|Publication number||US6578974 B2|
|Application number||US 09/948,801|
|Publication date||Jun 17, 2003|
|Filing date||Sep 7, 2001|
|Priority date||May 18, 2000|
|Also published as||US6585383, US6612706, US20010055166, US20020018311, US20020030905, US20020044365, WO2001088595A2, WO2001088595A3|
|Publication number||09948801, 948801, US 6578974 B2, US 6578974B2, US-B2-6578974, US6578974 B2, US6578974B2|
|Inventors||Roger Jonathan Helkey|
|Original Assignee||Calient Networks, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (99), Non-Patent Citations (11), Referenced by (2), Classifications (11), Legal Events (5) |
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Micromachined apparatus for improved reflection of light
US 6578974 B2
A micromachined apparatus for reflecting light is described that is designed to reduce losses in quality or intensity of light. Mirrors are used having lengths that are longer than their widths to reduce clipping of light when a mirror is located at an angle with respect to light falling thereon. Relatively long mirror torsion components are used to reduce forces required to pivot the mirrors. Regardless of the dimensions of the mirrors and the use of long torsion components, the mirrors are still located relatively close to one another. The relatively close positioning of the mirrors is due to a combined use of notches formed in support frames to which the torsion components are secured, oval shapes of the mirrors which take up less space than rectangular shapes, matching oval openings in the support frames, and the arrangement of the support frames in a non-rectangular array wherein tips of the support frames are located between one another.
What is claimed is:
1. A micromachined apparatus for reflecting light, comprising:
a support structure;
a plurality of support frames pivotally secured to the support structure and being located in first and second substantially parallel lines, the support frames in the first line pivoting about a first support frame axis and the support frames in the second line pivoting about a second support frame axis which is spaced and substantially parallel to the first support frame axis, a respective support frame in the second line being partially located between adjacent ones of the two of the support frames in the first line; and
a plurality of mirrors, each being secured to a respective support frame so as to be pivotal about a respective mirror axis transverse to a respective support frame axis about which the support frame pivots.
2. An apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising an electrostatic barrier structure located between the support frames and being formed so as to completely surround each support frame.
This is a divisional from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/574,660, filed May 18, 2000.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a micromachined apparatus for reflecting light.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Optical fibers are commonly used in networks such as the Internet. Optical fibers are often bundled together in an array, each carrying different signals of light. In certain instances the signals of light carried by the different optical fibers have to be switched into a different arrangement. The optical fibers are provided as input fibers into an optical switch and further optical fibers are provided as output fibers from the optical switch. A micromachined apparatus for reflecting light from the input optical fibers is located in a path of light being emitted from the input optical fibers. The micromachined apparatus for reflecting light usually has an array of mirrors which are arranged in a manner similar to the input optical fibers. Each mirror reflects light from a respective input optical fiber to the output optical fibers. Each mirror can be pivoted so that the light reflected therefrom is directed to a selected one of the output optical fibers.
Losses in quality and intensity of the light used in such a switch may occur. Losses may be due to the mirrors being located too far apart or due to clipping of edges of bundles of light when the mirrors are located at an angle to the bundles of light. Locating the mirrors too close to one another may, however, require forces that are too high for purposes of pivoting the mirrors against torsion spring forces which tend to restore the mirrors.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A micromachined apparatus for reflecting light is provided comprising a support structure and a plurality of mirrors. Each mirror is pivotally secured to the support structure. A first to a third adjacent ones of the mirrors are located at corners of a first triangle. Each corner of the triangle is less than 90°.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description that follows below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a micromachined apparatus for reflecting light according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional side view on 2—2 in FIG. 1; and
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional side view on 3—3 in FIG. 1.
