|Publication number||US6624918 B1|
|Application number||US 09/349,570|
|Publication date||Sep 23, 2003|
|Filing date||Jul 8, 1999|
|Priority date||Jul 8, 1999|
|Also published as||EP1067726A2, EP1067726A3|
|Publication number||09349570, 349570, US 6624918 B1, US 6624918B1, US-B1-6624918, US6624918 B1, US6624918B1|
|Inventors||John Sargent French, William J. Thompson, Patrick Raymond Wiand|
|Original Assignee||Triquint Technology Holding Co.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (10), Classifications (15), Legal Events (14)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to a digital control arrangement for adjusting the bandwidth of an optical receiver and, more particularly, to an arrangement for modifying a parametric value (e.g., voltage, current, capacitance, etc.) applied to a preamplifier so as to tune the output bandwidth of the receiver.
In certain optical communication systems, it has become important to control the bandwidth of the optical receiver. It is often desirable to maintain a bandwidth only as high as necessary to recover the information contained in the signal, thereby filtering out noise at higher frequencies. In particular, many optically amplified communication systems, especially wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) systems, have extremely tight tolerances on the receiver bandwidth in order to use the optical receiver to filter out amplified spontaneous emission noise.
Conventional optical receivers may exhibit a bandwidth that is too large for some WDM applications. One solution to this problem is to modify the fabrication process for optical receivers (usually GaAs integrated circuit devices) so as to produce receivers with the required tolerances. This approach is considered too costly for many applications. Alternatively, the fabricated devices may go through a series of tests to “weed out” those receivers (perhaps a majority of devices) with unfavorable characteristics (such as, for example, bandwidth too low (that is, the 3 dB cutoff frequency is below an acceptable value), or bandwidth too large (allowing, for example, an excessive amount of noise to be received). In this case, the device “yield” drops significantly, resulting in an increased cost for those devices that are found to be acceptable. Another prior art solution is to apply post-filtering beyond the receiver preamplifier so as to limit the noise from the preamplifier. Although this solution can be used successfully, it is considered to be extremely time-consuming, since it requires each receiver to be tested individually, with capacitors of the appropriate value being inserted in the circuit to provide the required filtering. The tight tolerance on the bandwidth requirement for optically amplified systems also leads to relatively low manufacturing yield as process variations move the receiver bandwidth beyond the design constraints.
A need remains in the art, therefore, for a relatively simple and straightforward arrangement for improving the control of the bandwidth of optical receivers.
The need remaining in the prior art is addressed by the present invention, which relates to a digital control arrangement for adjusting the bandwidth of an optical receiver and, more particularly, to an arrangement for modifying a parametric value (e.g., voltage, current, capacitance, etc.) applied to a preamplifier so as to tune the output bandwidth of the receiver.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a voltage regulator is used to apply the input supply voltage to the preamplifier of an optical receiver, where the preamplifier is known to display a bandwidth that is a function of the input voltage. The voltage regulator is adjustable by means of an included potentiometer. In operation, the bandwidth of the receiver is first determined. If the bandwidth is too low for the particular application, the potentiometer is adjusted to vary the resistance sensed by the voltage regulator, thus increasing (or decreasing, depending upon the polarity) the input voltage applied to the preamplifier. The change in input voltage results in increasing the bandwidth of the preamplifier, thus moving the 3 db cutoff of the receiver “upward” in frequency. Conversely, if the measured bandwidth of an exemplary receiver is too “high” (that is, the 3 dB cutoff frequency is beyond an upper bound limit, allowing for noise signals to pass through the receiver), the potentiometer is adjusted such that the voltage applied to the preamplifier by the voltage regulator is decreased (or increased, depending upon the polarity). The change in input voltage results in decreasing the bandwidth, moving the receiver's bandwidth “downward” into the “acceptable” range.
