Publication number | US6272487 B1 |

Publication type | Grant |

Application number | US 09/277,612 |

Publication date | Aug 7, 2001 |

Filing date | Mar 26, 1999 |

Priority date | Feb 28, 1997 |

Fee status | Paid |

Also published as | US5995957 |

Publication number | 09277612, 277612, US 6272487 B1, US 6272487B1, US-B1-6272487, US6272487 B1, US6272487B1 |

Inventors | Thomas Abel Beavin, Balakrishna Raghavendra Iyer, Akira Shibamiya, Hong Sang Tie, Min Wang |

Original Assignee | International Business Machines Corporation |

Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |

Patent Citations (6), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (98), Classifications (6), Legal Events (4) | |

External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |

US 6272487 B1

Abstract

The system, method, and program of this invention collects multi-column statistics, by a database management system, to reflect a relationship among multiple columns of a table in a relational database. These statistics are stored in the system catalog, and are used during query optimization to obtain an estimate of the number of qualifying rows when a query has predicates on multiple columns of a table.

A multi-column linear quantile statistic is collected by dividing the data of multiple columns into sub-ranges where each sub-range has approximately an even distribution of data, and determining a frequency and cardinality of each sub-range. A multi-column polygonal quantile statistic is collected by dividing the data of multiple columns into sub-spaces where each sub-space contains approximately the same number of tuples, and determining a frequency and cardinality of each sub-space.

The system catalog is accessed for the stored multi-column linear quantile statistic for a query having a single range predicate and at least one equal predicate to determine the selectivity value for the predicates of the query. The system catalog is accessed for the stored multi-column polygonal quantile statistic for a query having more than one range predicate. These statistics are used in various ways to determine the selectivity value for the predicates of the query.

Claims(37)

1. A method for use in a database management system for optimizing a query, the method comprising:

collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic to reflect a relationship among multiple selected non-indexed columns of a table, wherein the step of collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises collecting a first type of multi-column quantile statistics for indicating a number of rows between two given values by dividing the data into a plurality of sub-ranges, each sub-range having an even distribution of data, and determining a frequency and cardinality of each sub-range; and

storing the at least one type of multi-column statistic in a table for subsequent use in determining a selectivity value (a number of qualified rows) for predicates in the query, wherein the selectivity value is used in optimizing execution of the query.

2. The method of claim **1** wherein the step of collecting collects a different type of multi-column statistic for each type of column correlation.

3. The method of claim **1** wherein the step of collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises concatenating columns to collect a multi-column cardinality statistic by counting a number of distinct concatenated column values as the at least one type of multi-column statistic.

4. The method of claim **1** wherein the step of collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises concatenating non-indexed columns to create a multi-column frequent value statistic as the at least one type of multi-column statistic.

5. The method of claim **3** further comprising accessing the table for the multi-column cardinality statistic for the multiple columns having equal predicates in the query and determining the selectivity value as “1 divided by the multi-column cardinality statistic”.

6. The method of claim **4** further comprising accessing the table, and

if there are multi-column frequent value statistics containing a same plurality of columns as a plurality of equal predicates in the query, and

if literals in the predicates match literals in the stored multi-column frequent value, then

determining the selectivity value as being equal to a frequency of the multi-column frequent value.

7. The method of claim **4** further comprising accessing the table, and

if there are multi-column frequent value statistics containing a same plurality of columns as a plurality of equal predicates in the query, and

if literals in the predicates do not match literals in the stored multi-column frequent value, then

determining the selectivity value as: $\frac{\begin{array}{c}\text{(1}-\text{SUM(Frequency of}\\ \text{all multi-column frequent values))}\end{array}}{\begin{array}{c}\text{(}\ue89e\u201c\text{multi-column}\u201d\ue89e\text{cardinality)}-\\ \text{(number of}\ue89e\u201c\text{multi-column}\u201d\ue89e\text{frequent values)}\end{array}}.$

8. The method of claim **1** further comprising accessing the table for the first type of multi-column quantile statistics for the multiple columns for the query having a single range predicate and at least one equal predicate to determine the selectivity value for the predicates of the query.

9. The method of claim **8** further comprising determining the selectivity value as follows:

for predicates that are completely satisfied by one of the plurality of sub-ranges, the selectivity is the frequency;

for predicates that are partially satisfied by one of the sub-ranges, a final selectivity is equal to a selectivity of fully qualified sub-ranges plus a selectivity of partially qualified sub-ranges.

10. The method of claim **9** wherein the step of determining, for predicates that are partially satisfied by one of the sub-ranges, further comprises translating a boundary of a sub-range by concatenating a set of values of a lower boundary and concatenating a set of values of a higher boundary for the sub-range; and using the concatenated values in the selectivity determination.

11. A method for use in a database management system for optimizing a query, the method comprising:

collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic to reflect a relationship among multiple selected non-indexed columns of a table, wherein the step of collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises collecting a second type of multi-column quantile statistics for indicating a number of rows between two given sets of values by dividing the data into a plurality of sub-spaces, each sub-space containing approximately a same number of tuples, and determining a frequency and cardinality of each sub-space; and

storing the at least one type of multi-column statistic in a table for subsequent use in determining a selectivity value (a number of qualified rows) for predicates in the query, wherein the selectivity value is used in optimizing execution of the query.

12. The method of claim **11** further comprising accessing the table for the second type of multi-column quantile statistics for the multiple columns for the query having a plurality of range predicates to determine the selectivity value for the predicates of the query.

13. The method of claim **12** wherein the step of determining the selectivity further comprises determining a final selectivity as being equal to a selectivity of fully qualified sub-spaces plus a selectivity of partially qualified sub-spaces.

14. The method of claim **13** wherein the selectivity of partially qualified sub-spaces is determined according to the following: $\frac{\left(\mathrm{X1}-\mathrm{X2}+1\right)*\left(\mathrm{Y1}-\mathrm{Y2}+1\right)*\left(\mathrm{Z1}-\mathrm{Z2}+1\right)\ue89e\dots}{\left(\mathrm{XA}-\mathrm{XB}+1\right)*\left(\mathrm{YA}-\mathrm{YB}+1\right)*\left(\mathrm{ZA}-\mathrm{ZB}+1\right)\ue89e\dots}*\text{frequency for quantile}$

Where:

X1, X2 are the high and low bounds for the X-coordinate of the query

Y1, Y2 are the high and low bounds for the Y-coordinate of the query

Z1, Z2 are the high and low bounds for the Z-coordinate of the query

. . . etc., for each coordinate (dimension) of the query

XA, XB are the high and low bounds for the X-coordinate of the quantile

YA, YB are the high and low bounds for the Y-coordinate of the quantile

ZA, ZB are the high and low bounds for the Z-coordinate of the quantile

. . . etc., for each coordinate (dimension) of the quantile.

15. A database management system comprising:

means for collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic to reflect a relationship among multiple non-indexed columns of a table, wherein the means for collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises means for collecting a first type of multi-column quantide statistics for indicating a number of rows between two given values by dividing the data into a plurality of sub-ranges, each sub-range having an even distribution of data, and means for determining a frequency and cardinality of each sub-range; and

means for storing the at least one type of multi-column statistic in a table for subsequent use in determining a selectivity value (a number of qualified rows) for predicates in the query, wherein the selectivity value is used in optimizing execution of the query.

16. The system of claim **15** wherein the means for collecting collects a different type of multi-column statistic for each type of column correlation.

17. The system of claim **15** wherein the means for collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises means for concatenating columns to collect a multi-column cardinality statistic; and means for counting a number of distinct concatenated column values as the at least one type of multi-column statistic.

18. The system of claim **15** wherein the means for collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises means for concatenating non-indexed columns to create a multi-column frequent value statistic as the at least one type of multi-column statistic.

