|Publication number||US6377974 B1|
|Application number||US 09/487,338|
|Publication date||Apr 23, 2002|
|Filing date||Jan 19, 2000|
|Priority date||Jan 19, 2000|
|Also published as||DE60127235D1, DE60127235T2, EP1248984A1, EP1248984A4, EP1248984B1, US6606646, US20020083133, WO2001053953A1|
|Publication number||09487338, 487338, US 6377974 B1, US 6377974B1, US-B1-6377974, US6377974 B1, US6377974B1|
|Original Assignee||Speedbit Ltd.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (37), Classifications (22), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to computer networks in general and more particularly to methods and apparatus for downloading a file from a server.
Transfer protocols for downloading files from serving computers (servers) to client computers (clients) via computer networks such as the Internet are well known in the art. Two commonly used transfer protocols include the File Transfer Protocol (FTP) and the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP). Generally speaking, in order to download a file a client establishes a single data transfer link with a server during a file transfer session through which the contents of the file are transmitted from the server to the client.
Recent developments in file transfer protocols include the server's ability to begin downloading a file from a point other than the start of the file simply by instructing the server to begin transmitting the file from a specified byte offset. This server “download resume” capability has led to the development of file transfer software that is able to resume a download where the data transfer link has been terminated in the middle of a download. The download is simply continued in another file transfer session via another data transfer link with the server from the point at which the download stopped.
Unfortunately, not all servers possess download resume capability. Thus, where a download is made from such a server, should the download be prematurely terminated before the complete file is received, the download cannot be resumed from the point of termination to retrieve the remaining portions of the file, but, rather, the download must be restarted from the beginning of the file.
The present invention seeks to provide improved methods and apparatus for downloading a file from a server that does not possess download resume capability.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for downloading files the method including the steps of at a client a) requesting a proxy server to initiate a first download of a file from a first server the first server determined by the client to lack download resume capability and the proxy server possessing download resume capability, at the proxy server b) initiating the first download of the file from the first server, and at the client c) initiating at least a second download of the file from the proxy server.
Further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the initiating step c) includes initiating a plurality of concurrent second downloads from the proxy server, where each of the plurality of second downloads is of a different portion of the file, and further including the step of assembling the different portions of the file into a single downloaded file.
Still further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the initiating step c) includes initiating prior to the completion of the first download of the file from the first server to the proxy server.
There is also provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for downloading files, the method including at a client a) initiating a first download of a file from a first server, the first server determined by the client to lack download resume capability, b) detecting a termination of the download prior to the file being completely downloaded, c) requesting a proxy server to initiate a second download of the file from the first server, the proxy server possessing download resume capability, at the proxy server d) initiating the second download of the file from the first server, at the client e) initiating at least a third download of a non-downloaded portion of the file from the proxy server, and f) assembling the portions of the file downloaded during the first and third downloads into a single downloaded file.
Further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the initiating step e) includes initiating prior to the completion of the second download of the file from the first server to the proxy server.
It is appreciated throughout the specification and claims that references to a server not possessing download resume capability may be understood as either indicating that the server actually does not possess download resume capability or that the server while possessing download resume capability, appears to a client as not having download resume capability, such may occur when transparent proxies are employed between the client and the server.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a simplified conceptual illustration of a file downloading system, constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 2 is a simplified flowchart illustration of a method of operation of the system of FIG. 1 operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
Reference is now made to FIG. 1 which is a simplified conceptual illustration of a file downloading system constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. In the system of FIG. 1 a client computer 10 is provided capable of establishing a data transfer link with a server computer 12 via a network 14, such as the Internet. A proxy server 16 is also provided which is capable of establishing a data transfer link with server 12 and to which client 10 may establish one or more data transfer links. Server 12 either lacks download resume capability or is detected or otherwise perceived by client 10 in accordance with conventional protocols to lack download resume capability, while proxy server 16 possesses download resume capability.
