|Publication number||US6791191 B2|
|Application number||US 09/768,911|
|Publication date||Sep 14, 2004|
|Filing date||Jan 24, 2001|
|Priority date||Jan 24, 2001|
|Also published as||US20020096777, WO2002059967A2, WO2002059967A3|
|Publication number||09768911, 768911, US 6791191 B2, US 6791191B2, US-B2-6791191, US6791191 B2, US6791191B2|
|Inventors||Lap-Wai Chow, James P. Baukus, William M. Clark, Jr.|
|Original Assignee||Hrl Laboratories, Llc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (106), Non-Patent Citations (11), Referenced by (21), Classifications (17), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of the prevention of reverse engineering of integrated circuits and/or making such reverse engineering so difficult and time-consuming as to make reverse engineering of integrated circuits non-feasible.
More particularly, this invention relates to using, in order to prevent and/or discourage such reverse engineering, vias (i.e., holes etched in the oxide layers between metal layers and then filled with metal to affect a connection between metal layers) either not beginning on a metal layer or not terminating on a metal layer.
2. Description of the Related Art
The design and development of semiconductor integrated circuits require a thorough understanding of the complex structures and processes and involve many man-hours of work requiring high skill, costing considerable sums of money.
In order to avoid this time and effort, some developers resort to the practice of reverse engineering, disassembling existing devices manufactured by somebody else, and closely examining them to determine the physical structure of the integrated circuit, followed by slavishly copying the device. Thus, by obtaining a planar optical image of the circuits and by studying and copying them, typically required product development efforts are circumvented.
Such practices hurt the true developer of the product and impairs its competitiveness in the market-place, because the developer had to spend significant amounts of time and effort for the development, while the reverse engineer did not have to.
A number of approaches has been used in order to frustrate such reverse engineering attempts, particularly in the field of semiconductor integrated circuits.
For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,933 to Baukus, et. al. teaches how transistors in complementary metal oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuit can be connected by implanted, hidden and buried lines between the transistors. This hiding is achieved by modifying the p+ and n+ source/drain masks. The implanted interconnections are further used to make a 3-input AND-circuit look substantially the same as a 3-input OR-circuit.
Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,846 to Baukus, et. al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,930,663 to Baukus et. al. teach a further modification in the source/drain implant masks, so that the implanted connecting lines between transistors have a gap inserted, the length of which is approximately the length of the feature size of the CMOS technology being used. These gaps are called “channel blocks.”
If the gap is “filled” with one kind of implant (depending on whether the implanted connecting line is “p” or “n”), the line conducts; if another kind of implant is used for the gap-filling, the line does not conduct. The reverse engineer must determine connectivity on the basis of resolving the “n” or “p” implant at the minimum feature size of the channel block. In addition, transistor sizes and metal connection routings are modified, in order to deprive the reverse engineer of using clues with which he can find inputs, outputs, gate lines and so on as keys to the circuit functionality.
Practicing the inventions taught in the above-mentioned patents to secure an integrated circuit causes the reverse engineer to perform steps that are not always needed. These steps include: decomposing the circuit layer by layer, careful processing of each layer followed by imaging of the layer with exact registration to other layers, and having the required process to image and determine small area implants of specifically both and p-types.
Once a particular standard circuit functionality has been determined, the reverse engineer will attempt to find some signature in the metal layers of that standard circuit which can exactly indicate the presence of that particular standard circuit in other places in the integrated circuit. If this can be done, that information can be entered into the reverse engineer's data base and automatic pattern recognition of the metal pattern is used to determine the circuit, without need for the extensive delayering. This would save considerable time and effort.
Therefore, there still exists a need for an inexpensive, easy-to-implement defensive method which can help to provide the enhanced protection against the reverse engineering of semiconductor integrated circuits, in particular to make such a signature impossible to determine. The present invention provides such a method.
