Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS6632573 B1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 09/789,379
Publication dateOct 14, 2003
Filing dateFeb 20, 2001
Priority dateFeb 20, 2001
Fee statusPaid
Also published asUS20040081894, WO2002067344A2, WO2002067344A3
Publication number09789379, 789379, US 6632573 B1, US 6632573B1, US-B1-6632573, US6632573 B1, US6632573B1
InventorsYevgeniy S. Nimon, May-Ying Chu, Steven J. Visco
Original AssigneePolyplus Battery Company
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Electrolytes with strong oxidizing additives for lithium/sulfur batteries
US 6632573 B1
Abstract
Disclosed are oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes, battery cells containing such oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes, battery cell electrolytes containing oxidizing additives, and methods of treating lithium electrodes with oxidizing agents and battery cells containing such oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes. Battery cells containing SO2 as an electrolyte additive in accordance with the present invention exhibit higher discharge capacities after cell storage over cells not containing SO2. Pre-treating the lithium electrode with SO2 gas prior to battery assembly prevented cell polarization. Moreover, the SO2 treatment does not negatively impact sulfur utilization and improves the lithium's electrochemical function as the negative electrode in the battery cell.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(47)
What is claimed is:
1. A battery cell electrolyte, comprising:
a) a main solvent of an electrolyte solvent mixture, having the chemical formula R1(CH2CH2O)nR2, where n ranges between 1 and 10, R1 and R2 are different or identical groups selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, substituted alkyl, and substituted alkoxy groups; and
b) an oxidizing agent additive comprising no more than about 49% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture, oxidizing agent additive being selected from the group consisting of a halogen, an interhalogen, and an oxychloride and combinations thereof.
2. The electrolyte of claim 1, wherein the halogen is selected from the group consisting of Cl2, Br2 and I2.
3. The electrolyte of claim 1, wherein the oxychloride is selected from the group consisting of SO2Cl2 and SOCl2.
4. The electrolyte of claim 1, wherein the interhalogen is selected from the group consisting of iodine monochloride (ICl), iodine trichloride (ICl3) and iodine monobromide (I2Br2).
5. The electrolyte of claim 1, further comprising a dioxolane as a co-solvent.
6. The electrolyte of claim 5, wherein the dioxolane co-solvent comprises less than about 20% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture.
7. The electrolyte of claim 1, wherein said main solvent is a linear polyether.
8. The electrolyte of claim 1, wherein said main solvent is chosen from the glyme family including monoglyme diglyme, triglyme, and tetraglyme.
9. The electrolyte of claim 1, wherein said main solvent is dimethoxyetane.
10. The electrolyte of claim 1, further comprising a second co-solvent having a donor number of at least about 13.
11. The electrolyte of claim 10, wherein said second co-solvent is at least one of hexamethylphosphoramide, pyridine, N,N-diethylacetamide, N,N-diethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, tetramethylurea, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-dimethylformamide, tributylphosphate, trimetylphosphate N,N,N′N′-tetraethylsulfamide, tetramethylenediamine, tetramethylpropylenediamine, and pentamethyldiethylenetriamine.
12. The electrolyte of claim 1, further comprising an electrolyte salt.
13. The electrolyte of claim 12, wherein said electrolyte salt is at least one of LiN(C2F5SO2)2, LiN(CF3SO2)2, LiCF3SO3, LiClO4, LiPF6, LiBF4, LiAsF6.
14. The electrolyte of claim 1, wherein said electrolyte is in a liquid state.
15. The electrolyte of claim 1, wherein said electrolyte is in a gel state.
16. The electrolyte of claim 1, wherein said electrolyte is in a solid state.
17. A battery cell comprising:
a) a negative lithium electrode;
b) a positive electrode comprising an electrochemical active material;
c) an electrolyte including a
i) a main solvent of an electrolyte solvent mixture, having the chemical formula R1(CH2CH2O)nR2, where n ranges between 1 and 10, R1 and R2 are different or identical groups selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, substituted alkyl and substituted alkoxy groups; and
ii) an oxidizing agent additive comprising no more than about 49% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture, the oxidizing agent additive being selected from the group consisting of a halogen an interhalogen. and an oxychloride and combinations thereof.
18. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said electrochemically active material comprises sulfur in the form of at least one of elemental sulfur, a metal sulfide, a metal polysulfide, an organosulfur material, and combinations thereof, wherein said metal is selected from the group consisting of alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, and mixtures of alkali and alkaline earth metals.
19. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said electrochemically active material comprises Li2Sg.
20. The battery cell of claim 17, further comprising a first dioxolane co-solvent, comprising no more than 20% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture.
21. The battery cell of claim 17, further comprising a second co-solvent having a donor number of at least about 13.
22. The battery cell of claim 21, wherein said second co-solvent is at least one of hexamethylphosphoramide, pyridine, N,N-diethylacetamide, N,N-diethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, tetramethylurea, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-dimethylformamide, tributylphosphate, trimethylphosphate N,N,N′,N′N-tetraethylsulfitmide, tetramethylenediamine, tetramethylpropylenediamine, and pentamethyldiethylenetriamine.
23. The battery cell of claim 17, further comprising an electrolyte salt.
24. The battery cell of claim 23, wherein said electrolyte salt is at least one of LiN(C2F5SO2)2, LiN(CF3SO2)2, LiCF3SO3, LiClO4, LiPF6, LiBF4, LiAsF6.
25. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said electrolyte is in a liquid state.
26. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said electrolyte is in a gel state.
27. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said electrolyte is in a solid state.
28. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said electrolyte is a catholyte comprising a dissolved lithium polysulfide.
29. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein the halogen is selected from the group consisting of Cl2, Br2 and I2.
30. The batery cell of claim 17, wherein the oxychloride is selected from the group consisting of SO2 Cl2 and SOCl2.
31. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein the interhalogen is selected from the group consisting of iodine monochloride (ICl), iodine trichloride (ICl3) and iodine monobromide (I2Br2).
32. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said lithium negative electrode comprises at lent one material selected from the group consisting of lithium metal, a lithium alloy, and a lithium insertion compound.
33. The battery cell of claim 17, further comprising a dioxolane as an electrolyte co-solvent.
34. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein the dioxolane co-solvent comprises less than about 20% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture.
35. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said solvent is a linear polyether.
36. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said main solvent is chosen from the glyme family including monoglyme, diglyme, triglyme, and tetraglyme.
37. The battery cell of claim 17, wherein said main solvent is dimethoxyethane.
38. A battery cell electrolyte, consisting essentially of:
a) a main solvent of an electrolyte solvent mixture, having the chemical formula R1(CH2CH2O)nR2, where ranges between 1 and 10, R1 and R2 are different or identical groups selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, substituted alkyl, and substituted alkoxy groups; and
c) a sulfur dioxide oxidizing agent additive comprising no more than about 49% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture.
39. The electrolyte of claim 38, wherein the electrolyte contains about 3.2% by weight sulfur dioxide.
40. The electrolyte of claim 38, wherein said electrolyte is in a liquid state.
41. The electrolyte of claim 38, wherein said electrolyte is in a gel state.
42. The electrolyte of claim 38, wherein said electrolyte is in a solid state.
43. A battery cell comprising:
b) a negative lithium electrode;
b) a positive electrode comprising an electrochemically active material;
c) an electrolyte including a
i) a main solvent of an electrolyte solvent mixture, having the chemical formula R1 (CH2CH2O)nR2, where n ranges between 1 and 10, R1 and R2 are different or identical groups selected from the group consisting of alkyl alkoxy, substituted alkyl, and substituted alkoxy groups; and
ii) a sulfur dioxide oxidizing agent additive comprising no more than about 49% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture.
44. The cell of claim 43, wherein the electrolyte contains about 3.2% by weight sulfur dioxide.
45. The electrolyte of claim 43, wherein said electrolyte is in a liquid state.
46. The electrolyte of claim 43, wherein said electrolyte is in a gel state.
47. The electrolyte of claim 43, wherein said electrolyte is in a solid state.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to lithium-sulfur batteries, and in particular to battery electrolytes having additives of oxidizing agents.

The rapid proliferation of portable electronic devices in the international marketplace has led to a corresponding increase in the demand for advanced secondary batteries. The miniaturization of such devices as, for example, cellular phones, laptop computers, etc., has naturally fueled the desire for batteries having high specific energies. In addition, heightened awareness concerning toxic waste has motivated, in part, efforts to replace toxic cadmium electrodes in rechargeable nickel/cadmium batteries with the more benign hydrogen storage electrodes in nickel/metal hydride cells. For the above reasons, there is a strong market potential for environmentally benign battery technologies.

Secondary batteries are in widespread use in modern society, particularly in applications where large amounts of energy are not required. However, it is desirable to use batteries in applications requiring considerable power, and much effort has been expended in developing batteries suitable for high specific energy, medium power applications, such as, for electric vehicles and load leveling. Of course, such batteries are also suitable for use in lower power applications such as cameras or portable recording devices.

At this time, the most common secondary batteries are probably the lead-acid batteries used in automobiles. These batteries have the advantage of being capable of operating for many charge cycles without significant loss of performance. However, such batteries have a low energy to weight ratio. Similar limitations are found in most other systems, such as Ni-Cd and nickel metal hydride systems.

Among the factors leading to the successful development of high specific energy batteries, is the fundamental need for high cell voltage and low equivalent weight electrode materials. Electrode materials must also fulfill the basic electrochemical requirements of sufficient electronic and ionic conductivity, high reversibility of the oxidation/reduction reaction, as well as excellent thermal and chemical stability within the temperature range for a particular application. Importantly, the electrode materials must be reasonably inexpensive, widely available, non-toxic, and easy to process.

Thus, a smaller, lighter, cheaper, non-toxic battery has been sought for the next generation of batteries. The low equivalent weight of lithium renders it attractive as a battery electrode component for improving weight ratios. Lithium provides also greater energy per volume than do the traditional battery standards, nickel and cadmium.

The low equivalent weight and low cost of sulfur and its nontoxicity renders it also an attractive candidate battery component. Successful lithium/organosulfur battery cells are known. (See, De Jonghe et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,833,048 and 4,917,974; and Visco et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,162,175.)

Recent developments in ambient-temperature sulfur electrode technology may provide commercially viable primary and rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chu and colleagues are largely responsible for these developments which are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,582,623 and 5,523,179 (issued to Chu). The patents disclose a sulfur-based positive electrode for a battery cell that has low equivalent weight and high cell voltage and consequently a high specific energy (greater than about 120 Wh/kg). The disclosed positive electrode addresses deficiencies in the prior art to provide a high capacity sulfur-based positive composite electrode suitable for use with metal (such as lithium) negative electrodes. These developments allow electrochemical utilization of elemental sulfur at levels of 50% and higher over multiple cycles. Because sulfur has a theoretical maximum capacity of 1675 mAh/g (assuming all sulfur atoms in an electrode are fully reduced during discharge), the utilization of sulfur in lithium-sulfur cells as described in the above Chu patents typically exceeds 800 milliamp-hours per gram (mAh/g) of sulfur.