Typical operation of the system of FIG. 1 is now described in the context of an exemplary operational scenario. In the illustration client 10 is shown requesting the download of a file XYZ.DOC from server 12, with the download commencing from byte offset 0 of XYZ.DOC. Downloading may be carried out in accordance with the File Transfer Protocol(FTP), the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), or any other protocol known in the art. Typically, server 12 notifies client 10 of the size of the requested file, which is shown as 3.000 bytes in the illustration. The download of XYZ.DOC continues until bytes 0-999 have been downloaded to client 10, at which point the download is prematurely terminated before XYZ.DOC has been completely downloaded. The premature termination may be detected by client 10 using any known means.
After detecting the premature termination of the download, client 10 requests from proxy server 16 the portion of the file that has not yet been downloaded from server 12. The request is made of proxy server 16 and not server 12 since server 12 lacks download resume capability and would, therefore, begin downloading file XYZ.DOC from byte offset 0. thus retransmitting bytes 0-999 to client 10 unnecessarily. In response to the request from client 10, proxy server 16 downloads the file from server 12. Proxy server 16 typically has a much higher speed connection to network 14 than does client 10, enabling proxy server 16 to download the file from server 12 relatively quickly. For example, many Internet server connections transmit and receive data at rates measured in hundreds of kilobytes per second, while many client connections, such as dial-up connections, transmit and receive data at rates of less than 10 kilobytes per second. Once the portion of the file sought by client 10 has been downloaded to proxy server 16 from server 12, client 10 may continue to download the file from proxy server 16 in one or more portions beginning at byte offset 1000 and via one or more concurrent connections. Downloading from proxy server 16 to client 10 may be carried out in accordance with FTP or HTTP protocols, or any other protocol known in the art, that supports the downloading of a portion of a file starting at a location determined by the requestor, often starting at a location other than the beginning of the file. Where the file is downloaded to proxy server 16 at a rate that is faster than the rate at which proxy server 16 can transmit to client 10, proxy server 16 need not wait for the entire file to be downloaded from server 12 before transmitting the requested portions of the file to client 10. Once the various portions of file XYZ.DOC are received by client 10, they may be assembled using known means into the file XYZ.DOC, as shown by reference numeral 18.
In an alternative exemplary operational scenario client 10, having detected or otherwise perceived that server 12 lacks download resume capability, does not attempt to download the file from server 12, but rather requests that proxy server 16 download the file from server 12. Client 10 may then download the file from proxy server 16 starting from byte offset 0. As described hereinabove, the download to client 10 may begin either once the entire file has been downloaded to proxy server 16 or concurrently with the download from server 12 to proxy server 16.
Reference is now made to FIG. 2 which is a simplified flowchart illustration of a method of operation of the system of FIG. 1, operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Elements of the method of FIG. 2 may be implemented by client 10 and proxy server 16 using executable software, hardware, or any suitable combination thereof using conventional techniques. In the method of FIG. 2 a file to be downloaded is indicated at client 10 using any known data entry or selection technique, such as by clicking on a Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) link in a web page within a browser running on client 10 (step 100). In the embodiment of FIG. 2 the indication of the file preferably includes the location of a server on which the file may be found, namely server 12. This may be effected through the use of a Universal Resource Locator (URL) or any other location indicator known in the art. Client 10 then establishes a connection with server 12 to begin the download of the file (step 110). In accordance with any suitable conventional techniques, client 10 preferably determines whether server 12 lacks or possesses download resume capability (step 120). If server 12 is found to lack download resume capability, client 10 may either attempt to download the file from server 12 anyway (step 130), or may request that proxy server 16, known to client 10 to possess download resume capability, download the file from server 12 to itself (step 170). Where client 10 attempts to download the file from server 12, if the download ends prematurely, as detected by client 10 using conventional techniques (step 140), then client 10 instructs proxy server 16 to download the file from server 12 (step 150). Proxy server 16 then downloads the file from server 12, and client 10 downloads the non-downloaded portions from proxy server 16 using conventional download resume techniques, and the file is then assembled front the portions of the file downloaded to client 10 (step 160).