This invention makes the use of vias to provide connections between metal layers unpredictable and difficult to be determined accurately. Hence, the circuit will appear to be one thing, while in fact it is something else. This is a good way to prevent reverse engineering.
Modern integrated circuits are constructed such that signals are routed between circuit/logic blocks (or sometimes between transistors within a single circuit/logic block) and input/output ports, via metallic lines. For purposes of compaction, more than one metal layer is used, the metal layers being separated by a deposited insulating layer, both metal layers being disposed on top of the semiconductor substrate. Connections between these metal lines are accomplished by using vias, for example, holes etched in the insulating layer between metals. The vias are filled with a metal, typically, tungsten.
The gravamen of the present invention is to provide vias which either do not begin or do not terminate on a metal layer. Such non-metal terminating vias will look like an interconnection between adjacent metal layers/lines to the reverse engineer, but they in fact provide no such interconnection.
Such non-metal terminating vias will make it very difficult for a reverse engineer to determine what the signal routing pattern really is, making the process of reverse engineering more expensive and time consuming effectively rendering the circuit secure from such intrusion.
When the reverse engineer observes the top metal layer, dimples in the metal indicate the presence of vias. He will also observe the presence of the via after having removed the top metal layer. However, as a result of etching away the oxide layer between metal layers, down to the lower metal layer, the via is eliminated as well. Therefore, the reverse engineer is likely to assume that the metal layers are connected, because following the via to the lower level, where in fact it is not connected to the lower metal layer, is difficult to accomplish.
The reverse engineer will have to assume the via connects with two metal lines, one in the upper metal layer and one in the lower metal layer, while in fact, the connection is only with, at most, one metal layer.
A first aspect of the invention provides a semiconducting device adapted to prevent and/or to thwart reverse engineering, including an insulating layer disposed on a semiconductor substrate, a first metal layer and a second metal layer, said first metal layer and second metal layer being separated by said insulating layer and a via defined by said insulating layer, said via having a first end and a second end, wherein said first end of said via is connected to said first metal layer and said second end of said via terminates prior to reaching said second metal layer.
A second aspect of the invention provides a semiconducting device adapted to prevent and/or to thwart reverse engineering, including an insulating layer disposed on top of semiconductor substrate a first metal layer and a second metal layer, said first metal layer and second metal layer being separated by said insulating layer, and a via defined by said insulating layer, said via having a first end and a second end, wherein said second end of said via is connected to said second metal layer and said first end of said via terminates prior to reaching said first metal layer.
A third aspect of the invention provides a method for preventing and/or thwarting reverse engineering, comprising steps of disposing an insulating layer on top of semiconductor substrate, forming and patterning a first metal layer and a second metal layer so that said first metal layer and said second metal layer are separated by said insulating layer and forming a via defined by said insulating layer, said via having a first end and a second end, wherein said first end of said via is connected to said first metal layer and said second end of said via terminates prior to reaching said second metal layer.
A fourth aspect of the invention provides a method for preventing and/or thwarting reverse engineering, comprising steps of disposing an insulating layer on top of semiconductor substrate, forming and patterning a first metal layer and a second metal layer so that said first metal layer and said second metal layer are separated by said insulating layer, and forming a via defined by said insulating layer, said via having a first end and a second end, wherein said second end of said via is connected to said second metal layer and said first end of said via terminates prior to reaching said first metal layer.
The features and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a typical via connecting two metal layers.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing how metal lines are located relative to one another.
FIG. 2(a) is a schematic diagram showing a via according to one embodiment of this invention, where the via does not terminate on a lower metal layer.
FIG. 2(b) is a schematic diagram showing a via according to another embodiment of this invention where the via does not begin on an upper metal layer.