A micromachined apparatus for reflecting light is described that is designed to reduce losses in quality or intensity of light. “Micromachined” refers to structures fabricated by selective etching or deposition. As described in more detail below mirrors are used having lengths that are longer than their widths to reduce clipping of light when a mirror is located at an angle with respect to light falling thereon. Relatively long mirror torsion components are used to reduce forces required to pivot the mirrors. Regardless of the dimensions of the mirrors and the use of long torsion components, the mirrors are still located relatively close to one another. The relatively close positioning of the mirrors is due to a combined use of notches formed in support frames to which the torsion components are secured, oval shapes of the mirrors which take up less space than rectangular shapes, matching oval openings in the support frames, and the arrangement of the support frames in a non-rectangular array wherein tips of the support frames are located between one another.
FIG. 1 to FIG. 3 of the accompanying drawings illustrate a micromachined apparatus 10 for reflecting light according to an embodiment of the invention. The apparatus 10 includes a substrate 12, a support structure 14, a plurality of support frames 16, and a plurality of mirrors 18 and may be manufactured utilizing photographic techniques, ion etching techniques or any other technique as will be evident to a person skilled in the art.
The support structure 14 is formed on the substrate 12 so as to be secured to the substrate 12. The support structure 14 is in the form of a honeycomb defining generally hexagonal openings. In one implementation, the substrate is fabricated from silicon, the support structure 14 is formed by a reactive ion etching of silicon, and the mirrors 18 are formed by etching silicon.
Each frame 16 is formed to define an oval opening 20. Deep notches 22A and 22B are formed in a surface of the oval opening 20. The notches 22A and 22B are formed at 0° and 180° about the oval opening 20, respectively. Notches 24A and 24B are also formed in an outer surface of the frame 16. The notches 24A and 24B are located at 90° and 270° on the outer surface of the support frame 16.
The oval shape 20 has a length L1 and a width W1. The length L1 extends between the notches 22A and 22B and the width W1 between the notches 24A and 24B. The length L1 is typically about 320 microns and the width W1 is about 270 microns. The oval shape 20 thus has a long axis between the notches 22A and 22B. Because of the oval shape 20 and its orientation, and to allow for the notches 22A and 22B to be formed, the frame 16 has a length L2 and a width W2 wherein the length L2 is much larger that the width W2. The frame 16 thus takes up more space along its length L2 than along its width W2. The length L2 is typically about 520 microns and the width W2 about 340 microns.
Each frame 16 is located within a respective opening in the support structure 14 and is secured to the support structure 14 with two frame torsion components 26. Each frame torsion component 26 has a first end 28 and a second, opposing end 30. The first end 28 is non-rotationally secured to the support structure 14. The frame torsion component 26 extends from the first end 28 into a respective one of the notches 24A or 24B, and the second end 30 is non-rotationally secured to the frame 16. The frame 16 is thereby suspended above the substrate 12 by the frame torsion components 26. The frame 16 has a minimum spacing S as measured from directly next to the notch 24A to the support structure 14. The frame torsion component 26 has a torsion length from the end 26 to the end 30 which is more than the minimum spacing S.
The frame 16 can be pivoted about an axis through the frame torsion components 26. The entire length of each frame torsion component 26, i.e. from its end 28 to its end 30, winds up, or twists against a torsion spring force thereof, thus tending to return the frame 16 to its original position. It can thus be seen that, although the minimum spacing S can be kept relatively small, each spring torsion component 26 has a torsion length that is relatively long, in particular longer than the minimum spacing S. By keeping the torsion length relatively long, a torsion spring constant of each spring portion component can be increased with a corresponding decrease in torsion required to pivot the frame 16 by a predetermined degree. The relatively long torsion length is allowed for due to the extra space provided by the notch 24A or 24B. Another thinner frame having less material may also provide a similar amount of space but may include too little material for purposes of strength. The notches 24A or 24B thus provide additional space while maintaining strength in the frame 16.