Where client 10 does not attempt to download the file from server 12, client 10 instructs proxy server 16 to download the file from server 12 (step 170). Proxy server 16 then downloads the file from server 12, and client 10 downloads the entire file from proxy server 16 using conventional download and download resume techniques (step 180).
While the methods and apparatus disclosed herein may or may not have been described with reference to specific hardware or software, the methods and apparatus have been described in a manner sufficient to enable persons of ordinary skill in the art to readily adapt commercially available software and hardware as may be needed to reduce any of the embodiments of the present invention to practice without undue experimentation and using conventional techniques.
While the present invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, the description is intended to be illustrative of the invention as a whole and is not to be construed as limiting the invention to the embodiments shown. It is appreciated that various modifications may occur to those skilled in the art that, while not specifically shown herein, are nevertheless within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4912628 *||Mar 15, 1988||Mar 27, 1990||International Business Machines Corp.||Suspending and resuming processing of tasks running in a virtual machine data processing system|
|US5768528||May 24, 1996||Jun 16, 1998||V-Cast, Inc.||Client-server system for delivery of online information|
|US5918239 *||Jan 21, 1997||Jun 29, 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Deferred display of web pages corresponding to links selected by user|
|US6049892 *||Feb 24, 1997||Apr 11, 2000||Ethos Software Corporation||Process and apparatus for downloading data from a server computer to a client computer|
|US6098180 *||Feb 18, 1997||Aug 1, 2000||E-Parcel, Llc||Robust delivery system|
|US6134584||Nov 21, 1997||Oct 17, 2000||International Business Machines Corporation||Method for accessing and retrieving information from a source maintained by a network server|
|US6138162||Feb 11, 1997||Oct 24, 2000||Pointcast, Inc.||Method and apparatus for configuring a client to redirect requests to a caching proxy server based on a category ID with the request|
|US6195680 *||Jul 23, 1998||Feb 27, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Client-based dynamic switching of streaming servers for fault-tolerance and load balancing|
|US6304909 *||Dec 18, 1998||Oct 16, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Client-controlled link processing in computer network|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6606646 *||Feb 27, 2002||Aug 12, 2003||Speedbit Ltd.||Methods and apparatus for downloading a file from a server|
|US6618758 *||Feb 18, 2000||Sep 9, 2003||Lucent Technologies Inc.||System for downloading only a portion of a file from a server through a computer network utilizing a client menu downloaded periodically from the server|
|US6725290 *||Nov 8, 2000||Apr 20, 2004||Enfora, Inc.||Persistent modem connection|
|US6928468 *||Oct 29, 1999||Aug 9, 2005||Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.||System for broadcasting software applications and portable data communications device for use in such a system|
|US6973474 *||Aug 2, 2001||Dec 6, 2005||Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.||Information distribution apparatus that resumes distribution after interruption|
|US7003554 *||Mar 20, 2000||Feb 21, 2006||Netscape Communications Corp.||System and method for downloading portions of a remotely located network object to produce a completely downloaded local copy of the network object|
|US7055066 *||Oct 30, 2001||May 30, 2006||Lg Electronics Inc.||Loading error restoring apparatus and method of exchange|
|US7461319||Apr 4, 2003||Dec 2, 2008||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||System and method for downloading files over a network with real time verification|
|US7558842 *||Oct 17, 2003||Jul 7, 2009||E2Open, Inc.||Large file transfer in a design collaboration environment|
|US7752203||Aug 26, 2004||Jul 6, 2010||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for look ahead caching of personalized web content for portals|
