Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS6252544 B1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 09/236,184
Publication dateJun 26, 2001
Filing dateJan 25, 1999
Priority dateJan 27, 1998
Fee statusPaid
Also published asUS6429812, US6791472
Publication number09236184, 236184, US 6252544 B1, US 6252544B1, US-B1-6252544, US6252544 B1, US6252544B1
InventorsSteven M. Hoffberg
Original AssigneeSteven M. Hoffberg
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Mobile communication device
US 6252544 B1
A mobile communications device comprising a location sensing system, producing a location output; a memory, storing a set of locations and associated events; a telecommunications device, communicating event and location information between a remote system and said memory; and a processor, processing said location output in conjunction with said stored locations and associated events in said memory, to determine a priority thereof.
Previous page
Next page
What is claimed is:
1. A mobile device, comprising:
an environmental sensor input, receiving a signal indicative of an environmental status;
a position detection input, for receiving a position of said mobile device;
a memory, storing a set of positions of said mobile device at which said environmental status is sensed; and
a processor, producing an output of said sensed environmental statuses, in a process dependent on said stored set of positions at which said environmental status is sensed, said sensed environmental status, and said detected position of said mobile device.
2. The device according to claim 1, wherein said environmental sensor input receives a selectively detected electromagnetic emission.
3. The device according to claim 1, further comprising a manual input, said manual input being stored in said memory in relation to position information.
4. The device according to claim 1, wherein said environmental status is selected from one or more of the group consisting of a radar band emission, an optical emission, an image, a temperature, a velocity, a traffic condition, a weather condition, a selected type of vehicle, a road condition, a hazard, and a designated location.
5. The device according to claim 1, wherein said processor responds to an authorization code, said authorization code being unique for said mobile device, wherein said authorization code controls an availability of least a portion of the functions of said mobile device.
6. The device according to claim 1, further comprising a telecommunications subsystem, communicating environmental status and location information between a remote system and said memory.
7. The device according to claim 6, wherein at least one of said position detection input and said telecommunications subsystem shares radio frequency components with a cellular telephone system.
8. The device according to claim 6, wherein said telecommunications subsystem receives environmental status and position information from said remote system.
9. The device according to claim 6, wherein said telecommunications subsystem transmits environmental status and position information to said remote system.
10. The device according to claim 6, wherein a data path between said remote system and said telecommunications subsystem comprises a wired terrestrial network.
11. The device according to claim 6, wherein said telecommunications subsystem comprises a spread spectrum radio frequency communications system.
12. The device according to claim 6, wherein said telecommunications subsystem is a radio frequency communications system operating in a band selected from the 900 MHz, 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands.
13. The device according to claim 6, wherein said telecommunications subsystem is a radio frequency communications system operating in the range 50-450 MHz.
14. The device according to claim 6, wherein said memory stores an identification of an origin of stored information.
15. The device according to claim 6, wherein said telecommunications subsystem communicates a message intelligible to a human.
16. The device according to claim 6, wherein said telecommunications subsystem communicates using a protocol adaptive to one or more parameters selected from the group consisting of transmit power, data rate, data packet format, error detection scheme, error correction scheme, bandwidth allocation, modulation scheme, and encoding scheme.
17. The device according to claim 6, wherein said telecommunications subsystem transmits a signal encrypted using a public key-private key cipher.
18. The device according to claim 6, wherein said telecommunications subsystem first establishes communications with said remote system through a common control channel, and then switches to a private channel.
19. The device according to claim 6, further comprising a remote system, said remote system comprising:
a second memory, storing a set of positions and associated environmental statuses;
a second telecommunications subsystem, communicating event and location information with said communications subsystem between said mobile device and said second memory; and
a second processor, processing said position of said mobile device in conjunction with said stored positions and associated environmental statuses stored in said second memory, to determine a priority thereof.
20. The device according to claim 1, wherein said memory is adapted to store a chronological parameter associated with a status.
21. The device according to claim 20, wherein said chronological parameter is selected from one or more of the group consisting of time of detection of event, time of expiration of event, time of logging of event to memory, periodic variations in event, statistical mean time of expected recurrence of event, and time for presentation of event related information to user.
22. The device according to claim 21, wherein said processor prioritizes a plurality of environmental statuses based on a respective proximity of a stored position to a position of said mobile device.
23. The device according to claim 1, wherein said environmental sensor input receives signals indicative of a plurality of types of environmental status, and said processor prioritizes based on a type of status.
24. The device according to claim 22, wherein said processor prioritizes based on a prospective conjunction of a position of the mobile device with a stored location.
25. The device according to claim 22, wherein said environmental sensor input receives signals indicative of a plurality of types of environmental status, and said processor prioritizes based on a type of status.
26. The device according to claim 22, wherein said processor prioritizes based on a spatial-temporal proximity of a stored position to a set of loci defined by an itinerary.
27. The device according to claim 1, wherein said position detection input receives an output from a GPS receiver.
28. The device according to claim 1, wherein said position detection input comprises an output from a geographical mapping system.
29. A mobile, comprising:
means for detecting an environmental event proximate to said mobile device;
means for detecting a location of said mobile device;
means for storing a set of environmental event and associated detection locations; and
means for producing an output of said stored environmental events, dependent on said detected location, said associated detection locations, and said environmental event.
30. A method, comprising the steps of:
detecting a location of a mobile device;
detecting an environmental event proximate to the mobile device;
storing a set of environmental event and associated detection locations; and
producing an output of the stored environmental events, dependent on the detected location, and the associated detection locations, and the stored environmental events.
31. The device according to claim 1, wherein said environmental status comprises information relating to a commercial establishment.
32. A mobile device, comprising:
means for detecting an environmental event proximate to said mobile device;
means for detecting a location of said mobile device;
means for storing a set of environmental event and associated detection locations; and
means for producing an output of said stored environmental events, dependent on said detected location and said associated detection locations.
33. The method according to claim 30, wherein said producing step outputs said sensed environmental statuses in anticipation of a proximity thereto.
34. The method according to claim 30, wherein said producing step determines an anticipated path of said mobile device and outputs said sensed environmental statuses in further dependence on said anticipated path.
35. The method according to claim 30, wherein said producing step prioritizes an output of a plurality of said sensed environmental statuses based on a respective distance from said mobile device, an anticipated path of said mobile device, and a classification of a respective environmental status.
36. The method according to claim 30, further comprising the step of limiting operation of the mobile device according to a subscription.
37. The mobile device according to claim 1, wherein said processor outputs said sensed environmental statuses in anticipation of a proximity thereto.
38. The mobile device according to claim 1, wherein said processor determines an anticipated path of said mobile device and outputs said sensed environmental statuses in further dependence on said anticipated path.
39. The mobile device according to claim 1, wherein said processor prioritizes an output of a plurality of said sensed environmental statuses based on a respective distance from said mobile device, an anticipated path of said mobile device, and a classification of a respective environmental status.
40. The mobile device according to claim 1, wherein said processor communicates environmental status and position information through a cellular radio communication system with a server.
41. The mobile device according to claim 29, wherein said producing means outputs said sensed environmental statuses in anticipation of a proximity thereto.
42. The mobile device according to claim 29, wherein said producing means determines an anticipated path of said mobile device and outputs said sensed environmental statuses in further dependence on said anticipated path.
43. The mobile device according to claim 29, wherein said producing means prioritizes an output of a plurality of said sensed environmental statuses based on a respective distance from said mobile device, an anticipated path of said mobile device, and a classification of a respective environmental status.

The present application claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/072,757, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.


The present invention relates to the field of communications devices, and more particularly to mobile telecommunications devices having position detection and event storage memory.


A number of devices are known which provide mobile telecommunication capabilities. Further, known position detection systems employ the known Global Positioning System (GPS), Global Orbiting Navigational System (GLONASS), Loran, RF triangulation, inertial frame reference and Cellular Telephone base site, e.g., time difference of arrival (TDOA) or nearest antenna proximity systems. Known GPS mobile systems include memory to record location, time and event type, and some systems may be integrated with global information systems, to track path, speed, etc. Known Differential GPS (DGPS) systems include mobile telecommunication functionality to communicate between distant units, typically to allow very precise relative position measurements, in the presence of substantial absolute position errors, or to calibrate the position of a mobile transceiver based on a relative position with respect to a fixed transceiver having a known location. These systems do not typically intercommunicate event information between units. Thus, the communications streams relate to position information only. However, known weather balloon transceiver systems, for example, do transmit both position and weather information to a base station.

Many electronic location determination systems are available, or have been proposed, to provide location information to a user equipped with a location determination receiver. Groundbased location determination systems, such as Loran, Omega, TACAN, Decca, U.S. Airforce Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS Relnav), or U.S. Army Position Location and Reporting System (PLRS), use the intersection of hyperbolic surfaces to provide location information. A representative ground system is LORAN-C discussed in LORAN-C User Handbook, Department of Transportation, U.S. Coast Guard, Commandant Instruction M16562.3, May 1990, which is incorporated by reference herein. LORAN-C provides a typical location accuracy of approximately 400 meters. A limitation of a LORAN-C location determination system is that not all locations in the northern hemisphere, and no locations in the southern hemisphere, are covered by LORAN-C. A second limitation of LORAN-C is that the typical accuracy of approximately 400 meters is insufficient for many applications. A third limitation of LORAN-C is that weather, local electronic signal interference, poor crossing angles, closely spaced time difference hyperbolas, and skywaves (multipath interference) frequently cause the accuracy to be significantly worse than 400 meters.

Other ground-based location determination devices use systems that were developed primarily for communications, such as cellular telephone, FM broadcast, and AM broadcast. Some cellular telephone systems provide estimates of location, using comparison of signal strengths from three or more sources. FM broadcast systems having subcarrier signals can provide estimates of location by measuring the phases of the subcarrier signals. Kelley et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,173,710 disclose a system that allows determination of a location of a vehicle. FM subcarrier signals are received from three FM radio stations with known locations but unknown relative phases by signal processors at the vehicle as well as at a fixed station having a known location. The fixed station processor determines the relative phase of the signals transmitted by the three FM radio stations and transmits the relative phase information to the vehicle. The vehicle processor determines its location from the FM subcarrier signal phases and from the relative phase information it receives. A limitation of cellular systems and FM subcarrier systems for location determination is that they are limited to small regions, with diameters of the order of 20-50 km.

Satellite-based location determination systems such as GPS and GLONASS, use the intersection of spherical surface areas to provide location information with a typical (selective availability) accuracy of 100 meters, anywhere on or near the surface of the earth. These systems may also be used to obtain positional accuracies within 1 centimeter. The satellite-based location determination systems include satellites having signal transmitters to broadcast location information and control stations on earth to track and control the satellites. Location determination receivers process the signals transmitted from the satellites and provide location information to the user.

The Global Positioning System (GPS) is part of a satellite navigation system developed by the United States Defense Department under its NAVSTAR satellite program. A fully operational GPS includes up to 24 satellites approximately uniformly dispersed around six circular orbits with four satellites each, the orbits being inclined at an angle of 55°, relative to the equator, and being separated from each other by multiples of 60° longitude. The orbits have radii of 26,560 kilometers and are approximately circular. The orbits are non-geosynchronous, with 0.5 sidereal day (11.967 hours) orbital time intervals, so that the satellites move with time, relative to the Earth below. Theoretically, four or more GPS satellites will have line of sight to most points on the Earth's surface, and line of sight access to three or more such satellites can be used to determine an observer's position anywhere on the Earth's surface, 24 hours per day. Each satellite carries a cesium or rubidium atomic clock to provide timing information for the signals transmitted by the satellites. Internal clock correction is provided for each satellite clock.

A second configuration for global positioning is GLONASS, placed in orbit by the former Soviet Union and now maintained by the Russian Republic. GLONASS also uses 24 satellites, distributed approximately uniformly in three orbital planes of eight satellites each. Each orbital plane has a nominal inclination of 64.8° relative to the equator, and the three orbital planes are separated from each other by multiples of 120° longitude. The GLONASS circular orbits have smaller radii, about 25,510 kilometers, and a satellite period of revolution of {fraction (8/17)} of a sidereal day (11.26 hours). A GLONASS satellite and a GPS satellite will thus complete 17 and 16 revolutions, respectively, around the Earth every 8 sidereal days. The signal frequencies of both GPS and GLONASS are in L-band (1 to 2 GHz).

Because the signals from the satellites pass through the troposphere for only a short distance, the accuracy of satellite location determination systems such as GPS or GLONASS is largely unaffected by weather or local anomalies. A limitation of GLONASS is that it is not clear that the Russian Republic has the resources to complete and to maintain the system for full world wide 24 hour coverage.

The inherent accuracy of the GPS position measured by a commercial GPS receiver is approximately 20 meters. However, the United States Government currently intentionally degrades the accuracy of GPS computed positions for commercial users with Selective Availability, SA. With SA, the GPS position accuracy of a commercial GPS receiver is approximately 100 meters. However, higher accuracy is available with the use of secret decryption codes.

Differential Global Positioning System, DGPS, is a technique for enhancing the accuracy of the GPS position, and of course may be applied to GLONASS as well. The DGPS comprises the Global Positioning System together with a GPS reference station receiver situated at a known position. DGPS error correction information is derived by taking the difference between the measurements made by the GPS reference station and the expected measurement at the known position of the reference station. DGPS error correction information can be in the form of GPS satellite pseudorange offsets or GPS position offsets. If GPS position offsets are used, the GPS satellites used in the calculation of the GPS position must be included as part of the DGPS error correction information. A processor in a “differential-ready” GPS receiver applies the DGPS error correction information to enhance the GPS position to an accuracy in the range of 10 meters to a less than one meter.

Two types of DGPS exist, postprocessed and realtime. In postprocessed systems, the DGPS error correction information and a user's GPS position information are processed after the user has completed his data acquisition. In realtime systems, the DGPS error correction information is transmitted to the GPS user in a DGPS telemetry stream, e.g., a radio wave signal, and processed by a differential-ready GPS receiver as the application progresses. Realtime processing is desirable for many applications because the enhanced accuracy of DGPS is available to the GPS user while in the field. Realtime broadcast of DGPS error correction information is available from many sources, both public and private, including Coast Guard RDF beacon and commercially operated FM broadcast subcarriers. A DGPS radio wave receiver is required to receive the DGPS radio wave signal containing the DGPS error correction information, and pass the DGPS error corrections to the differential-ready GPS receiver.

Many applications of GPS including mineral surveying, mapping, adding attributes or features to maps, finding sites on a map, vehicle navigation, airplane navigation, marine navigation, field asset management, geographical information systems, and others require the enhanced accuracy that is available with DGPS. For instance, a 20 to 100 meter error could lead to unintentional trespassing, make the return to an underground asset difficult, or put a user on the wrong block while walking or driving in a city. These applications require a computer to store and process data, retain databases, perform calculations, display information to a user, and take input from a user entry. For instance, the user may need to store a map database, display a map, add attributes to features on the map, and store these attributes for geographical information. The user may also need to store and display locations or calculate range and bearing to another location.

GPS is typically used by many professionals engaged in navigation and surveying fields such as marine navigation, aircraft piloting, seismology, boundary surveying, and other applications where accurate location is required or where the cost of GPS is small compared to the cost of a mistake in determining location. Some mobile professionals in the utilities, insurance, ranching, prospecting, ambulance driving, trucking, delivery, police, fire, real estate, forestry, and other mobile applications use GPS to save time in their work. GPS is also used for personal travel such as hiking, biking, horseback riding, yachting, fishing, driving in personal cars, and other travel activities. To enhance the usefulness of GPS a number of sources have integrated maps into the output, or provide a global information system (GIS) to process the GPS output. Thus, it is known to sort and display proximate map features and/or attributes in the same coordinate system as the position information.

As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,528,248, incorporated herein by reference, a satellite location determination system using Global Positioning System (GPS) satellite signal transmitters receives a spread spectrum L1 carrier signal having a frequency=1575.42 MHz. The L1 signal from each satellite signal transmitter is binary phase shift key (BPSK) modulated by a Coarse/Acquisition (C/A) pseudo-random noise (PRN) code having a clock or chip rate of f0=1.023 MHz. Location information is transmitted at a rate of 50 baud. The PRN codes allow use of a plurality of GPS satellite signal transmitters for determining an observer's position and for providing location information. A signal transmitted by a particular GPS satellite is selected by generating and correlating the PRN code for that particular satellite signal transmitter with a GPS signal received from that satellite. All C/A PRN codes used for GPS satellite signals are known and are stored and/or generated in a GPS receiver. A bit stream from the GPS satellite signal transmitter includes an ephemeris location of the GPS satellite signal transmitter, an almanac location for all GPS satellites, and correction parameters for ionospheric signal propagation delay, and clock time of the GPS satellite signal transmitter. Accepted methods for generating the C/A-code are set forth in the document GPS Interface Control Document ICD-GPS-200, published by Rockwell International Corporation, Satellite Systems Division, Revision A, Sep. 26, 1984, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Energy on a single carrier frequency from all of the satellites is transduced by the receiver at a point close to Earth. The satellites from which the energy originated are identified by modulating the carrier transmitted from each satellite with pseudorandom type signals. In one mode, referred to as the coarse/acquisition (C/A) mode, the pseudorandom signal is a gold code sequence having a chip rate of 1.023 MHz; there are 1,023 chips in each gold code sequence, such that the sequence is repeated once every millisecond (the chipping rate of a pseudorandom sequence is the rate at which the individual pulses in the sequence are derived and therefore is equal to the code repetition rate divided by the number of members in the code; one pulse of the noise code is referred to as a chip).

The 1.023 MHz gold code sequence chip rate enables the position of the receiver responsive to the signals transmitted from four of the satellites to be determined to an accuracy of approximately 60 to 300 meters.

There is a second mode, referred to as the precise or protected (P) mode, wherein pseudorandom codes with chip rates of 10.23 MHz are transmitted with sequences that are extremely long, so that the sequences repeat no more than once per week. In the P mode, the position of the receiver can be determined to an accuracy of approximately 16 to 30 meters. However, the P mode requires Government classified information about how the receiver is programmed and is intended for use only by authorized receivers. Hence, civilian and/or military receivers that are apt to be obtained by unauthorized users are not responsive to the P mode.

To enable the receivers to separate the C/A signals received from the different satellites, the receiver includes a plurality of different locally derived gold code sources, each of which corresponds with the gold code sequence transmitted from one of the satellites in the field of the receiver. The locally derived and the transmitted gold code sequences are cross correlated with each other over one millisecond, gold code sequence intervals. The phase of the locally derived gold code sequences vary on a chip-by-chip basis, and then within a chip, until the maximum cross correlation function is obtained. Since the cross correlation for two gold code sequences having a length of 1,023 bits is approximately 16 times as great as the cross correlation function of any of the other combinations of gold code sequences, it is relatively easy to lock the locally derived gold code sequence onto the same gold code sequence that was transmitted by one of the satellites.

The gold code sequences from at least four of the satellites in the field of view of the receiver are separated in this manner by using a single channel that is sequentially responsive to each of the locally derived gold code sequences or by using parallel channels that are simultaneously responsive to the different gold code sequences. After four locally derived gold code sequences are locked in phase with the gold code sequences received from four satellites in the field of view of the receiver, the position of the receiver can be determined to an accuracy of approximately 60 to 300 meters.

The approximately 60 to 300 meter accuracy of GPS is determined by (1) the number of satellites transmitting signals to which the receiver is effectively responsive, (2) the variable amplitudes of the received signals, and (3) the magnitude of the cross correlation peaks between the received signals from the different satellites.

In response to reception of multiple pseudorange noise (PRN) signals, there is a common time interval for some of the codes to likely cause a degradation in time of arrival measurements of each received PRN due to the cross correlations between the received signals. The time of arrival measurement for each PRN is made by determining the time of a peak amplitude of the cross correlation between the received composite signal and a local gold code sequence that is identical to one of the transmitted PRN. When random noise is superimposed on a received PRN, increasing the averaging time of the cross correlation between the signal and a local PRN sequence decreases the average noise contribution to the time of arrival error. However, because the cross correlation errors between the received PRN's are periodic, increasing the averaging time increases both signal and the cross correlation value between the received PRN's alike and time of arrival errors are not reduced.