19. The system of claim **17** further comprising means for accessing the table for the multi-column cardinality statistic for the multiple columns having equal predicates in the query; and means for determining the selectivity value as “1 divided by the multi-column cardinality statistic”.

20. The system of claim **15** further comprising means for accessing the table for the first type of multi-column quantile statistics for the multiple columns for the query having a single range predicate and at least one equal predicate to determine the selectivity value for the predicates of the query.

21. The system of claim **20** further comprising means for determining the selectivity value as follows:

for predicates that are completely satisfied by one of the plurality of sub-ranges, the selectivity is the frequency;

for predicates that are partially satisfied by one of the sub-ranges, a final selectivity is equal to a selectivity of fully qualified sub-ranges plus a selectivity of partially qualified sub-ranges.

22. The system of claim **21** wherein the means for determining further comprises translating a boundary of a sub-range by concatenating a set of values of a lower boundary and concatenating a set of values of a higher boundary for the sub-range; and using the concatenated values in the selectivity determination.

23. A database management system comprising:

means for collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic to reflect a relationship among multiple non-indexed columns of a table, wherein the means for collecting at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises means for collecting a second type of multi-column quantile statistics for indicating a number of rows between two given sets of values by dividing the data into a plurality of sub-spaces, each sub-space containing approximately a same number of tuples, and means for determining a frequency and cardinality of each sub-space; and

means for storing the at least one type of multi-column statistic in a table for subsequent use in determining a selectivity value (a number of qualified rows) for predicates in the query, wherein the selectivity value is used in optimizing execution of the query.

24. The system of claim **23** further comprising means for accessing the table for the second type of multi-column quantile statistics for the multiple columns for the query having a plurality of range predicates to determine the selectivity value for the predicates of the query.

25. The system of claim **24** wherein the means for determining the selectivity further comprises means for determining a final selectivity as being equal to a selectivity of fully qualified sub-spaces plus a selectivity of partially qualified sub-spaces.

26. The system of claim **25** wherein the selectivity of partially qualified sub-spaces is determined according to the following: $\frac{\left(\mathrm{X1}-\mathrm{X2}+1\right)*\left(\mathrm{Y1}-\mathrm{Y2}+1\right)*\left(\mathrm{Z1}-\mathrm{Z2}+1\right)\ue89e\dots}{\left(\mathrm{XA}-\mathrm{XB}+1\right)*\left(\mathrm{YA}-\mathrm{YB}+1\right)*\left(\mathrm{ZA}-\mathrm{ZB}+1\right)\ue89e\dots}*\text{frequency for quantile}$

Where:

X1, X2 are the high and low bounds for the X-coordinate of the query

Y1, Y2 are the high and low bounds for the Y-coordinate of the query

Z1, Z2 are the high and low bounds for the Z-coordinate of the query

. . . etc., for each coordinate (dimension) of the query

XA, XB are the high and low bounds for the X-coordinate of the quantile

YA, YB are the high and low bounds for the Y-coordinate of the quantile

ZA, ZB are the high and low bounds for the Z-coordinate of the quantile

. . . etc., for each coordinate (dimension) of the quantile.

27. Computer programming code residing on at least one computer usable medium (i.e., a program product) for use in a database management system, the program product comprising:

means for causing a collection of at least one type of multi-column statistic to reflect a relationship among multiple non-indexed columns of a table, wherein the means for causing a collection of at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises means for causing a collection of a first type of multi-column quantile statistics for indicating a number of rows between two given values by dividing the data into a plurality of sub-ranges, each sub-range having an even distribution of data, and means for determining a frequency and cardinality of each sub-range; and

means for causing a storing of the at least one type of multi-column statistic in a table for subsequent use in determining a selectivity value (a number of qualified rows) for predicates in the query, wherein the selectivity value is used in optimizing execution of the query.

28. The program product of claim **27** wherein the means for causing the collection collects a different type of multi-column statistic for each type of column correlation.

29. The program product of claim **27** wherein the means for causing the collection of at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises means for causing a concatenation of columns to collect a multi-column cardinality statistic; and means for causing a counting of a number of distinct concatenated column values as the at least one type of multi-column statistic.

30. The program product of claim **27** wherein the means for causing a collection of at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises means for causing a concatenation of non-indexed columns to create a multi-column frequent value statistic as the at least one type of multi-column statistic.

31. The program product of claim **29** further comprising means for causing an access to the table for the multi-column cardinality statistic for the multiple columns having equal predicates in the query; and means for causing a determination of the selectivity value as “1 divided by the multi-column cardinality statistic”.

32. The program product of claim **27** further comprising means for causing an access to the table for the first type of multi-column quantile statistics for the multiple columns for the query having a single range predicate and at least one equal predicate to cause a determination of the selectivity value for the predicates of the query.

33. The program product of claim **32** further comprising means for causing a determination of the selectivity value as follows:

for predicates that are completely satisfied by one of the plurality of sub-ranges, the selectivity is the frequency;

for predicates that are partially satisfied by one of the sub-ranges, a final selectivity is equal to a selectivity of fully qualified sub-ranges plus a selectivity of partially qualified sub-ranges.

34. The program product of claim **33** wherein the means for causing a determination further comprises means for causing a translation of a boundary of a sub-range by concatenating a set of values of a lower boundary and concatenating a set of values of a higher boundary for the sub-range; and means for using the concatenated values in the selectivity determination.

35. Computer programming code residing on at least one computer usable medium (i.e., a program product) for use in a database management system, the program product comprising:

means for causing a collection of at least one type of multi-column statistic to reflect a relationship among multiple non-indexed columns of a table, wherein the means for causing a collection of at least one type of multi-column statistic further comprises means for causing a collection of a second type of multi-column quantile statistic for indicating a number of rows between two given sets of values by dividing the data into a plurality of sub-spaces, each sub-space containing approximately a same number of tuples, and means for causing a determination of a frequency and cardinality of each sub-space; and

means for causing a storing of the at least one type of multi-column statistic in a table for subsequent use in determining a selectivity value (a number of qualified rows) for predicates in the query, wherein the selectivity value is used in optimizing execution of the query.

36. The program product of claim **35** further comprising means for causing an access to the table for the second type of multi-column quantile statistics for the multiple columns for the query having a plurality of range predicates; and means for causing a determination of the selectivity value for the predicates of the query.

37. The system of claim **36** wherein the means for causing the determination of the selectivity value further comprises means for causing a determination of a final selectivity as being equal to a selectivity of fully qualified sub-spaces plus a selectivity of partially qualified sub-spaces.

Description

This application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 08/808,521, filed Feb. 28, 1997, which application is incorporated herein by reference.

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject co copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to a database management system for optimizing queries, and more specifically for determining an estimation for a number of qualified rows of a query (i.e., a selectivity value), e.g., for use in determining optimized access paths.

2. Description of the Related Art

Databases are computerized information storage and retrieval systems. A relational database management system (RDBMS) is a database management system (DBMS) which uses relational techniques for storing and retrieving data. A DBMS is structured to accept commands to store, retrieve, and delete data. One widely used and well known set of commands is called the Structured Query Language (SQL).

Relational databases are organized into tables which consist of rows and columns of data. The rows are formally called tuples. A database will typically have many tables and each table will typically have multiple columns. The tables are typically stored on random access storage devices (DASD) such as magnetic or optical disk drives for semi-permanent storage.

Tables are at the center of a relational database engine; and a major goal of the underlying query compiler is to provide a suite of mechanisms so that user data can be easily stored and efficiently manipulated.

An important function of query optimization is estimating the number of qualified rows accurately. This estimation is used to determine an optimized access path by the DBMS to the data. An inherent problem occurs during this estimation process when the query has predicates (local or join) on multiple columns of a table. Most database optimizers make an assumption that there is no relationship between those predicates; and they evaluate the predicates independently when estimating the number of qualified rows. This independence assumption, however, may, in many cases, be incorrect and may cause a very inaccurate qualifying row estimate. The following example illustrates this problem.

