|Publication number||US6368460 B1|
|Application number||US 09/734,941|
|Publication date||Apr 9, 2002|
|Filing date||Dec 11, 2000|
|Priority date||Oct 20, 1995|
|Also published as||US20020117285|
|Publication number||09734941, 734941, US 6368460 B1, US 6368460B1, US-B1-6368460, US6368460 B1, US6368460B1|
|Inventors||Cyrus K. Aidun|
|Original Assignee||Institute Of Paper Science And Technology, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (30), Non-Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (2), Classifications (11), Legal Events (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 09/645,829, filed Aug. 25, 2000, which is a divisional of prior application Ser. No. 09/534,690, filed Mar. 24, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,057, which is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 09/212,199, filed Dec. 15, 1998, now abandoned, which is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 08/920,415, filed Aug. 29, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,876,564, which is a continuation-in-part of prior application Ser. No. 08/546,548, filed Oct. 20, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,321, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The inventions relate generally to paper forming machine headbox tube section designs and methods to improve paper properties for increased productivity and formation quality with headbox components having hydrodynamic optimization for paper and board forming. More particularly, the inventions relate to the generation of a specific flow inside the headbox which distributes the fibers in an isotropic form (i.e., uniform in all directions) in the sheet eliminating “preferential fiber orientation” and producing a truly isotropic and uniform sheet, a very desirable condition which has long been sought by papermakers. Enhanced mixing of the stock is thus provided as jets of paper fiber stock emanate from a diffuser block for coupling a distributor to a nozzle chamber in a paper forming machine headbox for discharging a web product with isotropic fiber orientation.
2. Background and Description of Related Art
The quality of paper and the board forming, in manufacture, depends significantly upon the uniformity of the rectangular jet generated by a paper forming machine headbox component for discharging paper fiber stock upon the wire component of the paper forming machine. The fiber orientation in current commercial paper machines is anisotropic with preference to fibers that are oriented generally in the machine direction. Attempts to establish uniform paper stock flow in the headbox component, particularly the nozzle chamber, and to improve paper fiber orientation at the slice output of the headbox have involved using a diffuser installed between the headbox distributor (inlet) and the headbox nozzle chamber (outlet). The diffuser block enhances the supply of a uniform flow of paper stock across the width of the headbox in the machine direction (MD). Such a diffuser box typically includes multiple conduits or tubular elements between the distributor and the nozzle chamber which may include step widening or abrupt opening changes to create turbulent flows for deflocculation or disintegration of the paper fiber stock to ensure better consistency of the stock. High quality typically means good formation, uniform basis weight profiles, uniform sheet structure and high sheet strength properties. These parameters are affected to various degrees by paper fiber distributions, fiber orientations, fiber density and the distributions of fines and fillers. Optimum fiber orientations in the XY plane of the paper and board webs which influences MD/CD elastic stiffness ratios across the width is of significant importance in converting operations and end uses for certain paper grades.
Conventional paper forming apparatus used primarily in the paper and board industry consists of a unit which is used to transform paper fiber stock, a dilute pulp slurry (i.e., fiber suspended in water at about 0.5 to 1 percent by weight) into a rectangular jet and to deliver this jet on top of a moving screen (referred to as wire in the paper industry). The liquid drains or is sucked under pressure through the screen as it moves forward leaving a mat of web fiber (e.g., about 5 to 7 percent concentration by weight). The wet mat of fiber is transferred onto a rotating roll, referred to as a couch roll, transporting the mat into the press section for additional dewatering and drying processes.
The device which forms the rectangular jet is referred to as a headbox. These devices are anywhere from 1 to 9 meters wide depending on the width of the paper machine. There are different types of headboxes used in the industry. However, there are some features that are common among all of these devices. The pulp slurry (referred to as stock) is transferred through a pipe into a tapered section, the manifold, where the flow is almost uniformly distributed through the width of the box. The pipe enters the manifold from the side and therefore, there must be a mechanism to redirect the flow in the machine direction. This is done by a series of circular tubes which are placed in front of the manifold before the converging zone or nozzle chamber of the headbox. This section is referred to as the tube bundle, the tube bank or the diffuser block of the headbox. These tubes are either aligned on top of each other or are placed in a staggered pattern. There are anywhere from a few hundred to several thousand tubes in a headbox.
The tubes in current headboxes have a smooth surface starting from a circular shape in the manifold side and going through one or two step changes to larger diameter circular sections. Some tubes converge into a rectangular outlet (some with rounded edges) at the other end opening to the converging zone of the headbox. Analysis shows that the flow entering the tube may start to recirculate generating vorticity in the machine direction. The sign of the vorticity vector depends on the location of the tube. Very often, there is a pattern that develops as a natural outcome of the tube pattern structure and the structure of the headbox. In current machines, there is no control on the direction or strength of the vortices in the tubes. The tubes all have flat smooth internal surface and the flow pattern and secondary flow inside the tubes is governed by the inlet and outlet conditions. The machine direction vorticity could be positive or negative depending on the inlet and outlet conditions which in turn depend on the location of the tube in the tube bank.
The present invention relates to the control and formation of secondary flow in the tubes in order to achieve a superior flow field inside the converging zone of the headbox to achieve certain flow properties in the converging zone of the headbox. Thus, the concept relates to the modification of the flow inside the tube bank by altering the internal surface geometry of current tubes or tube inserts. The internal surfaces of all of the current tubes or tube inserts are either circular and therefore axisymmetric (type I), or, they start from a circular inlet and eventually converge into a rectangular outlet (type II) with a four fold symmetry (i.e., the entire tube can be divided into symmetric regions by two diagonal cross-sectional planes, one vertical cross-sectional plane and one horizontal cross-sectional plane. The new concept is to modify the geometry of the type I and/or inserts such that the internal surface is no longer axisymmetric or non-axisymmetric, and to modify the internal geometry of the type II tubes such that the internal geometry of the tube or the insert is no longer four fold symmetric. One described embodiment modifies the internal geometry of each tube in order to generate machine-direction (MD) vorticity and subsequently to arrange the tube or the insert in such a manner so that all the jets in each row of the tube bundle form with the same sign of MD vorticity vector and the jets in each column form with alternating sign of the MD vorticity. This generates shear layers which would result in cross-machine orientation of fibers and therefore would increase the strength and other physical properties in the CD while providing effective mixing and turbulent generation between tubes adjacent to each other in each row.
Another described embodiment modifies the internal geometry of each tube insert or tube in order to generate machine-direction (MD) vorticity and subsequently to arrange the tubes or the inserts in such a manner so that all the jets in each row and column of the tube bundle form with the same sign of MD vorticity vector. This results in strong mixing and dispersion of the fibers and fillers and therefore better uniformity in fiber and filler distribution in the sheet.
Another mechanism to generate axial vorticity inside the tubes of a headbox is to have a device, a tube insert, wherein a flat section at the manifold side is followed by a converging curved section, followed by a straight tube section, and where, one or more inclined fins or grooves are placed on the flat section or on the flat and the converging curved section of the headbox tube or insert nozzle of the headbox tube. The purpose of inclined fins or grooves is to control the defined direction or orientation of the axial vortices generated inside the tubes. The converging section of the insert nozzle or tube will accelerate the fluid and increase the angular velocity of the fluid, consequently, increasing the strength of the vortex as the fluid moves toward the straight (constant diameter) section of the tube. In another alternate embodiment, the generation one or more counter-rotating vortex pairs (CVPs) may be set up inside each tube instead of a single vortex per tube.
