|Publication number||US6815552 B2|
|Application number||US 10/182,776|
|Publication date||Nov 9, 2004|
|Filing date||Jan 30, 2001|
|Priority date||Feb 2, 2000|
|Also published as||CA2398993A1, CN1229363C, CN1422264A, EP1122249A1, US7205419, US7320779, US20030162983, US20050054864, US20070149790, US20080132718, WO2001057012A1|
|Publication number||10182776, 182776, PCT/2001/976, PCT/EP/1/000976, PCT/EP/1/00976, PCT/EP/2001/000976, PCT/EP/2001/00976, PCT/EP1/000976, PCT/EP1/00976, PCT/EP1000976, PCT/EP100976, PCT/EP2001/000976, PCT/EP2001/00976, PCT/EP2001000976, PCT/EP200100976, US 6815552 B2, US 6815552B2, US-B2-6815552, US6815552 B2, US6815552B2|
|Inventors||Michel Strebelle, Jean-Pierre Catinat|
|Original Assignee||Solvay (Societe Anonyme)|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (14), Classifications (6), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The invention relates to a process for manufacturing an oxirane by reaction between an olefin and hydrogen peroxide in the presence of a catalyst and a diluent. The invention relates more particularly to a process for manufacturing 1,2-epoxypropane (or propylene oxide) by reaction between propylene and hydrogen peroxide.
It is known practice to manufacture propylene oxide by epoxidizing propylene using hydrogen peroxide in the presence of a catalyst of TS-1 type, as disclosed, for example, in patent application EP-A-0 230 949.
The hydrogen peroxide used is generally greatly freed from organic impurities. Thus, crude solutions of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) arising from the extraction of a mixture derived from the oxidation of at least one alkylanthrahydroquinone, generally undergo one or more washing, extraction and/or distillation steps before being sold and/or used in synthetic processes. This is especially the case for the H2O2 solutions used for the manufacture of oxiranes.
Patent application EP-A-0 549 013 relates to an integrated process for oxidizing organic substrates and for producing H2O2 via an alkylanthraquinone (AO) process, which uses the water/alcohol mixture used during the oxidation of the organic substrate as the solvent for extracting the H2O2 from the quinone shuttle. The Applicant has found that this process has several drawbacks:
the lack of flexibility of the overall process due to the interdependence of each step of the synthesis (AO and oxidation);
the limitation of the alcohol content of the water/alcohol mixtures imposed by the extraction conditions, which penalizes the degree of conversion of the H2O2 during the epoxidation reaction;
the difficulties of phase separation during extraction with a water/alcohol mixture;
the passage of large amounts of methanol into the quinone shuttle, which, given the low flash point of methanol, results in an appreciable risk of explosion in the vapour phase during the step from oxidation to the synthesis of the H2O2;
a large amount of quinones extracted in the water/alcohol mixture, which penalizes the economic viability of an industrial plant; and
the pollution of the quinone shuttle by by-products of the oxidation reaction.
Moreover, the propylene used in the known epoxidation reactions is generally of relatively high purity, especially to avoid spurious oxidation reactions of the impurities, and mainly for reasons of yield and safety. Specifically, propane is the main impurity in propylene and it is reported in patent BE-A-1 001 884 that, in the presence of TS-1, hydrogen peroxide can oxidize an alkane.
In addition, in the case of propane, the oxidation product resulting therefrom is isopropanol. In the light of patent BE-A-1 001 884, a person skilled in the art would have deduced that, in a continuous process for producing propylene oxide with recycling of the organic reaction diluent (generally methanol), and/or in a continuous or batchwise process using a propane-rich source of propylene, isopropanol would accumulate in the diluent and end up being converted into acetone, which is generally difficult to separate from this diluent. In the presence of hydrogen peroxide, this acetone can form peroxides that are explosive and also insoluble in organic medium, which further increases the explosion hazard following their precipitation. This type of reasoning is applicable to any alkane oxidized in the presence of a peroxide compound and TS-1 and thus, to any source of olefin (recycled or otherwise) which is rich in alkane(s) and which would be intended for use in an epoxidation reaction.
