|Publication number||US6446119 B1|
|Application number||US 08/959,932|
|Publication date||Sep 3, 2002|
|Filing date||Oct 29, 1997|
|Priority date||Aug 7, 1997|
|Also published as||US20030005072|
|Publication number||08959932, 959932, US 6446119 B1, US 6446119B1, US-B1-6446119, US6446119 B1, US6446119B1|
|Inventors||Laslo Olah, Ferenc Friedler, Zoltan Kovacs|
|Original Assignee||Laslo Olah|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (16), Referenced by (184), Classifications (7), Legal Events (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This nonprovisional application claims priority based upon the following prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/055,523, filed Aug. 7, 1997.
The present invention relates to the monitoring of computer usage and, in particular, to a system and method for monitoring or recording a user's activity on a computer system by capturing the content on a display screen.
Since the introduction of the personal computer in the early 1980's, the PC has been subject to constant change, ever increasing in capability and usage. From its earliest form in which the data accessible was limited to that which the user could load from a floppy disk to the typical gigabyte hard drives common on PCS today, the amount of data and the ease of obtaining this data have been growing rapidly. With the fruition of the computer network, the available data is no longer limited to the user's system or what the user can load on his system. Local Area Networks or LANs are now common in small businesses, and in such networks users may, in addition to their own local data, obtain data from other local stations as well as data that is available on the local server. Corporate networks and internetworks may connect multiple LANs, thereby increasing the data available to users. Larger still are Wide Area Networks (WANs) and Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs), the latter of which is designed to cover large cities.
The largest such network, commonly known as the Internet, has introduced vast amounts of information into the business place and the home. The individual networks that make up the Internet include networks which may be served from sources such as commercial servers (.com), university servers (.edu), research networks (.org, net), and military networks (.mil). These networks are located throughout the world and-their numbers are ever increasing with an estimated 85,000 new domain registrations presently occurring each month with countless Internet sites spawned from these domains.
With the exponential growth of the Internet and the explosion of interest worldwide, one natural consequence of this profundity is a growing diversity in the subject matter of the available information. Although-this was the original intent of the Internet developers, there are obvious disadvantages and undesirable consequences of such a global information exchange. What is quickly becoming a notorious example of such occurrence is the proliferation of pornography, hate materials, and other materials, some of which may not only be offensive, but illegal.
A specific difficulty encountered with the introduction of this powerful informational tool in the business and home is the logistical problem of governing the usage of the available data to specific users. In a corporate environment with access to, for example, the Internet, it is obviously advantageous for management to be able to limit or monitor in some fashion their employees' usage of such a resource not only to ensure productivity but to prevent liability for inappropriate employee Internet activities. Likewise, in the home, a parent may desire to have the beneficial educational information that exists in great quantity on the Internet available for his child, but, at the same time, may wish to prevent that child from accessing inappropriate materials, either by intent or accident.
In the discussion that follows, ‘operator’ will refer to the person attempting to monitor or block another person's activity on a computer system by any method or means. ‘User’ will refer to the person whose computer activity is subject to being monitored or blocked.
Currently, those companies with the financial resources desiring the efficiency of exchanging information through the Internet may elect to use an intranet, e.g., a LAN. This way, the company can distribute information to its employees with the conveniences of the Internet, but without actually being connected to the Internet. The company may also either block specific domains from access by its employees, or give access to only specified domains. This may be achieved by appropriate software or coding to block domains at a gateway or firewall. However, these methods may not be financially or technically feasible, or this may not serve the company's intent in any regard. Also, this technique does not prevent employees from loading computer games on their computer and playing them during work hours. Often, a company may desire that its employees have unlimited access to data resources through the Internet with the only restriction being that their access is useful for fulfilling the duties of their jobs. In this instance, it would be counterproductive to give access to only certain domains, as doing so would block access to future domains that may provide information beneficial to serving well an employee's position.
Commercially available applications to help combat this problem on the home or business PC are well known, such as Net Nanny™, Surf Watch™, and NetSnitch™. These applications and their respective limitations are now discussed.
Net Nanny™ is a software utility marketed to control, primarily, children's access to offensive Internet sites. This software's primary functionality is the use of an operator-defined, customized dictionary of terms or phrases to be blocked from access. In operation, Net Nanny™ performs a system shutdown whenever any material matching criteria in the operator-defined dictionary is accessed. This product works offline as well as online and performs a system shutdown when material matching specified criteria are accessed, where the material to be blocked could be loaded from floppy disks, CD-ROMS, local hard drives, network drives, or any other appropriate media. It can also be configured to provide the user a warning or to create a log of “offenses”—accesses to material that have been defined as offensive in the customized dictionary. Specific sites are also able to be blocked by the software operator, and similarly, the operator may make only certain sites available to be accessed.
Although this specific, operator-defined approach is somewhat useful, a number of limitations are apparent. For example, in utilizing a customized dictionary to block sites by keyword, the operator is responsible for formulating a list of words or phrases that could be included on a site with offensive material. Any descriptive phrases or terminology overlooked or unknown by the operator may therefore be readily available to the user. In addition, material deemed offensive to the operator is not necessarily described on a website by offensive descriptive words that would be detected by the blocking software. For example, pornographic material may be served from a server in a numeric index format. In this case, graphic files may be sequentially numbered with no descriptive text on that site. In this instance, it would not be possible for the blocking software to detect the presence of the offensive graphic material. The same case would be true when operating the blocking software offline. Unless a graphic file, for instance, was named with a title that matched an offensive criteria, the file could be viewed without generating a detection by the blocking software.
SurfWatch™ is another program designed to block children's or employees' access to offensive Internet sites. It is intended to solely block offensive Internet sites and is therefore utilized only for online activities. Primarily, it relies on blocking sites by use of a database that contains sites that have been determined to be offensive and by the use of keyword filters. The database is periodically updated and is available through a service with payment of a licensing fee. Through the licensing agency, criteria have been established as to what material is deemed offensive, which includes, but is not limited to, sexually explicit, violent, and/or illegal drug information. The software operator has configuration options available to alter the criteria by which Internet sites are blocked.