FIG. 1 shows a usual via 1 connecting an upper metal layer 2 and a lower metal layer 3. The via 1 has two ends: a first end 1(a) and a second end 1(b). The upper and lower metal layers are separated by an insulating layer 4, typically made of silicon oxide. Insulating layers 5 and 6, typically, occur above and below metal layers 2 and 3. The insulating layers 4, 5 and 6 are disposed in a semiconductor device, preferably, an integrated circuit (not shown). The via 1 is filled with a metal, typically the same metal as the metal of metal layers 2 and 3, this metal usually being tungsten.
FIG. 2 shows that metal lines 2(a) and 3(a), within the two metal layers 2 and 3, respectively, do not typically run parallel. They are disposed in parallel planes, but the signal metal lines 2(a) and 3(a) are not parallel. Instead, the metal pattern, when viewed from the top, as shown on FIG. 2, is usually two arrays of lines proceeding in orthogonal directions, when viewed as projected onto a single plane. The metal lines 2(a) and 3(a) lie in different planes.
In order to confuse a reverse engineer, two new structures shown on FIGS. 2(a) and 2(b) are offered, these structures comprising two embodiments of this invention.
FIG. 2(a) schematically depicts a structure, disposed on an integrated circuit (not shown) where the via 1 terminates on the upper metal layer 2, where the first end 1(a) is connected to the upper metal layer 2, but the second end 1(b) does not terminate on the lower metal layer 3. As seen on FIG. 2(a), the second end 1(b) is spaced from the conducting line made from the lower metal layer 3. A portion of insulating layer isolates the second end 1(b) from the lower metal layer 3.
In an alternative embodiment, shown on FIG. 2(b), also used on an integrated circuit (not shown) the via 1 terminates on the lower metal layer 3, but does not terminate on the upper metal layer 2. In this case, the second end 1(b) is connected to the lower metal layer 3, but the first end 1(a) is spaced from and thus isolated from the conducting line in the upper metal layer 2 by a portion of insulating layer.
The vias 1 of both embodiments are manufactured according to common methods of fabrication of vias known to those skilled in the art. Usual design rule allowances, known to those skilled in the art, concerning the minimum spacing between an unterminated end of the via 1 and the metal layer 2 or 3, should be observed.
This invention can be used on any CMOS, bi-polar silicon, or group III-V integrated circuit. The references herein have been with regard to two metal layers. However, a device may have many metal layers and this invention can be used to imply a connection, but not a connect, between any two of many metal layers.
This invention is a circuit trick technique. It can be used together with other techniques disclosed in the previously discussed prior art to prevent reverse engineering. The composite of such previously known techniques is to make the connections between transistors difficult to determine. The reverse engineer will have to carefully analyze each CMOS transistor pair rather that utilize automatic circuit and pattern recognition techniques.
As a part of his or her above-mentioned analysis of each CMOS transistor pair, a reverse engineer is likely to look carefully at the metal traces and via 1 carefully removing one metal layer, determining the location of vias to the layer beneath to see the connection. When viewing the top metal layer 2, the reverse engineer looks for dimples in the top metal surface. These dimples indicate the presence of a via 1 beneath them, and this via 1 ordinarily connects to a metal layer below.
Seeing the dimple, the reverse engineer will, therefore, assume that underneath the dimple there is a via connecting to the metal layer below. He will proceed by checking the correctness of his or her assumption by etching away the top metal layer and noting the via 1 beneath. However, when etching away the via metal, along with the insulating layer 4 surrounding it, it is very difficult for the reverse engineer to determine if the via 1 does indeed terminate on the metal layer below.
By beginning or terminating a via 1 where there is no metal present, this invention will make the reverse engineer's task very difficult. He will assume all sorts of connections where there are none. Should he or she discover his or her error, he or she will have to use cross-sectioning of the circuit to determine where the missing metal portions are and this process is prohibitively expensive and labor-extensive, effectively making the circuit much more secure.
The structures of this invention can be easily inserted into an integrated circuit fabrication process according to techniques known to those skilled in the art. No additional processing steps are needed.
