|Publication number||US6731236 B1|
|Application number||US 10/459,137|
|Publication date||May 4, 2004|
|Filing date||Jun 11, 2003|
|Priority date||Jun 11, 2003|
|Also published as||CA2529004A1, DE602004020889D1, EP1631833A1, EP1631833B1, WO2005010551A1|
|Publication number||10459137, 459137, US 6731236 B1, US 6731236B1, US-B1-6731236, US6731236 B1, US6731236B1|
|Inventors||James R. Hager, Larry D. Almsted, Lavell Jordan|
|Original Assignee||Honeywell International Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (12), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (52), Classifications (11), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates generally to radar altimeters, and more specifically to, methods and apparatus for calibration of multiple antenna radar altimeters.
Interferometric synthetic aperture radar altimeters are used to provide precision terrain navigation. The precision terrain navigation is provided, at least in part, by measuring a cross track angle to the highest ground point or radar target that reflects radar energy back to the radar altimeter. Typically, the radar energy is transmitted from the radar altimeter in a cross track doppler swath below the aircraft on which the radar altimeter is incorporated. In one system, the cross track angle is measured by processing phase differences or time of arrival differences of radar return signals from the target at three separate antennas precision spaced and positioned on a baseline passing through the pitch axis of the aircraft.
Angular accuracy of typically on the order of fractions of a milli-radian is required for such precision terrain navigation. A radar processor which receives the radar return signals from the three antennas will provide such milli-radian accuracy if an exact measurement of antenna spacing and positioning is provided, and if exact cable delay and processing differences through the three radar channels to the radar processor is known. However, even with very careful assembly of an antenna assembly which includes the three radar antennas, the resulting errors in the cross track angle, or radar measured angle, are more than can be tolerated by a navigation system. Factors in the antenna assembly which can cause such errors include, for example, measurement and subsequent cutting of the cabling utilized in the assembly which connect the three antennas to the radar processor, and routing of the cables within the antenna assembly.
Present calibration methods utilize ground radar reflectors, whose exact positions are known through surveying, to provide known target positions to be used to calibrate the aircraft mounted radar altimeter during a flight test. The flight test calibration method, suitable for testing experimental data collection systems such as used in the development of radar terrain elevation maps, is far too costly for a production radar environment where several hundred radar altimeters might typically be produced each month.
An apparatus for calibrating an interferometric radar altimeter is provided. The radar altimeter provides an interferometric angle to a target based on radar energy received at a right antenna, a left antenna, and an ambiguous antenna located between the right and left antennas. The apparatus comprises a turntable on which the radar is mounted, a turntable controller which controls positioning of the radar altimeter on the turntable, a radar energy source receiving transmit signals from the radar altimeter, a reflector, and a calibration unit. The reflector reflects radar energy from the radar source towards the radar altimeter on the turntable and collimates the radar energy reflected to the turntable. The calibration unit receives an angle from the turntable controller indicative of a position of the radar altimeter and a measured angle from the radar altimeter indicative of a perceived orientation of the radar altimeter with respect to the collimated radar energy. The calibration unit calculates a radar calibration correction based on a difference between the angle received from the turntable and the measured angle received from the radar altimeter. The calibration unit then provides the calibration correction to the radar altimeter. The radar altimeter can then be installed in a vehicle.
In another aspect, a method for determining discrepancies between an orientation of a radar altimeter and a measurement of the orientation by the radar altimeter is provided. The radar altimeter has a plurality of receiving antennas, and the discrepancies are caused by varying delays in processing the radar returns received at each receiving antenna. The method comprises mounting the radar altimeter in a known orientation, directing a collimated radar signal towards the radar altimeter, providing a radar measurement of an angle of the radar altimeter with respect to the collimated radar signal, and determining a difference between an angle representative of the known orientation and the radar measurement angle.
