|Publication number||US6411118 B1|
|Application number||US 09/521,932|
|Publication date||Jun 25, 2002|
|Filing date||Mar 9, 2000|
|Priority date||Dec 18, 1997|
|Also published as||US6140827, US6303993, US6337574, US6472894, US6486552, US6630837, US6927589, US7005870, US20010048153, US20020158655, US20020185301, US20020196041, US20050174134, US20070063722, US20070090855|
|Publication number||09521932, 521932, US 6411118 B1, US 6411118B1, US-B1-6411118, US6411118 B1, US6411118B1|
|Inventors||James M Wark|
|Original Assignee||Micron Technology, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (34), Referenced by (6), Classifications (15), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/994,004, filed Dec. 18, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,827.
The present invention relates generally to semiconductor manufacturing and, more particularly, to methods for testing semiconductor dice having raised or bumped bond pads. More particularly still, the present invention relates to fabricating and using a testing grid suitable for testing solder balls used for bumped bond pads on an unpackaged semiconductor die.
Semiconductor dice are being fabricated with raised bond pads and are known as bumped semiconductor die. A bumped semiconductor die includes bond pads along with bumped solderable material such as a lead-tin alloy. These typically are manufactured from solder balls made of a lead-tin alloy. Bumped dies are often used for flip chip bonding where the die is mounted face down on the substrate, such as a printed circuit board, and then the die is attached to the substrate by welding or soldering. Typically, the bumps are formed as balls of materials that are circular in a cross-sectional plane parallel to the face of the die. The bumps typically have a diameter of from 50 micrometers (μm) to 100 μm. The sides of the bumps typically bow or curve outwardly from a flat top surface. The flat top surface forms the actual region of contact with a mating electrode on the printed circuit board or other substrate. In testing the attached solder bumps, a temporary electrical connection must be made between the contact locations or bond pads on the die and the external test circuitry associated with the testing apparatus. The bond pads provide a connection point for testing an integrated circuit on the die. Likewise, the integrity of each bump must be tested as well.
In making this temporary electrical connection, it is desirable to effect a connection that causes as little damage as possible to the bumped die. If the temporary connection to the bumped bond pad damages the pad, the entire die may be ruined. This is difficult to accomplish because the connection must also produce a low resistance or ohmic contact with the bumped bond pad. A bond pad, with or without a bump, typically has a metal oxide layer formed over it that must be penetrated to make the ohmic contact.
Some prior art contact structures, such as probe cards, scrape the bond pads and wipe away the oxide layer. This causes excess layer damage to the bond pads. Other interconnect structures, such as probe tips, may pierce the oxide layer and metal bond pad and leave a deep gouge. Still other interconnect structures, such as micro bumps, cannot even pierce the oxide layer, preventing the formation of an ohmic contact.
In the past, following testing of a bump pad die, it has been necessary to reflow the bumps, which are typically damaged by the procedure. This is an additional process step that adds to the expense and complexity of the testing process. Furthermore, it requires heating the tested die that can adversely affect the integrated circuitry formed on the die.
Other bond pad integrity testing systems have been developed in the prior art Typically, these testing systems use optical imaging to determine the integrity of the weld connection on the bumped sites. One type of system is a profiling system that uses interferometry with robotic wafer handling to automate the testing step. The testing step develops a profile for measuring solder bump heights. Unfortunately, although the interferometry system does not damage the device in any way, the time required for analyzing each bump location can take from two to four minutes. This type of throughput is unacceptable when a high speed system is necessary.
Accordingly, what is needed is a method and system for testing solder bumps in bond pad locations that does not damage the bond pads while improving throughput
According to the present invention, a method and apparatus for testing unpackaged semiconductor dice having raised contact locations are disclosed. The apparatus uses a temporary interconnect wafer that is adapted to establish an electrical connection with the raised ball contact locations on the die without damage to the ball contacts. The interconnect wafer is fabricated on a substrate, such as silicon, where contact members are formed in a pattern that matches the size and spacing of the contact locations on the die to be tested. The contact members on the interconnect wafer are formed as either pits, troughs, or spike contacts. The spike contacts penetrate through the oxide layer formed on the raised ball contact location. Conductive traces are provided in both rows and columns and are terminated on the inner edges of the walls of the pits formed in the substrate. This arrangement allows a system to measure the continuity across the bump pad or ball contact locations of the integrated circuit die in order to establish that each ball contact location is properly attached. This also allows the system to test for the presence and quality of the bump or ball contact locations on the particular die being tested.
FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a pit formed in a substrate wherein solder ball is received;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional perspective schematic view of the pit according to FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view of an array of pits according to that of FIG. 1 having a metal interconnect in a form of rows and columns;
FIG. 4 is an alternative embodiment of the pit of FIG. 1 wherein raised supports are provided along with sharp blades for penetrating the ball;
FIG. 5 is an alternative embodiment of the pit of FIG. 1 wherein raised portions are provide for penetrating the solder balls;
FIG. 6 is an example of a solder ball being out of place and failing to make adequate connection between adjacent metal bonds;
FIG. 7 is an example of when a ball that is too small has been identified;
FIG. 8 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a device under test where mismatched balls are adjacent to one another; and,
FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a test apparatus using the bump plate according to FIG. 3.
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional schematic view of a bump plate 10 for testing the connect conductivity and quality of a solder ball on an unpackaged semiconductor die. Bump plate 10 is fabricated in a semiconductor substrate 12, such as, for example, silicon, gallium arsenide, or silicon on sapphire, to name a few.
A plurality of receiving pits 14 is formed in the surface of substrate 12. Pit 14 can be any desired polygonal or curved shape, but is preferred to be square with four sloped side walls 16. Each wall 16 is at an angle of 54° from horizontal, conforming to the plane of the surface of the silicon substrate that can be used in fabricating bump plate 10. After pits or suitable features are etched (formed), the surface of the plate is coated with a thin layer insulator of about 200-300 Angstroms (such as Si Oxide) before the metal traces are formed. Electrical connection for testing for the presence of the solder balls on the die is provided by metal traces 18. Metal traces 18 are made from a suitable metal and extend across the surface of substrate 12 and down walls 16 of pit 14. A solder ball or bump 20 can then be positioned within pit 14 and contact all four sloped walls 16. Ball 20 is placed within pit 14 when a die under test is mated with bump plate 10. Since a metal trace 18 is placed on each wall 16 and extends across the surface of substrate 12 to an adjacent pit 14, an applied electric current can flow through metal traces 18 provided the solder ball 20 contacts both sides of wall 16 and metal trace 18 thereon.
A method that is adaptable for manufacturing bump plate 10 is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,736, “Fabricating An Interconnect For Testing Unpackaged Semiconductor Dice Having Raised Bond Pads,” commonly assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, and herein incorporated by reference for all purposes.
FIG. 2 depicts, in a cross-sectional perspective view, pit 14 prior to the addition of metal trace 18 of FIG. 1. Pit 14 has a substantially flat bottom surface that is non-conductive as well as four adjacent side walls 16, again having the slope angle that naturally slopes 54° in the surface plane of silicon substrate 12 as it is etched. The sloped wall 16 allows for a spherical ball 20 to seat within pit 14 without damaging the bottom curvature of ball 20 while still contacting metal trace 18 that extends down the slope of wall 16.
Bump plate 10 has a plurality of pits 14 and is shown in the schematic diagram of FIG. 3. Bump plate 10 actually is an array of bump pits 14 that is electrically connected in rows and columns using metal traces 18. Horizontal metal traces 18 run across the surface of substrate 12 and down the sloped walls 16 of the bump pits 14. It is important that metal traces 18 do not connect with one another within pits 14. As an electric current is placed across each row and down each column in a sequential manner, it becomes readily apparent at each pit 14 location whether a ball exists or the connection is of such poor quality as to provide no conduction across the row or down the column. From this information, a grid map of the defects can be established that will allow repair of the missing or poor quality bumped locations at a subsequent repair stage.
Alternative embodiments to pits 14 within the substrate 12 are shown in FIGS. 4 and 5. FIG. 4 illustrates a raised contact location 30 for contacting the bottom surface of a solder ball 20. Each raised contact location 30 comprises a set of side bumps 32 that form a valley 36. A plurality of sharpened projections 34 is formed within valley 36 and is designed to pierce the oxide layer formed over ball 20 and can be attached to adjacent a metal traces 18 for providing good ohmic contact to adjacent metal traces 18 with ball 20 for testing purposes. Contact location 30 can be in the shape of a polygon or circle and can be combined with pits 14 of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is an alternative embodiment where each pit 14 is replaced with a post trough 40, which is formed by a plurality of posts 42 to form a polygon, such as a square. Posts 42 are formed such that a valley 44 is formed in post trough 40. Metal traces are formed up and down the sides of post 42, but not connecting one another in the same manner as traces 18 in FIG. 3. Thus, when a ball 20 is placed in a post trough 40, a good ohmic connection forms between opposite traces 18 for conducting a test current. Further, post trough 40 can be in the shape of a polygon or circle and can be combined with pits 14 of FIG. 3 or contact locations 30 of FIG. 4.