The frames 16 are located in a nonrectangular array. The frames 16A, 16B, and 16C pivot about a common frame axis 31 and the frames 16D, 16E, and 16F pivot about a common frame axis 32 which is parallel to and spaced from the frame axis 31. A line can be constructed from a center point of an oval opening 20 of one frame (e.g. 16A) to an oval opening 20 of an adjacent frame (e.g. 16D). By constructing such lines between adjacent oval openings 20, it can be seen that center points of the oval openings 20 are located at corners of contiguous triangles. For example, the oval openings 20 of the frames 16A, 16B, and 16D are located respectively at corners 40, 42, and 44 of one triangle. Each corner, 40, 42, and 44 is less than 90°. The corners 40 and 42 are equal to one another. By so locating the frames 16, a zigzag pattern is created following center points of oval openings of the frames 16A, 16D, 16B, 16E, 16C, and 16F.
Each oval opening 20 has a center line 46 extending along its length L1. The center line 46 of the oval opening 16D is spaced and parallel to the center line 46 of the oval opening 20 of the frame 16A. Similarly, the center line 46 of the oval opening 20 of the frame 16B is spaced and parallel to the center line 46A of the oval opening 20 of the frame 16D, and so on. By so locating the frames 16, a tip 50 of the frame 16D near the notch 22B thereof can be located between tips 52 and 55 of the frames 16A and 16B, respectively.
By locating the tip 50 between the tips 52 and 55, the center points of the oval openings of the frames 16A, 16B, and 16D can be located closer to one another. This can be accomplished even though each frame 16 has a relatively long length L2. The frames 16 are then located over a smaller area than would for example be possible in a rectangular array.
Each mirror 18 has an approximate oval shape with a length L3 and a width W3. The length L3 is typically about 300 microns and the width W3 about 250 microns. Each mirror 18 is located within a respective oval opening 20 with its length L3 along the length L1 of the oval opening 20 and its width W3 along the width W1 of the oval opening 20. Each mirror 18 is secured to a respective frame 16 with two mirror torsion components 54. Each mirror torsion component 54 has first and second opposed ends 56 and 58 respectively. The first end 56 is non-rotationally secured to the mirror 18. The mirror torsion component 54 extends from the first end 56 into a respective one of the notches 22A or 22B. The second end 58 of the mirror torsion component 54 is non-rotationally secured to the frame 16 within the notch 22A or 22B. The mirror 18 is thereby suspended within the oval opening 20 of the frame 16. A center point of the mirror 18 coincides with a center point of the oval opening 20. There is a minimum spacing M as measured from a surface of the mirror 18 to a surface of the oval opening 20 directly next to the notch 22A. Although the minimum spacing M is relatively small, the mirror torsion component 54 is relatively long due to the depth of the notch 22A while still maintaining strength of the frame 16.
The mirror can pivot relative to the frame 16 about the center line 46, whereupon each mirror torsion component 54 winds up, or twists against a torsion spring force thereof. The entire length of the mirror torsion component from the first end 56 to the second end 58 winds up, or twists. The length of each mirror torsion component 54 allows it to have a higher torsion spring constant with a corresponding smaller force being applied to rotate the mirror 18 by a certain degree.
Electrostatic terminals 64 are formed on the substrate 12. The electrostatic terminals 64 are used to pivot the frame 16 or the mirror 18 by electrostatic attraction. The support structure 14 also serves as an electrostatic barrier between electrostatic terminals and adjacent mirrors 18. The apparatus 10 may be used in an optical switch wherein a respective circular bundle of light shines from a respective optical fiber onto a respective one of the mirrors 18. The light may shine in a direction 66 which is at an angle 68 of, for example, 45° with respect to a plane in which the substrate 12 extends. A usable portion of the bundle of light falls between the width W3 of the mirror 18. The bundle of light is usually circular in cross section so that it typically has a usable length which equals its usable width. Because of its length L3 of the mirror 18, the entire usable length of the bundle of light falls on the mirror 18. The oval shape of the mirror 18 thereby allows for the entire usable width and length of the bundle of light to be reflected therefrom, even though the light shines in the direction 66 and even when the frame 16 is pivoted as shown in FIG. 2 so that the mirror 18 is pivoted with respect to the frame 16. It should be noted that the oval shape of each mirror 18 also makes more efficient use of space than for example a rectangular mirror, thereby allowing for the mirrors 18 and frames 16 to be located over a smaller area.
