Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS6812617 B2
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 10/125,098
Publication dateNov 2, 2004
Filing dateApr 18, 2002
Priority dateApr 18, 2002
Fee statusPaid
Also published asEP1354848A2, US20030197446
Publication number10125098, 125098, US 6812617 B2, US 6812617B2, US-B2-6812617, US6812617 B2, US6812617B2
InventorsThomas Wayne Ives
Original AssigneeHewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
MEMS device having a flexure with integral electrostatic actuator
US 6812617 B2
Abstract
A micro-electro-mechanical device comprises a moveable mass, a frame for supporting the mass, and a flexure extending between the mass and the frame. The flexure includes an integral actuator for moving the mass member with respect to the frame.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(20)
What is claimed is:
1. A micro-electro-mechanical device comprising:
a moveable mass;
a frame for supporting the mass; and
a first flexure extending between the mass and the frame, wherein the first flexure includes a complete integral monolithic electrostatic actuator for bending the flexure in a direction normal to a longitudinal axis of the flexure and thereby moving the mass with respect to the frame.
2. The device of claim 1, further comprising a second flexure extending between the mass and the frame, wherein the second flexure includes a complete integral electrostatic actuator for bending the flexure in a direction normal to a longitudinal axis of the flexure and thereby moving the mass with respect to the frame.
3. The device of claim 2, wherein the first flexure moves the mass in a first direction and the second flexure moves the mass in a second direction.
4. The device of claim 3, wherein the first direction is opposite the second direction.
5. The device of claim 3, wherein the first direction is normal to the second direction.
6. The device of claim 1, wherein the integral electrostatic actuator comprises a plurality of electrostatic force elements on the flexure.
7. The device of claim 6, wherein the plurality of electrostatic force elements are moveable apart from each other at the urging of a repulsive electrostatic force to flex the flexure and move the mass member with respect to the frame.
8. The device of claim 7, wherein each of the plurality of electrostatic force elements comprises a T-shaped element monolithically formed with and extending from a side of the flexure.
9. The device of claim 7, wherein the plurality of electrostatic force elements are positioned on a single side of the flexure.
10. The device of claim 7, wherein the plurality of electrostatic force elements are positioned on more than one side of the flexure.
11. A data storage module for a data storage device, the storage module comprising:
a rotor having a plurality of data storage areas, the storage areas each being in one of a plurality of states to represent the data stored in that area;
a frame;
a first set of flexures suspending the rotor within the frame and permitting the rotor to move along a first axis; and
a second set of flexures suspending the rotor within the frame and permitting the rotor to move along a second axis; and
a complete electrostatic actuator on each flexure of the first and second sets of flexures, each actuator comprising monolithic electrostatic force elements spaced along a longitudinal axis of each flexure, the force elements for flexing the flexures in a direction normal to their longitudinal axis and moving the rotor with respect to the frame.
12. The data storage module of claim 11, wherein the first set of flexures have axes that are normal to the first axis.
13. The data storage module of claim 11, wherein the second set of flexures have axes that are normal to the second axis.
14. The data storage module of claim 11, wherein the axes of the first set of flexures intersects the second set of flexures along a length of the second set of flexures.
15. The data storage module of claim 11, wherein the first and second sets of flexures comprise thin-walled micro-fabricated beams.
16. The data storage module of claim 11, further comprising:
a first set of coupling beams extending from the rotor, wherein the first set of flexures extend between the first set of coupling beams and a coupling mass.
17. A data storage module for a data storage device, the storage module comprising:
a rotor having a plurality of data storage areas, the storage areas each being in one of a plurality of states to represent the data stored in that area;
a frame;
a first set of flexures suspending the rotor within the frame and permitting the rotor to move along a first axis; and
a second set of flexures suspending the rotor within the frame and permitting the rotor to move along a second axis;
the flexures of the first and second sets of flexures having monolithic electrostatic force elements along their length for flexing the flexures and moving the rotor with respect to the frame; and
a first set of coupling beams extending from the rotor, wherein the first set of flexures extend between the first set of coupling beams and a coupling mass;
wherein the second set of flexures extend between the coupling mass and the frame.
18. The data storage device of claim 17, wherein the first set of coupling beams have axes that are aligned with the first axis.
19. The data storage module of claim 11, further comprising:
a plurality of rotors, each being similar to the rotor recited in claim 11, each of the plurality of rotors suspended within the frame by flexures similar to the flexures recited in claim 11.
20. The data storage module of claim 11, wherein the first and second sets of flexures comprise micro-fabricated beams.
Description
REFERENCE TO APPLICATION

Reference is made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/124,888, entitled “FLEXURE WITH INTEGRAL ACTUATOR”, filed on like date herewith and having common inventorship and assignment.