Briefly, the invention relates to methods and apparatus to enhance paper and board forming qualities with insert tubes and/or a diffuser block in the paper forming machine headbox component which generates vorticity in the machine direction (MD) which is superimposed on the streamwise flow to generate a swirling or helical flow through the tubes of the diffuser block. Tubes of the diffuser block are designed such that the web product with isotropic fiber orientation of the paper fiber stock may be controlled by generating controlled axial vortices promoting mixing of the jets of paper stock from the tubular elements as the jets flow into the nozzle chamber to a uniform flow field of stock at the slice opening for the rectangular jet. Also disclosed is the effective mixing of the jets generating cross-machine direction (CD) shear between the rows of jets that form at the outlet of the tubes inside the nozzle chamber of the headbox to align paper fibers in the cross-machine direction.
The appended claims set forth the features of the present invention with particularity. The invention, together with its objects and advantages, may be best understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1A shows a paper forming machine headbox component used with a diffuser block exposed to show vortex forming means provided for a plurality of the tubular elements of the diffuser block in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 1B shows a cross-sectional view thereof;
FIG. 1C shows an insert tube embodying vortex forming means also in accordance with the invention for insertion in the diffuser block of a conventional paper forming machine headbox component;
FIG. 1D illustrates a tubular element of a step diffuser block for generating controlled axial vortices therein;
FIGS. 2A and 2B show an additional embodiment of the invention wherein fins or grooves at the inlet of the tubular element may be utilized to generate vortices and converging section can curved section forming an elongated portion near the inlet also generate controlled axial vortices within tubular elements;
FIG. 3A through FIG. 3H illustrate various controlled vortices configurations as positive and negative defined vortices emanating from the diffuser block to generate small scale turbulence between adjacent tubes for improved formation, and predetermined cross flows to achieve uniform stock flow in the nozzle chamber according to the invention;
FIGS. 4A-4H illustrate stock flow irregularity associated with conventional paper forming machine headbox components;
FIGS. 5A-5H illustrate the use of controlled axial vortices in the paper stock jets to provide more uniform paper stock flows in the nozzle chamber approaching the slice of the paper forming machine headbox component in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 6 is a side view cross-section of a tube in the tube bank of the headbox;
FIGS. 7A and 7B show the location of pressure pulse generators in one embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 8 is a cross-section view of a tube showing mounting details of an acoustic pressure pulse generator;
FIG. 9 is a cross-section view of a tube showing mounting details of a magnetically actuated finned body for generating vortexes;
FIG. 10 is a side view and front view of the finned body shown in FIG. 9;
FIG. 11 shows a pair of counter-rotating vortices delivered from each tube in the block in an XY± pattern;
FIG. 12 shows a pair of counter-rotating vortices delivered from each tube in the block in an XX± pattern;
FIG. 13 shows a pair of counter-rotating vortices delivered from each tube in the block in an XX+ + pattern;
FIG. 14 shows a pair of counter-rotating vortices delivered from each tube in the block in an XY+ + pattern;
FIG. 15 shows the delta shaped block placed at the exit section of the small diameter tube;
FIG. 16 shows the delta shaped block placed at the mid-section of the large diameter tube;
FIG. 17 shows the jet of Fluid B impinging on the Fluid A jet leaving the small diameter tube resulting in jet breakup into a CVP;
FIG. 18 shows the jet of Fluid B impinging on the Fluid A mainstream flow in the larger diameter tube resulting in a CVP;
FIG. 19 shows two pairs of counter-rotating vortices in each tube arranged in XX pattern, the two small squares inside the tubes representing the general location of the protuberance;
FIG. 20 shows two pairs of counter-rotating vortices in each tube arranged in XY pattern, the two small squares inside the tubes representing the general location of the protuberance;
FIG. 21 is a perspective view of a small diameter tube design in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 22 is an end view of the tube showing the closed core and tube fins of the tube of FIG. 21;
FIG. 23 is a sectional view of the tube of FIG. 21 taken as a cross section from FIG. 22;
FIG. 24 is a plot of the mesh;
FIG. 25 shows velocity vectors on the center plane for the entire model;
FIG. 26 shows axial velocity contours on the center plane for the entire model;
FIG. 27 shows velocity vectors on the center plane for the fin section only;
FIG. 28 shows axial velocity contours on the center plane for the fin section only;
FIG. 29A is an Excel plot showing axial velocity plotted at varying angles 5 mm past the end of the fins;
FIG. 29B shows the same at one diameter past the fins;
FIG. 30A shows the components of swirl taken along a line 45 degrees to the coordinate axes 5 mm past the end of the fins; and
FIG. 30B shows the above one diameter past the end of the fins;
FIG. 31 is a polar diagram illustrating the anisotropic fiber orientation illustrates fiber orientation with a preference to the machine direction;
FIG. 32 illustrates the reorientation of paper fibers providing isotropic fiber orientation for discharge as a web product resulting in higher cross-machine direction (CD) strength providing fiber orientation substantially equally in all in-plane directions as shown in the polar diagram;
FIGS. 33A-33C illustrate various manifestations of fiber orientation nonuniformity showing anisotropic paper having preferential fiber orientation which is typically distributed relative to the machine direction as shown in the polar plots, whereas FIG. 33D illustrates a uniform isotropic orientation; and
FIG. 34 shows a polar diagram of in-plane elastic content showing the orientation distribution of the strength of the web product for pilot trial samples of linerboard produced in accordance with the invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. FIG. 1A illustrates an embodiment of a paper forming machine headbox component 10 for receiving a paper fiber stock and generating a rectangular jet therefrom for discharge upon a wire component moving in a machine direction (MD). A distributor 12 is provided for distributing the paper fiber stock flowing into the headbox component 10 in a cross-machine direction (CD) which would be generally perpendicular to the machine direction of the wire component in a conventional hydraulic headbox. It is important to note however, that the present invention may also be embodied in a conventional air-cushioned headbox as well as the hydraulic headbox. The distributor 12 is provided to supply a flow of paper fiber stock across the width of the headbox 10 in the machine direction. A nozzle chamber 14 is shown having an upper surface and a lower surface converging to form a rectangular output lip defining a slice 22 opening for the rectangular jet at opening 24. As shown in cross section in FIG. 1B, the paper fiber stock flows as indicated by the arrows in the nozzle chamber 14 to output the rectangular jet 30 upon the wire 32 partially shown in FIG. 1B.
A diffuser block 16 is provided to couple the distributor 12 to the nozzle chamber 14. As illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B, the diffuser block 16 includes a multiplicity of individual tubular elements 18 disposed between the distributor 12 and the nozzle chamber 14, the presently described embodiment includes vortex forming means 20 provided for a plurality of the tubular elements 18. The vortex forming means 20 embodied herein may be provided for a subset or a plurality of the multiple tubular elements 18 for generating controlled axial vortices in the machine direction promoting mixing of the jets of the stock from the tubular elements 18, as the jets flow into the nozzle chamber to a uniform flow field of stock at the slice opening 22 for the rectangular jet 30 from the rectangular opening 24 at the slice 22.
As FIG. 1B illustrates in cross section, steps 26 and 28 as might be found in a conventional diffuser block for the purpose of breaking up deflocculating or disintegrating the paper fiber stock to enhance the uniformity thereof. As already described a step diffuser block is generally provided in conventional headboxes, and the present embodiment may or may not require the use of such a step diffuser, but for the purpose of the described embodiment, the step diffuser is provided as shown.
