|Publication number||US6813526 B1|
|Application number||US 10/065,467|
|Publication date||Nov 2, 2004|
|Filing date||Oct 22, 2002|
|Priority date||Aug 13, 2001|
|Publication number||065467, 10065467, US 6813526 B1, US 6813526B1, US-B1-6813526, US6813526 B1, US6813526B1|
|Inventors||William A. Dodd, Jr.|
|Original Assignee||William A. Dodd, Jr.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (32), Non-Patent Citations (16), Referenced by (40), Classifications (12), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 09/682,275, filed Aug. 13, 2001 now U.S. Pat No. 6,505,086 and claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/319,476 filed Aug. 16, 2002.
This invention relates to a method of monitoring golf car usage to enhance the efficiency of golf course operations and related equipment.
The present invention is a method for optimizing golf car deployment. The fundamental steps include recording golf car usage record based on axle revolutions, associating a golf car identification with the usage record, communicating the usage record and associated identification to a data store; calculating total usage data for each golf car identification and reporting total usage data. Recording the golf car usage data can be achieved by implementing a magnet device to record the deviation in galvanic current upon each rotation. However, photonic, mechanical and sonic detection of the axel rotation are anticipated by the present Invention.
The golf car identification may be proprietary to the particular golf car operation or may be the manufacturer's serial number. The association of the golf car identification with the usage data is preferably achieved by a database table wherein columns and row values represent the usage and golf car identification values. Additional identifying information in the table may include battery information, age of the golf car, maintenance records, warranty data, golf course information and the like.
The usage data for the golf car may be calculated as an aggregate since the golf car was deployed, similar to an odometer. Alternatively, the axle count may be periodically reset to maintain smaller values in the buffer. Usage data is typically stored in an electronic medium during golf car operation and retrieved periodically by wired or wireless means.
In an embodiment of the invention, golf car rental income data is calculated for a predetermined time frame. Golf car usage data for the same time frame is also calculated. The income data and the usage data are then compared whereby discrepancies between actual use and rental records may be resolved. For example, if a golf car typically travels 10,000 yards in a play of 18 holes and usage data indicates the golf car actually traveled 20,000 yards, rental income should reflect sales of two (2) 18 hole rounds under the golf car.
In a preferred embodiment, the preexisting accounting program used to track income In the golf car operation is provided with a software conduit for exporting golf car rental income data to the data store. Alternatively, the software conduit may import golf car usage data from the data store to the accounting program. For example, QUICKBOOKS software manufactured by Intuit Corporation provides a standardized development kit (SDK) for software developers to import and export data from the application. The SDK includes an object-oriented software component that is called from a software process to send and receive data from the QUICKBOOKS master data file. Accordingly, sales data for the golf car operation may be exported to the data store and compared with golf car usage. In this case, a reporting application such as CRYSTAL REPORTS manufactured by Crystal Decisions, Inc. in Palo Alto, Calif. may be deployed to generate reports from the data store to compare sales data with usage data. Alternatively, usage data from the data store may be imported to the QUICKBOOKS master data file and reports may be run within the QUICKBOOKS application to compare usage data and sales data.
An operation that has a high Income to usage value suggests an efficient, profitable operation. Accordingly, an embodiment of the invention includes the steps of calculating a usage-income efficiency value based on the step of comparing rental income data with usage data. Additionally, personal responsibility for the success or failure of the operation may be borne by identifying at least one or more employees responsible for collecting golf car rental income and grouping the usage-income efficiency value with the at least one or more employees. On a larger scale, the relative profitability of a plurality of golf course operation may be determined by measuring the usage-income efficiency value of a first golf course operation against a second golf course operation.
With a group of like-equipment, i.e., similar in make, type, model and age, (a “group”) it is in the group operator's economic interest to: (1) minimize equipment downtime, (2) minimize equipment repair expense, (3) extend the group useful life, and (4) if the equipment is used for revenue production, minimize revenue loss due to equipment downtime.
