|Publication number||US6571110 B1|
|Application number||US 09/502,548|
|Publication date||May 27, 2003|
|Filing date||Feb 10, 2000|
|Priority date||Aug 9, 1995|
|Also published as||US6104934, US6263215|
|Publication number||09502548, 502548, US 6571110 B1, US 6571110B1, US-B1-6571110, US6571110 B1, US6571110B1|
|Inventors||David O. Patton, Robert M. Yandrofski, Gerhard A. Koepf, Robert F. Arentz, Jerry Lynn Martin|
|Original Assignee||David O. Patton, Robert M. Yandrofski, Gerhard A. Koepf, Robert F. Arentz, Jerry Lynn Martin|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (27), Non-Patent Citations (46), Referenced by (55), Classifications (17), Legal Events (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present application is a continuation of pending prior application Ser. No. 08/797,949 filed Feb. 12, 1997, which claims priority from copending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/013,942, entitled “Cryoelectronic Receiver Front End for Mobile Radio Systems,” filed Mar. 22, 1996, and a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/694,772, having the same title and filed on Aug. 9, 1996, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/002,065 having the same title and filed on Aug. 9, 1995, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The present invention relates generally to base station receivers for communication applications and specifically to a receiver front end for base stations used in mobile radio systems.
In terrestrial mobile radio systems of cellular, PCS or other type, geographical areas are subdivided into a number of cells. The communications traffic in each cell is supported by a base station and each base station has assigned to it a multiplicity of RF carriers. In such cellular mobile radio systems that operate at UHF and higher frequencies, the size of the cells is determined by terrain features (there can not be manor obstructions between the mobile station and the base station), network capacity requirements (the number of users the system needs to support), and the base station receiver sensitivity (limited by losses and noise generated in the base station receiver front end). In such cellular mobile radio systems, cells are called capacity cells when their size is determined by traffic requirements, and cells are called coverage cells when their size is determined by the base station receiver sensitivity and the terrain. Furthermore, a distinction is made between the forward link, which is the radio signal transmitted from the base station to the mobile station, and the reverse link, which is the radio signal transmitted from the mobile station to the base station.
In the reverse link, the mobile station typically transmits 10 to 100 times less power than the base station transmits in the forward link. Therefore,the received signal strength at the base station is much lower than the received signal strength at the mobile station. In situations where the base station range is limited by the reverse link signal strength, the base station is identified as reverse link limited. Likewise, in forward link limited cells the range is limited by the strength of the signal received at the mobile station.
Mobile radio networks are designed for balanced forward and reverse links, i.e., equal base station range in both directions. This balance is based on the assumption that all cells are at full capacity. However, many operational networks are not at full capacity. Under these conditions, the base station transmitter can be driven harder to provide an increased range for the forward link. The cell is then reverse link limited.
Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) base stations and rural cellular base stations are typically reverse link limited. In particular, many existing cellular base stations are reverse link limited because they were designed for car phones transmitting at about 8Watts, while the majority of mobile stations today are battery operated hand-held phones, which transmit at much lower power levels (0.6 Watt in the U.S. and 2 Watts in Europe).
Reverse link limitations in specific existing cells due to terrain can be overcome. by increasing the antenna tower height at the base station. More general, construction of additional base stations or repeater sites is necessary. Both these approaches have major disadvantages: increasing the height of the receive antennas on the tower is typically not possible without replacing the entire tower and may violate zoning regulations. Building additional base stations or repeater sites is expensive and also requires a reassignment of the frequency reuse pattern of the network.
In capacity limited cellular networks, additional demand in the number of users can be met by adding new frequency channels to the existing cell sites if the additional channels are available. In networks where all channels are in use the only solution is splitting existing cells into smaller ones, and correspondingly, adding additional base stations and reassigning the frequency reuse pattern.
It is an objective of the present invention to disclose receiver front end circuitry that can provide significantly increased base station sensitivity for receiving reverse link signals from mobile stations. A related objective is to minimize the noise contributions from cable losses in the base station receive path which also increases the base station reverse link sensitivity compared to existing base stations.
Another objective is to reduce the number of base stations in coverage networks thereby reducing the installation and maintenance cost of such networks relative to existing cellular mobile radio systems.
Another related objective is to reduce the mobile station transmit power in coverage or capacity networks by increasing the base station receiver sensitivity.
It is a further objective to provide base station receiver front end circuitry with improved RF filter characteristics to reduce interference. This feature increases spectrum utilization providing increased capacity and revenue relative to existing base stations.
Yet another related objective is to operate said receiver front end circuitry in a thermally stable environment to avoid variations, degradation in performance, and failure due to ambient temperature fluctuations.
An additional objective relating to some digital cellular mobile radio systems is to increase network capacity. These and other objectives are achieved in the present invention which provides a receiver front end for a base station. The receiver front end includes: (1) a plurality of filtering means for spectrally filtering a plurality of RF signals to form a plurality of filtered RF signals; (2) a plurality of amplifying means, in communication with the plurality of filtering means, for amplifying the plurality of filtered RF signals; and (3) cooling means for cryogenically cooling the filtering means and the amplifying means. The cooling means is common to the plurality of filtering means and plurality of amplifying means and is substantially adjacent to the antenna to maintain the insertion loss along a transmission line extending between the antenna and amplifying means at or below a selected level. At least one of the plurality of filtering means and plurality of amplifying means comprises a superconducting material. In one embodiment, the receiver front end is mounted on a structure supporting the antenna. The cooling means can be a closed or open cycle refrigerator. The cooling means can maintain the filtering means and amplifying means at a stable temperature that is independent of the temperature of the environment external to the cooling means. The filtering means, amplifying means, and cooling means will hereinafter be referred to as the cryoelectronic receiver front end or the receiver front end. In one embodiment, the cryoelectronic receiver front end consists at a minimum of a spectral filter and a low noise amplifier, either or both of which can include a superconducting material for the passive components of the circuit.
To understand the performance advantages of the present invention, it is important to relate base station sensitivity with the base station noise figure. The sensitivity is described as the RF signal power level needed at the receive antenna port to detect a single telephone channel with a given signal quality. Frequently, in digital mobile radio systems, this signal quality is described by a frame error rate not exceeding one percent.
This error rate is a strong function of the signal to noise ratio as measured, for example, before the demodulator, and is thus strongly dependent on the noise power. The noise power in turn, is composed of noise received by the antenna and noise added by the RF receiver front end circuitry. The latter can be measured with standard techniques and is typically expressed as a noise figure value. The more noise added by the receiver, the larger the base station noise figure, the larger the total noise power at the demodulator, and the lower the sensitivity of the base station.
Cryogenic cooling significantly decreases RF losses in passive electronic circuits thereby reducing the thermal noise, also known as Johnson noise. As is also well known, Johnson noise generated in passive components is equal to the component loss when the component is operated at room temperature, but decreases substantially below the loss value when the component is operated at cryogenic temperature. Additionally, the losses in normal metals decrease with temperature, and the RF losses of superconducting metals when cooled below the transition temperature, are orders of magnitude lower than that of normal metals. The noise mechanisms intrinsic to a variety of semiconductor transistor designs, such as those used in low noise amplifiers, are also temperature dependent, and decrease with decreasing temperature. For example, the noise figure of PHEMT GaAs low noise amplifiers is known to substantially decrease when operated at cryogenic temperature. Preferably, the insertion loss of the filters is no more than about 0.2 dB and the noise figure of the LNAs is no more than about 0.4 dB at the temperature of the components (i.e., no more than about 150° K) in the cryocooler.
In addition to the use of cryoelectronic components with extremely low noise temperature, in the present invention, the RF feed line losses between the receive antenna and the cryoelectronic receiver front end are substantially minimized by locating the cryoelectronic receiver front end on the antenna mast in close proximity to the receive antenna structure. In cellular base stations it is common practice to locate all base station electronics including the receiver front end at the base of the antenna mast. Depending on the height of the mast, a substantial length of RF feed line (typically coaxial cable) is used to connect the receiver front end to the antenna port. This cable causes insertion losses that directly add to the base station noise figure. In the typical embodiment of the invention, the cryoelectronic receiver front end is mounted on the antenna support structure itself. Preferably, the insertion loss along the transmission line extending between the antenna and the receiver front end is no more than about 1.0 dB and more preferably no more than about 0.5 dB.
The noise figure of the cryoelectronic receiver front end of the present invention is preferably no more than 1.5 dB, more preferentially no more than 1.0 dB, and most preferably no more than about 0.7 dB. This compares with noise figures in the range of 3 to 8 dB in existing base stations. With respect to base stations sensitivity, this corresponds to a 2 to 7 dB improvement over the existing state of the art. The concomitant increase in reverse link range in cellular applications is preferably at least about 110%, more preferably at least about 120%, and most preferably at least about 140% of the reverse link range of conventional systems (i.e., with no tower-mounted cryoelectronic receiver front end).
