|Publication number||US6775605 B2|
|Application number||US 09/995,503|
|Publication date||Aug 10, 2004|
|Filing date||Nov 29, 2001|
|Priority date||Nov 29, 2001|
|Also published as||DE60234415D1, EP1316480A2, EP1316480A3, EP1316480B1, US20030100982|
|Publication number||09995503, 995503, US 6775605 B2, US 6775605B2, US-B2-6775605, US6775605 B2, US6775605B2|
|Inventors||Manoharprasad K. Rao, Kwaku O. Prakah-Asante, MD Abul Masrur|
|Original Assignee||Ford Global Technologies, Llc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (128), Referenced by (35), Classifications (13), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application relates to application file number 201-0400 entitled “Vehicle Sensing Based Pre-Crash Threat Assessment System,” which is filed simultaneously herewith and incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates generally to crash detection systems for automotive vehicles, and more particularly to a pre-crash threat assessment system for a crash detection system.
Due to the current density of traffic on the roads, motor vehicle operators are flooded with information. Consequently, operating a motor vehicle is a complex procedure in which various situations arise where the operator has limited, little, or no time to react or to manually engage safety measures.
Many previously known crash detection systems have incorporated crash detection algorithms based on sensed data. The application of remote sensing systems using radar, lidar, and vision based technologies for object detection, tracking, alarm processing, and potential safety countermeasure deployment is well known in the art.
Based on range and bearing information provided by radar, lidar, or vision based systems and based on additional information obtained from the host vehicle sensors, various algorithms have been used to track the path of a host vehicle, to track the path of a target, and to estimate the future position of objects in the host vehicle path.
Safety systems, such as airbags and motorized safety belt pre-tensioners, activate after contact occurs between two vehicles. A typical accident occurs within 90 ms, whereas a typical airbag deploys within approximately 70 ms. Time minimization between the start of an accident and the start of safety system deployment is therefore crucial. Through accident prediction, additional time for safety system activation is generated.
Currently, accident prediction algorithms are employed primarily for accident warning/avoidance and operate typically within a range larger than 30 meters between host and target vehicles. In the event that a collision is unavoidable, however, the range is less than, and often considerably less than, 30 meters. Therefore, damage minimization techniques must predict an unavoidable collision and deploy safety measures within a short time.
The limitations associated with current accident damage minimization techniques have made it apparent that a new technique to minimize damage to a vehicle or vehicle operator is needed. The new technique should predict a target vehicle position with respect to a host vehicle and should also substantially minimize the computational time for threat assessment calculations. The present invention is directed to these ends.
The present invention provides a remote, non-contact sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system. The present invention also provides a non-contact sensor-based pre-crash threat assessment system for an automobile.
In accordance with the present invention, a pre-crash assessment system, which includes a host vehicle in motion, is disclosed. A radar sensor is coupled to the host vehicle. It is to be understood, however, that alternate embodiments of the present invention will use numerous other sensor types and combinations of sensor types. The radar sensor substantially detects position and relative velocity of a first object in the near zone of the host vehicle. Generally, a near zone is less than thirty meters. A first safety device actuator is also coupled to the host vehicle. This actuator activates a first safety device. A pre-crash algorithm having a first threshold is determined through a comparison of a future position prediction of the first object relative to the host object and a fraction of the host object width plus an adjustable tolerance zone. The adjustable tolerance zone is a function of the last measured position, the direction of travel and the position of the target object when it comes in line with the front of the host vehicle. A safety device controller is coupled to the host vehicle. The controller generates a threshold assessment based on host vehicle dynamics and radar sensor measurements. The controller also controls the first safety device actuator by sending a command signal. The controller operates through logic designed to estimate whether a potential for crash between the host vehicle and the first object is within the first threshold for the first safety device actuator.
A future position prediction of the first object relative to the host vehicle is determined. The controller activates the first safety device actuator when a value for the potential for crash is within the first threshold and the safety device specific deployment criteria are met.
Advantages of the current invention are that remote sensing position and bearing information of a target object in the near vicinity of the host vehicle are used and threat assessment is made through a fast, robust and reliable algorithm. Fast algorithms allow more decision making time on the part of vehicle controllers and more deployment time for safety devices and are therefore preferable.
Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the description that follows and may be realized by the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a pre-crash assessment system in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a remote sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is an exemplary illustration of a pre-crash scenario in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a pre-crash threat assessment and safety device activation system in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
The present invention is illustrated with respect to a pre-crash threat assessment and safety device activation system, particularly suited to the automotive field. The present invention is, however, applicable to various other uses that may require pre-crash threat assessment, as will be understood by one skilled in the art.