|US7849462||Jan 7, 2005||Dec 7, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Image server|
|US8073926||Jan 7, 2005||Dec 6, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Virtual machine image server|
|US8112496||Jul 31, 2009||Feb 7, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Efficient algorithm for finding candidate objects for remote differential compression|
|US8117173||Apr 28, 2009||Feb 14, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Efficient chunking algorithm|
|US8214827 *||Nov 28, 2006||Jul 3, 2012||Flash Networks, Ltd||Method and system for improving user confidence and experience in content purchasing via a service provider premises|
|US8224981||Nov 29, 2007||Jul 17, 2012||Speedbit Ltd.||Accelerated multimedia file download and playback|
|US8495166 *||Apr 21, 2010||Jul 23, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Optimized caching for large data requests|
|US8972482 *||Mar 12, 2004||Mar 3, 2015||Thomson Licensing||Automated remote site downloading on a geographic drive|
|US20020026644 *||Aug 2, 2001||Feb 28, 2002||Yoshinori Hatayama||Information distribution apparatus|
|US20020053074 *||Oct 30, 2001||May 2, 2002||Lg Electronics Inc.||Loading error restoring apparatus and method of exchange|
|US20030084183 *||Sep 30, 2002||May 1, 2003||Anders Odlund||Dynamic transferring software/protocol|
|US20030105845 *||Oct 29, 1999||Jun 5, 2003||Rene Leermakers||System for broadcasting software applications and portable data communications device for use in such a system|
|US20040199809 *||Apr 4, 2003||Oct 7, 2004||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||System and method for downloading files over a network with real time verification|
|US20050034153 *||Feb 20, 2004||Feb 10, 2005||Maven Networks, Inc.||System and method for delivery of broadband content with integrated interactive elements|
|US20050086387 *||Oct 17, 2003||Apr 21, 2005||E2Open||Large file transfer in a design collaboration environment|
|US20060155674 *||Jan 7, 2005||Jul 13, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Image server|
|US20060155735 *||Jan 7, 2005||Jul 13, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Image server|
|US20070054658 *||Jun 23, 2004||Mar 8, 2007||Bouygues Telecom||Method for downloading files onto a mobile device|
|US20070094348 *||Oct 6, 2006||Apr 26, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||BITS/RDC integration and BITS enhancements|
|US20070127515 *||Nov 28, 2006||Jun 7, 2007||Ofek Ben-Arie||Method and system for improving user confidence and experience in content purchasing via a service provider premises|
|US20070198674 *||Mar 12, 2004||Aug 23, 2007||Jun Li||Automated Remote Site Downloading On A Geographic Drive|
|US20080126517 *||Oct 19, 2005||May 29, 2008||Monta Nakatsuka||File Transfer System, Transmitting Device and Receiving Device|
|US20080133771 *||Nov 29, 2007||Jun 5, 2008||Yosef Vardi||Accelerated multimedia file download and playback|
|US20080162666 *||Sep 11, 2007||Jul 3, 2008||Sony Corporation||Information processing device, download method, download interruption method, download resuming method, and program|
|US20110264759 *||Apr 21, 2010||Oct 27, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Optimized caching for large data requests|
|US20140006558 *||Mar 5, 2012||Jan 2, 2014||Beijing Qihoo Technology Company Limited||Method and device for resuming file download|
|CN1926833B||Mar 12, 2004||May 12, 2010||汤姆森许可贸易公司||Automatic remote sites download in geography driver|
|U.S. Classification||709/203, 714/748, 709/231, 709/219, 709/230, 714/18|
|International Classification||H04L29/14, H04L29/06, H04L29/08|
|Cooperative Classification||H04L69/40, H04L69/329, H04L67/2814, H04L67/42, H04L67/2819, H04L67/06, H04L29/06|
|European Classification||H04L29/06, H04L29/08N5, H04L29/06C8, H04L29/08A7, H04L29/14, H04L29/08N27D|
|May 22, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SPEEDBIT LTD., ISRAEL
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FEIGENBAUM, IDAN;REEL/FRAME:010803/0677
Effective date: 20000427
|Oct 23, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Oct 4, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Oct 9, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12