Again, the limitations are obvious. By relying on a licensing agent to develop updated databases of offensive sites, the operator is reliant on the agent to determine or locate any and all such sites containing material that is offensive. At best, the agent would be able to eliminate a large majority of such sites. It would not be reasonable, however, to expect such an agency to be able to locate every possible such site.
Additionally, there would exist a necessary delay in the creation of a new site containing offensive material and the time at which it is detected by the licensing agency and updated in the database of blocked sites. During that time, any user utilizing a system with the blocking software implemented by an operator would have unrestricted access to that site, assuming that the site did not contain descriptors matching those in the filtering module of the software.
A further problem of such a blocking method is that the operator is relying on a third party, the licensing agency, to concur with the operator in the subjective determination of what material is offensive. This method, in its most fundamental aspect, removes from the operator the ability to censor objectionable material as deemed objectionable by the operator. This limits the control of the operator to the task of formulating descriptive terms and phrases to be used by the filtering module, a method similar to and with limitations consistent with the previously discussed prior art application.
Another commercially available application is NetSnitch™ which does not actively block Internet sites, as the previously discussed art does, but instead creates a log of Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) that can later be reviewed and loaded by the software operator to determine what type of Internet sites have been visited by the user. It is designed to function online and, therefore, its usefulness is limited to online activities. When the user goes online, a log is activated which lists the specific Internet sites the user visits by recording that site's URL. It is, therefore, used as a monitor of user activity by allowing the software operator to later retrieve the log, and if desired, to go online and load the URLs one at a time to investigate what type of content is contained at the sites accessed by the user. As is apparent, this method does not offer any type of site blocking but gives, in one form, a complete history of the user's activity online, which is recorded by each site's URL.
An obvious limitation of this method, however, is that it only works online. Offensive material may be loaded by floppy disk, for example, and viewed without the monitoring software ever being activated. Furthermore, for the operator to determine the user's online activity history, it is necessary for the operator to go online him or herself, and load each URL to investigate the material at each site, a time consuming and inconvenient task. Also, none of the above techniques is able to verify the user's actual activities, e.g., the content of a user's discussion in an on-line “chat-box,” which can be pornographic, racial or hate related.
It is, therefore, evident that the need exists for a convenient system and method for monitoring a computer user's activity by an operator, while not limiting the user's computing or informational allowances. Although a great deal of today's PC users' data is generated from Internet usage, it has been established that a need exists for a software application to be effective offline, as well as online. It is further desired that no limitations be placed on what type of material is to be monitored and for the application to take no action against the user and, additionally, for the application to give no suggestion to the user of the application's operation. In doing so, the operator would have sole discretion as to what type of usage is objectionable or offensive and as to what course of action should be taken.
The present invention is directed to a system and method for monitoring computer usage. In a preferred embodiment, a computer operator specifies discrete moments of a computer's usage at which screen captures are executed and saved to a log. The operator, such as a parent, can later retrieve the screen images to provide a graphical record of the activities, such as that of his child, on that computer. The system and method of the present invention overcomes the limitations and inefficiencies of the prior art and gives full authority of determining what type of computer usage is inappropriate or offensive to the computer operator. Through the use of the present invention, an operator may determine not only whether or not a user's computer activity was inappropriate, but may also simply determine if the computer was operated in any manner. By employing the system and method of the disclosed invention, a record of a user's activity or inactivity is created that, in addition to being highly simple to evaluate, is an irrefutable account of the user's computer usage. Variations of the system and method allow the operator to direct monitoring events toward online activities.
A more complete understanding of the system and method of the present invention may be had by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is an exemplary embodiment of a conventional computer system which may employ the subject matter of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is an example of a main program interface utilized by the-system and method of the present invention, particularly using the computer system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 illustrates a configuration interface activated when the operator chooses to continuously monitor a computer's usage with manual entry of screen capture times;
FIG. 4 is an interface activated when the operator chooses to view captured images;
FIG. 5 is a configuration interface activated when the operator chooses to manually select the screen capture times and also chooses to have screen captures activated by modem downloads only; and
FIG. 6 illustrates a sample interface for selecting display formats.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skill ed in the art.
FIG. 1 illustrates a computer system incorporating the monitoring program according to the present invention. A file server 8 connects remote computers 2, 4 and 5 through the use of a network connection, generally represented by the reference numeral 1. File server 8 further connects computers 2, 4, and 5 to the Internet 9 via a gateway 7. Remote computers 4 and 5 are, in addition to their own local hard drives, equipped with external storage devices 11 and 13, respectively. Computer 5 is further networked to include computer 15 operating remotely from it. Of course, the number and arrangement of the computers in the network depicted in FIG. 1 have been arbitrarily selected and in no way limit the merits of the present invention.
It should be understood that since the exact configuration of the computer system components may vary greatly, the present invention, as set forth in the proceeding discussion, would be effective in any number of network configurations. Furthermore, the present invention is not limited to the various expansions or rearrangements on the network as described in FIG. 1, but also applies to a stand alone system, which may be defined as a computer system with no available resources outside its own physical devices. In addition, in the continuing discussion, reference will be made to operation of the invention in a network environment.
As an example of the potential usage of the disclosed invention, the particular network configuration of FIG. 1 is first considered in an office environment. In this example, an employer has employees operating from local computers 2, 4, 5, and 15. Employees are served files and Internet access through the server 8. In doing so, the employer wishes to discretely monitor the employees usage of their local computers. Utilizing the disclosed invention, the employer may go about this in a number of ways. The subject matter of the invention, which is preferably embodied in software, is loaded and configured on each of the employees' computers, 2, 4, 5, and 15. After some time of employee computer activity, the employer could return to each of these machines, and through functions later discussed, retrieve a visual log of the users' activities.
The employer may also choose to run the invention from server 8 with specific configuration made for each employee computer, 2, 4, 5, and 15. The employer may only wish to monitor one employee, 15 for instance. The employer may feel that the employee on computer 15 is especially savvy and may feel it is a possibility that this employee would discover the operation of the disclosed invention on the local computer. With the network configuration shown, the employer could run a monitoring routine from computer 5 or the server 8, with computer 15 being the target for monitoring user activity.