FIG. 1C shows an insert tube 34 which is insertable in a diffuser block for coupling the distributor to the nozzle chamber in a paper forming machine headbox for discharging paper fiber stock upon a wire component moving in a machine direction. The diffuser block in conventional machines includes a multiplicity of individual tubular elements as already discussed and also provide for the ability for such inserts, typically smooth cylindrical tubular inserts for varying diameter of the individual tubular elements. However, the inserts of the described embodiment and shown herein are typically used to generate vortices within such tubes and thus, asymmetric or non-axisymmetric surface with ridges or fins or grooves as opposed to smooth axisymmetric inner surfaces are employed. The tubular elements and the insert tubes are oriented axially in the machine direction and arranged as a matrix of rows and columns for generating multiple jets of paper fiber stock flowing into the nozzle chamber 14. The insert tube 34 includes a flat section inlet 36 for receiving the stock from the distributor, which also serves as a shoulder or rim for securing the insert tube 34 in the diffuser block 16. The insert tube 34 embodiment also includes an elongated section outlet 38 connected to the flat section inlet 36 for directing the jets of the paper fiber stock through the tubular elements of the diffuser block 16 as the jets flow towards the nozzle chamber 14. Also the vortex forming means 40 are provided for the insert tube 34 for generating the controlled axial vortices in the machine direction to promote mixing of the jets from the elongated section outlet as the jets flow toward the nozzle chamber 14. Herein, the vortex forming means include an asymmetric interior surface as shown in FIG. 1C within the elongated section outlet 38 for generating the controlled axial vortex therein. More specifically, the asymmetric interior surface has a spiral pitch defining a helical path as shown within the tubular elements to generate the controlled axial vortices as the stock travels along the helical path in the elongated section outlet 38. Thus, as described, for tubes in existing headboxes, the insert tube 34 may be constructed of plastic, metal, ceramic or composite inserts with the spiral-shaped grooves, fins, ridges or guides of various form at the inner surface. One such feature is to form spiral-shaped grooves or patterns through the inner surface of the insert as shown. These inserts can be easily placed inside the tubes to generate the desired machine-direction vorticity in the tube. The inserts such as tube insert 34 may be placed inside the tubes at the distributor or manifold side of a headbox 10. The initial section of the insert at the inlet may start with a smooth surface before the vortex generating means, discussed above.
Turning now to FIG. 1D, there are several ways to implement the described concept, e.g., the tubes have the feature of directing the flow in a manner to generate machine direction vorticity in a specific direction (i.e., with a specific vorticity vector sign, defined as positive (+) or negative (−) based on a right-hand rule). Thus, the sign of the secondary flow of the vorticity inside the tube is controlled by the spiral-shaped grooves, fins, ridges or guides of various form in the inner surface or such means for generating the vorticity. One such feature is to form spiral-shaped grooves or patterns through the inner surfaces of the tubes as shown in FIG. 1D, in a step diffuser box. As the fluid enters the tube from the manifold, the spiral grooves direct the flow in a recirculating manner generating or increasing the controlled vorticity in the machine direction. The grooves have increasing or decreasing pitch depending on the type of tube and the headbox design. As shown in FIG. 1D, the pitch of the spiral-shaped grooves may gradually change through the step diffuser tube as indicated by reference numerals 42, 44 and 46; note particularly the increased pitch between the groove 44 and the groove 46. The pitch of the grooves depends on the average MD velocity through the tube. If the MD velocity is very large, then the pitch may be considerably smaller than shown in the figure. Another means to generating the controlled vortices in addition or in place of the spiral grooves or fins, discrete sections of fins or ridges can be used to direct the stock in a helical pattern inside the tubes generating controlled MD vortices. The spiral-shaped grooves, fins or guides allow the fluid to gradually flow in the spiral-shaped pattern of the tube surface.
With reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B, additional tube insert embodiments are shown including vortex forming means as an inclined fin or groove 56 and 70 on flat section inlets 48 and 62 respectively. Such incline fins or grooves facilitate the generation of the controlled axial vorticity as the stock flows toward the elongated section outlet from the distributor 12 of the headbox 10. The mechanism of FIGS. 2A and 2B generate axial vorticity inside the tubes of the headbox wherein the flat section at the manifold or distributor side is followed by a converging curved section, herein curved sections 50 and 64 and converging portions 52 and 66 are provided as portions of the elongated section outlet connecting to elongated sections 54 and 68 respectively, in the two embodiments of FIGS. 2A and 2B. Where the inclined fin or groove, e.g., 56 or 70, is placed on the flat section, e.g., 48 or 62, or on the flat and the converging section of the headbox tube or insert nozzle of the headbox tube, the purpose of the inclined fin or groove is to control the direction of the vortex generated inside the tube as shown wherein inlet flow 58 is directed as a vortical flow pattern indicated by reference numeral 60 in FIG. 2A; and incoming flow 72 is directed as vortical flow 74 in the embodiment of FIG. 2B. The converging sections 52 or 66 of the insert tube will accelerate the fluid and increase the angular vorticity of the fluid, consequently increasing the strength of the vortex as the fluid flows towards the straight edge 54, or 68 of the tube. FIG. 2 shows the groove 56 as residing within the elongated outlet portion of the tube as well as on the flat section 48; while FIG. 2B provides the groove or fin 70 as residing solely on the flat surface 62. It should be noted that while a single fin or groove is shown on the tubes more fins may be desirable for creating the axial vorticity within the tubes as well as for ease of placement, orientation independence and the like for fitting such tubes into the diffuser block of conventional headboxes. The curved sections 50 and 64 may be incorporated into the elongated section and disposed between the flat section 48 and converging section 52 in FIG. 2A to facilitate the axial vorticity, and as such, provide additional vortex forming means as a curved section included along a portion of the converging section near the flat section for generating the controlled axial vortices as the paper fiber stock flows in the elongated section outlet
FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C illustrate various methods of mixing jets of paper fiber stock emanating from a multiplicity of axially aligned tubes arranged as a matrix of rows and columns in a diffuser block coupled to a nozzle chamber in a paper forming machine headbox for discharging a uniform flow field of stock upon the wire component moving in the machine direction. As indicated, the MD components of vortices of the jets emanating from the tubes are indicated as positive defined or negative defined axial vortices in accordance with the convention of the right-hand rule and where here we use the convention that positive MD points into the surface of the figures. One could also use the convention that MD is the negative direction. Positive or negative jets refer to jets with positive or negative MD vorticity, respectively. A method described herein provides for the generation of positive jets of paper fiber stock emanating from the diffuser block in controlled axial vortices in the machine direction for a first plurality of the tubes, the direction of the vortex being directed in a first positive-defined direction about the axes of each of the first plurality of tubes and positioning at least one of the positive jets adjacent another one of the positive jets promoting mixing as the jets flow into the nozzle chamber. This is illustrated in FIG. 3A where the first row 76 of FIG. 3A and the bottom row 80 of FIG. 3A whereby small scale turbulence is introduced between the individual positively oriented jets of rows 76 and 80 as the fluid flow emanates from the tubes promoting mixing thereof. Small scale turbulence is also introduced between the individual negatively oriented jets of row 78 in FIG. 3A. In addition to the secondary vorticity of the jets promoting mixing of the fluid emanating from the tubes, the configuration of FIG. 3A also generates shear layers which would result in cross-machine orientation of fibers and therefore, would increase the strength and other physical properties in the cross-machine direction, as indicated by shear layers in between 82 and 84 with the inner-posed layer of negative defined rows of vorticity as indicated by reference numeral 78. The jet orientation of row 78 is provided according to the method by generating negative jets of paper fiber stock emanating from the diffuser block in controlled axial vortices in the machine direction for a second plurality of tubes, the direction of each vortex being directed in a second negative-defined direction about the axes of each of said second plurality of tubes and positioning at least one of the negative jets adjacent another one of the negative jets promoting mixing as the jets flow into the nozzle chamber, herein row 78. FIG. 3A illustrates desired flows for enhancing the strength of paper or board because the shear layers in the CD provide CD strength by the alternating MD vorticity direction of the secondary flow of the jets from the tubes in each row of tubes resulting in shear layers which align more fibers in CD.
An alternate concept of modifying the internal geometry of each tube in order to generate machine direction vorticity and subsequently arrange the tubes or inserts in a manner such that all the jets of each row and column of the tube bundle form the same sign of MD vorticity vector is shown in FIG. 3B. This results in strong mixing and dispersion of the fibers and fillers and therefore better uniformity in fiber and filler distribution in the sheet and enhanced formation. As shown in FIG. 3B all of the rows and columns have the orientation same indicated by reference numeral 86, namely a positively defined orientation of vorticity which results in turbulent shears as indicated by reference numeral 88 and 90. FIG. 3B shows an orientation best for mixing where uniform dispersion is a criteria having emphasis over strength; such as in tissue or light-weight paper applications.