The use of superconducting material in the RF spectral filter provides not only high sensitivity but also improved spectral definition of the cellular band. Ideal bandpass filters have rectangular profiles. Actual filters have sloping skirts and in-band ripple. The low losses of superconducting material allow the fabrication of very small filter circuits with steep skirts and low in-band ripple. When used in mobile cellular radio system, such filters allow better use of the available spectrum, as more channels can be accommodated at the band edges without increased interference from adjacent bands. The small size of the superconducting planar filters allows use of more complex filter functions to be performed without increasing the size of the mast head cryoelectronic receiver front end and without significant loss in sensitivity. For example, combinations of bandpass and bandreject filters may be used in base stations where strong out-of-band interference signals need to be suppressed. Also, sharper filters can be used to more accurately define specific receive bands or parts thereof. For example, it is customary in the new cellular PCs systems to use 60-MHz wide filters. This corresponds to the entire PCS base station receive band. In actuality, each licensee only uses a small part of this spectrum, i.e., either a 15 MHz or a 5 MHz wide band. Superconducting filters can easily provide the selectivity for these narrower bands with only a minor increase in noise figure.
Another benefit of the cryoelectronic receiver front end is the increased spurious free dynamic range compared with existing receiver front ends. This is the result of the increase in amplifier gain and the decrease in noise realized through cooling the circuit.
The present invention is applicable to all base station modulation and multiplexing formats, such as analog or digital modulation, frequency, phase or amplitude modulation, frequency-, time- and code-division multiplexing. The improved sensitivity may be utilized in different cellular mobile systems in different ways. The benefits include but are not limited to: balancing of reverse link limited cells; increasing base station range in coverage networks; increasing cell capacity; better reception of signals transmitted through buildings and other structures; substantial reduction of degradation in receiver sensitivity caused by the insertion loss of the transmission line extending from the receiver front end to the base station because the RF signal is spectrally filtered and amplified before transmission along the line; and reducing handset transmit power levels for safety reasons, for increased talk time, and for better signal quality due to the higher linearity of the transmit amplifier.
The cryoelectronic receiver front end can readily be applied in cellular mobile radio systems designed to have balanced links. As the transmit power in the mobile stations is continuously adjusted to the minimum value for maintaining a certain reverse link quality, the use of the present invention allows mobile stations to operate at substantially reduced power levels. This increases the talk time for a given battery size, and reduces the power levels that users are exposed to.
In mobile radio systems that implement spread spectrum technology, such as code division multiplex systems, increased sensitivity of the base station receiver front end as provided with the present invention is known to significantly increase not only the cell size but also the capacity.
The filtering means and amplifying means in the receiver front end can be electronically tunable and/or located on a common substrate. The tuning means for tuning the filtering means can include a ferroelectric material.
The cooling means can include a cooling device, means for compressing a cooling fluid for use in the cooling device, and means for transporting the cooling fluid between the compressing means and the cooling device. The compressing means can be located near the base of the structure supporting the antenna, and the cooling device and receiver front end mounted on the upper part of the structure. In this manner, the compressing means can supply a number of cooling devices with cooling fluid. The cooling fluid can be transported to one or more cooling devices mounted on the structure by transmitting the cooling fluid through a conduit formed by the transmission line extending from the base station to the receiver front end.
The cooling means can include: (i) a cold finger contacting the plurality of filtering means and the plurality of amplifying means; (ii) valve means in communication with a conduit for providing the cooling fluid to the cold finger; (iii) variable speed motor means connected to the valve means for actuating the valve means at a variable frequency; (iv) a temperature sensor for sensing the temperature of the cold finger and providing an output signal representative of the temperature; and (v) means for controlling the speed of the variable motor means in response to the output signal of the temperature sensor. In this manner, the temperature of the cold finger is controlled by varying the speed of the variable motor means.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the cooling means includes a cooling member having a plurality of faces with at least one of the filtering means and at least one of the amplifying means being positioned adjacent to each of the number of faces. Typically, the cooling member has at least three faces. At least two filtering means and at least two amplifying means are typically adjacent to each of the faces. The cooling member is mounted on the cold finger at a location yielding the desired temperature of the cooling member.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the cooling means further includes a mounting means for mounting the amplifying means on the cooling member. The mounting means has a bulk conductivity sufficient to cause the amplifying means to have a higher temperature than the cooling member. Preferably, the frame member has a bulk conductivity of at least about 2 watts/cm-° K, and an integrated thermal conductivity of 20 watts/cm or less.
To protect the receiver front end from the environment, it can be enclosed in a weatherproof enclosure. The input and output ports in the enclosure for electrical conductors can be protected from power surges, such as by lightning, by lightning protection means. The enclosure can form an integral structure with the antenna, particularly with a patch array antenna.
Switching means can be used to bypass the RF signal around the receiver front end in the event of malfunction of receiver front end. Monitoring means for monitoring remotely the operation of the various components of the receiver front end can be used to activate the switching means.
For dual diversity reception, a second cooling means in a second receiver front end can be employed. The antenna is in communication with the receiver front end and the second antenna with the second receiver front end. This configuration provides enhanced system reliability by providing separate cooling means for the receiver front ends in each sector.
In another configuration for servicing multiple antennas, a single cryostat can include a plurality of filtering means and a plurality of amplifying means. In this configuration, a filtering means and amplifying means are connected with each of a plurality of antennas.
The relative locations of the filters and amplifiers on the cold finger can be important for optimal performance of each component. In one embodiment, the amplifier is positioned nearer the free end of the cold finger than the filter. This configuration provides significantly reduced insertion loss in the coaxial cable between the antenna and the filter. In another embodiment, a temperature gradient exists along the length of the cold finger with the lowest temperature being at the free end of the cold finger. Because the filter has a lower optimum operating temperature than the amplifier, the filter is located nearer the free end of the cold finger than the amplifier. In either case, the filter or amplifier is located at the point on the temperature gradient with the desired optimum operating temperature.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method for processing a wireless signal transmitted by a mobile station to a base station. The method includes the steps of: (1) cryogenically cooling components of the base station's receiver front end, with the temperature of cooling preferably being 90% or less of the transition temperature of a superconducting material in the receiver front end; (2) receiving the signal with the receiver front end; and (3) transmitting the received signal to the base station.
FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a cryoelectronic receiver front end and FIG. 1B is a diagram of the receiver front end on an antenna mast in close proximity to a base station and a compressor;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a cryostat and a cryoelectronic module;
FIG. 3 is a view of an embodiment of a receiver front end contained in a weatherproof enclosure;
FIG. 4 is a cut away of a cryostat containing multiple cryoelectronic modules;
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a cryoelectronic receiver front end with a bypass circuit;
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a cryoelectronic receiver front end system where multiple cryostats are supplied with cooling fluid by a single compressor;
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a fault-tolerant configuration of multiple cryoelectronic receiver front ends supporting a sectorized dual-diversity antenna system;
FIG. 8A is a simplified perspective view of a dual-antenna system where the antenna and cryoelectronic receiver front end are integrated into a single unit;
FIG. 8B is a view of the integrated antenna and cryoelectronic receiver front end;
FIG. 8C is a block diagram of the various components of a cryoelectronic receiver front end serving multiple antennas;
FIG. 8D is a diagram of a cryoelectronic receiver front end providing cooling for a power amplifier used for RF signal transmission;
FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a coax cable being used to transport cooling fluid to/from the cryoelectronic receiver front end;
FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of the coax cable in FIG. 9 showing a conduit for transporting the cooling fluid;
FIGS. 11A-13 depict the cryostat of another embodiment of the present invention with FIG. 13 being a cross-sectional view taken along lines A—A of FIG. 11;
FIG. 14 depicts the cryoelectronic receiver front end mounted on the interior structure of the compact weatherproof enclosure;
FIGS. 15A and B respectfully depict prior art base station circuitry and a base station circuitry using the cryoelectronic receiver of the present invention; and
FIGS. 16A and B depict results of tests using the systems of FIGS. 15A and B; and
FIG. 17 depicts a cryoelectronic cooling device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
An important aspect of the present invention is the combined use of highly conductive materials, particularly superconducting electronic materials, and cryocooling devices in a mast mounted RF receiver front end, to realize substantial benefits in mobile radio systems, based on increased base station sensitivity combined with high spectral selectivity. An important aspect of the invention lies in the use of closed cycle refrigerators, particularly cryopumps, as the cryocooling devices. As used herein, a cryopump is a cryogenic refrigeration device that entrains molecules on a cooled surface by weak dispersion forces (e.g., entrainment of a gas by cryocondensation, cryosorption, or cryotrapping on a surface that is cooled by a liquid cryogen or a mechanical refrigerator).
FIGS. 1A and 1B show the cryoelectronic receiver front end of the present invention installed in a base station with antenna mast 60 supporting an antenna assembly 56. The cryoelectronic receiver front end consists of a mast mounted portion 53 of the receiver front end, a compressor 72, and a conduit 76 for the cooling fluid. The height of the antenna mast or tower varies with application but typically ranges from about 35 to about 200 feet. As will be appreciated, the height of the tower structure can vary over a substantially broader range for microcell applications.
In the shown embodiment, a closed cycle mechanical refrigerator is used for cooling the electronics to cryogenic temperatures. The refrigerator or cryocooler consists of two parts, one being a compressor 72, and the other being a cold head assembly located inside the mast mounted portion 53. This type of refrigeration system is known as a Gifford McMahon refrigerator. In this configuration, the compressor 72 is connected to the receiver front end in the mast mounted portion 53 via a cooling fluid transport conduit 76. It includes two gas lines providing a cooling fluid such as cryogen to the cold head and a return path back to the compressor. While this is the preferred embodiment of the refrigerator, other refrigeration systems may be used that consist of two separate parts, such as pulse tubes, Joul-Thompson systems, or that consist of a single integrated part such as Sterling cycle refrigerators. Preferably, the refrigeration system is relatively inexpensive, has a heat lift of 5 watts or more at 70° K, draws no more than about 800 to about 1,000 watts of power, and a life in excess of 1.5 years.