It is a feature of this arrangement of the present invention that the voltage applied as the preamplifier input voltage is regulated via the voltage regulator. In this arrangement, therefore, variations in “nominal” supply voltages from device to device will not affect the performance of the receiver.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a digital potentiometer is used and controlled by a testing system such that the resistance is either incremented or decremented (as the case may be) in predetermined step sizes until a desired bandwidth is obtained.
In accordance with the present invention, any type of parametric control can be used to digitally change the preamplifier bandwidth. For example, a current signal, resistance, capacitance, electric and/or magnetic field, etc., can all be incremented/decremented in a predetermined manner to provide for an adjustment of the bandwidth of the preamplifier.
Other and further features of the present invention will become apparent during the course of the following discussion and by reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings:
FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary digitally-controlled optical receiver formed in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a simplified circuit diagram of an exemplary arrangement of the present invention utilizing a voltage regulator;
FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the movement of an optical receiver bandwidth as a function of the implementation of the present invention from a bandwidth considered too “low” to a bandwidth in the acceptable range;
FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the movement of an optical receiver bandwidth as a function of the implementation of the present invention from a bandwidth considered too “high” to a bandwidth in the acceptable range; and
FIG. 5 contains an exemplary embodiment of the voltage control arrangement of the present invention including a digital potentiometer.
An exemplary optical receiver 10 incorporating the digitally-controlled bandwidth adjustment arrangement of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 1. It is to be understood that a complete optical receiver may comprise other components beyond those shown in the illustration where these other components are not considered to be germane to the subject matter of the present invention. In general, an optical receiver functions to recover an electrical output signal, denoted VOUT from a received optical signal, denoted LIN. Referring to FIG. 1, received optical signal LIN is received by an optical device (photodetector) 12, such as a pin diode, which functions to convert the optical signal into an electrical current, defined as iout. Since most photodetectors cannot generate an electrical output of a level acceptable for subsequent processing in electrical circuits, preamplifier 14 is first used to convert the current signal iOUT to a voltage signal VOUT of sufficient magnitude to be applied as an input to a receiver module 16 for further signal processing, such as extracting the received message signal.
As mentioned above, a problem with conventional optical receivers is that the bandwidth of the receiver, as produced, may not match the requirements of a particular application. For example, an exemplary dense wavelength division multiplexed (DWDM) communication system may require an optical receiver with a bandwidth of 1.45 GHz. In accordance with the present invention, a digital controller 18 is coupled to pre-amplifier 14 and used to control a predetermined parameter (such as, for example, voltage, current, resistance, capacitance, etc.) so as to modify (either increase or decrease, as desired) the bandwidth of the device. A control signal, denoted C in FIG. 1, is applied as an input to digital controller 18 and used to provide the “increase”/“decrease” signal to digital controller 18.
FIG. 2 illustrates a specific embodiment of the present invention utilizing a voltage regulator and adjustable resistor network in conjunction with the preamplifier to adjust the “as manufactured” bandwidth of an optical receiver so as to provide a receiver with the desired bandwidth. Referring to FIG. 2, an exemplary voltage regulator 20 is used to generate a voltage, denoted VIN, that is applied as the bias input voltage to preamplifier 14. Voltage regulator 20 is coupled between the input supply potential, denoted VCC, and ground, with an adjustable resistor network 22 coupled between a “set” input and the output of voltage regulator 20. Adjustable resistor network is shown as comprising a first resistor R1 coupled between the “set” and “output” terminals of voltage regulator 20, a second resistor R2 and an adjustable resistance RPOT, the combination of R2 and RPOT connected in series between the “set” input of voltage regulator 20 and ground.