The GPS receiver may incorporate a Kalman filter, which is adaptive and therefore automatically modifies its threshold of acceptable data perturbations, depending on the velocity of the vehicle (GPS antenna). This optimizes system response and accuracy of the GPS system. Generally, when the vehicle increases velocity by a specified amount, the GPS Kalman filter will raise its acceptable noise threshold. Similarly, when the vehicle decreases its velocity by a specified amount, the GPS Kalman filter will lower its acceptable noise threshold.

Extremely accurate GPS receivers depend on phase measurements of the radio carriers that they receive from various orbiting GPS satellites. Less accurate GPS receivers simply develop the pseudoranges to each visible satellite based on the time codes being sent. Within the granularity of a single time code, the carrier phase can be measured and used to compute range distance as a multiple of the fundamental carrier wavelength. GPS signal transmissions are on two synchronous, but separate, carrier frequencies “L1” and “L2”, with wavelengths of nineteen and twenty-four centimeters, respectively. Thus within nineteen or twenty-four centimeters, the phase of the GPS carrier signal will change 360° (2π radians). However, the number of whole cycle (360°) carrier phase shifts between a particular GPS satellite and the GPS receiver must be resolved. At the receiver, every cycle will appear essentially the same, over a short time frame. Therefore there is an “integer ambiguity” in the calculation. The resolution of this integer ambiguity is therefore a calculation-intensive arithmetic problem to be solved by GPS receivers. The traditional approaches to such integer ambiguity resolution have prevented on-the-fly solution measurement updates for moving GPS receivers with centimeter accurate outputs. Very often, such highly accurate GPS receivers have required long periods of motionlessness to produce a first and subsequent position fix.

There are numerous prior art methods for resolving integer ambiguities. These include integer searches, multiple antennas, multiple GPS observables, motion-based approaches, and external aiding. Search techniques often require significant computation time and are vulnerable to erroneous solutions or when only a few satellites are visible. More antennas can improve reliability considerably. If carried to an extreme, a phased array of antennas results, whereby the integers are completely unambiguous and searching is unnecessary. But for economy, reduced size, complexity and power consumption, the minimum number of antennas required to quickly and unambiguously resolve the integers, even in the presence of noise, is preferred.

One method for integer resolution is to make use of the other observables that modulate a GPS timer. The pseudo-random code imposed on the GPS satellite transmission can be used as a coarse indicator of differential range, although it is very susceptible to multipath problems. Differentiating the L1 and L2 carriers in phase sensitive manner provides a longer effective wavelength, and reduces the search space, i.e., an ambiguity distance increased from 19 or 24 centimeters to about 456 centimeters. However, dual frequency receivers are expensive because they are more complicated. Motion-based integer resolution methods make use of additional information provided by platform or satellite motion. But such motion may not always be present when it is needed. Another prior art technique for precision attitude determination and kinematic positioning is described by Hatch, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,963,889, incorporated herein by reference, which employs two spaced antennas, moveable with respect to each other. Knight, U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,861, incorporated herein by reference, provides a method of reducing the mathematical intensity of integer ambiguity resolution. See also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,471,218, incorporated herein by reference.

Direct range measurements, combined with the satellite geometry, may also allow the correct integer carrier phase ambiguities to be determined for a plurality of satellites tracked at two or more sites. The use of additional sensors, such as a laser level, electronic distance meter, a compass, a tape, etc., provide valuable constraints that limit the number of possible integer ambiguities that need to be considered in a search for the correct set.

Many systems using handheld computers, having software and databases defining maps and running standard operating systems, have been coupled to GPS Smart Antennas. Wireless, infrared, serial, parallel, and PCMCIA interfaces have been used to interconnect the handheld computer and the GPS Smart Antenna. Differential-ready GPS Smart Antennas having an input to receive signals representative of DGPS error corrections are also commercially available. Further, GPS receivers and Differential-ready GPS Smart Antennas which are self contained, built onto a type II PCMCIA card (PC Card), and/or having serial data communications ports (RS-232 or RS-422) are commercially available. See, U.S. Pat. No. 5,276,451, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,210,540, assigned to Pioneer Electronic Corporation.

There are several different types of vehicle navigational systems. The first system makes use of stored map displays wherein the maps of a predetermined area are stored in the in-vehicle computer and displayed to the vehicle operator or driver. The maps, combined with information describing the location where the vehicle started and where it is to go, will highlight the direction and the driver will have to read the display and follow the route. One such stored map display system was offered by General Motors on their 1994 Oldsmobile, using Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites and dead reckoning techniques, and likely map matching to determine a precise location. The vehicle has radio receivers for receiving data from satellites, giving the location of the receiver expressed in latitude and longitude. The driver enters details of the desired destination into an on-board or in-vehicle computer in the form of specific address, a road intersection, etc. The stored map is displayed, allowing the operator to pinpoint the desired destination. The on-board computer then seeks to calculate the most efficient route, displaying the distance to, and the direction of, each turn using graphics and a voice prompt.

Other known systems employ speech recognition as a user input. For example, another system, described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,274,560 does not use GPS and has no sensing devices connected to the vehicle. The routing information is contained in a device that is coupled to a CD player in the vehicle's audio system. Commands are entered into the system via a microphone and the results are outputted through the vehicle's speakers. The vehicle operator spells out the locations and destinations, letter by letter. The system confirms the locations by repeating whole words. Once the system has received the current location and destination, the system develops the route and calculates the estimated time. The operator utilizes several specific performance commands, such as “Next”, and the system then begins to give segment by segment route directions.

Still another system, such as the Siemens Ali-Scout™ system, requires that the driver key-in the destination address coordinates into the in-vehicle computer. A compass located in the vehicle then gives a “compass” direction to the destination address. Such a compass direction is shown in graphics as an arrow on a display unit, indicating the direction the driver should go. Along the side of the road are several infrared beacon sites which transmit data information to a properly equipped vehicle relative to the next adjacent beacon site. From all of the information received, the in-vehicle computer selects the desired beacon data information to the next beacon and displays a graphic symbol for the vehicle operator to follow and the distance to the desired destination. In this system, there is no map to read; both a simple graphic symbol and a segment of the route is displayed, and a voice prompt telling the vehicle operator when to turn and when to continue in the same direction is enunciated. Once the program begins, there is minimal operator feedback required.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,350,970, describes a method for traffic management in a routing and information system for motor vehicle traffic. The system has a network of stationary routing stations each located in the vicinity of the roadway, which transmit route information and local information concerning its position to passing vehicles. The trip destination address is loaded by the vehicle operator into an onboard device in the vehicle and by dead reckoning techniques, a distance and direction graphic message is displayed. The first routing station which the vehicle passes transmits a message to the vehicle with route data to the next routing station. The vehicle receives the message and as it executes the several vector distances in the message, it accumulates time and distance which it then transmits to the second routing station when it is interrogated by the second routing station. In this manner, traffic management is updated in real time and the vehicles are always routed the “best way”. Of course, the best way may be the shortest way, the less traveled way, the cheapest way or any combination of these plus other criteria. See also, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/258241, filed on Aug. 3, 1994.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,668,880, incorporated herein by reference, relates to an intervehicle data communication device.

Systems which integrate GPS, GLONASS, LORAN or other positioning systems into vehicular guidance systems are well known, and indeed navigational purposes were prime motivators for the creation of these systems. Radar, laser, acoustic and visual sensors have all been applied to vehicular guidance and control, as well. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,757,450 relates to a reflected beam system for detecting a preceding vehicle, in order to allow control over intervehicular spacing. U.S. Pat. No. 4,833,469 relates to an obstacle proximity sensor, employing, e.g., a radar beam to determine distance and relative velocity of an obstacle. U.S. Pat. No. 5,600,561 relates to a vehicle distance data processor which computes a velocity vector based on serialtimepoints. U.S. Pat. No. 4,552,456 relates to an optical pulse radar for an automobile. U.S. Pat. No. 4,543,577 relates to a moving obstacle detection system for a vehicle, using Doppler radar. U.S. Pat. No. 4,349,823 relates to an automotive radar system for monitoring objects in front of the vehicle. U.S. Pat. No. 5,473,538 relates to a collision judging system for a vehicle, triggered by a braking event and determining a distance to an obstacle in front of the vehicle. U.S. Pat. No. 4,168,499 relates to an anti-collision radar system. U.S. Pat. No. 4,626,850 relates to a vehicle detection and collision avoidance apparatus, using an acoustic sensor. U.S. Pat. No. 4,028,662 relates to a passing vehicle signaling apparatus, to detect adjacent vehicles during a lane change. U.S. Pat. No. 5,541,590 relates to a vehicle crash predictive and evasive system, employing neural networks. U.S. Pat. No. 5,646,612 relates to a vehicle collision avoidance system, using an infrared imaging system. U.S. Pat. No. 5,285,523 relates to a neural network system for recognizing driving conditions and controlling the vehicle in dependence thereon. U.S. Pat. No. 5,189,619 relates to an artificial intelligence based adaptive vehicle control system. U.S. Pat. No. 5,162,997 relates to a driveradaptive automobile control system. U.S. Pat. No. 3,689,882 relates to an anti-collision radar system for detecting obstacles or on-coming vehicles.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,855,915 relates to a vehicle which may be autonomously guided using optically reflective materials. U.S. Pat. No. 5,347,456 relates to an intelligent roadway reference system for controlling lateral position of a vehicle, using magnetic sensors. U.S. Pat. No. 5,189,612 relates to an autonomous vehicle guidance system employing buried magnetic markers. U.S. Pat. No. 5,039,979 relates to a roadway alarm system employing metallized painted divider lines. U.S. Pat. No. 4,239,415 relates to a method for installing an electromagnetic sensor loop in a highway. U.S. Pat. No. 4,185,265 relates to a vehicular magnetic coded signaling apparatus which transmits binary signals using magnetic signposts. U.S. Pat. No. 5,687,215 relates to a vehicular emergency message system. U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,055 relates to a position monitoring system for vehicles, for example in case they are stolen. U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,071 relates to a system for time and/or event logging of an event, employing differential GPS. U.S. Pat. No. 5,701,328 relates to a chirped spread spectrum positioning system.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,689,269, 5,119,504, 5,678,182, 5,621,793, 5,673,305, 5,043,736, 5,684,860, 5,625,668, 5,602,739, 5,544,225, 5,461,365, 5,299,132, 5,301,368, 5,633,872, 5,563,607, 5,382,957, 5,638,078, 5,630,206, 5,610,815, 4,677,555, 4,700,301, 4,807,131, 4,963,889, 5,030,957, 5,144,317, 5,148,179, 5,247,306, 5,296,861, 5,347,286, 5,359,332, 5,442,363, 5,451,964, expressly incorporated herein by reference, relate to systems which employ GPS and telecommunication functionality. Such systems are often employed in differential global positioning system (DGPS) and vehicular security and tracking applications.

Typical “secure” encryption systems include the Rivest-Shamir-Adelman algorithm (RSA), the Diffie-Hellman algorithm (DH), the Data Encryption Standard (DES), elliptic curve encryption algorithms, so-called PGP algorithm, and other known algorithms. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,200,770, 4,218,582, 4,405,829, 4,424,414 and 4,424,415, expressly incorporated herein by reference, relate to RSA-type encryption systems. Other cryptographic system patents include U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,658,094 and 4,797,920, incorporated herein by reference. See also:

“A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems.” By R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adelman, Communication of the ACM, February 1978, Volume 21 Number 2. Pages 120-126.

The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms, By D. E. Knuth, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. 1969.

“The First Ten Years of Public Key Cryptography”, By Whitfield Diffie, Proceedings of the IEEE, Volume 6 Number 5, May 1988, Pages 560-577.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,668,952; 4,698,632; 4,700,191; 4,709,407; 4,725,840; 4,750,215; 4,791,420; 4,801,938; 4,805,231; 4,818,997; 4,841,302; 4,862,175; 4,887,068; 4,939,521; 4,949,088; 4,952,936; 4,952,937; 4,954,828; 4,961,074; 5,001,777; 5,049,884; 5,049,885; 5,063,385; 5,068,663; 5,079,553; 5,083,129; 5,122,802; 5,134,406; 5,146,226; 5,146,227; 5,151,701; 5,164,729; 5,206,651; 5,239,296; 5,250,951, 5,268,689; 5,270,706; 5,300,932; 5,305,007; 5,315,302; 5,317,320; 5,331,327; 5,341,138; 5,347,120; 5,363,105; 5,365,055; 5,365,516; 5,389,930; 5,410,750; 5,446,923; 5,448,638; 5,461,383; 5,465,413; 5,513,110; 5,521,696; 5,525,989; 5,525,996; 5,528,245; 5,528,246; 5,529,139; 5,510,793; 5,529,139; 5,610,815, expressly incorporated herein by reference, relate to radar and radar detection and identification systems, and associated technologies.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,519,718, incorporated herein by references, relates to a mobile bidirectional pager communication scheme.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,218,620, incorporated herein by references, relates to a spread spectrum communication device.

U.S, Pat. Nos. 3,161,871; 3,568,161; 3,630,079; 3,664,701; 3,683,114; 3,769,710; 3,771,483; 3,772,688; 3,848,254; 3,922,673; 3,956,797; 3,986,119; 3,993,955; 4,002,983; 4,010,619; 4,024,382; 4,077,005; 4,084,323; 4,114,155; 4,152,693; 4,155,042; 4,168,576; 4,229,620; 4,229,737; 4,235,441; 4,240,079; 4,244,123; 4,274,560; 4,313,263; 4,323,921; 4,333,238; 4,359,733; 4,369,426; 4,384,293; 4,393,270; 4,402,049; 4,403,291; 4,428,057; 4,437,151; 4,445,118; 4,450,477; 4,459,667; 4,463,357; 4,471,273; 4,472,663; 4,485,383; 4,492,036; 4,508,999; 4,511,947; 4,514,665; 4,518,902; 4,521,885; 4,523,450; 4,529,919; 4,547,778; 4,550,317; 4,555,651; 4,564,085; 4,567,757; 4,571,847; 4,578,678; 4,591,730; 4,596,988; 4,599,620; 4,600,921; 4,602,279; 4,613,867; 4,622,557; 4,630,685; 4,633,966; 4,637,488; 4,638,445; 4,644,351; 4,644,368; 4,646,096; 4,647,784; 4,651,157: 4,652,884; 4,654,879; 4,656,463; 4,656,476; 4,659,970; 4,667,203; 4,673,936; 4,674,048; 4,677,555; 4,677,686; 4,678,329; 4,679,147; 4,680,715; 4,682,953; 4,684,247; 4,688,244; 4,690,610; 4,691,149; 4,691,385; 4,697,281; 4,701,760; 4,701,934; 4,703,444; 4,706,772; 4,709,195; 4,713,767; 4,718,080; 4,722,410; 4,727,492; 4,727,962; 4,728,922; 4,730,690; 4,731,613; 4,740,778; 4,741,245; 4,741,412; 4,743,913; 4,744,761; 4,750,197; 4,751,512; 4,751,983; 4,754,280; 4,754,283; 4,755,905; 4,758,959; 4,761,742; 4,772,410; 774,671; 4,774,672; 4,776,750; 4,777,818; 4,781,514; 4,785,463; 4,786,164; 4,790,402; 4,791,572; 4,792,995; 4,796,189; 4,796,191; 4,799,062; 4,804,893; 4,804,937; 4,807,714; 4,809,005; 4,809,178; 4,812,820; 4,812,845; 4,812,991; 4,814,711; 4,815,020; 4,815,213; 4,818,171; 4,819,053; 4,819,174; 4,819,195; 4,819,860; 4,821,294; 4,821,309; 4,823,901; 4,825,457; 4,829,372; 4,829,442; 4,831,539; 4,833,477; 4,837,700; 4,839,835; 4,846,297; 4,847,862; 4,849,731; 4,852,146; 4,860,352; 4,861,220; 4,864,284; 4,864,592; 4,866,450; 4,866,776; 4,868,859; 4,868,866; 4,869,635; 4,870,422; 4,876,659; 4,879,658; 4,882,689; 4,882,696; 4,884,348; 4,888,699; 4,888,890; 4,891,650; 4,891,761; 4,894,655; 4,894,662; 4,896,370; 4,897,642; 4,899,285; 4,901,340; 4,903,211; 4,903,212; 4,904,983; 4,907,159; 4,908,629; 4,910,493; 4,910,677; 4,912,475; 4,912,643; 4,912,645; 4,914,609; 4,918,425; 4,918,609; 4,924,402; 4,924,417; 4,924,699; 4,926,336; 4,928,105; 4,928,106; 4,928,107; 4,932,910; 4,937,751; 4,937,752; 4,939,678; 4,943,925; 4,945,501; 4,947,151; 4,949,268; 4,951,212; 4,954,837; 4,954,959; 4,963,865; 4,963,889; 4,968,981; 4,970,652; 4,972,431; 4,974,170; 4,975,707; 4,976,619; 4,977,679; 4,983,980; 4,986,384; 4,989,151; 4,991,304; 4,996,645; 4,996,703; 5,003,317; 5,006,855; 5,010,491; 5,014,206; 5,017,926; 5,021,792; 5,021,794; 5,025,261; 5,030,957; 5,030,957; 5,031,104; 5,036,329; 5,036,537; 5,041,833; 5,043,736; 5,043,902; 5,045,861; 5,046,011; 5,046,130; 5,054,110; 5,055,851; 5,056,106; 5,059,969; 5,061,936; 5,065,326; 5,067,082; 5,068,656; 5,070,404; 5,072,227; 5,075,693; 5,077,557; 5,081,667; 5,083,256; 5,084,822; 5,086,390; 5,087,919; 5,089,826; 5,097,269; 5,101,356; 5,101,416; 5,102,360; 5,103,400; 5,103,459; 5,109,399; 5,115,223; 5,117,232; 5,119,102; 5,119,301; 5,119,504; 5,121,326; 5,122,803; 5,122,957; 5,124,915; 5,126,748; 5,128,874; 5,128,979; 5,144,318; 5,146,231; 5,148,002; 5,148,179; 5,148,452; 5,153,598; 5,153,836; 5,155,490; 5,155,491; 5,155,591; 5,155,688; 5,155,689; 5,157,691; 5,161,886; 5,168,452; 5,170,171; 5,172,321; 5,175,557; 5,177,685; 5,184,123; 5,185,610; 5,185,761; 5,187,805; 5,192,957; 5,193,215; 5,194,871; 5,202,829; 5,208,756; 5,210,540; 5,210,787; 5,218,367; 5,220,507; 5,220,509; 5,223,844; 5,225,842; 5,228,695; 5,228,854; 5,245,537; 5,247,440; 5,257,195; 5,260,778; 5,265,025; 5,266,958; 5,269,067; 5,272,483; 5,272,638; 5,274,387; 5,274,667; 5,276,451; 5,278,424; 5,278,568; 5,292,254; 5,293,318; 5,305,386; 5,309,474; 5,317,321; 5,319,548; 5,323,322; 5,324,028; 5,334,974; 5,334,986; 5,347,285; 5,349,531; 5,364,093; 5,365,447; 5,365,450; 5,375,059; 5,379,224; 5,382,957; 5,382,958; 5,383,127; 5,389,934; 5,390,125; 5,392,052; 5,400,254; 5,402,347; 5,402,441; 5,404,661; 5,406,491; 5,406,492; 5,408,415; 5,414,432; 5,416,712; 5,418,537; 5,418,538; 5,420,592; 5,420,593; 5,420,594; 5,422,816; 5,424,951; 5,430,948; 5,432,520; 5,432,542; 5,432,841; 5,433,446; 5,434,574; 5,434,787; 5,434,788; 5,434,789; 5,519,403; 5,519,620; 5,519,760; 5,528,234; 5,528,248; 5,565,874 and Re32856, expressly incorporated herein by reference, relate to GPS systems and associated technologies.

