|Publication number||US6690155 B2|
|Application number||US 10/105,897|
|Publication date||Feb 10, 2004|
|Filing date||Mar 25, 2002|
|Priority date||Mar 25, 2002|
|Also published as||US20030178989|
|Publication number||10105897, 105897, US 6690155 B2, US 6690155B2, US-B2-6690155, US6690155 B2, US6690155B2|
|Inventors||Ravi Vig, Alberto Bilotti, Pablo Javier Bolsinger|
|Original Assignee||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (20), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (5), Classifications (12), Legal Events (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates generally to sensors and, more particularly, to sensors having Hall cells for detecting rotations of a ferrous gear.
As is well known in the art, integrated gear tooth sensors using Hall cells and rotating targets are widely used in electronic automotive systems and many other such systems. In typical applications where an accurate detection of the tooth position is required, the Hall cell output is processed by relatively sophisticated electronics in order to cancel various distortive effects, such as offsets, temperature changes, airgap variations, production tolerances, and the like.
As shown in the prior art arrangement of FIG. 1, an integrated circuit sensor 10 can include a Hall cell 12 in proximity to a ferrous gear 14. The Hall cell 12 is attached to one pole face, e.g., N, of a magnet 16. The gear 14 rotates in close proximity to the Hall cell 12 such that the relatively strong field 18 of the magnet 16 or “background field” is weakly modulated by the airgap variations corresponding to the alternating tooth/valley perimeter of the rotating gear 14. The resultant signal variations reflect the gear 14 rotations as the Hall cell 12 generates a relatively small alternating signal voltage vsg embedded in the undesirable, relatively large direct current (DC) background signal Vbf, as shown in FIG. 2.
As is well known in the art, as much of the background signal Vbf as possible is removed for accurate processing of the signal vsg generated by rotation of the ferrous gear 14. Since the gear rotating frequency can vary within large limits including DC values, removing the background field signal Vbf by frequency discrimination is generally not practical.
FIGS. 3A-C show a common conventional sensor 20 arrangement for canceling the background field Vbf. In general, the prior art sensor 20 includes first and second Hall cells 12 a, 12 b coupled in a differential arrangement as shown in FIG. 3B. A subtractor 22 receives signals from the first and second Hall cells 12 a,b and outputs the difference signal Vsg between the two signals. If the Hall cells 12 a,b are properly spaced as compared to the tooth spacing on the gear 14, the difference voltage Vsg between the two Hall cells 12 a,b produces the desired signal variations while the background field Vbf is cancelled for the most part. Due to assembly imbalances and Hall cell offsets, the signal at the subtractor 22 output includes a residual offset Vroff (FIG. 3C) that can reach five to ten percent or more of the background signal Vbf. To further reduce the residual offset Vroff, known sensors require additional sophisticated electronic processing or costly trimming techniques.
It would, therefore, be desirable to overcome the aforesaid and other disadvantages by providing a sensor having a Hall cell that eliminates the need to correct for assembly imbalances and associated offsets. It would further be desirable to provide a sensor that is more economical than conventional sensor arrangements.
The present invention provides a Hall sensor with a subtractor circuit that removes a magnetic background field from a signal that is modulated by airgap variations from a rotating ferrous gear. With this arrangement, the need for differential Hall cells is eliminated. While the invention is primarily shown and described in conjunction with a Hall cell detecting rotations of a toothed ferrous wheel, it is understood that the invention is applicable to Hall sensors in general in which it is desirable to remove a background signal.
In one aspect of the invention, a sensor includes a Hall cell and a compensation circuit providing respective inputs to a subtractor circuit. The Hall cell output signal provided to the subtractor circuit includes a first component corresponding to a background field and a second component corresponding to air gap variations detected by the Hall cell. The compensation circuit output signal to the subtractor circuit cancels the background field signal component in the Hall cell output signal. Thus, the remaining signal corresponds to the second component of the Hall cell output, i.e., the detected air gap variations, which can be generated by teeth on a rotating ferrous gear.
In one particular embodiment, the compensation circuit includes a comparator circuit receiving an amplified subtractor output signal and a threshold signal. The comparator output is gated with a clock signal and the output is provided to a counter having outputs coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (DAC), which outputs an analog signal to the subtractor. The counter increments until the comparator output stops the clock signal from changing the counter value. After initialization, the signal from the DAC to the subtractor increases until reaching a steady state corresponding to the background field as determined by the comparator. The subtractor then outputs the signal corresponding to gear rotation with the background field signal removed.
The invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a pictorial representation of a prior art Hall sensor for detecting rotations of a ferrous gear;
FIG. 2 is a graphical depiction of signal strength over time for the prior art Hall sensor of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3A is a pictorial representation of a prior art sensor having first and second Hall cells coupled in a differential arrangement;
FIG. 3B is a schematic representation of the prior art sensor of FIG. 3A;
FIG. 3C is a graphical depiction of signal strength over time for the prior art sensor of FIG. 3A;
FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of a Hall cell sensor in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a graphical depiction of voltage over time for an exemplary sensor having background field cancellation in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a schematic representation showing further details of an exemplary sensor having background field cancellation in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a further schematic representation showing additional details of an exemplary sensor having background field cancellation in accordance with the present invention; and
FIGS. 8A-C are graphical snapshot representations of voltages over time for an exemplary sensor having background field cancellation in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 4 shows an exemplary Hall cell sensor 100 having a compensation circuit 102 for removing a background signal from a signal generated by a rotating ferrous gear 104 in accordance with the present invention. In general, the sensor 100 cancels, e.g., subtracts, the magnetic or background field generated by a magnet 106 within a Hall cell 108 from a signal containing the background signal and a signal detected by the Hall cell as the gear 104 rotates. The rotating gear 104, by periodically varying the airgap between the magnet 106 and the gear with its tooth/valley perimeter, modulates the magnetic field of the magnet such that the Hall cell 108 outputs an alternating voltage superimposed on the relatively large DC voltage background field.
As shown in FIG. 5, the Hall cell output voltage Vh includes a relatively large DC voltage Vbf component due to the background field and a relatively small signal voltage vsg component generated by the tooth/valley airgap variations. As described in detail below, after a compensation circuit signal Vc reaches a balance point BP, the background signal Vbf can be subtracted out leaving the small signal voltage vsg.
Referring again to the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 4, the compensation circuit 102 includes a subtractor 110 that receives at a first input 110 a the output signal Vh from the Hall cell 106 and a compensation signal Vc. The subtractor output signal Vin is amplified by an amplifier 112, which provides an output voltage Vo. In one particular embodiment, the amplifier output voltage signal Vo is provided to a first input 114 a of a comparator 116, which also receives a predetermined threshold voltage Vth at a second input 114 b. In one particular embodiment, the threshold voltage Vth at the second comparator input 114 b is set to zero Volts.
A logic circuit 118, here shown as a NOR gate, receives the comparator output signal and a clock signal 120. The NOR output signal 122 is coupled to the clock signal input of a counter circuit 124, which increments (or decrements) each clock cycle. A Digital-to-Analog Converter (DAC) 126 receives the digital value from the counter 124 and provides a converted analog compensation signal Vc to a second input 110 b of the subtractor 110.
In operation, the clock signal 120 initially passes through the NOR gate 118 and increments the counter 124 so as to increase the level of the compensation signal Vc to the second input of the subtractor 110. When the subtractor output reaches a level sufficient to change the output state of the comparator 116, the counter 124 stops increasing and the DAC 126 signal output Vc to the subtractor 110 reaches a steady state.
Looking now to FIG. 5 in conjunction with FIG. 4, the compensating voltage signal Vc from the DAC 126 is subtracted from the Hall cell output signal Vh after turn on, until full cancellation of the background signal Vbf is achieved after a time tc leaving the small signal voltage vsg. At this time, the comparator 116 output changes state when the amplifier 112 output voltage Vo is no longer greater than zero. The change in output state blocks the clock signal 120 through the NOR gate 118 and, thereby stops the counter 124 from incrementing. The DAC/counter stores the latest compensating voltage Vc value until the next turn-on. With this arrangement, the DC background field voltage signal Vbf is removed using only one Hall cell.
As shown and described above, the amplifier input voltage vin (subtractor output voltage) is the difference between the Hall cell output voltage vh and the compensating voltage Vc. In one embodiment, the compensating voltage Vc, after turn on, ramps up steadily from a zero level until reaching the Hall cell output voltage Vh. When the voltages are equal, i.e, vc=vh, the amplifier output vo is zero, and the comparator 116, which receives the amplifier output voltage vo and a threshold voltage Vth, changes output state so as to prevent clock pulses from reaching the counter 124. The DAC 126 then maintains the last voltage level generated and provides this signal to the subtractor 110.
In a typical gear tooth sensor using ferrous targets and operating at relatively low levels background fields of about 3 kG and signals of about 100 Gpp (peak-to-peak) are found. With Hall cells having a sensitivity of about 20 μV/G, the Hall cell produces a background dc voltage of about 60 mV plus a useful signal of 2 mVpp. In this example, once the compensation voltage Vc reaches about 60 mV, the comparator 116 changes output state, the data remains stored in the counter 124 and a steady state voltage of 60 mV is applied to the subtractor 110.