Referring to FIG. 1, a pre-crash assessment system 1, including a first target object (here illustrated as a first target vehicle 2) imminently colliding with a host vehicle 3, is illustrated. The pre-crash assessment system includes a high frequency remote sensor (or remote sensing system, as will be understood by one skilled in the art) 4 coupled to the host vehicle 3. The sensor 4 detects vehicle states of the first target vehicle 2. Examples of the vehicle states are position and velocity.
The first safety device actuator 5 is coupled to the host vehicle 3. This actuator 5 pre-arms the first safety device 6, here embodied as a pre-arming device for an airbag. The second safety device actuator 7 is also coupled to the host vehicle 3. The second safety device actuator 7 activates a second safety device 8, here embodied as a motorized safety belt pre-tensioner. Important to note is that numerous actuators and safety devices may be added to the system as needed by the manufacturer.
The safety device controller 9 is also coupled to the host vehicle 3. From the remote sensing system detected target vehicle states, the safety device controller 9 calculates target vehicle dynamics with respect to the host vehicle. Examples of target vehicle dynamics are velocities and accelerations. The safety device controller 9 generates a threshold assessment based on the sensed target vehicle dynamics. The safety device controller 9 also generates a control signal based on the host vehicle dynamics. The sensed information, in conjunction with host vehicle dynamic information, is used by the controller for countermeasure activation decision making. The controller 9 estimates whether a potential for crash between the host vehicle 3 and the first target vehicle 2 is within the first threshold for the first safety device actuator 5. The controller 9 also estimates whether a potential for crash between the host vehicle 3 and the first target vehicle 2 is within the second threshold for the second safety device actuator 7.
In the current embodiment, the estimation is made through a pre-crash algorithm. The algorithm is defined by the comparison of the predicted position of the target object, when the front of the target vehicle is in line with the front of the host vehicle 3 (i.e., when it is in the OX plane of the coordinate system, which is illustrated at the front of the host vehicle 3), with a fraction of the host vehicle width (ideally half the width (W/2)) plus additional adjustable tolerance allowed by the host vehicle systems. The fraction of width used is dependent on host vehicle parameters. The adjustable tolerance zone is a function of the last measured position of the target object, the target object direction of travel and the target object position when it comes in line with the front of the host vehicle.
The fraction of the width and the adjustable tolerance values are either pre-set into the system 12 during manufacture or later through a separate sensor that reads vehicle dimensions, which is subsequently attached to the host vehicle 3. The threat is severe, and, in the current embodiment, within the first actuator threshold when the target vehicle 2 predicted position is less than the fraction of width used. The threat is severe, and, in the current embodiment, within the second actuator threshold when the target vehicle predicted position is substantially less than the fraction of width used.
The safety device controller 9 further sends control signals to the host vehicle Controller Area Network Bus (CAN) 10, which controls the first safety device actuator 5 and the second safety device actuator 7 in response to threat assessment evaluations, as will be understood by one skilled in the art. The operations of the controller 9 will be discussed in detail later.
Referring to FIG. 2, a block-diagram of the remote sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system 12, is illustrated. The current invention addresses only threat assessment aspects of the system 12 (for pre-crash sensing purposes) with radar, lidar, or vision sensor based remote sensing systems.
The system 12 starts when operation block 13, which engages signal processing and detection algorithms, receives radar sensor data and predetermined detection thresholds. The radar sensor data is generated when an object impedes the radar pulse and reflects the pulse back to the radar sensor on the host vehicle. The detection thresholds are pre-set based on vehicle specific acceptable probability of detection and false alarm rates. Subsequently, operation block 13 sends the data and noise accompanying the signal, as will be understood by one skilled in the art, to operation block 14. The probability of detection and false alarm rates have significant effects on track initiation and track quality.
Operation block 14 associates the data from operation block 13 and engages an object tracking algorithm. Operation block 14 then sends the calculated track estimates of the object and the tracking error estimate signals to operation block 16, as will be understood by one skilled in the art.
Host vehicle dynamic data is also sent to the operation block 16 from the host vehicle dynamic sensing systems. Using this combination of received data, operation block 16 estimates the future states of the host vehicle and target object and sends this data to operation block 18. An evaluation is then made in operation block 18 of the potential for collision between the host vehicle and the target object. Operation blocks 16 and 18 are the threat assessment portion of the system 12, which will be discussed in detail later. Operation block 18 also evaluates whether the countermeasure activation criteria are met for various countermeasure actions under consideration. Subsequently, operation block 18 sends actuation signals to the Controller Area Network Bus (CAN) of the host vehicle, which engages the safety devices (countermeasures), as will be understood by one skilled in the art.
In the current invention, the host vehicle dynamics data is used for evaluating countermeasure deployment criteria only. Host vehicle dynamic data is not used to predict the future state of the object with respect to the host vehicle. Instead, the object future state, with respect to the host vehicle future state, is predicted through remote sensor obtained object position and bearing data (as a function of time).