Having described the invention in connection with several embodiments thereof, modification will now suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the described embodiments except as required by the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3673471||Oct 8, 1970||Jun 27, 1972||Fairchild Camera Instr Co||Doped semiconductor electrodes for mos type devices|
|US3946426||Sep 6, 1974||Mar 23, 1976||Harris Corporation||Interconnect system for integrated circuits|
|US4017888||Dec 31, 1975||Apr 12, 1977||International Business Machines Corporation||Non-volatile metal nitride oxide semiconductor device|
|US4139864||Jan 14, 1976||Feb 13, 1979||Schulman Lawrence S||Security system for a solid state device|
|US4164461||May 12, 1978||Aug 14, 1979||Raytheon Company||Semiconductor integrated circuit structures and manufacturing methods|
|US4196443||Aug 25, 1978||Apr 1, 1980||Rca Corporation||Buried contact configuration for CMOS/SOS integrated circuits|
|US4267578||Aug 26, 1974||May 12, 1981||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Calculator system with anti-theft feature|
|US4291391||Sep 14, 1979||Sep 22, 1981||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Taper isolated random access memory array and method of operating|
|US4295897||Oct 3, 1979||Oct 20, 1981||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Method of making CMOS integrated circuit device|
|US4314268||May 31, 1979||Feb 2, 1982||Nippon Electric Co., Ltd.||Integrated circuit with shielded lead patterns|
|US4317273||Nov 13, 1979||Mar 2, 1982||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Method of making high coupling ratio DMOS electrically programmable ROM|
|US4374454||Dec 22, 1980||Feb 22, 1983||U.S. Philips Corporation||Method of manufacturing a semiconductor device|
|US4409434||Dec 1, 1980||Oct 11, 1983||Electronique Marcel Dassault||Transistor integrated device, particularly usable for coding purposes|
|US4435895||Apr 5, 1982||Mar 13, 1984||Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated||Process for forming complementary integrated circuit devices|
|US4471376||Jan 14, 1981||Sep 11, 1984||Harris Corporation||Amorphous devices and interconnect system and method of fabrication|
|US4581628||Sep 27, 1982||Apr 8, 1986||Hitachi, Ltd.||Circuit programming by use of an electrically conductive light shield|
|US4583011||Nov 1, 1983||Apr 15, 1986||Standard Microsystems Corp.||Circuit to prevent pirating of an MOS circuit|
|US4603381||Jun 30, 1982||Jul 29, 1986||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Use of implant process for programming ROM type processor for encryption|
|US4623255||Oct 13, 1983||Nov 18, 1986||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator, National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Method of examining microcircuit patterns|
|US4727493||May 4, 1984||Feb 23, 1988||Integrated Logic Systems, Inc.||Integrated circuit architecture and fabrication method therefor|
|US4766516||Sep 24, 1987||Aug 23, 1988||Hughes Aircraft Company||Method and apparatus for securing integrated circuits from unauthorized copying and use|
|US4799096||Jun 3, 1987||Jan 17, 1989||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Monolithic integrated circuit comprising circuit branches parallel to one another|
|US4821085||May 1, 1985||Apr 11, 1989||Texas Instruments Incorporated||VLSI local interconnect structure|
|US4830974||Jan 11, 1988||May 16, 1989||Atmel Corporation||EPROM fabrication process|
|US4939567||Jan 30, 1989||Jul 3, 1990||Ibm Corporation||Trench interconnect for CMOS diffusion regions|
|US4962484||Jan 25, 1988||Oct 9, 1990||Hitachi, Ltd.||Non-volatile memory device|
|US4975756||Feb 28, 1989||Dec 4, 1990||Texas Instruments Incorporated||SRAM with local interconnect|
|US4998151||Apr 13, 1989||Mar 5, 1991||General Electric Company||Power field effect devices having small cell size and low contact resistance|
