|Publication number||US6895285 B2|
|Application number||US 10/154,353|
|Publication date||May 17, 2005|
|Filing date||May 23, 2002|
|Priority date||May 23, 2002|
|Also published as||US20030229406|
|Publication number||10154353, 154353, US 6895285 B2, US 6895285B2, US-B2-6895285, US6895285 B2, US6895285B2|
|Original Assignee||American Megatrends, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (25), Classifications (10), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to monitoring of a computer system to determine its status. More particularly, the present invention relates to monitoring the computer system through interaction with a port of the computer supporting driverless device nodes.
The status of a computer system is a measure of the computer system's health at any given time as affected by the load on the computer system. As the number and complexity of the processes being handled by a computer increase, the speed of the computer in completing a given task decreases. If the computer reaches a crashed state, it can no longer complete a given task without being reset. Thus, determining the status of a computer system allows a decision to be made as to whether the computer is overloaded and cannot effectively handle additional tasks or whether the computer has crashed and must be reset.
In a distributed environment, computers known as servers perform various tasks for client computers that communicate with the server over a network. The server enables sharing of files and other resources between client computers and the server, such as electronic mail. As an example, a world wide web (“web”) server may provide resources to client computers over the Internet. For successful sharing within the distributed environment, the server must maintain an acceptable status so that processes for client devices can be timely completed.
To monitor the status of a computer that is physically present, one can view the display screen and physically interact with the computer. However, to monitor a computer that is not physically present or to automate the monitoring process such as where several machines must be monitored contemporaneously, a monitoring device is coupled to the computer. Conventionally, the monitoring device communicates with the computer through the peripheral component interconnect (“PCI”) bus.
One type of monitoring device captures displayed screens of the computer by capturing display data from the PCI bus. The monitoring device transfers the display data over a network to a remote maintenance computer where it can be reviewed to determine whether the computer has crashed. For example, a particular operating system may produce a specific screen display due to a crash, and this screen data is transferred to the remote maintenance computer where it can be viewed or otherwise interpreted as a crash. One can determine when a computer has crashed and must be reset by accessing the remote maintenance computer that receives the display data.
However, this transfer of the screen data to the remote maintenance computer may not provide an indication of every crash. Also, a general indication of status may not be provided by the display data absent a crashed state, so the load on the computer may not be known. Additionally, a device that operates on the PCI bus to capture data requires a device driver that is compatible with the operating system of the computer being monitored. The operating system must dedicate system resources and processing time to the device driver, and the performance of the computer being monitored is adversely affected as a result.
Embodiments of the present invention provide status monitoring of a computer by emulating a driverless device node for a port of the computer that supports driverless devices. The driverless device node asserts a message that requires a status response to the operating system of the computer. The amount of time required for a status response to be returned from the operating system is detected. A status indication is then generated based on the amount of time detected for the response.
An embodiment of a device that monitors the status includes a processing device that provides the driverless device node emulation to assert the message requiring the status response. The processing device detects the amount of time required for the response and generates the status indication. A communications device transmits the status indication to a remote location where monitoring of the status indication is performed.
An embodiment of a system that monitors the status of a computer includes an operating system that is executed by the computer and that recognizes a port of the computer that supports driverless device nodes. A remote management device includes a processing device emulating the driverless device node for the port of the computer. The remote management device also includes a communications device coupled to a network that transmits the status indication over the network to a remote maintenance computer.
The various aspects of the present invention may be more clearly understood and appreciated from a review of the following detailed description of the disclosed embodiments and by reference to the drawings and claims.
The status of a computer is monitored to maintain the operation of the computer. For example, the computer being monitored may be a stand-alone machine or a server in a network environment. An example of an environment for employing a computer status monitor is shown in FIG. 1. One or more computers may be linked through a network 102 such as a local area network (“LAN”) or the Internet. The computers may include servers such as a file server 104, general server 106, and web server 108 as well as clients such as host computers 110, 112, and 114.
A status monitor is coupled to one or more of the computers. The status monitor provides a status indication to illustrate the condition of each computer being monitored. The status indication may take various forms such as a visual or audible alert for personnel in close proximity to the individual computers. Alternatively or in addition to the visual or audible alert, a status indication may be transmitted to a remote maintenance computer 116 connected to the network 102. The connection of the remote maintenance computer 116 to the status monitors of each computer may be an extension of the network 102 interconnecting the computers being monitored or may be a separate network such as a gateway to the Internet independent of the network 102.