Mirrors 18 are thus used which have lengths L3 which are longer than their widths W3. In addition, relatively long mirror torsion components 54 and frame torsion components 56 are used. Regardless of the dimensions of the mirrors 18 and the torsion components 54 and 26, the mirrors 18 are still located relatively close to one another. The relatively close positioning of the mirrors 18 is due to a combined use of a honeycomb support structure 14 which also serves as an electrostatic barrier, the notches 22A, 22B, 24A, 24B, the oval shapes of the mirrors 18 together with closely matching shapes of the oval openings 20, and the arrangement of the frames 16 in a non-rectangular array wherein a tip 50 can be located between the tips 52 and 54. By locating the mirrors closer to one another a smaller array is formed. A smaller array results in a smaller optical switch and a reduction in path length that light has to travel before reaching and after being reflected by a mirror. A reduction in path length of the light reduces losses in quality and intensity of light.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather that a restrictive sense.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3492484||Sep 27, 1966||Jan 27, 1970||Nippon Electric Co||Space division multiplexed optical communication system including a pair of light responsive matrices|
|US3493820||Dec 1, 1966||Feb 3, 1970||Raytheon Co||Airgap isolated semiconductor device|
|US3649105||Feb 21, 1968||Mar 14, 1972||North American Rockwell||Optical shutter|
|US4208094||Oct 2, 1978||Jun 17, 1980||Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated||Optical switch|
|US4274712||Jan 24, 1979||Jun 23, 1981||Sener, Ingenieria Y Sistemas, S.A.||Solar radiation reflectors adapted to track the incident rays of the sun|
|US4365863||May 29, 1980||Dec 28, 1982||Le Materiel Telephonique Thomson-Csf||Optical switch for a very large number of channels|
|US4421381||Mar 11, 1981||Dec 20, 1983||Yokogawa Hokushin Electric Corp.||Mechanical vibrating element|
|US4553436||Nov 9, 1982||Nov 19, 1985||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Silicon accelerometer|
|US4598585||Mar 19, 1984||Jul 8, 1986||The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.||Planar inertial sensor|
|US4613203||Apr 5, 1983||Sep 23, 1986||Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften||Secondary mirror tilting device for a reflecting telescope|
|US4626066||Dec 30, 1983||Dec 2, 1986||At&T Bell Laboratories||Optical coupling device utilizing a mirror and cantilevered arm|
|US4654663||Nov 16, 1981||Mar 31, 1987||Piezoelectric Technology Investors, Ltd.||Angular rate sensor system|
|US4706374||Sep 27, 1985||Nov 17, 1987||Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.||Method of manufacture for semiconductor accelerometer|
|US4851080||Dec 14, 1988||Jul 25, 1989||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Resonant accelerometer|
|US4922756||Jun 20, 1988||May 8, 1990||Triton Technologies, Inc.||Micro-machined accelerometer|
|US5016072||Mar 14, 1990||May 14, 1991||The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.||Semiconductor chip gyroscopic transducer|
|US5068203||Sep 4, 1990||Nov 26, 1991||Delco Electronics Corporation||Method for forming thin silicon membrane or beam|
|US5083857||Jun 29, 1990||Jan 28, 1992||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Multi-level deformable mirror device|
|US5097354||Jul 27, 1990||Mar 17, 1992||Omron Corporation||Beam scanner|
|US5121180||Jun 21, 1991||Jun 9, 1992||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Accelerometer with central mass in support|