FIG. 3C illustrates alternating sign vorticity 92 and 94 throughout the rows and columns of the tube bank which provides the configuration of Case 2 discussed below in connection with FIGS. 5A-5H wherein the described counter-rotating pattern of adjacent jets provides better mixing over jets lacking vorticity discussed further below. Computer analysis for headboxes employing the configuration of FIG. 3C shows the ability to achieve more uniform flow of the paper fiber stock within the nozzle chamber making secondary jets at the slice weaker and thus noticeable improvement in uniformity.
FIGS. 3D, 3E and 3F show additional patterns of the tubes for generating vortices of defined orientation, herein the matrix of rows and columns in the diffuser block being either vertical or inclined columns and introducing the vortex patterns in staggered tube arrangements. FIGS. 3D, 3E and 3F respectively provide patterns similar to those discussed above in connection with FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C, wherein the individual secondary vorticity of the jets emanating from the tubes is provided in a staggered pattern in FIGS. 3D-3F. In FIG. 3D, the alternating MD vorticity direction of the secondary flow of the jets from the staggered tubes results in shear layers which would align more fibers in the CD. In FIG. 3E, the MD vorticity direction of the secondary flow of the jets from the staggered tubes results in enhanced fiber dispersion and mixing of the fillers in the paper fiber stock. In FIG. 3F, the alternating checkerboard MD vorticity direction of the secondary flow of the jets from the staggered tubes results in effective mixing and fiber dispersion.
Additionally, FIG. 3G illustrates plural row pairs of common secondary vorticity of the jets from the tubes in a staggered pattern, herein a pair of negatively oriented rows 96 being provided above a pair of positively oriented rows 97 in a repetitive pattern. Accordingly, the alternating MD vorticity direction of the secondary flow of the jets from the staggered tubes in FIG. 3G results in shear layers which would align more fibers in the CD. From the foregoing, it is appreciated to those skilled in the art that the tubes arranged as a matrix of rows and columns in the diffuser block are provided either vertically or inclined and the rows or columns may be provided as staggered for enhancing fiber alignment. FIG. 3H similarly shows a repetitive pair vorticity pattern illustrating, e.g., negatively oriented rows 98 and positively oriented rows 99.
Turning now to FIGS. 4A-4H and FIGS. 5A-5H, the effect of vorticity in the tubes of the headbox 10 on the flow is illustrated for the slice and the nozzle chamber 14. Here, analysis shows the effect of vorticity in the jets leaving the tubes in the tube bank and entering the converging zone of the headbox. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of vorticity at the tube bank on the free surface rectangular jet 30 at the slice 22. Two cases have been considered, case one with no vorticity and the second case with axial vorticity. These cases are shown in FIGS. 4A and 5A, respectively.
The tubes in these cases, i.e., case #1 (FIGS. 4A-4H) and case #2 (FIGS. 5A-5H) are arranged in vertical columns, as shown in FIGS. 4A and 5A, respectively. The flow through the tube in case 1 has velocity component only in the machine direction. Wherein case 2, the flow in the tube has an axial vorticity imposed on the streamwise flow. The imposed secondary flows are counter-rotating axial vortices, that is the direction of rotation is clockwise and counter-clockwise in a checkerboard pattern. The cross machine direction, y, and the vertical z, components of the velocity at the tube outlet and the converging zone inlet are given respectively by:
These velocity components are super-imposed on the streamwise velocity component of the jet leaving the tubes as shown in FIG. 5A. In equation (1a, 1b) w and v are the vertical (Z) and transverse (CD) components of velocity, A is the magnitude of the secondary flow at the inlet, Δy and Δz are the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the tube outlet, respectively. The magnitude A, of the super-imposed secondary eddy in this study is 1.5% of the average streamwise component. The secondary velocity profile at the inlet to the converging zone is defined by a 4th order function of the y and z coordinates. The Reynolds number, based on the average inflow velocity U, the vertical height of the headbox L, and the kinematic fluid viscosity, v, is given by:
The results of the two cases are described herein with the analysis of computational experiments. The flow characteristics at the slice for each case is given by presenting the contour plot of each of the three velocity components (see FIGS. 4C-4H and FIGS. 5C-5H). Since the direction of the secondary flows cannot be identified in the black and white reproduction of the color-coded plots, we have added arrows to the plots to distinguish the flow direction.
For the first case, where the tubes are arranged in a straight vertical column, the flow is periodic with a wavelength of one-third of the width of the computation domain. The vertical component of the flow plays an important role in transferring fluid of high streamwise momentum towards the bottom wall of the headbox. Due to the periodicity of the flow, this momentum transfer varies significantly in the CD direction. Where the vertical velocity towards the wall is larger, the faster moving fluid carried from the middle of the slice to the wall forms a liquid jet. Where the vertical velocity is relatively smaller, a streamwise velocity jet of lower speed appears. These liquid jets can be seen in FIGS. 4D, 4F and 4H, where the contour plot of the three velocity components for this case are plotted along a horizontal cross-sectional plane near the lower lip of the slice. Removing the average vertical velocity from the actual vertical velocity reveals the cellular pattern of the secondary flow structure. The secondary flow patterns at the slice for each of the two cases are illustrated in the contour plots. The contour plots of the average velocity components for cases 1 and 2 at a horizontal cross-sectional plane are shown in FIGS. 4D, 4F, 4H and FIGS. 5D, 5F and 5H, respectively.
The vertical velocity component contour plot in FIGS. 4G, 4E and 4C show that the flow at the slice has a periodic structure similar to that in Case 1 (i.e., FIGS. 5G, 5E and 5C). However, in this case the deviation of the actual vertical velocity from the average vertical velocity is smaller. Consequently, less fluid with high streamwise momentum is transferred towards the bottom surface of the headbox. Also, less fluid with low streamwise momentum is lifted from the lower surface towards the middle of the slice. Thus, the secondary jets at the slice for Case 2, are weaker and less noticeable. Compared to Case 1, the secondary fluid flow cells created in this case are further away from the bottom and the CD velocity components are smaller than those of the first case.
In Case 1, the vertical velocity component changes sign and the variation in streamwise velocity due to the jets from the tubes remain strong up to the slice. As seen from the contour plot of the z component of velocity, there is considerable non-uniformity in the velocity. This kind of flow results in a streak pattern when manufacturing light-weight sheets. In the other case, however, the vertical component, as well as other components of the flow field, are more uniform due to the vortices which result in more effective coalescence and mixing of the jets.
The counter-rotating pattern of adjacent jets, as considered in this study, is perhaps not the most effective pattern for mixing of the fluid and suspended particles in jets from adjacent tubes. A more effective method for mixing is to force the jets from the tubes to rotate in the same direction. Depending on the desired properties of the sheet, the rotational pattern of the jets should be accordingly controlled using the special tubes outlined above and the specific pattern arrangement of FIGS. 3A, 3B or 3C, as appropriate.
In another embodiment, the vortex swirls are induced by means of pressure pulse generating elements. This method has three distinct advantages:
1) the generation of the secondary flow or swirl in the tubes can be fine-tuned on-line as the machine is in operation without any disturbances to the production,
2) the swirl number or the strength of the secondary flows can be adjusted in individual rows of tubes or in individual sections of the tube bank on-line while the machine is in operation without any disturbances to the paper machine production, and
3) no spiral finds or grooves or other constrictions are place inside the tubes; therefore, the probability of tube plugging is reduced below the conventional tubes.
Conventional tubes have two general sections. The first section is a small diameter tube which contacts at one end with the manifold or distributor of the headbox. On the other end, the small diameter tube connects to a larger diameter tube through a step change in cross-sectional area, as shown in FIG. 6.