|US5030796||Aug 11, 1989||Jul 9, 1991||Rockwell International Corporation||Reverse-engineering resistant encapsulant for microelectric device|
|US5050123||Nov 13, 1990||Sep 17, 1991||Intel Corporation||Radiation shield for EPROM cells|
|US5061978||Mar 15, 1990||Oct 29, 1991||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Semiconductor photosensing device with light shield|
|US5065208||Feb 20, 1990||Nov 12, 1991||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Integrated bipolar and CMOS transistor with titanium nitride interconnections|
|US5068697||Jul 17, 1990||Nov 26, 1991||Sony Corporation||Semiconductor memory which is protected from erasure by light shields|
|US5070378||Mar 28, 1991||Dec 3, 1991||Nec Corporation||Eprom erasable by uv radiation having redundant circuit|
|US5101121||Jan 8, 1991||Mar 31, 1992||Sgs Thomson Microelectronics S.A.||Security locks for integrated circuit|
|US5117276||Nov 8, 1990||May 26, 1992||Fairchild Camera And Instrument Corp.||High performance interconnect system for an integrated circuit|
|US5121089||Nov 1, 1990||Jun 9, 1992||Hughes Aircraft Company||Micro-machined switch and method of fabrication|
|US5121186||Oct 23, 1990||Jun 9, 1992||Hewlett-Packard Company||Integrated circuit device having improved junction connections|
|US5132571||Aug 1, 1990||Jul 21, 1992||Actel Corporation||Programmable interconnect architecture having interconnects disposed above function modules|
|US5138197||May 22, 1991||Aug 11, 1992||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Address decoder array composed of CMOS|
|US5146117||Apr 1, 1991||Sep 8, 1992||Hughes Aircraft Company||Convertible multi-function microelectronic logic gate structure and method of fabricating the same|
|US5168340||Oct 12, 1990||Dec 1, 1992||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Semiconductor integrated circuit device with guardring regions to prevent the formation of an MOS diode|
|US5202591||Aug 9, 1991||Apr 13, 1993||Hughes Aircraft Company||Dynamic circuit disguise for microelectronic integrated digital logic circuits|
|US5227649||Mar 6, 1992||Jul 13, 1993||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Circuit layout and method for VLSI circuits having local interconnects|
|US5231299||Mar 24, 1992||Jul 27, 1993||International Business Machines Corporation||Structure and fabrication method for EEPROM memory cell with selective channel implants|
|US5302539||May 29, 1990||Apr 12, 1994||Texas Instruments Incorporated||VLSI interconnect method and structure|
|US5308682||Oct 1, 1992||May 3, 1994||Nec Corporation||Alignment check pattern for multi-level interconnection|
|US5309015||Oct 26, 1992||May 3, 1994||Hitachi, Ltd.||Clock wiring and semiconductor integrated circuit device having the same|
|US5336624||Dec 7, 1992||Aug 9, 1994||Hughes Aircraft Company||Method for disguising a microelectronic integrated digital logic|
|US5341013||Jun 29, 1992||Aug 23, 1994||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Semiconductor device provided with sense circuits|
|US5354704||Jul 28, 1993||Oct 11, 1994||United Microelectronics Corporation||Symmetric SRAM cell with buried N+ local interconnection line|
|US5369299||Jul 22, 1993||Nov 29, 1994||National Semiconductor Corporation||Tamper resistant integrated circuit structure|
|US5371390||Nov 4, 1992||Dec 6, 1994||Aptix Corporation||Interconnect substrate with circuits for field-programmability and testing of multichip modules and hybrid circuits|
|US5376577||Jun 30, 1994||Dec 27, 1994||Micron Semiconductor, Inc.||Method of forming a low resistive current path between a buried contact and a diffusion region|
|US5384472||Aug 26, 1993||Jan 24, 1995||Aspec Technology, Inc.||Symmetrical multi-layer metal logic array with continuous substrate taps and extension portions for increased gate density|
|US5399441||Apr 12, 1994||Mar 21, 1995||Dow Corning Corporation||Method of applying opaque coatings|