Thus, patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,599,955 and 5,599,956 disclose the use of a substantially pure propylene, i.e. a propylene with a purity of at least 90% and preferably of at least 98%, the main impurity of which is propane.
Now, the various processes for synthesizing propylene (and olefins in general) generally lead to a propane content (or more generally a content of alkane(s)) which is appreciable, or even greater than that of the propylene, thus involving suitable separation and/or purification processes. Patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,599,955 and 5,599,956 mentioned above illustrate this problem.
In addition, various industrial processes using an olefin recycle the unconverted fraction thereof, which is conventionally enriched in alkane(s). These processes are thus also liable to require a separation of the constituents prior to this recycling. Examples of such processes are the polymerization of olefins and their epoxidation.
A subject of the present invention is a process for manufacturing an oxirane which avoids at least one of the abovementioned drawbacks, while at the same time having an increased degree of conversion and better selectivity than that obtained using a purified extract.
The invention consequently relates to a process for manufacturing an oxirane by reaction between an olefin and hydrogen peroxide in the, presence of a catalyst and an organic diluent, according to which the hydrogen peroxide is an aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution obtained by extraction, with substantially pure water, of the mixture derived from the oxidation of at least one alkylanthrahydroquinone, without subsequent washing and/or purification treatment.
Specifically, the Applicant has found, surprisingly, that the fact of using for the epoxidation reaction an H2O2 solution extracted with water rather than with a water/alcohol mixture allows the degree of conversion of this H2O2 to be increased. In addition, the fact of using an unpurified extract allows again in selectivity compared with the use of a purified extract.
The processes for producing hydrogen peroxide using alkylanthraquinone(s), or AO processes, are well known and are widely documented in the literature (see, for example, “Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Fifth Edition, 1989, Volume 3, p. 447-57”). They consist in subjecting a working solution of at least one alkylanthraquinone and/or of at least one tetrahydroalkylanthraquinone to a hydrogenation step, in a diluent, to produce one or more alkylanthrahydroquinones and/or alkyltetrahydroanthrahydroquinones. The working solution leaving the hydrogenation step is then subjected to an oxidation with oxygen, air or oxygen-enriched air to give hydrogen peroxide and to reform the alkylanthraquinones and/or alkyltetrahydroanthraquinones. The hydrogen peroxide formed is then separated from the working solution by means of an extraction step. According to the present invention, this extraction is carried out using substantially pure water. The working solution leaving the extraction step is then recycled into the hydrogenation step in order to recommence the hydrogen peroxide production cycle.
The term “alkylanthraquinones” is intended to denote, for example, 9,10-anthraquinones substituted with at least one alkyl side chain of linear or branched aliphatic type comprising at least one carbon atom. These alkyl chains usually comprise less than 9 carbon atoms and preferably less than 6 carbon atoms. Examples of such alkylanthraquinones are 2-ethylanthraquinone, 2-isopropylanthraquinone, 2-sec- and 2-tert-butylanthraquinone, 1,3-, 2,3-, 1,4- and 2,7-dimethylanthraquinone, and 2-iso- and 2-tert-amylanthraquinone, and mixtures of these quinones.
The expression “substantially pure water” is intended to denote a water containing less than 3% by weight of organic diluents, in particular of alcohol(s), preferably less than 0.1% or even less than 0.001% of these diluents. However, the extraction water may advantageously contain inorganic substances in a proportion of 0.001% by weight minimum, preferably 0.005% or even 0.01% minimum. However, the content of inorganic substances will not exceed 1% by weight, preferably 0.5%, or even 0.1%. These inorganic substances are advantageously substances which have a pH-regulating effect, such as acids and in particular strong acids such as nitric acid or phosphoric acid, or salts of such acids. These inorganic substances can also advantageously be substances which have an H2O2-stabilizing effect, such as alkali metal salts and alkaline-earth metal salts, and in particular sodium salts, such as sodium pyrophosphate. The extraction solution may thus comprise metal cations (such as alkali metals or alkaline-earth metals, for instance sodium) and/or anions such as phosphates, nitrates, etc. in low contents, generally less than 10 g/l, but greater than 0.01 g/l.