In addition, it is in the OEM's economic interest to encourage its customers, the equipment operators, to balance usage of groups of the OEM's equipment and thereby to: (1) ensure operator satisfaction with the equipment by minimizing equipment downtime and (2) minimize equipment warranty claims by the operator. The present invention, using collected golf car usage data, enables the operator to accomplish all of these objectives. On a periodic basis (hourly, daily, weekly, etc.), the method tabulates for every group being monitored by the invention a table of accumulated usage data for each equipment unit in the group. With every tabulation, every unit in the group is assigned to a usage percentile. On a periodic basis, the on-board memory device on each equipment unit is updated by the invention with its usage percentile ranking (“UPR”) and this UPR is displayed on a color-coded or display type LED mounted on each equipment unit. The operator balances group rotation by using each equipment unit based on the unit's UPR: frequent and repeated usage for units with low UPRs, minimum or no usage for units with high UPRs. The invention provides the operator and the OEM with periodic text and graphic notices identifying any equipment units that are deviating from the group's usage average. Unit's UPRs are constantly re-tabulated and unit usage is continuously adjusted so that throughout the group's useful life, every unit In the group has approximately the same usage as every other unit.
An embodiment of the present invention collects golf car usage data from on-board sensor devices on a group of equipment units, passes the data by various communications means to a database store, processes the golf car usage data from the group, prepares equipment rotation reports, and transmits the reports by various communications means to the equipment operator, such reports designed to enable the operator to balance the usage of the equipment units in the group and, in turn, to minimize equipment downtime, minimize equipment repair expense, extend the group useful life, and if the equipment is used for revenue production, minimize revenue loss due to equipment downtime.
in addition to the economic benefits enumerated above which result from balanced usage of the equipment, the equipment owner realizes a higher residual value for the units upon disposal. If the equipment is leased to the operator, these benefits accrue to the OEM; if purchased, they accrue to the operator.
The method includes the steps of prioritizing the deployment of golf cars based on total usage data and communicating a priority order by a visual Indicator. The visual indicator may be one or more light emitting diodes, a liquid crystal display (LCD) or the like. Preferably, if an LCD is used, it displays the deployment priority numerically or alphabetically. In addition, the LCD provides battery capacity level. As some modern golf cars are equipped with global positioning devices, an embodiment of the invention may utilizing these preexisting displays to provide the deployment priority by alphanumeric indicator.
There are economic benefits for an operator if he is able to compare his equipment usage levels for specified time periods (days, weeks, months) with usage levels of groups of other operators (i.e., groups by type, by size, and by geographic region). Based on an operator's percentile ranking within the various groups, the operator can determine, for example, if marketing and advertising expenditures are appropriate. If an operator's usage ranking percentile (“URP”) is low compared to other operators of his type within his geographic region, such marketing and promotional spending may be productive, whereas if the operator's URP is high, additional marketing and advertising expenses may not be worthwhile. In addition, the URP is a gauge of how efficient or productive his operation compares to other operators in the various groups.
The invention, using collected golf car usage data, generates comparative equipment usage reports (by day, week and month) for groups of other operators whose equipment is monitored by the invention, and makes such usage data available on-call to the operator in text and graphic form. Note that, for confidentiality purposes, an operator sees his usage data only compared to group index; i.e., the operator sees his URP within each of the various groups. The operator does not see specific usage data for any other individual operator within any group.
An operator can derive valuable economic benefits from knowing precisely how his equipment usage ranks in comparison to usage of various groups of other like-operators. The operator can raise URP within the groups by: (1) optimizing marketing and advertising programs, (2) scheduling additional shifts for more productivity, and (3) implementing maintenance programs to gain efficiency.
In an embodiment of the Invention, total usage data is grouped into operational units and a benchmark value is calculated across a plurality of operational units. The usage data of an individual operational unit is then compared with the benchmark value to quantify the relative success of the individual operational unit. Responsive to the comparison, modification may be made in marketing programs, personnel scheduling and maintenance programs. To encourage participation of a plurality of operational units without concern that competitive data might be disseminated, it is preferred that the identity of the other operational units under comparison be keep confidential.
There are economic benefits that accrue to a battery OEM (“BOEM”) if the BOEM is able to monitor and track battery voltage data for large quantities of batteries performing in “live” field applications. The BOEM can: (1) monitor the real operating environment in which its product is performing, (2) observe circumstances that cause product failure, (3) develop product improvements using large scale field data versus limited laboratory-test data, (4) document product failures, and (5) verify product warranty claims.
In addition, there are economic benefits that accrue to the operator of battery-powered equipment if the operator is able to monitor “exception” battery voltage data for batteries on his equipment. Low battery voltage information assists the operator in identifying failing batteries and changing such batteries before they cause equipment downtime or poor performance, resulting in loss of rental income, and/or operational inefficiencies, and/or poor equipment productivity.