Foreign patent references CA 1298387, 19920300; CA 1298903, 19920400; CA 2009171/1990 02; DE 3310111, 19840900; DE 3325397/1985 01; DE 3419156, 19840500; DE 3538908A1, 19870500; DE 4123097; EP 0155776/1990 08; EP 0158214, 19851000; EP 0181012, 19860500; EP 0290725/1992 09; EP 0295678, 19880600; EP 0309293A2, 19890300; EP 0323230, 19890500; EP 0323246, 19890700; EP 0348528, 19900100; EP 0393935, 19901000; EP 0444738, 19910900; EP 0485120, 19920500; EP 0501058 1991 04; EP 0512789, 19921100; FR 2554612, 19850500; GB 2079453, 19820100; GB 211204, 19830600; GB 2126040, 19870100; GB 2238870, 19891100; GB 2256987; JP 57-32980, 19820200; JP 63-26529, 19840200; JP 1130299, 19871100; JP 1136300, 19871100; JP 153180, 19890300; JP 63188517, 19890500; JP 0189414, 19900700; JP 2212713, 19900800; JP 02-243984, 19900900; JP 03-17688, 19910100; JP 3-080062, 1991 04 12; JP 3-080063, 1991 04 12; JP 0078678, 19910400; JP 0092714, 19910400; JP 1272656, 19910900; JP 03245075, 19911000; JP 3245076, 19911000; JP 63-12096; JP 221093; WO 87/06713, 19871100; WO 92/08952, 19920500; WO 93/09510, 19930500; WO 87/07056, 19871100 and WO 91/05429, incorporated herein by reference, relate to GPS and related technologies.

The following references, incorporated herein by reference, relate to GPS, position sensors, sensor data analysis, and associated technologies:

“Fuzzy Logic Simplifies Complex Control Problems”, Tom Williams, Computer Design, Mar. 1, 1991.

“Methods for Performance Evaluation of Coordinate Measuring Machines, ANSI/ASME B89.1.12M-1985,” An American National Standard, published by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, USA, 1985.

“Neural Network And Fuzzy Systems—A Dynamical Systems Approach To Machine Intelligence”, Bart Kosko; Prentice Hall 1992; Englewood Cliffs, N.J.; pp. 13, 18, 19.

“New Airbuses to Use Laser Inertial Reference Systems for Navigation,” Litton Systems, Aircraft Engineering, pp. 10-11, June 1983.

“Reasoning For Interpreting Sensor Data,” P. J. Braspenning, International Conference Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles, Amsterdam, 1986.

“Sensor Failure Detection Using a Hybrid Analytical/Intelligent Algorithm,” George Vachstevanos, International Conference Intelligent Autonomous Vehciles, Amsterdam, 1986. “An/PRC-112 Multi-Mission Transceiver”, published by Motorola, Inc., Communications Division, Copyright 1991.

“Combat Rescue. One Pass is All You Get. With PLS, One Pass is All You Need. PLS (Personnel Locator System)”, published jointly by Cubic Defense Systems and Motorola, Inc., publication date unknown.

“Artificial intelligence in the control and operation of construction plant-the autonomous robot excavator” published 1993.

“Automation and Robotics in Construction”-vol. 1 by FHG (9 pgs.) believed to have been published on or about June 1991.

“Backhoe Monitor” by IHC-3 Pgs.-Publication date unknown but believed to be prior to one year before the filing date.

Ashjaee, J., et al., “Precise Positioning Using a 4-Channel C/A Code GPS Receiver,” IEEE pp. 236-244, 1984.

Auch, W., et al., “Fibre Optic Gyroscope,” 1984.

B. Krogh et al., “Integrated Path Planning and Dynamic Steering Control for Autonomous Vehicles,” 1986.

Brockstein, A., “GPS-Kalman-Augmented Inertial Navigation System Performance,” Naecom '76 Record, pp. 864-868, 1976.

Brodie, K., et al., Performance Analysis of Integrated Navigation Systems, computer applications software technology, no date.

Brooks, R., “Solving the Fine-Path Problem by Good Representation of Free Space,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 190-197, March-April, 1983.

Brown, R., “Kalman Filtering Study Guide-A Guided Tour,” Iowa State University, pp. 1-19, 1984.

Brown, R., Random Signal Analysis & Kalman Filtering, Chapter 5, pp. 181-209, no date.

Bundorf, R. “The Influence of Vehicle Design Parameters on Characteristic Speed and Understeer,” January 1967.

C. McGillem et al., “Infra-Red Location System for Navigation of Autonomous Vehicles,” IEEE, pp. 1236-1238, 1988.

Canny, J., “A Computational Approach to Edge Detection,” pp. 184-203, 1985.

Culshaw, B., et al., “Fibre Optic Gyroscopes In Inertial Navigation,” no date.

D. Daniel et al., “Kinematics and Open-loop Control of an Ilonator-Based Mobile Platform,” pp. 346-351 1985.

D. Feng, “Satisficing Feedback Strategies for Local Navigation of Autonomous Mobile Robots,” May 5, 1989.

D. Kriegman et al., “Generic Models for Robot Navigation,” pp. 746-751, 1988.

D. Kuan et al., “Model-based Geometric Reasoning for Autonomous Road Following,” pp. 416-423, 1987.

D. Kuan, “Autonomous Robotic Vehicle Road Following,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pp. 647-658, 1988.

D. Rogers et al., Mathematical Elements for Computer Graphics, pp. 144-155, Dec. 8, 1989.

D. Touretzky et al., “What's Hidden in the Hidden Layers?,” Byte, pp. 227-233, August 1989.

Data Fusion in Pathfinder and Travtek, Roy Sumner, VNIS '91 conference, Oct. 20-23, Dearborn, Mich.

Database Accuracy Effects on Vehicle Positioning as Measured by the Certainty Factor, R. Borcherts, C. Collier, E. Koch, R. Bennet, VNIS '91 conference from Oct. 20-23, Dearborn, Mich.

Daum, F., et al., “Decoupled Kalman Filters for Phased Array Radar Tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, pp. 269-283, March 1983.

Denavit, J. et al., “A Kinematic Notation for Lower-Pair Mechanisms Bases on Matrices,” pp. 215-221, June, 1955.

Dickmanns, E. et al., “Guiding Land Vehicles Along Roadways by Computer Vision”, The Tools for Tomorrow, Oct. 23, 1985.

Dickmans, E., “Vehicle Guidance by Computer Vision,” no date.

Divakaruni, S., et al., “Fast Reaction and High Reliability of Strapdown Navigation Systems Using Ring Laser Gyros,” IEEE pp. 315-322, 1984.

E. Dickmanns et al., “A Curvature-based Scheme for Improving Road Vehicle Guidance by Computer Vision,” SPIE's Cambridge Symposium on Optical and Optoelectronic Engineering, October 1986.

E. Udd, “Fiberoptic v. Ring Laser Gyros: An Assessment of the Technology,” Laser Focus/Electro-Optics, pp. 64-74, December 1985.

Edward J. Krakiwsky, “A Kalman Filter for Integrating Dead Reckoning, Map Matching and GPS Positioning”, IEEE Plans '88 Position Location and Navigation Symposium Record, Kissemee, Fla. USA, Nov. 29-Dec. 2, 1988, pp. 39-46.

Euler, W., et al., “A Perspective on Civil Use of GPS, The Institute of Navigation, 36th Annual Meeting, pp. 1-7, 1980.

Fusion of Multisensor Data, John M. Richardson, Kenneth A. Marsh; International Journal of Robotics Research; vol. 7, no. 6; December 1988; pp. 78˜87.

Fuzzy Systems and Applications, United Signals and Systems, Inc., Bart Kosko with Fred Watkins, Jun. 5-7, 1991.

G. Geier, et al., “Design of an Integrated Navigation System for Robotic Vehicle Application,” Journal of the Institute of Navigation.

G. Wilfong, “Motion Planning for an Autonomous Vehicle,” AT&T Bell Laboratories, pp. 529-533, 1988.

GPS Technology and Opportunities, Clyde Harris and Roy Sikorski Expo Comm China '92, Beijing, China, Oct. 30-Nov. 4, 1992.

GPS World, News and Applications of the Global Positioning System, March/April 1990. GPS-90 Tutorials, The Institute of Navigation, Sep. 17-18, 1990, pp. 1∞28.

Greenspan, R., et al. “Accuracy of Relative Positioning by Interferometry with Reconstructed Carrier CPS: Experimental Results,” Third International Symposium on Satellite Doppler Positioning, pp. 1-19, 2/82.

H. Hatwal et al., “Some Inverse Solutions to an Automobile Path-tracking Problem with Input Control of Steering and Brakes,” Vehicle System Dynamics, pp. 61-71. 1986.

H. Nasr et al., “Landmark Recognition for Autonomous Mobile Robots,” pp. 1218-1223, 1988.

H. Nii, “Blackboard Application Systems, Blackboard Systems from a Knowledge Engineering Perspective,” The AI Magazine, pp. 82-89, August 1986.

H. Nii, “Blackboard Systems: The Blackboard Model Problem-solving and the Evolution of Blackboard Architectures,” The AI Magazine, pp. 38-53, Summer 1986.

H. Wunsche, “Detection and Control of Mobile Robot Motion by Real-Time Computer Vision,” Mobile Robots, pp. 100-104, 1986.

H. Yamazaki et al., “Autonomous Land Vehicle Using Millimeter Wave Sensing Systems,” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Robotics in Construction, June 1988.

Hiroshige et al., “Error Analysis of Electronic Roll Stabilization for Electronically Scanned Antennas”, IEEE 1991 pp. 71-75.

I. Cox, “Blanche: An Autonomous Robot Vehicle for Structured Environments,” AT&T Bell Laboratories, pp. 978-982, 1988.

IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 26, No. 7, July 1988 (New York) P. Enge et al. “Differential operation of global positioning system” pp. 48-59.

IEEE Journal of Robotics & Automation, vol. 4, No. 3, June 1988, IEEE (New York), C. Isik et al. “Pilot Level of a Hierarchical Controller for an Unmanned Mobile Robot”, pp. 241-255.

IEEE Journal of Robotics & Automation, vol. 4, No. 4, August. 1988, IEEE (New York) J. LeM “Domain-dependent reasoning for visual navigation of roadways, pp. 419-427 (Nissan) Mar. 24, 1988.

IEEE Plans '86 Position Location and Navigation Symposium, November 1986, S. Bose: “GPS/PLRS aided inertial land navigation system performance”, pp. 496-504.

IEEE Plans '86 Position Location and Navigation Symposium. November 1986, S. Bose: “GPS/PLRS aided inertial land navigation system performance”, pp. 496-504.

IEEE Plans '90 Position Location and Navigation Sympoium, Las Vegas, Mar. 20-23, 1990, IEEE New York, N.Y., US. Hunter et al: ‘Vehicle navigation using differential GPS’, pp. 392-398.

IEEE Proceedings, vol. 77, No. 11, Nov. 11, 1989, L. Schuchman et al.: “Applicability of an augmentated GPS for navigation in the National Airspace system”, pp. 1709-1727, 1713, 1717, FIGS. 1-8.

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis, vol. 10, No. 5 September 1988, IEEE (New York), D. Kuan et al., “Autonomous robotic vehicle road following” pp. 648-658.

Iijima, J., et al., “A Locomotion Control System for Mobile Robots,” no date.

Integration of GPS and Dead Reckoning Navigation Systems, Wei-Wen Kao, VNIS '91 conference from Oct. 20-23, Dearborn, Mich.

J. Borenstein et al., “The Vector Field Histogram-Fast Obstacle Avoidance for Mobile Robots,” IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, July. 1989.

J. Collins, “GPS Equipment Survey, GPS-What does it all mean?,” P.O.B., June-July 1987 pp. 12-22.

J. Crowley, “Asynchronous Control of Orientation and Displacement in a Robot Vehicle,” pp. 1277-1288, 1989.

J. Crowley, “Part 3: Knowledge Based Supervision of Robotics Systems,” 1989 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 37-42, 1989.

J. Dixon, “Linear and Non-linear Steady State Vehicle Handling,” Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 173-186, 1988.

J. Nielson, et al. “GPS Aided Inertial Navigation,” IEEE AES Magazine, pp. 20-26, March 1986.

J. Oliver et al., “A Navigation Algorithm for an Intelligent Vehicle with a Laser Rangefinder,” pp. 1145-1150, 1986.

J. Sennott et al., “Study of Differential Processing and Kalman Filtering of Bay Saint Louis Test Data, Ch 1-5, 1987.

Jacob, T., Integrated Navigation System for Approach Guidance for Regional Air-Traffic Using GPS, no date.

Johnson, C. “In-Flight Transfer Alignment/Calibration of a Strapdown INS that Employs Carouseled Instruments and IMV Indexing,” no date.

Jorgensen, “18-Satellite Constellations,” pp. 9-12, 1980.

Kaczmarek, K. W., “Cellular Networking: A Carrier's Perspective”, 39th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 1, 1989, vol. 1, pp. 1-6.

Kanayama, Y., et al., “A Vehicle Control Architecture-Smooth Driver,” Stanford University, no date.

Kanayama, Y., et al., “Trajectory Generation for Mobile Robots,” no date. Kao, M., et al., “Multiconfiguration Kalman Filter Design for High-Performance GPS Navigation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, pp. 304-314, March 1983.

Khatib, O., “Real-time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots”, pp. 500-505, 1985.

Knowledge Representation in Fuzzy Logic, Lotfi A. Zadeh, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 1, No. 1, March 1989.

Kowalski et al., “Music Algorithm Implementation for Shipboard HF Radio Direction Finding”, IEEE, 1991, pp. 0943-0947.

Kuritsky, M., et al., “Inertial Navigation,” Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 1156-1176, October 1983.

L. Matthies et al., “Integration of Sonar and Stereo Range Data Using a Grid-based Representation,” Computer Science Department and Robotics Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, pp. 727-733, 1988.

Lerner, E., “Gyros in Business Aircraft,” Aerospace America, pp. 66-69, October 1984. Lozano-Perez, T., et al., “An Algorithm for Planning Collision-free Paths among Polyhedral Obstacles,” Communications of the ACN, pp. 560-570, October 1979.

Luh, J., et al., “Resolved-acceleration Control of Mechanical Manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, pp. 468-475, June 1980.

M. Dailey et al., “Autonomous Cross-Country Navigation with the ALV,” Hughes Artificial Intelligence Center, pp. 718-726, 1988.

M. Grewal et al., “Application of Kalman Filtering to the Calibration and Alignment of Inertial Navigation Systems,” IEEE, pp. 65-72, 1986.

MacAdam, C., “Application of an Optimal Preview Control for Simulation of Closed-Loop Automobile Driving,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 393-399, June 1981.

Martin, E., “Aiding GPS Navigation Functions,” Naecom '76 Record, pp. 849-856, 1976. Mueller, C., et al., “Laser Gyro Land Navigation System Performance Predictions and Field Results,” IEEE, 1984.

Navigation “Surveys” Summer, 1984, vol. 31, #2, by P. F. MacDoran et al. Navigation Journal of The Institute of Navigation, vol. 32, No. 4, Winter, 1985-86, Printed in U.S.A., “Terrestrial Evaluation of the GPS Standard Positioning Service”: by Francis W. Mooney.

Navigation Journal of the Institute of Navigation, vol. 33, No. 4, Winter, 1986-87, Printed in U.S.A., “DiffStar: A Concept for Differential GPS in Northern Norway”, by Hermod Fjereide.

Navigation Journal of the Institute of Navigation, vol. 36, No. 3, Fall, 1989, Printed in U.S.A., “Loran-C Vehicle Tracking in Detroit's Public Safety Dispatch System”, by Laurence J. Cortland.

Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interface, Rockwell International Corporation, Nov. 30, 1987.

Nedley, A., et al., “A New Laboratory Facility for Measuring Vehicle Parameters Affecting Understeer and Brakesteer,” pp. 1-20, Jun. 2, 1972.

Nitao, J., et al., “A Pilot for a Robotic Vehicle System,” pp. 951-955, no date. Orin, D., “Supervisory Control of a Multi-legged Robot,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, pp. 79-91, Spring 1982.

P. Muir, et al. “Kinematic Modeling for Feedback Control of an Omnidirectional Wheeled Mobile Robot,” pp. 1772-1778, 1987.

Parkinson, B., et al., “NAVSTAR: Global Positioning System—Ten Years Later,” Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 1178-1186, 1983.

Patent Abstract of Japan, vol. 12, No. 290 (p. 742) Aug. 8, 1988 & JPA 63066479 (Nissan) Mar. 24, 1988.

Patent Abstract of Japan, vol. 13, No. 306 (p. 897) Jul. 13, 1989 & JPA 1079679 (Toyota) Mar. 24, 1989.

Patent Abstract of Japan, vol. 13, No. 306 (p. 897) Jul. 7, 1989 & JPA 1079679 (Toyota) Mar. 24, 1989.

Proceeding PR '88, The Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, Jun. 5-9, 1988 (Ann Arbor) S. Dickinson et al., “An expert vision system for Autonomous Land Vehicle Road Following”, pp. 826-831.

Proceedings 1987 IEEE Conference Mar. 31-Apr. 3, 1987, vol. 2, L. Conway et al.: “Teleautonomous systems: Methods & Architectures for Intermingling autonomous & Telerobotic Technology” pp. 1121 1130.

Proceedings 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Mar. 31-Apr. 3, 1987. (Raleigh, N.C.), sponsored by IEEE Council on Robotics & Automation, vol. 3, D. McMenthon, “A zero-bank algorithm for Inverse Perspective of a Road from Single Image, pp. 1444-1449.

Proceedings of 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, vol. 2, Apr. 24-29, 1988, Philadelphia, IEEE Computer Soc. Press (Washington D.C.), L. E. Banta: “A self turning navigation algorithm”, pp. 1313-1314.

Proceedings of the IEEE-F Communications, Radar and Signal Processing, vol. 127, No. 2 April 1980, Stevenage, GB. Blair et al: receivers for the NAVSTAR global positioning system, pp. 163-167.

Product Announcement, “Measurement Methods-Coordinate Measuring Specialists,” published by Measurement Methods, Baltimore, Md., USA, publication date unknown. Product Brochure entitled “KOBA-Step Precision Step Gauge,” published by Kolb & Baumann GmbH & Co., Germany, 1992.

Product Brochure, “Mobile Calibration Station Utilizing Surveillance Masters,” published by Glastonbury Gage, USA, publication date unknown.

R. Cox et al., “Design for Maintainability: Litton's New Family of RLG Inertial Navigation Systems,” IEEE, pp. 115-119, 1986.

R. Dork, “Satellite Navigation Systems for Land Vehicles,” IEEE AES Magazine, pp. 25, May 1987.

R. Dunlay, “Obstacle Avoidance Perception Processing for the Autonomous Land Vehicle,” pp. 912-917, 1988.

R. Majure et al., “Comparison of Laser Gyro IMU Configurations for Reentry Systems,” IEEE, pp. 96-100, 1986.

Randolph Hartman, “Integrated Laser Inertial/GPS Navigation (GPIRS), “Publication of Honeywell Inc., Febuary, 1990, from a presentation of the Royal Institute of Navigation NAV '89” Satellite Navigation Conference, October, 1989.

Raol, J., et al., “On the Orbit Determination Problem,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, pp. 274-290, May 1985.

Richardson, Rick, “Standards try to help-but don't always agree,” Quality Magazine, USA, publication date unknown.

S. Divakaruni et al., “Ring Laser Gyro Inertial and GPS Integrated Navigation System for Commercial Aviation,” IEEE, pp. 73-80, 1986.

Sakai, H., “Theoretical and Experimental Studies on the Dynamic Properties of Tyres Part I: Review of Rubber Friction,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, pp. 78-110, 1981.

Sakai, H., “Theoretical and Experimental Studies on the Dynamic Properties of Tyres, Part II: Experimental Investigation of Rubber Friction and Deformation of a Tyre,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, pp. 182-226, 1981.

Sakai, H., “Theoretical and Experimental Studies on the Dynamic Properties of Tyres, Part III: Calculation of the Six Components of Force and Moment of Tyre,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, pp. 335-372, 1981.

Savkoor, A. R., “The Lateral Flexibility of Pneumatic Tyre and Its Application to the Lateral Rolling Contact Problem,” pp. 367-381, no date.

Schwartz, H., “Sensitivity Analysis of an Integrated Navstar GPS/INS Navigation System to Component Failure,” Journal of the Institute of Navigation, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 325-337, 1983.