The H2O2 solution derived from the extraction, or crude H2O2 solution, generally contains less than 50% by weight of H2O2, usually less than 40% of H2O2. It generally contains more than 5% by weight of H2O2, usually more than 10%, in particular more than 20%, or even more than 30%. It does not undergo any subsequent washing and/or purification treatment before being used in the epoxidation reaction. Consequently, it contains organic impurities (products of degradation of the quinone shuttle) and inorganic impurities (cations and anions introduced by the extraction water, as well as those already present in the mixture derived from the oxidation of the alkylanthrahydroquinone(s)). The solution derived from the extraction may thus comprise organic impurities expressed as TOC (total organic carbon concentration), defined according to ISO standard 8245, in a proportion of at least 0.001 g/l, or even at least 0.01 g/l, or even at least 0.1 g/l, but not more than 10 g/l, or even 1 g/l, or even 0.2 g/l. It may also contain metal cations (such as alkali metals or alkaline-earth metals, for instance sodium) and/or anions such as phosphates, nitrates, etc. in low contents, generally less than or equal to 10 g/l, but greater than or equal to 0.01 g/l.
Before being used in the epoxidation reaction, the crude H2O2solution may be diluted with water or any other solvent or liquid diluent which has no adverse effect on the epoxidation reaction. In general, the aqueous solution used for the epoxidation contains at least 5% by weight, usually at least 10% by weight, of H2O2, in particular at least 20% by weight. It usually contains not more than 50% by weight of peroxide compound, in particular 40% by weight.
The oxirane which may be prepared by the process according to the invention is an organic compound comprising a group corresponding to the general formula:
The oxirane generally contains from 3 to 10 carbon atoms, preferably from 3 to 6 carbon atoms. An oxirane which may be prepared advantageously by the process according to the invention is 1,2-epoxypropane.
The olefins which are suitable in the process according to the invention generally contain from 3 to 10 carbon atoms and preferably 3 to 6 carbon atoms. Propylene and butylene are particularly suitable. Propylene is preferred.
The catalysts used in the process according to the invention advantageously contain a zeolite, i.e. a solid containing silica which has a microporous crystal structure. The zeolite is advantageously free of aluminium. It preferably contains titanium.
The zeolite which may be used in the process according to the invention may have a crystal structure of ZSM-5, ZSM-11 or MCM-41 type or of beta-zeolite type. Zeolites of ZSM-5 type are suitable. Those with an infrared adsorption band at about 950-960 cm−1 are preferred.
The zeolites which are particularly suitable are the titanium silicalites. Those corresponding to the formula xTiO2(1−x)SiO2 in which x is from 0.0001 to 0.5, preferably from 0.001 to 0.05, have good performance qualities. Materials of this type, known under the name TS-1 and having a crystal structure of ZSM-5 type, give particularly favourable results.
The reaction medium according to the invention generally comprises a liquid phase and a gaseous phase.
The organic diluents which may be used in the process according to the invention may be organic derivatives such as aliphatic alcohols, containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms. Methanol may be mentioned by way of example. The content of diluent in the liquid phase of the reaction medium is advantageously greater than 35% by weight, preferably greater than 60%, or even 75%. However, the content of diluent in the liquid phase of the reaction medium is generally less than 99% by weight, preferably less than 95%.
In one preferred variant of the process according to the invention, the oxirane produced in the reaction medium may be separated out by liquid-liquid extraction with a solvent as disclosed in patent application WO 99/14208 in the name of the Applicant.
The process according to the invention may be continuous or batchwise. If it is continuous, the unreacted olefin may be recycled into the reactor.
The reactor in which the process according to the invention takes place may be fed with a solution arising directly from the aqueous extraction step of an AO process. In this case, the plant in which the process according to the invention takes place also incorporates a plant for manufacturing the H2O2 solution according to an AO process. Such a plant and a process using it also constitute a subject of the present invention.
