|Publication number||US6879246 B2|
|Application number||US 09/853,890|
|Publication date||Apr 12, 2005|
|Filing date||May 11, 2001|
|Priority date||May 12, 2000|
|Also published as||DE60125088D1, DE60125088T2, EP1154368A1, EP1154368B1, US20020021207|
|Publication number||09853890, 853890, US 6879246 B2, US 6879246B2, US-B2-6879246, US6879246 B2, US6879246B2|
|Original Assignee||Stmicroelectronics S.A.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (101), Non-Patent Citations (18), Referenced by (10), Classifications (9), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to systems using electromagnetic transponders, that is, transceivers (generally mobile) capable of being interrogated in a contactless and wireless manner by a unit (generally fixed), called a read and/or write terminal. Generally, transponders extract the power supply required by the electronic circuits included therein from the high frequency field radiated by an antenna of the read and write terminal.
The present invention more specifically relates to systems in which several transponders are likely to receive, at the same time, the field radiated by a same read terminal. This regards, in particular, transponder readers provided with no means for isolating a transponder, for example, by introducing said transponder into a slot or the like.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
In such systems, the reader must be able to exhaustively determine the number of transponders present in its field as well as, according to the applications, the number of transponders with which it must simultaneously communicate.
Generally, terminal 1 is essentially formed of a series oscillating circuit formed of an inductance L1 in series with a capacitor C1 and a resistor R1. This series oscillating circuit is controlled by a device 2 that may include, among other things, an amplifier or antenna coupler, a circuit for controlling and exploiting the received data especially provided with a modulator/demodulator and with a microprocessor for processing the control signals and the data. Circuit 2 generally communicates with different input/output circuits (keyboard, screen, means of transmission to a server, etc.) and/or processing circuits, not shown. The circuits of the read/write terminal draw the power required by their operation from a supply circuit (not shown) connected, for example, to the electric supply system.
A transponder 10, intended for cooperating with a terminal 1, essentially includes a parallel oscillating circuit formed of an inductance L2, in parallel with a capacitor C2 between two input terminals 11, 12 of a control and processing circuit 13. Terminals 11, 12 are in practice connected to the input of a rectifying means (not shown), the outputs of which form D.C. supply terminals of the circuits internal to the transponder. These circuits generally include, essentially, a microprocessor, a memory, a demodulator of the signals that may be received from terminal 1, and a modulator for transmitting the data to the terminal.
The oscillating circuits of the terminal and of the transponder are generally tuned on a same frequency corresponding to the frequency of an excitation signal of the terminal's oscillating circuit. This high-frequency signal (for example, at 13.56 MHz) is not only used as a transmission carrier but also as a remote supply carrier for the transponders located in the terminal's field. When a transponder 10 is located in the field of a terminal 1, a high-frequency voltage is generated across terminals 11 and 12 of its resonant circuit. This voltage, after being rectified and possibly clipped, provides the supply voltage of electronic circuits 13 of the transponder.
The high-frequency carrier transmitted by the terminal is generally amplitude-modulated by said terminal according to different coding techniques to transmit data and/or control signals to one or several transponders in the field. In return, the data transmission from the transponder to a terminal is generally performed by modulating the load formed by resonant circuit L2, C2. This load variation occurs at the rate of a sub-carrier having a frequency (for example, 847.5 kHz) smaller than that of the carrier. This load variation can then be detected by the terminal in the form of an amplitude variation or of a phase variation by means, for example, of a measurement of the voltage across capacitor C1 or of the current in the oscillating circuit.
When idle, that is, when no transponder is present in its field, a terminal 1 periodically transmits a modulated data message on the high-frequency signal. This message is a request message intended for possible transponders. This request or general call, is part of a process needed for the initialization of a communication between a transponder and a terminal.
A difficulty in establishing a communication towards one or several transponders is due to the fact that several electromagnetic transponders can simultaneously be present in the terminal's field. The latter must thus be capable of determining not only the number of transponders present in its field, but also those of the transponders that correspond to the application for which it is intended and with which it must communicate.
This constraint requires a loop operation of the terminal control program until all the transponders present in its field have been properly identified.
As soon as it is powered on and in operation, a transponder read/write terminal 1 begins (block 20, ST), after a starting, set, and test phase, a stand-by procedure during which it waits for a communication with at least one transponder to be established. This procedure essentially consists of periodically sending (block 21) a request sequence (REQ) to the possible transponder(s) present in the terminal's field. After each sending of an interrogation request 21, the reader monitors (block 22) the reception by its demodulator of an acknowledgement message (ATQ) coming from a transponder having entered its field. In the absence of an acknowledgement, the reader loops on the sending of a request 21. When it receives an acknowledgement ATQ, it then switches to a mode of checking whether the transponder really is a transponder intended for it, as well as to a possible anti-collision mode (block 23) to individualize several transponders in the field. Indeed, as a response to an interrogation request by a terminal, if several transponders are present in the field thereof, they may respond at the same time or with a sufficiently low time interval to make the result of the demodulation by the reader unexploitable. Said reader must then either select a transponder with which it wishes to communicate, or assign different channels to the different transponders.
A communication only starts when the initialization and anti-collision process illustrated in
An initialization and anti-collision process of the type briefly described hereabove in relation with
The implementation of the method illustrated in
Indeed, the duration preceding the establishing of a communication between a read/write terminal and one or several transponders is a critical parameter in the use of such transponder systems. A transponder is often formed by a badge or by a contactless card handled by a user. If said user does not obtain an almost immediate communication with the reader, he will have a tendency to modify the position of his card or to believe that the system does not operate. It is considered that beyond a period of 100 milliseconds, the duration of establishment of a communication for a reliable operation with a transponder is too high.