Sennott, J. W., “Experimental Measurement and Characterization of Ionospheric Multipath Errors In Differential GPS”, no date.

Sennott, J., “Real-Time GPS and Loran-C Dynamical Performance for Critical Marine Applications,” IEEE, pp. 1006-1009, 1981.

Sennott, J.. et al., “A Queuing Model for Analysis of A Bursty Multiple-Access Communication Channel,” IEEE, pp. 317-321, 1981.

Sheridan, T. “Three Models of Preview Control,” IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, pp. 91-102, June 1966.

Sheth, P., et al., “A Generalized Symbolic Notation for Mechanism,” Transactions of the ASME, pp. 102-112, Febuary 1971.

Sorenson, W., “Least-Squares estimation: From Gauss to Kalman,” IEEE Spectrum, pp. 63-68, July 1970.

T. Graettinger et al., “Evaluation and Time-Scaling of Trajectories for Wheeled Mobile Robots,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Nov. 25, 1987.

Taylor, Benjamin R., “CMM accuracy measurements,” Quality Magazine, USA, 1986.

Upadhyay, T., et al., “Benefits on Integrating GPS and Inertial Navigation,” pp. 1-13, Jun. 1982.

Vaurus, J., “A Stimulation of an Imbedded Software System for Global Positioning System Navigation,” Proceedings of the 1985 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 586-590, 1985. Vehicle Dynamics Terminology, SAE J670e, 1984.

VNIS '89 Conference Record, Sep. 11-13, 1989, Toronto, Canada, T. Saito et al.

“Automobile Navigation System Using Beacon Information” pp. 139-145.

W. Nelson, “Continuous Steering-Function Control of Robot Carts,” AT&T Bell Laboratories, April 1988.

W. Nelson, et al., “Local Path Control for an Autonomous Vehicle,” AT&T Bell Laboratories, pp. 1504-1510, 1988.

W. Uttal, “Teleoperators,” Scientific American, pp. 124-129, December 1989. Wareby, Jan, “Intelligent Signaling: FAR & SS7”, Cellular Business, pp. 58, 60 and 62, July 1990.

Wescon/87 Conference Record, vol. 31, 1987, (Los Angeles, US) M. T. Allison et al “The next generation navigation system”, pp. 941-947.

Y. Goto et al., “The CMU System for Mobile Robot Navigation,” The Robotics Institutes, Carnegie-Mellon University, pp. 99-105, 1987.

Y. Kanayama et al., “A Locomotion Control Method for Autonomous Vehicles,” pp. 1315-1317, 1988.

Y. Kanayama et al., “Smooth Local Path-Planning for Autonomous Vehicles,” Center for Robotic Systems and Microelectronics, University of California at Santa Barbara, Mar. 7, 1988.

Yamada et al “GPS Navigator,” Japanese Radio Technical Bulletin No. 24, 1986.


The present invention provides a mobile telecommunications device having a position detector, which may be absolute, relative or other type, a memory for storing events in conjunction with locations, and a transmitter or receiver for communicating information stored or to be stored in the memory.

The aforementioned references, each incorporated by reference, relate to methods and apparatus which may be used as part of, or in conjunction with the present invention. Therefore, it is understood that the present invention may integrate other systems, or be integrated in other systems, having complementary, synergistic or related in some way. For example, common sensors, antennas, processors, memory, communications hardware, subsystems and the like may provide a basis for combination, even if the functions are separate.

The position detector is preferably a GPS or combined GPS-GLONASS receiver, although a cellular telephone position detection system (e.g., Enhanced 911 type system) may also be employed. According to aspects of the present invention, a positional accuracy tolerance of 100 up to 1000 meters may be acceptable, achievable with either type system. However, for such purposes as pothole reporting, positional accuracies of 1 to 3 meters are preferred. These may be obtained through a combination of techniques, and therefore the inherent accuracy of any one technique need not meet the overall system requirement.

The position detector may also be linked to a mapping system and possibly a dead reckoning system, in order to pinpoint a position with a geographic landmark. Thus, while precise absolute coordinate measurements of position may be used, it may also be possible to obtain useful data at reduced cost by applying certain presumptions to available data. In an automotive system, steering angle, compass direction, and wheel revolution information may be available, thereby giving a rough indication of position from a known starting point. When this information is applied to a mapping system, a relatively precise position may be estimated. Therefore, the required precision of another positioning system used in conjunction need not be high, in order to provide high reliability position information. For example, where it is desired to map potholes, positional accuracy of 10 cm may be desired, far more precise than might be available from a normal GPS receiver mounted in a moving automobile. However, when combined with other data, location and identification of such events is possible. Further, while the system may include or tolerate inaccuracies, it is generally desired that the system have high precision, as compensation for inaccuracies may be applied.

The system provides a memory for storing events and respective locations. Preferably, further information is also stored, such as a time of the event, its character or nature, and other quantitative or qualitative aspects of the information or its source and/or conditions of acquisition. This memory may be a solid state memory or module, rotating magnetic and/or optical memory devices, or other known types of memory.

The events to be stored may be detected locally, such as through a detector for radar and/or laser emission source, radio scanner, traffic or road conditions (mechanical vehicle sensors, visual and/or infrared imaging, radar or LIDAR analysis, acoustic sensors, or the like), places of interest which may be selectively identified, itinerary stops, and/or fixed locations. The events may also be provided by a remote transmitter, with no local event detection. Therefore, while means for identifying events having associated locations is a part of the system as a whole, such means need not be included in every apparatus embodying the invention.

Radar detectors typically are employed to detect operating emitters of X (10.5 GHz), K (25 GHz) and Ka (35 GHz) radar emissions from traffic control devices or law enforcement personnel for detecting vehicle speed by the Doppler effect. These systems typically operate as superheterodyne receivers which sweep one or more bands, and detect a wave having an energy significantly above background. As such, these types of devices are subject to numerous sources of interference, accidental, intentional, and incidental. A known system, Safety Warning System (SWS) licensed by Safety Warning System L.C., Englewood FL, makes use of such radar detectors to specifically warn motorists of identified road hazards. In this case, one of a set of particular signals is modulated within a radar band by a transmitter operated near the roadway. The receiver decodes the transmission and warns the driver of the hazard.

LIDAR devices emit an infrared laser signal, which is then reflected off a moving vehicle and analyzed for delay, which relates to distance. Through successive measurements, a sped can be calculated. A LIDAR detector therefore seeks to detect the characteristic pulsatile infrared energy.

Police radios employ certain restricted frequencies, and in some cases, police vehicles continuously transmit a signal. While certain laws restrict interception of messages sent on police bands, it is believed that the mere detection and localization of a carrier wave is not and may not be legally restricted. These radios tend to operate below 800 MHz, and thus a receiver may employ standard radio technologies.

Potholes and other road obstructions and defects have two characteristics. First, they adversely effect vehicles which encounter them. Second, they often cause a secondary effect of motorists seeking to avoid a direct encounter or damage, by slowing or executing an evasive maneuver. These obstructions may therefore be detected in three ways; first, by analyzing the suspension of the vehicle for unusual shocks indicative of such vents; second, by analyzing speed and steering patterns of the subject vehicle and possibly surrounding vehicles; and third, by a visual, ultrasonic, or other direct sensor for detecting the pothole or other obstruction. Such direct sensors are known; however, their effectiveness is limited, and therefore an advance mapping of such potholes and other road obstructions greatly facilitates avoiding vehicle damage and executing unsafe or emergency evasive maneuvers. An advance mapping may also be useful in remediating such road hazards, as well.

Traffic jams occur for a variety of reasons. Typically, the road carries traffic above a threshold, and for some reason the normal traffic flow patterns are disrupted. Therefore, there is a dramatic slowdown in the average vehicle speed, and a reduced throughput. Because of the reduced throughput, even after the cause of the disruption has abated, the roadways may take minutes to hours to return to normal. Therefore, it is typically desired to have advance warnings of disruptions, which include accidents, icing, rain, sun glare, lane closures, road debris, police action, exits and entrances, and the like, in order to allow the driver to avoid the involved region or plan accordingly. Abnormal traffic patterns may be detected by comparing a vehicle speed to the speed limit or a historical average speed, by a visual evaluation of traffic conditions, or by broadcast road advisories. High traffic conditions are associated with braking of traffic, which in turn results in deceleration and the illumination of brake lights. Brake lights may be determined by both the specific level of illumination and the center brake light, which is not normally illuminated. Deceleration may be detected by an optical, radar or LIDAR sensor for detecting the speed and/or acceleration state of nearby vehicles.

While a preferred embodiment of the present invention employs one or more sensors, broadcast advisories, including those from systems according to or compatible with the present invention, provide a valuable source of information relating to road conditions and information of interest at a particular location. Therefore, the sensors need not form a part of the core system. Further, some or all of the required sensors may be integrated with the vehicle electronics (“vetronics”), and therefore the sensors may be provided separately or as options. It is therefore an aspect of an embodiment of the invention to integrate the transceiver, and event database into a vetronics system, preferably using a digital vetronics data bus to communicate with existing systems, such as speed sensors, antilock brake sensors, cruise control, automatic traction system, suspension, engine, transmission, and other vehicle systems.

The radio used for the communications subsystem can be radio frequency AM, FM, spread spectrum, microwave, light (infrared, visible, UV) or laser or maser beam (millimeter wave, infrared, visible), or for short distance communications, acoustic or other communications may be employed. The system preferably employs an intelligent transportation system (ITS) or Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) allocated band, such as the 915 MHz, 2.4 MHz or 5.8 GHz band. (The 2.350-2.450 GHz band corresponds to the emission of microwave ovens, and thus the band suffers from potentially significant interference). The 24.125 GHz band, corresponding to K-band police radar, may also be available; however, transmit power in this band is restricted, e.g., less than about 9 mW. The signal may be transmitted through free space or in paths including fiber optics, waveguides, cables or the like. The communication may be short or medium range omnidirectional, line of sight, reflected (optical, radio frequency, retroreflector designs), satellite, secure or non-secure, or other modes of communications between two points, that the application or state-of-the-art may allow. The particular communications methodology is not critical to the invention, although a preferred embodiment employs a spread spectrum microwave transmission.

A number of Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) systems have been proposed or implemented in order to provide communications between vehicles and roadside systems. These DSRC systems traditionally operate in the 900 MHz band for toll collection, while the FCC has recently made available 75 MHz in the 5.850-5.925 GHz range for such purposes, on a co-primary basis with microwave communications, satellite uplinks, government radar, and other uses. However, spectrum is also available in the so-called U-NII band, which encompasses 5.15-5.25 GHz (indoors, 50 mW) and 5.25-5.35 (outdoors, 250 mW). At such frequencies, the preferred semiconductor technology for the radio-frequency circuits is Silicon Germanium, available as a biCMOS heterojunction bipolar transistor process from IBM (CommQuest Technologies Division). Gallium Arsenide processes may also operate in this band. Silicon processes are preferred in the 900 MHz band and below.

A Japanese ITS (“ETC”) proposal provides a 5.8 GHz full duplex interrogation system with a half duplex transponder, operating at about 1 megabit per second transmission rates.

It is noted that the present technology has the capability for streamlining transportation systems, by communicating traffic conditions almost immediately and quickly allowing decisions to be made by drivers to minimize congestion and avoid unnecessary slowdowns. A particular result of the implementation of this technology will be a reduction in vehicular air pollution, as a result of reduced traffic jams and other inefficient driving patterns. To further the environmental protection aspect of the invention, integration of the database with cruise control and driver information systems may reduce inefficient vehicle speed fluctuations, by communicating to the driver or controlling the vehicle at an efficient speed. As a part of this system, therefore, adaptive speed limits and intelligent traffic flow control devices may be provided. For example, there is no need for fixed time traffic lights if the intersection is monitored for actual traffic conditions. By providing intervehicle communications and identification, such an intelligent system is easier to implement. Likewise, the 55 miles per hour speed limit that was initially presented in light of the “oil crisis” in the 1970's, and parts of which persist today even in light of relatively low petroleum pricing and evidence that the alleged secondary health and safety benefit is marginal or non-existent, may be eliminated in favor of a system which employs intelligence to optimize the traffic flow patterns based on actual existing conditions, rather than a static set of rules which are applied universally and without intelligence.

The communications device may be a transmitter, receiver or transceiver, transmitting event information, storing received event information, or exchanging event information, respectively. Thus, while the system as a whole typically involves a propagation of event information between remote databases, each system embodying the invention need not perform all functions.

In a retroreflector design system, signal to noise ratio is improved by spatial specificity, and typically coherent detection. An interrogation signal is emitted, which is modulated and redirected back toward its source, within a relatively wide range, by a receiver. Thus, while the receiver may be “passive”, the return signal has a relatively high amplitude (as compared to nonretroreflective designs under comparable conditions) and the interrogator can spatially discriminate and coherently detect the return signal. Both optical and RF retroreflector systems exist.

In a preferred embodiment, the communications device employs an unlicensed band, such as 900 MHz (902-928 MHz), FRS, 49 MHz, 27 MHz, 2.4-2.5 GHz, 5.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz, etc. Further, in order to provide noise immunity and band capacity, spread spectrum RF techniques are preferred.

In one embodiment, communications devices are installed in automobiles. Mobile GPS receivers in the vehicles provide location information to the communications devices. These GPS receivers may be integral or separate from the communications devices. Event detectors, such as police radar and laser (LIDAR) speed detectors, traffic and weather condition detectors, road hazard detectors (pot holes, debris, accidents, ice, mud and rock slides, drunk drivers, etc.), traffic speed detectors (speedometer reading, sensors for detecting speed of other vehicles), speed limits, checkpoints, toll booths, etc., may be provided as inputs to the system, or appropriate sensors integrated therein. The system may also serve as a beacon to good Samaritans, emergency workers and other motorists in the event of accident, disablement, or other status of the host vehicle.

It is noted that at frequencies above about 800 MHz, the transmitter signal may be used as a part of a traffic radar system. Therefore, the transmitted signal may serve both as a communications stream and a sensor emission.

Functions similar to those of the Cadillac (GM) On-Star system may also be implemented, as well as alarm and security systems, garage door opening and “smart home” integration.

The memory stores information describing the event as well as the location of the event. Preferably, the memory is not organized as a matrix of memory addresses corresponding to locations, e.g., a “map”, but rather in a record format having explicitly describing the event and location, making storage of the sparse matrix more efficient and facilitating indexing and sorting on various aspects of each data record. Additional information, such as the time of the event, importance of the event, expiration time of the event, source and reliability of the event information, and commercial and/or advertising information associated with the event may be stored. The information in the memory is processed to provide a useful output, which may be a simple alphanumeric, voice (audible) or graphic output or the telecommunications system. In any case, the output is preferably presented in a sorted order according to pertinence, which is a combination of the abstract importance of the event and proximity, with “proximity” weighted higher than “importance”. Once a communication or output cycle is initiated, it may continue until the entire memory is output, or include merely output a portion of the contents.

In outputting information directly to a human user, thresholds are preferably applied to limit output to events which are of immediate consequence and apparent importance. For example, if the communications device is installed in a vehicle, and the information in the memory indicates that a pothole, highway obstruction, or police radar “trap” is ahead, the user is informed. Events in the opposite direction (as determined by a path or velocity record extracted from the position detector) are not output, nor are such events far away. On the other hand, events such as road icing, flooding, or the like, are often applicable to all nearby motorists, and are output regardless of direction of travel, unless another communications device with event detector indicates that the event would not affect the local communications device or the vehicle in which it is installed.

The system preferably ages event data intelligently, allowing certain types of events to expire or decrease in importance. A traffic accident event more than 12 hours old is likely stale, and therefore would not be output, and preferably is purged; however, locations which are the site of multiple accidents may be tagged as hazardous, and the hazard event output to the user as appropriate.

A temporal analysis may also be applied to the event data, and therefore diurnal variations and the like accounted for. Examples of this type of data include rush hour traffic, sun glare (adjusted for season, etc.), vacation routes, and the like.

Thus, user outputs are provided based on proximity, importance, and optionally other factors, such as direction, speed (over or under speed limit), time-of-day, date or season (e.g., sun glare), freshness of event recordation, and the like.

In communicating data to another communications device, typically it is desired to transmit (or exchange) all of the memory or all of a “public” portion of the memory, with the received information sorted and processed by the receiving unit and relevant information persistently stored in the memory. After exchange, conflicts may be resolved by a further exchange of information. An error detection and correction (EDC) protocol may be employed, to assure accurate data transmission.

Since the communication bandwidth is necessarily limited, and the communications channels subject to noise and crowding, it is often important to prioritize transmissions. It is noted that, without a complete communication of the memory, it is difficult to determine which events a communications partner is aware of, so that an initial communication may include an identification of the partners as well as recent encounters with other partners, to eliminate redundant communications, where possible. Vehicles traveling in the same direction will often be in close proximity longer than vehicles traveling in opposite directions. Further, the information of relevance to a vehicle traveling in the same direction will differ from the information of relevance to a vehicle traveling in the opposite direction. Thus, in addition to an identification of the communications device, the recent path and proposed path and velocity should also be exchanged. Based on this information, the data is prioritized and sorted, formatted and transmitted. Since the communications channel will likely vary in dependence on distance between partners, the communications protocol may be adaptive, providing increased data rate with decreasing distance, up to the channel capacity. Further, when the vehicles are relatively close, a line-of-sight communications scheme may be implemented, such as infrared (e.g., IRdA), while at larger distances (and/or for all distances) a spread spectrum 915 MHz, 2.4 GHz or 5.825 GHz RF communications scheme implemented.

Where multiple communications devices are present within a common communications region, these may be pooled, allowing transmissions from one transmitter to many receivers. In addition, within a band, multiple channels may be allocated, allowing multiple communications sessions. In this case, a single arbitration and control channel is provided to identify communications devices and communications parameters. Preferably, a communications device has the capability to monitor multiple channels simultaneously, and optionally to transmit on multiple channels simultaneously, where channel congestion is low. The channels are typically frequency division. Where such frequency division channels are defined, communications may be facilitated by so-called “repeaters”, which may itself be a mobile transceiver according to the present invention. Preferably, such a repeater unit itself monitors the data stream, and may even process the data stream based on its internal parameters before passing it on.

In order to assure data integrity and optimize data bandwidth, both forward and retrospective error correction are applied. Data is preferably packetized, with each packet including error detection and correction information. Successful receipt of each packet is acknowledged on a reverse channel, optionally interspersed with corresponding data packets traveling in the reverse direction (e.g., full duplex communications). Where the data error rate (raw or corrected) is unacceptably high, one or more “fallback” modes may be implemented, such as reduced data rates, more fault tolerant modulation schemes, and extended error correction and detection codes. Transmitter power may also be modulated within acceptable limits.

A central repository of event data may be provided, such as on the Internet or an on-line database. In this case, event information may be administered remotely, and local storage minimized or eliminated. Communications with the central database may be conducted by cellular telephone, cellular data packet devices (CDPD), PCS, GSM, satellite (Iridium™, etc.) or in other communications bands and other communications schemes.

Alternately, or in addition, the communications device may include a telephone modem (digital to analog modulator-demodulator) for exchanging event information over telephone communications lines. The device according to the present invention may either be plugged into a wall jack, use acoustic coupling (advantageous, for example, for pay-telephones) or communicate wirelessly with a base unit, such as while parked in a garage or service station. Where primary event information storage is remote from the device, preferably local storage is based on an itinerary (route) and frequently traveled areas, with less frequently traveled and not prospectively traveled routes stored remotely. This allows consolidated update of memory by a large number of sources, with statistical error detection and correction of errant event information. The itinerary information may be programmed in conjunction with the GPS system and mapping software.

According to one embodiment of the invention, the functions are integrated into a single device, including police radar and LIDAR detectors, user output, memory, central processor, GPS receiver and RF transceiver. Accessory inputs and outputs may also be provided, including means for alphanumeric, graphic (still or motion) or voice message communication between communications devices. Event information is communicated as packets including full event information as well as error correction and detection codes. The packet size is preferably large enough to minimize the impact of communications protocol overhead while small enough to minimize the efficiency loss resulting from full packet retransmissions. For example, a control channel is provided with 256 bit packets, while a set of regular communications channels is provided with 512 bit packets. Event information may span multiple packets or be consolidated within packets. The data is preferably compressed using a dictionary lookup, run length encoding, and/or model-based vector quantization method. Thus, since transceivers will typically be within 2000 meters from each other, relative position may be relayed in an offset format, with a grid size based on GPS precision and required accuracy, e.g., about 50-100 meters. The encoding may be adaptive, based, for example, on stored map information, with information representation density highest on traveled routes and lower in desolate areas. Thus, a sort of differential-corrected positional coding may be established between units.