The advantages of using a cryopump such as the Gifford McMahon system are its high reliability and the fact that the remote compressor can be co-located at the base of the antenna mast with the base station, in an environmentally controlled location. Additionally, this configuration allows easy access to the compressor for repair and maintenance functions. The structure and operation of the Gifford McMahon system is discussed in detail below.
Again referring to FIG. 1B, the base station is connected to the antenna assembly and to the mast mounted portion 53 of the receiver front end via cable assembly 68. Furthermore, cable assembly 64 connects the receiver front end 52 to the antenna assembly 56, preferentially with ultra-low loss coaxial cables. The quality and length of the coaxial cables 64 is selected in such a way as to minimize the insertion loss. The length of the cable 64 is preferably no more than about 10 feet. Preferably, the insertion loss along cable assembly 64 is no more than about 1.0 dB, more preferably less than about 0.5 dB, and most preferably no more than about 0.7 dB.
The height of the tower structure 60 varies with application. Typically, the height ranges from about 35 to about 200 feet. Depending upon the length and type of long coaxial cable assembly 68 and the frequency of the RF signal transmitted along the cable, the insertion loss along the cable 68 will typically range from about 1.5 to about 4.0 dB. As will be appreciated, the height of the tower structure and cable length can vary over a substantially broader range for microcell applications.
Functionally, the cryoelectronic receiver front end is in the receive path of the base station. Signals from the mobile station are being collected by the receive antennas in the antenna assembly, pass through the cryoelectronic receiver front end, and then pass to the RF receiver in the base station via the coaxial cable assembly 68. In the basic embodiment of the invention, the base station RF transmitter is connected directly to the transmit antennas in the antenna assembly without passing through the cryoelectronic receiver front end.
The mast mounted portion 53 of the cryoelectronic receiver front end as shown in FIGS. 1A and 2, contains the cold head assembly which is a cold head 92, and attached to it, cryostat 32. For protection of these components from environmental effects, the cryoelectronic receiver front end includes a weatherproof enclosure 52 with connectors (not shown) for the RF-, power and signal cables and gas lines 76. The enclosure is relatively compact, typically having a height of no more than about 22 inches and, for cylindrically shaped enclosures, a diameter of no more than about 10 inches. The cryostat is also relatively compact, typically having a height of no more than about 18 inches and a diameter of no more than about 8 inches.
The cryostat inside the cryoelectronic receiver front end includes a multiplicity of cryoelectronic modules in correspondence to the multiplicity of receive antennas in the antenna assembly. Typical wireless base. stations have three independent sectors, each with two receive antennas for dual diversity, requiring six cryoelectronic modules. Each module is then connected to one specific receive antenna via the low loss coaxial cable assembly 64. Cable assembly 68 then includes transmit cables connected to the transmit antennas and six receive cables connected directly to the cryoelectronic receiver front end. Other base stations, particularly in coverage networks use omni antennas, in which case two cryoelectronic modules may be needed for dual diversity reception. The benefit of packaging multiple cryoelectronic modules into one cryostat is the reduction in the number of cold heads needed to operate all modules at cryogenic temperatures. The limitation in the number of circuits that can be packaged in a single cryostat is the cooling power provided by the cold head, and the size of the modules. As the complexity and size of the cryoelectronic module increases it becomes increasingly more difficult to achieve a uniform temperature distribution.
In the basic embodiment of the invention, each cryoelectronic module includes a spectral filter and amplifier as shown in FIG. 2, with the filter and/or amplifier being fabricated with superconducting materials, such-as yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) or other such compounds.
FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of the basic embodiment of the cryostat as taught by the present invention. For simplicity only one cryoelectronic module is shown. The cryoelectronic module 20 includes a bandpass filter 24 and a low noise amplifier (LNA) 28 contained in a cryostat 32. The RF receive signal enters the cryostat 32 through a vacuum-tight RF feedthrough 36 and is guided to the band pass filter 24 via a short length of low-loss coaxial cable 40. The filtered signal is connected by a second length 41 of low-loss coaxial cable from the output of the filter to the input to the LNA 28. The filtered and amplified RF signal is then guided to the output RF feedthrough 48 via coaxial cable 44.
The band pass filter 24 is typically comprised of a superconducting circuit so as to minimize insertion loss and to provide sharp filter skirts. The frequency band passed by the superconducting filter is preferably matched to the spectral band licensed by the operator of the mobile radio network. For example, in United States PCS systems, the licensed bands are either 5 MHz or 15 MHz wide. The insertion loss of superconducting filter is preferably no more than about 0.5 dB, and more preferably less than about 0.3 dB. The LNA 28 may also be constructed as a superconducting planar hybrid circuit with the semiconductor device attached to a superconducting circuit board to improve performance and to further reduce metal losses. In other embodiments, more complex spectral filtering may be incorporated into the cryoelectronic module 20 and placed in the cryostat, to provide additional functionality to the base station receiver. The cryoelectronic module further may include other components, including but not limited to multi-couplers, diplexers, power dividers and splitters, limiters, mixers, phase shifters, and/or oscillators. These components may or may not be fabricated with superconducting metal as thin film planar circuits. The various circuits may be individually packaged or combined in larger packages.
The cryoelectronic modules 20 in the cryostat have a preferred operating temperature of 90% or less of the superconducting transition temperature of the superconducting material, more preferentially at or below 77° K for YBCO and at or below 90° K for TBCCO. It is further stabilized within a narrow temperature range of preferentially less than plus or minus 5° K with respect to the operating temperature. Being operated in this way inside the cryostat, the cryoelectronic module exhibits stable RF performance over a wide range of ambient temperatures.
FIG. 3 shows a pictorial drawing of the mast mounted portion of the cryoelectronic receiver front end in its basic embodiment for a single sector or omni base station. The cryostat 32 is attached to the cold head 92 and both are mounted in a weatherproof enclosure 52. The enclosure 52 has a door 100 for assembly, repair and maintenance functions. Other embodiments may use cylindrical or other enclosure shapes, with or without doors. The enclosure also includes mounting means for mounting it on an antenna mast. RF connectors 104 on the enclosure bottom provide signal input and output ports to the enclosure 52. Coaxial cables 106 provide connections between RF connectors 104 and RF ports 36 and 48 in the cryostat (being vacuum tight RF feedthroughs). The cold head cooling gas input and output lines 112 are connected to self-sealing gas connectors 116 on the bottom of the enclosure 52. Gas flow is only possible when the gas lines from the compressor 72 are connected to the cold head. Power for the cold head and the LNAs inside the cryostat is applied via power connectors 120 and 122, respectively. In other embodiments a common power connector may be used for the cold head and the LNAs. In yet another embodiment, power to the LNAs is provided via one of the coaxial cables 106 and RF connectors 104. In base stations with more than one sector, correspondingly more RF connectors 104, 36 and 48, and cables 106 are used. In other embodiments the filter and the amplifier, or any of the other components listed above are fabricated not as individual components, and connected via coaxial cables, but may be fabricated as integrated circuits on one or more common substrates.
FIG. 4 depicts one basic embodiment of the mounting of the cryoelectronic modules to the coldhead inside the cryostat 32. The coldhead 92 has connected to it a cold finger 93 that stands out into the cryostat. At the top (i.e., free) end of cold finger 93 the lowest temperature is achieved. In practice, there is a temperature gradient from the top of the adapter 94 to the bottom.
The mounting scheme, shown for single sector dual diversity applications, uses a mounting platform as the adaptor 94. The adaptor is composed of a material having a bulk conductivity of preferably at least about 2 watts/cm-° K and more preferably at least about 4 watts/cm-° K. Preferred materials are metals, such as aluminum, copper and alloys thereof, carbon, and sapphire, and composites thereof. The adaptor 94 desirably has a relatively high thermal inertia to slow the rate of heat transfer and therefore the rate of temperature rise in the system during power interruptions. Preferably, the thermal energy of the adaptor 94 ranges from about 5,000 to about 50,000 joules, more preferably from about 10,000 to about 40,000 joules, and most preferably from about 20,000 to about 30,000 joules. The ratio of the thermal energy of the adaptor to that of the cold finger preferably ranges from about 200:1 to about 100:1, and more preferably from about 50:1 to about 10:1. As will be appreciated, a number of configurations or shapes of the mounting platform can be employed to mount any two or more cryoelectronic modules at a desired position on the cold finger. Adaptor 94 is in tight thermal contact only at the top of the cold finger in order not to distribute cooling to the lower parts of the cold finger. Two cryoelectronic modules 20 are shown mounted on platform 94.
In general, it is not necessary that the amplifiers are operated at exactly the same temperature as the filters. Amplifiers can be operated at higher temperatures than the filters and still be within an acceptable degree of insertion loss. Accordingly, the amplifiers can be located at a higher temperature along the cooling gradient existing along the cold finger and/or operated at a higher temperature by placing an thermally insulative material (i.e., a material having a thermal conductivity less than that of the adaptor) between the amplifier and the adaptor 94 to slow the rate of heat transfer from the amplifier.