In still another aspect, a method for compensating a measured angle to a radar target provided by a radar altimeter is provided. The radar altimeter includes a plurality of receive antennas hard mounted to a chassis of the radar altimeter. The method comprises receiving a known orientation of the radar altimeter with respect to an expected radar return, directing a collimated radar signal towards the radar altimeter, receiving a radar measured angle resulting from the collimated radar signal, determining a difference between an angle representative of the known orientation and the radar measured angle, and providing radar calibration correction to the radar altimeter, the corrections causing the radar measured angle to be equal to the angle representative of the known orientation of the radar altimeter.
In yet another embodiment, a calibration unit receiving a radar measured angle and a turntable angle is provided. The turntable angle is indicative of an orientation of a radar altimeter with respect to a collimated radar signal. The calibration unit comprises a software code segment for calculating radar calibration corrections based on a difference between the two received angles.
FIG. 1 is a diagram of a radar altimeter which includes three antennas, and output an angle to a radar target.
FIG. 2 illustrates an apparatus for calibrating the radar assembly of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1 is one embodiment of an interferometric radar altimeter 10. Radar altimeter 10 includes a RF processor assembly 12, which further includes an antenna assembly 14. Antenna assembly 14 includes three radar antennas, which are designated as a left antenna 16, an ambiguous antenna 18, and a right antenna 20. Ambiguous antenna 18 is physically located between left antenna 16 and right antenna 20, though not exactly between left antenna 16 and right antenna 20. In particular embodiment, exact distances between the three antennas are known. Antenna assembly 14 (and the three antennas) receive reflected radar pulses, the pulses having originated from a radar source. Specifically, left antenna 16 receives the pulses and forwards the electrical signal to left receiver 22. Ambiguous antenna 18 also receives the reflected radar signal, albeit at a slightly different time, and passes the received signal to ambiguous receiver 24. Right antenna 20 also receives the radar pulses, at a time which is slightly different than either left antenna 16 or ambiguous antenna 20, and forwards the electrical signal to right receiver 26.
In the embodiment shown, right antenna 20 is also configured as a transmit antenna, and further operates as a portion of the above mentioned radar source. A transmit assembly 30 within RF processor assembly 12 provides a transmit signal to a circulator 32, which functions to direct the transmit signal to right antenna 20 and also directs radar returns from antenna 20 to right receiver 26. Circulator is further connected to a directional coupler 34, which provides a radar transmit pulse to a test output 36, typically in the form of a connector output, and which does not utilize any of antennas 16, 18, and 20. Any one of antennas 16, 18, and 20 can perform the transmit function, if connected to circulator 32 for switching purposes.
Receivers 22, 24, and 26, respectively forward left, ambiguous, and right radar return signals for processing which includes intermediate frequency mixers 40, analog-to-digital converters 42, and FIFO buffers 44 for each of the three radar channels. After processing, RF assembly 12 outputs signals representative of radar signals received at left antenna 16, ambiguous antenna 18, and right antenna 20, specifically left radar return 50, ambiguous radar return 52, and right radar return 54.
A phase processor 60 receives left radar return 50, ambiguous radar return 52, and right radar return 54 and determines phase differences between the three radar returns. In the embodiment shown, phase processor 60 outputs a first phase signal 62 representative of the phase difference between left radar return 50 and ambiguous radar return 52. Phase processor 60 also outputs a second phase signal 64 representative of the phase difference between ambiguous radar return 52 and right radar return 54. Phase processor 60 further outputs a third phase signal 66 representative of the phase difference between left radar return 50 and right radar return 54.
Phase signals 62, 64, and 66 are output by phase processor 60 and received by phase bias adjust processors. Phase adjustment processors are incorporated within altimeter 10 to provide a mechanism for removing discrepancies inherent in the processing of three separate radar return signals due to signal path distances, cabling, and other sources of signal delay from antennas 16, 18, and 20 to phase processor 60. In the embodiment shown, phase signal 62 from phase processor 60 is received by phase bias adjust processor 70 which also receives a calibration correction factor 72. Calibration correction factor 72 and phase signal 62 are combined within phase bias adjust processor 70 to provide an adjusted phase signal 74 which has had errors due to different signal delays between left and ambiguous radar channels removed based upon calibration correction factor 72. The same methodology is utilized to correct signal delay errors between ambiguous and right radar channels in phase bias adjust processor 76 which provides phase adjusted signal 78. Phase bias adjust processor 80 provides a phase adjusted signal 82 which is representative of corrected signal delay errors between left and right radar channels.