Alternatively, the solution may be stored and/or conveyed before being -fed into the reactor, which is the case for the purified solutions currently used.
In the process according to the invention, a gas which has no adverse effect on the epoxidation reaction may also be fed into the reactor. Specifically, in patent application WO 99/48883, the Applicant has found that by introducing a gaseous compound into the reaction medium at a flow rate which is sufficient to enable the oxirane produced to be entrained and removed from the reactor at the same time as the gaseous compound, the contact time between the oxirane produced and the epoxidation reaction medium is reduced. This thus avoids the formation of by-products and increases the selectivity of the epoxidation.
One advantageous embodiment of the process according to the invention consists in introducing the gaseous phase into the reactor at a flow rate such that it not only entrains at least some of the oxirane produced, but also circulates the liquid phase in the reactor, in particular when this reactor is a reactor of loop type. In this case, the gaseous phase is generally introduced into the reactor at a flow rate such that the molar ratio of the flow rate of this gaseous phase to the H2O2 feed rate is at least 5, in particular at least 8, values of at least 10 being common. The molar ratio of these flow rates is generally less than or equal to 100, in particular less than or equal to 60, values of less than or equal to 40, or even 20, being common.
Any type of reactor may be used in the process according to the invention, in particular a reactor of loop type. Reactors of loop type with a bubble siphon, in which the circulation of the liquid and also optionally of the catalyst is obtained by bubbling a gas into one of the branches, are suitable. This type of reactor is disclosed in the abovementioned patent application WO 99/48883.
In the process according to the invention, it may prove to be advantageous to maintain the pH of the liquid phase during the reaction between the olefin and the H2O2 at a value of at least 4.8, in particular of at least 5. The pH is advantageously less than or equal to 6.5, in particular less than or equal to 6. Good results are obtained when the pH is from 4.8 to 6.5, preferably from 5 to 6. The pH of the liquid phase during the epoxidation reaction may be controlled by adding a base. This base may be chosen from water-soluble strong bases which may be mentioned are NaOH and KOH. They may also be weak bases. The weak bases may be inorganic. Examples of weak inorganic bases which may be mentioned are NH4OH, Na2CO3, NaHCO3, Na2HPO4, K2CO3, Li2CO3, KHCO3, LiHCO3 and K2HPO4. The weak bases may also be organic. Weak organic bases which may be suitable are the alkali metal or alkaline-earth metal salts of carboxylic acids preferably containing from 1 to 10 carbon atoms. Sodium acetate may be mentioned by way of example. Weak bases give good results. Weak organic bases are preferred. Sodium acetate is particularly suitable.
The molar ratio between the amount of olefin used and the amount of H2O2 used is generally greater than or equal to 0.1, in particular greater than or equal to 1, and preferably greater than 5. This molar ratio is usually less than or equal to 100, in particular less than or equal to 50 and preferably less than or equal to 25.
In the process according to the invention, when it is performed continuously and in the presence of a zeolite, the H2O2 is generally used in an amount of at least 0.005 mol per hour and per gram of zeolite, in particular of at least 0.01 mol per hour and per gram of zeolite. The amount of H2O2 is usually less than or equal to 2.5 mol per hour and per gram of zeolite, and in particular less than or equal to 1 mol per hour and per gram of zeolite. Preference is shown for an amount of H2O2 of greater than or equal to 0.03 mol per hour and per gram of zeolite and less than or equal to 0.1 mol per hour and per gram of zeolite.
The reaction between the olefin and the H2O2 may be carried out in the presence of a salt such as a metal salt or an ammonium salt. The metal may be chosen from alkali metals and alkaline-earth metals such as lithium, sodium, potassium, caesium, magnesium, calcium, strontium and barium. The metal salts are advantageously halides, oxides, hydroxides, carbonates, sulphates and phosphates and organic acid salts such as acetates. The halides are generally fluorides, chlorides, bromides and iodides. Preference is shown for chlorides. The salt advantageously used in the process according to the present invention is preferably an alkali metal halide and advantageously sodium chloride. The amount of metal salt used is expressed as the content of metal ions or of ammonium ions arising from the salt relative to the amount of catalyst expressed in millimoles (mmol) of metal or of ammonium per gram of zeolite. This content may be greater than or equal to 10−4 mmol/g of zeolite and less than or equal to 10 mmol/g of zeolite. Advantageously, the metal salt content is greater than or equal to 10−3 mmol/g of zeolite and less than or equal to 1 mmol/g of zeolite. Preference is shown for a content of greater than or equal to 10−2 mmol/g of zeolite and less than or equal to 0.5 mmol/g of zeolite.