The invention, using collected voltage data, generates battery performance reports (i.e., periodic voltage readings) and makes such voltage data available on-call to the BOEM and to the equipment operator in text and graphic form. The BOEM derives the economic benefits described above by knowing precisely the patterns of voltage changes as the batteries are used in live field applications. The equipment operator derives the economic benefits described above by knowing precisely how the voltage of batteries in his equipment decline below threshold levels.
The invention: (1) collects periodic voltage data (typically hourly) from on-board sensor devices on equipment units, (2) passes the data by various communications means to a database store, processes the voltage data, prepares battery performance reports, (3) transmits such reports by various communications means to the BOEM and to the equipment operator, such reports designed to enable the BOEM to monitor the real operating environment in which its product is performing, observe circumstances that cause product failure, develop product improvements using large scale field data versus limited laboratory-test data, document product failures, and verify product warranty claims; such reports also enable the operator to identify failing batteries and change such batteries before they cause equipment downtime or poor performance, and resulting loss of rental income, and/or operational inefficiencies, and/or poor productivity.
Therefore, an embodiment of the invention includes the steps of collecting golf car battery level data concurrently with usage data, correlating battery level data and usage data and evaluating battery performance based on usage data. The product warranty data may be associated with battery performance to verify product warrant claims. Similarly, battery replacement may be schedule responsive to poor battery performance. The battery performance as measured by the invention may be transmitted to entities interested in the data, including, but not limited to, original battery manufacturers, fleet owners, and fleet maintenance personnel.
There are economic benefits for operators if they are able to forecast hourly, daily, weekly and monthly demand for use of their equipment so they can plan: (1) equipment maintenance and facilities maintenance if equipment use is forecast to be low, (2) use of underutilized units of equipment if demand is forecast to be low, and (3) scheduling of extra staff for support activities if equipment use is forecast to be high. For example, a golf course operator would like to know which days of the week demand for golf cars will be low so he can plan golf car and golf course maintenance on those days. On days and hours when demand is forecasted to be high, the operator needs to schedule extra sales and service staff and less maintenance staff.
The invention, using historical golf car usage data, generates equipment-demand forecasts by hour, day, week and month by tracking the actual usage for similar prior periods and making such usage data available on-call to the operator in text and graphic form. Operators can derive valuable economic benefits from knowing precisely historical equipment usage patterns. The operator can: (1) optimize staffing schedules and thereby minimize payroll costs, (2) schedule maintenance on equipment and maintenance on support facilities when equipment downtime will have the least effect on rental income or other productive uses of the equipment.
The invention: (1) collects golf car usage data from on-board sensor devices on a group of equipment units, (2) passes the data by various communications means to a database invention, such database invention stores and processes the golf car usage data from the group and prepares equipment-demand forecasts by hour, day, week and month, and (3) transmits such reports by various communications means to the equipment operator, such reports designed to enable the operator to forecast equipment demand patterns and thereby optimize staffing schedules and minimize payroll costs, and schedule maintenance on equipment and maintenance on support facilities when equipment downtime will have the least effect on rental income or other productive uses of the equipment. For example, greens keeping activities may be scheduled at times least likely to interfere with normal course play.
Therefore, an embodiment of the invention includes the steps of scheduling golf course maintenance based on usage data and optimizing staffing schedules coincident with the scheduled maintenance procedures and scheduling maintenance during low equipment demand periods.
There are economic benefits that accrue to the OEM, the insurer, and the lender (if applicable) if the OEM is able to use the invention to count new and used equipment inventory more accurately and more frequently. The OEM can: (1) eliminate the labor cost of physically counting the equipment inventory, (2) improve accuracy of the counts by eliminating human error, (3) increase the frequency of the counts, (4) detect and report deviation from expected counts (and thereby reduce inventory loss by early detection of missing equipment), and (5) readily make the count and deviation data available to the central accounting departments of the OEM, the insurer and the lender (if applicable).
The invention, on demand, remotely counts equipment located at an OEM equipment Inventory site, collects the equipment ID number for every unit at the site, generates inventory reports (i.e., the counts and ID's of equipment units at the site), and then makes the inventory data available on-call to the OEM, the insurer, and the lender in text and graphic form. The OEM, derives the economic benefits as described above, and precisely verifies the physical location of Its equipment. The Insurer and the lender verify the physical location of the equipment Inventory that they are insuring and/or financing.