Now, as discussed hereabove, this duration depends on the number of recognition loops to be performed by the reader before the communication is established to determine the number of transponders present in its field. This number of loops essentially depends on the number of transponders to be isolated.
Up to now, this number can only be determined by implementing statistic computations and probability algorithms tending to minimize the number of loops along the transponder detection.
The present invention aims at reducing the time required to initialize and establish communications between a read/write terminal of electromagnetic transponders and one or several transponders having entered its field, that is, to reduce the duration required by the read/write terminal to determine and identify all the transponders present at a given time in its field.
The present invention more specifically aims at providing a solution that enables reducing the number of request loops performed by this terminal.
The present invention also aims at optimizing the dynamic adaptation of the number of transponders to be detected taken into account in conventional anti-collision processes.
The present invention further aims at providing a solution which does not require using the detection results of the terminal's demodulator.
To achieve these and other objects, the present invention provides a terminal for generating a high-frequency electromagnetic field by means of an oscillating circuit, adapted to cooperating with at least one transponder when said transponder enters this field, and including means for regulating the signal phase in the oscillating circuit with respect to a reference value and means for evaluating, based on a measurement of the current in the oscillating circuit, the minimum number of transponders present in the field.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the terminal further includes means for, based on a measurement of the voltage across a capacitive element of the oscillating circuit, evaluating the maximum number of transponders present in the terminal's field.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the terminal includes means for determining and storing characteristic information relative to the voltages across the capacitive element of its oscillating circuit and to the currents in this oscillating circuit, in several determined configurations of the distance separating one or several transponders from the terminal, and for taking these characteristic information into account in evaluating the number of transponders.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, said characteristic information includes, among others, the voltage across the capacitive element when no transponder is present in the field of the terminal, the voltage across the capacitive element when a transponder is in a relation of maximum closeness with the terminal, the current in the oscillating circuit when no transponder is present in the terminal's field, and the current in the oscillating circuit when a transponder is in a relation of maximum closeness with the terminal.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the evaluation of the number of cards is performed without interpreting possible data messages carried by the high-frequency field.
The present invention also provides a method for establishing at least one communication between high-frequency magnetic field generation terminal and an electromagnetic transponder, including periodically sending a request sequence until at least one transponder entering the field sends an acknowledgement, and of evaluating, based on a measurement of the current in an oscillating circuit of the terminal, a minimum number of transponders likely to be present in the field.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, said evaluation includes comparing the measured current with previously calculated and stored values corresponding to evaluations of the maximum current for several minimum numbers of transponders.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the method further includes, based on the evaluation of the minimum number and on a measurement of the present voltage across a capacitive element of the oscillating circuit, evaluating a maximum number of transponders likely to be present in the terminal's field.
The foregoing objects, features and advantages of the present invention, will be discussed in detail in the following non-limiting description of specific embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The same elements have been referred to with the same references in the different drawings. For clarity, the characteristics of
A feature of the present invention is to provide an evaluation of the number of cards present in the field of a read/write terminal based on physical measurements performed on the terminal's oscillating circuit. More specifically, according to the present invention, the number of cards in the terminal's field is evaluated by comparing the values of the current in the terminal's oscillating circuit and the voltage across the capacitor of this oscillating circuit, with values measured and/or stored in a learning phase preceding the putting into service of the terminal.
The evaluation of this number of transponders considerably reduces the number of loops of the communication initialization or anti-collision process (FIG. 2). Indeed, even if a method dynamically adapting the number based on measurements is used, the initial number taken into account is refined as compared to a conventional implementation. According to the present invention, the evaluation of the number of cards is performed (upstream of the demodulator) without requiring to exploit the received data signal (that is, downstream of the terminal's demodulator). The present invention provides evaluating this number based on the sole current and voltage electric determinations and on calculations of these variables.
To obtain the information relative to the number of transponders or cards, one could think that it is enough to measure the load variation formed by an increase of the number of transponders in the terminal's field on the oscillating circuit thereof. However, such a measurement is unexploitable in practice, since such a variation is not linear according to the number of cards present in the field. Further, the load formed by a transponder on the oscillating circuit depends on the distance separating this transponder from the terminal. Now, the variation range, evaluated across the capacitor of the terminal's oscillating circuit (capacitor C1,
In particular, in most conventional terminals, the tuning of the resonance frequency to the carrier frequency is performed manually by means of a variable capacitor, once the terminal has been made. The tuning requires adjusting, especially due to the manufacturing tolerances of the capacitive and inductive elements, to guarantee the phase operating point chosen between a reference signal provided by an oscillator of the terminal and the received signal, sampled, for example, across capacitor C1. A detuning of the terminal's oscillating circuit has several consequences and, in particular, that of modifying the signal amplitude in this oscillating circuit and, accordingly, the available amplitude of the signal for a possible evaluation.
Thus, another feature of the present invention is to provide a regulation of the phase of the terminal's oscillating circuit with respect to a reference value. According to the present invention, this phase regulation is performed by means of a loop having a response time chosen for the loop to be sufficiently slow to avoid disturbing the possible back-modulation coming from a transponder, and sufficiently fast as compared to the passing speed of a transponder in the terminal's field. This can be called a static regulation with respect to the modulation frequencies (for example, the 13.56-MHz remote supply carrier frequency and the 847.5 kHz back-modulation frequency used in the data transmission from the transponder to the terminal).
