|Publication number||US6277627 B1|
|Application number||US 09/223,775|
|Publication date||Aug 21, 2001|
|Filing date||Dec 31, 1998|
|Priority date||Dec 31, 1997|
|Also published as||CA2316199A1, CA2316199C, DE69840107D1, EP1044374A1, EP1044374A4, EP1044374B1, US6521446, US20020004217, WO1999034212A1|
|Publication number||09223775, 223775, US 6277627 B1, US 6277627B1, US-B1-6277627, US6277627 B1, US6277627B1|
|Inventors||Homme W. Hellinga|
|Original Assignee||Duke University|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Non-Patent Citations (12), Referenced by (94), Classifications (25), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims priority from Provisional Application No. 60/070,293, filed Dec. 31, 1997, the entire contents of that application being incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates, in general, to biosensors and, in particular, to a glucose biosensor comprising a genetically engineered Glucose Binding Protein.
Biosensors couple highly specific biomolecular ligand binding events to changes in physical signals, thereby providing analytical tools that can measure the presence of single molecular species in complex mixtures. (Hall, Biosensors, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs (1991)). Most biosensors are naturally occurring macromolecules, such as enzymes or antibodies, which provide the desired analyte specificity, but often are not well suited to simple signal transduction mechanisms. (Griffiths et al, Tr. Biotech. 11:122-130 (1993)). One solution to this problem is to use protein engineering techniques to integrate signal transduction functions directly into proteins, adapting them to straightforward detection technologies, rather than developing instrumentation specific to the properties of a particular protein (Adams et al, Nature 39:694-697 (1991); Braha et al, Chem. Biol. 4:497-505 (1997); Brennan et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92:5783-5787 (1995); Brune et al, Biochemistry 33:8262-8271 (1994); Cornell et al, Nature 387:580-583 (1997); Gilardi et al, Anal. Chem. 66:3840-3847 (1994); Godwin et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118:6514-6515 (1996); Marvin et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:4366-4371 (1997); Post et al, J. Biol. Chem. 269:12880-12887 (1994); Romoser, J. Biol. Chem. 272:13270-13274 (1997); Stewart et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116:415-416 (1994); Thompson et al, J. Biomed. Op. 1:131-137 (1996); Walkup et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119:5445-5450 (1997)). A simple approach to building such integrated signal transducers is to exploit optical detection strategies based on changes in fluorescent reporter groups which respond to ligand binding (Guiliano et al, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomolec. Struct. 24:405-434 (1995); Czamik, Chem. Biol. 2:432-438 (1995)). Fluorophores can be site-specifically introduced into a protein by using total synthesis, semi synthesis, or gene fusions. In this way pairs of fluorophores can be arranged for detection of binding by fluorescence energy transfer, or a single, environmentally-sensitive fluorophore can be positioned to respond to conformational changes accompanying binding events. (See references cited above.)
Ideally, the structural relationship between ligand binding site and reporter group is such that each can be manipulated independently, allowing a modular approach to the optimization of the properties of the binding site or the fluorophore. (Marvin et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:4366-4371 (1997); Walkup et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119:3443-3450 (1997); Cheng et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118:11349-11356 (1996); Ippolito et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92:5017-5021 (1995); Elbaum et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118:8381-8387(1996)). One way to achieve such modularity is to spatially separate the two sites to minimize steric interference between them. Spatial separation of the reporter group and the binding site requires that the behavior of the fluorophore remain coupled to the degree of occupancy of the ligand binding site via an allosteric linkage mechanism. Recently, it has been shown that it is possible to engineer such integrated fluorescent allosteric signal transducer (FAST) functions in the Maltose Binding Protein (MBP) of E. coli by taking advantage of the large conformational changes that occur upon ligand binding in this protein, using a structure-based rational design approach (Marvin et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:4366-4371 (1997)).
The present invention relates, in one embodiment, to a Glucose/Galactose Binding Protein with engineered FAST functions and to a new class of fluorescent glucose sensors with applications in the food industry (Suleiman et al, In:Biosensor Design and Application, Matthewson and Finley, Eds. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., Vol. 511 (1992)), and clinical chemistry (Wilkins et al, Med. Eng. Phys. 18:273-278 (1996); Pickup, Tr. Biotech. 11:285-291 (1993); Meyerhoff et al, Endricon 6:51-58 (1996)).
The present invention relates to a glucose biosensor comprising a genetically engineered Glucose Binding Protein (GBP). In a specific embodiment, the invention relates to,a GBP engineered to include mutations that allow site specific introduction of environmentally sensitive reporter groups. The signal of these prosthetic groups changes linearly with the degree of glucose binding. Thus, the glucose sensor of the invention can be used, for example, for detection of glucose in blood or industrial fermentation processes.
FIG. 1. Comparison of the closed forms of MBP (Spurlino et al, J. Biol. Chem. 266:5202-5219 (1991)) (top; Protein Data Bank ref 2MBP) and GBP (Vyas et al, Nature, 327:635-638 (1987); Vyas et al, Science 242:1290-1295 (1988); Vyas et al, Biochemistry 33:4762-4768 (1994)) (bottom: PDB ref IGLG) complexed with their respective substrates, showing position. Attachment sites of conjugated fluorophores are indicated by spheres. The sphere located in the “flap” region of MBP indicates the position of the fluorophore that was found to give the best allosteric response (Marvin et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4366-4371 (1977)) (attached to Asp95Cys). On the basis of this result, four sites in the analogous region of GBP (255, 257, 294, 296) are predicted to be potentially allosterically linked to the glucose binding pocket. Sites 15 and 152, located in the glucose binding pocket, are positions for potential nonallosteric reporter groups. The ribbon diagrams were produced with Molscript (Krollis, J. Appl. Crystal. 24:946-950 (1991)).