The invention (1) periodically (daily, weekly, monthly or the like) collects equipment ID data from on-board sensor devices on equipment units stored at OEM sites, (2) passes the data by various communications means to a database invention, such database invention stores and processes the ID data and prepares inventory reports and (3) transmits such inventory reports by various communications means to the OEM, to the insurer and to the lender, such inventory counting process and such inventory reports designed to enable the OEM to eliminate the labor cost of physically counting the equipment inventory, to Improve accuracy of the counts, to Increase the frequency of the counts, to detect and report deviation from expected counts (and thereby reduce inventory loss by early detection of missing equipment), and to readily make the count and deviation data available to the central accounting departments of the OEM, the insurer and the lender.
Accordingly, an embodiment of the invention includes the steps of confirming golf car inventory based on the golf car identification, establishing a predetermined inventory value and reporting a deviation of the value in the confirmation step. The confirmation may be reported to those having a security interest in the golf cars including, but not limited to, OEMs, insurers and lenders.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and objects of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of an embodiment of the invention that reports golf car usage in view of rental income data.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view of an embodiment of the invention that calculates rotation priority based on aggregate golf car usage.
FIG. 3 is an illustration of an embodiment of the invention that displays deployment priority by light emitting diode affixed to a golf car.
FIG. 4 is an illustration of an embodiment of the invention that displays deployment priority by liquid crystal display affixed to a golf car showing numeric order.
FIG. 5 is an illustration of an embodiment of the invention that displays deployment priority by liquid crystal display affixed to a golf car showing alphabetic order.
FIG. 6 is a detailed illustration of an embodiment of the invention that displays deployment priority by a liquid crystal display which also displays global positioning satellite data and battery levels.
FIG. 7 is an illustration of an embodiment of the invention that displays deployment priority by a liquid crystal display affixed to a golf car roof which also displays global positioning satellite data and battery levels.
FIG. 8 is a diagrammatic view of an embodiment of the invention that calculates the performance of an operation based on a benchmark value derived from a plurality of operations.
FIG. 9 is a diagrammatic view of an embodiment of the invention that calculates battery performance relative to actual usage.
FIG. 10 is a diagrammatic view of an embodiment of the invention that forecasts staffing and maintenance schedules responsive to actual usage data.
FIG. 11 is a diagrammatic view of an embodiment of the invention that monitors golf car inventory and notifies entities with a security interest if a discrepancy exists.
In FIG. 1, golf cars 10A, 10B and 10C are communicatively linked to data store 20. The data transmitted between the golf cars 10A-C and data store 20 comprises axle rotations representative of the distance traveled by the golf car. Methods and apparatus to measure the axle rotations are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 5,930,742 entitled “Wheeled fleet information processing and reporting system including hubmeter” which is incorporated herein by reference.
The link between the golf cars 10A-C and the data store may comprise manual readings, hardwire, radio frequency or infrared transmissions. In a preferred embodiment, wireless communications are performed by IEEE standard 802.11a, although 802.11b or 802.15 (BlueTooth) may also be utilized, but with less range or speed. As an example, cart 10A indicated 7500 rotations, cart 10B 16044 rotations and cart 10C 15887 rotations. Every rotation of a golf car wheel is approximately 1.5 yards (golf car tire radius is 8.5 inches). A typical distance that a golf car travels on a course is 10,800 yards. Accordingly, a rule of thumb is that one can approximate the distance that a golf car will travel on a course by taking the score-card yardage of the course and multiply by it 1.5. In this particular example, a rotation count for an 18 round game averages 7200 rotations. Dividing the day's count by expected rotations is used to validate the actual usage of the golf car. Accounting software 30 is communicatively coupled to data store 20 to validate that rental income received correlates with the actual use of the golf car. Employees responsible for the rental income can be noted in data store or in accounting software 30. An operations-wide efficiency value can be calculated (in the example it is 80%) to reflect the income-to-usage balance and reported 40. Fleet rotation is illustrated in FIG. 2 wherein usage data from carts 10A-C are aggregated in data store 20 and rotation priority is resolved to even out use of the golf cars over time. Prioritizing the actual deployment of the golf cars may be achieved in a number of ways. In one embodiment, a report may be printed listing the golf cars and the order in which they should be deployed. Alternatively, coded notations may be affixed to the golf car to indicate which golf cars should be deployed first. For example, a green slip placed on a number of cars indicate they have low total usage and should be deployed first. Yellow slips indicate moderate usage and red slipped cars should only be deployed as a last resort. Alternatively, FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of the invention wherein the priority of the deployment is indicated electronically on the car itself in the form of a light emitting diode 50A-C. The diodes may simply light, blink or change color in various iterations to indicate deployment priority. For example, rapidly blinking LEDs indicate a high priority for deployment wherein constant-on LEDs indicate a low priority for deployment. In an alternative embodiment shown in FIG. 4, liquid crystal displays (LCDs) 60A-C numerically indicate the priority for deployment. This has the advantage of high deployment accuracy since the golf cars can be deployed in exact accordance with their total usage data. In a variation shown in FIG. 5, alphabetic characters are used to indicate deployment. Another advantage of using LCDs is that other information may be presented such as starting holes for shotgun starts. As golfing technology becomes more pervasive, some golf cars may already have existing LCD screens installed such as those found in GPS-enabled systems. In FIG. 6, deployment order and battery levels are displayed on a GPS-enabled display 80. The advantage of utilizing the existing display is cost savings on manufacture and installation. FIG. 7 illustrates the GPS-enabled display 80 mounted to the roof of a golf car which permits golf course staff to easily check deployment order and battery levels.