The cryostat also includes radiative head shielding to minimize heat loading of the cryoelectronic module via thermal radiation from the cryostat walls, which are at ambient temperature. In minimizing the heat load to the cold head, it is also preferred that the RF cables to and from the cryoelectronic modules are chosen in such a way as to minimize heat conduction. These techniques are not unique to the invention but are standard practice in cryogenic operated systems.
To monitor the performance of the mast mounted portion of the cryoelectronic receiver front end diagnostic electronics may be included in the weatherproof enclosure and inside the cryostat. These sensor signals may be transmitted either analog format or digitally to the base station via a signal bus and may be used to identify equipment faults and activate alarm functions. The analog or digital acquisition circuitry includes but is not limited to temperature sensors for the filters and low noise amplifiers, cold head motor power sensor, cryocoolant line pressure sensor, and vacuum sensors, all with the comparative logic for comparing the measured data to pre-selected operating limits. If the data equals or exceeds the operating limit(s), an alarm is produced to alert operating personnel and/or activate an RF by-pass circuit.
FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of the RF bypass circuit that can be used to minimize the impact of a failure of the closed-cycle refrigerator or of one of the cryoelectronic modules. The circuit includes a pair of single pole double throw (SPDT) RF switches 80 that are inserted between the cryoelectronic receiver module 20 and the cables 84 on the one hand and the RF ports 36, 48 of the weatherproof enclosure on the other. During normal operation of the cryoelectronic receiver front end, the RF switches 80 are set in the position that connects the antenna to the input port 36 of the cryostat and the output port 48 to the base station. When power to the cryostat is lost, the temperature in the cryostat rises above a predetermined point (usually the critical temperature of the superconducting components), the vacuum in the cryostat decreases, one of the LNA fails, or another operating parameter is exceeded, the RF switches 80 automatically switch to their alternate positions. In this position, the antenna input signal at port 36 is connected to a by-pass circuit 88 to output port 48 and the base station. The by-pass circuit can be as simple as a coaxial cable or include an amplifier and a spectral filter to maintain the performance of the receiver front end at a minimally acceptable level.
The spectral filters in the cryoelectronic module may be electronically tunable. This can for example be implemented with ferroelectric materials as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,472,935, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Tunable bandpass and bandreject filters may be used separately or in combination. The benefit of electronically tunable filters is that the frequency band can be shifted remotely without accessing the base station. Electronically tunable band reject filters may used to adaptively block strong out of band signals that are received by the antenna and degrade the signal to noise ratio of the communications channel. To provide such remote control to the cryoelectronic receiver front end, electrical control lines are added to the filter circuit that pass through the cryostat walls and are connected to a control circuit inside the weatherproof enclosure. The control circuit is then connected to the base station via additional analog or digital control lines.
Out-of-band interference can result from high RF power levels outside the band of interest creating more noise within the band of interest, which decreases the signal to noise ratio of the receiver front end. Such out-of-band signals can leak through the bandpass filter and into the amplifier. Such out-of-band interference is often due to transmit signals radiated from antennas in close proximity to the receiver front end, or to different wireless systems which service the same geographic area but operate at different frequencies. Bandpass filters are designed to reject signals outside the desired frequency range, but the magnitude of the rejection, and thus effectiveness for rejecting undesirable signals, varies as a result of filter design and filter type. It is an objective of this invention to increase the magnitude of rejection and thus decrease the out-of-band interference by using cryogenically cooled superconducting filters in the receiver front end.
As will be appreciated, such filters have the high temperature superconducting layer patterned to form a plurality of resonators that are able to convey RF signals by coupling. The superconducting layer is. deposited on the upper surface of a dielectric substrate with a conducting or superconducting ground plane being deposited on the lower substrate surface. Filters of the pinched line configuration are especially preferred. Such filters, which typically have a height of no more than about 20 mils, a width of no more than about 400 mils, and a length of no more than about 1.5 inches, provide for sharper filtering than is possible in existing base station filters. The frequency bandwidth passed by the superconducting filters preferably is less than about 60 MHz, more preferably less than about 40 MHz, and most preferably ranges from about 5 to about 15 MHz for United States PCS application. The insertion loss of superconducting filters is relatively low, i.e., preferably no more than about 1 dB, more preferably no more than about 0.7 dB, and most preferably no more than about 0.3 dB. The LNA 28 may also be constructed on a superconducting planar circuit to improve performance and to further reduce the circuit size. Other electronically tunable components such as an electronically tunable phase shifter and electronically tunable bandpass or band reject filters can also be incorporated into the cryoelectronic receiver module 20 and placed in the evacuated vessel. These components will also benefit from improved performance and reduced size when comprised of superconducting planar circuity.
FIG. 6 depicts a block diagram of a cryoelectronic receiver front end network, where several cold heads 92 a,b,c, each connected to a single evacuated vessel 32 a,b,c that houses one or more cryoelectronic modules, are all supported by a single compressor 72. Each cold head 92 a,b,c is connected to a gas manifold 124 via coolant fluid lines 128. A single pair of fluid lines 132 connects the manifold 124 to the compressor 72. For clarity, the RF connections are not shown in this figure. The configuration shown allows a single compressor 72 to support multiple mast mounted cryoelectronic receiver front ends that may be co-located on the same mast, or separated by distances up to ½ mile from the compressor. In applications,-where more cryoelectronic modules are needed than can be integrated into a single cryostat, the use of multiple mast mounted cryoelectronic receiver front ends supported by a single compressor saves installation cost.
FIG. 7 depicts a block diagram of a mast mounted cryoelectronic receiver front end supporting a base stations with three sectors in a fault-tolerant configuration. As shown here six receive antenna structures 56 a-f are used to provide a three-sectored, dual diversity antenna system. Three cryoelectronic receiver front ends 52 a-c are used, with each front end containing two cryoelectronic modules. Coax cables 64 a-f from the antenna structures 56 a-f are connected to the cryoelectronic receiver front ends 52 a-c in such a manner that the two antenna structures in each sector (α, β, and γ) are connected to separate cryoelectronic receiver front ends. In this manner, if a single cryostat fails, two sectors are degraded, but all sectors remain functional.
A further performance improvement of the present invention is possible by essentially eliminating the cable between the mast mounted cryogenic receiver front end and the receive antenna.
FIG. 8A is a simplified perspective view of an antenna configuration 136 where the antenna 56 is integrated with the mast mounted portion 53 of the cryoelectronic receiver front end. This arrangement minimizes the losses between the antenna and the receiver. Another embodiment of an integrated antenna is shown in FIG. 8B, where a linear array of conformal radiating patches 200 is part of the cylindrical weather proof enclosure 96. As will be appreciated, the conformal radiating patches substitute for the antenna 56. Such an integrated embodiment is also desirable for smart antenna systems, where cryogenically cooled tunable phase shifters are used to electronically steer the antenna beam. The phase shifters can be mounted inside the cryostat with the cryoelectronic modules. Smart antenna systems are under development now by a number of companies. Many of these systems require tunable phase shifters and control electronics co-located with the antenna structure.
FIG. 8C is a block diagram depicting the various components of a cryoelectronic receiver front end serving multiple antennas. The cryoelectronic receiver front end includes a plurality of filters 24, a plurality of LNA's 28, RF by-pass circuitry (which includes RF switches 80 and by-pass circuit 88), lightning protection circuitry 274 a-d, and evacuated vessel 32 all contained in a weatherproof enclosure 96. The coldhead 92 is served by the compressor 72 via cooling gas transport conduits 132. The cryoelectronic receiver front end has numerous RF inputs and outputs to serve the multiple Rx antennas.
FIG. 8D is a block diagram depicting the use of the outputted cooling fluid from the cryostat to cool other components located along the cooling gas transport conduit, such as a tower-mounted power amplifier for the transmission of RF signals. As will be appreciated, various components operate more efficiently at lower temperatures and/or generate heat from the conversion of electrical power into RF power. To maintain such components at desired temperature levels, the inputted or outputted cooling gas can pass through an evacuated enclosure 400 containing the components 404 a,b. In the figure, the outputted cooling fluid that has exited the cryostat is transported along cooling gas transport conduit 408. Within the housing, the fuel is expanded and provides the cooled for the components. After exiting the evacuated enclosure, the gas is transported via a cooling gas transport conduit 412 to the compressor for re-supply to the cryostat.
FIG. 9 is a block diagram depicting the use of a coaxial cable for transporting coolant fluid from the compressor 72 to the cryoelectronic receiver front end in the mast mounted portion 53. The coaxial cable 68 carries the filtered and amplified RF signal from the cryoelectronic receiver front end to the base station 144.
FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of the coaxial cable 68 showing a hollow inner conductive conduit 150 which is partially responsible for carrying the filtered and amplified RF signal, and is suspended within the outer conductor 350 of the cable 68. The cooling fluid is transported within the conduit 150.