|US5126812||May 23, 1990||Jun 30, 1992||The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.||Monolithic micromechanical accelerometer|
|US5172262||Apr 16, 1992||Dec 15, 1992||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Spatial light modulator and method|
|US5198390||Jan 16, 1992||Mar 30, 1993||Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.||RIE process for fabricating submicron, silicon electromechanical structures|
|US5203208||Apr 29, 1991||Apr 20, 1993||The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory||Symmetrical micromechanical gyroscope|
|US5226321||May 17, 1991||Jul 13, 1993||British Aerospace Public Limited Company||Vibrating planar gyro|
|US5235187||Apr 14, 1992||Aug 10, 1993||Cornell Research Foundation||Methods of fabricating integrated, aligned tunneling tip pairs|
|US5247222||Nov 4, 1991||Sep 21, 1993||Engle Craig D||Constrained shear mode modulator|
|US5255332||Jul 16, 1992||Oct 19, 1993||Sdl, Inc.||NxN Optical crossbar switch matrix|
|US5399415||Jun 4, 1993||Mar 21, 1995||Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.||Isolated tungsten microelectromechanical structures|
|US5428259||Apr 20, 1993||Jun 27, 1995||Nec Corporation||Micromotion mechanical structure and a process for the production thereof|
|US5444566||Mar 7, 1994||Aug 22, 1995||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Optimized electronic operation of digital micromirror devices|
|US5449903||Jun 15, 1993||Sep 12, 1995||Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.||Methods of fabricating integrated, aligned tunneling tip pairs|
|US5488862||Mar 8, 1994||Feb 6, 1996||D.B.A. Adagio||Monolithic silicon rate-gyro with integrated sensors|
|US5524153||Feb 10, 1995||Jun 4, 1996||Astarte Fiber Networks, Inc.||Optical fiber switching system and method using same|
|US5528296||Dec 16, 1994||Jun 18, 1996||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Jagged edge compensator for staggered pixel layouts of a spatial light modulator|
|US5555558||May 18, 1995||Sep 10, 1996||Laughlin; Richard H.||Method for switching optical signals|
|US5563343||May 26, 1993||Oct 8, 1996||Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.||Microelectromechanical lateral accelerometer|
|US5581643||Dec 8, 1994||Dec 3, 1996||Northern Telecom Limited||Optical waveguide cross-point switch|
|US5594820||Feb 8, 1995||Jan 14, 1997||Jds Fitel Inc.||Opto-mechanical device having optical element movable by twin flexures|
|US5600383||Jun 7, 1995||Feb 4, 1997||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Multi-level deformable mirror device with torsion hinges placed in a layer different from the torsion beam layer|
|US5608468||Jun 7, 1995||Mar 4, 1997||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Method and device for multi-format television|
|US5610335||May 19, 1994||Mar 11, 1997||Cornell Research Foundation||Microelectromechanical lateral accelerometer|
|US5628917||Feb 3, 1995||May 13, 1997||Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.||Masking process for fabricating ultra-high aspect ratio, wafer-free micro-opto-electromechanical structures|
|US5629790||Oct 18, 1993||May 13, 1997||Neukermans; Armand P.||Micromachined torsional scanner|
|US5645684||Jun 7, 1995||Jul 8, 1997||The Regents Of The University Of California||Multilayer high vertical aspect ratio thin film structures|
|US5648618||Jan 31, 1996||Jul 15, 1997||Armand P. Neukermans||Micromachined hinge having an integral torsion sensor|
|US5661591||Sep 29, 1995||Aug 26, 1997||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Optical switch having an analog beam for steering light|