Nevertheless, the challenge of providing improved batteries, and especially batteries having increased cycle life and long shelf-life, remains. In particular, the shelf-life of lithium-sulfur batteries is limited by the degradation of the lithium electrode surface during cell storage and the formation of thick and resistive surface passivating film comprising Li2S. The passivating film may significantly increase the lithium electrode polarization at the early stages of the cell discharge.

To compensate for this loss of active anode material, extra lithium may be provided for the lithium electrode increasing the cost and weight of the battery. The use of additional metals also increases the burden of disposing of the battery as additional toxic materials must be processed. Mossy lithium formed during cell cycling can also present a fire hazard by creating fine particles of lithium metal that can ignite on contact with air.

Accordingly, methods for the prevention of capacity loss in battery cells with sulfur-containing cathodes and the prevention of degradation of the surface of a lithium electrode in such cells would be desirable.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes, battery cells containing such oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes, battery cell electrolytes containing oxidizing additives, and methods of treating lithium electrodes with oxidizing agents and battery cells containing such oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes. Battery cells containing an SO2 oxidizing agent as an electrolyte additive in accordance with the present invention exhibit higher discharge capacities after cell storage over cells not containing SO2. Pre-treating the lithium electrode with SO2 gas prior to battery assembly prevented cell polarization. Moreover, the SO2 treatment does not negatively impact sulfur utilization and improves the lithium's electrochemical function as the negative electrode in the battery cell.

One aspect of the invention provides a battery cell electrolyte. The battery cell electrolyte may be characterized as including: a) a main solvent of an electrolyte solvent mixture, having the chemical formula R1(CH2CH2O)nR2, where n ranges between 1 and 10, R1 and R2 are different or identical groups selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, substituted alkyl, and substituted alkoxy groups and b) an oxidizing agent additive comprising no more than about 49% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture. The oxidizing agent additive may be at least one of sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, a halogen, an interhalogen, an oxychloride and a sulfur monochloride where the halogen is selected from the group consisting of Cl2, Br2 and I2 In specific embodiments, the oxychloride may be selected from the group consisting of SO2Cl2 and SOCL2 and the interhalogen may be selected from the group consisting of iodine monochloride (ICl), iodine trichloride (ICl3) and iodine monobromide I2Br2 Typically, the oxidizing agent additive has a stronger oxidizing ability than elemental S.

In preferred embodiments, the electrolyte may include a dioxolane co-solvent where the dioxolane co-solvent comprises less than about 20% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture and a second co-solvent having a donor number of at least about 13. The main solvent may be from the glyme family, in particular 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME). The electrolyte may include an electrolyte salt where the electrolyte may be in a liquid state, a gel state or a solid state.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a battery cell. The battery cell may be characterized as including: a) a negative lithium electrode b) a positive electrode comprising an electrochemically active material and c) an electrolyte including a: i) a main solvent of an electrolyte solvent mixture, having the chemical formula R1(CH2CH2O)nR2, where n ranges between 1 and 10, R1 and R2 are different or identical groups selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, substituted alkyl, and substituted alkoxy groups and ii) an oxidizing agent additive. The oxidizing agent additive may be at least one of sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, halogens, interhalogens, oxychlorides and sulfur monochlorides. The electrochemically active material may comprise sulfur in the form of at least one of elemental sulfur, a metal sulfide, a metal polysulfide, an organosulfur material, and combinations thereof, wherein said metal is selected from the group consisting of alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, and mixtures of alkali and alkaline earth metals.

In specific embodiments, the battery cell electrolyte may include dioxolane as a co-solvent, comprising no more than 20% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture and a high donor number co-solvent having a donor number of at least about 13. In addition, the battery cell electrolyte may include an electrolyte salt. The electrolyte of the battery cell may be in a liquid state, a gel state, or a solid state.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of making a protected lithium electrode battery cell. The method may be characterized as including: a) treating a lithium material with an oxidizing agent to form a negative electrode having a protective film, b) forming a positive electrode comprising an electrochemically active material and c) combining said negative and positive electrodes with an electrolyte following the treating of said lithium material where the oxidizing agent is at least one of sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, halogens, interhalogens, oxychlorides and sulfur monochlorides.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of making a protected lithium electrode battery cell. The method may be characterized as including: a) forming a negative electrode comprising a lithium material, b) forming a positive electrode comprising an electrochemically active material and c) combining said negative and positive electrodes with an electrolyte containing an oxidizing agent additive wherein the oxidizing agent additive reacts with the lithium material of the negative electrode to form a protective film on the negative electrode's surface. In specific embodiments, the negative electrode may be a glassy coated lithium electrode where a crack in the glassy coated lithium electrode may be penetrated by the oxidizing agent additive and the crack may be filled with a reaction product between the oxidizing agent additive and the lithium material of the glassy coated lithium electrode.

These and other features of the invention will further described and exemplified in the drawings and detailed description below.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts representative discharge characteristics for Li/S cells with and without an oxidizing agent additive.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of lithium/liquid electrolyte/sulfur cell of this invention.

FIG. 3A is a schematic illustration of a pre-formed barrier laminate including a bonding layer on a polymer or glass barrier, which is in turn on a carrier.

FIG. 3B is a schematic illustration of a lithium electrode being prepared according to an embodiment of the invention including forming a lithium layer on the bonding layer of the barrier layer laminate illustrated in FIG. 3A.

FIG. 4 illustrates effect of SO2 electrolyte additive on discharge characteristics of Li/S cells after storage.

FIG. 5 illustrates effect of Li electrode pretreatment with SO2 on discharge characteristics of Li/C cells containing dissolved polysulfides after cell storage.

FIG. 6 illustrates effect of combination of Li electrode pretreatment with SO2 and SO2 electrolyte additive on discharge characteristics of Li/S cells after storage.

FIG. 7 illustrates effect of Li electrode pretreatment with thionyl chloride on Li electrode impedance in electrolyte containing dissolved polysulfides during cell storage.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Reference will now be made in detail to preferred embodiments of the invention. Examples of preferred embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with these preferred embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to such preferred embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.

INTRODUCTION

The present invention provides oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes, battery cells containing such oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes, battery cell electrolytes containing an oxidizing agent, and methods of treating lithium electrodes with an oxidizer and methods of constructing battery cells containing such oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes. Treating lithium with an oxidizing agent allows a solid passivating film with Li-ion conductivity to form on the surface of the lithium. When used in a battery cell, the passivating film may protect a Li electrode from reactions with other active components of the electrolyte. When the Li is not treated with an oxidizing agent, during cell storage, the reactions with other active components in the electrolyte may result in the formation of a thick and porous film on the lithium surface. The thick and porous film may result in cell rate capability loss and a significant increase in Li electrode polarization at the early stage of the cell discharge. Pre-treatment of the Li electrode with the oxidizing agent or in-situ treatment of the Li electrode using an oxidizing additive in the electrolyte reduces the rate capability loss and polarization effects in a battery cell as compared to untreated Li electrodes in a similar battery cell. In addition, the oxidizing agent treatment does not negatively impact sulfur utilization and improves the lithium's electrochemical function as the negative electrode in the battery cell.

For example, experiments with Lithium-sulfur cells having S-loaded carbon cathodes and different electrolytes have shown that after storage for several days cell capacity significantly decreased. The capacity loss was observed for electrolyte formulations with a high solubility or a low solubility of lithium polysulfides (PS). Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, the capacity loss may be caused by the dissolution of elemental sulfur in the electrolyte followed by reaction between sulfur and the lithium electrode surface. The product of the reaction of sulfur with the lithium surface (Li2S) dissolves in the electrolyte to form lithium polysulfides (Li2Sx).Thus, the corrosion rate of the Li electrode will be high as long as elemental sulfur is present in the cell. Further, the formation of a Li2S layer on the Li electrode surface may result in high electrode polarization when the cell is initially discharged.

The pre-treatment or in-situ treatment of the lithium electrode with the oxidizing agent decreases the corrosion and polarization effects. For example, when the lithium electrode is pre-treated with SO2 gas, it is believed that a protective layer of the Li-ion conductor Li2S2O4 is formed in the surface of the electrode. The Li2S2O4 layer may prevent reaction of elemental sulfur with the surface of the electrode and hence decrease electrode corrosion during cell storage and polarization of the electrode during discharge.

In addition, the oxidizing agent may be advantageously used as additive in lithium battery cell electrolytes. For example, when the SO2 is used in certain amounts as an additive in the electrolyte, preferably no more than about 49% by weight of the electrolyte solvent mixture, SO2 can provide in situ protection of the lithium electrode without negatively impacting sulfur utilization while improving cell discharge characteristics after storage under open circuit voltage (OCV) conditions. As a result of presence of SO2 electrolyte additive, the highest state of sulfur oxidation due to the oxidation of polysulfides to sulfur is maintained.

The capacity of the battery cell may be increased employing an oxidizing agent additive in the electrolyte solution. For battery cells containing an oxidizing agent additive, the cathode has the value of the potential between the potential of the cathode, including the sulfur electrode, and the potential of the oxidizing additive which is usually more positive than the potential of lithium. When the cells starts to discharge, the oxidizer is reduced first which may increase the capacity of the battery. The additional delivered capacity depends on the amount of the oxidizing agent dissolved in the electrolyte. Further, oxidizing agents may alter the chemistry in a Li/S in a number of other ways which may also be beneficial to the battery cell performance: 1) via the formation of charge-transfer complexes between additives and organic solvents or polysulfides in the cell, 2) via the electrocatalysis of sulfur and polysulfides and 3) via a change in the morphology of the Li2S precipitate due to the formation of discharge products of the oxidizing additive.

FIG. 1 are example plots of discharge curves after storage under OCV conditions, for Li/S battery cells with and without oxidizing agent additives. The dashed line is representative of a typical discharge curve for a Li/S battery cell with the oxidizing agent additive and the solid line is representative of a typical discharge curve for a Li/S battery cell without the oxidizing agent additive. Other than the electrolyte oxidizing agent additive, both cells utilize a similar electrolyte formulation. Details of the electrolyte formulation are described in more detail in the following section on electrolytes.

The larger capacity of the battery cell with the oxidizing agent additive during initial discharge of the battery is due to the reduction of the oxidizing agent. When the oxidizing agent additive is reduced completely, the battery cells with and without the oxidizing agent additive exhibit a similar capacity. However, as a result of the corrosion protection afforded by the oxidizing agent additive to the Lithium electrode, the battery cell with the oxidizing agent exhibits a larger rate capability over time than the battery cell without the oxidizing agent. The benefits of oxidizing agent electrolyte additives may be useful for many types of battery systems and are not limited to Li/S battery cells described herein.