In a first embodiment, referring again to FIG. 9, the cooling fluid is introduced into the inner conduit by using a conductive plug 310 in the conduit 150 “downstream” of the junction 154 to prevent the cooling fluid from flowing down the conduit 150 to the base station 144. Electrically insulative tubing 158 is used to input or output the cooling fluid from the compressor 72 into the conduit 150. The electrically insulative tubing prevents the filtered and amplified RF signal from being removed from the conduit 150 upstream of the station 144. Electrically insulating tubing 158 is also used to input or output the fluid from the conduit 150 into the cooler (not shown) in the cryoelectronic receiver front end 53. A conductive plug is also used to prevent the fluid from flowing up the conduit past the junction with the tubing and into the amplifier.
In a second embodiment, the fluid is transported in the volume of the coaxial cable located between the outer conductor 350 and the inner conductor 150. An electrically insulating plug 320 is located “downstream” of the junction 155 to prevent the cooling fluid from flowing down the coaxial cable 68 to the base station 144.
In a third embodiment, the two previous embodiments are combined such that the fluid is transported in both volumes of the coaxial cable. This has the advantage that the cooling gas can be delivered and removed from the cold head via a single coaxial cable. For example, cooling fluid can be transported from the compressor to the cold head through the hollow inner conductor (described in the first embodiment), and cooling fluid can be transported from the cold head to the compressor through the volume of the coaxial cable located between the outer conductor 350 and the inner conductor 150 (described in the second embodiment).
In a fourth embodiment, the coaxial cable 68 is enclosed in a hollow structure (not shown), and the cooling fluid is transported in the volume located between the inner wall of the hollow structure and the outer wall 350 of the coaxial cable 68.
These embodiments reduce the number of cables that are required between the mast mounted portion of the receiver front end and the compressor and the base station, which in turn will lower the total weight and cost of the cables.
FIGS. 11A-12 depict another embodiment of the cryoelectronic receiver front end in which components for multiple cryoelectronic receiver circuitries are located on a structure attached to the cold finger. The cold finger 201 engages a multi-sided interface structure 204 having three faces 208 a-c oriented at a common angle θ of approximately 60 degrees relative to one another. Two bandpass filters 212 a,b and two LNAs 216 a,b are located on each face. In this manner, two sets of cryoelectronic receiver front ends are located on each face (for a total of six cryoelectronic receiver front ends). This design thereby permits a single cryostat to contain the cryoelectronic receiver front ends to support a three-sectored cell site.
The interface structure 204 is preferably composed of a material having a relatively high thermal conductivity. The material preferably has a bulk conductivity of preferably at least about 2 watts/cm-° K and more preferably at least about 4 watts/cm-° K. Preferred materials are metals, such as aluminum, copper and alloys thereof, carbon, and sapphire, and composites thereof. As will be appreciated, the interface structure 204 can have more than three faces, as desired.
The interface structure 204 is connected to the cold finger 203 at the selected location 220 along the length of the cold finger that has a desired temperature (which location 220 is preferably at the highly thermally conductive plug 202). The high conductivity of the interface structure 204 permits the structure to be contacted with the cold finger at the selected point along the temperature gradient (shown in FIG. 13) existing along the length of the cold finger 203 and have the temperature of the cold finger 203 at the selected point be distributed substantially uniformly throughout the structure 204. The interface structure 204 preferably does not physically contact the cold finger at other locations along the cold finger having a higher temperature than the desired temperature of the structure; thus, a gap 205 exists around the exterior of the cold finger and the interior of the structure. If it were to physically contact the cold finger at a number of such locations, the structure 204 would have the highest (i.e., warmest) temperature of the various connection locations. As will be appreciated the interface structure and plug at the end of the cold finger can also be an integral, one-piece member.
The thermal mass of the structure 204 is important to the thermal stability of the cryoelectronic receiver front end. The structure 204 provides a small amount of thermal inertia or energy (measured in joules and referenced from 300° K to 30° K), which has the benefit of maintaining the temperature of the cryoelectronic receiver front end in the preferred operating ranges. By way of example, short interruptions of power to the compressor, such as occur during a lightning strike, can impair the performance of the cryoelectronic receiver front end. The thermal inertia of the structure 204 slows the rate of thermal transfer (i.e., slows the rate of temperature rise in the system) during such power interruptions and thereby improves system performance and reliability. The thermal energy of the structure 204 preferably ranges from about 5,000 to about 50,000 joules, more preferably from about 10,000 to about 40,000 joules, and most preferably from about 20,000 to about 30,000 joules. In relative terms, the ratio of the thermal energy of the structure 204 to that of the cold finger 203 preferably ranges from about 200:1 to about 100:1 and more preferably from about 50:1 to about 10:1.
A mounting bracket 224 mounted on each face contains two LNAs. Either side of the bracket 224 has a pair of “C” brackets to hold an LNA.
The mounting bracket 224 is composed of a material that is thermally insulative to permit the LNA to operate at its optimal operating temperature. As noted above, a temperature gradient exists along the length of the cold finger 203. Although the optimal operating temperature of the LNA is greater than the optimal operating temperature of the filter, the LNAs are preferably located nearer the end 228 of the cold finger 203 (i.e., the coldest point along the length of the cold finger 203) and the filters 212 further from the end 228 to minimize insertion losses in the coaxial cable extending from the antenna to the filters (i.e., keep the cable as short as possible). The structure 204 is preferably attached to the cold finger 203 at the point along the temperature gradient having a temperature equal to the optimal operating temperature of the filters. Because the structure 204 will have this temperature substantially uniformly throughout its volume, it is important to use a thermal insulator between the LNAs and the structure 204 to retard cooling of the LNAs to a sufficient degree to permit the LNAs to be at an optimal operating temperature. The heat generated by the operation of the LNAs coupled with the reduced rate of cooling of the LNAs from the structure 204 (due to the mounting bracket) and the acceptable rate of cooling from the coaxial cable extending between each LNA and the corresponding filter will yield a higher temperature in the LNAs than exists in the structure 204. It is preferred that the integrated thermal conductivity of the mounting bracket be about 20 watts/cm or less, more preferably about 10 watts/cm or less, and most preferably about 5 watts/cm or less. Preferred metals thus include all stainless steels, bronze, brass, nickel alloys, and all glass composites as well as any normal insulation material such as glass, plastics, fibers and the like and composites thereof. This is a simple, reliable and low cost method for maintaining the LNAs in the desired temperature range.
The size and shape of the mounting bracket 224 are also important to the heat transfer resistance of the bracket. For example, a relatively thin bracket transfers heat more readily than a relatively thick bracket, and a bracket having a relatively small cross-sectional area in contact with the structure 204 transfers heat more slowly than a bracket having a relatively large cross-sectional area. Preferably, the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the tip “t” of the “C” bracket to the length “L” of the bracket is at least about 0.50 cm, more preferably ranges from about 0.05 to about 0.03 cm and most preferably ranges from about 0.02 to about 0.01 cm. The nub 217 of the bracket which contacts the LNA has a contact area with the LNA ranging from about 0.05 cm2 to about 0.25 cm2. An alternative bracket configuration is depicted in FIG. 11B in which the mounting bracket 225 is rectangular in shape and is attached to the structure 204 on one end and a retainment bracket 226 engaging the LNA 216 on the other.
A filter module 236 is mounted below the LNAs. Each filter module 236 includes two filters 212 a,b. Each LNA is connected via a coaxial cable (not shown) to a corresponding filter in the filter module to form one cryoelectronic receiver front end. Each filter is in turn connected to an antenna by a coaxial cable and the LNA to the other base station receiver components at the base of the antenna mast also by a coaxial cable.
In another embodiment shown in FIG. 14, the positions of the filter 212 and LNA 216 relative to the end 250 of the cold finger 254 are reversed relative to those depicted in FIGS. 11-13. In this configuration, the cold finger itself is machined or otherwise fabricated to have a plurality of faces for mounting the filters and LNAs. Because the optimal operating temperature for the filter 212 is about 60° K and for the LNA 216 is about 160° K, the filter 212 is placed closer to the end 250 of the cold finger than the LNA 216. The filter 212 and LNA 216 can be placed at positions along the length of the cold finger corresponding to the optimal operating temperatures for the devices. Such placement substantially minimizes the noise figure of the cryoelectronic receiver front end.
In yet another embodiment, a two-stage cryostat can be employed. Each cooling stage would have a separate cold finger and/or attached interface structure. A two-stage cryostat would permit the LNAs and filters to be placed in separate coolers, with each cooler being controlled to produce a preferred operating temperature. In this manner, the LNAs, which generally require a higher operating temperature for optimal performance, are cooled in a separate cooler from the filters.
In any of the embodiments discussed above, the cryostat is relatively compact and thermally and mechanically stable with excellent microwave performance. By way of example, the substantially cylindrical evacuated vessel typically has a height of no more than about 18 inches and a diameter of no more than about 8 inches. The enclosure containing the cryostat and the cryoelectronic receiver front end is also substantially cylindrical and has a height of no more than about 22 inches and a diameter of no more than about 10 inches.
Referring again to FIG. 14, the position of the evacuated vessel 260 containing multiple cryoelectronic receiver front end circuitries 262 a,b,c in the structure for the weatherproof enclosure (not shown) is depicted. The structure houses a number of other components, including lowpass filters 266 for nulling higher order passbands that cannot be processed by the superconducting filter, RF by-pass circuitry 270, lightning protection circuitry 274 a,b,c, for grounding electromagnetic radiation surges, such as-from lightning, that are conducted by any one of the inputs to the analog or digital acquisition circuitry, the coaxial cable leading from the cryoelectronic receiver front end to the other receiver components, or the coaxial cable extending from the antenna to the cryoelectronic receiver front end, and AC/DC converter for supplying power to the analog or digital acquisition circuitry. The combination of these features provide a device that is extremely sensitive and reliable and possesses significant system enhancements over the prior art.