Phase adjusted signals 74, 78, and 82 are received at phase ambiguity resolution processor 90. Within processor 90, phase relationships between phase adjusted signals 74, 78, and 82 are used, along with other signals (not shown) to determine an interferometric angle, Φ, from an aircraft to a target. Interferometric angle is also sometimes referred to as a radar measured angle, and errors in radar measured angle is sometimes referred to as cross track accuracy. Calibration correction factors 72 which provide compensation for signal delay errors due to signal path length and other sources of delay must be determined before radar altimeter 10 can be utilized for its above described intended purpose. Flight testing such radar altimeters can provide such calibration correction factors, through use of precisely position radar targets as described above, but flight testing to remove processing discrepancies between three radar channels is expensive, especially for a production radar.
FIG. 2 is a diagram of an apparatus 100, which allows determination of radar calibration correction factors, at a cost which is less than the costs associated with flight testing, and which further embodies an interferometric radar altimeter cross track accuracy optimization method. Apparatus 100 provides interferometric radar calibration, and specifically optimizes the cross track angular accuracy of radar altimeter 10 by forcing a best fit of the radar solution (e.g. radar measured angle) to a precision calibrated target source in a production environment. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, and described above with respect to FIG. 1, radar altimeter 10 is packaged as a unitary assembly with three antennas 16, 18, and 20 hard mounted to a chassis 102.
Referring specifically to FIG. 2, apparatus 100 includes a turntable 104 whose positioning is accurately controlled utilizing a turntable controller 106. Turntable controller 106 is equipped to provide an output 108 that includes at least a position of turntable 104 as an angle. Mounting radar altimeter 10 on turntable 104 provides a known orientation of radar altimeter 10, based on output 108. Output 108 is sometimes referred to as a truth angle. A radar transmit pulse 110 is sampled through directional coupler 36 (shown in FIG. 1) and delayed by a precision radar delay 112. Precision radar delay 112 delays transmission of radar transmit pulse 110, so that a radar return that is detected by radar altimeter 10, appears to have come from a distant target. The delayed transmit pulse 114 is amplified for transmission through a radar transmit horn 116 by amplifier 118. In one embodiment, radar transmit horn 118 is a narrow beam horn antenna which consolidates and directs the resulting radar transmit signal 120 to a reflector 122. Reflector 122 collimates and directs the energy of radar transmit signal 120 back towards radar altimeter 10 mounted on turntable 104 as a collimated beam 124. Radar delay 112 and reflector 122 together act to simulate a radar return from a distant target, based upon radar transmit pulse 110.
The energy of collimated beam 124 simulates a radar return from a distant target as radar returns from distant targets are nearly parallel. Collimated beam 124 is processed by radar altimeter 10, as described above with respect to FIG. 1, and results in radar altimeter 10 providing a radar measured angle 126 to a calibration unit 128 which also receives turntable angle 108. Turntable angle 108 is considered the known orientation of radar altimeter 10. Calibration unit 128 determines an error between radar measured angle 126 and turntable angle 108 which is utilized in determining radar calibration corrections 72.
In one embodiment, a zero degree setting on turntable 104 places radar altimeter 10 in a position where housing 102 is perpendicular to collimated beam 124. As collimated beam 124 should impinge antennas 16, 18, and 20 at the same moment in time, radar altimeter 10 should also provide a zero degree radar measured angle 126 to calibration unit 128. A zero degree reading in normal operating conditions (e.g. mounted on an aircraft) would indicate that the radar target is directly underneath radar altimeter 10. As radar altimeter 10 is rotated on precision turntable 104, individual antennas 16, 18, and 20 move closer to or farther away from reflector 122, and therefore are impinged by collimated beam 124 at different moments in time. To illustrate and referring to FIG. 2, in the position shown, antenna 20 will be impinged by collimated beam 124 before either of antennas 16 and 18. Antenna 18 will be impinged by collimated beam 124 before antenna 16. The difference in time of the received collimated beam 124 at each antenna 16, 18, and 20 results in a measured angle 126 other than zero being supplied to calibration unit 128.