It should be understood that regardless of whichever computer usage is subject to being monitored in such a network environment, the disclosed invention may be run from the targeted computer, from a network server, or from any other computer sharing appropriate communication paths with the targeted computer. Furthermore, the retrieval and viewing of monitored computer usage is not limited to the targeted computer or the computer from which the monitoring function was implemented from, but instead, it could be viewed from yet another computer with appropriate communication paths between itself and the disclosed invention.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention and its advantages are best understood by referring to FIGS. 2-4 of the drawings. FIG. 2 shows a main menu interface of the present invention. A number of configuration options are available to the operator. To implement the invention, the operator would select icon 10, ‘Total, ’ and 20, ‘Manual Setup’ from these options. The ‘Total’ option, 10, specifies that the monitoring routine of the present invention will continuously monitor the computer usage, regardless of its operating condition. The ‘Manual Setup’ option, 20, specifies that the operator will determine at what discrete moments the monitoring routine will execute screen captures and save these screen captures in an activity log. After selecting options 10 and 20, the operator must specify when the screen captures are to occur. This is done through an interface such as shown in FIG. 3.
The screen capture interface prompts the operator for the discrete moments at which the screen captures are to be executed, and is activated from the interface of FIG. 2 when the operator has selected either of options 10 and 20. In the example interface depicted in FIG. 3, the operator is prompted for five distinct hourly moments at which the screen capture is to be executed.
The actual time of the executions are specified relative to each hour of the day and are governed by the system clock. The operator would then enter respective values in the areas 30, 31, 32, 33, and 34. Entries are numerical values greater than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to 60, i.e., 1-60 minutes. For example, if the operator entered ‘03’ in the area 30, a screen capture would be executed and recorded at the first second of the third minute of each hour that the computer was running. This screen capture would be in addition to those entered in 31, 32, 33, and 34. Again, all times are consistent with the system clock from which the present invention is operating. Although in the present example, five screen captures per hour are specified by the operator to be executed, it is nonetheless apparent that the number of screen captures performed is arbitrary and may vary pursuant to operator criteria or preferences.
Once the operator has configured the program to the desired specifications, a confirmation message is generated informing the operator that the software is configured and ready to monitor a user's activity. No further action is then required by the operator until viewing the results. The system may be shut down or allowed to continue running. Either way, the program monitors a user's activity once the specified criteria in the program's configuration settings are satisfied.
The operator may later retrieve the saved screen captures. The operator would begin the retrieval from the main menu, as shown in FIG. 2. Here, the operator has the option of viewing the activity log in 24 hour mode, 12, or am/pm mode, 14. After selecting the mode, the operator selects option 40, ‘Show Saved Data.’ For security purposes, e.g., to prevent a child or employee from accessing or modifying the log, this option preferably activates a password screen. It should be understood, however, that password verification may be implemented during other parts of the monitoring routine, particularly in accessing the initial screen shown in FIG. 2. Ideally, the operator would be the only person with knowledge of the password. Once the operator has successfully entered the correct password, the monitoring routine prompts the operator to choose between viewing saved screens or saved statistics.
Assuming the operator chooses to view the saved screens, an interface similar to FIG. 4 is activated. The operator can then choose to view all the saved screens by selecting the appropriate object, 50, or the operator may choose to view the saved screens during a specific time period. To do this, the operator simply enters the range of dates and hours in areas 55 and 60. The procedure would be the same in 24 hours mode except the time is entered in by selecting hours from 1 to 24 as opposed to selecting the hour and choosing am or pm in am/pm mode. When the operator makes his viewing selection, the first saved screen appears in a window with a date/time stamp appearing in the upper right hand comer. A sample interface for such a screen is shown in FIG. 6. The operator then has the option to go forward to the next captured image 70, return to the previous image 75, or delete the captured image 80.
The operator can then view the next captured image by selecting object 70, marked ‘Next’. By viewing each consecutive image with the time/date stamp marked on it, the operator has a graphic time line of a user's activity on the computer. Assuming the program had been configured to operate continuously, any hourly time periods without any saved images would indicate a period of computer inactivity. Therefore, the operator has not only a historical profile of a user's activity, but can also gain information as to a user's periods of inactivity. A variation is included herein where an operator may not find it necessary to save actual images of a user's session, but may instead elect to save statistical information on a user's activities. This capturing of statistical information would be configured in a manner similar to that just described, only statistics such as download sites, times, dates, file names, sizes, applications running at specific times, and any number of other useful statistics lending information as to a particular user's computer activity would be entered in the log instead of an actual image of the screen capture.
A variation on this embodiment would allow the operator to specify time periods of continuous monitoring. In this manner, the operator may specify periods when no monitoring is desired or stop the monitoring program from running until reactuated by the operator. In a business office, this would be convenient for off hours. A similar example for the home may be when a child is in school. By making adjustments in the configuration options of the invention, this would allow an operator to avoid unnecessary monitoring, thereby expediting future review of captured data and avoiding monitoring of incidental usage.
In a second embodiment of the present invention, the operator may elect to have the times of screen capture execution automatically selected as opposed to manually entering the times. The operator is allowed this option by selecting 10, ‘Total,’ and 16, ‘Random Savings,’ from the configuration interface shown in FIG. 2. In implementing this option, the software monitoring utility changes the time of the first through fifth screen captures each hour. This provides an added protection against a user who is capable of determining the intervals at which the screen capture is implemented. Although it is unlikely, it is possible a user could discover the occurrence of the monitoring event by tangible signals generated by the computer, such as a hard disk activity light. By using option 16 of FIG. 2, the operator allows the times at which the screen captures are executed to vary by the hour, thus prohibiting the user from determining the particular minute or other time measure at which the capture will occur. The operator may then later retrieve captured images or statistics in a manner that is consistent with that described in the first embodiment. In a further modification, the program of the present invention allows the operator to specify periods when no monitoring is to be implemented.
In a third embodiment of the invention, a monitoring scheme more directed at determining a user's online activity is allowed. In this embodiment, the monitoring is not initiated until a modem download is detected. The operator may configure it to monitor at the discrete moments selected by the operator similar to the method described in embodiment 1. To do this, the operator would choose 18, ‘Modem’, and 20 ‘Manual Setup’, from the interface depicted in FIG. 2. Doing so would activate the configuration screen shown in FIG. 5.