The embodied approach is further clarified in FIG. 3, which illustrates an example of a pre-crash scenario 20. S1, S2, S3 and S4 are the positions of the host vehicle 22 at four consecutive times t1, t2, t3 and t4 respectively. T1, T2, T3 and T4 are the positions of a target object (ideally a target vehicle) 24 being tracked by the remote sensing system 12. Multiple objects are typically tracked, but to explain the embodiment, only the object that has the highest potential for crash is shown. R is the radial distance from the origin of the coordinate system, which is positioned at the front centerline of the host vehicle, to the nearest scattering center 27 of the target object 24. θ is the angle made by the nearest scattering center on the target object 24 with the Y-axis of the coordinate system. The radar sensor 26 is ideally attached to the front of the host vehicle 22. The Y-axis of a coordinate system is configured along the front central line of the host vehicle 22. In the Cartesian coordinate system, with origin at 0 on the host vehicle 22:
X1=R1 sin(θ1) and Y1=R1 cos(θ1) at time t1,
X2=R2 sin(θ2) and Y2=R2 cos(θ2) at time t2,
X3=R3 sin(θ3) and Y3=R3 cos(θ3) at time t3 and
X4=R4 sin(θ4) and Y4=R4 cos(θ4) at time t4.
In this manner, the X and Y coordinates of the target object 24 with respect to the coordinate system, fixed to the host vehicle and moving therewith, is determined as a function of time, which is here represented as: t1, t2, t3 and t4. By a numerical differentiation process, as will be understood by one skilled in the art, the X and Y components of the target object 24 velocities and accelerations are obtained. When Doppler velocity measurement capable radar or lidar sensors are used, the relative velocity information can be directly measured. In this situation, only X and Y components of the acceleration data need to be calculated using numerical differentiation procedures.
From the Y component of current position (e.g. Y4 corresponding to T4) and Y components of velocity (e.g. Vy4) and acceleration (e.g. Ay4), with respect to the moving coordinate system OXY, the time (tp) required for the target object 24 to be line OX is calculated through the equation:
From the X component of the current position (e.g. X4) and the X component of velocity (e.g. Vx4) and acceleration (e.g. Ax4), with respect to the moving coordinate system OXY, and the time (tp) at which the target object 24 will be on line OX, the X position at time (tp) is predicted through the equation:
The severity of threat (confidence level) is then assessed by comparing this predicted Xtp position (X at time tp) with a fraction of the host vehicle width (ideally half the width (W/2)) plus additional variable tolerance allowed by the host vehicle systems. The threat is severe, and, in the current embodiment, within the first actuator threshold when the target vehicle predicted position (Xtp) is less than the fraction of width used. The threat is severe, and, in the current embodiment, within the second actuator threshold when the target vehicle predicted position (Xtp) is substantially less than the fraction of width used. This algorithm employs only the remote sensing system-based measurements. This algorithm uses substantially less time to run than previous algorithms, which also considered the vehicle dynamics of the host vehicle in the evaluation of the crash assessment situations. Through this algorithm, the system substantially achieves the goal of providing a threat assessment means with short computational time requirements for threat assessment evaluations, thus providing more time for deployment of necessary countermeasures in a non-avoidable collision situation.
In FIG. 4, in view of and referencing components illustrated in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, a block diagram of the operation of a pre-crash threat assessment and safety device activation system 30, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, is illustrated. The logic starts in operation block 32 by obtaining the range (R) and the bearing (θ) of the target object 24 from the host vehicle remote sensor 26. Subsequently, operation block 34 activates and the object track record is updated from the data sent from operation block 32.
Operation block 36 then activates, and logic operative to estimate the velocity (Vy) and acceleration (AY) of the target object 24 is engaged. The data from operation block 34 is ideally filtered prior to estimation in operation block 36, as will be understood by one skilled in the art.
Operation block 38 then activates, which uses the longitudinal distance with respect to the 0X plane, and calculates the intercept time (tp) of the target object 24. From this intercept time (tp), operation block 40 activates and logic is engaged, operative to predict the lateral position (X at time tp) of the target object 24, as was previously discussed.
Operation block 42 subsequently activates and assesses the potential for collision and evaluates the confidence levels associated with the position prediction. The confidence levels are the thresholds within which the safety device controller, incorporated in the host vehicle 22, activates a countermeasure in response to the position prediction and the meeting of device specific deployment criteria. The confidence levels are assessed, in the current embodiment, by comparing the predicted Xtp position (X at time tp) with the host vehicle half width (W/2) plus additional variable tolerance allowed by the host vehicle systems.
A decision is then made in inquiry block 44 as to whether controller confidence levels are met. For a negative response, operation block 32 again is performed and the block diagram 30 operates for a subsequent position, velocity and acceleration of the target object 24 with respect to the host vehicle 22.