FIG. 6 shows a side-view cross section schematic of a tube in the tube bank of the headbox and the flow pattern from the small diameter tube at the left to the larger diameter tube. The doughnut shaped vortex is not axisymmetric since the jet from the small diameter tube bends randomly to attach to the wall of the large diameter tube. Often the jet changes angle in a random manner.
This embodiment provides a method and device to regulate the bending characteristics of the jet from the smaller diameter tube in order to generate a desired flow pattern at the outlet of the larger diameter tube. The described embodiment provides of a tube with a smaller diameter section followed by a step change or a more gradual change of diameter to a larger diameter tube—there are 2 to 12 pressure pulse generators 102 (PPG) at ports near the throat of the tube as shown in FIG. 7A. The pressure gradient pulses are generated in a given time sequence in order to control and regulate the bending of the jet from the smaller diameter tube. The schematic of this embodiment is shown in FIG. 7B. The device consists of several (8 ports are shown in FIG. 7B) PPG units which operate with an electric signal connected to an analog-to-digital converter (A/D) board and a digital processor (a computer).
The PPG can either be an acoustic device generating a pulse of acoustic pressure in the form of longitudinal waves inside the fluid or an electromagnetic device generating a magnetohydrodynamic (MH) pulse. The purpose of the pressure gradient pulse or the MH pulse is to control and guide the bending of the jet from the smaller diameter tube. Upon activation of a PPG, the jet can be forced to bend almost instantaneously in the direction opposite to the propagation of the pressure gradient pulse. For example, the activation of PPG at port 7 forces the jet to bend in the direction shown in that figure. If the PPG at ports 3 and 7 are activated in a time periodic manner, the jet oscillates back and forth in a time periodic manner. If PPG 1 to 8 are activated in a sequential manner (i.e., 1, 2, 3, . . . , 8, 1, 2, . . . ) the jet will rotate counter-clockwise with a slight phase lag. Activation of ports 8 to 1 will force the jet to rotate in the clockwise direction. Rotation of the jet around the larger diameter tube results in a swirling jet at the outlet of the tube. The swirl number, S, can be controlled with the frequency of activation of the PPG. Higher frequency will result in more swirl and larger swirl number, S.
It is important to note that the flow characteristics inside the tubes can be fully controlled with the sequence and the frequency of the activation of the PPG.
In a typical headbox, there are N tubes inside the tube bank where N could be several hundred to few thousand depending on the size of the headbox. The tubes are arranged in R number of rows, where 10>R23, and C=N/R columns.
With this embodiment each tube can be independently controlled, if desired. It is also easy to control blocks of tubes; for example, each row of tubes could have independent control, as well as, each column of tubes from column 1 to q and from Column C-q to C could be controlled, independently. The magnitude of q depends on how far from the side walls the tubes need to be controlled independently for superior control of the flow near the side wall and the edge of the headbox and the forming section.
One form of a PPG consists of a small flat plate, up to a few millimeters in diameter and less than a millimeter thick, which is flush with the inner surface of the tube. The surface would oscillate generating longitudinal pressure gradient waves with the application of electric field to a piezoelectric crystal adjacent to it. The vibration of the surface generates an acoustic field which propagates into the fluid generating a longitudinal wave. The setup of the PPG in the port at the throat of the tube is illustrated in FIG. 8. Another PPG element may be provided in the form of a ring which is positioned flush with the interior surface of the curved outlet of the insert of the smaller diameter section of the tube. The ring-shaped PPG is activated locally in a circular manner. The angular location of activation generated a pressure disturbance which deflects the jet, as shown in the diagram, to one side. Continuous activation of the PPG element in a circular manner will force the jet to rotate around the curved surface of the insert generating a swirling motion of the fluid inside the larger diameter tube.
A further mechanism to generate swirl inside the tubes in the tube bank of a headbox is by the use of magnetic force where a non-axisymmetric body of revolution 101 is placed inside an axisymmetric tube 103, as shown in FIG. 9. The metallic body of revolution 101 consists of an axisymmetric central region 105 shown in FIG. 10 and one to twelve fins. The most practical system would have three (F-3) to four (F-4) fins, as shown in FIG. 10. The fins could be straight or spiral shaped. The central body of revolution, 101, is partially hollow and consists of metallic sections or poles. The overall float is designed to experience up to three components of magnetic force, F1, F2 and F3 and one component of torque, T1, from the magnetic rings 109, 111 and 113. Two of the three components of force consist of axial forces in opposite direction from magnetic rings 109 and 111. The third component of force is a radial magnetic force from the electromagnetic ring 113, which holds the “float” in the center of the 117 section of the tube. The electromagnetic ring 113 also exerts a torque, T, on the “float”. The two opposing axial forces and the radial force from electromagnetic ring 113 hold the “float” in the center of the tube section 115. The torque from the electromagnetic ring 113 forces the “float” to rotate at a specific rate of rotation. The torque from the electromagnetic ring is variable according to the power supplied to the magnetic coil.
There are also hydrodynamic forces on the “float” during operation which resist the motion of the “float”. The hydrodynamic forces are the normal stress (force per unit area normal to the surface of the “float”) and the tangential stress (shear stress at the surface or drag per unit surface area). The magnetic forces and torque are adjusted considering the hydrodynamic forces to keep the “float” at the center with the float rotating at a specific rate of rotation (usually between 5 to 100 cycles per second or Hz).
The rotation of the “float” inside section 117 generates a swirling flow inside the tube which persists into section 110 and further downstream through the outlet of the tube into the converging zone of the headbox. The amount of swirl can be adjusted by the amount of torque exerted on the “float” by electromagnetic ring 113. The faster the rate of rotation of the “float”, the higher the swirl number inside the tube. The magnetic strength of the electromagnetic ring 113 can be adjusted on-line during operation to control the amount of swirl in individual tubes. Therefore, this method allows a fully automatic method to easily control the amount of swirl in individual tubes during operation attaching the electromagnetic ring 113, of each of the tubes to an electronic control system. An alternate mechanism may employ fins extended from the solid ring as a “rotor”, which fits inside the tube. The ring is forced to rotate at a controlled angular speed by a magnetic field, such as the electromagnetic ring or other means. The same effect of generating a swirling flow inside the tube is obtained with this device.
In another alternate embodiment, the generation one or more counter-rotating vortex pairs (CVPs) may be set up inside each tube instead of a single vortex per tube. The counter-rotating vortices inside the tubes result in more effective interaction of the jets once leaving the tubes. The CVPs may be generated in four orientations in the tube block, as demonstrated in FIGS. 11 through 14. Only the secondary flow pattern, that is the flow in the cross-sectional plane of the tubes is shown in these figures. These figures show three rows and three columns of the tubes in the tube block. As shown in these figures, the manner by which the secondary flows in the jet interact depend on the secondary flow pattern formed in the collection of tubes in the tube block.
The interaction of the adjacent jets from the tubes in the tube bank result in higher level of shear and extensional flow perpendicular to the streamwise direction in the converging nozzle of the headbox. This results in a more uniform fiber orientation in the forming jet leaving the headbox. That is with the correct level of axial vorticity in the jets leaving the tubes, the interaction between the jets will be such as to prevent fiber orientation in the streamwise direction. This results in an isotropical fiber orientation at the forming jet leaving the slice of the headbox.
When the orientation of the CVPs in each adjacent tube in a row varies alternatively, then the pattern is designated as an XY form. Otherwise, if the orientation of secondary flows in each tube in the row is the same, the pattern is identified as the XX pattern. To identify the secondary flow patterns that change alternatively in adjacent tubes in a column, the symbol ± is used; otherwise when the orientation is same in each column, the pattern is symbolized with the + + notation. By comparing the patterns in FIGS. 11 through 14, one can see the difference between the manner by which the secondary flows interact; in other words, the different form the adjacent jets from the tubes in the tube block interact.