The temperature of the reaction between the olefin and the H2O2 is advantageously greater than 35° C. to overcome the gradual deactivation of the catalyst. It is advantageous to perform the reaction at a temperature of greater than or equal to 40° C. and preferred greater than or equal to 45° C. A temperature of greater than or equal to 50° C. is most particularly preferred. However, the reaction temperature is generally less than 100° C. and preferably less than 80° C. The temperature at which the olefin reacts with the H2O2 is generally between 40° C. and 100° C. and preferably between 45° C. and 80° C.
In the process according to the invention, the reaction between the olefin and the H2O2 may take place at atmospheric pressure. It may also take place under pressure. Generally, this pressure does not exceed 40 bar. A pressure of 20 bar is suitable in practice.
According to one particularly advantageous variant of the process according to the invention, the olefin is reacted with the hydrogen peroxide in the presence of the catalyst and the organic diluent in a reactor in the liquid phase which is fed with hydrogen peroxide and organic diluent as well as with a fluid comprising the olefin and at least 10% by volume of alkane(s). The alkane content in the fluid is preferably greater than 10% by volume.
This variant is advantageous since it upgrades the various sources of olefins not freed of alkanes by using them to manufacture oxiranes, and since it reduces, surprisingly, during an oxidation reaction of an alkane with a hydrogen peroxide, the production of alcohol and of ketone in the presence of an olefin, this even taking account of the dilution factor. Consequently, the danger of precipitation of explosive peroxides is markedly less than that which would be theoretically expected and can consequently be managed with ease in a plant of industrial size.
One of the essential advantages of the advantageous variant lies in feeding a fluid containing at least 10% by volume of one or more alkane(s) into the reactor. The content of alkane(s) in this fluid may in certain cases be at least equal to 20% by volume, or even 30%. Fluids containing at least 50% by volume of alkane(s) may also be used. However, it is not recommended to use fluids containing more than 95% by volume of alkane(s), and it is even preferable to use fluids not containing more than 85% alkane(s).
The fluid usually contains more than 50% by volume of olefin, in particular at least 60% by volume and preferably at least 70% by volume. The amount of hydrogen introduced into the epoxidation reactor is usually less than 5% of the volume of the fluid, and is preferably equal to 0%. The amount of oxygen introduced into the epoxidation reactor is generally less than 10% of the volume of the fluid.
The alkane(s) contained in the fluid according to the present invention generally contain(s) from 3 to 10 carbon atoms and preferably 3 to 6 carbon atoms. Preferably, the alkane is linear and does not contain any aromatic substitutents in particular. When the olefin according to the invention is propylene, the alkane(s) consist(s) mainly of propane. Preferably, the alkane is not used as organic diluent for the epoxidation reaction and is different from the organic diluent.
The process according to the advantageous variant may be continuous or batchwise. If it is continuous, the fluid may be recycled into the reactor after the reaction between the olefin and the hydrogen peroxide.
In a first case of the advantageous variant of the process according to the invention, the process is continuous and the fluid fed into the reactor during the start of the process contains less than 10% by volume of alkane(s). During the process, the fluid is recycled into the reactor after the reaction between the olefin and the hydrogen peroxide such that the fluid recycled is gradually enriched with alkane. The alkane content in the fluid thus reaches a value of at least 10% by volume.
In a second case of the advantageous variant of the process according to the invention, this process is continuous or batchwise and the fluid fed into the reactor during the start of the process already contains at least 10% by volume of alkane(s).