At this modem-download interface, times are entered by the operator in the appropriate areas 90, 91, 92, 93, and 94. One difference in the functionality of this configuration compared to the configuration described in the first embodiment is that in this configuration, screen captures are not executed until a modem download occurs. When a modem download occurs, the entries made by the operator in the interface depicted in FIG. 4 are compared to the system clock and a capture is executed when a minute on the system clock is consistent with a minute entered by the operator at this interface.
It should be understood that in operating the invention according to this embodiment, a user's session in which no online activity occurs will not be subject to monitoring. Accordingly, an operator would only use this configuration when interested solely in monitoring a user's online activity. The operator may then later retrieve captured images or statistics in a manner that is consistent with that described in the first embodiment. With additional modification, the invention allows the operator to specify periods when no monitoring is to be implemented.
In a fourth embodiment of the present invention, the operator has another configuration available that may be directed to monitoring online activity. The operator may choose this configuration by respectively selecting 18 and 16 from the interface depicted in FIG. 2. The functionality of this configuration is similar to that described in the second embodiment with the exception that screen captures are not executed until the detection of a modem download. For each modem download, screen captures will be executed at the first second of five randomly selected minutes over an hour interval, the pattern repeating for each hour designated. The operator may then later retrieve captured images or statistics in a manner that is consistent with that described in the first embodiment. With some modification, the invention allows the operator to specify periods when no monitoring is to be implemented.
In addition to password usage, a further degree of operational integrity may be implemented to increase the difficulty of a user deleting the saved images in the case the user is able to discover the operation of the disclosed invention. This may be done by introducing a series of keywords or numerical entries that must be correctly entered in order to confirm the deletion. Ideally, only the operator would be knowledgeable of such information, and thus, even if the user discovers the operation of the invention, the possibility of the user being capable of deleting the saved data or disabling the program is further minimized.
Instead of a series of password requests, the program could instead require multiple request screens to cancel or delete the monitoring program or the stored data. Preferably, the number of distinct requests and requisite responses (clicks) handles the situation where the operator has forgotten the password and needs to cancel the program, e.g., before the harddrive falls. Although the user could in principle then delete the downloaded data (and even the monitoring program itself), the user would be unable to say the deletions were accidental if a large number, e.g., 21, of discrete steps were necessary to accomplish deletion.
It should be understood that the series of screen downloads/statistical data, stored on the storage devices 11 and 13 or upon the harddrives of the various computers depicted in FIG. 1, may be displayed as they appeared on the user's screen, e.g., display terminal 5A of computer 5, at the time of downloading, e.g., an image 5B thereon, or multiple such downloads displayed. In particular, the operator may select the manner of display and illustrate the user's usage of the computer by displaying multiple images/data alongside each other, e.g., an entire hour's worth of activity may be displayed on the terminal 5A, each image being reduced in size and resolution to fit. The images may be aligned or overlaid to better show computer usage over longer periods of time.
It should also be understood that the intercepted screen downloads/statistical data or other data transmissions may be stored on the aforementioned storage devices 11 and 13, harddrives, zip drives or any other type of memory storage.
Although various embodiments of the method and apparatus of the present invention have been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions without departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth and defined by the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5349675 *||Sep 4, 1990||Sep 20, 1994||International Business Machines Corporation||System for directly displaying remote screen information and providing simulated keyboard input by exchanging high level commands|
|US5379409 *||Mar 27, 1991||Jan 3, 1995||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Apparatus for remotely operating computer system|
|US5388252 *||Sep 7, 1990||Feb 7, 1995||Eastman Kodak Company||System for transparent monitoring of processors in a network with display of screen images at a remote station for diagnosis by technical support personnel|
|US5586240 *||Sep 14, 1994||Dec 17, 1996||Genesis Software, Inc.||Image generation and retrieval system integrated with arbitrary application using layered interface|
|US5732212 *||Jan 13, 1994||Mar 24, 1998||Fox Network Systems, Inc.||System and method for remote monitoring and operation of personal computers|
|US5761662 *||May 8, 1997||Jun 2, 1998||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Personalized information retrieval using user-defined profile|
|US5832212 *||Apr 19, 1996||Nov 3, 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Censoring browser method and apparatus for internet viewing|
|US5835722 *||Jun 27, 1996||Nov 10, 1998||Logon Data Corporation||System to control content and prohibit certain interactive attempts by a person using a personal computer|
|US5848396 *||Apr 26, 1996||Dec 8, 1998||Freedom Of Information, Inc.||Method and apparatus for determining behavioral profile of a computer user|
|US5848412 *||Nov 19, 1996||Dec 8, 1998||Ncr Corporation||User controlled browser identification disclosing mechanism|
|US5848418 *||Feb 19, 1997||Dec 8, 1998||Watchsoft, Inc.||Electronic file analyzer and selector|
|US5898419 *||Oct 6, 1995||Apr 27, 1999||International Business Machines Corp.||Method and apparatus for scaling a cursor on local computer to have the same size relative to a window on the local computer as another cursor has to another window on a remote computer|