Conventionally, terminal 30 includes an oscillating circuit formed of an inductance or antenna L1, in series with a capacitive element 31 and a resistive element R1, between an output terminal 32 of an amplifier or antenna coupler 33 and a terminal 34 at a reference potential (generally, the ground). An element 35 for measuring the current in the oscillating circuit is interposed, for example, between capacitive element 31 and ground 34. Measurement element 35 belongs to the phase regulation loop which will be described hereafter. Amplifier 33 receives a high-frequency transmission signal E, coming from a modulator 36 (MOD) that receives a reference frequency (signal OSC) for example, from a quartz oscillator (not shown). Modulator 36 receives, if necessary, a signal Tx of data to be transmitted and, in the absence of any data transmission from the terminal, provides the high-frequency carrier (for example, at 13.56 MHz) adapted to remotely supplying a transponder. Capacitive element 31 is a variable-capacitance element controllable by a signal CTRL.
In terminal 30, a phase regulation of the current in antenna L1 is performed with respect to a reference signal. This regulation is a regulation of the high-frequency signal, that is, of the carrier signal corresponding to signal E in the absence of data to be transmitted. This regulation is performed by varying the capacitance of the oscillating circuit of terminal 30 to maintain the current in the antenna in a constant phase relation with the reference signal which corresponds, for example, to signal OSC provided by the modulator's oscillator. Signal CTRL originates from a circuit 37 (COMP) having the function of detecting the phase interval with respect to the reference signal and accordingly modifying the capacitance of element 31. The phase measurement is performed from a measurement of current I in the circuit by means of current transformer 35 connected in series with element 31. This transformer generally is formed of a primary winding 35′ between element 31 and ground terminal 34, and of a secondary winding 35″, a first terminal of which is directly connected to ground 34 and a second terminal of which provides a signal MES providing the result of the measurement, a current-to-voltage conversion resistor R35 being connected in parallel with secondary winding 35″. The result of measurement MES is sent to comparator 37, which accordingly controls capacitive element 31 by means of signal CTRL.
According to a preferred embodiment such as illustrated in
The practical implementation of the phase regulation loop is within the abilities of those skilled in the art, using conventional means and based on the functional indications given hereabove. As an alternative to the current transformer of
By regulating the phase of the terminal's oscillating circuit on a reference value, not only the possible problems of sizing tolerances of the oscillating circuit components and of the drifts of these components in operation are overcome, but it becomes also possible to perform reliable measurements relative to the magnetic coupling between the terminal's oscillating circuit and that of one or several transponders.
Due to the use of a phase regulation loop, current and voltage measurements in the terminal's oscillating circuit can now be exploited to deduce therefrom, according to the present invention, information relative to the number of transponders or cards present in the field. This information especially takes into account the coupling between each of the cards and the terminal, that is, the coupling coefficient between the two interacting oscillating circuits. This coupling coefficient essentially depends on the distance separating the transponder from the terminal. It should be noted that the coupling coefficient between the oscillating circuits of a transponder and of the terminal always ranges between 0 and 1, and that the distance separating the antennas of the oscillating circuits is, as a first approximation, proportional to 1-k. Accordingly, in the following description, reference will be made either to the distance or to the coupling coefficient.
The present invention originates from an interpretation of different relations between the electric variables measured by the terminal in different operating configurations with one or several transponders.
In particular, current I in the series oscillating circuit of the terminal (for example, measured by transformer 23) is linked to the so-called generator voltage (called Vg) exciting the oscillating circuit and to apparent impedance Z1app of the oscillating circuit, by the following relation:
Further, the fact of regulating the phase of the oscillating circuit on a reference value provides that the distance variation of a transponder entering the terminal's field only translates as a modification of the real part of the impedance of this oscillating circuit. Indeed, all the variations which would tend to modify, statically as compared to the modulation frequencies, the imaginary part by the load formed of the transponder (or the transponders) are compensated for by the phase regulation loop. Thus, it is ensured that, in static operation, the imaginary part of impedance Z1app is null. Accordingly, impedance Z1app becomes equal to apparent resistance R1app and can be expressed as:
where ω represents the pulse, X2 represents the imaginary part of the impedance of the transponder's oscillating circuit (X2=ωL2−1/ωC2), and where R2 represents the load formed by the transponder's components on its own oscillating circuit, modeled in
Formulas 2 and 3 hereabove have been established in the case where a single transponder is present in the terminal's field. If, however, several transponders are present in this field, their respective contributions to the apparent impedance (more specifically, to the apparent resistance) on the terminal side should be added. Accordingly, for n transponders present in the terminal's field, one may write:
Considering that the transponders are of the same type, that is, have substantially similar characteristics, which is a realistic approximation, above formula 4 becomes:
The only term which is then variable is that depending on the coupling between oscillating circuits, and thus on the distance between each transponder and the terminal.
For n cards having different coupling coefficients k1, one may write:
As a first approximation, it may be considered that, as seen from the terminal, everything occurs as if it saw n transponders having the same coupling coefficient corresponding to an average coupling coefficient. Accordingly, an average coupling coefficient per card can be defined as being given by the following relation:
It should be noted that this amounts to defining a coefficient aav by the following relation:
It can be considered that, for n cards or transponders present in the terminal's field, current I measured by its intensity transformer depends on the number of cards and on their respective coupling coefficient expressed as a function of an average coupling coefficient as follows:
Intuitively, it can be seen that if all transponders have the same coupling coefficient with the terminal, that is, if they all are at the same distance, current I decreases with an increase of the number of transponders present in the field. Similarly, for the same current measured in the terminal's oscillating circuit, a decrease in the coupling coefficient of each transponder implies an increase in the number of transponders in the field. In other words, the product of the number of transponders by the square of the average coupling coefficient per transponder can be considered as being constant.