In operation of the present invention, receiver 10 is first evaluated to determine its bandwidth. If the value is within acceptable limits, no adjustments are required. For the purposes of the present discussion; it will first be presumed that the initial measured bandwidth is too “low”, that is, the measured 3 dB cutoff frequency is below a lower limit acceptable for the particular receiver application. In the exemplary arrangement shown in FIG. 2, the value of RPOT is decreased, which in turn increases the voltage, denoted VIN, generated by voltage regulator 20. Preamplifier 14, which exhibits a bandwidth that is a function of applied input voltage, will therefore have an “increase” in its bandwidth as the applied voltage VIN increases. The bandwidth of receiver 10 can then be monitored, with the value of RPOT continuously adjusted (in this case, decreased) until the bandwidth reaches an acceptable size. The value of RPOT is then “fixed” at the value associated with the adjusted bandwidth. FIG. 3 contains a graph illustrating bandwidth adjustment in accordance with the present invention from a “low” bandwidth regime to an acceptable bandwidth, the adjustment resulting from a decrease in the value of RPOT and applied as an input to preamplifier 14. Similarly, for the case where the initially measured bandwidth is too “high” for the particular receiver application, the value of RPOT may be increased, thus decreasing the value of input voltage VIN applied to preamplifier 14 until the bandwidth of receiver 10 has decreased to an acceptable value. FIG. 4 contains a graph illustrating the movement of an exemplary receiver's bandwidth from a “high” bandwidth to an acceptable bandwidth range, resulting from an upward adjustment in the value of RPOT until an acceptable value is obtained.
As mentioned above, an advantage of the arrangement of the present invention is that the voltage applied as an input to preamplifier 14 is a known, fixed value, controlled by voltage regulator 20. In conventional optical receiver arrangements, a preamplifier such as preamplifier 14 may use a supply line (such as VCC) as the input voltage, where this voltage may vary from circuit to circuit (as well as over time). This variation in applied voltage thus results in an undesired variation in bandwidth in the prior art receiver arrangements. Therefore, the use of a voltage regulator to regulate the preamplifier supply voltage in accordance with the present invention ensures a consistent value of input voltage, regardless of any fluctuations in voltage appearing along the supply rails.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention, utilizing a digital potentiometer 30 and a positive power supply, is illustrated in FIG. 5. Digital potentiometer 30 is used to provide the adjustment (either increase or decrease) to RPOT so as to adjust the size of the bandwidth of receiver 10 by controlling the voltage produced by voltage regulator 20. Referring to FIG. 5, digital potentiometer 30 includes a pair of inputs that are used to control the value of RPOT. A first DC input 32 is used to control the direction of the adjustment. For example, a positive value (such as 5V dc) applied to input 32 may be used to indicate that the value of RPOT needs to be adjusted “upward”. A negative value (or, alternatively, “ground” or 0V dc) applied to input 32 may then be used to indicate that the value of RPOT needs to be adjusted “downward”. Obviously, an alternative embodiment may use the complement of these values. Referring to FIG. 4, therefore, input 32 is denoted as the “UP/DOWN” input. Once the direction of the adjustment is ascertained, a series of pulses may then be applied to a second input 34, where each pulse will provide a predetermined level of increment (or decrement, as the case may be). For example, each pulse may result in adjusting the value of RPOT such that the receiver bandwidth is moved by 30 MHz. A series of pulses thus results in changing (either increasing or decreasing) the receiver bandwidth in a series of 30 MHz steps, until an appropriate bandwidth is reached. It is to be understood that 30 MHz is only an exemplary value, related to the value of RPOT, and various other step sizes may be used in providing bandwidth adjustment in accordance with the present invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4529947 *||Jun 4, 1984||Jul 16, 1985||Spectronics, Inc.||Apparatus for input amplifier stage|
|US4608542 *||Jun 6, 1985||Aug 26, 1986||Rca Corporation||Bandwidth controlled data amplifier|