The use of oxidizing agent electrolyte additives may also be advantageous when implemented in a battery cell with a lithium electrode protected with a thin Li-ion glassy conductor. The oxidizing agent tends to penetrate into the cracks and other imperfections of the glassy layer. Then, the oxidizing agent reacts with the Li electrode protecting its surface from reacting with sulfur or polysulfides. In addition, the reaction product of lithium and the oxidizing agent formed on the surface of the lithium electrode and within the cracks of the glassy layer may prevent further cracking of the glassy layer under gravitational and thermal stresses. Thus, the invented electrolyte may provide a mechanism for glassy layer healing in a battery cell employing a lithium electrode coated with a thin Li-ion glassy conductor.

Details and specific embodiments of the present invention in regards to oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes, battery cells containing such oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes, battery cell electrolytes containing an oxidizing agent additive, methods of treating lithium electrodes with oxidizer and methods of assembling battery cells containing such oxidizer-treated lithium electrodes are described in the following sections.

BATTERY DESIGN

Suitable batteries may be constructed according to the known art for assembling cell components and cells as desired, and any of the known configurations may be fabricated utilizing the invention. The exact structures will depend primarily upon the intended use of the battery unit. Examples include thin film with porous separator, thin film polymeric laminate, jelly roll (i.e., spirally wound), prismatic, coin cell, etc.

The negative electrode is spaced from the positive sulfur electrode, and both electrodes may be in material contact with an electrolyte separator. Current collectors contact both the positive and negative electrodes in a conventional manner and permit an electrical current to be drawn by an external circuit. In a typical cell, all of the components will be enclosed in an appropriate casing, for example, plastic, with only the current collectors extending beyond the casing. Thereby, reactive elements, such as sodium or lithium in the negative electrode, as well as other cell elements are protected.

Conventional cell designs are known in the art, which may be consulted for details. Examples of sulfur cells employing various design configurations are set forth in the following references which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes: (1) R. D. Rauh, F. S. Shuker, J. M. Marston and S. B. Brummer, J. Inorg. Nuc. Chem., “Formation of Lithium Polysulfides in Aprotic Media”, 39, 1761 (1977); (2) R. D. Rauh, K. M. Abraham, G. F. Pearson, J. K. Suprenant and S. B. Brummer, “A Lithium/Dissolved Sulfur Battery with an Organic Electrolyte,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 126, 523 (1979); (3) H. Yamin, A. Gorenshtein, J. Penciner, Y. Sterberg, and E. Peled, “Lithium Sulfur Battery,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 135, 1045 (1988); (4) H. Yamin and E. Peled, “Electrochemistry of a Nonaqueous Lithium/Sulfur Cell,” J. Power Sources, 9, 281 (1983); and (5) E. Peled, Y. Sterberg, A. Gorenshtein, and Y. Lavi, “Lithium-Sulfur Battery: Evaluation of Dioxolane-Based Electrolyte,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 136, 1621 (1989).

Referring now to FIG. 2, a cell 10 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown. Cell 10 includes a negative current collector 12, which is formed of an electronically conductive material. The current collector serves to conduct electrons between a cell terminal (not shown) and a negative electrode 14 (such as lithium) to which current collector 12 is affixed. If negative electrode 14 is made from lithium or other similarly reactive material, it will preferably include a protective layer 8 formed opposite current collector 12. Either negative electrode 14 or protective layer 8 (if present) contacts a liquid electrolyte in an electrolyte region 16.

Region 16 may be delineated by the boundaries of a separator, which prevents electronic contact between the positive and negative electrodes. A positive electrode 18 abuts the side of separator layer 16 opposite negative electrode 14. As electrolyte region 16 is an electronic insulator and ionic conductor, positive electrode 18 is ionically coupled to but electronically insulated from negative electrode 14. Finally, the side of positive electrode 18 opposite electrolyte region 16 is affixed to a positive current collector 20. Current collector 20 provides an electronic connection between a positive cell terminal (not shown) and positive electrode 18.

Current collectors 12 and 20, which provide current connections to the positive and negative electrodes, should resist degradation in the electrochemical environment of the cell and should remain substantially unchanged during discharge and charge. In one embodiment, the current collectors are sheets of conductive material such as aluminum, copper, or stainless steel. The positive electrode may be attached to the current collector by directly forming on the current collector or by pressing a pre-formed electrode onto the current collector. Positive electrode mixtures formed directly onto current collectors preferably have good adhesion. Positive electrode films can also be cast or pressed onto expanded metal sheets. Alternately, metal leads can be attached to the positive electrode by crimp-sealing, metal spraying, sputtering or other techniques known to those skilled in the art. The sulfur-based positive electrode can be pressed together with the electrolyte separator sandwiched between the electrodes. In order to provide good electrical conductivity between the positive electrode and a metal container, an electronically conductive matrix of, for example, carbon or aluminum powders or fibers or metal mesh may be used.

In the case where sulfur is provided entirely as a dissolved species in the electrolyte, positive electrode 18 may primarily include an electronic conductor such as a carbon fiber matrix together with a binder or other additives. In the case where sulfur is provided in both the solid and liquid (dissolved) phases, positive electrode 18 will include some amount of active sulfur in conjunction with the electronic conductor and possibly additives.

The separator may occupy all or some part of electrolyte compartment 16. Preferably, it will be a highly porous/permeable material such as a felt, paper, or microporous plastic film. It should also resist attack by the electrolyte and other cell components under the potentials experienced within the cell. Examples of suitable separators include glass, plastic, ceramic, and porous membranes thereof among other separators known to those in the art. In one specific embodiment, the separator is Celgard 2300 or Celgard 2400 available from Hoechst Celanese of Dallas, Tex.

The separator may also be of the type sometimes referred to as a “polymer” separator membrane having a porous or microporous network for entraining liquid electrolyte. Such separators are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,351,495 assigned to W. R. Grace & Co. and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,460,904, 5,540,741, and 5,607,485 all assigned to Bellcore, for example. These patents are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

In a preferred embodiment, the metal-sulfur cell has relatively thick positive and negative electrodes. Such thick format cells are particularly beneficial for use as primary cells, although they are appropriate in some secondary cells as well. The additional material provided in the electrodes provides extra capacity for long life. In a specific example, the positive electrode of a primary cell has an average thickness of at least about 40 micrometers and the positive electrode of a secondary cell has an average thickness of at most about 8micrometers. These thickness' apply to electrodes in which all sulfur is provided by the catholyte and those in which at least some sulfur is provided in the solid phase and localized at the electrode. Generally such thickness' represent a bare minimum and are appropriate with very high concentration catholytes.(e.g., 15 molar sulfur or possibly even 25 molar sulfur). In more typical embodiments, the positive electrode thickness will range between about 40 and 130 micrometers for primary cells and between about 8 and 30 micrometers for secondary cells. Note that it may be feasible and appropriate to provide sulfur as a suspension (e.g., a colloid) in the catholyte. Note also that it is generally desirable that the positive electrode have a relatively high porosity, possibly as high as 95% or more. Generally, higher porosity electrodes allow fabrication of cells with higher laminate energy densities because less electronic conductor is required. Of course, an electrode's porosity, capacity, and thickness are linked so that setting two of these parameters fixes the other.

ELECTROCHEMICAL AND CHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF LITHIUM-SULFUR LIQUID ELECTROLYTE BATTERIES

Referring again to FIG. 2, lithium-sulfur cell 10 will be described with relevant reaction mechanisms explained. During normal charging, the electrons are extracted from positive electrode 18 and transported over electrical connection 38 to negative electrode 14. The removal of electrons at positive electrode 18 oxidizes the species present in the electrode. In this reaction, lithium ions are liberated from lithium sulfide and/or lithium polysulfide species present in the positive electrode. The species remaining in the positive electrode will have the general formula Li2Sx, where x has a value of 1 or greater. Over time the charge reaction produces polysulfide species having longer and longer sulfur chains. It is known for example that in a normal charge reaction, the value of x in some polysulfides may be 12 or greater. In addition, some of the polysulfides will be further oxidized to elemental sulfur.

At the negative electrode, lithium ions present in the electrolyte 16 are transported through protective layer 8 and reduced to lithium metal as electrons are moved through electrical conduit 38.

The above electrode reactions proceed in the reverse direction during discharge. That is, the electrochemical reduction of active sulfur pulls electrons to positive electrode 18 through current collector 20 and from line 38. This reduces elemental sulfur, if present, to form various lithium species including lithium polysulfides and lithium sulfide. It also reduces the highly oxidized polysulfides to less oxidized polysulfides and lithium sulfide. Simultaneously, lithium ions are provided from negative electrode 14 through the electrolyte. The lithium ions are generated in conjunction with the flow of electrons from negative electrode 14 to line 38 (via current collector 12).

Generally, the higher molecular weight polysulfides (those with more sulfur atoms) are more highly soluble than their lower molecular weight counterparts. During discharge, these higher molecular weight species go into solution in the electrolyte and migrate throughout the cell. Some of the dissolved species move to the negative lithium metal electrode where they may be chemically reduced to form less-soluble lower molecular weight compounds such as lithium sulfide. Some of this lithium sulfide may form as a layer on the lithium metal electrode. The lithium sulfide layer may affect the batteries discharge characteristics such as polarization. Further, excess lithium sulfide may precipitate out of solution where it serves no beneficial use in the cell. In fact, the precipitated lithium sulfide (and/or less-soluble lower molecular weight polysulfides) represents lithium and sulfur that is no longer available for immediate participation in electrochemical reactions. Thus, precipitation of these compounds reduces the battery's capacity.

Precipitated sulfide or polysulfide may also form because the local solution concentration of these species exceeds their solubility limits. This occurs when the species are generated faster than they can diffuse away, a condition that exists when the local current density is too great in comparison with the mass transport rate. That is, the solution phase concentration gradient must support a mass flux that is sufficiently high to remove reaction products before they accumulate to their solubility limit. The present invention addresses this problem in at least two ways. First, it provides electrolyte solvents in which the discharge species are highly soluble and highly mobile thereby reducing the likelihood of precipitation. Second, it provides a cathode structure in which the mass flux is sufficiently fast that the local concentration of soluble species does not exceed the solubility limits.

Assuming that some precipitation will occur so that solid phase sulfur, sulfide, and/or polysulfide exist in the cell, it is important that the cell be designed to make these precipitated electroactive species available to electronic and ionic charge carriers. This allows high utilization of the active sulfur in the cell. To this end, the electronic conductor in the positive electrode should form an interconnected matrix so that there is always a clear current path from the positive current collector to any position in the electronic conductor. The interconnected matrix of the electronic conductor should also be sufficiently “open” that there is room for precipitated electroactive species to deposit on the matrix. Finally, any binder employed in the positive electrode should not prevent contact between the electronic conductor and the electroactive species. For example, the binder should not provide so much wetting that precipitated sulfur particles and/or the current collector are completely wetted and therefore unable to exchange electrons.

