|Publication number||US6625975 B1|
|Application number||US 09/720,699|
|Publication date||Sep 30, 2003|
|Filing date||Apr 26, 2000|
|Priority date||Apr 29, 1999|
|Also published as||DE19919472A1, DE19919472C2, DE50013154D1, EP1105724A2, EP1105724B1, WO2000067015A2, WO2000067015A3|
|Publication number||09720699, 720699, PCT/2000/1297, PCT/DE/0/001297, PCT/DE/0/01297, PCT/DE/2000/001297, PCT/DE/2000/01297, PCT/DE0/001297, PCT/DE0/01297, PCT/DE0001297, PCT/DE001297, PCT/DE2000/001297, PCT/DE2000/01297, PCT/DE2000001297, PCT/DE200001297, US 6625975 B1, US 6625975B1, US-B1-6625975, US6625975 B1, US6625975B1|
|Inventors||Roland Stahl, Rainer Strohmaier|
|Original Assignee||Robert Bosch Gmbh|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (20), Referenced by (18), Classifications (29), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to a device and a method for detecting ammonia, especially an NH3 slip, in a catalytic converter arrangement.
For reducing the NOx emissions from lean-mixture-driven internal combustion engines, especially diesel engines, an SCR catalytic converter (“selective catalytic reduction”) may be used for the exhaust treatment. In this respect, reference should be made to D. Schöppe, et al., “A Regulated Exhaust Treatment System for Meeting Future Emissions Threshold Values in Diesel Engines,” Progress Reports, VDI, Series 12, No. 267, Vol. 1 (1996), 17th International Vienna Engine Symposium, pp. 332-353, in which the mode of operation and the construction of an SCR catalytic converter of this type is discussed.
Summarizing, in an SCR catalytic converter, a selective catalytic reduction of NOx to N2 takes place, NH3 (ammonia) acting as a reducing agent, which can be obtained from a liquid urea solution in a hydrolysis catalytic converter upstream of the SCR catalytic converter.
However, in the operation of a system of this type for an exhaust treatment using an SCR catalytic converter, the problem arises that too much urea may be apportioned out, so that unconverted ammonia reaches the ambient air along with the exhaust via the SCR catalytic converter. If this NH3 emission is to be suppressed or monitored, an NH3 sensor by be required.
The exemplary device and method of the present inventions are believed to have the advantage that expensive sensors that specifically target NH3 and that are technically difficult to realize are not used for detecting ammonia or NH3 emissions. As a result, it is possible in an advantageous manner for a broader spectrum of sensor concepts or sensor materials to be considered for use, i e., for detecting ammonia, it is possible to use available gas sensors, especially those that do not react selectively to specific oxidizable gases or gas components, which may represent a significant cost advantage and a simplification with respect to the technology and manufacture of the gas sensors that can be used. In particular, the spectrum of gas sensors that can be used for detecting ammonia can be broadened significantly, in an advantageous manner, to include gas sensors having metallic electrodes, specifically Pt/Au systems, which may already be used as HC sensors.
As a result of the fact that the known SCR catalytic converter, via an upstream first means, has supplied to it an already at least substantially, preferably completely, pre-cleaned or pre-oxidized gas or exhaust gas, this gas already no longer contains any oxidizable or combustible gas components. In particular, gas components HC and CO are no longer contained in this pre-cleaned gas.
Upstream of the feed to the SCR catalytic converter, via a second gas supply device, ammonia is advantageously added to the gas that has been pre-cleaned in this manner, so that in the SCR catalytic converter no oxidizable gas exists apart from NH3. In the event that the totality of the supplied NH3 is not used up in the SCR catalytic converter for reducing the NOx that is present, an NH3 breakthrough or NH3 emission arises in the SCR catalytic converter, i.e., the gas emerging from the SCR catalytic converter contains ammonia. However, since this ammonia is the only oxidizable gas component contained in the gas, it is not necessary, for detecting the ammonia, to use a means that is specifically targeted to NH3, especially a gas sensor that specifically targets ammonia. A simple sensor suffices that is generally, or across a broad spectrum, sensitive to oxidizable gas components, as is already generally known.
Thus it is believed to be especially advantageous if the gas to be supplied to the SCR catalytic converter before being mixed with ammonia is pre-treated in an available oxidation catalytic converter, which carries out the at least substantial oxidation or pre-cleaning of the gas to be supplied to the SCR catalytic converter.