Each of the embodiments of FIGS. 1-5 is capable of testing for various types of solder ball conditions. The most significant is when a missing ball occurs. This is simple to detect in that no current will flow either across the column or down the row when the test current is applied. Other examples are also possible and are illustrated in FIGS. 6, 7, and 8. FIG. 6 is an example of when a solder ball 20 is off center and only contacts one or two sides of pit 14, thus preventing a good current signal from passing either across the column or down the row. FIG. 7 is an example of a ball 20 too small to touch any sides in pit 14. In this condition, no current can pass and it is viewed as being that no solder ball is present. FIG. 8 depicts where adjacent balls of different sizes are attached to die 50. A first ball 20 has a first diameter and a second ball 52 has a second diameter, which is much smaller than the first diameter of ball 20. As is shown, ball 20 is an appropriate size and contacts well with the sides of pit 14. By contrast, ball 52 is too small to even reach pit 14, so the current signal test shows it as not being present at all. Of course, the reverse can be true in that ball 52 is actually the desired size of the balls while ball 20 is an aberration and is much larger than desired. This would be also be evident in that many balls would be seen as not being present as the diameter of ball 20 would prevent several adjacent balls from contacting in their respective pits.
FIG. 9 depicts a test apparatus 54 that uses a bump plate 10. Apparatus 54 comprises a signal processor, such as a computer system 56, that attaches to a bump plate 10. Electrical signals or current are passed to bump plate 10 along the rows and columns of the metal traces 18 to establish a test pattern. A device under test (DUT) 58 is pressed upon bump plate 10 to match the solder ball pattern to the identical pattern fabricated on bump plate 10. Once contact is made, the test is begun and the results are obtained more quickly compared to prior art test apparatus using optical or other mechanical means previously described.
The bump die wafer inspection apparatus of the present invention offers the following advantages over the prior art. As the electronic world moves toward stencification miniaturization, better methods for testing these technologies are needed and this solution provides an advancement over those previously available and, using semiconductor fabrication techniques, a bump plate matching a desired solder ball pattern for a particular die can be generated. The silicon or other similar substrates serve as a rigid medium, and as a result of this rigidity, they have a fixed dimensional test capability for each bump/ball testing site. This limits its use with regard to the range of the dimensional tolerances that it can test This is significant in that the bumps, or balls, or both, require tight dimensional tolerances to pass such testing. The silicon micro-machining and photolithography processes allow much more precise geometry control than the printed circuit board (PCB) or film technologies found in the prior art. Hence, a more definitive distinction and grading is made for each ball shape and position. Additionally, the present apparatus provides a unique methodology for electronically mapping the failing ball sites and then utilizing this map to direct a repair or rework system to correct each failing site. These operations of testing, mapping, and subsequent repair can be combined in a highly automated in-line process, thus reducing the necessary steps previously required in the prior art of removing the bad boards and sending them to the rework section of the fabrication operation.
Another advantage is since the semiconductor substrate can be planarized to a uniform flatness compared to the PCB and other processing solutions, less damage is caused to the good solder balls attached to the DUT.
Thus the invention provides an improved method and system for testing a discrete, unpackaged semiconductor die having raised bond pads. Although specific materials have been described, it is understood that other materials can be utilized. Furthermore, although the method of the invention has been described with reference to certain specific embodiments as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US229757||May 17, 1880||Jul 6, 1880||phoro-uthograpifeh|
|US3806800||Dec 26, 1972||Apr 23, 1974||Ibm||Method and apparatus for determining the location of electrically conductive members on a structure|
|US4585991||Mar 13, 1985||Apr 29, 1986||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Solid state multiprobe testing apparatus|
|US4792683||Jan 16, 1987||Dec 20, 1988||Hughes Aircraft Company||Thermal technique for simultaneous testing of circuit board solder joints|
|US4838800||May 23, 1988||Jun 13, 1989||Gte Products Corporation||High density interconnect system|
|US5058178||Dec 21, 1989||Oct 15, 1991||At&T Bell Laboratories||Method and apparatus for inspection of specular, three-dimensional features|
|US5089772||Mar 9, 1990||Feb 18, 1992||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd.||Device for testing semiconductor integrated circuits and method of testing the same|