FIGS. 2A and B. Binding of glucose to the L255C-acrylodan (FIG. 2A) and H152C-IANBD (FIG. 2B) conjugates. The binding curve is the average of three separate titrations (error bars are smaller than the circles shown). Insert shows changes in the emission spectra upon addition of saturating glucose: no glucose (dashed line), 10 mM glucose (solid line).
FIG. 3. Solute quenching by iodide of the L255C-acrylodan conjugate. F0/F fractional change in fluoresence emission at 498 nm upon addition of iodide. Quenching was determined for apoprotein (circles) and in the presence of 10 mM glucose (diamonds), and is plotted for both emission maxima at 498 nm (closed symbols) and 520 nm (open symbols).
FIG. 4. Glucose binding pocket in GBP (Protein Databank Ref 2GBP).
FIG. 5. Blue LED-based fluorometer.
The present invention relates to a novel glucose-sensing protein engineered from GBP to include amino acid residues that allow site-specific introduction of environmentally sensitive reporter groups, such as fluorophores. The invention results, at least in part, from the identification of regions in GBP that are either placed directly within or are allosterically coupled to the glucose binding site.
Prior to the production of the glucose sensors of the invention, allosteric sites had been identified in the Maltose Binding Protein (MBP) (Marvin et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4366-4371 (1997)). Direct identification of the allosteric sites was possible as high resolution X-ray structures of MBP were known in both the maltose-bound (“closed”) and maltose-free (“open”) states. By contrast, GBP had been crystallized only in the “closed” (ie, glucose-bound) conformation and thus direct calculation of potentially allosteric site (PAS) locations was precluded. While MBP and GBP share little homology, have different molecular weights and even somewhat different secondary structure topology, it proved possible to exploit the rough structural similarity between the two proteins to predict the location of allosteric sites in GBP (Vyas et al, Nature 327:635-638 (1987); Vyas et al, Science 242:1290-1295 (1988); Vyas et al, Biochemistry 33:4762-4768 (1994)).
While glucose sensors of the invention are described in some detail in the Examples that follow, it will be appreciated that the particular engineered GBP's described represent only individual embodiments. Further, it will be appreciated that as GBP is a member of a superfamily of receptor proteins, the invention includes engineered GBP's other than engineered E. coli GBP's, such as engineered thermophilic bacteria GBP (see Tam et al, Microbiol. Rev. 57:320 (1993)).
Engineered proteins of the invention can be produced by site-specifically introducing a reporter group(s) by total synthesis, semi synthesis, or gene fusions (see Godwin et al (1996), Walkup et al (1997), Adams et al (1991), Bruné et al (1994), Gilardi et al (1994), Marvin et al (1997), Post et al (1994), Thompson et al (1996), Romoser et al (1997), all cited above)).
A variety of reporter groups can be used, differing in the physical nature of signal transduction (e.g., fluorescence, electrochemical, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)) and in the chemical nature of the reporter group. For example, a variety of different fluorophores can be used. Fluorophores that operate at long excitation and emission wavelengths (e.g., >600 nm) are preferred when the molecular sensor is to be incorporated into a transdermal biosensor (the skin being opaque below 600 nm). Presently, there are few environmentally sensitive probes available in this region of the spectrum and none with thiol-reactive functional groups (Thompson, R. B., Red and near-infrared fluorometry, in Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, J. R. Lackowicz, Editor 1994, Plenum Press: New York, p. 151-181). However, thiol-reactive derivatives of osmium(II) bisbipyridyl complexes and of the dye Nile Blue can be prepared (Geren et al, Biochem. 30:9450 (1991)). Conjugates containing these fluorophores, for example, attached at various cysteine mutants constructed in the hinge region of GBP, can be screened to identify which results in the largest change in fluorescence upon glucose binding. Os(II) bisbipyridyl complexes have absorbances at wavelengths longer than 600 nm with emission maxima in the 700 to 800 nm region (Demas et al, Anal. Chem. 63:829A (1991)) and the life-times are long (in 100 nsec range), simplifying the fluorescence life-time instrumentation. The absorbance and luminescence properties of these complexes can be tuned readily by ligand substitution. In these complexes, Os toxicity is reduced because the Os(II) state is exchange inert (greatly reducing any potential loss of metal from the complex), and the redox potential ˜1 V so that it is unlikely to be oxidized to Os(III) under physiological conditions (Demas et al, Anal. Chem. 63:829A (1991)). Redox cofactors can also be used as reporter groups, e.g., ferrocene and thiol-reactive derivatives thereof. Thiol-reactive derivatives of organic free radicals such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperinoxidy (TEMPO) and 2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (PROXYL) can also be used and changes in the EPR spectra of these probes in response to ligand binding monitored.
The reporter group(s) can be positioned in the binding pocket of the GBP (Vyas et al, Nature 327:635-638 (1987); Vyas et al, Science 242:1290-1295 (1988); Vyas et al, Biochemistry 33:4762-4768 (1994)), so that changes in reporter signal are a consequence of direct interactions with the bound glucose. This approach may be disadvantageous in that it can be accompanied by unfavorable steric interactions between the reporter group and glucose which lower the glucose affinity or substrate selectivity. Alternatively, the reporter group(s) can be positioned in locations distant from the binding site where the reporter group(s) senses glucose binding indirectly via an allosteric coupling mechanism based on detection of the domain movements. Appropriate allosteric sites are located in regions of GBP that undergo a local conformational change in concert with the interdomain bending motion. In the case of MBP, the positions of such sites were deduced by comparison of the experimentally determined structures of both protein conformations (ie, “open” and “closed”). As indicated above, it proved possible to extend this analysis to GBP on the basis of the rough structural homology between the two proteins. The allosteric sensing mechanism has the advantage that there is no direct interaction between the reporter group and glucose, so that the original properties of the binding site are essentially unaffected. The allosteric design strategy is modular in nature, that is, the ligand-binding site can be altered without destroying the reporting properties of the attached reporter, and vice versa.