|US5441902||Sep 2, 1993||Aug 15, 1995||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Method for making channel stop structure for CMOS devices|
|US5468990||Jul 22, 1993||Nov 21, 1995||National Semiconductor Corp.||Structures for preventing reverse engineering of integrated circuits|
|US5475251||May 31, 1994||Dec 12, 1995||National Semiconductor Corporation||Secure non-volatile memory cell|
|US5506806||Sep 20, 1994||Apr 9, 1996||Nec Corporation||Memory protection circuit for EPROM|
|US5531018||Dec 20, 1993||Jul 2, 1996||General Electric Company||Method of micromachining electromagnetically actuated current switches with polyimide reinforcement seals, and switches produced thereby|
|US5539224||Jun 23, 1994||Jul 23, 1996||Fujitsu Limited||Semiconductor device having unit circuit-blocks in a common chip as a first layer with electrical interconnections therebetween provided exclusively in a second, upper, interconnection layer formed on the first layer|
|US5541614||Apr 4, 1995||Jul 30, 1996||Hughes Aircraft Company||Smart antenna system using microelectromechanically tunable dipole antennas and photonic bandgap materials|
|US5571735||Jun 16, 1995||Nov 5, 1996||Nec Corporation||Method of manufacturing a semiconducter device capable of easily forming metal silicide films on source and drain regions|
|US5576988||Apr 27, 1995||Nov 19, 1996||National Semiconductor Corporation||Secure non-volatile memory array|
|US5611940||Apr 28, 1995||Mar 18, 1997||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Microsystem with integrated circuit and micromechanical component, and production process|
|US5638946||Jan 11, 1996||Jun 17, 1997||Northeastern University||Micromechanical switch with insulated switch contact|
|US5679595||Jul 24, 1996||Oct 21, 1997||Mosel Vitelic, Inc.||Self-registered capacitor bottom plate-local interconnect scheme for DRAM|
|US5719422||Apr 9, 1997||Feb 17, 1998||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Low threshold voltage, high performance junction transistor|
|US5719430||Nov 12, 1996||Feb 17, 1998||Nec Corporation||Buried-channel MOS transistor and process of producing same|
|US5721150||Mar 12, 1996||Feb 24, 1998||Lsi Logic Corporation||Use of silicon for integrated circuit device interconnection by direct writing of patterns therein|
|US5783846||Sep 22, 1995||Jul 21, 1998||Hughes Electronics Corporation||Digital circuit with transistor geometry and channel stops providing camouflage against reverse engineering|
|US5838047||Jun 14, 1996||Nov 17, 1998||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||CMOS substrate biasing for threshold voltage control|
|US5854510||Jun 26, 1997||Dec 29, 1998||Vlsi Technology, Inc.||Low power programmable fuse structures|
|US5866933||Feb 3, 1994||Feb 2, 1999||Hughes Electronics Corporation||Integrated circuit security system and method with implanted interconnections|
|US5880503||Jan 31, 1997||Mar 9, 1999||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Semiconductor integrated circuit device having static memory cell with CMOS structure|
|US5920097||Mar 26, 1997||Jul 6, 1999||Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.||Compact, dual-transistor integrated circuit|
|US5930663||May 11, 1998||Jul 27, 1999||Hughes Electronics Corporation||Digital circuit with transistor geometry and channel stops providing camouflage against reverse engineering|
|US5973375||Jun 6, 1997||Oct 26, 1999||Hughes Electronics Corporation||Camouflaged circuit structure with step implants|
|US5977593||Nov 20, 1997||Nov 2, 1999||Nec Corporation||Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same|
|US6046659||May 15, 1998||Apr 4, 2000||Hughes Electronics Corporation||Design and fabrication of broadband surface-micromachined micro-electro-mechanical switches for microwave and millimeter-wave applications|
|US6054659||Mar 9, 1998||Apr 25, 2000||General Motors Corporation||Integrated electrostatically-actuated micromachined all-metal micro-relays|