SELECT*FROM INVENTORY_TABLE

WHERE CURR_LOCATION=‘LOC1’

AND ORIG_LOCATION=‘LOC1’

Number of rows in INVENTORY_TABLE=500,000

Number of distinct values in CURR_LOCATION=50

Number of distinct values in ORIG_LOCATION=50

Selectivity is the percentage of rows that would qualify. Selectivity of “CURR_LOCATION=‘LOC1’” is evaluated to be=“0.02” (i.e., one out of every fifty rows would qualify). Selectivity of “ORIG_LOCATION=‘LOC1’” is evaluated to be=“0.02”. The number of qualified rows from INVENTORY_TABLE is evaluated to be:

In the previous example the optimizer assumed that there was no relationship between the two predicates in the query and evaluated them as if they were independent. In this case, however, assume that most items in the INVENTORY_TABLE have the same value for both the CURR_LOCATION and ORIG_LOCATION columns. In this case the actual number of rows that qualified would be much larger than the estimated number.

One type of statistic that takes into consideration multiple columns is called “FULLKEYCARD”. A “FULLKEYCARD” concatenates all of the columns in an index for indicating the number of distinct key values in an index. It has been previously used by DB2/MVS and other RDBMS vendors. While FULLKEYCARD does help with column correlation in limited circumstances, it has its limitations. For example, FULLKEYCARD can only be used for an index that has the same set of predicates that are in the query. Since it cannot be applied to non-indexed columns, it is not very well suited to solve the problem of column correlation discussed above.

It is therefore an object of this invention to improve performance for queries that have predicates on multiple columns of a table.

It is a further object of this invention to take into consideration the relationship between predicates when estimating the number of qualified rows from columns in a query.

It is a further object of this invention to use multi-column statistics to compute an estimate of the number of qualified rows when a query has predicates on multiple columns of a table.

This invention reduces the problem caused by column correlation during query optimization by removing the independence assumption when a new type of multi-column statistic is available. The system, method, and program of this invention collects multi-column statistics by relational DBMSs, and uses these statistics during query optimization to obtain an estimate of the number of qualifying rows when a query has predicates on multiple columns of a table.

The DBMS collects meaningful statistical data from the table of a database by analyzing the actual data in the database. The DBMS then stores the statistics in the DBMS system catalogs, i.e., tables, and applies this data to determine in advance a number of qualifying rows in order to further optimize the query based on (i.e., dependent upon) this number of estimated qualifying rows.

A database optimizer calculates a combined predicates filter factor when these predicate's columns are correlated. The optimizer chooses among point, linear or polygonal statistics.

More specifically, the system, method, and program of this invention collects multi-column statistics to reflect a relationship among multiple columns of a table. A multi-column cardinality statistic is collected by concatenating columns and counting the number of distinct concatenated values. A multi-column frequent value statistic is collected by concatenating columns and determining a frequency of the concatenated values. A multi-column linear quantile statistic is collected by dividing the data of multiple columns into sub-ranges where each sub-range has approximately an even distribution of data, and determining a frequency and cardinality of each sub-range. A multi-column polygonal quantile statistic is collected by dividing the data of multiple columns into sub-spaces where each sub-space contains approximately the same number of tuples, and determining a frequency and cardinality of each sub-space. Although only one sub-space can be used, accuracy will increase with increasingly more sub-spaces.

These statistics are stored in a table such as the system catalogs of the database management system.

The system catalog is accessed for the stored multi-column cardinality statistic or for the multi-column frequent value for a query having equal predicates. A selectivity value is determined as the inverse of the cardinality statistic; or the frequency of the frequent value statistic if there are multi-column frequent value statistics for the same columns as the equal predicates in the query, and the literals in the predicates match the literals in the stored multi-column frequent value. If the literals in the predicates do not match the literals in the stored multi-column frequent value, then a selectivity value is determined as:

The system catalog is accessed for the stored multi-column linear quantile statistic for a query having a single range predicate and at least one equal predicate to determine the selectivity value for the predicates of the query. For predicates that are completely satisfied by only one of the sub-ranges, the selectivity value is the frequency. Otherwise, the selectivity is determined by the selectivity of the fully-qualified sub-ranges plus a selectivity of partially qualified sub-ranges. This selectivity determination translates a boundary of a sub-range by concatenating a set of values of a lower boundary and concatenating a set of values of a higher boundary. The selectivity determination then utilizes this set of concatenated values.

The system catalog is accessed for the stored multi-column polygonal quantile statistic for a query having more than one range predicates to determine the selectivity value for the predicates of the query by adding up the selectivity of the fully and partially qualified sub-spaces. The selectivity of a partially qualified sub-space is determined according to the following:

Where:

X1, X2 are the high and low bounds for the X-coordinate of the query

Y1, Y2 are the high and low bounds for the Y-coordinate of the query

Z1, Z2 are the high and low bounds for the Z-coordinate of the query

. . . etc., for each coordinate (dimension) of the query

XA, XB are the high and low bounds for the X-coordinate of the quantile

YA, YB are the high and low bounds for the Y-coordinate of the quantile

ZA, ZB are the high and low bounds for the Z-coordinate of the quantile

. . . etc., for each coordinate (dimension) of the quantile.

The selectivity value is used by a query optimizer to further optimize the processing of the query such as by selecting an optimized access path to the data based upon the selectivity value. The various uses of selectivity values for query processing are well-known in the art. However, a system, method, and program product utilizing this invention will use a selectivity value that reflects dependencies among predicates of a query. Consequently the selectivity value is assumed to be a truer estimate of the number of qualifying rows on which further query processing optimizations can be based for better optimizations for certain queries.

For a more complete understanding of this invention, reference is now made to the following detailed description of the embodiments as illustrated in the accompanying drawing, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a graph representation where all tuples that satisfy equal predicates on multiple columns of the same table form a point where the “x” coordinate has the values of column X (COLX) and the “y” coordinate has the values of column Y (COLY), whereby a type of column correlation called point correlation is being illustrated;

FIG. 2 is a graph representation where all tuples that satisfy a single range predicate (as shown along the y-axis) and one or more equal predicates (as shown along the x-axis) on multiple columns of a same table form a line (or segment), whereby a type of column correlation called linear correlation is being illustrated;

FIG. 3 is a graph representation where all tuples that satisfy multiple range predicates on multiple columns of the same table form a polygon, whereby a type of columns correlation called polygonal correlation is being illustrated;

FIG. 4 is a graph representation showing a distribution of tuples for polygonal correlation;

FIG. 5A is a query processing system;

FIG. 5B is a query processing system in a networked environment; and

FIGS. 6A-6B together is a process flow of a system, method, and program product for collecting, storing, and using multi-column statistics.

The following terms are used herein:

Cardinality (CARD)—is a number of distinct values.

Frequency—is the percentage of all occurrences for all values that a specific value occurs.

Selectivity—is an estimated number of qualifying rows in a query.

Qualified (or qualifying) rows—are rows that satisfy the search conditions specified by the query.

FIGS. 6A and 6B together illustrate the overall process flow of collecting, storing, and using multi-column statistics. FIG. 6A and 6B will be referred to throughout the following description of the preferred embodiment.

There are many different types of column correlation during query optimization. The following identifies the basic types addressed in this invention.

Types of Column Correlation

‘Point’ Correlation

This type of column correlation occurs between equal predicates on multiple columns of the same table. For example:

If the set of all tuples that satisfied these two predicates were plotted on a graph with ‘x’ coordinate being the values of COLX and the ‘y’ coordinate being the values of COLY they would all be contained with the same ‘point’ on the graph (i.e., all tuples would have the same coordinates), as shown in FIG. **1**. In this example, all tuples satisfying the predicates: ‘COLX=4 AND COLY=1’ have the coordinates (4,1).

