|Publication number||US6376232 B1|
|Application number||US 09/380,633|
|Publication date||Apr 23, 2002|
|Filing date||Mar 6, 1998|
|Priority date||Mar 6, 1997|
|Also published as||EP0970184A1, WO1998039409A1|
|Publication number||09380633, 380633, PCT/1998/509, PCT/GB/1998/000509, PCT/GB/1998/00509, PCT/GB/98/000509, PCT/GB/98/00509, PCT/GB1998/000509, PCT/GB1998/00509, PCT/GB1998000509, PCT/GB199800509, PCT/GB98/000509, PCT/GB98/00509, PCT/GB98000509, PCT/GB9800509, US 6376232 B1, US 6376232B1, US-B1-6376232, US6376232 B1, US6376232B1|
|Inventors||Peter Alfred Payne, Krishna Chandra Persaud, Allan John Syms|
|Original Assignee||Osmetech Plc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (17), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (10), Classifications (14), Legal Events (10)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to the detection of microorganisms, more particularly to an apparatus for obtaining samples of microorganisms.
International Publication WO 95/33848 describes a method for identifying bacteria on the basis of characteristic gases and vapours emitted as by-products of bacterial metabolism. The gases and vapours are detected by an array of gas sensing devices, in particular arrays based on semiconducting organic polymers.
One very important source of such bacteria are samples obtained in a swab of some sort. The present invention provides a single apparatus having a dual use i) as a swab and ii) as a integral part of a gas sampling system for subsequent investigation by gas analysis.
For the avoidance of doubt, the term “gas” is understood to encompass any species in the gas phase, including vapours from volatile liquids.
According to the invention there is provided microorganism analysis means comprising:
a flow-through arrangement into which a microorganism-containing sample may be introduced;
a headpsace connected or connectible to gas analysis means;
the headpsace being connected to the flow-through arrangement so as to be affected by the sample.
The analysis means may comprise:
a tubular member; and
porous means disposed at one end of said tubular member and communicating therewith so that gas may be flowed through said swab means and said tubular member, the gas flow carrying gases evolved from said microorganism-containing sample therein.
The apparatus may further comprise a receptacle into which said tubular member and swab means may be disposed.
The swab means may comprise a polyethylene mesh or a porous ceramic.
The apparatus may farther comprise a culturing medium, which may be a gel disposed on the surface of the swab means. The gel may be an agar gel.
The swab means may include a layer of cotton wool or gauze.
The tubular member may be disposed in a cap, the cap forming a seal with the receptacle when the tubular member and swab means are disposed therein. The cap may comprise a gas port.
Gases evolved from said microorganism-containing sample may be entrained in a flow of gas which enters the receptacle via the gas port and exits the receptacle via the tubular member.
Gases evolved from said microorganism-containing sample may be entrained in a flow of gas which enters the receptacle via the tubular member and exits the receptacle via the gas port. The swab means may be disposed in a liquid culturing medium.
The flow-through arrangement may comprise a filter on which microorganisms may be collected from a sample flowing through the arrangement. The filter may be a micro-gauge filter.
The flow-through arrangement may, however, comprise an affinity column, which may be connected to a headspace for gas analysis or which may be subject to a washing flow carrying the released microorganism to a headspace generating arrangement.
Apparatus in accordance with the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a first embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 shows a second embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 3 shows a third embodiment of the invention; and
FIG. 4 shows a fourth embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 1 shows a first embodiment of the invention for obtaining a sample of bacteria and sampling gases evolved therefrom comprising:
a tubular member 10; and
porous swab means 12 disposed at one end 10 a of said tubular member 10 and communicating therewith so that a gas may be flowed through said swab means 12 and said tubular member 10, the gas flow carrying gases evolved from said sample of bacteria therein.
The swab means 12 is first used to obtain a sample of bacteria in the usual manner from, for example, a body part of a patient. It is advantageous in this regard that the tubular member 10 acts as a convenient handle whilst performing this task.
Usually, thereafter, the tubular member 10 and swab means 12 are disposed in a receptacle 14.
The swab means 12 is a porous frit that permits passage of gases therethrough. The swab means may comprise a polyethylene mesh or a porous ceramic.
It is advantageous—although not always essential—that the apparatus further comprises a culturing medium. As will become apparent later, a liquid culturing medium is not suitable with the first embodiment. However, a gel disposed on the surface of the swab means 12 is suitable. An example is an agar gel, which acts as a semi-permeable membrane.
The apparatus performs a dual role, since it is adapted to provide sampling of gases evolved by the bacterial sample. The gases are eventually introduced to a gas sensing device. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the gas is pumped, in the direction indicated by the arrows, through the tubular member 10 towards the gas sensing device (not shown).