Among the electric variable measurements that can easily be performed on the read/write terminal side, the present invention provides using the off-load and maximum coupling values corresponding to the following cases.
The off-load values represent the current and the voltage when no transponder is present in the terminal's field. In this off-load operation, the apparent impedance Z1 off-load of the terminal's oscillating circuit now only depends on components R1, L1, and C1 of the terminal. Further, since, due to the phase regulation, the imaginary part of this impedance is always null, one may write:
Another operating condition that can easily be determined corresponds to maximum coupling kmax. In this condition, that is, in a relation of minimum distance between a transponder and the terminal (for example, the transponder being laid on the terminal as close as possible to antenna L1), the measurement of current Imax in the terminal's oscillating circuit can be performed while a transponder of the concerned family or type is laid on the terminal.
Assuming that, in above formula 10, only values Vg, n, and kav are likely to vary for a given terminal and a given family of transponders, and writing this relation, at maximum coupling, for one card and for n cards, the following can be deduced:
with Imax(1) and Imax(n) representing the currents at the maximum coupling respectively for 1 and n cards.
By combining formulas 11 and 12, the following relation is obtained:
Now, the off-load and maximum coupling currents for a card can be measured in a learning phase of the reader by using a sample card for the current at maximum coupling Imax(1). Accordingly, the reader is able to calculate the different values of the current at maximum coupling for 2, 3, 4, etc. cards, the maximum number of calculated values being linked to the application and to the maximum number of cards estimated to be likely to be found in the reader's field.
As illustrated by the family of curves of
Accordingly, by measuring, upon operation of the reader, the current in its oscillating circuit, the minimum number of cards in the field can be determined by comparing this measured current with the different values calculated during the learning phase. It should be noted that, regarding the curves of
At the beginning (block 50, ST), the reader is turned on and configured by means of its internal computer for a learning phase. Voltage VC1 and current I at the maximum coupling for a card are measured (block 51). This measurement is performed by using a sample card which is placed at a minimum distance from the terminal, ideally at a null distance. Current Imax(1) is for example measured by an intensity transformer (35,
In a second step (block 52), the off-load voltage and current VC1 off-load and Ioff-load are measured and stored. These measurements are performed as no card is present in the terminal's field. Of course, the order of the measurements between the off-load operation and the maximum coupling is arbitrary. The off-load measurements (which are independent from the family or type of cards meant to operate with the terminal) may even be performed independently from the maximum coupling measurements (which can be renewed, for example, to change the type of cards intended for operating with the terminal).
Based on the current values measured at blocks 51 and 52, the computer means of the reader calculate (block 53) a set of current values corresponding to the maximum coupling for several cards. These values of Imax(n>1) correspond to those illustrated in
The learning phase is then over (block 54, E) and the reader is able to determine, each time one or several transponders will appear in its field, the minimum number of transponders. This number will enable adapting the request procedures and, more specifically, adapting the number of anti-collision steps to be implemented upon initialization of a transmission.
According to this simplified embodiment, after the end (block 54,
As soon as the reader has detected the possible presence of a transponder, it starts a determination phase such as illustrated in FIG. 6. After a step (block 60, ST) of program initialization, the current value I of the current in the reader's oscillating circuit is measured (block 61). Then, based on the values previously calculated in the learning phase, the minimum number nmin of transponders present in the terminal's field is determined (block 62).
For example, if the measured current I is included between off-load current Ioff-load and the maximum current for one card Imax(1), two cases are possible. Either a single card is present in the reader's field and this card has a given coupling k (smaller than kmax). Or there are n cards in the reader's field, which all individually have couplings k smaller than coupling k of the first case.
If the measured current is included between two maximum current values for n and n+1 cards, it is certain to have at least n cards in the reader's field. There can however be more than n+1 cards if the average coupling per card is smaller than in the case where only n cards are present.
It is then possible to choose (block 63) a number nR of request cycles in the anti-collision process which is a function of this minimum number.
Based on this number, a conventional anti-collision process (block 64 illustrating the initialization INIT of a transmission) is then applied.
A first advantage that then appears with the simplified embodiment of the present invention such as described hereabove is that by knowing the minimum number of cards, the number of anti-collision requests can already be adjusted and time is already saved with respect to the conventional process.
According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, after starting block 70 (ST), not only current I in the oscillating circuit, but also voltage VC1 across the capacitor of this circuit are measured (block 71).
Minimum number nmin is then determined (block 72) as in the simplified process (block 62, FIG. 6).
According to the preferred embodiment of
The calculation of these theoretical values is performed as follows.
Due to the phase regulation loop provided on the reader side, the theoretical voltage across the capacitive element of the reader can be calculated for each minimum number of cards, and the maximum number of cards present in the field can be deduced therefrom.
Indeed, it is known that imaginary part X1 app of apparent impedance Z1 app can be expressed as:
X1app =X1−a 2 X2, (formula 14)
Now, due to the static phase regulation, this imaginary part X1 app is null. Accordingly:
X1=a 2 .X2. (formula 16)
Based on these relations, the difference between the current and off-load values can be expressed as follows:
X1−X1off-load =a 2 .X2−a off-load 2 X2. (formula 17)
Now, coefficient aoff-load is null since the off-load coupling is null. Further, voltage VC1 across element 31 (neglecting the influence of current transformer 35) can be written as I/ωC1, current I being, for example, measured by transformer 35. As a result, above formula 17 can be written as:
By applying formula 17 to the current value and to the maximum coupling, and by transferring these applications in formula 18, one may write, for one card:
Now, applying formula 3 to the above formula provides:
Thus, ratio k/kmax between the present and maximum coupling coefficients can be expressed, when a single transponder is present in the terminal's field, as:
By applying formula 18 to maximum coupling kmax and by expressing, based on formulas 1 and 2, the difference between the apparent impedances at the maximum coupling and off-load, one may write, having combined the expressions obtained for coefficient amax 2:
is constant and the above formula 22 can apply to any value of current I and of voltage VC1 (replacing the values at the maximum coupling).