LIQUID ELECTROLYTES

It has now been discovered that the performance of lithium-sulfur batteries can be improved by employing electrolyte compositions designed to solubilize lithium sulfide and relatively low molecular weight polysulfides. The new electrolytes of this invention contain oxidizing agent additives that provide an in-situ mechanism for forming a protective coating on the metal electrode when the additive is used in a battery cell. In general, the electrolyte compositions of this invention include one or more solvents that strongly coordinate lithium. These solvents are “ionophores” for lithium ions. Exemplary ionophores are podands, coronands, and cryptands as described in chapter 10 of the treatise “Lithium Chemistry, A Theoretical and Experimental Overview,” Anne-Marie Sapse and Paul Von Rague Schleyer, Eds. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1995) which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. Chapter 10 was written by Bartsch et al. Podands are acyclic multidentate ligands. Common examples are glymes and polyethylene glycols. Coronands are monocyclic multidentate ligands. Common examples are crown ethers and substituted crown ethers. Cryptands are multicyclic multidentate ligands.

In a preferred embodiment, the electrolyte solvents of this invention include one or more compounds having an ethanediether linkage. They have the general formula R1(CH2CH2O)nR2, where n ranges between 1 and 10 and R1 and R2 are different or identical alkyl or alkoxy groups (including substituted alkyl or alkoxy groups). Alternatively, R1 and R2 may together form a closed ring to form a crown ether for example. Examples of linear solvents include the glymes (CH3O(CH2CH2O)nCH3) including monoglyme, diglyme, triglyme and tetraglyme and related oxides of the formula (CH2CH2O)n(CH2O)p, where p ranges from about 1 to 50. Such ethoxy repeating unit compounds serve as lithium ion coordinating solvents. In a preferred embodiment, the main solvent is a glyme having a value of n ranging between 1 and 6. In an especially preferred embodiment, the glyme is 1,2 -dimethoxyethane (CH3O(CH2CH2O)CH3). In another embodiment, the main solvent is a linear polyether.

Oxidizing agents, which may be added to the electrolyte solvents of this invention include soluble active additives. At least one of the following compounds is added to the electrolyte solvents including, sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), halogens, interhalogens, oxychlorides, sulfur monochlorides, vinyl carbonate and halogenated carbonates. Halogens (Cl2, Br2 and I2) as well as oxychlorides (SO2Cl2 and SOCl2), and sulfur monochlorides S2Cl2 have stronger oxidizing ability than elemental S. The potentials of these compounds versus Li exceed 3.5 V. The Li-I2 couple OCV is about 2.8V . In a battery cell fabrication, it may be more practical to use interhalogens (e.g. iodine monochloride (ICl), iodine trichloride (ICl3) and iodine monobromide I2Br2) instead of halogens because interhalogens are liquids or solids that can easily dissociate in the electrolyte and form halogens. Also, SO2 and N2O are stronger oxidizers than the polysulfides or the elemental S. For example, the Li-SO2 couple OCV is about 3.0 V.

Strong oxidizing agents in the electrolyte can serve two main functions when incorporated into a Li/S battery cell. First, because of their strong oxidizing ability the oxidizers immediately react with Li forming a solid passivating film with Li-ion conductivity. If the material of the passivating film has a low solubility in the electrolyte solution, the Li electrode is protected from reaction with other active components of the electrolyte. For example, the Li electrode may be protected from reactions with dissolved elemental sulfur and polysulfides. In the case of SO2, a protective layer of the Li-ion conductor Li2S2O4 is formed. In the case of additives of thionylchloride and iodine trichloride, a polycrystalline layer of LiCL with a relatively high ionic conductivity is formed. Second, during cell storage under OCV conditions, the additives may maintain the highest possible state of sulfur oxidation because of oxidation of the polysulfides to the elemental sulfur. Further, as described above, the addition of oxidizing agents in the electrolyte may add additional battery capacity because the additives are stronger oxidizers than the polysulfides.

The batteries of this invention can operate at room temperature. However, the present invention also pertains to systems operating at temperatures slightly outside of the ambient. Obviously, the choice of operating temperature ranges can influence the preferred electrolyte for the batteries of this invention. For example, at relatively low operating temperatures, lower molecular weight electrolytes will be preferred, so the value of “n” in the above-describe ethanediether compounds will be in the lower end of the 1-10 range. At higher temperatures, the opposite is true.

While the electrolyte solvents described above are a main component of the electrolytes of this invention, one or more cosolvents may be provided with them. If such cosolvents are employed, they are preferably chosen to solubilize lithium cations or sulfide/polysulfide anions. In certain preferred embodiments, crown ethers and/or cryptands are provided as cosolvents. In other preferred embodiments, donor or acceptor cosolvents may be employed. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the cosolvent is dioxolane. Preferred dioxolane-containing electrolytes are further described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/245,167, titled DIOXOLANE AS A COSOLVENT IN Li/Li2Sx BATTERIES, filed on Feb. 5, 1999, and having Nimon et al. as inventors. That document is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

Crown ethers also can be used as co-solvents. Crown ethers are macrocyclic polyethers generally having repeating ethoxy and/or propoxy groups. Crown ethers with 3 to 20 oxygen atoms have been synthesized. They are typically made up of linked ethoxy units (CH2CH2O)n as shown below. A general abbreviation used is n-C-m where n is the ring size and m is the number of oxygen atoms in the ring.

Commercially available crown ethers which have application in this invention include 12-crown-4, 15-crown-5, 18-crown-6, and modified crowns such as dibenzo-18-crown-6. Crown ethers are known to be complexing agents which solubilize alkali metal cations in nonpolar solvents. 12-crown-4 is known to be specific for the lithium cation.

In substituted crown ethers, one or more of the hydrogen atoms are replaced with a hydrocarbon group that may be linear, branched, or aromatic. These hydrocarbon groups may, in turn, be substituted with halo (F, Cl, Br, I), nitrile (CN), nitro (NO2), hydroxy (OH), and other common substituent groups. Examples are presented in chapter 10 of the above referenced “Lithium Chemistry” treatise. Specific examples include dibenzo-14-crown-4, tetramethyl-12-crown-4, benzo-15-crown-5. Crown ethers may also be substituted with podand groups such as (—COCH2CH2OCH3) to form podano-coronands or “lariat ethers.”

In an alternative embodiment, the main solvent is a cryptand. Cryptands are also known to strongly complex with alkali metal cations. Structurally, they are similar to crown ethers but possess an additional (—XCH2CH2) bridge to create an additional ring. X may be an oxygen, nitrogen, or sulfur atom. Often X is nitrogen and the corresponding cryptands are described as containing two nitrogen atoms linked by three (CH2CH2O)n bridges. These compounds are commonly identified by the number of oxygen atoms in each of the three bridges. Thus, a cryptand in which two of the bridges have n=2 (two oxygen atoms) and a third bridge having n=1 (one oxygen atom) is identified as [2.2.1]-cryptand.

One example of a general class of cosolvents is the donor solvents, which tend to solubilize cations and acceptor solvents which tend to solubilize anions. Donor solvents are characterized by high donor numbers DN. A desirable property of both donor and acceptor cosolvents used in this invention is a high dielectric constant. Such solvents generally promote dissociation of an ionic solute or a contact ion-pair.

Generally, donor solvents are those solvents which can be characterize as Lewis bases (they may be aprotic solvents). Generally, these solvents are good at solvating cations such as lithium ions. Donor solvents promote the ionization of covalent compounds to form intimate (or contact) ion-pairs. The concept of a solvent donor number is further explained and exemplified in “Experimental Electrochemistry, for Chemists,” by Sawyer and Roberts, Jr., John Wiley & Sons, New York (1995). That reference is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

Suitable donor cosolvents include hexamethylphosphoramide, pyridine, N,N-diethylacetamide, N,N-diethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, tetramethylurea, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-dimethylformamide, tributylphosphate, trimethylphosphate, N,N,N′,N′-tetraethylsulfamide, tetramethylenediamine, tetramethylpropylenediamine, and pentamethyldiethylenetriamine. These assist in solvation of lithium ions.

Suitable acceptor solvents assist in solvation of the sulfide and polysulfide anions. Acceptor solvents are those solvents which can be characterized as Lewis acids (they may be protic or aprotic solvents) and promote solvation of anions. Examples include alcohols such as methanol, glycols such as ethylene glycol, and polyglycols such as polyethylene glycol, as well as nitromethane, trifluoroacetic acid, trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, sulfur dioxide, and boron trifluoride.

It should be understood that the electrolyte solvents of this invention may also include other cosolvents which do not necessary fall into the donor solvent and acceptor solvent classes. Examples of such additional cosolvents include sulfolane, dimethyl sulfone, dialkyl carbonates, tetrahydrofuran (THF), dioxolane, propylene carbonate (PC), ethylene carbonate (EC), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), butyrolactone, N-methylpyrrolidinone, dimethoxyethane (DME or glyme), and combinations of such liquids.

In general, the liquid electrolyte solvents of this invention include about 50 to 100% by weight of the main solvent (excluding salts) which is usually one or more podand such as the above-described ethanediether compounds and include up to 49% by weight of the oxidizing additive. The balance will be one or more of the cosolvents listed above. More preferably, the electrolyte solvents include about 50 to 100% by weight main solvent, and most preferably between about 70 and 90% by weight main solvent. As noted, the main solvent is one or more of the lithium coordinating ionophores described above (podands such as glymes, coronands such as crown ethers, or cryptands). Aside from the main solvent, the electrolyte solvent may include one or more cosolvents (described above) which make up the balance. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the electrolyte solvent includes DME as the main solvent and dioxolane as the cosolvent, with the dioxolane making up between about 5 and 15% by weight of the mixture.

Exemplary but optional electrolyte salts for the battery cells incorporating the electrolyte solvents of this invention include, for example, lithium trifluoromethanesulfonimide (LIN(CF3SO2)2), lithium triflate (LiCF3SO3), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), LiPF6, LiBF4, LiAsF6, LiN(C2F5SO2)2, as well as, corresponding salts depending on the choice of metal for the negative electrode, for example, the corresponding sodium salts. As indicated above, the electrolyte salt is optional for the battery cells of this invention, in that upon discharge of the battery, the metal sulfides or polysulfides formed can act as electrolyte salts, for example, Mx/zS wherein x=0 to 2 and z is the valence of the metal.