|US5949415 *||Jun 16, 1997||Sep 7, 1999||Intel Corporation||Method and apparatus for tracking program usage in a computer system|
|US5987506 *||May 2, 1997||Nov 16, 1999||Mangosoft Corporation||Remote access and geographically distributed computers in a globally addressable storage environment|
|US5987611 *||May 6, 1997||Nov 16, 1999||Zone Labs, Inc.||System and methodology for managing internet access on a per application basis for client computers connected to the internet|
|US6023507 *||Mar 17, 1997||Feb 8, 2000||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Automatic remote computer monitoring system|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6606659 *||Jan 28, 2000||Aug 12, 2003||Websense, Inc.||System and method for controlling access to internet sites|
|US6745367 *||Sep 27, 1999||Jun 1, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and computer program product for implementing parental supervision for internet browsing|
|US6751348 *||Mar 29, 2001||Jun 15, 2004||Fotonation Holdings, Llc||Automated detection of pornographic images|
|US6836799 *||Aug 24, 1999||Dec 28, 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for tracking user profile and habits on a global network|
|US6863608 *||Oct 11, 2000||Mar 8, 2005||Igt||Frame buffer capture of actual game play|
|US6889169||Jan 31, 2003||May 3, 2005||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Collection of session-related information using an extendable sampling period|
|US6904168 *||Oct 22, 2001||Jun 7, 2005||Fotonation Holdings, Llc||Workflow system for detection and classification of images suspected as pornographic|
|US6963826||Sep 22, 2003||Nov 8, 2005||C3I, Inc.||Performance optimizer system and method|
|US6978303 *||Oct 26, 2000||Dec 20, 2005||Iontal Limited||Monitoring of computer usage|
|US7030737 *||Mar 1, 2002||Apr 18, 2006||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Apparatus, system, and method for indicating a level of network activity|
|US7076495 *||Apr 26, 2001||Jul 11, 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||Browser rewind and replay feature for transient messages by periodically capturing screen images|
|US7103215 *||May 7, 2004||Sep 5, 2006||Potomedia Technologies Llc||Automated detection of pornographic images|
|US7185015||Mar 14, 2003||Feb 27, 2007||Websense, Inc.||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US7237024||Oct 15, 2002||Jun 26, 2007||Aol Llc||Cross-site timed out authentication management|
|US7299281 *||Dec 8, 2003||Nov 20, 2007||Inbit, Inc.||Method and system for activating and capturing screen displays associated with predetermined user interface events|
|US7315891 *||Jan 11, 2001||Jan 1, 2008||Vericept Corporation||Employee internet management device|
|US7384339||Jan 15, 2004||Jun 10, 2008||Igt||Frame capture of actual game play|
|US7454355 *||Nov 28, 2000||Nov 18, 2008||Milman Robert N||Method and system for providing real estate information using a computer network, such as the internet|
|US7502797 *||Oct 15, 2004||Mar 10, 2009||Ascentive, Llc||Supervising monitoring and controlling activities performed on a client device|
|US7529754||May 19, 2005||May 5, 2009||Websense, Inc.||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US7533344 *||Sep 10, 1999||May 12, 2009||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Application unit monitoring and reporting system and method|
|US7577739||Dec 6, 2007||Aug 18, 2009||Vericept Corporation||Employee internet management device|
|US7653244 *||Feb 21, 2006||Jan 26, 2010||Potts Wesley F||Intelligent importation of information from foreign applications user interface|
|US7667733 *||Jul 18, 2003||Feb 23, 2010||Oswald David L||Computer monitor receiver|
|US7669213||Oct 28, 2004||Feb 23, 2010||Aol Llc||Dynamic identification of other viewers of a television program to an online viewer|
|US7734543||May 9, 2001||Jun 8, 2010||Metavante Corporation||Electronic bill presentment and payment system|
|US7739353||Jun 10, 2008||Jun 15, 2010||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Launching a web site using a personal device|
|US7779117 *||Oct 6, 2006||Aug 17, 2010||Aol Inc.||Monitoring digital images|
|US7797270||Jan 18, 2007||Sep 14, 2010||Websense, Inc.||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US7819316||Oct 8, 2007||Oct 26, 2010||Lv Partners, L.P.||Portable scanner for enabling automatic commerce transactions|
|US7822829||Aug 11, 2008||Oct 26, 2010||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method for interfacing scanned product information with a source for the product over a global network|
|US7869586||Mar 30, 2007||Jan 11, 2011||Eloyalty Corporation||Method and system for aggregating and analyzing data relating to a plurality of interactions between a customer and a contact center and generating business process analytics|
|US7870189||Mar 15, 2005||Jan 11, 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Input device having positional and scanning capabilities|
|US7890642||Sep 16, 2004||Feb 15, 2011||Websense Uk Limited||Device internet resource access filtering system and method|
|US7899862||Nov 18, 2003||Mar 1, 2011||Aol Inc.||Dynamic identification of other users to an online user|
|US7904344||Jan 29, 2008||Mar 8, 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Accessing a vendor web site using personal account information retrieved from a credit card company web site|
|US7904596||Sep 2, 2005||Mar 8, 2011||Jinsheng Wang||Method and system for tracking screen activities|
|US7908467||Jun 26, 2007||Mar 15, 2011||RPX-LV Acquistion LLC||Automatic configuration of equipment software|
|US7912760||Mar 17, 2009||Mar 22, 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method and apparatus for utilizing a unique transaction code to update a magazine subscription over the internet|
|US7912961||Jan 10, 2006||Mar 22, 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Input device for allowing input of unique digital code to a user's computer to control access thereof to a web site|
|US7925703||Dec 20, 2001||Apr 12, 2011||Numedeon, Inc.||Graphical interactive interface for immersive online communities|
|US7925780||Mar 13, 2007||Apr 12, 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method for connecting a wireless device to a remote location on a network|
|US7945491||Dec 29, 2000||May 17, 2011||Metavante Corporation||Integrated systems for electronic bill presentment and payment|
|US7957979||Oct 22, 2008||Jun 7, 2011||Home Mart, Inc.||Method and system for providing real estate information using a computer network, such as the internet|