Accordingly, the current voltage VC1 can be expressed as:
where constant K2 is equal to:
This constant can be calculated and stored during the learning phase based on the measured values (blocks 51 and 52, FIG. 5).
Equation 23 hereabove remains valid for several cards present in the terminal's field. Accordingly, based on the present measurement of the current (block 71,
It is then possible to compare (block 74,
If the measured voltage is smaller than or equal to the theoretical value calculated for number nmin, this means that the number of cards present in the field is equal to the minimum number. In this case, number nR of request sequences of the anti-collision process is chosen (block 75) based on this number nmin, which is known to now correspond to the exact number of transponders.
If the measured value is greater than the theoretical value, this means that there are more than nmin cards in the terminal's field.
It is then proceeded to another calculation phase including determining, based on the voltage measurement, the maximum number of cards present in the field. For this purpose, the calculation of the voltage VC1 that should be obtained to correspond to the current I measured for an increasing number nmin+i is iteratively performed. Indeed, since the minimum number of cards has been determined based on the current measurement, and since it is known that the real number of cards does not correspond to this minimum number, the number of cards in the terminal's field is smaller than the maximum coupling coefficient. In the opposite case, the measured current would have provided a greater minimum number of cards.
As illustrated by the example of embodiment of
As illustrated by this drawing, the calculations (block 53,
The calculation (block 73) of the theoretical voltage value, for the minimum number of cards obtained at value I of the measured current, determines an intersection point which, in the example shown in
The calculation performed at block 77 of
After having calculated a first value VC1 (I,3) for a unity increment i, the obtained value is compared with the measured value VC1 (block 78). As long as measured value VC1 is not greater than the calculated value, increment i is increased (block 79) and the calculation is resumed for a greater number of cards (value VC1(I,4)). In the example of
Afterwards, whether the number of requests has been determined by block 75 or by block 80, a conventional request process is performed while taking this number into account (block 90).
It should be noted that, although the representation of
The calculation of value VC1(I, nmin+i) is performed based on the following formula:
which is deduced from the application of formula 21 to an average coupling coefficient per card in the area of the minimum number, considering that, for a given measured current, the average coupling coefficient is given by the following relation:
where k(I,th,nmin) designates the average coupling coefficient per card corresponding to value nmin.
An advantage of the present invention is that it is now possible to determine at least the minimum number of transponders present in the field.
In the preferred embodiment illustrated hereabove, even the exact number or, at least a maximum number of transponders present in the field is determined. Knowing these numbers enables adapting the initialization algorithms of a communication when at least one transponder acknowledges an interrogation request transmitted by a terminal.
The fact of knowing a priori the number of cards in the reader's field enables evaluating the optimal number of request phases. The exchange time dedicated to the anti-collision protocol that must enable either selecting a card from among several cards presented at the same time in front of the reader, or identifying the cards in the reader's field, or allowing a selection sequencing of the different cards with which the reader must communicate, can thus be optimally reduced.
The adaptation of the foreseeable number of cards in the reader's field is performed, according to the present invention, as soon as a transponder acknowledges a request from the terminal. Initially, it can be provided to arbitrarily or conventionally set this number if a predetermined number is required to implement the interrogation process.
As soon as the reader detects the presence of a transponder, it performs the procedure of determination of the number of transponders by using the data calculated during the learning. By implementing the present invention, it is now no longer necessary to provide a dynamic adaptation of this number of requests outside of the bracket of the minimum number and of the maximum number determined by the method of the present invention. For the rest, a conventional interrogation, anti-collision and initialization process can be used.
It should be noted that number nR of requests does not necessarily correspond to the maximum or exact number determined by the present invention, but is a function of this number (for example, product or quotient by a predetermined coefficient, sum or subtraction of a predetermined number).
Of course, the present invention is likely to have various alterations, modifications, and improvements which will readily occur to those skilled in the art. In particular, the practical implementation of the present invention based on the functional indications given hereabove is within the abilities of those skilled in the art. It should only be noted that they will generally resort to usual techniques of programming of digital processing circuits present in transponder read/write terminals. Thus, since the present invention essentially implements calculation processes, it may be used with minor modifications of a conventional terminal mostly including arranging current and voltage information in the terminal's oscillating circuit.
Among the applications of the present invention are contactless chip cards (for example, identification cards for access control, electronic purse cards, cards for storing information about the card holder, consumer fidelity cards, toll television cards, etc.) and read or read/write systems for these cards (for example, access control terminals or porticoes, automatic dispensers, computer terminals, telephone terminals, televisions or satellite decoders, etc.).
Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only and is not intended to be limiting. The present invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and the equivalents thereto.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2411555||Oct 14, 1942||Nov 26, 1946||Standard Telephones Cables Ltd||Electric wave filter|
|US3618089||Jan 29, 1969||Nov 2, 1971||Moran Instr Corp||Range and time measure system|
|US4068232||Feb 12, 1976||Jan 10, 1978||Fairchild Industries, Inc.||Passive encoding microwave transponder|
|US4209783||Mar 22, 1978||Jun 24, 1980||Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co., Ltd.||Object identification system|
|US4278977||May 4, 1979||Jul 14, 1981||Rca Corporation||Range determining system|
|US4375289||Aug 4, 1980||Mar 1, 1983||PRECITEC Gesellschaft fur Prazisionstechnik und Elektronik mbH & Co. Entwicklungs und Vertriebs-KG||Apparatus for monitoring a boundary line|
|US4408185||Nov 13, 1979||Oct 4, 1983||Elsmark A/S||Process for transferring information and system for carrying out the process|
|US4593412||May 21, 1984||Jun 3, 1986||Multi-Elmac Company||Integrated oscillator antenna for low power, low harmonic radiation|
|US4656472||Jan 23, 1985||Apr 7, 1987||Walton Charles A||Proximity identification system with power aided identifier|
|US4660192||Apr 11, 1985||Apr 21, 1987||Pomatto Sr Robert P||Simultaneous AM and FM transmitter and receiver|
|US4673932 *||Dec 29, 1983||Jun 16, 1987||Revlon, Inc.||Rapid inventory data acquistion system|
|US4706050||Sep 4, 1985||Nov 10, 1987||Smiths Industries Public Limited Company||Microstrip devices|
|US4782308||Mar 6, 1987||Nov 1, 1988||Iskra-Sozd Elektrokovinske Industrije N.Sol.O||Circuit arrangement of a reading device for electromagnetic identification cards|
|US4802080||Mar 18, 1988||Jan 31, 1989||American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Information Systems||Power transfer circuit including a sympathetic resonator|
|US4814595||Mar 28, 1988||Mar 21, 1989||Electo-Galil Ltd.||Electronic data communications system|
|US4827266||Feb 19, 1986||May 2, 1989||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Antenna with lumped reactive matching elements between radiator and groundplate|
|US4928108||Mar 7, 1989||May 22, 1990||Bsh Electronics, Ltd.||Electrical signal separating device having isolating and matching circuitry for split passband matching|
|US4963887||Aug 29, 1989||Oct 16, 1990||Yamatake-Honeywell Co., Ltd.||Full duplex transponder system|
|US5013898||Nov 3, 1987||May 7, 1991||Mars Incorporated||Data detection, power transfer and power regulation for data storage devices|
|US5055853||Oct 3, 1988||Oct 8, 1991||Garnier Robert C||Magnetic frill generator|
|US5084699||Aug 30, 1989||Jan 28, 1992||Trovan Limited||Impedance matching coil assembly for an inductively coupled transponder|
|US5099227||Dec 18, 1989||Mar 24, 1992||Indala Corporation||Proximity detecting apparatus|
|US5126749||Aug 25, 1989||Jun 30, 1992||Kaltner George W||Individually fed multiloop antennas for electronic security systems|
|US5142292||Aug 5, 1991||Aug 25, 1992||Checkpoint Systems, Inc.||Coplanar multiple loop antenna for electronic article surveillance systems|
|US5202644||Jun 11, 1959||Apr 13, 1993||Ail Systems, Inc.||Receiver apparatus|
|US5214409||Dec 3, 1991||May 25, 1993||Avid Corporation||Multi-memory electronic identification tag|
|US5305008||Sep 4, 1992||Apr 19, 1994||Integrated Silicon Design Pty. Ltd.||Transponder system|
|US5324315||Aug 12, 1993||Jun 28, 1994||Medtronic, Inc.||Closed-loop downlink telemetry and method for implantable medical device|
|US5452344||Nov 16, 1993||Sep 19, 1995||Datran Systems Corporation||Communication over power lines|
|US5493267||Feb 26, 1993||Feb 20, 1996||Aktiebolaget Electrolux||Arrangement for the transfer of control commands in an apparatus or a machine operated from the mains|
|US5504485||Jul 21, 1994||Apr 2, 1996||Amtech Corporation||System for preventing reading of undesired RF signals|
|US5519381||Nov 18, 1993||May 21, 1996||British Technology Group Limited||Detection of multiple articles|
|US5521602||Feb 10, 1994||May 28, 1996||Racom Systems, Inc.||Communications system utilizing FSK/PSK modulation techniques|
|US5541604||Sep 3, 1993||Jul 30, 1996||Texas Instruments Deutschland Gmbh||Transponders, Interrogators, systems and methods for elimination of interrogator synchronization requirement|
|US5550536||Aug 17, 1994||Aug 27, 1996||Texas Instruments Deutschland Gmbh||Circuit frequency following technique transponder resonant|
|US5604411||Mar 31, 1995||Feb 18, 1997||Philips Electronics North America Corporation||Electronic ballast having a triac dimming filter with preconditioner offset control|
|US5619529||Jul 11, 1995||Apr 8, 1997||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Non-contact IC card and non-contact IC card reader/writer|
|US5621411||Jun 20, 1996||Apr 15, 1997||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Positioning with RF-ID transponders|
|US5691605||Aug 9, 1995||Nov 25, 1997||Philips Electronics North America||Electronic ballast with interface circuitry for multiple dimming inputs|
|US5698837||Oct 6, 1995||Dec 16, 1997||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Method and system for identifying and communicating with a plurality of contactless IC cards|
|US5698838||Oct 4, 1995||Dec 16, 1997||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Non-contact IC card including antenna circuit with adjustable resonant frequency|
|US5701121||Dec 12, 1994||Dec 23, 1997||Uniscan Ltd.||Transducer and interrogator device|
|US5703573||Jan 11, 1996||Dec 30, 1997||Sony Chemicals Corp.||Transmitter-receiver for non-contact IC card system|
|US5767503||Aug 30, 1995||Jun 16, 1998||Gemplus||Method for the manufacture of contact-free cards|