‘Linear’ Correlation

This type of correlation occurs between a single range predicate and one or more equal predicates. For example:

In this case, if the set of all tuples that satisfied these predicates were plotted on a graph it would form a line (or segment) as shown in FIG. **2**.

‘Polygonal’ Correlation

This type of correlation involves multiple range predicates. For example:

In this case, the set of all tuples that satisfy the predicates form a polygon when plotted on a graph as shown in FIG. **3**.

Multi-Column Statistics

With all three type of column correlation the object of this invention is the same. That is, to estimate the number of tuples that satisfy the predicates as accurately as possible. To that end, a new type of statistic, referred to herein as a multi-column statistic, is introduced. Each type of correlation requires a different type of multi-column statistic as discussed below.

‘Point’ Correlation Statistics

The following two types of statistics handle ‘point’ correlation problems. They are:

Multi-column cardinalities **620** (FIG. **6**A).

Multi-column frequent values **630** (FIG. **6**A).

These statistics are very similar to their single column counterparts. The only difference is that they represent a concatenation of columns rather than a single column. In essence, the columns are concatenated **621**, **631** (FIG. 6A) and treated as a single column. Unlike a “FULLKEYCARD” which takes into consideration all of the columns of an index, the multi-column cardinality statistic can take into consideration selected columns, i.e., a subset of the columns, from an index and/or a table. Likewise, the multi-column frequent values statistic can take into consideration selected columns from an index or table.

A multi-column cardinality represents the number of distinct values for a set of columns, **622** (FIG. **6**B). For example, given the following rows in a table:

COLX | COLY | ||

1 | 5 | ||

1 | 5 | ||

2 | 4 | ||

3 | 3 | ||

3 | 2 | ||

4 | 1 | ||

4 | 1 | ||

the cardinality for the concatenated columns COLX and COLY is 5. A query which has the predicates, COLX=? AND COLY=? will have a selectivity of 0.2 (i.e., 1 out of every 5 rows is estimated to qualify) using this multi-column statistic rather than a selectivity of 0.05 which is obtained using single column statistics and the independence assumption, (i.e., 1 out of 4 rows qualify in COLX and 1 out of 5 rows qualify in COLY, whereby ¼*⅕=0.05).

A multi-column frequent value indicates the frequency that a value, derived by concatenating multiple columns, occurs, **632** (FIG. **6**A). For example, given the predicates:

the selectivity for those predicates can be estimated using the following multi-column frequent value:

Concatenated Column Value | Frequency | ||

(3,5,8) | 10% | ||

It should be noted that the frequency of the concatenated values is determined by the database management system which examines a sample set of the actual values in the database.

Using this multi-column frequent value, the selectivity can be determined for the set of equal predicates to be 10%. If the value that was of interest did not match any of the frequent values, the selectivity could still be estimated by summing the non-matching frequencies, subtracting that frequency from 100% and dividing the result by the multi-column cardinality (less the number of non-matching frequent values).

A system, method, and program can utilize either the multi-column cardinality statistic or the multi-column frequent value statistic to determine selectivity, **662** (FIG. 6B) as illustrated according to the following logic flow:

Logic to estimate the selectivity for multiple equal predicates **661** (FIG. 6B) containing known literals using multi-column frequent value statistics.

Identify the set of equal predicates that contain known literals

If set contains <=1 predicate Then

Exit

Else

Continue

If there are no multi-column frequent value statistics containing the same columns as the predicates Then

Exit

Else

Continue

If all literals in the predicate match the literals in the multi-column frequent value Then

Selectivity is equal to the frequency of the multi-column frequent value

Else

Calculate Selectivity as:

Logic to estimate the selectivity for multiple equal predicates (may contain literals, host variables, parameter markers, etc.) **661** (FIG. 6A) using multi-column cardinality statistics.

Identify the set of equal predicates

If set contains <=1 predicate Then

Exit

Else

Continue

If there are no multi-column cardinality statistics containing the same columns as the predicates Then

Exit

Else

Continue

Calculate Selectivity as:

‘Linear’ Correlation Statistics

Some useful types of statistics when dealing with a single range predicate are quantile, or equi-depth histogram, statistics **640**, **646** (FIG. **6**A-**6**B). These statistics give an indication of the number of rows between two given values. Multi-column quantile statistics can be very useful when dealing with ‘linear’ correlation. For example, given the predicates:

and the following multi-column quantile statistics, (see **642**, FIG. **6**A:).

Low Multi-column | |||

Value | High Multi-column Value | Frequency | Card |

(1,1) | (2,7) | 10% | 10 |

(2,8) | (3,1) | 10% | 5 |

(3,2) | (3,5) | 10% | 4 |

(3,6) | (4,7) | 10% | 17 |

(4,8) | (6,3) | 10% | 25 |

(6,4) | (6,9) | 10% | 5 |

(7,0) | (7,7) | 10% | 7 |

(7,8) | (8,2) | 10% | 10 |

(8,3) | (9,7) | 10% | 14 |

(9,8) | (9,9) | 10% | 2 |

it can be seen that all the rows in the quantile bounded by (3,2) and (3,5) satisfy the predicates, and some of the rows in the quantile bounded by (3,6) and (4,7) satisfy the predicates. For quantiles that completely satisfy the predicates, the ‘Frequency’ can be used as an indication of the number of rows that satisfy the predicates. For quantiles that partially satisfy the predicates an interpolation formula (shown and discussed below) is needed to calculate what percentage of the quantile satisfies the predicates.

It should be clarified that the total range ((1,1) to (9,9)) is divided into quantiles or sub-ranges. The first range is from ((1,1) to (2,7)), and the second range is from ((2,8), (3,1)), etc. The ranges are selected so that there is approximately an even distribution of data within each range, **641** (FIG. **6**A.). Also, it should be noted that in the above table “Card” refers to cardinality which is the number of distinct values in a range.

In this example, the selectivity is calculated as follows:

Final Selectivity=Selectivity of Fully Qualified Quantiles+Selectivity of Partially Qualified Quantiles

A description of an interpolation formula (discussed above) for finding the selectivity of partially qualified quantiles is as follows.

Interpolation Formula (for linear statistics)

Where:

CARD is the number of distinct values for a given column

HIGHVAL is the ‘high’ quantile bound

LOWVAL is the ‘low’ quantile bound

‘lit’ is the value specified in the query

In the example,

the partially qualified quantile has the bound (3,6) and (4,7). The portion of that quantile that the query is interested in has the bounds (3,6) and (3,9). Logically then, the interpolation formula can be used for ‘<=’, where the literal value is (3,9). That is, everything <=(3,9) is of interest for this quantile.

The multi-column values are translated into numerical values in order to apply the formula. Assuming that in this case the translation occurs literally (i.e., (3,6) is translated to 36, and (4,7) is translated to 47). In essence the boundaries of a sub-range are being translated by concatenating the set of values of the lower boundary and concatenating the set of values of the higher boundary for the sub-range. These concatenated values are then used in the selectivity determination.

The following result occurs when these values are substituted into the formula:

As a result, 28% of this quantile is of interest. However, since this quantile only contains 10% of the data, this must be factored into the calculation:

A system, method, and program can utilize the multi-column quantile statistics to determine selectivity as illustrated according to the following logic flow:

Logic to estimate the selectivity for a set of predicates containing one or more equal predicates and one range predicate (and these predicates contain known literals), using multi-column quantile statistics (for ‘linear’ correlation), **646**, **647** (FIG. **6**A).