However, as calibration unit 128 receives a turntable angle 108 from turntable controller 106 that is highly accurate, and considered to be the truth angle, any differences in radar measured angle 126 and turntable angle 108, are likely caused by delays in processing of the radar returns received at antennas 16, 18, and 20 as described above. Calibration unit 128 calculates radar calibration corrections 72 based on differences between radar measured angle 126 and the truth angle of turntable angle 108 at multiple orientations of turntable 104 to provide accurate corrections. Radar calibration corrections 72 are loaded in phase bias adjust processors 70, 76, and 80 to compensate for the processing delays caused by cable lengths, cable routing, and other sources of radar signal delay. Outputs of phase bias adjust processors 70, 76, and 80, adjusted phase signals 74, 78, and 82 are adjusted such that errors between radar measured angle 126 and turntable angle 108 are minimized, providing improved cross track accuracy. As the above described radar processing components of radar altimeter 10 are hard wired and co-located within chassis 102, and distances between antennas 16, 18, and 20 remain the same, and radar calibration corrections 72 are portable to a final installation of radar altimeter 10, for example, within an aircraft, as radar calibration corrections are stored within radar altimeter 10.
In one embodiment, in order to provide the precision needed to provide an accurate turntable angle 108, chassis 102 of radar altimeter 10 is mounted to turntable 104 via precision guide pins (not shown) and optimized in cross track accuracy through radar calibration corrections 72. After radar altimeter 10 is optimized for cross track accuracy, radar altimeter 10 is mounted via precision guide pins into an aircraft opening. All errors due to inter channel delay path differences (delays in processing of radar returns received at the three antennas), relative positioning of the three antennas with each other, and temperature dependent errors are minimized. In one embodiment, the above described calibration correction process is performed in an anechoic chamber, which absorbs radar returns from undesired paths. The anechoic chamber improves integrity of radar returns received at radar altimeter 10 as a portion of radar pulse 120 from transmit horn 116 which does not impinge upon reflector 122 is absorbed within the chamber rather than reflecting back towards radar altimeter 10 from other sources of reflection.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4121213||Oct 31, 1977||Oct 17, 1978||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Radar altimeter simulator|
|US4683473||Jan 10, 1986||Jul 28, 1987||Honeywell Inc.||Radar transit time simulator device|
|US5157615 *||Dec 31, 1991||Oct 20, 1992||Ryan International Corporation||Aircraft traffic alert and collision avoidance device|
|US5160933||May 20, 1991||Nov 3, 1992||Honeywell Inc.||Radar altimeter with self-calibration feature|
|US5300934||Aug 27, 1992||Apr 5, 1994||Fieldtech Avionics & Instruments, Inc.||Radar altimeter loop simulator|
|US6114984||Dec 19, 1975||Sep 5, 2000||Northrop Grumman Corporation||Interferometric doppler guidance system|
|US6205400 *||Aug 13, 1999||Mar 20, 2001||Ching-Fang Lin||Vehicle positioning and data integrating method and system thereof|
|US6246960 *||Mar 26, 1999||Jun 12, 2001||Ching-Fang Lin||Enhanced integrated positioning method and system thereof for vehicle|
|US6427122 *||Jan 23, 2001||Jul 30, 2002||American Gnc Corporation||Positioning and data integrating method and system thereof|
|US20020069019 *||Dec 4, 2000||Jun 6, 2002||Ching-Fang Lin||Positioning and proximity warning method and system thereof for vehicle|
|US20020092350 *||Nov 27, 2001||Jul 18, 2002||Business Arts Inc.||Gravity gradiometry|