|US5801372||Aug 1, 1997||Sep 1, 1998||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Non-contact IC card with antenna switching circuit|
|US5831257||Aug 1, 1997||Nov 3, 1998||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Non-contact IC card including phase-locked loop circuitry|
|US5850416||Sep 16, 1997||Dec 15, 1998||Lucent Technologies, Inc.||Wireless transmitter-receiver information device|
|US5874725||Aug 1, 1997||Feb 23, 1999||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Non-contact IC card with phase variation detector|
|US5883582||Feb 7, 1997||Mar 16, 1999||Checkpoint Systems, Inc.||Anticollision protocol for reading multiple RFID tags|
|US5889273||Sep 18, 1996||Mar 30, 1999||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Wireless communication data storing medium for receiving a plurality of carriers of proximate frequencies and a transmission/receiving method|
|US5905444||Nov 12, 1996||May 18, 1999||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Anti-theft system for a motor vehicle|
|US5955950||Jul 24, 1998||Sep 21, 1999||Checkpoint Systems, Inc.||Low noise signal generator for use with an RFID system|
|US6014088||Nov 29, 1996||Jan 11, 2000||Ronald Barend Van Santbrink||Method and system for contactless exchange of data between a read/write unit and one or more information carriers|
|US6025780||Jul 25, 1997||Feb 15, 2000||Checkpoint Systems, Inc.||RFID tags which are virtually activated and/or deactivated and apparatus and methods of using same in an electronic security system|
|US6028503||Nov 4, 1997||Feb 22, 2000||U.S. Philips Corporation||Contactless data transmission and receiving device with a synchronous demodulator|
|US6034640||Apr 1, 1998||Mar 7, 2000||Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.||Antenna device|
|US6070803||Feb 24, 1998||Jun 6, 2000||Stobbe; Anatoli||Reading device for a transponder|
|US6070804||Feb 25, 1998||Jun 6, 2000||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Non-contact IC card with monitor for source power|
|US6072383||Nov 4, 1998||Jun 6, 2000||Checkpoint Systems, Inc.||RFID tag having parallel resonant circuit for magnetically decoupling tag from its environment|
|US6075491||May 14, 1998||Jun 13, 2000||Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.||Chip antenna and mobile communication apparatus using same|
|US6100788||Dec 29, 1997||Aug 8, 2000||Storage Technology Corporation||Multifunctional electromagnetic transponder device and method for performing same|
|US6137411||Feb 11, 1997||Oct 24, 2000||Rso Corporation N.V.||Article surveillance system|
|US6150986||Aug 15, 1996||Nov 21, 2000||Alfa Laval Agri Ab||Antenna system comprising driver circuits for transponder|
|US6154635||Jun 19, 1996||Nov 28, 2000||Fujitsu Ten Limited||Antenna driving device for transponder|
|US6172608||Jun 18, 1997||Jan 9, 2001||Integrated Silicon Design Pty. Ltd.||Enhanced range transponder system|
|US6208235||Mar 5, 1998||Mar 27, 2001||Checkpoint Systems, Inc.||Apparatus for magnetically decoupling an RFID tag|
|US6229443||Jun 23, 2000||May 8, 2001||Single Chip Systems||Apparatus and method for detuning of RFID tag to regulate voltage|
|US6243013||Jan 8, 1999||Jun 5, 2001||Intermec Ip Corp.||Cascaded DC voltages of multiple antenna RF tag front-end circuits|
|US6265962||Jun 29, 2000||Jul 24, 2001||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method for resolving signal collisions between multiple RFID transponders in a field|
|US6272320||Jan 12, 1998||Aug 7, 2001||Em Microelectronic-Marin Sa||Base station for a contactless interrogation system comprising a phase locked and voltage controlled oscillator|
|US6272321||Sep 13, 1997||Aug 7, 2001||Temic Semiconductor Gmbh||Method for tuning an oscillating receiver circuit of a transponder built into a RFID system|
|US6281794||May 25, 1999||Aug 28, 2001||Intermec Ip Corp.||Radio frequency transponder with improved read distance|
|US6304169||Dec 30, 1997||Oct 16, 2001||C. W. Over Solutions, Inc.||Inductor-capacitor resonant circuits and improved methods of using same|
|US6307468||Jul 20, 1999||Oct 23, 2001||Avid Identification Systems, Inc.||Impedance matching network and multidimensional electromagnetic field coil for a transponder interrogator|
|US6307517||Jun 13, 2000||Oct 23, 2001||Applied Wireless Identifications Group, Inc.||Metal compensated radio frequency identification reader|
|US6335665||Sep 28, 1999||Jan 1, 2002||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Adjustable phase and delay shift element|
|US6393045||Sep 24, 1998||May 21, 2002||Wherenet Corp.||Spread spectrum baseband modulation of magnetic fields for communications and proximity sensing|
|US6424820||Apr 2, 1999||Jul 23, 2002||Interval Research Corporation||Inductively coupled wireless system and method|
|US6441804||Feb 1, 1999||Aug 27, 2002||Kye Systems Corp.||Transmitter and receiver for use in a wireless cursor control system|
|US6446049||Sep 29, 1998||Sep 3, 2002||Pole/Zero Corporation||Method and apparatus for transmitting a digital information signal and vending system incorporating same|
|US6491230||Jul 20, 1999||Dec 10, 2002||Thomson-Csf Detexis||Contactless badge reader|
|US6498923||Dec 18, 1997||Dec 24, 2002||Rohm Co., Ltd.||Telecommunication device|
|US6646543 *||Jan 26, 1998||Nov 11, 2003||Regie Autonome Des Transports Parisiens||Method for managing collisions in a contactless data exchanging system|
|US6650226||Apr 6, 2000||Nov 18, 2003||Stmicroelectronics S.A.||Detection, by an electromagnetic transponder reader, of the distance separating it from a transponder|
|US6650227||Dec 8, 1999||Nov 18, 2003||Hid Corporation||Reader for a radio frequency identification system having automatic tuning capability|