It is generally preferred that income-producing assets be utilized to the maximum extend possible. This is one reason airlines attempt to keep their expensive airliners in service on a nearly continuous basis. Golf course operations vary in success due to many variables including marketing, personnel staff and availability of golf cars to meet demand. It is highly valuable for a golf course operation to empirically measure its performance relative to other golf course operations. However, due to the competitive nature of the business, golf courses are not likely to share proprietary business information with each other. An embodiment of the invention that overcomes this problem is illustrated in FIG. 8 wherein Operations A-C report golf car usages of 78, 63 and 93 percent respectively. The usage data is stored in data store 20. A benchmark is calculated by taking the sum of usage values from Operations A-C and dividing the total by the number of operations (in this case three). Each operation can then measure its performance against the benchmark value. In the example, Operation A is operating at 100% of the benchmark, Operation B is operating at 81% of the benchmark and Operation C is operating at 119% of the benchmark. While Operation B is poorly performing, Operation C can confirm its usage performance is good. Provided the statistical pool is sufficient, the benchmark does not disclose the relative performance of competing operations. Management and staff responsible for high usage performance, and thus profitability, can be rewarded with bonuses in view of Its rating against the benchmark. Poor usage values in view of the benchmark suggest changes may be needed to increase efficiency and marketing efforts.
Although many golf cars utilize combustion engines, battery propelled golf cars are quiet, non-polluting and highly preferred by many courses. In addition, batteries that drive the car are relatively expensive and subject to a wide range of performance characteristics. In FIG. 9, capacity for batteries A-C is reported to data store 20 in view of actual usage data. Battery A has a 90% capacity with an aggregate use of 400,000 turns. Battery B has a 98% capacity with an aggregate use of 600,000 turns. Finally, Battery C has a 66% capacity with an aggregate use of only 150,000 turns. A battery benchmark is calculated by taking the sum of axle revolutions divided by battery capacity and dividing this sum by the population count. A battery performance value is then calculated by dividing the quotient of axle revolutions and battery capacity by the battery benchmark. As shown in FIG. 9, Battery C's battery performance value is 53% which would indicate a problem with the battery in view of its low use. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, warranty data and scheduled maintenance data is accessible by the data store 20 wherein warranty claims for defective batteries may be automated. In addition, battery manufacturers can be notified of unexpected problems, trends in batter life and the like by communicatively linking them with data store 20.
Another problem in the art exist in golf car operations relating to the variability of golf car usage during identifiable time periods. The periods may be seasonal, monthly, weekly, daily, or related to extraneous events such as holidays, major sporting events (such as the Superbowl), and the like. In FIG. 10, data store 20 reports golf car usage by the day of the week. As shown, Saturday and Sunday are the most popular days for use while Friday is the least popular day. Responsive to this report, staff scheduling may be automatically performed to ensure adequate staff in busy periods and to avid over-staffing during inactive periods. In addition, golf course and golf car maintenance scheduling can be avoided during busy periods when the golf car assets are needed to bring in income to the operation.
In FIG. 11, carts 10A-B transmit data received by data store 20. However, due to malfunction, misuse of theft, cart 10C does not transmit data. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, data store 20 maintains audit records to determine if an asset is potentially missing and communicates the information to operations manager, the OEM, insurer or lender of the asset.