|US5673139||Jul 19, 1993||Sep 30, 1997||Medcom, Inc.||Microelectromechanical television scanning device and method for making the same|
|US5726073||Jan 19, 1996||Mar 10, 1998||Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.||Compound stage MEM actuator suspended for multidimensional motion|
|US5726815||Apr 12, 1996||Mar 10, 1998||Fusion Uv Systems, Inc.||Apparatus for aligning the object focus in filament irradiating units|
|US5828800||Jun 23, 1997||Oct 27, 1998||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Self-aligned mechanical M|
|US5872880||Aug 12, 1996||Feb 16, 1999||Ronald S. Maynard||Hybrid-optical multi-axis beam steering apparatus|
|US5912608||Apr 26, 1996||Jun 15, 1999||The Nippon Signal Co., Ltd.||Planar type electromagnetic actuator|
|US5920417||Jul 19, 1994||Jul 6, 1999||Medcam, Inc.||Microelectromechanical television scanning device and method for making the same|
|US5943157||May 6, 1998||Aug 24, 1999||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Spatial light modulator having improved contrast ratio|
|US5943454||Aug 15, 1997||Aug 24, 1999||Lucent Technologies, Inc.||Freespace optical bypass-exchange switch|
|US5960132||Dec 31, 1997||Sep 28, 1999||At&T Corp.||Fiber-optic free-space micromachined matrix switches|
|US5960133||Jan 27, 1998||Sep 28, 1999||Tellium, Inc.||Wavelength-selective optical add/drop using tilting micro-mirrors|
|US5969848||Jul 3, 1997||Oct 19, 1999||The Regents Of The University Of California||Micromachined electrostatic vertical actuator|
|US5995688||Jun 1, 1998||Nov 30, 1999||Lucent Technologies, Inc.||Micro-opto-electromechanical devices and method therefor|
|US5998816||Sep 10, 1997||Dec 7, 1999||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Sensor element with removal resistance region|
|US5999303||Jan 13, 1999||Dec 7, 1999||Seagate Technology Inc.||Micro-machined mirror using tethered elements|
|US6000280||Mar 23, 1998||Dec 14, 1999||Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.||Drive electrodes for microfabricated torsional cantilevers|
|US6002818||Dec 5, 1997||Dec 14, 1999||Lucent Technologies Inc||Free-space optical signal switch arrangement|
|US6020272||Oct 8, 1998||Feb 1, 2000||Sandia Corporation||Method for forming suspended micromechanical structures|
|US6028689||Jan 24, 1997||Feb 22, 2000||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force||Multi-motion micromirror|
|US6028690||Nov 23, 1998||Feb 22, 2000||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Reduced micromirror mirror gaps for improved contrast ratio|
|US6044705||May 12, 1997||Apr 4, 2000||Xros, Inc.||Micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsion bars|
|US6053618||Jul 2, 1997||Apr 25, 2000||Arpin; P. Paul||Medical mirror-self treatment|
|US6062697||Aug 13, 1998||May 16, 2000||Bryant; Larry A.||Universal hitch mirror|
|US6072617||Nov 20, 1997||Jun 6, 2000||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Micro mechanical device with memory metal component|
|US6075239||Aug 24, 1998||Jun 13, 2000||Lucent Technologies, Inc.||Article comprising a light-actuated micromechanical photonic switch|
|US6075639||Aug 28, 1998||Jun 13, 2000||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Micromachined scanning torsion mirror and method|
|US6097859||Feb 12, 1998||Aug 1, 2000||The Regents Of The University Of California||Multi-wavelength cross-connect optical switch|
|US6097860||Jun 5, 1998||Aug 1, 2000||Astarte Fiber Networks, Inc.||Compact optical matrix switch with fixed location fibers|
|US6121552||Jun 13, 1997||Sep 19, 2000||The Regents Of The University Of Caliofornia||Microfabricated high aspect ratio device with an electrical isolation trench|