The tubular member 10 is advantageously disposed in a cap 16, the cap 16, forming a seal with the receptacle 14 when the tubular member 10 and swab means 12 are disposed therein. In this way a sample headspace is created. It may be possible to operate without a cap 16, although in general, of course, exposure of the bacteria to the atmosphere is to be avoided. In this vein, the end 10 b of the tubular might be provided with a polymer or elastomer seal which is broken before sampling or which breaks if a pre-defined positive pressure is produced in the receptacle 14.
Alternatively, the cap 16 can comprise a gas port, which in this example would act as a gas inlet. A suitable carrier gas, such as nitrogen, would then be flowed into the receptacle 14, gases evolved by the bacteria carried therein. It may be possible to use the tubular member 10 as a gas inlet and the gas port as an outlet.
FIG. 2 shows a second embodiment of the invention comprising a tubular member 20 and porous swab means 22. The tubular member 20 and swab means 22 are moulded as one piece in plastic. The swab means 22 comprise a plurality of apertures 24 which communicate with the hollow core of the tubular member 20. A polyethylene mesh or a porous ceramic might be used as swab means 22 instead.
The swab means 22 further comprises a layer of cotton wool or gauze 26.
The tubular member 20 is disposed in a cap 28, the cap 28 comprising a gas port 30. After using the swab means 22 to obtain a sample of bacteria, the unit comprising the tubular member 20, swab means 22 and cap 28 are disposed in a receptacle 32, the cap forming a seal therewith.
The receptacle advantageously contains a liquid culturing medium 34.
The tubular member 20 and gas port 30 are adapted for connection to a suitable gas sampling system, in which gas is pumped from the gas port 30 across a gas sensing device (not shown). Gas—which might be atmospheric air, or an inert carrier gas such as nitrogen—enters the receptacle 32 via the tubular member 20. The gas flows out of the apertures 24 and bubbles through the culturing medium 34. Gases evolved by the sample of bacteria are thus carried in the gas flow.
The gases evolved by the sample of bacteria may be detected by any suitable gas sensor arrangement. A preferred form is an array of gas sensors, most preferably an array of semiconducting organic polymer gas sensors, such as described in International Publication WO 95/33848. Such polymer gas sensors usually rely on the detection of variations in their dc resistance (see, for example, J V Hatfield, P Neaves, P J Hicks, K Persaud and P Travers, Sensors & Actuators B, 18-19 (1994) 221-228). It is also possible to interrogate semiconducting organic polymers by applying ac electrical signal thereto and monitoring an electrical impedance quantity of the polymers, or variations in such an electrical impedance quantity, as a function of the frequency of the applied ac electrical signal (see, for example, British Patent GB 2203 553 and MEH Amrani, RM Dowdeswell, P A Payne and K C Persaud Proceedings of Eurosensors X, Vol. 2 (1996) pp 665-668). Using this latter technique, a single semiconducting organic polymer sensor may be used in place of a whole array. However, other gas sensing techniques, such as mass spectrometry, GC-MS, or spectroscopic techniques such as infra-red spectroscopy, might be employed.
It should be noted that simpler systems to those described above may also be employed. For example, a swab may be disposed within a suitable container and carrier gas flowed into and out of the containers. The swab may be disposed into a container having a liquid culturing medium, and sparging employed. Alternatively, a stop-flow technique can be used. In one embodiment, a swab is disposed in a container which is inflated or pressurised with a suitable carrier gas, possibly via a single needle through a septum. The positive pressure drives the flow, which may be released using a suitable valve. Before sampling, the swab may be left for a period of time to allow a headspace to develop.
FIG. 3 illustrates an analysis arrangement in which the flow through arrangement comprises a filter 31 on which microorganisms are collected from a sample flowing through the arrangement, introduced, possibly, from a syringe or vial 33. The microorganisms are trapped on the filter 31, which may be micromesh filter e.g. a 0.2 μm filter.
The flow through arrangement, after the flow has terminated, can be deployed as the headspace, a gas-senor probe being inserted, or the microorganisms may be washed off the filter, into a headspace, or the filter removed and deployed in a headspace of a gas sensor.
FIG. 4 illustrates an affinity column 41 performing the like function as the filter 31 of FIG. 3, microorganisms attaching to the affinity beads as by charge or an antibody. The column can be gas-analysed directly of the microorganisms eluted by e.g. a changed ionic strength wash solution.
The technique exemplified by FIGS. 3 and 4 offer the ability to remove the original matrix or carrier from the microorganisms under examination. This can be important to remove factors such as water or amines to which the sensors might be sensitive which could mask gases indicative of particular microorganisms or conditions of microorganisms.
The microorganisms to which this invention relates can include bacteria, yeast, fungi, viruses, prions or fragments of any of the above.
Swabs, filters and affinity beads can be constructed or treated so as to be selective to certain microorganisms (or against certain microorganisms), in which case gas analysis may be restricted to a go/no go test or arranged to give a fine resolution between microorganisms of a particular type.