Supplying the ammonia to the pre-cleaned or pre-oxidized gas, which is to be supplied to the SCR catalytic converter and which, for example, emerges from the oxidation catalytic converter, is carried out in a very advantageous manner using a generally known gas supply device, which includes a hydrolysis catalytic converter for producing ammonia from a chemical compound, especially urea, a dosing system for the dosed and controlled adding of ammonia to the pre-oxidized gas, and an appropriate supply line (e.g., the at least one of the ammonia and the NH3 slip emission is releasable from the at least one of the chemical compound and the urea in the hydrolysis catalytic converter).
Furthermore, it is believed to be advantageous if the second arrangement, device or structure for detecting the oxidizable gas components emerging from the SCR catalytic converter is connected to a processing unit, which is connected via a control unit and a control line to the gas supply device for supplying ammonia to the pre-oxidized gas. In this manner, the addition of ammonia to the gas supplied to the SCR catalytic converter can advantageously be controlled, or, in the form of a closed feedback circuit, can be regulated as a function of the NH3 that is actually consumed for the reduction of NOx, such that the quantity of the unused ammonia emerging from the SCR catalytic converter is minimized or is reduced virtually to zero.
The FIGURE shows a block diagram of an exemplary catalytic converter arrangement for detecting an NH3 emission.
The FIGURE shows a catalytic converter arrangement 1, such as can be used, for example, in the exhaust gas treatment of diesel engines or of lean-mixture-driven internal combustion engines. Into this catalytic converter arrangement 1 is introduced, initially via an appropriate, an available exhaust gas pipe, a supplied gas 5, in particular a diesel-engine exhaust gas, which has a multiplicity of oxidizable gas components, in particular, for example, HC and CO, as well as nitrogen oxide (NOx). This supplied gas 5 is initially introduced into an available oxidation catalytic converter 10, for example, the one discussed in European Patent Application No. 0800 856, which undertakes a pre-cleaning and pre-oxidation of supplied gas 5, so that the oxidizable gas components contained in supplied gas 5, especially HC or CO, are substantially or completely oxidized or converted, for example, to H2O or CO2. Thus an at least substantially oxidized gas 5′ containing only NOx as a pollutant component, emerges from oxidation catalytic converter 10.
This at least substantially oxidized gas 5′ is then subsequently supplied via a generally known first gas supply device to an SCR catalytic converter 12. However, in this context, it is first provided that, before entering into SCR catalytic converter 12, ammonia is mixed with at least substantially oxidized gas 5′. This takes place using a second gas supply device, which has a dosing system 13, a supply line 14, and a hydrolysis catalytic converter 11. Specifically, for this purpose, dosing system 13 via supply line 14 initially supplies urea to hydrolysis catalytic converter 11, which in a generally known manner is there converted to NH3. This NH3 is then mixed with at least substantially oxidized gas 5′ before the gas mixture, generated in this manner, composed of NH3 and at least substantially oxidized gas 5′, arrives in SCR catalytic converter 12.
Alternatively, it is also possible, in accordance with the FIGURE, that urea is added in a dosed manner, initially via dosing system 13 and supply line 14, to at least substantially oxidized gas 5′, and that this mixture is then supplied to hydrolysis catalytic converter 11, which converts the urea to NH3, so that the gas mixture is composed of at least substantially oxidized gas 5′ and NH3.
In this sense, the first gas supply device and the second gas supply device in the exemplary embodiments discussed in accordance with the FIGURE interpenetrate each other and are spatially integrated in each other, because the first gas supply device supplies the generated, at least substantially oxidized gas 5′, for example, via appropriate pipes, initially to the second gas supply device, which modifies the gas in hydrolysis catalytic converter 11 as a part of the second gas supply device by adding NH3, and in which thus the at least substantially oxidized gas 5′ and the NH3 are mixed together. This gas mixture is then finally supplied to SCR catalytic converter 12.
However, in a further variant of the exemplary embodiment discussed, it is also possible spatially to separate the first gas supply device and the second gas supply device one from the other, so that the first one generates at least substantially oxidized gas 5′ and supplies it directly to the SCR catalytic converter, and the second one generates the ammonia and likewise supplies it directly to SCR catalytic converter 12. In this variant, in an advantageous manner, at least substantially oxidized gas 5′ and the supplied NH3, before arriving in SCR catalytic converter 12, are additionally mixed using a suitable, an available mixing device.