In a further aspect of the present invention, mutations are introduced both at an allosteric site (for purposes of reporter group linkage) and in the binding site in order to alter affinity of the protein for glucose without destroying, or unduly impacting, allosteric linkage with the reporter group. This aspect of the invention can find application, for example, when the biosensor is used for determining blood glucose concentrations. Blood glucose is typically about 7 mM and fluctuates between 5-15 mM in diabetic conditions (Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, 2nd ed., (1986) Burtis and Ashwood (eds.) Saunders, London). In order to accurately determine the glucose concentration without the necessity for sample dilution, the binding constant of the engineered biosensor be adjusted so as to match the physiological (and pathological) operating range. Wild type GBP has a Kd (glucose)=0.8 μm. Advantageously, a biosensor of the invention has a weaker binding constant (about four orders of magnitude weaker) but is still specific for glucose. For example, biosensors having a binding constant for glucose in the range of 0.8 μM to 20 mM can be used. Advantageously, the binding constant is in the range of 1 mM to 20 mM when the biosensor is to be used for clinical purposes. Binding constants can be determined, for example, by measuring the fluorescence change of an engineered protein in response to known quantities of glucose (see Examples that follow). Similarly, binding constants can be “tuned” to match the operating conditions in industrial processes.
Mutations that change the binding constant of GBP without altering the sugar specificity can be identified by examination of the three-dimensional structure of the glucose binding pocket in GBP (FIG. 4). Three categories of interactions between the protein and the bound sugar can be altered: (A) direct hydrogen bond interactions, (B) direct van der Waals interactions, (C) indirect van der Waals or hydrogen-bond contacts. Class (A ) contacts are most likely to contribute to specificity and therefore may be left unaltered. Class (B) and (C) contacts can be altered by site-directed mutagenesis with specific residues being mutated, in the first instance, to alanine. W183A and Y10A single mutants, as well as the W183AY10A double mutant, have been constructed in an allosterically signaling construct designated 255C. These mutations change the binding constant for glucose from 0.2 μM to 20μM, 50μM and 650μM, respectively, demonstrating that the binding constant can be “tuned” without destroying the allosteric signaling mechanism. The D154AW183A double mutant described in Example 5 (also in a 255C background) has a binding constant of 7.2. Other mutations involving, for example, Phe16, Lys92, Glu147, Lys9, Asp184, Asn14, Asn91, His152, Asp154, Arg158, Asn211, Asp236, Asn256; Tyr10, Met17, Asn66, Ser112, Ser115, Trp183, Asn210, Met214, Gln261 and/or Tyr295, can be made. In addition to changing specific positions to alanine, the effect of other amino acids can also be determined. Advantageously, all mutations will also be examined in the non-allosteric 152C background.
The biosensor of the invention can be used in essentially any setting where glucose detection is required. For example, the present biosensor can be used in the food industry (Suleiman et al, In: Biosensor Design and Application: Mathewson and Finley Eds; American Chemical Socieity, Washington, DC 1992, vol. 511) and in clinical chemistry (Wilkins et al, Med. Eng. Phys. 18:273-288 (1996); Pickup, Tr. Biotech. 11:285-291 (1993); Meyerhoff et al, Endricon 6:51-58 (1966); Riklin et al, Nature 376:672-675 (1995); Willner et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118:10321-10322 (1996)). The biosensor of the invention can be used, for example, as the basis for the construction of a fluorescent flow cell containing immobilized GBP-FAST conjugates. (See Wilkins et al, Med. Eng. Phys. 18:273-288 (1966), Pickup, Tr. Biotech. 11:285-291 (1993); Meyerhoff et al, Endricon. 6:51 (1966); Group, New Engl. J. Med. 329:977-986 (1993); Gough et al, Diabetes 44:1005-1009 (1995)). The present biosensor can be used in an implantable device suitable for use as an artificial pancreas.
Certain aspects of the present invention are described in greater detail in the non-limiting Examples that follows. (See also Marvin et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120:7 (1998)).
The following experimental details relate to the specific Examples that follow.
Mutagenesis. The gene for the cytoplasmic form of GBP (Scholle et al, Mol. Gen. Genet. 208:247-253 (1987)) (i.e., lacking the leader sequence peptide) was amplified from E. coli genomic DNA using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) with flanking primers designed to introduce an EcoRI restriction site 5′ to the start codon N-Terminus (5′ CCG GAA TTC GGA GAT ACC ATG GCT GAT ACT CGC ATT GGT GTA ACA ATC TAT 3′; restriction site and start codon are underlined), and a BamHI site just before the stop codon (5′ AAG CTT TCA TTA GGA TCC TTT CTT GCT GAA CTC AGC CAG GTT GCT TTT 3′). The resulting fragment was cloned into the pKK223-3 expression vector (Pharmacia). An oligonucleotide cassette coding for a His5 oligopeptide was subsequently cloned into the BamHI site to allow single-step purification by Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (Hochuli et al, Bio/Technol. 6:1321-1325 (1988)) (IMAC). Individual cysteine mutants were made by overlapping PCR fragment mutagenesis.
Protein Expression and Purification. A colony of E. coli XL1-blue cells (Stratagene) freshly transformed with a plasmid expressing a mutant GBP protein was grown at 37° C. overnight in 20 mL of 2XYT medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin. 2XYT medium (1 L) supplemented with 0.2% (w/v) glucose was inoculated with 10 mL of the overnight culture and grown with vigorous shaking at 37° C. until OD600−0.5. Protein expression was induced with 1 mM 1PTG and grown for a further 4 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 g, resuspended in 40 mL of high salt buffer (1 M NaCl, 50 mM phosphate, pH 7.0; HSB), and stored frozen at −80° C. The cells were thawed and lysed in a chilled French press at 1200 psi. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 6000 g for 10 min. DNA was precipitated by addition of polyenimine (pH8) to 5% (w/v) and removed by centrifugation at 6000 g for 30 min. GBP was purified with a single-step IMAC (Hochuli et al, Bio/Technol. 6:1321-1325 (1988)) procedure. Cleared lysate was diluted to 100 mL with HSB onto a 30 mL iminodiacetate/zinc column (Pharmacia) and extensively washed with HSB to remove unbound proteins (and bound glucose), followed by elution of mutant GBP with use of a 200 mL, 0-100 mM imidazole gradient in HSB. GBP was located in a single late peak that revealed only one protein band on an overloaded SDS/polyacrylamide gel stained with Coomassie Blue. Yields were typically 5 mg/L growth.