The cryoelectronic receiver front end of this embodiment is more stable after installation than the cryoelectronic receiver front end of the prior embodiment. Because all three of the cryoelectronic receiver front end circuitries are in one evacuated vessel 260 and one weatherproof enclosure, the overall volume of the cryostats is significantly reduced. Accordingly, because wind loading decreases as the volume of the cryostat decreases, the cryoelectronic receiver front end is more stable when exposed to the wind loads encountered when it is mounted on an antenna mast. Further stability to wind loading can be realized from constructing the enclosure in a cylindrical shape.
In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, a cryoelectronic cooling device using a variable speed motor is provided. Referring to FIG. 17, the variable speed motor controls the rate at which the cooling and exhaust gas valves are opened and closed. The cold finger 254 is cooled by compressed gas that enters the cold finger via the cooling valve and expands. After the cooling cycle, the gas is exhausted via the exhaust valve and is routed through the heat exchanger (not shown) and compressor 72. The cycle is then repeated. The speed at which the cooling and exhaust valves open and close is controlled by the variable speed motor attached to the cold finger 254. The temperature of the cold finger 254 can be controlled by varying the speed at which the motor opens and closes the valves; thus, increasing the motor speed increases the cooling capacity of the cold finger and lowers the temperature of the cold finger and vice versa. As noted above, a gas compressor is remotely located from the cooling device by two flexible, high-pressure hoses.
Presently, coldhead motors are constant speed and are operated at maximum speed and power. The temperature of the coldhead (or cold finger) is raised by attaching a heater, such as a resistive wire which dissipates electrical current as heat, and varying the current through the heater. This approach works well if the heat load of the cryocooler is small compared to the cooling capacity, and if power required to operate the cryocooler at full power is not a significant concern. However, for cryoelectronic receiver front ends, power consumption is a significant concern. The amount of electrical power available to supply cooling power for the coldhead is limited because it is expensive to route electrical cables and transmit electrical energy to the top of a tower.
Referring to FIG. 17, the cryoelectronic cooling device 500 of the present invention includes the variable speed motor 504, a motor mount 508, cooling and exhaust gas inputs 512 a,b, base tube assembly 516, displacer tube 520, heat exchanger 524, rotary valve 528, valve plate 532, stem assembly 536, displacer top bumper 540, displacer 544, displacer bottom bumper 548, base plate 550, and regenerator 552. The stem assembly includes a stem seal retainer 556, a stem seal 560, and a stem 564. The motor 504 and valve plate 532 pneumatically drive the displacer 544. The displacer 544 is made from an thermal insulating material and is driven by the cooling gas which is introduced into the stem channel 568 through a cooling gas port 572 and exhausted through the output channel 576 and the exhaust port 580. The gas is inputted or outputted via the valve plate 532 and rotary valve 528. The regenerator 552 is housed within the displacer 544. The displacer 544 is in fluid communication with a space on either side of the displacer. The displacer moves up and down within the displacer tube 520.
In operation, the cooling fluid is introduced into the regenerator 552 when the cooling gas port 572 is opened and the displacer is at or near the displacer bottom bumper. The cooling fluid is cooled as it passes through the regenerator and the cooled fluid enters into the cold end of the cold finger causing the displacer to rise to the displacer top bumper 540. The exhaust port 580 is opened to allow the fluid to expand and cool. The displacer is lowered as the fluid exits through the output valve and the process is repeated. The reliability of the system results from maintaining a low pressure differential across the seals in the displacer (i.e., across the upper and lower ends of the displacer), the use of room temperature input and output valves, and the complete removal of entrained compressor lubricating fluid from the cooling fluid.
The variable speed motor can be any motor, such as a DC stepper motor, which can displace the valve plate at differing speeds, depending upon the desired temperature at the end of the cold finger 254 (which refers to the portion of the device 500 enclosed by the displacer tube 520.
To control the speed of the motor and therefore the temperature of the cold finger 254, a temperature sensor 584 is placed at a location of the cold finger (which is typically the free end of the cold finger), and an output signal from the sensor is used via a control feedback loop to control the speed of the motor to realize the desired cooling rate and temperature of the cold finger. The control feedback loop can is include an actuating device 588 for controlling the motor speed. The actuating device can be an analog circuit, a microprocessor, or other well-known circuitry.
The use of a variable speed motor to drive the valve plate has numerous benefits. First, the speed of the motor can be controlled to produce an optimum rate of cooling in the cold finger. Cryocoolers generally have an optimum motor speed, or rate of displacement of the valve plate, that varies depending upon the cold finger temperature profile. The optimum motor speed is that speed causing the maximum cooling rate of the cold finger. Thus, if the cold head is at a higher temperature than the desired temperature, the motor speed can be increased to more rapidly cool the cold head to the desired temperature. When the desired temperature is realized, the motor speed can be reduced to a speed sufficient to maintain the desired temperature. Second, the use of a variable speed motor can significantly prolong the life of the motor and of the cryoelectronic cooling device. As will be appreciated, a constant speed motor, such as an AC synchronous motor, operating at maximum speed can have a significantly shorter operating life than a variable speed motor, which can operate at lower speeds. The reliability of the cryocooler is fundamental to the success of cryoelectronic receiver front ends. Third, the power consumption of a variable speed motor can be significantly less than the power consumption of a constant speed motor. Finally, the heat load of the tower-mounted receiver front end is much larger than usually encountered in standard cryocooler applications, and imposing an additional heat load via the resistive heater is inefficient and a waste of electrical power.
The performances of a conventional base station having the components shown in FIG. 15A and of a base station according to the present invention having the components shown in FIG. 15B were compared. The performances were tested under actual conditions using the same mobile station. The results of the tests are presented in FIGS. 16A and 16B. The vertical axis plots the percent residual bit error rate (“RBER”) and the horizontal axis the input signal power of the mobile station. The graph shows that for a smaller mobile station input signal level, one can achieve the same RBER (i.e., accuracy) with the base station of FIG. 15B as with the base station of FIG. 15A. Stated another way, for a given mobile station input signal power, the base station of FIG. 15B provides a superior RBER than the base station of FIG. 15A. It has been discovered that the base station of FIG. 15B has at least a 6 dB improvement in bit-per-second receiver sensitivity compared to that of FIG. 15A.