|US5257285 *||Dec 12, 1988||Oct 26, 1993||Bt&D Technologies Limited||Transimpedance pre-amplifier and a receiver including the pre-amplifier|
|US5455705||Mar 14, 1994||Oct 3, 1995||Analog Devices, Inc.||Transimpedance amplifier for optical receiver|
|US5801588 *||Feb 21, 1997||Sep 1, 1998||Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.||Preamplifier for optical communication|
|US5821814 *||Dec 17, 1996||Oct 13, 1998||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Negative feedback amplifier|
|US5907422||Jan 6, 1997||May 25, 1999||Qualop Systems Corp.||Universal optical signal receiver|
|US6055279 *||Sep 18, 1998||Apr 25, 2000||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Burst mode digital optical receiver|
|US6175275 *||Sep 28, 1999||Jan 16, 2001||Stmicroelectronics S.A.||Preamplifier with an adjustable bandwidth|
|EP0430238A2||Nov 29, 1990||Jun 5, 1991||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Fiber optic receiving circuit for converting an optical signal to an electric signal|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7076164 *||Jun 24, 2002||Jul 11, 2006||Tellabs Operations, Inc.||System and method for measuring power of optical signals carried over a fiber optic link|
|US7302178||Jul 6, 2006||Nov 27, 2007||Tellabs Operations, Inc.||System and method for measuring power of optical signals carried over a fiber optic link|
|US7466928||Jul 22, 2005||Dec 16, 2008||Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.||Optical receiver with dynamic gain and bandwidth|
|US9201435 *||Mar 5, 2013||Dec 1, 2015||Infineon Technologies Ag||System and method for a power supply|
|US9523989||Nov 23, 2015||Dec 20, 2016||Infineon Technologies Ag||System and method for a power supply|
|US20030002098 *||Jun 24, 2002||Jan 2, 2003||Carrick John C.||System and method for measuring power of optical signals carried over a fiber optic link|
|US20060018669 *||Jul 22, 2005||Jan 26, 2006||Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.||Optical receiver with dynamic gain and bandwidth|
|US20060250608 *||Jul 6, 2006||Nov 9, 2006||Tellabs Operations, Inc.||System and Method for Measuring Power of Optical Signals Carried Over a Fiber Optic Link|
|US20080032643 *||Jul 20, 2006||Feb 7, 2008||Sierra Wireless, Inc. A Canadian Corp.||Methods and apparatus for providing input voltages to power amplifiers|
|US20140253071 *||Mar 5, 2013||Sep 11, 2014||Infineon Technologies Ag||System and Method for a Power Supply|
|U.S. Classification||330/110, 330/308|
|International Classification||H04B10/06, H04B10/04, H04J14/02, H04B10/158, H04B10/28, H03G5/16, H04B10/14, H04B10/26, H03F3/08|
|Cooperative Classification||H04J14/0221, H04B10/6932|
|European Classification||H04B10/6932, H04J14/02B|
|Jul 8, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FRENCH, JOHN SARGENT;THOMPSON, WILLIAM J.;WIAND, PATRICKRAYMOND;REEL/FRAME:010094/0623
Effective date: 19990706
|Jan 6, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AGERE SYSTEMS INC., PENNSYLVANIA
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AGERE SYSTEMS GUARDIAN CORP.;REEL/FRAME:015552/0682
Effective date: 20020822
Owner name: TRIQUINT TECHNOLOGY HOLDING COMPANY, OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AGERE SYSTEMS INC.;REEL/FRAME:015552/0687
Effective date: 20030102
|Feb 21, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AGERE SYSTEMS GUARDLAN CORP., PENNSYLVANIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.;REEL/FRAME:015748/0497
Effective date: 20010130
|Apr 11, 2007||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Sep 23, 2007||REIN||Reinstatement after maintenance fee payment confirmed|
|Sep 23, 2007||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Nov 13, 2007||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20070923
|Dec 3, 2007||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Dec 3, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 28, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATI
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:TRIQUINT TECHNOLOGY HOLDING CO., A DELAWARE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:026109/0478
Effective date: 20100622
|May 27, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|May 27, 2011||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 7
|Jan 29, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jun 16, 2016||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: QORVO US, INC., NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;REEL/FRAME:039050/0193
Effective date: 20160330