|US6128121||Apr 30, 1999||Oct 3, 2000||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Deformable mirror device and manufacturing method thereof|
|US6137926||Nov 13, 1998||Oct 24, 2000||Maynard; Ronald S.||Hybrid optical multi-axis beam steering apparatus|
|US6239473||Jan 14, 1999||May 29, 2001||Kionix, Inc.||Trench isolation for micromechanical devices|
|US6245590||Aug 5, 1999||Jun 12, 2001||Microvision Inc.||Frequency tunable resonant scanner and method of making|
|US6253001||Jan 20, 2000||Jun 26, 2001||Agilent Technologies, Inc.||Optical switches using dual axis micromirrors|
|US6256430||Nov 23, 1998||Jul 3, 2001||Agere Systems Inc.||Optical crossconnect system comprising reconfigurable light-reflecting devices|
|US6262827||Apr 27, 2000||Jul 17, 2001||Fujitsu Limited||Galvano-mirror|
|US6278812||Dec 14, 1999||Aug 21, 2001||At&T Corporation||Protection schemes for mirror-failure in free-space micromachined optical switches|
|US6289145||Jul 18, 2000||Sep 11, 2001||The Regents Of The University Of California||Multi-wavelength cross-connect optical switch|
|US6295154||May 12, 1999||Sep 25, 2001||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Optical switching apparatus|
|US6320993||Sep 16, 1999||Nov 20, 2001||Astarte Fiber Networks, Inc.||Optical switch pathway configuration using control signals|
|US6330102||Mar 25, 2000||Dec 11, 2001||Onix Microsystems||Apparatus and method for 2-dimensional steered-beam NxM optical switch using single-axis mirror arrays and relay optics|
|US6396976||Apr 14, 2000||May 28, 2002||Solus Micro Technologies, Inc.||2D optical switch|
|DE19757181A1||Dec 19, 1997||Jul 1, 1999||Bosch Gmbh Robert||Arrangement for coupling glass fibers|
|DE19800745A1||Jan 12, 1998||Jul 15, 1999||Bosch Gmbh Robert||Design- und Herstellungsverfahren für eine mikromechanische Vorrichtung|
|EP0813089A2||Jun 9, 1997||Dec 17, 1997||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Deformable mirror device and manufacturing method thereof|
|EP0834759A2||Sep 25, 1997||Apr 8, 1998||Mcnc||Microelectromechanical devices including rotating plates and related methods|
|EP0980014A1||Jun 2, 1999||Feb 16, 2000||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Spring-ring micromechanical device|
|EP1120677A2||Dec 22, 2000||Aug 1, 2001||Cronos Integrated Microsystems, Inc.||MEMS optical cross-connect switch|
|GB2175705A|| ||Title not available|
|GB2275787A|| ||Title not available|
|GB2328312A|| ||Title not available|
|JPS60107017A|| ||Title not available|
|1||"Lucent's New All-Optical Router Uses Bell Labs Microscopic Mirrors," Bells Labs press release, pp. 1-4, Nov. 10, 1999 http://www.bell-labs com/news/1999/november/10/1.html.|
|2||D.T. Neilson, V.A. Aksyuk, S. Arney, N.R. Basavanhally, K.S. Bhalla, D.J. Bishop, B.A. Boie, C.A. Bolle, J.V. Gates, A.M. Gottlieb, J.P. Hickey, N.A. Jackman, P.R. Kolodner, S.K. Korotky, B. Mikkelsen, F. Pardo, G. Raybon, R. Ruel, R.E. Scotti, T.W. Van Blarcum,, L. Zhang, and C.R. Giles, "Fully Provisional 112x112 Micro-Mechanical Optical Crossconnect With 35.8Tb/s Demonstrated Capacity," OFC 2000 Tech. Dig., Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 202-204 (Mar. 7-10, 2000).|
|3||D.T. Neilson, V.A. Aksyuk, S. Arney, N.R. Basavanhally, K.S. Bhalla, D.J. Bishop, B.A. Boie, C.A. Bolle, J.V. Gates, A.M. Gottlieb, J.P. Hickey, N.A. Jackman, P.R. Kolodner, S.K. Korotky, B. Mikkelsen, F. Pardo, G. Raybon, R. Ruel, R.E. Scotti, T.W. Van Blarcum,, L. Zhang, and C.R. Giles, "Fully Provisional 112×112 Micro-Mechanical Optical Crossconnect With 35.8Tb/s Demonstrated Capacity," OFC 2000 Tech. Dig., Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 202-204 (Mar. 7-10, 2000).|