Preferably, the fluid (comprising the olefin and the alkane(s)) which is fed into the reactor is a gas. In this case, one particular embodiment of the advantageous variant of the process according to the invention consists in introducing this gas into the reactor at a flow rate such that it not only entrains at least some of the oxirane produced, but also circulates the liquid phase in the reactor, in particular when this reactor is a reactor of loop type. In this case, the gas is generally introduced into the reactor at a flow rate such that the molar ratio of the flow rate of this gas to the feed rate of the peroxide compound is at least 5, in particular at least 8, values of at least 10 being common. The molar ratio of these flow rates is generally less than or equal to 100, in particular less than or equal to 60, values of less than or equal to 40, or even 20, being common.
In the advantageous variant of the process according to the invention, when it is performed continuously, preference is shown for an amount of hydrogen peroxide of greater than or equal to 0.03 mol per hour and per gram of zeolite and less than or equal to 0.25 mol per hour and per gram of zeolite.
In the advantageous variant of the process according to the invention, the aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution usually contains-not more than 70% by weight of peroxide compound, in particular 50% by weight.
The invention also relates to a process for manufacturing an oxirane, according to which an olefin is reacted, in a reactor in the liquid phase, with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of a catalyst and an organic diluent, in which the reactor is fed with hydrogen peroxide and with organic diluent, as well as with a fluid comprising the olefin and at least 10% by volume of alkane(s).
This other process of the invention corresponds to the advantageous variant disclosed above when it is performed as such without being combined with the first process of the invention which uses an aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution obtained by extraction, using substantially pure water, of the mixture derived from the oxidation of at least one alkylanthrahydroquinone, without subsequent washing and/or purification treatment.
The conditions under which this other process may be performed are identical to those of the first process except for the use of a crude hydrogen peroxide solution.
A continuous reactor containing 5.25 g of TS-1 is maintained at 35° C. and at atmospheric pressure and fed with 0.57 mol of H2O2/h, introduced in the form of an aqueous 40 wt % solution, with 4.75 mol of methanol/h and with 250 Nl/l (i.e. 11.2 mol/h) of propylene. The liquid and gaseous phases leaving are analysed to determine the proportions of the various organic products and also the degree of conversion of the H2O2.
The table below summarizes the results obtained after the tests, starting with a fresh TS-1 catalyst prepared according to the procedures known in the literature.
Degree of conversion of the
H2O2 after running for 2 h
Degree of conversion of the
H2O2 after running for 6 h
Selectivity* after 6 h
*the selectivity is expressed by the ration mol/mol PO (propylene oxide) formed/total of organic products formed.
As is known, a gradual loss of activity of the catalyst is observed, which is not affected by the quality of H2O2 used. Only the selectivity is favourably influenced in the presence of the crude H2O2.
The respective contents of anions and cations in these H2O2 solutions should be noted:
Content in mg/l
Other cations (except H+)
Phosphates expressed as P
The table below summarizes tests that are identical in all respects to Example 1 and Example 2C, during a following cycle after regeneration of the catalyst. This regeneration is obtained by passing air heated to 300° C. over the catalyst for 7 h.
Degree of conversion of the
H2O2 after running for 2 h
Degree of conversion of the
H2O2 after running for 6 h
Selectivity** after 6 h
It is confirmed that the activities have, to within the accuracy of the measurements, remained identical and that the difference in selectivity is maintained.
An H2O2 synthesis solution obtained after oxidizing a quinones/hydroquinones shuttle was extracted using a methanol/water mixture containing 52% by weight of methanol. This aqueous extract was then used in a propylene epoxidation test (Example 5C) and the performance qualities obtained were compared with those of a similar test carried out with crude H2O2 at 40% by weight in water, obtained from the extraction of the same shuttle with substantially pure water (Example 6). This shuttle contains 11.8 g/kg of H2O2.
The extraction with the water/alcohol mixture was carried out in 4 steps:
A first extraction was carried out by treating 14 331 g of shuttle (containing 169.1 g of H2O2 in total) with 1511 g of the methanol/water mixture. The methanol/water phase is denser than the starting organic solution and separates out relatively quickly (in about 15 min) to give 1085 g of extract. Its H2O2 concentration, determined by iodometry, is equal to 3.18 mol H2O2/kg, which corresponds to 3.45 mol or 117.4 g of H2O2 (=69% of the total present).