The controller 206 may be of various forms including a universal serial bus (USB) controller, USB 2 controller, P/S 2 controller, firewire (IEEE 1394) controller, or other controller that supports driverless device nodes. Device nodes include the digital logic for the devices that communicates with the controller 206, such as digital logic incorporated into a keyboard, joystick, or other peripheral device.
The motherboard 200 includes a PCI expansion slot 208 that is in communication with the CPU 202. The motherboard 200 receives power from a power supply through a system power connection 210, and system power is distributed to the various components including the PCI expansion slot 208. An embodiment of a status monitor is included on a card 212 that is disposed within the PCI slot 208. The status monitor of card 212 may draw power from the PCI slot 208 in addition to utilizing an on-board battery back up and/or an A/C wall adapter.
The status monitor of card 212 includes a driverless device node connection 214. The driverless device node connection 214 connects to a port 218 of the controller 206 via a cable 216. Signals are passed between the driverless device node connection 214 and the controller 206 through the cable 216 to enable the monitoring card 212 to communicate bi-directionally with the CPU 202 and operating system 204. The status monitor of card 212 does not require communications through the PCI slot 208 so no device driver for the particular operating system 204 is required, and PCI bus bandwidth is not used for monitoring purposes. In addition to or as an alternative to drawing power through the PCI slot 208, the card 212 may draw power from the port 218.
The status monitoring operations of card 212 function independently of the system that it is monitoring, so the monitoring of the computer is not affected by its status. Furthermore, the card 212 may optionally be equipped with additional functionality to initiate resetting and power down of the computer via an interface to the reset and power connections (not shown) of the computer. For example, the status monitor of card 212 may detect a crashed state of the computer which necessitates a reset. The additional functionality of card 212 then initiates a reboot of the computer being monitored by activating a reset. The card 212 also may be optionally configured to provide control of the computer being monitored from a remote location.
The status monitor of the card 312 includes a device node connector 314 that is electrically linked to the external connector 318 of the computer by a cable 316. As described for the embodiment of
The status monitor 400 may maintain its own independent power sources. An on-board battery 414 may be provided to supply power when other sources are unavailable, such as when the system power to the computer being monitored is terminated. Additionally, a wall adapter 412 may be utilized to provide DC system power from an AC source such as the standard 110V AC.
The status monitor 400 includes a processing device 402 that is programmed to emulate a driverless device node for the driverless device node controller of the computer being monitored. The processing device 402, such as the ISP1181 model from Philips Electronics, may be programmed to emulate one or more various devices. For example, the processing device may emulate a human interface device such as a USB keyboard or joystick to the controller and operating system of the computer being monitored. Assuming the computer being monitored already has a peripheral device connected such as a standard keyboard, then the operating system recognizes both the standard keyboard and the USB keyboard being emulated by the status monitor 400.
The device node is emulated from a driverless device node connector 404 that communicates with the processing device 402. The device node connector 404 is electrically connected to the controller of the computer through a cable or other electrical connection. System power from the port of the computer may be provided to the status monitor 400 through the connector 404.
The processing device 402 is configured to assert messages from the emulated device node through the connector 404 to the operating system of the computer. The asserted messages are chosen so that they require a reply from the operating system. For example, a scroll lock, number lock, or caps lock message including a key down signal followed by a key up signal requires that the operating system send a reply to turn on the light associated with the key being depressed. When asserting a keystroke message, the processing device 402 may be configured so that the device node immediately repeats the keystroke to reverse the instruction to the operating system and eliminate any effect on the computer being monitored. The processing device 402 is further configured to read for the required replies from the operating system during a reply interrupt routine of the device node.
To determine the status of the computer being monitored, the processing device 402 detects the amount of time that elapses from the time the message is sent from the device node until the reply from the operating system is received. A clock 406 located on a card of the status monitor 400 or located externally or remotely from the status monitor 400 provides a timing reference used by the processing device 402 to determine the amount of time that elapses. The processing device 402 can determine the status of the computer by looking up the detected time in a table stored in memory 408. Memory 408 may be integrated with the processing device 402 or may be separate and communicate over a bus with the processing device 402. Memory 408 may include combinations of both random access and read only memories.
The table data being referenced may be generated through tests on the computer being monitored or a computer of similar configuration. A load may be simulated and the required time for response to the message asserted by the device node is recorded for the known load. This is repeated for various loads to populate the table with status data. A maximum elapsed time may also be defined in the table to indicate that the computer has crashed if the reply is not received before the maximum time is reached.
Once the status of the computer has been found in relation to the elapsed time, the processor 402 generates a status indication. The status indication may be a visual or audible signal to someone in close proximity. Alternatively or in addition to the close proximity signal, the status indication may be a message sent to a remote location such as the remote maintenance computer 116 of FIG. 1. In an embodiment where a signal to a remote location occurs, the processor 402 communicates with a communication device 416 to transmit the signal to the remote location.