THE FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to micro-electro-mechanical devices, and more particularly to a micro-electro-mechanical device having a moveable mass which is supported and moved by a flexure having an integrally formed actuator.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Micro-electro-mechanical systems (hereinafter “MEMS”) are integrated systems of small size where the feature sizes are generally of micron dimensions. MEMS devices are created on a common silicon substrate utilizing microfabrication technology like that used for integrated circuit (IC) processing. The fabrication processes selectively etch away parts of the silicon wafer or add new structural layers to form the mechanical and electromechanical devices.

One unique feature of MEMS is the extent to which actuation, sensing, control, manipulation, and computation are integrated into the same system. Examples of MEMS devices include individually controlled micro-mirrors used in a projection display, accelerometers that sense a crash condition and activate airbags in cars, pressure sensors, “lab on a chip” systems, and data storage devices.

Many MEMS devices include masses that are moveable within the system. In these MEMS devices, beams or flexures are often used to support the moveable masses in the system. The beams supply both support of the system's mass and compliance for the system's mass movements. If motion of the system's mass must be limited, additional features are generally created in the system to limit the motion as desired. The actual movement of a system's mass is accomplished by yet another device separate from the beams or flexures and motion limiting features. Referred to herein generically as actuators or micro-actuators, various types of devices may be used to cause movement of a system's mass. Micro-actuators which are used in MEMS devices use a variety of methods to achieve actuation: electrostatic, magnetic, piezoelectric, hydraulic and thermal.

In MEMS devices such as those mentioned above, space limitations of the device must be considered. Even though MEMS devices are by definition already extremely small, it may be desired to maximize the size of one component of the device relative to the size of another component or to the size of the entire device. Thus, it would be desirable to reduce the space occupied by such other components of the device, or to eliminate selected components entirely. In addition, it would be desirable to reduce the number of process steps needed to fabricate a particular MEMS device or specific components of a MEMS device. As noted above, MEMS devices are manufactured using micro-fabrication technology like that used in the production of integrated circuits. A reduction or simplification of the process steps required to form a particular MEMS device or one of its components would speed the manufacturing process, and reduce the likelihood of error in the manufacturing process.

In the example of MEMS devices having masses that are moveable within the system, it is often the moveable mass whose size is desired to be maximized with respect to the total size of the device. For example, in a data storage device, the moveable mass may be or include the storage medium. To maximize the data storage capacity of the device, it would be desirable to make the moveable mass as large as possible within the confines of the device. In such devices, it would be desirable to reduce the total space occupied by the flexures supporting the moveable mass, the features limiting the mass motion, and the actuator that moves the mass.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A micro-electro-mechanical device comprises a moveable mass, a frame for supporting the mass, and a flexure extending between the mass and the frame. The flexure includes an integral actuator for moving the mass with respect to the frame.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of one embodiment of a flexure used in one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2 is a top plan view of the flexure shown in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a greatly enlarged view of the circled portion 3 of FIG. 1.

FIGS. 4a and 4 b are top plan views of another embodiment of the flexure used in another embodiment of the invention.

FIGS. 5a and 5 b are top plan views of additional embodiments of the flexure used in additional embodiments of the invention.

FIGS. 6a and 6 b are a plan view and a perspective view, respectively, of the one embodiment of the inventive MEMS device using a flexure having an integral actuator.

FIGS. 7a and 7 b are alternate embodiments of one portion of the MEMS device of FIGS. 6a and 6 b.

FIG. 8 is an illustration of beam movement and torsion in the MEMS device of FIGS. 6a and 6 b.