Fluorophore Coupling. Fluorophores were conjugated to the mutant GBP proteins via the single free cysteine. Acrylodan (Prendergast et al, J. Biol. Chem. 259:7541-7544 (1983)) and (((2-(iodoacetoxy)ethyl)methyl)amino)-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (Ghosh et al, Biochem. J. 108:155 (1968)) (IANBD) were purchased from Molecular Probes and used without further purification. The fluorophores were dissolved in acetonitrile and reacted with freshly purified cysteine mutants (5:1 molar ratio) of GBP (˜1 mg) in 1 M NaCl, 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), for 3-5 h at room temperature. Unreacted fluorophore was separated from protein by gel filtration. The extent of coupling was measured both by determining the remaining free thiol concentration with use of Ellman's reagent (Ellman, Arch. Biochem. Biophy. 82:70-77 (1959)) and by using the ratio of the absorbances of the major protein and fluorophore chromophores (ε280(GBP) =37 mM−1 cm−1 (this study); ε469(IANBD)=23 mM−1 cm−1; ε392(acrylodan)=20 mM−1 cm−1). Coupling was always found to be greater than 95%. The conjugates were stable at 4° C. for a period of months, as determined by glucose binding assays.
Measurement of Glucose and Galactose Binding. Sugar binding was determined by measuring changes in fluorescence of the conjugated fluorophores on a SLM-Aminco-Bowman series-2 fluorimeter at 25±1° C. Glucose or galactose (Sigma) was titrated into a 50 nM conjugated protein solution in 0.1 M NaCl, 50 mM phosphate (pH 7.0), which was continuously mixed with a magnetic stirrer. For titrations, the excitation and emission slit widths were set to 4 and 16 nm, respectively (IANBD: λex=469 nm, λcm=540 nm; acrylodan: λex=392 nm, λem=520 nm). Under these conditions the instrument noise was <1% of the fluorescence signal observed in saturating solutions of glucose. Experimentally observed binding curves were fit to a binding isotherm:
where ΔF is the change in fluorescence, ΔFmax the fluorescence change at saturating concentrations of ligand, Kd the binding constant, and S the concentration of ligand.
The conformational differences of the high-resolution X-ray structures of the open (Spurlino et al, J. Biol. Chem. 266:5202-5219 (1991) and closed (Sharff et al, Biochemistry 31:10657-10663 (1992)) forms of MBP were analyzed, and regions that were predicted to be allosterically linked to the binding site were analyzed (Marvin et al, Proc. Natl. Acd. Sci. USA 94:4366-4371 (1977)). Site-specific attachment of environmentally sensitive fluorophores demonstrated that these regions are allosterically coupled to maltose binding. GBP has been crystallized only in the closed conformation, precluding direct calculation of potentially allosteric site (PAS) locations. Instead, the results obtained on MBP were used, and the rough structural similarity between MBP and GBP relied upon to predict the location of analogous PASs in the latter, even though the two proteins share little sequence homology and are of different molecular weight and somewhat different secondary structure topology (Hsiao et al, J. Mol. Biol. 262:225-242 (1996)).
The site that gave the most pronounced allosteric signaling in MBP is located in a region that forms a mobile “flap” covering the actual hinge. This flap is formed by two unconnected halves, each confined to one of the domains. Their relative movement changes the environment of an attached fluorophore which is completely separated from the binding pocket by the hing β-sheet. The equivalent flap region in GBP is much smaller, with only one-half truly retained, which limits the attached positions in GBP to the hinge itself (FIG. 1).
Faced with the limited amount of structural information available for GBP, the search for PAS locations was restricted to this region. Since it is impossible to predict which of the residues in the flap region is likely to give the most pronounced allosteric response to ligand binding, the β-sheet portion of the flap was scanned and four sites for reporter group attachment (L255, D257, P294, V296) were identified. These positions are all located in one side of the hinge β-sheet, forming a surface onto which the flap α-helix is packed. Their microenvironment is therefore predicted to change if the flap region rearranges upon ligand binding.
In addition to the PAS mutations, two sites for attachment of reporter groups in the binding site itself were identified (N15, H152). Fluorophores placed in these positions are predicted to respond to changes in their microenvironment by direct interaction with the ligand, by protein conformational changes as the “jaws” of the binding site close around the ligand, or by changes in solvation. This strategy has been used successfully to introduce nonallosteric signal transducing fluorescent reporter groups in MBP (Gilardi et al, Anal. Chem. 66:3840-3847 (1994)) and Phosphate Binding. Protein (Brune et al, Biochemistry 33:8262-8271 (1994)) (PBP), another member of the periplasmic binding protein family, which binds to inorganic phosphate. In both cases the ligand binding constant of the conjugated protein is significantly increased relative to wild-type, indicating a significant degree of steric interference between the ligand and the fluorophore, which may also account for the change in the microenvironment of the fluorophore (Gilardi et al, Prot. Engin. 5:479-486 (1997)). This strategy therefore loses the steric independence between reporter group and binding site inherent in the allosteric approach.