Identify the Set of Predicates

If set contains <=1 predicate Then

Exit

Else

Continue

If there are no multi-column quantile statistics containing the same columns as the predicates Then

Exit

Else

Continue

If the range predicate is on the first column of the multi-column quantile statistic Then

Exit

Else

Continue

Determine Which Quantiles are Fully or Partially Matched

If there are partially matched quantiles Then

Determine Low and High Multi-column literal values for the partially matched quantiles, bounding the values by the Low and High Multi-column Quantile values

Calculate Selectivity as:

SUM(Frequency of Fully matched ‘Multi-column’ Quantiles)+SUM(Frequency of Partially matched ‘Multi-column’ Quantiles*reduction factor)

where ‘reduction factor’ is calculated as:

where:

CARD=Multi-column cardinality

HQ=High Multi-column Quantile value

LQ=Low Multi-column Quantile value

Logic to determine if a quantile is fully or partially matched

Do for each Quantile

Select (range predicate)

When (‘<’)

If High Multi-column Quantile value ‘<’ Multi-column literal then Quantile is fully matched

Else

If Low Multi-column Quantile value ‘<’ Multi-column literal then Quantile is partially matched

When (‘<=’)

If High Multi-column Quantile value ‘<=’ Multi-column literal then Quantile is fully matched

Else

If Low Multi-column Quantile value ‘<=’ Multi-column literal then Quantile is partially matched

When (‘>’)

If Low Multi-column Quantile value ‘>’ Multi-column literal then Quantile is fully matched

Else

If High Multi-column Quantile value ‘>’ Multi-column literal then Quantile is partially matched

When (‘>=’)

If Low Multi-column Quantile value ‘>=’ Multi-column literal then Quantile is fully matched

Else

If High Multi-column Quantile value ‘>=’ Multi-column literal then Quantile is partially matched

When (‘BETWEEN’)

If High Multi-column Quantile value ‘<=’ High Multi-column literal and Low Multi-column Quantile value ‘>=’ Low Multi-column literal then Quantile is fully matched

Else

If (Low Multi-column Quantile value ‘<=’ High Multi-column literal and Low Multi-column Quantile value ‘>=’ Low Multi-column literal) or (High Multi-column Quantile value ‘>=’ Low Multi-column literal and High Multi-column Quantile value ‘<=’ High Multi-column literal) then Quantile is partially matched

Otherwise

Not a range predicate

End

End

Logic to determine the Low and High Multi-column bounded literal values for partially matched quantiles

Select (range predicate)

When (‘<’ or ‘<=’)

Do

Low Multi-column literal=Low Multi-column Quantile value

High Multi-column literal=Multi-column literal

End

When (‘>’ or ‘>=’)

Do

Low Multi-column literal=Multi-column literal

High Multi-column literal=High Multi-column Quantile value

End

When (‘BETWEEN’)

Do

If Low Multi-column literal<Low Multi-column Quantile value then

Low Multi-column literal=Low Multi-column Quantile value

If High Multi-column literal>High Multi-column Quantile value then

High Multi-column literal=High Multi-column Quantile value

End

Otherwise

Not a range predicate

End

‘Polygonal’ Correlation Statistics:

Of the three types of correlation to handle, polygonal correlation is the most complex. It requires a new type of multi-column quantile statistic. It is similar to the multi-column quantile statistic used for ‘linear’ correlation, but has one significant difference. The multi-column quantile statistics take n-dimensional space (the domain of all possible tuples) and divides it into segments, with a low and high multi-column value defining the ends of each segment. This works well when dealing with ‘linear’ correlation because the answer set can also be represented by a single segment, bounded by a low and high value. When dealing with ‘polygonal’ correlation, however, the answer set is characterized by an n-dimensional polygon (within the domain of all possible tuples). Trying to divide the n-dimensional space representing the answer set into segments, while possible, is not practical or efficient, as an unlimited number of segments could be generated.

Another approach is to generate a new type of multi-column quantile statistic, **650** (FIG. **6**A). one that divides n-dimensional space into smaller, bounded, n-dimensional sub-spaces, with each sub-space containing approximately the same number of tuples, **651** (FIG. **6**A). For example, consider the distribution of tuples shown in FIG. **4**.

The following multi-column quantile statistics (see **652** (FIG. 6A) divide the space in FIG. 4 into 10 sub-spaces, each space containing approximately the same number of tuples.

Low Multi-column | |||

Value | High Multi-column Value | Frequency | Card |

(1,1) | (8,3) | 10% | 5 |

(2,6) | (2,11) | 10% | 5 |

(3,5) | (5,7) | 12% | 6 |

(3,8) | (5,11) | 10% | 5 |

(4,13) | (1,19) | 10% | 5 |

(5,12) | (8,14) | 10% | 5 |

(6,7) | (18,9) | 10% | 5 |

(18,15) | (8,19) | 10% | 5 |

(19,1) | (9,5) | 10% | 5 |

(19,12) | (14,14) | 8% | 4 |

With these statistics, the low and high multi-column values represent opposite corners of an n-dimensional space. Using these two points all of the edges of space can be derived. Now, consider the following predicates:

The answer set for these predicates is bounded by the values (3,2) and (9,10). Using these two points all edges of the space representing the answer set can be derived.

It can then be determined which quantiles are fully contained within the answer set and which are partially contained within the answer set. The selectivity calculation, **656**, **657** (FIG. **6**B), is then very similar to that done for ‘linear’ correlation.

Final Selectivity=Selectivity of Fully Qualified Quantiles+Selectivity of Partially Qualified Quantiles

In some cases, a simplified version of ‘multi-column quantile statistics’ may be sufficient. This would consist of collecting just one quantile with the low value representing the lowest, or second lowest value, in the domain of all tuples, and the high value representing the highest, or second highest value, in the domain of all tuples. Also, the multi-column cardinality must be collected. If the data is uniformly distributed then interpolating using the low and high bounds of the answer set, the low and high bounds of the domain, and the cardinality of the domain, should produce a reasonable estimate.

If the data is not uniformly distributed, but instead characterized by a small number of frequent values, then using the above statistics in conjunction with multi-column frequent values can improve the estimation in that case.

This technique can also be applied to ‘linear’ correlation.

Interpolation Formula (for polygonal statistics)

The interpolation formula using polygonal statistics uses the same principles as for linear statistics, but it is a little more complex. The added complexity comes in because the formula must take the multi-dimensional aspect of the data into account as follows:

Where:

X1, X2 are the high and low bounds for the X-coordinate of the query

Y1, Y2 are the high and low bounds for the Y-coordinate of the query

Z1, Z2 are the high and low bounds for the Z-coordinate of the query

. . . etc., for each coordinate (dimension) of the query

XA, XB are the high and low bounds for the X-coordinate of the quantile

YA, YB are the high and low bounds for the Y-coordinate of the quantile

ZA, ZB are the high and low bounds for the Z-coordinate of the quantile

. . . etc., for each coordinate (dimension) of the quantile

Finding the partially qualified quantiles and Query Bounds for each quantile requires determining all the edges and corners of the quantile. Given two opposite corners of an n-dimensional space (i.e., quantile bounds or query bounds), the other corners that define that space can be determined by finding all possible combinations of the co-ordinates for those two corners.

For example, given the corners (3,2) and (9,10), the other corners that define that 2-dimensional space are:

(3,10)

(9,2)

The number of corners is equal to (2**number of dimensions). For a 2 dimensional space there will be 4 corners. For a 3 dimensional space there will be 8 corners. For a 4 dimensional space there will be 16 corners.

The query bounds for partially qualified quantiles can then be determined by comparing the coordinate values of the corners of the two areas. If corners of the query area fall outside the quantile area then the corner of the quantile area is used. If corners of the quantile area fall outside the query area, then the corners of the query area are used. Consequently, the area in common, between the query area and the quantile area, is obtained.

Using the example above, the following quantiles are partially qualified by the query.

Quantile Bounds | Frequency | Query Bounds | ||||

(1,1) | (8,3) | 10% | (3,2) | (8,3) | ||

(3,8) | (5,11) | 10% | (3,8) | (5,10) | ||

(6,7) | (18,9) | 10% | (6,7) | (9,9) | ||

(19,1) | (9,5) | 10% | (9,2) | (9,5) | ||

By substituting into the formula:

Collecting Multi-Column Statistics

Collecting multi-column statistics, **611** (FIG. **6**A), involves the same type of processing required to collect single column statistics, however, it must be known beforehand which sets of columns are to be concatenated to form the basis for the multi-column statistics. Since indexes provide a logical grouping of columns, and also provide ordering that simplifies the collection process, it seems natural to look to the indexes first as the basis for collecting multi-column statistics.