|US6057520||Jun 30, 1999||May 2, 2000||Mcnc||Arc resistant high voltage micromachined electrostatic switch|
|US6117762||Apr 23, 1999||Sep 12, 2000||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Method and apparatus using silicide layer for protecting integrated circuits from reverse engineering|
|US6154388||Apr 1, 1999||Nov 28, 2000||Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd.||Security circuit for semiconductor memory and method for protecting stored data using the same|
|US6215158||Sep 10, 1998||Apr 10, 2001||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Device and method for forming semiconductor interconnections in an integrated circuit substrate|
|US6294816||May 29, 1998||Sep 25, 2001||Hughes Electronics Corporation||Secure integrated circuit|
|US6326675||Mar 18, 1999||Dec 4, 2001||Philips Semiconductor, Inc.||Semiconductor device with transparent link area for silicide applications and fabrication thereof|
|EP0364769A2||Sep 26, 1989||Apr 25, 1990||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Semiconductor device having a gate electrode consisting of a plurality of layers|
|EP0463373A2||May 24, 1991||Jan 2, 1992||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Local interconnect using a material comprising tungsten|
|EP0528302A1||Aug 7, 1992||Feb 24, 1993||Hughes Aircraft Company||Dynamic circuit disguise for microelectronic integrated digital logic circuits|
|EP0585601A1||Jul 28, 1993||Mar 9, 1994||Hughes Aircraft Company||Integrated circuit security system and method with implanted interconnections|
|EP0764985A2||May 10, 1996||Mar 26, 1997||Hughes Aircraft Company||Digital circuit with transistor geometry and channel stops providing camouflage against reverse engineering|
|EP0883184A2||May 30, 1998||Dec 9, 1998||Hughes Electronics Corporation||Camouflaged circuit structure with implants|
|EP1193758A1 *||Oct 2, 2000||Apr 3, 2002||SGS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS S.r.l.||Anti-deciphering contacts|
|JP58190064A||Title not available|
|JP61147551U||Title not available|
|JP2001118845A *||Title not available|
|JP2001284357A *||Title not available|
|JPH0246762A||Title not available|
|JPH02237038A||Title not available|
|JPS58190064A||Title not available|
|JPS61147551A *||Title not available|
|JPS63129647A||Title not available|
|WO1998021734A1||Nov 6, 1997||May 22, 1998||Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.||Method for manufacturing a micromechanical relay|
|WO1998057373A1 *||Jun 13, 1997||Dec 17, 1998||Inside Technologies||Method for making an integrated circuit and integrated circuit produced by said method|
|1||Document No. 02237038, dated Dec. 6, 1990, Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 014, No. 550 (E-1009).|
|2||Document No. 63129647, dated Jun. 2, 1988, Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 012, No. 385 (E-668), Oct. 14, 1998.|
|3||Fredericksen, T.M., "A Multiple-Layer-Metal CMOS Process," Intuitive CMOS Electronics, Revised Edition, Section 5.6, pp. 134-146 (1989).|
|4||Hodges and Jackson, Analysis and Design of Digital Integrated Circuits, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, p. 353 (1988).|
|5||Larson, L.E., et al., "Microactuators for GaAs-based Microwave Integrated Circuits," IEEE, pp. 743-746 (1991).|
|6||Lee, "Engineering a Device for Electron-beam Probing," IEEE Design sand Test of Computers, pp. 36-49 (1989) (1983).|
|7||Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 016, No. 197 (p-1350) May 12, 1992 & JP-A-40 28 092 (Toshiba Corp), abstract.|
|8||Sze, S.M., ed. VLSI Technology, McGraw-Hill, pp. 99, 447, and 461-465 (1983).|
|9||Sze, S.M., ed., "Silicides for Gates and Interconnections," VLSI Technology, McGraw-Hill, pp. 372-380 (1983).|
|10||*||U.S. patent application Publication 2002/0063268, Vajana et al., May 30, 2002.*|