The six GBP variants with single cysteines introduced for site-specific covalent attachment of fluorophores were constructed by a PCR mutagenesis strategy. Table 1 shows the results of the acrylodan (Prendergast et al, J. Biol. Chem. 259:7541-7544 (1983)) or (((2-(iodoacetoxy)ethyl)methyl)amino)-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (Ghosh et al, Biochem. J.108:155 (1968)) (IANBD) conjugates of these mutant proteins. These two fluorophores have been selected because of their known sensitivity to the polarity of their microenvironments.
Binding Properties of Fluorescent Conjugates of the Mutant Proteins
R: ratio of fluorescence of fully saturated GBP (10 mM glucose) to apoprotein (R=1.0 indicates no change; R<1.0 indictes a decrease upon glucose binding; R>indicates an increase). Kd(Glc), Kd(Gal): binding constant (μM) for glucose and galactose, respectively (nd: not done; binding constants were determined for all cases where R≠1.0). Wild-type has a Kd(Glc)=0.2 μM, and Kd(Gal)=0.4 μM (Miller et al, J. Biol. Chem. 258:13665-13672 (1983)). N15C and H152C are the positions for nonallosteric reporter groups, the other four mutants are located in the hinge region of the allosteric flap.
All four mutants in the hinge region showed a change in fluorescence of their acrylodan or IANBD conjugates upon ligand binding. The acrylodan conjugate at position 255 gives the largest change (2-fold decrease; FIG. 2A). In all cases, a single-site hyperbolic binding curve could be constructed by measuring the change in fluorescence as a function of glucose or galactose concentration, from which we conclude that the fluorophores attached to the hinge region are allosterically linked to the sugar binding pocket, as predicted. Furthermore, the sugar binding constants are affected by no more than a factor of 4, indicating that the FAST and ligand binding sites are sterically separated, as intended.
Two cysteine mutations were also constructed in the binding pocket itself (FIG. 1). H152C interacts directly with the sugar, since it replaces his 152 which forms a hydrogen bond with the O6 oxygen of both galactose and glucose. (Vyas et al, Biochemistry 33:4762-4768 (1994)). The largest change in fluorescence of all the variants explored in this study (4-fold increase) was observed with IANBD attached at this position. However, this conjugate shows a large increase in the binding constants for glucose (˜100-fold) and galactose (˜500-fold) as would be expected both from the loss of the hydrogen bond to the O6 oxygen and from direct steric interference with the bound sugar.
Fluorophores attached to N15C are intended to respond to changes in the interdomain distance, rather than by direct interaction with the sugar, since Asn15 points away from the sugar binding pocket. Both the acrylodan and the IANBD conjugates show a change upon sugar binding, though not as large as IANBD at the 152 position. However, the conjugates at the 15 position do not greatly perturb the sugar binding constants, indicating that there is no direct interaction with the sugar.
Both acrylodan and IANBD are sensitive to changes in the polarity of their microenvironment (Ghosh et al, Biochem. J. 108:155 (1968); Macgregor et al, Nature 319:70-73 (1986); Weber et al, J. Biochemistry 18:3075-3078 (1979)), which may result from changes in solvent accessibility, probe mobility, and changes in the steric interactions with the surrounding protein (or ligand, in the case of the H152C-NBD conjugate). Such microenvironmental changes may manifest themselves as differences in emission intensity as well as shifts in the wavelengths of their maxima. The emission maxima of acrylodan are known to be particularly dependent on the polarity of the environment, showing a significant blue shift in nonpolar relative to aqueous environments (Macgregor et al, Nature 319:70-73 (1986); Weber et al, Biochemistry 18:3075-3078 (1979)).
The responses of the different sites vary widely. In several cases only one of the two conjugates coupled at a particular site responds to binding of the sugar (see Table 1). Furthermore, none of the conjugates show an appreciable shift in emission maxima upon ligand binding. The behavior of the best allosteric signal transducer in the hinge region, L255C-acrylodan (FIG. 3), was examined in more detail. The emission spectrum of this conjugate has two maxima (498 and 520 nm; FIG. 2A), suggesting that the attached acrylodan is present in two distinct environments differing in their polarities which are intermediate between water and ethanol based on their blue shifts relative to water (Prendergast et al, J. Biol. Chem. 259:7541-7544 (1983)). Both peaks are present in the apo and sugar-bound forms, although their relative intensity changes somewhat upon ligand binding, suggesting a slight redistribution between the two states. To examine the potential contribution of differences in the solvent accessibility of the attachment site to changes in dipolar relaxation of the fluorophore that occurs upon ligand binding, we determined the effect of iodide on the fluorescence in the presence and absence of glucose. Iodide selectively quenches solvent-exposed fluorophores. The degree of quenching follows the Stem-Volmer equation describing steady-state collisional quenching (Lehrer et al, Methods Enzymol. 49:222-236 (1978)):
where F0/F is the fractional decrease in fluorescence, and K the Stem-Volmer quenching constant (K>1.0 for a solvent-exposed fluorophore) which is related to the degree of solvent accessibility. It was found that the quenching constants measured for both emission maxima of the acrylodan are approximately the same, do not change upon glucose addition and are >1 (FIG. 3), indicating that both acrylodan conformations are partially solvent exposed, and the change in the microenvironment is unlikely to involve a change in solvent accessibility. Similar observations were made on other conjugates.
These results suggest that the mechanism by which the conformational changes affect the dipolar relaxation of the attached fluorophore does not involve change in the local solvent-accessibility of the attachment position, but is dependent on the detailed interaction of the fluorophore with its microenvironment, as was also observed for IANBD attached in the binding site of MBP (Gilardi et al, Prot. Engin. 5:479-486 (1997)).