FIG. 9 is a plan view of another embodiment of a MEMS device using a flexure having an integral actuator.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

One embodiment of a flexure 10 for use in a micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) is shown in FIGS. 1-3. The flexure 10 includes a compliant longitudinal beam 12 having a first side 14 and a second side 16 opposite first side 14. An actuator 18 is integrally formed with beam 12. The actuator 18 may be selectively activated to flex beam 12. In use, flexure 10 may, for example, be positioned to interact with a movable mass (not shown), such that flexing of beam 12 by actuator 18 moves the moveable mass.

As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, actuator 18 is integrally formed as part of a central section 20 of beam 12. However, actuator 18 may be positioned along any portion of the length of beam 12 (such as adjacent an end 23 of beam 12), or along the entire length of beam 12, as is required for a particular application. The end sections 21 of beam 12 may be of any length appropriate for the flexures intended use. The dimensions of the embodiment of invention shown in FIGS. 1-3 should not be construed as limiting with regard to the dimensions and positioning of actuator 18.

In the embodiment of flexure 10 shown in FIGS. 1-3, actuator 18 is of an electrostatic nature. That is, actuator 18 is selectively activated by the presence of an electrostatic charge. In one embodiment of the invention, actuator 18 comprises a plurality of force elements 22 projecting from the first side 14 of beam 12. When flexure 10 is electrostatically charged, force elements 22 move apart from each other due to a repulsive electrostatic force and thereby flex beam 12 towards its second side 16.

Force elements 22 may also be positioned on both sides of beam 12. As shown in FIG. 4a, force elements 22 are positioned adjacent both first side 14 and second side 16 of beam 12. The group of force elements 22 positioned on first side 14 in the central section 20 of beam 12 will act to flex end sections 21 of beam 12 toward second side 16. At the same time, the group of force elements 22 positioned on second side 16 in the end sections 21 of beam 12 will act to flex the ends 23 of beam 12 back toward first side 14. When electrostatically charged, beam 12 will have a shape similar to that shown in FIG. 4b (the shape of beam 12 in FIG. 4b is greatly exaggerated for illustrative purposes). Force elements 22 may be positioned along the beam 12 in configurations other than that shown which result in the desired shape of beam 12 when electrostatically charged.

Force elements 22 also function to limit the bending or flexing of beam 12 toward the side of the beam 12 with force elements 22. In the embodiments shown in FIGS. 1-3, force elements 22 limit the bending of beam 12 toward its first side 14. In particular, as beam 12 flexes toward its first side 14, force elements 22 contact each other and thereby prevent further flexing or bending of beam 12 in that direction. In this manner, additional elements intended to limit the movement of beam 12 or a mass with which it interacts do not need to be incorporated in the MEMS device using flexure 10.

When used as a micro-electro-mechanical device, beam 12 may have a width between the first side 14 and second side 16 in the range of 100,000 angstroms (10 microns) or less, and more typically less than 30,000 angstroms (3 microns), depending upon the intended application of flexure 10. Beam 12 may also preferably be a high aspect ratio beam. In one possible embodiment, beam 12 will have an aspect ratio of at least 3, but the aspect ratio may be much more or less depending upon the application. A high aspect ratio in beam 12 creates more surface area between adjacent force elements 22, and thus creates a larger actuation force between adjacent force elements 22 when flexure 10 is electrostatically charged. The aspect ratio of beam 12 will be influenced by factors including the force required to be generated by actuator 18 of flexure 10, the strength of the electrostatic charge and the amount of available space in the MEMS device.

In one embodiment of the invention, force elements 22 comprise T-shaped (or hammer-shaped) elements which are monolithically attached to and extend from the first side 14 of beam 12. Each T-shaped element comprises a T-stem 24 and a T-cross member 26, with the T-stem 24 extending from beam 12. T-cross members 26 move apart from each other when electrostatically charged to flex beam 12 toward second side 16. T-cross members 26 will contact each other if beam 12 is flexed toward first side 14, and thereby limit the degree to which beam 12 can flex toward first side 14.

Force elements 22 may have shapes other than a T-shape as illustrated in FIGS. 1-3. For example, force elements 22 may be straight (FIG. 5a), L-shaped (FIG. 5b), or any other shape which may used to create a repulsive force when electrostatically charged.