Regardless of whether the sulfur is present in a solid phase, the cells of this invention preferably operate with their electrolytes at a concentration of between about 3 and 30molar sulfur, more preferably between about 5 and 25 molar sulfur, and most preferably between about 10 and 20 molar sulfur. The sulfur used in this measure is the sulfur atoms in electroactive species. Thus, for example, one molar Li2S corresponds to one molar sulfur, whereas one molar Li2S5 corresponds to five molar sulfur, and one molar S8 corresponds to eight molar sulfur. Note that in some cases at least some of the sulfur may exist as suspended particles within the catholyte.

It should be understood that some systems employing liquid electrolytes are commonly referred to as having “polymer” separator membranes. Such systems are considered liquid electrolyte systems within the context of this invention. The membrane separators employed in these systems actually serve to hold liquid electrolyte in small pores by capillary action. Essentially, a porous or microporous network provides a region for entraining liquid electrolyte. As mentioned above, such separators are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,351,495 assigned to W. R. Grace & Co. and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,460,904, 5,540,741, and 5,607,485 all assigned to Bellcore, for example.

The battery cells of this invention may also include a gel-state or a solid-state electrolyte. An exemplary solid-state electrolyte separator is a ceramic or glass electrolyte separator which contains essentially no liquid. Specific examples of solid-state ceramic electrolyte separators include beta alumina-type materials such as sodium beta alumina, Nasicon™ or Lisicon™ glass or ceramic. Polymeric electrolytes, porous membranes, or combinations thereof are exemplary of a type of electrolyte separator to which an aprotic organic plasticizer liquid can be added according to this invention for the formation of a solid-state electrolyte separator containing less than 20% liquid. Suitable polymeric electrolytes include polyethers, polyimines, polythioethers, polyphosphazenes, polymer blends, and the like and mixtures and copolymers thereof in which an appropriate electrolyte salt has optionally been added. Preferred polyethers are polyalkylene oxides, more preferably, polyethylene oxide. In addition, the electrolyte separator could contain less than 20% by weight of a dioxolane-containing liquid electrolyte, such as described above.

In the gel-state, the electrolyte separator contains at least 20% by weight of an organic liquid (see the above listed dioxolane-containing liquid electrolyte compositions for examples), with the liquid being immobilized by the inclusion of a gelling agent. Many gelling agents such as polyacrylonitrile, PVDF, or PEO can be used.

In addition, oxidizing electrolyte additives in accordance with the present invention may be used to supplement the protection afforded to glass-coated lithium electrodes, such as described in commonly-assigned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/431,190 entitled “Encapsulated Lithium Alloy Electrodes Having Barrier Layers”, filed Nov. 1, 1999, the entire specification of which is incorporated herein by reference. In the case of lithium electrodes coated with a protective glass layer, the oxidizing electrolyte additives in accordance with the present invention may effectively heal cracks which form in the glass during cycling by penetrating the cracks and contacting the lithium to form a protective coating. An advantage of using the oxidizing additive, in the present invention, with the electrode covered with the glassy layer is that it reduces the quality requirements of the glassy layer and the complexity of quality control needed to manufacture the glassy electrode. In addition, the self-healing nature of the coating improves battery reliability as well.

NEGATIVE ELECTRODE

Most generally, the negative electrode can comprise any metal, any mixture of metals, glass, carbon or metal/carbon material capable of functioning as a negative electrode in combination with the sulfur-based composite positive electrode of this invention. Accordingly, negative electrodes comprising any of the alkali or alkaline earth metals or transition metals (the polyether electrolytes are known to transport divalent ions such as Zn ++), for example, in combination with the positive electrodes and electrolytes of this invention are within the ambit of the invention, and particularly alloys containing lithium and/or sodium.

Stated another way, the negative electrodes employed in the batteries of this invention may include a metal (in elemental or alloy form) or an ion of that metal as used in, for example. a carbon intercalation electrode or a glass matrix electrode. As explained above, metal ions from this negative electrode combine with elemental sulfur or polysulfides to produce a sulfide and polysulfides of the metal during discharge of the battery. Some of the resulting metal sulfides and polysulfides may remain localized near the positive electrode. Some fraction of these discharge products, however, will dissolve in the solvent of the electrolyte and move freely through the liquid containing regions of the cell. As mentioned, some of these dissolved discharge products may actually precipitate from solution and become unavailable for further electrochemical reaction, thereby reducing the cell's capacity.

In one preferred embodiment, the materials for the negative electrodes include a metal such as lithium or sodium or an alloy of one of these with one or more additional alkali metals and/or alkaline earth metals. Preferred alloys include lithium aluminum alloys, lithium silicon alloys, lithium tin alloys, and sodium lead alloys (e.g., Na4Pb). Other metallic electrodes may include alkaline earth electrodes such as magnesium and their alloys; transition metal electrodes such as aluminum, zinc, and lead and their alloys;

The surface of such metallic negative electrodes can be modified to include a protective layer on the electrolyte side. This protective layer should be conductive to lithium ions and help prevent the formation of lithium dendrites or “mossy” lithium on repeated cycling. As described above, it can be produced in situ of the battery cell by the action of oxidizing additives, including sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, halogens, interhalogens, oxychlorides and sulfur monochlorides. In addition, a protective coating may be added to an electrode by pretreating the electrode with gaseous sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide or halogens or pretreating the electrode with liquid oxychlorides. For example, prior to battery assembly, the lithium electrode may be pretreated with gaseous sulfur dioxide to produce a film of Li2S2O4 on the surface of the electrode. The film, as described above, provides the benefits such as improved discharge capacity after storage.

Examples of preferred protective layer formats and materials are described in the following U.S. patent applications, each of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/086,665, filed May 29, 1998, titled PROTECTIVE COATINGS FOR NEGATIVE ELECTRODES, and naming Visco et al. as inventors; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/139,603, filed Aug. 25, 1998, titled PLATING METAL NEGATIVE ELECTRODES UNDER PROTECTIVE COATINGS, and naming Chu et al. as inventors; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/139,601, filed Aug. 25, 1998, titled METHOD FOR FORMING ENCAPSULATED LITHIUM ELECTRODES HAVING GLASS PROTECTIVE LAYERS, and naming Visco et al. as inventors; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/431,190, filed Nov. 1, 1999, titled ENCAPSULATED LITHIUM ALLOY ELECTRODES HAVING BARRIER LAYERS, and naming Chu et al. as inventors.

In an alternative embodiment, the negative electrode may be an intercalation electrode such as a carbon-based lithium ion electrode. Such electrodes are available in commercial lithium ion batteries available from Sony Corporation of Japan. These materials are described by Jeffrey Dahn in Chapter 1 of “Lithium Batteries, New Materials, Developments and Perspectives,” edited by G. Pistoia and published by Elsevier (1994), which reference is incorporated herein by reference. Generally, such electrodes have the formula LiyC6 (where y=0.3 to 2). For many of these materials, the fully charged electrode has the formula LiC6. The intercalation electrode matrix may include graphite, petroleum coke, carbon inserted within highly disordered carbons, etc. The inserted carbon may also be doped with boron, phosphorus, or other appropriate dopant. In one example, the carbon may be prepared from low temperature pyrolysis (about 750° C. ) of carbon or carbon-silicon containing polymers such that the carbon product retains some hydrogen or silicon or both. (See, Sato et al., “A Mechanism of Lithium Storage in Disordered Carbons,” Science, 264: 556 Apr. 22 1994), which discusses very good results with a preferred negative electrode of Li inserted within poly p-phenylene-based carbon).

Glass matrix negative electrodes such as Li/Sn2O3 and Li/SiO2 may also be employed in the batteries of the present invention. These electrodes are similar to the above-described carbon-based intercalation electrodes in that lithium ions are inserted therein during charge and removed during discharge. Such glass matrix electrodes are described in various references including Tahara et al., European Patent Application No. 93111938.2 (1993), Idota et al. Canadian Patent Application, 21134053 (1994), and I. Courtney et al. Meeting Abstracts of the Electrochemical Society, Fall Meeting, San Antonio, Tx. Oct. 6-11, 1996 Vol. 96-2, Abstract #66, page 88, each of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

FIGS. 3A-B illustrate a fabrication process for a glassy coated lithium electrode which may be used with an oxidizing agent electrolyte additive of the present invention. Considering FIG. 1A first, a lithium electrode 110 is fabricated as a laminate in the following manner. Optionally, a thin layer of a release agent 112 is deposited on a web carrier 114 by evaporation for example. This web carrier and the release agent should have a very smooth surface. Deposition of the release agent is followed by deposition of a single ion conductor 116 onto release agent 112 by a suitable process such as sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, coating, extrusion/calendering, or spray coating. Layer 116 serves as a barrier layer in the completed electrode and is therefore preferably a single ion conductor which conducts ions of the active metal used in the electrode (e.g., lithium). Because barrier layer 116 is deposited on a very smooth surface, it too will be smooth and continuous.

As described above, any cracks that may form in the barrier layer 116 may be filled (e.g. “healed”) by a reaction product of the active metal and an oxidizing agent additive in the electrolyte. For example, when a SO2 oxidizing additive is part of the electrolyte solution of a battery cell with a glass coated lithium electrode, any cracks in the glass coat may allow SO2 to react with the surface of the electrode. When the SO2 reacts with Li in the electrode, Li2S2O4 is formed essentially sealing the cracks in the glassy layer.

Next, after the barrier layer is formed, a bonding layer 117 is formed on barrier layer 116. This material should easily and strongly bond with the active metal. Preferably it is also substantially non-reactive with ambient agents such as moisture and other gases in air. Aluminum and aluminum alloys work well as bonding layer materials when lithium is the active metal.

Lithium 118 (or other active metal for the electrode) is deposited on bonding layer 117 by evaporation for example. Then, a current collector 120 (e.g., a copper layer of about 1000 angstroms to one micrometer thickness) is optionally formed on lithium layer 118 by a conventional process such as evaporation or sputtering. Finally, the barrier layer/lithium layer/current collector laminate is separated from the carrier 114, with release layer 112 giving way. The bonding layer facilitates adherence of the lithium to the barrier layer to allow clean separation without damaging the barrier layer.

The resulting structure may be referred to as an “encapsulated electrode.” Because the lithium is encapsulated within the barrier layer and the current collector, it may be transported, stored, and otherwise handled without the precautions normally required for a lithium metal electrode. Note that in some embodiments, a current collector is not employed. Rather, the layer of lithium is protected on one side and exposed on the other.

It is possible that the barrier layer laminate can be produced in a continuous fashion. A fresh layer, is formed on the web as it passes through each of a series of stations. The barrier layer laminate, including web, the release agent, the barrier layer, and the bonding layer, may be stored under ambient conditions.

Because the web carrier supports continuous fabrication of the electrode laminate through a series of deposition reactors, it should withstand high temperatures and wide pressure ranges. Examples of suitable web materials include plastics such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene, polyethylene, polyvinylchloride (PVC), polyolefins, and polyimides. The web carrier should have a thickness and tensile strength suitable for web handling at the line speeds dictated by the metal and glass or polymer deposition steps.