To explain the form of interaction between the jets in the tube block, let us define a cylindrical polar coordinate system (r,θ,z), to define the radial, azimuthal, and axial directions of flow in the tubes with respective velocity components (ur,uθ,u2). The primary flow is represented by the axial velocity component, u2, where the other two components in the radial and azimuthal directions are referred to as the secondary part of the mean flow.
One mechanism to generate the CVP is based on the natural tendency of jets to form vortices when encountering a pressure gradient in the radial and azimuthal directions. From now on, we will refer to this variation in pressure as the Radial-Azimuthal-Pressure Variation (RAPV). Variation in pressure according to RAPV will result in CVPs with swirl number, S, defined for each vortex as
Note that the limit on the integrals is from the center of the vortex, r=0, to the edge at r=R. If the vortex is not circular, then R is a function of the angle, θ. When the swirl number is less than about 0.4, the value of S can be estimated by
when γ<0.4 and
where γ is the ratio of the maximum azimuthal to axial velocity. In this application, the value of S is between 0.01 for very weak swirl to 5.0 for very strong swirl in the flow, depending on the degree of shear and turbulence desired in the flow field. For various grades of paper, for example, the value of swirl may be changed through this range as outlined below.
There are several mechanisms by which the RAPV can be generated in a jet. The first is due to the hairpin vortex forming in the wake of a protuberance in the jet, as shown in FIGS. 15 and 16. The protuberance in these figures is placed at the exit of the small diameter tube or after the expansion in the larger diameter tube. As the flow approaches the base of the protuberance, a streamwise velocity gradient forms resulting in a rolling flow towards the base of the protuberance. Depending on the shape of the protuberance, a standing vortex may or may not exist at the upstream base. The rolling vortex then bends around the protuberance and is swept upward with the flow forming a horseshoe-like vortex. The upward motion of the fluid splits the jet generating a CVP in the wake of the protuberance. This action can also be generated with a jet of a second fluid impinging at an angle on the primary jet from the small diameter tube or the flow inside the larger diameter tube as shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, respectively. The primary flow consists of Fluid A which is the fiber suspension. The second fluid, that is Fluid B, is used for generation of the CVP in the mainstream through interaction with the primary flow. This interaction could either take place at the outlet of the smaller diameter tube or further downstream inside the larger diameter tube.
Further enhancement of the tube design is to separate the outlet region of each tube into two sections such that each vortex in the CVP will enter one subdivided tube. Then in FIGS. 11 to 14, there will be 18 distinct outlet regions from 9 tubes in three rows and three columns.
It is important to note that the vortex patterns in FIGS. 11 to 14 are generated with one protuberance inside the tube, and that two protuberances at 180° apart, will generate two pairs of CVPs, as shown in FIGS. 19 and 20; and . . . N protuberances at 360°/N apart will generate N CVPs. It is also possible to place the protuberances at unequal angular position.
The consequence and benefits of generating axial vorticity inside individual tubes in the tube block of a headbox provides one or more counter-rotating vortex pairs (CVP) inside each tube instead of just one vortex per tube. The counter-rotating vortices inside the tubes result in more effective interaction of the jets once leaving the tubes. Depending on the application, the CVPs are generated in four orientations in the tube block, as demonstrated in FIGS. 11 to 14, as discussed above.
In FIGS. 21-23, in order to achieve the largest level of swirl in the small diameter tube 120, the spiral fins 122, 124, and 126 are designed to follow a spiral tubular section where all of the flow 128 has to pass through one of the spiral tubular passages. This will guide most of the flow 128 through the spiral section of the fins 122, 124, and 126, instead of the middle bore section. Since as shown in FIG. 23, most of the flow 128 follows the spiral streamline parallel to the fin surface, the swirl number will be increased. This is because the swirl number, as defined above, is proportional to the integral of the mass of fluid times the angular to axial momentum ratio. The larger the mass of fluid undergoing the swirl motion, the larger the swirl number. More details on this system is provided below. The closed core 130 in the spiral section followed by the open core in the downstream section provides a much higher swirl number in a smaller diameter tube.
With a wide diameter tube, e.g., greater than 27 millimeters inner diameter (ID), three (3) internal fins were found optimal when used in the described embodiments, the wide diameter tube allowing for an open center without the fins extending to a solid central core. It has been observed that with such wide diameter tubes, i.e., greater than approximately 27 or 28 millimeters, the vortex strength is sufficiently large using the open core embodiment In many paper machine headboxes, however, the ID is often limited to approximately only 20 millimeters, and thus as shown in FIGS. 21-23, the tube design utilizes a solid center core 130 upstream with a partially solid and partially open tube embodiment to generate the sufficient amount of vortex strength desired in the smaller diameter tube 120. This is much more difficult to fabricate and manufacture, and thus while the larger diameter tube is preferred with the open core, often in the particular paper machine application, the parameters result in a limited diameter, i.e., less than 27 millimeters, in which to generate the same amount of vorticity in the smaller area.
With reference to FIGS. 24-30 discussed further below, the geometry of mesh flow diagrams illustrates the axial velocity components of the vorticity generated with the described tube 120 embodiment of FIGS. 21-23. Whereas the solid core 130 facilitates the sufficient vortex strength, it should be appreciated that the use of an open core in the small diameter tube, of a sufficient opening to avoid plugging of the tube, requires an opening such that the fluid flow 128 through the tube towards the center of the tube, without experiencing the rotating effects of the fins 122, 124, and 126. Thus, where the diameter of the tube is small, e.g., ID less than 27 millimeters, then to generate the same strength vorticity as the large diameter open central core tube, the open area should be reduced greatly to generate the sufficient velocity vortex, so most of the flow 128 would go between the fins 122, 124, and 126 to experience the rotation. The problem however in practice is that the use of a small open area cannot practically be sufficiently reduced for a tip to tip distance between fins of less than 6 to 7 millimeters due to the potential for fiber stapling which may occur, causing the tube 120 to plug.
As discussed, keeping the area in between the tip of the fin sufficiently large with the small diameter tube 120 causes too much fluid to tend to go straight through the center without experiencing the rotating effects of the fins. Thus, the downstream effect of vorticity would be very weak because most of the fluids would not have been forced to rotate. With the center plugged, as shown in FIGS. 21-23, the solid central core 130 however requires that all of the flow 128 go along the fins 122, 124, and 126 and therefore the fluid is required to initiate a rotational movement as it passes the core and enters the open area downstream in the tube 120. Inside the tube, since the fluid is already experiencing a rotating effect, it tends to fill in between the fins as the flow moves downstream, resulting in a centrifugal force which pushes outwardly, facilitating its sufficiently large vortex strength.
Filling the entire region with a closed core however results in a fluid downstream at the end of the fins having no velocity, thus the fins tend to collect fibers at the tip which creates fiber flocs. Advantageously, with the solid core design of FIGS. 21-23, where the partial core is filled and the downstream half is open, a stronger mixing force results in the core region, where the fins 122, 124, and 126 are still operating. Therefore, any kind of fiber buildup is prevented at the zero velocity point at the downstream end of the solid core. The plots of FIGS. 24-30 show the effects for fluid flow 128 going in between the fins in the two dimensional views, where the cross vector velocity plots in the cross-sectional plane illustrate the full strength facilitating the flow initially staying around the solid core in between the fins and then mixing while a rotational flow is achieved downstream with the remaining fluid flow.
If the orientation of all of the fibers in a given surface area of the sheet, for example in a square centimeter of the sheet, can be measured, and the number of fibers in each angular increment, for example every 10 degrees, can be counted and plotted in a “fiber orientation polar plot”, then the level of fiber network anisotropy can be evaluated. For example, in FIG. 31, the fiber orientation anisotropy is shown as an elliptical polar diagram with the major axis in the machine direction. The length of the line OA is proportional to the number of fibers oriented in the general direction of line OA.