By integrating functions, efficiencies are achieved. Thus, a single central processor, memory, program store and user interface will suffice for all functions. Further, the power supply and housing are also consolidated. While GPS and telecommunication antennas will be distinct, other portions of the system may also be integrated. In a device intended for vehicular applications, the GPS and other functions may be available to other vehicular systems, or the required data received from other systems. For example, the Cadillac (GM) On-Star system might supply GPS signals to the communications device according to the present invention, or vice versa.

Communication between communications devices may also employ the cellular telephone network, for example utilizing excess capacity in a local or regional communication mode rather than linked to the public switched telecommunications network (PSTN). Thus, the system may include or encompass a typical cellular (AMPS, IS-136, IS-95, CDPD, PCS and/or GSM) type telecommunications device, or link to an external telecommunications device.

Even where the cellular telephony infrastructure is not involved, mobile hardware may be reused for the present invention. For example, the output of a mobile cellular transceiver may be “upconverted” to, for example, 900 MHz or 2.4 GHz, and retransmitted. While this is somewhat inefficient in terms of power and complexity, it allows use of existing cellular devices (with software reprogramming and data interfacing) in conjunction with a relatively simple upconversion transmitter.

According to the present invention, messages are passed between a network of free roving devices. In order to maintain network integrity, spurious data must be excluded. Thus, in order to prevent a “hacker” or miscreant (e.g., overzealous police official) from intentionally contaminating the dispersed database, or an innocent person from transmitting corrupted data, the ultimate source of event data is recorded. When corrupt or erroneous data is identified, the source is also identified. The corrupting source is then transmitted or identified to the central database, whereupon, units in the field may be programmed to ignore the corrupt unit, or to identify its location as a possible event to be aware of.

Preferably, data is transmitted digitally, and may be encrypted. Encryption codes may be of a public-key/private key variety, with key lookup (e.g., by a cellular telephony or CDPD-type arrangement to a central database) either before each data exchange, or on a global basis with published updates. In fact, corrupt or unauthorized units may be deactivated by normal and authorized units within the network, thus inhibiting “hacking” of the network. Thus, a subscription based system is supported.

Techniques corresponding to the Firewire (IEEE 1394) copy protection scheme may be implemented, and indeed the system according to the present invention may implement or incorporate the IEEE 1394 interface standard. While the event database is generally not intended to be copy-protected, the IEEE 1394 key management scheme may be useful for implementing subscription schemes and for preventing tampering.

One way to subsidize a subscription-based system is through advertising revenue. Therefore, the “events” may also include messages targeted to particular users, either by location, demographics, origin, time, or other factors. Thus, a motel or restaurant might solicit customers who are close by (especially in the evening), or set up transponders along highways at desired locations. Travelers would then receive messages appropriate to time and place. While the user of the system according to the present invention will typically be a frequent motorist or affluent, the system may also provide demographic codes, which allow a customized response to each unit. Since demographic information is personal, and may indicate traveler vulnerability, this information is preferably not transmitted as an open message and is preferably not decodable by unauthorized persons. In fact, the demographic codes may be employed to filter received information, rather than to broadcast interests.

Commercial messages may be stored in memory, and therefore need not be displayed immediately upon receipt. Further, such information may be provided on a so-called “smart card” or PC Card device, with messages triggered by location, perceived events, time and/or other factors. In turn, the presentation of commercial messages may be stored for verification by an auditing agency, thus allowing accounting for advertising fees on an “impression” basis.

The communications device may also receive data through broadcasts, such as using FM sidebands, paging channels, satellite transmission and the like. Thus, locationally or temporally distant information need not be transmitted between mobile units.

While low power or micropower design is desirable, in an automobile environment, typically sufficient power is continuously available to support sophisticated and/or power hungry electronic devices; thus, significant design freedom is provided to implement the present invention using available technologies.

These and other objects will become clear through a review of the drawings and detailed description of the preferred embodiments.


The drawings show:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a communications system according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the prioritization scheme; and

FIG. 3 is a block diagram representing a message format.


FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an communications device embodiment of the present invention. The mobile communications device 1 includes, as necessary elements, a location sensing system 2, producing a location output 3; a memory 4, storing a set of locations and associated events; a telecommunications subsystem 5, communicating event and location information between a remote system and the memory 4; and a processor 6, processing the location output in conjunction with the stored locations and associated events in the memory 4, to determine a priority thereof.

The location sensing system 2 comprises a known GPS receiver, which produces data that is analyzed by the processor 6. In an alternate embodiment, the GPS receiver includes its own processor and outputs coordinate positions, e.g., Cartesian coordinates, latitude and longitude, to the communications device processor 6, e.g., through a serial port or data bus, such as PC card, Universal serial Bus (USB), Firewire (IEEE 1394), peripheral connect interface (PCI), or other bus, such as that present within an automobile for communication of signals between subsystems. The location sensing system may also determine a position based on the GLONASS system, LORAN, inertial reference, cellular base stations 10′, 10″, triangulation with fixed radio sources, such as FM radio and television stations, environmental markers and/or transponders, or the like.

The communications subsystem 5 is a 900 MHz digital spread spectrum radio transceiver 12, operating unlicensed according to FCC regulations for this type of equipment. The system may alternately or additionally communicate in other unlicensed bands, such as 27 MHz, 49 MHz, FRS band, 2.4-2.5 GHz, 5.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz using various known modulation schemes and data communication protocols. Further, licensed radio bands may also be used, including FM radio sidebands (88-108 MHz), television PRO channel, cellular telephony channels, DECT, PCS and GSM channels, and the like. Likewise, satellite systems 16, 17 may be used to communicate with the mobile communications device 1. Thus, for example, instead of direct communication between mobile units, the existing cellular telephony 10′, 10″ infrastructure may be used to provide intercell, local, and/or regional communications between units, controlled by cellular telephone switching processors 11′, 11″. These communications may be given a lower priority than voice communications on the cellular telephone network, and therefore may use otherwise excess bandwidth, thus allowing reduced costs and reduced user fees or subscription rates. Further, this scheme allows use of existing cellular telephones 14, as or instead of an integrated communications subsystem operating according to a different standard. For example, cellular telephones may be present in the vehicle for voice communications purposes, and therefore simultaneously with a system according to the present invention. In this case, the communications device need only have a data communications transceiver for interfacing with a cellular communication device, e.g., AMPS, IS-95, IS-136, CDPD, DECT, GSM and PCS, and need not integrate the radio frequency communication device components. In a variant embodiment, a cellular-type telephone is controlled to operate outside the (AMPS) cellular telephone channels, in the 900 MHz band. It is noted that existing cellar communications system do not support high bandwidth data communications when using a single channel. On the other hand, the modifications to a digital cellular communications device to allocate a full time division multiplexed (TDM) channel to as single transceiver are theoretically simple, and allow relatively high data rates. Thus, slightly modified transceivers may be employed. Such modified transceivers may also be used for other high bandwidth mobile requirements, such as mobile video-conferencing, and the like.

The memory 4 may be of any standard type, for example, static random access memory, dynamic random access memory, ferroelectric memory, magnetic domain memory (e.g., diskette, hard disk), non-volatile semiconductor memory (e.g., UV-EPROM, EEPROM, Flash, non-standard electrically erasable programmable non-volatile memory), optically readable memory (e.g., R-CDROM, RW-CDROM, R-DVD, etc.), scanning/tunneling micromechanical memory systems, and the like. Preferably, common memory devices, such as 72 or 168 pin dynamic RAM single inline memory modules (SIMMs) are employed, at least for a volatile portion of the memory, allowing simple upgrades and industry standard compatibility.

While the preferred embodiment includes a radio frequency transceiver for transmitting event data and receiving event data, embodiments are also possible which either transmit or receive the relevant data, but not both. For example, regulations may limit certain transmissions or relevant event sensors, e.g., radar detectors in trucks. In these cases, a receive only embodiment may be appropriate. Further, while radio frequency communications are preferred, due to their range, data capacity and availability, optical communications systems 13, e.g., infrared LED's and laser diodes, acoustic communication 15, passive backscatter communications (employing an RF transceiver such as the spread spectrum transceiver 12), and the like may also be employed in conjunction or in substitution of a radio frequency system. Optical communication systems 13 may employ various detectors, including opticalhomodyne detectors, or other coherent optical detectors, or other types of optical sensors, such as PIDs, CCDs, silicon photodiodes, and the like.

Under some circumstances, a wired link between units may be appropriate. For example, a central database 20 may provide consolidated and reliable data. The relevant portion of the database 20 may be downloaded by telephone through a modem 21, either through a physical connection 23 (e.g., RJ-11 or RJ-12 jack) or through an acoustic coupler 22, through the public switched telephone network, Internet or other network 24, to a database server 25. The memory 4 of the mobile unit may also be uploaded to the central database 20, after processing by the database server 25, during the same connection or session.

Thus, according to the present invention, the public switched telephone network 24 may be involved both during intermittent mass data communications with a central database 20, and also using, for example, cellular telephony 14, for the normal operation of the system (e.g., communications between mobile units).

The processor 6 analyzes the information stored in memory 4 to provide a prioritized output. Thus, the memory may store information relating to a relatively large number of events, without overwhelming the capacity of a human user or communications partner. Priority may be based on a number of factors, including proximity of a stored location to a sensed location or a spatial-temporal proximity of a stored location to a loci of an itinerary 101, a prospective conjunction 102 of a sensed location with a stored location, a type of event 103, a type of event and a sensed condition associated with the mobile communications device 104, or other factors or a combination of factors. Neural networks, fuzzy logic and/or traditional logic paradigms may also be employed to prioritize the outputs. These logical paradigms are provided in known manner, and, especially in the case of neural network-based systems, a training aspect may be supplied with the system to allow it to adapt to the preferences and capabilities of the user. Thus, for a human user, events which are forthcoming and important are output, while past events and those in the distant future, if at all, are low priority. On the other hand, for communications with other devices, the prioritization is primarily in consideration of the fact that the communication between units may be only short lived; therefore, the data is communicated in order to priority, preferably of the recipient device. In an adaptive device, if the user believes that the information from the device is inappropriate, a simple input is provided, which is later analyzed to alter the information presentation algorithm. Likewise, if an information alert retrospectively turns out to be erroneous is a predictable manner, i.e., relating to a route not taken, the system may internally adjust the algorithm without user input.

In order to sort the priorities, the intended recipient may, for example, identify itself 201 and communicate its location 202 an itinerary or intended or prospective path 205. High priority messages 204 and various codes 203 may be interspersed through the communication string. The transmitting unit then outputs data 206 in order of the computed or predicted importance of the event and the time before the recipient encounters the event. Static events, such as fixed location radar emission sources, which may, for example, indicate a source for interference with a radar detector, or a speed detection/control device, may be transmitted as well.

Therefore, it is noted that the present invention provides a means for mapping events and for analyzing their significance. Thus, this embodiment does not merely rely on processed sensor outputs to supply information to the user; rather, sensor outputs may be filtered based on past experience with the particular location in question. If a particular user does not have direct experience with a location, then the experience of others at that location may be substituted or combined to improve analysis of the sensor signal. Therefore, the signal analysis from the sensor need not be subjected to a relatively high threshold to avoid false alarms. A low threshold is acceptable because other information is employed to determine the nature of the physical elements which give rise to the event and sensor activation.

It is noted that, in the case of “false alarms”, the response of the unit is to detect the event, e.g., radar signal, correlate it with a stored “false alarm” event, and suppress an alarm or modify the alarm signal. Thus, information stored in memory and/or transmitted between units, may signify an important alarm or a suppression of an erroneous alarm. In this context is apparent that the integrity of the database structure, especially from corruption by the very sources of alarms which are intended to be detected, is important. To the extent that the environment responds to the existence and deployment of the system according to the present invention, for example by detecting transmissions between units to identify and locate units, and thereby alter the nature of an event to be detected, the present system may also be adaptive, in terms of its function and signature spectral patterns. In one aspect, the system may employ a so-called “FLASH” upgradable memory, which controls system, operation. Therefore, periodically, the system operation may be altered. The communications may selectively occur on a plurality of bands, using a plurality of protocols. Thus, for example, the system may have tri-band capability, e.g., 900 MHz, 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz. The mapping feature of the present invention may also be used to identify the locations of such monitoring sites. The system may also mask its transmissions as other, more common types of transmissions or environmental sources of emissions. A direct sequence spread spectrum technique maybe employed which is difficult to detect without knowing the spread spectrum sequence seed. Of course, an aspect of the present invention is open communications, which as a matter of course are not securely encrypted and which would identify the transponder and its location. This problem may be addressed, in part, relying on laws which prevent unauthorized eavesdropping and unauthorized interception and decryption of communications, unauthorized “copying” of copyright works and defeating of copy protection schemes thereof, control over availability of authorized transceivers, and patent protection of the design and implementation.

Thus, in a preferred design, all communications are direct sequence spread spectrum over a wide band, with medium to high security codes, e.g., 10 bits or greater length chip sequence and 12 bits or greater data encryption, and more preferably 16 bit or greater chip sequence and 16 bit or greater data encryption. The chip sequence of the control and arbitration channel, which must be available to all compatible units, may be adaptive or changing, for example following a formula based on time, location, and/or an arbitrary authorization code provided with a subscription update. Further, the chip sequence may vary based on selective availability (SA) deviancies in GPS data, or based on the identity of satellites in view of the receiver. While such information might be available to “pirates”, miscreants, hackers and scofflaws, the algorithm for generating the chip sequence might be held as confidential, and thus the system unusable without specific authorization and incompatible with equipment without such algorithm. Such systems employing secure encryption with open access have been employed in satellite television (General Instrument VideoCipher II) and the like. It is noted that, in order to mask a message in a spread spectrum signal, multiple active channels may be employed, one or more of which transmits the desired data and the remainder transmitting noise or masking data.

Employing 2.4 or 5.8 GHz communications bands, data rates of 10 megabits per second (MBPS) are possible, although lower rates, such as 0.5-1.0 MBPS may be preferred to reduce loss due to interference or adverse communications conditions and maintain availability of simultaneous communications on multiple channels within the band in a small geographic area.

Where mobile devices are traveling parallel and at similar speeds, or both are stopped, an extended communications session may be initiated. In this case, the data prioritization will be weighted to completely exchange a public portion of the database, although emphasis will still be placed on immediately forthcoming events, if anticipated. On the other hand, where computed or user-input trajectories indicate a likely brief encounter, the immediate past events are weighted most heavily.

In order to analyze temporal relevance, the memory 4 preferably stores an event identifier 301, a location 302, a time of detection of an event 303, a source of the event information 304, an encoding for a likely expiration of the event 305, a reliability indicator for the event 306, and possibly a message associated with the event 307 including other information. These data fields may each be transmitted or received to describe the event, or selectively transmitted based on the nature of the event or an initial exchange between units specifying the information which will be communicated.

For example, in a radar detector embodiment, mobile police radar “traps” are often relocated, so that a particular location of one event should not be perpetuated beyond its anticipated or actual relevance. In this case, expirations may be stored, or calculated based on a “type” of event according to a set of rules. False alarms, due to security systems, traffic control and monitoring systems, and the like, may also be recorded, to increase the reliability any warnings provided.

Likewise, traffic jams often resolve after minutes or hours, and, while certain road regions may be prone to traffic jams, especially at certain hours of the day and/or days of the week, abnormal condition information should not persist indefinitely.

The preferred embodiment according to the present invention provides an event detector, which, in turn is preferably a police radar 18 and LIDAR 19 detector. Other detected events may include speed of vehicle, traffic conditions, weather conditions, road conditions, road debris or potholes, site designation, sources of radio signals or interference or false alarms for other event detectors, and particular vehicles, such as drunk drivers or unmarked police cars (possibly by manual event input). The event detector may include, for example, a sensor. such as a camera 26, which may analyze traffic control indicia (such as speed limits, cautions, traffic lights). The event may also include a commercial message or advertisement, received, for example from a fixed antenna beside a road, which, for example, is stored as the message 307. Such a commercial message 307 may be presented immediately or stored for future output. The received message, whether commercial or not, may be a static or motion graphic image, text or sound message. The user output of the system 27 may thus be visual, such as a graphic or alphanumeric (text) display, indicator lights or LED's 28, audible alerts or spoken voice through an audio transducer 29.

The camera is, for example, a color, monochrome or infrared charge coupled device (CCD) or complementary metal oxide silicon field effect transistor (CMOS) imager, having resolution of CIF (common interchange format), QCIF (quarter common interchange format), NTSC (national television standards committee), PAL (phase-alternate line), or other standard, and preferably images using NTSC format and transmits, if at all, as QCIF. Image communication may be, for example H.261 or H.263, using H.324+ (using mobile communications extensions) or H.323 protocol. The imager may also be incorporated as part of a mobile videoconferencing system, although a dual imager system (one for imaging persons and the other for imaging road conditions) may be implemented. Other ITU standards, e.g., T.120, may be employed for data communications, although the particular nature of the data communications channel(s) may compel other communications protocols.

In order to maintain the integrity of the database stored in memory 4, 20, it may be useful to store the originator of a record, i.e., its source 304. Thus, if event information from that origin is deemed unreliable, all records from that source may be purged, and future messages ignored or “flagged”. As stated above, even the proximity of an unreliable or modified unit may be detrimental to system operation. Therefore, where the location of such a unit is known, other units in proximity may enter into a silent mode. Further, normal units may transmit a “kill” message to the unreliable unit, causing it to cease functioning (at least in a transmit mode) until the problem is rectified or the unit reauthorized.

The unit is preferably tamper-proof, for example, codes necessary for unit activation and operation are corrupted or erased if an enclosure to the unit is opened. Thus, techniques such as employed in the General Instrument VideoCipher II and disclosed in Kaish et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,494,114, may be employed.

The communications subsystem preferably employs an error correction/error detection protocol, with forward error correction and confirmation of received data packet. The scheme may be adaptive to the quality of the communication channel(s), with the packet length, encoding scheme, transmit power, bandwidth allocation, data rate and modulation scheme varied in an adaptive scheme to optimize the communication between units. In many cases, units engaged in communication will exchange information bidirectionally. In that case, a full duplex communication protocol is preferred; on the other hand, where communication is unidirectional, greater data communication rates may be achieved employing the available bandwidth and applying it to the single communication session.

In some instances, it may be desired to maintain privacy of communications. In that case, two possibilities are available; spread spectrum communications, preferably direct sequence spread spectrum communications is employed, to limit eavesdropping possibilities. Second, the data itself may be encrypted, using, for example, a DES, PGP, elliptic keys, or RSA type encryption scheme. Keys may be supplied or exchanged in advance, negotiated between partners, or involve a public key-private key encryption algorithm. For example, the spread spectrum communications chip sequence may be based on an encrypted code.

In order to provide flexibility in financing the communications devices, the commercial messages 307 discussed above may be employed. Further, by circulating authorization tokens or codes 203, a subscription service may be provided. Thus, in a simplest subscription scheme, the communications device has a timer function, which may be a simple clock or GPS referenced. The user must input an authorization code periodically in order for the device to continue operating. Thus, similarly to satellite television receivers and some addressable cable television decoders, failure to provide the authorization code, which may be entered, e.g., by telephone communication or through a keypad 30, renders the device temporarily or permanently inoperative. In order to reduce the burden of reauthorizations, the authorization codes or tokens may be passed through the communications “cloud” 24, so that devices 1, if used, will eventually receive the authorization data. Conversely, a code 203 may be circulated which specifically deactivates a certain device 1, for example for non-payment of the subscription fee or misuse of the device (e.g., in an attempt to corrupt other users databases). The authorization process is preferably integral to the core operation of the system, making bypassing authorization difficult.