Otherwise, the confidence levels are compared to the threshold of the first safety device (embodied as a pre-arming device for an airbag) and the threshold of the second safety device (embodied as a motorized belt pre-tensioner) in operation block 46. These threshold comparisons and safety device specific criteria are used to reach the countermeasure deployment decision.
A determination is then made in inquiry block 48 as to whether either safety device deployment criterion is met. Two safety device thresholds for two safety devices are included in the current embodiment, however numerous other safety device thresholds for numerous other safety devices may be added as needed for vehicle safety. In operation block 50, if either safety device deployment criterion is met, the controller sends a signal to the first safety device actuator or the second safety device actuator for the respective countermeasure (safety device) activation.
Otherwise, operation block 32 again activates and the block diagram 30 operates for a subsequent position, velocity and acceleration of the target object 24 with respect to the host vehicle 22.
The current embodiment combines this efficient approach for threat assessment with advanced techniques for radar based object tracking. The quality of threat assessment depends upon the quality of tracking. Advanced filtering and tracking techniques such as: Alpha-Beta-Gamma filtering and adaptive Kalman filtering are used to initiate and maintain quality tracks for objects in the near zone of the host vehicle. These filtering and tracking techniques improve the reliability, robustness, and confidence levels of the threat assessment predictions without significantly sacrificing processing speeds, as will be understood by one skilled in the art.
In operation, in view of FIG. 3, when a target object 24 comes in range of the radar sensor 26 of the host vehicle 22, logic operates to track the target object 24 and estimate the future position, velocity and acceleration of the target object 24 relative to the host vehicle 22. An assessment is then conducted for the confidence of collision and whether the collision will require pre-arming the airbag or activating the motorized belt pre-tensioners. Ideally, to minimize nuisance activation, the motorized belt pre-tensioner is activated when there is a higher certainty of collision. A lower threshold is used for pre-arming the airbag.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that there has been brought to the art a new remote sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system. It is to be understood that the preceding description of the preferred embodiment is merely illustrative of some of the many specific embodiments that represent applications of the principles of the present invention. Numerous and other arrangements would be evident to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3514610||Jan 4, 1967||May 26, 1970||Victor J Huston||Photocell device to prevent automobile rear end collisions|
|US4257703||Mar 15, 1979||Mar 24, 1981||The Bendix Corporation||Collision avoidance using optical pattern growth rate|
|US4381829||Oct 20, 1980||May 3, 1983||Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault||Collision detection system with safety devices|
|US4623966||Feb 15, 1984||Nov 18, 1986||Sperry Limited||Collision avoidance apparatus|
|US4638289||Feb 24, 1984||Jan 20, 1987||Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh||Accident data recorder|
|US4673937||Jul 24, 1985||Jun 16, 1987||Davis John W||Automotive collision avoidance and/or air bag deployment radar|
|US4833469||Aug 3, 1987||May 23, 1989||David Constant V||Obstacle proximity detector for moving vehicles and method for use thereof|
|US4916450||May 12, 1988||Apr 10, 1990||Radar Control Systems Corporation||Radar system for headway control of a vehicle|
|US4969103||Nov 1, 1989||Nov 6, 1990||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Speed control apparatus for an automotive vehicle with creep control|
|US4992943||Feb 13, 1989||Feb 12, 1991||Mccracken Jack J||Apparatus for detecting and storing motor vehicle impact data|
|US4994972||Nov 6, 1989||Feb 19, 1991||Trw Technar Inc.||Apparatus and method employing multiple crash evaluation algorithms for actuating a restraint system in a passenger vehicle|
|US5040118||Nov 6, 1989||Aug 13, 1991||Trw Technar Inc.||Apparatus and method employing multiple crash evaluation algorithms and evaluation expertise for actuating a restraint system in a passenger vehicle|
|US5063603||Nov 6, 1989||Nov 5, 1991||David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc.||Dynamic method for recognizing objects and image processing system therefor|
|US5091726||Aug 23, 1990||Feb 25, 1992||Industrial Technology Resarch Institute||Vehicle anti-collision system|
|US5162794||Nov 21, 1989||Nov 10, 1992||Nancy Seith||Safe trailing distance warning for vehicles|