FIG. 6 shows a further embodiment of a Hall cell sensor 200 that cancels a magnet background signal from a signal generated by Hall cell 202 proximate a rotating ferrous gear 204 in accordance with the present invention. A Hall cell 202 provides a differential signal to a first differential transconductor 206, which includes a subtractor circuit 208, such as the subtractor circuit 110 of FIG. 4. First and second load resistances RL1, RL2 can be coupled to the respective differential outputs 210 a, b, which provide the output voltage vo to a comparator 212. A flip flop circuit 214 is coupled to the comparator output 215 and a logic circuit 216, such as a NOR gate, receives a clock signal 218 and the flip flop output signal Q. The logic circuit 216 output is coupled to a counter 220 to which a DAC 222 is connected. A second differential transconductor 224 receives the DAC output 222 and provides a differential current Ia, Ib to the first transconductor 206.
The difference between the current signals Ia, Ib entering at first and second terminals T1 a, T1 b of the first transconductor 206 produces a compensation voltage vc, which is subtracted by the subtractor circuit 208 from the input voltage vh, as described below. The DAC 222 output voltage controls the differential current Ia, Ib via the second differential transconductor 224.
The comparator 212 detects the balance condition when the differential output voltage goes through zero, generating a hold signal that is stored in the flip flop 214, which blocks the clock signal 218 from the counter 220. It is understood that the differential transconductors 206, 224 provide enhanced linear amplification of relatively large input signals.
FIG. 7 shows an exemplary circuit implementation of the first and second differential transconductors 206, 224. The first (amplifying) transconductor 206 operates with bias currents Ia, Ib, which are generated by the second (mirror) transconductor 224. The differential bias current Ia-Ib from the second transconductor 224 corresponds to an output voltage VDAC divided by the value of a resistor R2 coupled across emitter terminals of first and second mirror transistors Q1, Q2, i.e., VDAC/R2. Straightforward circuit analysis at first and second nodes N1, N2 of the first transconductor 206 gives an amplifier gain equal to the load resistors RL divided by the value of the resistor coupled between emitter terminals of third and fourth transistors Q3, Q4 of the first transconductor, i.e., 2RL/R1 and the output compensation voltage becomes Vc=2(Ia−Ib)RL, which is equivalent to Vc=[2VDACRL]/R2.
It is understood that the signal at the subtractor output, which is identical to the signal at the amplifier output vo except for a gain factor, shows some residual offset due to the fact that the cancelled signal is not the true background voltage but rather the sum of the background voltage and the signal voltage. This offset depends on the instantaneous value of the Hall cell output voltage vh at the time cancellation (vh=vc) occurs, which triggers the flip-flop circuit FF.
FIG. 8A shows the case where the hall cell output signal vh is equal to the background field Vbf at the balance point BP (vh=vc) giving rise to a centered waveform at the subtractor output. FIG. 8B shows one extreme case where the subtractor output signal is maximum at the balance point BP, for example when a tooth is just facing the Hall cell. The subtractor output includes a negative offset voltage Voff. FIG. 8C shows the converse extreme when the subtractor output signal is minimum for the case of a gear valley facing the Hall cell producing a positive offset voltage Voff.
From the above it can be seen that the residual offset Voff after compensation can range between about −vsg(p−p)/2 to about +vsg(p−p)/2. This offset is relatively well behaved as the critical ratio |Vroff|/vsg(p−p) can never be higher than 0.5. This is in contrast to ratios that are 5 to 10 times higher in prior art differential cancellation systems when operating at low levels.
It is understood that the background signal canceling technique of the present invention can be readily adapted for canceling negative or positive background fields by adjusting the DAC range such that the compensating voltage starts at the most negative value of Vbf and extends up to the most positive value of Vbf. In addition, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that cancellation can be performed not only at startup when vsg is approximately a dc voltage but under a running target.
As is well known to one of ordinary skill in the art, the sensitivity of Hall cells, particularly when fed from a constant voltage source, shows a well known temperature dependence. After compensation of the background field Vbf, the temperature dependence can remain unchanged by providing the compensation voltage Vc with a similar temperature dependence. This can be readily achieved by properly controlling the temperance dependence of the DAC output voltage.
In contrast with prior art differential Hall cell sensors, such as that shown in FIG. 3, the inventive Hall sensor requires one Hall cell. One of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate the comparative advantages in chip area and current consumption, as well as the elimination of offsets for assembly imbalances. Further advantages accrue since the inventive sensor performance is immune to angle deviations in the gear rotating plane and to gear tooth to tooth spacing.
Various modifications and/or substitutions to the particular embodiments shown and described herein will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, while illustrative circuits, such as NOR gates and counters are used herein, a variety of other circuit arrangements well known to one of ordinary skill in the art can be used to meet the needs of a particular application. In addition, a range of analog and digital circuit configurations different from the illustrative embodiments described herein can be used without departing from the invention.