|US6650229||Apr 5, 2000||Nov 18, 2003||Stmicroelectronics S.A.||Electromagnetic transponder read terminal operating in very close coupling|
|US6654466||Apr 15, 1998||Nov 25, 2003||Rohm Co., Ltd.||Data communication equipment, data communication system, and data communication method|
|US6690229||Dec 18, 2002||Feb 10, 2004||Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.||Feed back current-source circuit|
|US6703921||Apr 5, 2000||Mar 9, 2004||Stmicroelectronics S.A.||Operation in very close coupling of an electromagnetic transponder system|
|US20020008611||May 11, 2001||Jan 24, 2002||Luc Wuidart||Validation of the presence of an electromagnetic transponder in the field of an amplitude demodulation reader|
|US20030227323||Jun 4, 2003||Dec 11, 2003||Jean-Pierre Enguent||Electromagnetic transponder reader|
|EP0369622A2||Oct 24, 1989||May 23, 1990||Security Tag Systems, Inc.||Proximity reading of coded tag|
|EP0568067A1||Apr 29, 1993||Nov 3, 1993||Texas Instruments Incorporated||RFID system with controlled charge|
|EP0579332A1||Jul 14, 1993||Jan 19, 1994||N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek NEDAP||Electromagnetic detection system|
|EP0645840A1||Sep 23, 1994||Mar 29, 1995||N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek NEDAP||Antenna configuration of an electromagnetic detection system and an electromagnetic detection system comprising such antenna configuration|
|EP0768540A1||Oct 9, 1996||Apr 16, 1997||Texas Instruments Deutschland Gmbh||Transponder system and method|
|EP0857981A1||Feb 5, 1997||Aug 12, 1998||EM Microelectronic-Marin SA||Base station of a remote interrogation system with a voltage and phase controlled oscillator|
|EP0902475A2||Sep 15, 1998||Mar 17, 1999||Microchip Technology Inc.||A single-sided package including an integrated circuit semiconductor chip and inductive coil and method therefor|
|GB2298553A||Title not available|
|GB2321726A1||Title not available|
|JPH07245946A||Title not available|
|1||French Search Report from French Patent Application 00 06061, filed May 12, 2000.|
|2||French Search Report from French Patent Application 00 06064, filed May 12, 2000.|
|3||French Search Report from French Patent Application 00 06065, filed May 12, 2000.|
|4||French Search Report from French Patent Application 00 06071, filed May 12, 2000.|
|5||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 00 06302, filed May 17, 2000.|
|6||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 00/01214, filed Jan. 31, 2000.|
|7||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 00/06301, filed May 17, 2000.|
|8||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 98 08024, filed Jun. 22, 1998.|
|9||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 98 08025, filed Jun. 20, 1998.|
|10||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 99 04544, filed Apr. 7, 1999.|
|11||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 99 04545, filed Apr. 7, 1999.|
|12||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 99 04546, filed Apr. 7, 1999.|
|13||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 99 04547, filed Apr. 7, 1999.|
|14||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 99 04548, filed Apr. 7, 1999.|
|15||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 99 04549, filed Apr. 7, 1999.|
|16||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 99 07024, filed May 31, 1999.|
|17||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 99 09563, filed Jul. 20, 1999.|
|18||French Search Report from French Patent Application No. 99 09564, filed Jul. 20, 1999.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7046121 *||Aug 9, 2001||May 16, 2006||Stmicroelectronics S.A.||Detection of an electric signature of an electromagnetic transponder|
|US7263330||Oct 27, 2005||Aug 28, 2007||Stmicroelectronics S.A.||Validation of the presence of an electromagnetic transponder in the field of a phase demodulation reader|
|US8362902 *||Jan 29, 2013||Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute||RFID reader and method for identifying RFID tag thereof and apparatus for analyzing reception power pattern|
|US8912886 *||Jul 15, 2008||Dec 16, 2014||Optoelectronics Co., Ltd.||Power management system for electronic shelf labels and the like|
|US9344156||Apr 18, 2012||May 17, 2016||Stmicroelectronics (Rousset) Sas||Protection of communication by an electromagnetic transponder|
|US20030164742 *||Aug 9, 2001||Sep 4, 2003||Luc Wuidart||Detection of an electric signature of an electromagnetic transponder|
|US20060111043 *||Oct 27, 2005||May 25, 2006||Stmicroelectronics S.A.||Validation of the presence of an electromagnetic transponder in the field of a phase demodulation reader|
|US20060172702 *||Mar 28, 2006||Aug 3, 2006||St Microelectronics||Sizing of an electromagnetic transponder system for an operation in extreme proximity|
|US20110018714 *||Jan 27, 2011||Fujitsu Limited||Rfid reader and method for identifying rfid tag thereof and apparatus for analyzing reception power pattern|
|US20110175732 *||Jul 15, 2008||Jul 21, 2011||Optoelectronics Co., Ltd.||Power management system for electronic shelf labels and the like|
|U.S. Classification||340/10.2, 340/10.32|
|International Classification||H04B5/02, H04B1/59, G06K7/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G06K7/10019, G06K7/0008|
|European Classification||G06K7/10A1, G06K7/00E|
|Jul 25, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: STMICROELECTRONICS S.A., FRANCE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WUIDART, LUC;REEL/FRAME:012009/0875
Effective date: 20010531
|Jul 26, 2005||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Sep 25, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 24, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8