It will be seen that the objects set forth above, and those made apparent from the foregoing description, are efficiently attained and since certain changes may be made in the above construction without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matters contained in the foregoing description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween. Now that the invention has been described.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5053768||Dec 21, 1989||Oct 1, 1991||Invisible Fence Company, Inc.||Golf cart control system|
|US5095430||Apr 17, 1990||Mar 10, 1992||Joseph W. Remedio||Golf cart computer with cartridge storage|
|US5132968||Jan 14, 1991||Jul 21, 1992||Robotic Guard Systems, Inc.||Environmental sensor data acquisition system|
|US5371487||Nov 10, 1993||Dec 6, 1994||Caterpillar Inc.||Method and apparatus for indicating a changed condition|
|US5524081||May 2, 1994||Jun 4, 1996||Paul; Benjamin J.||Golf information and course mangement system|
|US5553269||Sep 17, 1991||Sep 3, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Apparatus for monitoring sensor information from diffeerent types of sources|
|US5576972||Mar 28, 1995||Nov 19, 1996||Harrison; Dana C.||Intelligent area monitoring system|
|US5610586||Feb 16, 1995||Mar 11, 1997||Cart Watch, Inc.||Golf cart control and monitoring apparatus and system|
|US5673252||May 26, 1995||Sep 30, 1997||Itron, Inc.||Communications protocol for remote data generating stations|
|US5797809||Feb 24, 1994||Aug 25, 1998||Hyuga; Makoto||Golf course guidance method, guidance device, and management system|
|US5852351||Aug 20, 1997||Dec 22, 1998||Csi Technology||Machine monitor|
|US5907491||Apr 4, 1997||May 25, 1999||Csi Technology, Inc.||Wireless machine monitoring and communication system|
|US5912644 *||Aug 5, 1997||Jun 15, 1999||Wang; James J. M.||Spread spectrum position determination, ranging and communication system|
|US5930742||Dec 19, 1996||Jul 27, 1999||Golf Car Systems, Inc.||Wheeled fleet information processing and reporting system including hubmeter|
|US5963679||Jan 26, 1996||Oct 5, 1999||Harris Corporation||Electric field fingerprint sensor apparatus and related methods|
|US6112126||Feb 20, 1998||Aug 29, 2000||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Adaptive object-oriented optimization software system|
|US6115654||Dec 23, 1997||Sep 5, 2000||Simmonds Precision Products, Inc.||Universal sensor interface system and method|
|US6131067||Sep 6, 1996||Oct 10, 2000||Snaptrack, Inc.||Client-server based remote locator device|
|US6204772||Dec 16, 1999||Mar 20, 2001||Caterpillar Inc.||Method and apparatus for monitoring the position of a machine|
|US6208247||Aug 18, 1998||Mar 27, 2001||Rockwell Science Center, Llc||Wireless integrated sensor network using multiple relayed communications|
|US6236940 *||Mar 1, 1999||May 22, 2001||Prolink, Inc.||Display monitor for golf cart yardage and information system|
|US6305009||Dec 3, 1998||Oct 16, 2001||Robert M. Goor||Compiler design using object technology with cross platform capability|
|US6326982||Jun 24, 1999||Dec 4, 2001||Enreach Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for automatically accessing web pages based on television programming information|
|US6348007||May 13, 1999||Feb 19, 2002||Futaba Denshi Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Golf cart location display device|
|US6359431||Jul 31, 2000||Mar 19, 2002||Stenten's Golf Cart Accessories, Inc.||Golf cart speedometer/odometer|
|US6470242||Mar 28, 2001||Oct 22, 2002||Prolink, Inc.||Display monitor for golf cart yardage and information system|
|US6496141||Jun 13, 2001||Dec 17, 2002||Vxt, L.L.C.||Hybrid system and method for golf course distance determination using GPS navigation signals|
|US20020004723||Feb 8, 2001||Jan 10, 2002||Yoshinobu Meifu||Golf data management system, data center, and method of managing golf data|
|US20020016674 *||May 21, 2001||Feb 7, 2002||Rudow Richard W.||Golf course yardage and information system having improved zone information and display characteristics|
|US20020116140||Feb 16, 2001||Aug 22, 2002||Rider Robert A.||Method and apparatus for testing batteries on a golf car|
|EP0710494B1||Feb 24, 1994||Nov 21, 2001||HYUGA, Makoto||Method for guiding golf course, device therefor, and golf course managing system|