Examination of the experimentally determined three-dimensional structure of GBP (see FIG. 4) indicates that there are two types of residues that form the glucose binding site, those that make direct contact with glucose through hydrogen bonds or van der Waals interactions (primary binding surface) and those that serve to orient the residues in the primary binding surface (secondary binding surface). (Primary binding surface in E. coli GBP: Asn14, Asn91, His152, Asp154, Arg158, Asn211, Asp236, Asn256; secondary binding surface in E. coli GBP: Tyr10, Phe16, Met17, Asn66, Ser112, Ser115, Trp183, Asn210, Met214, Gln261, Tyr295). In order to change the binding constant for glucose, residues in both surfaces have been systematically mutated, either singly or in pairs. The data obtained are shown in Table 2. The Asp154Ala, Trp183Ala (D154A+W183A) double mutant has a binding constant of 7.2 mM. The dynamic range is thus matched for operating in physiologically relevant glucose concentration ranges.
Kd's of mutant proteins binding sugars (expressed in μM). NB = “non-binding”
The number refers to the sequence position in E. coli GBP.
Since the emission wavelengths of the blue LED (maximum at 470 nm, half-power±30nm) are perfectly matched to the excitation wavelength of Nile blue dye (NBD) fluorophore (maximum at 469 nm), a simple prototype special-purpose fluorometer was constructed based on inexpensive, simple, readily available electronic components (see FIG. 5). A 1 ml cuvette is illuminated with a Nichia Chemical silicon-mixed gallium nitride blue LED (3 cd at 20 mA). A double convex lens is used to focus light into the sample. A high-pass glass filter (515 mn cutoff) is used to separate excitation from emission light. A large (100 mm2) planar diffuse Si PIN photodiode (Photonic Detectors) is used to detect the emitted light. The photodiode is operated in an unbiased (photovoltaic) mode, optimized for low-noise and low-frequency operation. The signal is low-pass filtered (5 Hz cutoff), and subsequently passed through a variable summer and variable gain amplifier to achieve the desired low- and high-end calibration. LT1028 (ultra-low noise) operational amplifiers are used for all analog signal processing. A 12-bit dual-slope integrating analog-to-digital converter with a total conversion time of ˜150 ms is used to average out noise from the analog input. The digital output is fed through a 27C64 EPROM. The reading appears on a four seven-segment green LED display. This instrument can detect changes in NBD fluorescence upon ligand binding to sufficient accuracy to construct a hyperbolic binding curve.
All documents cited above are hereby incorporated in their entirety by reference.
One skilled in the art will appreciate from a reading of this disclosure that various changes in form and detail can be made without departing from the true scope of the invention.
|1||Boos et al, "Transport Properties of the Galactose-binding Protein of Escherichia coli", The Journal of Biological Chemistry 247(3):917-924 (1972).|
|2||Brune et al, "Direct, Real-Time Measurement of Rapid Inorganic Phosphate Release Using a Novel Fluorescent Probe and Its Application to Actomyosin Subfragment 1 ATPase", Biochemistry 33(27):8262-8271 (1994).|
|3||Careaga et al, "Large Amplitude Twisting Motions of an Interdomain Hinge: A Disulfide Trapping Study of the Galactose-Glucose Binding Protein", Biochemistry 34:3048-3055 (1995).|
|4||Drueckhammer, "New approaches to fluorescence based glucose sensors", Database FEDRIP on Dialog, NTIS, 00313296, Identifying No. 1R21DK55234-01, Abstract (1998).|
|5||Li et al, "Comparative stereochemical analysis of glucose-binding proteins for rational design of glucose-specific agents", J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn, 9(4):327-344 (1998).|
|6||Marvin and Hellinga, "Engineering Biosensors by Introducing Fluorescent Allosteric Signal Transducers: Construction of a Novel Glucose Sensor", J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 120(1):7-11 (1998).|
|7||Marvin et al, "The rational design of allosteric interactions in a monomeric protein and its applications to the construction of biosensors", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4366-4371 (1997).|
|8||Pickup, "Developing glucose sensors for n vivo use", Trends in Biochech. 11:285-291 (1993).|
|9||Rao, "Protein engineered glucose sensor", Database FEDRIP on Dialog, NTIS, 00352410, Identifying No. 1R01RR14170-01, Abstract (1998).|
|10||Rougier et al, "Use of Lectin to Detect the Sugar Components of Maize Root Cap Slime", The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 27(4):878-881 (1979).|
|11||Vyas et al, "Crystallographic Analysis of the Epimeric and Anomeric Specificity of the Periplasmic Transport/Chemosensory Protein Receptor for D-Glucose and D-Galactose", Biochemistry 33:4762-4768 (1994).|
|12||Wilkins and Atanasov, "Glucose monitoring: state of the art and future possibilities", Med. Eng. Phys. 18(4):273-288 (1996).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6767733||Oct 10, 2001||Jul 27, 2004||Pritest, Inc.||Portable biosensor apparatus with controlled flow|
|US6855556||Jan 4, 2002||Feb 15, 2005||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Binding protein as biosensors|
|US6977180||Aug 28, 2002||Dec 20, 2005||Duke University||Biosensor|
|US7064103||Jan 4, 2002||Jun 20, 2006||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Binding protein as biosensors|
|US7316909||Jun 19, 2006||Jan 8, 2008||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Binding protein as biosensors|
|US7326538 *||Jun 19, 2006||Feb 5, 2008||Becton Dickinson And Company||Binding proteins as biosensors|
|US7409238||Apr 13, 2005||Aug 5, 2008||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Micro-invasive method for painless detection of analytes in extracellular space|
