|Publication number||US6580037 B1|
|Application number||US 09/734,109|
|Publication date||Jun 17, 2003|
|Filing date||Dec 11, 2000|
|Priority date||Aug 23, 2000|
|Publication number||09734109, 734109, US 6580037 B1, US 6580037B1, US-B1-6580037, US6580037 B1, US6580037B1|
|Original Assignee||Tom Luke|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Referenced by (20), Classifications (10), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Serial No. 60/227,340 filed Aug. 23, 2000.
The present invention relates to weighing equipment and, more particularly, to a method and system for receiving error messages at a location remote from the weighing equipment sending the error message.
Weighing equipment is typically used to weigh semi-trailer trucks and railroad cars and engines at various points on a highway or railroad not limited to this specific application. It can also be used in all industrial applications commonly found in the process control industry. At these weighing stations various systems are utilized to weigh the equipment and then to process that information and report the information to the scale operator. Some of these weighing systems may include load cells and sectional controllers that electronically receive weight information and transfer the weight information on to an instrument control system that reports the information to the user at the scale site. Information such as diagnostic information and error information is also reported to the operator at the scale site. This information ensures that the scale is operational and running at its peak level of performance.
These electronic scales typically have the capability to show some types of error messages to the scale user at the site. This, while useful information, has the disadvantage in that it is displayed only to the operator at the scale. Thus, if the operator is not at the scale when the error is displayed or is reported, the error may go unnoticed.
Additionally, error messages and diagnostic messages from the scale system may be reported at odd working hours when the operator is not present to view or receive the message. This may cause the operator to miss an urgent message that may require servicing of the scale at that immediate moment and, if it is not done, the scale may fail to operate properly.
Accordingly, there exists a need for a method and system that reports diagnostic and error information to a central location that is remote to the scale site. Moreover, there is a need for such a method system that is more efficient and reliable and provides scale operators an early warning system to reduce scale downtime and/or eliminate erroneous scale readings.
Generally described, a remote error reporting system on weighing equipment is provided. The system includes a load sensing apparatus, a scale instrument operably coupled with the load sensing apparatus to receive weight load data and a service center device in communication with the scale instrument to receive the weight load data.
In another aspect of the invention, a method in a computer system for reporting weighing equipment performance data from one or more scales is provided. In accordance with the method, load sensing data is obtained from each of the one or more scales and is transmitted to a service center. The transmitted load sensing data is then processed at the service center. Finally, response data is sent by the service center and received at each of the one or more scales.
By providing a method and system for remotely reporting errors on weighing equipment, numerous advantages are realized. For example, the reporting system of the present invention provides error and diagnostic information for one or more scales to a central service center allowing scale operators to efficiently respond to scale operation problems. As such, the present system significantly reduces erroneous error readings and scale downtime.
The objectives and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a preferred remote error reporting system of the present invention;
FIG. 2. is a schematic diagram of the preferred remote error reporting system of FIG. 1; and
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a preferred method for remotely reporting weighing equipment messages of the present invention.
Turning now to the drawings in greater detail, and initially to FIG. 1, the system for remotely reporting weighing equipment errors of the present invention is designated generally by the reference number 10. The remote error reporting system 10 includes a load sensing apparatus 12 that includes a power supply 14, load cells 16 and sectional controllers 18. The load sensing apparatus and its associated components measure weight loads and other diagnostic information in the form of load sensing data. The load sensing apparatus 12 is coupled with a scale instrument 20 and receives the load sensing data obtained by the load sensing apparatus 12. The scale instrument 20 is then connected with network 22 that establishes a connection between the scale instrument 20 and a service center 24. It would be understood that multiple scale instruments, coupled with their associated load sensing apparatuses, could be connected to a single service center via the network and would receive the load sensing data obtained at each scale.
FIG. 2 further illustrates the preferred system for remotely reporting errors in the scale generally described in FIG. 1. The load sensing apparatus 12 includes a scale platform 26 that has multiple load cells 16 placed along the perimeter of the underside of the scale platform. Each pair of load cells is connected to a sectional controller 18 that receives analog signals from the load cells as weight is applied to the scale platform 26. The sectional controllers 18 convert the analog sensing data to digital data and the digital data is then communicated to the scale instrument 20 to be read by the scale operator.