|US5166881||Jan 15, 1991||Nov 24, 1992||Mitsubishi Denki K.K.||Following control apparatus for an automotive vehicle|
|US5173859||Nov 5, 1990||Dec 22, 1992||General Motors Corporation||Automatic vehicle deceleration|
|US5182459||Jan 18, 1991||Jan 26, 1993||Zexel Corporation||Control system for vehicle safety device|
|US5230400||Dec 2, 1991||Jul 27, 1993||Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha||Vehicle cruise control system|
|US5234071||Feb 25, 1992||Aug 10, 1993||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Travel control apparatus for motor a vehicle|
|US5249157||Aug 22, 1990||Sep 28, 1993||Kollmorgen Corporation||Collision avoidance system|
|US5307136||Oct 14, 1992||Apr 26, 1994||Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Distance detection system for vehicles|
|US5314037||Jan 22, 1993||May 24, 1994||Shaw David C H||Automobile collision avoidance system|
|US5430432||Jul 22, 1994||Jul 4, 1995||Camhi; Elie||Automotive warning and recording system|
|US5467283||Oct 19, 1993||Nov 14, 1995||Mazda Motor Corporation||Obstacle sensing apparatus for vehicles|
|US5479173||Mar 8, 1994||Dec 26, 1995||Mazda Motor Corporation||Obstacle sensing apparatus for vehicles|
|US5502432||Dec 10, 1992||Mar 26, 1996||Stanley Electric Co., Ltd.||Apparatus and method of warning rear-end collision|
|US5521580||Feb 28, 1995||May 28, 1996||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Danger avoidance system for a vehicle|
|US5526269||Jun 20, 1994||Jun 11, 1996||Yazaki Corporation||Digital operation recorder|
|US5534870||Dec 14, 1994||Jul 9, 1996||Thomson - Csf||Anticollision device, notably for motor vehicles|
|US5541590||Jan 19, 1995||Jul 30, 1996||Takata Corporation||Vehicle crash predictive and evasive operation system by neural networks|
|US5552986||Mar 28, 1994||Sep 3, 1996||Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.||Passenger restraint belt system|
|US5572428||Sep 28, 1994||Nov 5, 1996||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Anti-collision system for vehicles|
|US5574463||May 24, 1995||Nov 12, 1996||Nippondenso Co., Ltd.||Obstacle recognition system for a vehicle|
|US5594414||Aug 2, 1994||Jan 14, 1997||Namngani; Abdulatif||Collision probability detection system|
|US5602760||Feb 2, 1994||Feb 11, 1997||Hughes Electronics||Image-based detection and tracking system and processing method employing clutter measurements and signal-to-clutter ratios|
|US5604683||Sep 12, 1991||Feb 18, 1997||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Evaluating target tracking when using multiple sensors|
|US5629847||Dec 22, 1994||May 13, 1997||Airbag Systems Co., Ltd.||Control system for vehicle safety devices|
|US5635922||Dec 27, 1994||Jun 3, 1997||Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd.||Apparatus for and method of preventing car collision utilizing laser|
|US5646612||Dec 29, 1995||Jul 8, 1997||Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.||Method for avoiding collision of vehicle and apparatus for performing the same|
|US5680097||Dec 7, 1993||Oct 21, 1997||Mazda Motor Corporation||Vehicle run safety apparatus|
|US5684474||Mar 13, 1996||Nov 4, 1997||Gilon; Shmuel||Collision avoidance detector|
|US5689264||Oct 5, 1995||Nov 18, 1997||Mazda Motor Corporation||Obstacle detecting system for vehicles|
|US5699040||Nov 20, 1996||Dec 16, 1997||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Vehicle collision preventing system|
|US5699057||May 7, 1996||Dec 16, 1997||Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Warning system for vehicle|
|US5710565||Apr 5, 1996||Jan 20, 1998||Nippondenso Co., Ltd.||System for controlling distance to a vehicle traveling ahead based on an adjustable probability distribution|
|US5745870||Sep 13, 1995||Apr 28, 1998||Mazda Motor Corporation||Traveling-path prediction apparatus and method for vehicles|
|US5748477||Dec 19, 1995||May 5, 1998||Takata Corporation||Vehicle collision control system|
|US5749426||Dec 12, 1995||May 12, 1998||Lucas Industries Public Limited Company||Apparatus and method for cruise control|
|US5751211||Dec 27, 1996||May 12, 1998||Denso Corporation||Obstacle warning system for a vehicle|
|US5751836||Sep 27, 1996||May 12, 1998||David Sarnoff Research Center Inc.||Automated, non-invasive iris recognition system and method|
|US5754099||Mar 24, 1995||May 19, 1998||Nippondenso Co., Ltd.||Obstacle warning system for a vehicle|
|US5771481||Nov 29, 1995||Jun 23, 1998||Lucas Industries Public Limited Company||Apparatus and method for cruise control|
|US5779264||Feb 10, 1997||Jul 14, 1998||Sagem-Autoliv||Crash detector arrangement|
|US5808561||Mar 17, 1997||Sep 15, 1998||Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Drive assist system for a vehicle and the method thereof|
|US5815093||Jul 26, 1996||Sep 29, 1998||Lextron Systems, Inc.||Computerized vehicle log|