|US5108024||Jun 3, 1991||Apr 28, 1992||Motorola, Inc.||Method of inspecting solder joints|
|US5177439||Aug 30, 1991||Jan 5, 1993||U.S. Philips Corporation||Probe card for testing unencapsulated semiconductor devices|
|US5225037||Jun 4, 1991||Jul 6, 1993||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Method for fabrication of probe card for testing of semiconductor devices|
|US5367253 *||Apr 14, 1993||Nov 22, 1994||Micron Semiconductor, Inc.||Clamped carrier for testing of semiconductor dies|
|US5394490||Aug 11, 1993||Feb 28, 1995||Hitachi, Ltd.||Semiconductor device having an optical waveguide interposed in the space between electrode members|
|US5479105||Jun 27, 1994||Dec 26, 1995||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Known-good die testing apparatus|
|US5479694||Apr 13, 1993||Jan 2, 1996||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method for mounting integrated circuits onto printed circuit boards and testing|
|US5510721||Dec 19, 1994||Apr 23, 1996||Ford Motor Company||Method and adjustment for known good die testing using resilient conductive straps|
|US5523696||Dec 7, 1993||Jun 4, 1996||International Business Machines Corp.||Method and apparatus for testing integrated circuit chips|
|US5530375||Apr 6, 1995||Jun 25, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Method of testing circuits and/or burning-in chips|
|US5543724||Oct 3, 1994||Aug 6, 1996||Motorola, Inc.||Method and apparatus for locating conductive features and testing semiconductor devices|
|US5550763||May 2, 1994||Aug 27, 1996||Michael; David J.||Using cone shaped search models to locate ball bonds on wire bonded devices|
|US5585281||Feb 3, 1995||Dec 17, 1996||Motorola, Inc.||Process and apparatus for forming and testing semiconductor package leads|
|US5617209||Apr 27, 1995||Apr 1, 1997||View Engineering, Inc.||Method and system for triangulation-based, 3-D imaging utilizing an angled scaning beam of radiant energy|
|US5646442||Sep 14, 1995||Jul 8, 1997||Yamaichi Electronics Co., Ltd.||Contact structure for IC socket|
|US5703406||Jan 19, 1996||Dec 30, 1997||Lg Semicon Co., Ltd.||Interconnection structure for attaching a semiconductor device to a substrate|
|US5783865||Feb 16, 1996||Jul 21, 1998||Fujitsu Limited||Wiring substrate and semiconductor device|
|US5796591||Jun 7, 1995||Aug 18, 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Direct chip attach circuit card|
|US5834844||Mar 22, 1996||Nov 10, 1998||Shinko Electric Industries Co., Ltd.||Semiconductor device having an element with circuit pattern thereon|
|US5877559||Aug 6, 1996||Mar 2, 1999||Nitto Denko Corporation||Film carrier for fine-pitched and high density mounting and semiconductor device using same|
|US5883435||Jul 25, 1996||Mar 16, 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Personalization structure for semiconductor devices|
|US5920125||May 9, 1997||Jul 6, 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Interconnection of a carrier substrate and a semiconductor device|
|US5965945||Nov 12, 1998||Oct 12, 1999||Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.||Graded PB for C4 pump technology|
|US5994781||May 29, 1998||Nov 30, 1999||Tessera, Inc.||Semiconductor chip package with dual layer terminal and lead structure|
|US6037667||Aug 24, 1998||Mar 14, 2000||Micron Technology, Inc.||Socket assembly for use with solder ball|
|US6046909||Nov 16, 1998||Apr 4, 2000||Intel Corporation||Computer card with a printed circuit board with vias providing strength to the printed circuit board|
|US6075290||Feb 26, 1998||Jun 13, 2000||National Semiconductor Corporation||Surface mount die: wafer level chip-scale package and process for making the same|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6630837||Aug 13, 2002||Oct 7, 2003||Micron Technology, Inc.||Apparatus for testing bumped die|
|US20050174134 *||Apr 7, 2005||Aug 11, 2005||Wark James M.||Method and apparatus for testing bumped die|
|US20060139045 *||Dec 29, 2005||Jun 29, 2006||Wesley Gallagher||Device and method for testing unpackaged semiconductor die|
|US20070063722 *||Nov 17, 2006||Mar 22, 2007||Wark James M||Method and apparatus for testing bumped die|
|US20070090855 *||Nov 17, 2006||Apr 26, 2007||Wark James M||Method and apparatus for testing bumped die|
|US20090152719 *||Dec 18, 2007||Jun 18, 2009||Teck Kheng Lee||Methods of fluxless micro-piercing of solder balls, and resulting devices|
|U.S. Classification||324/756.07, 324/762.03|
|International Classification||H05K3/40, G01R1/04, H05K3/32, G01R1/073, G01R31/28|
|Cooperative Classification||H05K3/4007, H05K3/325, G01R31/2831, G01R31/2886, G01R1/07307, G01R1/0483|
|European Classification||G01R1/04S3U, G01R1/073B|
|Oct 7, 2003||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Dec 2, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Nov 25, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jan 31, 2014||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Jun 25, 2014||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Aug 12, 2014||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20140625