However, just as is often done in order to collect single column statistics on non-index columns, multi-column statistics can be collected on non-indexed columns by first taking a random sample of the data then extracting the columns of interest, then sorting the sample on those columns. Once there is an ordered set of rows in the sample, the collection process is identical to the process for collecting statistics on indexed columns.

Collecting Multi-column Cardinalities

Multi-column cardinalities are collected **620** (FIG. 6A) by simply counting the number of distinct values that occur when reading an ordered set of those values, **622** (FIG. **6**A). The ‘value’ in this case is the concatenation of individual column values. The following example illustrates this process:

COLX | COLY | Concatenated Value | ||

1 | 5 | 15 | ||

1 | 5 | 15 | ||

2 | 4 | 24 | ||

3 | 2 | 32 | ||

3 | 3 | 33 | ||

4 | 1 | 41 | ||

4 | 1 | 41 | ||

5 distinct values | ||||

(cardinality) | ||||

Multi-column cardinalities are stored as rows in a table (typically a catalog table), **612** (FIG. **6**A), and contain the following information:

Table name or identifier

Number of columns concatenated together

List of column identifiers

Cardinality

Collecting Multi-Column Frequent Values

Multi-column frequent values are collected **630** (FIG. 6A) in the same way that single column frequent values are collected, however, the value that is used is the concatenation of individual column values.

Multi-column frequent values are stored as rows in a table (typically a catalog table), **612** (FIG. **6**A), and contain the following information:

Table name or identifier

Number of columns concatenated together

List of column identifiers

Concatenated column value

Frequency that the concatenated column value occurs

Collecting Multi_Column Quantile Statistics for ‘Linear’ Correlation

Multi-column quantile statistics can be collected **640** (FIG. 6A) using either a static or dynamic process. The static process makes two passes at reading the ordered set of rows. The first pass simply counts the total number of rows. If this is already known, then this pass is not needed.

Once the total number of rows is known, the number of rows belonging to each quantile can be obtained by dividing the total number of rows by the number of quantiles desired. For example, if the total number of ordered rows is 1000, and 10 quantiles are desired, then each quantile should contain 100 rows (1000/10).

The ordered set of rows is then read. The bounds of each quantile is set such that each quantile contains the desired number of rows. Consequently, the size, i.e., boundaries, of each quantile may vary depending upon the distribution of the data.

When using the dynamic process, only one pass of the ordered set of rows is needed. During that pass the desired number of rows in each quantile, and the low and high bounds of each quantile, are dynamically adjusted as needed so that each quantile contains approximately the same number of rows. This algorithm might result in the last quantile being larger or smaller than the rest, but it saves one scan of the ordered set of rows (if the total number of rows isn't known).

Multi-column quantile statistics are stored as rows in a table (typically a catalog table), **612**(FIG. **6**A), and contain the following information.

Table name or identifier

Number of columns concatenated together

List of column identifiers

Low concatenated column value

High concatenated column value

Frequency

Cardinality

Collecting Multi_Column Quantile Statistics for ‘Polygonal’ Correlation

Finding an efficient process for collecting multi-column quantile statistics for use with ‘polygonal’ correlation is quite complex. However, the statistics, once collected, **650** (FIG. **6**A), can be stored in the same way as ‘linear’ correlation statistics. That is, they can be stored as rows in a table, **612** (FIG. **6**A), containing the following information.

Table name or identifier

Number of columns concatenated together

List of column identifiers

Low concatenated column value

High concatenated column value

Frequency

Cardinality

If the simplified version of ‘multi-column quantile statistics’, where only one quantile is collected, is used, then the collection process is very simple. When reading an ordered set of rows the low and high value for each column is determined and used to form the low and high multi-column values (the bounds of the quantile). The number of distinct multi-column values is also determined when reading this ordered set of rows. If the data is characterized by a small number of frequent values, then those values can also be collected when reading the ordered set of rows.

Using Multi-Column Statistics

As described earlier, the purpose for collecting multi-column statistics is to remove the independence assumption made by the optimizer when estimating the number of qualified rows (i.e., selectivity value), **662**, **647**, **657** (FIG. **6**A). in order to arrive at an estimate that would be more accurate.

The four main times during query optimization where the independence assumption is made are: 1) When estimating the selectivity of an index for single table access; 2) When estimating the number of qualified rows in a table for single table access; 3) When estimating the selectivity of an index for join access; and 4) When estimating the number of qualified rows in a table for join access.

The primary difference between these four cases is the set of predicates involved. When estimating the selectivity of an index for single table access, only local predicates are considered. When estimating the selectivity for join access, both local predicates and eligible join predicates are considered. The same is true for the other two cases when estimating the number of qualified rows in a table.

Multi-column statistics can be used in all four cases. If the local predicates contain literals then multi-column frequent values or multi-column quantile statistics can be used in place of the independence assumption. For join predicates and local predicates that don't contain literals, multi-column cardinalities can often be used be used in place of the independence assumption.

As discussed above, multi-column statistics can, in many cases, improve the accuracy when estimating the number of qualified rows for a particular query. Consequently, there is a greater likelihood that the most efficient access path will be selected when these statistics are available to the optimizer. An improved estimate for the number of qualified rows can be beneficial also in the area of database design, e.g., when an index is not efficient, and for other purposes.

It should be noted that the types of correlation shown herein all deal with multiple columns of the same table (i.e., ‘intractable’ correlation). The statistics used herein have been designed for this type of correlation, where all of the columns are within the same table. Queries can, however, suffer from ‘linter-table’ correlation, where there is a relationship between columns of different tables. This type of correlation predominately effects join size estimation which is not addressed herein.

Query Processing System

The above described preferred embodiment can be implemented in a query optimizer or query processing system. The following describes an example of one such SQL query processing system with reference to FIGS. 5A and 5B. An application **501** issues SQL queries **503** that are parsed by the SQL parser component **505**. The parser **505** generates an internal representation of the query called a query graph, i.e. a data structure (query graph model, QGM) **506**. The QGM **506** is passed to the query global semantics **512**, the query rewrite component **507**, and the plan optimization **516**. The query rewrite engine **507** applies transformations to rewrite the query. After the rewrite phase, **507**, the query graph **506** is revised and used by the optimization phase **516**. Each query is then translated into an executable plan **519** through a threaded code generator **518**.

FIG. 5B shows the context of the query engine **500** in a database management system (DBMS) **540** in a processing system **1** having memory **521** and at least one cpu **522**. The system **1**could be connected to other systems **2** via a network **530**. The application **501** could be resident on any of the systems **1**, **2**, in the network or could be any user connected to any one of the systems via input/output user interface devices (e.g., keyboard, display, etc.). The system, method and program of this invention is applicable to any type of database management system whether it is contained within a single system or is within a networked environment including parallel processing systems, client/server processing systems, distributed systems, etc. Although the invention herein is described in reference to relational database management systems, multi-column statistics are applicable and adaptable to other database systems including object oriented systems. For example, the invention is easily adaptable to take into consideration a correlation and relationship among objects such as through multi-object statistics similar to the multi-column statistics described herein.

Using the foregoing specification, the invention may be implemented as a machine, process, or article of manufacture by using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce programming software, firmware, hardware or any combination thereof.

Any resulting program(s), having computer readable program code, may be embodied within one or more computer usable media such as memory devices or transmitting devices, thereby making a computer program product or article of manufacture according to the invention. As such, the terms “article of manufacture” and “computer program product” as used herein are intended to encompass a computer program existent (permanently, temporarily, or transitorily) on any computer usable medium such as on any memory device or in any transmitting device.