One skilled in the art will appreciate further features and advantages of the invention based on the above-described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited by what has been particularly shown and described, except as indicated by the appended claims. All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4293814 *||Aug 8, 1979||Oct 6, 1981||Ford Motor Company||Crankshaft position sensor circuitry for providing stable cyclical output signals without regard to peak to peak variations in sensor signals|
|US4992731 *||Jul 18, 1989||Feb 12, 1991||North American Philips Corporation||Rotary speed sensor with base line compensation of Hall cell output signal|
|US5389889||Sep 10, 1993||Feb 14, 1995||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Temperature-compensated current source for use in a hall analog magnetic-field detector|
|US5442283||Sep 3, 1993||Aug 15, 1995||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Hall-voltage slope-activated sensor|
|US5517112 *||Nov 7, 1994||May 14, 1996||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Magnetic field detector with noise blanking|
|US5532583 *||May 4, 1993||Jul 2, 1996||Storage Technology Corporation||System and method for calibrating a position sensing system|
|US5581179||May 31, 1995||Dec 3, 1996||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Hall-effect ferrous-article-proximity sensor assembly|
|US5621319||Dec 8, 1995||Apr 15, 1997||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Chopped hall sensor with synchronously chopped sample-and-hold circuit|
|US5650719||Jan 17, 1996||Jul 22, 1997||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Detection of passing magnetic articles while periodically adapting detection thresholds to changing amplitudes of the magnetic field|
|US5694038 *||Jan 17, 1996||Dec 2, 1997||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Detector of passing magnetic articles with automatic gain control|
|US5777465 *||Feb 16, 1996||Jul 7, 1998||Analog Devices, Inc.||Circuitry and method for sensing spatial transitions sensed with a magnetic sensor|
|US5917320||Apr 28, 1997||Jun 29, 1999||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Detection of passing magnetic articles while periodically adapting detection threshold|
|US6064199 *||Feb 23, 1998||May 16, 2000||Analog Devices, Inc.||Magnetic field change detection circuitry having threshold establishing circuitry|
|US6091239||Aug 31, 1999||Jul 18, 2000||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Detection of passing magnetic articles with a peak referenced threshold detector|
|US6232768||May 7, 1997||May 15, 2001||Allegro Microsystems Inc.||Centering a signal within the dynamic range of a peak detecting proximity detector|
|US6242908||Mar 24, 1999||Jun 5, 2001||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Detection of passing magnetic articles while adapting the detection threshold|
|US6252735 *||Feb 25, 1999||Jun 26, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Voltage-biasing, voltage-sensing differential preamplifier for magnetoresistive elements|
|US6285958 *||Feb 12, 1998||Sep 4, 2001||American Electronic Components, Inc.||Electronic circuit for automatic compensation of a sensor output signal|
|US6297627||Jan 27, 1999||Oct 2, 2001||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Detection of passing magnetic articles with a peak-to-peak percentage threshold detector having a forcing circuit and automatic gain control|
|JPS6042666A *||Title not available|
|1||*||Bilotti et al. "Monolithic Magnetic Hall Sensor Using Dynamic Quadrature Offset Cancellation," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 829-836.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8203332 *||Jun 24, 2008||Jun 19, 2012||Magic Technologies, Inc.||Gear tooth sensor (GTS) with magnetoresistive bridge|
|US8249714||Jul 10, 2006||Aug 21, 2012||Customkynetics, Inc.||Lower extremity exercise device with stimulation and related methods|
|US8299783||Aug 27, 2009||Oct 30, 2012||Allegro Microsystems, Inc.||Circuits and methods for calibration of a motion detector|
|US8432158||Oct 2, 2008||Apr 30, 2013||Honeywell International Inc.||Apparatus and method for determining speed and direction of slotted targets utilizing dual magnetic sensor packaging|
|US20090315543 *||Jun 24, 2008||Dec 24, 2009||Magic Technologies, Inc.||Gear tooth sensor (GTS) with magnetoresistive bridge|
|U.S. Classification||324/207.12, 324/225, 324/166, 324/207.2|
|International Classification||G01D5/14, G01D5/244|
|Cooperative Classification||G01D5/24495, G01D5/147, G01D5/2448|
|European Classification||G01D5/244R2, G01D5/244R5, G01D5/14B2|
|Mar 25, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VIG, RAVI;BILOTTI, ALBERTO;BOLSINGER, PABLO JAVIER;REEL/FRAME:012766/0775;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020313 TO 20020318
|Jun 29, 2004||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Dec 6, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VIG, RAVI;BILOTTI, ALBERTO;BOLSINGER, PABLO JAVIER;REEL/FRAME:018590/0152;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020313 TO 20020318
|Feb 12, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 10, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Apr 10, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CONVERSION AND NAME CHANGE;ASSIGNOR:ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030426/0178
Effective date: 20130321
|Nov 10, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS ARGENTINA S.A.;REEL/FRAME:034132/0858
Effective date: 20141105
|Feb 11, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12