Each sectional controller 18 is a device that accepts a pair of analog inputs from the load cells 16. Sectional controllers typically accept inputs from two load cells in a section of a scale, but may be configured to receive more than two. The two inputs are assigned identification numbers in the sectional controller. As mentioned above, these input channels receive analog input from the load cells and through these channels, the analog signals are sent to a single analog to digital converter within the sectional controller. The analog to digital converter multiplexes each load cell input and then converts the analog signal from each independent load cell to a digital signal as well as assigning a specific identification number to the load cell. This information is then sent to the scale instrument for further processing. The power supply 14 powers the sectional controllers and provides power surge suppression for the system. As would be understood, other devices that would receive load sensing data and then transmit the data to a scale instrument would be taught by this invention.
The scale instrument receives the load sensing data and passes this information onto the service center 24 via a communications network 22 (FIG. 1). The network 22 preferably includes a pair of modems 28, 30 that provide a direct connection between the scale instrument 20 and the service center 24. The first modem 28 is connected to the scale instrument and receives the processed load sensing data information from the scale instrument as well as other criteria from the instrument 20 and transmits that information to a second modem 30 that is coupled with the service center computer 24. As would be understood, the network may also include other direct and indirect methods of transmitting data from the scale instrument to the service center including local area networks and wide area networks. If using a local area network, the system would communicate via a network interface adaptor. If using a wide area network the system would typically use a modem or other means for establishing communications over the wide area network such as the Internet. Additionally, as would understood, the modems 28 and 30 could be internal or external to the computer.
The load sensing data received at the scale instrument and further processed and transmitted to the service center may include weight readings, error messages and diagnostic messages. Error messages and diagnostic messages may include, but are not limited to, the time, date, location of the scale, and mode of failure. Failure modes typically include load cell failures, sectional controller failures, over capacity warnings, memory failures, low internal battery voltage warnings, internal change in calibration parameters and programmable service dates to insure timely service of the scale.
In operation, the method for remotely reporting weighing equipment errors is illustrated in FIG. 3. At step 40, the load sensing apparatus obtains the load sensing data. This data is then received at the scale instrument and processed by the scale instrument at step 42. The processed load sensing data includes, but is not limited to, detected errors and diagnostic messages reported by the load sensing apparatus. The processed load sensing data is then transmitted on to the service center at step 44. When the error message or diagnostic message is received at the service center, a message is posted at the center and logged to a database or a technician can be called or paged.
As messages are received at the service center, personnel may review the messages as they are received or may review them after they have been logged into the database. If personnel at the service center require further information about a certain message, they may query the scale reporting the message at step 46 by transmitting a request for further information via the network back to the reporting scale instrument.
Constructed and operated as previously described, the remote error reporting system allows operators to efficiently operate multiple scales that results in a significant reduction in erroneous error readings and scale downtime. The ability to receive error and diagnostic information at a central location also allows scale operators to optimize service personnel over a large number of scales. Additionally, service personnel may be dispatched in a timely manner once errors are received at the service center location.
From the foregoing, it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to attain all the ends and objects herein above set forth, together with other advantages which are obvious and which are inherent to the invention.
It will be understood that certain features and subcombinations are of utility and may be employed without reference to other features and subcombinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope of the claims.
Since many possible embodiments may be made of the invention without departing from the scope thereof, it is understood that all matters herein set forth or shown in the accompanying drawings is to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4122532 *||Jan 31, 1977||Oct 24, 1978||Pitney-Bowes, Inc.||System for updating postal rate information utilized by remote mail processing apparatus|