|US5835007||Feb 10, 1997||Nov 10, 1998||Delco Electronics Corporation||Method and apparatus for crash sensing using anticipatory sensor inputs|
|US5835873||Feb 21, 1997||Nov 10, 1998||Breed Automotive Technology, Inc.||Vehicle safety system with safety device controllers|
|US5838228||Sep 18, 1997||Nov 17, 1998||Clark; Dennis D.||System for preventing rear end collisions|
|US5847472||Jul 25, 1996||Dec 8, 1998||Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.||Method for recording an operation time of an air bag system and an apparatus for performing the same|
|US5847755||Dec 11, 1996||Dec 8, 1998||Sarnoff Corporation||Method and apparatus for detecting object movement within an image sequence|
|US5872536||Feb 19, 1997||Feb 16, 1999||Hittite Microwave Corporation||Multi-sensor anticipatory object detection system|
|US5905457||Feb 25, 1993||May 18, 1999||Rashid; Charles||Vehicle radar safety apparatus|
|US5906393||Sep 16, 1997||May 25, 1999||Trw Inc.||Occupant restraint system and control method with variable sense, sample, and determination rates|
|US5920345||Jun 2, 1997||Jul 6, 1999||Sarnoff Corporation||CMOS image sensor with improved fill factor|
|US5926126||Sep 8, 1997||Jul 20, 1999||Ford Global Technologies, Inc.||Method and system for detecting an in-path target obstacle in front of a vehicle|
|US5936549||Jun 10, 1997||Aug 10, 1999||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Obstacle detecting apparatus and vehicle occupant protecting device using the same|
|US5938714||Dec 8, 1997||Aug 17, 1999||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Distance control apparatus having a distance control start/stop determination device|
|US5948026||Oct 24, 1996||Sep 7, 1999||General Motors Corporation||Automotive data recorder|
|US5949366||May 18, 1998||Sep 7, 1999||Robert Bosch Gmbh||Method and device for sensing an imminent or possible collision|
|US5949918||Aug 18, 1997||Sep 7, 1999||Sarnoff Corporation||Method and apparatus for performing image enhancement|
|US5955967||Nov 22, 1996||Sep 21, 1999||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Scan-type radar apparatus for a vehicle to accurately detect an object in a lane of the radar equipped vehicle|
|US5959552||May 20, 1997||Sep 28, 1999||Cho; Myungeun||System for minimizing automobile collision damage and personal injury|
|US5959569 *||Oct 9, 1997||Sep 28, 1999||Eaton Vorad Technologies, L.L.C.||Method and apparatus for in path target determination for an automotive vehicle using a gyroscopic device|
|US5963272||Oct 30, 1996||Oct 5, 1999||Sarnoff Corporation||Method and apparatus for generating a reference image from an image sequence|
|US5964822||Aug 27, 1997||Oct 12, 1999||Delco Electronics Corp.||Automatic sensor azimuth alignment|
|US5983161||Sep 24, 1996||Nov 9, 1999||Lemelson; Jerome H.||GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method|
|US5995037||Jun 29, 1998||Nov 30, 1999||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Obstacle detection system for a vehicle|
|US5999117||Jun 16, 1998||Dec 7, 1999||Northrop Grumman Corporation||Method for tracking and detecting turns of maneuvering targets|
|US5999874||Sep 15, 1997||Dec 7, 1999||Robert Bosch Gmbh||Method and apparatus for controlling the velocity of a vehicle|
|US6002983||Aug 27, 1997||Dec 14, 1999||Delphi Technologies, Inc.||Angle extent estimation method for a motor vehicle object detection system|
|US6018308||Jul 23, 1998||Jan 25, 2000||Denso Corporation||Obstacle recognition system for automotive vehicle|
|US6025797||Jul 22, 1998||Feb 15, 2000||Denso Corporation||Angular shift determining apparatus for determining angular shift of central axis of radar used in automotive obstacle detection system|
|US6026340||Sep 30, 1998||Feb 15, 2000||The Robert Bosch Corporation||Automotive occupant sensor system and method of operation by sensor fusion|
|US6031484||Nov 19, 1997||Feb 29, 2000||Daimlerchrysler Ag||Release device for passenger restraint systems in a motor vehicle|
|US6037860||Sep 18, 1998||Mar 14, 2000||Volkswagen Ag||Method and arrangement for avoiding and/or minimizing vehicle collisions in road traffic|
|US6044166||Feb 23, 1996||Mar 28, 2000||Sarnoff Corporation||Parallel-pipelined image processing system|
|US6044321||Jun 9, 1997||Mar 28, 2000||Hitachi, Ltd.||Intelligent cruise control system for moving body|
|US6049619||Feb 10, 1997||Apr 11, 2000||Sarnoff Corporation||Method and apparatus for detecting moving objects in two- and three-dimensional scenes|
|US6061015||Jan 5, 1999||May 9, 2000||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Vehicle obstacle detecting system|
|US6076028||Sep 29, 1998||Jun 13, 2000||Veridian Engineering, Inc.||Method and apparatus for automatic vehicle event detection, characterization and reporting|
|US6084508||Jul 13, 1998||Jul 4, 2000||Volkswagen Ag||Automatic emergency braking method and arrangement|