|WO2002005900A2||Jul 18, 2001||Jan 24, 2002||Golf-Domain.Com Llc||Method and apparatus for managing golf related information obtained in part by using impulse radio technology|
|1||Baartse, Mark et al., Professional ASP XML, 2000, Wrox Press Ltd., United Kingdom.|
|2||Bentham, Jeremy, TCP/IP Lean Web Servers for Embedded Systems, 2000, CMP Books, Kansas, United States.|
|3||Fifth IEEE TC-9/NIST Workshop on Smart Transducer Interface Standards IEEE P1451, Conference Proceedings Nov. 15-17, 1995, NIST U.S. Department of Commerce.|
|4||Smith, Clint, Wireless Telecom FAQs 2001 McGraw-Hill, New York.|
|5||Taylor H. Rosemary, Data Acquisition for Sensor Systems, 1997, Chapman & Hall, London.|
|6||US 2001/0019420 A1, Sanbongi et al., Sep. 6, 2001, Image Data Processing System.|
|7||US 2001/0032025 A1, Lenz et al., Oct. 18, 2001, System and Method for Monitoring and Control of Processes and Machines.|
|8||US 2001/0033567 A1, Frati, Oct. 25, 2001, Device for Providing Services and for Transmission of Data in the Home.|
|9||US 2001/0044588 A1, Mault, Nov. 22, 2001, Monitoring System.|
|10||US 2001/0049471 A1, Suzuki et al., Dec. 6, 2001, Life Support Apparatus and Method and Method for Providing Advertisement Information.|
|11||US 2002/0019584 A1, Schulze et al., Feb. 14, 2002, Wireless Internet Bio-Telemetry Monitoring System and Interface.|
|12||US 2002/0035403 A1, Clark et al., Mar. 21, 2002, Method and Apparatus for Remotely Monitoring and Controlling a Pool or Spa.|
|13||US 2002/0041240 A1, Ikeda et al., Apr. 11, 2002, Status Notification System, Status Notification Apparatus and Response Apparatus.|
|14||US 2002/0059030 A1, Otworth et al., May 16, 2002, Method and Apparatus for the Processing of Remotely Collected Electronic Information Characterizing Properties of Biological Entities.|
|15||US 2002/0059178 A1, Hirabayashi et al., May 16, 2002, Information Management Method, Information Processing Method, Information Processing Apparatus . . .|
|16||*||WO 01/61271 A2, Map Matching Golf Navigation System, Aug. 23, 2001, Coffee, John.*|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7171187 *||Aug 19, 2002||Jan 30, 2007||Longview Advantage, Inc||Method and system for asset tracking|
|US7468659||Sep 5, 2006||Dec 23, 2008||Luther Haave||Method of configuring a tracking device|
|US7636626 *||Dec 22, 2009||General Motors Company||Method and system for monitoring and retrieving device usage|
|US7756616 *||Jul 13, 2010||General Motors Llc||Criteria-based alternative messaging for a vehicle email notification system|
|US7801506||Sep 5, 2006||Sep 21, 2010||Luther Haave||System for asset tracking|
|US7908051||Mar 15, 2011||General Motors Llc||Vehicle maintenance event reporting method|
|US7996098||Sep 19, 2008||Aug 9, 2011||Aerovironment, Inc.||Reactive replenishable device management|
|US8005586 *||Aug 23, 2011||Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha||Electric golf cart|
|US8044338 *||Jan 29, 2007||Oct 25, 2011||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Electronic device for counting and storing the number of rotations of an object and the number of counter resets|
|US8195388 *||Dec 21, 2009||Jun 5, 2012||General Motors Llc||Method and system of monitoring and retrieving device usage|
|US8217781 *||Jul 10, 2012||Whirlpool Corporation||Method of facilitating servicing an appliance using a central collector|
|US8892297||Dec 29, 2006||Nov 18, 2014||General Motors Llc||Pre-delivery inspection auditing system and method|
|US9059485||Sep 10, 2010||Jun 16, 2015||Aerovironment, Inc.||Reactive replenishable device management|
|US20030050038 *||Aug 19, 2002||Mar 13, 2003||Luther Haave||Method and system for asset tracking|
|US20050156715 *||Jan 16, 2004||Jul 21, 2005||Jie Zou||Method and system for interfacing with mobile telemetry devices|
|US20050168353 *||Mar 25, 2005||Aug 4, 2005||Mci, Inc.||User interface for defining geographic zones for tracking mobile telemetry devices|
|US20060089844 *||Oct 26, 2004||Apr 27, 2006||Aerovironment, Inc., A California Corporation||Dynamic replenisher management|
|US20060217875 *||Mar 28, 2005||Sep 28, 2006||General Motors Corporation.||Method and system for monitoring and retrieving device usage|