|4||Janusz Bryzek, Kurt Petersen, & Wendell McCulley, "Micromachines on the March," IEEE Spectrum, pp. 20-31, (May 1994).|
|5||Larry J. Hornbeck, "Digital Light Proecssing for High-Brightness, High-Resolution Applications." SPIE vol. 3013, San Jose, CA, pp. 27-40, (Feb. 1997).|
|6||Lih Y. Lin and Evan L. Goldstein, "Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMs) for WDM Optical-Crossconnect Networks," IEEE, pp. 954-957 (1999).|
|7||M. Adrian Michalicek, Wenge Zhang, Kevin F. Harsh, Victor M. Bright, and Y.C. Lee, "Micromirror Arrays Fabricated by Flip-Chip Assembly," Part of the SPIE Conference on Miniaturizes Systems with Micro-Optics and MEMs, Santa Clara, SPIE vol. 3878, pp. 68-79, (Sep. 1999).|
|8||Ming C. Wu, "MEMS for Optical and RF Applications." UCLA Extension, Department of Engineering, Information Systems and Technical Management, Engineering: 823.52, Nov. 1-3, 1999.|
|9||PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT Counterpart Application No. PCT/US01/13964 Containing International Search Report (Jun. 18, 2002).|
|10||Robert E. Mihailovich et al., "Single-Crystal Silicon Torsional Resonators," School of Electrical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, IEEE, pp. 184-188 (1993).|
|11||Timothy J. Broshnihan, James M. Bustillo, Albert P. Pisano & Roger T. Howe, "Embedded Interconnect & Electrical Isolation for High-Aspect-Ratio, SOI Inertial Instruments," Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Sensor, pp. 637-640, Transducers '97, 1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators (Chicago, Jun. 16-19, 1997) (Jun. 16-19, 1997).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7193767 *||Mar 3, 2004||Mar 20, 2007||Jonathan Peeri||Method for enhancing visibility|
|US7379668||Apr 2, 2002||May 27, 2008||Calient Networks, Inc.||Optical amplification in photonic switched crossconnect systems|
|Mar 25, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CALIENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:RIVIERA SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030077/0566
Effective date: 20100916
Owner name: RIVIERA SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:CALIENT NETWORKS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030126/0257
|Mar 18, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CALIENT NETWORKS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HELKEY, ROGER JONATHAN;REEL/FRAME:030035/0275
Effective date: 20000804
|Dec 17, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Dec 18, 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 3, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BARTELS, HENRY E., CONNECTICUT
Owner name: BARTELS, KENNETH G., CONNECTICUT
Owner name: BARTELS, PHILIP H., CONNECTICUT
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:CALIENT NETWORKS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014172/0609
Effective date: 20031110
Owner name: CAYUGA VENTURE FUND II LLC AS AGENT, NEW YORK
Owner name: SHULL, ARTHUR, NEW YORK
Owner name: WIDDING, FRED B., NEW YORK
Owner name: CAYUGA VENTURE FUND II LLC AS AGENT 15 THORNWOOD D
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:CALIENT NETWORKS, INC. /AR;REEL/FRAME:014172/0609
Owner name: BARTELS, PHILIP H.,CONNECTICUT
Owner name: CAYUGA VENTURE FUND II LLC AS AGENT,NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:CALIENT NETWORKS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:14172/609
Owner name: SHULL, ARTHUR,NEW YORK
Owner name: BARTELS, KENNETH G.,CONNECTICUT
Owner name: WIDDING, FRED B.,NEW YORK
Owner name: BARTELS, HENRY E.,CONNECTICUT