The release agent serves to release the subsequently formed electrode from the web carrier. The particular release layer chosen depends upon the types of web carrier and barrier layer employed. Suitable release agents are known in the art. In a specific embodiment, the release layer is a 50 angstrom copper film formed by evaporation or sputtering. The release agent should be as thin as possible while still retaining release properties, and easily dissolving in the target battery environments. In the case of a copper release, a thick copper release film could potentially block ionic transport to the barrier layer. Therefore a thin Cu layer is envisaged whereby, once in the battery environment, the thin copper layer is removed by corrosion and/or dissolution, exposing the barrier layer to the battery electrolyte.

The encapsulated electrode 110 resulting from this process includes a lithium metal layer 118 sandwiched between current collector 120 and barrier layer 116. Because the lithium layer is formed after the barrier layer (rather than having the barrier layer deposited on a potentially rough lithium surface as in conventional processes), the barrier layer is of high quality. That is, the barrier layer is generally gap-free and adherent when produced according to this invention. As mentioned, it may be difficult to directly deposit glass onto a lithium film due to the high degree of surface roughness of the lithium film relative to the sputter deposited glass film thickness (e.g., 300 to 1500 angstroms).

EXAMPLES

Various experiments were conducted to demonstrate the performance advantages provided by the various aspects of this invention. It should be understood that the experiments described in the following examples are representative only and in no way limit the scope of the present invention. The experiments are provided mainly to show the high level of performance that can be attained when following the guidelines presented herein.

Laboratory electrochemical cells of two types were constructed: with carbon cathodes (Li/C cells) and with elemental sulfur-loaded cathodes (Li/S cells).

Li/S CELLS

The Li/S cell contained a lithium anode (lithium foil 125 μm thick from AVESTOR, Montreal, Canada), a porous sulfur-loaded cathode, and an electrolyte solution containing a supporting salt, LiN(SO2CF3)2—lithium bistrifluoromethane-sulfonilimide (LiTFSI), dissolved in a mixture of 1,2 dimethoxyethane (DME) with 1,3 dioxolane. The supporting salt was used at a concentration of 0.5 mole per liter of solution. The ratio of DME to dioxolane was 9:1 by weight. All electrolyte components were bought from Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.

The separator was a micro-porous polymeric layer having a nominal thickness of 25 microns (Hoechst Celanese, Celgard 2400). The separator was vacuum dried overnight prior to transfer into an argon-filled glove box.

The sulfur-loaded cathode was made by impregnating a slurry containing elemental sulfur into a carbon fiber paper (Lydall Technical papers, Rochester, N.Y.). The slurry composition was 50 wt % sulfur, 28 wt % carbon black, 20 wt % polyethylene oxide (MW=900K), and 2 wt % Brij35 dissolved in acetonitrile. The cathode was vacuum dried overnight prior to transfer into the glovebox for final cell assembly.

230 microliters of the electrolyte were placed on the porous cathode followed by placement of the microporous separator on the cathode. An additional 20 microliters of electrolyte were then placed on the separator layer. Once assembled, the cell was compressed at 2 psi.

Li/C CELLS

The Li/C cell contained a lithium anode (lithium foil 125 μm thick from AVESTOR, Montreal, Canada), a porous carbon cathode, and an electrolyte solution containing 0.5 mole per liter of LiTFSI and the lithium polysulfide Li2S8 completely dissolved in the mixture of DME and Dioxolane (9: 1).

The carbon porous cathode was made by air spraying a slurry containing 70% carbon black and 30% polyvinylidene flouride (Mw˜250,000) into a carbon fiber paper (Lydall Technical papers, Rochester, N.Y.). The solvent was Dimethyl formamide. The slurry contained approximately 11% solids by weight. The cathode was vacuum dried overnight prior to transfer into the glovebox for cell assembly.

330 microliters of the electrolyte containing dissolved polysulfides were placed on the porous cathode followed by placement of the microporous separator on the cathode. An additional 20 microliters of electrolyte were then placed on the separator layer. Once assembled, the cell was compressed at 2 psi.

The cells were tested at 25° C. with a Series 4000 battery test system from Maccor Inc. of Tulsa, Okla.

Example 1

Li/S cells with S-loaded cathodes were discharged at 1.0 mA/cm2 after 5 days of storage. A first cell contained an SO2 additive in the electrolyte while a second cell did not contain the SO2 additive. Besides the different electrolyte formulations, the first cell and the second cell were essentially similar. The SO2 additive in the first cell comprised 3.2% of the electrolyte by weight. The second cell without the SO2 additive in the electrolyte lost more than half of its initial capacity after 5 days of storage. The first cell having the electrolyte with 3.2% by weight of dissolved SO2 exhibited a much larger capacity as compared to the second cell without the SO2 additive (See FIG. 4).

Example 2

Li/C cells with 12 M sulfur as Li2S8 dissolved in the mixture of DME and Dioxolane (9:1) were discharged at 1.0 mA/cm2 after 4 days of storage. A lithium electrode in a first cell was pretreated with SO2 gas prior to assembly of the first battery cell while a lithium electrode in a second cell was not pretreated with the SO2 gas. Besides pre-treatment of the lithium electrode with SO2 gas, the first cell and the second cell were essentially similar. The second cell with the untreated lithium electrode quickly polarized. The first cell having the lithium electrode pretreated with SO2 gas exhibited a much larger capacity as compared to the second cell with the lithium electrode not treated with SO2 gas (See FIG. 5).

Example 3

Li/S cells with S-loaded cathodes were discharged at 1.0 mA/cm after 5 days of storage. A lithium electrode in a first cell was pretreated with SO2 gas prior to assembly of the first battery cell while a lithium electrode in a second cell was not pretreated with the SO2 gas. In addition, a first cell contained an SO2 additive in the electrolyte while a second cell did not contain the SO2 additive. Besides the different electrolyte formulations and pre-treatment of the lithium electrode with SO2 gas, the first cell and the second cell were essentially similar. The SO2 additive in the first cell comprised 3.0% of the electrolyte by weight. The first cell having the lithium electrode pretreated with SO2 gas and SO2 electrolyte additive exhibited a much larger capacity as compared to the second cell with the lithium electrode not treated with SO2 gas and without SO2 electrolyte additive (See FIG. 6).

Example 4

An impedance of the interface between the Li electrode and the electrolyte containing dissolved lithium polysulfides was measured in the symmetrical cell with two identical Li electrodes. The solution was 7.5 M sulfur as Li2S8 dissolved in the mixture of DME and Dioxolane (9:1) with 0.5 M LiTSFI. Impedance measurements were performed during cell storage under open circuit conditions for different time periods. A lithium electrode in a first cell was pretreated with liquid thionyl chloride for 1.5 hourses prior to assembly of the cell while a lithium electrode in a second cell was not pretreated with the thionyl chloride. Besides pre-treatment of the lithium electrode with the liquid thionyl chloride, the first cell and the second cell were essentially similar. The lithium electrode pretreated with thionyl chloride exhibited low and stable interface resistance. The interface resistance of the untreated lithium electrode grew rapidly during storage. An increasing interface resistance is typically consistent with corrosion of the lithium electrode via reaction with the long chain polysulfides dissolved in the solvent mixture. The stable interface resistance of the electrode pretreated with the liquid thionyl chloride indicates the formation of a passivating film that protects the Li electrode from reacting with the polysulfides. After 10 days of storage the interface resistance of the treated electrode is about five times less than the resistance of the untreated one (See FIG. 7).