The microorganisms may be gas analysed directly or after culturing or amplification.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2923669 *||Apr 8, 1958||Feb 2, 1960||Millipore Filter Corp||Method of bacterial analysis|
|US3324855||Jan 12, 1965||Jun 13, 1967||Heimlich Henry J||Surgical sponge stick|
|US3918435 *||Jan 24, 1974||Nov 11, 1975||Miles Lab||Transport swab tube|
|US4003240 *||Jun 13, 1975||Jan 18, 1977||Honeywell Inc.||Calibration device for vaporized liquids|
|US4073691 *||Aug 24, 1976||Feb 14, 1978||Johnston Laboratories, Inc.||Method for detecting the presence of biologically active agents|
|US4553553||Mar 7, 1983||Nov 19, 1985||Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh||Device for the detection of bacteria, fungi, and viruses in blood|
|US4707450 *||Sep 25, 1986||Nov 17, 1987||Nason Frederic L||Specimen collection and test unit|
|US4953560 *||Dec 7, 1989||Sep 4, 1990||Bernard Samuels||Apparatus, method, and test kit for diagnosis of vaginal yeast infections|
|US4962036 *||Sep 25, 1987||Oct 9, 1990||Ceskoslovenska Akademie Ved||Microorganism determination with a sorbent packed column|
|US5047331||Oct 19, 1987||Sep 10, 1991||Oxoid Limited||Method and device for bacterial testing|
|US5051360||Apr 24, 1990||Sep 24, 1991||Abo, Inc.||Method for detecting microorganism activity|
|US5440942 *||Feb 2, 1994||Aug 15, 1995||Hubbard; Stephen H.||Biological sample collecting and holding device|
|US5814474 *||Jul 23, 1996||Sep 29, 1998||Becton Dickinson And Company||Direct identification of microorganisms in culture bottles|
|EP0088971A2||Mar 5, 1983||Sep 21, 1983||Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh||Device for the detection of bacteria, fungi and viruses in blood|
|EP0357892A1||Jun 16, 1989||Mar 14, 1990||Becton Dickinson and Company||Swab for collection of biological samples|
|JPH07260770A *||Title not available|
|WO1993012421A1||Dec 18, 1992||Jun 24, 1993||Nason, Frederic, L.||Specimen test unit|
|1||International Search Report; PCT/GB98/00509; Jun. 30, 1998; A. Coucke.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7255677||Mar 4, 2003||Aug 14, 2007||Smiths Detection Inc.||Detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of a medical condition or disease with artificial olfactometry|
|US7819803||Jul 20, 2007||Oct 26, 2010||Smiths Detection Inc.||Detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of a medical condition or disease with artificial olfactometry|
|US9222623||Mar 12, 2014||Dec 29, 2015||Genmark Diagnostics, Inc.||Devices and methods for manipulating deformable fluid vessels|
|US9410663||Mar 12, 2014||Aug 9, 2016||Genmark Diagnostics, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for manipulating deformable fluid vessels|
|US20040006257 *||Mar 4, 2003||Jan 8, 2004||Cyrano Sciences Inc.||Detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of a medical condition or disease with artificial olfactometry|
|US20070265509 *||Jul 20, 2007||Nov 15, 2007||Smiths Detection Inc.||Detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of a medical condition or disease with artificial olfactometry|
|EP2965817A1||Oct 24, 2013||Jan 13, 2016||Genmark Diagnostics Inc.||Integrated multiplex target analysis|
|WO2005015166A1 *||Jul 23, 2004||Feb 17, 2005||Pharmacia Italia S.P.A.||Method and apparatus for automated swab sample analysis|
|WO2016077341A2||Nov 10, 2015||May 19, 2016||Genmark Diagnostics, Inc.||Instrument and cartridge for performing assays in a closed sample preparation and reaction system employing electrowetting fluid manipulation|
|WO2016077364A2||Nov 10, 2015||May 19, 2016||Genmark Diagnostics, Inc.||Instrument and cartridge for performing assays in a closed sample preparation and reaction system|
|U.S. Classification||435/287.5, 435/288.1, 435/30, 435/309.1, 435/34|
|International Classification||C12M1/34, C12M1/30, C12M1/28|
|Cooperative Classification||C12M25/14, C12M33/02, C12M41/34|
|European Classification||C12M1/28, C12M1/34D, C12M1/30|
|Oct 7, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: OSMETECH PLC, UNITED KINGDOM
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PAYNE, PETER ALFRED;PERSAUD, KRISHNA CHANDRA;SYMS, ALLANJOHN;REEL/FRAME:010362/0275
Effective date: 19990917
|Sep 15, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Nov 30, 2009||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Apr 23, 2010||REIN||Reinstatement after maintenance fee payment confirmed|
|Jun 15, 2010||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20100423
|Aug 23, 2010||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Aug 23, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Sep 13, 2010||PRDP||Patent reinstated due to the acceptance of a late maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20100916
|Sep 20, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OSMETECH PLC;REEL/FRAME:025026/0788
Effective date: 20100831
|Oct 2, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12