|US7496392||Nov 26, 2003||Feb 24, 2009||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Fiber optic device for sensing analytes|
|US7563891||Jul 21, 2009||Becton, Dickinson & Company||Long wavelength thiol-reactive fluorophores|
|US7629172||Sep 27, 2004||Dec 8, 2009||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Entrapped binding protein as biosensors|
|US7687263||Mar 30, 2010||Becton, Dickinson And Company||In vitro tumor angiogenesis model|
|US7708944||Jun 13, 2006||May 4, 2010||Research Foundation Of State University Of New York||Ultra-sensitive, portable capillary sensor|
|US7718353 *||Mar 1, 2004||May 18, 2010||University Of Maryland Baltimore County||Proteins, sensors, and methods of characterizing analytes using the same|
|US7767821||Aug 3, 2010||Becton, Dickinson & Company||Long wavelength thiol-reactive fluorophores|
|US7777016||Oct 14, 2005||Aug 17, 2010||Carnegie Institution Of Washington||Neurotransmitter sensors and methods of using the same|
|US7787923||Oct 19, 2004||Aug 31, 2010||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Fiber optic device for sensing analytes and method of making same|
|US7792561||Aug 16, 2007||Sep 7, 2010||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Fiber optic device for sensing analytes|
|US7809441||May 17, 2006||Oct 5, 2010||Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.||Implantable medical device with chemical sensor and related methods|
|US7851593||Dec 14, 2010||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Binding proteins as biosensors|
|US7951605||Jun 7, 2005||May 31, 2011||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Multianalyte sensor|
|US8071794||Jun 22, 2009||Dec 6, 2011||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Long wavelength thiol-reactive fluorophores|
|US8084575||Dec 19, 2003||Dec 27, 2011||Julius-Maximilians-Universitat||Millisecond activation switch for seven-transmembrane proteins|
|US8126554||May 17, 2006||Feb 28, 2012||Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.||Implantable medical device with chemical sensor and related methods|
|US8129525||Jun 22, 2009||Mar 6, 2012||Becton Dickinson And Company||Long wavelength thiol-reactive fluorophores|
|US8173863||Oct 14, 2005||May 8, 2012||Carnegie Institution Of Washington||Sucrose biosensors and methods of using the same|
|US8257971||Sep 4, 2012||Becton, Dickinson And Company||In vitro tumor angiogenesis model|
|US8357505||Oct 14, 2005||Jan 22, 2013||Carnegie Institution Of Washington||Environmentally stable sensors and methods of using the same|
|US8414844||Apr 7, 2010||Apr 9, 2013||Research Foundation Of State University Of New York||Ultra-sensitive, portable capillary sensor|
|US8465981||Aug 6, 2008||Jun 18, 2013||University Of Kentucky Research Foundation||Polypeptides, systems, and methods useful for detecting glucose|
|US8530633||Oct 14, 2005||Sep 10, 2013||Carnegie Institution Of Washington||Development of sensitive FRET sensors and methods of using the same|
|US8551777||Aug 15, 2012||Oct 8, 2013||Corning Incorporated||In vitro tumor angiogenesis model|
|US8571659||Jan 27, 2012||Oct 29, 2013||Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.||Implantable medical device with chemical sensor and related methods|
|US8623639||Apr 20, 2007||Jan 7, 2014||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Thermostable proteins and methods of making and using thereof|
|US8772047||May 21, 2008||Jul 8, 2014||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Dyes having ratiometric fluorescence response for detecting metabolites|
|US8778635||Jul 24, 2013||Jul 15, 2014||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Thermostable proteins and methods making and using thereof|
|US8795230||Nov 22, 2011||Aug 5, 2014||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Adjustable height needle infusion device|
|US8814831||Nov 22, 2011||Aug 26, 2014||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Ballistic microneedle infusion device|
|US8846365||Oct 14, 2005||Sep 30, 2014||Carnegie Institution Of Washington||Nucleic acids encoding phosphate fluorescent indicators and methods of using the same|
|US8939928||Jul 23, 2009||Jan 27, 2015||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Medical device having capacitive coupling communication and energy harvesting|
|US8965470||Jul 17, 2008||Feb 24, 2015||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Micro-invasive method for painless detection of analytes in extracellular space|
|US9023661||Oct 14, 2008||May 5, 2015||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Visual glucose sensor and methods of use thereof|
|US20030129622 *||Aug 28, 2002||Jul 10, 2003||Hellinga Homme W.||Biosensor|
|US20030130167 *||Jan 4, 2002||Jul 10, 2003||Pitner J. Bruce||Binding protein as biosensors|
|US20030232370 *||Apr 22, 2003||Dec 18, 2003||Trifiro Mark A.||Glucose sensor and uses thereof|
|US20040060987 *||Apr 29, 2003||Apr 1, 2004||Green Larry R.||Digital image analysis method for enhanced and optimized signals in fluorophore detection|
|US20040118681 *||Oct 16, 2003||Jun 24, 2004||Hellinga Homme W.||Biosensor|
|US20040229290 *||May 7, 2004||Nov 18, 2004||Duke University||Protein design for receptor-ligand recognition and binding|
|US20040234962 *||May 2, 2003||Nov 25, 2004||Javier Alarcon||Multicoated or multilayer entrapment matrix for protein biosensor|
|US20050014290 *||Feb 12, 2004||Jan 20, 2005||Hsieh Helen Vivian||Binding proteins as biosensors|
|US20050042704 *||Sep 27, 2004||Feb 24, 2005||Javier Alarcon||Entrapped binding protein as biosensors|
|US20050112685 *||Nov 26, 2003||May 26, 2005||Amiss Terry J.||Compositions and methods for measuring analyte concentrations|