|US20060217935 *||Mar 28, 2005||Sep 28, 2006||General Motors Corporation||Vehicle component usage monitor|
|US20060220809 *||Oct 25, 2005||Oct 5, 2006||Rf Monolithics, Inc.||System and method for monitoring use of vehicles such as golf carts|
|US20070011035 *||Jan 11, 2004||Jan 11, 2007||Ofir Yaffe||System and method for optimizing transportations assignments and mainetenance activities|
|US20070021100 *||Sep 5, 2006||Jan 25, 2007||Longview Advantage, Inc.||System for asset tracking|
|US20070026842 *||Sep 5, 2006||Feb 1, 2007||Longview Advantage, Inc.||Method of configuring a tracking device|
|US20070112576 *||Nov 16, 2005||May 17, 2007||Avery Robert L||Centralized management of maintenance and materials for commercial aircraft fleets with fleet-wide benchmarking data|
|US20070112608 *||Nov 16, 2005||May 17, 2007||Avery Robert L||Integrated maintenance services for fleet aircraft|
|US20070173986 *||Dec 29, 2006||Jul 26, 2007||General Motors Corporation||Pre-delivery inspection auditing system and method|
|US20070173992 *||Dec 29, 2006||Jul 26, 2007||General Motors Corporation||Vehicle email notification system and method|
|US20070179798 *||Dec 29, 2006||Aug 2, 2007||General Motors Corporation||Vehicle email system and method with financial notification features|
|US20070191995 *||Dec 29, 2006||Aug 16, 2007||General Motors Corporation||Enrollment method for a vehicle email notification system|
|US20080027604 *||Dec 29, 2006||Jan 31, 2008||General Motors Corporation||Vehicle maintenance event reporting method|
|US20080027606 *||Dec 29, 2006||Jan 31, 2008||General Motors Corporation||Criteria-based alternative messaging for a vehicle email notification system|
|US20080039995 *||Dec 29, 2006||Feb 14, 2008||General Motors Corporation||Vehicle fleet email notification method and system|
|US20080183347 *||Jan 9, 2008||Jul 31, 2008||Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha||Electric golf cart|
|US20090003510 *||Jan 29, 2007||Jan 1, 2009||Franck Vial||Electronic Device For Counting the Number of Rotations of an Object With Storage Means|
|US20090024232 *||Sep 19, 2008||Jan 22, 2009||Aerovironment, Inc.||Reactive Replenishable Device Management|
|US20090100132 *||Dec 19, 2008||Apr 16, 2009||Whirlpool Corporation||Collector for monitoring and recording appliance data|
|US20100100441 *||Dec 21, 2009||Apr 22, 2010||General Motors Llc||Method and system of monitoring and retrieving device usage|
|US20100332076 *||Sep 10, 2010||Dec 30, 2010||Aerovironment, Inc.||Reactive replenishable device management|
|CN1855830B||Mar 28, 2006||Jun 30, 2010||通用汽车有限责任公司||Method and system for monitoring and retrieving device usage|
|WO2016054010A1 *||Sep 29, 2015||Apr 7, 2016||Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC||Telematics system, methods and apparatus for two-way data communication between vehicles in a fleet and a fleet management system|
|U.S. Classification||700/65, 701/123, 701/24, 702/63, 702/187, 700/73, 700/66|
|Cooperative Classification||G05B2219/31121, G05B19/0423, G05B2219/34038|
|Apr 28, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 8, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Dec 19, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SMART SENSOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMPIRE IP LLC;REEL/FRAME:031847/0684
Effective date: 20131219
|Jan 8, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: EMPIRE IP LLC, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SMART SENSOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC;REEL/FRAME:031947/0454
Effective date: 20140105
Owner name: SENSOR-TECH INNOVATIONS LLC, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMPIRE IP LLC;REEL/FRAME:031947/0322
Effective date: 20140106
|Apr 27, 2016||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: EMPIRE IP LLC, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GOLF CAR SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:038393/0397
Effective date: 20130626
|May 2, 2016||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jun 6, 2016||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GOLF CAR SYSTEMS, INC., FLORIDA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DODD, WILLIAM A, JR.;REEL/FRAME:038819/0313
Effective date: 20010823