopter rotor blades
JPS56149297A (en) * 1980-03-28 1981-11-19 Westland Aircraft Ltd Rotor blade for helicopter
US4427344A (en) * 1980-03-28 1984-01-24 Westland Aircraft, Ltd. Helicopter rotor blade
US4975022A (en) * 1988-07-05 1990-12-04 Westland Helicopter Limited Helicopter rotor blades
JPH0260898A (en) * 1988-07-05 1990-03-01 Westland Helicopters Ltd Rotor-blade for helicopter, main-rotor for helicopter and helicopter
US5174721A (en) * 1990-10-13 1992-12-29 Westland Helicopters Limited Helicopter rotor blades
US5205715A (en) * 1990-10-13 1993-04-27 Westland Helicopters, Ltd. Helicopter rotor blades
US5199851A (en) * 1990-10-24 1993-04-06 Westland Helicopters Ltd. Helicopter rotor blades
EP0518598A1 (en) * 1991-06-14 1992-12-16 Westland Helicopters Limited Helicopter rotor blades
JPH05170186A (en) * 1991-06-14 1993-07-09 Westland Helicopters Ltd Rotor blade for helicopter
US5246344A (en) * 1991-06-14 1993-09-21 Westland Helicopters Limited Helicopter rotor blade with improved performance characteristics
US5320494A (en) * 1992-12-22 1994-06-14 United Technologies Corporation Helicopter rotor blade having a replaceable anhedral tip