|US20020165669 *||Oct 12, 2001||Nov 7, 2002||Enpoint, L.L.C.||Attitude measurement using a single GPS receiver with two closely-spaced antennas|
|1||*||"Calibration of 1064 nm channel of LITE using playa surface returns", Cooley, T.W.; Reagan, J.A.; Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. IGARSS '95. 'Quantitative Remote Sensing for Science and Applications', Int'l, vol: 3, Jul. 10-14, 1995 Ps: 2326-2328.|
|2||*||"Establishing analytical criteria for selection of sites for calibration of spaceborne laser altimeters", Filin, S.; IGARSS '02. 2002 IEEE International, vol: 6, Jun. 24-28, 2002 Page(s): 3591-3594.*|
|3||*||"Pointing angle and timing calibration/validation of the Geoscience Laser Altimeter with a ground-based detection system", Magruder, L.A.; Schutz, B.E.; Silverberg, E.C.; IGARSS '01. IEEE 2001 International, vol: 4, Jul. 9-13, 2001 Page(s): 1584-1587.*|
|4||"Calibration of 1064 nm channel of LITE using playa surface returns", Cooley, T.W.; Reagan, J.A.; Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. IGARSS '95. ‘Quantitative Remote Sensing for Science and Applications’, Int'l, vol: 3, Jul. 10-14, 1995 Ps: 2326-2328.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7138940 *||Jul 22, 2004||Nov 21, 2006||Honeywell International Inc.||Method and systems for automatic zero calibration of radar altimeters|
|US7417586||Feb 7, 2006||Aug 26, 2008||Honeywell International Inc.||Methods and systems for interferometric cross track phase calibration|
|US7688253||Jul 9, 2008||Mar 30, 2010||Honeywell International Inc.||Method and processor for reduced ambiguity resolution matrix for interferometric angle determination|
|US7719462 *||Aug 7, 2008||May 18, 2010||Siemens Milltronics Process Instruments, Inc.||Time-of-flight radar calibration system|
|US8060389||Aug 18, 2005||Nov 15, 2011||Apple Inc.||System and method for anonymous location based services|
|US8108144||Jun 30, 2008||Jan 31, 2012||Apple Inc.||Location based tracking|
|US8127246||Oct 1, 2007||Feb 28, 2012||Apple Inc.||Varying user interface element based on movement|
|US8175802||Jan 25, 2008||May 8, 2012||Apple Inc.||Adaptive route guidance based on preferences|
|US8180379||Feb 22, 2008||May 15, 2012||Apple Inc.||Synchronizing mobile and vehicle devices|
|US8204684||Jan 8, 2008||Jun 19, 2012||Apple Inc.||Adaptive mobile device navigation|
|US8275352||Jan 3, 2008||Sep 25, 2012||Apple Inc.||Location-based emergency information|
|US8290513||Oct 16, 2012||Apple Inc.||Location-based services|
|US8311526||May 27, 2008||Nov 13, 2012||Apple Inc.||Location-based categorical information services|
|US8332402||Jan 25, 2008||Dec 11, 2012||Apple Inc.||Location based media items|
|US8355862||Jan 6, 2008||Jan 15, 2013||Apple Inc.||Graphical user interface for presenting location information|
|US8359643||Sep 18, 2008||Jan 22, 2013||Apple Inc.||Group formation using anonymous broadcast information|
|US8369867||Jun 30, 2008||Feb 5, 2013||Apple Inc.||Location sharing|
|US8385946||Jan 25, 2008||Feb 26, 2013||Apple Inc.||Disfavored route progressions or locations|
|US8385964||Jun 7, 2011||Feb 26, 2013||Xone, Inc.||Methods and apparatuses for geospatial-based sharing of information by multiple devices|
|US8452529||Jan 10, 2008||May 28, 2013||Apple Inc.||Adaptive navigation system for estimating travel times|
|US8463238||Jan 2, 2008||Jun 11, 2013||Apple Inc.||Mobile device base station|
|US8538458||Mar 11, 2008||Sep 17, 2013||X One, Inc.||Location sharing and tracking using mobile phones or other wireless devices|
|US8538685||Jun 6, 2007||Sep 17, 2013||Apple Inc.||System and method for internet connected service providing heterogeneous mobile systems with situational location relevant content|
|US8548735||Jan 30, 2012||Oct 1, 2013||Apple Inc.||Location based tracking|