CONCLUSION

The use of oxidizing agent as a protector for lithium electrodes has been described. Battery cells with the electrolyte containing dissolved oxidizing additives or electrodes pretreated with the oxidizer and then incorporated into the battery cell exhibit improved storageability and increased discharge capacity over cells without oxidizing additives in the electrolyte or without electrodes pretreated with the oxidizing additive. The present invention is applicable to both primary and rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. In addition, methods and compositions in accordance with the present invention, including strong oxidizer-pretreated electrodes and electrolytes containing oxidizing additives , may be used in conjunction with other lithium battery cells and fabrication techniques. All references cited in this application are incorporated by reference for all purposes.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3404035Oct 22, 1965Oct 1, 1968Ford Motor CoSecondary battery employing molten alkali metal reactant
US3413150Sep 28, 1966Nov 26, 1968Ford Motor CoBattery having a molten alkali metal anode and a molten sulfur cathode
US3532543Feb 21, 1968Oct 6, 1970Aerojet General CoBattery employing lithium - sulphur electrodes with non-aqueous electrolyte
US3907591Oct 22, 1974Sep 23, 1975Varta AgPositive sulphur electrode for galvanic cells and method of producing the same
US3915743Jun 26, 1974Oct 28, 1975Varta BatterieBattery with negative lithium electrode
US3947289Nov 23, 1973Mar 30, 1976P. R. Mallory & Co., Inc.Propylene carbonate, butyrolactone, dioxolane, ethers
US3953231Apr 25, 1975Apr 27, 1976General Electric CompanyElectrolytic cells
US4002492Jul 1, 1975Jan 11, 1977Exxon Research And Engineering CompanyHigh energy density electrochemical cell
US4143214Jun 26, 1978Mar 6, 1979Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Cells having cathodes containing Cs S cathode-active materials
US4268587Oct 11, 1977May 19, 1981General Electric CompanyLithium, potassium, anodes, sulfur
US4386019Jul 29, 1981May 31, 1983The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of EnergySlurrying active mat*rial and carrier to form extrudable material and evaporation of carrier
US4410609Sep 17, 1981Oct 18, 1983Emanuel PeledHigh energy primary cell; low self-discharge rate
US4436796Jul 30, 1981Mar 13, 1984The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of EnergyHigh temperature batteries
US4469761Sep 20, 1982Sep 4, 1984Diamond Shamrock CorporationAnhydrous liquid anode separated from anhydrous sulfur containing catholyte by cationic semipermeable membrane
US4664991Sep 12, 1985May 12, 1987Alain PerichaudOne-dimensional, polysulfurated
US4784925Nov 8, 1985Nov 15, 1988Whittaker CorporationAs electroreduction catalyst of liquid cathode
US4784927Dec 19, 1985Nov 15, 1988Whittaker CorporationCurrent collector cathode, oxidizable anode and electrolytes
US4820599May 17, 1988Apr 11, 1989Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.Rechargeable active material positive electrode, lithium-aluminum alloy negative electrode, aluminum-manganese plate
US4833048Mar 31, 1988May 23, 1989The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of EnergyOrganosulfur cathode
US4889779Apr 30, 1986Dec 26, 1989Amoco CorporationMixture of iodine and lithium iodide as electrolyte
US4917974Apr 14, 1989Apr 17, 1990The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of EnergyLithium/organosulfur redox cell having protective solid electrolyte barrier formed on anode and method of making same
US5162175Apr 30, 1991Nov 10, 1992Visco Steven JCell for making secondary batteries
US5523179Nov 23, 1994Jun 4, 1996Polyplus Battery CompanyRechargeable positive electrode
US5529860Jun 7, 1995Jun 25, 1996Moltech CorporationRechargable electrochemical cell
US5532077May 25, 1995Jul 2, 1996Polyplus Battery Company, Inc.Rechargeable positive electrode
US5582623Jun 7, 1995Dec 10, 1996Polyplus Battery Company, Inc.Mixing active sulfur, an electronic conductor, and an ionic conductor, homogenizing, forming electrode
US5686201Jul 26, 1996Nov 11, 1997Polyplus Battery Company, Inc.Metal-sulfur cell, electrolyte, and conductor mixture
US5691083Jun 7, 1995Nov 25, 1997Eveready Battery Company, Inc.Potassium ion additives for voltage control and performance improvement in nonaqueous cells
US5698339Oct 23, 1995Dec 16, 1997Canon Kabushiki KaishaAnode with an anode active material-retaining body having a number of pores distributed therein, a rechargeable battery, provided with said anode, and the process for the production of said anode
US6017651Sep 3, 1998Jan 25, 2000Polyplus Battery Company, Inc.Methods and reagents for enhancing the cycling efficiency of lithium polymer batteries
US6030720Oct 10, 1997Feb 29, 2000Polyplus Battery Co., Inc.Liquid electrolyte lithium-sulfur batteries
US6045937Oct 26, 1998Apr 4, 2000Mitsubishi Chemical CorporationElectrochemical cell having a controlled electrode surface and associated fabrication and chemical process
US6225002Feb 5, 1999May 1, 2001Polyplus Battery Company, Inc.Dioxolane as a proctector for lithium electrodes
EP0602984A2Dec 16, 1993Jun 22, 1994Associated Universities, Inc.Electrochemical cell
EP0689260A1Jun 1, 1995Dec 27, 1995Tadiran Ltd.Rechargeable electrochemical cell
GB2137406A Title not available
GB2273603A Title not available
GB2311410A Title not available
JPH06275313A Title not available
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1A. Gavrilov, et al. "In Situ Morphological Study of Lithium-Electrolyte Interface", Electrochemical Society, (Extended Abstract). </STEXT>
2A. Gavrilov, et al. "In Situ Morphological Study of Lithium-Electrolyte Interface", Electrochemical Society, (Extended Abstract).
3Abraham, K.M., "Some Chemistry in the Li/"SOCI<HIL><PDAT>2 </SB><PDAT>+BrCl" Cell", Nov. 1998, J. Electrochem. Soc.: Electrochemical Science and Technology, pp. 2686-2691. </STEXT>
4Abraham, K.M., "Some Chemistry in the Li/"SOCI2 +BrCl" Cell", Nov. 1998, J. Electrochem. Soc.: Electrochemical Science and Technology, pp. 2686-2691.
5Abstract of proceedings of the 6<HIL><th </SP><PDAT>International Symposium of Power Sources 2, 1968, Brighton, Sussex, UK, 24-26, Sep. 1968. </STEXT>
6Abstract of proceedings of the 6th International Symposium of Power Sources 2, 1968, Brighton, Sussex, UK, 24-26, Sep. 1968.
7Besenhard, J.O., "Cycling Behavior and Corrosion of Li-Al Electrodes in Organic Electrolytes", 1978, J. Electroanal Chem., 94, pp. 77-81.</STEXT>
8Besenhard, J.O., "Cycling Behavior and Corrosion of Li-Al Electrodes in Organic Electrolytes", 1978, J. Electroanal Chem., 94, pp. 77-81.
9Brummer, S.B., et al., "Low Temperature Lithium/Sulfur Secondary Battery (Annual Progress Report, Dec. 1, 1974-Dec. 1, 1975)," EIC Corporation, Apr. 1976, Newton, Massachusetts. </STEXT>
10Brummer, S.B., et al., "Low Temperature Lithium/Sulfur Secondary Battery (Annual Progress Report, Dec. 1, 1974—Dec. 1, 1975)," EIC Corporation, Apr. 1976, Newton, Massachusetts.
11Coleman et al, "The sulfur electrode", Proceedings of the 6<HIL><th </SP><PDAT>international Symposium of Power Sources, pp. 2889-302, (1968). </STEXT>
12Coleman et al, "The sulfur electrode", Proceedings of the 6th international Symposium of Power Sources, pp. 2889-302, (1968).
13DeGott, P., "Polymere Carbone-Soufre Synthese Et Proprietes Electrochimiques," Doctoral Thesis at l'Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, (Date of Defense Jun. 19, 1986). </STEXT>
14DeGott, P., "Polymere Carbone-Soufre Synthese Et Proprietes Electrochimiques," Doctoral Thesis at l'Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, (Date of Defense Jun. 19, 1986).
15Kavan, L., Novak, P., and Dousek, F.P., "Electrochimica Acto," vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 1605-1612, Mar. 8, 1988, Great Britain. </STEXT>
16Kavan, L., Novak, P., and Dousek, F.P., "Electrochimica Acto," vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 1605-1612, Mar. 8, 1988, Great Britain.
17Larry A. Dominey, "Lithium Batteries" New Materials, Developments and Perspectives, 1994, New York, Industrial Chemistry Library, vol. 5, pp. 137-165. </STEXT>
18Larry A. Dominey, "Lithium Batteries" New Materials, Developments and Perspectives, 1994, New York, Industrial Chemistry Library, vol. 5, pp. 137-165.
19Lauck, H., "Storage battery with lithium anode and sulfur cathode," Abstract #9855s, Chemical Abstracts, 80: 467-468; 1974. </STEXT>
20Lauck, H., "Storage battery with lithium anode and sulfur cathode," Abstract #9855s, Chemical Abstracts, 80: 467-468; 1974.
21Liu, Meilin, Visco, Steven J., and De Jonghe, Lutgard C., "Novel Solid Redox Polymerization Electrodes All-Solid State, Thin-Film, Rechargeable Lithium Batteries", J. Electrochem Soc., vol. 138, No. 7, pp. 1891-1895, Jul. 1991. </STEXT>
22Liu, Meilin, Visco, Steven J., and De Jonghe, Lutgard C., "Novel Solid Redox Polymerization Electrodes Electrochemical Properties", J. Electrochem Soc., vol. 138, No. 7, pp. 1896-1901, Jul. 1991. </STEXT>
23Liu, Meilin, Visco, Steven J., and De Jonghe, Lutgard C., "Novel Solid Redox Polymerization Electrodes All-Solid State, Thin-Film, Rechargeable Lithium Batteries", J. Electrochem Soc., vol. 138, No. 7, pp. 1891-1895, Jul. 1991.
24Liu, Meilin, Visco, Steven J., and De Jonghe, Lutgard C., "Novel Solid Redox Polymerization Electrodes Electrochemical Properties", J. Electrochem Soc., vol. 138, No. 7, pp. 1896-1901, Jul. 1991.
25Meilin, Lui, "Novel Electrodes for Advanced Energy Storage System"Dissertation of Ph.D. at the University of Berkeley, Chapter 2, pp. 3-6, 1989. </STEXT>
26Meilin, Lui, "Novel Electrodes for Advanced Energy Storage System"Dissertation of Ph.D. at the University of Berkeley, Chapter 2, pp. 3-6, 1989.
27Peled et al., Rechargeable Lithium-Sulfur Battery (Extended Abstract), Journal of Power Source, 26: 269-271, 1989.
28Peled et al., Rechargeable Lithium-Sulfur Battery (Extended Abstract), Journal of Power Source, 26: 269-271, 1989. </STEXT>
29Peled et al.; "Lithium-Sulfur Battery: Evaluation of Dioxolane-Based Electrolytes", J. Electrochem., Soc., 136 (6): 1621-1624, Jun. 1989. </STEXT>
30Peled et al.; "Lithium-Sulfur Battery: Evaluation of Dioxolane-Based Electrolytes", J. Electrochem., Soc., 136 (6): 1621-1624, Jun. 1989.
31Peramunage and Licht, "A Solid Sulfur Cathode for Aqueous Batteries"; Science 261: 1029-1032, Aug. 20, 1993. </STEXT>
32Peramunage and Licht, "A Solid Sulfur Cathode for Aqueous Batteries"; Science 261: 1029-1032, Aug. 20, 1993.
33Rao, B.M.L., et al. "Lithium-Aluminus Electrode", Oct. 1977, J. Electrochecm. Soc.: Electrochemical Science and Technology, pp. 1490-1492. </STEXT>
34Rao, B.M.L., et al. "Lithium-Aluminus Electrode", Oct. 1977, J. Electrochecm. Soc.: Electrochemical Science and Technology, pp. 1490-1492.
35Rauh et al. "A Lithium/Dissolved Sulfur Battery with an Organic Electrolyte"; J. Electrochem. Soc., 126(4): 523-527, Apr. 1979. </STEXT>
36Rauh et al. "A Lithium/Dissolved Sulfur Battery with an Organic Electrolyte"; J. Electrochem. Soc., 126(4): 523-527, Apr. 1979.
37Rauh et al., "Formation of Lithium Polysulfides in Aprotic Media", J. Inorg., Nuc. Chem., 39: 1761-1765, 1977. </STEXT>
38Rauh et al., "Formation of Lithium Polysulfides in Aprotic Media", J. Inorg., Nuc. Chem., 39: 1761-1765, 1977.