The communication device 416 may be an Ethernet device such as model 82559 by Intel Corporation, standard analog, DSL, or cable modem, ISDN interface, or other similar data communications unit. The communications device 416 communicates through a port 418 to the appropriate interface such as an Ethernet port, telephone line, cable line, or ISDN line.
The logical operations of the status monitor 400 are shown in FIG. 5. The status monitor 400 may delay monitoring until the computer being monitored has completed booting up such as by delaying a set period of time once a power signal is received through the device port or PCI slot of the computer. Once status monitoring is started, the logical operations of status monitoring begin at assertion operation 502.
At assertion operation 502, the processing device 402 asserts a message from the driverless device node to the controller and ultimately the operating system of the computer being monitored. As discussed above, the message that is asserted is one that requires a status reply from the operating system, such as a scroll lock keystroke down followed by a scroll lock keystroke up. At that point, the processing device 402 begins timing by storing a time stamp in memory 408 and begins reading for the reply through connector 404 at timer operation 504.
When a reply interrupt period for the device node is reached and an attempt to read a reply has occurred, the processing device 402 determines whether a reply has been read at query operation 506. For example, where a scroll lock keystroke down followed by a scroll lock keystroke up sequence is delivered as the message asserted to the operating system, the processing device 402 reads for two replies, the first of which indicates that the light on the keyboard should go on.
If a reply was received, then the processor 402 measures the time that elapsed until the reply occurred at time operation 508. The elapsed time is measured with reference to the time the message was sent and the time when the reply was received. Once the elapsed time is known, the processor 402 performs a look-up of the time in the status table to find the associated status at table operation 510. The processor 402 then generates a status indication by obtaining the status value from the table at status operation 512. The processor 402 may trigger a visual or audible alert if the status indicates that the computer is overloaded.
Alternatively, the processor 402 may pass the status indication to the communications device for delivery to a remote location. Once the communications device receives the status indication and instruction to send from the processor 402, the communications device transmits the status indication at send operation 514. The processor 402 may be configured with thresholds that it employs to determine whether a status indication should be delivered or ignored. For example, if a computer is not overloaded then the processor 402 may provide no status indication alert because the computer requires no further attention.
Once the status indication has been transmitted or alternatively ignored, the processor 402 waits until the next appropriate polling time at delay operation 516. The delay may be measured with reference to the timing signal from the clock 406. The polling period may be set at whatever period the user desires. For example, the polling period may be very short so that the driverless device node again asserts the message only a few computer system cycles after receiving the last reply. Once the delay ends, operational flow transitions back to assertion operation 502 for the monitoring process to repeat.
On iterations where the query operation 506 detects that no reply has been received from the operating system at the device node, operational flow transitions to query operation 518. Here, the processing device 402 detects whether the previously defined maximum elapsed time has been exceeded. If not, then at the next reply interrupt the processor 402 again reads for a reply and query operation 506 detects whether the reply occurred. If the maximum elapsed time has been exceeded prior to receiving the reply, then the processor 402 generates a crashed status indication at status operation 520. The processor 402 may then create the visual or audible alert and/or transmits the status to the remote location through the communication device 416 at send operation 522. Alternatively, additional functionality of the card, if any, may automatically initiate a reset of the computer.
As described above, the card providing the status monitor or an additional remote management card may include additional functionality that permits the computer to be reset or powered down. The remote management computer may control the computer being monitored so as to reboot the computer and implement a diagnostic program prior to resuming normal computer activity. These additional functions may result from or occur independently of the status indication provided by embodiments of the present invention.