Where a number of communications devices are in proximity, a multi-party communication session may be initiated. For example, the communications subsystem may have simultaneous multi-channel capability, allowing each unit to transmit on a separate channel or use a shared channel. Where the number of channels or channel capacity is insufficient, units may take turns transmitting event information on the same channel (e.g., according to estimated priority), or time division multiplex (TDM) the channel(s). Preferably, the communication scheme involves a number of channels within a band, e.g., 1 common control channel and 24 data communications channels. Since some communication sessions may be relatively short, e.g., limited to a few seconds, a data communications channel preferably has a maximum capacity of tens of kilobits per second or higher. In some cases, hundreds of kilobits, or megabit range bandwidths are achievable, especially with a small number of channels (e.g., one channel). Thus, for example, a DSSS spread spectrum transceiver operating in the 2.5 GHz band might have a usable bandwidth of 10 megabits per second, even while sharing the same band with other transceivers in close proximity. Where necessary, directional antennas or phased arrays may be employed to provide spatial discrimination.

The system preferably has advanced ability to detect channel conditions. Thus, where communications are interrupted by physical limitations in the channel, the impairment to the communications channel is detected and the communications session paused until the impairment abates. This, in turn, will allow other units, which might not be subject to the impairment, to use the same channel during this interval. The channel impairment may be detected by a feedback protocol between communications partners, or by means of symmetric antennas and communications systems, by which an impairment of a received signal may be presumed to affect the transmitted signal as well. The latter requires a high degree of standardization of equipment design and installation for effectiveness.

It is particularly noted that, where the events to be detected and the communications subsystem operate in the same band, structures may be shared between the communications and event detection systems, but this also increases the possibilities for interference.

As one embodiment of the invention, the processor may be provided as a standard personal digital assistant (PDA) with a PC Card or PCMCIA slot for receiving a standard GPS receiver module. The PDA, in turn has memory, which may include random access memory, flash memory, and rotating magnetic memory (hard disk), for example. The PDA also includes a data communications port, which sends data to and controls the communications subsystem, which may be, for example, model interfacing with, e.g., a cellular telephone or CDPD system. The PDA has a processing system which is capable of running applications written in general purpose, high level languages such as C. The PDA may operate under a standard operating system, such as Microsoft Windows CE, or a proprietary operating system. A software application written in a high level language can normally be ported to run in the PDA processing system. Thus, the basic elements of the hardware platform are all available without customization. In a preferred embodiment, an event sensor is provided, such as a police radar and laser speed detection equipment system (e.g., “radar detector”) is provided. This may employ a modified commercially available radar detector, to produce a serial data stream or parallel signal set. For example, radar detectors providing an alphanumeric display often transmit data to the display controller by means of a serial data signal. This signal may be intercepted and interfaced with a serial port or custom port of the PDA.

Optionally, the GPS Smart Antenna is “differential-ready” to apply differential GPS (DGPS) error correction information to improve accuracy of a GPS determined location. The application program for the PDA may be provided in a semiconductor memory cartridge or stored on hard disk.

The PDA 30 includes the processing system, including a microprocessor, memory, precoded program instructions and data stored in memory, a microprocessor bus for addresses, data, and control, an interrupt bus for interrupt signals, and associated hardware, operates in a conventional manner to receive digital signals, process information, and issue digital signals. A user interface in the PDA includes a visual display or audible output to present signals received from the processing system to a user, a user entry system to issue signals from the user to the processing system. The user interface may include one or more push keys, toggle switches, proximity switches, trackballs, joysticks or pressure sensitive keys, a touch-sensitive display screen, microphones or a combination of any of the above used together or with other similar type user input methods. The PDA sends digital signals representing addresses, data, and commands to the memory device and receives digital signals representing instructions and data from the memory. A PDA interface electrically connects the processing system to a GPS Smart Antenna. If the PDA and GPS are not integrated, a preferred interface comprises a computerstandard low to medium speed serial data interface, such as RS-232, RS-422, or USB, through a cabled interface for connection to the GPS Smart Antenna.

The GPS Smart Antenna system includes a GPS receiver antenna to receive GPS satellite signals from GPS satellite transmitters, a GPS frequency downconverter to downconvert the approximately 1.575 GHz frequency of the L1 GPS satellite signals to a lower frequency (LF) signal that is suitable for digital processing, and to issue the LF to a GPS processor. The GPS processor demodulates and decodes the LF signal and provides location information for at least one of (i) location of the GPS antenna, (ii), GPS satellite pseudoranges between the GPS satellites and the GPS antenna, (iii) rate of change of location of the GPS antenna, (iv) heading of the GPS antenna, and (v) time to a GPS interface. Optionally, the GPS Smart Antenna and GPS processor are differential-ready. An optional input select switch, controlled by the GPS processor upon a request from the PDA, allows a single serial interface to receive either a control signal from the PDA or a DGPS error correction signal from an optional DGPS radiowave receiver. Alternately, a DGPS-type system may be coordinated between multiple mobile receivers, top provide high relative position accuracy, even where the absolute position accuracy is low. Since the event position calculations are based on the relative position frame, the effect is to accurately position the events with respect to the vehicle.

The user device may display, for example, map features according to a coordinate system such as latitude and longitude. The display may also include an indication of the location of the GPS receiver, an itinerary, proposed route, and indications of the location of various events. By correlating the GPS with a stored map, the absolute location of the vehicle may be determined by map matching techniques. In accordance with the present invention, these events are derived from the event detector or the memory. Other communications devices may also be located on the display.

The user entry system has both touchscreen keys and press keys in the present embodiment. With a touchscreen, a user enters a request by touching a designated portion overlying a visual display with his finger (or soft pointer, such as a plastic pen). The touchscreen senses the touch and causes a digital signal to be sent to the processing system indicating where the touch was made. Switches such as rotary switches, toggle switches, or other switches can equally well be applied. An advantage of the touchscreen is that a label or a placement of the touchscreen, and a corresponding function of the touchscreen, may be changed by the computer controlling the display any number of times without changing electrical or mechanical hardware. In the present embodiment, zoom keys may be employed change scale and resolution of a map on the display. Zooming in decreases the scale, so that the map is viewed with greater resolution over a lesser area of the map. Zooming out increases the scale, so that a greater area of the map is viewed with lesser resolution. A map orientation key selects an orientation of a direction on the map with a direction on the visual display, for example, orientations of north up or current ground track up. It is noted that these map functions are generally known, and known techniques may be generally applied for such map functions. According to the present invention, in addition to normal map functions, the event data may be overlayed on the map to provide additional dimensions of display data. Further, by providing these data, which are dynamic, the map system becomes useful even to travelers who are well aware of the geography and layout of the region being traveled.

A 900 MHz spread spectrum communications system operates as follows. The RF receiver includes an antenna, low noise amplifier (LNA) with a noise temperature below 80 degrees Kelvin and a helical bandpass filter to cancel the image frequency noise. The filtered signal is then downconverted to an intermediate frequency (IF) of about 70 MHz, which is the result of mixing the filtered received signal with a local oscillator signal of between about 832-858 MHz at about 17 dbm. Of course, other tuning frequencies may be selected, for example, to avoid interference with other equipment. The local oscillator thus operates at about 850 MHz and is locked to a reference of 10.625 MHz. The 70 MHz IF frequency is amplified and filtered by a SAW filter 906 with a bandwidth of 1.5-10 MHz, depending on the data signal bandwidth. The IF is then demodulated to baseband, employing a demodulator using an inverse sequence from the transmitted spread spectrum sequence. Thus, in a frequency hopping embodiment, the demodulator synthesizes a signal having the appropriate frequency sequence. In a direct sequence spread spectrum embodiment, the demodulator provides the appropriate pseudorandom code sequence to demodulate the received signal. Time synchronization may be effected by using the timing functions of the GPS receiver. The demodulated signal is then decoded into messages, which are typically digital bitstreams.

In a 2.4 GHz system, the RF semiconductor technology will typically include gallium arsenide integrated circuits. In a 5.8 GHz system, the RF section semiconductors are preferably silicon germanium. Once demodulated to below about 1 GHz, standard silicon technologies may be employed.

The baseband demodulator may also comprise a digital radio, employing a digital signal processor, receiving a digitized IF signal and outputting a data stream. In this case, it may be preferred to digitize at an IF frequency below 70 MHz. For example, with a data stream having a bandwidth of 1.5 MHz, the preferred IF is 3-10 MHz, with quadrature digitization of the analog signal at that IF. The IF signal may be processed in parallel with a plurality of demodulators, allowing multiple signals to be received simultaneously.

In the 900 MHz embodiment, a PLL, such as a 1.1 gigahertz PLL frequency synthesizer, Part No. MC145190 available from Motorola Semiconductors, Phoenix, Ariz., may be used to generate the first IF. This frequency synthesizer, referenced to the 9.6 megahertz reference frequency, generates a local oscillator signal of approximately 860 megahertz. This PLL synthesizer chip produces a locked stable output signal which is low pass filtered to produce a variable voltage to control voltage control oscillator. VCO is, for example, Part No. MQC505-900 operating at approximately 860 megahertz and available from Murata of Tokyo, Japan. The feedback through sense keeps synthesizer chip stable to produce a stable, fixed course output. A second PLL produces a fine control frequency. The second PLL includes a synthesizer chip, e.g., Part No. MC145170 available from Motorola Semiconductor of Phoenix, Ariz. This PLL frequency synthesizer chip has digital controls for control by a microcontroller. The output of the fine synthesizer chip is low pass filtered to produce a variable DC voltage to control a voltage controlled oscillator, e.g., Part No. MQC309-964, operating within the 900 megahertz band. The fine adjust frequency is band pass filtered with an SAW band pass filter with a center frequency of approximately 38 megahertz. The band pass filter is, for example, Part No. SAF38.9MZR80Z also available from Murata of Tokyo, Japan. The output of the second PLL is controlled in accordance with the output frequency desired based on the frequency of the hop transmitted at the current time. By adjusting the fine frequency, which would be mixed with the coarse frequency, the output frequency in the 900 megahertz band is produced with very little phase noise, very little phase jitter and extremely narrow noise skirt. Thus, this double loop system serves to demodulate the signal to a low IF frequency or to baseband.