|US6085151 *||Jan 20, 1998||Jul 4, 2000||Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc.||Predictive collision sensing system|
|US6087928||Oct 22, 1997||Jul 11, 2000||Breed Automotive Technology, Inc.||Predictive impact sensing system for vehicular safety restraint systems|
|US6088639||Oct 3, 1997||Jul 11, 2000||Delco Electronics Corporation||Method of enabling and disabling occupant restraints|
|US6094159||Feb 5, 1999||Jul 25, 2000||Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc.||Process for measuring distance with adaptive amplification|
|US6097332||Mar 15, 1999||Aug 1, 2000||Crosby, Ii; Robert G.||Radar detector for pre-impact airbag triggering|
|US6114951||Dec 17, 1997||Sep 5, 2000||Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Vehicle collision preventing apparatus|
|US6121896||Jan 26, 1999||Sep 19, 2000||Rahman; Anis||Motor vehicle early warning system|
|US6148943||Jan 19, 1999||Nov 21, 2000||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Vehicle behavior control system|
|US6151539||Nov 3, 1998||Nov 21, 2000||Volkswagen Ag||Autonomous vehicle arrangement and method for controlling an autonomous vehicle|
|US6157892||Jun 10, 1999||Dec 5, 2000||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Obstacle avoidance control system for vehicle|
|US6161074||Dec 22, 1999||Dec 12, 2000||Visteon Global Technologies, Inc.||Method and system for continued vehicle control in an adaptive speed control system at vehicle speeds below a minimum operating speed when a sensed target disappears|
|US6168198||Nov 23, 1999||Jan 2, 2001||Automotive Technologies International, Inc.||Methods and arrangements for controlling an occupant restraint device in a vehicle|
|US6169479||Oct 23, 1998||Jan 2, 2001||Visteon Global Technologies, Inc.||Vehicular deformation sensor system|
|US6177866||May 28, 1999||Jan 23, 2001||O'connell Patricia||Tailgating warning system|
|US6185490||Mar 15, 1999||Feb 6, 2001||Thomas W. Ferguson||Vehicle crash data recorder|
|US6188316||Mar 11, 1999||Feb 13, 2001||Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Vehicle dynamic control system|
|US6191704||Dec 19, 1997||Feb 20, 2001||Hitachi, Ltd,||Run environment recognizing apparatus|
|US6204756||Oct 23, 1998||Mar 20, 2001||Visteon Global Technologies, Inc.||Diagnostics for vehicle deformation sensor system|
|US6209909||Feb 17, 1998||Apr 3, 2001||Automotive Technologies International Inc.||Side impact airbag systems|
|US6218960||Feb 29, 2000||Apr 17, 2001||Yazaki Corporation||Rear-view monitor for use in vehicles|
|US6219606||Nov 16, 1998||Apr 17, 2001||Delphi Technologies, Inc.||Restraint deployment control method having a delayed adaptable deployment threshold|
|US6223125||Jan 6, 2000||Apr 24, 2001||Brett O. Hall||Collision avoidance system|
|US6225918||Feb 19, 1999||May 1, 2001||Bing Kam||Automatic warning signal system for vehicles|
|US6226389||Dec 28, 1999||May 1, 2001||Jerome H. Lemelson||Motor vehicle warning and control system and method|
|US6229438||Apr 19, 2000||May 8, 2001||Emergency Warning Systems, Inc.||Vehicular hazard warning system|
|US6246961||Jun 8, 1999||Jun 12, 2001||Yazaki Corporation||Collision alarm method and apparatus for vehicles|
|US6249738||May 27, 1999||Jun 19, 2001||Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.||Apparatus and method for automatically controlling vehicular velocity|
|US6256584||Aug 16, 1999||Jul 3, 2001||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Travel safety system for vehicle|
|US6259992||Jun 3, 1999||Jul 10, 2001||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Vehicle safety running control system|
|US6405132 *||Oct 4, 2000||Jun 11, 2002||Intelligent Technologies International, Inc.||Accident avoidance system|
|US6420996 *||Aug 8, 2001||Jul 16, 2002||Ford Global Technologies, Inc.||Integrated radar and active transponder collision prediction system|
|US6816539||Jul 20, 1998||Nov 9, 2004||Samsung Electronics Company, Limited||Multiple-channel digital receiver for global positioning system|
|US20020032515 *||Nov 8, 2001||Mar 14, 2002||Hitachi, Ltd.||Vehicle control method and vehicle warning method|
|US20030060980 *||Feb 15, 2002||Mar 27, 2003||Prakah-Asante Kwaku O.||Integrated collision prediction and safety systems control for improved vehicle safety|
|EP0720928A2||Dec 5, 1995||Jul 10, 1996||Lucas Industries Public Limited Company||Apparatus and method for cruise control|
|JP5465934B2||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7138938||May 6, 2005||Nov 21, 2006||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||System and method for preemptively sensing an object and selectively operating both a collision countermeasure system and a parking assistance system aboard an automotive vehicle|