|US20050113657 *||Nov 26, 2003||May 26, 2005||Javier Alarcon||Fiber optic device for sensing analytes|
|US20050113658 *||Oct 19, 2004||May 26, 2005||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Fiber optic device for sensing analytes and method of making same|
|US20050283057 *||Apr 13, 2005||Dec 22, 2005||Raskas Eric J||Micro-invasive method for painless detection of analytes in extracellular space|
|US20060009941 *||Jun 21, 2005||Jan 12, 2006||Mario Motz||System for evaluating a sensor signal|
|US20060030761 *||Jun 27, 2005||Feb 9, 2006||Raskas Eric J||Micro optical sensor device|
|US20060078908 *||Jun 7, 2005||Apr 13, 2006||Pitner James B||Multianalyte sensor|
|US20060216752 *||Jun 19, 2006||Sep 28, 2006||Pitner J B||Binding Protein as Biosensors|
|US20060216753 *||Jun 19, 2006||Sep 28, 2006||Pitner J B||Binding Proteins as Biosensors|
|US20060272037 *||Dec 19, 2003||Nov 30, 2006||Patrick Bauerle||Millisecond activation switch for seven-transmembrane proteins|
|US20060280652 *||May 18, 2005||Dec 14, 2006||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Long wavelength thiol-reactive fluorophores|
|US20070092966 *||May 5, 2006||Apr 26, 2007||Min Wu||In Vitro Tumor Angiogenesis Model|
|US20070208237 *||May 7, 2007||Sep 6, 2007||Raskas Eric J||Method of using a micro optical sensor device|
|US20070270674 *||May 17, 2006||Nov 22, 2007||Michael John Kane||Implantable Medical Device with Chemical Sensor and Related Methods|
|US20070270675 *||May 17, 2006||Nov 22, 2007||Michael John Kane||Implantable Medical Device with Chemical Sensor and Related Methods|
|US20080019920 *||Oct 14, 2005||Jan 24, 2008||Carnegie Institution Of Washington||Neurotransmitter Sensors and Methods of Using the Same|
|US20080032312 *||Jun 8, 2007||Feb 7, 2008||Amiss Terry J||Compositions and methods for measuring analyte concentrations|
|US20080166747 *||Apr 18, 2007||Jul 10, 2008||Duke University||Biosensor|
|US20080261255 *||Mar 1, 2004||Oct 23, 2008||Leah Tolosa||Proteins, Sensors, and Methods of Characterizing Analytes Using the Same|
|US20080311047 *||Nov 16, 2006||Dec 18, 2008||Thijs Kaper||Multimetric Biosensors and Methods of Using Same|
|US20080311675 *||May 21, 2008||Dec 18, 2008||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Dyes having ratiometric fluorescence response for detecting metabolites|
|US20090093693 *||Jul 17, 2008||Apr 9, 2009||Eric Jules Raskas||Micro-invasive method for painless detection of analytes in extracellular space|
|US20090104714 *||Oct 14, 2008||Apr 23, 2009||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Visual glucose sensor and methods of use thereof|
|US20090126034 *||Oct 14, 2005||May 14, 2009||Frommer Wolf B||Environmentally Stable Sensors and Methods of Using the Same|
|US20090178149 *||Oct 14, 2005||Jul 9, 2009||Sylvie Lalonde||Polyamine Sensors and Methods of Using the Same|
|US20090188001 *||Oct 14, 2005||Jul 23, 2009||Frommer Wolf B||Sucrose Biosensors and Methods of Using the Same|
|US20090311674 *||Oct 14, 2005||Dec 17, 2009||Frommer Wolf B||Phosphate Biosensors and Methods of Using the Same|
|US20100037329 *||Oct 14, 2005||Feb 11, 2010||Frommer Wolf B||Development of sensitive fret sensors and methods of using the same|
|US20100136604 *||Feb 1, 2010||Jun 3, 2010||Becton, Dickinson And Company||In vitro tumor angiogenesis model|
|US20100167417 *||Jun 22, 2009||Jul 1, 2010||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Long wavelength thiol-reactive fluorophores|
|US20100187106 *||Apr 7, 2010||Jul 29, 2010||Research Foundation Of State University Of New York||Ultra-sensitive, portable capillary sensor|
|US20100248268 *||Oct 16, 2006||Sep 30, 2010||Woods Daniel F||Methods to utilize invertebrate chemosensory proteins for industrial and commercial uses|
|US20110117661 *||Aug 6, 2008||May 19, 2011||Sylvia Daunert||Polypeptides, systems, and methods useful for detecting glucose|
|US20110184168 *||Jul 28, 2011||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Long wavelength thiol-reactive fluorophores|
|EP1458760A1 *||Jan 6, 2003||Sep 22, 2004||Becton, Dickinson and Company||Entrapped binding proteins as biosensors|
|EP1468023A2 *||Jan 6, 2003||Oct 20, 2004||Becton, Dickinson and Company||Binding proteins as biosensors|
|EP1552303A2 *||Oct 16, 2003||Jul 13, 2005||Duke University||Biosensor|
|WO2003021247A1 *||Aug 28, 2002||Mar 13, 2003||Duke University||Biosensor|
|WO2003057850A2 *||Jan 6, 2003||Jul 17, 2003||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Binding proteins as biosensors|
|WO2003057850A3 *||Jan 6, 2003||Oct 28, 2004||Becton Dickinson Co||Binding proteins as biosensors|
|WO2004036176A2||Oct 16, 2003||Apr 29, 2004||Duke University||Biosensor|
|WO2004036176A3 *||Oct 16, 2003||Jul 29, 2004||Homme W Hellinga||Biosensor|
|WO2005054855A1 *||Nov 16, 2004||Jun 16, 2005||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Compositions and methods for measuring analyte concentrations|
|WO2009052299A2||Oct 16, 2008||Apr 23, 2009||Becton, Dickinson And Company||Visual glucose sensor and methods of use thereof|
|U.S. Classification||435/287.1, 422/82.05, 436/172, 422/82.08, 436/518, 204/403.01, 435/288.7, 436/805, 435/488, 435/287.2, 435/7.2, 204/400, 435/808, 435/14, 435/817|
|International Classification||G01N33/533, G01N33/58, G01N33/66|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S436/805, Y10S435/817, Y10S435/808, G01N33/582, G01N33/66|
|European Classification||G01N33/58D, G01N33/66|
|Mar 11, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DUKE UNIVERSITY, NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HELLINGA, HOMME W.;REEL/FRAME:009821/0963
Effective date: 19990219
|Jan 20, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jan 24, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Feb 8, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12