39Ronald Snaith, et al., "Lithium Chemistry" A Theoretical and Experimental Overview, 1995, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 227-477. </STEXT>
40Ronald Snaith, et al., "Lithium Chemistry" A Theoretical and Experimental Overview, 1995, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 227-477.
41S.J. Visco, M.M. Doeff, and L.C. De Jonghe, "Thin-Film Technology for Solid-State Lithium Batteries Employing Solid Redox Poly-Merization Cathodes", pp. 89-92, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 1991. </STEXT>
42S.J. Visco, M.M. Doeff, and L.C. De Jonghe, "Thin-Film Technology for Solid-State Lithium Batteries Employing Solid Redox Poly-Merization Cathodes", pp. 89-92, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 1991.
43Societe des Accumulateurs Fixes et de Traction, "Lithium-sulfur battery", Abstracts 111055d, Chemical Abstracts 66: 10360; 1967. </STEXT>
44Societe des Accumulateurs Fixes et de Traction, "Lithium-sulfur battery", Abstracts 111055d, Chemical Abstracts 66: 10360; 1967.
45Ue, Makoto, Visco, Steven J., and De Jonghe, Lutgard C., "Comparison of Cathode Utilization between Polymeric Organodisulfide and Titanium Disulfide in Solid Polymer Electrode Rechargeable Lithium Cells", Denki Kagaku, vol. 61, No. 12, pp. 1409-1415, 1993. </STEXT>
46Ue, Makoto, Visco, Steven J., and De Jonghe, Lutgard C., "Comparison of Cathode Utilization between Polymeric Organodisulfide and Titanium Disulfide in Solid Polymer Electrode Rechargeable Lithium Cells", Denki Kagaku, vol. 61, No. 12, pp. 1409-1415, 1993.
47Visco, S.J., Liu, M., Armand, B. and De Jonghe, L.C., Solid Redox Polymerization Electrodes and Their use in All-Solid-State Batteries, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 190, p. 198, 1990.
48Visco, S.J., Liu, M., Armand, B. and De Jonghe, L.C., Solid Redox Polymerization Electrodes and Their use in All-Solid-State Batteries, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 190, p. 198, 1990. </STEXT>
49Wang, Jiqiang, et al. "Investigations of Binary Lithium-Zinc, Lithium-Cadmium and Lithium-Lead Alloys as Negative Electrodes in Organic Solvent-Based Electrolyte", 1986, Solid State Ionics 20, pp. 185-189. </STEXT>
50Wang, Jiqiang, et al. "Investigations of Binary Lithium-Zinc, Lithium-Cadmium and Lithium-Lead Alloys as Negative Electrodes in Organic Solvent-Based Electrolyte", 1986, Solid State Ionics 20, pp. 185-189.
51Yamin and Peled, "Electrochemistry of Nonaqueous Lithium/Sulfur Cell", J. Power Sources, 9: 281-287, 1983. </STEXT>
52Yamin and Peled, "Electrochemistry of Nonaqueous Lithium/Sulfur Cell", J. Power Sources, 9: 281-287, 1983.
53Yamin et al., Lithium Sulfur Battery,: J. Electrochem. Soc., 135(5): 1045-1048, May 1988.
54Yamin et al., Lithium Sulfur Battery,: J. Electrochem. Soc., 135(5): 1045-1048, May 1988. </STEXT>
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6955866 *Jul 3, 2002Oct 18, 2005Polyplus Battery CompanyAnode comprising a lithium layer with a ternary alloy layer comprising lithium, a first metal and a second metal that is effective to increase lithium cycling efficiency and anode stability towards electrolyte components
US7019494 *Jan 6, 2004Mar 28, 2006Moltech CorporationMethods of charging lithium sulfur cells
US7118830Mar 23, 2004Oct 10, 2006Hammond Group, Inc.Battery paste additive and method for producing battery plates
US7282295Apr 14, 2004Oct 16, 2007Polyplus Battery CompanyPrevents the active metal from deleterious reaction with the environment on the other (cathode) side of the impervious layer, which may include aqueous or non-aqueous liquid electrolytes (catholytes) and/or a variety electrochemically active materials, including liquid, solid and gaseous oxidizers
US7282296Oct 14, 2003Oct 16, 2007Polyplus Battery CompanyIonically conductive composites for protection of active metal anodes
US7282302Dec 5, 2003Oct 16, 2007Polyplus Battery Companythe properties of different ionic conductors are combined in a composite material that has properties of high overall ionic conductivity and chemical stability towards the anode, the cathode and ambient conditions encountered in battery making
US7390591Feb 3, 2004Jun 24, 2008Polyplus Battery CompanyIonically conductive membranes for protection of active metal anodes and battery cells
US7432017Oct 14, 2003Oct 7, 2008Polyplus Battery CompanyHigh ionic conductivity separating interlayer preventing reactions; lithium compatible
US7482096Jun 4, 2003Jan 27, 2009Polyplus Battery Companycoating the active metal anode (e.g., Li) surface with a thin layer of an inorganic compound with Li-ion conductivity; preferred examples include lithium phosphate, and/or lithium metaphosphate; chemical protection; improved stability toward the electrolyte
US7491458Apr 14, 2004Feb 17, 2009Polyplus Battery CompanyAnodes, cathodes, electroconductive electrolytes with liquid oxidizer
US7598002 *Mar 10, 2006Oct 6, 2009Material Methods LlcEnhanced electrochemical cells with solid-electrolyte interphase promoters
US7608178Nov 10, 2004Oct 27, 2009Polyplus Battery CompanyElectrowinning lithium ions; protective cathodes; solvent, acid and alkali resistance; electroconductive membranes
US7645543Feb 3, 2004Jan 12, 2010Polyplus Battery CompanyActive metal/aqueous electrochemical cells and systems
US7646171 *Mar 23, 2006Jan 12, 2010Sion Power CorporationMonitoring cell voltage during charging, calculating rate of change of voltage with specific charging capacity (dV/dQ), and terminating charging when dV/dQ is equal to or greater than 5 Vg/Ah, and wherein cell comprises cathode, anode, and electrolyte comprising solvents, N-O additives
US7666233Jun 29, 2007Feb 23, 2010Polyplus Battery CompanyAssembling active metal anode comprising alkali metal or alkali metal alloy and cathode comprising an electronically conductive component and an aqueous constituent, wherein protective membrane is disposed between active metal anode and cathode, membrane being ionically conductive to ions of active metal
US7674558Nov 18, 2008Mar 9, 2010Polyplus Battery CompanyAlleviation of voltage delay in lithium-liquid depolarizer/electrolyte solvent battery cells
US7695861Mar 22, 2006Apr 13, 2010Oxis Energy Limitedcathode made of an electroconductive material, a mixture of lithium sulfide and sulfur; aprotic electrolyte comprising lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate in solvent; high specific energy, long cycle life, safety for the user and the environment, low cost
US7781108Dec 12, 2008Aug 24, 2010Polyplus Battery CompanyActive metal fuel cells
US7829212Jun 28, 2007Nov 9, 2010Polyplus Battery CompanyProtected active metal electrode and battery cell structures with non-aqueous interlayer architecture
US7838144May 29, 2009Nov 23, 2010Polyplus Battery CompanyProtective composite battery separator and electrochemical device component with red phosphorus
US7858223Jun 28, 2007Dec 28, 2010Polyplus Battery CompanyElectrochemical device component with protected alkali metal electrode
US7998626Jul 6, 2010Aug 16, 2011Polyplus Battery CompanyActive metal fuel cells
US8012621Nov 26, 2007Sep 6, 2011Ceramatec, Inc.Nickel-metal hydride battery using alkali ion conducting separator
US8012633Oct 12, 2007Sep 6, 2011Ceramatec, Inc.Advanced metal-air battery having a ceramic membrane electrolyte
US8021784Jun 1, 2006Sep 20, 2011Hammond Group, Inc.Cureless battery paste and method for producing battery plates
US8048571Dec 29, 2009Nov 1, 2011Polyplus Battery CompanyActive metal / aqueous electrochemical cells and systems
US8088270Nov 25, 2008Jan 3, 2012Ceramatec, Inc.Process for recovering alkali metals and sulfur from alkali metal sulfides and polysulfides
US8159192Jul 22, 2011Apr 17, 2012Ceramatec, Inc.Method for charging a nickel-metal hydride battery
US8182943Dec 19, 2006May 22, 2012Polyplus Battery CompanyComposite solid electrolyte for protection of active metal anodes
US8202649Sep 19, 2011Jun 19, 2012Polyplus Battery CompanyActive metal/aqueous electrochemical cells and systems
US8216722Nov 25, 2008Jul 10, 2012Ceramatec, Inc.Solid electrolyte for alkali-metal-ion batteries
US8323817Sep 11, 2009Dec 4, 2012Ceramatec, Inc.Alkali metal seawater battery
US8323820Jun 12, 2009Dec 4, 2012Polyplus Battery CompanyCatholytes for aqueous lithium/air battery cells
US8334075Apr 23, 2012Dec 18, 2012Polyplus Battery CompanySubstantially impervious lithium super ion conducting membranes
US8361652Apr 2, 2012Jan 29, 2013Oxis Energy LimitedLithium sulphide battery and method of producing the same
US8389147Jun 12, 2009Mar 5, 2013Polyplus Battery CompanyHydrogels for aqueous lithium/air battery cells
US8455131Jun 12, 2009Jun 4, 2013Polyplus Battery CompanyCathodes and reservoirs for aqueous lithium/air battery cells
US8679684Dec 1, 2005Mar 25, 2014Oxis Energy, Ltd.Electrolyte for lithium-sulphur batteries and lithium-sulphur batteries using the same
US8722221Jul 22, 2011May 13, 2014Ceramatec, Inc.Method of discharging a nickel-metal hydride battery
US8735002Sep 7, 2011May 27, 2014Sion Power CorporationLithium sulfur electrochemical cell including insoluble nitrogen-containing compound
US8748043Apr 14, 2008Jun 10, 2014Sion Power CorporationElectrolytes for lithium sulfur cells
US8771855Aug 1, 2011Jul 8, 2014Ceramatec, Inc.Alkali metal aqueous battery
US8771879Sep 5, 2008Jul 8, 2014Ceramatec, Inc.Lithium—sulfur battery with a substantially non-porous lisicon membrane and porous lisicon layer
WO2009046211A2 *Oct 2, 2008Apr 9, 2009Katie CychoszAdsorbents for organosulfur compound removal from fluids
WO2014093978A1 *Dec 16, 2013Jun 19, 2014The Penn State Research FoundationLiquid electrolyte for increasing capacity and cycling retention of lithium sulfur battery
Classifications
U.S. Classification429/344, 429/199, 429/329, 429/346, 429/333
International ClassificationH01M6/16, H01M4/12, H01M4/02, H01M6/18
Cooperative ClassificationH01M6/168, H01M4/382, H01M6/162, H01M4/12, H01M6/18, H01M4/06
European ClassificationH01M4/38A3, H01M6/18, H01M4/12, H01M6/16E, H01M4/06
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Apr 14, 2011FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Apr 16, 2007FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Jan 24, 2002ASAssignment
Owner name: POLYPLUS BATTERY COMPANY, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT AT REEL/FRAME 011560/0649;ASSIGNORS:NIMON, YEVGENIY S.;CHU, MAY-YING;VISCO, STEVEN J.;REEL/FRAME:012548/0652;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010205 TO 20010214
Owner name: POLYPLUS BATTERY COMPANY SUITE B 2431 FIFTH STREET
Free format text: CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT AT REEL/FRAME 011560/0649;ASSIGNORS:NIMON, YEVGENIY S. /AR;REEL/FRAME:012548/0652;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010205 TO 20010214
Feb 20, 2001ASAssignment
Owner name: POLYPLUS BATTERY COMPANY, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NIMON, YEVGENIY S.;CHU, MAY-YING;VISCO, STEVEN J.;REEL/FRAME:011560/0649;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010205 TO 20010214
Owner name: POLYPLUS BATTERY COMPANY, INC. SUITE B 2431 FIFTH
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NIMON, YEVGENIY S. /AR;REEL/FRAME:011560/0649;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010205 TO 20010214