Although the present invention has been described in connection with various exemplary embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that many modifications can be made thereto within the scope of the claims that follow. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of the invention in any way be limited by the above description, but instead be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5586250 *||Nov 12, 1993||Dec 17, 1996||Conner Peripherals, Inc.||SCSI-coupled module for monitoring and controlling SCSI-coupled raid bank and bank environment|
|US5835700 *||Aug 16, 1996||Nov 10, 1998||Seagate Technology, Inc.||SCSI-coupled module for monitoring and controlling SCSI-coupled raid bank and bank environment|
|US5966510 *||Dec 29, 1997||Oct 12, 1999||Seagate Technology, Inc.||SCSI-coupled module for monitoring and controlling SCSI-coupled raid bank and bank environment|
|US6012154 *||Sep 18, 1997||Jan 4, 2000||Intel Corporation||Method and apparatus for detecting and recovering from computer system malfunction|
|US6061810 *||Dec 5, 1996||May 9, 2000||Compaq Computer Corporation||Computer system with error handling before reset|
|US6438709 *||Dec 29, 1997||Aug 20, 2002||Intel Corporation||Method for recovering from computer system lockup condition|
|US20030172320 *||Mar 7, 2002||Sep 11, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for system surveillance using firmware progress code|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7152107 *||Aug 7, 2002||Dec 19, 2006||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Information sharing device|
|US7764184 *||Dec 22, 2004||Jul 27, 2010||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Apparatus and system for monitoring environmental factors in a computer system|
|US8484703||May 12, 2009||Jul 9, 2013||Mcafee, Inc.||Systems and methods for delegation and notification of administration of internet access|
|US8499337 *||Oct 6, 2005||Jul 30, 2013||Mcafee, Inc.||Systems and methods for delegation and notification of administration of internet access|
|US8533273 *||Sep 16, 2008||Sep 10, 2013||Fujitsu Limited||Method, apparatus, and computer readable storage medium for controlling communication|
|US8543868 *||Dec 21, 2010||Sep 24, 2013||Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.||Distributed computing system that monitors client device request time and server servicing time in order to detect performance problems and automatically issue alerts|
|US8555238||Apr 17, 2006||Oct 8, 2013||Embotics Corporation||Programming and development infrastructure for an autonomic element|
|US8839047||Aug 26, 2013||Sep 16, 2014||Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.||Distributed computing system that monitors client device request time in order to detect performance problems and automatically issue alerts|
|US8990632 *||Sep 11, 2012||Mar 24, 2015||Nec Corporation||System for monitoring state information in a multiplex system|
|US9189792 *||Jul 5, 2007||Nov 17, 2015||Mediaport Entertainment, Inc.||System and methods for monitoring devices, systems, users, and user activity at remote locations|
|US9473379||Sep 8, 2014||Oct 18, 2016||Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.||Client in distributed computing system that monitors service time reported by server in order to detect performance problems and automatically issue alerts|
|US20040030772 *||Aug 7, 2002||Feb 12, 2004||Newell Lawrence Bert||Information sharing device|
|US20060155517 *||Dec 22, 2004||Jul 13, 2006||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Apparatus and system for monitoring environmental factors in a computer system|
|US20060224517 *||Feb 1, 2006||Oct 5, 2006||Anirudha Shimpi||Systems and methods for delivering digital content to remote locations|
|US20060249576 *||Apr 4, 2006||Nov 9, 2006||Mark Nakada||Systems and methods for providing near real-time collection and reporting of data to third parties at remote locations|
|US20060265280 *||Apr 3, 2006||Nov 23, 2006||Mark Nakada||Systems and methods for advertising on remote locations|
|US20070033273 *||Apr 17, 2006||Feb 8, 2007||White Anthony R P||Programming and development infrastructure for an autonomic element|
|US20070220364 *||Dec 29, 2006||Sep 20, 2007||Quanta Computer Inc.||Method for capturing a display frame of a computer crashing|
|US20080004748 *||Jul 5, 2007||Jan 3, 2008||Butler Jon F||Systems and Methods Monitoring Devices, Systmes, Users and User Activity at Remote Locations|
|US20090012873 *||Jun 19, 2008||Jan 8, 2009||Mike Hamling||Systems for managing digital media distribution|
|US20090077159 *||Sep 16, 2008||Mar 19, 2009||Fujitsu Limited||Method, apparatus, and computer readable storage medium for controlling communication|
|US20090166375 *||Jul 5, 2008||Jul 2, 2009||Butler Jon F||Systems and Methods Monitoring Devices, Systems, Users and User Activity at Remote Locations|
|US20120159267 *||Dec 21, 2010||Jun 21, 2012||John Gyorffy||Distributed computing system that monitors client device request time and server servicing time in order to detect performance problems and automatically issue alterts|
|US20130080840 *||Sep 11, 2012||Mar 28, 2013||Nec Corporation||Multiplex system|
|US20140089140 *||Dec 2, 2013||Mar 27, 2014||Mediaport Entertainment, Inc.||Individualized Digital Media Delivery Systems|
|U.S. Classification||700/27, 714/E11.188, 713/502, 713/500, 714/47.1|
|International Classification||G06F11/00, G06F11/32, G05B11/01|
|May 23, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AMERICAN MEGATRANDS, INC., GEORGIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MAITY, SANJOY;REEL/FRAME:012939/0106
Effective date: 20020520
|Dec 22, 2008||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Dec 22, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Oct 4, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Oct 27, 2016||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12