One possible application for the flexure 10 having an integrally formed actuator 18 as described above is illustrated in FIGS. 6a and 6 b. FIGS. 6a and 6 b show a MEMS device having a moveable mass. Many types of MEMS devices utilize moveable masses, but for ease of explanation a high-density data storage module 110 is described herein. However, it is intended that the invention be defined by the language of the claims below and not restricted to data storage modules. Storage module 110 includes a rotor 112 and a frame 114 for supporting rotor 112. Rotor 112 is bounded by its top edge 116, bottom edge 118, left edge 120 and right edge 122. The front face 124 of rotor 112 defines an X-Y plane, with top edge 116 and bottom edge 118 aligned with the X-axis, and left edge 120 and right edge 122 aligned with the Y-axis. Front face 124 of rotor 112 is formed from a storage medium that has a plurality of storage areas 126 for data storage. The storage areas 126 (shown generically in FIG. 6b) are in one of a plurality of states to represent data stored in that area. Rotor frame 114 is spaced from rotor edges 116, 118, 120 and 122. In one embodiment, rotor frame 114 surrounds rotor 112 in the X-Y plane. (As used herein, directional terms such as top, bottom, left, right, front and back are relative terms, and should not be construed as a limitation on the overall orientation of the storage module 110).

Rotor 112 is supported within rotor frame 114 by a plurality of flexures 10 which interconnect rotor 112 and rotor frame 114. Force elements 22 of flexures 10 are not illustrated in FIGS. 6a and 6 b for reasons of clarity. However, flexures 10 are of the type described above having integrally formed actuators 18. The flexures 10 supply both support of the rotor 112 and compliance for movements of rotor 112. In controlling the motion of rotor 112, it is often desirable to have the greatest in-plane to out-of-plane compliance ratio (referred to herein as the compliance ratio) possible. However, this ratio can be limited by the chosen mechanical architecture. The reason a high compliance ratio is desirable is that the forces provided by the actuator 18 integrally formed in flexures 10 are not very strong. Improving in-plane compliance while maintaining, or improving, the compliance ratio allows the relatively weak forces of integral actuators 18 to move rotor 112 in an acceptable manner. Increasing the in-plane compliance may be accomplished by allowing for axial shortening of the flexures 10. That is, as the flexures 10 bend they tend to become shorter in their axial direction which leads to a decrease in the in-plane compliance. Compensating for this axial shortening will increase the in-plane compliance. An additional way to improve the in-plane compliance while keeping the out-of-plane compliance low and still improving the compliance ratio is to allow the ends of the flexures 10 to move angularly. Even a small angle at either or both ends of the beam 12 can significantly increase the in-plane compliance. In many instances, the same structure may compensate for axial shortening and also allow angular movement of the beam.

As shown in FIGS. 6a and 6 b, to compensate for axial shortening and also allow angular movement of the flexures 10, a first pair of coupling beams 130 a, 130 b extend from top edge 116 of the rotor 112, while a second pair of coupling beams 132 a, 132 b extend from bottom edge 118 of rotor 112. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 6a and 6 b, rotor 112 is rectangular in shape and first set of coupling beams 130 a, 130 b, 132 a, 132 b extend from the corners of rotor 112. Coupling beams 130 a, 130 b, 132 a, 132 b are generally aligned with the left and right edges 120, 122 of rotor 112. However, coupling beams 130 a, 130 b, 132 a, 132 b may have a different origination and orientation from that shown in FIGS. 6a and 6 b. For example, the alternate embodiments shown in FIGS. 7a and 7 b allow coupling beam 130 a additional freedom to rotate and thereby provide additional in-plane compliance to the rotor 112.

First pair of coupling beams 30 a, 30 b are connected to first coupling mass 134 a (positioned adjacent top edge 116 of rotor 112) by flexures 136 a extending between the first pair of coupling beams 130 a, 130 b and first coupling mass 134 a. Second pair of coupling beams 132 a, 132 b are connected to second coupling mass 134 b (positioned adjacent bottom edge 118 of rotor 112) by flexures 136 b extending between the second pair of coupling beams 132 a, 132 b and second coupling mass 134 b. First set of flexures 136 a, 136 b, have an axial orientation which is generally aligned with the top and bottom edges 116, 118 of rotor 112.