Cited By (50)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6497385B1 (en) 2000-11-08 2002-12-24 Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Rotor blade with optimized twist distribution
US6666648B2 (en) 2002-05-17 2003-12-23 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Directional elastomeric coupler
US6769872B2 (en) 2002-05-17 2004-08-03 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Active control of multi-element rotor blade airfoils
US6932569B2 (en) 2002-05-17 2005-08-23 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Active control of multi-element rotor blade airfoils
US6986642B2 (en) * 2002-08-30 2006-01-17 Cartercopters, L.L.C. Extreme mu rotor
US20040042901A1 (en) * 2002-08-30 2004-03-04 Carter Jay W. Extreme mu rotor
US6976829B2 (en) 2003-07-16 2005-12-20 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Rotor blade tip section
US20050013694A1 (en) * 2003-07-16 2005-01-20 Kovalsky David A. Rotor blade tip section
US20050281676A1 (en) * 2004-06-16 2005-12-22 Egolf Thomas A Multi-hedral rotary wing
US20060038058A1 (en) * 2004-08-23 2006-02-23 Routery Edward E Active control of airfoils
US20060104812A1 (en) * 2004-11-18 2006-05-18 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Mission replaceable rotor blade tip section
US7246998B2 (en) 2004-11-18 2007-07-24 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Mission replaceable rotor blade tip section
US20100272576A1 (en) * 2005-08-15 2010-10-28 Abe Karem High performance outboard section for rotor blades
US8128376B2 (en) 2005-08-15 2012-03-06 Abe Karem High performance outboard section for rotor blades
WO2008091299A2 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-07-31 Abe Karem High performance outboard section for rotor blades
WO2008091299A3 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-10-09 Abe Karem High performance outboard section for rotor blades
US7762785B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2010-07-27 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Main rotor blade with integral tip section
US7758312B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2010-07-20 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Main rotor blade with integral tip section
US7771173B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2010-08-10 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Main rotor blade with removable tip cap
US20090148301A1 (en) * 2007-12-10 2009-06-11 Leahy Kevin P Main rotor blade with removable tip cap
US20090148302A1 (en) * 2007-12-10 2009-06-11 Leahy Kevin P Main rotor blade with integral tip section
US20090148303A1 (en) * 2007-12-10 2009-06-11 Leahy Kevin P Main rotor blade with integral tip section
US20090252604A1 (en) * 2008-04-02 2009-10-08 Alexander Eric J Thermal management system for a gas turbine engine
US8262344B2 (en) 2008-04-02 2012-09-11 Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Thermal management system for a gas turbine engine
CN101585413A (en) * 2008-05-22 2009-11-25 阿古斯塔公司 Helicopter antitorque tail rotor blade
US20100092299A1 (en) * 2008-05-22 2010-04-15 Agusta S.P.A. Helicopter antitorque tail rotor blade
CN101585413B (en) * 2008-05-22 2014-01-08 阿古斯塔公司 Helicopter antitorque tail rotor blade
US8210818B2 (en) * 2008-05-22 2012-07-03 Agusta S.P.A. Helicopter antitorque tail rotor blade
US10252793B2 (en) * 2008-06-20 2019-04-09 Aviation Partners, Inc. Split blended winglet
US11511851B2 (en) * 2008-06-20 2022-11-29 Aviation Partners, Inc. Wing tip with optimum loading
US10589846B2 (en) * 2008-06-20 2020-03-17 Aviation Partners, Inc. Split blended winglet
US20190233089A1 (en) * 2008-06-20 2019-08-01 Aviation Partners, Inc. Split Blended Winglet
US10232934B2 (en) * 2008-06-20 2019-03-19 Aviation Partners, Inc. Wing tip with optimum loading
DE102009025843B4 (en) 2009-05-19 2022-11-17 Kronen Gmbh Device and method for separating plant parts
US20120237354A1 (en) * 2010-12-02 2012-09-20 Alan Brocklehurst Aerofoil
RU2513355C2 (en) * 2010-12-02 2014-04-20 ВЕСТЛАНД ХЕЛИКОПТЕР Лимитид Airfoil
US9085359B2 (en) * 2010-12-02 2015-07-21 Agustawestland Limited Rotor blade tip planform
US9061758B2 (en) * 2011-03-31 2015-06-23 Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Noise and performance improved rotor blade for a helicopter
US20120251326A1 (en) * 2011-03-31 2012-10-04 Eurocopter Deutschland Gmbh Noise and performance improved rotor blade for a helicopter
US10787246B2 (en) * 2011-06-09 2020-09-29 Aviation Partners, Inc. Wing tip with winglet and ventral fin
US10106247B2 (en) 2011-06-09 2018-10-23 Aviation Partners, Inc. Split blended winglet
US10377472B2 (en) * 2011-06-09 2019-08-13 Aviation Partners, Inc. Wing tip with winglet and ventral fin
US9630704B2 (en) 2011-09-29 2017-04-25 Snecma Blade for a fan of a turbomachine, notably of the unducted fan type, corresponding fan and corresponding turbomachine
US9302769B2 (en) * 2013-05-03 2016-04-05 Airbus Helicopters Ducted rotor for an aircraft and a rotorcraft
US20140326826A1 (en) * 2013-05-03 2014-11-06 Airbus Helicopters Ducted rotor for an aircraft and a rotorcraft
US10370086B2 (en) * 2014-02-05 2019-08-06 Safran Aircraft Engines Blade for a turbine engine propeller, in particular a propfan engine, propeller, and turbine engine comprising such a blade
RU2603710C1 (en) * 2015-08-24 2016-11-27 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Центральный аэрогидродинамический институт имени профессора Н.Е. Жуковского" (ФГУП "ЦАГИ") Rotary-winged aircraft propeller blade
US11279469B2 (en) * 2016-07-12 2022-03-22 The Aircraft Performance Company Gmbh Airplane wing
US10899440B2 (en) * 2017-03-09 2021-01-26 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Rotor blade tip design for improved hover and cruise performance
US11427307B2 (en) * 2018-01-15 2022-08-30 The Aircraft Performance Company Gmbh Airplane wing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0867363A2 (en) 1998-09-30
EP0867363A3 (en) 1999-06-02
JPH10264896A (en) 1998-10-06
JP3170470B2 (en) 2001-05-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6231308B1 (en) Rotor blade for rotary wing aircraft
US6190132B1 (en) Rotor blade for rotorcraft
JP2624785B2 (en) Aircraft rotor blades
US6168383B1 (en) Rotor blade for rotary-wing aircraft
US6361279B1 (en) Blade profile for aircraft rotor and rotor comprising same
RU2139811C1 (en) Blade with swept tip for rotating lifting surface of flying vehicle
US4248572A (en) Helicopter blade
JP2633413B2 (en) Rotor blades of rotary wing aircraft
CA2759909C (en) Aerofoil
US9061758B2 (en) Noise and performance improved rotor blade for a helicopter
JPH06305492A (en) Rotor blade
JPH036039B2 (en)
JPS62299466A (en) Propeller
JP2620087B2 (en) Rotary wing aircraft blade
US5961290A (en) Helicopter blade aerofoil
JP3051398B1 (en) Helicopter blade airfoil and helicopter blade
EP0518598B1 (en) Helicopter rotor blades
US2532753A (en) Transonic airfoil design
US5957662A (en) helicopter blade aerofoil
US6164918A (en) Helicopter blade aerofoil
US20050265850A1 (en) Rotor blade for helicopter
JP2002308192A (en) Rotor blade for rotor craft
JP2000118499A (en) Rotor blade for rotary wing plane
CN116443245B (en) Supercritical rotor wing profile with obviously improved high-speed characteristics based on forward blade concept
JP3722961B2 (en) Rotor blade of rotorcraft

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER-HELICOPT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TSUJIUCHI, EIICHI YAMAKAWA;REEL/FRAME:009073/0451

Effective date: 19971224

AS Assignment

Owner name: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF COMMUTER-HELICOPT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KONDO, NATSUKI;TSUJIUCHI, TOMOKA;YAMAKAWA, EIICHI;REEL/FRAME:009717/0207;SIGNING DATES FROM 19971224 TO 19971227

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20050515