A second extraction was carried out with 1522 g of the same methanol/water mixture. The separation is less sharp. The separation of the phases is fairly slow: more than 1 h is required to be able to separate the phases. In contrast with the first extraction, the methanol/water phase is less dense this time and consists of 1215 g of extract. Its H2O2 concentration is equal to 0.833 mol/kg, which is equivalent to 1.012 mol or 34.4 g of H2O2. 90% of the total H2O2 are thus recovered in two extractions.
A third extraction was carried out with 1511 g of the same methanol/water mixture. The same separation difficulty was encountered, with recovery of about 1446 g of methanol/water phase. Its H2O2 concentration is equal to 0.244 mol/kg, which is equivalent to 0.353 mol or 12.0 g of H2O2 (i.e. 96.9% of the total H2O2 in 3 extractions)
Finally, a fourth extraction was carried out with 1517 g of the same methanol/water mixture. The same separation difficulty was encountered, with recovery of about 1497 g of methanol/water phase. Its H2O2 concentration is equal to 0.071 mol/kg, which is equivalent to 0.106 mol or 3.6 g of H2O2 (i.e. 99.0% of the total H2O2 in 4 extractions).
The 4 extracts were then mixed together, to give a methanol/water solution containing 0.94 mol H2O2/kg (effectively confirmed by titration) The methanol content determined by GC is in the region of 437 g/kg.
The content of “useful” quinones (=which may be used to produce H2O2) lost in this phase is 0.020 g/kg of extract.
There has moreover clearly been passage of some of the methanol into the quinone shuttle, as demonstrated by the differences between the weights of the methanol/water mixtures used and those of the collected extracts (in particular for the first and second extractions). The methanol content of the quinone shuttle, determined by GC, is effectively in the region of 6.0% by weight.
The propylene (Pe) epoxidation tests were carried out in a plant of bubble siphon type under the following conditions: T: 55° C.; flow rate of Pe: 75 Nl/h; H2O2: 0.17 mol H2O2/h; concentration of H2O2 in the zero-conversion loop: 1.0 mol/kg; catalyst: 0.53 g of TS-1.
As regards Example 5, the introduction of the mixture alone of the four methanol/water extracts containing H2O2 into the bubble siphon plant would lead, following stripping, to a methanol-poor medium (conc. <440 g/kg). Consequently, additional methanol was added so as to keep its concentration in the loop at ≈440 g/kg, which corresponds to the methanol content of the reference test with crude H2O2 (Example 6).
The results obtained are given in the table below:
Degree of conversion of the H2O2 (%)
Propylene oxide was manufactured in a bubble siphon reactor as disclosed in patent application WO 99/48883, by reaction between propylene and hydrogen peroxide in the presence of methanol and of catalyst TS-1 used in the form of beads 0.5 mm in diameter.
The tests were carried out at a temperature of 55° C., with a continuous feed of hydrogen peroxide at a flow rate of 0.17 mol/h. The total flow rate of gas is 75 Nl/h (i.e. 3.3 mol/h). The initial H2O2 concentration in the zero-conversion loop was 1.5 mol/kg. The amount of catalyst used was 4.5 g of beads containing 1.5 g of TS-1.
In Example 1, a mixture containing 75% “polymer-grade” propylene (98% propylene and 0.3% propane) and 25% propane (molar %) was used; in Example 2, 100% “polymer grade” propylene was used, and in Example 3, a mixture containing 75% “polymer grade” propylene and 25% nitrogen was used.
The results obtained are given in the table below.
The selectivity towards propylene oxide is given by the molar ratio, expressed as a percentage, between the amount of propylene oxide obtained divided by the sum of all the C3 organic products formed.
Degree of conversion
of H2O2 (%)
The isopropanol production measured after 5 h is 0.007 mmol/h for Example 1. There is no detectable trace of isopropanol in Tests 2 and 3.