|11||*||Wolf, Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era-vol. 2:Process Integration, Lattice Press, 1990, pp. 194-199, 387, 482 and 508.*|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7281667 *||Apr 14, 2005||Oct 16, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and structure for implementing secure multichip modules for encryption applications|
|US7472836||Jun 26, 2007||Jan 6, 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and structure for implementing secure multichip modules for encryption applications|
|US7498181||Sep 29, 2005||Mar 3, 2009||Chipworks Inc.||Method of preparing an integrated circuit die for imaging|
|US7806341||Jan 5, 2009||Oct 5, 2010||International Business Machines Corporation||Structure for implementing secure multichip modules for encryption applications|
|US7994042 *||Oct 26, 2007||Aug 9, 2011||International Business Machines Corporation||Techniques for impeding reverse engineering|
|US8111089||Feb 7, 2012||Syphermedia International, Inc.||Building block for a secure CMOS logic cell library|
|US8151235||Feb 24, 2009||Apr 3, 2012||Syphermedia International, Inc.||Camouflaging a standard cell based integrated circuit|
|US8324102 *||Jun 27, 2011||Dec 4, 2012||International Business Machines Corporation||Techniques for impeding reverse engineering|
|US8418091||Apr 9, 2013||Syphermedia International, Inc.||Method and apparatus for camouflaging a standard cell based integrated circuit|
|US9355199||Mar 7, 2013||May 31, 2016||Syphermedia International, Inc.||Method and apparatus for camouflaging a standard cell based integrated circuit|
|US20060231633 *||Apr 14, 2005||Oct 19, 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and structure for implementing secure multichip modules for encryption applications|
|US20070072314 *||Sep 29, 2005||Mar 29, 2007||Chipworks Inc.||Method of preparing an integrated circuit die for imaging|
|US20080000988 *||Jun 26, 2007||Jan 3, 2008||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and structure for implementing secure multichip modules for encryption applications|
|US20080108215 *||Nov 7, 2006||May 8, 2008||Applied Materials, Inc.||Integrated circuit interconnect lines having reduced line resistance|
|US20090111257 *||Oct 26, 2007||Apr 30, 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Techniques for Impeding Reverse Engineering|
|US20090145973 *||Jan 5, 2009||Jun 11, 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Structure for implementing secure multichip modules for encryption applications|
|US20100213974 *||Aug 26, 2010||SypherMedia Interational, Inc.,||Method and apparatus for camouflaging a printed circuit board|
|US20100218158 *||Aug 26, 2010||Syphermedia International, Inc.||Method and apparatus for camouflaging a standard cell based integrated circuit|
|US20100301903 *||May 24, 2010||Dec 2, 2010||Syphermedia International, Inc.||Building block for a secure cmos logic cell library|
|US20110256720 *||Oct 20, 2011||International Business Machines Corporation||Techniques for Impeding Reverse Engineering|
|DE102013224060A1||Nov 26, 2013||May 28, 2015||Ihp Gmbh - Innovations For High Performance Microelectronics / Leibniz-Institut Für Innovative Mikroelektronik||Erschweren von optischem Reverse Engineering|
|U.S. Classification||257/775, 438/638, 257/773, 257/E23.145, 438/926, 257/774|
|International Classification||H01L23/522, H01L27/02, H01L23/58|
|Cooperative Classification||H01L2924/0002, Y10S438/926, H01L27/0203, H01L23/573, H01L23/5226|
|European Classification||H01L23/57A, H01L23/522E, H01L27/02B|
|Jan 24, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HRL LABORATORIES, LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHOW, LAP-WAI;BAUKUS, JAMES P.;CLARK, WILLIAM M., JR.;REEL/FRAME:011487/0412
Effective date: 20010116
|Feb 25, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 6, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Apr 22, 2016||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|