Finally, in SCR catalytic converter 12, with the assistance of the supplied ammonia in an available manner, the nitrogen oxide (NOx) present in the supplied gas or gas mixture is reduced to N2 through a selective catalytic reaction. Downstream of SCR catalytic converter 12, the emerging gas 5″ is then conveyed further and removed.
Emerging gas 5″, as pollutant components, now has only NOx, in the event the supply of ammonia via the second gas supply device was not sufficient (insufficient emission reduction), or NH3, in the event the supply of ammonia was too great (NH3 emission or NH3 breakthrough). Further oxidizable gas components, such as CO and HC, were already removed from supplied gas 5 by oxidation catalytic converter 10.
Therefore, in order to check quantitatively whether the NH3 supplied is adequate, too great, or too small, a gas sensor 15 is provided downstream of SCR catalytic converter 12, the gas sensor being sensitive in a non-selective manner, or across a broad spectrum, with respect to oxidizable gas components and being in contact with emerging gas 5″. Gas sensor 15 is, for example, an available gas sensor having metallic electrodes on a Pt/Au base, which are widely used as HC sensors. Sensors of this type have a logarithmic characteristic curve as a function of the gas concentration, i.e., they have a very high sensitivity especially in the range of concentrations under 100 ppm, such as may arise in an NH3 breakthrough, and therefore they make possible, in a very effective and simple manner, a quantitative determination of the oxidizable gas components in emerging gas 5″.
Furthermore, gas sensor 15 is connected to an available processing unit 16 for receiving, evaluating, and conditioning the signals of gas sensor 15. Processing unit 16 is also connected to a control unit 17, which via a control line 18 is connected to dosing system 13. In this context, processing unit 16, control unit 17, control line 18 and dosing system 13, or the second gas supply device, are also integrated in one assembly.
Therefore, via control unit 17, as a function of the measuring signal of gas sensor 15, it is possible to control the ammonia supply to substantially oxidized gas 5′ before it enters into SCR catalytic converter 12, the ammonia supply in an available manner always being regulated in the form of a closed feedback circuit, such that, on the one hand, the most complete reduction possible and therefore the removal of nitrogen oxide from the emerging gas 5″ is achieved, and that, on the other hand, at the same time the smallest possible amount of ammonia is contained in the emerging gas 5″.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3599427 *||Sep 22, 1969||Aug 17, 1971||Ford Motor Co||Exhaust gas purification|
|US5116579 *||Apr 1, 1991||May 26, 1992||Nippon Shokubai Kagaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.||Removing nitrogen oxides in exhaust gases from a diesel engine|
|US5308810 *||Dec 28, 1992||May 3, 1994||Atlantic Richfield Company||Method for treating contaminated catalyst|
|US5357749 *||May 14, 1992||Oct 25, 1994||Hitachi Ltd.||Apparatus for controlling exhaust concentration|
|US5367875 *||Dec 7, 1992||Nov 29, 1994||Coltec Industries Inc||Automated catalytic reduction system|
|US5369956 *||Apr 27, 1993||Dec 6, 1994||Mercedes-Benz Ag||Exhaust gas aftertreatment device for internal combustion engines|
|US5540047||Oct 6, 1994||Jul 30, 1996||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method for reducing the nitrogen oxide concentration in the exhaust of an internal combustion engine or of a firing system|
|US5628186 *||Nov 7, 1995||May 13, 1997||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method and apparatus for controlled introduction of a reducing agent into a nitrogen oxide-containing exhaust gas|
|US5809774 *||Nov 19, 1996||Sep 22, 1998||Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.||System for fueling and feeding chemicals to internal combustion engines for NOx reduction|
|US5809775 *||Apr 2, 1997||Sep 22, 1998||Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.||Reducing NOx emissions from an engine by selective catalytic reduction utilizing solid reagents|
|US5833932 *||Oct 20, 1997||Nov 10, 1998||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Catalytic converter for nitrogen oxide reduction in the exhaust gas of an internal combustion engine|
|US5968464 *||May 12, 1997||Oct 19, 1999||Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.||Urea pyrolysis chamber and process for reducing lean-burn engine NOx emissions by selective catalytic reduction|