A test under conditions identical to those of Examples 7 to 9 above was carried out with pure propane. The isopropanol production measured after 5 h is 0.11 mmol/h, i.e. a factor of 16 relative to Example 1. There is also formation of 0.04 mmol/h of acetone. The H2O2 conversion is very low, i.e. 1% after 5 h.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6518441||Jun 5, 1998||Feb 11, 2003||Basf Aktiengesellschaft||Method for oxidizing an organic compound containing at least one C-C double bond|
|DE19623611A1||Jun 13, 1996||Dec 18, 1997||Basf Ag||Verfahren zur Herstellung von Epoxiden aus Olefinen und Wasserstoffperoxid|
|EP0526945A1||Jul 30, 1992||Feb 10, 1993||ENIRICERCHE S.p.A.||Process for producing olefin oxides|
|EP0549013A1||Nov 24, 1992||Jun 30, 1993||ENIRICERCHE S.p.A.||Process for oxidizing organic compounds with hydrogen peroxide produced in an anthraquinone redox process|
|EP0709339A1||Sep 28, 1995||May 1, 1996||ARCO Chemical Technology, L.P.||Hydrogen peroxide process, integrated process for epoxidation and novel alkylammonium salts of sulfonic acid-substituted anthrahydroquinone and anthraquinone|
|EP0819683A1||Jul 4, 1997||Jan 21, 1998||ENICHEM S.p.A.||Process for the preparation of epoxides from olefins|
|WO1999014208A1||Sep 10, 1998||Mar 25, 1999||Dominique Balthasart||Method for making an oxirane|
|WO1999048883A1||Mar 20, 1999||Sep 30, 1999||Catinat Jean Pierre||Method for making an oxirane|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7205419 *||Sep 15, 2004||Apr 17, 2007||Solvay (Société Anonyme)||Process for manufacturing an oxirane|
|US7320779||Mar 7, 2007||Jan 22, 2008||Solvay (Societe Anonyme)||Process for manufacturing an oxirane|
|US7722847||Sep 24, 2003||May 25, 2010||Evonik Degussa Gmbh||Aqueous hydrogen peroxide solutions and method of making same|
|US7981391||Aug 14, 2009||Jul 19, 2011||Evonik Degussa Gmbh||Aqueous hydrogen peroxide solutions and method of making same|
|US8134018||Jan 9, 2006||Mar 13, 2012||Basf Se||Process for the epoxidation of an olefin with improved energy balance|
|US8481765||Dec 16, 2008||Jul 9, 2013||Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc.||Method for the production of epichlorohydrin|
|US8729282||Jul 9, 2009||May 20, 2014||Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc.||Process for the manufacture of a 1,2-epoxide|
|US8735614||Jan 25, 2012||May 27, 2014||Solvay Sa||Process for the manufacture of 1,2-epoxy-3-chloropropane|
|US8796478||Jan 25, 2012||Aug 5, 2014||Solvay Sa||Process for the manufacture of 1,2-epoxy-3-chloropropane|
|US8802873||Jul 9, 2009||Aug 12, 2014||Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc.||Process for the manufacture of epichlorohydrin|
|US8859790||Jan 26, 2011||Oct 14, 2014||Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc.||Process for the manufacture of a 1,2-epoxide and a device for carrying out said process|
|US9102640||Feb 19, 2014||Aug 11, 2015||Evonik Degussa Gmbh||Process for the manufacture of a 1,2-epoxide and a device for carrying out said process|
|US20040101462 *||Sep 24, 2003||May 27, 2004||Thomas Haas||Aqueous hydrogen peroxide solutions and method of making same|
|US20050054864 *||Sep 15, 2004||Mar 10, 2005||Solvay (Societe Anonyme)||Process for manufacturing an oxirane|
|U.S. Classification||549/531, 549/523|
|International Classification||C07D303/04, C07D301/12|
|Dec 19, 2002||AS||Assignment|
|Aug 8, 2006||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Apr 25, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jun 25, 2012||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Nov 9, 2012||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Jan 1, 2013||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20121109