|US7958049||Apr 2, 2003||Jun 7, 2011||Metavante Corporation||System and method for obtaining customer bill information and facilitating bill payment at biller websites|
|US7958234 *||Mar 4, 2009||Jun 7, 2011||Yahoo! Inc.||System and method for monitoring user interaction with web pages|
|US7979576||Oct 21, 2008||Jul 12, 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method and apparatus for connecting a user location to one of a plurality of destination locations on a network|
|US7995717||May 18, 2005||Aug 9, 2011||Mattersight Corporation||Method and system for analyzing separated voice data of a telephonic communication between a customer and a contact center by applying a psychological behavioral model thereto|
|US8005985||Oct 14, 2008||Aug 23, 2011||RPX—LV Acquisition LLC||Method and apparatus for utilizing an audibly coded signal to conduct commerce over the internet|
|US8015174||Feb 28, 2007||Sep 6, 2011||Websense, Inc.||System and method of controlling access to the internet|
|US8020206||Sep 13, 2011||Websense, Inc.||System and method of analyzing web content|
|US8020209||Jun 1, 2005||Sep 13, 2011||Websense, Inc.||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US8023639||Mar 28, 2008||Sep 20, 2011||Mattersight Corporation||Method and system determining the complexity of a telephonic communication received by a contact center|
|US8024471||Sep 28, 2004||Sep 20, 2011||Websense Uk Limited||System, method and apparatus for use in monitoring or controlling internet access|
|US8069098||Sep 22, 2008||Nov 29, 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Input device for allowing interface to a web site in association with a unique input code|
|US8078724||Feb 23, 2010||Dec 13, 2011||Yawonba Holdings Au, Llc||Method and system for tracking screen activities|
|US8094790||Mar 1, 2006||Jan 10, 2012||Mattersight Corporation||Method and software for training a customer service representative by analysis of a telephonic interaction between a customer and a contact center|
|US8094803||May 18, 2005||Jan 10, 2012||Mattersight Corporation||Method and system for analyzing separated voice data of a telephonic communication between a customer and a contact center by applying a psychological behavioral model thereto|
|US8122137||Sep 8, 2004||Feb 21, 2012||Aol Inc.||Dynamic location of a subordinate user|
|US8141147||Sep 28, 2004||Mar 20, 2012||Websense Uk Limited||System, method and apparatus for use in monitoring or controlling internet access|
|US8150817||Mar 12, 2009||Apr 3, 2012||Websense, Inc.||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US8206215||Aug 31, 2006||Jun 26, 2012||Igt||Gaming machine systems and methods with memory efficient historical video re-creation|
|US8244817||May 13, 2008||Aug 14, 2012||Websense U.K. Limited||Method and apparatus for electronic mail filtering|
|US8250081||Jan 18, 2008||Aug 21, 2012||Websense U.K. Limited||Resource access filtering system and database structure for use therewith|
|US8255950||Feb 12, 2010||Aug 28, 2012||Aol Inc.||Dynamic identification of other viewers of a television program to an online viewer|
|US8281037||Oct 23, 2009||Oct 2, 2012||Orb Networks, Inc.||System and method for delivering content to users on a network|
|US8296440||May 12, 2009||Oct 23, 2012||Rpx Corporation||Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location with an optical reader having a programmable memory system|
|US8307068 *||Jun 17, 2009||Nov 6, 2012||Volonics Corporation||Supervised access computer network router|
|US8365241 *||Jun 9, 2008||Jan 29, 2013||Symantec Corporation||Method and apparatus for archiving web content based on a policy|
|US8414402||Mar 22, 2006||Apr 9, 2013||Igt||Frame capture of actual game play|
|US8417815 *||Jan 12, 2012||Apr 9, 2013||Canon Denshi Kabushiki Kaisha||Management server, client terminal, terminal management system, terminal management method, program, and recording medium|
|US8452849||Jul 15, 2011||May 28, 2013||Facebook, Inc.||Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream|
|US8484703||May 12, 2009||Jul 9, 2013||Mcafee, Inc.||Systems and methods for delegation and notification of administration of internet access|
|US8499337||Oct 6, 2005||Jul 30, 2013||Mcafee, Inc.||Systems and methods for delegation and notification of administration of internet access|
|US8510437||Dec 1, 2011||Aug 13, 2013||Yawonba Holdings Au, Llc||Method and system for tracking screen activities|
|US8533349||Jul 8, 2003||Sep 10, 2013||Websense, Inc.||System and method for controlling access to internet sites|
|US8549134 *||Feb 11, 2005||Oct 1, 2013||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Network event indicator system|
|US8577972||Jan 19, 2010||Nov 5, 2013||Facebook, Inc.||Methods and systems for capturing and managing instant messages|
|US8594285||Jun 21, 2011||Nov 26, 2013||Mattersight Corporation||Method and system for analyzing separated voice data of a telephonic communication between a customer and a contact center by applying a psychological behavioral model thereto|
|US8615800||Jul 10, 2006||Dec 24, 2013||Websense, Inc.||System and method for analyzing web content|
|US8640234||May 4, 2004||Jan 28, 2014||Trustwave Holdings, Inc.||Method and apparatus for predictive and actual intrusion detection on a network|
|US8645340||Apr 2, 2012||Feb 4, 2014||Websense, Inc.||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US8689325||Jun 1, 2005||Apr 1, 2014||Websense, Inc.||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US8701014||Nov 18, 2003||Apr 15, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Account linking|
|US8701194||Sep 12, 2011||Apr 15, 2014||Websense, Inc.||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US8706872 *||Aug 7, 2012||Apr 22, 2014||Parentsware, Llc||Agreement compliance controlled information throttle|
|US8718262||Mar 30, 2007||May 6, 2014||Mattersight Corporation||Method and system for automatically routing a telephonic communication base on analytic attributes associated with prior telephonic communication|
|US8732305 *||Jun 8, 2009||May 20, 2014||Canon Denshi Kabushiki Kaisha||Management server, client terminal, terminal management system, terminal management method, program, and recording medium|
|US8732337||Aug 10, 2012||May 20, 2014||Qualcomm Incorporated||System and method for delivering content to users on a network|
|US8751634||Nov 22, 2010||Jun 10, 2014||Qualcomm Incorporated||System and method for delivering content to users on a network|