Rotor frame 114 includes first and second flexure mounts 140 a, 140 b, which are positioned on opposite sides of rotor 112 (adjacent left edge 120 and right edge 122 as shown in FIG. 6a). First and second coupling masses 134 a, 134 b are connected to first flexure mount 140 a by flexures 142 a. First and second coupling masses 134 a, 134 b are connected to second flexure mount 140 b by flexures 142 b. Second set of flexures 142 a, 142 b have an axial orientation which is generally aligned with the left and right edges 120, 122 of rotor 112. Coupling masses 134 a, 134 b simply act as rigid bodies to translate movement between flexures 142 a, 142 b and flexures 136 a, 136 b.

It should be noted that in the embodiment shown in FIGS. 6a and 6 b, the sets of flexures 136 a, 136 b, 142 a, 142 b each comprise a total of four individual flexures. However, a different number of individual flexures may be used in the sets of flexures (for example, a total of two or six flexures in each set).

The faces of flexures 136 a, 136 b are in the X-Z plane; this set of flexures may be flexed in the Y direction allowing the rotor 112 to move in the Y direction with respect to the frame 114. The faces of flexures 142 a, 142 b are in the Y-Z direction; this set of flexures may be flexed in the X direction allowing the rotor 112 to move in the X direction with respect to the frame 114.

A simplified axial view of one of the high aspect beam flexures 10 is shown in FIG. 8. As the beams 12 are flexed in-plane and out-of-plane, a torsion occurs in the beams 12. This torsion occurs even though the beam 12 does not twist with respect to its axial plane. FIG. 8 shows end views of a high aspect ratio beam under no load (Position A), in-plane and out-of-plane loads (Position B), and in-plane, out-of-plane and torsion loads (Position C). Because the motion of the rotor 112 puts the beam 12 in torsion due to the moment arms arising from displacement, the beam's tendency is to flex back from the Position C illustrated in FIG. 8 toward the Position B illustrated in FIG. 8. As noted above, it is often desirable to have the greatest in-plane to out-of-plane compliance ratio possible. However, this compliance ratio is often decreased by the beam torsions described above. In order to maintain a higher compliance ratio, it is desirable to decrease the beam's torsional and out-of-plane compliance while maximizing its in-plane compliance.

In the high density storage module described herein, the beams torsional and out-of-plane compliance is reduced by aligning the flexures 10 in such a way as to effectively counteract the torsions created in the flexures 10 as the rotor 112 is displaced along the Z-axis, such as by vibrational forces. The greatest counteraction effect is achieved when flexures 136 a, 136 b are oriented to axially point at the midpoint of flexures 142 a, 142 b. However, counteraction of the torsions are also achieved the lesser extent when the intersection is not at the midpoint of flexures 142 a, 142 b. Thus, the position of the first and second set of flexures 136 a, 136 b, is such that the axis of the first and second set of flexures 136 a, 136 b, intersects the flexures 142 a, 142 b somewhere along the length of flexures 142 a, 142 b.

Although the storage module 110 has been described above with respect to a single rotor 112 supported by frame 114, in practice a plurality of rotors 112 may be supported by frame 114. A storage module 210 having an array of rotors 112 is illustrated in FIG. 9. It will be noted that the orientation of flexures 136 a, 136 b, 142 a, 142 b provides a significant benefit when a plurality of rotors 112 are used in the storage module 210. Specifically, flexures 136 a, 136 b, 142 a, 142 b are arranged about the periphery of rotors 112 such that flexures 136 a, 136 b, 142 a, 142 b are each in substantially parallel alignment with the respective adjacent edges of rotors 112. Thus, the total area required for each rotor 112 and its associated suspension system is reduced and the packing density of rotors 112 within storage module 210 is correspondingly increased.

The packing density of the rotors 112 in storage module 210 may be further increased, as illustrated in FIG. 9, by eliminating the majority of the frame 114 between adjacent rotors 12. Specifically, it can be seen in FIG. 9 that the frame 114 is reduced to leave only the flexure mounts 140 a, 140 b of adjacent rotors 112. That is, the only portion of frame 114 between adjacent rotors is the flexure mounts 140 a, 140 b. The flexure mounts are mechanically secured to a motion ground, so that each rotor of the array of rotors 112 may move independently. Of course, frame 114 may also be extended so that it fully surrounds each rotor, if that is desired.

Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein for purposes of description of the preferred embodiment, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a wide variety of alternate and/or equivalent implementations calculated to achieve the same purposes may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown and described without departing from the scope of the present invention. Those with skill in the chemical, mechanical, electromechanical, and electrical arts will readily appreciate that the present invention may be implemented in a very wide variety of embodiments. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the preferred embodiments discussed herein. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4374402Jun 27, 1980Feb 15, 1983Burroughs CorporationPiezoelectric transducer mounting structure and associated techniques
US5235187 *Apr 14, 1992Aug 10, 1993Cornell Research FoundationMethods of fabricating integrated, aligned tunneling tip pairs
US5375033Jan 6, 1993Dec 20, 1994Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.Multi-dimensional precision micro-actuator
US5563446Jan 25, 1994Oct 8, 1996Lsi Logic CorporationSurface mount peripheral leaded and ball grid array package
US6181531 *Nov 10, 1998Jan 30, 2001Fujitsu LimitedThin film magnetic head slider and electrostatic actuator for driving a head element thereof
US6307298 *Mar 20, 2000Oct 23, 2001Motorola, Inc.Actuator and method of manufacture
US6411589Jul 29, 1998Jun 25, 2002Hewlett-Packard CompanySystem and method for forming electrostatically actuated data storage mechanisms
US6587408 *Sep 30, 1999Jul 1, 2003Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyHigh-density mechanical memory and turing machine
JPH0576187A Title not available
JPH10109284A * Title not available
WO1998019304A1 *Sep 30, 1997May 7, 1998Ichikawa ShinjiRecording/reproducing head, recording/reproducing head positioning mechanism and recorder/reproducer
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Banks, D., "Microsystems, Microsensors & Microactuators: An Introduction", http://www.dbanks.demon.co.uk/ueng/, Apr. 1999.
2Chan, Dutton, Electrostatic Micromechanical Actuator with Extended Range of Travel (Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 1-30 (Sep. 2000).
3Howe R.T., Muller R.S., Gabriel K.J., Trimmer W.S.N., "Silicon micromechanics: sensors and actuators on a chip", IEEE Spectrum, Jul. 1990, pp. 29-35, (1990).
4Jaecklin V.P., Linder C., de Rooij N.F., Moret J.M., Bischof R., Rudolf F. "Novel polysilicon comb actuators for xy-stages" Micro Electro Mechanical Systems '92, Travemunde, Germany, Feb. 4-7, pp. 147-149 (1992).
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7170665 *Jul 24, 2002Jan 30, 2007Olympus CorporationOptical unit provided with an actuator
US7177068 *Dec 20, 2002Feb 13, 2007Robert Bosch GmbhApparatus, method and system for providing enhanced mechanical protection for thin beams
US7342703Jan 26, 2007Mar 11, 2008Robert Bosch GmbhMicro-mechanical beam protective support structures wherein at least two adjacent support structures touch each other upon reaching a predetermined bending action
US7448273 *Nov 16, 2004Nov 11, 2008Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Effecting dynamic measurement of low mass devices
US7701110 *Aug 4, 2006Apr 20, 2010Hitachi, Ltd.Ultrasonic transducer and manufacturing method thereof
Classifications
U.S. Classification310/309, 360/294.4, 369/44.16
International ClassificationB81B3/00, H02N1/00, B81B7/00
Cooperative ClassificationB81B2203/058, B81B2201/042, B81B2203/053, B81B3/0072, B81B2201/07, B81B3/0021, B81B3/0062, B81B2201/0235
European ClassificationB81B3/00H2, B81B3/00P, B81B3/00S2S
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
May 2, 2012FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
May 12, 2008REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
May 2, 2008FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Jun 18, 2003ASAssignment
Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P., COLORAD
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:013776/0928
Effective date: 20030131
Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.,COLORADO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100203;REEL/FRAME:13776/928
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100330;REEL/FRAME:13776/928
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100406;REEL/FRAME:13776/928
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100413;REEL/FRAME:13776/928
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100420;REEL/FRAME:13776/928
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100504;REEL/FRAME:13776/928
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100518;REEL/FRAME:13776/928
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:13776/928
Jul 1, 2002ASAssignment
Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, COLORADO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IVES, THOMAS WAYNE;REEL/FRAME:013043/0139
Effective date: 20020405
Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ADMI
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IVES, THOMAS WAYNE /AR;REEL/FRAME:013043/0139