Executing program code directly from one medium, storing program code onto a medium, copying the code from one medium to another medium, transmitting the code using a transmitting device, or other equivalent acts, may involve the use of a memory or transmitting device which only embodies program code transitorily as a preliminary or final step in making, using or selling the invention.

Memory devices include, but are not limited to, fixed (hard) disk drives, diskettes, optical disks, magnetic tape, semiconductor memories such as RAM, ROM, Proms, etc. Transmitting devices include, but are not limited to, the internet, intranets, electronic bulletin board and message/note exchanges, telephone/modem-based network communication, hard-wired/cabled communication network, cellular communication, radio wave communication, satellite communication, and other stationary or mobile network systems/communication links.

A machine embodying the invention may involve one or more processing systems including, but not limited to, cpu, memory/storage devices, communication links, communication/transmitting devices, servers, I/O devices, or any subcomponents or individual parts of one or more processing systems, including software, firmware, hardware or any combination or subcombination thereof, which embody the invention as set forth in the claims.

One skilled in the art of computer science will easily be able to combine the software created as described with appropriate general purpose or special purpose computer hardware to create a computer system and/or computer subcomponents embodying the invention and to create a computer system and/or computer subcomponents for carrying out the method of the invention.

While the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been illustrated in detail, it should be apparent that modifications and adaptations to that embodiment may occur to one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention as set forth in the following claims.

Patent Citations

Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US5335345 | Apr 11, 1990 | Aug 2, 1994 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Dynamic query optimization using partial information |

US5412806 | Aug 20, 1992 | May 2, 1995 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Calibration of logical cost formulae for queries in a heterogeneous DBMS using synthetic database |

US5469568 | Jan 7, 1993 | Nov 21, 1995 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for choosing largest selectivities among eligible predicates of join equivalence classes for query optimization |

US5761653 | Apr 3, 1996 | Jun 2, 1998 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for estimating cardinalities for query processing in a relational database management system |

US5802521 * | Oct 7, 1996 | Sep 1, 1998 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining distinct cardinality dual hash bitmaps |

US5899986 | Feb 10, 1997 | May 4, 1999 | Oracle Corporation | Methods for collecting query workload based statistics on column groups identified by RDBMS optimizer |

Non-Patent Citations

Reference | ||
---|---|---|

1 | DB2 for MVS/ESA Administration Guide, vol. 2, 2Version 4, pp. 5-210 to 5-213, 5-233, and 5-287. | |

2 | Gassner, P. et al.,"Query Optimization in the IBM DB2 Family," Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, Dec. 1993, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 4-18. |

Referenced by

Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US6374235 * | Jun 25, 1999 | Apr 16, 2002 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for a join operation on a multi-column table and satellite tables including duplicate values |

US6397204 * | Jun 25, 1999 | May 28, 2002 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for determining the join ordering of tables in a join query |

US6446063 * | Jun 25, 1999 | Sep 3, 2002 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for performing a join operation on a multi column table and satellite tables |

US6477523 * | Dec 3, 1999 | Nov 5, 2002 | Ncr Corporation | Selectivity prediction with compressed histograms in a parallel processing database system |

US6513041 * | Dec 1, 2000 | Jan 28, 2003 | Required Technologies, Inc. | Value-instance-connectivity computer-implemented database |

US6581068 * | Feb 2, 2000 | Jun 17, 2003 | Cartesis, S.A. | System and method for instant consolidation, enrichment, delegation and reporting in a multidimensional database |

US6662175 * | May 8, 2001 | Dec 9, 2003 | Ncr Corporation | Semantic query optimization using value correlation |

US6732085 * | May 31, 2001 | May 4, 2004 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for sample size determination for database optimizers |

US6738755 * | Feb 29, 2000 | May 18, 2004 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query optimization method for incrementally estimating the cardinality of a derived relation when statistically correlated predicates are applied |

US6801903 * | Oct 12, 2001 | Oct 5, 2004 | Ncr Corporation | Collecting statistics in a database system |

US6957225 * | May 30, 2002 | Oct 18, 2005 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatic discovery and use of column correlations in tables |

US6980976 * | Aug 13, 2001 | Dec 27, 2005 | Oracle International Corp. | Combined database index of unstructured and structured columns |

US7010516 * | Dec 19, 2001 | Mar 7, 2006 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for rowcount estimation with multi-column statistics and histograms |

US7082568 * | Jan 27, 1998 | Jul 25, 2006 | Fujitsu Limited | Interactive data analysis support apparatus and media on which is recorded an interactive data analysis support program |

US7111025 | Apr 30, 2003 | Sep 19, 2006 | International Business Machines Corporation | Information retrieval system and method using index ANDing for improving performance |

US7146363 * | May 20, 2003 | Dec 5, 2006 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for cardinality estimation based on query execution feedback |

US7213011 * | Apr 8, 2002 | May 1, 2007 | Oracle International Corporation | Efficient processing of multi-column and function-based in-list predicates |

US7249120 * | Jun 27, 2003 | Jul 24, 2007 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for selecting candidate statistics to estimate the selectivity value of the conditional selectivity expression in optimize queries based on a set of predicates that each reference a set of relational database tables |

US7272591 * | Jan 22, 2004 | Sep 18, 2007 | Ncr Corporation | Method and system for updating value correlation optimizations |

US7289978 | Mar 13, 2003 | Oct 30, 2007 | International Business Machines Coporation | Substituting parameter markers for literals in database query language statement to promote reuse of previously generated access plans |

US7353219 | May 28, 2004 | Apr 1, 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining validity ranges of query plans based on suboptimality |

US7386538 * | Mar 24, 2005 | Jun 10, 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Building database statistics across a join network using skew values |

US7447676 | Apr 21, 2003 | Nov 4, 2008 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system of collecting execution statistics of query statements |

US7461050 | Mar 30, 2006 | Dec 2, 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods of cost estimation using partially applied predicates |

US7478083 * | Apr 3, 2006 | Jan 13, 2009 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for estimating cardinality in a database system |

US7483873 | Jan 18, 2005 | Jan 27, 2009 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and article of manufacture for improving execution efficiency of a database workload |

US7516117 * | Aug 24, 2006 | Apr 7, 2009 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for accelerating range queries using periodic monotonic properties of non-monotonic functions |

US7562067 * | May 6, 2005 | Jul 14, 2009 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for estimating functional relationships in a database |

US7610264 | Oct 27, 2009 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for providing a learning optimizer for federated database systems | |

US7624094 * | Nov 24, 2009 | Microsoft Corporation | Automatic database statistics creation | |

US7636707 * | Apr 6, 2004 | Dec 22, 2009 | Microsoft Corporation | Query selectivity estimation with confidence interval |

US7647293 * | Jan 12, 2010 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting correlation from data | |

US7657503 * | Feb 2, 2010 | At&T Corp. | System and method for generating statistical descriptors for a data stream | |

US7765211 | Jul 27, 2010 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for space management of multidimensionally clustered tables | |

US7822740 * | Aug 29, 2002 | Oct 26, 2010 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimation of input/output requirements for table probe in join processing |

US7877374 | Dec 1, 2006 | Jan 25, 2011 | Microsoft Corporation | Statistics adjustment to improve query execution plans |

US7930296 | Apr 18, 2008 | Apr 19, 2011 | International Business Machines Corporation | Building database statistics across a join network using skew values |

US8051058 * | Sep 12, 2008 | Nov 1, 2011 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for estimating cardinality in a database system |

US8103708 * | Jan 24, 2012 | AT & T Intellectual Property II, LP | System and method for generating statistical descriptors for a data stream | |

US8126872 | Oct 30, 2008 | Feb 28, 2012 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods of cost estimation using partially applied predicates |

US8140516 | Dec 8, 2008 | Mar 20, 2012 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and article of manufacture for improving execution efficiency of a database workload |