|US8775560||Jan 31, 2013||Jul 8, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream|
|US8781102||Nov 5, 2013||Jul 15, 2014||Mattersight Corporation||Method and system for analyzing a communication by applying a behavioral model thereto|
|US8799388||Aug 13, 2012||Aug 5, 2014||Websense U.K. Limited||Method and apparatus for electronic mail filtering|
|US8819176||Sep 13, 2012||Aug 26, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent map results related to a character stream|
|US8849948 *||Jul 29, 2011||Sep 30, 2014||Comcast Cable Communications, Llc||Variable speed playback|
|US8856140||Jun 9, 2009||Oct 7, 2014||Microsoft Corporation||Querying dialog prompts using hash values|
|US8874672||Feb 13, 2012||Oct 28, 2014||Facebook, Inc.||Identifying and using identities deemed to be known to a user|
|US8891754||Mar 31, 2014||Nov 18, 2014||Mattersight Corporation||Method and system for automatically routing a telephonic communication|
|US8954530||Sep 13, 2012||Feb 10, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent results related to a character stream|
|US8954531||Sep 13, 2012||Feb 10, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent messaging label results related to a character stream|
|US8954534||Jan 4, 2013||Feb 10, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream|
|US8965964||Dec 29, 2004||Feb 24, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Managing forwarded electronic messages|
|US8966064||Aug 7, 2012||Feb 24, 2015||Parentsware, Llc||Agreement compliance controlled electronic device throttle|
|US8978140||Jun 20, 2011||Mar 10, 2015||Websense, Inc.||System and method of analyzing web content|
|US8983054||Oct 16, 2014||Mar 17, 2015||Mattersight Corporation||Method and system for automatically routing a telephonic communication|
|US9003059 *||Mar 31, 2008||Apr 7, 2015||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Running applications in an online or offline mode based on the availability of the connection to the remote web server|
|US9003524||Dec 23, 2013||Apr 7, 2015||Websense, Inc.||System and method for analyzing web content|
|US9043462||May 16, 2014||May 26, 2015||Parentsware, Inc.||Schedule and location responsive agreement compliance controlled information throttle|
|US9047364||Jan 16, 2013||Jun 2, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent client capability-based results related to a character stream|
|US9047464 *||Mar 15, 2013||Jun 2, 2015||NSS Lab Works LLC||Continuous monitoring of computer user and computer activities|
|US9053173||Jan 28, 2013||Jun 9, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent results related to a portion of a search query|
|US9053174||Jan 30, 2013||Jun 9, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent vendor results related to a character stream|
|US9053175||Jan 30, 2013||Jun 9, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent results using a spelling correction agent|
|US9070118||Sep 14, 2012||Jun 30, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Methods for capturing electronic messages based on capture rules relating to user actions regarding received electronic messages|
|US9075867||Jan 31, 2013||Jul 7, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent results using an assistant|
|US9075868||Feb 13, 2013||Jul 7, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent results based on database queries|
|US9083801||Oct 8, 2013||Jul 14, 2015||Mattersight Corporation||Methods and system for analyzing multichannel electronic communication data|
|US9117054||Dec 21, 2012||Aug 25, 2015||Websense, Inc.||Method and aparatus for presence based resource management|
|US9124701||Feb 6, 2015||Sep 1, 2015||Mattersight Corporation||Method and system for automatically routing a telephonic communication|
|US9130972||May 24, 2010||Sep 8, 2015||Websense, Inc.||Systems and methods for efficient detection of fingerprinted data and information|
|US9171064||Jan 31, 2013||Oct 27, 2015||Facebook, Inc.||Intelligent community based results related to a character stream|
|US9191510||Mar 14, 2013||Nov 17, 2015||Mattersight Corporation||Methods and system for analyzing multichannel electronic communication data|
|US20010025249 *||Mar 23, 2001||Sep 27, 2001||Daisuke Tokunaga||On-line real-time monitoring system and method of on-line real-time monitoring business|
|US20010054100 *||Apr 27, 2001||Dec 20, 2001||Vince Roche||Windows Desktop monitoring system|
|US20020004907 *||Jan 11, 2001||Jan 10, 2002||Donahue Thomas P.||Employee internet management device|
|US20020026507 *||Jan 18, 2001||Feb 28, 2002||Sears Brent C.||Browser proxy client application service provider (ASP) interface|
|US20020042824 *||Jun 14, 2001||Apr 11, 2002||Gestweb S.P.A.||Method for controlling access to a data communication network|
|US20020097267 *||Dec 20, 2001||Jul 25, 2002||Numedeon, Inc.||Graphical interactive interface for immersive online communities|
|US20020111887 *||Nov 7, 2001||Aug 15, 2002||Mcfarlane Richard||Employee online activity monitoring system|
|US20020159630 *||Mar 29, 2001||Oct 31, 2002||Vasile Buzuloiu||Automated detection of pornographic images|
|US20020161780 *||Apr 26, 2001||Oct 31, 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Browser rewind and replay feature for transient messages wherein the messages are stored automatically when they are initially rendered and replayed when selected|
|US20020161794 *||Apr 26, 2001||Oct 31, 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Browser rewind and replay feature for transient messages by periodically capturing screen images|
|US20030009457 *||Feb 6, 2002||Jan 9, 2003||William Lu||Image interception method|
|US20030131094 *||Jan 10, 2002||Jul 10, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Apparatus and method of limiting application program usage|
|US20030164771 *||Mar 1, 2002||Sep 4, 2003||Dove Daniel Joseph||Apparatus, system, and method for indicating a level of network activity|
|US20030195796 *||May 7, 2003||Oct 16, 2003||Vijay Konda||Internet activity rating system|
|US20040015586 *||Jul 8, 2003||Jan 22, 2004||Ronald Hegli||System and method for controlling access to internet sites|
|US20040068559 *||Oct 4, 2002||Apr 8, 2004||Shaw Terry D.||Method for detection of unauthorized computer system usage|
|US20040073660 *||Oct 15, 2002||Apr 15, 2004||Toomey Christopher Newell||Cross-site timed out authentication management|
|US20040147314 *||Jan 15, 2004||Jul 29, 2004||Igt||Frame capture of actual game play|
|US20040181788 *||Mar 14, 2003||Sep 16, 2004||Websense Inc||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US20040208361 *||May 7, 2004||Oct 21, 2004||Vasile Buzuloiu||Automated detection of pornographic images|