|US4868757 *||Jul 9, 1986||Sep 19, 1989||Pi Electronics Corporation||Computerized integrated electronic mailing/addressing apparatus|
|US5319562 *||Aug 22, 1991||Jun 7, 1994||Whitehouse Harry T||System and method for purchase and application of postage using personal computer|
|US5606507 *||Jun 22, 1994||Feb 25, 1997||E-Stamp Corporation||System and method for storing, retrieving and automatically printing postage on mail|
|US5638442 *||Aug 23, 1995||Jun 10, 1997||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Method for remotely inspecting a postage meter|
|US5650930 *||Apr 12, 1995||Jul 22, 1997||Hagenbuch; Leroy G.||Apparatus and method responsive to the on-board measuring of haulage parameters of a vehicle|
|US5656799 *||Apr 29, 1994||Aug 12, 1997||U-Ship, Inc.||Automated package shipping machine|
|US5745887 *||Aug 23, 1996||Apr 28, 1998||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Method and apparatus for remotely changing security features of a postage meter|
|US5764522 *||Feb 28, 1995||Jun 9, 1998||Shalev; Matti||Programmable system for controlling, regulating, and adjusting flow of animal-feed material from a material storage vessel|
|US5878376 *||May 19, 1997||Mar 2, 1999||Soehnle-Waagen Gmbh + Co.||Method for calibrating scales|
|US6035291 *||May 2, 1997||Mar 7, 2000||Francotyp Postalia Gmbh||Method and arrangement for data processing in a shipping system with a postage meter machine, including automatic selection of the most beneficial carrier|
|US6356882 *||Dec 29, 1999||Mar 12, 2002||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Method and system for inputting a weight to a browser in an internet-based shipping system|
|US6426471 *||Mar 30, 2000||Jul 30, 2002||Mettler-Toledo, Inc.||Mouse pad scale|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6777624 *||May 10, 2002||Aug 17, 2004||Shimadzu Corporation||Electronic balance with a remote error reporting via the internet and a display for informing a user of corrective measures from a remote service center|
|US6884946 *||Mar 5, 2002||Apr 26, 2005||Premark Feg L.L.C.||Scale for weighing and determining a price of an item|
|US6970094 *||Feb 23, 2001||Nov 29, 2005||Yamato Scale Co., Ltd.||Remotely accessible combination weighing apparatus and combination weighing system|
|US7364123 *||Dec 6, 2004||Apr 29, 2008||General Electric Company||Self powered railway monitoring system|
|US7432456||Sep 3, 2004||Oct 7, 2008||Cat Scale Company||System and method for providing certified weighing services at remotely attended scales|
|US8194129 *||Nov 30, 2007||Jun 5, 2012||MJK Holdings, LLC||Weight monitoring system for scrap and recycled materials|
|US8203459||May 4, 2009||Jun 19, 2012||MJK Holdings, LLC||Security systems and methods for continuously monitoring the weight of a container|
|US8441365||Jun 14, 2012||May 14, 2013||Mjk Holding, Llc||Security systems and methods for continuously monitoring the weight of a container and determining a monetary value of the material therein|
|US9518862 *||Nov 4, 2014||Dec 13, 2016||Mettler-Toledo, LLC||Weighing apparatus rezero fault prediction and remote alerting|
|US20020179337 *||May 10, 2002||Dec 5, 2002||Shimadzu Corporation||Electronic balance and method of evaluating the same|
|US20030168259 *||Mar 5, 2002||Sep 11, 2003||Miller David Scott||Scale for weighing and determining a price of an item|
|US20060052980 *||Sep 3, 2004||Mar 9, 2006||Cat Scale Company||System and method for providing certified weighing services at remotely attended scales|
|US20060118678 *||Dec 6, 2004||Jun 8, 2006||Wells Kenneth B Ii||Self powered railway monitoring system|
|US20090201369 *||Nov 30, 2007||Aug 13, 2009||Jones David H||Weight Monitoring System For Scrap And Recycled Materials|
|US20090261981 *||May 4, 2009||Oct 22, 2009||Mjk Holding, Llc||Weight monitoring systems and methods|
|US20110099504 *||Dec 30, 2010||Apr 28, 2011||Monnier Carla A||Scale with automatic offline indication and related method|
|US20160123794 *||Nov 4, 2014||May 5, 2016||Mettler-Toledo, LLC||Weighing apparatus rezero fault prediction and remote alerting|
|USRE45012||Oct 9, 2013||Jul 15, 2014||MJK Holdings, LLC||Security systems and methods for continuously monitoring the weight of a container|
|EP2078288A2 *||Oct 24, 2007||Jul 15, 2009||Mettler-Toledo Inc.||Systems and methods for verification of a verifiable device|
|EP2078288A4 *||Oct 24, 2007||Nov 30, 2011||Mettler Toledo Inc||Systems and methods for verification of a verifiable device|
|U.S. Classification||177/25.13, 702/173, 705/416, 705/414|
|International Classification||G01G23/37, G01G23/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G01G23/3707, G01G23/00|
|European Classification||G01G23/00, G01G23/37B|
|Dec 11, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: FAIRBANK SCALES, MISSOURI
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LUKE, TOM;REEL/FRAME:011363/0005
Effective date: 20001207
|Oct 28, 2003||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Jun 26, 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Aug 4, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Sep 25, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Dec 16, 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NBH CAPITAL FINANCE, A DIVISION OF NBH BANK, N.A.,
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FAIRBANKS SCALES INC.;REEL/FRAME:037310/0515
Effective date: 20151209