There has thus been shown and described novel communications devices and systems and methods which fulfill all the objects and advantages sought therefor. Many changes, modifications, variations, combinations, subcombinations and other uses and applications of the subject invention will, however, become apparent to those skilled in the art after considering this specification and the accompanying drawings which disclose the preferred embodiments thereof. All such changes, modifications, variations and other uses and applications which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention are deemed to be covered by the invention, which is to be limited only by the claims which follow.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3689882Dec 29, 1970Sep 5, 1972T E M I Tech Modernes InternAnti-crash radio detector for automotive vehicles
US4028662May 24, 1976Jun 7, 1977Raymond Donald YoungPassing vehicle signalling apparatus
US4168499Jun 29, 1978Sep 18, 1979Nissan Motor Company, LimitedAnti-collision radar system provided with circuitry for monitoring driver's
US4185265Jun 9, 1977Jan 22, 1980Cincinnati Electronics CorporationVehicular magnetic coded signalling apparatus
US4239415Nov 6, 1978Dec 16, 1980Blikken Wendell AMethod of installing magnetic sensor loops in a multiple lane highway
US4349823Jul 22, 1980Sep 14, 1982Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaAutomotive radar monitor system
US4543577Jun 15, 1982Sep 24, 1985Nissan Motor Company, LimitedMoving obstacle detection system for a vehicle
US4552456Aug 26, 1982Nov 12, 1985Nissan Motor Company, LimitedOptical pulse radar for an automotive vehicle
US4626850May 16, 1983Dec 2, 1986David CheyVehicle detection and collision avoidance apparatus
US4757450Mar 20, 1986Jul 12, 1988Nissan Motor Company, LimitedMethod and system for automatically detecting a preceding vehicle
US4833469Aug 3, 1987May 23, 1989David Constant VObstacle proximity detector for moving vehicles and method for use thereof
US4855915Mar 13, 1987Aug 8, 1989Dallaire Rodney JAutoguided vehicle using reflective materials
US5039979Apr 11, 1990Aug 13, 1991Mcclive Ralph TRoadway alarm system
US5043736Jul 27, 1990Aug 27, 1991Cae-Link CorporationCellular position locating system
US5119504Jul 19, 1990Jun 2, 1992Motorola, Inc.Position aided subscriber unit for a satellite cellular system
US5162997Jan 22, 1991Nov 10, 1992Nissan Motor Company, LimitedControl system for automotive vehicle for controlling vehicle driving behavior with feature of harmonization of vehicular driving condition dependent control and driver's driving tendency adapted control
US5189612Sep 12, 1991Feb 23, 1993Protee Groupement D'interet EconomiqueSystem and method of navigating the travel of an autonomous vehicle
US5189619Aug 2, 1990Feb 23, 1993Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaAI-based adaptive vehicle control system
US5218620Mar 17, 1992Jun 8, 1993Clarion Co., Ltd.Spread spectrum communication device
US5223844 *Apr 17, 1992Jun 29, 1993Auto-Trac, Inc.Vehicle tracking and security system
US5285523Sep 24, 1991Feb 8, 1994Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Apparatus for recognizing driving environment of vehicle
US5299132Jul 28, 1992Mar 29, 1994By-Word Technologies, Inc.Vehicle locating and communicating method and apparatus using cellular telephone network
US5301368Oct 26, 1990Apr 5, 1994Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.System for controlling operations of GPS receiver unit and radio telephone unit for automotive vehicle
US5369588Aug 7, 1992Nov 29, 1994Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaNavigation system for motor vehicles
US5382957Dec 19, 1989Jan 17, 1995The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavySystem and method
US5459667 *Jan 14, 1994Oct 17, 1995Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.Navigation apparatus for informing vehicle driver of information regarding travel route
US5461365Oct 27, 1994Oct 24, 1995Schlager; DanMulti-hazard alarm system using selectable power-level transmission and localization
US5473538Dec 28, 1992Dec 5, 1995Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaVehicle collision judging system for controlling brake actuation
US5523950May 8, 1995Jun 4, 1996Peterson; Thomas D.Method and apparatus for providing shortest elapsed time route information to users
US5541590Jan 19, 1995Jul 30, 1996Takata CorporationVehicle crash predictive and evasive operation system by neural networks
US5544225Jun 5, 1995Aug 6, 1996Highwaymaster Communications, Inc.Data messaging in a cellular communications network
US5550551Jul 25, 1994Aug 27, 1996At&T Corp.Position monitoring system and method
US5563607May 26, 1994Oct 8, 1996Trimble Navigation LimitedTime and/or location tagging of an event
US5568390Dec 29, 1995Oct 22, 1996Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaNavigation system to be mounted on vehicles
US5600561Feb 9, 1995Feb 4, 1997Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaVehicle distance data processor
US5602739Nov 22, 1995Feb 11, 1997Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing CompanyVehicle tracking system incorporating traffic signal preemption
US5610821Nov 18, 1994Mar 11, 1997Ibm CorporationOptimal and stable route planning system
US5621793May 5, 1995Apr 15, 1997Rubin, Bednarek & Associates, Inc.TV set top box using GPS
US5625668Apr 12, 1994Apr 29, 1997Trimble Navigation LimitedPosition reporting cellular telephone
US5630206Aug 11, 1994May 13, 1997Stanford Telecommunications, Inc.Position enhanced cellular telephone system
US5633872Sep 29, 1994May 27, 1997Eon CorporationInteractive radio
US5638078Nov 1, 1994Jun 10, 1997Telia AbArrangement for providing communication and positioning in a guidance installation
US5646612Dec 29, 1995Jul 8, 1997Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for avoiding collision of vehicle and apparatus for performing the same
US5668880Jan 17, 1995Sep 16, 1997Alajajian; Philip MichaelInter-vehicle personal data communications device
US5673305Jun 15, 1994Sep 30, 1997Worldwide Notification Systems, Inc.Apparatus and method for tracking and reporting the location of a motor vehicle
US5678182Jun 19, 1995Oct 14, 1997Trimble Navigation LimitedSelf-locating radio system that automatically configures to the radio regulations for the location
US5684860Dec 15, 1993Nov 4, 1997Milani; CarloApparatus for automatically distributing calls between users and a fleet of mobile stations through a central station
US5687215Apr 10, 1995Nov 11, 1997Ford Motor CompanyVehicular emergency message system
US5689269Jan 25, 1995Nov 18, 1997American Technology CorporationGPS relative position detection system
US5691724Aug 9, 1996Nov 25, 1997Aker; John L.Police traffic radar using FFT processing to find fastest target
US5701328Feb 23, 1995Dec 23, 1997Stanford Telecommunications, Inc.Chirped spread spectrum positioning system
US5760713 *May 10, 1996Jun 2, 1998Kabushiki Equos ResearchNavigation system of a vehicle
US5774827Apr 3, 1996Jun 30, 1998Motorola Inc.Commuter route selection system
US5838237May 22, 1996Nov 17, 1998Revell; Graeme CharlesPersonal alarm device
US5845227Feb 9, 1996Dec 1, 1998Peterson; Thomas D.Method and apparatus for providing shortest elapsed time route and tracking information to users
US5862509Dec 20, 1996Jan 19, 1999Zexel CorporationVehicle navigation using timed turn and timed lane restrictions
US5914654Oct 9, 1998Jun 22, 1999Intellectual Property Development Associates Of Connecticut, Inc.Methods and apparatus for inputting messages, including advertisements, to a vehicle
US5916300 *Jul 18, 1997Jun 29, 1999Trimble Navigation LimitedAutomatic event recognition to trigger recording changes
US5955973 *May 21, 1997Sep 21, 1999Concord, Inc.Field navigation system
US5983158Sep 6, 1996Nov 9, 1999Aisin Aw Co., Ltd.Navigation system for vehicles
US5987381Mar 11, 1997Nov 16, 1999Visteon Technologies, LlcAutomobile navigation system using remote download of data
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6347281 *Mar 8, 2000Feb 12, 2002R. Mark LitzsingerRemote global positioning device and method
US6351711 *Sep 14, 2000Feb 26, 2002Sirf Technology, Inc.GPS navigation system using neural networks
US6353776 *Jul 3, 2000Mar 5, 2002Siemens AktiengesellschaftControl system and method for controlling at least one function of an object and access control and driving authorization device for a motor vehicle
US6374155 *Nov 24, 1999Apr 16, 2002Personal Robotics, Inc.Autonomous multi-platform robot system
US6437735 *Sep 7, 2000Aug 20, 2002Ericsson Inc.Position detection system integrated into mobile terminal
US6456234 *Jun 7, 2000Sep 24, 2002William J. JohnsonSystem and method for proactive content delivery by situation location
US6456930 *Sep 7, 2001Sep 24, 2002Fujitsu LimitedMethod of and device for requesting guide information, method of and device for supplying guide information, and computer product
US6469653Aug 22, 2001Oct 22, 2002Uniden America CorporationApparatus and method for selectively monitoring radar signals and providing an alert responsive thereto
US6473055 *Apr 12, 2001Oct 29, 2002Toshiba Tec Kabushiki KaishaDirectional antenna apparatus and mobile communication system using the same
US6475146 *Sep 24, 2001Nov 5, 2002Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.Method and system for using personal digital assistants with diagnostic medical ultrasound systems
US6477460 *Feb 27, 2001Nov 5, 2002Metro One Telecommunications, Inc.Process and system for the annotation of machine-generated directions with easily recognized landmarks and other relevant information
US6477565 *Sep 16, 1999Nov 5, 2002Yodlee.Com, Inc.Method and apparatus for restructuring of personalized data for transmission from a data network to connected and portable network appliances
US6496755Mar 8, 2002Dec 17, 2002Personal Robotics, Inc.Autonomous multi-platform robot system
US6505121 *Aug 1, 2001Jan 7, 2003Hewlett-Packard CompanyOnboard vehicle navigation system
US6516285 *Sep 28, 2000Feb 4, 2003Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd.Position detecting apparatus with DSRC feature and its control method
US6522250 *Aug 14, 2001Feb 18, 2003The Mitre CorporationMovement history based selective distribution of generally broadcast information
US6526381 *Sep 30, 1999Feb 25, 2003Intel CorporationRemote control with speech recognition
US6539304 *Nov 2, 2001Mar 25, 2003Sirf Technology, Inc.GPS navigation system using neural networks
US6549145 *Aug 10, 2001Apr 15, 2003Pni CorporationRadar/laser detection device with multi-sensing and reporting capability
US6567850Oct 27, 1999May 20, 2003Yodlee, Inc.System and method for determining revenue from an intermediary derived from servicing data requests
US6601107 *Feb 2, 1998Jul 29, 2003Hughes Electronics CorporationAdaptive fuzzy control of data acquisition and broadcasting
US6611120 *Mar 18, 2002Aug 26, 2003Samsung Gwangju Electronics Co., Ltd.Robot cleaning system using mobile communication network
US6614385Dec 17, 2001Sep 2, 2003Escort Inc.Police activity transponder utilizing a vehicle interface
US6625135 *Apr 28, 1999Sep 23, 2003Cargenie Mellon UniversityMethod and apparatus for incorporating environmental information for mobile communications
US6654682 *Jan 11, 2001Nov 25, 2003Siemens Transportation Systems, Inc.Transit planning system
US6670905Jun 14, 2000Dec 30, 2003Escort Inc.Radar warning receiver with position and velocity sensitive functions
US6683867 *Feb 18, 2000Jan 27, 2004Rockwell Collins, Inc.Parallel precise time transfer to multiple GPS units
US6684157 *Dec 6, 2001Jan 27, 2004Yazaki North America, Inc.Method and system for interfacing a global positioning system, other navigational equipment and wireless networks with a digital data network
US6714193 *Dec 3, 1998Mar 30, 2004Thomson Licensing S. A.Arrangement for processing video data
US6728619 *Mar 30, 2001Apr 27, 2004Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.Failure measure outputting method, output system, and output device
US6731642 *May 3, 1999May 4, 20043Com CorporationInternet telephony using network address translation
US6741054May 2, 2001May 25, 2004Vision Robotics CorporationAutonomous floor mopping apparatus
US6744383 *Nov 15, 2002Jun 1, 2004At&T Wireless Services, Inc.Intelligent roadway system
US6748225 *Feb 29, 2000Jun 8, 2004Metro One Telecommunications, Inc.Method and system for the determination of location by retail signage and other readily recognizable landmarks
US6771268Mar 3, 2000Aug 3, 2004Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Video skimming system utilizing the vector rank filter
US6784833Feb 21, 2003Aug 31, 2004Lockheed Martin CorporationPersonal surveillance system with locating capabilities
US6804602Apr 2, 2002Oct 12, 2004Lockheed Martin CorporationIncident-aware vehicular sensors for intelligent transportation systems
US6809775 *Dec 7, 2000Oct 26, 2004Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.TV receiver apparatus and related method
US6836238Jun 30, 2003Dec 28, 2004Escort Inc.Police radar/laser detector with integral vehicle parameter display using a vehicle interface
US6845324 *Mar 1, 2003Jan 18, 2005User-Centric Enterprises, Inc.Rotating map and user-centric weather prediction
US6862500May 12, 2003Mar 1, 2005Circumnav Networks, Inc.Methods for communicating between elements in a hierarchical floating car data network
US6885936 *May 22, 2003Apr 26, 2005Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Information provision system and apparatus and method therefor
US6898529 *Sep 5, 2003May 24, 2005Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Method and system for determining parameters inside a subterranean formation using data sensors and a wireless ad hoc network
US6906741May 30, 2002Jun 14, 2005Palm, Inc.System for and method of conferencing with a handheld computer using multiple media types
US6925378May 12, 2003Aug 2, 2005Circumnav Networks, Inc.Enhanced mobile communication device with extended radio, and applications
US6937865 *Sep 12, 2000Aug 30, 2005Ericsson Inc.Position detection system integrated into mobile terminal
US6943729Oct 1, 2003Sep 13, 2005S5 Wireless, Inc.Method and system for time difference of arrival (TDOA) location services
US6965614 *Apr 24, 2000Nov 15, 2005Nortel Networks LimitedMethod and system for communications between different types of devices
US6967625Dec 31, 2002Nov 22, 2005Vivato, Inc.E-plane omni-directional antenna
US6977608 *Dec 15, 2004Dec 20, 2005Rockwell CollinsAtmospheric data aggregation and forecasting system
US6978258 *Dec 26, 2001Dec 20, 2005Autodesk, Inc.Fuzzy logic reasoning for inferring user location preferences
US6980587 *Mar 9, 2001Dec 27, 2005Nec CorporationMethod for acquisition of slot timing in a direct sequence spread spectrum communication receiver
US6992621Mar 7, 2003Jan 31, 2006Vivato, Inc.Wireless communication and beam forming with passive beamformers
US7053797Mar 5, 2003May 30, 2006Taylor Lance GIntelligent selectively-targeted communications systems and methods for aircraft
US7054620 *Apr 10, 2002May 30, 2006Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)Method for deferred location reporting in a radio cellular network
US7055168Sep 22, 2000May 30, 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Method for interpreting and executing user preferences of audiovisual information
US7089116Oct 22, 2004Aug 8, 2006User-Centric Ip, L.P.User-centric event reporting
US7096037May 30, 2002Aug 22, 2006Palm, Inc.Videoconferencing bandwidth management for a handheld computer system and method
US7096100 *Mar 10, 2004Aug 22, 2006Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Vehicle-mounted apparatus and guidance system
US7098844Dec 10, 2004Aug 29, 2006Escort Inc.Acceleration detector with integral vehicle parameter display using a vehicle interface
US7113107Mar 5, 2003Sep 26, 2006Taylor Lance GIntelligent selectively-targeted communications systems and methods
US7138913 *Apr 29, 2004Nov 21, 2006Transport International Pool, Inc.Selective reporting of events in asset tracking system
US7139664 *Mar 28, 2005Nov 21, 2006Weather Central, Inc.System and method for providing personalized storm warnings
US7146014Jun 11, 2002Dec 5, 2006Intel CorporationMEMS directional sensor system
US7187997Apr 12, 2004Mar 6, 2007Johnson William JSystem and method for proactive content delivery by situational location
US7188026May 12, 2003Mar 6, 2007Dash Navigation, Inc.Hierarchical floating car data network
US7231236 *Jul 26, 2004Jun 12, 2007Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd.Integrated antenna and input/output port for a wireless communication device
US7239236 *Aug 16, 2004Jul 3, 2007Britton Rick AWireless sensors for alarm system operations
US7248159Dec 30, 2004Jul 24, 2007User-Centric Ip, LpUser-centric event reporting
US7251476Nov 1, 2004Jul 31, 2007Xcellasave, Inc.Method for advertising on digital cellular telephones and reducing costs to the end user
US7254483 *Dec 8, 2000Aug 7, 2007Advanced Marine Technologies Pty Ltd.System for fishing
US7256750Apr 13, 2005Aug 14, 2007Vivato, Inc.E-plane omni-directional antenna
US7265663Oct 22, 2002Sep 4, 2007Trivinci Systems, LlcMultimedia racing experience system
US7266450May 23, 2005Sep 4, 2007General Motors CorporationMethod and system for selecting route guidance data for off-board navigation
US7268700 *Sep 9, 2004Sep 11, 2007Hoffberg Steven MMobile communication device
US7269400 *Aug 16, 2004Sep 11, 2007Logitech Europe S.A.Wireless peripheral interface with universal serial bus port
US7271737 *Jul 27, 2004Sep 18, 2007Hoffberg Steven MMobile communication device
US7272497 *Mar 16, 2004Sep 18, 2007Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki KaishaVehicle navigation system with multi-use display
US7295608Sep 26, 2002Nov 13, 2007Jodie Lynn ReynoldsSystem and method for communicating media signals
US7298248Jul 18, 2005Nov 20, 2007K40 ElectronicsCommunication system for vehicles
US7302102Feb 23, 2004Nov 27, 2007Reynolds Jodie LSystem and method for dynamically switching quality settings of a codec to maintain a target data rate
US7305467 *Dec 23, 2002Dec 4, 2007Borgia/Cummins, LlcAutonomous tracking wireless imaging sensor network including an articulating sensor and automatically organizing network nodes
US7312702Feb 22, 2005Dec 25, 2007Erudite Holding LlcExpediting release procedure of cargo container at border crossing or at customs entry point by tracking and reporting threats while cargo container is in transit
US7339522Aug 9, 2005Mar 4, 2008S5 Wireless, Inc.Method and system for time difference of arrival (TDOA) location services
US7348895Nov 3, 2005Mar 25, 2008Lagassey Paul JAdvanced automobile accident detection, data recordation and reporting system
US7362239Jun 1, 2005Apr 22, 2008Persen Technologies IncorporatedVehicle warning system
US7373085 *Dec 7, 2000May 13, 2008The Directv Group, Inc.Hybrid satellite and fiber communications system
US7373243Mar 31, 2004May 13, 2008Nissan Technical Center North America, Inc.Method and system for providing traffic information
US7385501 *Aug 3, 2005Jun 10, 2008Himanshu S. AminSystem for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US7386396Jun 6, 2007Jun 10, 2008Johnson William JSystem and method for situational location proactive search
US7397416Aug 24, 2006Jul 8, 2008Escort Inc.Police radar/laser detector with integral vehicle parameter display using a vehicle interface
US7411493Sep 16, 2005Aug 12, 2008User-Centric Ip, L.P.User-centric event reporting
US7451005 *Feb 27, 2006Nov 11, 2008Hoffberg Steven MVehicular information system and method
US7457358Feb 23, 2004Nov 25, 2008Interact Devices, Inc.Polymorphic codec system and method
US7457359Apr 16, 2004Nov 25, 2008Mabey Danny LSystems, devices and methods for securely distributing highly-compressed multimedia content
US7499798Feb 23, 2005Mar 3, 2009General Motors CorporationMethod for transferring routes between navigational devices
US7505772 *Feb 6, 2008Mar 17, 2009Richard B HimmelsteinSystem and method for location-based user matching
US7523000 *Oct 11, 2005Apr 21, 2009Nissan Technical Center North America, Inc.Vehicle pre-collision countermeasure system
US7525450 *Aug 3, 2005Apr 28, 2009Khi Acquisitions Limited Liability CompanySystem for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US7551919Jun 25, 2007Jun 23, 2009Xcellasave, Inc.Method for advertising on digital cellular telephones and reducing costs to the end user
US7573873Apr 28, 2004Aug 11, 20093Com CorporationInternet telephony using network address translation
US7576679 *Jan 5, 2007Aug 18, 2009Escort Inc.Radar detector with position and velocity sensitive functions
US7596391Feb 19, 2009Sep 29, 2009Himmelstein Richard BSystem and method for wireless communication between a vehicle and a mobile unit
US7599434Oct 23, 2003Oct 6, 2009Reynolds Jodie LSystem and method for compressing portions of a media signal using different codecs
US7599715Feb 19, 2009Oct 6, 2009Himmelstein Richard BSystem and method for matching wireless devices
US7606657 *Feb 3, 2001Oct 20, 2009Robert Bosch GmbhDevice and method for detecting and preprocessing vehicle, traffic and/or driver related data
US7610365 *Feb 14, 2001Oct 27, 2009International Business Machines CorporationAutomatic relevance-based preloading of relevant information in portable devices
US7634354 *Aug 31, 2005Dec 15, 2009Microsoft CorporationLocation signposting and orientation
US7640268 *Apr 11, 2003Dec 29, 2009Ricoh Company, Ltd.Positional information management system, positional information management method, recording medium, and mobile terminal
US7647197Aug 7, 2003Jan 12, 2010Surveylab Group LimitedMobile instrument, viewing device, and methods of processing and storing information
US7647340Jun 15, 2001Jan 12, 2010Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Metadata in JPEG 2000 file format
US7649534Feb 1, 2006Jan 19, 2010Microsoft CorporationDesign of arbitrary linear and non-linear maps
US7653131Dec 2, 2005Jan 26, 2010Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Identification of replay segments
US7657836Sep 27, 2002Feb 2, 2010Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Summarization of soccer video content
US7657907Sep 30, 2002Feb 2, 2010Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Automatic user profiling
US7672879Oct 27, 2000Mar 2, 2010Yodlee.Com, Inc.Interactive activity interface for managing personal data and performing transactions over a data packet network
US7681448Mar 23, 2010Medius, Inc.System and method for aligning sensors on a vehicle
US7693484May 30, 2002Apr 6, 2010Palm, Inc.Dynamic networking modes method and apparatus
US7693628 *Jan 4, 2005Apr 6, 2010Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc.Controller with communication of multi-source tasks
US7710290Jun 22, 2007May 4, 2010Apple Inc.System and method for situational location relevant invocable speed reference
US7716403 *Sep 30, 2005May 11, 2010Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Information technology integration with automation systems
US7734300 *Feb 24, 2003Jun 8, 2010Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.Portable telephone performing a predetermined operation based on location information
US7747291Aug 24, 2009Jun 29, 2010Himmelstein Richard BWireless communication method
US7752535Dec 1, 2005Jul 6,, Inc.Categorization of summarized information
US7765279Oct 27, 1999Jul 27, 2010Verticalone CorporationSystem and method for scheduling harvesting of personal information
US7769620Sep 1, 1998Aug 3, 2010Dennis FernandezAdaptive direct transaction for networked client group
US7769633 *Jan 22, 2008Aug 3, 2010Nokia CorporationReal-time wireless e-coupon (promotion) definition based on available segment
US7778739Aug 7, 2006Aug 17, 2010Medius, Inc.Method and apparatus for dynamic configuration of multiprocessor system
US7783304Aug 24, 2009Aug 24, 2010Himmelstein Richard BWireless communication method
US7787872May 8, 2007Aug 31, 2010Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AbMethod and apparatus for event-triggered exchange of location-based information in a communications network
US7793136Dec 27, 2006Sep 7, 2010Eagle Harbor Holdings LLCApplication management system with configurable software applications
US7793205Jul 8, 2005Sep 7, 2010Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Synchronization of video and data
US7797367Oct 4, 2000Sep 14, 2010Gelvin David CApparatus for compact internetworked wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)
US7804440Jun 20, 2007Sep 28, 2010Escort Inc.Radar detector with position and velocity sensitive functions
US7809367 *Jun 28, 2002Oct 5, 2010Volvo Teknisk Utveckling AbSystem and method for prioritized communication between a central station and remote objects
US7830442 *Apr 29, 2003Nov 9, 2010ARETé ASSOCIATESCompact economical lidar system
US7843331Apr 15, 2004Nov 30, 2010Miller John MSystem for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US7843332 *Aug 3, 2005Nov 30, 2010Miller John MSystem for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US7844687Oct 4, 2000Nov 30, 2010Gelvin David CMethod for internetworked hybrid wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)
US7847685 *Aug 3, 2005Dec 7, 2010Miller John MSystem for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US7853865Jul 8, 2005Dec 14, 2010Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Synchronization of video and data