US8140568 | Dec 13, 2001 | Mar 20, 2012 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimation and use of access plan statistics |

US8583653 * | Dec 17, 2010 | Nov 12, 2013 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Methods and systems for determining candidates for a custom index in a multi-tenant database environment |

US8630999 | Jan 30, 2012 | Jan 14, 2014 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and computer program product for cost estimation using partially applied predicates |

US8812486 | Feb 8, 2008 | Aug 19, 2014 | International Businesss Machines Corporation | Determining validity ranges of query plans based on suboptimality |

US8856085 | Jul 19, 2011 | Oct 7, 2014 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic consistent sampling for data analysis |

US8892525 * | Sep 6, 2013 | Nov 18, 2014 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic consistent sampling for data analysis |

US9031934 | Nov 27, 2012 | May 12, 2015 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimation of a filter factor used for access path optimization in a database |

US9104784 | Jul 22, 2013 | Aug 11, 2015 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting multi-column composite key column sets |

US9122722 * | Dec 22, 2010 | Sep 1, 2015 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Transforming queries in a multi-tenant database system |

US9141654 * | Apr 3, 2014 | Sep 22, 2015 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Executing user-defined function on a plurality of database tuples |

US9239853 | Sep 18, 2014 | Jan 19, 2016 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic consistent sampling for data analysis |

US9244793 | Nov 4, 2008 | Jan 26, 2016 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Using target database system statistics in emulation |

US9336246 | Feb 28, 2012 | May 10, 2016 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating composite key relationships between database objects based on sampling |

US20010018694 * | Jan 27, 1998 | Aug 30, 2001 | Fujitsu Limited | Interactive analysis support apparatus and media on which is recorded an interactive data analysis support program |

US20030033275 * | Aug 13, 2001 | Feb 13, 2003 | Alpha Shamim A. | Combined database index of unstructured and structured columns |

US20030088579 * | Oct 12, 2001 | May 8, 2003 | Brown Douglas P. | Collecting statistics in a database system |

US20030115183 * | Dec 13, 2001 | Jun 19, 2003 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimation and use of access plan statistics |

US20030126127 * | Jan 2, 2002 | Jul 3, 2003 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimation of join fanout using augmented histogram |

US20030135485 * | Dec 19, 2001 | Jul 17, 2003 | Leslie Harry Anthony | Method and system for rowcount estimation with multi-column statistics and histograms |

US20040044651 * | Aug 29, 2002 | Mar 4, 2004 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimation of input/output requirements for table probe in join processing |

US20040117387 * | Aug 26, 2003 | Jun 17, 2004 | Vincent Civetta | Database sizing and diagnostic utility |

US20040193629 * | Apr 6, 2004 | Sep 30, 2004 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for sample size determination for database optimizers |

US20040210563 * | Apr 21, 2003 | Oct 21, 2004 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system of collecting execution statistics of query statements |

US20040220896 * | Apr 30, 2003 | Nov 4, 2004 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for optimizing queries on views defined by conditional expressions having mutually exclusive conditions |

US20040220904 * | Apr 30, 2003 | Nov 4, 2004 | International Business Machines Corporation | Information retrieval system and method using index ANDing for improving performance |

US20040220972 * | Apr 29, 2003 | Nov 4, 2004 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for space management of multidimensionally clustered tables |

US20040236722 * | May 20, 2003 | Nov 25, 2004 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for cardinality estimation based on query execution feedback |

US20040249845 * | Jun 29, 2004 | Dec 9, 2004 | Oracle International Corporation | Efficient processing of multi-column and function-based in-list predicates |

US20050004907 * | Jun 27, 2003 | Jan 6, 2005 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for using conditional selectivity as foundation for exploiting statistics on query expressions |

US20050065911 * | Nov 5, 2004 | Mar 24, 2005 | Microsoft Corporation | Automatic database statistics creation |

US20050192996 * | Jul 28, 2003 | Sep 1, 2005 | Tarin Stephen A. | Value-instance-connectivity computer-implemented database |

US20050228779 * | Apr 6, 2004 | Oct 13, 2005 | Microsoft Corporation | Query selectivity estimation with confidence interval |

US20050278357 * | Jun 10, 2004 | Dec 15, 2005 | Brown Paul G | Detecting correlation from data |

US20060161517 * | Jan 18, 2005 | Jul 20, 2006 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and article of manufacture for improving execution efficiency of a database workload |

US20060195416 * | Feb 28, 2005 | Aug 31, 2006 | Ewen Stephan E | Method and system for providing a learning optimizer for federated database systems |

US20060218128 * | Mar 24, 2005 | Sep 28, 2006 | International Business Machines Corporation | Building database statistics across a join network using skew values |

US20060282436 * | May 6, 2005 | Dec 14, 2006 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for estimating functional relationships in a database |

US20070016603 * | Jul 14, 2005 | Jan 18, 2007 | International Business Machines Corporation | Representing a distribution of data |

US20070162514 * | Dec 13, 2006 | Jul 12, 2007 | Vincent Civetta | Database sizing and diagnostic utility |

US20070233634 * | Apr 3, 2006 | Oct 4, 2007 | Vincent Corvinelli | Method and system for estimating cardinality in a database system |

US20070233637 * | Mar 30, 2006 | Oct 4, 2007 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods of cost estimation using partially applied predicates |

US20070282784 * | May 31, 2006 | Dec 6, 2007 | Natwar Modani | Comprehensive algebraic relationship discovery in databases |

US20080052269 * | Oct 31, 2007 | Feb 28, 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimation and use of access plan statistics |

US20080059410 * | Aug 24, 2006 | Mar 6, 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for accelerating range queries using periodic monotonic properties of non-monotonic functions |

US20080133458 * | Dec 1, 2006 | Jun 5, 2008 | Microsoft Corporation | Statistics adjustment to improve query execution plans |

US20080228709 * | Apr 18, 2008 | Sep 18, 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Building database statistics across a join network using skew values |

US20080228710 * | Apr 18, 2008 | Sep 18, 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Building database statistics across a join network using skew values |

US20090012977 * | Sep 12, 2008 | Jan 8, 2009 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for estimating cardinality in a database system |

US20090055352 * | Oct 30, 2008 | Feb 26, 2009 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods of cost estimation using partially applied predicates |

US20100114869 * | Oct 27, 2008 | May 6, 2010 | Vinay Deolalikar | Generating a query plan for estimating a number of unique attributes in a database |

US20100153379 * | Dec 15, 2009 | Jun 17, 2010 | Graham Cormode | System and Method for Generating Statistical Descriptors for a Data Stream |

US20110282881 * | Nov 17, 2011 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Methods and systems for determining candidates for a custom index in a multi-tenant database environment | |

US20110295838 * | Dec 22, 2010 | Dec 1, 2011 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Transforming queries in a multi-tenant database system |

US20140012819 * | Sep 6, 2013 | Jan 9, 2014 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic Consistent Sampling For Data Analysis |

US20140324889 * | Apr 3, 2014 | Oct 30, 2014 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Executing user-defined function on a plurality of database tuples |

EP1302871A2 * | Sep 25, 2002 | Apr 16, 2003 | Ncr International Inc. | Collecting statistics in a database system |

WO2015116054A1 * | Jan 29, 2014 | Aug 6, 2015 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Multi-column statistic generation of a multi-dimensional tree |

Classifications

U.S. Classification | 1/1, 707/999.002 |

International Classification | G06F17/30 |

Cooperative Classification | Y10S707/99932, G06F17/30469 |

European Classification | G06F17/30S4P3T5S |

Legal Events

Date | Code | Event | Description |
---|---|---|---|

Dec 15, 2004 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 4 |

Jan 22, 2009 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 8 |

Jul 11, 2011 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: GOOGLE INC., CALIFORNIA Effective date: 20110630 Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:026569/0275 |

Jan 9, 2013 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 12 |

Rotate