|US8644843||May 16, 2008||Feb 4, 2014||Apple Inc.||Location determination|
|US8660530||May 1, 2009||Feb 25, 2014||Apple Inc.||Remotely receiving and communicating commands to a mobile device for execution by the mobile device|
|US8666367||May 1, 2009||Mar 4, 2014||Apple Inc.||Remotely locating and commanding a mobile device|
|US8670748||Mar 30, 2010||Mar 11, 2014||Apple Inc.||Remotely locating and commanding a mobile device|
|US8694026||Oct 15, 2012||Apr 8, 2014||Apple Inc.||Location based services|
|US8712441||Apr 11, 2013||Apr 29, 2014||Xone, Inc.||Methods and systems for temporarily sharing position data between mobile-device users|
|US8738039||Nov 9, 2012||May 27, 2014||Apple Inc.||Location-based categorical information services|
|US8750898||Jan 18, 2013||Jun 10, 2014||X One, Inc.||Methods and systems for annotating target locations|
|US8762056||Feb 6, 2008||Jun 24, 2014||Apple Inc.||Route reference|
|US8774825||Jun 6, 2008||Jul 8, 2014||Apple Inc.||Integration of map services with user applications in a mobile device|
|US8798593||May 7, 2013||Aug 5, 2014||X One, Inc.||Location sharing and tracking using mobile phones or other wireless devices|
|US8798645||Jan 30, 2013||Aug 5, 2014||X One, Inc.||Methods and systems for sharing position data and tracing paths between mobile-device users|
|US8798647||Oct 15, 2013||Aug 5, 2014||X One, Inc.||Tracking proximity of services provider to services consumer|
|US8831635||Jul 21, 2011||Sep 9, 2014||X One, Inc.||Methods and apparatuses for transmission of an alert to multiple devices|
|US8924144||Jan 30, 2012||Dec 30, 2014||Apple Inc.||Location based tracking|
|US8977294||Nov 12, 2007||Mar 10, 2015||Apple Inc.||Securely locating a device|
|US9024805 *||Sep 26, 2012||May 5, 2015||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Radar antenna elevation error estimation method and apparatus|
|US9031581||Nov 7, 2014||May 12, 2015||X One, Inc.||Apparatus and method for obtaining content on a cellular wireless device based on proximity to other wireless devices|
|US9066199||Jun 27, 2008||Jun 23, 2015||Apple Inc.||Location-aware mobile device|
|US9109904||Jan 25, 2008||Aug 18, 2015||Apple Inc.||Integration of map services and user applications in a mobile device|
|US9131342||Apr 30, 2014||Sep 8, 2015||Apple Inc.||Location-based categorical information services|
|US9167558||Jun 12, 2014||Oct 20, 2015||X One, Inc.||Methods and systems for sharing position data between subscribers involving multiple wireless providers|
|US9185522||Nov 7, 2014||Nov 10, 2015||X One, Inc.||Apparatus and method to transmit content to a cellular wireless device based on proximity to other wireless devices|
|US20060017609 *||Jul 22, 2004||Jan 26, 2006||Hager James R||Methods and systems for automatic zero calibration of radar altimeters|
|US20080143585 *||Feb 7, 2006||Jun 19, 2008||Honeywell International Inc.||Methods and systems for interferometric cross track phase calibration|
|US20090005005 *||Jan 2, 2008||Jan 1, 2009||Apple Inc.||Mobile Device Base Station|
|US20090079618 *||Aug 7, 2008||Mar 26, 2009||Shaun Philip Harwood||Time-of-flight radar calibration system|
|CN102323571A *||May 31, 2011||Jan 18, 2012||北京航空航天大学||Distribution method of satellite-borne dual-antenna SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) interferometric calibrator with comprehensive overall parameter|
|U.S. Classification||342/174, 342/120, 342/121|
|International Classification||G01S7/40, G01S13/88, G01S13/44|
|Cooperative Classification||G01S13/4454, G01S7/4021, G01S13/882|
|European Classification||G01S13/44G, G01S7/40A3|
|Jun 11, 2003||AS||Assignment|
|Sep 14, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 23, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Oct 27, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12