|US7177750||May 19, 2005||Feb 13, 2007||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US7212907||May 19, 2005||May 1, 2007||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US7248962||May 19, 2005||Jul 24, 2007||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US7359782||Jul 18, 2005||Apr 15, 2008||Automotive Technologies International, Inc.||Vehicular impact reactive system and method|
|US7386385 *||May 19, 2005||Jun 10, 2008||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for recognising the lane-change manoeuver of a motor vehicle|
|US7422293||Jul 26, 2005||Sep 9, 2008||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||System and a method for dissipating voltage in an electrical circuit of a vehicle|
|US7774123||May 19, 2005||Aug 10, 2010||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US7831367||May 19, 2005||Nov 9, 2010||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US7831368||May 19, 2005||Nov 9, 2010||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US7840330||May 19, 2005||Nov 23, 2010||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US7890263||Apr 8, 2005||Feb 15, 2011||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||System and method for sensing and deployment control supervision of a safety device|
|US8060308||Feb 18, 2008||Nov 15, 2011||Intelligent Technologies International, Inc.||Weather monitoring techniques|
|US8248295 *||Dec 5, 2008||Aug 21, 2012||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Pre-crash safety system|
|US8355852||May 4, 2007||Jan 15, 2013||GM Global Technology Operations LLC||Slow or stopped vehicle ahead advisor with digital map integration|
|US8437890 *||Jul 15, 2010||May 7, 2013||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Integrated framework for vehicle operator assistance based on a trajectory prediction and threat assessment|
|US8463500||Mar 30, 2006||Jun 11, 2013||Ford Global Technologies||Method for operating a pre-crash sensing system to deploy airbags using inflation control|
|US8543261 *||Jul 15, 2010||Sep 24, 2013||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Methods and apparati for predicting and quantifying threat being experienced by a modeled system|
|US8554461||Jul 16, 2007||Oct 8, 2013||Ford Global Technologies, Llc||System and method for pre-deploying restraints countermeasures using pre-crash sensing and post-crash sensing|
|US8612099 *||May 4, 2012||Dec 17, 2013||Tk Holdings Inc.||Occupant restraint system|
|US8744648 *||Apr 9, 2013||Jun 3, 2014||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Integrated framework for vehicle operator assistance based on a trajectory prediction and threat assessment|
|US20050209764 *||May 19, 2005||Sep 22, 2005||Marko Schroder||System for recognizing left-hand or right-hand driving conditions|
|US20050216137 *||May 19, 2005||Sep 29, 2005||Marko Schroder||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US20050216170 *||May 19, 2005||Sep 29, 2005||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the spread of a motor vehicle|
|US20050216171 *||May 19, 2005||Sep 29, 2005||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for recognising the lane-change manoeuver of a motor vehicle|
|US20050216172 *||May 19, 2005||Sep 29, 2005||Marko Schroder||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US20050240330 *||May 19, 2005||Oct 27, 2005||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US20050240335 *||May 19, 2005||Oct 27, 2005||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US20050251313 *||May 19, 2005||Nov 10, 2005||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US20050251323 *||May 19, 2005||Nov 10, 2005||Lucas Automotive Gmbh||System for influencing the speed of a motor vehicle|
|US20100271256 *||Dec 5, 2008||Oct 28, 2010||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Pre-crash safety system|
|US20110215915 *||Sep 8, 2011||Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.||Detection system and detecting method for car|
|US20120083947 *||Jul 15, 2010||Apr 5, 2012||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Integrated framework for vehicle operator assistance based on a trajectory and threat assessment|
|US20120109610 *||Jul 15, 2010||May 3, 2012||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Methods and apparati for predicting and quantifying threat being experienced by a modeled system|
|US20120283916 *||May 4, 2012||Nov 8, 2012||Tk Holdings Inc.||Occupant restraint system|
|U.S. Classification||701/45, 701/301, 702/143, 280/733, 342/72|
|International Classification||G01S13/93, B60R21/0134, B60R21/01|
|Cooperative Classification||B60R21/0134, G01S13/931, B60R21/013, G01S2013/9375|
|Nov 29, 2001||AS||Assignment|
|Apr 22, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,MICHIGAN
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013987/0838
Effective date: 20030301
|Jan 7, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 23, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8