|US5976475 *||Apr 2, 1997||Nov 2, 1999||Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.||Reducing NOx emissions from an engine by temperature-controlled urea injection for selective catalytic reduction|
|US6082102 *||Sep 25, 1998||Jul 4, 2000||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||NOx reduction system with a device for metering reducing agents|
|US6105365 *||Apr 8, 1997||Aug 22, 2000||Engelhard Corporation||Apparatus, method, and system for concentrating adsorbable pollutants and abatement thereof|
|US6125629 *||Nov 13, 1998||Oct 3, 2000||Engelhard Corporation||Staged reductant injection for improved NOx reduction|
|US6173568 *||Sep 16, 1998||Jan 16, 2001||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method and device for operating an internal combustion engine operating with an excess of air|
|US6357226 *||Oct 22, 1998||Mar 19, 2002||Chrysler Corporation||Control system for lean air-fuel ratio NOx catalyst system|
|DE3721572A1||Jun 30, 1987||Feb 11, 1988||Jenbacher Werke Ag||Process for open-loop and closed-loop control of a catalyst|
|EP0800856A2||Apr 7, 1997||Oct 15, 1997||Degussa Aktiengesellschaft||Catalyst for treating exhaust gases from diesel engines|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7827782||Mar 23, 2006||Nov 9, 2010||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||Method for remediating emissions|
|US7833495||Feb 2, 2007||Nov 16, 2010||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||Exhaust treatment device facilitating through-wall flow|
|US8133842||Oct 21, 2010||Mar 13, 2012||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||Exhaust treatment device facilitating through-wall flow|
|US8225600||May 27, 2010||Jul 24, 2012||Theis Joseph R||Method for remediating emissions|
|US8359833||Dec 23, 2009||Jan 29, 2013||Caterpillar Inc.||Method for introducing a reductant into an exhaust stream|
|US8459012||Nov 19, 2008||Jun 11, 2013||Caterpillar Inc.||Method for purging a dosing system|
|US8474248||May 6, 2009||Jul 2, 2013||Detroit Diesel Corporation||Model based method for selective catalyst reducer urea dosing strategy|
|US8601795||Nov 11, 2011||Dec 10, 2013||Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft||Sensor for detecting the amount of a reducing agent and the amount of a pollutant in an exhaust gas|
|US20020182127 *||May 29, 2002||Dec 5, 2002||Tillmann Braun||Device and method for removing nitrogen oxides from the exhaust gas from lean-burn internal combustion engines|
|US20050247049 *||May 5, 2004||Nov 10, 2005||Eaton Corporation||Temperature swing adsorption and selective catalytic reduction NOx removal system|
|US20060260296 *||Mar 23, 2006||Nov 23, 2006||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||Method for remediating emissions|
|US20070128088 *||Feb 2, 2007||Jun 7, 2007||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||Exhaust Treatment device Facilitating Through-Wall Flow|
|US20090120078 *||Nov 17, 2008||May 14, 2009||Emitec Gesellschaft Fur Emissionstechnologie Mbh||Apparatus for Treating Exhaust Gas of an Internal Combustion Engine|
|US20100122521 *||Nov 19, 2008||May 20, 2010||Caterpillar Inc.||Method for purging a dosing system|
|US20100229535 *||May 27, 2010||Sep 16, 2010||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||Method for remediating emissions|
|US20100281855 *||May 6, 2009||Nov 11, 2010||Min Sun||Model based method for selective catalyst reducer urea dosing strategy|
|US20110035941 *||Oct 21, 2010||Feb 17, 2011||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||Exhaust Treatment device Facilitating Through-Wall Flow|
|US20110146247 *||Dec 23, 2009||Jun 23, 2011||Caterpillar Inc.||Method for introducing a reductant into an exhaust stream|
|U.S. Classification||60/286, 60/303, 60/295, 60/301, 60/274|
|International Classification||F01N13/02, G01N33/00, B01D53/94, B01D53/86, F01N3/08, G01N31/00, G01N31/10, F01N3/20|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02T10/24, F01N2610/02, F01N3/2066, G01N31/10, F01N2240/40, B01D53/9431, G01N33/0054, B01D53/9495, G01N31/005, F01N13/009|
|European Classification||G01N33/00D2D4K, B01D53/94Y, G01N31/10, B01D53/94F2D, G01N31/00C, F01N3/20E|
|Mar 2, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, GERMANY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STAHL, ROLAND;STROHMAIER, RAINER;REEL/FRAME:011600/0643;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010117 TO 20010118
|May 3, 2005||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Mar 27, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 23, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Mar 24, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12