In FIG. 31, the ratio of the major axis to the minor axis, that is OB/OC, is referred to as the MD/CD fiber orientation ratio. The polar diagram is usually measured by measurement of the propagation of speed of sound in the ultrasonic frequency in a given direction in the plane of the sheet of paper. In a given direction, the speed of sound squared is proportional to the elasticity of the sheet which in turn is proportional to the orientation of fibers in a given direction. These values are measured routinely by commercial instruments such as the Lorentzen & Wettre (L&W) instrument.
The MD/CD fiber orientation ratio in conventional machines is typically greater than 1.2, and often substantially greater than this ratio indicative of anisotropic fiber orientation. Several examples outlined in Tables 1-4 below are provided with five samples in each test run to provide an average MD/CD ratio determination for various headbox configurations. Table 1, indicating a control run, shows a substantial MD/CD ratio on average. For the tube bank configurations for Tables 2-4, headbox configurations have been identified for reducing the average MD/CD ratio to obtain a ratio closer to 1.0.
MD/CD Test Results for Tube Bank: CNTL6
(marked on sample and process as CRL6)
Sile Open: 1.25″. Cons. = 0.65%
MD/CD Test Results for Tube Bank: R406
Sile Open: 1.25″. Cons. = 0.65%
MD/CD Test Results for Tube Bank: R40-6GK
Sile Open: 1.25″. Cons. = 0.65%
MD/CD Test Results for Tube Bank: R40-6SR
Sile Open: 1.25″. Cons. = 0.65%
With reference to the data indicated above, and in view of the observed elastic content identified in FIG. 34, substantial reorientation of fibers in the web product may be achieved. FIG. 34 provides a polar diagram of the in-plane ultrasonic velocity squared, to indicate the elastic content showing the orientation distribution of the strength of the fiberboard sheet The sample is provided from the pilot trials produced using 26 pound linerboard with the described system. The polar plot of the fiber orientation illustrates the ability to turn the axis of the fiber content being produced in the web product more towards the CD direction with less fibers being oriented in the MD direction. This provides for the strength in the CD direction as being as large as the strength in the MD direction. Accordingly, the specification of paper manufacture for packaging and other paper products with respect to the CD machine direction strength may be achieved with less fiber content. Once the strength in the CD direction is increased, the production process may be optimized for predetermined weight per square meter of sheet of paper or a certain amount of fiber content to meet minimum CD strength specifications. Of course, the strength in the MD direction will be lower because of the reorientation of fibers, providing less fibers oriented in the MD direction, however the MD direction usually has substantially more strength than the CD direction in conventional paperboard manufacture.
The axial velocity at different angles downstream is shown as cross sections at the plotted angles, for example, the 22 millimeter diameter is tube embodiment illustrates axial velocity at zero, 30, 60, 90, 12 0, and 150 degrees (180 being the same as zero degrees). As shown, from only 5 millimeters to one diameter (22 millimeters) passed the end of the tubular region, the flow from the straight section is illustrated in which the velocity field quickly becomes uniform. Looking at the stream line velocity component at different cross sections, at the indicated angles, shows the flow going between the fins at a higher velocity than the flow moving along the fins. Thus, the flow around the middle of the fin is at a somewhat higher velocity than the flow near the edge of the fin which is slower but which flow very quickly equilibrates with the remaining fluid flow. With the plot showing 45 degrees at half the fin and one diameter across the fin, the flow is also shown as very quickly becoming more uniform, i.e., the x and y components of the swirling velocity. Accordingly, the tube 120 design of FIGS. 21-23, and the mesh flow diagrams of FIGS. 21-30, illustrate a further approach for enhancing swirl in smaller diameter tubes of the described system with one to two diameters of downstream straight section flow from the tube resulting in the flow achieving a uniform velocity in the nozzle of the headbox.
With reference to FIGS. 24-30, these plots and figures are from model D27 which was built in finite element mesh generation program and run using finite element analysis to simulate the above approach. The geometry is as follows:
Number of fins:
Tapered from 3 mm thickness at the base to
1.5 mm at the tip which is rounded.
The center core region is filled with a torpedo
shaped block which runs from 3 mm before the
start of the fins to 2 mm into the fin section.
Before the start of the fins, the block is hemi-
spherical. From the start of the fins to 10 mm
back, it is a straight circular cylinder. From
10 mm until it ends at 20 mm, it tapers as a cone
with a rounded tip. The fins meet the center block
at a right angle and with rounds from 0 to 10 mm.
At 10 mm, as the block tapers, the fins leave the
block and the tips blend quickly from flat to fully
In the package are twelve plots. These are black and white line plots chosen to reproduce well and be clear at small sizes. In keeping with this, they have minimal labeling.
The first three are engineering design program plots of the geometry of the section containing the fins and center body as described above. (1) shows side and end views, (2) shows only the side view, and (3) shows only the end view. The flow characteristics illustrated, rather than the dimensions (not shown), in FIGS. 23-30 will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art.
These drawings are followed by a series of nine plots presenting typical results from finite element analysis.
The model was generated in finite element mesh generation program to represent a simplified version of the true geometry. The leading and trailing edge rounds were deleted from the fins and all surface intersections were taken to be sharp. An upstream section of straight circular duct was added with flow entering as a jet of 9 mm diameter and quadratic profile 60 mm upstream of the fins. A straight circular duct of 150 mm length was added to the outlet. The volume was meshed with linear brick elements and all external surfaces were meshed with linear tetrahedral elements. The final model contains 361,200 elements with 344,830 nodes.
This model was run simulating water at 40° C. and with a flow rate of 20 gpm. The computational velocity was scaled such that one “unit” of velocity in finite element analysis corresponds to 4 mm/s in reality. This was done to aid convergence. Other properties were adjusted to keep the Reynolds number consistent. The model was set for incompressible, steady, turbulent flow, and used the standard k-epsilon formulation as included in finite element analysis. The inlet boundary condition was given by the flow rate and includes a small inlet component of kinetic energy and dissipation to “kick start” the k-epsilon routine. Wall boundary conditions are the no-slip and impermeability conditions, and, additionally, the wall imposes a Law of the Wall formulation on all volume elements directly touching the wall. The outlet has a free boundary condition. There is a Stokes initial condition applied through the volume for velocity and a uniform low value of kinetic energy and dissipation, again to “kick start” the k-epsilon routine. The simulation converged in 251 iterations and used 279,022 processor seconds (approximately 3.2 days).
The swirl number for this case was calculated by integrating the swirl number along a series of radii 30 degrees apart. It was calculated at 5 mm and one diameter past the fins. The results are given below:
At 5 mm: 0.3156
At 1 dia: 0.2786
FIG. 31 is a polar diagram illustrating the anisotropic fiber orientation illustrates fiber orientation with a preference to the machine direction;
FIG. 32 illustrates the reorientation of paper fibers providing isotropic fiber orientation for discharge as a web product resulting in higher cross-machine direction (CD) strength providing fiber orientation substantially equally in all in-plane directions as shown in the polar diagram; and
FIGS. 33A-33C illustrate various manifestations of fiber orientation nonuniformity showing anisotropic paper having preferential fiber orientation which is typically distributed relative to the machine direction as shown in the polar plots, whereas FIG. 33D illustrates a uniform isotropic orientation.