US7856386Sep 17, 2009Dec 21, 2010Yodlee, Inc.Host exchange in bill paying services
US7859402Oct 29, 2007Dec 28, 2010Miller John MComputer-implemented method to perform location-based searching
US7885685Jul 22, 2010Feb 8, 2011Himmelstein Richard BWireless communication method
US7891004Oct 4, 2000Feb 15, 2011Gelvin David CMethod for vehicle internetworks
US7899938Sep 14, 2001Mar 1, 2011Dennis S. FernandezIntegrated medical sensor and messaging system and method
US7904569Oct 4, 2000Mar 8, 2011Gelvin David CMethod for remote access of vehicle components
US7904814Dec 13, 2001Mar 8, 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.System for presenting audio-video content
US7907976Aug 27, 2010Mar 15, 2011Himmelstein Richard BVehicleTalk
US7912645 *Jul 16, 2007Mar 22, 2011Intelligent Technologies International, Inc.Information transfer arrangement and method for vehicles
US7912646 *Aug 6, 2009Mar 22, 2011Donnelly CorporationDriver assistance system for vehicle
US7948401 *Jan 18, 2007May 24, 2011Potomac Aviation Technology Corp.Emergency transmission monitoring and reporting
US7952512 *Oct 14, 2008May 31, 2011Sprint Communications Company L.P.Mobile device enabled radar tags
US7965222 *May 26, 2010Jun 21, 2011Telecommunication Systems, Inc.Cellular augmented radar/laser detector
US7974247 *Nov 12, 2001Jul 5, 2011Daita Frontier Fund, LlcCommunication terminal device and billing device
US7982599Mar 10, 2008Jul 19, 2011Miller John MSystem for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US7983835Nov 3, 2005Jul 19, 2011Lagassey Paul JModular intelligent transportation system
US7999721Aug 20, 2008Aug 16, 2011Escort Inc.Radar detector with navigational function
US8001860Feb 2, 2010Aug 23, 2011Eagle Harbor Holdings LLCMethod and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems
US8006117Aug 18, 2010Aug 23, 2011Eagle Harbor HoldingsMethod for multi-tasking multiple java virtual machines in a secure environment
US8006118Aug 18, 2010Aug 23, 2011Eagle Harbor HoldingsSystem and method for application failure detection
US8006119Aug 18, 2010Aug 23, 2011Eagle Harbor HoldingsApplication management system
US8020028Aug 5, 2010Sep 13, 2011Eagle Harbor HoldingsApplication management system for mobile devices
US8023964Apr 1, 2008Sep 20, 2011International Business Machines CorporationPredictive mobile phone service disruption service
US8027268Oct 24, 2008Sep 27, 2011Eagle Harbor Holdings, LlcMethod and apparatus for dynamic configuration of multiprocessor system
US8031050Oct 4, 2011Apple Inc.System and method for situational location relevant invocable speed reference
US8032477Mar 14, 2003Oct 4, 2011Linda Irene HoffbergAdaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore
US8036265Nov 9, 2007Oct 11, 2011Interact DevicesSystem and method for communicating media signals
US8045729Oct 24, 2008Oct 25, 2011Eagle Harbor Holdings, LlcAudio system with application management system for operating different types of audio sources
US8051446Dec 6, 1999Nov 1, 2011Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Method of creating a semantic video summary using information from secondary sources
US8064515Aug 19, 2009Nov 22, 2011Interact Devices, Inc.System and method for compressing portions of a media signal using different codecs
US8073565Dec 6, 2011Apple Inc.System and method for alerting a first mobile data processing system nearby a second mobile data processing system
US8079118Oct 13, 2010Dec 20, 2011Borgia/Cummins, LlcMethod for vehicle internetworks
US8089401Oct 29, 2009Jan 3, 2012Telecommunication Systems, Inc.Culled satellite ephemeris information for quick, accurate assisted locating satellite location determination for cell site antennas
US8126889Oct 7, 2002Feb 28, 2012Telecommunication Systems, Inc.Location fidelity adjustment based on mobile subscriber privacy profile
US8127246Oct 1, 2007Feb 28, 2012Apple Inc.Varying user interface element based on movement
US8140658Oct 4, 2000Mar 20, 2012Borgia/Cummins, LlcApparatus for internetworked wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)
US8150421Sep 19, 2006Apr 3, 2012Trueposition, Inc.User plane uplink time difference of arrival (U-TDOA)
US8160160Sep 8, 2006Apr 17, 2012Broadcast International, Inc.Bit-rate reduction for multimedia data streams
US8165057Sep 13, 2010Apr 24, 2012Eagle Harbor Holdings, LlcWireless telecommunications method
US8175395Nov 26, 2007May 8, 2012Interact Devices, Inc.System and method for dynamically switching quality settings of a codec to maintain a target data rate
US8180294Dec 29, 2009May 15, 2012Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Dynamic networking modes method and apparatus
US8200246Jun 12, 2012Microsoft CorporationData synchronization for devices supporting direction-based services
US8224346Feb 25, 2008Jul 17, 2012Himmelstein Richard BSystem and method for matching users in a wireless communication system
US8229467Jan 19, 2006Jul 24, 2012Locator IP, L.P.Interactive advisory system
US8289939Nov 3, 2003Oct 16, 2012Xr Communications LlcSignal communication coordination
US8325061Jan 7, 2010Dec 4, 2012Emilcott Associates, Inc.System and method for mobile environmental measurements and displays
US8340836Nov 22, 2010Dec 25, 2012Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Intelligent selectively-targeted communications methods
US8373588Feb 20, 2009Feb 12, 2013Escort Inc.Wireless connectivity in a radar detector
US8380383Apr 16, 2012Feb 19, 2013Eagle Harbor Holdings, LlcDistributed vehicle control system
US8385946Jan 25, 2008Feb 26, 2013Apple Inc.Disfavored route progressions or locations
US8417490May 11, 2010Apr 9, 2013Eagle Harbor Holdings, LlcSystem and method for the configuration of an automotive vehicle with modeled sensors
US8428517May 4, 2012Apr 23, 2013Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Dynamic networking modes method and apparatus
US8437909Feb 25, 2011May 7, 2013GM Global Technology Operations LLCMethod and apparatus for communication within control systems
US8452529Jan 10, 2008May 28, 2013Apple Inc.Adaptive navigation system for estimating travel times
US8463238Jan 2, 2008Jun 11, 2013Apple Inc.Mobile device base station
US8467991May 8, 2009Jun 18, 2013Microsoft CorporationData services based on gesture and location information of device
US8472417Sep 3, 2008Jun 25, 2013Mobotix AgCommunication control method
US8483888 *Apr 3, 2012Jul 9, 2013Orbital Sciences CorporationEmergency communications channel systems and methods for satellite command
US8489669Jul 10, 2007Jul 16, 2013Apple Inc.Mobile data processing system moving interest radius
US8494695Sep 2, 2009Jul 23, 2013General Electric CompanyCommunications system and method for a rail vehicle
US8525723Oct 29, 2010Sep 3, 2013Escort Inc.Radar detector with navigation function
US8538373May 25, 2011Sep 17, 2013Blackbird Technologies, Inc.Methods and apparatus for emergency tracking
US8538685Jun 6, 2007Sep 17, 2013Apple Inc.System and method for internet connected service providing heterogeneous mobile systems with situational location relevant content
US8565734Aug 27, 2010Oct 22, 2013Seong Sang Investments LlcAdvanced wireless vehicle services
US8600422Jul 16, 2012Dec 3, 2013Seong Sang Investments LlcLocating a target unit in a wireless network
US8605010 *Feb 24, 2012Dec 10, 2013Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.Information processing device
US8611927Mar 31, 2011Dec 17, 2013Locator Ip, LpInteractive advisory system
US8612131 *Apr 5, 2011Dec 17, 2013B&C Electronic Engineering, Inc.Emergency and traffic alert system
US8615257May 31, 2012Dec 24, 2013Microsoft CorporationData synchronization for devices supporting direction-based services
US8615358May 26, 2005Dec 24, 2013General Motors LlcSystem and method for zone based initial route guidance within a telematics equipped mobile vehicle
US8624771Oct 13, 2009Jan 7, 2014Escort Inc.Wireless connectivity in a radar detector
US8631188 *Sep 2, 2009Jan 14, 2014Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Data storage device overlapping host data transfer for a write command with inter-command delay
US8638763Dec 5, 2006Jan 28, 2014Palm, Inc.System and method for communicating with a network access node
US8639267Oct 3, 2008Jan 28, 2014William J. JohnsonSystem and method for location based exchanges of data facilitating distributed locational applications
US8645176May 7, 2007Feb 4, 2014Trimble Navigation LimitedUtilizing historical data in an asset management environment
US8648692Aug 17, 2005Feb 11, 2014Seong Sang Investments LlcAccessing an automobile with a transponder
US8650277 *Feb 3, 2011Feb 11, 2014Symantec CorporationMethod, system, and computer readable medium for gathering usage statistics
US8666936May 7, 2007Mar 4, 2014Trimble Navigation LimitedSystem and method for asset management
US8675733Jun 12, 2012Mar 18, 2014Interact Devices, Inc.Polymorphic codec system and method
US8680988Mar 26, 2012Mar 25, 2014Blackbird Technologies Inc.Mobile asset tracking unit, system and method
US8681044Dec 30, 2011Mar 25, 2014Telecommunication Systems, Inc.Culled satellite ephemeris information for quick, accurate assisted locating satellite location determination for cell site antennas
US8700301Jan 29, 2009Apr 15, 2014Microsoft CorporationMobile computing devices, architecture and user interfaces based on dynamic direction information
US8700302Aug 6, 2009Apr 15, 2014Microsoft CorporationMobile computing devices, architecture and user interfaces based on dynamic direction information
US8700313Jan 13, 2012Apr 15, 2014Blackbird Technologies, Inc.Mobile unit and system having integrated mapping, communications and tracking
US8701023Feb 14, 2007Apr 15, 2014Cypress Semiconductor CorporationGlobal parameter management graphical user interface (GUI) for embedded application design
US8712838Jan 28, 2010Apr 29, 2014International Business Machines CorporationDynamic web page construction based on determination of client device location
US8750841May 14, 2010Jun 10, 2014William J. JohnsonSystem and method for automatically leaving an outgoing caller message
US8760339Feb 11, 2013Jun 24, 2014Escort Inc.Wireless connectivity in a radar detector
US8761751Sep 14, 2010Jun 24, 2014William J. JohnsonSystem and method for targeting data processing system(s) with data
US8769442Jul 7, 2009Jul 1, 2014Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for allocating digital graffiti objects and canvasses
US8803695 *Jan 8, 2013Aug 12, 2014Lytx, Inc.System and method for identifying non-event profiles
US8806099May 7, 2010Aug 12, 2014Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.Information technology integration with automation systems
US8812654Oct 21, 2010Aug 19, 2014Borgia/Cummins, LlcMethod for internetworked hybrid wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)
US8813021Feb 14, 2007Aug 19, 2014Cypress Semiconductor CorporationGlobal resource conflict management for an embedded application design
US8830576 *Mar 22, 2005Sep 9, 2014University Of WyomingViewing device synchronizer
US8832121Feb 1, 2006Sep 9, 2014Accuweather, Inc.Location-based data communications system and method
US8868374Jun 3, 2013Oct 21, 2014Microsoft CorporationData services based on gesture and location information of device
US8872767Jul 7, 2009Oct 28, 2014Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for converting gestures into digital graffiti
US8886392Dec 21, 2011Nov 11, 2014Intellectual Ventures Fund 79 LlcMethods, devices, and mediums associated with managing vehicle maintenance activities
US8892128Oct 13, 2009Nov 18, 2014Telecommunication Systems, Inc.Location based geo-reminders
US8892310Feb 21, 2014Nov 18, 2014Smartdrive Systems, Inc.System and method to detect execution of driving maneuvers
US8908516Aug 29, 2011Dec 9, 2014Blackberry CorporationMaintaining stability of a wireless network by adjusting transmitting period
US8909388 *Dec 30, 2013Dec 9, 2014Hyundai Motor CompanyDriving device and method using imaging device signal and navigation signal
US8929459 *Sep 28, 2011Jan 6, 2015Google Inc.Systems and methods utilizing efficient video compression techniques for browsing of static image data
US8930233Nov 14, 2011Jan 6, 2015Apple Inc.System and method for anonymous location based services
US8949899Jun 13, 2005Feb 3, 2015Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Collaborative recommendation system
US8963686Nov 5, 2012Feb 24, 2015Apple Inc.System and method for situational location relevant invocable speed reference
US8965695Mar 5, 2007Feb 24, 2015Google Technology Holdings LLCHierarchical floating car data network
US8965841May 7, 2007Feb 24, 2015Trimble Navigation LimitedMethod for automatic asset classification
US8978439Jan 20, 2011Mar 17, 2015Eagle Harbor Holdings, LlcSystem and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems
US8984059Jul 12, 2013Mar 17, 2015Apple Inc.Mobile data processing system moving interest radius
US8996240Mar 16, 2006Mar 31, 2015Smartdrive Systems, Inc.Vehicle event recorders with integrated web server
US9019091Mar 17, 2011Apr 28, 2015Donnelly CorporationInterior rearview mirror system
US9031779 *May 30, 2012May 12, 2015Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.System and method for hazard detection and sharing
US9041561May 7, 2007May 26, 2015Trimble Navigation LimitedMethod for controlling power usage of a reporting device
US9043138Sep 7, 2007May 26, 2015Green Driver, Inc.System and method for automated updating of map information
US9066199Jun 27, 2008Jun 23, 2015Apple Inc.Location-aware mobile device
US9078095Aug 21, 2013Jul 7, 2015William J. JohnsonSystem and method for location based inventory management
US9090295Nov 18, 2013Jul 28, 2015The Wilfred J. and Louisette G. Lagassey Irrevocable TrustModular intelligent transportation system
US9094798Dec 12, 2014Jul 28, 2015Locator IP, L.P.Interactive advisory system
US9100793Dec 5, 2011Aug 4, 2015Apple Inc.System and method for alerting a first mobile data processing system nearby a second mobile data processing system
US9109904Jan 25, 2008Aug 18, 2015Apple Inc.Integration of map services and user applications in a mobile device
US9111234May 7, 2007Aug 18, 2015Trimble Navigation LimitedEnabling notifications pertaining to an asset
US20010030995 *Mar 9, 2001Oct 18, 2001Anne-Marie GesretMethod for acquisition of slot timing in a direct sequence spread spectrum communication receiver
US20010049624 *Dec 18, 2000Dec 6, 2001Masashi UyamaAdvertisement distributing method and system
US20010052875 *Apr 12, 2001Dec 20, 2001Toshiba Tec Kabushiki KaishaDirectional antenna apparatus and mobile communication system using the same
US20020004391 *Dec 7, 2000Jan 10, 2002Austin John T.Hybrid satellite and fiber communications system
US20020077062 *Dec 12, 2001Jun 20, 2002Lg Electronics Inc.Information service system and operation method thereof
US20020077981 *Nov 12, 2001Jun 20, 2002Yozan, Inc.Communication terminal device and billing device
US20040073361 *Oct 15, 2002Apr 15, 2004Assimakis TzamaloukasEnhanced mobile communication device, and transportation application thereof
US20040086039 *Oct 23, 2003May 6, 2004Interact Devices, Inc.System and method for compressing portions of a media signal using different codecs
US20040102197 *Nov 17, 2003May 27, 2004Dietz Timothy AlanDynamic web page construction based on determination of client device location
US20040106414 *Apr 10, 2002Jun 3, 2004Ewert Joerg ChristianMethod for deferred location reporting in a radio cellular network
US20040107042 *Dec 3, 2002Jun 3, 2004Seick Ryan E.Road hazard data collection system and method
US20040119838 *Apr 29, 2003Jun 24, 2004Andrew GriffisCompact economical lidar system
US20040164896 *Feb 21, 2003Aug 26, 2004Lockheed Martin CorporationPersonal surveillance system with locating capabilities
US20040165783 *Feb 23, 2004Aug 26, 2004Interact Devices, Inc.System and method for dynamically switching quality settings of a codec to maintain a target data rate
US20040174299 *Mar 7, 2003Sep 9, 2004Vivato, IncWireless communication and beam forming with passive beamformers
US20040181324 *Mar 10, 2004Sep 16, 2004Koji ArataVehicle-mounted apparatus and guidance system
US20040181340 *Mar 1, 2003Sep 16, 2004User-Centric Enterprises, Inc.Rotating map and user-centric weather prediction
US20040193371 *Mar 16, 2004Sep 30, 2004Yoshikazu KoshijiVehicle navigation system with multi-use display
US20040198339 *Sep 27, 2002Oct 7, 2004Martin Ronald BruceSelective multi-media broadcast of traffic information
US20040204850 *Mar 6, 2002Oct 14, 2004Ford Motor CompanyAutomotive synchronized communication networks
US20040223476 *Nov 3, 2003Nov 11, 2004Bobby JoseSignal communication coordination
US20040230345 *May 12, 2003Nov 18, 2004Assimakis TzamaloukasMethods for communicating between elements in a hierarchical floating car data network
US20040230370 *May 12, 2003Nov 18, 2004Assimakis TzamaloukasEnhanced mobile communication device with extended radio, and applications
US20040230374 *May 12, 2003Nov 18, 2004Assimakis TzamaloukasEnhanced dead reckoning method
US20040246171 *Jun 30, 2003Dec 9, 2004Escort Inc.Police radar/laser detector with integral vehicle parameter display using a vehicle interface
US20040248586 *Jun 9, 2003Dec 9, 2004Motorola, Inc.Location markers on mobile devices
US20040252051 *Apr 12, 2004Dec 16, 2004Johnson William J.System and method for proactive content delivery by situational location
US20050001743 *Jul 2, 2003Jan 6, 2005Haemerle Richard R.Information retrieval and display device and system
US20050018768 *Apr 16, 2004Jan 27, 2005Interact Devices, Inc.Systems, devices and methods for securely distributing highly-compressed multimedia content
US20050020225 *Aug 16, 2004Jan 27, 2005Sergio LazzarottoWireless peripheral interface with universal serial bus port
US20050037824 *Jul 26, 2004Feb 17, 2005Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd.Integrated antenna and input/output port for a wireless communication device
US20050038645 *Feb 23, 2004Feb 17, 2005Interact Devices, Inc.Polymorphic codec system and method
US20050049789 *Aug 27, 2003Mar 3, 2005Kelly Terence F.System and method for providing personalized storm warnings
US20050055162 *Sep 5, 2003Mar 10, 2005Li GaoMethod and system for determining parameters inside a subterranean formation using data sensors and a wireless ad hoc network
US20050073459 *Oct 1, 2003Apr 7, 2005Spectrum5, Inc.Method and system for time difference of arrival (TDOA) location services
US20050086004 *Oct 22, 2004Apr 21, 2005User-Center Enterprises, Inc.User-centric event reporting
US20050091165 *Oct 28, 2004Apr 28, 2005Sezan Muhammed I.Audiovisual information management system with usage preferences
US20050091685 *Oct 28, 2004Apr 28, 2005Sezan Muhammed I.Audiovisual information management system
US20050091686 *Oct 28, 2004Apr 28, 2005Sezan Muhammed I.Audiovisual information management system with seasons
US20050114908 *Jan 3, 2005May 26, 2005Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Summarization of football video content
US20050117020 *Jan 3, 2005Jun 2, 2005Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Summarization of football video content
US20050117021 *Jan 3, 2005Jun 2, 2005Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Summarization of football video content
US20050120033 *Oct 28, 2004Jun 2, 2005Sezan Muhammed I.Audiovisual information management system with identification prescriptions
US20050128361 *Jan 3, 2005Jun 16, 2005Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Summarization of football video content
US20050131727 *Oct 28, 2004Jun 16, 2005Sezan Muhammed I.Audiovisual information management system with user identification
US20050134686 *Jan 3, 2005Jun 23, 2005Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Summarization of football video content
US20050154763 *Jun 14, 2004Jul 14, 2005Van Beek Petrus J.Segmentation metadata for audio-visual content
US20050155053 *Mar 8, 2005Jul 14, 2005Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Summarization of sumo video content
US20050155055 *Mar 8, 2005Jul 14, 2005Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Summarization of sumo video content
US20050176444 *Feb 24, 2003Aug 11, 2005Shigeyuki TanakaPortable telephone
US20050188328 *Oct 28, 2004Aug 25, 2005Sezan Muhammed I.Audiovisual information management system with presentation service
US20050197775 *Dec 30, 2004Sep 8, 2005User-Centric Enterprises, Inc.User-centric event reporting
US20050222755 *Mar 31, 2004Oct 6, 2005Nissan Technical Center North America, Inc.Method and system for providing traffic information
US20050237934 *Apr 18, 2005Oct 27, 2005Pioneer CorporationInformation distribution system
US20050240378 *Jun 8, 2005Oct 27, 2005User-Centric Enterprises, Inc.User-centric event reporting with follow-up information
US20050264404 *Jun 1, 2005Dec 1, 2005Franczyk Frank MVehicle warning system
US20050266858 *Aug 3, 2005Dec 1, 2005Miller John MSystem for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US20050272442 *Aug 3, 2005Dec 8, 2005Miller John MSystem for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US20060012468 *Jul 18, 2005Jan 19, 2006K40 ElectronicsCommunication system for vehicles
US20060019676 *Aug 3, 2005Jan 26, 2006Miller John MSystem for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US20060033660 *Aug 9, 2005Feb 16, 2006Dodson W KMethod and system for time difference of arrival (TDOA) location services
US20080086427 *May 7, 2007Apr 10, 2008Daniel John WallaceExternally augmented asset management
US20100042320 *Feb 18, 2010Microsoft CorporationLocation aware mobile-device software development
US20100185975 *Jul 22, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.User interface systems and methods for manipulating and viewing digital documents
US20100214163 *Aug 26, 2010Thales-Raytheon Systems Company LlcTransmitting location information of a beacon
US20100223351 *May 14, 2009Sep 2, 2010Ryan SteelbergSystem and method for on-demand delivery of audio content for use with entertainment creatives
US20110153199 *Jun 23, 2011Fujitsu Ten LimitedNavigation apparatus
US20110181443 *Jul 28, 2011B&C Electronic Engineering, Inc.Emergency and traffic alert system
US20110208857 *Aug 25, 2011Odyssey Software, Inc.Method, system, and computer readable medium for gathering usage statistics
US20110285591 *May 19, 2010Nov 24, 2011Palm, Inc.Correlating contextual data and position data to improve location based services
US20120076210 *Mar 29, 2012Google Inc.Systems and Methods Utilizing Efficient Video Compression Techniques for Browsing of Static Image Data
US20120154281 *Jun 21, 2012Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.Information Processing Device
US20120259485 *Apr 3, 2012Oct 11, 2012Orbital Sciences CorporationEmergency communications channel systems and methods for satellite command
US20130131980 *May 23, 2013On Time Systems, Inc.Resolving gps ambiguity in electronic maps
US20130144498 *May 16, 2012Jun 6, 2013Hyundai Motor CompanyApparatus and method for controlling emergency braking based on condition information of a vehicle
US20130197774 *Jan 8, 2013Aug 1, 2013Drivecam, Inc.System and method for identifying non-event profiles
US20130325325 *May 30, 2012Dec 5, 2013Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North AmericaSystem and method for hazard detection and sharing
US20140274181 *Mar 15, 2013Sep 18, 2014Rosemount Inc.Resource optimization in a field device
US20140278084 *Mar 13, 2013Sep 18, 2014Ipventure, Inc.Method and apparatus for intelligent acquisition of position information
US20140317152 *Jun 30, 2014Oct 23, 2014Lytx, Inc.System and method for identifying non-event profiles
US20150057968 *Sep 20, 2013Feb 26, 2015Navico Holding AsWearable device for fishing
US20150133223 *Sep 13, 2014May 14, 2015Russell O. Carter, SR.Geo-location interactive gaming system
USRE40653Aug 2, 2005Mar 10, 2009Fleming Iii Hoyt ARadar detector for detecting police radar that receives GPS data
USRE41905Oct 25, 2007Nov 2, 2010Fleming Iii Hoyt AIntelligent radar detector
USRE42927Sep 1, 2010Nov 15, 2011Apple Inc.System and method for obtaining and using location specific information
EP1916644A1Oct 19, 2007Apr 30, 2008RUAG ElectronicsMethod and device for creating and transmitting georeferenced messages
WO2003025774A1 *Sep 17, 2002Mar 27, 2003Inet Blue CorpCommunication, location and tracking system
WO2003046690A2 *Nov 25, 2002Jun 5, 2003Steele TechnologiesMultimedia racing experience system and corresponding experience based displays
WO2004015374A1 *Aug 7, 2003Feb 19, 2004Bond Craig RichardMobile instrument, viewing device, and methods of processing and storing information
WO2004057881A1 *Dec 19, 2003Jul 8, 2004Michael Leslie NormanPosition communication method and apparatus
WO2006023832A2 *Aug 17, 2005Mar 2, 2006Texas Instruments IncMethod and apparatus for providing closed-loop transmit precoding
WO2007079395A2 *Dec 28, 2006Jul 12, 2007Trueposition IncDevice and network enabled geo-fencing for area sensitive gaming enablement
U.S. Classification342/357.31, 342/457, 701/409, 701/485, 701/445
International ClassificationH04B7/185, G01S19/48
Cooperative ClassificationH04B7/18576
European ClassificationH04B7/185R
Legal Events
Sep 29, 2004FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Sep 18, 2008FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Jul 14, 2009CCCertificate of correction
Oct 4, 2012FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12