|US20040210520 *||Apr 2, 2003||Oct 21, 2004||Fitzgerald Daleen R.||Bill payment payee information management system and method|
|US20050010639 *||May 3, 2004||Jan 13, 2005||James Long||Network meeting system|
|US20050065756 *||Sep 22, 2003||Mar 24, 2005||Hanaman David Wallace||Performance optimizer system and method|
|US20050086255 *||Oct 15, 2004||Apr 21, 2005||Ascentive Llc||Supervising monitoring and controlling activities performed on a client device|
|US20050120113 *||Dec 22, 2004||Jun 2, 2005||Accountability International, Inc.||System and method for monitoring application utilization|
|US20050197184 *||Dec 30, 2003||Sep 8, 2005||Steven Ahlquist||System for regulating use of an electronic device|
|US20050210035 *||May 19, 2005||Sep 22, 2005||Kester Harold M||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US20050223001 *||Jun 1, 2005||Oct 6, 2005||Kester Harold M||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US20050256956 *||Oct 13, 2004||Nov 17, 2005||Battelle Memorial Institute||Analyzing user-activity data using a heuristic-based approach|
|US20060035708 *||Jul 13, 2005||Feb 16, 2006||Igt||Method and apparatus for verifying game outcome|
|US20060150249 *||May 4, 2004||Jul 6, 2006||Derek Gassen||Method and apparatus for predictive and actual intrusion detection on a network|
|US20060178188 *||Mar 22, 2006||Aug 10, 2006||Igt||Frame capture of actual game play|
|US20060195441 *||Jan 3, 2006||Aug 31, 2006||Luc Julia||System and method for delivering content to users on a network|
|US20060253784 *||Apr 11, 2006||Nov 9, 2006||Bower James M||Multi-tiered safety control system and methods for online communities|
|US20060265089 *||Mar 1, 2006||Nov 23, 2006||Kelly Conway||Method and software for analyzing voice data of a telephonic communication and generating a retention strategy therefrom|
|US20070009155 *||Feb 21, 2006||Jan 11, 2007||Potts Wesley F||Intelligent importation of information from foreign application user interface using artificial intelligence|
|US20070094263 *||Oct 6, 2006||Apr 26, 2007||Aol Llc||Monitoring Digital Images|
|US20070156741 *||Dec 27, 2005||Jul 5, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for recording terminal time and establishing usage profiles across systems and applications|
|US20070162341 *||Mar 20, 2007||Jul 12, 2007||Sprint Spectrum L.P.||Method and System for Distribution and Use of Coupons|
|US20070162463 *||Jan 18, 2007||Jul 12, 2007||Websense, Inc.||System and method of monitoring and controlling application files|
|US20080012935 *||Nov 22, 2005||Jan 17, 2008||Gateway Inc.||Inappropriate content detection and distribution prevention for wireless cameras/camcorders with e-mail capabilities and camera phones|
|US20080097767 *||Nov 28, 2000||Apr 24, 2008||Home Mart, Inc.||Method and System for Providing Real Estate Information Using a Computer Network, Such as the Internet|
|US20080133745 *||Dec 6, 2007||Jun 5, 2008||Vericept Corporation||Employee internet management device|
|US20090132579 *||Nov 21, 2007||May 21, 2009||Kwang Edward M||Session audit manager and method|
|US20090150216 *||Oct 22, 2008||Jun 11, 2009||Home Mart, Inc.||Method and System for Providing Real Estate Information Using a Computer Network, Such as the Internet|
|US20090168090 *||Dec 23, 2008||Jul 2, 2009||Noritsu Koki Co., Ltd.||Viewer method and viewer device|
|US20090240796 *||Jun 8, 2009||Sep 24, 2009||Canon Denshi Kabushiki Kaisha||Management server, client terminal, terminal management system, terminal management method, program, and recording medium|
|US20110289117 *||Nov 24, 2011||International Business Machines Corporation||Systems and methods for user controllable, automated recording and searching of computer activity|
|US20120117238 *||May 10, 2012||Canon Denshi Kabushiki Kaisha|
|US20140012977 *||Aug 7, 2012||Jan 9, 2014||Negeen MOUSSAVIAN||Agreement compliance controlled information throttle|
|US20140283059 *||Mar 15, 2013||Sep 18, 2014||NSS Lab Works LLC||Continuous Monitoring of Computer User and Computer Activities|
|CN101223510B||May 30, 2006||Jun 23, 2010||科学园株式会社||监视方法以及监视系统|
|CN102460457B *||Jun 3, 2010||Apr 22, 2015||创新科技有限公司||Method for monitoring activities of a first user on any of a plurality of platforms|
|EP1887473A1 *||May 30, 2006||Feb 13, 2008||Science Park Corporation||Monitoring method, monitoring system, system program, and recording medium containing the program|
|EP2075702A1 *||Dec 18, 2008||Jul 1, 2009||Noritsu Koki Co., Ltd||Capture method and capture device|
|EP2079025A1 *||Dec 18, 2008||Jul 15, 2009||Noritsu Koki Co. Ltd.||Capture method and capture device|
|EP2079026A1 *||Dec 19, 2008||Jul 15, 2009||Noritsu Koki Co., Ltd||Capture method and capture device|
|WO2004036351A2 *||Oct 1, 2003||Apr 29, 2004||America Online Inc||Cross-site timed out authentication management|
|WO2005057329A2 *||Sep 8, 2004||Jun 23, 2005||America Online Inc||Dynamic location of a subordinate user|
|WO2006129676A1||May 30, 2006||Dec 7, 2006||Science Park Corp||Monitoring method, monitoring system, system program, and recording medium containing the program|
|WO2010140985A1 *||Jun 3, 2010||Dec 9, 2010||Creative Technology Ltd||A method for monitoring activities of a first user on any of a plurality of platforms|
|WO2013180697A1 *||May 30, 2012||Dec 5, 2013||Thomson Licensing||Parental monitoring in a home gateway environment|
|U.S. Classification||709/224, 714/E11.196, 709/223, 709/225|
|Jan 20, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: LASLO OLAH, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FRIEDLER, FERENC DR.;KOVACS, ZOLTAN;REEL/FRAME:009666/0431
Effective date: 19980107
|Feb 25, 2003||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Mar 22, 2006||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|May 3, 2006||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|May 3, 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 20, 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: WHEEL DATA, L.L.C., DELAWARE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MOUNT HAMILTON PARTNERS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:020279/0161
Effective date: 20060725
|Jan 3, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MOUNT HAMILTON PARTNERS, LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OLAH, LASLO;REEL/FRAME:020309/0626
Effective date: 20060522
|Feb 19, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Feb 25, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12