With reference to FIGS. 31 and 32, whereas the ratio of the major axis to the minor axis in FIG. 31 illustrates anisotropic fiber orientation with a preference to the machine direction, FIG. 32 shows an isotropic fiber orientation which is achieved when the paper fibers are oriented approximately equally in all in-plane directions resulting in the circular polar diagram of FIG. 32. It will be appreciated that the isotropic fiber orientation results in higher cross-machine (CD) strength as indicated from the dashed line polar plot outline in FIG. 32 extending in the solid circular polar diagram in the CD direction. The additional CD strength accordingly results in the ability to manufacture a paperboard product having lighter weight sheets with the same CD performance, additional use of recycled fiber product, improved printing surface and superior dimensional stability. Additionally, the process results in a system requiring less energy consumption and thus fiber conception while providing increased productivity advantages. As discussed further in connection with the examples set forth below, increased CD strength of approximately 7-25% in CD specific STFI linerboard strength results in reduced basis-weight for the same level of sheet performance. Additionally, common problems such as twist, warp, and sheet curl, and the dependence upon jet wire speed, are substantially alleviated. Thus, decoupling of formation and fiber orientation allows more flexibility in headbox design to achieve better formation. The grades of paper product most significantly impacted include linerboard and corrugated medium, bleached board, kraft paper, coating paper and board, and tissue products. For example, it may be anticipated that a 10% increase in CD strength may result in approximately 9% less fiber requirement for meeting the specification of strength and quality. It may be appreciated therefore that the reduced fiber requirement results in energy costs per ton of product which is substantially reduced. The headbox tube design may advantageously be provided as a retrofit to existing tube sections of current headboxes which maybe provided as a simple retrofit requiring a minimal amount of machine downtime.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that modifications to the foregoing preferred embodiments may be made in various aspects. The present invention is set forth with particularity in the appended claims. It is deemed that the spirit and scope of that invention encompasses such modifications and alterations to the preferred embodiment as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art and familiar with the teachings of the present application.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3846229||Jan 28, 1972||Nov 5, 1974||Lodding Engineering Corp||Flow systems for inducing fine-scale turbulence|
|US4018646 *||Oct 29, 1975||Apr 19, 1977||Johnson & Johnson||Nonwoven fabric|
|US4087321||Dec 20, 1976||May 2, 1978||Escher Wyss Gmbh||Head box having distributor pipe connected to a pulp guide block|
|US4133173 *||Jun 13, 1977||Jan 9, 1979||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Ducted rockets|
|US4179222||Jan 11, 1978||Dec 18, 1979||Systematix Controls, Inc.||Flow turbulence generating and mixing device|
|US4284470 *||Sep 26, 1979||Aug 18, 1981||Gaf Corporation||High-strength roofing products using novel glass fiber mats|
|US4529480 *||Aug 23, 1983||Jul 16, 1985||The Procter & Gamble Company||Tissue paper|
|US4539075||Dec 19, 1983||Sep 3, 1985||Oy Tampella Ab Lapintie||Perforated sheet for the head box of a paper machine|
|US4604164||Jan 30, 1985||Aug 5, 1986||Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Flow restraining elements in the headbox of a paper machine|
|US4643584||Sep 11, 1985||Feb 17, 1987||Koch Engineering Company, Inc.||Motionless mixer|
|US4812208||Sep 21, 1987||Mar 14, 1989||Seishi Gijutsu Kenkyu Kumiai||Headbox for paper machine with parallel twisted plates|
|US4936689||Aug 2, 1989||Jun 26, 1990||Koflo Corporation||Static material mixing apparatus|
|US5000227||Sep 27, 1989||Mar 19, 1991||Westvaco Corporation||Pressurized fluid carrier conduit connection|
|US5019215||Oct 17, 1988||May 28, 1991||Groupe Laperrier & Verreault, Inc.||Headbox with conduits having multiply connected domains|
|US5110416||Jun 1, 1990||May 5, 1992||Valmet Paper Machinery Inc.||Turbulence generator in the headbox of a papermaking machine|
|US5124002||May 9, 1991||Jun 23, 1992||J. M. Voith Gmbh||Headbox with turbulence generator pipe layers of different cross sections|
|US5183537||Oct 7, 1991||Feb 2, 1993||Beloit Technologies, Inc.||Headbox tube bank apparatus and method of directing flow therethrough|
|US5196091||Oct 29, 1991||Mar 23, 1993||Beloit Technologies, Inc.||Headbox apparatus with stock dilution conduits for basis weight control|
|US5304285||Aug 19, 1987||Apr 19, 1994||J.M. Voith Gmbh||Stock-inlet for papermaking machine|
|US5484203||Oct 7, 1994||Jan 16, 1996||Komax Systems Inc.||Mixing device|
|US5549792||Jul 12, 1994||Aug 27, 1996||J. M. Voith Gmbh||Headbox for a paper machine|
|US5603807||Jul 5, 1995||Feb 18, 1997||J. M. Voith Gmbh||Paper machine headbox with longitudinally shiftable contoured wall|
|US5622603||Mar 3, 1994||Apr 22, 1997||J.M. Voith Gmbh||Influencing the jet velocity in the multilayer headbox|
|US5792321||Oct 20, 1995||Aug 11, 1998||Institute Of Paper Science & Technology, Inc.||Methods and apparatus to enhance paper and board forming qualities|
|US5876564||Aug 29, 1997||Mar 2, 1999||Institute Of Paper Science And Technology, Inc.||Methods and apparatus to enhance paper and board forming qualities|
|US6153057||Mar 24, 2000||Nov 28, 2000||Institute Of Paper Science And Technology, Inc.||Methods and apparatus to enhance paper and board forming qualities|
|CA1320860C||Oct 12, 1988||Aug 3, 1993||Luc Y. Fortier||Headbox|
|DE9304736U1||Mar 30, 1993||May 19, 1993||Sulzer-Escher Wyss Gmbh, 7980 Ravensburg, De||Title not available|
|EP0364242A2||Oct 11, 1989||Apr 18, 1990||LE GROUPE LAPERRIERE & VERREAULT INC.||Headbox|
|SU1490205A1||Title not available|
|1||Bulletin KSM-6, "Static Mixing Technology", Koch Engineering Company, Inc., Wichita, Kansas, Copyright 1991, 16 pages.|
|2||Dr. Ruediger Kurtz and Dr. Werner Seebas, "Influence of Headbox Design on Web Formation and Product Quality-an Update on the Escher Wyss Step Diffusor Headbox", paper given at the PIRA Paper and Board Division Conference "Paper Machine Headboxes-an Update", Nov. 1989, Blackburn, United Kingdom, 6 pages.|
|3||Dr. Ruediger Kurtz and Dr. Werner Seebas, "Influence of Headbox Design on Web Formation and Product Quality—an Update on the Escher Wyss Step Diffusor Headbox", paper given at the PIRA Paper and Board Division Conference "Paper Machine Headboxes—an Update", Nov. 1989, Blackburn, United Kingdom, 6 pages.|
|4||Product Brochure, "Step Diffusor Headboxes", Escher Wyss Paper Technology, Sulzer-Escher Wyss GmbH, Ravensburg, Federal Republic of Germany, 1989, 33 pages.|
|5||W. Felsch: Papiermacher Taschenbuch, 1989, Dr. Curt Haefner Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 2-5 and 128-137) (Section on Page Machines from The Papermaker Handbook, 5th edition).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6841040 *||Dec 9, 2002||Jan 11, 2005||Metso Paper, Inc.||Method and device for feeding chemicals into a fibre suspension|
|US20030106661 *||Dec 9, 2002||Jun 12, 2003||Hannu Lepomaki||Method and device for feeding chemicals into a fibre suspension|
|U.S. Classification||162/216, 162/339, 162/336, 162/343|
|Cooperative Classification||D21F1/026, D21F1/028, D21F1/02|
|European Classification||D21F1/02G, D21F1/02E, D21F1/02|
|Dec 11, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INSTITUTE OF PAPER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC., GE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AIDUN, CYRUS K.;REEL/FRAME:011364/0439
Effective date: 20001208
|Nov 15, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION, GEORGIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INSTITUTE OF PAPER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC.;REEL/FRAME:015370/0995
Effective date: 20041112
|Oct 26, 2005||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Apr 10, 2006||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Apr 10, 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 9, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Nov 15, 2013||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Apr 9, 2014||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|May 27, 2014||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20140409