Modifications and adaptations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. It is to be expressly understood, however, that such modifications and adaptations are within the scope of the present invention, as set forth in the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3564546||Aug 10, 1959||Feb 16, 1971||Sperry Rand Corp||Countermeasures system utilizing superconductive frequency memory device|
|US3694753||Aug 7, 1970||Sep 26, 1972||Arndt George D||System for improving signal-to-noise ratio of a communication signal|
|US3730967||May 13, 1970||May 1, 1973||Air Reduction||Cryogenic system including hybrid superconductors|
|US3902143||Jun 27, 1974||Aug 26, 1975||Clauss Robert C||Refrigerated coaxial coupling|
|US3931623||May 31, 1974||Jan 6, 1976||Communications Satellite Corporation||Reliable earth terminal for satellite communications|
|US4494244||Feb 14, 1983||Jan 15, 1985||Alfred Arndt||Step-off device for aircraft voice communication system|
|US4565972||Mar 18, 1985||Jan 21, 1986||Tx Rx Systems, Inc.||Tower mounted preamplifier|
|US4763132||Aug 6, 1987||Aug 9, 1988||Andrew Corporation||Resilient one piece waveguide hanger interlockable with antenna tower|
|US4996188||Jul 28, 1989||Feb 26, 1991||Motorola, Inc.||Superconducting microwave filter|
|US5006825||Oct 14, 1988||Apr 9, 1991||Thomson-Cf||Coaxial line coupler with fluid cooled inner conductor|
|US5010304||Nov 3, 1989||Apr 23, 1991||General Electric Company||Cryogenically-cooled radio-frequency power amplifier|
|US5020138||Mar 28, 1990||May 28, 1991||Sony Corporation||Radio communication apparatus having cooling means|
|US5120705||Aug 22, 1990||Jun 9, 1992||Motorola, Inc.||Superconducting transmission line cable connector providing capacative and thermal isolation|
|US5123080||Jan 8, 1990||Jun 16, 1992||Ranco Incorporated Of Delaware||Compressor drive system|
|US5157928||May 20, 1991||Oct 27, 1992||Helix Technology Corporation||Electronically controlled cryopump|
|US5215959||May 18, 1992||Jun 1, 1993||University Of California, Berkeley||Devices comprised of discrete high-temperature superconductor chips disposed on a surface|
|US5244869||Oct 23, 1990||Sep 14, 1993||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Superconducting microwave frequency selective filter system|
|US5347168||Aug 21, 1992||Sep 13, 1994||American Superconductor Corporation||Cryogenic electronics power supply and power sink|
|US5443368||Jul 16, 1993||Aug 22, 1995||Helix Technology Corporation||Turbomolecular pump with valves and integrated electronic controls|
|US5472935||Dec 1, 1992||Dec 5, 1995||Yandrofski; Robert M.||Tuneable microwave devices incorporating high temperature superconducting and ferroelectric films|
|US5535593||Aug 22, 1994||Jul 16, 1996||Hughes Electronics||Apparatus and method for temperature control of a cryocooler by adjusting the compressor piston stroke amplitude|
|US5604925||Apr 28, 1995||Feb 18, 1997||Raytheon E-Systems||Super low noise multicoupler|
|US5968876||Apr 21, 1997||Oct 19, 1999||Conductus, Inc.||Compressable tuning element for microwave resonators and method of making same|
|US6104934||Feb 12, 1997||Aug 15, 2000||Spectral Solutions, Inc.||Cryoelectronic receiver front end|
|US6205340||Aug 9, 1996||Mar 20, 2001||Spectral Solutions, Inc.||Cryoelectronic receiver front end for mobile radio systems|
|US6212404||Jul 29, 1998||Apr 3, 2001||K&L Microwave Inc.||Cryogenic filters|
|WO1997006606A1||Aug 9, 1996||Feb 20, 1997||Superconducting Core Technologies, Inc.||Cryolectronic receiver front end for mobile radio systems|
|1||"ClearSite(TM) Front-End Receiver Subsystem Model 110C-A & Model 110C-B: High-Temperature Superconducting Front-End Subsystem for Cellular Base Stations," Installation and Operations Manual, Conductus, Inc. 1998, pp. 1-1 to 6-2.|
|2||"Illinois Superconductor Receives Second Patent on Thick Film HTS"; Superconductivity News, Conductus Reports Fiscal Year Results; vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 1-2, Feb. 19, 1996.|
|3||"ClearSite™ Front-End Receiver Subsystem Model 110C-A & Model 110C-B: High-Temperature Superconducting Front-End Subsystem for Cellular Base Stations," Installation and Operations Manual, Conductus, Inc. 1998, pp. 1-1 to 6-2.|
|4||Andersen, Jĝrgen Bach, Theodore S. Rappaport, and Susumu Yoshida; Propagation Measurements and Models for Wireless Communications Channels: IEEE Communications Magazine; Jan. 1995; pp. 42-49.|
|5||Barnes et al., "Some Microwave Applications of Basrti03 and High Temperature Superconductors" Integrated Ferroelectrics, 8:171-184 (1995).|
|6||Barthle et al., "Trends in Design of Communications Satellite Earth Stations," The Microwave Journal, Oct. 1967.|
|7||Bhasin, K.B., S.S. Tonchich, C.M. Chorey, R.R. Bonetti and A.E. Williams; Preformance of a Y-Ba-Cu-O Superconducting Filter/GaAs Low Noise Amplifier Hybrid Circuit; IEEE MTT-S Digest;1992; pp. 481-483.|
|8||Conductus Demonstrates Thin-Film 19-Pole Microwave Filter; Superconductor Week; Mar. 27, 1995; p. 6.|
|9||Dogan et al., "PCS trailblazers take on risks for chance at bountiful market"; Radio Communications Report, 14(18), 3 pages (1995).|
|10||Drolet, Daniel J., "A Hybrid High-Tc Superconductor Filter/Low-Noise Amplifier Microwave Integrated Circuit," Carleton University, Mar. 1994, pp. i-116.|
|11||Drolet; D., S. Meszaros, M.G. Stubbs and J.S. Wight; A hydrid high-Tc superconductor k-band amplifier with filter; presented at the 22nd European Microwaves Conference, Sep. 6-9, 1993 at Madrid, Spain.|
|12||Duzer, T. Van, "Application of High-Temperature Superconductors to Electronic Devices," FED HiTcSe-Ed Workshop, Jun., 1988, pp. 303-304.|
|13||Forse et al., "35 GHz Downconverter Using HTS Films," SPIE, vol. 2156, pp. 80-87.|
|14||Garg et al., AT&T "Wireless and Personal Communications Systems", pp. 39-43, 85, 88-89, 127, 132-135, 151-153 (Prentice-Hall pub.) 1996.|
|15||Golestaneh et al., "The Effect of Adjacent Channel Interference on the Capacity of FDMA Cellular Systems," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 43, No. 4, Nov. 1994, pp. 946-953.|
|16||Goodman, David J.; Trends in Cellular and Cordless Communications; IEEE Communications Magazine; Jun. 1991; pp. 31-40.|
|17||Grandhi, et al., "Distributed Power Control in Cellular Radio Systems," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 42, No. 2/3/4, Feb./Mar./Apr. 1994, pp. 226-228.|
|18||Hammond et al., "Designing with Superconductors," IEEE Spectrum, Apr. 1993, pp. 34-39.|
|19||Hammond et al., "High-Tc Microwave Superconductors and Applications," SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2156, Jan. 1994, index pp. i-ix.|
|20||HTS Filter Applications: Cellular Telephone Base Station Equipment, Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc., Jan. 1994, pp. I-1 to A3.|
|21||International Workshop on High-Temperature Superconducting Electron Devices, May, 1994.|
|22||Javadi, et al. "Low-Noise Hybrid Superconductor/Semiconductor 7.4 GHz Receiver Downconverter for NASA Space Applications," SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2156, Jan. 1994, pp. 101-106.|
|23||Kchao et al., "Analysis ofa direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum Cellular Radio System"; IEEE Transactions on Communications, 41(10):1507-1516 (1993).|
|24||Kirschman, Randall K., "Low-Temperature Electronics," IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, vol. 6, No. 2, Mar. 1990, pp. 2-12.|
|25||Kohno, Ryuji, Rueven Meidan, and Laurence B. Milstein: Spread Spectrum Access Methods for Wireless Communications; IEEE Communications Magazine; Jan. 1995; pp. 58-67.|
|26||Levy et al., "A History of Microwave Filter Research, Design, and Development," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-32, No. 9, Sep. 1984, pp. 1055 & 1064.|
|27||Liberti, Jr., et al., "Analytical Results for Capacity Improvements in CDMA," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 43, No. 3, Nov. 1994, pp. 680-690.|
|28||Little et al., Development of A Low Cost, Cryogenic Refrigeration System For Cooling Of Cryoelectronics; Adv. Cryog. Eng. 1994.|
|29||Matthael et al., "Theory and Design of Diplexers and Multiplexers," Advances in Microwaves, vol. 2, 1967, pp. 237-247.|
|30||Microwaves & RF, "The Wireless Solution Site," Motorola, Inc., Apr. 1997, 2 pages.|
|31||Naval Studies Board, "Superconductive Electronics," National Academy Press, May 1984, pp. 1-36.|
|32||Nisenoff et al., "High Temperature Superconductivity Space Experiment (HTSSE): Passive Milimeter Wave Devices," SPIE, vol. 1394, 1990, pp. 104-113.|
|33||O'Hanlon; "A User's Guide to Vacuum Technology"; A Wiley-Interscience Publication; pps. 230-236.|
|34||Padgett, Jay E., Christoph G. Günther, and Takeshi Hattori; Overview of Wireless Personal Communications; IEEE Communications Magazine; Jan. 1995; pp. 28-41.|
|35||Pettai, Raoul, "Noise in Receiving Systems," Wiley-Interscience, Jan. 7, 1984, pp. 108-123.|
|36||Robertson, Mark, "Tow Applications of HTS Technology on an Airborn Platform," SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2156, Jan. 1994, pp. 13-20.|
|37||Ryan, Paul A., "High-Temperature Superconductivity for Avionic Electronic Warfare and Radar Systems," SPIE, vol. 2156, 1994, pp. 2-12.|
|38||Scharen et al., "Filter Subsystems for Wireless Communications," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 7, No. 2, Jun. 1997, pp. 3744-3749.|
|39||Simon, Randy, "High-Tc Thin Films and Electronic Devices," Physics Today, Jun. 1991, pp. 64-70.|
|40||Talisa et al., "High-Temperature Superconducting Four-Channel Filterbanks," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconducitivity, vol. 5, No. 2, Jun. 1995, pp. 2079-2082.|
|41||Topical Meeting on High-Temperature Superconducting Electron Devices, Jun. 1988 Table of Contents.|
|42||U.S. Statutory Invention Registration, Conrad, Reg. No. H653, Published Jul. 4, 1989.|
|43||Viterbi et al., "Other-Cell Interference in Cellular Power-Controlled CDMA," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 42, No. 2/3/4, Feb./Mar./Apr. 1994, pp. 1501-1504.|
|44||Viterbi et al., "Performance of Power-Controlled Wideband Terrestrial Digital Communiction"; IEEE Transactions on Communications, 41(4):559-568 (1993).|
|45||Westerveld, Rudi, and Ramjee Prasad; Rural Communications in India Using Fixed Cellular Radio Systems; IEEE Communications Magazine; Oct. 1994; pp. 70-77.|
|46||Whitehead, James F.; Cellular System Design; An Emerging Engineering Discipline; IEEE Communications Magazine; Feb. 1986; pp. 8-15.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6735450 *||Nov 16, 2000||May 11, 2004||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for wireless outdoor environment communications networks|
|US6968210 *||Jun 20, 2002||Nov 22, 2005||Hitachi Kokusai Electric, Inc.||Receiving apparatus|
|US6999741 *||Nov 29, 2001||Feb 14, 2006||Nec Corporation||Signal processor and cooling method of the same, and radio receiver including the signal processor and cooling method of the same|
|US7009455 *||Mar 15, 2004||Mar 7, 2006||Kyocera Wireless Corp.||Tunable power amplifier matching circuit|
|US7084823||Feb 26, 2004||Aug 1, 2006||Skycross, Inc.||Integrated front end antenna|
|US7174737 *||Feb 26, 2003||Feb 13, 2007||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Refrigeration plant for parts of installation, which are to be chilled|
|US7206605 *||Feb 8, 2002||Apr 17, 2007||Nec Corporation||Radio receiver|
|US7277728 *||May 5, 2000||Oct 2, 2007||Nokia Corporation||Base station of a communication network, preferably of a mobile telecommunication network|
|US7433331 *||Oct 20, 2003||Oct 7, 2008||Motorola, Inc.||Circuit and method for adapting to reverse link limited channels|
|US7477902 *||Sep 29, 2005||Jan 13, 2009||Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc.||Capacity allocation in a wireless communication system|
|US7519331 *||Aug 10, 2006||Apr 14, 2009||Nortel Networks Limited||Basestation maintenance systems and method|
|US7541972||Dec 7, 2007||Jun 2, 2009||Src, Inc.||RF attenuation circuit|
|US7720443||Jun 2, 2003||May 18, 2010||Kyocera Wireless Corp.||System and method for filtering time division multiple access telephone communications|
|US7746292||Sep 14, 2004||Jun 29, 2010||Kyocera Wireless Corp.||Reconfigurable radiation desensitivity bracket systems and methods|
|US8064958 *||Mar 11, 2004||Nov 22, 2011||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Method device base station and site for reducing the number of feeders in an antenna diversity diversity system|
|US8228840||Jun 15, 2004||Jul 24, 2012||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Antenna diversity arrangement and method|
|US8237620||Feb 1, 2010||Aug 7, 2012||Kyocera Corporation||Reconfigurable radiation densensitivity bracket systems and methods|
|US8258942||Jan 24, 2008||Sep 4, 2012||Cellular Tracking Technologies, LLC||Lightweight portable tracking device|
|US8401491 *||Mar 16, 2009||Mar 19, 2013||Research In Motion Limited||Basestation maintenance systems and method|
|US8478205||Apr 16, 2010||Jul 2, 2013||Kyocera Corporation||System and method for filtering time division multiple access telephone communications|
|US8571543||Sep 14, 2012||Oct 29, 2013||Blackberry Limited||Basestation maintenance systems and method|
|US8885340 *||Jul 7, 2010||Nov 11, 2014||Callisto France||Dual-performance low noise amplifier for satellite-based radiofrequency communication|
|US20020065055 *||Nov 29, 2001||May 30, 2002||Nec Corporation||Signal processor and cooling method of the same, and radio receiver including the signal processor and cooling method of the same|
|US20020149439 *||Feb 14, 2002||Oct 17, 2002||Toncich Stanley S.||Tunable isolator|
|US20030027596 *||Jun 20, 2002||Feb 6, 2003||Yoichi Okubo||Receiving apparatus|
|US20030179051 *||Mar 17, 2003||Sep 25, 2003||Jun Hattori||Low-temperature high-frequency amplifying apparatus and wireless apparatus|
|US20040174220 *||Mar 15, 2004||Sep 9, 2004||Toncich Stanley S.||Tunable power amplifier matching circuit|
|US20040227683 *||Feb 26, 2004||Nov 18, 2004||Caimi Frank M.||Integrated front end antenna|
|US20040263411 *||Jul 26, 2004||Dec 30, 2004||Jorge Fabrega-Sanchez||System and method for dual-band antenna matching|
|US20050007291 *||Jul 26, 2004||Jan 13, 2005||Jorge Fabrega-Sanchez||System and method for impedance matching an antenna to sub-bands in a communication band|
|US20050020229 *||Feb 8, 2002||Jan 27, 2005||Wataru Hattori||Radio receiver|
|US20050057322 *||Oct 26, 2004||Mar 17, 2005||Toncich Stanley S.||Apparatus and method for combining electrical signals|
|US20050057414 *||Sep 14, 2004||Mar 17, 2005||Gregory Poilasne||Reconfigurable radiation desensitivity bracket systems and methods|
|US20050083234 *||Sep 14, 2004||Apr 21, 2005||Gregory Poilasne||Wireless device reconfigurable radiation desensitivity bracket systems and methods|
|US20050083871 *||Oct 20, 2003||Apr 21, 2005||Motorola Inc.||Circuit and method for adapting to reverse link limited channels|
|US20050085200 *||Nov 5, 2004||Apr 21, 2005||Toncich Stanley S.||Antenna interface unit|
|US20050085204 *||Jul 26, 2004||Apr 21, 2005||Gregory Poilasne||Full-duplex antenna system and method|
|US20050095998 *||Nov 5, 2004||May 5, 2005||Toncich Stanley S.||Tunable matching circuit|
|US20050148312 *||Feb 16, 2005||Jul 7, 2005||Toncich Stanley S.||Bandpass filter with tunable resonator|
|US20050150242 *||Feb 26, 2003||Jul 14, 2005||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Refrigeration plant for parts of installation, which are to be chilled|
|US20050176372 *||Feb 5, 2004||Aug 11, 2005||Wheat International Communications Corporation||Highly integrated reliable architectural radio system for maritime application|
|US20050181783 *||Sep 28, 2004||Aug 18, 2005||Nextel Communications, Inc.||Mobile satellite system|
|US20050207518 *||Feb 16, 2005||Sep 22, 2005||Toncich Stanley S||Constant-gain phase shifter|
|US20060009174 *||Jul 9, 2004||Jan 12, 2006||Doug Dunn||Variable-loss transmitter and method of operation|
|US20060270368 *||Jul 10, 2006||Nov 30, 2006||Caimi Frank M||Integrated Front End Antenna|
|US20070072645 *||Sep 29, 2005||Mar 29, 2007||Clark Andrew C||Capacity allocation in a wireless communication system|
|US20070077967 *||Aug 10, 2006||Apr 5, 2007||Nortel Networks Limited||Basestation Maintenance Systems and Method|
|US20070135160 *||Nov 30, 2005||Jun 14, 2007||Jorge Fabrega-Sanchez||Method for tuning a GPS antenna matching network|
|US20070191064 *||Mar 11, 2004||Aug 16, 2007||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Method device base station and site for reducing the number of feeders in an antenna diversity diversity system|
|US20090146868 *||Dec 7, 2007||Jun 11, 2009||Syracuse Research Corporation||Rf attenuation circuit|
|US20090176531 *||Mar 16, 2009||Jul 9, 2009||Charles Nicholls||Basestation Maintenance Systems And Method|
|US20100127950 *||Feb 1, 2010||May 27, 2010||Gregory Poilasne||Reconfigurable radiation densensitivity bracket systems and methods|
|US20120140413 *||Jul 7, 2010||Jun 7, 2012||Callisto France||Dual-performance low noise amplifier for satellite-based radiofrequency communication|
|WO2009114738A2 *||Mar 12, 2009||Sep 17, 2009||Hypres, Inc.||Digital radio-frequency tranceiver system and method|
|WO2009114738A3 *||Mar 12, 2009||Dec 23, 2009||Hypres, Inc.||Digital radio-frequency tranceiver system and method|
|U.S. Classification||455/561, 455/117, 455/217|
|International Classification||H04B1/00, H04B1/28, F25B9/14, H04B1/036, H04B1/18, H04B1/16|
|Cooperative Classification||F25B9/14, H04B1/16, H04B1/28, H04B1/18, H04B1/036, H04B1/00|
|European Classification||H04B1/18, H04B1/16|
|Feb 27, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SUPERCONDUCTING CORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., COLORADO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PATTON, DAVID O.;KOEPF, GERHARD A.;ARENTZ, ROBERT F.;ANDOTHERS;REEL/FRAME:011555/0978
Effective date: 19961009
Owner name: SUPERCONDUCTING CORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., COLORADO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PATTON, DAVID O.;YANDROFSKI, ROBERT M.;KOEPF, GERHARD A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:011555/0989
Effective date: 19961009
|Jul 13, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SPECTRAL SOLUTIONS, INC., COLORADO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SPECTRAL SOLUTIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012002/0775
Effective date: 20010710
|Oct 15, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ISCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SPECTRAL SOLUTIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012263/0990
Effective date: 20010710
|Nov 13, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ELLIOT ASSOCIATES, L.P., NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012153/0422
Effective date: 20011106
Owner name: ALEXANDER FINANCE, LP, ILLINOIS
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012153/0422
Effective date: 20011106
|Jan 23, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ALEXANDER FINANCE, LP, ILLINOIS
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ISCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.;ELLIOTT ASSOCIATES, L.P.;ALEXANDER FINANCE, LP;REEL/FRAME:013663/0591
Effective date: 20021210
Owner name: MANCHESTER SECURITIES CORPORATION, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ISCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.;ELLIOTT ASSOCIATES, L.P.;ALEXANDER FINANCE, LP;REEL/FRAME:013663/0591
Effective date: 20021210
|Sep 9, 2003||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Dec 13, 2006||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|May 27, 2007||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Jul 17, 2007||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20070527